1
|
Schmeising-Barnes N, Waller J, Marlow LAV. Intention to have blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening: a cross-sectional population-based survey in England. Br J Cancer 2024:10.1038/s41416-024-02822-4. [PMID: 39191895 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02822-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials assessing the clinical utility of blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are underway. Understanding public attitudes towards MCED screening is essential if these tests are to be used. We aimed to quantify MCED screening intention and potential barriers and facilitators to uptake. METHODS Adults aged 50-77 (n = 958) completed an online survey. The primary outcome was intention to have MCED screening if offered. Psychological variables including barriers and facilitators were assessed. We used logistic regressions to explore associations between socio-demographics and psychological factors and intention. RESULTS 93.8% of participants said they would 'definitely' or 'probably' have MCED screening if offered. Intention was significantly associated with previous screening participation and general cancer attitudes but not with socio-demographic factors. Participants were more likely to be intenders if they had higher health motivation, and perceived greater benefits of blood tests. Participants were less likely to be intenders if they perceived greater disadvantages of blood tests, more practical barriers, were more worried about the outcome and more concerned about a positive result. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS MCED screening intention was high. The lack of socio-demographic variation suggests equitable interest in this type of screening; however, future research should consider how intention translates to uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ninian Schmeising-Barnes
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Laura A V Marlow
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Røssell EL, Bekker HL, Schonberg MA, Sønbø Kristiansen I, Borgquist S, Støvring H. Danish Women Make Decisions about Participation in Breast Cancer Screening prior to Invitation Information: An Online Survey Using Experimental Methods. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:674-688. [PMID: 38703097 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241248142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION At mammography screening invitation, the Danish Health Authority recommends women aged 50 to 69 y make an informed decision about whether to be screened. Previous studies have shown that women have very positive attitudes about screening participation. Therefore, we hypothesized that Danish women may already have decided to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving their screening invitation at age 50 y. METHODS We invited a random sample of 2,952 Danish women aged 44 to 49 y (prescreening age) to complete an online questionnaire about barriers to informed screening decision making using the official digital mailbox system in Denmark. We asked participants about their screening intentions using 3 different questions to which women were randomized: screening presented 1) as an opportunity, 2) as a choice, and 3) as an opportunity plus a question about women's stage of decision making. All women completed questions about background characteristics, intended participation in the screening program, use and impact of screening information, and preferences for the decision-making process. Data were linked to sociodemographic register data. RESULTS A total of 790 (26.8%) women participated in the study. Herein, 97% (95% confidence interval: 96%-98%) reported that they wanted to participate in breast cancer screening when invited at age 50 y. When presented with the choice compared with the opportunity framing, more women rejected screening. When asked about their stage of decision making, most (87%) had already made a decision about screening participation and were unlikely to change their mind. CONCLUSION In our study, almost all women of prescreening age wanted to participate in breast cancer screening, suggesting that providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making. HIGHLIGHTS Almost all women of prescreening age (44-49 y) in our study wanted to participate in the Danish national mammography screening program starting at age 50 y.Early decision making represents a barrier for informed decision making as women in this study had intentions to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving an official screening invitation, and therefore, providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making.Very few women rejected screening participation; however, more women rejected screening when the information was framed as an active choice between having or declining breast cancer screening (continue with usual care) compared with presenting only the option of screening with no description of the alternative.Two-thirds of women reading the screening information in this study had unchanged attitudes toward screening after reading the presented information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hilary Louise Bekker
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Research Centre of Patient Involvement Interventions (ResCenPI), DPH, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Signe Borgquist
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik Støvring
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Danya H, Nakayama K. Decision-making styles of patients and general population in health care: A scoping review. Nurs Forum 2022; 57:1012-1025. [PMID: 35789092 DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decision-making styles form the backbone of effective decision-making and show promise as an important construct that warrants further attention. We investigated what is known about decision-making styles among patients and the general population in a health care setting. METHODS We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework and searched PubMed and CINAHL databases using relevant combinations of keywords and subject headings. Articles were limited to those published in English up to February 2020. RESULTS Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. We found that decision-making styles were described as role preferences or personality, psychological, and cognitive factors that influence decision-making. In the identified studies, the evidence was scarce regarding decision-making styles as the foundation for effective decision-making. Moreover, most studies were vague in the description of decision-making styles, offered little explanation of the concept, and varied substantially in the terminology, numbers, and types of decision-making styles and measurement methods. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making styles, as a dynamic process, have received little attention in health care and are rarely addressed in health communication research or investigations of decision-making support. Other frameworks that are not directly related to decision-making styles were used in most analyzed studies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Decision-making styles in health care should be reinterpreted as a dynamic process that can be developed or changed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hitomi Danya
- Department of Nursing Informatics, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Nakayama
- Department of Nursing Informatics, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Azar D, Murphy M, Fishman A, Sewell L, Barnes M, Proposch A. Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study. Health Promot J Austr 2022; 33:272-281. [PMID: 33713368 PMCID: PMC9292328 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED Population cancer screening rates are around 50% for the general population and even lower in rural areas. This study aimed to explore knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, motivators and barriers to breast, bowel and cervical screening participation in under-screened men and women. METHODS We used a qualitative research design. Focus groups were segmented by age, sex and screening participation. Participants were under-screened in at least one of the cancer screening programs, with separate groups for each of the programs. The discussion guides were designed around the Health Belief Model and group discussions were coded using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS Fourteen focus groups were held with 80 participants. Key themes were that the concept of cancer screening was not well understood, a low priority for preventive health behaviours, issues relating to local general practitioners (GP) and screening was unpleasant, embarrassing and/or inconvenient. A key determinant of participation in cancer screening was exposure to prompts to action, and it was evident that participants often required multiple prompts before they took action. CONCLUSIONS Opportunities that develop attitudes to health that place disease prevention as a high priority; improve understanding of the benefit of screening in terms of early detection and treatment; improve GP availability and the patient-practitioner relationship; and the development of messages for each of the screening programs should be further explored as factors that may influence rural population screening rates. SO WHAT?: Addressing health attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, health practitioner and test-related barriers and improving messaging may increase cancer screening participation in under-screened rural populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Azar
- Gippsland Primary Health NetworkTraralgonVICAustralia
| | | | | | - Lauren Sewell
- Gippsland Primary Health NetworkTraralgonVICAustralia
| | - Megan Barnes
- Gippsland Primary Health NetworkTraralgonVICAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Enyan NIE, Akaba S, Amoo SA. Women diagnosed with HIV and unknown HIV status perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer and perceived benefits of cervical cancer screening in Ghana: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health 2021; 21:367. [PMID: 34657607 PMCID: PMC8522230 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01509-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is an issue of global health concern, and it seems to be the next epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa after Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). This study compared the perceptions of susceptibility to cervical cancer and benefits of cervical cancer screening among women diagnosed and those with unknown HIV status and determined the association between socio-demographic factors and HIV status. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted with 600 women diagnosed with HIV and 600 women with unknown HIV status in the Central Region of Ghana. Convenience sampling was used and a structured interview schedule was the main data collection instrument. Data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, chi-square test and independent samples t-test. RESULTS A high proportion of women diagnosed with HIV 94.8% (n = 569) and those with unknown HIV status 93.5% (n = 561) agreed that "screening can find cervical changes". Also, 58.0% (n = 348) of women diagnosed with HIV agreed that they have been in polygamous relationships so they may get cervical cancer. There was a statistically significant association between marital status (X2 = 167.071, p = 0.001), religion (X2 = 57.720, p = 0.001), level of education (X2 = 118.997, p = 0.001), employment status (X2 = 782.646, p = 0.001) and HIV status. A comparison of the mean difference for women diagnosed and those with unknown HIV status in relation to perceived benefits of cervical cancer screening showed a statistically significant difference (t = 7.418, df = 1198, p = 0.001). Nonetheless, there was no statistically significant difference in the means for women diagnosed and those with unknown HIV status regarding perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer (t = 0.935, df = 1198, p = 0.351). CONCLUSIONS Women with HIV perceived higher benefits of cervical cancer screening. Perception of susceptibility to cervical cancer by women with and those without HIV need to be addressed in efforts to improve their health. Furthermore, interventions for women with HIV should consider some important sociodemographic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Innocentia Ebu Enyan
- Department of Adult Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
| | - Selorm Akaba
- Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, School of Agriculture, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dodd RH, Mac OA, McCaffery KJ. Women's experiences of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program in Australia 12 months following implementation: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039041. [PMID: 32665351 PMCID: PMC7359067 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore women's experiences of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program in Australia from the perspective of women who have received different human papillomavirus (HPV) test results. Women aged 25 to 74 are now screened every 5 years with primary HPV screening. DESIGN Qualitative interview study. SETTING Australia. PARTICIPANTS Women in Australia aged 25 to 74 who reported participating in cervical screening since December 2017, purposively sampled by test result (HPV positive, HPV negative and HPV status unknown). METHODS 26 interviews with women aged 25 to 74 were conducted and analysed thematically. RESULTS Three main themes emerged: knowledge and attitudes about the programme changes, information dissemination, the meaning and responses to test results and the new cervical screening test (CST). Some women showed little awareness of the changes, but others understood that HPV is detected earlier than abnormal cells. Some expressed positive attitudes towards the CST and were not anxious about less frequent screening. Most women envisaged the changes would have minimal impact on their screening behaviour. Women mainly wanted more information about the changes and the possible results from the new CST. Overall women could recall their HPV results and understand the implications for future cervical screening. Anxiety about being at 'increased risk' was more apparent in women who were HPV positive without history of abnormal results. CONCLUSIONS Women show some understanding of HPV and the new CST, but more written and public communication about the changes and possible results are warranted. Efforts are needed to ensure that women who are HPV positive without history of abnormal results receive the information needed to alleviate anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H Dodd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Olivia A Mac
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dodd RH, Obermair HM, McCaffery KJ. Implementing changes to cervical screening: A qualitative study with health professionals. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 60:776-783. [PMID: 32510586 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Profound changes were made to the Australian National Cervical Screening Program in December 2017, which included a reduction in the frequency of screening and a new cervical screening test. AIM To explore the attitudes and experiences of health professionals practising in Australia since implementation of these changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with general practitioners, obstetricians and gynaecologists, pathologists and nurses involved in cervical screening Australia-wide. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis. RESULTS Overall, health professionals had positive attitudes toward the changes but described many challenges associated with their implementation. Participants discussed practical system challenges, communication and education, finding ways around the guidelines and other perceived 'collateral'. Practical system challenges included increased colposcopy referrals, limited access to the National Cancer Screening Register, a complex primary screening approach, and issues with self-collection. In terms of communication and education, limited public education was recognised, in addition to challenges with particular age groups of women. Finding ways around the guidelines were described, for example over-referring women for co-testing by stating symptoms, which could lead to overtreatment. Other perceived collateral were demonstrated through reduced opportunistic screening opportunities due to less frequent primary care presentations, and concern over the potential for further underscreening in already under-screened populations. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide insight into the challenges health professionals face with renewing programs, in terms of practical issues and unexpected downstream effects which need to be addressed to ensure future implementation of the program is streamlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael H Dodd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Helena M Obermair
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Head KJ, Johnson NL, Scott SF, Zimet GD. Communicating Cervical Cancer Screening Results in Light of New Guidelines: Clinical Practices at Federally Qualified Health Centers. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 35:815-821. [PMID: 30945950 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1593079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
New guidelines for cervical cancer screening (CCS) incorporate both HPV and Pap tests, and there is a need to understand communication of these cotesting results to patients, especially in at-risk populations disproportionally affected by cervical cancer. This study used computer-assisted telephone interviews in 2017 at 51 federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Indiana to evaluate the characteristics of clinical communication CCS results to women. Results revealed that clinical communication practices varied on channel, timing, and content. Almost half of the clinics (n = 23, 45%) communicate results to patients by phone. Most clinics (n = 47, 92%) notify patients of results in two weeks or less. For cotesting, 70% (n = 36) always communicate Pap/HPV results at the same time. The majority of clinics (n = 42, 82%) explain the type of abnormal Pap test, while only 43% (n = 22) discuss the cervical cancer risk as indicated by the HPV test result. Even though 98% (n = 48) of participants rated their communication strategy as effective, qualitatively participants acknowledged difficulties in communicating cotesting results with their often transient and low health literate patients populations. These results indicate considerable variation and potential deficits in clinical communication of cotesting results in FQHCs, but several promising communication strategies were identified that may inform improved screening communication for other clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
| | - Nicole L Johnson
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
| | - Susanna Foxworthy Scott
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thompson EL, Galvin AM, Daley EM, Tatar O, Zimet GD, Rosberger Z. Recent changes in cervical cancer screening guidelines: U.S. women's willingness for HPV testing instead of Pap testing. Prev Med 2020; 130:105928. [PMID: 31756351 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening guidelines in the United States were revised in 2018 to include the option of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. The transition to this screening method may face difficulties as Pap testing has been the primary screening modality in the United States. The objective of this study is to assess information, motivation, and behavioral skills associated with willingness to receive an HPV test instead of a Pap test among women. The sample included U.S. 812 women, ages 30 to 65 years. Participants completed an online survey in 2018. The Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills (IMB) model was used to measure predictors of willingness for HPV testing. The outcome variables were willingness to receive the HPV test instead of the Pap test, with and without time interval details. Logistic regression modeling was used with SAS 9.4. Over half of the sample (55%) were willing to receive the HPV test. For the information domain, HPV knowledge was significantly associated with willingness for HPV testing (OR = 1.08, 95%CI 1.04-1.13). Significant motivating factors included: positive attitudes, social norms, perceived benefits, worry about cervical cancer, and worry about abnormal HPV tests. For behavioral skills, women were significantly more willing to get the HPV test if a provider recommended it (OR = 2.43, 95%CI 1.53-3.87) and currently up-to-date on cervical cancer screening guidelines (OR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.52-2.26). Addressing barriers and facilitators to willingness to transition to primary HPV testing over Pap testing is needed as the United States has updated guidelines for cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika L Thompson
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
| | - Annalynn M Galvin
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Ellen M Daley
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ovidiu Tatar
- Research Center-Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Departments of Oncology, Psychology, & Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Obermair HM, McCaffery KJ, Dodd RH. "A Pap smear saved my life": Personal experiences of cervical abnormalities shape attitudes to cervical screening renewal. J Med Screen 2019; 27:223-226. [PMID: 31771406 DOI: 10.1177/0969141319889648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2017, the Australian National Cervical Screening Program changed from two-yearly Pap smears between ages 18 and 69, to five-yearly human papillomavirus screening between ages 25 and 74 (the "Renewal"). This study investigated attitudes towards the changes, among individuals previously affected by cervical abnormalities/cervical cancer, personally or through a friend/relative. METHODS We conducted a thematic analysis of comments expressing personal history or a family/friend history of cervical abnormalities/cervical cancer as a reason for opposing changes to the cervical screening program. The comments were taken from a 20% random sample of 19,633 comments posted on the "Change.org" petition "Stop May 1st Changes to Pap Smears - Save Women's Lives" in February-March 2017. RESULTS There were 831 (20.8%) commenters who reported that they were concerned about a change in screening due to: feelings of increased personal vulnerability to cervical cancer due to their own personal history of cervical abnormalities; comparison of extended screening intervals and later age of first screening to their own experiences; and a perception of increased personal risk due to family history. CONCLUSION Women previously affected by cervical abnormalities or cervical cancer, personally or through a friend/relative, expressed concern about changes to cervical screening due to perceived increased risk and feeling vulnerable due to personal history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena M Obermair
- Sydney School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- Sydney School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Okan Y, Smith SG, Bruine de Bruin W. How is cervical cancer screening information communicated in UK websites? Cross-sectional analysis of content and quantitative presentation formats. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029551. [PMID: 31662361 PMCID: PMC6830680 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether UK websites about cervical cancer screening targeted to the public include (1) information about benefits and risks of screening, possible screening results and cervical cancer statistics, (2) quantitative presentation formats recommended in the risk communication literature and (3) appeals for participation and/or informed decision-making. DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis of websites using a comprehensive checklist of information items on screening benefits, risks, possible results and cervical cancer statistics. OUTCOME MEASURES We recorded the number of websites that contained each of the information items, and the presentation format used for probabilistic information (no quantification provided, verbal quantifiers only, different types of numerical formats and/or graphs). We also recorded the number of websites containing appeals for participation and/or informed decision-making. SETTING Websites were identified through the most common Google search terms used in the UK to find information on cervical screening, according to GoogleTrends and a commercial internet-monitoring programme. Two additional websites were identified by the authors as relevant. RESULTS After applying exclusion criteria, 14 websites were evaluated, including websites of public and private health service providers, charities, a medical society and a pharmacy. The websites mentioned different benefits, risks of screening and possible results. However, specific content varied between websites. Probabilistic information was often presented using non-recommended formats, including relative risk reductions to express screening benefits, and verbal quantifiers without numbers to express risks. Appeals for participation were present in most websites, with almost half also mentioning informed decision-making. CONCLUSIONS UK websites about cervical cancer screening were generally balanced. However, benefits and risks were presented using different formats, potentially hindering comparisons. Additionally, recommendations from the literature to facilitate understanding of quantitative information and facilitate informed decisions were often not followed. Designing websites that adhere to existing recommendations may support informed screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmina Okan
- Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Samuel G Smith
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Wändi Bruine de Bruin
- Centre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nagendiram A, Bougher H, Banks J, Hall L, Heal C. Australian women’s self‐perceived barriers to participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review. Health Promot J Austr 2019; 31:343-353. [DOI: 10.1002/hpja.280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Nagendiram
- James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Mackay Clinical School Mackay QLD Australia
| | - Hannah Bougher
- James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Mackay Clinical School Mackay QLD Australia
| | - Jennifer Banks
- James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Mackay Clinical School Mackay QLD Australia
| | - Leanne Hall
- James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Mackay Clinical School Mackay QLD Australia
| | - Clare Heal
- James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Mackay Clinical School Mackay QLD Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kristiansen BK, Andersen B, Bro F, Svanholm H, Vedsted P. Direct notification of cervical cytology results to women improves follow-up in cervical cancer screening - A cluster-randomised trial. Prev Med Rep 2018; 13:118-125. [PMID: 30568870 PMCID: PMC6296289 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Up to half of all women do not receive follow-up as recommended after cervical cytology testing and are thus at increased risk of dysplasia progression. Women from lower social positions are at increased risk of not receiving follow-up. Sample takers, often general practitioners, convey results to women, but communication problems constitute a challenge. We aimed to investigate the effect of direct notification of cervical cytology results on follow-up rates. In a 1:1 cluster-randomised controlled trial, we assessed if having the pathology department convey cervical cytology results directly to the investigated women improved timely follow-up, compared with conveying the results via the general practitioner as usual. All women with a cervical cytology performed in a general practice in the Central Denmark Region (2013-2014) and receiving follow-up recommendation were included (n = 11,833). The proportion of women without timely follow-up was lower in the group with direct notifications than in the control group of women receiving usual care, regardless of age, educational status, cohabitation status and ethnicity. Among the women with the most severe cervical cytology diagnoses who are recommended gynaecological follow-up within 3 months, the percentage without timely follow-up was 15.1% in the intervention group and 19.5% in the control group (prevalence difference: -0.04 (95%CI: -0.07; -0.02)). Improved timely follow-up was also observed for women with a recommendation to have follow-up performed at 3 and 12 months. Cervical cytology results conveyed directly by letter to women increased the proportion of women with timely follow-up without raising inequality in follow-up measured by social position. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (TRN: NCT02002468) 29 November 2013.
Collapse
Key Words
- AGC, Atypical Glandular Cells
- AIS, adenocarcinoma in situ
- ASC-H, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL
- ASC-US, Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance
- CCU, cancer of the cervix uteri
- CDR, Central Denmark Region
- DPDB, Danish National Pathology Registry and Data Bank
- Early detection of cancer
- GP, general practitioner
- General practice
- HSIL, High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion
- ICC, intra-cluster correlation coefficient
- LSIL, Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion
- Mass screening
- PD, prevalence differences
- PR, prevalence ratio
- Quality of health care
- SNOMED, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine
- Socioeconomic factors
- Uterine cervical dysplasia
- hrHPV-pos., high-risk Human Papilloma Virus positive
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Kjær Kristiansen
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.,Department for Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, 8930 Randers, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department for Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, 8930 Randers, Denmark
| | - Flemming Bro
- Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hans Svanholm
- Department of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, 8930 Randers, Denmark
| | - Peter Vedsted
- Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tatar O, Thompson E, Naz A, Perez S, Shapiro GK, Wade K, Zimet G, Gilca V, Janda M, Kahn J, Daley E, Rosberger Z. Factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) test acceptability in primary screening for cervical cancer: A mixed methods research synthesis. Prev Med 2018; 116:40-50. [PMID: 30172799 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Primary screening for cervical cancer is transitioning from the longstanding Pap smear towards implementation of an HPV-DNA test, which is more sensitive than Pap cytology in detecting high-risk lesions and offers greater protection against invasive cervical carcinomas. Based on these results, many countries are recommending and implementing HPV testing-based screening programs. Understanding what factors (e.g., knowledge, attitudes) will impact on HPV test acceptability by women is crucial for ensuring adequate public health practices to optimize cervical screening uptake. We used mixed methods research synthesis to provide a categorization of the relevant factors related to HPV primary screening for cervical cancer and describe their influence on women's acceptability of HPV testing. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Health and Web of Science for journal articles between January 1, 1980 and October 31, 2017 and retained 22 empirical articles. Our results show that while most factors associated with HPV test acceptability are included in the Health Belief Model and/or Theory of Planned Behavior (e.g., attitudes, knowledge), other important factors are not encompassed by these theoretical frameworks (e.g., health behaviors, negative emotional reactions related to HPV testing). The direction of influence of psychosocial factors on HPV test acceptability was synthesized based on 14 quantitative studies as: facilitators (e.g., high perceived HPV test benefits), barriers (e.g., negative attitudes towards increased screening intervals), contradictory evidence (e.g., sexual history) and no impact (e.g., high perceived severity of HPV infection). Further population-based studies are needed to confirm the impact of these factors on HPV-based screening acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ovidiu Tatar
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec H3T1E4, Canada.
| | - Erika Thompson
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, School of Public Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie, Blvd., EAD 709M, Fort Worth, TX 76107-2699, USA.
| | - Anila Naz
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec H3T1E4, Canada.
| | - Samara Perez
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec H3T1E4, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Gilla K Shapiro
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec H3T1E4, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Kristina Wade
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec H3T1E4, Canada.
| | - Gregory Zimet
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Section of Adolescent Medicine, 410 West 10th Street, HS 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Vladimir Gilca
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, 945 Wolfe Avenue, Québec, Quebec G1V 5B3, Canada.
| | - Monika Janda
- Queensland University of Technology, Faculty of Health, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Jessica Kahn
- University of Cincinnati (Ohio), Division of Adolescent and Transition Medicine, MLC 4000, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
| | - Ellen Daley
- University of South Florida, Department of Community and Family Health, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, MDC 56, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 4333 Cote Ste-Catherine Road, Montreal, Quebec H3T1E4, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Obermair HM, Dodd RH, Bonner C, Jansen J, McCaffery K. 'It has saved thousands of lives, so why change it?' Content analysis of objections to cervical screening programme changes in Australia. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019171. [PMID: 29440214 PMCID: PMC5829885 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Revised: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The incidence and mortality of cervical cancer have halved since introduction of the Australian cervical screening programme in 1991, involving 2-yearly Pap smears from ages 18-69 years. In 2017, the programme changed to 5- yearly primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for women aged 25-74 years. This study investigated reasons for opposition to the renewed screening programme within the open-ended comments of an online petition, 'Stop May 1st Changes to Pap Smears-Save Women's Lives', opposing the changes, which received over 70 000 signatures and almost 20 000 comments. METHODS Content analysis of a random sample of 2000 comments, reflecting 10% of the 19 633 comments posted in February-March 2017. RESULTS Nineteen codes were identified, reflecting four themes: (1) valuing women's health and rights, (2) political statements, (3) concerns about healthcare funding cuts and (4) opposition to specific components of the new screening programme. The most prevalent codes were: placing value on women's health (33%), concerns about increasing screening intervals (17%) and opposition to the changes related to personal experiences with cervical cancer or cervical abnormalities (15%). Concern about the key change in technology (HPV testing instead of Pap smears) was expressed in less than 3% of comments, and some opposition to the changes from health professionals was noted. CONCLUSIONS Screening changes within this selected group were perceived as threatening women's health, as a political policy created by male decision-makers and as a cost-cutting exercise. Many commenters were concerned about increased screening intervals and later screening onset, but little opposition was expressed regarding the testing technology itself. This analysis may inform public education and communication strategies for future changes to cervical screening programmes internationally, to pre-emptively address specific concerns about the changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena M Obermair
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachael H Dodd
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim K, Kim S, Gallo JJ, Nolan MT, Han H. Decision making about Pap test use among Korean immigrant women: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2017; 20:685-695. [PMID: 27687295 PMCID: PMC5513020 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding how individuals make decisions about Pap tests concerning their personal values helps health-care providers offer tailored approaches to guide patients' decision making. Yet research has largely ignored decision making about Pap tests among immigrant women who experience increased risk of cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE To explore decision making about Pap tests among Korean immigrant women. METHODS We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using 32 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with Korean immigrant women residing in a north-eastern metropolitan area. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive coding. RESULTS Although most women with positive decisions made their own decisions, some women deferred to their providers, and others made decisions in collaboration with their providers and significant others. While women making positive decisions tended to consider both barriers to and facilitators of having Pap tests, women making negative decisions predominantly discussed the barriers to having Pap tests, such as modesty and differences between the South Korean and US health-care systems. The women's reflections on their decisions differed regarding their Pap test decisions. CONCLUSIONS Women's desired roles in the decision-making process and reflection on their decision outcome appeared to vary, although most participants with positive decisions made their own decisions and were satisfied with their decisions. Future research should conduct longitudinal, quantitative studies to test our findings regarding decision-making processes and outcomes about Pap tests. IMPLICATIONS The findings should be incorporated into cervical cancer screening practices to fulfil the unmet needs of immigrant women in patient-provider communication and to facilitate women's decision making about Pap tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyounghae Kim
- School of NursingUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsCTUSA
| | - Soohyun Kim
- Department of Community‐Public HealthSchool of NursingJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Joseph J. Gallo
- Department of Mental HealthBloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins University BaltimoreBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Marie T. Nolan
- Department of Acute and Chronic CareSchool of NursingJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Hae‐Ra Han
- Department of Community‐Public HealthSchool of NursingJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jayasinghe Y, Rangiah C, Gorelik A, Ogilvie G, Wark JD, Hartley S, Garland SM. Primary HPV DNA based cervical cancer screening at 25 years: Views of young Australian women aged 16–28 years. J Clin Virol 2016; 76 Suppl 1:S74-S80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2015] [Revised: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 10/31/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
18
|
Shirvani SM, Jiang J, Likhacheva A, Hoffman KE, Shaitelman SF, Caudle A, Buchholz TA, Giordano SH, Smith BD. Trends in Local Therapy Utilization and Cost for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women: Implications for Payment and Policy Reform. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:605-16. [PMID: 27034179 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Revised: 01/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Older women with early-stage disease constitute the most rapidly growing breast cancer demographic, yet it is not known which local therapy strategies are most favored by this population in the current era. Understanding utilization trends and cost of local therapy is important for informing the design of bundled payment models as payers migrate away from fee-for-service models. We therefore used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database to determine patterns of care and costs for local therapy among older women with breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Treatment strategy and covariables were determined in 55,327 women age ≥66 with Tis-T2N0-1M0 breast cancer who underwent local therapy between 2000 and 2008. Trends in local therapy were characterized using Joinpoint. Polychotomous logistic regression determined predictors of local therapy. The median aggregate cost over the first 24 months after diagnosis was determined from Medicare claims through 2010 and reported in 2014 dollars. RESULTS The median age was 75. Local therapy distribution was as follows: 27,896 (50.3%) lumpectomy with external beam radiation, 18,356 (33.1%) mastectomy alone, 6159 (11.1%) lumpectomy alone, 1488 (2.7%) mastectomy with reconstruction, and 1455 (2.6%) lumpectomy with brachytherapy. Mastectomy alone declined from 39.0% in 2000 to 28.2% in 2008, and the use of breast conserving local therapies rose from 58.7% to 68.2%. Mastectomy with reconstruction was more common among the youngest, healthiest patients, whereas mastectomy alone was more common among patients living in rural low-income regions. By 2008, the costs were $36,749 for lumpectomy with brachytherapy, $35,030 for mastectomy with reconstruction, $31,388 for lumpectomy with external beam radiation, $21,993 for mastectomy alone, and $19,287 for lumpectomy alone. CONCLUSIONS The use of mastectomy alone in older women declined in favor of breast conserving strategies between 2000 and 2008. Using these cost estimates, price points for local therapy bundles can be constructed to incentivize the treatment strategies that confer the highest value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shervin M Shirvani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Jing Jiang
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anna Likhacheva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abigail Caudle
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas A Buchholz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Scalzo K, Mullins R. The recommended interval for cervical cancer screening: Victorian women's attitudes to an extended interval. Aust N Z J Public Health 2015; 39:153-6. [DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2014] [Revised: 07/01/2014] [Accepted: 10/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Scalzo
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer; Cancer Council Victoria
| | - Robyn Mullins
- Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer; Cancer Council Victoria
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Odeh B, Kayyali R, Nabhani-Gebara S, Philip N. Optimizing cancer care through mobile health. Support Care Cancer 2015; 23:2183-8. [PMID: 25649121 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2627-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Accepted: 01/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The survival rates for patients living with cancer are increasing, due to recent advances in detection, prevention and treatment. It has been estimated that there were 28 million cancer survivors around the world in 2012. In the UK, for patients diagnosed in 2007, it is predicted that more than half of them will survive their cancer for 5 years or more. A large majority of cancer survivors report unmet supportive care needs and distressing symptoms and adverse long-term consequences related to their cancer. Cancer management could be optimized to better meet patients demand through technology, including mobile health (m-Health). m-Health is defined as the use of mobile communications and network technologies for health care. m-Health can help both patients and health-care professionals and play an important part in managing and delivering cancer care including managing side effects, supporting drug adherence, providing cancer information, planning and follow up and detecting and diagnosing cancer. Health authorities have already published guidelines regulating m-Health to insure patient safety and improve the accountability of its applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassel Odeh
- Drug Discovery, Delivery and Patient Care (DDDPC) Centre, School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, KT1 2EE, UK,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
McRae J, Martin C, O'Leary J, Sharp L. "If you can't treat HPV, why test for it?" Women's attitudes to the changing face of cervical cancer prevention: a focus group study. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2014; 14:64. [PMID: 24885650 PMCID: PMC4135323 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2013] [Accepted: 04/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background The relationship between infection with high-risk strains of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer is transforming prevention through HPV vaccination and HPV oncogenic testing. In Ireland, a national cervical cancer screening programme and HPV vaccination were recently launched; HPV testing is currently being integrated into the screening programme. Women’s views on the transformation of cervical cancer prevention have been relatively little investigated. Methods Using qualitative focus groups, we determined women’s knowledge, attitudes towards, and acceptability of cervical cancer screening, HPV oncogenic testing and vaccination of HPV. Fifty nine women, recruited through primary care in Ireland, participated in ten focus groups. A dynamic topic guide was developed from literature reviewed. Women were provided with standardised information about HPV infection, HPV testing. Discussion transcripts were analysed thematically. Results The primary themes that emerged regarding HPV infection were: knowledge, emotional response and societal influences; especially those of healthcare practitioners. Knowledge, logistics, and psychological impact were the primary themes relating to HPV testing. Women’s attitudes towards HPV testing changed during discussion as issues were explored, thus demonstrating the complexity of this issue; lack of existing treatment for HPV infection influenced women’s attitudes, attachment to existing cervical cancer screening also was a significant factor. Conclusions Women currently have a strong attachment to cytology and any changes towards HPV primary testing will need to be managed carefully. To ensure that future cervical cancer prevention strategies will be acceptable to women, sufficient thought will have to be given to information provision and education. We identified the importance to women of healthcare practitioners’ opinions regarding HPV. Appropriate and timely information on HPV will be crucial in order to minimise possible psychological effects women may have.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith McRae
- National Cancer Registry, Building 6800, Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, Ireland.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Molisani A, Dumenci L, Matsuyama RK. Influences of patient sociodemographics on cancer information received through the first 9 months of treatment. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2014; 29:158-166. [PMID: 24113903 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0564-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluates the amount and change of information cancer patients report receiving related to disease, diagnostic tests, treatments, physical care, and psychosocial resources over 9 months of treatment. Information received by newly diagnosed, stages II-IV cancer patients receiving treatment (N = 139) at baseline, 4, and 9 months is examined through a two-stage latent growth model. Each information-received category was modeled with latent variables of intercept and slope. Random intercept and slope factors are then regressed on multiple sociodemographic covariates. The mean amount of information received does not change over time, but significant inter-individual variability was observed. Age (younger) and marital status (married) are significantly associated with a higher total amount of information received while education (less) and race (African-American) are significantly associated with slower declines of information received over time. While the mean amount of information cancer patients receive is relatively constant over the course of treatment for the first 9 months, the level and rate of information received is somewhat varied based on patient characteristics. Healthcare professionals need to be aware of the varying amounts of information received by patients and ensure that the amount is consistent with the patient's individual needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Molisani
- Department of Social and Behavioral Health, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU), PO Box 980149, Richmond, VA, 23298-0149, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Baker TA, O'Connor ML, Krok JL. Experience and knowledge of pain management in patients receiving outpatient cancer treatment: what do older adults really know about their cancer pain? PAIN MEDICINE 2013; 15:52-60. [PMID: 24118873 DOI: 10.1111/pme.12244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE An individual's ability to effectively manage their cancer pain is influenced by knowledge and perceptions regarding the pain experience. While significance of the physician's knowledge of cancer pain management has been reported, much less is known how a patient's knowledge may influence their ability to optimally manage their pain. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence health and social factors have on the knowledge and experience of cancer pain among older adults. DESIGN A prospective cross-sectional study of older Black and White patients presenting for outpatient cancer treatment. METHODS Participants were surveyed on questions assessing pain severity, knowledge and experience of pain, self-efficacy for pain treatment, satisfaction with pain treatment, and additional social, health, and demographic characteristics. A series of hierarchical regression models were specified to examine predictors of cancer pain knowledge and experience. RESULTS Education, race, and trust were significant predictors of pain knowledge, whereas self-efficacy for pain, pain interference, and pain severity were indicators of the experience of cancer pain. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge and experience of (cancer) pain are contingent upon a myriad of social and clinical factors that are not exclusive but rather coexisting determinants of health. Understanding older adults' knowledge of pain may begin to diminish the imparities in the diagnosis and treatment of pain among this growing diverse population of older adults. It may similarly allow for programs to be tailored to fit the specific needs of the patient in the treatment and management of their cancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara A Baker
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tritter J. Editorial. Health Expect 2013; 16:113-4. [DOI: 10.1111/hex.12072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
26
|
Matsuyama RK, Kuhn LA, Molisani A, Wilson-Genderson MC. Cancer patients' information needs the first nine months after diagnosis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2013; 90:96-102. [PMID: 23058682 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2012] [Revised: 08/22/2012] [Accepted: 09/22/2012] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer patients' information needs about disease, diagnostic tests, treatments, physical care, and psychosocial resources during treatment are examined. METHODS Information needs of newly diagnosed, Stages II-IV cancer patients receiving treatment (N=138) were studied over nine months. Information needs were assessed using The Toronto Informational Needs Questionnaire (TINQ). There are five subscales for the TINQ: disease, diagnostic tests, treatment, physical and psychosocial. Health literacy and amount of information wanted were also measured. A repeated measures, univariate two-level model for longitudinal data was analyzed. Separate models for each subscale were constructed and covariates were examined simultaneously for associations with information needs. Models were estimated using FIML. RESULTS Although significant reduction of needs was observed over time, total information needs remained high throughout. Gender (women), age (younger), race (African American), education (lesser), and marital status (married) were significantly associated with higher information needs over time. Cancer type and stage were not significantly associated. CONCLUSION Cancer patients' information needs decrease yet remain high over time. Patients' information needs are highest near diagnosis and change throughout the course of their treatment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS As patients obtain and understand information, they will continue to need information in new areas relevant to their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin K Matsuyama
- Department of Social and Behavioral Health, Virginia Commonwealth University & Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA 23298-0149, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|