Factors associated with damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort

Elucidating the mechanisms and efficacy of antimalarial drugs in systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Antimalarials (AMs) are old drugs with a wide range of beneficial effects in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) beyond the control of activity. The most recent debate is focused on defining the optimal doses to assure the best benefit/risk ratio.

AREAS COVERED

We have reviewed the pharmacological basis underlying the various therapeutic effects of AMs and the beneficial and toxic effects of HCQ, also discussing the role of mepacrine not only as a substitute in cases of maculopathy, but also as a very effective therapy combined with HCQ. We searched PubMed and Embase for articles published in English at any time. We used the terms "hydroxychloroquine" or "mepacrine" or "chloroquine" or "antimalarials", "pharmacokinetics", "efficacy", "remission", "toxicity", "adherence". We reviewed original research articles, large observational studies, systematic reviews, and expert consensus statements. Additionally, studies were identified through the assessment of the reference lists of the evaluated manuscripts.

EXPERT OPINION

We advocate for the widespread use of HCQ at stable doses of 200 mg/d (≤4 mg/kg/d for most patients) and also for the early combination therapy with mepacrine to assure a good control of SLE activity, and also a durable and safe use of these essential drugs for the management of SLE.

Modelling long-term outcomes for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

New treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) aim to improve tolerability and disease activity control over standard of care (SoC) treatment. SoC typically includes daily glucocorticoid (GC) which carries a risk of organ damage over time. This study sought to develop natural history models to identify predictors of long-term outcomes with current SoC SLE treatment.

METHODS

Generalized linear and parametric accelerated failure time survival models (GLM) and parametric accelerated failure time (AFT) survival models were designed to identify predictors of disease activity, flare rate, GC use, organ damage, and mortality beyond the first year of treatment in patients with SLE. Models were run using a longitudinal retrospective analysis of prospectively collected Toronto Lupus Cohort (TLC) study data, collected between 1997 and 2020. Covariates of clinical and statistical significance were selected by bivariate- then multi-variate regression to find the model of best fit.

FINDINGS

Of the 1255 subjects included, 89 % were female 89 % and 65 % Caucasian. Mean follow-up was 10·5 years. At first visit, 51 % of patients had moderate-to-severe disease activity (SLEDAI-2 K score ≥ 6). Mean organ damage scores gradually increased over the years following diagnosis. Median survival of the cohort was ∼35 years from study entry. In the GLM models, SLEDAI-2 K yearly average, and average GC dose were key for predicting change in SLEDAI-2 K, GC use/ dose, and flare (any/rate). Together, adjusted mean SLEDAI-2 K and GC dose were shown to be predictors of mortality and damage in at least 9 of 12 organ systems considered.

INTERPRETATION

These comprehensive, longitudinal, predictive models show that disease activity and GC use are significant predictors of organ damage and mortality in a patient population with predominantly moderate to severe SLE. This deepens understanding of SLE natural history and underscores the need for new treatment approaches that reduce disease activity and GC use with an aim to improve long-term SLE outcomes.

FUNDING

This study was funded by AstraZeneca.

Treatment patterns in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in New Zealand

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the treatment pattern of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Aotearoa/New Zealand.

METHODS

SLE patients were linked to the pharmaceutical dispensing data. The use of publicly funded anti-malarials, immunomodulators, biologics, glucocorticoids and bisphosphonates were compared by gender, ethnicity, age group, socioeconomic status and year of SLE identification. Adherence to hydroxychloroquine was examined using the medication possession ratio (MPR), with a MPR of ≥0.8 considered as high adherence.

RESULTS

Of the 2631 SLE patients, 73.8% used hydroxychloroquine, 64.1% used immunomodulators/biologics and 68.0% used 5 mg or more prednisone daily for at least 90 days. Women were more likely to use hydroxychloroquine than men. Asian patients had a different treatment pattern than other ethnic groups, and Māori were less likely to use hydroxychloroquine. The proportions of patients using different treatments decreased with age. Of the patients using hydroxychloroquine, 54.5% had high adherence. For patients over 40 years old and on long term prednisone, 47.3% had bisphosphonates and this figure was 17.8% for patients under the age of 40 years old. Patients with better socioeconomic status had a higher probability of using bisphosphonates than patients with lower socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to hydroxychloroquine in these patients varied and was lower in men and in Māori. Prednisone is commonly prescribed and used long term. Half of those over the age of 40 years old co-administered bisphosphonate. Further research is needed to identify the reasons for these discrepancies on SLE treatments by gender, ethnicity, age and socioeconomic status.

Real-world treatment patterns in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: associations with comorbidities and damage

OBJECTIVE

To assess treatment patterns and the association between long-term glucocorticoid (GC) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use and damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A retrospective study including patients with SLE using the computerised database of a large health maintenance organisation. Patients were matched with subjects from the general population. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between GC cumulative daily doses, HCQ and comorbidities: Osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Models were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, smoking, disease duration and HCQ use.

RESULTS

A total of 1073 patients with SLE were included, 87.79% were women. The age at first diagnosis was 37.23±14.36 and the SLE disease duration was 12.89±6.23 years. Initiation of HCQ within 12 months of SLE diagnosis increased from 51.02% in 2000 to 83.67% in 2010 and 93.02% in 2018. The annual usage of GC gradually decreased from 45.34% in 2000 to 30.76% in 2020. CVD and osteoporosis were more prevalent in SLE than in the general population. Multivariable logistic regression models revealed increased odds for comorbidities in patients receiving a mean daily dose of prednisone of more than 5 mg/day compared with those receiving 5 mg/day or less.

CONCLUSIONS

CVD and osteoporosis were more prevalent in SLE than in the general population. The dose and frequency of GC treatment in patients with SLE have decreased over the years. Prednisone usage in doses exceeding 5 mg/day is associated with significantly increased odds of osteoporosis and CVD.

Sensitivity of classification criteria from time of diagnosis in an incident systemic lupus erythematosus cohort: a population-based study from Norway

OBJECTIVES

To compare the sensitivity of 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria against 1997 ACR criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), for incident SLE cases in the presumably complete population-based Nor-SLE cohort from Southeast Norway (2.9 million inhabitants).

METHODS

All cases International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) coded as SLE during 2000-2017 were individually reviewed. Those with a confirmed SLE diagnosis by expert clinical assessment were included in the Nor-SLE cohort. Core clinical data were recorded, and the cases were classified according to 2019 EULAR/ACR and 1997 ACR criteria. Juvenile SLE was defined as <16 years at diagnosis and adult SLE was defined as ≥16 years at diagnosis.

RESULTS

We included 737 incident SLE cases (701 adults, 36 juveniles). At diagnosis, 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria were more sensitive than 1997 ACR criteria for adults (91.6% vs 77.3%; p<0.001), but not for juveniles (97.2% vs 88.9%). The 2019 EULAR/ACR counts at diagnosis differed by age group and ethnicity, being higher in young cases and those originating from Asia. From time of diagnosis to study end the fulfilment rate of 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria for the adult cohort increased from 92.5% and 86.5% to 94.6% and 91.0%, respectively, for females and males (mean disease duration of 7.5 years).

CONCLUSION

Showing 92% criteria fulfilment already at time of SLE diagnosis by 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria versus 77% by 1997 ACR criteria, the results from this population-based study suggest that the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria will achieve its goal of capturing more early-SLE cases for clinical trials.

Damage in a large systemic lupus erythematosus cohort from the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry (RELESSER) with emphasis on the cardiovascular system: a longitudinal analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess organ damage, with emphasis on the cardiovascular system, over the different stages of the disease in a large SLE cohort.

METHODS

Multicentre, longitudinal study of a cohort of 4219 patients with SLE enrolled in the Spanish Society of Rheumatology Lupus Registry. Organ damage was ascertained using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). We longitudinally analysed SDI (globally and for each domain) over time only in the 1274 patients whose dates of damage events had been recorded.

RESULTS

During the first year after diagnosis of SLE, 20% of the 1274 patients presented with new damage manifestations. At years 2 and 3, new damage was recorded in 11% and 9% of patients. The annual percentage of patients with new damage after year 5 decreased to 5%. In the first year with the disease, most damage was accumulated in the musculoskeletal, neuropsychiatric and renal systems; in later stages, most damage was in the musculoskeletal, ocular and cardiovascular systems. Considering 'cerebrovascular accident' and 'claudication for 6 months' as cardiovascular items, the cardiovascular system was the second most affected system during the early stages of SLE, with 19% of the patients who presented with damage affected at first year after diagnosis. During the late stages, 20-25% of the patients presenting with new damage did so in this modified cardiovascular domain of the SDI.

CONCLUSIONS

New damage occurs mainly during the first year following diagnosis of SLE. Cardiovascular damage is relevant in both the early and the late stages of the disease. Strategies to prevent cardiovascular damage should be implemented early after diagnosis of SLE.

The additional role of anti-nucleosome antibodies in the prediction of renal damage in systemic lupus erythematosus based on CSTAR (XXV)

OBJECTIVES

The predominant determinant of an unfavorable prognosis among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients resides in the irreversible organ damage. This prospective cohort study aimed to identify the additional value of anti-nucleosome antibodies on organ damage accumulation in SLE patients.

METHODS

Based on the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) registry, demographic characteristics, autoantibodies profiles, and clinical manifestations were collected at baseline. Follow-up data were collected by reviewing clinical records.

RESULTS

Of 2481 SLE patients with full follow-up data, 663 (26.7%) were anti-nucleosome antibodies positive and 1668 (68.0%) were anti-dsDNA antibodies positive. 764 (30.8%) patients developed new organ damage during a mean follow-up of 4.31 ± 2.60 years. At baseline, patients with positive anti-nucleosome antibodies have a higher rate of lupus nephritis (50.7% vs 36.2%, p < .001). According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis, both anti-nucleosome (HR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.09-1.54, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.38-2.05, p < .001) were associated with organ damage accumulation. Anti-nucleosome (HR = 2.51, 95% CI, 1.81-3.46, p < .001) and anti-dsDNA antibodies (HR = 1.69, 95% CI, 1.39-2.06, p < .001) were independent predictors for renal damage. Furthermore, the combination of the two antibodies can provide more accurate information about renal damage in overall SLE patients (HR = 3.19, 95% CI, 2.49-4.10, p < .001) and patients with lupus nephritis at baseline (HR = 2.86, 95% CI, 2.29-3.57, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Besides anti-dsDNA antibodies, anti-nucleosome antibodies can also provide information about organ damage accrual during follow-up. The ability of co-positivity of anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA antibodies in predicting renal damage may lead to additional benefits in the follow-up of these patients.

Improved Health Outcomes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Following Early Belimumab Initiation Without Prior Immunosuppressant Use: A Real-World Descriptive Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have variable treatment pathways, including antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and/or biologics. This study describes differences in clinical outcomes when initiating belimumab (BEL) before and after immunosuppressant use.

METHODS

This real-world, retrospective cohort study (GSK Study 217536) used de-identified administrative claims data from January 2015 to December 2022 in the Komodo Health Database. Adults with moderate/severe SLE initiating BEL (index date) were identified from January 2017 to May 2022, allowing a ≥ 24-month baseline period. Patients were stratified into those initiating BEL before immunosuppressant use (no immunosuppressant use within 24 months before index) and those initiating BEL after immunosuppressant use (one immunosuppressant used within 24 months before index). Oral glucocorticoid (OGC) use, SLE flares, new organ damage, and all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) were analyzed descriptively over a 24-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Baseline SLE severity was similar for patients initiating BEL before (n = 2295) versus after (n = 4114) immunosuppressant use (moderate, 83.1% vs 79.0%; severe, 16.8% vs 21.0%). Patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use had lower SLE flare rates and OGC use. Post-index, patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use discontinued their OGC sooner (moderate baseline SLE, 4.5 vs 8.9 months; severe baseline SLE, 6.2 vs 11.6 months). Patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use had lower SLE flare rates per person-year at all time points (especially severe flare rates in patients with severe baseline SLE, 0.70 vs 1.48 through 24 months post-index). Median time to new organ damage occurrence was longer in patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use (moderate baseline SLE, 32.1 vs 26.7 months; severe baseline SLE, 22.7 vs 21.6 months). All-cause HCRU was similar between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that patients initiating BEL before versus after immunosuppressant use had more favorable outcomes.

Methylprednisolone Pulses and Prolonged Remission in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Propensity Score Analysis of the Longitudinal Lupus-Cruces-Bordeaux Inception Cohort

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of methylprednisolone pulses (MP), given during the first year after the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), in achieving prolonged remission according to the degree of lupus activity at presentation.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of routine clinical care data from the Lupus-Cruces-Bordeaux cohort. The end point was prolonged remission (ie, during five consecutive yearly visits). The effect of MP on remission during the first year was analyzed in the whole cohort and according to the baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 score: <6, 6 to 12, and >12, reflecting mild, moderate, and severe activity, respectively. For adjustment, logistic regression with propensity score (PS) and other therapeutic covariates was performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-three patients were included. Prolonged remission was achieved by 132 patients (57%). MP were associated with prolonged remission (PS-adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-623, P = 0.042). A strong clinical effect was seen among patients with moderate (adjusted OR 5.28, 95% CI 1.27-21.97, P = 0.022) and moderate-severe SLE activity (adjusted OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.11-14.82, P = 0.033). The administration of MP resulted in reduced average dosages of prednisone during the first year among patient with moderate (mean 6.6 vs 10.2 mg/day, P = 0.017) and severe activity (mean 14 vs 28 mg/day, P = 0.015). The odds of prolonged remission were increased by longer-term use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and decreased by higher initial doses of prednisone.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of MP to induce prolonged remission in patients with SLE, particularly in those with moderate and severe activity. The extended use of HCQ also contributes to achieve prolonged remission.

Effect of antimalarials on clinical outcomes in lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of antimalarial drugs in response to therapy, incidence of LN flares, and progression of kidney disease in a large LN cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 424 biopsy-proven LN patients followed for >3 years. We obtained demographic, clinical, laboratory, histopathological and treatment variables. Antimalarial use was approached as (i) users vs no users, (ii) according to prevalent vs incident use regarding the LN flare and (iii) according to the type of antimalarial. All outcomes were evaluated by time-to-event analyses. Adjusted hazard ratios were obtained by Cox regression.

RESULTS

The cohort included 424 patients, median age of 29 years (IQR 23-37), 96% female, with a median eGFR of 81 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 48-118) and proteinuria of 3.4 g/g (IQR 1.9-5.5). Antimalarial use was associated with higher complete response (aHR 1.57, 1.08-2.27), lower incidence of kidney flares (aHR 0.63, 0.43-0.92) and lower progression to kidney failure (aHR 0.37, 0.23-0.53). The effect of antimalarials on these outcomes was modified by the presentation eGFR, histological class and/or concomitant initial immunosuppressor. These protective effects were observed in patients with prevalent or incident use regarding the LN flare and patients using hydroxychloroquine. The incidence of toxic retinopathy was 1.7%, 5.7% and 8.8% by 3, 5 and 7 years of continued antimalarial use, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of antimalarial drugs is associated with increased response to therapy, lower incidence of kidney flares, and lower progression to kidney failure in LN patients. Conversely, this population is at high risk of toxic maculopathy, and yearly ophthalmologic examination is recommended.

Belimumab in early systemic lupus erythematosus: A propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of belimumab in patients with early systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), defined as having a disease duration of less than 6 months.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with SLE in the early stage who received belimumab and standard of care (belimumab group) or standard of care alone (control group) since September 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce potential bias. The primary endpoint was lupus low disease activity status (LLDAS) at weeks 12 and 24. The secondary endpoints were remission and the proportion of glucocorticoid dose tapering to 7.5 mg/day. The efficacy of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis was also assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 111 eligible patients, 16 patients in the belimumab group and 31 patients in the control group were identified by 1:2 PSM. At week 24, a significantly higher proportion of individuals achieved low disease activity state (LLDAS) in the belimumab group compared to the control group (56.3% vs. 19.4%, OR = 5.357, 95% CI = 1.417 to 20.260, p = 0.013). Furthermore, more patients in the belimumab group were reduced to low-dose glucocorticoid ( ≤ 7.5 mg/day) at week 24 (75.0% vs. 35.5%, OR = 5.182, 95%CI = 1.339 to 20.058, p = 0.017). Significant improvements in Patient Global Assessment scores were observed at Week 12 and 24 for those treated with belimumab compared to controls. In a subgroup analysis evaluating the efficacy of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis, 42.9% of the seven individuals treated with belimumab achieved a complete renal response (CRR) by Week 24, and no instances of disease relapse were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In SLE patients with a disease duration of less than 6 months, belimumab treatment can promote LLDAS achievement and reduce glucocorticoid dose, leading to a better prognosis. Introducing belimumab in the early stage of SLE may be a beneficial decision.

Comparison of Attainment and Protective Effects of Lupus Low Disease Activity State in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Versus Established Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) attainment is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with recent onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Data from a 13-country longitudinal SLE cohort were collected prospectively between 2013 and 2020. An inception cohort was defined based on disease duration < 1 year at enrollment. Patient characteristics between inception and noninception cohorts were compared. Survival analyses were performed to examine the association between LLDAS attainment and damage accrual and flare.

RESULTS

Of the total 4106 patients, 680 (16.6%) were recruited within 1 year of SLE diagnosis (inception cohort). Compared to the noninception cohort, inception cohort patients were significantly younger, had higher disease activity, and used more glucocorticoids, but had less organ damage at enrollment. Significantly fewer inception cohort patients were in LLDAS at enrollment than the noninception cohort (29.6% vs 52.3%, P < 0.001), but three-quarters of both groups achieved LLDAS at least once during follow-up. Limiting analysis only to patients not in LLDAS at enrollment, inception cohort patients were 60% more likely to attain LLDAS (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.61, P < 0.001) than noninception cohort patients and attained LLDAS significantly faster. LLDAS attainment was significantly protective against flare in both the inception and noninception cohorts. A total of 88 (13.6%) inception cohort patients accrued organ damage during a median 2.2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

LLDAS attainment is protective from flare in recent onset SLE. Significant protection from damage accrual was not observed because of low rates of damage accrual in the first years after SLE diagnosis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03138941).

Real-world effectiveness of belimumab in patients with lupus in China: RELIABLE observational cohort study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of belimumab in SLE has been demonstrated in randomised clinical trials, and its real-world effectiveness has been shown in studies in several countries. While belimumab was approved for treating SLE in China in 2019, data on its benefit in clinical practice are limited. This study will evaluate belimumab's effectiveness in China, using practical clinical measures, such as Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), to add to the body of real-world evidence.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Real-world Effectiveness of beLImumAB in patients with systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China (RELIABLE) is an ambidirectional, observational descriptive cohort study across approximately 15 centres in China. Adults with SLE newly initiating belimumab with ≥1 measure of all five LLDAS components (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000; no new lupus disease activity; Physician Global Assessment; prednisolone-equivalent dose; immunosuppressants/biologics use) in the 3 months preceding belimumab initiation (index date) will be eligible and retrospectively and/or prospectively enrolled, depending on data availability. The retrospective follow-up will be ≤6 months, and retrospective and prospective patients will have a maximum 24-month follow-up. The primary objectives will be to describe the proportion of patients achieving LLDAS at 12 and 24 months post-index. The key secondary objective will be to describe the proportion of patients achieving LLDAS and each component at 3, 6, 9 and 18 months post-index. All data will be analysed descriptively; a statistical estimand will be applied to account for intercurrent events expected in a real-world setting.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will comply with all applicable laws regarding patient privacy; institutional review board approval will be obtained before the study commencement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will evaluate belimumab's effectiveness in patients with SLE initiating belimumab in clinical practice in China. Using LLDAS will provide clinicians with valuable insights into the impact of belimumab on the treat-to-target strategy with a relevant measure that can be repeated across the clinical practice.

The long-term safety and tolerability of anifrolumab for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Japan: TULIP-LTE subgroup analysis

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of anifrolumab 300 mg, alongside standard therapy, in patients from Japan with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the TULIP-LTE trial (NCT02794285).

METHODS

TULIP-LTE was a 3-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled long-term extension (LTE) of the TULIP trials. The primary safety outcome included serious adverse events (SAEs) and AEs of special interest (AESIs) during the LTE period. Exploratory efficacy outcomes included SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) scores and glucocorticoid use. We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients who enrolled in Japan.

RESULTS

Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of SAEs during the LTE and follow-up for patients receiving anifrolumab 300 mg (n = 21) were 8.7 per 100 patient-years; AESIs included influenza (6.9) and herpes zoster (3.5). One of three patients receiving placebo had an SAE (13.9). One patient per group discontinued due to an AE. There were no deaths. During the TULIP + LTE period, patients receiving anifrolumab 300 mg (n = 24) had sustained reduction from baseline in mean SLEDAI-2 K scores and cumulative glucocorticoid dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

Anifrolumab 300 mg showed a favourable benefit-risk profile for the long-term treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe SLE from Japan, with safety, tolerability, and efficacy profiles consistent with the overall population.

Phenotypic subgroup in serologically active clinically quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus: A cluster analysis based on CSTAR cohort

BACKGROUND

Serologically active clinically quiescent (SACQ) is a state within systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) characterized by elevated serologic markers without clinical activity. The heterogeneity in SACQ patients poses challenges in disease management. This multicenter prospective study aimed to identify distinct SACQ subgroups and assess their utility in predicting organ damage.

METHODS

SACQ was defined as a sustained period of at least 6 months with persistent serologic activity, marked by positive anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies and/or hypocomplementemia, and without clinical activity. Cluster analysis was employed, utilizing 16 independent components to delineate phenotypes.

FINDINGS

Among the 4,107 patients with SLE, 990 (24.1%) achieved SACQ within 2.0 ± 2.3 years on average. Over a total follow-up of 7,105.1 patient years, 340 (34.3%) experienced flares, and 134 (13.5%) developed organ damage. Three distinct SACQ subgroups were identified. Cluster 1 (n = 219, 22.1%) consisted predominantly of elderly males with a history of major organ involvement at SLE diagnosis, showing the highest risk of severe flares (16.4%) and organ damage (27.9%). Cluster 2 (n = 279, 28.2%) was characterized by milder disease and a lower risk of damage accrual (5.7%). Notably, 86 patients (30.8%) in cluster 2 successfully discontinued low-dose glucocorticoids, with 49 of them doing so without experiencing flares. Cluster 3 (n = 492, 49.7%) featured the highest proportion of lupus nephritis and a moderate risk of organ damage (11.8%), with male patients showing significantly higher risk of damage (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.51, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.82-11.79).

CONCLUSION

This study identified three distinct SACQ clusters, each with specific prognostic implications. This classification could enhance personalized management for SACQ patients.

FUNDING

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program (2021YFC2501300), the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z201100005520023), the CAMS Innovation Fund (2021-I2M-1-005), and National High-Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-D-009).

Lack of awareness of systemic lupus erythematosus and its consequences in a cohort of moderate and severe patients in Spain: The LupusVoice study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune condition that can highly impact patients' quality of life (QoL). However, there is a lack of knowledge about SLE, affecting the general population and health care professionals (HCPs) alike. This lack of knowledge has negative implications for patients and the healthcare system, worsening prognosis, negatively impacting QoL, and increasing healthcare utilization. The aim of this paper is to draw attention, according to the perspective of the participants of this study, to the lack of awareness of SLE and its consequences in Spain, and to suggest improvements.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This qualitative, descriptive, observational, multicenter, and cross-sectional study included 40 patients with moderate or severe SLE, recruited during their routine visits in six university hospitals in Spain. The study also included 11 caregivers and 9 HCPs. All participants were individually interviewed. Data from the interviews were coded and analyzed thematically by two anthropologists following a phenomenological perspective.

RESULTS

Our study identified a lack of disease awareness among primary care physicians, emergency medicine doctors, and other specialists treating SLE symptomatology. This led to diagnostic delays, which had a clinical and emotional impact on patients. Furthermore, symptom awareness was found to be context dependent. Differences in symptom awareness between HCPs and patients led to a mismatch between the severity evaluation made by doctors and patients. Some HCPs did not consider the limitations of the current severity evaluation of SLE, and therefore attributed symptoms potentially caused by SLE to the unfavorable socioeconomic conditions patients lived in. Finally, a lack of social awareness among friends, family members, and romantic partners led to lower social support, increased isolation, and negative physical and emotional impact for patients. Gender differences in the provision of support were identified.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the need to increase SLE awareness among patients, HCPs, and the broader public in order to improve patient QoL. Being aware of the clinical and emotional impact of such lack of awareness, as well as the role played by context on the patient experience of SLE, is a crucial step towards achieving this goal.

Use of Glucocorticoids in SLE: A Clinical Approach

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are one of the most effective first-line treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, GC burden is associated with damage. The initial GC dose and tapering schedule should be tailored to the severity of the clinical scenario. As lupus therapy should prompt remission while minimising damage, recent guidelines recommend a more accurate approach to the use of GCs, setting lower starting doses and rapid tapering schemes, and encouraging maintenance prednisolone doses <5 mg/day. Methylprednisolone pulses (MP) help to reduce the dose of oral GCs and improve the clinical response in both severe and non-severe manifestations, without significant side effects. Fixed-tapering GC scheme provides a useful strategy to reduce GCs exposure. Long-term antimalarial treatment and early initiation of immunosuppressive drugs improve clinical efficacy while reducing GC toxicity. Besides, withdrawal of GCs is an achievable goal in patients in prolonged remission on stable treatment, and recent studies have attempted to identify the most suitable candidates. In this article, we review the pharmacological basis, clinical evidence of efficacy, dose-related harms, and potential withdrawal of GCs. We also review guidelines recommendations and finally give a personal and practical approach to dealing with the use of GCs in SLE patients.

Safety and efficacy of telitacicept in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus patients who failed treatment with belimumab : A case series

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effect and safety of telitacicept, an antagonist of BLyS/APRIL-mediated B cell activation, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who failed treatment with belimumab and in whom telitacicept was administered combined with conventional therapy. A review of published reports on telitacicept for SLE was also performed.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the records of patients seen in the Department of Rheumatology at the Wuhan Hospital of Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, China, with refractory SLE who had failed treatment with belimumab. The terms "systemic lupus erythematosus" and "telitacicept" were used to identify patients reported in the English medical literature.

RESULTS

Identified were 14 refractory SLE patients, 3 males (21%) and 11 females (79%). The median age was 32.9 years. The median disease duration was 8.9 years. Patients in this cohort received telitacicept for an average of 34.1 weeks (17-62 weeks) and the total SLE responder index 4 (SRI-4) response rate was 78.9% (n = 11). The mean SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score declined from 8.6 at baseline (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.87-9.28) to 4.29 at the endpoint (95% CI 3.4-5.16). All cases (100%) had hypocomplementemia at baseline, and 7 cases (50%) reported normal C3 and C4 levels at the follow-up endpoint. At the observation endpoint, the 24‑h urinary protein value of the 13 cases with proteinuria (baseline 24‑h urinary protein > 0.5 g/d) displayed a reduction, and 3 values turned negative. Although some patients had low serum total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels, subnormal IgG levels, and absolute counts of peripheral blood lymphocytes after treatment, no serious infection was reported. One case was refractory lupus hepatitis confirmed by liver pathology, and upon change to change to telitacicept treatment, liver function returned to normal.

CONCLUSION

This is the first case series in SLE patients who accepted telitacicept treatment after failed treatment with belimumab. Our case series and review of the literature show that telitacicept combined with the original standard treatment may significantly improve disease activity while reducing prednisone use. No major safety issues were seen in this group of patients. Telitacicept may be a promising drug for the treatment of refractory lupus hepatitis.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with a newly confirmed diagnosis of lupus nephritis in the United States over a 5-year follow-up period

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and healthcare costs in patients with newly confirmed lupus nephritis (LN) in the United States over a 5-year follow-up period.

METHODS

This retrospective, longitudinal cohort study (GSK Study 214102) utilized administrative claims data to identify individuals with a newly confirmed diagnosis of LN between August 01, 2011, and July 31, 2018, based on LN-specific International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes. Index was the date of first LN-related diagnosis code claim. HCRU, healthcare costs, and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares were reported annually among eligible patients with at least 5 years continuous enrollment post-index.

RESULTS

Of 2,159 patients with a newly confirmed diagnosis of LN meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, 335 had at least 5 years continuous enrollment post-index. HCRU was greatest in the first year post-LN diagnosis across all categories (inpatient admission, emergency room [ER] visits, ambulatory visits, and pharmacy use), and trended lower, though remained substantial, in the 5-year follow-up period. Among patients with LN and HCRU, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) number of ER visits and inpatient admissions were 3.7 (4.6) and 1.8 (1.5), respectively, in Year 1, which generally remained stable in Years 2-5; the mean (SD) number of ambulatory visits and pharmacy fills were 35.8 (25.1) and 62.9 (43.8), respectively, in Year 1, and remained similar for Years 2-5. Most patients (≥ 91.6%) had ≥ 1 SLE flare in each of the 5 years of follow-up. The proportion of patients who experienced a severe SLE flare was higher in Year 1 (31.6%) than subsequent years (14.3-18.5%). Total costs (medical and pharmacy; mean [SD]) were higher in Year 1 ($44,205 [71,532]) than subsequent years ($29,444 [52,310]-$32,222 [58,216]), driven mainly by inpatient admissions (Year 1: $21,181 [58,886]; subsequent years: $7,406 [23,331]-$9,389 [29,283]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a newly confirmed diagnosis of LN have substantial HCRU and healthcare costs, particularly in the year post-diagnosis, largely driven by inpatient costs. This highlights the need for improved disease management to prevent renal damage, improve patient outcomes, and reduce costs among patients with renal involvement.

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease characterised by the presence of autoantibodies towards nuclear antigens, immune complex deposition, and chronic inflammation at classic target organs such as skin, joints, and kidneys. Despite substantial advances in the diagnosis and management of SLE, the burden of disease remains high. It is important to appreciate the typical presentations and the diagnostic process to facilitate early referral and diagnosis for patients. In most patients, constitutional, mucocutaneous, and musculoskeletal symptoms represent the earliest complaints; these symptoms can include fatigue, lupus-specific rash, mouth ulcers, alopecia, joint pain, and myalgia. In this Seminar we will discuss a diagnostic approach to symptoms in light of the latest classification criteria, which include a systematic evaluation of clinical manifestations (weighted within each domain) and autoantibody profiles (such as anti-double-stranded DNA, anti-Sm, hypocomplementaemia, or antiphospholipid antibodies). Non-pharmacotherapy management is tailored to the individual, with specific lifestyle interventions and patient education to improve quality of life and medication (such as hydroxychloroquine or immunosuppressant) adherence. In the last decade, there have been a few major breakthroughs in approved treatments for SLE and lupus nephritis, such as belimumab, anifrolumab, and voclosporin. However the disease course remains variable and mortality unacceptably high. Access to these expensive medications has also been restricted across different regions of the world. Nonetheless, understanding of treatment goals and strategies has improved. We recognise that the main goal of treatment is the achievement of remission or low disease activity. Comorbidities due to both disease activity and treatment adverse effects, especially infections, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular disease, necessitate vigilant prevention and management strategies. Tailoring treatment options to achieve remission, while balancing treatment-related comorbidities, are priority areas of SLE management.

Clinical and economic burden of organ damage among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-world setting in Germany

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a chronic multisystem autoimmune disease, carries high risk of organ damage and burden to healthcare systems. SLE disease modification aims to reduce disease activity with minimal treatment toxicity and preventing or minimizing organ damage development. This real-world study utilizing healthcare administrative claims data assessed organ damage development, associated costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with SLE in Germany.

METHODS

Claims data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017, were obtained from the Betriebskrankenkassen German Sickness Fund Database. Adults (> 18 years) with a confirmed SLE diagnosis between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2014, (inclusion period) were included. The index date was calculated based on the first recorded SLE diagnosis during this period. Patients were propensity score-matched (1:3) to a comparator cohort without SLE by age, sex, and comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index). Organ damage was identified using an algorithm developed based on conditions described in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI), using ICD-10-GM diagnostic codes, healthcare procedures, and/or treatments.

RESULTS

2121 patients with SLE and 6308 comparator patients were included (mean follow-up time: 6.4 years). Organ damage prevalence increased from 60.5% at baseline to 83.0% during 6 years of follow-up in all patients with SLE, while 17.0% of patients with SLE did not develop organ damage. Patients with newly confirmed SLE diagnosis without organ damage at baseline were nearly twice as likely to develop organ damage within 5 years versus the comparator cohort (52.0% vs. 27.0%). Total annual costs per patient-year for patients with SLE with organ damage were more than double those of patients with SLE without organ damage; both the number of inpatient admissions and length of stay were higher.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a recently developed algorithm allowed us to use claims data to elucidate SLE organ damage, and its associated high clinical and economic burden, in a large, representative sample in Germany. To our knowledge, this is the first European analysis of its kind involving a broad cohort of patients with SLE treated in the routine care setting.

Association of systemic lupus erythematosus standard of care immunosuppressants with glucocorticoid use and disease outcomes: a multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study examines the association of standard-of-care systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) medications with key outcomes such as low disease activity attainment, flares, damage accrual, and steroid-sparing, for which there is current paucity of data.

METHODS

The Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) prospectively collects data across numerous sites regarding demographic and disease characteristics, medication use, and lupus outcomes. Using propensity score methods and panel logistic regression models, we determined the association between lupus medications and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1707 patients followed over 12,689 visits for a median of 2.19 years, 1332 (78.03%) patients achieved the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), 976 (57.18%) experienced flares, and on most visits patients were taking an anti-malarial (69.86%) or immunosuppressive drug (76.37%). Prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine and azathioprine were utilised with similar frequency across all organ domains; methotrexate for musculoskeletal activity. There were differences in medication utilisation between countries, with hydroxychloroquine less frequently, and calcineurin inhibitors more frequently, used in Japan. More patients taking leflunomide, methotrexate, chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid were taking ≤ 7.5 mg/day of prednisolone (compared to > 7.5 mg/day) suggesting a steroid-sparing effect. Patients taking tacrolimus were more likely (Odds Ratio [95% Confidence Interval] 13.58 [2.23-82.78], p = 0.005) to attain LLDAS. Patients taking azathioprine (OR 0.67 [0.53-0.86], p = 0.001) and methotrexate (OR 0.68 [0.47-0.98], p = 0.038) were less likely to attain LLDAS. Patients taking mycophenolate mofetil were less likely to experience a flare (OR 0.79 [0.64-0.97], p = 0.025). None of the drugs was associated with a reduction in damage accrual.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests a steroid-sparing benefit for most commonly used standard of care immunosuppressants used in SLE treatment, some of which were associated with an increased likelihood of attaining LLDAS, or reduced incidence of flares. It also highlights the unmet need for effective treatments in lupus.

Predictors of Organ Damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Asia Pacific Region: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Irreversible organ damage is common in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite evidence of increased prevalence and severity of SLE in Asia Pacific, organ damage is less well studied in this region. This systematic review aims to identify predictors of organ damage in SLE in the Asia Pacific region.

METHODS

We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for observational studies on organ damage in adult patients with SLE in Asia Pacific from August 31, to September 5, 2022. Study selection and data extraction were completed by two independent reviewers using Covidence systematic review software. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Significant results from univariable and multivariable analyses were synthesized from included studies.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight eligible studies were selected from 1999 to 2022; 22 (58%) of these reported organ damage at study enrollment and 19 (50%) reported damage accrual, as measured by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. Factors predictive of organ damage included older age, glucocorticoid use, longer disease duration, and disease activity. Lupus nephritis was a risk factor for renal and overall damage accrual. Hydroxychloroquine was protective against overall organ damage.

CONCLUSION

Predictors of organ damage in SLE in Asia Pacific are similar to other regions. Although glucocorticoid use is a modifiable risk factor for organ damage, the impact of immunosuppressives and biologic therapies needs further investigation. Effective strategies in early disease are needed to minimize initial organ damage as it predicts subsequent damage accrual.

Interpreting hydroxychloroquine blood levels for medication non-adherence: a pharmacokinetic study

OBJECTIVE

Characterise the relationship between hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels and the number of missed doses, accounting for dosage, dose timing and the large variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) between patients.

METHODS

We externally validated a published PK model and then conducted dosing simulations. We developed a virtual population of 1000 patients for each dosage across a range of body weights and PK variability. Using the model, 10 Monte Carlo simulations for each patient were conducted to derive predicted whole blood concentrations every hour over 24 hours (240 000 HCQ levels at steady state). To determine the impact of missed doses on levels, we randomly deleted a fixed proportion of doses.

RESULTS

For patients receiving HCQ 400 mg daily, simulated random blood levels <200 ng/mL were exceedingly uncommon in fully adherent patients (<0.1%). In comparison, with 80% of doses missed, approximately 60% of concentrations were <200 ng/mL. However, this cut-off was highly insensitive and would miss many instances of severe non-adherence. Average levels quickly dropped to <200 ng/mL after 2-4 days of missed doses. Additionally, mean levels decreased by 29.9% between peak and trough measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose an algorithm to optimally interpret HCQ blood levels and approximate the number of missed doses, incorporating the impact of dosage, dose timing and pharmacokinetic variability. No single cut-off has adequate combinations of both sensitivity and specificity, and cut-offs are dependent on the degree of targeted non-adherence. Future studies should measure trough concentrations to better identify target HCQ levels for non-adherence and efficacy.

Disease evolution and organ damage accrual in patients with stable UCTD: a long-term monocentric inception cohort

OBJECTIVES

Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases (UCTDs) are systemic autoimmune conditions that cannot be diagnosed nor classified as defined CTD; the majority maintains an undifferentiated profile (stable UCTD, sUCTD) over time. Data on long-term outcomes of sUCTD are lacking.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal analysis of an inception cohort of 141 patients with sUCTD.Disease evolution and damage accrual were evaluated at 1, 5 and 10 years. Partial least square (PLS) regression was used to identify the basal variables contributing to damage accrual at 1, 5 and 10 years of follow-up. Trend of damage over time was compared with a cohort of age-matched and sex-matched patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by means of Nelson-Aalen analysis.

RESULTS

11.3% of patients evolved to a definite CTD after a median 11 years (IQR 6-25) from the first symptom. At last visit, 10% were on glucocorticoids and 6% on immunosuppressive therapy. In 27.3%, at least one item of organ damage was recorded according to the SLICC/DI score (mean score 1.19±0.46). At PLS analysis, age at diagnosis and age at first symptoms were related to damage at 1 year, not taking antimalarials and taking immunosuppressants were associated with damage at 5 years.The mean survival without damage was 9.3 years in sUCTD and 8.4 years in SLE. The 10-year probability without damage was 62% and 23% in SLE and sUCTD, respectively (p=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Although less significantly impacted than in patients with SLE, in the long-term UCTDs can accumulate organ damage and evolve into defined connective tissue diseases.

Glucocorticoid treatment in SLE is associated with infections, comorbidities and mortality-a national cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with SLE have an increased risk of comorbidities and impaired survival. We aimed to assess whether various thresholds of oral CS (OCS) can predict development of infections, comorbidities, malignancies and survival in SLE using data from national health registries in Sweden.

METHODS

All incident SLE cases, age >18 years, in Sweden (n = 5309) between 2005 and 2020 and matched population controls (n = 26 545) were included and followed until 2020, a total of 257 942 patient years. Data from national registers were retrieved including information from the National Prescribed Drug Register. Risk factors were analysed using time-dependent Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Compared with no OCS, >0 to <5.0 mg/day, 5.0-7.5 mg/day as well as >7.5 mg/day OCS predicted development of infections (pneumonia, influenza, herpes zoster and urinary tract infection), osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, gastroduodenal ulcers, cataracts, hypertension and mortality (all P < 0.05). OCS >0 to <5.0 mg/day was associated with lower hazard ratios for these comorbidities than higher doses of OCS. Fifteen years after diagnosis, 48% of patients were taking OCS at a median dose of 5.7 mg/day. A small reduction of OCS treatment 5 years after diagnosis in patients diagnosed with SLE 2006-10 compared with 2011-15 was observed, 49% vs 46% respectively (P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Results highlight the potential harm associated with even low OCS dose treatment in SLE and the need to judiciously use OCS at the lowest possible dose to maximize efficacy and minimize harm.

The Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Flares on Clinical and Economic Outcomes: The CHAMOMILE Claims Database Study in Germany

INTRODUCTION

CHAMOMILE (CHaracteristics and impact of flares on clinicAl and econoMic OutcoMes In patients with systemic Lupus Erythematosus [SLE]) examined how flares in the year of SLE diagnosis impact future disease activity and damage, productivity, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with SLE in Germany.

METHODS

CHAMOMILE was a retrospective cohort study of adults with an SLE diagnosis in the German Sickness Fund Database from 1 July 2010 to 31 December 2013. Patients were classified according to their greatest flare severity during the baseline year (none, mild, or moderate/severe). The number and severity of flares were assessed annually over 5-8.5 follow-up years, along with SLE organ/system damage, treatments, work disability, and HCRU metrics.

RESULTS

Of 2088 patients (84.6% female; mean age [standard deviation] 51.4 [16.1] years; mean follow-up 6.8 [2.1] years), 34.3% (n = 716) were flare-free, 29.8% (n = 622) had mild flares, and 35.9% (n = 750) had moderate/severe flares at baseline. Baseline flare severity was related to future flares: rates during follow-up were higher in patients with moderate/severe baseline flares compared with those with mild or no baseline flares (89.6 vs 78.5 and 44.2 flares/100 patient years, respectively). Overall, 80.2% (n = 1675) of patients received glucocorticoids at least once during baseline and follow-up. Patients' HCRU was generally greatest in their baseline year. Costs were highest in patients with moderate/severe baseline flares.

CONCLUSION

Baseline flare severity provided insight into a patient's disease course and the clinical and economic burden of SLE over time, highlighting the ramifications of uncontrolled disease for patients with SLE.

Effect of Sustained Clinical Remission on the Risk of Lupus Flares and Impaired Kidney Function in Patients With Lupus Nephritis

Introduction

This retrospective study on patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (LN) aimed to assess the probability of sustained clinical remission (sCR) and to investigate sCR effects on disease flares and impaired kidney function (IKF).

Methods

sCR was defined as clinical-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) = 0 and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 lasting ≥1 year; IKF: eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for >3 months. We analyzed the probability of achieving and maintaining sCR, and the yearly risk of flare. Cox models were used to identify predictors of sCR and IKF with variables analyzed as time-dependent covariates when appropriate.

Results

Of 303 patients followed-up with for 14.8 (interquartile range: 9.8-22) years, 257 (84.8%) achieved sCR. The probability of achieving sCR progressively increased over time reaching 90% at 15 years. Baseline age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.017; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.005-1.029; P = 0.004), hydroxychloroquine intake (HR: 1.385; 95% CI: 1.051-1.825; P = 0.021), and absence of arterial hypertension (HR: 0.699; 95% CI: 0.532-0.921; P = 0.011) were independent predictors of sCR. Among patients who achieved sCR, 142 (55.3%) developed a lupus flare after a median time of 3.6 (2.3-5.9) years. In the remaining 115 patients, sCR persisted for 9.5 (5.8-14.5) years. The probability of sCR to persist at 15 years was 38%. SLE flare risk decreased to 10%, 5%, and 2% in patients with sCR lasting <5, 5 to 10, and >10 years, respectively. At the last observation, 57 patients (18.81%) had IKF. sCR achievement (HR: 0.18, P < 0.001) and its duration (HR: 0.83, P < 0.001) were protective against IKF.

Conclusion

sCR is an achievable target in LN management and protects against IKF. The longer the sCR, the higher the chance of its persistence and the lower the risk of SLE flares.

Balancing risks and benefits in the use of hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids in systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and glucocorticoids (GCs) constitute the oldest and more used drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite this long experience, both are still subject to a number of uncertainties, mainly regarding the dose.

AREAS COVERED

We review the main mechanisms of action, the clinical and toxic effects of HCQ and GCs and analyze the recommendations for the use of both in guidelines published since 2018. We offer a set of recommendations based on the pharmacology, mechanisms of action and clinical evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

HCQ is the backbone therapy for SLE, and a judicious use must be accomplished, using doses that allow a good control of lupus without compromising the safety of treatments very much prolonged over the time. Stable doses of 200 mg/day seem to accomplish both conditions. GCs should be used more judiciously, with methyl-prednisolone pulses as the main therapy for inducing rapid remission and doses ≤5-2.5 mg/day be never exceeded in long-term maintenance treatments.

Pragmatic targets for moderate/severe SLE and their implications for clinical care and trial design: sustained DORIS or LLDAS for at least 6 months is sufficient while their attainment for at least 24 months ensures high specificity for damage-free progression

OBJECTIVES

Treatment targets in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated in unselected-in terms of severity-cohorts, which limits their generalisability. We assessed remission (Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS)) and Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) in a historical cohort of 348 patients with active moderate-to-severe disease and median follow-up of 5 years.

METHODS

Active SLE was defined as Physician Global Assessment ≥1.5 and/or SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 ≥6, requiring therapy intensification. DORIS/LLDAS, organ damage, flares and adverse events were monitored. Shared frailty survival, generalised linear models and K-means clustering were applied.

RESULTS

Sustained DORIS and LLDAS for ≥6 months occurred in 41.1% and 80.4%, respectively, and resulted in reduced damage accrual (HR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93 and 0.61; 0.43 to 0.86) and severe flares (HR: 0.14; 0.08 to 0.27 and 0.19; 0.13 to 0.27). LLDAS without DORIS was also protective (HR: 0.65; 0.43 to 0.98 for damage, 0.49; 0.36 to 0.67 for flares). Models fitting increasing duration of targets showed that DORIS ≥50% and LLDAS ≥60% of time, or alternatively, ≥24 and ≥36 months, achieved optimal balance between feasibility (20.2-41.7%) and specificity (73.3-86.1%) for damage-free outcome. These targets were linked to reduced serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR): 0.56-0.71), hospitalisation (RR: 0.70) and mortality (RR: 0.06-0.13). Patients with predominant arthritis and mucocutaneous disease experienced reduced DORIS/LLDAS, compared with counterparts with major organ involvement. Conventional drugs were more frequently used in the former group, whereas potent immunosuppressive/biological agents in the latter.

CONCLUSIONS

In moderate-to-severe SLE, sustained DORIS/LLDAS for at least 6 months is sufficient, while attainment for at least 24 months ensures higher specificity for damage-free progression, thus facilitating treat-to-target strategies and clinical trials. Arthritis and skin disease represent unmet therapeutic needs that could benefit from novel biologics.

Incidence and medical costs of lupus in Spanish hospitals: a retrospective database analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the comorbidity profile, use of healthcare resources and medical costs of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) treated at the hospital level in Spain.

METHODS

Admission records of patients with SLE and CLE that were registered between January 2016 and December 2020 were obtained from a Spanish hospital discharge database and analyzed in a retrospective multicenter study.

RESULTS

329 patients met the criteria; 64.44% were female and 35.56% were male, with a median age of 54.65 years. Mean Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 2.75 in the index admission. 31.61% of the patients suffered essential hypertension, 21.96% suffered asthma and 19.76% suffered hyperlipidemia. Mortality rate was 3.95%. The most common medical procedure was heart ultrasound (19.45%) and introduction in peripheral vein of anti-inflammatory with a percutaneous approach (17.93%). Mean admission cost was €6355.99.

CONCLUSIONS

Lupus patients showed a higher incidence and prevalence in the female population, with associated cardiac diseases as the main secondary conditions.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: How Machine Learning Can Help Distinguish between Infections and Flares

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a multifaceted autoimmune ailment that impacts multiple bodily systems and manifests with varied clinical manifestations. Early detection is considered the most effective way to save patients' lives, but detecting severe SLE activity in its early stages is proving to be a formidable challenge. Consequently, this work advocates the use of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms for the diagnosis of SLE flares in the context of infections. In the pursuit of this research, the Random Forest (RF) method has been employed due to its performance attributes. With RF, our objective is to uncover patterns within the patient data. Multiple ML techniques have been scrutinized within this investigation. The proposed system exhibited around a 7.49% enhancement in accuracy when compared to k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithm. In contrast, the Support Vector Machine (SVM), Binary Linear Discriminant Analysis (BLDA), Decision Trees (DT) and Linear Regression (LR) methods demonstrated inferior performance, with respective values around 81%, 78%, 84% and 69%. It is noteworthy that the proposed method displayed a superior area under the curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy (both around 94%) in comparison to other ML approaches. These outcomes underscore the feasibility of crafting an automated diagnostic support method for SLE patients grounded in ML systems.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous belimumab in a subgroup of South Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus enrolled into a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in North East Asia

AIM

This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg in the South Korean subgroup of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) enrolled in the North East Asia (NEA) study (GSK Study BEL113750; NCT01345253).

METHODS

NEA was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 3 trial. Patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE were randomized 2:1 to belimumab or placebo plus standard therapy administered on Days 0, 14, and 28, and then every 28 days up to Week 48. The primary efficacy endpoint in this analysis was SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response rate at Week 52, defined as the proportion of patients achieving a ≥4-point reduction in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score, no worsening (<0.3 increase from baseline) in Physician Global Assessment, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A domain and <2 new BILAG B domain scores.

RESULTS

Among 100 South Korean patients enrolled in NEA, 54/66 (81.8%) belimumab- and 24/34 (70.6%) placebo-treated patients completed the double-blind phase. Significantly more belimumab- than placebo-treated patients achieved SRI-4 response at Week 52 (n = 35/66, 53.0% vs. n = 8/34, 23.5%; odds ratio [OR; 95% confidence interval (CI)]: 3.67 [1.45, 9.28]; p = .0061). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 adverse event was similar between groups (belimumab: n = 60/66, 90.9% vs. placebo: n = 31/34, 91.2%). No new safety signals emerged in this subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

Belimumab was efficacious for the treatment of SLE and well tolerated among the South Korean subgroup of patients from the NEA study.

Sociodemographic profiles and organ damage accural in the Black Women's Experience Living with Lupus study

OBJECTIVE

Black/African American women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) experience greater organ damage and at younger ages than white women. The objective of this study was to advance research on SLE inequities by identifying sociodemographic risk profiles associated with organ damage accrual specifically among Black/African American women.

METHODS

Latent profile analysis was conducted among 438 Black/African American women with SLE living in Atlanta, GA and enrolled in the Black Women's Experiences Living with Lupus (BeWELL) Study (May 2015 to April 2017). Proportional hazard and Poisson regression models examined prospective associations between sociodemographic profiles and the timing and degree of organ damage accrual over 2 years.

RESULTS

Four profiles emerged: (1) "Younger/Lower SES with Uncontrolled SLE" (44.8%), (2) "Older/Lower SES with Uncontrolled SLE" (23.3%), (3) "Mid-SES with Controlled SLE" (19.6%), and (4) "Higher SES with Controlled SLE" (11.2%). Approximately 42% of participants experienced new organ damage during the follow-up period. Proportional hazard models indicated that "Older/Lower SES with Uncontrolled SLE" participants were at greatest risk of new organ damage (HR = 2.41; 95% CI = 1.39, 4.19), followed by "Younger/Lower SES with Uncontrolled SLE" participants (HR = 1.56; 95% CI = 0.92, 2.67), compared to those in the "Higher SES with Controlled SLE" profile. Poisson regression models revealed that these two groups also exhibited greater organ damage accrual (b = 0.98, SE = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.52, 1.44 and b = 0.72, SE = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.27, 1.17, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Black/African American women with fewer socioeconomic resources and uncontrolled SLE are at greatest risk for increasing disease severity over time. Social inequities likely contribute to racial inequities in SLE progression.

Bibliometric analysis of global literature productivity in systemic lupus erythematosus from 2013 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Bibliometric analysis is a mature method for quantitative evaluation of academic productivity. In view of the rapid development of research in the field of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the past decade, we used bibliometric methods to comprehensively analyze the literature in the field of SLE from 2013 to 2022.

METHODS

The relevant literature in the field of SLE from 2013 to 2022 was screened in the Web of Science Core Collection database. After obtaining and sorting out the data, CiteSpace and VOSviewer software were used to visualize the relevant data, and SPSS software was used for scientific statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 18,450 publications were included in this study. The number of articles published over the past 10 years has generally shown an upward trend, while Altmetric attention scores have also shown a clear upward trend in general and in most countries. Citation analysis and Altmetric analysis can mutually prove and supplement the influence of papers. The USA, China, Japan, Italy, and the UK are the most productive countries, but China and Japan are significantly inferior to other countries in terms of research influence. Four of the top ten authors are at the center of the collaboration network. LUPUS is the most contributing journal. The theme of systemic lupus erythematosus research mainly focuses on the pathogenesis, treatment, and management of SLE, and the emerging trend is related research on machine learning and immune cells.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the research status of SLE, clarifies the main contributors in this field, discusses and analyzes the research hotspots and trends in this field, and provides reference for further research in this field to promote the development of SLE research. Key Points • Through bibliometric analysis, Altmetric analysis, and visual analysis, we reveal the global productivity characteristics of SLE-related papers in the past 10 years. • The number of global SLE-related studies has shown a significant increase, indicating that SLE is still a hot topic and deserves further study. • Citation analysis and Altmetric analysis can mutually prove and supplement the influence of papers, and the attention of related literature among non-professional researchers is increasing. • The theme of SLE research mainly focuses on the pathogenesis, treatment, and management of SLE. The emerging trend is machine learning and immune cells, which may provide new strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of SLE in the future.

Anifrolumab: first biologic approved in the EU not restricted to patients with a high degree of disease activity for the treatment of moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 interferons (IFNs) play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and various type I IFNs targeting therapeutic approaches have been developed. Anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the subunit 1 of the type I IFN receptor, has acquired considerable interest and has entered different clinical human trials willing to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the data obtained in phases 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials of anifrolumab for SLE patients. A focus is made on data of clinical efficacy and safety obtained in MUSE, TULIP-1 and TULIP-2 trials.

EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY

Anifrolumab is a promising therapeutic option for patients with SLE, currently authorized for moderate-to-severe SLE. Extensive real-world use is now going to generate data required to gain experience on the type of patients who benefit the most from the drug, and the exact positioning of anifrolumab in the therapeutic plan.

Predictors of flare-related inpatient or emergency department stay in systemic lupus erythematosus: A real-world analysis of Medicaid claims in the United States

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by multisystem inflammation. Medical management of SLE is based on reducing inflammation and tissue damage in the affected organs; however, medications used to treat SLE have been found to contribute to additional organ damage. Therefore, finding new ways to predict and prevent flares that require an inpatient (IP) stay or emergency department (ED) visit is critical for reducing the clinical and economic burden in patients with SLE.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors of SLE flares requiring an IP/ED visit among a Medicaid-insured population with SLE.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients from the Merative MarketScan Medicaid database (2013-2019). To capture patients at all stages of their SLE journey, all SLE claims for a patient were captured, and the index date was randomly selected among those claims that were at least 12 months after the first evidence of SLE. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled 1-year pre-index (year 1) and post-index (year 2). Demographics, clinical characteristics, and health care use and costs were measured in year 1, and flares requiring an IP/ED visit were identified in year 2 using the Garris algorithm. Multivariable logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) modeling were used to identify year 1 predictors and combination of factors, respectively, associated with flares-related IP/ED visits.

RESULTS

Of the 8,083 patients included in the study, 37.6% of patients (n = 3,039) had a flare. Logistic regression identified ED visits in year 1 as one of the strongest predictors of flares-related IP/ED visits in year 2 (odds ratio = 2.19 [95% CI = 1.93-2.49]). SLE treatment progression to biologics (0.54 [0.42-0.70]) was the strongest predictor of decreased odds. Other strong predictors included other neurological disorders (1.63 [1.43-1.87]), Black race (1.49 [1.32-1.68]), chronic kidney disease/renal failure (1.35 [1.10-1.66]), and opioid use (1.30 [1.17-1.45]). CART modeling identified patients with an ED visit, an IP admission, and a diagnosis of Elixhauser Comorbidity Index-defined other neurological disorders in year 1 as having the highest probability of a flare-related IP/ED visit in year 2 (probability = 0.708), whereas patients without an ED visit had the lowest probability (probability = 0.185).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with the highest risk of a flare that required an IP/ED visit were those with a prior ED visit, IP admission, and other neurological disorders. Modeling also identified patients with prior opioid use, Black patients, and patients without SLE medications as subgroups with a high risk of a flare requiring an IP/ED visit.

Steroid-sparing effect of belimumab: results from a retrospective observational study of real-world data

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in patients with SLE in a US rheumatology network pre- and post-belimumab initiation.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study (GSK Study 214140) used data from the Patient-Important Outcomes Data Repository (PIONEER)-Rheumatology database. Eligible adults with SLE initiated belimumab between 1 January 2012 and 30 June 2021, and had available data for >180 days pre- and >360 days post-belimumab initiation. The index was the date of belimumab initiation. Changes in OCS use were measured by: proportion of patients receiving OCS; mean total OCS dose/patient; mean total number of OCS days supplied/patient; mean daily OCS dose for days supplied/patient; the proportion of patients with OCS doses of ≤5 mg/day and ≤7.5 mg/day for days supplied. These changes were assessed between period (P)1 (6 months pre-index) and P2 (first 6 months post-index) and P3 (second 6 months post-index) in patients with OCS use in P1 who persisted with belimumab at each assessed period.

RESULTS

Overall, 608 patients received belimumab for 180 days (full analysis set (FAS)) and 492 for 360 days. Most patients were female (92.8%); 70.4% had moderate SLE. In P1, 56.3% of FAS patients and 54.5% of patients who persisted with belimumab for 360 days received OCS.Among patients receiving OCS in P1, significantly fewer patients received OCS in P2 (78.4%) and P3 (64.9%) vs P1 (100.0%). Significant reductions from P1 were observed in P2 and P3 in the mean total OCS dose/patient, the mean OCS daily dose for days supplied and the proportions of patients with OCS dose of ≤5 mg/day and ≤7.5 mg/day, and the mean total OCS days supplied/patient in P3 only.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis showed significant reductions in OCS dose and use in patients with SLE who persisted with belimumab, providing more real-world evidence for belimumab's steroid-sparing effect.

Association Between Severe Nonadherence to Hydroxychloroquine and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Flares, Damage, and Mortality in 660 Patients From the SLICC Inception Cohort

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this study were to assess the associations of severe nonadherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), objectively assessed by HCQ serum levels, and risks of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares, damage, and mortality rates over five years of follow-up.

METHODS

The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort is an international multicenter initiative (33 centers throughout 11 countries). The serum of patients prescribed HCQ for at least three months at enrollment were analyzed. Severe nonadherence was defined by a serum HCQ level <106 ng/mL or <53 ng/mL for HCQ doses of 400 or 200 mg/day, respectively. Associations with the risk of a flare (defined as a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 increase ≥4 points, initiation of prednisone or immunosuppressive drugs, or new renal involvement) were studied with logistic regression, and associations with damage (first SLICC/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index [SDI] increase ≥1 point) and mortality with separate Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Of the 1,849 cohort participants, 660 patients (88% women) were included. Median (interquartile range) serum HCQ was 388 ng/mL (244-566); 48 patients (7.3%) had severe HCQ nonadherence. No covariates were clearly associated with severe nonadherence, which was, however, independently associated with both flare (odds ratio 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-6.42) and an increase in the SDI within each of the first three years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92 at three years; 95% CI 1.05-3.50). Eleven patients died within five years, including 3 with severe nonadherence (crude HR 5.41; 95% CI 1.43-20.39).

CONCLUSION

Severe nonadherence was independently associated with the risks of an SLE flare in the following year, early damage, and five-year mortality.

Comparisons of SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2K and classification of disease activity based on the SLE-DAS with reference to patient-reported outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Although the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) and its definitions to classify disease activity have been recently developed to overcome the drawbacks of the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), the performance of the SLE-DAS for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has not been fully examined. We aimed to compare SLE-DAS with SLEDAI-2K and validate the classifications of disease activity based on SLE-DAS in terms of PROs.

METHODS

We assessed generic quality of life (QoL) using the Medical Outcome Survey 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), disease-specific QoL using the lupus patient-reported outcome tool (LupusPRO), burden of symptoms using the SLE Symptom Checklist (SSC), patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA).

RESULTS

Of the 335 patients with SLE, the magnitudes of the mean absolute error, root mean square error, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion were comparable for most PROs between the SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2K. In contrast, SLEDAI-2K had a higher predictive value for health-related QoL of LupusPRO and PtGA than SLE-DAS. Low disease activity, Boolean and index-based remission and categories of disease activity (remission, mild and moderate/severe activity) were significantly associated with health-related QoL in LupusPRO, SSC and PhGA, but not SF-36 or PtGA.

CONCLUSION

No clear differences were identified in the use of the SLE-DAS over the SLEDAI-2K in assessing PROs in patients with SLE. The classification of disease activity based on the SLE-DAS was validated against several PROs. SLE-DAS and its categories of disease activity effectively explain some of the PROs.

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: new therapeutic options

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disease of unknown cause, with heterogeneity in its clinical presentation, as well as variability in its clinical course and prognosis. The current goal of treatment is to achieve disease remission or a state of low activity, and thereby improve the patient's quality of life. Biological therapy in lupus, unlike other entities, although it has not been fully established, in recent years it has burst onto the scene with important therapeutic novelties. This review aims to update the therapeutic tools for the treatment of SLE focusing on the new molecules that have achieved the objectives of their clinical trials.

Nursing Recommendations in the Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Delphi Consensus

Introduction: Nurses' role in the management of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is essential. Specific guidelines for nurses have not been previously developed in Spain. This project aimed to try to develop comprehensive and validated recommendations for nurses regarding the management of people with SLE. Method: A Delphi questionnaire with 90 general and specific recommendations was designed by the scientific committee and underwent two rounds of participation. Results: Panellists reached a consensus on "agreement" for 85 recommendations during the first round and for 87 recommendations after the second and final rounds. Panellists agreed that people with SLE should be managed within a multidisciplinary team, and that this team should include specialized nurses. Panellists stated that most of the services lack specialized nurses. Experts identified lack of specific training programs targeted to nurses as the main barrier for application of recommendations. Panellists recommended an extended role for nurses in the management of people with SLE, including diagnosis, patient education, treatment monitoring and administration, and follow-up. Conclusions: This study is the first consensus that provides nursing recommendations from experts on the management of people with SLE in Europe. Design of standardized training programs targeted to nurses would facilitate the application of the recommendations.

Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE: Are we there yet?

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a great heterogenicity in course and clinical manifestations. Although prognosis improved in the last decades of the 20th century, mortality remains higher than in the general population and uncontrolled disease activity and therapy-related adverse effects have been identified as major contributors to damage accrual and poor outcomes. Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE represents a great challenge even to the expert rheumatologist. Global disease activity indices are tools developed to assess activity across multiple organ systems. Several disease activity indices have been developed over the years, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, and knowing them is essential for understanding research studies, such as clinical trials, in which they are used. Organ-specific activity indices have been developed concurrently to represent organ involvement such as glomerulonephritis, cutaneous and musculoskeletal lupus manifestations. Regarding damage, the SLICC/ACR damage index has proven to be an effective tool for damage accrual assessment, yet not devoid of drawbacks. This review provides an overview of the most frequently utilized indices developed for the assessment of activity and damage in SLE highlighting their pros and cons when applied to the research and clinical setting.

Clinical patterns of disease: From early systemic lupus erythematosus to late-onset disease

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex disease with an insidious clinical presentation. In up to half of the cases, SLE onset is characterized by clinical and serological manifestations that, although specific, are insufficient to fulfill the classification criteria. This condition, called incomplete SLE, could be as challenging as the definite and classifiable SLE and requires to be treated according to the severity of clinical manifestations. In addition, an early SLE diagnosis and therapeutic intervention can positively influence the disease outcome, including remission rate and damage accrual. After diagnosis, the disease course is relapsing-remitting for most patients. Time in remission and cumulative glucocorticoid exposure are the most important factors for prognosis. Therefore, timely identification of SLE clinical patterns may help tailor the therapeutic intervention to the disease course. Late-onset SLE is rare but more often associated with delayed diagnosis and a higher incidence of comorbidities, including Sjogren's syndrome. This review focuses on the SLE disease course, providing actionable strategies for early diagnosis, an overview of the possible clinical patterns of SLE, and the clinical variation associated with the different age-at-onset SLE groups.

The effect of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Disease Activity Score and SLE Disease Activity Index 2000-based remission states in patients with SLE on damage accrual

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effect of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) with the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) remission state on damage accrual.

METHODS

This study classified SLE patients from the Lupus Clinic of the Royal Thai Army (LUCRA) cohort based on the SLE-DAS index, or Boolean-based, and SLEDAI-2K (Doria) remission state. Regression analysis models were constructed to identify predictors of the Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) during follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 197 patients identified; 97 patients met at least one definition of remission state, and 100 patients were in the non-remission group at enrollment. Of 97 patients, 97 achieved the SLE-DAS index-based definition, 74 achieved the SLE-DAS Boolean-based definition, and 55 achieved the Doria definition. The mean ± SD of follow-up was 4.77 ± 0.6 years. The changes in SDI over time were non-significantly lower in patients who met any definition of remission compared with those who did not. Multivariate analysis revealed that predictive factors for increased SDI were age and baseline SDI ≥ 1. SLE-DAS index, Boolean, and Doria-based definitions of remission at enrollment had no significant risk reduction on SDI compared with the non-remission group (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.37-1.32, p = .27; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.37-1.44, p = .37; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.39-1.65, p = .55, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SLE who achieved remission status according to the SLE-DAS index or SLEDAI-2K definitions did not show any significant difference in damage accrual compared to those who were not in remission.

Effect of belimumab on kidney-related outcomes in patients with lupus nephritis: post hoc subgroup analyses of the phase 3 BLISS-LN trial

BACKGROUND

Data on belimumab efficacy in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) according to diagnosis duration or induction therapy are limited. Post hoc analyses of the phase 3, randomized, double-blind BLISS-LN study (GSK BEL114054; NCT01639339) were performed to assess belimumab efficacy on kidney-related outcomes in newly diagnosed and relapsed LN subgroups and according to the use of glucocorticoid (GC) pulses at induction.

METHODS

BLISS-LN randomized 448 patients with active LN to monthly intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo plus standard therapy. Post hoc analyses assessed primary efficacy renal response (PERR) and complete renal response (CRR) at week 104, time to kidney-related event or death and time to first LN flare from week 24 in newly diagnosed and relapsed patients and patients with/without GC pulses at induction.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of patients achieved a PERR with belimumab versus placebo in the newly diagnosed {69/148 [46.6%] versus 55/148 [37.2%]; odds ratio [OR] 1.36 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-2.20]} and relapsed [27/75 (36.0%) versus 17/75 (22.7%); OR 2.31 (95% CI 1.07-5.01)] subgroups. Similarly for CRR [newly diagnosed: 50/148 (33.8%) versus 36/148 (24.3%); OR 1.49 (95% CI 0.88-2.51) and relapsed: 17/75 (22.7%) versus 8/75 (10.7%); OR 3.11 (95% CI 1.16-8.31)]. The probability of kidney-related event or death, or LN flare was lower with belimumab versus placebo in both subgroups. Belimumab was associated with improved kidney outcomes versus placebo with or without GC pulses at induction.

CONCLUSION

Data suggest consistent benefits of belimumab on kidney outcomes for newly diagnosed and relapsed patients, and irrespective of GC pulses at induction.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in England prior to vaccination: a retrospective observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Determine the prevaccination healthcare impact of COVID-19 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in England.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of adult patients with SLE from 1 May to 31 October 2020.

SETTING

Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) databases from general practitioners across England combining primary care and other health-related data.

PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 6145 adults with confirmed SLE diagnosis ≥1 year prior to 1 May 2020 were included. Most patients were women (91.0%), white (67.1%), and diagnosed with SLE at age <50 (70.8%). Patients were excluded if they had a COVID-19 diagnosis before 1 May 2020.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared. COVID-19 severity was determined by patient care required and procedure/diagnosis codes. COVID-19 cumulative incidence, hospitalisation rates, lengths of stay and mortality rates were determined and stratified by SLE and COVID-19 severity.

RESULTS

Of 6145 patients, 3927 had mild, 1288 moderate and 930 severe SLE at baseline. The majority of patients with moderate to severe SLE were on oral corticosteroids and antimalarial treatments. Overall, 54/6145 (0.88%) patients with SLE acquired and were diagnosed with COVID-19, with 45 classified as mild, 6 moderate and 3 severe COVID-19. Cumulative incidence was higher in patients with severe SLE (1.4%) compared with patients classified as mild (0.8%) or moderate (0.8%). Ten COVID-19-specific hospital admissions occurred (n=6 moderate; n=4 severe). Regardless of COVID-19 status, hospital admission rates and length of stay increased with SLE severity. Of 54 patients with SLE diagnosed with COVID-19, 1 (1.9%) COVID-19-related death was recorded in a patient with both severe SLE and severe COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

SLE severity did not appear to impact COVID-19 outcomes in this study. The COVID-19 pandemic is evolving and follow-up studies are needed to understand the relationship between COVID-19 and SLE.

Development of American College of Rheumatology Quality Measures for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Modified Delphi Process With Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) Registry Data Review

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop readily measurable digital quality measure statements for clinical care in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a multistep process guided by consensus methods.

METHODS

Using a modified Delphi process, an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) workgroup of SLE experts reviewed all North American and European guidelines from 2000 to 2020 on treatment, monitoring, and phenotyping of patients with lupus. Workgroup members extracted quality constructs from guidelines, rated these by importance and feasibility, and generated evidence-based quality measure statements. The ACR Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) Registry was queried for measurement data availability. In 3 consecutive Delphi sessions, a multidisciplinary Delphi panel voted on the importance and feasibility of each statement. Proposed measures with consensus on feasibility and importance were ranked to identify the top 3 measures.

RESULTS

Review of guidelines and distillation of 57 quality constructs resulted in 15 quality measure statements. Among these, 5 met high consensus for importance and feasibility, including 2 on treatment and 3 on laboratory monitoring measures. The 3 highest-ranked statements were recommended for further measure specification as SLE digital quality measures: 1) hydroxychloroquine use, 2) limiting glucocorticoid use >7.5 mg/day to <6 months, and 3) end-organ monitoring of kidney function and urine protein excretion at least every 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The Delphi process selected 3 quality measures for SLE care on hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoid reduction, and kidney monitoring. Next, measures will undergo specification and validity testing in RISE and US rheumatology practices as the foundation for national implementation and use in quality improvement programs.

Burden of disease and real-world treatment patterns of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in the Australian OPAL dataset

OBJECTIVE

To describe the demographics, disease burden and real-world management of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Australian community practice.

METHODS

Patients with a physician diagnosis of SLE and at least 1 visit between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2021 were identified in the OPAL dataset, an aggregated collection of data extracted from the electronic medical records of patients managed by 112 Australian rheumatologists. Demographics, basic clinical features and prescribed medications were described, with medication combinations used as a surrogate of disease severity.

RESULTS

Of 5133 patients with a diagnosis of lupus, 4260 (83%) had SLE. Of these SLE patients, almost 90% of patients were female, with a median age of 49 years [IQR 37-61] at first-recorded visit. Of the 2285 SLE patients whose most recent visit was between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2021, 52.5% had mild disease, 29.9% had moderate-severe disease and 7.4% had very severe disease. Visit frequency increased with disease severity. Most patients (85.8%) were treated with hydroxychloroquine, typically prescribed as first line-of-therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this large real-world Australian cohort of patients with SLE, a substantial burden of disease was identified, with a significant proportion (almost one-third of patients) considered to have moderate to severe disease based on medication use. This study provides a greater understanding of the path from symptom onset to treatment and the heterogeneous presentation of patients with SLE who are treated in community practice in Australia. Key messages • Most published studies describing patients with SLE are derived from specialist lupus centres, typically in the hospital setting, therefore little is known about the characteristics of patients with SLE who are receiving routine care in community clinics. • The OPAL dataset is a large collection of clinical data from the electronic medical records of rheumatologists predominantly practising in private community clinics, which is where the majority (73-80%) of adult rheumatology services are conducted in Australia [1-3] . Since data from community care has not been widely available for SLE research, this study contributes important insight into this large and under-reported patient population. • To improve access to care and effective treatments, and reduce the burden of SLE in Australia, a greater understanding of the characteristics and unmet needs of patients with SLE managed in the community setting is required.

Advances in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe multisystem autoimmune disease that can cause injury in almost every body system. While considered a classic example of autoimmunity, it is still relatively poorly understood. Treatment with immunosuppressive agents is challenging, as many agents are relatively non-specific, and the underlying disease is characterized by unpredictable flares and remissions. This State of The Art Review provides a comprehensive current summary of systemic lupus erythematosus based on recent literature. In basic and translational science, this summary includes the current state of genetics, epigenetics, differences by ancestry, and updates about the molecular and immunological pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. In clinical science, the summary includes updates in diagnosis and classification, clinical features and subphenotypes, and current guidelines and strategies for treatment. The paper also provides a comprehensive review of the large number of recent clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus. Current knowns and unknowns are presented, and potential directions for the future are suggested. Improved knowledge of immunological pathogenesis and the molecular differences that exist between patients should help to personalize treatment, minimize side effects, and achieve better outcomes in this difficult disease.