Case for genome sequencing in infants and children with rare, undiagnosed or genetic diseases

Ontology-based expansion of virtual gene panels to improve diagnostic efficiency for rare genetic diseases

BACKGROUND

Virtual Gene Panels (VGP) comprising disease-associated causal genes are utilized in the diagnosis of rare genetic diseases to evaluate candidate genes identified by whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing. VGPs generated by the PanelApp software were utilized in a UK 100,000 Genome Project pilot study to filter candidate genes, thus enhancing diagnostic efficiency for rare diseases. However, PanelApp also filtered out disease-causing genes in nearly 50% of the cases.

METHODS

Here, we propose various methods for optimized approach to design VGPs that significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency by leveraging the hierarchical structure of the Mondo disease ontology, without excluding disease-causing genes. We also performed computational experiments on an evaluation dataset comprising 74 patients to determine the optimal VGP design method.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrate that the proposed method can significantly enhance rare disease diagnosis efficiency by automatically identifying candidate genes. The proposed method successfully designed VGPs that improve diagnosis efficiency without excluding disease-causing genes.

CONCLUSION

We have developed novel methods for VGP design that leverage the hierarchical structure of the Mondo disease ontology to improve rare genetic disease diagnosis efficiency. This approach identifies candidate genes without excluding disease-causing genes, and thereby improves diagnostic efficiency.

Benchmarking nanopore sequencing and rapid genomics feasibility: validation at a quaternary hospital in New Zealand

Approximately 200 critically ill infants and children in New Zealand are in high-dependency care, many suspected of having genetic conditions, requiring scalable genomic testing. We adopted an acute care genomics protocol from an accredited laboratory and established a clinical pipeline using Oxford Nanopore Technologies PromethION 2 solo system and Fabric GEM™ software. Benchmarking of the pipeline was performed using Global Alliance for Genomics and Health benchmarking tools and Genome in a Bottle samples (HG002-HG007). Evaluation of single nucleotide variants resulted in a precision and recall of 0.997 and 0.992, respectively. Small indel identification approached a precision of 0.922 and recall of 0.838. Large genomic variations from Coriell Copy Number Variation Reference Panel 1 were reliably detected with ~2 M long reads. Finally, we present results obtained from fourteen trio samples, ten of which were processed in parallel with a clinically accredited short-read rapid genomic testing pipeline (Newborn Genomics Programme; NCT06081075; 2023-10-12).

Fast and accurate DNASeq variant calling workflow composed of LUSH toolkit

BACKGROUND

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming increasingly prevalent for molecular diagnosis, staging and prognosis because of its declining costs and the ability to detect nearly all genes associated with a patient's disease. The currently widely accepted variant calling pipeline, GATK, is limited in terms of its computational speed and efficiency, which cannot meet the growing analysis needs.

RESULTS

Here, we propose a fast and accurate DNASeq variant calling workflow that is purely composed of tools from LUSH toolkit. The precision and recall measurements indicate that both the LUSH and GATK pipelines exhibit high levels of consistency, with precision and recall rates exceeding 99% on the 30x NA12878 dataset. In terms of processing speed, the LUSH pipeline outperforms the GATK pipeline, completing 30x WGS data analysis in just 1.6 h, which is approximately 17 times faster than GATK. Notably, the LUSH_HC tool completes the processing from BAM to VCF in just 12 min, which is around 76 times faster than GATK.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the LUSH pipeline is a highly promising alternative to the GATK pipeline for WGS data analysis, with the potential to significantly improve bedside analysis of acutely ill patients, large-scale cohort data analysis, and high-throughput variant calling in crop breeding programs. Furthermore, the LUSH pipeline is highly scalable and easily deployable, allowing it to be readily applied to various scenarios such as clinical diagnosis and genomic research.

Novel, likely pathogenic variant in ATP7A associated with Menkes disease diagnosed with ultrarapid genome sequencing

Menkes disease is a multisystem disorder caused by disturbances in copper absorption and metabolism. This lethal neurodegenerative disease presents with fine, 'kinky' hair, connective tissue dysfunction and developmental regression after 2-3 months of age. The primary variant associated with Menkes is in the ATP7A gene with X-linked recessive inheritance. Historically, the diagnosis of Menkes has relied on clinical signs and symptoms, but as the disease has varying levels of severity and presentation, it can take months to diagnose and treat. Emerging technology for ultrarapid genome sequencing offers a DNA-based route of diagnosis with preliminary results in hours, allowing for earlier discovery and treatment of Menkes with the potential for better long-term outcomes. Ultrarapid whole genome sequencing identified a novel, likely pathogenic, frameshift variant in the ATP7A gene consistent with a diagnosis of Menkes disease. The clinical manifestations and pathophysiology of this disorder, as well as a rapid DNA-based diagnosis, are described in this case.

Role of next generation sequencing in diagnosis and management of critically ill children with suspected monogenic disorder

Next generation sequencing based diagnosis has emerged as a promising tool for evaluating critically ill neonates and children. However, there is limited data on its utility in developing countries. We assessed its diagnostic rate and clinical impact on management of pediatric patients with a suspected genetic disorder requiring critical care. The study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital in Northern India. We analyzed 70 children with an illness requiring intensive care and obtained a precise molecular diagnosis in 32 of 70 probands (45.3%) using diverse sequencing techniques such as clinical exome, whole exome, and whole genome. A significant change in clinical outcome was observed in 13 of 32 (40.6%) diagnosed probands with a change in medication in 11 subjects and redirection to palliative care in two subjects. Additional benefits included specific dietary management (three cases), avoidance of a major procedure (one case) and better reproductive counseling. Dramatic therapeutic responses were observed in three cases with SCN1A, SCN2A and KCNQ2-related epileptic encephalopathy. A delayed turn-around for sequencing results was perceived as a major limiting factor in the study, as rapid and ultra-rapid sequencing was not available. Achieving a precise molecular diagnosis has great utility in managing critically ill patients with suspected genetic disorders in developing countries.

How to customize common data models for rare diseases: an OMOP-based implementation and lessons learned

BACKGROUND

Given the geographical sparsity of Rare Diseases (RDs), assembling a cohort is often a challenging task. Common data models (CDM) can harmonize disparate sources of data that can be the basis of decision support systems and artificial intelligence-based studies, leading to new insights in the field. This work is sought to support the design of large-scale multi-center studies for rare diseases.

METHODS

In an interdisciplinary group, we derived a list of elements of RDs in three medical domains (endocrinology, gastroenterology, and pneumonology) according to specialist knowledge and clinical guidelines in an iterative process. We then defined a RDs data structure that matched all our data elements and built Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) processes to transfer the structure to a joint CDM. To ensure interoperability of our developed CDM and its subsequent usage for further RDs domains, we ultimately mapped it to Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM. We then included a fourth domain, hematology, as a proof-of-concept and mapped an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) dataset to the developed CDM.

RESULTS

We have developed an OMOP-based rare diseases common data model (RD-CDM) using data elements from the three domains (endocrinology, gastroenterology, and pneumonology) and tested the CDM using data from the hematology domain. The total study cohort included 61,697 patients. After aligning our modules with those of Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) Core Dataset (CDS) modules, we leveraged its ETL process. This facilitated the seamless transfer of demographic information, diagnoses, procedures, laboratory results, and medication modules from our RD-CDM to the OMOP. For the phenotypes and genotypes, we developed a second ETL process. We finally derived lessons learned for customizing our RD-CDM for different RDs.

DISCUSSION

This work can serve as a blueprint for other domains as its modularized structure could be extended towards novel data types. An interdisciplinary group of stakeholders that are actively supporting the project's progress is necessary to reach a comprehensive CDM.

CONCLUSION

The customized data structure related to our RD-CDM can be used to perform multi-center studies to test data-driven hypotheses on a larger scale and take advantage of the analytical tools offered by the OHDSI community.

Genomic Landscape of Branchio-Oto-Renal Syndrome through Whole-Genome Sequencing: A Single Rare Disease Center Experience in South Korea

Branchio-oto-renal (BOR) and branchio-otic (BO) syndromes are characterized by anomalies affecting the ears, often accompanied by hearing loss, as well as abnormalities in the branchial arches and renal system. These syndromes exhibit a broad spectrum of phenotypes and a complex genomic landscape, with significant contributions from the EYA1 gene and the SIX gene family, including SIX1 and SIX5. Due to their diverse phenotypic presentations, which can overlap with other genetic syndromes, molecular genetic confirmation is essential. As sequencing technologies advance, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used in rare disease diagnostics. We explored the genomic landscape of 23 unrelated Korean families with typical or atypical BOR/BO syndrome using a stepwise approach: targeted panel sequencing and exome sequencing (Step 1), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) with copy number variation screening (Step 2), and WGS (Step 3). Integrating WGS into our diagnostic pipeline detected structure variations, including cryptic inversion and complex genomic rearrangement, eventually enhancing the diagnostic yield to 91%. Our findings expand the genomic architecture of BOR/BO syndrome and highlight the need for WGS to address the genetic diagnosis of clinically heterogeneous rare diseases.

The impact of clinical genome sequencing in a global population with suspected rare genetic disease

There is mounting evidence of the value of clinical genome sequencing (cGS) in individuals with suspected rare genetic disease (RGD), but cGS performance and impact on clinical care in a diverse population drawn from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been investigated. The iHope program, a philanthropic cGS initiative, established a network of 24 clinical sites in eight countries through which it provided cGS to individuals with signs or symptoms of an RGD and constrained access to molecular testing. A total of 1,004 individuals (median age, 6.5 years; 53.5% male) with diverse ancestral backgrounds (51.8% non-majority European) were assessed from June 2016 to September 2021. The diagnostic yield of cGS was 41.4% (416/1,004), with individuals from LMIC sites 1.7 times more likely to receive a positive test result compared to HIC sites (LMIC 56.5% [195/345] vs. HIC 33.5% [221/659], OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.4, p < 0.0001). A change in diagnostic evaluation occurred in 76.9% (514/668) of individuals. Change of management, inclusive of specialty referrals, imaging and testing, therapeutic interventions, and palliative care, was reported in 41.4% (285/694) of individuals, which increased to 69.2% (480/694) when genetic counseling and avoidance of additional testing were also included. Individuals from LMIC sites were as likely as their HIC counterparts to experience a change in diagnostic evaluation (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.1-∞, p = 0.05) and change of management (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.3, p = 0.49). Increased access to genomic testing may support diagnostic equity and the reduction of global health care disparities.

Health Care Costs After Genome-Wide Sequencing for Children With Rare Diseases in England and Canada

Importance

Etiologic diagnoses for rare diseases can involve a diagnostic odyssey, with repeated health care interactions and inconclusive diagnostics. Prior studies reported cost savings associated with genome-wide sequencing (GWS) compared with cytogenetic or molecular testing through rapid genetic diagnosis, but there is limited evidence on whether diagnosis from GWS is associated with reduced health care costs.

Objective

To measure changes in health care costs after diagnosis from GWS for Canadian and English children with suspected rare diseases.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was a quasiexperimental retrospective analysis across 3 distinct English and Canadian cohorts, completed in 2023. Mixed-effects generalized linear regression was used to estimate associations between GWS and costs in the 2 years before and after GWS. Difference-in-differences regression was used to estimate associations of genetic diagnosis and costs. Costs are in 2019 US dollars. GWS was conducted in a research setting (Genomics England 100 000 Genomes Project [100KGP] and Clinical Assessment of the Utility of Sequencing and Evaluation as a Service [CAUSES] Research Clinic) or clinical outpatient setting (publicly reimbursed GWS in British Columbia [BC], Canada). Participants were children with developmental disorders, seizure disorders, or both undergoing GWS between 2014 and 2019. Data were analyzed from April 2021 to September 2023.

Exposures

GWS and genetic diagnosis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Annual health care costs and diagnostic costs per child.

Results

Study cohorts included 7775 patients in 100KGP, among whom 788 children had epilepsy (mean [SD] age at GWS, 11.6 [11.1] years; 400 female [50.8%]) and 6987 children had an intellectual disability (mean [SD] age at GWS, 8.2 [8.4] years; 2750 female [39.4%]); 77 patients in CAUSES (mean [SD] age at GWS, 8.5 [4.4] years; 33 female [42.9%]); and 118 publicly reimbursed GWS recipients from BC (mean [SD] age at GWS, 5.5 [5.2] years; 58 female [49.2%]). GWS diagnostic yield was 143 children (18.1%) for those with epilepsy and 1323 children (18.9%) for those with an intellectual disability in 100KGP, 47 children (39.8%) in the BC publicly reimbursed setting, and 42 children (54.5%) in CAUSES. Mean annual per-patient spending over the study period was $5283 (95% CI, $5121-$5427) for epilepsy and $3373 (95% CI, $3322-$3424) for intellectual disability in the 100KGP, $724 (95% CI, $563-$886) in CAUSES, and $1573 (95% CI, $1372-$1773) in the BC reimbursed setting. Receiving a genetic diagnosis from GWS was not associated with changed costs in any cohort.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, receiving a genetic diagnosis was not associated with cost savings. This finding suggests that patient benefit and cost-effectiveness should instead drive GWS implementation.

Exome and genome sequencing in a heterogeneous population of patients with rare disease: Identifying predictors of a diagnosis

PURPOSE

Exome (ES) and genome sequencing (GS) are increasingly being utilized for individuals with rare and undiagnosed diseases; however, guidelines on their use remain limited. This study aimed to identify factors associated with diagnosis by ES and/or GS in a heterogeneous population of patients with rare and undiagnosed diseases.

METHODS

In this case control study, we reviewed data from 400 diagnosed and 400 undiagnosed randomly selected participants in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network, all of whom had undergone ES and/or GS. We analyzed factors associated with receiving a diagnosis by ES and/or GS.

RESULTS

Factors associated with a decreased odds of being diagnosed included adult symptom onset, singleton sequencing, and having undergone ES and/or GS before acceptance to the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (48%, 51%, and 32% lower odds, respectively). Factors that increased the odds of being diagnosed by ES and/or GS included having primarily neurological symptoms and having undergone prior chromosomal microarray testing (44% and 59% higher odds, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We identified several factors that were associated with receiving a diagnosis by ES and/or GS. This will ideally inform the utilization of ES and/or GS and help manage expectations of individuals and families undergoing these tests.

The expanding diagnostic toolbox for rare genetic diseases

Genomic technologies, such as targeted, exome and short-read genome sequencing approaches, have revolutionized the care of patients with rare genetic diseases. However, more than half of patients remain without a diagnosis. Emerging approaches from research-based settings such as long-read genome sequencing and optical genome mapping hold promise for improving the identification of disease-causal genetic variants. In addition, new omic technologies that measure the transcriptome, epigenome, proteome or metabolome are showing great potential for variant interpretation. As genetic testing options rapidly expand, the clinical community needs to be mindful of their individual strengths and limitations, as well as remaining challenges, to select the appropriate diagnostic test, correctly interpret results and drive innovation to address insufficiencies. If used effectively - through truly integrative multi-omics approaches and data sharing - the resulting large quantities of data from these established and emerging technologies will greatly improve the interpretative power of genetic and genomic diagnostics for rare diseases.

The Approach to a Child with Dysmorphic Features: What the Pediatrician Should Know

The advancement of genetic knowledge and the discovery of an increasing number of genetic disorders has made the role of the geneticist progressively more complex and fundamental. However, most genetic disorders present during childhood; thus, their early recognition is a challenge for the pediatrician, who will be also involved in the follow-up of these children, often establishing a close relationship with them and their families and becoming a referral figure. In this review, we aim to provide the pediatrician with a general knowledge of the approach to treating a child with a genetic syndrome associated with dysmorphic features. We will discuss the red flags, the most common manifestations, the analytic collection of the family and personal medical history, and the signs that should alert the pediatrician during the physical examination. We will offer an overview of the physical malformations most commonly associated with genetic defects and the way to describe dysmorphic facial features. We will provide hints about some tools that can support the pediatrician in clinical practice and that also represent a useful educational resource, either online or through apps downloaded on a smartphone. Eventually, we will offer an overview of genetic testing, the ethical considerations, the consequences of incidental findings, and the main indications and limitations of the principal technologies.

Systematic reanalysis of genomic data by diagnostic laboratories: a scoping review of ethical, economic, legal and (psycho)social implications

With the introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques increasing numbers of disease-associated variants are being identified. This ongoing progress might lead to diagnoses in formerly undiagnosed patients and novel insights in already solved cases. Therefore, many studies suggest introducing systematic reanalysis of NGS data in routine diagnostics. Introduction will, however, also have ethical, economic, legal and (psycho)social (ELSI) implications that Genetic Health Professionals (GHPs) from laboratories should consider before possible implementation of systematic reanalysis. To get a first impression we performed a scoping literature review. Our findings show that for the vast majority of included articles ELSI aspects were not mentioned as such. However, often these issues were raised implicitly. In total, we identified nine ELSI aspects, such as (perceived) professional responsibilities, implications for consent and cost-effectiveness. The identified ELSI aspects brought forward necessary trade-offs for GHPs to consciously take into account when considering responsible implementation of systematic reanalysis of NGS data in routine diagnostics, balancing the various strains on their laboratories and personnel while creating optimal results for new and former patients. Some important aspects are not well explored yet. For example, our study shows GHPs see the values of systematic reanalysis but also experience barriers, often mentioned as being practical or financial only, but in fact also being ethical or psychosocial. Engagement of these GHPs in further research on ELSI aspects is important for sustainable implementation.

Genetically guided precision medicine clinical decision support tools: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Patient care using genetics presents complex challenges. Clinical decision support (CDS) tools are a potential solution because they provide patient-specific risk assessments and/or recommendations at the point of care. This systematic review evaluated the literature on CDS systems which have been implemented to support genetically guided precision medicine (GPM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase, encompassing January 1, 2011-March 14, 2023. The review included primary English peer-reviewed research articles studying humans, focused on the use of computers to guide clinical decision-making and delivering genetically guided, patient-specific assessments, and/or recommendations to healthcare providers and/or patients.

RESULTS

The search yielded 3832 unique articles. After screening, 41 articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Alerts and reminders were the most common form of CDS used. About 27 systems were integrated with the electronic health record; 2 of those used standards-based approaches for genomic data transfer. Three studies used a framework to analyze the implementation strategy.

DISCUSSION

Findings include limited use of standards-based approaches for genomic data transfer, system evaluations that do not employ formal frameworks, and inconsistencies in the methodologies used to assess genetic CDS systems and their impact on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We recommend that future research on CDS system implementation for genetically GPM should focus on implementing more CDS systems, utilization of standards-based approaches, user-centered design, exploration of alternative forms of CDS interventions, and use of formal frameworks to systematically evaluate genetic CDS systems and their effects on patient care.

Consensus reporting guidelines to address gaps in descriptions of ultra-rare genetic conditions

Genome-wide sequencing and genetic matchmaker services are propelling a new era of genotype-driven ascertainment of novel genetic conditions. The degree to which reported phenotype data in discovery-focused studies address informational priorities for clinicians and families is unclear. We identified reports published from 2017 to 2021 in 10 genetics journals of novel Mendelian disorders. We adjudicated the quality and detail of the phenotype data via 46 questions pertaining to six priority domains: (I) Development, cognition, and mental health; (II) Feeding and growth; (III) Medication use and treatment history; (IV) Pain, sleep, and quality of life; (V) Adulthood; and (VI) Epilepsy. For a subset of articles, all subsequent published follow-up case descriptions were identified and assessed in a similar manner. A modified Delphi approach was used to develop consensus reporting guidelines, with input from content experts across four countries. In total, 200 of 3243 screened publications met inclusion criteria. Relevant phenotypic details across each of the 6 domains were rated superficial or deficient in >87% of papers. For example, less than 10% of publications provided details regarding neuropsychiatric diagnoses and "behavioural issues", or about the type/nature of feeding problems. Follow-up reports (n = 95) rarely contributed this additional phenotype data. In summary, phenotype information relevant to clinical management, genetic counselling, and the stated priorities of patients and families is lacking for many newly described genetic diseases. The PHELIX (PHEnotype LIsting fiX) reporting guideline checklists were developed to improve phenotype reporting in the genomic era.

Rapid Genome Sequencing Shows Diagnostic Utility In Infants With Congenital Heart Defects

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect and a leading cause of infant mortality. CHD often has a genetic etiology and recent studies demonstrate utility in genetic testing. In clinical practice, decisions around genetic testing choices continue to evolve, and the incorporation of rapid genome sequencing (rGS) in CHD has not been well studied. Though smaller studies demonstrate the value of rGS, they also highlight the burden of results interpretation. We analyze genetic testing in CHD at two time-points, in 2018 and 2022-2023, across a change in clinical testing guidelines from chromosome microarray (CMA) to rGS. Analysis of 421 hospitalized infants with CHD demonstrated consistent genetic testing across time. Overall, after incorporation of rGS in 2022-2023, the diagnostic yield was 6.8% higher compared to 2018, and this pattern was consistent across all patient subtypes analyzed. In 2018, CMA was the most common test performed, with diagnostic results for CHD in 14.3%, while in 2022-2023, rGS was the most frequent test performed, with results diagnostic for CHD in 16.9%. Additionally, rGS identified 44% more unique genetic diagnoses than CMA. This is the largest study to highlight the value of rGS in CHD and has important implications for management.

Applications of genome sequencing as a single platform for clinical constitutional genetic testing

The number of human disease genes has dramatically increased over the past decade, largely fueled by ongoing advances in sequencing technologies. In parallel, the number of available clinical genetic tests has also increased, including the utilization of exome sequencing for undiagnosed diseases. Although most clinical sequencing tests have been centered on enrichment-based multigene panels and exome sequencing, the continued improvements in performance and throughput of genome sequencing suggest that this technology is emerging as a potential platform for routine clinical genetic testing. A notable advantage is a single workflow with the opportunity to reflexively interrogate content as clinically indicated; however, challenges with implementing routine clinical genome sequencing still remain. This review is centered on evaluating the applications of genome sequencing as a single platform for clinical constitutional genetic testing, including its potential utility for diagnostic testing, carrier screening, cytogenomic molecular karyotyping, prenatal testing, mitochondrial genome interrogation, and pharmacogenomic and polygenic risk score testing.

Evidence review and considerations for use of first line genome sequencing to diagnose rare genetic disorders

Early use of genome sequencing (GS) in the diagnostic odyssey can reduce suffering and improve care, but questions remain about which patient populations are most amenable to GS as a first-line diagnostic test. To address this, the Medical Genome Initiative conducted a literature review to identify appropriate clinical indications for GS. Studies published from January 2011 to August 2022 that reported on the diagnostic yield (DY) or clinical utility of GS were included. An exploratory meta-analysis using a random effects model evaluated DY based on cohort size and diagnosed cases per cohort. Seventy-one studies met inclusion criteria, comprising over 13,000 patients who received GS in one of the following settings: hospitalized pediatric patients, pediatric outpatients, adult outpatients, or mixed. GS was the first-line test in 38% (27/71). The unweighted mean DY of first-line GS was 45% (12-73%), 33% (6-86%) in cohorts with prior genetic testing, and 33% (9-60%) in exome-negative cohorts. Clinical utility was reported in 81% of first-line GS studies in hospitalized pediatric patients. Changes in management varied by cohort and underlying molecular diagnosis (24-100%). To develop evidence-informed points to consider, the quality of all 71 studies was assessed using modified American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria, with five core points to consider developed, including recommendations for use of GS in the N/PICU, in lieu of sequential testing and when disorders with substantial allelic heterogeneity are suspected. Future large and controlled studies in the pediatric and adult populations may support further refinement of these recommendations.

Validated WGS and WES protocols proved saliva-derived gDNA as an equivalent to blood-derived gDNA for clinical and population genomic analyses

BACKGROUND

Whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have become standard methods in human clinical diagnostics as well as in population genomics (POPGEN). Blood-derived genomic DNA (gDNA) is routinely used in the clinical environment. Conversely, many POPGEN studies and commercial tests benefit from easy saliva sampling. Here, we evaluated the quality of variant call sets and the level of genotype concordance of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels) for WES and WGS using paired blood- and saliva-derived gDNA isolates employing genomic reference-based validated protocols.

METHODS

The genomic reference standard Coriell NA12878 was repeatedly analyzed using optimized WES and WGS protocols, and data calls were compared with the truth dataset published by the Genome in a Bottle Consortium. gDNA was extracted from the paired blood and saliva samples of 10 participants and processed using the same protocols. A comparison of paired blood-saliva call sets was performed in the context of WGS and WES genomic reference-based technical validation results.

RESULTS

The quality pattern of called variants obtained from genomic-reference-based technical replicates correlates with data calls of paired blood-saliva-derived samples in all levels of tested examinations despite a higher rate of non-human contamination found in the saliva samples. The F1 score of 10 blood-to-saliva-derived comparisons ranged between 0.8030-0.9998 for SNVs and between 0.8883-0.9991 for small-indels in the case of the WGS protocol, and between 0.8643-0.999 for SNVs and between 0.7781-1.000 for small-indels in the case of the WES protocol.

CONCLUSION

Saliva may be considered an equivalent material to blood for genetic analysis for both WGS and WES under strict protocol conditions. The accuracy of sequencing metrics and variant-detection accuracy is not affected by choosing saliva as the gDNA source instead of blood but much more significantly by the genomic context, variant types, and the sequencing technology used.

Clinical utility of early rapid genome sequencing in the evaluation of patients with differences of sex development

Establishing an early and accurate genetic diagnosis among patients with differences of sex development (DSD) is crucial in guiding the complex medical and psychosocial care they require. Genetic testing routinely utilized in clinical practice for this population is predicated upon physical exam findings and biochemical and endocrine profiling. This approach, however, is inefficient and unstandardized. Many patients with DSD, particularly those with 46,XY DSD, never receive a molecular genetic diagnosis. Rapid genome sequencing (rGS) is gaining momentum as a first-tier diagnostic instrument in the evaluation of patients with DSD given its ability to provide greater diagnostic yield and timely results. We present the case of a patient with nonbinary genitalia and systemic findings for whom rGS identified a novel variant of the WT1 gene and resulted in a molecular diagnosis within two weeks of life. This timeframe of diagnosis for syndromic DSD is largely unprecedented at our institution. Rapid GS expedited mobilization of a multidisciplinary medical team; enabled early understanding of clinical trajectory; informed planning of medical and surgical interventions; and guided individualized psychosocial support provided to the family. This case highlights the potential of early rGS in transforming the evaluation and care of patients with DSD.

International Undiagnosed Diseases Programs (UDPs): components and outcomes

Over the last 15 years, Undiagnosed Diseases Programs have emerged to address the significant number of individuals with suspected but undiagnosed rare genetic diseases, integrating research and clinical care to optimize diagnostic outcomes. This narrative review summarizes the published literature surrounding Undiagnosed Diseases Programs worldwide, including thirteen studies that evaluate outcomes and two commentary papers. Commonalities in the diagnostic and research process of Undiagnosed Diseases Programs are explored through an appraisal of available literature. This exploration allowed for an assessment of the strengths and limitations of each of the six common steps, namely enrollment, comprehensive clinical phenotyping, research diagnostics, data sharing and matchmaking, results, and follow-up. Current literature highlights the potential utility of Undiagnosed Diseases Programs in research diagnostics. Since participants have often had extensive previous genetic studies, research pipelines allow for diagnostic approaches beyond exome or whole genome sequencing, through reanalysis using research-grade bioinformatics tools and multi-omics technologies. The overall diagnostic yield is presented by study, since different selection criteria at enrollment and reporting processes make comparisons challenging and not particularly informative. Nonetheless, diagnostic yield in an undiagnosed cohort reflects the potential of an Undiagnosed Diseases Program. Further comparisons and exploration of the outcomes of Undiagnosed Diseases Programs worldwide will allow for the development and improvement of the diagnostic and research process and in turn improve the value and utility of an Undiagnosed Diseases Program.

Clinical Genetics Assessment Triangle (CGAT): A simple tool to identify patients with genetic conditions

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a simple tool for general physicians to promptly identify and refer pediatric patients with a higher probability of having a genetic condition.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective, descriptive study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital's Clinical Genetics Unit from June 2019 to January 2020. We included patients under 18 years of age who visited the unit, excluding those without genetic testing. Epidemiological, clinical, and genetic variables were collected from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of a genetic condition based on genetic testing.

RESULTS

Among 445 patients, 304 were included; 163 (53.6%) were male, and mean age was 7.4 years (SD 5.1 years). A genetic condition was diagnosed in 139 patients (45.7%). Using a multiple logistic regression model, five variables significantly contributed to reaching a diagnosis: suspected diagnosis at referral (OR 3.45, P < 0.001), short stature (OR 3.11, P < 0.001), global developmental delay/intellectual disability (OR 2.65, P < 0.001), dysmorphic craniofacial features (OR 1.99, P = 0.035), and multiple congenital anomalies (OR 2.54, P = 0.033). The association strength (OR) increased when these variables were paired with each other. The study's findings are presented in the form of a triangle, known as the Clinical Genetics Assessment Triangle (CGAT), which summarizes the results. A decision tree model is applied to guide clinical department referrals based on the affected sides of the triangle.

CONCLUSIONS

The CGAT has the potential to enable general physicians to promptly identify pediatric patients with an increased probability of having a genetic condition.

Optimal Protocols and Management of Clinical and Genomic Data Collection to Assist in the Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Congenital Anomalies

Standardized protocols have been designed and developed specifically for clinical information collection and obtaining trio genomic information from infants affected with congenital anomalies (CA) and their parents, as well as securing human biological resources. The protocols include clinical and genomic information collection on multiple CA that were difficult to diagnose using pre-existing screening methods. We obtained human-derived resources and genomic information from 138 cases, including 45 families of infants with CA and their parent trios. For the clinical information collection protocol, criteria for target patient selection and a consent system for collecting and utilizing research resources are crucial. Whole genome sequencing data were generated for all participants, and standardized protocols were developed for resource collection and manufacturing. We recorded the phenotype information according to the Human Phenotype Ontology term, and epidemiological information was collected through an environmental factor questionnaire. Updating and recording of clinical symptoms and genetic information that have been newly added or changed over time are significant. The protocols enabled long-term tracking by including the growth and development status that reflect the important characteristics of newborns. Using these clinical and genetic information collection protocols for CA, an essential platform for early genetic diagnosis and diagnostic research can be established, and new genetic diagnostic guidelines can be presented in the near future.

Precision medicine in rare diseases: What is next?

Molecular diagnostics is a cornerstone of modern precision medicine, broadly understood as tailoring an individual's treatment, follow-up, and care based on molecular data. In rare diseases (RDs), molecular diagnoses reveal valuable information about the cause of symptoms, disease progression, familial risk, and in certain cases, unlock access to targeted therapies. Due to decreasing DNA sequencing costs, genome sequencing (GS) is emerging as the primary method for precision diagnostics in RDs. Several ongoing European initiatives for precision medicine have chosen GS as their method of choice. Recent research supports the role for GS as first-line genetic investigation in individuals with suspected RD, due to its improved diagnostic yield compared to other methods. Moreover, GS can detect a broad range of genetic aberrations including those in noncoding regions, producing comprehensive data that can be periodically reanalyzed for years to come when further evidence emerges. Indeed, targeted drug development and repurposing of medicines can be accelerated as more individuals with RDs receive a molecular diagnosis. Multidisciplinary teams in which clinical specialists collaborate with geneticists, genomics education of professionals and the public, and dialogue with patient advocacy groups are essential elements for the integration of precision medicine into clinical practice worldwide. It is also paramount that large research projects share genetic data and leverage novel technologies to fully diagnose individuals with RDs. In conclusion, GS increases diagnostic yields and is a crucial step toward precision medicine for RDs. Its clinical implementation will enable better patient management, unlock targeted therapies, and guide the development of innovative treatments.

Differences of Sex Development: Current Issues and Controversies

Differences of sex development (DSD) encompass a broad range of conditions in which the development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomic sex is not typically male or female. Terms used to describe DSD are controversial, and continuously evolving. An individualized, multidisciplinary approach is key to both the diagnosis and management of DSD. Recent advances in DSD care include expanded genetic testing options, a more nuanced approach to gonadal management, and an emphasis on shared decision-making, particularly related to external genital surgical procedures. The timing of DSD surgery is currently being questioned and debated in both medical and advocacy/activism spheres.

ClinVar and HGMD genomic variant classification accuracy has improved over time, as measured by implied disease burden

BACKGROUND

Curated databases of genetic variants assist clinicians and researchers in interpreting genetic variation. Yet, these databases contain some misclassified variants. It is unclear whether variant misclassification is abating as these databases rapidly grow and implement new guidelines.

METHODS

Using archives of ClinVar and HGMD, we investigated how variant misclassification has changed over 6 years, across different ancestry groups. We considered inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) screened in newborns as a model system because these disorders are often highly penetrant with neonatal phenotypes. We used samples from the 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP) to identify individuals with genotypes that were classified by the databases as pathogenic. Due to the rarity of IEMs, nearly all such classified pathogenic genotypes indicate likely variant misclassification in ClinVar or HGMD.

RESULTS

While the false-positive rates of both ClinVar and HGMD have improved over time, HGMD variants currently imply two orders of magnitude more affected individuals in 1KGP than ClinVar variants. We observed that African ancestry individuals have a significantly increased chance of being incorrectly indicated to be affected by a screened IEM when HGMD variants are used. However, this bias affecting genomes of African ancestry was no longer significant once common variants were removed in accordance with recent variant classification guidelines. We discovered that ClinVar variants classified as Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic are reclassified sixfold more often than DM or DM? variants in HGMD, which has likely resulted in ClinVar's lower false-positive rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering misclassified variants that have since been reclassified reveals our increasing understanding of rare genetic variation. We found that variant classification guidelines and allele frequency databases comprising genetically diverse samples are important factors in reclassification. We also discovered that ClinVar variants common in European and South Asian individuals were more likely to be reclassified to a lower confidence category, perhaps due to an increased chance of these variants being classified by multiple submitters. We discuss features for variant classification databases that would support their continued improvement.

At-Risk Genomic Findings for Pediatric-Onset Disorders From Genome Sequencing vs Medically Actionable Gene Panel in Proactive Screening of Newborns and Children

Importance

Although the clinical utility of genome sequencing for critically ill children is well recognized, its utility for proactive pediatric screening is not well explored.

Objective

To evaluate molecular findings from screening ostensibly healthy children with genome sequencing compared with a gene panel for medically actionable pediatric conditions.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This case series study was conducted among consecutive, apparently healthy children undergoing proactive genetic screening for pediatric disorders by genome sequencing (n = 562) or an exome-based panel of 268 genes (n = 606) from March 1, 2018, through July 31, 2022.

Exposures

Genetic screening for pediatric-onset disorders using genome sequencing or an exome-based panel of 268 genes.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Molecular findings indicative of genetic disease risk.

Results

Of 562 apparently healthy children (286 girls [50.9%]; median age, 29 days [IQR, 9-117 days]) undergoing screening by genome sequencing, 46 (8.2%; 95% CI, 5.9%-10.5%) were found to be at risk for pediatric-onset disease, including 22 children (3.9%) at risk for high-penetrance disorders. Sequence analysis uncovered molecular diagnoses among 32 individuals (5.7%), while copy number variant analysis uncovered molecular diagnoses among 14 individuals (2.5%), including 4 individuals (0.7%) with chromosome scale abnormalities. Overall, there were 47 molecular diagnoses, with 1 individual receiving 2 diagnoses; of the 47 potential diagnoses, 22 (46.8%) were associated with high-penetrance conditions. Pathogenic variants in medically actionable pediatric genes were found in 6 individuals (1.1%), constituting 12.8% (6 of 47) of all diagnoses. At least 1 pharmacogenomic variant was reported for 89.0% (500 of 562) of the cohort. In contrast, of 606 children (293 girls [48.3%]; median age, 26 days [IQR, 10-67 days]) undergoing gene panel screening, only 13 (2.1%; 95% CI, 1.0%-3.3%) resulted in potential childhood-onset diagnoses, a significantly lower rate than those screened by genome sequencing (P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this case series study, genome sequencing as a proactive screening approach for children, due to its unrestrictive gene content and technical advantages in comparison with an exome-based gene panel for medically actionable childhood conditions, uncovered a wide range of heterogeneous high-penetrance pediatric conditions that could guide early interventions and medical management.

Deficit of homozygosity among 1.52 million individuals and genetic causes of recessive lethality

Genotypes causing pregnancy loss and perinatal mortality are depleted among living individuals and are therefore difficult to find. To explore genetic causes of recessive lethality, we searched for sequence variants with deficit of homozygosity among 1.52 million individuals from six European populations. In this study, we identified 25 genes harboring protein-altering sequence variants with a strong deficit of homozygosity (10% or less of predicted homozygotes). Sequence variants in 12 of the genes cause Mendelian disease under a recessive mode of inheritance, two under a dominant mode, but variants in the remaining 11 have not been reported to cause disease. Sequence variants with a strong deficit of homozygosity are over-represented among genes essential for growth of human cell lines and genes orthologous to mouse genes known to affect viability. The function of these genes gives insight into the genetics of intrauterine lethality. We also identified 1077 genes with homozygous predicted loss-of-function genotypes not previously described, bringing the total set of genes completely knocked out in humans to 4785.

First-Tier Next Generation Sequencing for Newborn Screening: An Important Role for Biochemical Second-Tier Testing

There is discussion of expanding newborn screening (NBS) through the use of genomic sequence data; yet, challenges remain in the interpretation of DNA variants. Population-level DNA variant databases are available, and it is possible to estimate the number of newborns who would be flagged as having a risk for a genetic disease (including rare variants of unknown significance, VUS) via next-generation sequencing (NGS) positive. Estimates of the number of newborns screened as NGS positive for monogenic recessive diseases were obtained by analysis of the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). For a collection of diseases for which there is interest in NBS, we provided 2 estimates for the expected number of newborns screened as NGS positive. For a set of lysosomal storage diseases, we estimated that 100 to approximately 600 NGS screen positives would be found per disease per year in a large NBS laboratory (California), and this figure may be expected to rise to a limit of about 1000 if we account for the fact that gnomAD does not contain all worldwide variants. The number of positives would drop 2.5- to 10-fold if the 10 VUS with highest allele frequency were biochemically annotated as benign. It is proposed that a second-tier biochemical assay using the same dried blood spot could be carried out as a filter and as part of NBS to reduce the number of high-risk NGS positive newborns to a manageable number.

Exploring the Potential Challenges for Developing Generic Orphan Drugs for Rare Diseases: A Survey of US and European Markets

OBJECTIVES

The US Food and Drug Administration in 1983 and the European Union's European Medicines Agency in 2000 implemented the orphan drug development program for rare diseases. The study aimed to find the potential challenges encountered by generic companies in developing generics for rare diseases.

METHODS

We performed a thematic analysis, which consists of qualitative and quantitative research. For data analysis of approved orphan drugs, we used statistical methods, and for the industrial case study, we selected 14 generic companies and conducted semistructured interviews related to 10 critical areas of drug development.

RESULTS

The orphan drug approvals were classified into 4 categories: the number of orphan approvals, pediatric claims, formulation, and therapeutic areas. We analyzed the approvals from 2001 to 2021; the Food and Drug Administration approved 815 drugs and European Medicines Agency approved 258 drugs. The pediatric orphan approvals were analyzed from 2010 to 2021; the average percentage of orphan drugs claim pediatric exclusivity during this period was found to be 31.8%. In formulation, we found the highest percentage of drugs belong to small molecules at 71%. In the therapeutic class, oncology drugs have a majority of approvals at 25%. The industrial case study responses revealed that the major challenge for drug development is the complexity of the disease at 21%, followed by the limited market at 17%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high need for generic orphan drugs in the developing countries. The generic companies can use the opportunities provided by health authorities for the benefit of both the company and the patient perspective.

Trio RNA sequencing in a cohort of medically complex children

Genome sequencing (GS) is a powerful test for the diagnosis of rare genetic disorders. Although GS can enumerate most non-coding variation, determining which non-coding variants are disease-causing is challenging. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as an important tool to help address this issue, but its diagnostic utility remains understudied, and the added value of a trio design is unknown. We performed GS plus RNA-seq from blood using an automated clinical-grade high-throughput platform on 97 individuals from 39 families where the proband was a child with unexplained medical complexity. RNA-seq was an effective adjunct test when paired with GS. It enabled clarification of putative splice variants in three families, but it did not reveal variants not already identified by GS analysis. Trio RNA-seq decreased the number of candidates requiring manual review when filtering for de novo dominant disease-causing variants, allowing for the exclusion of 16% of gene-expression outliers and 27% of allele-specific-expression outliers. However, clear diagnostic benefit from the trio design was not observed. Blood-based RNA-seq can facilitate genome analysis in children with suspected undiagnosed genetic disease. In contrast to DNA sequencing, the clinical advantages of a trio RNA-seq design may be more limited.

Pharmacogenetic profiling via genome sequencing in children with medical complexity

BACKGROUND

Children with medical complexity (CMC) are a priority pediatric population, with high resource use and associated costs. Genome-wide sequencing is increasingly organized for CMC early in life as a diagnostic test. Polypharmacy becomes common as CMC age. Clinically relevant pharmacogenetic (PGx) information can be extracted from existing genome sequencing (GS) data via GS-PGx profiling. The role of GS-PGx profiling in the CMC population is unclear.

METHODS

Prescribed medications were extracted from care plans of 802 eligible CMC enrolled in a structured Complex Care Program over a 10-year period. Drug-gene associations were annotated using curated Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium data. GS-PGx profiling was then performed for a subset of 50 CMC.

RESULTS

Overall, 546 CMC (68%) were prescribed at least one medication with an established PGx association. In the GS-PGx subgroup, 24 (48%) carried variants in pharmacogenes with drug-gene guidelines for one or more of their current medications. All had findings of potential relevance to some medications, including 32 (64%) with variants in CYP2C19 that could affect their metabolism of proton-pump inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

GS-PGx profiling at the time of diagnostics-focused genetic testing could be an efficient way to incorporate precision prescribing practices into the lifelong care of CMC.

IMPACT

Polypharmacy and genetic test utilization are both common in children with medical complexity. The role of repurposing genome sequencing data for pharmacogenetic profiling in children with medical complexity was previously unclear. We identified a high rate of medication use with clinically relevant drug-gene associations in this priority pediatric population and demonstrated that relevant pharmacogenetic information can be extracted from their existing genome sequencing data. Pharmacogenetic profiling at the time of diagnostics-focused genetic testing could be an efficient way to incorporate precision prescribing practices into the lifelong care of children with medical complexity.

Clinical genomics and precision medicine

Precision Medicine emerges from the genomic paradigm of health and disease. For precise molecular diagnoses of genetic diseases, we must analyze the Whole Exome (WES) or the Whole Genome (WGS). By not needing exon capture, WGS is more powerful to detect single nucleotide variants and copy number variants. In healthy individuals, we can observe monogenic highly penetrant variants, which may be causally responsible for diseases, and also susceptibility variants, associated with common polygenic diseases. But there is the major problem of penetrance. Thus, there is the question of whether it is worthwhile to perform WGS in all healthy individuals as a step towards Precision Medicine. The genetic architecture of disease is consistent with the fact that they are all polygenic. Moreover, ancestry adds another layer of complexity. We are now capable of obtaining Polygenic Risk Scores for all complex diseases using only data from new generation sequencing. Yet, review of available evidence does not at present favor the idea that WGS analyses are sufficiently developed to allow reliable predictions of the risk components for monogenic and polygenic hereditary diseases in healthy individuals. Probably, it is still better for WGS to remain reserved for the diagnosis of pathogenic variants of Mendelian diseases.

Risk Variants in the Exomes of Children With Critical Illness

IMPORTANCE

Diagnostic genetic testing can lead to changes in management in the pediatric intensive care unit. Genetic risk in children with critical illness but nondiagnostic exome sequencing (ES) has not been explored.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between loss-of-function (LOF) variants and pediatric critical illness.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This genetic association study examined ES first screened for causative variants among 267 children at the Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of NewYork-Presbyterian, of whom 22 were otherwise healthy with viral respiratory failure; 18 deceased children with bronchiolitis from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of New York City, of whom 14 were previously healthy; and 9990 controls from the Institute for Genomic Medicine at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. The ES data were generated between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, and analyzed between January 1, 2017, and September 2, 2022.

EXPOSURE

Critical illness.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Odds ratios and P values for genes and gene-sets enriched for rare LOF variants and the loss-of-function observed/expected upper bound fraction (LOEUF) score at which cases have a significant enrichment.

RESULTS

This study included 285 children with critical illness (median [range] age, 4.1 [0-18.9] years; 148 [52%] male) and 9990 controls. A total of 228 children (80%) did not receive a genetic diagnosis. After quality control (QC), 231 children harbored excess rare LOF variants in genes with a LOEUF score of 0.680 or less (intolerant genes) (P = 1.0 × 10-5). After QC, 176 children without a diagnosis harbored excess ultrarare LOF variants in intolerant genes but only in those without a known disease association (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5). After QC, 25 children with viral respiratory failure harbored excess ultrarare LOF variants in intolerant genes but only in those without a known disease association (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1-6.6). A total of 114 undiagnosed children were enriched for de novo LOF variants in genes without a known disease association (observed, 14; expected, 6.8; enrichment, 2.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this genetic association study, excess LOF variants were observed among critically ill children despite nondiagnostic ES. Variants lay in genes without a known disease association, suggesting future investigation may connect phenotypes to causative genes.

An automated 13.5 hour system for scalable diagnosis and acute management guidance for genetic diseases

While many genetic diseases have effective treatments, they frequently progress rapidly to severe morbidity or mortality if those treatments are not implemented immediately. Since front-line physicians frequently lack familiarity with these diseases, timely molecular diagnosis may not improve outcomes. Herein we describe Genome-to-Treatment, an automated, virtual system for genetic disease diagnosis and acute management guidance. Diagnosis is achieved in 13.5 h by expedited whole genome sequencing, with superior analytic performance for structural and copy number variants. An expert panel adjudicated the indications, contraindications, efficacy, and evidence-of-efficacy of 9911 drug, device, dietary, and surgical interventions for 563 severe, childhood, genetic diseases. The 421 (75%) diseases and 1527 (15%) effective interventions retained are integrated with 13 genetic disease information resources and appended to diagnostic reports ( https://gtrx.radygenomiclab.com ). This system provided correct diagnoses in four retrospectively and two prospectively tested infants. The Genome-to-Treatment system facilitates optimal outcomes in children with rapidly progressive genetic diseases.

Newborn Screening by Genomic Sequencing: Opportunities and Challenges

Newborn screening for treatable disorders is one of the great public health success stories of the twentieth century worldwide. This commentary examines the potential use of a new technology, next generation sequencing, in newborn screening through the lens of the Wilson and Jungner criteria. Each of the ten criteria are examined to show how they might be applied by programmes using genomic sequencing as a screening tool. While there are obvious advantages to a method that can examine all disease-causing genes in a single assay at an ever-diminishing cost, implementation of genomic sequencing at scale presents numerous challenges, some which are intrinsic to screening for rare disease and some specifically linked to genomics-led screening. In addition to questions specific to routine screening considerations, the ethical, communication, data management, legal, and social implications of genomic screening programmes require consideration.

A Formative Study of the Implementation of Whole Genome Sequencing in Northern Ireland

Background: The UK 100,000 Genomes Project was a transformational research project which facilitated whole genome sequencing (WGS) diagnostics for rare diseases. We evaluated experiences of introducing WGS in Northern Ireland, providing recommendations for future projects. Methods: This formative evaluation included (1) an appraisal of the logistics of implementing and delivering WGS, (2) a survey of participant self-reported views and experiences, (3) semi-structured interviews with healthcare staff as key informants who were involved in the delivery of WGS and (4) a workshop discussion about interprofessional collaboration with respect to molecular diagnostics. Results: We engaged with >400 participants, with detailed reflections obtained from 74 participants including patients, caregivers, key National Health Service (NHS) informants, and researchers (patient survey n = 42; semi-structured interviews n = 19; attendees of the discussion workshop n = 13). Overarching themes included the need to improve rare disease awareness, education, and support services, as well as interprofessional collaboration being central to an effective, mainstreamed molecular diagnostic service. Conclusions: Recommendations for streamlining precision medicine for patients with rare diseases include administrative improvements (e.g., streamlining of the consent process), educational improvements (e.g., rare disease training provided from undergraduate to postgraduate education alongside genomics training for non-genetic specialists) and analytical improvements (e.g., multidisciplinary collaboration and improved computational infrastructure).

[Research advances in the clinical genetics of leukodystrophy in children]

Leukodystrophy (LD) is a group of genetic heterogeneous diseases characterized by primary abnormalities in glial cells and myelin sheath, and it is a common nervous system disease in children and has significant genotype-phenotype correlation. In recent years, the improvement in high-throughput sequencing has changed the diagnostic and therapeutic mode of LD, and elaborative phenotype analysis, such as the collection of natural history and multimodal neuroimaging evaluation during development, also provides important information for subsequent genetic diagnosis. This article reviews LD from the perspective of clinical genetics, in order to improve the awareness of this disease among pediatricians in China.

Sirolimus Restores Erythropoiesis and Controls Immune Dysregulation in a Child With Cartilage-Hair Hypoplasia: A Case Report

Cartilage-hair hypoplasia (CHH) is a syndromic immunodeficiency characterized by metaphyseal dysplasia, cancer predisposition, and varying degrees of anemia. It may present as severe combined immunodeficiency in infancy, or slowly progress until fully manifesting in late adolescence/adulthood. No targeted treatment is currently available, and patients are usually managed with supportive measures, or are offered a bone marrow transplant if the clinical phenotype is severe and a suitable donor is available. We report the case of a young girl presenting with transfusion-dependent erythropoietic failure and immunological features resembling autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome who responded well to empirical sirolimus. She later developed a marked growth delay, which was ultimately attributed to metaphyseal dysplasia. A diagnosis of CHH was reached through whole-genome sequencing (WGS), after a less sensitive genetic diagnostic strategy failed. The patient eventually underwent a haploidentical bone marrow transplant due to progressive combined immunodeficiency manifested as cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. This case illustrates the potential role of sirolimus in correcting anemia and partially controlling the immune aberrations associated with CHH, and serves as a reminder of the invaluable role of WGS in diagnosing patients with complex and atypical presentations.

The Brazilian Rare Genomes Project: Validation of Whole Genome Sequencing for Rare Diseases Diagnosis

Rare diseases affect up to 13.2 million individuals in Brazil. The Brazilian Rare Genomes Project is envisioned to further the implementation of genomic medicine into the Brazilian public healthcare system. Here we report the validation results of a whole genome sequencing (WGS) procedure for implementation in clinical laboratories. In addition, we report data quality for the first 1,200 real-world patients sequenced. We sequenced a well-characterized group of 76 samples, including seven gold standard genomes, using a PCR-free WGS protocol on Illumina Novaseq 6,000 equipment. We compared the observed variant calls with their expected calls, observing good concordance for single nucleotide variants (SNVs; mean F-measure = 99.82%) and indels (mean F-measure = 99.57%). Copy number variants and structural variants events detection performances were as expected (F-measures 96.6% and 90.3%, respectively). Our WGS protocol presented excellent intra-assay reproducibility (coefficients of variation ranging between 0.03% and 0.20%) and inter-assay reproducibility (coefficients of variation ranging between 0.02% and 0.09%). Limitations of the WGS protocol include the inability to confidently detect variants such as uniparental disomy, balanced translocations, repeat expansion variants, and low-level mosaicism. In summary, the observed performance of the WGS protocol was in accordance with that seen in the best centers worldwide. The Rare Genomes Project is an important initiative to bring pivotal improvements to the quality of life of the affected individuals.

Whole-exome sequencing and adrenocorticotropic hormone therapy in individuals with infantile spasms

AIM

To identify additional genes associated with infantile spasms using a cohort with defined infantile spasms.

METHOD

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 21 consented individuals with infantile spasms and their unaffected parents (a trio-based study). Clinical history and imaging were reviewed. Potentially deleterious exonic variants were identified and segregated. To refine potential candidates, variants were further prioritized on the basis of evidence for relevance to disease phenotype or known associations with infantile spasms, epilepsy, or neurological disease.

RESULTS

Likely pathogenic de novo variants were identified in NR2F1, GNB1, NEUROD2, GABRA2, and NDUFAF5. Suggestive dominant and recessive candidate variants were identified in PEMT, DYNC1I1, ASXL1, RALGAPB, and STRADA; further confirmation is required to support their relevance to disease etiology.

INTERPRETATION

This study supports the utility of WES in uncovering the genetic etiology in undiagnosed individuals with infantile spasms with an overall yield of five out of 21. High-priority candidates were identified in an additional five individuals. WES provides additional support for previously described disease-associated genes and expands their already broad mutational and phenotypic spectrum.

Deep phenotyping and whole-exome sequencing improved the diagnostic yield for nuclear pedigrees with neurodevelopmental disorders

Background

Neurodevelopmental disorders, a group of early‐onset neurological disorders with significant clinical and genetic heterogeneity, remain a diagnostic challenge for clinical genetic evaluation. Therefore, we assessed the diagnostic yield by combining standard phenotypes and whole‐exome sequencing in families with these disorders that were “not yet diagnosed” by the traditional testing methods.

Methods

Using a standardized vocabulary of phenotypic abnormalities from human phenotype ontology (HPO), we performed deep phenotyping for 45 “not yet diagnosed” pedigrees to characterize multiple clinical features extracted from Chinese electronic medical records (EMRs). By matching HPO terms with known human diseases and phenotypes from model organisms, together with whole‐exome sequencing data, we prioritized candidate mutations/genes. We made probable genetic diagnoses for the families.

Results

We obtained a diagnostic yield of 29% (13 out of 45) with probably genetic diagnosis, of which compound heterozygosity and de novo mutations accounted for 77% (10/13) of the diagnosis. Of note, these pedigrees are accompanied by a more significant number of non‐neurological features.

Conclusions

Deep phenotyping and whole‐exome sequencing improve the etiological evaluation for neurodevelopmental disorders in the clinical setting.

Best practices for the interpretation and reporting of clinical whole genome sequencing

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) shows promise as a first-tier diagnostic test for patients with rare genetic disorders. However, standards addressing the definition and deployment practice of a best-in-class test are lacking. To address these gaps, the Medical Genome Initiative, a consortium of leading health care and research organizations in the US and Canada, was formed to expand access to high quality clinical WGS by convening experts and publishing best practices. Here, we present best practice recommendations for the interpretation and reporting of clinical diagnostic WGS, including discussion of challenges and emerging approaches that will be critical to harness the full potential of this comprehensive test.

Investigating underlying human immunity genes, implicated diseases and their relationship to COVID-19

Aim: A human immunogenetics variation study was conducted in samples collected from diverse COVID-19 populations. Materials & methods: Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing (WGS/WES), data processing, analysis and visualization pipeline were applied to identify variants associated with genes of interest. Results: A total of 2886 mutations were found across the entire set of 13 genomes. Functional annotation of the gene variants revealed mutation type and protein change. Many variants were found to be biologically implicated in COVID-19. The involvement of these genes was also found in multiple other diseases. Conclusion: The analysis determined that ACE2, TMPRSS4, TMPRSS2, SLC6A20 and FYCOI had functional implications and TMPRSS4 was the gene most altered in virally infected patients.

The quest to establish an understanding of the genetics underlying COVID-19 is a central focus of life sciences today. COVID-19 is triggered by SARS-CoV-2, a single-stranded RNA respiratory virus. Several clinical-genomics studies have emerged positing different human gene mutations occurring due to COVID-19. A global analysis of these genes was conducted targeting major components of the immune system to identify possible variations likely to be involved in COVID-19 predisposition. Gene-variant analysis was performed on whole-genome sequencing samples collected from diverse populations. ACE2, TMPRSS4, TMPRSS2, SLC6A20 and FYCOI were found to have functional implications and TMPRSS4 may have a role in the severity of clinical manifestations of COVID-19.

Exome and Whole Genome Sequencing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

The role of genomic sequencing (exome and whole genome) in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has changed with advances in technology and bioinformatics in the last decade. Evidence from 18 retrospective and prospective studies of exome and whole genome sequencing in pediatric intensive care settings has demonstrated an average diagnostic yield of close to 40% and an immediate impact on clinical management in more than 20% of patients tested, and the highest clinical utility was in the perinatal setting. Genomic sequencing, when indicated, should be the standard of care for patients in the NICU.

National Rare Diseases Registry System (NRDRS): China's first nation-wide rare diseases demographic analyses

Background

China has made tremendous progresses in serving the needs of its people living with rare diseases in the past decade, especially over the last 5 years. The Chinese government’s systematic approach included a series of coordinated initiatives, amongst these are: forming the Rare Disease Expert Committee (2016), funding the “Rare Diseases Cohort Study” (2016–2020), and publishing its first “Rare Disease Catalog” (2018). Herein, we present the National Rare Diseases Registry System (NRDRS)—China’s first national rare diseases registry, and the analysis of cases registered in the first 5 years ending Dec 31, 2020.

Results

The total 62,590 cases covered 166 disease/disease types, forming 183 disease cohorts. The data from nearly 22% of them (13,947 cases) is also linked to valuable biological samples. The average age of definitive diagnosis was 30.88 years; 36.07% of cases were under 18 years of age. Regional distribution analysis showed 60% of cases were from the more developed, wealthier East and North China, suggesting the local availability of quality care and patients’ financial status were key access factors. Finally, 82.04% of cases were registered from the five clinical departments: Neurology, Endocrine, Hematology, Cardiovascular, and Nephrology, suggesting that either these are most affected by rare diseases, or that there were disease non-specific ascertainment factors.

Conclusions

The preliminary analysis of the first 5-year’s data provides unique and valuable insight on rare disease distribution in China, and higlights the directions for enhancing equity, scale and utility.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-02130-7.

The diagnostic trajectory of infants and children with clinical features of genetic disease

We characterized US pediatric patients with clinical indicators of genetic diseases, focusing on the burden of disease, utilization of genetic testing, and cost of care. Curated lists of diagnosis, procedure, and billing codes were used to identify patients with clinical indicators of genetic disease in healthcare claims from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Database (13,076,038 unique patients). Distinct cohorts were defined to represent permissive and conservative estimates of the number of patients. Clinical phenotypes suggestive of genetic diseases were observed in up to 9.4% of pediatric patients and up to 44.7% of critically-ill infants. Compared with controls, patients with indicators of genetic diseases had higher utilization of services (e.g., mean NICU length of stay of 31.6d in a cohort defined by multiple congenital anomalies or neurological presentations compared with 10.1d for patients in the control population (P < 0.001)) and higher overall costs. Very few patients received any genetic testing (4.2-8.4% depending on cohort criteria). These results highlight the substantial proportion of the population with clinical features associated with genetic disorders and underutilization of genetic testing in these populations.