1
|
Lansink C, Sinha B, Meessen N, Dekkers T, Beerlage-de Jong N. Why Do Physicians Prescribe Antibiotics? A Systematic Review of the Psycho-Socio-Organisational Factors Related to Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing of Antimicrobials in Europe. Infect Dis Rep 2024; 16:664-683. [PMID: 39195002 DOI: 10.3390/idr16040051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Effective antimicrobial use enhances care quality and combats antibiotic resistance. Yet, non-guideline factors influence potentially inappropriate prescribing. This study explores psycho-socio-organisational factors in antimicrobial prescribing as perceived by physicians across primary, secondary, and tertiary care. Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases from 1 January 2000, to 8 March 2023, with an update search until 30 January 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on studies in Europe exploring psycho-socio-organisational factors for antibiotic prescribing from physicians' perspectives in hospital, inpatient, or primary care settings. Exclusion criteria targeted out-of-office prescriptions or low-quality studies. To evaluate the latter, several quality and risk-of-bias checklists were used. Data were extracted on study characteristics, study design, and methods and identified determinants of antibiotic prescribing. Data was analysed using a narrative synthesis method. Results: Among 8370 articles, 58 met inclusion criteria, yielding 35 articles from 23 countries. Three main themes emerged: personal, psychological, and organisational factors, encompassing seven determinants including work experience, knowledge, guideline adherence, uncertainty management, perceived pressure, time constraints, and diagnostic resource availability. Uncertainty management was key, with work experience and knowledge mitigating it. No additional factors emerged in the updated search. Conclusion: Enhanced uncertainty management decreases perceived patient and/or parental pressure to prescribe antibiotics, contributing to reducing potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). Therefore, it is imperative to educate physicians on effectively managing uncertainty. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing should be tailored to the specific needs and preferences of the different prescribing physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lansink
- Section of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bhanu Sinha
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nico Meessen
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Dekkers
- Section of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke Beerlage-de Jong
- Section of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baillie EJ, Merlo G, Van Driel ML, Magin PJ, Hall L. Early-career general practitioners' antibiotic prescribing for acute infections: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2024; 79:512-525. [PMID: 38252922 PMCID: PMC10904722 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is a worldwide threat, exacerbated by inappropriate prescribing. Most antibiotic prescribing occurs in primary care. Early-career GPs are important for the future of antibiotic prescribing and curbing antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVES To determine antibiotic prescribing patterns by early-career GPs for common acute infections. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Scopus. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full texts for inclusion. Primary outcomes were antibiotic prescribing rates for common acute infections by GPs with experience of 10 years or less. Secondary outcomes were any associations between working experience and antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS Of 1483 records retrieved, we identified 41 relevant studies. Early-career GPs were less likely to prescribe antibiotics compared with their more experienced colleagues (OR range 0.23-0.67). Their antibiotic prescribing rates for 'any respiratory condition' ranged from 14.6% to 52%, and for upper respiratory tract infections from 13.5% to 33%. Prescribing for acute bronchitis varied by country, from 15.9% in Sweden to 26% in the USA and 63%-73% in Australia. Condition-specific data for all other included acute infections, such as sinusitis and acute otitis media, were limited to the Australian context. CONCLUSIONS Early-career GPs prescribe fewer antibiotics than later-career GPs. However, there are still significant improvements to be made for common acute conditions, as their prescribing is higher than recommended benchmarks. Addressing antimicrobial resistance requires an ongoing worldwide effort and early-career GPs should be the target for long-term change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma J Baillie
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Greg Merlo
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mieke L Van Driel
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Parker J Magin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- GP Training Research Department, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa Hall
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Al Naji H, Inglis JM, Tucker E, Rowett D, Larcombe R, Medlin S, Mangoni AA, Thynne T. Prescribing of antivirals for COVID-19 in a South Australian local health network according to statewide guidelines. Intern Med J 2024; 54:183-186. [PMID: 38267381 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Antiviral drugs were rapidly implemented into clinical practice for the treatment of high-risk patients with COVID-19, prompting the development of statewide guidelines. This South-Australian study reviewed guideline adherence, assessed prescribing patterns and highlighted the inappropriate management of relative drug-drug interactions and dosing for renal function. Additionally, it evaluated the impact of inappropriate antiviral drug use and suggested methods to improve quality use of medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba Al Naji
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Joshua M Inglis
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Emily Tucker
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Debra Rowett
- Drug and Therapeutics Information Service, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rebecca Larcombe
- Pharmacy Services, Flinders Medical Centre, SA Pharmacy, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sophie Medlin
- Pharmacy Services, Flinders Medical Centre, SA Pharmacy, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Arduino A Mangoni
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tilenka Thynne
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Poluektova O, Robertson DA, Rafferty A, Cunney R, Lunn PD. A scoping review and behavioural analysis of factors underlying overuse of antimicrobials. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2023; 5:dlad043. [PMID: 37168837 PMCID: PMC10164659 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Overuse of antimicrobials is a challenging global issue that contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Despite widespread awareness of the problem among members of the medical community and various attempts to improve prescription practices, existing antimicrobial stewardship programmes are not always effective. In our view, this may reflect limited understanding of factors that influence prescription of antimicrobials as empirical therapy, implying a need to address the psychological mechanisms behind some of the specific behaviours involved. Objectives To identify factors that influence the antimicrobials prescription as empirical therapy, and to relate these factors to findings from behavioural science. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the literature on the factors underlying antimicrobial prescription decisions, following the protocol designed using PRISMA guidelines. Results and conclusions From a final sample of 90 sources, we identified ten factors important in antimicrobial prescription decisions. In the second stage of our analysis, we grouped them into five final categories: (1) nature of the decision, (2) social influences, (3) individual differences, (4) characteristics of the patient, (5) context. We analyse these categories using a behavioural science perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Poluektova
- Behavioural Research Unit, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, School of Social Science and Philosophy, Department of Sociology (Visiting Research Fellow), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre A Robertson
- Behavioural Research Unit, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, School of Psychology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aisling Rafferty
- Children’s Health Ireland, Department of Pharmacy, Dublin, Ireland
- University of Birmingham, School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Sciences,Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert Cunney
- Children’s Health Ireland, Irish Meningitis and Sepsis Reference Laboratory, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Microbiology, Dublin, Ireland
- Children’s Health Ireland, Department of Microbiology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter D Lunn
- Behavioural Research Unit, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mather M, Pettigrew LM, Navaratnam S. Barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by primary care practitioners: a theory-informed systematic review of reviews using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel. Syst Rev 2022; 11:180. [PMID: 36042457 PMCID: PMC9429279 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02030-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the barriers and facilitators to behaviour change by primary care practitioners (PCPs) is vital to inform the design and implementation of successful Behaviour Change Interventions (BCIs), embed evidence-based medicine into routine clinical practice, and improve quality of care and population health outcomes. METHODS A theory-led systematic review of reviews examining barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by PCPs in high-income primary care contexts using PRISMA. Embase, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, HMIC and Cochrane Library were searched. Content and framework analysis was used to map reported barriers and facilitators to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and describe emergent themes. Intervention functions and policy categories to change behaviour associated with these domains were identified using the COM-B Model and Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). RESULTS Four thousand three hundred eighty-eight reviews were identified. Nineteen were included. The average quality score was 7.5/11. Reviews infrequently used theory to structure their methods or interpret their findings. Barriers and facilitators most frequently identified as important were principally related to 'Knowledge', 'Environmental context and resources' and 'Social influences' TDF domains. These fall under the 'Capability' and 'Opportunity' domains of COM-B, and are linked with interventions related to education, training, restriction, environmental restructuring and enablement. From this, three key areas for policy change include guidelines, regulation and legislation. Factors least frequently identified as important were related to 'Motivation' and other psychological aspects of 'Capability' of COM-B. Based on this, BCW intervention functions of persuasion, incentivisation, coercion and modelling may be perceived as less relevant by PCPs to change behaviour. CONCLUSIONS PCPs commonly perceive barriers and facilitators to behaviour change related to the 'Capability' and 'Opportunity' domains of COM-B. PCPs may lack insight into the role that 'Motivation' and aspects of psychological 'Capability' have in behaviour change and/or that research methods have been inadequate to capture their function. Future research should apply theory-based frameworks and appropriate design methods to explore these factors. With no 'one size fits all' intervention, these findings provide general, transferable insights into how to approach changing clinical behaviour by PCPs, based on their own views on the barriers and facilitators to behaviour change. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION A protocol was submitted to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine via the Ethics and CARE form submission on 16.4.2020, ref number 21478 (available on request). The project was not registered on PROSPERO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Mather
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tunbridge Wells Hospital, Tonbridge Road, Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN2 4QJ, UK.
| | - Luisa M Pettigrew
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.,UCL Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Medical School, Upper Third Floor, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Stefan Navaratnam
- Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, North Devon District Hospital, Raleigh Heights, Barnstaple, EX31 4JB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harbin NJ, Lindbæk M, Romøren M. Barriers and facilitators of appropriate antibiotic use in primary care institutions after an antibiotic quality improvement program - a nested qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:458. [PMID: 35624423 PMCID: PMC9137170 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03161-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic prescribing by physicians in primary care institutions is common and affected by several factors. Diagnosis and treatment of infections in a nursing home (NH) resident is challenging, with the risk of both under- and overtreatment. Identifying barriers and facilitators of appropriate antibiotic prescribing in NHs and municipal acute care units (MACUs) is essential to ensure the most adequate antibiotic treatment possible and develop future antibiotic stewardship programs. METHODS After implementing a one-year antibiotic quality improvement program, we conducted six semi-structured focus group interviews with physicians (n = 11) and nurses (n = 14) in 10 NHs and 3 MACUs located in the county of Østfold, Norway. We used a semi-structured interview guide covering multiple areas influencing antibiotic use to identify persistent barriers and facilitators of appropriate antibiotic prescribing after the intervention. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The content analysis was performed following the six phases of thematic analysis developed by Braun and Clarke. RESULTS We identified thirteen themes containing barriers and facilitators of the appropriateness of antibiotic use in primary care institutions. The themes were grouped into four main levels: Barriers and facilitators 1) at the clinical level, 2) at the resident level, 3) at the next of kin level, and 4) at the organisational level. Unclear clinical presentation of symptoms and lack of diagnostic possibilities were described as essential barriers to appropriate antibiotic use. At the same time, increased availability of the permanent nursing home physician and early and frequent dialogue with the residents' next of kin were emphasized as facilitators of appropriate antibiotic use. The influence of nurses in the decision-making process regarding infection diagnostics and treatment was by both professions described as profound. CONCLUSIONS Our qualitative study identified four main levels containing several barriers and facilitators of appropriate antibiotic prescribing in Norwegian NHs and MACUs. Diagnostic uncertainty, frequent dialogue with next of kin and organisational factors should be targeted in future antibiotic stewardship programs in primary care institutions. In addition, for such programs to be as effective as possible, nurses should be included on equal terms with physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolay Jonassen Harbin
- Antibiotic Center for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Postboks 1130 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Morten Lindbæk
- Antibiotic Center for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Postboks 1130 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria Romøren
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Talkhan H, Stewart D, Mcintosh T, Ziglam H, Abdulrouf PV, Al-Hail M, Diab M, Cunningham S. Investigating clinicians’ determinants of antimicrobial prescribing behaviour using the Theoretical Domains Framework. J Hosp Infect 2022; 122:72-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Wanat M, Santillo M, Borek AJ, Butler CC, Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S. OUP accepted manuscript. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2022; 4:dlac026. [PMID: 35321397 PMCID: PMC8935206 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
In order to design appropriate antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes, it is crucial to understand challenges to tackling antibiotic resistance (AMR) specific to each healthcare setting. Antibiotic prescribing in primary care accounts for most prescriptions with a significant proportion considered clinically inappropriate. Qualitative research has a long history in social sciences, but its value and contribution are still contested in medical journals including in the AMR/AMS field. However, through its focus on understanding, meaning making and explaining, qualitative research can offer insights in how to improve AMS efforts in primary care. This paper provides an overview of unique considerations, contributions and challenges related to using qualitative research in AMS to help the AMS community new to qualitative research to utilize its potential most fully. First, we discuss specific considerations for AMS in relation to the stages of conducting a qualitative study, including identifying a research question and choosing a suitable methodology; sampling appropriate participants; planning a recruitment strategy; choosing a method of data collection; and conducting data analysis. These are illustrated with examples of qualitative AMS studies in primary care. Second, we highlight the importance of patient and public involvement throughout all stages of the project and ensuring quality in qualitative AMS research. Finally, drawing on these considerations, we make a further case for the value and contribution of qualitative methodologies in AMS/AMR research while outlining future directions for both AMS and qualitative research, including the need for studies with diverse actors; interdisciplinary collaborations; and complex decisions on methodologies and timelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Corresponding author. E-mail: ; @SKGTonkinCrine, @BorekAleksandra, @MartaSantillo, @marta_wanat, @sibylanthierens, @ChrisColButler
| | - Marta Santillo
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aleksandra J. Borek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher C. Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sibyl Anthierens
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chater A, Family H, Lim R, Courtenay M. Influences on antibiotic prescribing by non-medical prescribers for respiratory tract infections: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 75:3458-3470. [PMID: 32766694 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need to conserve antibiotic efficacy, through the management of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) without recourse to antibiotics, is a global priority. A key target for interventions is the antibiotic prescribing behaviour of healthcare professionals including non-medical prescribers (NMPs: nurses, pharmacists, paramedics, physiotherapists) who manage these infections. OBJECTIVES To identify what evidence exists regarding the influences on NMPs' antimicrobial prescribing behaviour and analyse the operationalization of the identified drivers of behaviour using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). METHODS The search strategy was applied across six electronic bibliographic databases (eligibility criteria included: original studies; written in English and published before July 2019; non-medical prescribers as participants; and looked at influences on prescribing patterns of antibiotics for RTIs). Study characteristics, influences on appropriate antibiotic prescribing and intervention content to enhance appropriate antibiotic prescribing were independently extracted and mapped to the TDF. RESULTS The search retrieved 490 original articles. Eight papers met the review criteria. Key issues centred around strategies for managing challenges experienced during consultations, managing patient concerns, peer support and wider public awareness of antimicrobial resistance. The two most common TDF domains highlighted as influences on prescribing behaviour, represented in all studies, were social influences and beliefs about consequences. CONCLUSIONS The core domains highlighted as influential to appropriate antibiotic prescribing should be considered when developing future interventions. Focus should be given to overcoming social influences (patients, other clinicians) and reassurance in relation to beliefs about negative consequences (missing something that could lead to a negative outcome).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Chater
- Centre for Health, Wellbeing and Behaviour Change, University of Bedfordshire, Bedford MK41 9EA, UK.,University College London School of Pharmacy, London WC1H 9JP, UK
| | - Hannah Family
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Medina-Perucha L, García-Sangenís A, Moragas A, Gálvez-Hernández P, Cots JM, Lanau-Roig A, Borràs A, Amo I, Monfà R, Llor C, Berenguera A. Autonomy, power dynamics and antibiotic use in primary healthcare: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244432. [PMID: 33338078 PMCID: PMC7748265 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a global health concern. Although numerous strategies have tried to reduce inadequate antibiotic prescribing, antibiotics are still prescribed in 60% of acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRTIs) cases in Catalonia (Spain). This study aims to explore service users' experiences of ALRTIs, the quality and access to healthcare services, and health education. Selective purposive sampling was carried out, based on a prior definition of participant characteristics. These were sex, age, ethnicity, date of the last ALRTI, number of ALRTIs in the last year, and treatments received. Participants with a previous diagnosis of ALRTIs were recruited from three primary health care centres in Barcelona and one in Tarragona. Twenty-nine interviews were conducted between April and June 2019. A content thematic analysis was performed. Three themes were identified: 1) risk perceptions and help-seeking; 2) treatment preferences and antibiotic use; and 3) relationship dynamics and communication with healthcare professionals. Accounts of service users' sense of autonomy towards their health and power dynamics within the healthcare system were apparent. Supporting service users to become reliable, subjective and agentic experts of their health and bodies could help them to voice their healthcare agendas. Power structures embedded within healthcare, political and economic institutions should be challenged so that healthcare services can be co-developed (with service users) and based on service users' autonomy and horizontal relationships. Special consideration should be paid to the intersection of social vulnerabilities. A concordance approach to prescribing could be key to improve the responsible use of antibiotics and to contribute to the prevention of AMR in primary healthcare. The marketisation of health, and the increased demands of private healthcare in Spain due to the financial pressures on public healthcare as a consequence of the financial crisis of 2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic, are a risk for promoting adequate antibiotic prescribing and use. Trial registration The ISAAC-CAT study has been registered in the NCT registry, ID: NCT03931577.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Medina-Perucha
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana García-Sangenís
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
| | - Ana Moragas
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Jaume I Health Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Pablo Gálvez-Hernández
- Institut Universitari de Pacients (Patients’ University Institut), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
- University of Toronto, IHPME-BFON Collaborative PhD Specialization Program in Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Josep María Cots
- La Marina Health Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, Associació d’Infermeria Familiar i Comunitària de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Lanau-Roig
- La Marina Health Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, Associació d’Infermeria Familiar i Comunitària de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alícia Borràs
- Institut Universitari de Pacients (Patients’ University Institut), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
- Escola Universitària d'Infermeria, Escoles Universitàries Gimbernat, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain
| | - Isabel Amo
- Institut Universitari de Pacients (Patients’ University Institut), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramon Monfà
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
| | - Carl Llor
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Via Roma Health Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Berenguera
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
- Departament d'Infermeria, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Borek AJ, Wanat M, Atkins L, Sallis A, Ashiru-Oredope D, Beech E, Butler CC, Chadborn T, Hopkins S, Jones L, McNulty CAM, Roberts N, Shaw K, Taborn E, Tonkin-Crine S. Optimising antimicrobial stewardship interventions in English primary care: a behavioural analysis of qualitative and intervention studies. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039284. [PMID: 33334829 PMCID: PMC7747536 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While various interventions have helped reduce antibiotic prescribing, further gains can be made. This study aimed to identify ways to optimise antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions by assessing the extent to which important influences on antibiotic prescribing are addressed (or not) by behavioural content of AMS interventions. SETTINGS English primary care. INTERVENTIONS AMS interventions targeting healthcare professionals' antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections. METHODS We conducted two rapid reviews. The first included qualitative studies with healthcare professionals on self-reported influences on antibiotic prescribing. The influences were inductively coded and categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Prespecified criteria were used to identify key TDF domains. The second review included studies of AMS interventions. Data on effectiveness were extracted. Components of effective interventions were extracted and coded using the TDF, Behaviour Change Wheel and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) taxonomy. Using prespecified matrices, we assessed the extent to which BCTs and intervention functions addressed the key TDF domains of influences on prescribing. RESULTS We identified 13 qualitative studies, 41 types of influences on antibiotic prescribing and 6 key TDF domains of influences: 'beliefs about consequences', 'social influences', 'skills', 'environmental context and resources', 'intentions' and 'emotions'. We identified 17 research-tested AMS interventions; nine of them effective and four nationally implemented. Interventions addressed all six key TDF domains of influences. Four of these six key TDF domains were addressed by 50%-67% BCTs that were theoretically congruent with these domains, whereas TDF domain 'skills' was addressed by 24% of congruent BCTs and 'emotions' by none. CONCLUSIONS Further improvement of antibiotic prescribing could be facilitated by: (1) national implementation of effective research-tested AMS interventions (eg, electronic decision support tools, training in interactive use of leaflets, point-of-care testing); (2) targeting important, less-addressed TDF domains (eg, 'skills', 'emotions'); (3) using relevant, under-used BCTs to target key TDF domains (eg, 'forming/reversing habits', 'reducing negative emotions', 'social support'). These could be incorporated into existing, or developed as new, AMS interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra J Borek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Marta Wanat
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Louise Atkins
- Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Sallis
- Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Diane Ashiru-Oredope
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship and Healthcare Associated Infections (HCAI), Public Health England, London, UK
| | | | - Christopher C Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Tim Chadborn
- Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Susan Hopkins
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship and Healthcare Associated Infections (HCAI), Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Leah Jones
- Primary Care and Interventions Unit, Public Health England, Gloucester, UK
| | | | - Nia Roberts
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karen Shaw
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship and Healthcare Associated Infections (HCAI), Public Health England, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Esther Taborn
- NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK
- NHS East Kent Clinical Commissioning Groups, Canterbury, UK
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smits M, Colliers A, Jansen T, Remmen R, Bartholomeeusen S, Verheij R. Examining differences in out-of-hours primary care use in Belgium and the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Public Health 2020; 29:1018-1024. [PMID: 31086964 PMCID: PMC6896980 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The organizational model of out-of-hours primary care is likely to affect healthcare use. We aimed to examine differences in the use of general practitioner cooperatives for out-of-hours care in the Netherlands and Belgium (Flanders) and explore if these are related to organizational differences. Methods A cross-sectional observational study using routine electronic health record data of the year 2016 from 77 general practitioner cooperatives in the Netherlands and 5 general practitioner cooperatives in Belgium (Flanders). Patient age, gender and health problem were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results The number of consultations per 1000 residents was 2.3 times higher in the Netherlands than in Belgium. Excluding telephone consultations, which are not possible in Belgium, the number of consultations was 1.4 times higher. In Belgium, the top 10 of health problems was mainly related to infections, while in the Netherlands there were a larger variety of health problems. In addition, the health problem codes in the Dutch top 10 were more often symptoms, while the codes in the Belgian top 10 were more often diagnoses. In both countries, a relatively large percentage of GPC patients were young children and female patients. Conclusion Differences in the use of general practitioner cooperatives seem to be related to the gatekeeping role of general practitioners in the Netherlands and to organizational differences such as telephone triage, medical advice by telephone, financial thresholds and number of years of experience with the system. The information can benefit policy decisions about the organization of out-of-hours primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marleen Smits
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Colliers
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA), Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Tessa Jansen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roy Remmen
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA), Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Stephaan Bartholomeeusen
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA), Centre for General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Robert Verheij
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xu J, Wang X, Sun KS, Lin L, Zhou X. Parental self-medication with antibiotics for children promotes antibiotic over-prescribing in clinical settings in China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:150. [PMID: 32894189 PMCID: PMC7487542 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00811-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Self-medication with antibiotics (SMA) is one of the most dangerous inappropriate antibiotic use behaviors. This study aims to investigate the impact of parental SMA for children before a consultation on their doctor’s subsequent antibiotic prescribing behavior, including intravenous (IV) antibiotic use in the clinical setting of China. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted between June 2017 and April 2018 in three provinces of China. A total of 9526 parents with children aged 0–13 years were investigated. Data from 1275 parents who had self-medicated their children and then visited a doctor in the past month were extracted and analyzed. Results One-third (410) of the studied children had parental SMA before the consultation and 83.9% of them were subsequently prescribed antibiotics by doctors. Children with parental SMA were more likely to be prescribed antibiotics (aOR = 7.79, 95% CI [5.74–10.58]), including IV antibiotics (aOR = 3.05, 95% CI [2.27–4.11]), and both oral and IV antibiotics (aOR = 3.42, 95% CI [2.42–4.84]), than children without parental SMA. Parents with SMA behaviors were more likely to request antibiotics (aOR = 4.05, 95% CI [2.59–6.31]) including IV antibiotics (aOR = 2.58, 95% CI [1.40–4.76]), and be fulfilled by doctors (aOR = 3.22, 95% CI [1.20–8.63]). Conclusions Tailored health education for parents is required in both community and clinical settings to discourage parental SMA for children. The doctors should not prescribe unnecessary antibiotics to reinforce parents’ SMA behaviors. We recommend expanding the current IV antibiotics ban in outpatient settings of China to cover outpatient pediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayao Xu
- Institute of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Institute of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kai Sing Sun
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Leesa Lin
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Xudong Zhou
- Institute of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Plate A, Kronenberg A, Risch M, Mueller Y, Di Gangi S, Rosemann T, Senn O. Treatment of urinary tract infections in Swiss primary care: quality and determinants of antibiotic prescribing. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:125. [PMID: 32611320 PMCID: PMC7329427 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01201-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Urinary tract infections are one of the most common reasons for prescribing antibiotics in primary care. Current guidelines recommend fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, or trimethoprim - sulfamethoxazol as empiric first line antimicrobial agents in uncomplicated infections. However, there is evidence that the use of fluoroquinolones, which are no longer recommended, is still inappropriate high. We determined antibiotic prescription patterns, quality and factors affecting antibiotic prescriptions in urinary tract infections in primary care in Switzerland. Methods From June 2017 to August 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional study in patients suffering from a urinary tract infection (UTI). Patient and general practitioners characteristics as well as antibiotic prescribing patterns were analysed. Results Antibiotic prescribing patterns in 1.352 consecutively recruited patients, treated in 163 practices could be analysed. In 950 (84.7%) patients with an uncomplicated UTI the prescriptions were according to current guidelines and therefore rated as appropriate. Fluoroquinolones were prescribed in 13.8% and therefore rated as inappropriate. In multivariable analysis, the age of the general practitioner was associated with increasing odds of prescribing a not guideline recommended antibiotic therapy. Conclusions We found a high degree of guideline conform antibiotic prescriptions in patients with an uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care in Switzerland. However, there is still a substantial use of fluoroquinolones in empiric therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Plate
- Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8071, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Andreas Kronenberg
- Swiss Center for Antibiotic Resistance, Institute for Infectious Diseases, University Bern, Bern and Medix General Practice Network, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin Risch
- labormedizinisches zentrum Dr Risch Ostschweiz AG, Buchs, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Yolanda Mueller
- Department of Family Medicine, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Di Gangi
- Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8071, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Rosemann
- Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8071, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Senn
- Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8071, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A simple dose of antibiotics: qualitative analysis of sepsis reporting in UK newspapers. BJGP Open 2020; 4:bjgpopen20X101005. [PMID: 31964635 PMCID: PMC7330194 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A recent drive to improve sepsis awareness has been accompanied by prolific media reporting about its management in children. Media reporting is known to influence public understanding of health issues and subsequent health-seeking behaviour. Aim To examine UK newspaper representations of sepsis in children to better understand how the messages they convey may impact on parents' consulting behaviour and expectations about antimicrobial prescribing. Design & setting Qualitative analysis of articles published in 12 UK newspapers from January 1988 to June 2018. Method Thematic analysis of 140 articles about sepsis in children identified through a search on the Nexis database. Results Reporting about sepsis in UK newspapers was characterised by emotive personal narratives about affected children who have suffered death or disability. These events were frequently presented as resulting from failings within the healthcare system that could have been avoided by early treatment. Health professionals were portrayed as inadequately prepared to recognise and manage sepsis, and as reluctant to prescribe antibiotics, even when necessary. Parents were positioned as advocates for their children, and as being ultimately responsible for ensuring that they receive appropriate treatment. Conclusion This research identified messages about sepsis in the UK news media that could influence public attitudes about antibiotic prescribing in acute childhood illness. Public health communications about sepsis awareness must acknowledge the wider implications of unnecessary antibiotic use as a driver of antimicrobial resistance to reduce the risk of damaging efforts to promote rational prescribing.
Collapse
|
16
|
van Hecke O, Butler C, Mendelson M, Tonkin-Crine S. Introducing new point-of-care tests for common infections in publicly funded clinics in South Africa: a qualitative study with primary care clinicians. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029260. [PMID: 31772084 PMCID: PMC6887073 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Broad-spectrum antibiotics are routinely prescribed empirically in the resource-poor settings for suspected acute common infections, which drive antimicrobial resistance. Point-of-care testing (POCT) might increase the appropriateness of decisions about whether and which antibiotic to prescribe, but implementation will be most effective if clinician's perspectives are taken into account. OBJECTIVES To explore the perceptions of South African primary care clinicians working in publicly funded clinics about: making antibiotic prescribing decisions for two common infection syndromes (acute cough, urinary tract infection); their experiences of existing POCTs; their perceptions of the barriers and opportunities for introducing (hypothetical) new POCTs. DESIGN, METHOD, PARTICIPANTS, SETTING Qualitative semistructured interviews with 23 primary care clinicians (nurses and doctors) at publicly funded clinics in the Western Cape Metro district, South Africa. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Clinicians reported that their antibiotic prescribing decisions were influenced by their clinical assessment, patient comorbidities, social factors (eg, access to care) and perceived patient expectations. Their experiences with currently available POCTs were largely positive, and they were optimistic about the potential for new POCTs to: support evidence-based prescribing decisions that might reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions; reduce the need for further investigations; support effective communication with patients, especially when antibiotics were unlikely to be of benefit. Resources and workflow disruption were seen as the main barriers to uptake into routine care. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians working in publicly funded clinics in the Western Cape Metro of South Africa saw POCTs as potentially useful for positively addressing both clinical and social drivers of the overprescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics, but were concerned about the resource implications and disruption of existing patient workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver van Hecke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Chris Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marc Mendelson
- Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, UK
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rose J, Crosbie M, Stewart A. A qualitative literature review exploring the drivers influencing antibiotic over-prescribing by GPs in primary care and recommendations to reduce unnecessary prescribing. Perspect Public Health 2019; 141:19-27. [PMID: 31633458 DOI: 10.1177/1757913919879183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This qualitative literature review aims to critically assess and analyse published literature to determine drivers influencing over-prescribing by general practitioners (GPs) in primary care, exploring their views and opinions, and also to determine how antibiotic prescribing can be improved and unnecessary prescribing reduced, thus reducing the threat to public health from antibiotic resistance. It is intended to develop new thinking in this area and add to existing knowledge concerning GPs' antibiotic prescribing behaviour. METHODS Thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's 2006 framework was used to analyse 17 qualitative studies chosen from EBSCOhost databases, focusing on GPs' views of antibiotic prescribing in primary care, with specific search strategies and inclusion criteria to ensure study quality and trustworthiness. RESULTS Three main themes and nine sub-themes were generated from the studies. The first main theme discussed GP factors related to over-prescribing, the main drivers being GP attitudes and feelings and anxiety/fear concerning prescribing. The second theme highlighted external factors, with pressures from time and financial issues as the main drivers within this theme. The final theme marked patient pressure, demand and expectation with lack of patient education as the major drivers affecting GP over-prescribing. CONCLUSION The findings of this research show GPs' antibiotic prescribing in primary care is complex, being influenced by many internal and external factors. A multifaceted approach to interventions targeting the drivers identified could significantly reduce the level of antibiotic prescribing thus minimising the impact of antibiotic resistance and promoting a more efficient working environment for GPs and patients alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Rose
- University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chater A, Courtenay M. Community nursing and antibiotic stewardship: the importance of communication and training. Br J Community Nurs 2019; 24:338-342. [PMID: 31265341 DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2019.24.7.338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship (using antimicrobials responsibly) can reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Many health professionals identify themselves as 'antibiotic guardians', but patient expectations, time constraints, and a lack of confidence or underdeveloped communication skills can influence decisions to prescribe. Nurse prescribers have an important role to play in antibiotic stewardship, and their numbers continue to grow. While nurse prescribers welcome this extension to their traditional role, they are often faced with barriers to antibiotic stewardship activities. These barriers may relate to their Capability (knowledge/skill), Opportunity (norms of practice, influence of patients, environmental factors), and Motivation (attitudes and beliefs, concern over outcome, emotion and habit) [COM-B]. Education, training and enablement can help to overcome these barriers, and the development of knowledge, confidence and effective communication skills should be of priority. Further, communication skills can help nurse prescribers understand patient expectations, with the use of open-ended questions, active listening and creation of a patient-centred consultation that leads to a mutually agreed end goal and way forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Chater
- Reader in Health Psychology and Behaviour Change, Centre for Health, Wellbeing and Behaviour Change, University of Bedfordshire, Bedford; Honorary Senior Lecturer in Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine, Centre for Behavioural Medicine, University College London School of Pharmacy, London
| | - Molly Courtenay
- Professor, School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Courtenay M, Rowbotham S, Lim R, Peters S, Yates K, Chater A. Examining influences on antibiotic prescribing by nurse and pharmacist prescribers: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e029177. [PMID: 31221892 PMCID: PMC6588983 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Respiratory tract infections are frequently managed by nurse and pharmacist prescribers, and these prescribers are responsible for 8% of all primary care antibiotic prescriptions. Few studies have explored antibiotic prescribing among these prescribers, and interventions to target their antibiotic prescribing behaviour do not exist. Research objectives were to: (1) use the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify the factors that influence nurse and pharmacist prescriber management of respiratory tract infections and (2) identify the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) that can be used as the basis for the development of a theoretically informed intervention to support appropriate prescribing behaviour. DESIGN Qualitative design comprising semistructured interviews, using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity and Motivation for Behaviour. SETTING Primary care. PARTICIPANTS Twenty one prescribers (4 pharmacists and 17 nurses). RESULTS A range of factors across 12 domains of the TDF were found to influence prescriber behaviour, and 40 BCTs were identified as supporting appropriate prescribing. For example, patient expectations (social influence) was identified as a factor influencing prescribing decisions, and a number of BCTs (problem solving, goal setting and information about health consequences) were identified as supporting prescribers in managing these expectations. CONCLUSION With increasing numbers of nurse and pharmacist prescribers managing infections in primary care, these findings will inform theoretically grounded interventions to support appropriate prescribing behaviour by these groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samantha Rowbotham
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rosemary Lim
- School of Pharmacy, Reading University, Reading, UK
| | - Sarah Peters
- Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kathryn Yates
- Londonwide LMC, Londonwode LMCs and Londonwide Enterprise Ltd, London, UK, UK
| | - Angel Chater
- Department of Sport Science and Physical, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Anderson EC, Kesten JM, Lane I, Hay AD, Moss T, Cabral C. Primary care clinicians' views of paediatric respiratory infection surveillance information to inform clinical decision-making: a qualitative study. BMJ Paediatr Open 2019; 3:e000418. [PMID: 31321318 PMCID: PMC6597489 DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate primary care clinicians' views of a prototype locally relevant, real-time viral surveillance system to assist diagnostic decision-making and antibiotic prescribing for paediatric respiratory tract infections (RTI). Clinicians' perspectives on the content, anticipated use and impact were explored to inform intervention development. BACKGROUND Children with RTIs are overprescribed antibiotics. Pressures on primary care and diagnostic uncertainty can lead to decisional biases towards prescribing. We hypothesise that real-time paediatric RTI surveillance data could reduce diagnostic uncertainty and help reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. METHODOLOGY Semistructured one-to-one interviews with 21 clinicians from a range of urban general practitioner surgeries explored the clinical context and views of the prototype system. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Though clinicians self-identified as rational (not over)prescribers, cognitive biases influenced antibiotic prescribing decisions. Clinicians sought to avoid 'anticipated regret' around not prescribing for a child who then deteriorated. Clinicians were not aware of formal infection surveillance information sources (tending to assume many viruses are around), perceiving the information as novel and potentially useful. Perceptions of surveillance information as presented included: not relevant to decision-making/management; useful to confirm decisions post hoc; and increasing risks of missing sick children. Clinicians expressed wariness of using population-level data to influence individual patient decision-making and expressed preference for threat (high-risk) information identified by surveillance, rather than reassuring information about viral RTIs. CONCLUSIONS More work is needed to develop a surveillance intervention if it is to beneficially influence decision-making and antibiotic prescribing in primary care. Key challenges for developing interventions are how to address cognitive biases and how to communicate reassuring information to risk-oriented clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C Anderson
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanna May Kesten
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West and NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK
| | - Isabel Lane
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK
| | - Alastair D Hay
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK
| | - Timothy Moss
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Christie Cabral
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Davari M, Khorasani E, Tigabu BM. Factors Influencing Prescribing Decisions of Physicians: A Review. Ethiop J Health Sci 2019; 28:795-804. [PMID: 30607097 PMCID: PMC6308758 DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i6.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The pharmaceutical bill is increasing at an alarming rate. The physician practice variation has a pronounced effect on healthcare spending. A number of factors can influence the prescribing behavior of physicians. The aim of this review was to identify the factors affecting the prescribing decision of physicians. Methods Electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE CENTRAL, Cochrane Libraries and Google scholar were searched systematically for literatures on factors influencing prescribing decisions of physicians from 2000 to 2016. There was no restriction on the study designs. Results Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria from 1122 search results. A total of 33 factors were identified. The most frequent factors were patients' clinical condition, pharmaceutical industries, physician attributes, patient preference and cost of medicine. Conclusion Physicians' personal attributes, cost of the medicine and pharmaceutical industries' marketing and promotion strategies were mostly mentioned to influence prescribing decision. The identified factors showed that prescribing is not only geared for patient benefit, but also towards personal interest. The use of valid and reliable practice guidelines could reduce the negative impact of wide ranges of factors and promote the rational prescribing effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Davari
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Pharmaceutical Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
| | - Elahe Khorasani
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Pharmaceutical Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.,Faculty of Pharmacy, Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bereket Molla Tigabu
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Pharmaceutical Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International Campus.,Haramaya University, School of Pharmacy, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hashimoto H, Matsui H, Sasabuchi Y, Yasunaga H, Kotani K, Nagai R, Hatakeyama S. Antibiotic prescription among outpatients in a prefecture of Japan, 2012-2013: a retrospective claims database study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026251. [PMID: 30948598 PMCID: PMC6500307 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate oral antibiotic prescribing patterns and identify factors associated with antibiotic prescriptions, with the aim of guiding future interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Database of public health insurance claims in Kumamoto prefecture (Japan). PARTICIPANTS Beneficiaries of the national or late elders' health insurance system between April 2012 and March 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Of the 7 770 481 outpatient visits, 682 822 had a code for antibiotics (860 antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 population). Third-generation cephalosporins (35%), macrolides (32%) and quinolones (21%) were the most frequently prescribed. Acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), including viral upper respiratory infections (URI) (22%), pharyngitis (18%), bronchitis (11%) and sinusitis (10%) were the most frequently diagnosed for antibiotic prescribing, followed by gastrointestinal (9%), urinary tract (8%) and skin, cutaneous and mucosal infections (5%). Antibiotic prescribing rates for viral URI, pharyngitis, bronchitis, sinusitis and gastrointestinal infections were 35%, 54%, 53%, 57% and 30%, respectively. In multivariable analysis for ARTIs and gastrointestinal infections, patient age (10-19 years especially), patient sex (male) and facility scale (free-standing clinics or small-scale hospital-based clinics) were associated with increased antibiotic prescribing. CONCLUSIONS Broad-spectrum antibiotics constituted 88% of oral outpatient antibiotic prescriptions. Approximately 70% of antibiotics were prescribed for ARTIs and gastroenteritis with modest benefit from antibiotic treatment. The quality of antibiotic prescribing needs to be improved. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions should target ARTIs and gastroenteritis, as well as young patients and small-scale institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideki Hashimoto
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sasabuchi
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Kotani
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Ryozo Nagai
- President, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shuji Hatakeyama
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
O’Doherty J, Leader LFW, O’Regan A, Dunne C, Puthoopparambil SJ, O’Connor R. Over prescribing of antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections; a qualitative study to explore Irish general practitioners' perspectives. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2019; 20:27. [PMID: 30764777 PMCID: PMC6374900 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0917-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-microbial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to public health and antibiotics are often unnecessarily prescribed for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in general practice. We aimed to investigate why general practitioners (GPs) continue to prescribe antibiotics for ARTIs despite increasing knowledge of their poor efficacy and worsening antimicrobial resistance. METHODS We used an explorative qualitative study design. Thirteen GPs were recruited through purposive sampling to represent urban and rural settings and years of experience. They were based in general practices within the Mid-West of Ireland. GPs took part in semi-structured interviews that were digitally audio recorded and transcribed. RESULTS Three main themes and three subthemes were identified. Themes include (1) non-comprehensive guidelines; how guideline adherence can be difficult, (2) GPs under pressure; pressures to prescribe from patients and perceived patient expectations and (3) Unnecessary prescribing; how to address it and the potential of public interventions to reduce it. CONCLUSIONS GPs acknowledge their failure to implement guidelines because they feel they are less usable in clinical situations. GPs felt pressurised to prescribe, especially for fee-paying patients and in out of hours settings (OOH), suggesting the need for interventions that target the public's perceptions of antibiotics. GPs behaviours surrounding prescribing antibiotics need to change in order to reduce AMR and change patients' expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane O’Doherty
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Leonard F. W. Leader
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain, Busaiteen, Muharraq Governorate, Kingdom of Bahrain
| | - Andrew O’Regan
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Colum Dunne
- Centre for Infections in Infection, Inflammation & Immunity (41), Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Soorej Jose Puthoopparambil
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Raymond O’Connor
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rosenberg A, Fucile C, White RJ, Trayhan M, Farooq S, Quill CM, Nelson LA, Weisenthal SJ, Bush K, Zand MS. Visualizing nationwide variation in medicare Part D prescribing patterns. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:103. [PMID: 30454029 PMCID: PMC6245567 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0670-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To characterize the regional and national variation in prescribing patterns in the Medicare Part D program using dimensional reduction visualization methods. Methods Using publicly available Medicare Part D claims data, we identified and visualized regional and national provider prescribing profile variation with unsupervised clustering and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) dimensional reduction techniques. Additionally, we examined differences between regionally representative prescribing patterns for major metropolitan areas. Results Distributions of prescribing volume and medication diversity were highly skewed among over 800,000 Medicare Part D providers. Medical specialties had characteristic prescribing patterns. Although the number of Medicare providers in each state was highly correlated with the number of Medicare Part D enrollees, some states were enriched for providers with > 10,000 prescription claims annually. Dimension-reduction, hierarchical clustering and t-SNE visualization of drug- or drug-class prescribing patterns revealed that providers cluster strongly based on specialty and sub-specialty, with large regional variations in prescribing patterns. Major metropolitan areas had distinct prescribing patterns that tended to group by major geographical divisions. Conclusions This work demonstrates that unsupervised clustering, dimension-reduction and t-SNE visualization can be used to analyze and visualize variation in provider prescribing patterns on a national level across thousands of medications, revealing substantial prescribing variation both between and within specialties, regionally, and between major metropolitan areas. These methods offer an alternative system-wide and pattern-centric view of such data for hypothesis generation, visualization, and pattern identification. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-018-0670-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rosenberg
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,University of Alabama Birmingham, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Birmingham, 14642, AL, USA
| | - Christopher Fucile
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,University of Alabama Birmingham, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, Birmingham, 14642, AL, USA
| | - Robert J White
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA
| | - Melissa Trayhan
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA
| | - Samir Farooq
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA
| | - Caroline M Quill
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA
| | - Lisa A Nelson
- Department Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA
| | - Samuel J Weisenthal
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA
| | - Kristen Bush
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA
| | - Martin S Zand
- Rochester Center for Health Informatics at the University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd - 1.207, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA. .,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, 14642, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pettigrew LM, Kumpunen S, Rosen R, Posaner R, Mays N. Lessons for 'large-scale' general practice provider organisations in England from other inter-organisational healthcare collaborations. Health Policy 2018; 123:51-61. [PMID: 30509873 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Policymakers in England are increasingly encouraging the formation of 'large-scale' general practice provider collaborations with the expectation that this will help deliver better quality services and generate economies of scale. However, solid evidence that these expectations will be met is limited. This paper reviews evidence from other inter-organisational healthcare collaborations with similarities in their development or anticipated impact to identify lessons. Medline. SSCI, Embase and HMIC database searches identified a range of initiatives which could provide transferable evidence. Iterative searching was undertaken to identify further relevant evidence. Thematic analysis was used to identify areas to consider in the development of large-scale general practice providers. Framework analysis was used to identify challenges which may affect the ability of such providers to achieve their anticipated impact. A narrative approach was used to synthesise the evidence. Trade-offs exist in 'scaling-up' between mandated and voluntary collaboration; networks versus single organisations; small versus large collaborations; and different types of governance structures in terms of sustainability and performance. While positive impact seems plausible, evidence suggests that it is not a given that clinical outcomes or patient experience will improve, nor that cost savings will be achieved as a result of increasing organisational size. Since the impact and potential unintended consequences are not yet clear, it would be advisable for policymakers to move with caution, and be informed by ongoing evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa M Pettigrew
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK; Nuffield Trust, 59 New Cavendish Street, London, W1G 7LP, UK.
| | | | - Rebecca Rosen
- Nuffield Trust, 59 New Cavendish Street, London, W1G 7LP, UK
| | - Rachel Posaner
- Library & Information Service, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham, B15 2RT, UK
| | - Nicholas Mays
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK; Nuffield Trust, 59 New Cavendish Street, London, W1G 7LP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
O'Connor R, O'Doherty J, O'Regan A, Dunne C. Antibiotic use for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI) in primary care; what factors affect prescribing and why is it important? A narrative review. Ir J Med Sci 2018; 187:969-986. [PMID: 29532292 PMCID: PMC6209023 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1774-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging global threat to health and is associated with increased consumption of antibiotics. Seventy-four per cent of antibiotic prescribing takes place in primary care. Much of this is for inappropriate treatment of acute respiratory tract infections. AIMS To review the published literature pertaining to antibiotic prescribing in order to identify and understand the factors that affect primary care providers' prescribing decisions. METHODS Six online databases were searched for relevant paper using agreed criteria. One hundred ninety-five papers were retrieved, and 139 were included in this review. RESULTS Primary care providers are highly influenced to prescribe by patient expectation for antibiotics, clinical uncertainty and workload induced time pressures. Strategies proven to reduce such inappropriate prescribing include appropriately aimed multifaceted educational interventions for primary care providers, mass media educational campaigns aimed at healthcare professionals and the public, use of good communication skills in the consultation, use of delayed prescriptions especially when accompanied by written information, point of care testing and, probably, longer less pressurised consultations. Delayed prescriptions also facilitate focused personalised patient education. CONCLUSION There is an emerging consensus in the literature regarding strategies proven to reduce antibiotic consumption for acute respiratory tract infections. The widespread adoption of these strategies in primary care is imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray O'Connor
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick City, Limerick, 000, Ireland.
| | - Jane O'Doherty
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick City, Limerick, 000, Ireland
| | - Andrew O'Regan
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick City, Limerick, 000, Ireland
| | - Colum Dunne
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick City, Limerick, 000, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Colliers A, Coenen S, Remmen R, Philips H, Anthierens S. How do general practitioners and pharmacists experience antibiotic use in out-of-hours primary care? An exploratory qualitative interview study to inform a participatory action research project. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e023154. [PMID: 30269072 PMCID: PMC6169767 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Antibiotics (ABs) are one of the most prescribed medications in out-of-hours (OOH) care in Belgium. Developing a better understanding of why ABs are prescribed in this setting is essential to improve prescribing habits. OBJECTIVES To assess AB prescribing and dispensing challenges for general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists in OOH primary care, and to identify context-specific elements that can help the implementation of behaviour change interventions to improve AB prescribing in this setting. DESIGN This is an exploratory qualitative study using semistructured interviews. This study is part of a participatory action research project. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Participants include 17 GPs and 1 manager, who work in a Belgian OOH general practitioners cooperative (GPC), and 5 pharmacists of the area covered by the GPC. The GPC serves a population of more than 187 000 people. RESULTS GPs feel the threshold to prescribe AB in OOH care is lower in comparion to office hours. GPs and pharmacists talk about the difference in their professional identity in OOH (they define their task differently, they feel more isolated, insecure, have the need to please and so on), type of patients (unknown patients, vulnerable patients, other ethnicities, demanding patients and so on), workload (they feel time-pressured) and lack of diagnostic tools or follow-up. They are aware of the problem of AB overprescribing, but they do not feel ownership of the problem. CONCLUSION The implementation of behaviour change interventions to improve AB prescribing in OOH primary care has to take these context specifics into account and could involve interprofessional collaboration between GPs and pharmacists. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03082521; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies Colliers
- Department of General Practice - Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Samuel Coenen
- Department of General Practice - Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine (ESOC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Roy Remmen
- Department of General Practice - Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Hilde Philips
- Department of General Practice - Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Sibyl Anthierens
- Department of General Practice - Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: an updated and expanded meta-ethnography. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:e633-e645. [PMID: 29914880 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x697889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing unnecessary prescribing remains a key priority for tackling the global rise of antibiotic-resistant infections. AIM The authors sought to update a 2011 qualitative synthesis of GPs' experiences of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), including their views of interventions aimed at more prudent prescribing. They expanded the original scope to encompass all primary care professionals (PCPs) who can prescribe or dispense antibiotics for ARTIs (for example, nurses and pharmacists). DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies. METHOD A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ASSIA, and Web of Science. No date or language restrictions were used. Identified studies were grouped according to their thematic focus (usual care versus intervention), and two separate syntheses were performed. RESULTS In all, 53 articles reporting the experiences of >1200 PCPs were included. Analysis of usual-care studies showed that PCPs tend to assume multiple roles in the context of ARTI consultations (the expert self, the benevolent self, the practical self), depending on the range of intrapersonal, interpersonal, and contextual situations in which they find themselves. Analysis of intervention studies identified four possible ways in which PCPs may experience quality improvement interventions (compromise, 'supportive aids', source of distress, and unnecessary). CONCLUSION Contrary to the original review, these results suggest that the use of the same intervention is experienced in a totally different way by different PCPs, and that the same elements that are perceived as benefits by some could be viewed as drawbacks by others. Acceptability of interventions is likely to increase if these are context sensitive and take into account PCPs' varying roles and changing priorities.
Collapse
|
29
|
van der Werf ET, Duncan LJ, Flotow PV, Baars EW. Do NHS GP surgeries employing GPs additionally trained in integrative or complementary medicine have lower antibiotic prescribing rates? Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of national primary care prescribing data in England in 2016. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020488. [PMID: 29555793 PMCID: PMC5875618 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine differences in antibiotic prescription rates between conventional General Practice (GP) surgeries and GP surgeries employing general practitioners (GPs) additionally trained in integrative medicine (IM) or complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) (referred to as IM GPs) working within National Health Service (NHS) England. DESIGN Retrospective study on antibiotic prescription rates per STAR-PU (Specific Therapeutic group Age-sex weighting Related Prescribing Unit) using NHS Digital data over 2016. Publicly available data were used on prevalence of relevant comorbidities, demographics of patient populations and deprivation scores. SETTING Primary Care. PARTICIPANTS 7283 NHS GP surgeries in England. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE The association between IM GPs and antibiotic prescribing rates per STAR-PU with the number of antibiotic prescriptions (total, and for respiratory tract infection (RTI) and urinary tract infection (UTI) separately) as outcome. RESULTS IM GP surgeries (n=9) were comparable to conventional GP surgeries in terms of list sizes, demographics, deprivation scores and comorbidity prevalence. Negative binomial regression models showed that statistically significant fewer total antibiotics (relative risk (RR) 0.78, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97) and RTI antibiotics (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.94) were prescribed at NHS IM GP surgeries compared with conventional NHS GP surgeries. In contrast, the number of antibiotics prescribed for UTI were similar between both practices. CONCLUSION NHS England GP surgeries employing GPs additionally trained in IM/CAM have lower antibiotic prescribing rates. Accessibility of IM/CAM within NHS England primary care is limited. Main study limitation is the lack of consultation data. Future research should include the differences in consultation behaviour of patients self-selecting to consult an IM GP or conventional surgery, and its effect on antibiotic prescription. Additional treatment strategies for common primary care infections used by IM GPs should be explored to see if they could be used to assist in the fight against antimicrobial resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther T van der Werf
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lorna J Duncan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Erik W Baars
- Louis Bolk Institute, Bunnik, The Netherlands
- University of Applied Sciences, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Williams SJ, Halls AV, Tonkin-Crine S, Moore MV, Latter SE, Little P, Eyles C, Postle K, Leydon GM. General practitioner and nurse prescriber experiences of prescribing antibiotics for respiratory tract infections in UK primary care out-of-hours services (the UNITE study). J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 73:795-803. [PMID: 29190384 PMCID: PMC5890663 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Interventions are needed to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Although community antibiotic prescribing appears to be decreasing in the UK, figures for out-of-hours (OOH) prescribing have substantially increased. Understanding the factors influencing prescribing in OOH and any perceived differences between general practitioner (GP) and nurse prescriber (NP) prescribing habits may enable the development of tailored interventions promoting optimal prescribing in this setting. Objectives To explore UK GP and NP views on and experiences of prescribing antibiotics for RTIs in primary care OOH services. Methods Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs and NPs working in primary care OOH services. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse data. Results The research shows that factors particular to OOH influence antibiotic prescribing, including a lack of patient follow-up, access to patient GP records, consultation time, working contracts and implementation of feedback, audit and supervision. NPs reported perceptions of greater accountability for their prescribing compared with GPs and reported they had longer consultations during which they were able to discuss decisions with patients. Participants agreed that more complex cases should be seen by GPs and highlighted the importance of consistency of decision making, illness explanations to patients as well as a perception that differences in clinical training influence communication with patients and antibiotic prescribing decisions. Conclusions Environmental and social factors in OOH services and a mixed healthcare workforce provide unique influences on antibiotic prescribing for RTIs, which would need to be considered in tailoring interventions that promote prudent antibiotic prescribing in OOH services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Williams
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - A V Halls
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - S Tonkin-Crine
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - M V Moore
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - S E Latter
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Health Sciences, Building 67, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - P Little
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - C Eyles
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - K Postle
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - G M Leydon
- University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Courtenay M, Rowbotham S, Lim R, Deslandes R, Hodson K, MacLure K, Peters S, Stewart D. Antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections: a mixed-methods study of patient experiences of non-medical prescriber management. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e013515. [PMID: 28298366 PMCID: PMC5353344 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Revised: 12/27/2016] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To (1) explore patients' expectations and experiences of nurse and pharmacist non-medical prescriber-led management of respiratory tract infections (RTIs), (2) examine whether patient expectations for antibiotics affect the likelihood of receiving them and (3) understand factors influencing patient satisfaction with RTI consultations. DESIGN Mixed methods. SETTING Primary care. PARTICIPANTS Questionnaires from 120 patients and follow-up interviews with 22 patients and 16 nurse and pharmacist non-medical prescribers (NMPs). RESULTS Patients had multiple expectations of their consultation with 43% expecting to be prescribed an antibiotic. There was alignment between self-reported patient expectations and those perceived by NMPs. Patient expectations for non-antibiotic strategies, such as education to promote self-management, were associated with receipt of those strategies, whereas patient expectations for an antibiotic were not associated with receipt of these medications. 'Patient-centred' management strategies (including reassurance and providing information) were received by 86.7% of patients. Regardless of patients' expectations or the management strategy employed, high levels of satisfaction were reported for all aspects of the consultation. Taking concerns seriously, conducting a physical examination, communicating the treatment plan, explaining treatment decisions and lack of time restrictions were each reported to contribute to patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS NMPs demonstrate an understanding of patient expectations of RTI consultations and use a range of non-antibiotic management strategies, particularly those resembling a patient-centred approach. Overall, patients' expectations were met and prescribers were not unduly influenced by patient expectations for an antibiotic. Patients were satisfied with the consultation, indicating that strategies used by NMPs were acceptable. However, the lower levels of satisfaction among patients who expected but did not receive an antibiotic indicates that although NMPs appear to have strategies for managing RTI consultations, there is still scope for improvement and these prescribers are therefore an important group to involve in antimicrobial stewardship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Courtenay
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Samantha Rowbotham
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Rhian Deslandes
- Cardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Karen Hodson
- Cardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Katie MacLure
- School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sarah Peters
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Derek Stewart
- School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
McNulty CAM, Lecky DM, Hawking MKD, Roberts C, Quigley A, Butler CC. How much information about antibiotics do people recall after consulting in primary care? Fam Pract 2016; 33:395-400. [PMID: 27073194 PMCID: PMC4957011 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sharing information with patients within a consultation about their infection and value of antibiotics can help reduce antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections. However, we do not know how often information is given about antibiotics or infections, and if this is related to knowledge and attitudes. OBJECTIVES To determine the public's reported use of antibiotics, receipt of information from health professionals about antibiotics and resistance, trust in health professionals and knowledge levels about antibiotics and resistance. METHODS Face-to-face computer-assisted survey with 1625 adults over 15 years in randomly selected households using multistage sampling. Rim weighting was used to correct for any selection biases. RESULTS About 88% trusted their GP to determine the need for antibiotics. Of those who took antibiotics in the past year, 62% were for a throat infection, 60% for sinus infection and 42% for a cough. Although 67% who had been prescribed an antibiotic recalled being given advice about their infection or antibiotics, only 8% recalled information about antibiotic resistance. Those in lower social grades were less likely to recall advice. About 44% correctly indicated that antibiotics effectively treat bacterial rather than viral infections. Only 45% agreed that 'healthy people can carry antibiotic resistant bacteria'. CONCLUSION GPs and health carers are trusted decision-makers, but could share more information with patients about the need or not for antibiotics, self-care and antibiotic resistance, especially with younger patients and those of lower social grade. Better ways are needed for effective sharing of information about antibiotic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cliodna A M McNulty
- Primary Care Unit, Public Health England, Gloucester, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff,
| | - Donna M Lecky
- Primary Care Unit, Public Health England, Gloucester
| | | | | | | | - Chris C Butler
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford and Cynon Vale Medical Practice, Cwm Taf University Health Board, Mountain Ash, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ashdown HF, Räisänen U, Wang K, Ziebland S, Harnden A. Prescribing antibiotics to 'at-risk' children with influenza-like illness in primary care: qualitative study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011497. [PMID: 27288385 PMCID: PMC4908907 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend immediate antibiotic treatment of respiratory tract infections in 'at-risk' individuals with comorbidities. Observational evidence suggests that influenza particularly predisposes children to bacterial complications. This study investigates general practitioners' (GPs') accounts of factors influencing their decision-making about antibiotic prescribing in the management of at-risk children with influenza-like illness (ILI). DESIGN Qualitative interview study using a maximum variation sample with thematic analysis through constant comparison. SETTING Semistructured telephone interviews with UK GPs using a case vignette of a child with comorbidities presenting with ILI. PARTICIPANTS There were 41 GPs (41.5% men; 40 from England, 1 from Northern Ireland) with a range of characteristics including length of time in practice, paediatrics experience, practice setting and deprivation. RESULTS There was considerable uncertainty and variation in the way GPs responded to the case and difference of opinion about how long-term comorbidities should affect their antibiotic prescribing pattern. Factors influencing their decision included the child's case history and clinical examination; the GP's view of the parent's ability to self-manage; the GP's own confidence and experiences of managing sick children and assessment of individual versus abstract risk. GPs rarely mentioned potential influenza infection or asked about immunisation status. All said that they would want to see the child; views about delayed prescribing varied in relation to local health service provision including options for follow-up and paediatric services. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates diagnostic uncertainty and wide variation in GP decision-making about prescribing antibiotics to children with comorbidity. Future guidelines might encourage consideration of a specific diagnosis such as influenza, and risk assessment tools could be developed to allow clinicians to quantify the levels of risk associated with different types of comorbidity. However, the wide range of clinical and non-clinical factors involved in decision-making during these consultations should also be considered in future guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen F Ashdown
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ulla Räisänen
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kay Wang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sue Ziebland
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anthony Harnden
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Andre M, Gröndal H, Strandberg EL, Brorsson A, Hedin K. Uncertainty in clinical practice - an interview study with Swedish GPs on patients with sore throat. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2016; 17:56. [PMID: 27188438 PMCID: PMC4870808 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0452-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uncertainty is inevitable in clinical practice in primary care and tolerance for uncertainty and concern for bad outcomes has been shown to vary between physicians. Uncertainty is a factor for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Evidence-based guidelines as well as near-patient tests are suggested tools to decrease uncertainty in the management of patients with respiratory tract infections. The aim of this paper was to describe strategies for coping with uncertainty in patients with pharyngotonsillitis in relation to guidelines. METHODS An interview study was conducted among a strategic sample of 25 general practitioners (GPs). RESULTS All GPs mentioned potential dangerous differential diagnoses and complications. Four strategies for coping with uncertainty were identified, one of which was compliant with guidelines, "Adherence to guidelines", and three were idiosyncratic: "Clinical picture and C-reactive protein (CRP)", "Expanded control", and "Unstructured". The residual uncertainty differed for the different strategies: in the strategy "Adherence to guidelines" and "Clinical picture and CRP" uncertainty was avoided, based either on adherence to guidelines or on the clinical picture and near-patient CRP; in the strategy "Expanded control" uncertainty was balanced based on expanded control; and in the strategy "Unstructured" uncertainty prevailed in spite of redundant examination and anamnesis. CONCLUSION The majority of the GPs avoided uncertainty and deemed they had no problems. Their strategies either adhered to guidelines or comprised excessive use of tests. Thus use of guidelines as well as use of more near-patient tests seemed associated to reduced uncertainty, although the later strategy at the expense of compliance to guidelines. A few GPs did not manage to cope with uncertainty or had to put in excessive work to control uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Andre
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Family Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. .,Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Box 564, 75122, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Hedvig Gröndal
- Department of Sociology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eva-Lena Strandberg
- Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Family Medicine, Malmö, Sweden.,Blekinge Centre of Competence, Blekinge County Council, Karlskrona, Sweden
| | - Annika Brorsson
- Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Family Medicine, Malmö, Sweden.,Center for Primary Health Care Research, Skåne Region, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Katarina Hedin
- Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences, Family Medicine, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Research and Development, Kronoberg County Council, Växjö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Primary care clinician antibiotic prescribing decisions in consultations for children with RTIs: a qualitative interview study. Br J Gen Pract 2016; 66:e207-13. [PMID: 26852795 PMCID: PMC4758501 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16x683821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are a major primary care challenge in children because they are common and costly, there is uncertainty regarding their diagnosis, prognosis, and management, and the overuse of antibiotics leads to illness medicalisation and bacterial resistance. AIM To investigate healthcare professional (HCP) diagnostic and antibiotic prescribing decisions for children with RTIs. DESIGN AND SETTING Semi-structured interviews conducted with 22 GPs and six nurses. HCPs were recruited from six general practices and one walk-in centre, serving a mix of deprived and affluent areas. METHOD Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed, imported into NVivo 9, and analysed thematically. RESULTS HCPs varied in the symptom and clinical examination findings used to identify children they thought might benefit from antibiotics. Their diagnostic reasoning and assessment of perceived clinical need for antibiotics used a dual process, combining an initial rapid assessment with subsequent detailed deductive reasoning. HCPs reported confidence diagnosing and managing most minor and severe RTIs. However, residual prognostic uncertainty, particularly for the intermediate illness severity group, frequently led to antibiotic prescribing to mitigate the perceived risk of subsequent illness deterioration. Some HCPs perceived a need for more paediatrics training to aid treatment decisions. The study also identified a number of non-clinical factors influencing prescribing. CONCLUSION Prognostic uncertainty remains an important driver of HCPs' antibiotic prescribing. Experience and training in recognising severe RTIs, together with more evidence to help HCPs identify the children at risk of future illness deterioration, may support HCPs' identification of the children most and least likely to benefit from antibiotics.
Collapse
|
37
|
The influence of children's day care on antibiotic seeking: a mixed methods study. Br J Gen Pract 2015; 64:e302-12. [PMID: 24771845 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14x679741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preschool-aged children are the highest consumers of antibiotics, but consult mainly for viral infections. Little is known about how day care, which is common in this age group, influences primary care consulting and treatment-seeking behaviours. AIM To investigate daycare providers' approaches to excluding and/or readmitting children with infections, and the consequences for parents' consulting and antibiotic-seeking behaviours. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional survey, document analysis, and qualitative interviews of daycare providers and parents in South East Wales, UK. METHOD A total of 328 daycare providers were asked to complete a survey about infection exclusion practices and to provide a copy of their sickness exclusion policy. Next, 52 semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected questionnaire responders and parents using their services. Questionnaire responses underwent bivariate analysis, policies underwent document analysis, and interviews were thematically analysed using constant comparison methods. RESULTS In total 217 out of 328 (66%) daycare providers responded; 82 out of 199 (41%) reported advising parents that their child may need antibiotics and 199 out of 214 (93%) reported advising general practice consultations. Interviews confirmed that such advice was routine, and beliefs about antibiotic indications often went against clinical guidelines: 24% (n = 136) of sickness exclusion policies mentioning infections made at least one non-evidence-based indication for 'treatment' or antibiotics. Parent interviews revealed that negotiating daycare requirements lowered thresholds for consulting and encouraged antibiotic seeking. CONCLUSION Daycare providers encourage parents to consult general practice and seek antibiotics through non-evidence-based policies and practices. Parents' perceptions of daycare providers' requirements override their own beliefs of when it is appropriate to consult and seek treatment.
Collapse
|
38
|
Clinicians' views and experiences of interventions to enhance the quality of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30:408-16. [PMID: 25373834 PMCID: PMC4370987 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3076-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Revised: 05/01/2014] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence shows a high rate of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in primary care in Europe and the United States. Given the costs of widespread use and associated antibiotic resistance, reducing inappropriate use is a public health priority. OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore clinicians' experiences of training in communication skills and use of a patient booklet and/or a C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care test to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs). DESIGN We used a qualitative research approach, interviewing clinicians who participated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing two contrasting interventions. PARTICIPANTS General practice clinicians in Belgium, England, The Netherlands, Poland, Spain and Wales participated in the study. APPROACH Sixty-six semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim, translated into English where necessary, and analysed using thematic and framework analysis. KEY RESULTS Clinicians from all countries attributed benefits for themselves and their patients to using both interventions. Clinicians reported that the communication skills training and use of the patient booklet gave them greater confidence in addressing patient expectations for an antibiotic by providing answers to common questions and supporting the clinician's own explanations. Clinicians felt the booklet could be used for a variety of patients and for different types of infections. The CRP test was viewed as a tool to decrease diagnostic uncertainty, to support non-prescription decisions, and to reassure patients, but was only necessary when clinicians were uncertain about the need for antibiotics. CONCLUSION Providing clinicians with training and support tools for use in practice was received positively and was valued by clinicians across countries. Interventions seemed to have influenced behaviour by increasing clinician knowledge about illness severity and prescribing, increasing confidence in making non-prescribing decisions when antibiotics were unnecessary, and enabling clinicians to anticipate positive outcomes when making such decisions. Addressing such determinants of behaviour change enabled interventions to be relevant for clinicians working across different contexts.
Collapse
|
39
|
[Prospective cross-sectional study of antibiotic prescriptions in a sample of French general practitioners]. Presse Med 2015; 44:e59-66. [PMID: 25650299 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2014] [Revised: 06/19/2014] [Accepted: 07/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of our study was to assess the quality of antibiotic prescriptions in a sample of general practitioners (GPs) receiving junior doctors in training, whatever the motive of the prescription. METHODS We performed a prospective observational study of all antibiotics prescribed in October 2012 by 21 GPs working in southeastern France. Two specialists (general medicine and infectious diseases) independently assessed the compliance with recommendations of antibiotic prescriptions using a validated algorithm. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-two antibiotic courses were prescribed, mainly for low respiratory tract infections (30%), ENT (26%), urinary tract (22%) or skin (13%) infections. Forty prescriptions were considered as appropriate (17%), 77 as inappropriate (33%; mainly due to a non-recommended molecule choice [77%] or a too long treatment duration [44%]) and 115 prescriptions were unnecessary (50%), due to diagnostic issues. There were wide variations between GPs. An essential laboratory or imaging investigation was missing for 36% of prescriptions: chest X-ray for pneumonia (80% were missing), rapid antigen diagnostic test for acute pharyngitis (23% missing) and urine dipstick for urinary tract infections (80% missing). Fluoroquinolones and macrolides/synergistins accounted for 31% of the prescriptions, and were associated with a lower prevalence of appropriate prescriptions (7% and 2% respectively, P<0.001). There was a co-prescription of anti-inflammatory drugs in 15% of the cases. CONCLUSION The misuse of antibiotics was frequent in this study. Improving the diagnostic workout is of paramount importance. Urgent actions are needed to improve antibiotic use in general practice.
Collapse
|
40
|
van Buul LW, van der Steen JT, Doncker SMMM, Achterberg WP, Schellevis FG, Veenhuizen RB, Hertogh CMPM. Factors influencing antibiotic prescribing in long-term care facilities: a qualitative in-depth study. BMC Geriatr 2014; 14:136. [PMID: 25514874 PMCID: PMC4289541 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2014] [Accepted: 12/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Insight into factors that influence antibiotic prescribing is crucial when developing interventions aimed at a more rational use of antibiotics. We examined factors that influence antibiotic prescribing in long-term care facilities, and present a conceptual model that integrates these factors. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with physicians (n = 13) and nursing staff (n = 13) in five nursing homes and two residential care homes in the central-west region of the Netherlands. An iterative analysis was applied to interviews with physicians to identify and categorize factors that influence antibiotic prescribing, and to integrate these into a conceptual model. This conceptual model was triangulated with the perspectives of nursing staff. Results The analysis resulted in the identification of six categories of factors that can influence the antibiotic prescribing decision: the clinical situation, advance care plans, utilization of diagnostic resources, physicians’ perceived risks, influence of others, and influence of the environment. Each category comprises several factors that may influence the decision to prescribe or not prescribe antibiotics directly (e.g. pressure of patients’ family leading to antibiotic prescribing) or indirectly via influence on other factors (e.g. unfamiliarity with patients resulting in a higher physician perceived risk of non-treatment, in turn resulting in a higher tendency to prescribe antibiotics). Conclusions Our interview study shows that several non-rational factors may affect antibiotic prescribing decision making in long-term care facilities, suggesting opportunities to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use. We developed a conceptual model that integrates the identified categories of influencing factors and shows the relationships between those categories. This model may be used as a practical tool in long-term care facilities to identify local factors potentially leading to inappropriate prescribing, and to subsequently intervene at the level of those factors to promote appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2318-14-136) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura W van Buul
- EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dempsey PP, Businger AC, Whaley LE, Gagne JJ, Linder JA. Primary care clinicians' perceptions about antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis: a qualitative study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2014; 15:194. [PMID: 25495918 PMCID: PMC4275949 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-014-0194-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2014] [Accepted: 11/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background Clinicians prescribe antibiotics to over 65% of adults with acute bronchitis despite guidelines stating that antibiotics are not indicated. Methods To identify and understand primary care clinician perceptions about antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 primary care clinicians in Boston, Massachusetts and used thematic content analysis. Results All the participants agreed with guidelines that antibiotics are not indicated for acute bronchitis and felt that clinicians other than themselves were responsible for overprescribing. Barriers to guideline adherence included 6 themes: (1) perceived patient demand, which was the main barrier, although some clinicians perceived a recent decrease; (2) lack of accountability for antibiotic prescribing; (3) saving time and money; (4) other clinicians’ misconceptions about acute bronchitis; (5) diagnostic uncertainty; and (6) clinician dissatisfaction in failing to meet patient expectations. Strategies to decrease inappropriate antibiotic prescribing included 5 themes: (1) patient educational materials; (2) quality reporting; (3) clinical decision support; (4) use of an over-the-counter prescription pad; and (5) pre-visit triage and education by nurses to prevent visits. Conclusions Clinicians continued to cite patient demand as the main reason for antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis, though some clinicians perceived a recent decrease. Clinicians felt that other clinicians were responsible for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and that better pre-visit triage by nurses could prevent visits and change patients’ expectations. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-014-0194-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick P Dempsey
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
| | - Alexandra C Businger
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
| | - Lauren E Whaley
- Bureau of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Joshua J Gagne
- Survey and Data Management Core, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jeffrey A Linder
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
McCleary N, Ramsay CR, Francis JJ, Campbell MK, Allan J. Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14:621. [PMID: 25471752 PMCID: PMC4258016 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0621-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 11/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health-care quality in primary care depends largely on the appropriateness of General Practitioners' (GPs; Primary Care or Family Physicians) decisions, which may be influenced by how difficult they perceive decisions to be. Patient scenarios (clinical or case vignettes) are widely used to investigate GPs' decision making. This review aimed to identify the extent to which perceived decision difficulty, decision appropriateness, and their relationship have been assessed in scenario studies of GPs' decision making; identify possible determinants of difficulty and appropriateness; and investigate the relationship between difficulty and appropriateness. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for scenario studies of GPs' decision making. One author completed article screening. Ten percent of titles and abstracts were checked by an independent volunteer, resulting in 91% agreement. Data on decision difficulty and appropriateness were extracted by one author and descriptively synthesised. Chi-squared tests were used to explore associations between decision appropriateness, decision type and decision appropriateness assessment method. RESULTS Of 152 included studies, 66 assessed decision appropriateness and five assessed perceived difficulty. While no studies assessed the relationship between perceived difficulty and appropriateness, one study objectively varied the difficulty of the scenarios and assessed the relationship between a measure of objective difficulty and appropriateness. Across 38 studies where calculations were possible, 62% of the decisions were appropriate as defined by the appropriateness standard used. Chi-squared tests identified statistically significant associations between decision appropriateness, decision type and decision appropriateness assessment method. Findings suggested a negative relationship between decision difficulty and appropriateness, while interventions may have the potential to reduce perceived difficulty. CONCLUSIONS Scenario-based research into GPs' decisions rarely considers the relationship between perceived decision difficulty and decision appropriateness. The links between these decisional components require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola McCleary
- />Aberdeen Health Psychology Group & Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 2nd Floor Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD Scotland, UK
| | - Craig R Ramsay
- />Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Jill J Francis
- />School of Health Sciences, City University London, England, UK
| | - Marion K Campbell
- />Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Julia Allan
- />Aberdeen Health Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ternhag A, Grünewald M, Nauclér P, Tegmark Wisell K. Antibiotic consumption in relation to socio-demographic factors, co-morbidity, and accessibility of primary health care. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 46:888-96. [DOI: 10.3109/00365548.2014.954264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
44
|
Moore M. Amoxicillin for acute lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: subgroup analysis of potential high-risk groups. Br J Gen Pract 2014; 64:e75-80. [PMID: 24567620 PMCID: PMC3905438 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14x677121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2013] [Revised: 09/06/2013] [Accepted: 10/29/2013] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotics are of limited overall clinical benefit for uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) but there is uncertainty about their effectiveness for patients with features associated with higher levels of antibiotic prescribing. AIM To estimate the benefits and harms of antibiotics for acute LRTI among those producing coloured sputum, smokers, those with fever or prior comorbidities, and longer duration of prior illness. DESIGN AND SETTING Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial of antibiotic placebo for acute LRTI in primary care. METHOD Two thousand and sixty-one adults with acute LRTI, where pneumonia was not suspected clinically, were given amoxicillin or matching placebo. The duration of symptoms, rated moderately bad or worse (primary outcome), symptom severity on days 2-4 (0-6 scale), and the development of new or worsening symptoms were analysed in pre-specified subgroups of interest. Evidence of differential treatment effectiveness was assessed in prespecified subgroups by interaction terms. RESULTS No subgroups were identified that were significantly more likely to benefit from antibiotics in terms of symptom duration or the development of new or worsening symptoms. Those with a history of significant comorbidities experienced a significantly greater reduction in symptom severity between days 2 and 4 (interaction term -0.28, P = 0.003; estimated effect of antibiotics among those with a past history -0.28 [95% confidence interval = -0.44 to -0.11], P = 0.001), equivalent to three people in 10 rating symptoms as a slight rather than a moderately bad problem. For subgroups not specified in advance antibiotics provided a modest reduction in symptom severity for non-smokers and for those with short prior illness duration (<7 days), and a modest reduction in symptom duration for those with short prior illness duration. CONCLUSION There is no clear evidence of clinically meaningful benefit from antibiotics in the studied high-risk groups of patients presenting in general practice with uncomplicated LRTIs where prescribing is highest. Any possible benefit must be balanced against the side-effects and longer-term effects on antibiotic resistance.
Collapse
|
45
|
Yardley L, Douglas E, Anthierens S, Tonkin-Crine S, O’Reilly G, Stuart B, Geraghty AWA, Arden-Close E, van der Velden AW, Goosens H, Verheij TJM, Butler CC, Francis NA, Little P. Evaluation of a web-based intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for LRTI in six European countries: quantitative process analysis of the GRACE/INTRO randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci 2013; 8:134. [PMID: 24238118 PMCID: PMC3922910 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2013] [Accepted: 11/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To reduce the spread of antibiotic resistance, there is a pressing need for worldwide implementation of effective interventions to promote more prudent prescribing of antibiotics for acute LRTI. This study is a process analysis of the GRACE/INTRO trial of a multifactorial intervention that reduced antibiotic prescribing for acute LRTI in six European countries. The aim was to understand how the interventions were implemented and to examine effects of the interventions on general practitioners' (GPs') and patients' attitudes. METHODS GPs were cluster randomised to one of three intervention groups or a control group. The intervention groups received web-based training in either use of the C-reactive protein (CRP) test, communication skills and use of a patient booklet, or training in both. GP attitudes were measured before and after the intervention using constructs from the Theory of Planned Behaviour and a Website Satisfaction Questionnaire. Effects of the interventions on patients were assessed by a post-intervention questionnaire assessing patient enablement, satisfaction with the consultation, and beliefs about the risks and need for antibiotics. RESULTS GPs in all countries and intervention groups had very positive perceptions of the intervention and the web-based training, and felt that taking part had helped them to reduce prescribing. All GPs perceived reducing prescribing as more important and less risky following the intervention, and GPs in the communication groups reported increased confidence to reduce prescribing. Patients in the communication groups who received the booklet reported the highest levels of enablement and satisfaction and had greater awareness that antibiotics could be unnecessary and harmful. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the interventions should be broadly acceptable to both GPs and patients, as well as feasible to roll out more widely across Europe. There are also some indications that they could help to engender changes in GP and patient attitudes that will be helpful in the longer-term, such as increased awareness of the potential disadvantages of antibiotics and increased confidence to manage LRTI without them. Given the positive effects of the booklet on patient beliefs and attitudes, it seems logical to extend the use of the patient booklet to all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Yardley
- Centre for Applications of Health Psychology (CAHP), Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BG, UK
| | - Elaine Douglas
- Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Sibyl Anthierens
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1 Wilrijk, Antwerp BE-2610, Belgium
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- Primary Care and Population Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Gilly O’Reilly
- Primary Care and Population Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care and Population Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Adam W A Geraghty
- Primary Care and Population Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Emily Arden-Close
- Centre for Applications of Health Psychology (CAHP), Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BG, UK
| | - Alike W van der Velden
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Goosens
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, VAXINFECTIO, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Theo JM Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Chris C Butler
- Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Nick A Francis
- Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care and Population Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Coenen S, Francis N, Kelly M, Hood K, Nuttall J, Little P, Verheij TJM, Melbye H, Goossens H, Butler CC. Are patient views about antibiotics related to clinician perceptions, management and outcome? A multi-country study in outpatients with acute cough. PLoS One 2013; 8:e76691. [PMID: 24194845 PMCID: PMC3806785 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2013] [Accepted: 08/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outpatients with acute cough who expect, hope for or ask for antibiotics may be more unwell, benefit more from antibiotic treatment, and be more satisfied with care when they are prescribed antibiotics. Clinicians may not accurately identify those patients. OBJECTIVE To explore whether patient views (expecting, hoping for or asking for antibiotics) are associated with illness presentation and resolution, whether patient views are accurately perceived by clinicians, and the association of all these factors with antibiotic prescribing and patient satisfaction with care. METHODS Prospective observational study of 3402 adult patients with acute cough presenting in 14 primary care networks. Correlations and associations tested with multilevel logistic regression and McNemar 's tests, and Cohen's Kappa, positive agreement (PA) and negative agreement (NA) calculated as appropriate. RESULTS 1,213 (45.1%) patients expected, 1,093 (40.6%) hoped for, and 275 (10.2%) asked for antibiotics. Clinicians perceived 840 (31.3%) as wanting to be prescribed antibiotics (McNemar's test, p<0.05). Their perception agreed modestly with the three patient views (Kappa's = 0.29, 0.32 and 0.21, PA's = 0.56, 0.56 and 0.33, NA's = 0.72, 0.75 and 0.82, respectively). 1,464 (54.4%) patients were prescribed antibiotics. Illness presentation and resolution were similar for patients regardless their views. These associations were not modified by antibiotic treatment. Patient expectation and hope (OR:2.08, 95% CI:[1.48,2.93] and 2.48 [1.73,3.55], respectively), and clinician perception (12.18 [8.31,17.84]) were associated with antibiotic prescribing. 2,354 (92.6%) patients were satisfied. Only those hoping for antibiotics were less satisfied when antibiotics were not prescribed (0.39 [0.17,0.90]). CONCLUSION Patient views about antibiotic treatment were not useful for identifying those who will benefit from antibiotics. Clinician perceptions did not match with patient views, but particularly influenced antibiotic prescribing. Patients were generally satisfied with care, but those hoping for but not prescribed antibiotics were less satisfied. Clinicians need to more effectively elicit and address patient views about antibiotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Coenen
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for General Practice, Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nick Francis
- Cochrane Institutes of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Kelly
- South East Wales Trials Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Kerenza Hood
- South East Wales Trials Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqui Nuttall
- South East Wales Trials Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Medical Group, University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Theo J. M. Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hasse Melbye
- General Practice Research Unit, Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway
| | - Herman Goossens
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christopher C. Butler
- Cochrane Institutes of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cals JWL, van Leeuwen ME, Chappin FHF, de Bont EGPM, Dinant GJ, Butler CC. "How Do You Feel about Antibiotics for This?" A Qualitative Study of Physician Attitudes towards a Context-Rich Communication Skills Method. Antibiotics (Basel) 2013; 2:439-49. [PMID: 27029312 PMCID: PMC4790273 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics2030439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Revised: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 08/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
To explore experiences with and views of general practitioners (GPs) on a physician communication training method in primary care and its applicability and implementation in daily practice, we performed a semi-structured qualitative study of GPs’ experience of training in and implementing a communication skills training program for managing lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) which included a seminar, simulated patient consultation together with providing and receiving feedback on ones own transcript, and a seminar in a structured approach to the LRTI consultation. Seventeen out of 20 eligible GPs who had participated in the IMPAC3T trial and were allocated to receiving enhanced physician communication training for managing lower respiratory tract infection participated. GPs’ experiences with the physician communication training method and its specific components were positive. The method gave GPs additional tools for managing LRTI consultations and increased their sense of providing evidence-based management. During the study, GPs reported using almost all communication items covered in the training, but some GPs stated that the communication skills diluted over time, and that they continued to use a selected set of the skills. The general communication items were most regularly used. Implementation of the method in daily practice helped GPs to prescribe fewer antibiotics in LRTI with the only perceived disadvantage being time-pressure. This study suggests that GPs felt positive about the physician communication training method for enhanced management of LRTI in primary care. GPs continued to use some of the communication items, of which general communication items were the most common. Furthermore, GPs believed that implementation of the communication skills in daily practice helped them to prescribe fewer antibiotics. The context-rich communication method could have wider application in common conditions in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen W L Cals
- Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mirjam E van Leeuwen
- Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Fleur H F Chappin
- Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Eefje G P M de Bont
- Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Geert-Jan Dinant
- Department of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Christopher C Butler
- Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Whaley LE, Businger AC, Dempsey PP, Linder JA. Visit complexity, diagnostic uncertainty, and antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in primary care: a retrospective study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2013; 14:120. [PMID: 23957228 PMCID: PMC3765925 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 08/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines and performance measures recommend avoiding antibiotics for acute cough/acute bronchitis and presume visits are straightforward with simple diagnostic decision-making. We evaluated clinician-assigned diagnoses, diagnostic uncertainty, and antibiotic prescribing for acute cough visits in primary care. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of acute cough visits - cough lasting ≤21 days in adults 18-64 years old without chronic lung disease - in a primary care practice from March 2011 through June 2012. RESULTS Of 56,301 visits, 962 (2%) were for acute cough. Clinicians diagnosed patients with 1, 2, or ≥ 3 cough-related diagnoses in 54%, 35%, and 11% of visits, respectively. The most common principal diagnoses were upper respiratory infection (46%), sinusitis (10%), acute bronchitis (9%), and pneumonia (8%). Clinicians prescribed antibiotics in 22% of all visits: 65% of visits with antibiotic-appropriate diagnoses and 4% of visits with non-antibiotic-appropriate diagnoses. Clinicians expressed diagnostic uncertainty in 16% of all visits: 43% of visits with antibiotic-appropriate diagnoses and 5% of visits with non-antibiotic-appropriate diagnoses. Clinicians expressed uncertainty more often when prescribing antibiotics than when not prescribing antibiotics (30% vs. 12%; p < 0.001). As the number of visit diagnoses increased from 1 to 2 to ≥ 3, clinicians were more likely to express diagnostic uncertainty (5%, 25%, 40%, respectively; p < 0.001) and prescribe antibiotics (16%, 25%, 41%, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Acute cough may be more complex and have more diagnostic uncertainty than guidelines and performance measures presume. Efforts to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute cough should address diagnostic complexity and uncertainty that clinicians face.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Whaley
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexandra C Businger
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick P Dempsey
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Linder
- Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Grover ML, Nordrum JT, Mookadam M, Engle RL, Moats CC, Noble BN. Addressing Antibiotic Use for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in an Academic Family Medicine Practice. Am J Med Qual 2013; 28:485-91. [DOI: 10.1177/1062860613476133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|