Dopamine antagonists can inhibit methamphetamine sensitization, but not cocaine sensitization, when assessed by ambulatory activity in mice

Chronic digoxin exposure causes hyperactivity, anxiolysis, and alters brain monoamine content in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

To investigate the effects of chronic exposure to the cardiotonic steroid digoxin on locomotor activity, anxiety, and brain tissue monoamine content in Zebrafish. In total 24 adult (3-5 months) wild-type experimentally naïve zebrafish (50 : 50 ratio of females to males) were housed in 4-L tanks, in groups of six animals per tank. Two μM Digoxin was maintained in half of the tanks for 7 days. The 'Novel tank test' was performed on day 7 and the animals were euthanized. Concentrations of dopamine, serotonin, and their metabolites were then quantified in brain tissue using HPLC-ED. Seven-day exposure to 2 μM water solution of digoxin caused robust hyperlocomotion and reduced anxiety-like behavior in adult zebrafish in the 'Novel tank test'. The treatment also evoked pronounced neurochemical responses in zebrafish, including increased whole-brain 3-methoxytyramine, reduced norepinephrine and serotonin, and unaltered dopamine, homovanillic acid or 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels. Deficits in monoaminergic (dopaminergic, serotonergic, and noradrenergic) neurotransmission are a key pathogenetic factor for multiple neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. Commonly used clinically to treat cardiac conditions, cardiotonic steroids can affect dopaminergic neurotransmission. Chronic exposure to digoxin evokes hyperactivity-like behavior accompanied by altered monoamine neurotransmission in zebrafish, which may be relevant to understanding the central nervous system side effects of cardiotonic steroids.

Pharmacological Treatments for Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Current Status and Future Targets

The illicit use of the psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH) is a major concern, with overdose deaths increasing substantially since the mid-2010s. One challenge to treating METH use disorder (MUD), as with other psychostimulant use disorders, is that there are no available pharmacotherapies that can reduce cravings and help individuals achieve abstinence. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the molecular targets that have been tested in assays measuring the physiological, the cognitive, and the reinforcing effects of METH in both animals and humans. Several drugs show promise as potential pharmacotherapies for MUD when tested in animals, but fail to produce long-term changes in METH use in dependent individuals (eg, modafinil, antipsychotic medications, baclofen). However, these drugs, plus medications like atomoxetine and varenicline, may be better served as treatments to ameliorate the psychotomimetic effects of METH or to reverse METH-induced cognitive deficits. Preclinical studies show that vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitors, metabotropic glutamate receptor ligands, and trace amine-associated receptor agonists are efficacious in attenuating the reinforcing effects of METH; however, clinical studies are needed to determine if these drugs effectively treat MUD. In addition to screening these compounds in individuals with MUD, potential future directions include increased emphasis on sex differences in preclinical studies and utilization of pharmacogenetic approaches to determine if genetic variances are predictive of treatment outcomes. These future directions can help lead to better interventions for treating MUD.

Consecutive treatments of methamphetamine promote the development of cardiac pathological symptoms in zebrafish

Chronic methamphetamine use, a widespread drug epidemic, has been associated with cardiac morphological and electrical remodeling, leading to the development of numerous cardiovascular diseases. While methamphetamine has been documented to induce arrhythmia, most results originate from clinical trials from users who experienced different durations of methamphetamine abuse, providing no documentation on the use of methamphetamine in standardized settings. Additionally, the underlying molecular mechanism on how methamphetamine affects the cardiovascular system remains elusive. A relationship was sought between cardiotoxicity and arrhythmia with associated methamphetamine abuse in zebrafish to identify and to understand the adverse cardiac symptoms associated with methamphetamine. Zebrafish were first treated with methamphetamine 3 times a week over a 2-week duration. Immediately after treatment, zebrafish underwent electrocardiogram (ECG) measurement using an in-house developed acquisition system for electrophysiological analysis. Subsequent analyses of cAMP expression and Ca2+ regulation in zebrafish cardiomyocytes were conducted. cAMP is vital to development of myocardial fibrosis and arrhythmia, prominent symptoms in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Ca2+ dysregulation is also a factor in inducing arrhythmias. During the first week of treatment, zebrafish that were administered with methamphetamine displayed a decrease in heart rate, which persisted throughout the second week and remained significantly lower than the heart rate of untreated fish. Results also indicate an increased heart rate variability during the early stage of treatment followed by a decrease in the late stage for methamphetamine-treated fish over the duration of the experiment, suggesting a biphasic response to methamphetamine exposure. Methamphetamine-treated fish also exhibited reduced QTc intervals throughout the experiment. Results from the cAMP and Ca2+ assays demonstrate that cAMP was upregulated and Ca2+ was dysregulated in response to methamphetamine treatment. Collagenic assays indicated significant fibrotic response to methamphetamine treatment. These results provide potential insight into the role of methamphetamine in the development of fibrosis and arrhythmia due to downstream effectors of cAMP.

Cannabidiol modulates the METH-induced conditioned place preference through D2-like dopamine receptors in the hippocampal CA1 region

The main problem with addiction is a relapse with a high rate in methamphetamine (METH) abusers. Using addictive drugs repetitively will cause the reward. METH reward is due to an increase in dopamine levels, and the endocannabinoid system (ECS) has a modulatory role in reward through CB1 receptors. On the other hand, the hippocampus plays an important role in learning and memory, so it is involved in the neuroplasticity caused by METH abuse. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been shown to reduce the effects of METH through different mechanisms such as increasing the ECS activity, regulating emotional memory in the ventral hippocampus through D2-like dopamine receptors, and decreasing the mesolimbic dopaminergic activity. The present study tried to find out the role of hippocampal CA1 D2-like dopamine receptors (D2R) in the effects of cannabidiol on the acquisition and expression of METH-induced conditioned place preference (METH-CPP) in rats by using microinjection of sulpiride as a D2R antagonist. For this purpose, different groups of animals received different doses of sulpiride (0.25, 1, and 4 μg/0.5 μL DMSO; CA1), once prior to the injection of CBD (10 μg/5 μL for acquisition and 50 μg/5 μL for expression; ICV) and once in the absence of CBD. Control groups were also considered. In brief, findings showed that cannabidiol decreases METH-induced CPP. Intra-CA1 administration of sulpiride reversed the decreasing effects of cannabidiol on METH-induced CPP in both acquisition and expression phases but more prominent in the expression phase. The results showed that sulpiride did not affect the METH-induced CPP in the absence of cannabidiol. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that cannabidiol decreased METH-induced CPP in part through interaction with hippocampal CA1 D2-dopamine receptors.

Cocaine engages a non-canonical, dopamine-independent, mechanism that controls neuronal excitability in the nucleus accumbens

Drug-induced enhanced dopamine (DA) signaling in the brain is a canonical mechanism that initiates addiction processes. However, indirect evidence suggests that cocaine also triggers non-canonical, DA-independent, mechanisms that contribute to behavioral responses to cocaine, including psychomotor sensitization and cocaine self-administration. Identifying these mechanisms and determining how they are initiated is fundamental to further our understanding of addiction processes. Using physiologically relevant in vitro tractable models, we found that cocaine-induced hypoactivity of nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh) medium spiny neurons (MSNs), one hallmark of cocaine addiction, is independent of DA signaling. Combining brain slice studies and site-directed mutagenesis in HEK293T cells, we found that cocaine binding to intracellular sigma-1 receptor (σ1) initiates this mechanism. Subsequently, σ1 binds to Kv1.2 potassium channels, followed by accumulation of Kv1.2 in the plasma membrane, thereby depressing NAcSh MSNs firing. This mechanism is specific to D1 receptor-expressing MSNs. Our study uncovers a mechanism for cocaine that bypasses DA signaling and leads to addiction-relevant neuroadaptations, thereby providing combinatorial strategies for treating stimulant abuse.

The Sigma-1 Receptor: When Adaptive Regulation of Cell Electrical Activity Contributes to Stimulant Addiction and Cancer

The sigma-1 receptor (σ1R) is an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident chaperone protein that acts like an inter-organelle signaling modulator. Among its several functions such as ER lipid metabolisms/transports and indirect regulation of genes transcription, one of its most intriguing feature is the ability to regulate the function and trafficking of a variety of functional proteins. To date, and directly relevant to the present review, σ1R has been found to regulate both voltage-gated ion channels (VGICs) belonging to distinct superfamilies (i.e., sodium, Na⁺; potassium, K⁺; and calcium, Ca²⁺ channels) and non-voltage-gated ion channels. This regulatory function endows σ1R with a powerful capability to fine tune cells’ electrical activity and calcium homeostasis—a regulatory power that appears to favor cell survival in pathological contexts such as stroke or neurodegenerative diseases. In this review, we present the current state of knowledge on σ1R’s role in the regulation of cellular electrical activity, and how this seemingly adaptive function can shift cell homeostasis and contribute to the development of very distinct chronic pathologies such as psychostimulant abuse and tumor cell growth in cancers.

Intracerebroventricular injection of ouabain causes mania-like behavior in mice through D2 receptor activation

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of ouabain, an inhibitor of the Na, K-ATPase, is an approach used to study the physiological functions of the Na, K-ATPase and cardiotonic steroids in the central nervous system, known to cause mania-like hyperactivity in rats. We describe a mouse model of ouabain-induced mania-like behavior. ICV administration of 0.5 µl of 50 µM (25 pmol, 14.6 ng) ouabain into each lateral brain ventricle results in increased locomotor activity, stereotypical behavior, and decreased anxiety level an hour at minimum. Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry showed that administration of 50 µM ouabain causes a drastic drop in dopamine uptake rate, confirmed by elevated concentrations of dopamine metabolites detected in the striatum 1 h after administration. Ouabain administration also caused activation of Akt, deactivation of GSK3β and activation of ERK1/2 in the striatum of ouabain-treated mice. All of the abovementioned effects are attenuated by haloperidol (70 µg/kg intraperitoneally). Observed effects were not associated with neurotoxicity, since no dystrophic neuron changes in brain structures were demonstrated by histological analysis. This newly developed mouse model of ouabain-induced mania-like behavior could provide a perspective tool for studying the interactions between the Na,K-ATPase and the dopaminergic system.

Protective and restorative effects of the traditional Chinese medicine Jitai tablet against methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity

Background

Methamphetamine (METH) is a psychostimulant with high abuse liability that affects the monoamine neurotransmitter systems, particularly the dopamine system. Currently there are no effective medications for the treatment of METH abuse to restore METH-induced dopaminergic dysfunction. The Jitai tablet (JTT), a commercial traditional Chinese medicinal preparation, has been shown to modulate the dopaminergic function both in heroin addicts and in morphine-dependent rats. The purpose of this study was to investigate, in a rodent model, whether JTT can protect against METH-induced neurotoxicity, and/or restore METH-damaged dopaminergic function.

Methods

Immunohistochemical staining and/or autoradiography staining were used to detect tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression in the substantia nigra, and to examine the levels of dopamine transporter (DAT), dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) and TH levels in the striatum. Using a stereotyped behavior rating scale, we evaluated the inhibitory effect of JTT on METH-induced behavioral sensitization.

Results

Repeated METH administration induced obvious stereotyped behavior and neurotoxicity on the dopaminergic system. Pre-treatment with JTT significantly attenuated METH-induced stereotyped responses, and interdicted METH-induced changes in the levels of DAT, D2R and TH expression. Treatment with JTT after METH administration restored DAT, D2R and TH expression to normal levels.

Conclusions

Our results indicated that JTT protects against METH-induced neurotoxicity and restores the dopaminergic function, and thus might be a potential treatment for the dopaminergic deficits associated with METH abuse.

Importance of D1 and D2 receptor stimulation for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats

The behavioral manifestations of psychostimulant-induced sensitization vary markedly between young and adult rats, suggesting that the neural mechanisms mediating this phenomenon differ across ontogeny. In this project we examined the importance of D1 and D2 receptors for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period. In the behavioral experiments, rats were injected with reversible D1 and/or D2 antagonists (SCH23390 and/or raclopride) or an irreversible receptor antagonist (EEDQ) either before cocaine administration on the pretreatment day (induction) or before cocaine challenge on the test day (expression). In the EEDQ experiments, receptor specificity was assessed by using selective dopamine antagonists to protect D1 and/or D2 receptors from inactivation. Receptor binding assays showed that EEDQ caused substantial reductions in dorsal striatal D1 and D2 binding sites, while SCH23390 and raclopride fully protected D1 and D2 receptors from EEDQ-induced alkylation. Behavioral results showed that neither D1 nor D2 receptor stimulation was necessary for the induction of cocaine sensitization in preweanling rats. EEDQ disrupted the sensitization process, suggesting that another receptor type sensitive to EEDQ alkylation was necessary for the induction process. Expression of the sensitized response was prevented by an acute injection of a D1 receptor antagonist. The pattern of DA antagonist-induced effects described for preweanling rats is, with few exceptions, similar to what is observed when the same drugs are administered to adult rats. Thus, it appears that maturational changes in D1 and D2 receptor systems are not responsible for ontogenetic differences in the behavioral manifestation of cocaine sensitization.

Potential for targeting dopamine/DARPP-32 signaling in neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders

INTRODUCTION

Alterations in dopamine neurotransmission has been implicated in pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, and DARPP-32 plays a pivotal role in dopamine neurotransmission. DARPP-32 likely influences dopamine-mediated behaviors in animal models of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders and therapeutic effects of pharmacological treatment. Areas covered: We will review animal studies on the biochemical and behavioral roles of DARPP-32 in drug addiction, schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease. In general, under physiological and pathophysiological conditions, DARPP-32 in D1 receptor expressing (D1R) -medium spiny neurons (MSNs) promotes dopamine/D1 receptor/PKA signaling, whereas DARPP-32 in D2 receptor expressing (D2R)-MSNs counteracts dopamine/D2 receptor signaling. However, the function of DARPP-32 is differentially regulated in acute and chronic phases of drug addiction; DARPP-32 enhances D1 receptor/PKA signaling in the acute phase, whereas DARPP-32 suppresses D1 receptor/PKA signaling in the chronic phase through homeostatic mechanisms. Therefore, DARPP-32 plays a bidirectional role in dopamine neurotransmission, depending on the cell type and experimental conditions, and is involved in dopamine-related behavioral abnormalities. Expert opinion: DARPP-32 differentially regulates dopamine signaling in D1R- and D2R-MSNs, and a shift of balance between D1R- and D2R-MSN function is associated with behavioral abnormalities. An adjustment of this imbalance is achieved by therapeutic approaches targeting DARPP-32-related signaling molecules.

Presynaptic G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Gatekeepers of Addiction?

Drug abuse and addiction cause widespread social and public health problems, and the neurobiology underlying drug actions and drug use and abuse is an area of intensive research. Drugs of abuse alter synaptic transmission, and these actions contribute to acute intoxication as well as the chronic effects of abused substances. Transmission at most mammalian synapses involves neurotransmitter activation of two receptor subtypes, ligand-gated ion channels that mediate fast synaptic responses and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that have slower neuromodulatory actions. The GPCRs represent a large proportion of neurotransmitter receptors involved in almost all facets of nervous system function. In addition, these receptors are targets for many pharmacotherapeutic agents. Drugs of abuse directly or indirectly affect neuromodulation mediated by GPCRs, with important consequences for intoxication, drug taking and responses to prolonged drug exposure, withdrawal and addiction. Among the GPCRs are several subtypes involved in presynaptic inhibition, most of which are coupled to the Gi/o class of G protein. There is increasing evidence that these presynaptic Gi/o-coupled GPCRs have important roles in the actions of drugs of abuse, as well as behaviors related to these drugs. This topic will be reviewed, with particular emphasis on receptors for three neurotransmitters, Dopamine (DA; D1- and D2-like receptors), Endocannabinoids (eCBs; CB1 receptors) and glutamate (group II metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors). The focus is on recent evidence from laboratory animal models (and some evidence in humans) implicating these receptors in the acute and chronic effects of numerous abused drugs, as well as in the control of drug seeking and taking. The ability of drugs targeting these receptors to modify drug seeking behavior has raised the possibility of using compounds targeting these receptors for addiction pharmacotherapy. This topic is also discussed, with emphasis on development of mGlu2 positive allosteric modulators (PAMs).

Behavioral sensitization to ethanol: Neural basis and factors that influence its acquisition and expression

Ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization (EBS) was first described in 1980, approximately 10 years after the phenomenon was described for psychostimulants. Ethanol acts on γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate receptors as an allosteric agonist and antagonist, respectively, but it also affects many other molecular targets. The multiplicity of factors involved in the behavioral and neurochemical effects of ethanol and the ensuing complexity may explain much of the apparent disparate results, found across different labs, regarding ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization. Although the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system plays an important role in EBS, we provide evidence of the involvement of other neurotransmitter systems, mainly the glutamatergic, GABAergic, and opioidergic systems. This review also analyses the neural underpinnings (e.g., induction of cellular transcription factors such as cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein and growth factors, such as the brain-derived neurotrophic factor) and other factors that influence the phenomenon, including age, sex, dose, and protocols of drug administration. One of the reasons that make EBS an attractive phenomenon is the assumption, firmly based on empirical evidence, that EBS and addiction-related processes have common molecular and neural basis. Therefore, EBS has been used as a model of addiction processes. We discuss the association between different measures of ethanol-induced reward and EBS. Parallels between the pharmacological basis of EBS and acute motor effects of ethanol are also discussed.

Effects of D2 or combined D1/D2 receptor antagonism on the methamphetamine-induced one-trial and multi-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats

RATIONALE

There is suggestive evidence that the neural mechanisms mediating one-trial and multi-trial behavioral sensitization differ, especially when the effects of various classes of dopamine (DA) agonists are examined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of the D2 receptor for the induction of one-trial and multi-trial methamphetamine sensitization in preweanling rats.

METHODS

In a series of experiments, rats were injected with saline or raclopride (a selective D2 receptor antagonist), either alone or in combination with SCH23390 (a selective D1 receptor antagonist), 15 min prior to treatment with the indirect DA agonist methamphetamine. Acute control groups were given two injections of saline. This pretreatment regimen occurred on either postnatal days (PD) 13-16 (multi-trial) or PD 16 (one-trial). On PD 17, rats were challenged with methamphetamine and locomotor sensitization was determined.

RESULTS

Blockade of D2 or D1/D2 receptors reduced or prevented, respectively, the induction of multi-trial methamphetamine sensitization in young rats, while the same manipulations had minimal effects on one-trial behavioral sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

DA antagonist treatment differentially affected the methamphetamine-induced sensitized responding of preweanling rats depending on whether a one-trial or multi-trial procedure was used. The basis for this effect is uncertain, but there was some evidence that repeated DA antagonist treatment caused nonspecific changes that produced a weakened sensitized response. Importantly, DA antagonist treatment did not prevent the one-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats. The latter result brings into question whether DA receptor stimulation is necessary for the induction of psychostimulant-induced behavioral sensitization during early ontogeny.

Differential modulation of methamphetamine-mediated behavioral sensitization by overexpression of Mu opioid receptors in nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area

RATIONALE

Repeated administration of methamphetamine (Meth) induces behavioral sensitization which is characterized by a progressive increase in locomotor response after each injection. Previous studies have shown that Mu opioid receptors (MORs) can regulate Meth-mediated behavioral sensitization. However, the reported interactions are controversial; systemic activation of MORs either enhanced or suppressed Meth sensitization. It is possible that alteration of Meth sensitization after systemic administration of MOR ligands reflects the sum of distinct MOR reactions in multiple brain regions.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to examine the actions of MORs on Meth sensitization after regionally selective overexpression of human MOR through an AAV6-based gene delivery system.

METHOD

We demonstrated that adeno-associated virus (AAV)-MOR increased MOR immunoreactivity and binding in vitro. AAV-MOR or AAV-green fluorescent protein (GFP) was injected into the nucleus accumbens (NAc) or ventral tegmental area (VTA) of adult mice. Two weeks after viral infection, animals received Meth or saline for five consecutive days. Locomotor behavior and striatal dopamine (DA) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) level were determined.

RESULTS

Repeated administration of Meth progressively increased locomotor activity; this sensitization reaction was attenuated by intra-NAc AAV-MOR microinjections. Infusion of AAV-MOR to VTA enhanced Meth sensitization. AAV-MOR significantly enhanced DA levels in VTA after VTA infection but reduced DOPAC/DA turnover in the NAc after NAc injection.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest a differential modulation of Meth sensitization by overexpression of MOR in NAc and VTA. Regional manipulation of MOR expression through AAV may be a novel approach to control Meth abuse and psychomimetic activity.

The effect of nicotine induced behavioral sensitization on dopamine D1 receptor pharmacology: An in vivo and ex vivo study in the rat

Behavioral sensitization is a phenomenon which can develop following repeated intermittent administration of a range of psychostimulants, and other compounds, and may model neuroplastic changes seen in addictive processes and neuropsychiatric disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) ligands on nicotine-induced behavioral sensitization and their molecular consequences in the striatum. Wistar rats were chronically treated (5 days) with vehicle or nicotine (0.4 mg/kg; s.c.) and locomotor activity was measured. Following a 5 day withdrawal period, rats were pretreated with vehicle or the D1R antagonist SCH-23390 (0.03 mg/kg; i.p.) and challenged with nicotine. Either 45 min or 24h post-challenge, the striatum was isolated and ex vivo receptor binding and cAMP accumulation (using LC-MS/MS) were assessed. It was shown that chronic nicotine administration induced the development and expression of locomotor sensitization, of which the latter was blocked by SCH-23390. Nicotine-induced sensitization had no effect on forskolin stimulated cAMP accumulation but increased the efficacy of dopamine for the D1R and decreased the potency of D1R agonists. These effects were antagonized by in vivo pre-challenge with SCH-23390. No effect on D1 receptor binding was observed. Moreover, time dependent effects were observed between tissue taken 45 min and 24h post-challenge. The present findings provide a connection between behavioral sensitization and intracellular cAMP accumulation through the D1R. Together these data suggest that changes in D1R signaling in the dorsal striatum may play an important role in the underlying mechanisms of nicotine-induced behavioral sensitization.

Role of the D1 receptor for the dopamine agonist-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats

RATIONALE

The neural mechanisms mediating the ontogeny of behavioral sensitization are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to determine the role of the D1 receptor for the induction of dopamine agonist-induced behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period.

METHODS

In the first experiment, the early ontogeny of R-propylnorapomorphine (NPA)-induced behavioral sensitization was examined by pretreating male and female rats with saline or NPA (0.5, 1, or 2 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (IP)) before placement in activity chambers on postnatal day (PD) 12, 16, 20, or 24. One day later, rats were tested with lower doses of NPA and the occurrence of locomotor sensitization was determined. In subsequent experiments, rats were injected with saline or the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 (0.1, 0.5, 1, or 5 mg/kg, IP) 0, 15, 30, or 60 min before cocaine, methamphetamine (METH), or NPA pretreatment. The next day, rats were tested with the same dopamine agonist again and sensitized responding was assessed.

RESULTS

NPA produced one-trial behavioral sensitization at all ages tested. In preweanling rats, SCH23390, regardless of dose, was ineffective at preventing the induction of cocaine-, METH-, or NPA-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results are in partial contrast to adult rodent studies, in which SCH23390 blocks the induction of METH- and apomorphine-induced behavioral sensitization, but not cocaine sensitization. When these findings are considered together, it appears that D1 receptor stimulation is not necessary for the induction of behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period, although D1 receptors may play a more important role in adulthood.

Dopamine signaling in reward-related behaviors

Dopamine (DA) regulates emotional and motivational behavior through the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway. Changes in DA mesolimbic neurotransmission have been found to modify behavioral responses to various environmental stimuli associated with reward behaviors. Psychostimulants, drugs of abuse, and natural reward such as food can cause substantial synaptic modifications to the mesolimbic DA system. Recent studies using optogenetics and DREADDs, together with neuron-specific or circuit-specific genetic manipulations have improved our understanding of DA signaling in the reward circuit, and provided a means to identify the neural substrates of complex behaviors such as drug addiction and eating disorders. This review focuses on the role of the DA system in drug addiction and food motivation, with an overview of the role of D1 and D2 receptors in the control of reward-associated behaviors.

Early ontogeny of D-amphetamine-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization

The early ontogeny of D-amphetamine-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization was characterized using male and female preweanling and preadolescent rats. In Experiment 1, rats were injected with saline or D-amphetamine (1, 4, or 8mg/kg) in activity chambers or the home cage on postnatal day (PD) 12, PD 16, PD 20, or PD 24. One day later, rats were challenged with either 0.5 or 2mg/kg D-amphetamine and distance traveled was measured in activity chambers for 120min. In Experiment 2, saline or D-amphetamine was administered in activity chambers on PD 24, while a challenge injection of D-amphetamine (0.25-4mg/kg) was given on PD 25. At younger ages (PD 13 and PD 17), a strong sensitized response was evident on the test day regardless of whether rats were pretreated with D-amphetamine (4 or 8mg/kg) before being placed in the activity chamber or 30min after being returned to the home cage. Rats did not display D-amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization on PD 21, nor was context-dependent sensitization apparent on PD 25 even when a broad dose range of D-amphetamine was used. When low doses of D-amphetamine were administered on the pretreatment and test days (1 and 0.5mg/kg, respectively), sensitized responding was not evident at any age. In summary, D-amphetamine-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization was only apparent within a narrow developmental window during early ontogeny. This ontogenetic pattern of sensitized responding is similar to the one produced by methamphetamine and distinct from the pattern produced by cocaine. The unique sensitization profiles resulting from repeated D-amphetamine and cocaine treatment may be a consequence of their different mechanisms of action.

Unusual effects of nicotine as a psychostimulant on ambulatory activity in mice

The present study examined the effect of nicotine, alone and in combination with various drugs that act on the CNS, on ambulatory activity, a behavioral index for locomotion, in ICR (CD-1) strain mice. Nicotine at 0.25–2 mg/kg acutely reduced ambulatory activity of ICR mice. The effect of nicotine was similar to that of haloperidol and fluphenazine but distinct from that of bupropion and methylphenidate. ICR mice developed tolerance against the inhibitory effect of nicotine on ambulatory activity when nicotine was repeatedly administered. This effect was also distinct from bupropion and methylphenidate as they produced augmentation of their ambulation-stimulating effects in ICR mice. Nicotine reduced the ambulation-stimulating effects of bupropion and methylphenidate as well as haloperidol and fluphenazine. Taken together, nicotine exhibited unusual effects as a psychostimulant on ambulatory activity in ICR mice.

Involvement of µ-Opioid Receptor in Methamphetamine-Induced Behavioral Sensitization

Methamphetamine is a potent addictive stimulant drug that activates certain systems in the brain. It is a member of the amphetamine family, but the effects of methamphetamine are much more potent, longer lasting, and more harmful to the central nervous system. Repeated administration of methamphetamine induces behavioral sensitization, which is considered to be related to compulsive drug-seeking behavior. Although the mechanism responsible for methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization remains unclear, it is believed that the mesolimbic dopaminergic system in the central nervous system plays a critical role in the development of behavioral sensitization. Our previous studies indicate that the involvement of the μ-opioid receptor system underlies the development of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Understanding the mechanisms of behavioral sensitization that are regulated by the μ-opioid receptor system would be helpful in developing therapeutic programs against methamphetamine addiction. This review briefly discusses the neural circuitry and cellular mechanisms that are known to play a central role in methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization and outlines the role of the μ-opioid receptor system in the development of methamphetamine-induced sensitization.

Eating high-fat chow enhances sensitization to the effects of methamphetamine on locomotion in rats

Eating high-fat chow can modify the effects of drugs acting directly or indirectly on dopamine systems and repeated intermittent drug administration can markedly increase sensitivity (i.e., sensitization) to the behavioral effects of indirect-acting dopamine receptor agonists (e.g., methamphetamine). This study examined whether eating high-fat chow alters the sensitivity of male Sprague Dawley rats to the locomotor stimulating effects of acute or repeated administration of methamphetamine. The acute effects of methamphetamine on locomotion were not different between rats (n=6/group) eating high-fat or standard chow for 1 or 4 weeks. Sensitivity to the effects of methamphetamine (0.1-10mg/kg, i.p.) increased progressively across 4 once per week tests; this sensitization developed more rapidly and to a greater extent in rats eating high-fat chow as compared with rats eating standard chow. Thus, while eating high-fat chow does not appear to alter sensitivity of rats to acutely-administered methamphetamine, it significantly increases the sensitization that develops to repeated intermittent administration of methamphetamine. These data suggest that eating certain foods influences the development of sensitization to drugs acting on dopamine systems.

Gabapentin blocks methamphetamine-induced sensitization and conditioned place preference via inhibition of α₂/δ-1 subunits of the voltage-gated calcium channels

Our previous investigation demonstrated that repeated administration of morphine significantly enhanced α(2)/δ-1 subunit expression in the frontal cortex and limbic forebrain of mice as well as morphine-induced place preference. However, little is known about regulatory mechanisms of α(2)/δ-1 subunit expression in conditioned place preference by methamphetamine (METH). In the present study, we investigated the role of α(2)/δ-1 subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) in the mouse brain under repeated treatment with METH. The level of α(2)/δ-1 subunit increased significantly in the limbic forebrain including the nucleus accumbens and the frontal cortex of mice showing METH-induced sensitization. Under these conditions, the development of behavioral sensitization induced by the intermittent administration of METH was significantly suppressed by the co-administration of gabapentin (GBP) with binding activity to an exofacial epitope of α(2)/δ-1 subunit. Furthermore, GBP administered i.c.v. caused a dose-dependent inhibition of the METH-induced place preference. Chronic GBP treatment at the dose alleviating sensitization and place preference significantly reduced the elevation of α(2)/δ-1 subunit of VGCC induced by the repeated administration of METH in the limbic forebrain and frontal cortex, whereas there were no changes in the increase of α(2)/δ-1 subunit mRNA. These findings indicate that α(2)/δ-1 subunit plays a critical role in the development of METH-induced place preference following neuronal plasticity, and that GBP, which significantly suppressed METH-induced place preference by its possible inhibitory action of α(2)/δ subunit to neuronal membrane, may possibly be used as an alternative drug to treat or prevent drug dependence.

Treatment of the psychostimulant-sensitized animal model of schizophrenia

Behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants in rodents is associated with the alteration of dopaminergic neurotransmission, and has been proposed as a useful model of schizophrenia due to its progressively intensifying, easily relapsing, and long-lasting features. Pharmacological treatments that reverse the established sensitization may have potential therapeutic values for schizophrenia. The present aim is to review pharmacological treatments that induce the reversal of established sensitization to psychostimulants. In addition, we discuss possible mechanisms for the reversal of sensitization. Reversal of sensitization is induced by chronic dopamine D1 receptor agonism, D2 or D1/D2 receptor agonism combined with mild N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism or serotonin (5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(3) ) receptor antagonism, 5-HT(1A) receptor agonism, and 5-HT(2A) or 5-HT(3) receptor antagonism. Chronic treatments with these drugs likely adjust altered dopaminergic neurotransmission in sensitized animals. Especially, chronic dopamine D1 receptor agonism, which may adjust mesolimbic hyperdopaminergic and mesocortical hypodopaminergic functions in sensitized animals, is an attractive therapeutic approach for schizophrenia.

Role of dopamine D1-like receptors in methamphetamine locomotor responses of D2 receptor knockout mice

Behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants manifests as an increased locomotor response with repeated administration. Dopamine systems are accepted to play a fundamental role in sensitization, but the role of specific dopamine receptor subtypes has not been completely defined. This study used the combination of dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice and a D1-like antagonist to examine dopamine D1 and D2 receptor involvement in acute and sensitized locomotor responses to methamphetamine. Absence of the dopamine D2 receptor resulted in attenuation of the acute stimulant effects of methamphetamine. Mutant and wild-type mice exhibited sensitization that lasted longer within the time period of the challenge test in the mutant animals. Pretreatment with the D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 produced more potent reductions in the acute and sensitized locomotor responses to methamphetamine in D2 receptor-deficient mice than in wild-type mice; however, the expression of locomotor sensitization when challenged with methamphetamine alone was equivalently attenuated by previous treatment with SCH 23390. These data suggest that dopamine D2 receptors play a key role in the acute stimulant and sensitizing effects of methamphetamine and act in concert with D1-like receptors to influence the acquisition of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization, traits that may influence continued methamphetamine use.

Evidence for dopamine involvement in ambulation promoted by menthone in mice

The present study examines the mechanism that underlies the ability of menthone (MTN), a constituent of peppermint oil, to promote mouse ambulation. Since bupropion (BUP), a dopamine (DA) uptake inhibitor, promotes mouse ambulation, the effect of MTN combined with BUP on ambulation was investigated. The results showed that BUP with MTN produced an additive interaction on mouse ambulation. The effects of DA antagonists chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, SCH12679 and spiperone on the ability of MTN to promote ambulation were then examined. All of these antagonists attenuated the effects of MTN. Prior exposure to the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, which inhibits catecholamines synthesis, decreased subsequent sensitivity to the effect of MTN. These results suggest that DA is involved in the ability of MTN to promote ambulation in mice.

Repeated administration of a dopamine D1 receptor agonist reverses the increased proportions of striatal dopamine D1High and D2High receptors in methamphetamine-sensitized rats

Repeated administration of psychostimulants produces a behavioural sensitization. Amphetamine-sensitized animals are known to have a higher proportion of high-affinity states of dopamine D2 receptors (D2(High) receptors) in the striatum. We recently reported that repeated administration of a dopamine D1 receptor agonist, R-(+)-SKF38393, reverses the established behavioural sensitization to methamphetamine (MAP). To investigate the mechanisms for reversal of behavioural sensitization, we examined the effect of repeated administration of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist on the proportions of D2(High) receptors and the high-affinity states of dopamine D1 receptors (D1(High) receptors) in the striatum. In the striatum from the MAP-sensitized rats, the proportions of D1(High) and D2(High) receptors (28.5 +/- 1.96 and 57.5 +/- 3.58%) were higher than those in the saline-control rats (12.0 +/- 1.01 and 21.9 +/- 1.60%, respectively). Repeated administration of R-(+)-SKF38393 to the MAP-sensitized rats reduced the increased proportions of D1(High) and D2(High) receptors to 12.4 +/- 1.57 and 31.0 +/- 2.14%, respectively, which were similar to the proportions in the saline-control rats. The total densities of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors were not altered in each treatment condition. The results demonstrate that the proportions of D1(High) and D2(High) receptors in the striatum are elevated in MAP-sensitized rats, and that repeated administration of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist to the MAP-sensitized rats reverses the increased proportions of D1(High) and D2(High) receptors. The findings reveal postsynaptic mechanisms for the development of behavioural sensitization to MAP and the reversal of established sensitization by repeated administration of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist.

Nullifying drug-induced sensitization: behavioral and electrophysiological evaluations of dopaminergic and serotonergic ligands in methamphetamine-sensitized rats

Repeated exposure to methamphetamine produces a persistent enhancement of the acute motor effects of the drug, commonly referred to as behavioral sensitization. Behavioral sensitization involves monoaminergic projections to several forebrain nuclei. We recently revealed that the ventral pallidum (VP) may also be involved. In this study, we sought to establish if treatments with antagonists or partial agonists to monoaminergic receptors could "reverse" methamphetamine-induced behavioral and VP neuronal sensitization. Behavioral sensitization was obtained in rats with five once-daily s.c. injections of 2.5mg/kg methamphetamine, an effect that persisted for at least 60 days. After the development of sensitization, 15 once-daily treatments of mirtazapine (a 5-HT(2/3), alpha(2) and H(1) antagonist), SKF38393 (D(1) partial agonist) or SCH23390 (dopamine D(1) antagonist) nullified indices of motor sensitization as assessed by measuring the motoric response to an acute methamphetamine challenge 30 days after the fifth repeated methamphetamine treatment. VP neurons recorded in vivo from methamphetamine-sensitized rats at the 30-day withdrawal time also showed a robust downward shift in the excitatory responses observed to an acute i.v. methamphetamine challenge in non-sensitized rats. This decreased excitatory effect was reversed by mirtazapine, but not by other antagonists that were tested. These data suggest a potential therapeutic benefit for mirtazapine in the treatment of methamphetamine addiction, and point to a possible role for the VP in the sensitization process to methamphetamine.

Reversal of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization by repeated administration of a dopamine D1 receptor agonist

Repeated intermittent administration of methamphetamine (MAP) produces an enduring hypersensitivity to the motor stimulant effect of MAP, termed behavioral sensitization. Dopamine plays a critical role in the development and expression of behavioral sensitization. Here, we investigated whether a dopamine D1 receptor agonist could reverse behavioral sensitization to MAP. Administration of MAP (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) to rats once every 3 days for a total of 5 times (days 1-13) induced the enhancement of locomotor activity after MAP challenge (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) on day 20, verifying the development of behavioral sensitization. The MAP-sensitized rats then received a dopamine D1 agonist, R-(+)-SKF38393 (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.), once a day for 7 consecutive days (days 21-27). Behavioral analysis on days 30 and 41 revealed that the enhanced locomotor activity was reversed by repeated R-(+)-SKF38393 administration. Moreover, repeated R-(+)-SKF38393 administration reversed the increased dopamine release in the striatum after MAP challenge on day 41. Thus, repeated administration of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist induces the reversal of established behavioral sensitization to MAP and of increased dopamine release in the striatum, lasting for at least 2 weeks. Dopamine D1 receptor agonists may be useful therapeutic agents for the treatment of psychostimulant addiction.

Studies on the role of dopamine D1 receptors in the development and expression of MDMA-induced behavioral sensitization in rats

RATIONALE

There is a large body of evidence indicating that the mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway is critically involved in the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine and cocaine, but its role in the development of sensitization to psychostimulants is not that sound. Very few studies, however, have examined the role of dopamine transmission in 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced sensitization.

OBJECTIVES

The effects of the D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 on the development and expression of MDMA-induced behavioral sensitization were investigated in rats.

METHODS

During the development phase of sensitization, SCH 23390 was administered 15 min before every administration of MDMA. After 12 days of withdrawal, a MDMA challenge dose was given and locomotor activity was measured. In separate experiments, 15 min before the challenge injection of MDMA, SCH 23390 was administered either systemically or directly into the core of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of MDMA-pretreated rats.

RESULTS

SCH 23390 did not prevent the development of MDMA-induced behavioral sensitization but completely blocked the expression when given before the challenge dose of MDMA. The same results were obtained when SCH 23390 was locally applied into the core of the NAc.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggest that D1 receptor stimulation is not critical for the development of long-term MDMA sensitization, in agreement with what has been reported for cocaine. By contrast, expression of sensitization depends on the activation of D1 receptors located in the NAc core.

Perspectives for the development of animal models of bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder (BD) has been a particularly challenging illness for the development of adequate animal models for neurobiological studies. These difficulties are largely related to the peculiar clinical characteristics of this illness, with an intriguing alternation of mania, depression, euthymia, and mixed states. The etiology and brain mechanisms involved in this several mental illness remain unknown. Preclinical studies with animal models of mania or depression have been developed to evaluate the potential efficacy of new psychotropic drugs and generate information concerning the biochemical effects of these drugs on specific targets. These models try to mimic the behavioral components of mania and depression in human subjects and examine the pharmacological responses and mechanisms of action of potentially new therapeutic agents. The main limitation is that there is currently no model that would mimic mood cyclicity, which is a hallmark feature of BD. Thus, these models do not represent valid paradigms for the study of this illness, because they do not address key questions regarding cyclicity. In this review, we propose that new genetics approaches involving potential animal models of BD are a promising new area for further development.

Evidence for the involvement of dopamine in ambulation promoted by menthol in mice

The present study examines the mechanism that underlies the ability of menthol (ME), a major constituent of peppermint oil, to promote mouse ambulation. We initially confirmed that bupropion (BUP), a dopamine (DA) uptake inhibitor, promotes ambulation in ICR mice. Since the subcutaneous administration of ME produced similar effects in mice, we investigated the effects of ME on ambulation when combined with BUP. The results showed that BUP potentiated the effect of ME on mouse ambulation. We then examined effects of the DA antagonists chlorpromazine, haloperidol, fluphenazine, spiperone, and SCH12679 on the ability of BUP and ME to promote ambulation. All of these DA antagonists attenuated the effects of BUP and ME. Prior exposure to reserpine, which depletes monoamines, caused decreased sensitivity to the ability of BUP and of ME in promoting ambulation. The tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, similarly decreased subsequent sensitivity to the effects of BUP and ME. These results suggest that DA is involved in the abilities of ME and BUP to promote ambulation in mice.

Sensitized increase of period gene expression in the mouse caudate/putamen caused by repeated injection of methamphetamine

Methamphetamine (MAP) causes the sensitization phenomena not only in MAP-induced locomotor activity, dopamine release, and Fos expression, but also in MAP-induced circadian rhythm. Cocaine-induced sensitization is reportedly impaired in Drosophila melanogaster mutant for the Period (Per) gene. Thus, sensitization may be related to induction of the Per gene. A rapid induction of mPer1 and/or mPer2 in the suprachiasmatic nucleus after light exposure is believed to be necessary for light-induced behavioral phase shifting. Although the caudate/putamen (CPu) expresses mPer1 and/or mPer2 mRNA, the function of these genes in this nucleus has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, we examined whether MAP affects the expression of mPer1 and/or mPer2 mRNA in the mouse CPu. Injection of MAP augmented the expression of mPer1 but not mPer2 or mPer3 in the CPu, and this MAP-induced increase in mPer1 expression lasted for 2 h. Also, the MAP-induced increase of mPer1 mRNA was strongly antagonized by pretreatment with a dopamine D1 receptor and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, but not by a D2 receptor antagonist. Interestingly, application of either the D1 or the D2 agonist alone did not cause mPer1 expression. The present results demonstrate that activation of both NMDA and D1 receptors is necessary to produce MAP-induced mPer1 expression in the CPu. Repeated injection of MAP caused a sensitization in not only the locomotor activity but also mPer1 expression in the CPu without affecting the level of mPer2, mPer3, or mTim mRNA. Thus, these results suggest that MAP-induced mPer1 gene expression may be related to the mechanism for MAP-induced sensitization in the mouse.

The dopamine antagonist sch 23390 reverses dizocilpine-induced blockade of cocaine sensitization

The present work examined the effects of pre-treatment with Sch 23390, a selective D(1) receptor antagonist, on the dizocilpine-induced blockade of sensitization to the locomotor-stimulating effect of cocaine. Rats were given either cocaine [15mgkg(-1)day(-1), intraperitoneally (i.p.)] from day 1 to day 5 (cocaine-experienced rats) or vehicle (cocaine-naïve rats). From day 6 to day 15, animals remained drug-free in their home cages. On day 16 rats received a challenge injection of cocaine (15mgkg(-1)) or vehicle, and were tested for sensitization to the locomotor-stimulating effect of cocaine. In cocaine-naïve rats the acute effect of cocaine was a 1.5 times increase in locomotor activity. In cocaine-experienced rats, the acute effects of cocaine were considerably more pronounced than in cocaine-naïve rats; the stimulating effect of cocaine in these animals was a doubling in locomotor activity. In cocaine-naïve rats, pre-treatment with dizocilpine (100microgkg(-1)), Sch 23390 (100microgkg(-1)) or a combination of the two drugs from day 1 to day 5 changed neither spontaneous locomotor activity nor cocaine stimulant activity. By contrast, cocaine-experienced animals that had been given 100microgkg(-1) dizocilpine from day 1 to day 5 failed to show the increase in locomotor activity when challenged with cocaine on day 16. Pre-treatment with Sch 23390 (100microgkg(-1)day(-1), i.p.) from day 1 to day 5 was found to prevent completely the cocaine anti-sensitization properties of 100microgkg(-1) dizocilpine, but failed to prevent cocaine sensitization. On the other hand, horizontal activity in cocaine-experienced rats that had been given dizocilpine (100microgkg(-1)) 15min before cocaine challenge on day 16 was higher than in corresponding controls. It is concluded that prevention of cocaine sensitization by dizocilpine may be related to the events set into motion by the NMDA antagonist at the level of dopaminergic transmission involving D(1) receptors.

Simultaneous monitoring of conditioned place preference and locomotor sensitization following repeated administration of cocaine and methamphetamine

The paradigm of conditioned place preference has been widely used to demonstrate the rewarding properties of psychomotor stimulants. Such drugs also stimulate locomotor activity. Repeated administration of low doses of psychomotor stimulants causes progressive increases in the locomotor stimulating effect, a phenomenon termed behavioral sensitization. Using a new activity monitor (SCANET MV-10LD) that simultaneously measures the amount of time spent and the distance traveled in each side of a two-compartment chamber, the present study assessed place preference conditioning and locomotor sensitization following repeated administration of cocaine or methamphetamine (MAP) in mice. We examined the effect of environmental factors on these activities using two different types of chamber: one having a single cue, and the other having dual cues for the discrimination of compartments. In both types of chamber, cocaine (5-20 mg/kg) and MAP (1-2 mg/kg) similarly produced conditioned place preference. However, repeated cocaine administration caused the development of locomotor sensitization only in the single-cue chamber. On the other hand, repeated administration of MAP resulted in the development of sensitization in both types of chamber. The findings indicate that environmental factors differentially affect the development of locomotor sensitization, but not place preference conditioning, following repeated administration of cocaine or methamphetamine. The advantages of this new system will be discussed.

Activation of serotonin (5-HT)1A receptors inhibits amphetamine sensitization in mice

The effects of serotonin (5-HT)1A drugs on the development and expression of sensitization to the locomotor effect of amphetamine (AMPH) were studied in mice. 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT1A agonist, dose-dependently reduced the expression of AMPH (2.5 mg/kg)-induced sensitization. The latter inhibitory effect of 8-OH-DPAT was reversed by (S)-N-tert-butyl-3-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)-2-phenyl propamine (WAY 100135), a 5-HT1A antagonist. WAY 100135 given alone did not affect expression of AMPH sensitization. Combined injections of 8-OH-DPAT, but not WAY 100135, with AMPH (2.5 mg/kg) during the development of sensitization, protected against the expression of sensitization to a challenge dose of AMPH (2.5 mg/kg) 3 days after withdrawal. The above inhibitory effect of 8-OH-DPAT on the development of AMPH sensitization was blocked by pretreatment with WAY 100135. The AMPH-induced conditioned locomotion was unaffected by pretreatment with 8-OH-DPAT. These results indicate that 5-HT1A receptors are not involved in AMPH-induced sensitization per-se, whereas their pharmacological activation leads to the inhibition of both the development and the expression of AMPH-induced sensitization.

Effect of acute and chronic stress restraint on amphetamine-associated place preference: involvement of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors

The purpose of this study was to determine the D-amphetamine (1.0, 1. 5 and 2 mg/kg i.p.)-induced place preference in rats pre-exposed to acute or chronic restraint stress, using the conditioned place preference model. We also studied the involvement of opioid and dopamine mechanisms in the acute restraint stress-induced increase of D-amphetamine-induced place preference. A single restraint session (2 h) but not chronic restraint (2 h/day for 7 days) leading to adaptation to the stressor, enhanced the D-amphetamine-induced place preference. This enhancing effect was prevented by haloperidol administration (0.4 mg/kg i.p.), (+/-)-sulpiride (60 mg/kg i.p.) or R(+)-SCH-23390 hydrochloride (R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride, 30 microg/kg i.p.) 10-20 min prior to the acute restraint session. However, naltrexone pretreatment (1 or 2 mg/kg i.p.) failed to prevent the acute restraint-induced enhancement of D-amphetamine-induced place preference. These results suggest that: (1) the enhancement of D-amphetamine-induced place preference occurred after a single restraint stress but not following chronic restraint stress, (2) the stimulation of both dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors is necessary for the development of single restraint stress-induced enhancement of D-amphetamine-induced place preference and (3) apparently, an opioid system is not involved in this acute restraint-induced effect.

Both glutamate receptor antagonists and prefrontal cortex lesions prevent induction of cocaine sensitization and associated neuroadaptations

Behavioral sensitization to psychomotor stimulants is accompanied by a number of alterations in the mesoaccumbens dopamine (DA) system, including DA autoreceptor subsensitivity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and DA D1 receptor supersensitivity in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). We investigated the role of excitatory amino acid (EAA) transmission in the induction of cocaine sensitization and these accompanying DA receptor alterations. To do so, we used three glutamate receptor antagonists, the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg), the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist CGS 19755 (10.0 mg/kg), and the AMPA receptor antagonist NBQX (12.5 mg/kg). Rats received daily double injections of either one of these antagonists or saline with either cocaine (15.0 mg/kg) or saline for 5 days. Cocaine sensitization was defined as an increase in horizontal locomotor activity in response to cocaine challenge (7.5 mg/kg) on the third day of withdrawal. All three antagonists prevented the induction of cocaine sensitization. Extracellular single cell recordings revealed that these antagonists also prevented the induction of DA autoreceptor subsensitivity in the VTA and DA D1 receptor supersensitivity in the NAc. To determine whether the relevant glutamate receptors were under regulation by medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) EAA efferents, we next lesioned the mPFC bilaterally with ibotenic acid at least 7 days before repeated cocaine treatment began. These lesions also prevented the induction of cocaine sensitization and the associated neuroadaptations. Our findings indicate that glutamate transmission from mPFC to the mesoaccumbens DA system is critical for the induction of cocaine sensitization and its cellular correlates.

Involvement of dopamine receptors on locomotor stimulation and sensitization elicited by the interaction of ethanol and mazindol in mice

We have previously observed that the combination of ethanol (EtOH) and the anorectic drug mazindol (MZ) produces more marked effects on behavior than either substance alone. In the present study we examined whether the repeated administration of the drug combination could induce sensitization to its motor activating effects in mice and, if so, whether this response could be affected by dopamine (DA) receptors antagonists. Male Swiss albino mice were treated daily for 7 days with combined EtOH+MZ (1.2 g/kg, 5.0 mg/kg IP), EtOH (1.2 g/kg IP), MZ (5.0 mg/kg IP), or control solution coadministered with the D1 dopamine antagonist SCH-23390 (0.025 or 0.05 mg/kg IP), the mixed dopamine antagonist haloperidol (0.05 or 0.075 mg/kg IP), or vehicle. After the injections on days 1, 7, and 10, mice were assessed in activity cages at different time intervals. Repeated administration of MZ resulted in an enhancement of its locomotor activating effects, behavioral sensitization. Further, the combined EtOH+MZ treatment also resulted in sensitization to its locomotor effects. Moreover, the development of MZ and EtOH+MZ sensitization was attenuated by both SCH-23390 and haloperidol. These data demonstrate that following repeated MZ or EtOH+MZ exposure mice show locomotor sensitization through DA receptor stimulation. Also, these findings suggest that a major determinant of combined anorectic-alcohol misuse may be the increased stimulating effects produced by such combination.

Repeated injection of GBR 12909, but not cocaine or WIN 35,065-2, into the ventral tegmental area induces behavioral sensitization

A role for the mesolimbic dopamine system in the development of behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants, such as cocaine and amphetamine, is well established. Previous reports have suggested that the ventral tegmental area (VTA) is involved in the initiation of, while the nucleus accumbens is in involved in the expression of behavioral sensitization. This hypothesis is supported in part, by studies which demonstrated that behavioral sensitization could be induced by repeated intra-VTA, but not intra-accumbal, administration of amphetamine. The present studies were designed to determine whether repeated intra-VTA cocaine would similarly induce behavioral sensitization. Rats receiving four daily injections of cocaine (1.5, 5 or 15 nmol/side) into the VTA did not show a sensitized behavioral response when challenged with cocaine (15 mg/kg, ip) 1 week later. In contrast to this, repeated injection of the specific dopamine reuptake inhibitor, GBR 12909 (15 nmol/side) produced behavioral sensitization to a challenge injection of cocaine. Repeated injections of the cocaine analog WIN 35,065-2 did not induce behavioral sensitization to cocaine, suggesting that the local anesthetic properties of cocaine were not responsible for the inability of intra-VTA cocaine to induce sensitization. In summary, the data suggest that sensitization to cocaine may involve mechanisms different from amphetamine.

D1 and D2 dopamine and opiate receptors are involved in the restraint stress-induced sensitization to the psychostimulant effects of amphetamine

The time course of the restraint stress-induced sensitization to the stimulant effects of amphetamine (AMPH, 0.5 mg/kg IP) on locomotor activity was investigated for up to 8 days. In a series of separate experiments, the involvement of opioid and dopaminergic mechanisms in the development of acute restraint stress-induced behavioral sensitization were characterized. Both a single restraint session (2 h) and chronic restraint (2 h per day for 7 days) similarly potentiated the effects of AMPH on motor activity. This behavioral sensitization was prevented by the administration of naltrexone (2 mg/kg IP), haloperidol (1 mg/kg IP), sulpiride (60 mg/kg IP) or SCH23390 (0.5 mg/kg IP) 10-20 min prior to restraint. These results indicate that 1) the development of sensitization to amphetamine-induced effects on motor activity does not depend on the length of exposure to stress (acute or chronic). 2) the stimulation of both D1 and D2 dopaminergic receptors is necessary for the development of the restraint stress-induced sensitization to AMPH and 3) and opioid system is also implicated in this sensitization process.

Cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization: effects of haloperidol and SCH 23390 treatments

The objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine could be prevented by high doses of the dopamine receptor antagonists haloperidol and SCH 23390. In two experiments, male Wistar rats were injected daily for 4 days with either cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle in combination with haloperidol (1.0 mg/kg, IP), SCH 23390 (0.5 mg/kg, SC), or vehicle. After the daily injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas. At 24 h after the last preexposure test session, all rats were given a challenge injection of cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) and tested for activity. Cocaine treatments produced a greater relative increase in locomotor activity with repeated exposure compared to vehicle treatments (i.e., sensitization). Moreover, the acute activating effects of cocaine over days were blocked by both haloperidol and SCH 23390. The coadministration of haloperidol, but not SCH 23390, blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine. That is, after the cocaine challenge injection, rats pretreated with SCH 23390 and cocaine did not differ from rats preexposed only to cocaine, whereas rats pretreated with haloperidol and cocaine did not differ from rats pretreated only with vehicle. Pretreatment with haloperidol or SCH 23390 without cocaine enhanced the locomotor-activating effects of the subsequent cocaine challenge injection. These findings suggest that cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization may develop as a result of repeated dopamine D1- or D2-type receptor stimulation, and that brief dopamine antagonist treatments enhance subsequent behavioral sensitivity to cocaine.

Inhibition of cocaine sensitization by MK-801, a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist: evaluation by ambulatory activity in mice

Alterations of cocaine effects, which were induced by prior repeated 5-time administration of MK-801 ((+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine) (i.p.) alone or in combination with cocaine (s.c.) at 3- to 4-day intervals, were investigated by means of ambulatory activity in mice. The repeated administration of either cocaine (10 and 20 mg/kg) alone or MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg) alone progressively enhanced each drug's effect. The enhanced effects of cocaine and MK-801 were estimated to be 1.8-2.2 times and about 1.4 times, respectively, as great as those at the 1st administration. Although the coadministration of MK-801 with cocaine produced a significant enhancement in the ambulation-increasing effect, the comparatively higher doses of MK-801 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) acted not only to reduce cocaine sensitivity but also to inhibit the development of cocaine sensitization. Thus, the mice that had been given MK-801 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) alone 5 times showed lower sensitivities to cocaine (20 mg/kg) than the mice given saline alone. The mice coadministered MK-801 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) with cocaine (10 and 20 mg/kg) also exhibited lower sensitivities to cocaine (10 and 20 mg/kg) than those given cocaine alone. However, MK-801 could not ameliorate the established sensitization to cocaine. Similar interactions have been demonstrated between MK-801 at 1 mg/kg, but not 0.3 mg/kg, and methamphetamine. The present results indicate that MK-801 can inhibit the development of sensitization to cocaine at a lower dose than that required to inhibit methamphetamine sensitization.