Linagliptin and its effects on hyperglycaemia and albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes and renal dysfunction: the randomized MARLINA-T2D trial

Factors Involved in the Development of Diabetic Kidney Disease in Patients With Slowly Progressive Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction The duration of diabetes mellitus (DM), blood pro-inflammatory markers, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) activity are known predictors of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) progression in acute-onset type 1 DM (AT1DM) and type 2 DM. However, predictors of DKD progression in slowly progressive type 1 insulin-dependent DM (SPIDDM) have been less frequently studied. Patients and methods This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients with SPIDDM (definite) (26 men/34 women). We utilized Cox proportional hazard analyses to determine whether characteristics and laboratory findings at the time of the SPIDDM diagnosis were associated with subsequent DKD progression. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the last outpatient clinic visit served as indicators of renal function. Also, to compare blood markers in patients with SPIDDM, we included 21 patients diagnosed with AT1DM at the same department during the same period and 50 healthy adult volunteers. Results In patients with SPIDDM (definite), the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that the body mass index (BMI), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels at diagnosis, and the duration of DM prior to SPIDDM diagnosis were associated with the new onset of albuminuria and systolic blood pressure (SBP) at diagnosis, and the duration of DM prior to SPIDDM diagnosis was associated with a decline in eGFR to less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m². Additionally, serum hs-CRP levels were significantly higher in the SPIDDM (definite) group compared to both the AT1DM patients and healthy controls, suggesting a higher inflammatory state in patients with SPIDDM at the time of diagnosis. In patients with SPIDDM (definite) who were not treated with a DPP4 inhibitor, plasma DPP4 activity was associated with the new onset of albuminuria. Conclusions BMI, SBP, hs-CRP levels, DPP4 activity at SPIDDM diagnosis, and the duration of DM prior to SPIDDM diagnosis are associated with subsequent progression of DKD in SPIDDM. Also, we found that the patients with SPIDDM are often already being treated as DM for a long period of time at the time of diagnosis, which may be linked to their already high inflammatory status at the time of SPIDDM diagnosis and contribute to DKD progression. These findings underscore the importance of early diagnosis and management in preventing DKD progression in this population.

The DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin improves glycaemic control and early-stage diabetic nephropathy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the MiniMed 780G advanced hybrid closed-loop system: a randomised controlled trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibition has beneficial effects on various metabolic indicators in diabetes. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) is expressed in diverse organs including the kidneys and is cleaved and inactivated by DPP-4 enzyme. The aim of this study was to conduct a randomised controlled trial to assess the effect of sitagliptin on diabetic nephropathy when used as an add-on therapy to the advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes and nephropathy.

METHODS

This open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial took place at the Pediatric Diabetes Clinic, Ain Shams University, Egypt. Forty-six adolescents aged 14.13 ± 2.43 years on the MiniMed 780G system for at least 6 months before study, with HbA1c ≤69 mmol/mol (8.5%) and diabetic nephropathy in the form of microalbuminuria, were randomly assigned to two groups (n=23 for each) based on a computer-generated randomisation sequence. The intervention group received oral sitagliptin 50 mg for 3 months. The other group used AHCL only and served as a control group. The primary outcome measure was the change in urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) after 3 months of administration of sitagliptin. The key secondary outcome measure was the change from baseline in SDF-1 levels after treatment.

RESULTS

Data for all participants were analysed. No significant difference was found between the groups as regards baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics as well as AHCL system settings (p>0.05). Serum SDF-1 levels were higher in all individuals with type 1 diabetes vs healthy control individuals (p<0.001). After 3 months, sitagliptin resulted in a significant decrease of SDF-1 levels from 3.58 ± 0.73 to 1.99 ± 0.76 ng/ml (p<0.001), together with improvement of UACR from 7.27 ± 2.41 to 1.32 ± 0.31 mg/mmol (p<0.001). In addition, sitagliptin reduced postprandial glucose, sensor glucose, coefficient of variation and total daily dose of insulin, while time in range 3.9-10.0 mmol/l (70-180 mg/dl) and insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio were significantly increased. Sitagliptin was safe and well-tolerated without severe hypoglycaemia or diabetic ketoacidosis.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Sitagliptin as an add-on therapy to AHCL had a reno-protective effect for individuals with type 1 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy, in addition to the improvement of time in range while reducing glycaemic variability and without compromising safety.

FUNDING

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06115460.

Safety of Linagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Linagliptin is an oral dipeptidyl peptidase DPP-4 inhibitor, which is indicated for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as monotherapy or add-on to therapy with other hypoglycemic drugs.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the safety of linagliptin focusing on cardiovascular risks among subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search across the following databases: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to November 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of linagliptin compared to placebo in patients with Type 2 diabetes were included. The primary safety points were cardiovascular (CV) adverse events including non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), CV death, MI, stroke, and hospitalization for unstable angina. While, secondary safety points included 17 reported adverse events such as infections, hypoglycemia and abdominal pain. Three reviewers independently screened and reviewed each study to extract relevant information. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We conducted a meta-analysis using the random effects model. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) of targeted adverse events with linagliptin compared to placebo were estimated using the Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies with 19,981 adult patients were included. There was no difference in the incidence of all CV adverse events or individual CV adverse events between linagliptin and the placebo arms. The pooled estimate of the risk of upper respiratory tract infection was reported in twelve trials with a 38% risk reduction among patients treated with the linagliptin group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45-0.85, and I2 = 0%), while no difference was found in other infections. For gastrointestinal disorders, the risk of abdominal pain showed a 65% risk reduction among patients treated with the linagliptin group compared to the placebo group (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.77, and I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed an overall acceptable safety profile of linagliptin in patients with T2DM. Moreover, our study showed a risk reduction of upper respiratory tract infection and abdominal pain when using linagliptin compared to placebo.

Individual dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and acute kidney injury in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

This network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aimed to determine whether any individual dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors increase the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online via PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. The primary outcome was AKI. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity. Twenty-nine studies involving 56 117 participants were included. There were 918 cases of AKI (1.63%). The risk of bias was generally considered to be low. The only DPP-4 inhibitor that significantly increased the frequency of AKI when compared with placebo was sitagliptin (risk ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.22-2.23). However, because one study showed significant outliers in the funnel plot, in a highly heterogeneous population composed solely of patients undergoing surgery for coronary artery bypass graft, we conducted a post-hoc sensitivity analysis to exclude this study. The results showed no statistically significant difference in the risk of AKI between sitagliptin and placebo. Individual DPP-4 inhibitors do not appear to increase the risk of AKI. However, sitagliptin may be associated with AKI in patients with underlying severe cardiovascular disease.

Effect of DPP-4i inhibitors on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

About 20-40% patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) had an increased risk of developing diabetic nephropathy (DN). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) were recommended for treatment of T2DM, while the impact of DPP-4i on renal function remained unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of DPP-4i on renal parameter of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in T2DM.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed across PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. A fixed or random-effects model was used for quantitative synthesis according to the heterogeneity, which was assessed with I2 index. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed with standard methods, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were identified. Administration of DPP-4i produced no significant effect on eGFR (WMD, -0.92 mL/min/1.73m2, 95% CI, -2.04 to 0.19) in diabetic condition. DPP-4i produced a favorable effect on attenuating ACR (WMD, -2.76 mg/g, 95% CI, -5.23 to -0.29) in patients with T2DM. The pooled estimate was stable based on the sensitivity test. No publication bias was observed according to Begg's and Egger's tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with DPP-4i preserved the renal parameter of eGFR in diabetic condition. Available evidences suggested that administration of DPP-4i produced a favorable effect on attenuating ACR in patients with T2DM. INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTIVE REGISTER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (PROSPERO) NUMBER: CRD.42020144642.

Targeting cluster of differentiation 26 / dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (CD26/DPP4) in organ fibrosis

Cluster of differentiation 26 (CD26)/dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) is an exopeptidase that is expressed as a transmembrane protein in many organs but also present in a circulating soluble form. Beyond its enzymatic and costimulatory activity, CD26/DPP4 is involved in the pathogenesis of chronic fibrotic diseases across many organ types, such as liver cirrhosis, kidney fibrosis and lung fibrosis. Organ fibrosis is associated with a high morbidity and mortality, and there are no causative therapies that can effectively attenuate the progress of the disease. Growing evidence suggests that inhibiting CD26/DPP4 can modulate the profibrotic tissue microenvironment and thus reduce fibrotic changes within affected organs. This review summarizes the role of CD26/DPP4 in fibroproliferative disorders and highlights new opportunities for an antifibrotic treatment by CD26/DPP4 inhibition. As a major advantage, CD26/DPP4 inhibitors have been in safe and routine clinical use in type 2 diabetes for many years and thus qualify for repurposing to repurpose as a promising therapeutic against fibrosis. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue on Translational Advances in Fibrosis as a Therapeutic Target. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v180.22/issuetoc.

Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with SGLT-2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors Combination Therapy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Cardiovascular Outcome Trials

OBJECTIVE

The cardiovascular (CV) and renal benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are well known. However, similar beneficial effects of SGLT2i in combination with DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) are not known. It is of interest to explore a trial-level meta-analysis to find out this knowledge gap.

METHODS

A literature search was carried out in PubMed and Embase databases until January 31, 2023. All CV outcome trials (CVOTs) reporting the CV and renal outcomes of SGLT2i with or without background DPP4i therapy against the placebo were retrieved. A meta-analysis was subsequently conducted by applying the inverse variance-weighted averages of pooled logarithmic hazard ratio using random effects analysis, primarily.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis showed that the beneficial three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) composite (three CVOTs; N = 32,418), the composite of CV death or heart failure hospitalization (hHF) (four CVOTs; N = 37,687), hHF (three CVOTs; N = 27,545), CV death (four CVOTs; N = 34,565), and renal outcomes (two CVOTs; N = 25,406) with SGLT2i are similar with or without background DPP4i therapy against the placebo (P_{heterogeneity} = 0.71, 0.07, 0.87, 0.72, and 0.25; respectively). However, against the placebo, the summary estimates for 3P-MACE composite, hHF, and renal outcomes were stronger with SGLT2i alone whilst the summary estimates for CV death or hHF composite were larger with SGLT2i with background DPP4i therapy.

CONCLUSION

Beneficial CV and renal effects of SGLT2i are similar against placebo regardless of background DPP4i therapy.

Comparative Efficacy of Novel Antidiabetic Drugs on Albuminuria Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Albuminuria, or elevated urinary albumin-to-creatine ratio (UACR), is a biomarker for chronic kidney disease that is routinely monitored in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Head-to-head comparisons of novel antidiabetic drugs on albuminuria outcomes remain limited. This systematic review qualitatively compared the efficacy of novel antidiabetic drugs on improving albuminuria outcomes in patients with T2D.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE database until December 2022 for Phase 3 or 4 randomized, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on changes in UACR and albuminuria categories in patients with T2D.

RESULTS

Among 211 records identified, 27 were included, which reported on 16 trials. SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs decreased UACR by 19-22% and 17-33%, respectively, versus placebo (P < 0.05 for all studies) over median follow-up of ≥ 2 years; DPP-4 inhibitors showed varying effects on UACR. Compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors decreased the risk for albuminuria onset by 16-20% and for albuminuria progression by 27-48% (P < 0.05 for all studies) and promoted albuminuria regression (P < 0.05 for all studies) over median follow-up of ≥ 2 years. Evidence on changes in albuminuria categories with GLP-1 RA or DPP-4 inhibitor treatment were limited with varying outcome definitions across studies and potential drug-specific effects within each class. The effect of novel antidiabetic drugs on UACR or albuminuria outcomes at ≤ 1 year remains poorly studied.

CONCLUSION

Among the novel antidiabetic drugs, SGLT2 inhibitors consistently improved UACR and albuminuria outcomes in patients with T2D, with continuous treatment showing long-term benefit.

Reduction in the Risk of Peripheral Neuropathy and Lower Decrease in Kidney Function with Metformin, Linagliptin or Their Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Placebo in Prediabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of glucose-lowering drugs on peripheral nerve and kidney function in prediabetes.

METHODS

Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 658 adults with prediabetes treated for 1 year with metformin, linagliptin, their combination or placebo. Endpoints are small fiber peripheral neuropathy (SFPN) risk estimated by foot electrochemical skin conductance (FESC < 70 μSiemens) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

RESULTS

Compared to the placebo, the proportion of SFPN was reduced by 25.1% (95% CI:16.3-33.9) with metformin alone, by 17.3% (95% CI 7.4-27.2) with linagliptin alone, and by 19.5% (95% CI 10.1-29.0) with the combination linagliptin/metformin (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). eGFR remained +3.3 mL/min (95% CI: 0.38-6.22) higher with the combination linagliptin/metformin than with the placebo (p = 0.03). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) decreased more with metformin monotherapy -0.3 mmol/L (95%CI: -0.48; 0.12, p = 0.0009) and with the combination metformin/linagliptin -0.2 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.37; -0.03) than with the placebo (p = 0.0219). Body weight (BW) decreased by -2.0 kg (95% CI: -5.65; -1.65, p = 0.0006) with metformin monotherapy, and by -1.9 kg (95% CI: -3.02; -0.97) with the combination metformin/linagliptin as compared to the placebo (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

in people with prediabetes, a 1 year treatment with metformin and linagliptin, combined or in monotherapy, was associated with a lower risk of SFPN, and with a lower decrease in eGFR, than treatment with placebo.

The effect of linagliptin on microalbuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a randomized, double blinded clinical trial

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of linagliptin on microalbuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). The present double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed on 92 patients with DN who were divided into two groups. The intervention and control groups received linagliptin 5 mg and placebo for 24 weeks, respectively. Blood pressure, lipid profile, liver enzymes, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) were assessed and recorded before, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after the beginning of the intervention. The mean value of UACR decrease was significant over time in both groups, with higher decrease in linagliptin group, however, the differences between two groups were not, statistically significant (P > 0.05). However, the percentage of improvement in microalbuminuria (UACR < 30 mg/g) in the linagliptin group was significantly higher than that of the control group during 24 weeks of intervention (68.3% vs. 25%; P-value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean value of the UACR and other parameters between linagliptin treated and placebo treated patients with diabetic nephropathy. Further studies, with longer periods of follow-up are suggested to examine these patients' renal outcomes.

Optimization of Albuminuria-Lowering Treatment in Diabetes by Crossover Rotation to Four Different Drug Classes: A Randomized Crossover Trial

OBJECTIVE

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors decrease the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) but are ineffective in up to 40% of patients. We hypothesized that rotation through different drug classes overcomes RAS inhibitor resistance and tested this in a randomized crossover trial.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We assigned 26 adults with type 1 diabetes and 37 with type 2 diabetes and UACR between 30 and 500 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 to 4-week treatment periods with telmisartan 80 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg, linagliptin 5 mg, and baricitinib 2 mg in random order, separated by 4-week washout periods. Each participant was then re-exposed for 4 weeks to the drug that induced that individual's largest UACR reduction. Primary outcome was the difference in UACR response to the best-performing drug during the confirmation period versus UACR response to the other three drugs.

RESULTS

There was substantial variation in the best-performing drug. Telmisartan was best performing for 33 participants (52%), empagliflozin and linagliptin in 11 (17%), and baricitinib in 8 participants (13%). The individuals' best-performing drug changed UACR from baseline during the first and confirmatory exposures by a mean of -39.6% (95% CI -44.8, -33.8; P < 0.001) and -22.4% (95% CI -29.7, -12.5; P < 0.001), respectively. The Pearson correlation for first versus confirmatory exposure was 0.39 (P = 0.017). The mean change in UACR with the other three drugs was +1.6% (95% CI -4.3%, 8.0%; P = 0.593 versus baseline; difference versus individuals' best-performing drug at confirmation, 30.9% [95% CI 18.0, 45.3]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a large and reproducible variation in participants' responses to different UACR-lowering drug classes. These data support systematic rotation through different drug classes to overcome therapy resistance to RAS inhibition.

Clinical trials with reno-vascular end points in patients with diabetes: Changing the scenario over the past 20 years

Major clinical advances over the last 20 years in the area of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) have been confirmed in large seminal clinical trials. These findings add to the previously identified benefits resulting from intensive glucose and blood pressure control therapies. Furthermore, newer glucose lowering treatments such as SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists appear very promising and are likely to transform the management and outlook of DKD over the next decade. In addition, novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and a recently reported trial with an endothelin receptor blocker also have the potential to change clinical practice.

Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Nephropathy: A 2022 International Update

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Its pathogenesis encompasses functional alterations involving elevated intraglomerular and systemic pressure, increased activity of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and oxidative stress, and the eventual development of renal fibrosis. The management of DN involves the optimization of blood pressure (BP) and blood glucose targets. However, treatment of these risk factors slows down but does not stop the progression of DN. Innovative pharmacologic therapies for dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) could play a key role in bridging this gap and attenuating the residual risk of DN beyond traditional risk factor management. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), and inhibitors of mineralocorticoid receptor-mediated sodium reabsorption are recently introduced drug classes that have been shown to have positive effects on kidney function in individuals with T2DM. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the therapeutic options available in order to prevent or slow the onset and progression of DN in diabetic patients.

Enterorenal crosstalks in diabetic nephropathy and novel therapeutics targeting the gut microbiota

The role of gut-kidney crosstalk in the progression of diabetic nephropathy (DN) is receiving increasing concern. On one hand, the decline in renal function increases circulating uremic toxins and affects the composition and function of gut microbiota. On the other hand, intestinal dysbiosis destroys the epithelial barrier, leading to increased exposure to endotoxins, thereby exacerbating kidney damage by inducing systemic inflammation. Dietary inventions, such as higher fiber intake, prebiotics, probiotics, postbiotics, fecal microbial transplantation (FMT), and engineering bacteria and phages, are potential microbiota-based therapies for DN. Furthermore, novel diabetic agents, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and sodium-dependent glucose transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, may affect the progression of DN partly through gut microbiota. In the current review, we mainly summarize the evidence concerning the gut-kidney axis in the advancement of DN and discuss therapies targeting the gut microbiota, expecting to provide new insight into the clinical treatment of DN.

Traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease: A study-level pooled analysis of 44 randomized controlled trials

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has significant effects on reducing 24-h urinary protein (24-h UPRO) and improves renal function indices. The current level of evidence-based medicine is still not enough due to the limitation of clinical center size and sample size.

Objective: We aimed to update the current evidence on the efficacy of TCM in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and SinoMed were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy of TCM combined with Western medicine with that of Western medicine alone for the treatment of DKD. The main outcome measure was 24-h UPRO. The secondary outcomes were serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol (TC), and triglyceride (TG). Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias.

Results: A total of 44 RCTs with 3,730 participants were included. The summary estimates showed that compared with Western medicine alone, TCM combined with Western medicine significantly improved 24-h UPRO [standardized mean difference (SMD) −1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.45 to −0.74]. Moreover, TCM combined with Western medicine significantly reduced the levels of other renal function indices, including Scr (SMD −1.25, 95% CI: −1.69 to −0.81) and BUN (SMD −0.75, 95% CI: −1.10 to −0.40). TCM combined with Western medicine also showed greater benefits in reducing the levels of FBG (SMD −0.31, 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15) and HbA1c (SMD −0.62, 95% CI: −0.89 to −0.36) in patients with DKD. In addition, superior effects on the lipid profile were noted in the TCM combined with Western medicine group in terms of TG (SMD −1.17, 95% CI: −1.76 to −0.59) and TC (SMD −0.95, 95% CI: −1.43 to −0.47). The risk of bias could have resulted from selective reports, unclear randomization methods, unblinded assignments, and some missing data.

Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that TCM combined with Western medicine has significant effects on reducing 24-h UPRO and improves renal function indices and lipid profiles compared with Western medicine alone for DKD. However, the results should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of bias of the included trials.

Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=213199], identifier [CRD: 42020213199].

Diagnosis 101: diabetic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) attributed to diabetes occurs in 20%-40% of patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is recognized as the most common cause of end-stage kidney disease in the USA and most Western countries. For quite some time, it has been recognized that treatments based on inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) can reduce the rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with DKD. Recently however, several novel agents, namely sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, were demonstrated to not only improve glycemic control but also to improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Another agent, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist, has also been shown to have cardiorenal benefits in patients with DKD. With such new developments, one would expect that it would eventually translate into further slowing CKD progression in the DKD population, provided that patients are diagnosed appropriately and in a timely manner. In this study, the authors attempt to investigate real-world data, looking at how well providers are establishing the diagnosis of DKD and its potential implications.

Comparison of effects of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin on renal function and glycaemic control: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Background

This study aimed to compare the effects of Linagliptin and Empagliflozin on renal function and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

Method

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, parallel trial on patients aged 30 to 80 years with type 2 DM and HbA1c ≤ 9%, regardless of background medical therapy, to compare the effects of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin on albuminuria, FBS, HbA1c, and eGFR. Participants were given the mentioned drugs for 12 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests in IBM™SPSS® statistics software for windows version 24.

Results

In total, 60 patients participated in the study, thirty patients in each group. The mean age of participants was 56.8 (SD = 8.15) in the Empagliflozin group and 60.9 (SD = 7.22) in the Linagliptin group. Before the intervention, FBS, HbA1C, and albuminuria values were significantly higher in the Empagliflozin group than those in the Linagliptin group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups regarding eGFR (P = 0.271). Changes in the FBS, HbA1C, and eGFR were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05), but there was more decrease in albuminuria in the Empagliflozin group compared to the Linagliptin group (P = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.98).

Conclusions

Regardless of baseline albuminuria, eGFR, or HbA1c, Empagliflozin 10 mg daily significantly reduced albuminuria at 12 weeks compared to Linagliptin 5 mg daily in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20200722048176N1. Registered 3 August 2020.

Repurposing drugs for highly prevalent diseases: pentoxifylline, an old drug and a new opportunity for diabetic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease is one of the most frequent complications in patients with diabetes and constitutes a major cause of end-stage kidney disease. The prevalence of diabetic kidney disease continues to increase as a result of the growing epidemic of diabetes and obesity. Therefore, there is mounting urgency to design and optimize novel strategies and drugs that delay the progression of this pathology and contain this trend. The new approaches should go beyond the current therapy focussed on the control of traditional risk factors such as hyperglycaemia and hypertension. In this scenario, drug repurposing constitutes an economic and feasible approach based on the discovery of useful activities for old drugs. Pentoxifylline is a nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor currently indicated for peripheral artery disease. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown renoprotection secondary to anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects in diabetic patients treated with this old known drug, which makes pentoxifylline a candidate for repurposing in diabetic kidney disease.

Nano-Technological Approaches for Targeting Kidney Diseases With Focus on Diabetic Nephropathy: Recent Progress, and Future Perspectives

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease worldwide. With the rising prevalence of diabetes, the occurrence of DN is likely to hit pandemic proportions. The current treatment strategies employed for DN focus on the management of blood pressure, glycemia, and cholesterol while neglecting DN’s molecular progression mechanism. For many theranostic uses, nano-technological techniques have evolved in biomedical studies. Several nanotechnologically based theranostics have been devised that can be tagged with targeting moieties for both drug administration and/or imaging systems and are being studied to identify various clinical conditions. The molecular mechanisms involved in DN are discussed in this review to assist in understanding its onset and progression pattern. We have also discussed emerging strategies for establishing a nanomedicine-based platform for DN-targeted drug delivery to increase drug’s efficacy and safety, as well as their reported applications.

Recent advances in the pharmacotherapeutic management of diabetic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetes and is a key cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) worldwide. Major clinical advances have been confirmed in large trials demonstrating renoprotection, adding to the benefits of existing intensive glucose and blood pressure control therapies. Furthermore, there are exciting new treatments predominantly at an experimental and early clinical phase which appear promising.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review DKD in the context of existing and emerging therapies affording cardiorenal benefits including SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists. They explore novel therapies demonstrating potential including a newly developed mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and endothelin receptor blockade, while evaluating the utility of DPP4 inhibitors in current clinical practice. They also consider the recent evidence of emerging therapies targeting metabolic pathways with enzyme inhibitors, anti-fibrotic agents, and agents modulating transcription factors.

EXPERT OPINION

Significant improvements have been made in the management of DKD with SGLT2i and GLP-1 agonists providing impressive renoprotection, with novel progress in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade with finerenone. There is also great potential for several new experimental therapies. These advances provide us with optimism that the outlook of this devastating condition will continue to improve.

Maresin 1 Alleviates Diabetic Kidney Disease via LGR6-Mediated cAMP-SOD2-ROS Pathway

BACKGROUND

Chronic hyperglycemia-induced inflammation is recognized as the most important pathophysiological process in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). As maresin 1 (MaR1) is an extensive anti-inflammatory lipid mediator, the present study investigated the protective role of MaR1 in the pathogenesis of DKD and its clinical relevance.

METHODS

Serum MaR1 concentrations were analyzed in 104 subjects with normal glucose tolerant, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), or DKD. Streptozotocin (STZ) together with high fat diet was used to induce male C57BL/6 J mice into diabetic mice which were treated with MaR1. Human renal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2 cells) were treated by high glucose for glucotoxicity cell model and transfected with LGR6 siRNA for knockdown with MaR1 added，and detected oxidative stress and inflammatory related factors.

RESULTS

Serum MaR1 concentrations were significant decreased in T2DM with or without kidney disease compared with normal participant and were lowest in patients with DKD. Serum MaR1 concentrations were negatively correlated with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), duration of diabetes, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), neutrophil, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and were positively correlated with high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In mouse model, MaR1 injection alleviated hyperglycemia, UACR and the pathological progression of DKD. Interestingly, the renal expression of LGR6 was down-regulated in DKD and high glucose treated HK-2 cells but up-regulated by MaR1 treatment. Mechanistically, MaR1 alleviated inflammation via LGR6-mediated cAMP-SOD2 antioxidant pathway in DKD mice and high glucose treated HK-2 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that decreased serum MaR1 levels were correlated with the development of DKD. MaR1 could alleviate DKD and glucotoxicity-induced inflammation via LGR6-mediated cAMP-SOD2 antioxidant pathway. Thus, our present findings identify MaR1 as a predictor and a potential therapeutic target for DKD.

Association between use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors with kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

This study aimed to compare the efficacies of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes using network meta-analysis.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for studies published up to September 28, 2020. Randomized clinical trials enrolling participants with type 2 diabetes were included, for which SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and DPP-4 inhibitors were compared with either each other, or placebo or no treatment. A network meta-analysis using a Bayesian approach was performed. The primary outcome was composite renal events, and the secondary outcome was acute kidney injury (AKI) events. All research was conducted according to a protocol registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020208090).

Results

In total, we retrieved 17 445 studies, of which 98 articles enrolling 186 335 participants were included for the network meta-analysis. For our primary outcome, the network meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between drug classes regardless of baseline factors. However, GLP-1 receptor agonists were most likely ranked best among the three drugs in reducing composite renal events (80%, moderate-quality evidence). Compared with the control groups (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.87, low-quality evidence), GLP-1 receptor agonists (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96, moderate-quality evidence) and with DPP-4 inhibitors (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.86, low-quality evidence), SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of AKI events.

Conclusions

In this network meta-analysis, although none of the three new antidiabetic drug classes reduced the composite renal events in participants with type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists may be more effective. The use of SGLT-2 inhibitors was associated with a lower AKI event risk than DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, placebo, or no treatment.

Rationality, Efficacy, Tolerability of Empagliflozin Plus Linagliptin Combination for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Treatment of diabetes mellitus includes more than one drug of different groups, which may lead to a high pill burden and non-adherence to drugs. We have aimed to systematically analyze the clinical efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic cost-effectiveness of the fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin plus a linagliptin in Type-2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and EMBASE was performed using the MeSH terms and/or keywords"((Single-pill combination) OR ((Fixeddose combination) OR (Combination therapy)) AND (Empagliflozin add on-to Linagliptin) OR (Empagliflozin combined with Linagliptin) OR ((Combination of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin)" from the inception to February 2021.

RESULTS

Search results were found in a total of 13 clinical studies. After removing duplicates and studies not according to inclusion criteria, a total of eight clinical studies (Randomized controlled trials: 7; Observational cohort studies: 1) were included (n=7491). A significant reduction in the primary endpoint, the mean changes in baseline HbA1c at the end of 24 weeks and/or 52 weeks was found in the empagliflozin plus a linagliptin combination group in all included studies. In addition, significant efficacy was seen in decreasing the secondary endpoints such as the mean change in the fasting plasma glucose, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and body weight with fewer adverse events than the adverse effects with either drug alone.

CONCLUSION

After reviewing findings from the available clinical studies of the combination of empagliflozin plus linagliptin, we conclude that the combination is effective, safe, tolerable, and rationale cost effective compared to placebo and either drug alone for the management of T2DM in patients with inadequate glycemic control with metformin alone, patients with intolerance to metformin, increased baseline HbA1c, patients with overweight or obesity and diabetic hypertensive, CHF, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and renal dysfunction patients. Future randomized controlled trials in a larger number of T2DM patients with or without CHF and renal failure patients are recommended.

Comparative Cardiovascular Outcomes of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to explore the cardiovascular outcomes of all the kind and dosages of sodium-glucose cotransport-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

METHOD AND RESULT

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies to compare the therapeutic effects of different SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM patients. The effect measurements estimate chosen were odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Forty-seven RCTs involving a total of 70574 participants were eligible for direct and indirect comparisons. In direct comparison, treatment with dapagliflozin 5mg showed significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with treatment with dapagliflozin 2.5mg (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.70). According to NMA, interestingly, empagliflozin 10mg/25mg, and canagliflozin 100mg was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality compared with placebo (OR of 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.85; 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.84; and 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95, respectively). Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin 10mg, empagliflozin 10mg and 25mg displayed the lower risks for cardiovascular events (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.44-1.00; OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22-0.93; and 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.74, respectively) by direct comparison. Moreover, canagliflozin 100/300mg showed significantly higher risks of cardiovascular events compared with empagliflozin 10mg (OR of 4.83, 95% CI 1.14-20.46 and 5.31, 95% CI 1.26-22.34, respectively) and empagliflozin 25mg (4.23, 95% CI 1.13-15.83 and 4.65, 95% CI 1.25-17.27, respectively) according to NMA. There were non-significant differences among all interventions in volume depletion in traditional pairwise meta-analysis. While in NMA, canagliflozin 100/300mg were associated with significantly increased risks of volume depletion compared with placebo (OR of 1.47, 95% CI 1.08-1.99 and 2.19, 95% CI 1.66-2.90, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the limitations of the NMA, this study showed that empagliflozin might be better than other SGLT2 inhibitors with low risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM suggesting the need for ad hoc RCTs.

Novel Therapies for Kidney Disease in People With Diabetes

CONTEXT

The increasing burden of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has led to the discovery of novel therapies.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to summarize the results of recent clinical trials that test the efficacy of potential therapies for DKD.

METHODS

A systematized narrative review was performed utilizing the PubMed, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, and Cochrane databases (January 2010 to January 2021). The included trials assessed the efficacy of specific medications using renal endpoints in adult participants with type 1 or 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

Fifty-three trials were identified. Large, multinational, and high-powered trials investigating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors demonstrated improved renal outcomes, even in patients with established DKD. Trials examining incretin-related therapies also showed some improvement in renal outcomes. Additionally, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists exhibited potential with multiple improved renal outcomes in large trials, including those involving participants with established DKD. Atrasentan, baricitinib, ASP8232, PF-04634817, CCX140-B, atorvastatin, fenofibrate, probucol, doxycycline, vitamin D, omega-3 fatty acids, silymarin, turmeric, total glucosides of paeony, and tripterygium wilfordii Hook F extract were all associated with some improved renal endpoints but need further exploration. While bardoxolone methyl was associated with a decrease in albuminuria, high rates of cardiovascular adverse effects curtailed further exploration into this agent. Selonsertib, allopurinol, praliciguat, palosuran, benfotiamine, and diacerein were not associated with improved renal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Trials have yielded promising results in the search for new therapies to manage DKD. SGLT2 inhibitors and incretin-related therapies have demonstrated benefit and were associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are another class of agents with increasing evidence of benefits.

Treatments for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Delaying disease progression and reducing the risk of mortality are key goals in the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD). New drug classes to augment renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors as the standard of care have scarcely met their primary endpoints until recently. This systematic literature review explored treatments evaluated in patients with CKD since 1990 to understand what contemporary data add to the treatment landscape. Eighty-nine clinical trials were identified that had enrolled patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate 13.9-102.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 29.9-2911.0 mg/g, with (75.5%) and without (20.6%) type 2 diabetes (T2D). Clinically objective outcomes of kidney failure and all-cause mortality (ACM) were reported in 32 and 64 trials, respectively. Significant reductions (P < 0.05) in the risk of kidney failure were observed in seven trials: five small trials published before 2008 had evaluated the RAAS inhibitors losartan, benazepril, or ramipril in patients with (n = 751) or without (n = 84-436) T2D; two larger trials (n = 2152-2202) published onwards of 2019 had evaluated the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors canagliflozin (in patients with T2D and UACR > 300-5000 mg/g) and dapagliflozin (in patients with or without T2D and UACR 200-5000 mg/g) added to a background of RAAS inhibition. Significant reductions in ACM were observed with dapagliflozin in the DAPA-CKD trial. Contemporary data therefore suggest that augmenting RAAS inhibitors with new drug classes has the potential to improve clinical outcomes in a broad range of patients with CKD.

Safety and tolerability of linagliptin in Asians with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of 4457 patients from 21 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Safety and tolerability of glucose-lowering drugs is a key consideration for use in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We evaluated the safety and tolerability of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin in Asian patients with T2D.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a post-hoc, descriptive pooled analysis of 21 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of linagliptin in T2D patients lasting ≤52 weeks. We evaluated adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters in Asian participants living in Asia, both overall and in the East Asian subgroup.

RESULTS

This analysis included 4457 Asian patients overall (2712 receiving linagliptin; 1745 receiving placebo) and 3057 (68.6%) East Asians. AEs were reported in 1510 (55.7%) Asian patients receiving linagliptin and 1032 (59.1%) receiving placebo but were considered drug-related in only 13.0% of each group. Serious AEs occurred in 109 (4.0%) linagliptin patients and 90 (5.2%) placebo patients. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis (6.4% linagliptin, 7.3% placebo), upper respiratory tract infection (5.7% linagliptin, 6.5% placebo), and hypoglycemia (7.3% linagliptin, 6.3% placebo). One linagliptin patient had pancreatitis; none had bullous pemphigoid. No clinically relevant mean changes in laboratory parameters occurred. These findings were consistent in East Asians.

CONCLUSIONS

Linagliptin is well tolerated in Asian T2D patients, including East Asians, with low risk for AEs.

Sitagliptin's renoprotective effect in a diabetic nephropathy model in rats: The potential role of PI3K/AKT pathway

Management of diabetic nephropathy (DN) is far from satisfactory. There is a rising role of the involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) pathway in the pathogenesis of DN. This study aimed at investigating the renoprotective effects of PI3K/AKT pathway via sitagliptin in a rat model of DN. Thirty-two male Wistar rats were divided into four groups (eight rats each): (I) control, (II) sitagliptin, (III) DN, and (IV) DN + sitagliptin. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), kidney index, and kidney function tests in both blood and urine were measured. The levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and gene expressions of PI3K, pPI3K, AKT, and pAKT in renal tissue were detected. Renal histopathological and immunohistochemical studies were evaluated. DN + sitagliptin group showed significant decrease in FBG and kidney index, improvement in kidney function tests, and a decrease in levels of TNF-α and TGF-β in renal tissues compared with DN group. This was associated with significant increase in SOD and gene expressions of PI3K and AKT and their phosphorylated active forms in renal tissue in DN + sitagliptin group compared with DN group. Moreover, DN + sitagliptin group showed apparent decrease in amount of collagen fibers and expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) compared with DN group. This work shows that sitagliptin improved renal functions and histopathological changes, impeded inflammation, and oxidative stress and upregulated PI3K/AKT pathway which highlights its renoprotective effects in a rat model of DN.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review

Diabetic kidney disease is one of the most frequent complications in patients with diabetes mellitus and affects morbidity and mortality. The recent therapies include oral hypoglycemic drugs that, in addition to optimizing glycemic control and reducing the risk of hypoglycemia, may affect the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease; these novel therapies include inhibitors of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), a group of oral hypoglycemic therapeutic agents that act at the level of the incretin system. DPP-4 inhibitors show additional pleiotropic effects in in vitro models, reducing inflammation, fibrosis, and oxidative damage, further suggesting potential kidney protective effects. Although existing trials suggest a possible benefit in the progression of diabetic kidney disease, further studies are needed to demonstrate kidney-specific benefits of DPP-4 inhibitors.

Recent therapeutic targets in diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus has been increased dramatically which in turn leads to complications including cardiovascular diseases, diabetic kidney disease, and substantially end-stage renal disease.

METHODS

We reviewed articles discussing the pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy with new agents that may be useful in the management of the disease. We used PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and the Open-access searching engines.

RESULTS

The recent recommendations primarily depend on glycaemic and blood pressure control and the use of standard renin-angiotensin system blockade. Currently, the use of agents with nephroprotective effects beyond the hyperglycaemic lowering effect has been evidenced clinically.

CONCLUSIONS

In his review, the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and lines of treatment of diabetic nephropathy are discussed. In addition, a focus on the clinical role and nephroprotective effects of the emerging therapeutic class, dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors, is addressed in detail.

Ten-year follow-up of sitagliptin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Early and effective intervention with a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i) before the development of advanced atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is reported to increase the chance of significant reductions in not only microvascular disease, but also CVD.

METHOD

This study aimed to investigate whether sitagliptin is effective and tolerated for glycemic control and whether renoprotective effects and β-cell function are preserved for as long as ten years in Japanese patients with T2DM without a history of CVD.

RESULTS

The situation is equivalent to improving glycemic control as assessed by hemoglobin A1c both in a sitagliptin group [sitagliptin 50 mg as either monotherapy or combination therapy with other oral glucose-lowering drugs (n = 17)] or a control group [placebo as either monotherapy or combination therapy with other glucose-lowering drugs (n = 9)], while anti-inflammatory effects as assessed by high-sensitivity C-reactive peptide in the sitagliptin group were superior to those in the control group. In the sitagliptin group, mean urinary albumin excretion (measured as urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio) was markedly decreased, but no changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate were seen throughout the study. Beta-cell function as evaluated by homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function values was reduced at baseline in both groups, improved significantly in the sitagliptin group, and continued unchanged in the control group during the study.

CONCLUSION

These observations suggest that early intervention with sitagliptin in patients with T2DM may have long-lasting renoprotective and islet-protective effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Registry (UMIN000038459). Registered 01 November (retrospectively registered): https://upload.umin.ac.jp/UMIN000038459.

Can Newer Anti-Diabetic Therapies Delay the Development of Diabetic Nephropathy?

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is progressive in nature and leads to hyperglycemia-associated microvascular and macrovascular complications. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most prominent microvascular complication induced by T2DM and is characterized by albuminuria and progressive loss of kidney function. Aggressive management of hyperglycemia and hypertension has been found effective in delaying the development and progression of DN. Although the conventional antidiabetic treatment is effective in the earlier management of hyperglycemia, the progressive loss of beta cells ultimately needs the addition of insulin to the therapy. The emergence of newer antidiabetic agents may address the limitations associated with conventional antidiabetic therapies, which not only improve the glycemic status but also effective in improving cardio-renal outcomes. Nevertheless, the exact role of these agents and their role in minimizing diabetes progression to DN still needs elaboration. The present review aimed to highlights the impact of these newer antidiabetic agents in the management of hyperglycemia and their role in delaying the progression of diabetes to DN/management of DN in patients with T2DM.

Decreased Mortality After Long-Term Treatment With Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Retrospective Study of U.S. Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the United States is 13% of the general population. Among those with CKD, diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. This is a retrospective study examining the effect of long-term use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on all-cause mortality and progression of renal disease in the veteran population.

METHODS

Data was extracted using the Veterans Administration Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. A large cohort of veterans diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus were used to identify patients on DPP-4 inhibitors and without DPP-4 inhibitors. Groups were compared to determine the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on the progression of CKD and all-cause mortality. Data were analyzed using SAS.

RESULTS

Subjects in the treatment group (n = 40 558) had baseline variables (age, body mass index, race) similar to the control group (n = 40 558). Diabetes control improved in the treatment group (HgbA1c, 8.3% [67 mmol/mol] to 7.8% [62 mmol/mol]; P < .001) but not in the control group (HgbA1c, 7.4% [57 mmol/mol] to 7.3% [56 mmol/mol]). New diagnoses of heart failure and coronary artery bypass grafts were clinically significant (odds ratios = 0.66 and 0.52). No change in progression of CKD was seen in either group. All-cause mortality was reduced by 59%.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that DPP-4 inhibitors are associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality independent of glucose control, albeit with no clear cause, including obtainable cardiovascular outcomes. Our data is consistent with prior trials in that DPP-4 inhibitors did not show a significant change in serum creatinine or microalbuminuria.

Linagliptin in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Kidney Transplant

BACKGROUND

The incidence and prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing. The most common cause of ESRD is diabetes mellitus (DM). Kidney transplantation offers better quality of life and survival for patients with ESRD. Because of the use of immunosuppressive therapy and steroids post-kidney transplantation, the patients are at an increased risk for the development of posttransplant DM (PTDM). Management of DM after transplantation (whether pre-existing or transplant related) remains a challenge. Multiple treatment options are currently available to manage PTDM. Those medications have good safety and efficacy record in the general population and in patients with mild degrees of kidney disease.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single center analysis of safety and efficacy of linagliptin post-kidney transplantation. The study was approved by the institutional review board. We collected data (demographics, laboratory tests, and any symptoms or hospitalizations) for 42 patients for a period of 12 months.

RESULTS

All 42 patients received linagliptin throughout the study period. Patients' average age was 62 years. Twenty-three were women and all were of Middle Eastern descent and had kidney transplants on average of 25 months when they were included in the study. Nineteen patients had DM before the transplant, and the rest had PTDM. Eighteen patients were on metformin and 15 were on insulin, whereas the rest were not on any other medications at the start of the study. Baseline average creatinine was 1.5 mg/dL (132.9 mmol/L) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was 8.2 g/dL at the start of the study, whereas creatinine was 1.6 mg/dL (138.5 mmol/L) and HbA1c was 7.4 g/dL at the end. HbA1c dropped 0.8 on average within 3 months of starting linagliptin and remained at the same level for the rest of the study. Urine protein did not change significantly throughout the study. Three patients developed acute myocardial infarction during the study, and a fourth one was hospitalized with an opportunistic infection. Two patients had urinary tract infections. Adverse effects were minimal. No allergic reactions, hypoglycemia, or acute pancreatitis episodes were reported. The average weight and body mass index did not change throughout the study. None of the patients stopped the medication.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, linagliptin seems to be safe and efficacious after kidney transplantation. It can be considered as a treatment option to manage DM after transplantation.

Urinary dipeptidyl peptidase-4 protein is increased by linagliptin and is a potential predictive marker of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes

Results of a post hoc analysis of urinary dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) protein as a predictor of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) response to linagliptin treatment based on MARLINA-T2D trial data are described. MARLINA was a 24-week, phase 3b, multinational, placebo-controlled clinical trial, in which patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), HbA1c 6.5%-10.0% and UACR 30-3000 mg/g (n = 360) were treated with linagliptin or placebo. After 24 weeks of treatment, linagliptin significantly inhibited urinary DPP-4 activity and increased urinary DPP-4 protein. Furthermore, medium urinary DPP-4 protein levels (between 5.5 and 7.5 natural logarithmic [ln] μg/g creatinine) at baseline allowed for prediction of improved UACR in linagliptin-treated individuals. In patients with lower or higher levels of urinary DPP-4 protein at baseline, no association between linagliptin treatment and improved UACR was present. This might suggest a varying degree of importance of DPP-4 as a pathophysiological factor in T2D-associated kidney disease. In summary, urinary DPP-4 might be a useful predictive biomarker for UACR improvement by linagliptin.

New progress in drugs treatment of diabetic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is not only one of the main complications of diabetes, but also the leading cause of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The occurrence and development of DKD have always been a serious clinical problem that leads to the increase of morbidity and mortality and the severe damage to the quality of life of human beings. Controlling blood glucose, blood pressure, blood lipids, and improving lifestyle can help slow the progress of DKD. In recent years, with the extensive research on the pathological mechanism and molecular mechanism of DKD, there are more and more new drugs based on this, such as new hypoglycemic drugs sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) inhibitors, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors with good efficacy in clinical treatment. Besides, there are some newly developed drugs, including protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors, advanced glycation end product (AGE) inhibitors, aldosterone receptor inhibitors, endothelin receptor (ETR) inhibitors, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) inhibitors, Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors and so on, which show positive effects in animal or clinical trials and bring hope for the treatment of DKD. In this review, we sort out the progress in the treatment of DKD in recent years, the research status of some emerging drugs, and the potential drugs for the treatment of DKD in the future, hoping to provide some directions for clinical treatment of DKD.

Urinary exosomal microRNA profiling in type 2 diabetes patients taking dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor compared with sulfonylurea

Background

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor has been reported to have kidney-protective benefits. To elucidate how antidiabetic agents prevent diabetic kidney disease progression, it is important to investigate their effect on the kidney environment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Herein, we investigated the expression pattern of urinary exosome-derived microRNA (miRNA) in patients taking a combination of DPP-4 inhibitor and metformin (DPP-4 inhibitor group) and compared them with patients taking a combination of sulfonylurea and metformin (sulfonylurea group).

Methods

This was a prospective study involving 57 patients with type 2 DM (DPP-4 inhibitor group, n = 34; sulfonylurea group, n = 23) and healthy volunteers (n = 7). We measured urinary exosomal miRNA using the NanoString nCounter miRNA array (NanoString Technologies) across the three groups (n = 4 per each group) and validated findings using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Twenty-one differentially expressed candidate miRNAs were identified, and six (let-7c-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-26a-3p, miR-30d, miR-205, and miR-200a) were selected for validation. Validation showed no significant difference in miRNA expression between the DPP-4 inhibitor and sulfonylurea groups. Only miR-23a-3p was significantly overexpressed in the diabetes group compared with the control group (DPP-4 inhibitor vs. control, p = 0.01; sulfonylurea vs. control, p = 0.007). This trend was consistent even after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index.

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in urine exosome miRNA expression between diabetic participants taking DPP-4 inhibitor and those taking sulfonylurea. The miR-23a levels were higher in diabetic participants than in nondiabetic controls.

Effects of DPP4 Inhibitors on Renal Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) intends to evaluate the efficacy of DPP4 Inhibitors (DPP4I) compared with placebo, other antidiabetics (or DPP4I) on renal outcomes, adverse events (AEs), and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We searched relevant scientific database for RCTs with DPP4I and prespecified renal end point. The effect size (mean difference or risk ratio) was reported with its 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs (n = 39040 participants) were included in the analysis. The rate of change in eGFR was not different in DPP4 inhibitor and control group. DPP4I use beyond 52 weeks did not worsen albuminuria progression (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.96; high quality evidence) compared to placebo. The risk of AEs within 52 weeks (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.08; moderate quality evidence), beyond 52 weeks (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.00; low quality evidence), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.12; very low quality evidence) were similar to placebo. In head-to-head comparison between two DPP4I studies, no significant differences were found between alogliptin and vildagliptin for improvement in eGFR, UACR, or AE at 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

DPP4I do not seem to provide persuasive benefit in the renal outcomes or all-cause mortality in diabetes mellitus, though there was no evidence for increased AEs.

Incretin drugs in diabetic kidney disease: biological mechanisms and clinical evidence

As the prevalence of diabetes continues to climb, the number of individuals living with diabetic complications will reach an unprecedented magnitude. The emergence of new glucose-lowering agents - sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and incretin therapies - has markedly changed the treatment landscape of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition to effectively lowering glucose, incretin drugs, which include glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R) agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors, can also reduce blood pressure, body weight, the risk of developing or worsening chronic kidney disease and/or atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, and the risk of death. Although kidney disease events have thus far been secondary outcomes in clinical trials, an ongoing phase III trial in patients with diabetic kidney disease will test the effect of a GLP1R agonist on a primary kidney disease outcome. Experimental data have identified the modulation of innate immunity and inflammation as plausible biological mechanisms underpinning the kidney-protective effects of incretin-based agents. These drugs block the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of kidney damage, including the activation of resident mononuclear phagocytes, tissue infiltration by non-resident inflammatory cells, and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules. GLP1R agonists and DPP4 inhibitors might also attenuate oxidative stress, fibrosis and cellular apoptosis in the kidney.

Changes in Albuminuria Predict Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the LEADER Trial

OBJECTIVE

A post hoc analysis to investigate the association between 1-year changes in albuminuria and subsequent risk of cardiovascular and renal events.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

LEADER was a randomized trial of liraglutide up to 1.8 mg/day versus placebo added to standard care for 3.5-5 years in 9,340 participants with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. We calculated change in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to 1 year in participants with >30% reduction (n = 2,928), 30-0% reduction (n = 1,218), or any increase in UACR (n = 4,124), irrespective of treatment. Using Cox regression, risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and a composite nephropathy outcome (from 1 year to end of trial in subgroups by baseline UACR [<30 mg/g, 30-300 mg/g, or ≥300 mg/g]) were assessed. The analysis was adjusted for treatment allocation alone as a fixed factor and for baseline variables associated with cardiovascular and renal outcomes.

RESULTS

For MACE, hazard ratios (HRs) for those with >30% and 30-0% UACR reduction were 0.82 (95% CI 0.71, 0.94; P = 0.006) and 0.99 (0.82, 1.19; P = 0.912), respectively, compared with any increase in UACR (reference). For the composite nephropathy outcome, respective HRs were 0.67 (0.49, 0.93; P = 0.02) and 0.97 (0.66, 1.43; P = 0.881). Results were independent of baseline UACR and consistent in both treatment groups. After adjustment, HRs were significant and consistent in >30% reduction subgroups with baseline micro- or macroalbuminuria.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction in albuminuria during the 1st year was associated with fewer cardiovascular and renal outcomes, independent of treatment. Albuminuria monitoring remains an important part of diabetes care, with great unused potential.

SGLT2 Inhibitors and Other Novel Therapeutics in the Management of Diabetic Kidney Disease

Over the past 40 years there has been a steady rise in the number of people with chronic kidney disease due mainly to a significant increase in the number of people with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Current treatments (blood pressure control, blood sugar control, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors) have had a significant impact on slowing progression of DKD. But the continued rise illustrates that there is a great need for new medications. Recently, a number of potentially reno-protective medicines have been studied. In this review, these new medications are discussed with respect to both their reported benefits and possible risks.

Saxagliptin and vildagliptin lowered albuminuria in patients with diabetes and hypertension independent on glycaemic control

BACKGROUND

Preclinical data illustrated that the dipeptidyl peptidase-4(DPP-4) inhibitors did lower urinary albumin excretion in diabetes-induced rats. We evaluated the effects of saxagliptin and vildagliptin on albuminuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy on top of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade therapy.

METHODS

This study included 120 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension, and prevalent albuminuria [defined as urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 30-3000mg/g creatinine] on a stable dose of olmesartan as a standard RAAS blocker for diabetic nephropathy. Patients were assigned to receive either of saxagliptin 5mg/day (n = 40), vildagliptin 100mg/day (n = 40), or traditional antidiabetic therapy as control patients (n = 40) for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Each of saxagliptin and vildagliptin significantly reduced albuminuria after 12 weeks, with mean percentage changes (%) of -57.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) -66.1 to -49.8], and -55.2% (95% CI -64.9 to -45.4); P < .001, respectively, compared with the control group. Significantly, saxagliptin shifted higher proportions of patients towards lower albuminuria categories (P < .001) compared with vildagliptin despite a similar UACR rate of changes. Results of binary logistic models confirmed that the change in UACR because saxagliptin was independent of changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c ), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), or body weight (overall regression: P = .002, R²  = 0.398) vs control. Likewise, vildagliptin reduced UACR independently on other confounders (overall regression: P = .002, R²  = 0.388). Furthermore, no significant correlation was observed between the change in UACR and changes in HbA1c, SBP or eGFR with either saxagliptin or vildagliptin (Pearson coefficients: 0.203, 0.143, -0.190; P > .05, and 0.003, 0.241, 0.019; P > .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4 inhibitors, saxagliptin, and vildagliptin, resulted in substantial reductions in albuminuria in patients with T2D and hypertension on top of RAAS blockade after short term therapy independently on glycaemic or hemodynamic changes. Saxagliptin was superior to vildagliptin in albuminuria-categorical shifting.

Renoprotection in diabetic kidney disease: can incretin-based therapies deliver?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Incretin-based therapies mimic or augment the gut-hormone glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and, due to their glucose-lowering potential and beneficial safety profile, as well as their cardiovascular safety and/or protection, are prescribed on a large scale to treat individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, whether the two drug-classes that belong to this category, respectively GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, also reduce the risk of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is at present heavily debated. This review aims to discuss the current evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence from land-mark cardiovascular safety trials, conducted in people with T2D at high-cardiovascular risk but with normal kidney function, suggest that both drug-classes have excellent renal safety profiles. In contrast to DPP-4 inhibitors, it seems that GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce albuminuria and possibly induce a reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline. However, the trials were not properly designed to test renal outcomes.

SUMMARY

A dedicated renal trial involving a GLP-1 receptor agonist has recently commenced and will answer the question whether these drugs will be effective to reduce DKD. Moreover, ongoing mechanism-of-action studies are focusing on the renal physiological effects of GLP-1, as the effects on particularly albuminuria reduction remain currently unexplained.

Renoprotective Effects of DPP-4 Inhibitors

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). DPP-4 inhibitors reduce glucose levels by inhibiting degradation of incretins. DPP-4 is a ubiquitous protein with exopeptidase activity that exists in cell membrane-bound and soluble forms. It has been shown that an increased renal DPP-4 activity is associated with the development of DKD. A series of clinical and experimental studies showed that DPP-4 inhibitors have beneficial effects on DKD, independent of their glucose-lowering abilities, which are mediated by anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidative stress properties. In this review article, we highlight the current understanding of the clinical efficacy and the mechanisms underlying renoprotection by DPP-4 inhibitors under diabetic conditions.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes at varying cardiovascular and renal risk.

DESIGN

Network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to 11 August 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Randomised controlled trials comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists with placebo, standard care, or other glucose lowering treatment in adults with type 2 diabetes with follow up of 24 weeks or longer. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequentist random effects network meta-analysis was carried out and GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) used to assess evidence certainty. Results included estimated absolute effects of treatment per 1000 patients treated for five years for patients at very low risk (no cardiovascular risk factors), low risk (three or more cardiovascular risk factors), moderate risk (cardiovascular disease), high risk (chronic kidney disease), and very high risk (cardiovascular disease and kidney disease). A guideline panel provided oversight of the systematic review.

RESULTS

764 trials including 421 346 patients proved eligible. All results refer to the addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists to existing diabetes treatment. Both classes of drugs lowered all cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and kidney failure (high certainty evidence). Notable differences were found between the two agents: SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced admission to hospital for heart failure more than GLP-1 receptor agonists, and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced non-fatal stroke more than SGLT-2 inhibitors (which appeared to have no effect). SGLT-2 inhibitors caused genital infection (high certainty), whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists might cause severe gastrointestinal events (low certainty). Low certainty evidence suggested that SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists might lower body weight. Little or no evidence was found for the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists on limb amputation, blindness, eye disease, neuropathic pain, or health related quality of life. The absolute benefits of these drugs vary substantially across patients from low to very high risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes (eg, SGLT-2 inhibitors resulted in 3 to 40 fewer deaths in 1000 patients over five years; see interactive decision support tool (https://magicevidence.org/match-it/200820dist/#!/) for all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced cardiovascular and renal outcomes, with some differences in benefits and harms. Absolute benefits are determined by individual risk profiles of patients, with clear implications for clinical practice, as reflected in the BMJ Rapid Recommendations directly informed by this systematic review.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019153180.

Cardiorenal outcomes with dapagliflozin by baseline glucose-lowering agents: Post hoc analyses from DECLARE-TIMI 58

AIM

To assess the associations between baseline glucose-lowering agents (GLAs) and cardiorenal outcomes with dapagliflozin versus placebo in the DECLARE-TIMI 58 study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DECLARE-TIMI 58 assessed the cardiorenal outcomes of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. This post hoc analysis elaborates the efficacy and safety outcomes by baseline GLA for treatment effect and GLA-based treatment interaction.

RESULTS

At baseline, 14 068 patients (82.0%) used metformin, 7322 (42.7%) sulphonylureas, 2888 (16.8%) dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, 750 (4.4%) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and 7013 (40.9%) insulin. Dapagliflozin reduced the composite of cardiovascular death (CVD) and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) versus placebo regardless of baseline GLA, with greater benefit in the small group of patients with baseline use of GLP-1 RAs (HR [95% CI] 0.37 [0.18, 0.78] vs. 0.86 [0.75, 0.98] in GLP-1 RA users vs. non-users, P_interaction = .03). The overall HR for major adverse cardiovascular events (CVD, myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.84, 1.03) with dapagliflozin versus placebo, with no interaction by baseline GLA (P_interaction > .05). The renal-specific outcome was reduced with dapagliflozin versus placebo in the overall cohort (HR [95%CI] 0.53[0.43-0.66]), with no interaction by baseline GLA (P_interaction > .05). All of these outcomes were similar in those with versus those without baseline metformin use.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of dapagliflozin on cardiorenal outcomes were generally consistent regardless of baseline GLA, with consistent benefits regardless of baseline metformin use. The potential clinical benefit of combining sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors with GLP-1 RAs, given some evidence of cardiovascular risk reduction with both classes, should be explored further.