Hormone replacement therapy with dydrogesterone and 17 beta-oestradiol: effects on serum lipoproteins and glucose tolerance during 24 month follow up

The Effects of Flaxseed Consumption on Glycemic Control in Native American Postmenopausal Women with Hyperglycemia and Hyperlipidemia

Glucose control in postmenopausal women is influenced by many factors, such as hormones, lifestyle variables, and genetics. Limited data exist on the effect of whole flaxseed on glucose status in postmenopausal Native American women. The aim of this study was to investigate the glucose management effect of a flaxseed dietary intervention on postmenopausal Native American women. In this study, 55 Native American postmenopausal women (aged 47-63 years) with borderline hyperglycemia (>100 and <126 mg/dL) and mild to moderate hypercholestorolemia (≥200 to ≤380 mmol/L), who were not on hormone replacement therapy, were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three dietary regimens (control, flaxseed, and flaxseed + fiber) for three months, receiving interventions in the form of bread, muffins, and flaxseed powder. Despite daily consumption of flaxseed across diverse food formats, no significant changes in glucose (p = 0.3, p = 0.2), insulin levels (p = 0.59, p = 0.9), or HOMA-IR (p = 0.84, p = 0.66) were observed compared to their respective baseline values within the flaxseed and flaxseed + fiber groups, respectively. Conversely, the control group showed a significant rise in final glucose values from baseline (p = 0.01). However, the incorporation of ground flaxseed into low-glycemic foods holds potential for beneficial effects through maintaining glucose status among postmenopausal Native American women. This research provides critical insights into the effects of flaxseed, emphasizing the need for continued exploration to understand its role in supporting glucose management among postmenopausal Native American women. Further exploration is required to investigate the potential long-term impact and the use of flaxseed in managing glucose levels in this demographic.

Menopausal hormone therapy in women with medical conditions

Hormone therapy is the most effective treatment for menopause-related symptoms. Current evidence supports its use in young healthy postmenopausal women under the age of 60 years, and within 10 years of menopause, with benefits typically outweighing risks. However, decision making is more complex in the more common clinical scenario of a symptomatic woman with one or more chronic medical conditions that potentially alter the risk-benefit balance of hormone therapy use. In this review, we present the evidence relating to the use of hormone therapy in women with chronic medical conditions such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, venous thromboembolism, and autoimmune diseases. We discuss the differences between oral and transdermal routes of administration of estrogen and the situations when one route might be preferred over another. We also review evidence regarding the effect of different progestogens, when available.

Dydrogesterone treatment for menstrual-cycle regularization in abnormal uterine bleeding – ovulation dysfunction patients

BACKGROUND

Dydrogesterone has shown significant efficacy in treatment of irregular menstrual cycle due to abnormal uterine bleeding - ovulation dysfunction (AUB-O), but there were few relevant studies. This observational study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of dydrogesterone for the treatment of Chinese patients with AUB-O.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of dydrogesterone on menstrual-cycle (MC) regularization and metabolism in the patients with AUB-O.

METHODS

A prospective, non-interventional, single-arm, post-marketing observational study was conducted. Chinese women aged 16 years or above with AUB-O who had been prescribed dydrogesterone were enrolled. The patients were treated with dydrogesterone 10 mg from day 16 to day 25 of each cycle, consecutively for at least 3 cycles. The main outcome was defined as the percentage of patients whose MCs returned to normal (defined as 21 d < menstrual cycle ≤ 35 d) after three cycles of dydrogesterone treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen women with AUB-O were enrolled in the present study. Of 89 patients who completed treatment, 72 (80.9%) achieved a regular MC at the end of the 3^rd circle. The level of androgen, including testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, declined significantly (P = 0.01 and 0.031, respectively), whereas other hormone levels remained steady. During the treatment, 44/80 (55.0%) subjects in the per-protocol set had reported biphasic basal body temperature.

CONCLUSION

Dydrogesterone therapy was effective in achieving MC regularization for Chinese patients with AUB-O.

Diabetes in Menopause: Risks and Management

The aim of this review is to present, critically appraise and qualitatively synthesize current evidence on the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) development during menopause, the management of climacteric symptoms in women with T2DM and the management of T2DM in postmenopausal women. Menopause represents the end of reproductive life in women, as a result of ovarian aging. It is characterized by substantial decrease in the endogenous oestrogen concentrations and it is accompanied by alterations in body weight, adipose tissue distribution and energy expenditure, as well as insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity and activity that can predispose to the development of T2DM, independently of, and additively to, aging. Many women in midlife experience climacteric symptoms, including hot flushes and night sweats, resulting in an indication to receive Hormone Replacement Treatment (HRT). HRT has a favourable effect on glucose homeostasis both in women without and with T2DM. The latter was considered in the past as a cardiovascular disease (CVD) equivalent, which would suggest that women with the disease should not receive HRT. However, nowadays evidence exists to support an individualized approach of women based on their CVD risk, as some women with T2DM may be excellent candidates for HRT. Regarding T2DM management for women in menopause, lifestyle intervention, including diet and exercise, constitutes its cornerstone. However, most of these women will eventually require pharmacologic therapy. The most suitable agents should be selected according to their metabolic, cardiovascular and bone effects, taking into consideration the specific characteristics and comorbidities of each postmenopausal woman.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Menopausal Hormone Therapy: An Update

During menopausal transition, various phenotypical and metabolic changes occur, affecting body weight, adipose tissue distribution and energy expenditure as well as insulin secretion and sensitivity. Taken together, these can predispose women to the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Many women in midlife experience climacteric symptoms, including hot flashes and night sweats. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is then indicated. MHT has a favourable effect on glucose homeostasis in both women without and with T2DM. T2DM was considered in the past as a cardiovascular disease (CVD) equivalent, which would suggest that women with T2DM should not receive MHT. This notion may still deter many clinicians from prescribing MHT to these patients. However, nowadays there is strong evidence to support an individualised approach after careful evaluation of CVD risk. In older women with T2DM (> 60 years old or > 10 years in menopause), MHT should not be initiated, because it may destabilise mature atherosclerotic plaques, resulting in thrombotic episodes. In obese women with T2DM or in women with moderate CVD risk, transdermal 17β-oestradiol could be used. This route of delivery presents beneficial effects regarding triglyceride concentrations and coagulation factors. In peri- or recently post-menopausal diabetic women with low risk for CVD, oral oestrogens can be used, since they exhibit stronger beneficial effects on glucose and lipid profiles. In any case, a progestogen with neutral effects on glucose metabolism should be used, such as natural progesterone, dydrogesterone or transdermal norethisterone. The goal is to maximise benefits and minimise adverse effects.

Menopause and diabetes: EMAS clinical guide

INTRODUCTION

Whether menopause increases the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) independently of ageing has been a matter of debate. Controversy also exists about the benefits and risks of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in women with T2DM.

AIMS

To summarise the evidence on 1) the effect of menopause on metabolic parameters and the risk of T2DM, 2) the effect of T2DM on age at menopause, 3) the effect of MHT on the risk of T2DM, and 4) the management of postmenopausal women with T2DM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of experts' opinions.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Metabolic changes during the menopausal transition include an increase in and the central redistribution of adipose tissue, as well as a decrease in energy expenditure. In addition, there is impairment of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity and an increase in the risk of T2DM. MHT has a favourable effect on glucose metabolism, both in women with and in women without T2DM, while it may delay the onset of T2DM. MHT in women with T2DM should be administered according to their risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In women with T2DM and low CVD risk, oral oestrogens may be preferred, while transdermal 17β-oestradiol is preferred for women with T2DM and coexistent CVD risk factors, such as obesity. In any case, a progestogen with neutral effects on glucose metabolism should be used, such as progesterone, dydrogesterone or transdermal norethisterone. Postmenopausal women with T2DM should be managed primarily with lifestyle intervention, including diet and exercise. Most of them will eventually require pharmacological therapy. The selection of antidiabetic medications should be based on the patient's specific characteristics and comorbidities, as well on the metabolic, cardiovascular and bone effects of the medications.

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Type 2 Diabetes Prevention: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Clinical Implications

Type 2 diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. Large, randomized controlled trials suggest that menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) delays the onset of type 2 diabetes in women. However, the mechanisms and clinical implications of this association are still a matter of controversy. This review provides an up-to-date analysis and integration of epidemiological, clinical, and basic studies, and proposes a mechanistic explanation for the effect of menopause and MHT on type 2 diabetes development and prevention. We discuss the beneficial effects of endogenous estradiol with respect to insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, and glucose effectiveness; we also discuss energy expenditure and adipose distribution, both of which are affected by menopause and improved by MHT, which thereby decreases the incidence of type 2 diabetes. We reconcile differences among studies that investigated the effect of menopause and MHT formulations on type 2 diabetes. We argue that discrepancies arise from physiological differences in methods used to assess glucose homeostasis, ranging from clinical indices of insulin sensitivity to steady-state methods to assess insulin action. We also discuss the influence of the route of estrogen administration and the addition of progestogens. We conclude that, although MHT is neither approved nor appropriate for the prevention of type 2 diabetes due to its complex balance of risks and benefits, it should not be withheld from women with increased risk of type 2 diabetes who seek treatment for menopausal symptoms.

Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Insulin Resistance in Postmenopausal Diabetic Women

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance (IR) is closely associated with diabetes mellitus. On the other hand, increased visceral fat in menopause is also associated with IR, which makes postmenopausal diabetic women in a big risk for cardiovascular diseases. There are conflicting reports about the effects on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on IR.

AIM

The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of HRT on IR.

METHODS

A total of 40 postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes were enrolled and followed for 12 months. Half of them were assigned to take HRT, while the other half made the control group. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and insulinemia were measured in both groups at baseline and after 12 months. IR was represented by Homeostatic model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR).

RESULTS

HRT was associated with significant decrease in HOMA-IR, FPG and insulinemia in the examined group. There was no significant reduction in FPG and no significant increase in insulinemia levels and HOMA-IR values in control group after 12 months.

CONCLUSION

HRT was associated with statistically signifficant increase of insulin sensitivity. Larger clinical trials will be necessary to understand whether HRT may improve insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis in women with diabetes, especially when given shortly after entering menopause.

Oral estradiol and dydrogesterone combination therapy in postmenopausal women: review of efficacy and safety

HRT is known to be effective for the relief of menopausal symptoms and prevention of osteoporosis. HRT should be tailored to the woman, enhancing the beneficial effects of the treatment while minimizing the risks. It is difficult to evaluate data on particular preparations of HRT and the different dosages in isolation. The purpose of this review is to highlight the efficacy and safety specific to oral estradiol and dydrogesterone combinations of four different dose strengths. A systematic literature search using Medline was carried out to identify studies containing efficacy or safety data. The findings of the retrieved publications confirm that estradiol and dydrogesterone combinations give very effective menopausal symptom relief and prevention of osteoporosis whilst maintaining a good safety profile. Data also show that these combinations of HRT give additional benefit to certain metabolic parameters including lipids, insulin, glucose and body fat distribution. By selecting the treatment and dose most suitable for each individual woman at her particular stage of menopause, the benefits can be optimized whilst mitigating the risks. HRT plays an important role in improving and maintaining women's health when used appropriately.

Hormone replacement therapy for women with type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting information about the impact of the menopause on glycaemic control amongst women with type 1 diabetes. Some menopausal women with type 1 diabetes are treated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) but the effects of this treatment have, to date, not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of HRT for women with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from their inception to June 2012. The last search was run for all databases on 18 June 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials that involved peri- or postmenopausal women with type 1 diabetes undergoing HRT as an intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two researchers independently applied the inclusion criteria to the identified studies and assessed risk of bias. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or by intervention by a third party. Descriptive analysis was conducted for the review.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety-two publications were screened. No studies met the inclusion criteria exclusively but one study that included both type 1 and type 2 diabetes participants was considered. This randomised clinical trial (RCT) compared HRT (N = 27) with placebo (N = 29) over 12 months. The outcome measures were cardiovascular risk factors, including lipid profile, glycaemic control, blood pressure and body weight. No significant differences between placebo and HTR were detected. Patient-important outcomes like all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, diabetic complications or health-related quality of life were not investigated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of evidence around the use of HRT in women with type 1 diabetes. The one study that has been undertaken in this area is underpowered. More RCTs are required in the area to examine the impact of HRT on glycaemic control and cardiovascular outcomes.

Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with HRT

Prevention of cardiovascular disease has increasingly important health implications as our population ages. Menopause is associated with the development of cardiovascular risk factors and there are many plausible biological mechanisms through which estrogen may confer cardiovascular protection. Despite a wealth of observational data to support the use of estrogen, large randomized controlled trials failed to demonstrate a benefit. It is now becoming clearer that the beneficial cardiovascular effects of estrogen are greatest in younger women and those closest to menopause. This has led to the development of the timing hypothesis. Use of age-appropriate estrogen doses is crucial to maximize cardiovascular benefits while minimizing risk of adverse effects such as venous thromboembolism and stroke.

Glucose tolerance of premenopausal women after menopause due to surgical removal of ovaries

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of the abrupt withdrawal of ovarian function on glucose tolerance by studying premenopausal women before and after oophorectomy.

METHODS

Thirty premenopausal women who needed hysterectomy for benign reasons volunteered for the study in our hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed before surgery and 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Fasting glucose, fasting insulin levels and insulin/glucose indexes, HOMA indexes, insulin and glucose levels were measured during OGTT.

RESULTS

The mean fasting and 2-h glucose levels of the women did not change significantly during the 12 months of follow-up. However, the glucose levels during the glucose tolerance tests changed significantly after surgery (p<0.05). Insulin responses to the glucose tolerance test also increased significantly (p<0.005). Insulin/glucose indexes were significantly higher after surgery (p<0.005). Type 2 diabetes mellitus was detected in five women and impaired glucose tolerance was detected in 12 of the 30 patients after surgery in the 12-month period.

CONCLUSION

The impairment of carbohydrate metabolism due to an abrupt decrease in natural estrogen levels should be considered before removing the ovaries during hysterectomy in premenopausal patients.

Insulin resistance in the middle-aged women with "Tigerish Back and Bearish Waist"

The objective of this study was to elucidate the role of fat distribution in predicting insulin resistance in peri- or post-menopausal women. The results demonstrated that insulin resistance increases with waist circumference and subscapular skinfold thickness but decreases with higher thigh circumflex in the peri- and post-menopausal women.

Menopausal hormone therapy and new-onset diabetes in the French Etude Epidemiologique de Femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale (E3N) cohort

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Two US randomised trials found a lower incidence of type 2 diabetes in women treated by menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) with oral conjugated equine oestrogen combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of various MHTs, according to their formulation and route of administration, on new-onset diabetes in a cohort of postmenopausal French women.

METHODS

The association between MHT use and new-onset diabetes was investigated by Cox regression analysis in 63,624 postmenopausal women in the prospective French cohort of the Etude Epidemiologique de Femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale (E3N). Cases of diabetes were identified through self-reporting or drug-reimbursement record linkage, and further validated.

RESULTS

1,220 new-onset diabetes cases were validated. We observed a lower risk of new-onset diabetes among women who had ever used MHT (HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.72-0.93]), compared with those who had never used MHT. Adjustment for BMI during follow-up (rather than according to baseline BMI) did not substantially modify this association. An oral route of oestrogen administration was associated with a greater decrease in diabetes risk than a cutaneous route (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.55-0.85] vs 0.87 [95% CI 0.75-1.00], p for homogeneity = 0.028). We were not able to show significant differences between the progestagens used in combined MHT.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Use of MHT appeared to be associated with a lower risk of new-onset diabetes. This relationship was not mediated by changes in BMI. Further studies are needed to confirm the stronger effect of oral administration of oestrogen compared with cutaneous administration.

1 and 2 mg 17β-estradiol combined with sequential dydrogesterone have similar effects on the serum lipid profile of postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of 1 and 2 mg 17beta-estradiol on serum lipid profile. Beneficial effects have been clearly established in previous studies with a 2 mg dose; further evidence was required to confirm the beneficial effects of a 1 mg dose.

METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study involved 579 postmenopausal women randomized to oral treatment with placebo, 1 mg/day 17beta-estradiol sequentially combined with 5 or 10 mg/day dydrogesterone for the last 14 days of each 28-day cycle, or 2 mg/day 17beta-estradiol sequentially combined with 10 or 20 mg/day dydrogesterone for the last 14 days of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued for 26 cycles.

RESULTS

High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were significantly (p<0.05) increased after 26 cycles in all active treatment groups compared with placebo. In addition, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels were significantly reduced, and apolipoprotein A1 and triglyceride levels were significantly increased, in all active treatment groups after 13 and 26 cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study clearly indicate that sequential combinations of either 1 or 2 mg 17beta-estradiol with dydrogesterone are associated with long-term, favorable changes in the serum lipid profile. There was no evidence that dydrogesterone compromised the 17beta-estradiol-induced improvements in lipid profile.

Adrenal androgen production capacity remains high up to menopause in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Hyperandrogenism is one of the main features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Of circulating androgens, 50% of androstenedione and testosterone are of ovarian and adrenal origin, whereas dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA sulfate are almost uniquely of adrenal origin. Our previous studies have indicated that ovarian androgen production capacity is enhanced in women with PCOS, and it remains high until late reproductive age. To study whether this also applies to adrenal androgen production, ACTH tests were performed in healthy women and in women with PCOS.

MATERIALS

Sixty-nine healthy women (aged 19-62 yr; body mass index 19.2-35.0 kg/m2) and 58 women with previously diagnosed PCOS (aged 18-59 yr; body mass index 19.0-42.9 kg/m2) participated in the study.

METHODS

The subjects underwent ACTH stimulation tests, and serum cortisol, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, testosterone, DHEA, and DHEA sulfate levels were analyzed at 0, 30, and 60 min.

RESULTS

Basal and ACTH-stimulated levels of most adrenal androgens decreased in healthy women with age, whereas in women with PCOS, only the concentrations of basal serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone decreased, and all areas under the curve (AUCs) remained unchanged and significantly higher (except for DHEA) than those in control women. Likewise, at the menopausal transition, pre- and postmenopausal women with PCOS exhibited mainly unchanged and higher basal androgen and AUC levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Similarly to ovarian endocrine function, serum adrenal steroid levels and adrenal steroid production capacity remain enhanced at least up to menopause in women with PCOS.

An open-label study of subdermal implants of estradiol-only versus subdermal implants of estradiol plus nomegestrol acetate: effects on symptom control, lipid profile and tolerability

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of continuous 17-beta estradiol-only silastic implants with those of continuous 17-beta estradiol plus continuous nomegestrol acetate silastic implants on symptom control, lipid profile and tolerability in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This was an open-label, parallel-group study. Women with and without uterus and no contraindications to hormone therapy (HT) in this study, we consider as HT the replacement of Estrogens-only and Estrogens + Progestogens Therapy, were enrolled. Each subject was assigned to receive four 17-beta estradiol-only silastic implants (women without uterus), or four 17-beta estradiol plus one nomegestrol acetate silastic implant (women with intact uterus), for 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 40 subjects were enrolled and received, the silastic implants of which 40 (100.0%) subjects completed the study (n = 20, estradiol only; n = 20, estradiol plus nomegestrol acetate). The incidence of postmenopausal symptoms decreased significantly. No significant decreases in total cholesterol (1.3%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.1%), triglycerides (1.2%) and fasting glucose ((1.3%) serum levels were observed in both groups, whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased significantly (2.8%), during the study in both groups. The incidences of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Women treated with 17-beta estradiol-only silastic implants or 17-beta estradiol plus nomegestrol acetate silastic implants showed significant improvement of postmenopausal symptoms, including urogenital and sexual health symptoms and a significant increase in HDL cholesterol and no significant differences in other lipid profiles and tolerability.

Metabolic syndrome and the menopause

The metabolic syndrome consists of a combination of risk factors that include abdominal obesity, atherogenic dyslipidaemia, hypertension and insulin resistance. It increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. The increased risk of cardiovascular disease is higher in women than in men. The first manifestation of metabolic syndrome may occur in pregnancy presenting as gestational diabetes or preeclampsia. Both conditions are associated with increased insulin resistance. Also metabolic syndrome is more common in polycystic ovarian syndrome. It has been suggested that there is a metabolic syndrome resulting from the menopause due to estrogen deficiency, as many of the risk factors are more prevalent in postmenopausal women. Also estrogen replacement improves insulin sensitivity and reduces the risk of diabetes. The key elements in managing the metabolic syndrome are weight reduction, increasing physical activity and diet modification. If blood pressure, lipid and glycaemic control are not achieved through these interventions then pharmacological therapy will be required.

Insulin secretion and clearance after subacute estradiol administration in postmenopausal women

CONTEXT

Data from large clinical trials of postmenopausal women suggest that the incidence of diabetes is reduced in women randomized to estrogen-based hormone therapy when compared with placebo. Whether this is due to an effect of estrogen on insulin or glucose metabolism remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to test the hypothesis that estradiol (E(2)) increases insulin secretion and clearance.

DESIGN

Serum insulin and C-peptide (CPEP) responses to hyperglycemia (250 mg/dl) plus iv L-arginine were measured on 2 separate days, with (EST) and without [control (CON)] subacute (24 h) transdermal E(2) administration.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

There were 11 postmenopausal women (mean +/- sd; 55 +/- 4 yr) included in this study.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Insulin secretion and clearance were estimated from the CPEP area under the curve and the molar ratio of CPEP to insulin area under the curve, respectively. Mean glucose disposal rate (GDR) was estimated from the rate of glucose infusion during the final 30 min of the hyperglycemic clamp.

RESULTS

There were no differences in insulin secretion or clearance between the EST and CON days. Fasting glucose was lower on the EST compared with the CON (93 +/- 6 vs. 98 +/- 8 mg/dl), but mean GDR was not different. However, when one outlier was excluded from analysis, GDR was increased after EST compared with CON. Furthermore, a strong inverse association was observed between years since menopause and E(2)-mediated changes in GDR (r = -0.794; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, 24-h transdermal E(2) administration did not alter insulin secretion or clearance in postmenopausal women. However, a longer time since menopause was associated with a reduced effect of E(2) to increase glucose uptake.

Effects of dydrogesterone on the vascular system

Estrogens exert beneficial effects on the vascular system, while progestogens generally have a negative impact (e.g. vasoconstrictor effects on the arterial system). In contrast, dydrogesterone appears to be largely neutral in terms of biochemical markers and indirect clinical endpoints, such as blood pressure, that act as surrogate markers for vascular function. Studies on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, which can also influence vascular function, demonstrate that the addition of dydrogesterone intensifies rather than attenuates beneficial estrogenic effects. Dydrogesterone also has largely neutral effects on hemostasis. Since there are relatively few data available on clinical parameters such as blood flow measurements, especially in women with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, increased risks cannot be excluded for a combination of estrogen replacement with dydrogesterone. Further studies should focus on this open question since dydrogesterone, with its largely neutral properties, might be a suitable option, including for older women already at increased cardiovascular risk.

HRT and the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Observational studies have consistently shown a benefit of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on coronary heart disease (CHD), but some randomised studies have not shown any significant effect. Thus questions still remains as to whether HRT is beneficial for CHD, and in whom this benefit might be achieved. The biological effects of oestrogen on the cardiovascular system have been extensively studied, and beneficial effects on metabolic CHD risk factors, as well as on arterial function and on surrogate clinical markers of CHD, have been demonstrated. Thus it seems implausible that HRT should not benefit CHD in postmenopausal women. Most randomised trials using clinical outcomes have studied just one dose of one HRT regimen, a dose inappropriately high with the average starting age of the participants being in their mid-60s. The observational population studies largely comprise women starting on HRT at appropriate dose around the age of menopause, i.e. early 50s. In fact, it was the older women in the randomised trials that failed to show benefit, whereas there was a trend to benefit in the younger ones for whom the starting dose of HRT was appropriate. Furthermore, a pilot study of lower dose HRT in older women did not show any cardiovascular harm. Inappropriately high doses of oestrogen could cause cardiovascular harm due to transient disturbances in thrombogenesis and vascular remodelling. Whilst the greatest CHD benefit may be seen by starting HRT in the early postmenopause, this does not exclude benefit in older women given appropriate low dose therapy.

The effect of continuous combined HRT on glucose homeostasis and plasma lipids

BACKGROUND

Hyperandrogenicity in women is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Estradiol alone decreases hyperandrogenicity and have beneficial effects on glucose metabolism and plasma lipids in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse effects on glucose homeostasis and plasma lipids by 2 mg estradiol and 1mg norethisterone acetate (NETA) given as a daily tablet during 6 months in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-one postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6% or more and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) values of 60 nmol/L or less were included. Anthropometric variables, blood pressure, sex steroid hormones, HbA1c, serum and lipoprotein lipids, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) were measured. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed and blood glucose, insulin and C-peptide were analysed. All measurements were taken at baseline and after each 6-month period.

RESULTS

An increase of SHBG and a decrease in free testosterone and PAI-1 levels was induced by the estradiol/NETA treatment compared with placebo. Lipoprotein(a) decreased but otherwise lipid metabolism was unaffected. No differences were recorded in glucose homeostasis between active treatment and placebo.

CONCLUSION

Estradiol/NETA therapy decreased hyperandrogenicity in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Lipoprotein(a) and PAI-1 which are independent risk factors for coronary heart disease decreased. No changes in glucose homeostasis were found.

Clinical study comparing the effects of sequential hormone replacement therapy with oestradiol/dydrogesterone and conjugated equine oestrogen/norgestrel on lipids and symptoms

A clinical study comparing the effects of sequential hormone replacement therapy with oestradiol/dydrogesterone and conjugated equine oestrogen/norgestrel on lipids and symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare the effects of sequential 17beta-oestradiol/dydrogesterone and conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE)/norgestrel on lipid parameters, climacteric symptoms, bleeding patterns and tolerability.

STUDY DESIGN

This double-blind study was conducted in 193 peri- and post-menopausal women randomised to receive six, 28-day cycles of oral sequential oestradiol 1 mg/dydrogesterone 10 mg or CEE 0.625 mg/norgestrel 0.15 mg. The change from baseline in serum lipids and hot flushes was analysed using a two-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks there was a statistically significant increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the oestradiol/dydrogesterone group and a significant reduction in the CEE/norgestrel group. The difference between the groups was significant (P=0.001). The number of hot flushes was reduced by 86% in both groups; this improvement was supported by the Greene Climacteric Symptom Scale score, the patients' opinion and quality of life assessments. The percentage of women experiencing cyclic bleeding was greater with CEE/norgestrel, as was the mean duration and severity of bleeding. Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Oestradiol/dydrogesterone and CEE/norgestrel were equally effective in treating climacteric symptoms, but oestradiol/dydrogesterone showed some advantages in terms of lipid profile and incidence of bleeding.

Effect of oral conjugated equine estrogen combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate on plasma homocysteine levels in postmenopausal women

Conjugated equine estrogen alone or combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate lowered homocysteine levels in postmenopausal women. Regardless of the dosage of progestin used, there was no impact on homocysteine metabolism after 3 years of therapy.

Consequences of menopause in women with diabetes mellitus - a clinical problem

Human life was prolonged by 30 years in the past century, with the result that about 40% of a woman's life falls within the postmenopausal period. The consequences, both early and remote, in the form of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and neoplastic disease are most pronounced in women suffering from one of the most common diseases, i.e., diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome preceding it. These patients are problematic for physicians, and for this reason a study of diagnostic and therapeutic management was undertaken on the basis of our own experience as well as examination based on evidence-based medicine. Prior to making therapeutic decisions it is necessary to determine cardiovascular, thromboembolic and breast cancer risk factors. Hormonal therapy may be helpful in young postmenopausal women who are free of risk factors, and its composition and route of administration are significant considerations. Women with risk factors and who are more than 10 years after menopause should be administered alternative therapy depending on the diagnosed pathology.

Evaluation of the effects of various gestagens on insulin sensitivity, using homeostatic model assessment, in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy

The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of various gestagens on insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy (HRT). This prospective study enrolled 156 postmenopausal women who had menopausal status for at least 6 months. Group 1 was treated with 17 beta-estradiol (E2; 2 mg) plus norethisterone acetate (NETA; 1 mg); Group 2 was given E2 (2 mg) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 2.5 mg); Group 3 was given E2 (2 mg) plus dydrogesterone (DG; 10 mg); and Group 4 was given E2 (2 mg) plus micronized progesterone (MP; 100 mg). Group 5 was the surgical menopausal group and was given only E2 (2 mg) continuously. All 156 subjects completed the 3-month follow-up on the trial. The patients were analyzed by using homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) for insulin sensitivity before treatment and 3 months after treatment, comparing the effects of various HRT regimens on insulin sensitivity. No significant differences were found in the baseline characteristics of the patients (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in mean values of HOMA before HRT among the five groups (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in mean values of HOMA only in Group 1 (E2 + NETA) and Group 3 (E2 + DG) after HRT (p > 0.05). E2 + NETA and E2 + DG were found to improve insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women after 3 months of treatment, whereas E2 + MPA, E2 + MP and E2 only did not show such an effect in postmenopausal women.

The effects of 17β-oestradiol plus dydrogesterone compared with conjugated equine oestrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate on lipids, apolipoproteins and lipoprotein(a)

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of 17 beta-oestradiol plus dydrogesterone with conjugated equine oestrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate on serum lipids, apolipoproteins and lipoprotein(a) in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

A multi-centre, prospective, randomised, double-blind, comparative one-year study in 362 healthy postmenopausal women aged 39-74 years with an intact uterus. Fasting blood samples were taken at baseline and after 28 and 52 weeks of treatment. Participants received daily oral treatment with continuous combined 1 mg micronised 17 beta-oestradiol/5 mg dydrogesterone (E/D: n=180) or 0.625 mg conjugated equine oestrogens/5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE/MPA: n=182).

RESULTS

Significant differences between the two groups after 52 weeks were observed for total cholesterol (E/D: -1.7%; CEE/MPA: -7.3%), LDL-cholesterol (E/D: -4.5%; CEE/MPA: -11.3%), HDL-cholesterol (E/D: +15.3%; CEE/MPA: +7.5%), triglycerides (E/D: +9.8%; CEE/MPA: +16.6%), VLDL-triglycerides (E/D: -3.3%; CEE/MPA: +10.0%), lipoprotein(a) (E/D: 0.0%; CEE/MPA: -25.2%) and for the ratio apolipoprotein B/LDL-cholesterol (E/D: +0.9%; CEE/MPA +5.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

E/D and CEE/MPA differ in their anti-atherogenic effects on lipids and lipoproteins. This however can not easily be translated to differences in clinical cardiovascular outcomes.

Combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with features of metabolic syndrome. Results from a population-based study of Swedish women: Women’s Health in the Lund Area study

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the influence of hormone therapy (HT) on features of metabolic syndrome with special reference to the composition and mode of administration of three specific HT regimens, all containing estradiol (E2) + norethisterone.

DESIGN

The Women's Health in the Lund Area project screened all women (n = 10,766), born between 1935 and 1945. Complete data were obtained from 6,917 women. Those at or above defined cutoff limits were considered positively screened (n = 3,593) for metabolic syndrome. All of them were invited to undergo an oral glucose tolerance test; 2,923 women accepted. After excluding 200 women with impaired fasting glucose, 2,723 women were included in the present analysis. Serum lipids were determined by conventional standard methods at the department of clinical chemistry of Lund University Hospital.

RESULTS

According to World Health Organization criteria, 2,123 women had normal glucose tolerance and 600 women had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). IGT was less common (P = 0.001) among users of a transdermal patch [CYC-TRANS; E2 50 microg + norethisterone acetate (NETA) 250microg] compared with the two-combined oral regimen [CON-O (continuous oral E2 2 mg + NETA 1 mg) + CYC-O (sequential oral E2 2 mg + NETA 1 mg)]. Furthermore, IGT was more common among CON-O users when compared with either the CYC-O + CYC-TRANS group (P = 0.002) or the CYC-TRANS only group (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences between CYC-O versus CYC-TRANS or CON-O. Serum levels of total cholesterol were higher in the CYC-TRANS group than in the combined CON-O + CYC-O group (P < 0.05); they also were higher (P = 0.05) when comparing the CYC-O + CYC-TRANS versus CON-O as well as higher in CYC-TRANS versus CON-O (P < 0.05). Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were higher in the CYC-O (P = 0.001), CYC-TRANS (P < 0.05), and the CYC-O + CYC-TRANS (P = 0.001) groups when compared with the CON-O users. There were no differences in the mean age, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), body mass index, waste-hip ratio, or the rate of cigarette and alcohol consumption between the different hormone regimens.

CONCLUSION

The risk of having a pathological glucose load was lower in transdermal versus oral users of HT. Transdermal HT could be regarded as first-line treatment in women at risk of developing diabetes.

Hormone therapy impairs endothelial function in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with rosiglitazone

Diabetes and ovarian senescence are associated with impaired endothelial function and altered arterial mechanical properties. Alterations in normal vascular structure and functioning are the primary cause of mortality and morbidity with type 2 diabetes. Similarly, after menopause, women experience an increase in the rate of cardiovascular disease. Thiazolidinediones have exhibited a number of antiatherogenic actions in populations with type 2 diabetes. The effect of thiazolidinediones in combination with hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women is, however, unknown. To assess whether HT (transdermal estradiol 50 microg and micronized progesterone (100 mg/d) affects vascular function, 21 women receiving rosiglitazone were randomly assigned to receive HT or placebo for 12 wk in a double-blind crossover design. Measures of glycemic control, lipids, blood pressure, flow-mediated dilation, and distensibility index were undertaken at baseline and after each treatment. As a result, flow-mediated dilation was significantly reduced (15.3 +/- 3.8 to 6.6 +/- 1.6%, P = 0.02) with HT, whereas lipids, blood pressure, and distensibility index were unchanged. Placebo had no significant affect on any variables. Thus, the addition of HT to rosiglitazone treatment attenuates endothelial function without altering other cardiovascular risk factors. Caution should, therefore, be exercised when considering combined treatment with thiazolidinedione and HT.

Effect of oestrogen plus progestin on the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Studies examining the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on concentrations of glucose, insulin and diabetes incidence have been inconclusive, in part because many of the studies were too small. We examined the effect of oestrogen plus progestin on diabetes incidence and insulin resistance.

METHODS

The study was a randomised, double-blind trial comparing the effect of daily 0.625 mg conjugated equine oestrogens plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate with that of placebo during 5.6 years of follow-up. The participants were 15,641 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trial. These women were aged 50 to 79 and all had an intact uterus. Diabetes incidence was ascertained by self-report of treatment with insulin or oral hypoglycaemic medication. Fasting glucose, insulin, and lipoproteins were measured in a random sample at baseline and at 1 and 3 years.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of treated diabetes was 3.5% in the hormone therapy group and 4.2% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.93, p=0.004). There was little change in the hazard ratio after adjustment for changes in BMI and waist circumference. During the first year of follow-up, changes in fasting glucose and insulin indicated a significant fall in insulin resistance in actively treated women compared to the control subjects (Year 1 to baseline between-group difference -0.22+/-0.10, p=0.03). INTERPRETATIONS/CONCLUSION: These data suggest that combined therapy with oestrogen and progestin reduces the incidence of diabetes, possibly mediated by a decrease in insulin resistance unrelated to body size. Future studies of alternative postmenopausal hormone therapy regimens and selective oestrogen agonists and/or antagonists should consider the effects of these regimens on insulin resistance and diabetes.

Metabolic and vascular effect of progestins in post-menopausal women. Implications for cardioprotection

Estrogen therapy causes changes in a variety of cardiovascular risk factors, including insulin resistance, lipoprotein profile, haemostasis, coronary atherosclerosis and vascular reactive, that suggest a potential cardioprotective effect in postmenopausal women. With respect to the role of adjunctive progestins, currently available data suggest that the cardiovascular effects may differ depending on the type, dosage and route of administration of the progestin. Androgenic progestins antagonise the favourable cardiovascular effect of estrogens, whilst non-androgenic progestins do not impair, or may even enhance, the beneficial effect of estrogens. Therefore, less androgenic progestins would appear to be the agent of choice for combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with cardiovascular risk factors.

Effects of low and high dose oestradiol and dydrogesterone therapy on insulin and lipoprotein metabolism in healthy postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

Menopause diminishes insulin secretion and elimination, increases risk of diabetes and adversely affects lipoprotein metabolism. This study was undertaken to establish whether oral oestradiol plus dydrogesterone postmenopausal hormone therapy can modify these changes.

DESIGN

Randomized prospective trial of postmenopausal women taking low dose therapy (1 mg/day oestradiol-17 beta with 5 or 10 mg/day dydrogesterone for days 17-28 of each cycle, n = 15) or high dose therapy (2 mg/day oestradiol-17 beta with 10 or 20 mg/day orally administered dydrogesterone, n = 9).

MEASUREMENTS

Patients underwent measurement of glucose, insulin and C-peptide in the fasting state and during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) at baseline and after 12 and 24 cycles of treatment. Modelling analysis was used to derive measures of insulin secretion, elimination and sensitivity. Fasting serum lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins were also measured.

RESULTS

In both groups there were significant reductions in fasting glucose, insulin and C-peptide. Pancreatic insulin secretion during the IVGTT was increased by treatment (ranging from 45% to 92%, P < 0.01). Insulin elimination was increased at both the peripheral (16% to 43%, P < 0.05) and hepatic (18% to 31%, P < 0.05) levels. Insulin sensitivity was unaffected. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was reduced and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal hormone therapy with oestradiol plus dydrogesterone can favourably affect lipoprotein concentrations and can reverse menopause-associated changes in insulin secretion and elimination.

Progestins and their effects on the breast

Nowadays, when the available scientific data on the in vivo effects of progestins on mammary gland tissue remain controversial, it is of utmost importance to establish adequate criteria to evaluate their actions. One of the reasons for this situation is that a variety of progestins have been studied using a number of different study designs. In addition, data relating to the effects of progestins on breast tissue have been interpreted differently from country to country. Recent data indicate that some progestins clearly oppose the favourable effects of estrogens on a number of important metabolic processes, e.g. influencing insulin-like-growth-factor (IGF)-1 serum levels. IGF-1 is a mitogenic and antiapoptotic peptide involved in growth regulation of breast epithelial cells. Circulating IGF-1 exerts endocrine action, it regulates growth hormone secretion by a negative feedback mechanism. In the past few years, both laboratory investigations and epidemiologic studies provided strong evidence that the IGF-1/growth hormone axis is involved in human cancer risk [Maturitas 29 (1998) 61; Horm. Res. 51 (1999) 34; Eur. J. Cancer 36 (2000) 1224; Maturitas 41 (2002) 299] Some progestins also have effects on the enzymes in breast tissue that are responsible for the local synthesis of estradiol. Thus, whilst progestins without androgenic action have been found to markedly inhibit these enzymes, an equivalent degree of inhibition is not achieved with testosterone-derivatives. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the various partial actions of the different progestins and their effects on breast tissue. Furthermore, factors such as the duration of breast tissue exposure to progestin activity, the influence of different regimens on protective apoptotic mechanisms in the breasts, as well as dose levels and the degree of mammary gland tissue differentiation throughout treatment, should also be considered.

Five weeks of insulin-like growth factor-I treatment does not alter glucose kinetics or insulin sensitivity during a hyperglycemic clamp in older women

Insulin sensitivity and the activity of the hypothalamic-growth hormone (GH)- insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis both decline with age. Treatment with IGF-I increases insulin sensitivity in healthy young subjects. We hypothesized that increasing plasma IGF-I in postmenopausal women to levels characteristic of young women would enhance insulin sensitivity. To test the hypothesis, fasting glucose kinetics and insulin sensitivity were measured in 24 healthy, normoglycemic, postmenopausal women before and after 5 weeks of treatment with either recombinant human (rh)IGF-I (15 microg/kg body weight/d twice daily) or placebo in a double-blind study. Diet energy content and composition were rigidly controlled to maintain energy balance. A hyperglycemic clamp (8 mmol/L) coupled with stable isotope infusion ([6,6(2)H]glucose) was performed before and after treatment to assess whole-body insulin sensitivity; defined as the glucose rate of disappearance (Rd) or rate of infusion (GRIF) scaled to the steady-state insulin concentration (I). There were no differences in fasting glucose or insulin concentrations, glucose kinetics, or glucose oxidation after either treatment. During the clamps, steady-state insulin concentrations with placebo (pre = 151 +/- 28 pmol/L, post = 173 +/- 31 pmol/L) were slightly different than with IGF-I (pre = 182 +/- 37 pmol/L, post = 163 +/- 33 pmol/L), but the variations were not significant. No significant changes in whole-body insulin sensitivity were observed after treatment with IGF-I, calculated as Rd/I (pre = 17.7 +/- 2.6 microg/kg/min/pmol/L, post = 19.3 +/- 2.0 microg/kg/min/pmol/L for IGF-I v pre = 24.2 +/- 2.5 microg/kg/min/pmol/L, post = 22.8 +/- 3.4 microg/kg/min/pmol/L for placebo) or as GRIF/I (pre = 18.0 +/- 3.9 microg/kg/min/pmol/L, post = 22.3 +/- 3.5 microg/kg/min/pmol/L for IGF-I v pre = 26.4 +/- 6.2 microg/kg/min/pmol/L, post = 26.9 +/- 4.8 microg/kg/min/pmol/L for placebo). Baseline insulin sensitivity in women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT, n = 15) was similar to nonusers (n = 9), but HRT users derived a greater portion of energy expenditure from carbohydrate oxidation compared with nonusers. HRT use had no impact on the response to IGF-I. Overall, we observed subtle, but physiologically insignificant, variations after IGF-I treatment in the direction of enhanced insulin sensitivity. The data suggest that 5 weeks of low-dose rhIGF-I treatment has no material influence on whole-body insulin sensitivity in normoglycemic postmenopausal women.

Intravenous estrogens increase insulin clearance and action in postmenopausal women

To test the hypothesis that estrogens alter insulin action, we evaluated the effects of intravenous conjugated estrogens (CE) on insulin-stimulated steady-state glucose infusion rate (SSGIR) and suppression of plasma glycerol in postmenopausal women (mean +/- SD; 56 +/- 4 yr; n = 12) not using hormone replacement. SSGIR and glycerol were measured during a two-stage (8 and 40 mU. m-2. min-1) hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp on 2 days, with or without a 2.5-mg intravenous CE bolus. Serum estradiol concentrations were increased approximately 200% on the estrogen (EST) compared with the control (CON) days. Serum insulin was reduced (P < 0.01) during stage 2 of the clamp for EST (63.3 +/- 12.8 micro U/ml) vs. CON (78.2 +/- 15.8 micro U/ml). Mean SSGIR and plasma glycerol did not differ between CON and EST days. With adjustment for differences in insulin concentration between conditions, stage 2 glucose disposals were significantly higher (8.63 vs. 7.20 mg. kg-1. min-1) and plasma glycerol concentrations were significantly lower (29.4 vs. 35.0 micro mol/l) for EST vs. CON. Our findings suggest that acute CE administration increases insulin clearance and action in postmenopausal women.

Long-term effects of oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapy on plasma homocysteine levels

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term effects of oral and transdermal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on serum homocysteine levels in postmenopausal women.

DESIGN

An open, prospective, controlled study. Seventy-five healthy postmenopausal women were recruited as eligible for the study. Fifty women seeking HRT were randomized to receive continuous 17beta-estradiol, either by oral (2 mg daily; n = 25) or transdermal (50 microg daily; n = 25) administration, plus 10 mg dydrogesterone daily for 14 days of each 28-day cycle. Twenty-five women unwilling to receive hormone treatment received only calcium supplementation, representing the control group. Fasting blood samples were analyzed at baseline and then after 6, 12, and 24 months to determine plasma homocysteine levels.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine women completed the study. After 6 months of therapy, homocysteine concentrations showed a statistically significant reduction in the treated groups versus both baseline and controls, and no further significant variations were found thereafter. The mean reduction in the homocysteine levels throughout the study was 13.6% in the oral and 8.9% in the transdermal group, respectively, without significant difference between the two routes of estradiol administration. Women with the highest baseline levels of homocysteine experienced the greatest reduction. No significant variations in homocysteine concentrations were found in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral and transdermal estradiol sequentially combined with dydrogesterone shows comparable effectiveness in reducing plasma homocysteine levels in postmenopausal women. Women with the highest pretreatment concentrations of homocysteine benefit the most by the lowering effect of HRT.

Progesterone does not influence vascular function in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

The protective functions of oestrogen therapy alone on cardiovascular risk parameters are well established; however, the action of progesterone on vascular parameters in an oestrogen-deprived environment is less clear.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of progesterone alone on vascular function and hormone levels in postmenopausal women.

DESIGN

In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over design study, 20 healthy postmenopausal women were tested before and after 6 weeks of treatment with micronized progesterone (100 mg/daily) and matching placebo.

METHODS

Tests included measurement of sex hormones and gonadatropin levels, lipids and measures of surrogate markers of vascular function including, blood pressure, flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery, systemic arterial compliance and cutaneous vascular reactivity.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- SEM) age of subjects was 56.4 +/- 2.7 years and the average body mass index at the baseline visit was 27.1 +/- 1.0 kg/m2. Progesterone levels increased as a result of progesterone treatment (0.9 +/- 0.2 to 9.5 +/- 2.3 nmol/l, P = 0.001), whereas follicle-stimulating hormone levels decreased (75.1 +/- 11.4 to 67.6 +/- 10.0, P = 0.001). Systemic arterial compliance, flow mediated dilation, cutaneous vascular reactivity, blood pressure, body mass index, plasma levels of cholesterol, lipids and oestrogen were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that progesterone given without oestrogen does not adversely affect vascular function in postmenopausal women.

Effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on HbA(1c) levels

OBJECTIVE

Estrogen seems to contribute to glucose homeostasis in women. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on HbA(1c) levels in Japanese postmenopausal women and to determine whether the effects varied with age.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied 99 postmenopausal women taking HRT (mean +/- SD age 56.5 +/- 6.9 years, BMI 21.5 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)) and 101 postmenopausal women not on HRT (51.4 +/- 6.1 years, 21.3 +/- 2.4 kg/m(2)). HRT consisted of continuous conjugated equine estrogen (CEE; 0.625 mg/day) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 2.5 mg/day) for >2 years.

RESULTS

HbA(1c) levels are positively associated with age and BMI in women who use HRT as well as in those who do not use HRT. After adjusting for age and BMI, HRT showed no effects on HbA(1c) levels. However, HbA(1c) levels were significantly lower in postmenopausal women aged 40-49 years who were taking HRT than in women of similar age who were not taking HRT (mean +/- SE 4.776 +/- 0.092 vs. 5.096 +/- 0.078%, P < 0.05). No differences in HbA(1c) levels between women who did and did not use HRT were observed in those older than 50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral HRT involving CEE combined with MPA may decrease HbA(1c) levels in women aged 40-49 years and is likely to have no adverse effects on HbA(1c) levels in women older than 50 years.

Low-dose hormone therapy and carbohydrate metabolism

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence by two low doses of oral continuous-combined formulations of 17 beta-estradiol (E(2)) and norethisterone acetate (NETA) on carbohydrate metabolism in healthy postmenopausal women.

DESIGN

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Volunteers at a university hospital.

SUBJECT

One hundred twenty healthy postmenopausal women.

INTERVENTION(S)

One hundred twenty women were randomized to three treatment arms: (1) E(2) 1 mg/NETA 0.25 mg group (n = 40); (2) E(2) 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg group (n = 40); (3) placebo group (n = 40). A total of 102 women completed 12 months of treatment. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fasting glucose, fasting insulin, total area under the curve (AUC) and insulin/glucose index during OGTT.

RESULT(S)

Fasting levels of glucose and insulin declined significantly in the E(2)/NETA 0.5 mg group. At OGTT, the total AUC for insulin declined in both active arms. The curve for glucose increased significantly in the E(2)/NETA 0.25 mg group. A lower insulin/glucose index was observed during OGTT in both active regimens when compared with placebo. In the active treatment groups, a significant reduction of fasting glucose and/or fasting insulin was encountered in women with higher basal fasting levels (fasting glucose >4.2 mmol/L or log-fasting insulin >0.87).

CONCLUSION(S)

Oral low-dose E(2) 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg regimen did not impair carbohydrate metabolism, but seemed to improve insulin sensitivity in healthy postmenopausal women.

Effect of postmenopausal oestradiol and dydrogesterone therapy on lipoproteins and insulin sensitivity, secretion and elimination in hysterectomised women

OBJECTIVES

To investigate in depth the metabolic effects of oestradiol-17 beta both alone and in combination with the progestagen dydrogesterone.

METHODS

Fifteen hysterectomised postmenopausal women were studied before treatment and after 24 weeks taking oestradiol-17 beta alone (2 mg per day), then following a further 6 (oestrogen-alone phase) and 12 (oestrogen plus progestagen phase) weeks with inclusion of dydrogesterone (10 mg per day for days 17-28 of each 28 day cycle). Measurements at each visit included fasting serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, insulin sensitivity, secretion and elimination by modelling analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test glucose, insulin and C-peptide concentrations, body fat distribution by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and arterial function by carotid artery ultrasound.

RESULTS

Significant reductions were seen throughout in total and LDL cholesterol. The net reductions in total and LDL cholesterol by the end of the study were 5.8% (P<0.05) and 18.4% (P<0.001), respectively. HDL and HDL subfraction cholesterol concentrations rose during treatment with oestradiol alone, the rise being primarily in the HDL(2) subfraction (+21.6%, P<0.001). Fasting serum triglycerides rose 30% on oestradiol treatment. These increases were unaffected by the addition of dydrogesterone. Insulin sensitivity, secretion and elimination, body fat distribution and arterial function were not significantly affected at any stage of the therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The small study sample and high variability in measures of glucose and insulin metabolism may have contributed to the absence of the expected significant improvement in these parameters. Orally administered oestradiol had beneficial effects on total, LDL and HDL cholesterol which were unaffected by the addition of dydrogesterone.

Individual effect of E2 and dydrogesterone on insulin sensitivity in post-menopausal women

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a three-month continuous administration of oral E2, alone, or combined with 2 different dosages of dydrogesterone, on the glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. In a prospective placebo-controlled study, 43 normal weight and normoinsulinemic women were randomized to receive either 2 mg of oral 17beta E2 daily (group A), or 2 mg E2 daily plus 5 mg daily oral dydrogesterone, from day 14 to 28, in a sequentially combined regimen (group B), or 2 mg of E2 and 10 mg dydrogesterone in the same sequentially combined regimen (group C) or placebo for 12 weeks. An OGTT and a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp were performed before and after treatment. Serum glucose and insulin concentrations were measured both in fasting conditions and after OGTT. C-peptide pancreatic secretion was tested only in fasting conditions. Total body glucose utilization (M), for insulin sensitivity evaluation, was determined in each subject. Postmenopausal women treated with unopposed 17beta E2 (group A) showed a slight but statistically significant decrease of insulin sensitivity (p<0.05). A more marked deterioration of the same parameter was observed in the 2 groups treated with E2 plus dydrogesterone (group B and group C: p<0.01). Post hoc testing for the percent change from baseline indicated that group A significantly differed from group C (p<0.05) and all treated groups significantly differed from the placebo group (p<0.01). Finally, after treatment in group C, a significant reduction of insulin and an increase of glucose responses to OGTT (p<0.01) were observed. These results indicate that, in a short-term period, the use of 17beta E2 and overall 17beta E2 plus dydrogesterone, even with the reduction of insulin plasma levels, might cause a decrease in insulin sensitivity in normal weight and normoinsulinemic post-menopausal women.

Oral 17beta-estradiol (1 mg) continuously combined with dydrogesterone improves the serum lipid profile of postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of 1 mg 17beta-estradiol continuously combined with 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 mg dydrogesterone on the serum lipid profile of postmenopausal women.

DESIGN

Serum lipid profile was measured in two 1-year studies performed in healthy, nonhysterectomized, postmenopausal women. One study (n = 182) had an open design and investigated oral 17beta-estradiol 1 mg daily continuously combined with dydrogesterone 2.5 mg daily; the other study (n = 326) had a double-blind, randomized design and investigated oral 17beta-estradiol 1 mg daily continuously combined with dydrogesterone at doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg daily.

RESULTS

With all four dosages of dydrogesterone, serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly reduced (-4.6% to -7.6% and -6.3% to -11.6%, respectively), whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly increased (+4.3% to +7.4%). Serum apolipoprotein A1 and B also improved significantly, reflecting the favorable changes in high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as did lipoprotein(a).

CONCLUSION

Oral 17beta-estradiol 1 mg daily continuously combined with dydrogesterone 2.5 to 20 mg daily has beneficial effects on serum lipid profile in postmenopausal women.

Positive effects on cardiovascular and breast metabolic markers of oral estradiol and dydrogesterone in comparison with transdermal estradiol and norethisterone acetate

OBJECTIVES

To assess differences in two sequential combined hormone replacement therapy (HRT) products on selected cardiovascular and breast metabolic markers. The products were different concerning the route of administration of estradiol and its combined progestin, either oral or transdermal, and the androgenic properties of progestogens, respectively, dydrogesterone and norethisterone acetate.

METHODS

One hundred and nineteen healthy non-hysterectomized postmenopausal women were included in this open, multi-center, two parallel group trial. They were randomized to a treatment of six 28-day cycles with oral estradiol sequentially combined with dydrogesterone (oE2/D10) or a sequential combination patch of estradiol plus norethisterone acetate (tdE/NETA). At baseline and after six cycles the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), the sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and the total insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) blood levels were determined by a central laboratory. A total of 89 women were compliant to the protocol.

RESULTS

After six cycles, a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) concerning HDL-C, SHBG and IGF-I levels was found between the two treatment groups. The HDL-C levels were increased in the oE2/D10 group and decreased in the tdE/NETA group, with a final difference of about 0.3 mmol/l. The oE2/D10 treatment induced a sharp increase (about 57 mmol/l) in SHBG levels. IGF-I levels decreased with both the products, but the difference in favor of the oE2/D10 treatment was of about 30 ng/ml. Moreover, patients on tdE/NETA with an IGF-I baseline value below the median showed an increase.

CONCLUSION

Oral estradiol sequentially combined with dydrogesterone, a non-androgenic progestogen, induced positive changes of some cardiovascular (HDL-C) and breast (SHBG and IGF-I) metabolic markers. These effects were significantly different from those obtained with a transdermal estradiol associated to an androgenic progestogen.

Hormone replacement therapy, insulin sensitivity, and abdominal obesity in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether insulin sensitivity differs between postmenopausal women taking estradiol, women on estrogen plus progesterone hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and women not on HRT and whether differences are explained by the differences in total and/or abdominal adiposity and fat deposition in the muscle.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied 28 obese, sedentary postmenopausal Caucasian women. Women taking oral estrogen (n = 6) were matched for age (57 +/- 3 vs. 58 +/- 2 years), weight (87.9 +/- 6.0 vs. 83.0 +/- 3.9 kg), and BMI (33.9 +/- 1.7 vs. 33.9 +/- 1.9 kg/m(2)) with women not on HRT (n = 6). Eight women taking oral estrogen plus progesterone were matched with eight different women not on HRT for age (59 +/- 2 vs. 60 +/- 2 years), weight (82.8 +/- 3.7 vs. 83.7 +/- 4.1 kg), and BMI (30.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 29.9 +/- 1.3 kg/m(2)).

RESULTS

VO(2max) (maximal aerobic capacity), percentage of fat, total body fat mass, and fat-free mass (FFM) were similar between groups. Visceral fat, subcutaneous abdominal fat, sagittal diameter, and mid-thigh low-density lean tissue (intramuscular fat) did not differ by hormone status. Basal carbohydrate and fat utilization was not different among groups. Fasting plasma glucose and insulin did not differ by hormone use. Glucose utilization (M) was measured during the last 30 min of a 3-h hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (40 mU. m(2). min(-1)). Postmenopausal women taking oral estrogen had a 31% lower M than women not on HRT (42.7 +/- 4.0 vs. 61.7 +/- 4.7 micromol. kg(FFM). min(-1), P < 0.05). M was 26% lower in women taking estrogen plus progesterone (44.0 +/- 3.5 vs. 59.7 +/- 6.2 micromol. kg(FFM). min(-1), P < 0.05) than women not on HRT. M/I, the amount of glucose metabolized per unit of plasma insulin (I), an index of insulin sensitivity, was 36% lower in women taking estrogen compared with matched women not on HRT (P < 0.05) and 28% lower in women taking estrogen plus progesterone compared with matched women not on HRT (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal women taking oral estrogen or those taking a combination of estrogen and HRT are more insulin-resistant than women not on HRT, even when women are of comparable total and abdominal adiposity.