8R-Lisuride Is a Potent Stereospecific Histamine H1-Receptor Partial Agonist

Binding of histamine to the H1 receptor-a molecular dynamics study

Binding of histamine to the G-protein coupled histamine H₁ receptor plays an important role in the context of allergic reactions; however, no crystal structure of the resulting complex is available yet. To deduce the histamine binding site, we performed unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on a microsecond time scale, which allowed to monitor one binding event, in which particularly the residues of the extracellular loop 2 were involved in the initial recognition process. The final histamine binding pose in the orthosteric pocket is characterized by interactions with Asp107^3.32, Tyr108^3.33, Thr194^5.43, Asn198^5.46, Trp428^6.48, Tyr431^6.51, Phe432^6.52, and Phe435^6.55, which is in agreement with existing mutational data. The conformational stability of the obtained complex structure was subsequently confirmed in 2 μs equilibrium MD simulations, and a metadynamics simulation proved that the detected binding site represents an energy minimum. A complementary investigation of a D107A mutant, which has experimentally been shown to abolish ligand binding, revealed that this exchange results in a significantly weaker interaction and enhanced ligand dynamics. This finding underlines the importance of the electrostatic interaction between the histamine ammonium group and the side chain of Asp107^3.32 for histamine binding.

Aminergic GPCR-Ligand Interactions: A Chemical and Structural Map of Receptor Mutation Data

The aminergic family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays an important role in various diseases and represents a major drug discovery target class. Structure determination of all major aminergic subfamilies has enabled structure-based ligand design for these receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis data provides an invaluable complementary source of information for elucidating the structural determinants of binding of different ligand chemotypes. The current study provides a comparative analysis of 6692 mutation data points on 34 aminergic GPCR subtypes, covering the chemical space of 540 unique ligands from mutagenesis experiments and information from experimentally determined structures of 52 distinct aminergic receptor-ligand complexes. The integrated analysis enables detailed investigation of structural receptor-ligand interactions and assessment of the transferability of combined binding mode and mutation data across ligand chemotypes and receptor subtypes. An overview is provided of the possibilities and limitations of using mutation data to guide the design of novel aminergic receptor ligands.

A Combined In Vitro/In Silico Approach to Identifying Off-Target Receptor Toxicity

Many xenobiotics can bind to off-target receptors and cause toxicity via the dysregulation of downstream transcription factors. Identification of subsequent off-target toxicity in these chemicals has often required extensive chemical testing in animal models. An alternative, integrated in vitro/in silico approach for predicting toxic off-target functional responses is presented to refine in vitro receptor identification and reduce the burden on in vivo testing. As part of the methodology, mathematical modeling is used to mechanistically describe processes that regulate transcriptional activity following receptor-ligand binding informed by transcription factor signaling assays. Critical reactions in the signaling cascade are identified to highlight potential perturbation points in the biochemical network that can guide and optimize additional in vitro testing. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model provides information on the timing and localization of different levels of receptor activation informing whole-body toxic potential resulting from off-target binding.

The Target Residence Time of Antihistamines Determines Their Antagonism of the G Protein-Coupled Histamine H1 Receptor

The pharmacodynamics of drug-candidates is often optimized by metrics that describe target binding (K_d or K_i value) or target modulation (IC₅₀). However, these metrics are determined at equilibrium conditions, and consequently information regarding the onset and offset of target engagement and modulation is lost. Drug-target residence time is a measure for the lifetime of the drug-target complex, which has recently been receiving considerable interest, as target residence time is shown to have prognostic value for the in vivo efficacy of several drugs. In this study, we have investigated the relation between the increased residence time of antihistamines at the histamine H₁ receptor (H₁R) and the duration of effective target-inhibition by these antagonists. Hela cells, endogenously expressing low levels of the H₁R, were incubated with a series of antihistamines and dissociation was initiated by washing away the unbound antihistamines. Using a calcium-sensitive fluorescent dye and a label free, dynamic mass redistribution based assay, functional recovery of the H₁R responsiveness was measured by stimulating the cells with histamine over time, and the recovery was quantified as the receptor recovery time. Using these assays, we determined that the receptor recovery time for a set of antihistamines differed more than 40-fold and was highly correlated to their H₁R residence times, as determined with competitive radioligand binding experiments to the H₁R in a cell homogenate. Thus, the receptor recovery time is proposed as a cell-based and physiologically relevant metric for the lead optimization of G protein-coupled receptor antagonists, like the H₁R antagonists. Both, label-free or real-time, classical signaling assays allow an efficient and physiologically relevant determination of kinetic properties of drug molecules.

Molecular Modelling Approaches for the Analysis of Histamine Receptors and Their Interaction with Ligands

Several experimental techniques to analyse histamine receptors are available, e.g. pharmacological characterisation of known or new compounds by different types of assays or mutagenesis studies. To obtain insights into the histamine receptors on a molecular and structural level, crystal structures have to be determined and molecular modelling studies have to be performed. It is widely accepted to generate homology models of the receptor of interest based on an appropriate crystal structure as a template and to refine the resulting models by molecular dynamic simulations. A lot of modelling techniques, e.g. docking, QSAR or interaction fingerprint methods, are used to predict binding modes of ligands and pharmacological data, e.g. affinity or even efficacy. However, within the last years, molecular dynamic simulations got more and more important: First of all, molecular dynamic simulations are very helpful to refine the binding mode of a ligand to a histamine receptor, obtained by docking studies. Furthermore, with increasing computational performance it got possible to simulate complete binding pathways of ions or ligands from the aqueous extracellular phase into the allosteric or orthosteric binding pocket of histamine receptors.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors

Histamine is a developmentally highly conserved autacoid found in most vertebrate tissues. Its physiological functions are mediated by four 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors (H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R) that are all targets of pharmacological intervention. The receptors display molecular heterogeneity and constitutive activity. H1R antagonists are long known antiallergic and sedating drugs, whereas the H2R was identified in the 1970s and led to the development of H2R-antagonists that revolutionized stomach ulcer treatment. The crystal structure of ligand-bound H1R has rendered it possible to design new ligands with novel properties. The H3R is an autoreceptor and heteroreceptor providing negative feedback on histaminergic and inhibition on other neurons. A block of these actions promotes waking. The H4R occurs on immuncompetent cells and the development of anti-inflammatory drugs is anticipated.

A structural chemogenomics analysis of aminergic GPCRs: lessons for histamine receptor ligand design

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chemogenomics focuses on the discovery of new connections between chemical and biological space leading to the discovery of new protein targets and biologically active molecules. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a particularly interesting protein family for chemogenomics studies because there is an overwhelming amount of ligand binding affinity data available. The increasing number of aminergic GPCR crystal structures now for the first time allows the integration of chemogenomics studies with high-resolution structural analyses of GPCR-ligand complexes.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

In this study, we have combined ligand affinity data, receptor mutagenesis studies, and amino acid sequence analyses to high-resolution structural analyses of (hist)aminergic GPCR-ligand interactions. This integrated structural chemogenomics analysis is used to more accurately describe the molecular and structural determinants of ligand affinity and selectivity in different key binding regions of the crystallized aminergic GPCRs, and histamine receptors in particular.

KEY RESULTS

Our investigations highlight interesting correlations and differences between ligand similarity and ligand binding site similarity of different aminergic receptors. Apparent discrepancies can be explained by combining detailed analysis of crystallized or predicted protein-ligand binding modes, receptor mutation studies, and ligand structure-selectivity relationships that identify local differences in essential pharmacophore features in the ligand binding sites of different receptors.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

We have performed structural chemogenomics studies that identify links between (hist)aminergic receptor ligands and their binding sites and binding modes. This knowledge can be used to identify structure-selectivity relationships that increase our understanding of ligand binding to (hist)aminergic receptors and hence can be used in future GPCR ligand discovery and design.

Structure of the human histamine H1 receptor complex with doxepin

The biogenic amine histamine is an important pharmacological mediator involved in pathophysiological processes such as allergies and inflammations. Histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) antagonists are very effective drugs alleviating the symptoms of allergic reactions. Here we show the crystal structure of the H(1)R complex with doxepin, a first-generation H(1)R antagonist. Doxepin sits deep in the ligand-binding pocket and directly interacts with Trp 428(6.48), a highly conserved key residue in G-protein-coupled-receptor activation. This well-conserved pocket with mostly hydrophobic nature contributes to the low selectivity of the first-generation compounds. The pocket is associated with an anion-binding region occupied by a phosphate ion. Docking of various second-generation H(1)R antagonists reveals that the unique carboxyl group present in this class of compounds interacts with Lys 191(5.39) and/or Lys 179(ECL2), both of which form part of the anion-binding region. This region is not conserved in other aminergic receptors, demonstrating how minor differences in receptors lead to pronounced selectivity differences with small molecules. Our study sheds light on the molecular basis of H(1)R antagonist specificity against H(1)R.

Pharmacological characterization of the new histamine H4 receptor agonist VUF 8430

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We compare the pharmacological profiles of a new histamine H4 receptor agonist 2-(2-guanidinoethyl)isothiourea (VUF 8430) with that of a previously described H4 receptor agonist, 4-methylhistamine.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Radioligand binding and functional assays were performed using histamine H4 receptors expressed in mammalian cell lines. Compounds were also evaluated ex vivo in monocyte-derived dendritic cells endogenously expressing H4 receptors and in vivo in anaesthetized rats for gastric acid secretion activity.

KEY RESULTS

Both VUF 8430 and 4-methylhistamine were full agonists at human H4 receptors with lower affinity at rat and mouse H4 receptors. Both compounds induced chemotaxis of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. VUF 8430 also showed reasonable affinity and was a full agonist at the H3 receptor. Agmatine is a metabolite of arginine, structurally related to VUF 8430, and was a H4 receptor agonist with micromolar affinity. At histamine H3 receptors, agmatine was a full agonist, whereas 4-methylhistamine was an agonist only at high concentrations. Both VUF 8430 and agmatine were inactive at H1 and H2 receptors, whereas 4-methylhistamine is as active as histamine at H2 receptors. In vivo, VUF 8430 only caused a weak secretion of gastric acid mediated by H2 receptors, whereas 4-methylhistamine, dimaprit, histamine and amthamine, at equimolar doses, induced 2.5- to 6-fold higher output than VUF 8430.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our results suggest complementary use of 4-methylhistamine and VUF 8430 as H4 receptor agonists. Along with H4 receptor antagonists, both agonists can serve as useful pharmacological tools in studies of histamine H4 receptors.

Discovery of quinazolines as histamine H4 receptor inverse agonists using a scaffold hopping approach

From a series of small fragments that was designed to probe the histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R), we previously described quinoxaline-containing fragments that were grown into high affinity H(4)R ligands in a process that was guided by pharmacophore modeling. With a scaffold hopping exercise and using the same in silico models, we now report the identification and optimization of a series of quinazoline-containing H(4)R compounds. This approach led to the discovery of 6-chloro-N-(furan-3-ylmethyl)2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)quinazolin-4-amine (VUF10499, 54) and 6-chloro-2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-N-(thiophen-2-ylmethyl)quinazolin-4-amine (VUF10497, 55) as potent human H(4)R inverse agonists (pK(i) = 8.12 and 7.57, respectively). Interestingly, both compounds also possess considerable affinity for the human histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) and therefore represent a novel class of dual action H(1)R/H(4)R ligands, a profile that potentially leads to added therapeutic benefit. Compounds from this novel series of quinazolines are antagonists at the rat H(4)R and were found to possess anti-inflammatory properties in vivo in the rat.

The noncompetitive antagonism of histamine H1 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells by olopatadine hydrochloride: its potency and molecular mechanism

Calcium responses to various concentrations of histamine were monitored in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing the human histamine H(1) receptor. The effects of various histamine H(1) receptor antagonists on the dose-response curve for histamine were evaluated. Olopatadine hydrochloride (olopatadine) inhibited the histamine-induced maximum response (pD(2)': 7.5) but had insignificant effects on histamine EC(50) values. This noncompetitive property exhibited by olopatadine, which was also observed in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, was the most striking among the antihistamines tested in this study. The geometrical isomer of olopatadine (E-isomer), which had a similar binding affinity to the histamine H(1) receptor as olopatadine, showed a mixed antagonistic profile (competitive and noncompetitive). These results indicate that the geometry around the double bond in the dimethylaminopropylidene group is critical for the potent noncompetitive property of olopatadine. Furthermore, binding mode analyses suggest that the protonated amine group in the dimethylaminopropylidene moiety of olopatadine forms an ionic bond with Glu 181 that is present in the second extracellular loop of the histamine H(1) receptor, whereas the amine group of the E-isomer does not. The second extracellular loop in aminergic G-protein-coupled receptors contributes to ligand binding and therefore the noncompetitive property of olopatadine may be explained by the interaction with Glu 181.

In Vitro Pharmacology of Clinically Used Central Nervous System-Active Drugs as Inverse H1 Receptor Agonists

The human histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) is a prototypical G protein-coupled receptor and an important, well characterized target for the development of antagonists to treat allergic conditions. Many neuropsychiatric drugs are also known to potently antagonize this receptor, underlying aspects of their side effect profiles. We have used the cell-based receptor selection and amplification technology assay to further define the clinical pharmacology of the human H(1)R by evaluating >130 therapeutic and reference drugs for functional receptor activity. Based on this screen, we have reported on the identification of 8R-lisuride as a potent stereospecific partial H(1)R agonist (Mol Pharmacol 65:538-549, 2004). In contrast, herein we report on a large number of varied clinical and chemical classes of drugs that are active in the central nervous system that display potent H(1)R inverse agonist activity. Absolute and rank order of functional potency of these clinically relevant brain-penetrating drugs may possibly be used to predict aspects of their clinical profiles, including propensity for sedation.

Striking differences of action of lisuride stereoisomers at histamine H1 receptors

This study has characterised the pharmacological profile of some dopaminergic agents of the ergoline family including the antiparkinsonian drug 8S-lisuride at native guinea pig histamine H(1) receptors and recombinant human and guinea pig H(1) receptors. We used segments of guinea pig ileum to study contractile responses, Sf9 insect cell membranes expressing the guinea pig H(1) receptor (gpH(1)R) and the human H(1) receptor (hH(1)R) to analyse GTPase activity of G(q)-proteins and we conducted [(3)H]mepyramine binding studies using recombinant gpH(1)Rs and hH(1)Rs. 8S-Lisuride acted as a potent partial agonist at H(1)Rs of guinea pig ileum (pD(2) 7.6, E (max) 28% of histamine-induced maximum response) and as a silent antagonist at recombinant gpH(1)Rs (pA(2) 7.5) and hH(1)Rs (pA(2) 7.7) in GTPase studies. In contrast, its epimeric counterpart, 8R-lisuride, lacked efficacy and showed much lower affinity for H(1)Rs of both species than 8S-lisuride. High affinity of 8S-lisuride and low affinity of 8R-lisuride was also estimated for gpH(1)Rs and hH(1)Rs in radioligand binding studies. The 1-allylated derivative of 8S-lisuride, 1-allyl-8S-lisuride, was equipotent with its parent compound (pD(2) 7.7) and showed enhanced efficacy in guinea pig ileum and at recombinant gpH(1)Rs in GTPase studies (E (max) 53%, 32%). Other antiparkinsionian drugs such as 8S-terguride, pergolide, cabergoline and bromocriptine displayed lower affinities for H(1)Rs than 8S-lisuride. In conclusion, our results show that the antiparkinsonian drug 8S-lisuride is dramatically more potent than its epimeric counterpart 8R-lisuride in all assays used. 8S-Lisuride behaved as a partial agonist at gpH(1)Rs and as a silent antagonist at hH(1)Rs. Thus 8S-lisuride may act as an antagonist in vivo. This may be of potential importance since H(1)Rs modulate dopaminergic transmission in the brain.

BML-241 fails to display selective antagonism at the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor, S1P(3)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The thiazolidine carboxylic acid, BML-241, has been proposed as a lead compound in development of selective antagonists at the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1P3), based on its inhibition of the rise in intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]i) in HeLa cells overexpressing S1P receptors. We have studied the antagonistic properties of BML-241 for the S1P(3) receptor in more detail.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with the S1P3, S1P2 or alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors were used to investigate the effect of BML-241 on increases in [Ca2+]i mediated via different receptors. CHO-K1 cells were used to study ATP-induced [Ca2+]i elevations. Effects on S1P3 -mediated inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and on binding to alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors were also investigated. In addition, the effect of BML-241 on contractions of rat mesenteric artery induced by phenylephrine was studied in an organ bath.

KEY RESULTS

High concentrations of BML-241 (10 microM) inhibited the rise in [Ca2+]i induced by S1P3 and S1P2 receptor stimulation; lower concentrations were ineffective. This high concentration of BML-241 also inhibited [Ca2+]i increases via P2 (nucleotide) receptor or alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor stimulation. Moreover, BML-241 (10 microM) inhibited alpha(1)-adrenoceptor-mediated contraction of rat mesenteric artery but did not displace [3H]-prazosin from alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors in concentrations up to 100 microM. BML-241 (10 microM) did not affect the S1P3 -mediated decrease of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

We conclude that BML-241 is a low potency, non-selective inhibitor of increases in [Ca2+]i, rather than a specific antagonist at the S1P3 receptor.

Pharmacological characterization of the ergot alkaloid receptor in the salivary gland of the ixodid tickAmblyomma hebraeum

Female ticks of the family Ixodidae osmoregulate by secreting the excess fluid of the blood meal back into the host's circulation via the salivary glands. At least three receptors control salivary fluid secretion in the tick Amblyomma hebraeum: (1) dopamine (DA) stimulates fluid secretion via a DA receptor, (2) ergot alkaloids (ErAs) stimulate fluid secretion via an ErA-sensitive receptor (the natural ligand of which has not been identified), and (3) a GABA receptor potentiates the action of DA and ErAs. Here we present some pharmacological properties of the ErA-sensitive receptor. Of the 11 ErAs we tested, (i) four were complete agonists (approximate concentration eliciting 50% maximum response is given in parentheses): dihydroergotamine (0.02 μmol l–1),ergonovine (ErN; 0.06 μmol l–1), methylergonovine (0.1μmol l–1) and α-ergocriptine (0.9 μmol l–1); (ii) three were `incomplete agonists' (approximate concentration eliciting 20% maximum response is given in parentheses):ergocorninine (3.5 μmol l–1), ergocristinine (7.5 μmol l–1) and ergocristine (10 μmol l–1); (C)three were partial agonists (approximate concentration eliciting the respective maximum response in parentheses): ergocornine (50% maximum by 1μmol l–1), methysergide (28% maximum by 10 μmol l–1) and bromocriptine (22% maximum by 10 μmol l–1); and (D) one had no activity up to 1 mmol l–1: ergothioneine. Bromocriptine and methysergide did not antagonize the action of DA, but were effective competitive antagonists of ErN, with Kis of ∼0.3 μmol l–1 and 11 μmol l–1, respectively. Ergothioneine was not an antagonist at either the DA- or ErA-sensitive receptor. The putative protein kinase C activators, 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG) and 1,2-dioctanoyl-sn-glycerol (DiC8), neither stimulated salivary fluid secretion nor potentiated the action of DA or ErN. The putative protein kinase C inhibitors, bisindolymaleimide (BIM) and calphostin C did not inhibit the action of DA or ErN, although low concentrations of calphostin C(10 nmol l–1) appeared to potentiate the action of DA but not ErN. The ion transport inhibitors, furosemide and amiloride (both up to 1 mmol l–1), had no significant effect on DA-stimulated or ErN-stimulated fluid secretion.

Characterization of the Histamine H4 Receptor Binding Site. Part 1. Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Dibenzodiazepine Derivatives

A series of dibenzodiazepine derivatives was synthesized to probe the binding site of the recently discovered histamine H4 receptor (H4R). Optimization of the lead structure clozapine (2) resulted in (E)-7-chloro-11-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)dibenzo[b,f][1,4]oxazepine (7j), a potent H4R agonist (H4R, pKi = 7.6). Pharmacological data suggests that the series of nonimidazole compounds can be used to describe the orthosteric binding site of the H4R because both 2 and 7j displace [3H]histamine in a competitive manner. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the effects of 7j are competitively antagonized by the selective H4R antagonist JNJ 7777120 (1), indicating considerable overlap of their binding sites. On the basis of the derived structure-activity relationships and additional pharmacological results, a pharmacophore model was constructed, which will be the premise for the design of novel H4R ligands.

Discovery of naturally occurring splice variants of the rat histamine H3 receptor that act as dominant-negative isoforms

We described previously the cDNA cloning of three functional rat histamine H3 receptor (rH3R) isoforms as well as the differential brain expression patterns of their corresponding mRNAs and signaling properties of the resulting rH3A, rH3B, and rH3C receptor isoforms (Mol Pharmacol 59:1-8). In the current report, we describe the cDNA cloning, mRNA localization in the rat central nervous system, and pharmacological characterization of three additional rH3R splice variants (rH3D, rH3E, and rH3F) that differ from the previously published isoforms in that they result from an additional alternative-splicing event. These new H3R isoforms lack the seventh transmembrane (TM) helix and contain an alternative, putatively extracellular, C terminus (6TM-rH3 isoforms). After heterologous expression in COS-7 cells, radioligand binding or functional responses upon the application of various H3R ligands could not be detected for the 6TM-rH3 isoforms. In contrast to the rH3A receptor (rH3AR), detection of the rH3D isoform using hemagglutinin antibodies revealed that the rH3D isoform remains mainly intracellular. The expression of the rH3D-F splice variants, however, modulates the cell surface expression-levels and subsequent functional responses of the 7TM H3R isoforms. Coexpression of the rH3AR and the rH3D isoforms resulted in the intracellular retention of the rH3AR and reduced rH3AR functionality. Finally, we show that in rat brain, the H3R mRNA expression levels are modulated upon treatment with the convulsant pentylenetetrazole, suggesting that the rH3R isoforms described herein thus represent a novel physiological mechanism for controlling the activity of the histaminergic system.

Evaluation of Histamine H1-, H2-, and H3-Receptor Ligands at the Human Histamine H4 Receptor: Identification of 4-Methylhistamine as the First Potent and Selective H4 Receptor Agonist

The histamine H(4) receptor (H(4)R) is involved in the chemotaxis of leukocytes and mast cells to sites of inflammation and is suggested to be a potential drug target for asthma and allergy. So far, selective H(4)R agonists have not been identified. In the present study, we therefore evaluated the human H(4)R (hH(4)R) for its interaction with various known histaminergic ligands. Almost all of the tested H(1)R and H(2)R antagonists, including several important therapeutics, displaced less than 30% of specific [(3)H]histamine binding to the hH(4)R at concentrations up to 10 microM. Most of the tested H(2)R agonists and imidazole-based H(3)R ligands show micromolar-to-nanomolar range hH(4)R affinity, and these ligands exert different intrinsic hH(4)R activities, ranging from full agonists to inverse agonists. Interestingly, we identified 4-methylhistamine as a high-affinity H(4)R ligand (K(i) = 50 nM) that has a >100-fold selectivity for the hH(4)R over the other histamine receptor subtypes. Moreover, 4-methylhistamine potently activated the hH(4)R (pEC(50) = 7.4 +/- 0.1; alpha = 1), and this response was competitively antagonized by the selective H(4)R antagonist JNJ 7777120 [1-[(5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)-carbonyl]-4-methylpiperazine] (pA(2) = 7.8). The identification of 4-methylhistamine as a potent H(4)R agonist is of major importance for future studies to unravel the physiological roles of the H(4)R.

Delineation of Receptor-Ligand Interactions at the Human Histamine H1 Receptor by a Combined Approach of Site-Directed Mutagenesis and Computational Techniques - or - How to Bind the H1 Receptor

Histamine H(1) antagonists or "antihistamines" are one of the most prescribed drug families in Western countries. They exert their effect by binding to the histamine H(1) receptor, a receptor belonging to the class of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this review, the binding of ligands to the human histamine H(1) receptor with respect to site-directed mutagenesis studies and molecular modeling techniques is described. The ligands described include agonists (histamine and histaprodifens), a stereoselective partial agonist (lisuride), and selected inverse agonists (mepyramine, acrivastine and triprolidine).

Pharmacological Differences between Human and Guinea Pig Histamine H1 Receptors: Asn84 (2.61) as Key Residue within an Additional Binding Pocket in the H1 Receptor

We tested several histamine H(1) receptor (H(1)R) and antagonists for their differences in agonists binding affinities between human and guinea pig H(1)Rs transiently expressed in African green monkey kidney (COS-7) cells. Especially, the bivalent agonist histaprodifen-histamine dimer (HP-HA) shows a higher affinity for guinea pig than for human H(1)Rs. Based on the structure of HP-HA, we have further identified VUF 4669 [7-(3-(4-(hydroxydiphenylmethyl)piperidin-1-yl)propoxy)-4-oxochroman-2-carboxylic acid] as a guinea pig-preferring H(1)R antagonist, demonstrating that the concept of species selectivity is not limited to agonists. To delineate the molecular mechanisms behind the observed species selectivity, we have created mutant human H(1)Rs in which amino acids were individually replaced by their guinea pig H(1)R counterparts. Residue Asn(84) (2.61) in transmembrane domain (TM) 2 seemed to act as a selectivity switch in the H(1)R. Molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis studies suggest that Asn(84) interacts with the conserved Tyr(458) (7.43) in TM7. Our data provide the first evidence that for some H(1)R ligands, the binding pocket is not only limited to TMs 3, 4, 5, and 6 but also comprises an additional pocket formed by TMs 2 and 7.