Effect of angiotensin-II blockade on systemic and hepatic haemodynamics and on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cirrhosis with ascites

Dual angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor reduced portal pressure through peripheral vasodilatation and decreasing systemic arterial pressure in cirrhotic rats

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertension develops along with the progression of liver cirrhosis. Natriuretic peptides have been shown to reduce portal pressure but concomitantly activate the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) upregulate natriuretic peptides and avoid the adverse effects of RAAS activation. ARNIs have been shown to reduce portal pressure in rats with pre-hepatic portal hypertension, which involves relatively little liver injury. This study aimed to evaluate the relevant effects of an ARNI in rats with both liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats received common bile duct ligation to induce liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Sham-operated rats served as surgical controls. All rats were randomly allocated into three groups to receive distilled water (vehicle), LCZ696 (an ARNI), or valsartan for 4 weeks. Portal hypertension and relevant derangements were assessed after treatment.

RESULTS

Portal hypertension and hyperdynamic circulation developed in the cirrhotic rats. In the rats with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, both LCZ696 and valsartan reduced portal hypertension, mean arterial pressure, and systemic vascular resistance. The decrease in portal pressure was highly associated with the reduction in arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance. Blood flow in hepatic, splanchnic, and portosystemic collateral systems was not altered. LCZ696 did not significantly influence liver injury or plasma cytokine levels. Liver fibrosis and splanchnic angiogenesis were not affected.

CONCLUSION

ARNI treatment exerted portal pressure lowering effects via peripheral vasodilatation and decreasing systemic arterial pressure in the rats with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Caution should be taken when using ARNIs in liver cirrhosis.

Prognostic value of blood pressure and resting heart rate in patients with tricuspid regurgitation

Background

The prognostic value of blood pressure (BP) and resting heart rate (RHR) in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) patients is unknown.

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the associations of BP and RHR with all-cause mortality in patients with TR.

Methods

A total of 2,013 patients with moderate or severe TR underwent echocardiography and BP measurement. The associations of routinely measured BP and RHR with 2-year all-cause mortality were analyzed.

Results

The cohort had 45.9% male patients and a mean age of 62.5 ± 15.9 years. At the 2-year follow-up, 165 patient deaths had occurred. The risk of death decreased rapidly, negatively correlating with systolic blood pressure (SBP) up to 120 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) up to 70 mmHg. For RHR, the risk increased in direct proportion, starting at 80 beats per min. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, coronary heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and NYHA class, SBP [hazard ratio (HR):0.89; 95% CI:0.823–0.957 per 10 mmHg increase; P =0.002], DBP (HR:0.8; 95% CI:0.714–0.908 per 10 mmHg increase; P < 0.001), and RHR (HR: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.022–1.175 per 10 beats per min increase; P = 0.011) were independently associated with all-cause mortality. These associations persisted after further adjustments for echocardiographic indices, medications, serological tests, and etiologies.

Conclusion

In this cohort of patients with TR, routinely measured BP and RHR were associated with all-cause mortality independently. However, further large-scale, high-quality studies are required to validate our findings.

Portal Hypertension and Related Complications: Diagnosis and Management

Portal hypertension is a major complication of cirrhosis, and its consequences, including ascites, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome, lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. The past several decades have seen major improvements in the clinical management of complications of portal hypertension, resulting in substantial gains in patient outcomes. However, important challenges remain. This review focuses on the pathophysiology and diagnosis of portal hypertension and discusses general approaches in the management of patients with ascites as a result of portal hypertension.

The potential role of vascular alterations and subsequent impaired liver blood flow and hepatic hypoxia in the pathophysiology of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) covers a spectrum of disease ranging from steatosis to steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis, but the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain largely unknown. As there is currently no approved pharmacological therapy and the prevalence of NAFLD keeps increasing, understanding of its pathophysiology is crucial. We hypothesise that vascular alterations in early NAFLD play a role in the progression of the disease by inducing an increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and consequently relative hypoxia in the liver. Evidence of the detrimental effects of hypoxia in NAFLD has already been observed in liver surgery, where the outcomes of steatotic livers after ischaemia-reperfusion are worse than in healthy livers, and in obstructive sleep apnoea, which is an independent risk factor of NAFLD. Moreover, early histological damage in NAFLD is situated in the pericentral zone, which is also the first zone to be affected by a decreased oxygen tension because of the unique hepatic vacsular anatomy that causes the pericentral oxygen tension to be the lowest. Angiogenesis is also a characteristic of NAFLD, driven by hypoxia-induced mechanisms, as demonstrated in both animal models and in humans with NAFLD. Relative hypoxia is most probably induced by impaired blood flow to the liver, caused by increased intrahepatic vascular resistance. An increased intrahepatic vascular resistance early in the development of disease has been convincingly demonstrated in several animal models of NAFLD, whereas an increased portal pressure, a consequence of increased intrahepatic vascular resistance, has been proven in patients with NAFLD. Animal studies demonstrated a decreased intrahepatic effect of vasodilators and an increased reactivity to vasoconstrictors that results in an increased intrahepatic vascular resistance, thus the presence of a functional component. Pharmacological products that target vasoregulation can hence improve the intrahepatic vascular resistance and this might prevent or reverse progression of NAFLD, representing an important therapeutic option to study. Some of the drugs currently under evaluation in clinical trials for NASH have interesting properties related to the hepatic vasculature. Some other interesting drugs have been tested in animal models but further study in patients with NAFLD is warranted. In summary, in this paper we summarise the evidence that leads to the hypothesis that an increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and subsequent parenchymal hypoxia in early NAFLD is an important pathophysiological driving mechanism for the progression of the disease.

Pathogenesis of Hepatorenal Syndrome: Implications for Therapy

Patients with cirrhosis are prone to develop acute kidney injury (AKI) due to a number of causes, including bacterial infections with or without septic shock, hypovolemia, administration of nephrotoxic drugs, and intrinsic kidney diseases, among others. Most importantly, patients with advanced cirrhosis develop a distinctive cause of AKI, characterized by rapidly progressive glomerular filtration rate loss associated with marked disturbances in circulatory function in the absence of obvious pathologic abnormalities in the kidneys, known as hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Decreased kidney function results from intense renal vasoconstriction secondary to the complex circulatory changes of cirrhosis with splanchnic vasodilatation and effective hypovolemia. Beyond activation of vasoactive systems, factors including impaired renal blood flow autoregulation and systemic inflammation may play a role in the development of HRS. Most patients improve with albumin and vasopressors; however, the prognosis of HRS remains very poor. Novel biomarkers may be helpful in distinguishing HRS from other causes of AKI in patients with cirrhosis.

Challenges and Management of Liver Cirrhosis: Pathophysiology of Renal Dysfunction in Cirrhosis

Kidney dysfunction is a common complication of patients with advanced cirrhosis and is associated with poor prognosis. Patients with advanced cirrhosis show circulatory dysfunction characterized by reduced systemic vascular resistance due to splanchnic arterial vasodilation, which is caused by portal hypertension. The progressive reduction in systemic vascular resistance leads to effective arterial hypovolemia. In order to maintain arterial pressure within normal limits in this setting, there is activation of systemic vasoconstrictor systems, including the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic nervous system and, in late stages, nonosmotic hypersecretion of vasopressin. Although these systems have positive effects in maintaining arterial pressure, they have a negative influence on kidney function, leading to the retention of sodium and solute-free water, and in late stages of the disease an intense kidney vasoconstriction develops, leading to decrease of the glomerular filtration rate and the development of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Moreover, bacterial translocation and the existence of a systemic inflammatory state in patients with advanced cirrhosis may play a role in the impairment of circulatory function. HRS is a unique cause of kidney failure of functional origin that develops in patients with cirrhosis. However, besides HRS, patients with cirrhosis may develop kidney failure due to other causes, including bacterial infections, prerenal kidney failure, shock, use of nephrotoxic drugs or intrinsic kidney diseases. Considering the existence of circulatory dysfunction and some degree of kidney vasoconstriction, patients with advanced cirrhosis have fragile kidney function and are susceptible to easily developing kidney failure associated with other complications of the disease, particularly bacterial infections and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Diastolic dysfunction is a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and a normal creatinine

We investigated left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and its relationship with circulatory function and prognosis in cirrhosis with portal hypertension and normal creatinine. Conventional and tissue Doppler (TDI) echocardiography, systemic and hepatic hemodynamics, and the activity of endogenous vasoactive systems (AEVS) were measured prospectively in 80 patients. Plasma renin activity (PRA; >4 ng/mL/hour) was used as a surrogate of effective arterial blood volume. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Thirty-seven patients had LVDD (19 with grade 1 and 18 with grade 2). Left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial volume, AEVS, and natriuretic peptide levels were significantly greater in patients with LVDD than without LVDD. Patients with grade 2 LVDD, compared to grade 1 LVDD and without LVDD, had significantly lower mean arterial pressure and higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, E-wave transmitral/early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e' ratio), cardiopulmonary pressures, PRA, and natriuretic peptide levels. Systolic and cardiac chronotropic function were significantly lower in patients with grade 2 LVDD than without LVDD. LVDD was more frequent in patients with ascites and increased PRA than patients without ascites or with ascites but normal PRA. Fourteen patients with LVDD developed hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) type 1 on follow-up. Survival was different according to degree of LVDD (without LVDD: 95%; grade 1 LVDD: 79%; grade 2 LVDD: 39%; P < 0.001). Independent predictive factors of mortality were MELD score and E/e' ratio.

CONCLUSION

LVDD occurs simultaneously with other changes in cardiac structure and function and is associated with an impairment of effective arterial blood volume. LVDD is a sensitive marker of advanced cirrhosis, type 1 HRS development, and mortality.

Comparative randomized study on efficacy of losartan versus propranolol in lowering portal pressure in decompensated chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, with propranolol on portal hypertension in patients with decompensated chronic liver disease.

METHODS

In all, 30 patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis and large varices without any prior therapy for portal hypertension were randomized to either losartan (n = 15) or propranolol (n = 15). Clinical, biochemical and hemodynamic parameters including hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) were measured at baseline and after 4-week therapy. Patients with HVPG < 12 mmHg were regarded as responders.

RESULTS

An equal number of responders were seen in both groups (6/15, 40.0%). The reduction of WHVP and HVPG was greater in the losartan group than in the propranolol group, although no significant differences between them were found. Heart rate decreased more in the propranolol arm than in the losartan arm (P < 0.01); however, no correlation between the decrease of heart rate and the reduction of HVPG was observed. One patient in the losartan group, although a responder, had gastrointestinal bleeding 2 months after the drug administration, but the varices were small under endoscopy and did not require definitive therapy. The fall of MABP was greater with losartan, with no statistical difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The effect of losartan was comparable to propranolol in reducing portal pressure in decompensated Child-Pugh B chronic liver disease.

Aliskiren reduces portal pressure in portal hypertensive rats

BACKGROUND

Aliskiren is a direct renin inhibitor used in the treatment for arterial hypertension. It can also augment nitric oxide (NO) production, which plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension and modulation of porto-systemic collaterals. This study investigated the effects of aliskiren on portal pressure and porto-systemic collaterals of portal vein-ligated (PVL) rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sham-operated and PVL rats received aliskiren (50 mg/kg per day) or distilled water (control) treatment for 10 days. The mean arterial pressure and portal pressure were measured by catheterization of the right femoral artery and mesenteric vein, while the superior mesenteric arterial blood flow was measured by Doppler technique. The left adrenal vein and superior mesentery artery were dissected for mRNA study. The PVL rats also underwent preincubation with (i) Krebs solution (control); (ii) 10(-4) M aliskiren; or (iii) 10(-4) M aliskiren plus nonselective NO inhibitor N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine (10(-4) M), followed by the addition of arginine vasopressin (AVP) to evaluate the collateral vascular responsiveness.

RESULTS

Aliskiren had systemic arterial pressure- and portal pressure-lowering effects in PVL rats. Superior mesentery arterial resistance also decreased. The constitutive NO synthase was enhanced in the left adrenal vein and superior mesentery artery after aliskiren treatment. Aliskiren attenuated the collateral vasoconstrictive effects of AVP, but the vasodilatory effects were abolished after nonselective NO synthase inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic aliskiren use reduces portal pressure in portal hypertensive rats partly due to the modulation of splanchnic and collateral NO synthase.

Ascites

Ascites is the pathologic accumulation of fluid in the peritoneum. It is the most common complication of cirrhosis, with a prevalence of approximately 10%. Over a 10-year period, 50% of patients with previously compensated cirrhosis are expected to develop ascites. As a marker of hepatic decompensation, ascites is associated with a poor prognosis, with only a 56% survival 3 years after onset. In addition, morbidity is increased because of the risk of additional complications, such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome. Understanding the pathophysiology of ascites is essential for its proper management.

Quantitative modeling of the physiology of ascites in portal hypertension

Although the factors involved in cirrhotic ascites have been studied for a century, a number of observations are not understood, including the action of diuretics in the treatment of ascites and the ability of the plasma-ascitic albumin gradient to diagnose portal hypertension. This communication presents an explanation of ascites based solely on pathophysiological alterations within the peritoneal cavity. A quantitative model is described based on experimental vascular and intraperitoneal pressures, lymph flow, and peritoneal space compliance. The model's predictions accurately mimic clinical observations in ascites, including the magnitude and time course of changes observed following paracentesis or diuretic therapy.

The roles of angiotensin II receptors in the portosystemic collaterals of portal hypertensive and cirrhotic rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In liver cirrhosis/portal hypertension, collaterals as varices may bleed and are influenced by vasoresponsiveness. An angiotensin blockade ameliorates portal hypertension but the influence on collaterals is unknown.

METHODS

Portal hypertension and cirrhosis were induced by portal vein (PVL) and common bile duct ligation (BDL). Hemodynamics, real-time PCR of angiotensin II receptors (AT(1)R, AT(2)R) in the left adrenal vein (LAV, sham) and splenorenal shunt derived from LAV (PVL, BDL) were performed. With an in situcollateral perfusion model, angiotensin II vasoresponsiveness with different preincubations was evaluated: (1) vehicle; (2) AT(1)R blocker losartan; (3) losartan plus nonselective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor (N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine); (4) AT(2)R blocker PD123319; (5) PD123319 plus N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine; (6) N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine, and (7) losartan plus inducible NOS inhibitor aminoguanidine.

RESULTS

LAV AT(1)R and AT(2)R expression decreased in PVL and BDL rats. Losartan attenuated angiotensin II-elicited vasoconstriction but PD123319 had no effect. N(ω)-nitro-L-arginine but not aminoguanidine reversed the losartan effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin receptors are downregulated in the collateral vessel of portal hypertensive and cirrhotic rats. The AT(1)R blockade attenuates the angiotensin II vasoconstrictive effect, suggesting AT(1)R mediates collateral vasoconstriction and the influence of AT(2)R is negligible. The lack of aminoguanidine influence indicates that endothelial NOS participates in the losartan effect.

Pathophysiology of portal hypertension and its clinical links

Portal hypertension is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Intrahepatic vascular resistance due to architectural distortion and intrahepatic vasoconstriction, increased portal blood flow due to splanchnic vasodilatation, and development of collateral circulation have been considered as major factors for the development of portal hypertension. Recently, sinusoidal remodeling and angiogenesis have been focused as potential etiologic factors and various researchers have tried to improve portal hypertension by modulating these new targets. This article reviews potential new treatments in the context of portal hypertension pathophysiology concepts.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in the reduction of portal pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone antagonists [ACE inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), aldosterone antagonists (AA)] are potential therapies for portal hypertension. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of RAAS inhibitors in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction.

METHODS

We included full-text controlled trials in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The primary outcome was mean change in HVPG between treatment and control. Two independent reviewers performed trial selection and quality assessment. An individual patient meta-analysis based on the data of three studies was performed.

RESULTS

From 193 citations, 19 controlled trials (n=678) were included. When compared to placebo, ARB/ACEi resulted in significant HVPG reduction. The best quality trials compared ARB/ACEi to beta-blockers (BB). Pooled individual patient data for three of four of these trials showed that BB decreased the HVPG more than ARB/ACEi. In patients with Child Pugh A cirrhosis, the HVPG reduction with ARB/ACEi (-17%; 95% CI: -28 to -6), was similar to that of BB (-21%; 95% CI: -32 to -9). Significant variation in the comparison groups of AA trials precluded pooling. There was no difference in adverse events in any group but selected studies noted adverse hemodynamic effects in decompensated patients on ARB/ACEi.

CONCLUSIONS

ARB/ACEi reduce portal pressure in patients with Child Pugh A cirrhosis without adverse events. The efficacy and safety in this group may be secondary to a targeted effect on the local hepatic RAAS system, as compared to decompensated patients who risk hypotension and renal insufficiency due to activation of the systemic RAAS. Further studies should determine the potential of these drugs as an alternative or adjunct to BB.

Local RAS

The concept of a circulating RAS is well established and known to play an endocrine role in the regulation of fluid homeostasis (see Section 4.1, Chapter 4). However, it is more appropriate to view the RAS in the contemporary notion as an “angiotensin-generating system”, which consists of angiotensinogen, angiotensin-generating enzymes, and angiotensins, as well as their receptors. Some RASs can be termed as “complete”, having renin and ACE involved in the biosynthesis of angiotensin II peptide, i.e. in a renin and/or ACE-dependent manner which is exemplified in the circulating RAS. On the other hand, some RAS can be termed as “partial”, having alternate enzymes to renin and ACE, such as chymase and ACE2 (see Section 4.3, Chapter 4) available for the generation of angiotensin II and other bioactive angiotensin peptides in the biosynthetic cascade, i.e. in a renin and/or ACE-independent manner. Complete vs. partial RASs can be exemplified in the so-called intrinsic angiotensin-generating system or local RAS; for example, a local and functional RAS with renin and ACE-dependent but a renin-independent pathway have been indentified in the pancreas and carotid body, respectively. In the past two decades, local RASs have gained increasing recognition especially with regards to their clinical importance. Distinct from the circulating RAS, these functional local RASs exist in such diverse tissues and organs as the pancreas, liver, intestine, heart, kidney, vasculature, carotid body, and adipose, as well as the nervous, reproductive, and digestive systems. Taken into previous findings from our laboratory and others together, Table 5.1 is a summary of some recently identified local RASs in various levels of tissues and organs.

Role of angiotensin II in liver fibrosis-induced portal hypertension and therapeutic implications

Angiotensin II (AT-II) is a peptide that plays an important role in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system. Traditionally, the RAA system has been related with states of systemic hypertension and hypoperfusion as a counterbalance mechanism. Recently, AT-II has been studied for its properties in the process of fibrosis in several organs, especially in the liver. AT-II is capable to stimulate the activated hepatic stellate cells, which increase expression of profibrogenic molecules like tumor growth factor-beta, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and collagen I, among others. At the same time, AT-II is implied in the hemodynamic balance of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Due to its profibrogenic and vasoactive properties, blockade of AT-II actions constitutes an important therapeutic target to inhibit fibrotic processes and reduction of risk of complications of portal hypertension as well. Some drugs like angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or the angiotensin II receptor blockers have been studied as alternatives for the treatment of patients with cirrhosis with promising results. Nonetheless, additional research is required in order to consider these drugs as a part of the integral treatment of the patient with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Clinical Trial: High-dose furosemide plus small-volume hypertonic saline solutions vs. repeated paracentesis as treatment of refractory ascites

BACKGROUND

In patients with cirrhosis, ascites is defined as refractory when it cannot be mobilized or recurs early in standard diuretic therapy.

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous high-dose furosemide + hypertonic saline solutions (HSS) with repeated paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-four subjects (59/25 M/F) with cirrhosis, mostly of viral aetiology, admitted for refractory ascites, were randomly assigned to receive furosemide (250-1000 mg/bid i.v.) plus HSS (150 mL H(2)O with NaCl 1.4-4.6% or 239-187 mEq/L) (60 patients, Group A) or to repeated paracentesis and a standard diuretic schedule (24 patients, Group B).

RESULTS

During hospitalization, Group A patients had more diuresis (1605 +/- 131 mL vs. 532 +/- 124 mL than Group B patients; P < 0.001) and a greater loss of weight at discharge (-8.8 +/- 4.8 kg vs. -4.5 +/- 3.8 kg, P < 0.00). Control of ascites, pleural effusions and/or leg oedema was deemed significantly better in Group A.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized pilot study suggests that HHS plus high-dose furosemide is a safe and effective alternative to repeated paracentesis when treating hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. Larger studies will be needed to evaluate long-term outcomes such as readmission and mortality.

Sodium Retention in Heart Failure and Cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis and heart failure (HF) share the pathophysiology of decreased effective arterial blood volume because of splanchnic vasodilatation in cirrhosis and decreased cardiac output in HF, with resultant stimulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Hyperaldosteronism plays a major role in the pathogenesis of ascites and contributes to resistance to loop diuretics. Therefore, the use of high doses of aldosterone antagonist (spironolactone up to 400 mg/day) is the main therapy to produce a negative sodium balance in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Hyperaldosteronism also has increasingly been recognized as a risk factor for myocardial and vascular fibrosis. Therefore, low-dose aldosterone antagonists are being used in patients with HF for cardioprotective action. However, the doses (25 to 50 mg/day) at which they are being used in cardiac patients as reported in the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study are not natriuretic. It is likely, therefore, that the mortality benefit relates primarily from their effect on cardiac and vascular fibrosis. Resistance to commonly used loop diuretics is frequently present in patients with advanced HF. In patients with decompensated HF with volume overload who are loop diuretic resistant, ultrafiltration may be the only available option. This is, however, an invasive procedure. For these patients, natriuretic doses of aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone >50 mg/day) may be a potential option. The competitive natriuretic response of aldosterone antagonists is related to activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: the higher the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activity, the higher the dose of aldosterone antagonist required to produce natriuresis. This article will discuss the potential use of natriuretic doses of aldosterone antagonists in patients with HF, including the potential side effect of hyperkalemia.

Angiotensin receptor blockers are superior to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the suppression of hepatic fibrosis in a bile duct-ligated rat model

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin blockade such as with an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) has antifibrotic properties. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the antifibrotic effect between ARBs and ACEIs.

METHODS

Common bile duct-ligated (BDL) adult Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to five groups (each group, n = 8) as follows: G1, BDL without drug; G2, BDL + captopril 100 mg/kg per day; G3, BDL + ramipril 10 mg/kg per day; G4, BDL + losartan 10 mg/kg per day; G5, BDL + irbesartan 15 mg/kg per day. Four weeks post-BDL, hepatic fibrosis was analyzed histomorphologically using Batts and Ludwig scores. alpha-Smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) expression by immunohistochemical staining, hydroxyproline contents of liver tissue by spectrophotometry, and angiotensin receptor, collagen, procollagen, and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) expressions were evaluated by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Angiotensin receptor expression was also determined by Western blotting.

RESULTS

Batts and Ludwig scores were 3.8, 2.6, 2.4, 1.8, and 1.6 in G1, G2, G3, G4, and G5, respectively. Histologically, ARB groups (G4, G5) showed significant suppression of hepatic fibrosis compared with ACEI groups or the control. Expressions of alpha-SMA (%) and the content of hydroxyproline (microg liver tissue) were significantly lower in ARB groups (G4, G5) than in ACEI groups (G2, G3) (P < 0.05). Also, ARB reduced the expression of angiotensin receptor, collagen, procollagen, and TGF-beta1 compared with ACEI. Western blot analysis showed that the expression of angiotensin receptor was inhibited in both ARB and ACEI groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ARB and ACEI attenuate hepatic fibrosis through inhibiting hepatic stellate cell activation, and the inhibitory effect of ARBs on hepatic fibrosis is superior to that of ACEIs in the BDL rat model.

Expression of angiotensin II receptor type 1 is reduced in advanced rat liver fibrosis

In this study, we assessed the hypothesis that the expression of angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AGTR1) in liver tissue changes with increasing fibrosis, which would influence the antifibrotic efficacy of AGTR1 blockers. Rats were treated with candesartancilexetil (CAN) initiated 8 or 15 days after bile duct occlusion (BDO). Four weeks after BDO, AGTR1 mRNA and protein were decreased compared to those in sham-operated animals depending on the amount of fibrosis. Starting CAN early, but not late, reduced mRNA of profibrotic TGF-beta, MMP2, and Smad2. However, CAN had no significant effect on collagen I, fibrosis, or intrahepatic resistance. In conclusion, progression of liver fibrosis reduces AGTR1 expression. Therefore, in our model, antifibrotic effects of CAN are insufficient to improve fibrosis or intrahepatic resistance. However, if AGTR1 blockade is started early, a decrease in essential profibrotic molecules is achieved. Hence, early initiation of therapy with AGTR1 blockers may be crucial for the prevention of cirrhosis.

Blockade of renin-angiotensin system in antifibrotic therapy

Recent studies have shown that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a pivotal role in liver fibrosis. An intrahepatic RAS is expressed in chronically damaged livers, and angiotensin-II (AT-II) reportedly stimulates contraction and proliferation of the activated hepatic stellate cells (Ac-HSC), and increases the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) expression through angiotensin type-I receptors (AT1-R). Some studies have demonstrated that the clinically used angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ACE-I), and AT1-R blockers (ARB) significantly attenuated experimental liver fibrosis along with suppression of the Ac-HSC and hepatic TGF-beta expression. Angiotensin-II also stimulates the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) in a dose- and time-dependent manner via protein kinase-C as an intracellular signaling cascade in the Ac-HSC, and these effects are completely suppressed by ARB. Combination treatment with low-dose interferon (IFN) and ACE-I exerts a stronger inhibitory effect than either single agent on its own. In humans it has been reported that ARB markedly improved the liver fibrosis score and TGF-beta expression in patients with chronic hepatitis C and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Serum fibrosis markers also significantly improved by treatment with low-dose IFN and ACE-I in patients with chronic hepatitis C, refractory to IFN monotherapy. Collectively, these data suggest that the interaction between AT-II and AT1-R plays a pivotal role in liver fibrosis development. Because both ACE-I and ARB are widely used in clinical practice without serious side-effects, these drugs in combination with IFN may provide a new strategy for antifibrosis therapy.

AT1 receptor antagonist Candesartan in selected cirrhotic patients: effect on portal pressure and liver fibrosis markers

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in hepatic fibrogenesis and in portal hypertension. To examine the long-term effects of Candesartan cilexetil, an angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker, on portal-systemic haemodynamics and on liver fibrosis.

METHODS

Forty-seven compensated Child A and Child B (8) cirrhotic patients were randomly assigned to receive Candesartan cilexetil, 8 mg/d (N.24) and no treatment (N.23) for 1 year. Portal-systemic haemodynamic parameters, serological levels of procollagen (PIIINP), hyaluronic acid (HA) and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFbeta1) were assessed at baseline and after 12 months.

RESULTS

No patients discontinued or decreased the drug. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) decreased significantly in treated patients (-8.4%+/-2.4) with a reduction >20% in 25% of cases vs+5.6%+/-2.9 in the untreated group. HA plasma levels decreased significantly in Candesartan treated patients in whom HVPG diminished and rose in untreated patients in whom HVPG increased.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected cirrhotic patients, pharmacological inhibition of the AT1 receptor is well tolerated and induced a mild reduction of portal pressure. This haemodynamic effect might be related to liver fibrogenesis activity.

The future treatment of portal hypertension

Increased understanding of the hyperdynamic circulation syndrome has resulted in novel therapeutic approaches, some of which have already reached clinical practice. Central to the hyperdynamic circulation syndrome is an imbalance between the increase in different vasodilators (foremost among which is nitric oxide) and the compensatory increase in vasoconstrictors--usually accompanied by a blunted response. This chapter discusses the role of endothelin in the pathogenesis of the syndrome and in future treatment approaches. A relatively new area of research in this field is the role of infection and inflammation in the initiation and maintenance of the hyperdynamic circulation syndrome. The use of antibiotics in the setting of acute variceal bleeding is standard practice. Studies have suggested that chronic manipulation of the intestinal flora could have beneficial effects in the treatment of portal hypertension. The bile salts are another novel and interesting target. Although their vasoactive properties have been known for some time, recent data demonstrate that their effects could be central in the pathogenesis of the hyperdynamic circulation syndrome, and that manipulation of the composition of the bile acid pool could be a therapeutic approach to portal hypertension. Finally, hypoxia and angiogenesis play a role in the development of portal hypertension and the formation of collaterals. This role needs to be further defined but it appears likely that this phenomenon is yet another target for therapeutic intervention.

Resolving fibrosis in the diseased liver: translating the scientific promise to the clinic

Liver fibrosis and its end-stage disease cirrhosis are a major cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the world. Fibrosis is a response to chronic liver injury or infection that if unabated leads to the replacement of normal functional liver tissue with scar tissue. Basic research over the past decade has generated a vastly improved knowledge of the cell and molecular biology of liver fibrosis that provides a framework on which to design and develop therapeutics. The field has also witnessed a genuine paradigm shift from the original dogma that liver fibrosis is only ever a progressive process, to the new understanding that liver fibrosis even in an advanced stage can be reversible. There is therefore renewed optimism that liver fibrosis may be cured providing that we develop therapies that halt the fibrogenic process and encourage the natural regenerative properties of the liver. The key to the design of effective therapeutics will be to exploit the ongoing discoveries pertaining to the biology and function of fibrogenic hepatic myofibroblasts and their interplay with other liver cells and with the hepatic extracellular matrix. This review provides a critique of those discoveries in basic research that provide the most promise for translation to the clinic. In addition, we review the latest developments in the search for minimal invasive diagnostic tests for fibrosis that will be essential for determining the efficacy of anti-fibrotic drugs.

Management of cirrhotic ascites: physiological basis of diuretic action

Ascites is a significant complication of cirrhosis that occurs in approximately 50% of patients. The mortality rate is high in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Conventional interventions rest with dietary sodium restriction, diuretic use, large-volume paracentesis, peritoneovenous shunts and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. The mainstay of therapy, however, is the judicious use of diuretics. This article reviews the physiological basis of diuretic use in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, as well as recent concepts on the pathogenesis of ascites formation. Through a better understanding of the pathophysiology of ascites formation and the mechanism of action of diuretics, improved extracellular fluid balance can be achieved in these patients.

Portal hypertension: from pathophysiology to clinical practice

Portal hypertension (PHT) is responsible for the more severe and often lethal complications of cirrhosis such as bleeding oesophageal varices, ascites, renal dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy. Because of the combined impact of these complications, PHT remains the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Over the years, it has become clear that a decrease in portal pressure is not only protective against the risk of variceal (re)bleeding but is also associated with a lower long-term risk of developing complications and an improved long-term survival. A milestone in therapy was the introduction of non-selective beta-blockers for the prevention of bleeding and rebleeding of gastro-esophageal varices. However, in practice, less than half the patients under beta-blockade are protected from these risks, supporting the overall demand for innovation and expansion of our therapeutic armamentarium. Recent advances in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of cirrhotic PHT have directed future therapy towards the increased intrahepatic vascular resistance, which, in part, is determined by an increased hepatic vascular tone. This increased vasculogenic component provides the rationale for the potential use of therapies aimed at increasing intrahepatic vasorelaxing capacity via gene therapy, liver-selective nitric oxide donors and statines on the one hand, and at antagonizing excessive intrahepatic vasoconstrictor force through the use of endothelin antagonists, angiotensin blockers, alpha(1) adrenergic antagonists or combined alpha(1)- and non-selective beta-blockers or somatostatin analogues on the other. The focus of this review is to give an update on the pathophysiology of PHT in order to elucidate these potential novel strategies subsequently.

Chronic administration of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, is not effective in reducing portal pressure in patients with preascitic cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Plasma angiotensin II (ANG II) concentrations are elevated in cirrhosis and have been implicated as a cause of portal hypertension. We aimed to study both the systemic and portal hemodynamics, and tolerability after chronic administration of losartan, an ANG II receptor antagonist.

METHODS

Twelve patients with preascitic cirrhosis were studied: mean age of 53.8 +/- 3.3 yr; average Child-Pugh score of 5.8 +/- 0.3; alcohol etiology (5), hepatitis B/C (1/3), primary biliary cirrhosis (3). No patients were on diuretics or vasoactive medication. Hemodynamic measurements were performed at baseline and 4 weeks after daily administration of 25 mg losartan.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in the hepatic venous pressure gradient (15.4 +/- 1.5 to 13.6 +/- 1.6 mmHg, -11.7%, p = NS), despite a significant reduction in the wedge hepatic venous pressure (20.3 +/- 1.8 to 17.3 +/- 1.8 mmHg, -14.8%, p < 0.05). Cardiac output, hepatic blood flow, systemic vascular resistance, creatinine clearance, and natriuresis were unaffected. The plasma renin activity increased significantly from 2.7 +/- 0.4 to 5.2 +/- 1.1 ng/ml/h (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the mean arterial pressure from 96.9 +/- 3.3 to 89.3 +/- 3.5 mmHg, -7.8 +/- 3.0% (p = 0.02), with 1 patient experiencing symptomatic hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic administration of low-dose losartan does not lead to a significant reduction in the portal pressure gradient. Losartan is unlikely to be useful in the management of patients with early cirrhosis, who are at risk of variceal bleeding.

Acute haemodynamic effects of losartan in anaesthetized cirrhotic rats

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertension in cirrhosis is the result of increased intrahepatic vascular resistance to portal outflow as well as increased portal tributary blood flow. The angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan has been suggested as a portal pressure-lowering drug in patients with cirrhosis.

AIM

To investigate the systemic and splanchnic haemodynamic effects of different doses of losartan.

METHODS

In 35 anaesthetized rats with secondary biliary cirrhosis, 3, 10 or 30 mg of losartan kg(-1) or solvent were administered intravenously. Ten sham-operated rats served as controls. Mean arterial pressure and portal pressure were measured by catheters in the femoral artery or portal vein. Systemic and splanchnic haemodynamics and mesenterico-systemic shunt rate were determined by the coloured microsphere method.

RESULTS

Losartan reduced portal pressure (sham: 9.1 +/- 0.4. cirrhosis: 19.3 +/- 1.1, after 3 mg kg(-1) of losartan 16.4 +/- 0.4, after 10 mg kg(-1) of losartan 15.6 +/- 0.6, after 30 mg kg(-1) of losartan 14.9 +/- 0.6 mmHg) without reducing portal sinusoidal resistance. However, in cirrhotic rats it reduced portal tributary blood flow (sham: 4.3 +/- 0.6. cirrhosis: 8.6 +/- 1.4, after 3 mg kg(-1) of losartan 3.8 +/- 0.7, after 10 mg kg(-1) of losartan 4.7 +/- 0.5, after 30 mg kg(-1) of losartan 5.9 +/- 0.9 mmHg). This was owing either to an increase in splanchnic vascular resistance at the 3 mg kg(-1) dose or to a reduction in the splanchnic perfusion-pressure gradient secondary to a reduction in mean arterial pressure at the 10 and 30 mg kg(-1) doses (mean arterial pressure: sham: 109.7 +/- 4.8. cirrhosis: 109.4 +/- 2.8, after 3 mg kg(-1) of losartan 99.7 +/- 2.9, after 10 mg kg(-1) of losartan 89.9 +/- 3.4, after 30 mg kg(-1) of losartan 81.0 +/- 2.9 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Low doses of losartan reduce portal hypertension by an increase in splanchnic vascular resistance without hypotensive side-effects on arterial pressure.

Activated human hepatic stellate cells express the renin-angiotensin system and synthesize angiotensin II

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in hepatic fibrogenesis. In other organs, myofibroblasts accumulated in damaged tissues generate angiotensin II, which promotes inflammation and extracellular matrix synthesis. It is unknown whether myofibroblastic hepatic stellate cells, the main hepatic fibrogenic cell type, express the renin-angiotensin system and synthesize angiotensin II. The aim of this study was to investigate whether quiescent and activated human hepatic stellate cells contain the components of the renin-angiotensin system and synthesize angiotensin II.

METHODS

Hepatic stellate cells were freshly isolated from normal human livers (quiescent hepatic stellate cells) and from human cirrhotic livers (in vivo activated hepatic stellate cells). Culture-activated hepatic stellate cells were used after a second passage of quiescent hepatic stellate cells. Angiotensinogen, renin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme were assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Angiotensin II production was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Quiescent hepatic stellate cells barely express the renin-angiotensin system components--angiotensinogen, renin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme--and do not secrete angiotensin II. In contrast, both in vivo activated hepatic stellate cells and culture-activated hepatic stellate cells highly express active renin and angiotensin-converting enzyme and secrete angiotensin II to the culture media. Mature angiotensin II protein is also detected in the cytoplasm of in vivo activated and culture-activated hepatic stellate cells. Growth factors (platelet-derived growth factor and epidermal growth factor) and vasoconstrictor substances (endothelin-1 and thrombin) stimulate angiotensin II synthesis, whereas transforming growth factor-beta and proinflammatory cytokines have no effect. Vasodilator substances markedly attenuate the effect of endothelin-1.

CONCLUSIONS

After activation, human hepatic stellate cells express the components of the renin-angiotensin system and synthesize angiotensin II. These results suggest that locally generated angiotensin II could participate in tissue remodeling in the human liver.

Current pharmacotherapy in the management of cirrhosis: focus on the hyperdynamic circulation

Many major complications of hepatic cirrhosis relate to the development of a characteristic hyperdynamic circulatory state in these patients, irrespective of the underlying disease aetiology. Vasodilatation of the systemic and splanchnic circulations leads to a reduced total systemic vascular resistance, increased cardiac output and intense activation of neurohumoral vasoconstrictor systems including the sympathetic nervous system, renin-angiotensin system and vasopressin. Vasoconstriction of the renal and hepatic circulations contributes to the development of renal failure and portal hypertension, respectively. Current treatments that focus on amelioration of these circulatory derangements offer much promise, however, they are often limited by side effects in these patients.

Effects of long-term Irbesartan in reducing portal pressure in cirrhotic patients: comparison with propranolol in a randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The role of angiotensin II (AT-II) type I receptor antagonists in the treatment of portal hypertension remains controversial. We tested the efficacy of Irbesartan (Irb) vs. Propranolol (Pro) in reducing portal pressure and evaluated its systemic haemodynamic effects.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive either Irb 300 mg/day (19 patients) or Pro 40-120 mg/day (15 patients) for 2 months.

RESULTS

Irb was discontinued in five patients (26%). No major side effect occurred in the Pro group. On an average, the portal pressure gradient decreased significantly more in the Pro than in the Irb group (median -19.5%, range -11/-31% vs. -4.8%, +2.5/-10%, P<0.001). A clinically significant decrease was seen in one (7%) of the patients given Irb vs. five (33%) given Pro (P<0.02). The fall in mean arterial pressure was significantly higher with Irb than with Pro (median -29%, range -15/-45% vs. -4.9%, +8/-19%, P<0.02). Irb significantly modified the blood creatinine clearance (median -29 ml/m, range +9/-61 ml/m, -30, -24/-35% P<0.0001 vs. basal).

CONCLUSIONS

Irb offers no advantage over Pro in the control of portal hypertension. Moreover, its therapeutic profile is limited by important side effects.

Nitric oxide mediates the reduced vasoconstrictor response to angiotensin II in patients with preascitic cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Altered vascular responses to vasopressor agents contribute to the pathogenesis of the circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis. This study aims to assess the role of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) in the reduced vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II (ANG-II) in eight patients with preascitic cirrhosis compared with eight age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

METHODS

Forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to sub-systemic, locally-active intra-brachial infusions of ANG-II were measured using venous occlusion plethysmography before and during the application of an 'NO-clamp', a balanced co-infusion of L-N(G)-monomethyl-arginine (a selective NO synthase inhibitor) and sodium nitroprusside (an exogenous NO donor) to block endogenous NO production and restore normal NO-mediated basal blood flow, respectively.

RESULTS

Before applying the 'NO-clamp', ANG-II caused dose-dependent reductions of FBF in both groups (P<0.001) that were significantly attenuated in the cirrhotic patients (P=0.012). In the presence of the 'NO-clamp', the ANG-II-mediated vasoconstriction was enhanced in cirrhotic patients (P<0.01), unchanged in controls, and now similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that vasoconstriction to ANG-II is reduced in patients with preascitic cirrhosis, and suggests that this is principally due to enhanced NO generation mediated by ANG-II.

Hemodynamic and antifibrotic effects of losartan in rats with liver fibrosis and/or portal hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To assess the effects of the early and chronic administration of losartan--a specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist--in the prevention of hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension.

METHODS/RESULTS

(1) In CCl(4) rats, losartan at 5 and 10 mg/kg per day significantly decreased portal pressure (-11, -18%, respectively), splenorenal shunt blood flow (-60, -80%) and liver fibrosis (liver hydroxyproline and area of fibrosis) without significant changes in mortality and mean arterial pressure (MAP). (2) In bile duct ligated (BDL) rats, losartan at 5 mg/kg per day significantly decreased portal pressure (-14%), splenorenal shunt blood flow (-70%) and liver fibrosis. Losartan at 10 mg/kg per day significantly worsened liver and renal functions, mortality and liver fibrosis, without significant changes in portal pressure and splenorenal shunt blood flow. Losartan at 5 and 10 mg/kg per day significantly decreased MAP (-24, -30%). (3) In portal vein ligated (PVL) rats, losartan significantly decreased MAP (-12%) but did not change portal pressure or splenorenal shunt blood flow.

CONCLUSIONS

In BDL and CCl(4) rats, losartan has beneficial effects on splanchnic hemodynamics and liver fibrosis. Losartan might decrease hepatic resistances in fibrotic liver. Losartan decreased MAP except in CCl(4) rats. Higher dosage of losartan had deleterious effects in BDL rats.

Plasma endothelin-1 concentrations in children with cirrhosis and their relationship to renal function and the severity of portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide involved in the pathogenesis of several disorders. Endothelin-1 concentrations are increased in adult patients with cirrhosis. However, little is known about ET-1 concentrations in children with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Radioimmune assay was used to measure plasma ET-1 concentrations in 19 children with cirrhosis (8 patients with ascites, and 11 without ascites), and 11 age- and sex-matched healthy children. The plasma ET-1 concentrations were correlated with the mean blood pressure, creatinine clearance, and severity of portal hypertension, as measured by portal flow volume and portal flow velocity.

RESULTS

Patients with cirrhosis and ascites had increased plasma ET-1 concentrations compared with patients who did not have ascites (6.8 pg/mL +/- 0.62 pg/mL vs. 4.6 pg/mL +/- 0.35 pg/mL; mean +/- SEM; < 0.01) and controls (3.6 pg/mL +/- 0.27 pg/mL; mean +/- SEM; < 0.0005). Plasma ET-1 concentrations were higher in patients with cirrhosis who did not have ascites compared with controls ( < 0.005). No significant differences were observed between concentrations of the patients with cholestasis and those without cholestasis (5.4 pg/mL +/- 0.52 pg/mL vs. 5.2 +/- 0.32 pg/mL; mean +/- SEM; = 0.1). Plasma ET-1 concentrations correlated positively with the mean blood pressure ( = 0.58; < 0.05) and negatively with renal function, as measured by creatinine clearance ( = -0.7; <0.005). However, no correlation was detected between ET-1 concentrations and portal flow volume ( = -0.02; = 0.4) or portal flow velocity ( = -0.16; = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma ET-1 concentrations are increased in children with cirrhosis, with or without ascites, compared with controls. Patients with cirrhosis and ascites have increased ET-1 concentrations compared with those without ascites. The degree of increase does not relate to the severity of portal hypertension. This increase tends to maintain systemic blood pressure but is associated with a decrease in renal function.

Inhibition of renin-angiotensin system attenuates liver enzyme-altered preneoplastic lesions and fibrosis development in rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It is suggested that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in tumor development and fibrogenesis. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of RAS inhibition on the liver enzyme-altered preneoplastic lesions and fibrosis development.

METHODS

The effects of the clinically used angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), perindopril (PE), on two different rat model of liver carcinogenesis models induced separately by diethylnitrosamine (DEN) and a choline-deficient L-amino acid-defined (CDAA) diet were studied. This CDAA model was also used to elucidate the effect of PE on liver fibrosis development.

RESULTS

The immunohistochemical evaluation revealed that the glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT)-positive preneoplastic foci significantly decreased in the livers of the PE-treated groups. In CDAA-induced liver fibrosis model, PE revealed a marked inhibitory effect of liver fibrosis development. The hepatic hydroxyproline, serum fibrosis markers, alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) immunopositive cells in number, and alpha-(III) pro-collagen mRNA expression were significantly suppressed by PE treatment. These inhibitory effects of PE were achieved even at a clinically comparable dose (2 mg/kg per day).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that the RAS is involved in liver carcinogenesis and fibrosis development.

Effect of 1-week losartan administration on bile duct-ligated cirrhotic rats with portal hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Nitric oxide and angiotensin play important roles in the pathogenesis of the hemodynamic derangement in cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The hemodynamic effects of losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension are conflicting. This study was undertaken to explore the possible mechanism of action of losartan on portal hypertension in cirrhotic rats produced by bile duct ligation (CBL).

METHODS

Three weeks after surgery, CBL and sham-operated rats randomly received vehicle or losartan (3 mg/kg per 12 h by gavage) for 1 week. Hemodynamic values, hormone levels, and aortic eNOS protein expression were measured after drug administration.

RESULTS

In CBL rats, 1-week losartan treatment decreased portal pressure and ameliorated hyperdynamic circulation associated with a blunted vascular response to N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester infusion. The hematocrit increased and the plasma volume, aldosterone, plasma renin activity, norepinephrine, and nitrate and nitrite levels decreased. The eNOS protein expression was reduced in CBL rats receiving losartan compared with those receiving vehicle.

CONCLUSIONS

One-week losartan treatment in CBL rats decreased portal pressure and ameliorated hyperdynamic circulation. In addition to the suppression of renin-angiotensin axis, the reduced aortic eNOS protein expression may play a partial role for the mechanism of action of losartan in CBL rats.

Efficacy of irbesartan, a receptor selective antagonist of angiotensin II, in reducing portal hypertension

The use of angiotensin II antagonists in the treatment of portal hypertension remains controversial. Our aims were to assess the effect of Irbesartan on portal pressure and to evaluate its safety in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Twenty-five cirrhotic patients were treated in a pilot study with Irbesartan 300 mg orally once daily for 60 days. Hemodynamic evaluations and biochemical tests were performed before therapy and after two months of treatment. Three patients (12%) discontinued treatment for symptomatic arterial hypotension (mean arterial pressure -26.% +/- 3.1 versus basal). In the 18 responders, the hepatic venous pressure gradient diminished by a mean of 18.1% +/- 10.5 from baseline (p = 0.02); the gradient decreased by 20% or more in only 5 patients (23%). The mean arterial pressure decreased significantly during therapy (92 +/- 7 vs 109 +/- 25 mm Hg, P < 0.001). In conclusions, Irbesartan induced a marginal reduction in portal pressure and its safety was limited by the pronounced effects on arterial pressure.

Randomized comparison of long-term losartan versus propranolol in lowering portal pressure in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It has been suggested that losartan, an angiotensin II (A-II) type 1 receptor blocker, may have a pronounced portal pressure reducing effect, far greater than that of propranolol. This randomized controlled trial compared the hemodynamic and renal effects of continued 6-week administration of losartan (n = 25) vs. propranolol (n = 15) in portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis treated endoscopically after a variceal bleeding episode.

METHODS

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), systemic hemodynamics, renal function, and vasoactive factors were measured before and at 6 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Losartan did not reduce HVPG (-2% +/- 12%, NS) but significantly decreased mean arterial pressure (MAP, -8% +/- 10%, P = 0.001). On the contrary, propranolol significantly reduced HVPG (-10% +/- 11%, P = 0.003) and cardiac output (-16% +/- 12%, P = 0.001) but did not modify MAP (2.5% +/- 10%, NS). Losartan increased A-II levels, reduced aldosterone, and decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Child B patients. Propranolol did not modify renal function. Adverse events related to therapy were mild and similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike propranolol, long-term losartan administration does not significantly reduce HVPG in patients with cirrhosis treated after a variceal bleeding episode, and it caused hypotension and reduced GFR in patients with moderate liver failure. Therefore, losartan is not an alternative to propranolol in preventing variceal rebleeding.

Hemodynamic effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists have been proposed as new drugs for portal hypertension. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study aimed to assess the effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan on portal and systemic hemodynamics and renal function in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension received 150 mg/d irbesartan or placebo for 1 week. Systemic hemodynamics, kidney and liver function parameters were recorded regularly; hepatic venous pressure gradient and plasma renin were assessed on days 0 and 7.

RESULTS

Irbesartan reduced the hepatic venous pressure gradient by 12.2% +/- 6.6% (P < 0.05) and mean arterial pressure by 5.3% +/- 4.0% in 13 of 18 verum patients. In 4 (22%) verum patients, arterial hypotension, accompanied by significant renal impairment, required withdrawal of irbesartan. In these patients, baseline plasma renin (P < 0.002) and cystatin C (P < 0.001) levels were higher, and creatinine clearance (P < 0.02), serum sodium (P < 0.01), and albumin (P < 0.05) were lower than in patients who tolerated irbesartan. Four of five patients with baseline renin >900 microU/mL developed treatment-limiting hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

The angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan is not advisable in patients with advanced cirrhosis and high plasma renin because it may induce arterial hypotension and only moderately reduces portal pressure.

Angiotensin II induces contraction and proliferation of human hepatic stellate cells

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Circulating levels of angiotensin II (ANGII), a powerful vasoconstrictor factor, are frequently increased in chronic liver diseases. In these conditions, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) proliferate and acquire contractile properties. This study investigated the presence of receptors for ANGII and the effects of ANGII in human HSCs activated in culture.

METHODS

The presence of ANGII receptors was assessed by binding studies. The effects of ANGII on intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)), cell contraction, and cell proliferation were also assessed.

RESULTS

Binding studies showed the presence of ANGII receptors of the AT1 subtype. ANGII elicited a marked dose-dependent increase in [Ca(2+)](i) and cell contraction. Moreover, ANGII stimulated DNA synthesis and increased cell number. All these effects were totally blocked by losartan and reduced by nitric oxide donors or prostaglandin E(2). The effects of ANGII were barely detectable in quiescent cells (2 days in culture), suggesting that phenotypic transformation of HSCs is associated with a marked increase in the effects of ANGII.

CONCLUSIONS

ANGII induces contraction and is mitogenic for human-activated HSCs by acting through AT1 receptors. These results suggest that activated HSCs are targets of the vasoconstrictor action of ANGII in the intrahepatic circulation.

Mechanisms of ascites formation

Ascites is the most common complication of cirrhosis. It is associated with profound changes in the splanchnic and systemic circulation and with renal abnormalities. The development of ascites is related to the existence of severe sinusoidal portal hypertension that causes marked splanchnic arterial vasodilation and a forward increase in the splanchnic production of lymph. Splanchnic arterial vasodilation also produces arterial vascular underfilling, arterial hypotension, compensatory activation of the RAAS, SNS, and AVP, and a continuous sodium and water retention, leading to ascites formation. Now, therefore, the splanchnic arterial circulation, rather than the venous portal system, is believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of ascites formation.

Complications of cirrhosis. I. Portal hypertension

Increased resistance to portal blood flow is the primary factor in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension, and is mainly determined by the morphological changes occurring in chronic liver diseases. This is aggravated by a dynamic component, due to the active-reversible- contraction of different elements of the porto-hepatic bed. A decreased synthesis of NO in the intrahepatic circulation is the main determinant of this dynamic component. This provides a rationale for the use of vasodilators to reduce intrahepatic resistance and portal pressure. Another factor contributing to aggravate the portal hypertension is a significant increase in portal blood flow, caused by arteriolar splanchnic vasodilation and hyperkinetic circulation. Splanchnic arteriolar vasodilation is a multifactorial phenomenon, which may involve local (endothelial) mechanisms as well as neurogenic and humoral pathways. Most pharmacological treatments have been aimed at correcting the increased portal blood inflow by the use of splanchnic vasoconstrictors, such as beta-blockers, vasopressin derivatives and somatostatin. Several studies have demonstrated that changes in the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) during maintenance therapy are useful to identify those patients who are going to have a variceal bleeding or rebleeding. The wide individual variation in the HVPG response to pharmacological treatment makes it desirable to schedule follow-up measurements of HVPG during pharmacological therapy. A priority for research in the forthcoming years is to develop accurate non-invasive methods to assess prognosis, which can be used to substitute or as surrogate indicators of the HVPG response. In the clinical management of portal hypertension, beta-blockers are at present the only accepted treatment for the prevention of variceal bleeding. Whether the association of isosorbide-5-mononitrate will improve the high efficacy of beta-blockers is questionable. The efficacy of more aggressive techniques, such as endoscopic band ligation, should be further tested against beta-blockers in patients with a high risk of bleeding. In the treatment of acute variceal bleeding, administration of somatostatin or terlipressin is an established therapy. It may be used alone or, preferably, as an initial treatment before sclerotherapy or endoscopic band ligation. No more than two sessions of endoscopic treatment should be used to control the bleeding. If the bleeding is not easily controlled, other alternatives such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) or derivative surgery should be considered, the former being the best in patients with poor liver function. Recent studies suggest that early measurement of HVPG during variceal bleeding may be used as a guide for therapeutic decisions in the treatment of patients with acute variceal bleeding. Those patients with a high HVPG have a high risk of poor evolution, and may be candidates for more intensive and aggressive therapy, such as surgery or TIPS. Those with lower HVPG have a very high probability of an uneventful evolution, and may thus be managed more conservatively using medical and endoscopic treatments. Pharmacological agents (propranolol or nadolol), endoscopic treatment (preferably banding ligation) or surgery can be used to prevent rebleeding. A pending task for the new millennium is to assess whether the early treatment of asymptomatic, compensated cirrhotic patients with portal pressure reducing agents can prevent the development of esophageal varices and of other complications of portal hypertension.