A systematic review of antiandrogens and feminization in transgender women

High circulating concentrations of estradiol are anabolic for bone mass and strength in an adult male to female transgender mouse model

The effects of gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on bone microarchitecture and fracture risk in adult transgender women is unclear. To investigate the concept that skeletal integrity and strength in trans women may be improved by treatment with a higher dose of GAHT than commonly prescribed, we treated adult male mice with a sustained, high dose of estradiol. Adult male mice at 16 weeks of age were administered ~1.3 mg estradiol by silastic implant, implanted intraperitoneally, for 12 weeks. Controls included vehicle treated intact females and males. High-dose estradiol treatment in males stimulated the endocortical deposition of bone at the femoral mid-diaphysis, increasing cortical thickness and bone area. This led to higher stiffness, maximum force, and the work required to fracture the bone compared to male controls, while post-yield displacement was unaffected. Assessment of the material properties of the bone showed an increase in both elastic modulus and ultimate stress in the estradiol treated males. Treatment of male mice with high dose estradiol was also anabolic for trabecular bone, markedly increasing trabecular bone volume, number and thickness in the distal metaphysis which was accompanied by an increase in the histomorphometric markers of bone remodelling, mineralizing surface/bone surface, bone formation rate and osteoclast number. In conclusion, a high dose of estradiol is anabolic for cortical and trabecular bone in a male to female transgender mouse model, increasing both stiffness and strength. These findings suggest that increasing the current dose of GAHT administered to trans women, while considering other potential adverse effects, may be beneficial to preserving their bone microstructure and strength.

Peri-operative care of transgender and gender-diverse individuals: guidance for clinicians and departments

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this document is to guide best practice to ensure the safety and dignity of transgender and gender-diverse people in the peri-operative period. While transgender and gender-diverse people may have specific health needs in relation to gender dysphoria, their health requirements go beyond their gender identity. Most doctors will provide care to someone who is transgender or gender-diverse at some stage in their career. It is therefore important that all anaesthetists are educated on specific considerations when caring for these patients.

METHODS

A working party was assembled consisting of individuals with experience in direct clinical care of the relevant patient group, those who have expertise in endocrinology and gender-affirming hormones, educators on the topic of transgender and gender-diverse healthcare, and authors of both cisgender and transgender identities. After discussion among the working party, targeted searches of literature were undertaken.

RESULTS

The authors initially came up with a list of over 25 recommendations which was subsequently revised to a list of 15 recommendations after further review by the working party. These included airway assessment and management; management of hormonal therapy; relevant issues in obstetric anaesthesia; and hospital infrastructure and processes.

CONCLUSIONS

This document provides the first guidance produced to advise on best practice to ensure the safety and dignity of trans and gender-diverse individuals in the peri-operative period.

Prostate cancer in transgender women: A propensity score-matched analysis of disease severity and survival

BACKGROUND

Despite the rise in gender-affirming care, our understanding of prostate cancer (PCa) in transgender women (TGW) remains in its infancy. Health disparities and lack of PCa awareness and screening are possible barriers to providing quality care for this population. In addition, the implication of hormonal manipulation for the aggressiveness of PCa in TGW is yet to be determined. Here, this study sought to compare oncological characteristics and survival outcomes between transgender and cisgender (CG) patients with PCa via two national data sets.

METHODS

The Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure database (1999-2020) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database (2010-2017) were reviewed. Demographic and clinical details were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed on propensity score-matched groups to identify predictors of high-risk disease and metastasis in patients with PCa. Groups were matched 5:1 (CG:TGW) on the basis of age, race, year of diagnosis, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Primary outcomes included metastatic presentation, high-risk localized disease, overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM).

RESULTS

A total of 1194 patients were included (199 TGW; 995 CG). Associations between transgender identity and metastatic presentation (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; p = .2), high-risk localized disease (OR, 1.19; p = .50), or PCSM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; p = .3) were not detected. Transgender identity was associated with improved OS (HR, 0.67; p = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

PCa-specific outcomes seem comparable between TGW and CG men, although the study was underpowered to detect modest differences. Further investigation into the incidence and outcomes of PCa in TGW is warranted.

Transgender healthcare: metabolic outcomes and cardiovascular risk

Transgender identity is often associated with gender dysphoria and minority stress. Gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) includes masculinising or feminising treatment and is expected to be lifelong in most cases. Sex and sex hormones have a differential effect on metabolism and CVD in cisgender people, and sex hormone replacement in hypogonadism is associated with higher vascular risk, especially in ageing individuals. Using narrative review methods, we present evidence regarding metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes during GAHT and propose recommendations for follow-up and monitoring of metabolic and cardiovascular risk markers during GAHT. Available data show no increased risk for type 2 diabetes in transgender cohorts, but masculinising GAHT increases lean body mass and feminising GAHT is associated with higher fat mass and insulin resistance. The risk of CVD is increased in transgender cohorts, especially during feminising GAHT. Masculinising GAHT is associated with a more adverse lipid profile, higher haematocrit and increased BP, while feminising GAHT is associated with pro-coagulant changes and lower HDL-cholesterol. Assigned male sex at birth, higher age at initiation of GAHT and use of cyproterone acetate are separate risk factors for adverse CVD markers. Metabolic and CVD outcomes may improve during gender-affirming care due to a reduction in minority stress, improved lifestyle and closer surveillance leading to optimised preventive medication (e.g. statins). GAHT should be individualised according to individual risk factors (i.e. drug, dose and form of administration); furthermore, doctors need to discuss lifestyle and preventive medications in order to modify metabolic and CVD risk during GAHT. Follow-up programmes must address the usual cardiovascular risk markers but should consider that biological age and sex may influence individual risk profiling including mental health, lifestyle and novel cardiovascular risk markers during GAHT.

Evaluation and medical care of intersex and gender diverse youth

While there is considerable overlap in the treatment of patients with intersex traits and differences in sex development (I/DSD) with transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth, the initial medical evaluation varies significantly. I/DSD youth often present due to differences in genitalia development in infancy or pubertal development in adolescence, and this leads to comprehensive biochemical, radiologic, and genetic evaluation. TGD youth, however, tend to have typical development noted at birth and during puberty, but present with a gender identity that does not align with their sex assigned at birth and do not require evaluation for underlying pathology. For both I/DSD and TGD youth, the mainstays of treatment are to better align one's physical appearance to their gender identity. This review discusses the non-medical and medical interventions utilized in gender affirming care. A multidisciplinary team of mental health providers, pediatric medical providers, and surgeons is recommended for providing gender affirming care to both I/DSD youth and TGD youth and their families. Radiologists have an important role in initial evaluation of I/DSD youth and in ongoing monitoring of growth and bone mineral density during puberty induction in I/DSD and TGD youth.

Effectiveness and Safety of Different Estradiol Regimens in Transgender Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

A goal of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transgender women is to use estradiol to suppress endogenous production of testosterone. However, the effects of different estradiol regimens and route of administration on testosterone suppression is unknown. This is the first open-label randomized trial comparing different GAHT regimens for optimal estradiol route and dosing.

Objective

To evaluate 1 month and 6 months testosterone suppression <50 ng/dL with pulsed (once- or twice-daily sublingual 17-beta estradiol) and continuous (transdermal 17-beta estradiol) GAHT.

Methods

This study was conducted at an outpatient adult transgender clinic. Thirty-nine transgender women undergoing initiation of GAHT were randomly assigned to receive either once-daily sublingual, twice-daily sublingual, or transdermal 17-beta estradiol. All participants received spironolactone as an antiandrogen. Doses were titrated at monthly intervals to achieve total testosterone suppression <50 ng/dL.

Results

Transdermal 17-beta estradiol resulted in more rapid suppression of total testosterone, lower estrone levels, with no differences in estradiol levels when compared to once-daily and twice-daily sublingual estradiol. Moreover, there was no difference in the mean estradiol dose between the once-daily and twice-daily sublingual 17-beta estradiol group.

Conclusion

Continuous exposure with transdermal 17-beta estradiol suppressed testosterone production more effectively and with lower overall estradiol doses relative to once or twice daily sublingual estradiol. Most transgender women achieved cisgender women testosterone levels within 2 months on 1 or 2 0.1 mg/24 hours estradiol patches. Given no difference between once- or twice-daily sublingual estradiol, pulsed 17-beta estradiol likely provides no benefit for testosterone suppression.

Puberty suppression in adolescents with gender dysphoria: an emerging issue with multiple implications

Controversy exists over puberty suppression (PS) in adolescents with gender dysphoria (GD). PS is preferentially achieved with GnRH analogues. By preventing the development of secondary sex characteristics, PS may improve psychological functioning, well-being, quality of life, emotional and behavioral (especially internalizing) problems and depressive symptoms, thus decreasing suicidality. PS can also extend the diagnostic period and give transgender adolescents time to explore their gender identity. GnRHa may also decrease the need for feminization/masculinization surgery. However, 2-year treatment with GnRHa may result in bone mass accrual retardation (decrease in BMD/BMAD z-scores), growth velocity deceleration (decrease in height SDS), increase in fat mass, temporary pause in oocyte/sperm maturation. The most common side effects of GnRHa are hot flashes, mood fluctuations, fatigue and headache. They are usually mild and rarely lead to GnRHa discontinuation. Based on current scientific evidence, PS could be recommended to adolescents who meet the diagnostic criteria of gender incongruence (by DSM-5 and/or ICD-11) and have long-lasting intense GD, which aggravates with puberty onset. Before initiating PS, possible mental issues should be addressed and informed consent (by the adolescent/caregiver) should be given, after counseling on probable reproductive effects of GnRHa. GnRHa can only be started after the adolescent has entered Tanner stage 2. Nevertheless, published studies are inadequate in number, small in size, uncontrolled and relatively short-term, so that it is difficult to draw safe conclusions on efficacy and safety of GnRHa. Large long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to expand knowledge on this controversial issue and elucidate the benefit and risks of PS.

Serum Hormone Concentrations in Transgender Youth Receiving Estradiol

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the serum estradiol levels in gender-diverse youth to compare the efficacy of different estradiol routes in achieving therapeutic blood levels and suppressing serum testosterone levels.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of patients who initiated estradiol at an adolescent gender clinic between 2010 and 2019. Data on the route of estradiol administration and antiandrogen use (spironolactone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist) were collected, and laboratory data were analyzed. Scatterplots were used to visualize the relationship between the estradiol dose and testosterone and estradiol laboratory values.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 17.2 (1.6) years. The most common route of estradiol administration was oral only (62.7%), followed by transdermal only (23.7%), multiple routes excluding subcutaneous (8.5%), and any subcutaneous (5.1%). Notable variability was observed in the serum estradiol levels, with means (SDs) of 131.9 (120.4) pg/mL for those on oral estrogen 6 to 8 mg per day, 62.6 (40.3) pg/mL for those on transdermal estrogen 0.1 to 0.15 mg every 24 hours, and 53.6 (42.4) pg/mL for those on subcutaneous estradiol. In patients who received spironolactone, transdermal estradiol was associated with lower testosterone levels than estradiol administered orally or subcutaneously.

CONCLUSION

Oral, transdermal, and subcutaneous administrations of estrogen all lead to increased serum estradiol levels and are effective for use in gender-affirming care for youth. Patients on transdermal estrogen tended to have lower serum estradiol levels but also had more suppression of serum testosterone levels.

The Impact of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy on Physical Performance

CONTEXT

The inclusion of transgender people in elite sport has been a topic of debate. This narrative review examines the impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) on physical performance, muscle strength, and markers of endurance.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE and Embase were searched using terms to define the population (transgender), intervention (GAHT), and physical performance outcomes.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Existing literature comprises cross-sectional or small uncontrolled longitudinal studies of short duration. In nonathletic trans men starting testosterone therapy, within 1 year, muscle mass and strength increased and, by 3 years, physical performance (push-ups, sit-ups, run time) improved to the level of cisgender men. In nonathletic trans women, feminizing hormone therapy increased fat mass by approximately 30% and decreased muscle mass by approximately 5% after 12 months, and steadily declined beyond 3 years. While absolute lean mass remains higher in trans women, relative percentage lean mass and fat mass (and muscle strength corrected for lean mass), hemoglobin, and VO2 peak corrected for weight was no different to cisgender women. After 2 years of GAHT, no advantage was observed for physical performance measured by running time or in trans women. By 4 years, there was no advantage in sit-ups. While push-up performance declined in trans women, a statistical advantage remained relative to cisgender women.

CONCLUSION

Limited evidence suggests that physical performance of nonathletic trans people who have undergone GAHT for at least 2 years approaches that of cisgender controls. Further controlled longitudinal research is needed in trans athletes and nonathletes.

Effectiveness and Safety of Different Estradiol Regimens in Transgender Women (TREAT Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) for transgender women are mostly based on clinical experience from experts in the field and treatments used on postmenopausal women. While care is currently provided with the best available evidence, there is a critical gap in knowledge about the safest and most effective estradiol routes of administration for GAHT in transgender women; this statement is supported by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health on their Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, version 8. Furthermore, the reported rates of cardiometabolic adverse events in transgender women highlight the importance of investigating changes in lipoproteins, glucose, and insulin sensitivity, among other markers while receiving GAHT.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the degree of testosterone suppression achieved at 1, 6, and 12 months in treatment-naive transgender women when randomized to GAHT with estradiol and spironolactone as antiandrogens. As a secondary aim, this study will assess the treatment effect on metabolic and coagulation factors from baseline to 6 and 12 months after initiating GAHT.

METHODS

This is a prospective pilot, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at an adult transgender clinic in a tertiary medical center. The 3 treatment arms include once-daily sublingual 17-β estradiol, twice-daily sublingual 17-β estradiol, and transdermal 17-β estradiol. All participants received spironolactone as an antiandrogen. Transgender women aged 18 to 45 years who are being evaluated for the initiation of GAHT with 17-β estradiol and did not have a history of coagulopathy, cigarette smoking, liver disease, dyslipidemia requiring treatment, or use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist were eligible to enroll. The main outcome is the total testosterone suppression at 1 and 6 months after the initiation of GAHT, and the secondary outcome is to assess treatment effect in a lipid panel; homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; coagulation factors II, IX, and XI; Von Willebrand factor; activated protein C resistance; protein C; and protein S at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after therapy is initiated.

RESULTS

This study was funded in March 2022, and enrollment concluded in August 2022. It was concluded in July 2023, and currently, the results are being analyzed for publication.

CONCLUSIONS

The Transgender Estradiol Affirming Therapy (TREAT) study offers a rigorous and reproducible approach to answer important questions regarding GAHT in transgender women, specifically, the most effective 17-β estradiol regimen to suppress testosterone levels to 50 ng/dL, as currently recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05010707; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05010707.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/53092.

Sublingual Estradiol Offers No Apparent Advantage Over Combined Oral Estradiol and Cyproterone Acetate for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy of Treatment-Naive Trans Women: Results of a Prospective Pilot Study

Purpose

Chronic gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) with sublingual estradiol (SLE) has not been studied. We aimed to compare GAHT with SLE only, to combined oral (CO) estradiol and cyproterone acetate, in treatment-naive trans women.

Methods

Twenty-two trans women enrolled into either the CO arm or the SLE-only arm (0.5 mg four times daily) in this 6-month prospective study. Anthropometric and laboratory variables were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months. At the study beginning and end, body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance, and gender dysphoria, sexual desire, and function were assessed by validated questionnaires.

Results

Subjects in the SLE were older, 26.3±5.8 years versus 20.1±2.3 years, p=0.006. All anthropometric, body composition, and laboratory variables were identical at baseline. Although dysphoria appeared greater, and sexual function lower at baseline in the CO group, this canceled out after age adjustment. Both treatments induced similar biochemical and hormonal changes. Creatinine, hemoglobin and cholesterol decreased significantly, while testosterone was suppressed to the same level in both groups: 3.22 [1.47-5.0] nmol/L in the SLE group and 2.41 [0.55-8.5] nmol/L in the CO, p=0.65. Significant changes in body composition toward a more feminine body were noted in both groups. Dysphoria did not significantly improve in either group, while sexual desire and function decreased at six months in both, p<0.001.

Conclusions

Both treatments achieved similar clinical changes. At this stage, SLE, which repeatedly induces alarming excursions of serum estradiol throughout the day, appears to offer no advantage over the CO approach.

Gender-affirming pharmacotherapy and additional health considerations: A contemporary review

BACKGROUND

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals in the United States face health care disparities compounded with discrimination and limited access to necessary medical services. Gender-affirming interventions have been shown to mitigate gender dysphoria and psychiatric comorbidities, yet United States legislation limiting such interventions has increased. As medication experts, pharmacists can facilitate access to care and appropriate use of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and educate other health care providers on best practices for caring for TGD individuals in a variety of settings.

OBJECTIVES

To provide pharmacists with a contemporary review of GAHT and associated medication-related concerns.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for articles published until December 2022. MeSH terms such as transgender, transsexual, gender diverse, gender variant, or gender nonconforming in combination with phrases like gender-affirming care, treatment, pharmacotherapy, or hormone therapy were used to capture desired articles.

RESULTS

Feminizing hormone therapy (FHT), such as estrogen and antiandrogen agents, increases female secondary sex characteristics while suppressing male secondary sex characteristics. Masculinizing hormone therapy (MHT) achieves male secondary sex characteristics and minimizes female secondary sex characteristics using testosterone. For both FHT and MHT, the choice of therapy and formulation ultimately involves the patient's treatment goals, preferences, and tolerability. GAHT has additional health considerations pertaining to renal drug dosing, fertility, cardiovascular, and cancer risks. Pharmacists may provide crucial guidance and education to both patients and health care providers regarding risks associated with GAHT.

CONCLUSION

Many pharmacists feel unprepared to help provide, manage, and optimize GAHT. For many TGD individuals, GAHT is medically necessary and a life-saving treatment. Therefore, pharmacists should be provided tools to close knowledge gaps and improve their ability to care for these patients. By offering a thorough updated overview of GAHT, pharmacists can gain confidence to provide appropriate care for this increasingly visible population.

A Mouse Model to Investigate the Impact of Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy with Estradiol on Reproduction

Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) can help transgender and/or gender diverse (TGD) individuals achieve emobidment goals that align with their transition needs. Clinical evidence from estradiol (E)-GAHT patients indicate widespread changes in tissues sensitive to E and testosterone (T), particularly in the reproductive system. Notably, E-GAHTs effects on hormones and reproduction vary greatly between patients. With the goal of informing clinical research and practice for TGD individuals taking E, this study examines intact male mice implanted with capsules containing one of three different E doses (low 1.25 mg; mid 2.5 mg; high 5 mg), or a blank control capsule. All E-GAHT doses suppress T and follicle stimulating hormone levels while elevating E levels. Only the high E-GAHT dose significantly supresses luteinizing hormone levels. All E-GAHT doses affect epididymis tubule size similarly while seminiferous tubule morphology and bladder weight changes are dose-dependent. E-GAHT does not alter the presence of mature sperm, though E-exposed sperm have altered motility. These data represent the first evidence that mouse models offer an effective tool to understand E-GAHTs impact on reproductive health and the dose-dependent effects of this model permit examinations of diverse patient outcomes.

Sex Differences in Athletic Performance: Perspectives on Transgender Athletes

Sex hormone concentrations, particularly testosterone, are primary determinants of sex-based differences in athletic and sports performance, and this relationship may inform fair competition and participation for athletes. This article describes the sex-based dichotomy in testosterone and the implications for sex-based differences in individual sports performance, including factors that relate to athletic performance for transgender individuals, and areas of future investigation.

Psychopharmacological Considerations for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy

ABSTRACT

The field of transgender health has grown exponentially since the early 2010s. While this increased visibility has not been without controversy, there is growing acknowledgement of the needs of transgender, nonbinary, and gender expansive (TNG) patients and the health disparities they experience compared to the cisgender population. There is also increased interest among clinicians and trainees in providing gender-affirming care in all medical specialties. This is particularly relevant in psychiatry as mental health disparities in TNG patients have been well-documented. TNG patients experience significant minority stress and higher rates of psychiatric illness, self-harm, suicidality, and psychiatric hospitalization compared to their cisgender peers. In this review, we will cover potential interactions and side effects relevant to psychiatric medication management for the three most common medication classes prescribed as part of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT): gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor agonists, estradiol, and testosterone. Although no studies directly examining the efficacy of psychiatric medications or their interactions with GAHT for TNG patients have been published yet, we have synthesized the existing literature from both cisgender and TNG patients to shed light on health care disparities seen in TNG patients. Since clinicians' lack of comfort and familiarity with gender-affirming care contributes significantly to these disparities, we hope this narrative review will help psychiatric prescribers provide TNG patients with the same quality of care that cisgender patients receive.

Implications of gender-affirming endocrine care for sports participation

Many transgender (trans) individuals utilize gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) to promote changes in secondary sex characteristics to affirm their gender. Participation rates of trans people in sport are exceedingly low, yet given high rates of depression and increased cardiovascular risk, the potential benefits of sports participation are great. In this review, we provide an overview of the evidence surrounding the effects of GAHT on multiple performance-related phenotypes, as well as current limitations. Whilst data is clear that there are differences between males and females, there is a lack of quality evidence assessing the impact of GAHT on athletic performance. Twelve months of GAHT leads to testosterone concentrations that align with reference ranges of the affirmed gender. Feminizing GAHT in trans women increases fat mass and decreases lean mass, with opposite effects observed in trans men with masculinizing GAHT. In trans men, an increase in muscle strength and athletic performance is observed. In trans women, muscle strength is shown to decrease or not change following 12 months of GAHT. Haemoglobin, a measure of oxygen transport, changes to that of the affirmed gender within 6 months of GAHT, with very limited data to suggest possible reductions in maximal oxygen uptake as a result of feminizing GAHT. Current limitations of this field include a lack of long-term studies, adequate group comparisons and adjustment for confounding factors (e.g. height and lean body mass), and small sample sizes. There also remains limited data on endurance, cardiac or respiratory function, with further longitudinal studies on GAHT needed to address current limitations and provide more robust data to inform inclusive and fair sporting programmes, policies and guidelines.

Cardiovascular disease and feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy: Implications for the provision of safe and lifesaving care

Sex recorded at birth, gender identity, and feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy (fGAHT) likely contribute to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in transgender women. Understanding the interplay of these factors is necessary for the provision of safe, affirming, and lifesaving care. Among transgender women taking fGAHT, data show increases in CVD mortality and rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thromboembolism compared to reference populations, depending on study design and comparators. However, most studies are observational with a paucity of contextualizing information (e.g., dosing, route of administration, gonadectomy status), which makes it difficult to parse adverse fGAHT effects from confounders and interaction with known CVD risk factors (e.g., obesity, smoking, psychosocial and gender minority stressors). Increased CVD risk in transgender women points toward a need for greater attention to CVD management in this population including cardiology referral when indicated and additional research on the mechanisms and mediators of CVD risk.

Transgender health and the impact of aging and menopause

Gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is used by many transgender people to reduce gender incongruence and improve psychological functioning. As GAHT shares many similarities with menopausal hormone therapy, clinicians supporting people through menopause are ideally placed to manage GAHT. This narrative review provides an overview of transgender health and discusses long-term effects of GAHT to consider when managing transgender individuals across the lifespan. Menopause is less relevant for transgender individuals who take GAHT (often given lifelong) to achieve sex steroid concentrations generally in the range of the affirmed gender. For people using feminizing hormone therapy, there is an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke and osteoporosis relative to cisgender individuals. For trans people using masculinizing hormone therapy, there is an increased risk of polycythemia, probable higher risk of myocardial infarction and pelvic pain which is poorly understood. Proactive mitigation of cardiovascular risk factors is important for all transgender people and optimization of bone health is important for those using feminizing hormones. With a lack of research to guide GAHT in older age, a shared decision-making approach is recommended for the provision of GAHT to achieve individual goals whilst minimizing potential adverse effects.

Gender-affirming hormonal therapy for transgender and gender-diverse people-A narrative review

As the number of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people accessing gender-affirming care increases, the need for healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing gender-affirming hormonal therapy (GAHT) also increases. This chapter provides an overview of the HCPs interested in getting involved in providing GAHT.

Changes in Serum Testosterone and Adrenal Androgen Levels in Transgender Women With and Without Gonadectomy

BACKGROUND

Initiating feminizing gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) in transgender women causes a steep decline in serum testosterone. It is unknown if testosterone concentrations change further and whether adrenal androgen levels change during feminizing GAHT and after gonadectomy. This limits clinical decision making in transgender women with symptoms attributed to GAHT or gonadectomy.

METHODS

Transgender women (n = 275) initiating estradiol and cyproterone acetate (CPA) were included at baseline, and had follow-up visits after 3 months, 12 months, and 2 to 4 years. During follow-up, 49.5% of transgender women underwent a gonadectomy. Total testosterone (TT), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and androstenedione (A4) were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

After 3 months of GAHT, mean TT, calculated free testosterone (cFT), and A4 decreased by 18.4 nmol/L (95% CI, -19.4 to -17.4, P < 0.001 [ie, -97.1%]), 383 pmol/L (95% CI, -405 to -362, P < 0.001 [ie, -98.3%]), and 1.2 nmol/L (95% CI, -1.4 to -1.0, P < 0.001 [ie, -36.5%]), respectively, and remained stable thereafter. DHEA and DHEAS decreased by 7.4 nmol/L (95% CI, -9.7 to -5.1 [ie, -28.0%]) and 1.8 µmol/L (95% CI, -2.2 to -1.4 [ie, -20.1%]), respectively, after 1 year and did not change thereafter. After gonadectomy, CPA therapy is stopped, which induced no further change in TT, cFT, DHEA, DHEAS, and A4 compared with those who did not undergo gonadectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm that after an initial drop, testosterone levels in transgender women remain stable. Adrenal androgens decrease in the first year of CPA and estrogen supplementation and remain unchanged after gonadectomy. Androgens did not change after gonadectomy and cessation of CPA. Correlates with clinical symptoms remain to be elucidated.

Gender-affirming endocrine care for youth with a nonbinary gender identity

Nonbinary individuals, or those who identify outside of the traditional gender binary, are currently present in up to 9% of the general population of youth or up to 55% of gender-diverse youth. Despite the high numbers of nonbinary individuals, this population continues to experience barriers to healthcare due to providers' inability to see beyond the transgender binary and lack of competence in providing nonbinary care. In this narrative review, we discuss using embodiment goals to individualize care of nonbinary individuals, and review hormonal and nonhormonal treatment options for gender affirmation. Hormonal treatments include those often used in binary transgender individuals, such as testosterone, estradiol, and anti-androgens, but with adjustments to dosing or timeline to best meet a nonbinary individual's embodiment goals. Less commonly used medications such as selective estrogen receptor antagonists are also discussed. For nonhormonal options, alterations in gender expression such as chest binding, tucking and packing genitalia, and voice training may be beneficial, as well as gender-affirming surgeries. Many of these treatments lack research specific to nonbinary individuals and especially nonbinary youth, and future research is needed to ensure safety and efficacy of gender-affirming care in this population.

Progestogen Use in Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Transgender women take gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) to affirm their gender identity and improve quality of life and well-being. Usually, GAHT in transgender women consists of estrogen plus a testosterone-lowering medication. The use of progestogens in GAHT for transgender women has been a controversial topic due to lack of evidence for benefit and potential for increased harm.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using 4 databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Ovid, and Cochrane). Manuscripts were reviewed from January 2000 to March 2022 to identify effects of progestogens in transgender women over the age of 16 years on breast development, cardiovascular disease, bone density, quality of life, and stroke incidence.

RESULTS

Ten articles were deemed eligible based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies analyzing users of cyproterone acetate were also included if there was a comparator group. No relevant studies were found assessing stroke incidence in the transgender population using a progestogen compound.

CONCLUSION

Overall, findings were significant for a decreased high-density lipoprotein level and increased thromboembolism risk in transgender women using progestogens. No conclusive evidence was found regarding improved quality of life or breast development. Further research needs to be conducted assessing the effects of progestogens in transgender women.

Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8

Background: Transgender healthcare is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field. In the last decade, there has been an unprecedented increase in the number and visibility of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people seeking support and gender-affirming medical treatment in parallel with a significant rise in the scientific literature in this area. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) is an international, multidisciplinary, professional association whose mission is to promote evidence-based care, education, research, public policy, and respect in transgender health. One of the main functions of WPATH is to promote the highest standards of health care for TGD people through the Standards of Care (SOC). The SOC was initially developed in 1979 and the last version (SOC-7) was published in 2012. In view of the increasing scientific evidence, WPATH commissioned a new version of the Standards of Care, the SOC-8. Aim: The overall goal of SOC-8 is to provide health care professionals (HCPs) with clinical guidance to assist TGD people in accessing safe and effective pathways to achieving lasting personal comfort with their gendered selves with the aim of optimizing their overall physical health, psychological well-being, and self-fulfillment. Methods: The SOC-8 is based on the best available science and expert professional consensus in transgender health. International professionals and stakeholders were selected to serve on the SOC-8 committee. Recommendation statements were developed based on data derived from independent systematic literature reviews, where available, background reviews and expert opinions. Grading of recommendations was based on the available evidence supporting interventions, a discussion of risks and harms, as well as the feasibility and acceptability within different contexts and country settings. Results: A total of 18 chapters were developed as part of the SOC-8. They contain recommendations for health care professionals who provide care and treatment for TGD people. Each of the recommendations is followed by explanatory text with relevant references. General areas related to transgender health are covered in the chapters Terminology, Global Applicability, Population Estimates, and Education. The chapters developed for the diverse population of TGD people include Assessment of Adults, Adolescents, Children, Nonbinary, Eunuchs, and Intersex Individuals, and people living in Institutional Environments. Finally, the chapters related to gender-affirming treatment are Hormone Therapy, Surgery and Postoperative Care, Voice and Communication, Primary Care, Reproductive Health, Sexual Health, and Mental Health. Conclusions: The SOC-8 guidelines are intended to be flexible to meet the diverse health care needs of TGD people globally. While adaptable, they offer standards for promoting optimal health care and guidance for the treatment of people experiencing gender incongruence. As in all previous versions of the SOC, the criteria set forth in this document for gender-affirming medical interventions are clinical guidelines; individual health care professionals and programs may modify these in consultation with the TGD person.

Drug Repurposing for COVID-19: A Review and a Novel Strategy to Identify New Targets and Potential Drug Candidates

In December 2019, the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first identified in the province of Wuhan, China. Since then, there have been over 400 million confirmed cases and 5.8 million deaths by COVID-19 reported worldwide. The urgent need for therapies against SARS-CoV-2 led researchers to use drug repurposing approaches. This strategy allows the reduction in risks, time, and costs associated with drug development. In many cases, a repurposed drug can enter directly to preclinical testing and clinical trials, thus accelerating the whole drug discovery process. In this work, we will give a general overview of the main developments in COVID-19 treatment, focusing on the contribution of the drug repurposing paradigm to find effective drugs against this disease. Finally, we will present our findings using a new drug repurposing strategy that identified 11 compounds that may be potentially effective against COVID-19. To our knowledge, seven of these drugs have never been tested against SARS-CoV-2 and are potential candidates for in vitro and in vivo studies to evaluate their effectiveness in COVID-19 treatment.

An introduction to gender-affirming hormone therapy for transgender and gender-nonbinary patients

ABSTRACT

Transgender and gender-nonbinary patients may present to primary care providers seeking gender-affirming hormone therapy. Patients who meet criteria for diagnosis of gender incongruence may start or continue hormone therapy after providing informed consent. Prescribing and monitoring of masculinizing and feminizing hormone therapy can be managed in primary care settings.

Approach to the Patient: Pharmacological Management of Trans and Gender-Diverse Adolescents

Internationally, increasing numbers of children and adolescents with gender dysphoria are presenting for care. In response, gender-affirming therapeutic interventions that seek to align bodily characteristics with an individual's gender identity are more commonly being used. Depending on a young person's circumstances and goals, hormonal interventions may aim to achieve full pubertal suppression, modulation of endogenous pubertal sex hormone effects, and/or development of secondary sex characteristics congruent with their affirmed gender. This is a relatively novel therapeutic area and, although short-term outcomes are encouraging, longer term data from prospective longitudinal adolescent cohorts are still lacking, which may create clinical and ethical decision-making challenges. Here, we review current treatment options, reported outcomes, and clinical challenges in the pharmacological management of trans and gender-diverse adolescents.

Bone health in transgender people: a narrative review

Bone health in transmen and transwomen is an important issue that needs to be evaluated by clinicians. Prior to gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT), transwomen have lower bone mineral density (BMD) and a higher prevalence of osteopenia than cismen probably related to external factors, such as hypovitaminosis D and less physical activities. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues in transgender youth may cause bone loss; however, the addition of GAHT restores or at least improves BMD in both transboys and transgirls. The maintenance or increase in BMD shown in short-term longitudinal studies emphasizes that GAHT does not have a negative effect on BMD in adult transwomen and transmen. Gonadectomy is not a risk factor if GAHT is taken correctly. The prevalence of fractures in the transgender population seems to be the same as in the general population but more studies are required on this aspect. To evaluate the risk of osteoporosis, it is mandatory to define the most appropriate reference group not only taking into consideration the medical aspects but also in respect of the selected gender identity of each person.

Southern African HIV Clinicians' Society gender-affirming healthcare guideline for South Africa

No abstract available.

Toward a Lowest Effective Dose of Cyproterone Acetate in Trans Women: Results From the ENIGI Study

CONTEXT

Cyproterone acetate (CPA) is a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor and exerts negative hypothalamic feedback. It is often used in combination with estrogens in trans women to achieve feminization. However, CPA has been associated with side effects such as changes in liver enzyme concentrations and increases in prolactin concentrations. The question is whether the testosterone-lowering effect, as well as these side effects, are dose dependent.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the lowest effective dose of CPA in trans women to prevent side effects.

METHODS

This longitudinal study, conducted at gender identity centers in Amsterdam, Ghent, and Florence, is part of the European Network for the Investigation of Gender Incongruence (ENIGI), a multicenter prospective cohort study. Participants were trans women (n = 882) using estrogens only or in combination with 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg CPA daily. The primary outcome measure was the concentration of testosterone at 3 and/or 12 months of hormone therapy.

RESULTS

Using estrogens only (without CPA) led to testosterone concentrations of 5.5 nmol/L (standard error of the mean [SEM] 0.3). All doses of CPA resulted in testosterone concentrations below the predefined threshold of suppression of 2 nmol/L (10 mg, 0.9 nmol/L, SEM 0.7; 25 mg, 0.9 nmol/L, SEM 0.1; 50mg, 1.1 nmol/L, SEM 0.1; 100 mg, 0.9 nmol/L, SEM 0.7). Higher prolactin and lower high-density lipoprotein concentrations were observed with increasing doses of CPA. No differences in liver enzyme concentrations were found between the doses.

CONCLUSION

Compared with higher doses of CPA, a daily dose of 10 mg is equally effective in lowering testosterone concentrations in trans women, while showing fewer side effects.

Sex and Gender Differences in Clinical Pharmacology: Implications for Transgender Medicine

The transgender adult population is growing globally, but clinical pharmacology has lagged behind other areas of transgender medicine. Medical care for transgender adults may include long-term testosterone or estrogen treatment to align secondary sex characteristics with gender identity. Clinicians often use drug-drug interaction data from the general adult population to predict medication disposition or safety among transgender adults. However, this approach does not address the complex pharmacodynamic effects of hormone therapy in transgender adults. In this review, we critically examine sex-related and gender-related differences in clinical pharmacology and apply these data to discuss current gaps in transgender medicine.

Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Bone Health: Do Different Regimens Influence Outcomes in Transgender Adults? A Narrative Review and Call for Future Studies

BACKGROUND

Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) influences bone health in transgender individuals. Several hormone preparations and administration routes are available for GAHT, but no studies have compared clinical and laboratory bone health measures across different GAHT regimens.

CONTENT

We searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Google Scholar for studies measuring bone turnover markers and bone mineral density before and during GAHT in transgender adults. We summarized bone health data by hormone type and administration route (estrogen or testosterone; oral, transdermal/percutaneous, intramuscular). Among trans women, we also examined outcomes among regimens containing different adjunctive agents (antiandrogens or gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs).

SUMMARY

Most hormone preparations maintained or increased areal bone mineral density among trans adults taking GAHT for at least 12 months from baseline. Different bone turnover markers were measured across studies, and we were unable to compare or comment on the direct influence of selected hormone preparations on these clinical laboratory measures. Larger and uniformed studies are needed to measure volumetric bone mineral density and biomarkers of bone metabolism in trans adults taking standardized GAHT regimens.