The pharmacodynamic impact of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, on circulating levels of inflammatory biomarkers in patients with psoriatic arthritis: substudy results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (PALACE 1)

Exploratory Efficacy Evaluation of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: 32-Week Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

INTRODUCTION

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, chronic dermatitis that greatly impacts functioning and quality of life and can be difficult to treat. Approved treatment options for PPP are limited, and many patients do not fully respond to current treatments.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in Japanese patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks followed by an extension phase where all patients received apremilast through week 32. PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI), modified PPPASI (which evaluates pustules and vesicles separately), and Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) total scores and subscores (erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales) were evaluated over 32 weeks of apremilast treatment. Achievement of ≥ 50% improvement in PPPASI (PPPASI-50) was evaluated at week 16 among baseline demographic and clinical characteristic subgroups.

RESULTS

At week 16, improvements in total score and subscores for PPPASI, modified PPASI, and PPSI, as well as rates of PPPASI-50 were at least moderately greater with apremilast than placebo. Mean PPPASI total score decreased by - 68.3% from baseline to week 32 with continued apremilast treatment. At week 32, mean change from baseline in PPPASI/modified PPPASI subscores ranged from - 58.5% to - 77.0% with apremilast. At week 32, PPSI total score for physician and patient assessments decreased by - 51.3% and - 40.0%, respectively, with continued apremilast treatment. PPPASI-50 response at week 16 was greater with apremilast versus placebo in most demographic and baseline characteristic subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in all PPPASI and PPSI total scores and subscores observed with apremilast over 16 weeks were maintained through 32 weeks in patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Rates of PPPASI-50 response at week 16 were mostly consistent across patient subgroups.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT04057937.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral systemic nonbiologic therapies for psoriasis patients

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory immune condition. Treatments for psoriasis vary with disease severity, ranging from topicals to systemic biologic agents. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of these therapies establish drug efficacy, toxicity, and optimal dosing to ensure therapeutic drug levels are sustained and adverse effects are minimized.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Ovid MEDLINE for PK and PD, efficacy, and safety data regarding oral systemic nonbiologic therapies utilized for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The findings were organized into sections for each drug: oral acitretin, methotrexate, cyclosporine, apremilast, tofacitinib, and deucravacitinib.

EXPERT OPINION

Some psoriasis patients may not respond to initial therapy. Ongoing research is evaluating genetic polymorphisms that may predict an improved response to specific medications. However, financial and insurance barriers, as well as limited genetic polymorphisms correlated with treatment response, may restrict the implementation of genetic testing necessary to personalize treatments. How well psoriasis patients adhere to treatment may contribute greatly to variation in response. Therapeutic drug monitoring may help patients adhere to treatment, improve clinical response, and sustain disease control.

Emerging strategies for nanomedicine in autoimmunity

Autoimmune disorders have risen to be among the most prevalent chronic diseases across the globe, affecting approximately 5-7% of the population. As autoimmune diseases steadily rise in prevalence, so do the number of potential therapeutic strategies to combat them. In recent years, fundamental research investigating autoimmune pathologies has led to the emergence of several cellular targets that provide new therapeutic opportunities. However, key challenges persist in terms of accessing and specifically combating the dysregulated, self-reactive cells while avoiding systemic immune suppression and other off-target effects. Fortunately, the continued advancement of nanomedicines may provide strategies to address these challenges and bring innovative autoimmunity therapies to the clinic. Through precise engineering and rational design, nanomedicines can possess a variety of physicochemical properties, surface modifications, and cargoes, allowing for specific targeting of therapeutics to pathological cell and organ types. These advances in nanomedicine have been demonstrated in cancer therapies and have the broad potential to advance applications in autoimmunity therapies as well. In this review, we focus on leveraging the power of nanomedicine for prevalent autoimmune disorders throughout the body. We expand on three key areas for the development of autoimmunity therapies - avoiding systemic immunosuppression, balancing interactions with the immune system, and elevating current platforms for delivering complex cargoes - and emphasize how nanomedicine-based strategies can overcome these barriers and enable the development of next-generation, clinically relevant autoimmunity therapies.

Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory immune disorder due to chronic activation of the adaptive and innate immune responses. Therapies for psoriasis target reducing inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-17, and interleukin-22. Patients with inflammatory disorders have reduced metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes in the liver. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes due to psoriasis also have an impact on reaching therapeutic concentrations of the drug. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data help determine the safety and clinical considerations necessary when utilizing drugs for plaque psoriasis. A literature search was performed on PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE for the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of oral therapies and biologics utilized for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The findings from the literature search were organized into two sections: oral therapies and biologics. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in healthy patients, patients with psoriasis, and special populations are discussed in each section. The oral therapies described in this review include methotrexate, cyclosporine, apremilast, tofacitinib, and deucravacitinib. Biologics include tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, interleukin-17 inhibitors, ustekinumab, and interleukin-23 inhibitors. Clinical considerations for these therapies include drug toxicities, dosing frequency, and anti-drug antibodies. Methotrexate and cyclosporine have a risk for hepatoxicity and renal impairment, respectively. Moreover, drugs metabolized via cytochrome P450, including tofacitinib and apremilast have decreased clearance in patients with psoriasis, requiring dose adjustments. Patients treated with therapies such as adalimumab can develop anti-drug antibodies that reduce the long-term efficacy of the drug. Additionally, overweight patients benefit from more frequent dosing to achieve better psoriasis clearance.

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, recurrent, and chronic dermatitis with limited therapeutic options.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast for the treatment of Japanese patients with PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment.

METHODS

This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) total score ≥ 12 and moderate or severe pustules/vesicles on the palm or sole (PPPASI pustule/vesicle severity score ≥ 2) at screening and baseline with an inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized (1:1) to apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks, followed by a 16-week extension phase during which all patients received apremilast. The primary endpoint was achievement of PPPASI-50 response (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in PPPASI). Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline in PPPASI total score, Palmoplantar Pustulosis Severity Index (PPSI), and patient's visual analog scale (VAS) for PPP symptoms (pruritus and discomfort/pain).

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were randomized (apremilast: 46; placebo: 44). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved PPPASI-50 at week 16 with apremilast versus placebo (P = 0.0003). Patients receiving apremilast showed greater improvement in PPPASI at week 16 versus placebo (nominal P = 0.0013), as well as PPSI and patient-reported pruritus and discomfort/pain (nominal P ≤ 0.001 for all). Improvements were sustained through week 32 with apremilast treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, headache, and nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast treatment demonstrated greater improvements in disease severity and patient-reported symptoms versus placebo at week 16 in Japanese patients with PPP with sustained improvements through week 32. No new safety signals were observed.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV: NCT04057937.

Proteomic and Metabolomic Changes in Psoriasis Preclinical and Clinical Aspects

Skin diseases such as psoriasis (Ps) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Overlap of autoinflammatory and autoimmune conditions hinders diagnoses and identifying personalized patient treatments due to different psoriasis subtypes and the lack of verified biomarkers. Recently, proteomics and metabolomics have been intensively investigated in a broad range of skin diseases with the main purpose of identifying proteins and small molecules involved in the pathogenesis and development of the disease. This review discusses proteomics and metabolomics strategies and their utility in research and clinical practice in psoriasis and psoriasis arthritis. We summarize the studies, from in vivo models conducted on animals through academic research to clinical trials, and highlight their contribution to the discovery of biomarkers and targets for biological drugs.

New synthetic pharmacotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory and immune-mediated condition affecting 3.2% of the United States population. There are many options for psoriasis treatment including topicals, oral systemic agents, and biologics. A greater understanding of the pathophysiology of psoriasis has led to an increase in the therapeutic options for treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we outline the novel synthetic agents for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and discuss a strategy for implementing these agents in clinical practice. A literature search was performed using PubMed to identify articles relevant to the topic published before October 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Topicals are first-line for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, most commonly including topical steroids, vitamin D analogs, and topical calcineurin inhibitors. While new topical agents have favorable properties, they are not always effective and adherence to topical agents is poor. Biologics are safe and effective, but patients often prefer oral therapy as opposed to injectable medications. Additionally, anti-drug antibodies can reduce effectiveness of biologics over time. Oral medications are preferred, but we now have a high bar for efficacy and safety. Cost is also a barrier for many patients. Recent development of new synthetic treatment options is promising, and we recommend that providers consider these agents as they develop holistic and individualized treatment plans for their patients.

Intermittent treatment with Apremilast, a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, ameliorates Alzheimer's-like pathology and symptoms through multiple targeting actions in aged T2D rats

BACKGROUND

Apremilast (Apre), a novel phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, immunomodulator, neuroprotective and senolytic properties, therefore, Apre like other PDE4 inhibitors may be a promising candidate for treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of Apre on Alzheimer's like pathology and symptoms in an animal model.

METHODS

The effects of Apre and cilostazol, a reference drug, on the behavioral, biochemical, and pathological features of Alzheimer's disease induced by a high-fat/high-fructose diet combined with low-dose streptozotocin (HF/HFr/l-STZ) were investigated.

RESULT

Apre 5 mg/kg IP/day for 3 consecutive days per week for 8 weeks attenuated memory and learning deficits tested by novel object recognition, Morris water maze and passive avoidance tests. Apre treatment significantly decreased the number of degenerating cells, and abnormal suppression of gene expression of AMPA and NMDA receptor subunits in the cortex and hippocampus of the AD rat model compared to rats that received vehicle. A significant decrease in elevated levels of hippocampal amyloid beta, tau-positive cell count, cholinesterase activity, and hippocampal caspase-3, a biomarker of neurodegeneration, was also observed after treatment with Apre in AD rats compared to rats that received placebo. Furthermore, a significant decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, insulin resistance and GSK-3 was demonstrated in AD aged rats treated by Apre.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that intermittent treatment with Apre can enhance cognitive function in HF/HFr/l-STZ rats which may be related to decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, insulin resistance and GSK-3β.

More than a random association between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and psoriatic arthritis: shared pathogenic features and implications for treatment

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by skin and joints involvement, and with a great burden of comorbidity that could affect the choice of treatment. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality. Medical therapy can improve symptoms and the frequency and severity of exacerbations. A variety of evidence showed an increasing association between COPD and PsA.

AREAS COVERED

Psoriatic disease and COPD appear to have a possible pathophysiologic link. The inhibition of intracellular molecules responsible for pro-inflammatory responses could be a therapeutic approach for both psoriatic diseases and COPD. Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4) were developed to treat chronic inflammatory conditions such as psoriasis, PsA and COPD. Roflumilast has been used to treat COPD and asthma, while Apremilast to treat psoriasis and PsA. Given the efficacy and safety of these treatments, we can speculate that blocking PDE-4 might also provide clinical benefits in patients with co-existing COPD and PsA.

EXPERT OPINION

This hypothesis could offer the opportunity to screen patients for both diseases. Furthermore, this approach would increase the involvement of other specialists in the management of PsA, and it would improve the use of a tailored treatment for each patient.

Integrating imaging and biomarker assessment to better define psoriatic arthritis and predict response to biologic therapy

The treatment options for PsA have substantially expanded over the last decade. Approximately 40% of patients will not respond to first-line anti-TNF-α therapies. There is limited data to help clinicians select the most appropriate biologic therapy for PsA patients, including guidance for decisions on biologic therapy switching. In this review we will examine the current understanding of predictors of response to treatment. Imaging technology has evolved to allow us to better study psoriatic disease and define disease activity, including synovitis and enthesitis. Enthesitis is implicated in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis of PsA. It appears to be a common thread among all of the various PsA clinical presentations. Enthesitis mainly manifests as tenderness, which is difficult to distinguish from FM, chronic pain and mechanically associated enthesopathy, and it might be relevant for understanding the apparent 40% failure of existing therapy. Excess adipose tissue makes if more difficult to detect joint swelling clinically, as many PsA patients have very high BMIs. Integrating imaging and clinical assessment with biomarker analysis could help to deliver stratified medicine in PsA and allow better treatment decision making. This could include which patients require ongoing biologic therapy, which class of biologic therapy that should be, and who alternatively requires management of non-inflammatory disease.

Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibition Reduces Cutaneous Inflammation and IL-1β Expression in a Psoriasiform Mouse Model but Does Not Inhibit Inflammasome Activation

Apremilast (Otezla^®) is an oral small molecule phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor approved for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and oral ulcers associated with Behçet’s disease. While PDE4 inhibition overall is mechanistically understood, the effect of apremilast on the innate immune response, particularly inflammasome activation, remains unknown. Here, we assessed the effect of apremilast in a psoriasis mouse model and primary human cells. Psoriatic lesion development in vivo was studied in K5.Stat3C transgenic mice treated with apremilast for 2 weeks, resulting in a moderate (2 mg/kg/day) to significant (6 mg/kg/day) resolution of inflamed plaques after 2-week treatment. Concomitantly, epidermal thickness dramatically decreased, the cutaneous immune cell infiltrate was reduced, and proinflammatory cytokines were significantly downregulated. Additionally, apremilast significantly inhibited lipopolysaccharide- or anti-CD3-induced expression of proinflammatory cytokines in peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Notably, inflammasome activation and secretion of IL-1β were not inhibited by apremilast in PBMCs and in human primary keratinocytes. Collectively, apremilast effectively alleviated the psoriatic phenotype of K5.Stat3 transgenic mice, further substantiating PDE4 inhibitor-efficiency in targeting key clinical, histopathological and inflammatory features of psoriasis. Despite lacking direct effect on inflammasome activation, reduced priming of inflammasome components upon apremilast treatment reflected the indirect benefit of PDE4 inhibition in reducing inflammation.

Two cases of Hailey-Hailey disease effectively treated with apremilast and a review of reported cases

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by a mutation of the ATP2C1 gene. Corticosteroids, antibiotics or cyclosporine have been administered to reduce inflammation and prevent flare-ups, but the efficacy is not always sufficient. We herein report two cases of HHD effectively treated with apremilast and review the previous literature. Patient 1 was a 28-year-old male and patient 2 was a 35-year-old female. Both patients were diagnosed with HHD based on histological and genetic analyses. Both patients were treated with oral antibiotics or topical corticosteroids, but their symptoms were refractory, therefore apremilast was administered to both patients. Two weeks later, the skin lesion of both patients was improved. No adverse reaction was observed except for mild headache in patient 2. There have been 13 reported cases of HHD treated with apremilast, including our cases. Eight cases showed a good response to apremilast, whereas five cases showed no response. There seems to be no association between the disease severity and efficacy of apremilast, although the reason remains unknown. Interestingly, an early improvement of the HHD lesion was observed in all good response cases. Although digestive symptoms, headache, and myalgia were observed as adverse events, the treatment was well-tolerated. The accumulation of a greater number of similar cases and further research will be required. We hypothesize that apremilast may be a useful therapeutic option for skin lesions of HHD.

Apremilast in a Japanese subgroup with Behçet's syndrome: Results from a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Apremilast efficacy and safety was assessed in a prespecified subgroup of Japanese patients with oral ulcers associated with Behçet's syndrome from a Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of apremilast (RELIEF).

METHODS

The primary end point was area under the curve for number of oral ulcers during the 12-week placebo-controlled phase (AUCWk0-12). Key secondary end points were change from baseline in oral ulcer pain, complete oral ulcer resolution, and measures of disease activity and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine Japanese patients were randomised (apremilast 30 mg BID: n = 19; placebo: n = 20). Improvements at Week 12 were observed for apremilast vs. placebo in AUCWk0-12 for the number of oral ulcers (115.9 vs. 253.3; nominal P = 0.0168); 57.9% vs. 25.0% achieved complete oral ulcer resolution, 47.4% vs. 0.0% achieved oral ulcer resolution by Week 6 and maintained oral ulcer-free status for ≥6 additional weeks; mean change from baseline in BSAS was -10.5 vs. 0.5. Favourable effects were observed for apremilast vs. placebo in other secondary end points, including QoL. Clinical benefits were sustained over 28 weeks of continued apremilast treatment. Adverse events were consistent with apremilast's known safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast reduced the number of oral ulcers and overall disease activity in this Japanese subgroup with Behçet's syndrome.

An evaluation of apremilast for the treatment of adult patients with oral ulcers associated with Behçet's syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Behçet's syndrome is a chronic, multi-system, variable vasculitis of unknown etiology that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Mucocutaneous lesions such as oral ulcers and genital ulcers are common manifestations that can affect the quality of life of patients significantly. Treatment for mucocutaneous lesions in Behçet's syndrome continues to be critical, and an unmet need remains a significant issue.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates the mechanism of action of apremilast, its effect on the number and pain of oral ulcers, other manifestations, such as genital ulcers, disease activity, quality of life and safety profile in Behçet's syndrome patients. Data from clinical trials as well as observational studies were included.

EXPERT OPINION

Two randomized placebo-controlled trials and real-world observational data suggest that apremilast is an effective and well-tolerated treatment modality for oral and genital ulcers in Behçet's syndrome. Observational studies additionally showed beneficial results for skin lesions, arthritis, and intestinal involvement.

Promising drug repurposing approach targeted for cytokine storm implicated in SARS-CoV-2 complications

A global threat has emerged in 2019 due to the rapid spread of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). As of January 2021, the number of cases worldwide reached 103 million cases and 2.22 million deaths which were confirmed as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This global pandemic galvanized the scientific community to study the causative virus (SARS-CoV2) pathogenesis, transmission, and clinical symptoms. Remarkably, the most common complication associated with this disease is the cytokine storm which is responsible for COVID-19 mortality. Thus, targeting the cytokine storm with new medications is needed to hamper COVID-19 complications where the most prominent strategy for the treatment is drug repurposing. Through this strategy, several steps are skipped especially those required for testing drug safety and thus may help in reducing the dissemination of this pandemic. Accordingly, the aim of this review is to outline the pathogenesis, clinical features, and immune complications of SARS-CoV2 in addition to suggesting several repurposed drugs with their plausible mechanism of action for possible management of severe COVID-19 cases.

Apremilast Inhibits Inflammatory Osteoclastogenesis

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is associated with bone erosion and inflammation-induced bone loss, which are mediated by osteoclasts and modulated by inflammatory cytokines. Apremilast (a selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor) is efficacious in PsA and acts by inhibiting cytokine production. However, there are no direct data informing whether and how apremilast affects osteoclast formation in humans.

METHODS

Osteoclastogenic cytokine production by activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was measured in the presence and absence of apremilast. Effects of apremilast on osteoclast differentiation were tested (i) in co-cultures of activated PBMCs and human CD14+ blood monocytes as well as (ii) in CD14+ blood monocytes stimulated with activated-PBMCs supernatant, TNF or IL-17A. Bone resorption was measured on OsteoAssay plates. Effects of apremilast on ex vivo osteoclast differentiation were compared in PsA, pre-PsA and psoriasis patients as well as in healthy controls.

RESULTS

Apremilast significantly impaired the expression of key osteoclastogenic cytokines in activated PBMCs. Furthermore, apremilast dose-dependently and significantly inhibited activated PBMC-driven osteoclast differentiation, and ex-vivo osteoclast differentiation of PBMCs derived from PsA and pre-PsA patients, but not from psoriasis patients or healthy controls. TNF and IL-17A-enhanced osteoclastogenesis and osteolytic activity of CD14+ blood monocytes from PsA patients was also significantly inhibited by apremilast. Finally, apremilast inhibited expression of the key osteoclast fusion protein DC-STAMP.

CONCLUSION

Phosphodiesterase-4 targeting by apremilast not only inhibits osteoclastogenic cytokine production, but also directly suppresses inflammation-driven osteoclastogenesis. These data provide initial evidence that apremilast has the potential to provide a direct bone protective effect in PsA.

Inhibition of Phosphodiesterase-4 in Psoriatic Arthritis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are a heterogeneous superfamily of enzymes which catalyze the degradation of the intracellular second messengers cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Among PDEs, PDE4 is the most widely studied and characterized isoenzyme. PDE4 blocking can lead to increased levels of intracellular cAMP, which results in down-regulation of inflammatory responses by reducing the expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-23, IL-17, interferon-γ, while increasing regulatory cytokines, such as IL-10. Therefore, PDE4 has been explored as a therapeutic target for the treatment of different chronic inflammatory conditions such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PsA shares clinical, genetic, and pathogenic features with IBD such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), and enteropathic spondyloarthritis (eSpA) represent a frequent clinical evidence of the overlap between gut and joint diseases. Current therapeutic options in PsA patients and underlying UC are limited to synthetic immunosuppressants and anti-TNF. Apremilast is an oral PDE4 inhibitor approved for the treatment of active PsA patients with inadequate response to synthetic immunosuppressants. The efficacy and a good safety profile observed in randomized clinical trials with apremilast in PsA patients have been confirmed by few studies in a real-life scenario. In addition, apremilast led to significant improvement in clinical and endoscopic features in UC patients in a phase II RCT. By now there are no available data regarding its role in eSpA patients. In view of the above, the use of apremilast in eSpA patients is a route that deserves to be deepened.

A Phase III Randomized Study of Apremilast, an Oral Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor, for Active Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

This phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01583374) randomized patients with active AS (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 20 mg twice daily, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 24 weeks, followed by a long-term extension phase (up to 5 yrs). The primary endpoint was Assessment of the Spondyloarthritis international Society 20 (ASAS20) response at Week 16. The effect of treatment on radiographic outcomes after 104 weeks was assessed using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS).

RESULTS

In total, 490 patients with active AS were randomized in the study (placebo: n = 164; apremilast 20 mg twice daily: n = 163; apremilast 30 mg twice daily: n = 163). The primary endpoint of ASAS20 response at Week 16 was not met (placebo: 37%; apremilast 20 mg twice daily: 35%; apremilast 30 mg twice daily: 33%; P = 0.44 vs placebo). At Week 104, mean (SD) changes from baseline in mSASSS were 0.83 (3.6), 0.98 (2.2), and 0.57 (1.9) in patients initially randomized to placebo, apremilast 20 mg twice daily, and apremilast 30 mg twice daily, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events through Week 104 were diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory infection, and nausea.

CONCLUSION

No clinical benefit was observed with apremilast treatment in patients with active AS. The safety and tolerability of apremilast were consistent with its known profile.

Biologic therapies for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease commonly associated with plaque psoriasis that, manifests with peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis, and axial involvement. PsA can be progressive and harmful, resulting in joint deformities, functional impairments, low quality of life, and increased mortality. It was found that both non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment could improve conditions of PsA. Recently launched biological products have become the main therapeutic agents used for treating PsA unresponsive to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. This paper aims at introducing available biologics for PsA management in Korea. The tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor was the first approved biological product to show outstanding efficacy for treating PsA. Ustekinumab, designed for blocking interleukin-12/23, has been approved and widely used. Interleukin-17 inhibitors such as secukinumab and ixekizumab have also been introduced to improve the symptoms of PsA. It was found that many patients with PsA experienced a dramatic improvement in their condition after using these biological products. Additionally, new immunological modulators such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors and Janus kinase inhibitors were approved for the treatment of PsA.

Characterization of LY2775240, a selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, in nonclinical models and in healthy subjects

Abstract

LY2775240 is a highly selective, potent and orally‐administered inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), and is being investigated as a treatment option for inflammatory disorders, such as psoriasis. LY2775240 was investigated in rodent and rhesus monkey nonclinical models. Treatment with LY2775240 led to significant reductions in TNFα production, a marker of PDE4 engagement upon immune activation, in both nonclinical models. In the first part of a 2‐part first‐in‐human randomized study, a wide dose range of LY2775240 was safely evaluated and found to be well‐tolerated with common adverse events (AEs) of nausea, diarrhea, and headache. No serious AEs were reported. The pharmacokinetic profile of LY2775240 was well‐characterized, with a half‐life that can support once‐a‐day dosing. An ex vivo pharmacodynamic (PD) assay demonstrated dose‐dependent PDE4 target engagement as assessed by reduction in TNFα production. A 20 mg dose of LY2775240 led to near‐maximal TNFα inhibition in this PD assay in the first part of the study and was selected for comparison with the clinical dose of apremilast (30 mg) in the crossover, second part of this study. The 20 mg dose of LY2775240 demonstrated sustained maximal (50%–80%) inhibition of TNFα over all timepoints over the 24‐h duration. The comparator apremilast achieved peak inhibition of ~ 50% at only 4 h postdose with a return to about 10% inhibition within 12 h of dosing. In summary, the nonclinical data and safety, tolerability, and PK/PD data in healthy subjects supports further investigation of LY2775240 in inflammatory indications.

Apremilast Microemulsion as Topical Therapy for Local Inflammation: Design, Characterization and Efficacy Evaluation

Apremilast (APR) is a selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor administered orally in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis. The low solubility and permeability of this drug hinder its dermal administration. The purpose of this study was to design and characterize an apremilast-loaded microemulsion (APR-ME) as topical therapy for local skin inflammation. Its composition was determined using pseudo-ternary diagrams. Physical, chemical and biopharmaceutical characterization were performed. Stability of this formulation was studied for 90 days. Tolerability of APR-ME was evaluated in healthy volunteers while its anti-inflammatory potential was studied using in vitro and in vivo models. A homogeneous formulation with Newtonian behavior and droplets of nanometric size and spherical shape was obtained. APR-ME released the incorporated drug following a first-order kinetic and facilitated drug retention into the skin, ensuring a local effect. Anti-inflammatory potential was observed for its ability to decrease the production of IL-6 and IL-8 in the in vitro model. This effect was confirmed in the in vivo model histologically by reduction in infiltration of inflammatory cells and immunologically by decrease of inflammatory cytokines IL-8, IL-17A and TNFα. Consequently, these results suggest that this formulation could be used as an attractive topical treatment for skin inflammation.

Apremilast ameliorates ox-LDL-induced endothelial dysfunction mediated by KLF6

Apremilast is a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor used in the treatment of psoriasis and several other inflammatory diseases. Interest has been expressed in seeking out therapies that address both psoriasis and atherosclerosis. In the present study, we explored the effects of apremilast in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) exposed to oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) to simulate the atherosclerotic microenvironment in vitro. Our findings indicate that apremilast may reduce the expression of lectin-like oxidized-low-density-lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1), the main ox-LDL scavenging receptor. Apremilast also inhibited the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8), which are deeply involved in the chronic inflammatory response associated with atherosclerosis. Interestingly, we found that apremilast inhibited the attachment of U937 monocytes to HAECs by reducing the expression of the chemokine monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) and the cellular adhesion molecule vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). This effect was found to be mediated through the rescue of Krüppel like factor 6 (KLF6) expression, which was reduced in response to ox-LDL via increased phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). These findings suggest a potential role for apremilast in the treatment of atherosclerosis.

Apremilast Normalizes Gene Expression of Inflammatory Mediators in Human Keratinocytes and Reduces Antigen-Induced Atopic Dermatitis in Mice

Background

Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in psoriasis, while its efficacy in atopic dermatitis (AD) was found to be modest. AD is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with activation of T helper (Th) 2 and Th17 immunity and a compromised epidermal barrier.

Objective

The objectives of this study were to examine the expression of PDE4 isoforms in skin from healthy subjects and AD patients, and to determine the effects of apremilast on AD-related inflammatory markers in vitro and in murine models of AD.

Methods

The expression of PDE4 isoforms (A, B, C, and D) in skin biopsies from healthy subjects and AD patients was evaluated using immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. Using quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, we evaluated the effects of apremilast on gene expression in adult human epidermal keratinocytes (HEKa) stimulated by Th2 and Th17 cytokines, and in two mouse models of antigen-induced AD.

Results

Expression of PDE4 isoforms increased up to three-fold in the epidermis of AD patients versus healthy skin. In interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-17-stimulated HEKa cells, apremilast significantly changed the expression of ILs, including IL-12/IL-23p40 and IL-31, and alarmins S100A7, S100A8, and S100A12. In mouse models of AD, apremilast significantly reduced ear swelling and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression.

Conclusion

PDE4 is overexpressed in AD skin compared with normal skin, and inflammatory gene expression by human keratinocytes and mouse dermatitis can be modulated by apremilast.

Apremilast increases IL-10-producing regulatory B cells and decreases proinflammatory T cells and innate cells in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis

OBJECTIVES

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis are immune-mediated inflammatory diseases sharing common immunological mechanisms. Regulatory B cells (Breg cells) producing IL-10 (B10 cells), a critical anti-inflammatory B-cell subset, were found to be decreased in both PsA and psoriasis. Apremilast, a phosphodiesterase-4(PDE4) inhibitor, increases IL-10 and therefore, we examined the effect of apremilast on Breg cells.

METHODS

Fifty patients, including 20 with PsA and 30 with psoriasis, were included in the study. The effect of apremilast on Breg cells at 3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment, was examined by flow cytometry in ODN2006 (TLR9)-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells and magnetically-isolated cells. Th1 cells, Th17 cells and NKT were also measured.

RESULTS

Ex vivo stimulated cell analysis identified that post-apremilast (IL-10+CD19+) B10 cells were increased in all PsA and psoriasis patients and correlated with psoriatic skin and joint clinical improvement. Apremilast decreased IFNγ(+) T and NKT cells and IL-17(+)NKT cells. B10 cells also inversely correlated with Th1 cells, and IFNγ(+)NKT cells.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that Breg cells are a major target of apremilast in PsA and psoriasis and that apremilast-induced increase of Breg cells is associated with a decrease of Th1 cells, IFNγ-producing NKT cells and IL-17-producing NKT cells.

Targeted synthetic pharmacotherapy for psoriatic arthritis: state of the art

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, different studies regarding psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have shown the pathogenetic role of dysfunction of signaling pathways involving the phosphodiesterase-4 enzyme and transcription factors or enzymes belonging to the kinase (JAK)-signal family pathway. These also represent the target of several drugs known as targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs).

AREAS COVERED

The authors performed a systematic literature search using the PubMed database, as well as through retrieving data from randomized controlled trials, their post-hoc analysis, and pooled data analysis on the efficacy and safety profile of the PDE4 inhibitor (PDE4i), apremilast, and the inhibitors of JAK (JAKis), tofacitinib, filgotinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, in PsA.

EXPERT OPINION

In PsA, the PDE4i, apremilast, and the JAKi, tofacitinib, are effective across multiple clinical domains and have an acceptable tolerability profile, thus expanding the treatment options available for PsA patients. Apremilast and tofacitinib show several advantages mainly represented by their oral administration, a fast onset of action, and a short half-life. Data on tsDMARDs in PsA are still limited, and randomized trials and real-life studies are advocated.

Large-scale Analyses of Disease Biomarkers and Apremilast Pharmacodynamic Effects

Finding biomarkers that provide shared link between disease severity, drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects and response status in human trials can provide number of values for patient benefits: elucidating current therapeutic mechanism-of-action, and, back-translating to fast-track development of next-generation therapeutics. Both opportunities are predicated on proactive generation of human molecular profiles that capture longitudinal trajectories before and after pharmacological intervention. Here, we present the largest plasma proteomic biomarker dataset available to-date and the corresponding analyses from placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trials of the phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor apremilast in psoriasis (PSOR), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from 526 subjects overall. Using approximately 150 plasma analytes tracked across three time points, we identified IL-17A and KLK-7 as biomarkers for disease severity and apremilast pharmacodynamic effect in psoriasis patients. Combined decline rate of KLK-7, PEDF, MDC and ANGPTL4 by Week 16 represented biomarkers for the responder subgroup, shedding insights into therapeutic mechanisms. In ankylosing spondylitis patients, IL-6 and LRG-1 were identified as biomarkers with concordance to disease severity. Apremilast-induced LRG-1 increase was consistent with the overall lack of efficacy in ankylosing spondylitis. Taken together, these findings expanded the mechanistic knowledge base of apremilast and provided translational foundations to accelerate future efforts including compound differentiation, combination, and repurposing.

Treatment of Severe Hailey-Hailey Disease With Apremilast

Importance

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD) is a rare, autosomal-dominant acantholytic dermatosis characterized clinically by development of recurrent blisters and erosions in friction areas. Despite progression in our understanding of the molecular genetics of HHD, therapy remains suboptimal and there is no known cure.

Objective

To determine whether the novel phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor apremilast is effective in the treatment of HHD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Clinical case series of 4 patients with severe, treatment-resistant HHD at an outpatient clinic in the Department of Dermatology of Nice University Hospital, Nice, France. The patients were treated with apremilast; after the initial titration, the dose was 30 mg, twice daily.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Objective clinical response was assessed by the treating dermatologist using the physician global assessment score; recorded adverse effects were monitored throughout the treatment at intervals of 2 to 3 months.

Results

Three women and 1 man, with a mean age of 56 years, were treated and followed up for 6 to 10 months. Family history of the disease was noted in 3 (75%) of the cases. The lesions affected the axillary regions (75%), submammary regions (75%), inguinal regions (100%), and back and neck areas (50%). An improvement in the symptoms was reported by all of the patients after a treatment period of 1 month. After 6 months, the improvement of HHD lesions was reported as moderate to almost cleared among the patients. However, 2 patients developed some flares after 6 to 10 months of treatment and stopped apremilast therapy. One of the patients developed uncontrolled diffuse lesions and apremilast was reintroduced, resulting in partial control of her disease.

Conclusions and Relevance

Apremilast appears to offer a low-risk therapeutic alternative or adjunct in resistant and severe forms of HHD. A prospective controlled trial with long-term follow-up is required to confirm these preliminary observations.

Apremilast mechanism of efficacy in systemic-naive patients with moderate plaque psoriasis: Pharmacodynamic results from the UNVEIL study

BACKGROUND

Pharmacodynamic (PD) subanalyses of clinical trials in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis demonstrated the efficacy of apremilast correlated with reductions in cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

This PD subanalysis of a phase IV, randomized, controlled trial (UNVEIL) in systemic-naive patients with moderate plaque psoriasis (psoriasis-involved body surface area [BSA] 5%-10%; static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] = 3) evaluated the relationship between efficacy and changes in inflammatory biomarkers with apremilast 30 mg twice daily (BID) versus placebo.

METHODS

Patients were randomized (2:1) to apremilast 30 mg BID or placebo for 16 weeks. Blood samples were analyzed for interleukins (IL)-17A, -17F, -22, and -23; cardiometabolic biomarkers (leptin; adiponectin; apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, B, and E); and the number of T-helper 17 (Th17) cells, regulatory T cells, and total T cells at Weeks 0, 4, and 16. Correlations were examined between percentage change in biomarkers and efficacy (based on PGAxBSA).

RESULTS

Of 221 randomized patients, 38 were included in PD analyses (placebo, n = 12; apremilast, n = 26). Median percentage reductions in plasma cytokine levels were significantly greater with apremilast versus placebo for IL-17A (P < 0.05), IL -17F (P < 0.001), and IL-22 (P < 0.01) at Week 4 and IL-22 (P < 0.05) at Week 16. At Week 16, in patients receiving apremilast, improvement in PGAxBSA significantly correlated with change in IL-17A (r = 0.45, P = 0.04). Adipokines, apolipoproteins, and T-cell population levels were largely unchanged.

CONCLUSION

Clinical improvements in psoriasis correlated with apremilast-mediated decreases in IL-17A without significantly affecting systemic IL-23 levels, adipokines, or Th17 and regulatory T-cell numbers.

A Phase I, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study of CC-11050 in People Living With HIV With Suppressed Plasma Viremia on Antiretroviral Therapy (APHRODITE)

OBJECTIVE

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PDE4i) are novel anti-inflammatory medications that have been approved for rheumatologic diseases and have been tested as host-directed therapy in tuberculosis. We examined the safety of CC-11050, a potent PDE4i in people living with HIV (PLWH) with suppressed HIV plasma viremia. We hypothesized that CC-11050 could be used to modulate HIV-related inflammation.

METHOD

Thirty PLWH on antiretroviral therapy (ART) ≥ 1 year with suppressed HIV viremia were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to 12 weeks of CC-11050 200mg twice daily or placebo with follow-up at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. Primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints were the effect of CC-11050 on cytokines, monocyte, and T-cell activation and potential pharmacokinetic interaction between CC-11050 and Efavirenz (EFV).

RESULTS

At baseline, median age was 49.5 years and CD4 count 459 cells/µL. Most frequent adverse events (grade 1 and 2 only) in CC-11050 group were headache, diarrhea, nausea, cough, nasal congestion, and restlessness. Over a 12-week period, the CC-11050 group had lower level of IL-8, adjusted for baseline level, group, and week (0.72-fold, P = .02), lower percentage of NK cells (0.87-fold, P = .02) and higher IL-6 level (1.48-fold, P = .03) compared to placebo (0.87-fold, P = .02). CC-11050 and EFV co-administration did not reveal any pharmacokinetic interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

CC-11050 was well tolerated in PLWH, without affecting CD4 counts or plasma viremia, and led to a decrease in NK cells and plasma IL-8 level after 12-weeks of administration. Further study will be needed to elucidate the efficacy of CC-11050 as potential anti-inflammatory adjuvant strategy in HIV.

A systematic review of herpes zoster incidence and consensus recommendations on vaccination in adult patients on systemic therapy for psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis: From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation

BACKGROUND

Herpes zoster (HZ) incidence is linked to immunosuppression. Patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on systemic therapy might be at an increased risk for HZ.

OBJECTIVE

To assess HZ risk in patients with psoriasis and PsA by systemic treatment and provide recommendations regarding HZ vaccination.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for HZ in patients with psoriasis and PsA. HZ vaccination guidelines were reviewed, and the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation made consensus recommendations in psoriasis and PsA patients using graded evidence.

RESULTS

In total, 41 studies met inclusion criteria. Systemic corticosteroids (strong, 1), tofacitinib (strong, 1), and combination therapy with biologic and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (weak, 2a) carry increased HZ risk while monotherapy does not. There is insufficient evidence to determine risk with interleukin 12/23, 17, and 23 inhibitors or apremilast (weak, 2a). Recombinant zoster vaccine is recommended for all psoriasis and PsA patients >50 years old and patients <50 years old on tofacitinib, systemic steroids, or combination systemic treatment. Vaccination of patients <50 years old on other systemic therapies may be considered on a case-by-case basis.

LIMITATIONS

There was significant heterogeneity between studies.

CONCLUSION

HZ risk depends on disease severity and treatment class. Recombinant zoster vaccine should be given to all psoriasis and PsA patients >50 years old and younger patients at increased risk.

IL-12/IL-23p40 identified as a downstream target of apremilast in ex vivo models of arthritis

BACKGROUND

Apremilast (Otezla®) is a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor approved for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but the reason why apremilast shows clinical effect is not fully understood. The objective of this study was to study the downstream effects of apremilast on cells of inflamed joints in immune-mediated inflammatory arthritis.

METHODS

Synovial fluid was obtained from patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), PsA or peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA; n = 18). The in vitro models consisted of synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs) or fibroblast-like synovial cells (FLSs) cultured for 48 h, SFMCs cultured for 21 days, an osteoclast pit formation assay, and a mineralization assay.

RESULTS

In SFMCs cultured for 48 h, apremilast decreased the production of interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 (the shared subunit of IL-12 and IL-23), colony-stimulating factor 1, CD6, and CD40 and increased the production of C-X-C motif chemokine 5 dose-dependently. Apremilast had a very different response signature compared with the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor adalimumab with a substantially greater inhibition of IL-12/IL-23p40. In SFMCs cultured for 21 days, apremilast increased the secretion of IL-10. In FLS cultures, apremilast decreased matrix metalloproteinase-3 production. Apremilast decreased osteoclastogenesis but did not affect mineralization by human osteoblasts.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals the downstream effects of apremilast in ex vivo models of arthritis with a strong inhibition of IL-12/IL-23p40 by SFMCs. Our findings could explain some of the efficacy of apremilast seen in IL-12/IL-23-driven immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis and PsA.

Complete resolution of erythrodermic psoriasis with first-line apremilast monotherapy

Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is the most serious type of psoriasis with high morbidity and mortality. First-line recommended therapies for EP, cyclosporine and infliximab have significant adverse effects. Cyclosporine increases the risk of hypertension, leucopenia, infections and renal failure. Infliximab increases the risk of reactivation of tuberculosis, hepatitis B and histoplasmosis, and increases risk for hepatitis, autoantibody formation, congestive heart failure, demyelinating disorders, pancytopenia, lymphoma and skin cancer. An effective drug with a much safer side effect profile will be of significant benefit in EP. The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast is U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Adverse effects of apremilast reported are headache, nausea, diarrhoea, upper respiratory tract infection, potential for depression and weight loss. We report complete and long-standing resolution of EP with first-line apremilast monotherapy. Apremilast may be an effective option with comparatively minor side effects for EP.

Association of synovial tissue polyfunctional T-cells with DAPSA in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

This study examines polyfunctional T-cells in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) synovial tissue and their associations with clinical disease and implications for therapy.

METHODS

PsA synovial tissue was enzymatically/mechanically digested to generate synovial tissue single cell suspensions. Frequencies of polyfunctional CD4, CD8, T-helper 1 (Th1), Th17 and exTh17 cells, using CD161 as a marker of Th17 plasticity, were determined by flow cytometry in matched PsA synovial tissue and peripheral blood. Synovial T-cell polyfunctionality was assessed in relation to Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and in synovial cell suspensions cultured with a current mode of treatment, phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor.

RESULTS

PsA synovial tissue infiltrating CD4⁺ T-cells expressed higher levels of interleukin (IL)-17A, interferon gamma (IFN-γ), GM-CSF and CD161, with parallel enrichment of Th1, Th17 and exTh17 T-helper subsets (all p<0.05). Interestingly, a significant proportion of synovial T-cell subsets were triple-positive for GM-CSF, tumour necrosis factor (-TNF), -IL-17 or IFN-γ compared with matched blood (all p<0.05). Importantly, frequencies of polyfunctional T-cells correlated with DAPSA: Th1-GM-CSF⁺/TNF⁺/IFN-γ⁺ (r=0.7, p<0.01), Th17-GM-CSF⁺/TNF⁺/IL-17⁺ (r=0.6, p<0.057) and exTh17-GM-CSF⁺/TNF⁺/IFN-γ⁺ (r=0.7, p=0.0096), with no associations observed for single cytokine-producing T-cells. Following ex vivo culture of PsA synovial tissue cell suspensions, polyfunctional GM-CSF⁺TNFα⁺IL-17A⁺ or/IFN-γ⁺-producing T-cells (p<0.05), but not single cytokine-producing T-cells, were inhibited with a PDE4 inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate enrichment of polyfunctional T-cells in PsA synovial tissue which were strongly associated with DAPSA and ex vivo therapeutic response.

The Management of Acute Anterior Uveitis Complicating Spondyloarthritis: Present and Future

Spondyloarthropathies (SpA) encompass a group of chronic inflammatory diseases sharing common genetic and clinical features, including the association with HLA-B27 antigen, the involvement of both the axial and the peripheral skeleton, the presence of dactylitis, enthesitis, and typical extra-articular manifestations such as psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, and acute anterior uveitis (AAU). The latter is commonly reported as a noninfectious acute inflammation of the anterior uveal tract and its adjacent structures. AAU may affect more than 20% of SpA patients representing the most common extra-articular manifestation of the disease. Considering the potential consequences of untreated AAU, early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are crucial to avoid complications of remittent or chronic eye inflammation, such as visual loss and blindness. The management of SpA has dramatically improved over the last decades due to the development of new treat-to-target strategies and to the introduction of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), particularly tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFis), currently used for the treatment of nonresponder patients to conventional synthetic agents. Along with the improvement of musculoskeletal features of SpA, bDMARDs provided an additional effect also in the management of AAU in those patients who are failures to topical and systemic conventional therapies. Nowadays, five TNFis, one interleukin-17, and one interleukin 12/23 blocker are licensed for the treatment of SpA, with different proven efficacy in preventing and treating ocular involvement. The aim of this review is to summarize the current options and to analyze the future perspectives for the management of SpA-associated AAU.

Paths for Improving Bevacizumab Available in 2018: The ADZT Regimen for Better Glioblastoma Treatment

During glioblastoma treatment, the pharmaceutical monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor A, bevacizumab, has improved the quality of life and delayed progression for several months, but has not (or only marginally) prolonged overall survival. In 2017, several dramatic research papers appeared that are crucial to our understanding of glioblastoma vis-a-vis the mode of action of bevacizumab. As a consequence of these papers, a new, potentially more effective treatment protocol can be built around bevacizumab. This is the ADZT regimen, where four old drugs are added to bevacizumab. These four drugs are apremilast, marketed to treat psoriasis, dapsone, marketed to treat Hansen’s disease, zonisamide, marketed to treat seizures, and telmisartan, marketed to treat hypertension. The ancillary attributes of each of these drugs have been shown to augment bevacizumab. This paper details the research data supporting this contention. Phase three testing of AZDT addition to bevacizumab is required to establish safety and effectiveness before general use.

Small molecule therapy for managing moderate to severe psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

The majority of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients experience a good clinical response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic therapies (bDMARDs). However, treatment failure with these drugs can represent a relevant clinical problem. Moreover, in daily clinical practice, the appropriate identification of patients eligible for these agents can be conditioned by numerous aspects, mainly represented by comorbidities, such as history of malignancies, chronic and recurrent infectious diseases. Areas covered: We searched in the PUBMED database and review published data on the efficacy and safety profile of the small molecules, inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4, apremilast, and of JAK/STAT pathways, tofacitinib, in PsA. Moreover, we report data on the other JAK inhibitor, baricitinib, and the A(3) adenosine receptors agonist, CF101, emerging by studies conducted in psoriasis patients. Expert opinion: In Psoriatic Arthritis, apremilast appears promising for PsA and recent studies have shown a good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Data on tofacitinib in PsA are limited. Studies on the small molecules, baricitinib and CF101 are still incomplete and limited to trials conducted in Rheumatoid Arthritis and in psoriasis. Further studies on small molecules and on their underlining mechanisms are advocated in PsA.

PDE4 Inhibition and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Novel Therapeutic Avenue

BACKGROUND

In the last few decades, a better knowledge of the inflammatory pathways involved in the pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) has promoted biological therapy as an important tool to treat IBD patients. However, in spite of a wider spectrum of biological drugs, a significant proportion of patients is unaffected by or lose their response to these compounds, along with increased risks of infections and malignancies. For these reasons there is an urgent need to look for new pharmacological targets. The novel Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors have been recently introduced as new modulators of intracellular signals and gene transcription for the treatment of IBD.

AIM

To discuss and describe the state of the art of this new class of compounds in the IBD field, with particular attention to apremilast.

METHODS

Published articles selected from PubMed were comprehensively reviewed, with key words including apremilast, inflammatory disease, IBD, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, pathogenesis, therapies, and treatment.

RESULTS

PDE4 inhibitors generate elevated intracellular levels of cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP), that consequently down-regulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the mucosa of IBD patients. The newly developed apremilast is one of these drugs and has already been approved for the treatment of dermatologic/rheumatologic inflammatory conditions; studies in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis have in fact demonstrated its clinical activity. However, no clinical trials have yet been published on the use of apremilast in IBD.

CONCLUSION

In light of the similarity of pro-inflammatory signaling pathways across the gut, the skin, and joints, apremilast is likely supposed to show its efficacy also in IBD.

The phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast inhibits Th1 but promotes Th17 responses induced by 6-sulfo LacNAc (slan) dendritic cells

BACKGROUND

The phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor apremilast increases cellular cAMP levels and has proven effective in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriasis arthritis. We recently described 6-sulfo LacNAc dendritic cells (slanDCs) as immature DCs in blood and as a subset of inflammatory dermal DCs in psoriasis with a pronounced capacity to produce proinflammatory cytokines and to program Th17/Th1 T cell responses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate possible immune regulatory effects of the PDE4 inhibitor apremilast on slanDCs.

METHODS

In vitro studies were performed analyzing the effects of apremilast on the proinflammatory function of slanDCs and their capacity to induce Th1/Th17-biased T cell responses.

RESULTS

Increasing cAMP levels in slanDCs by PDE4 inhibition strongly reduced production of IL-12 and TNF-α. In line with these findings, co-culture experiments with apremilast-pulsed slanDCs and allogeneic T cells either from psoriasis patients or healthy controls, revealed a significant reduction of IFN-γ production and expression of the transcription factor T-bet. In parallel, production of IL-23 and IL-1ß by slanDCs was increased and co-cultured T cells revealed a largely augmented IL-17 production and an upregulated RORyt expression.

CONCLUSIONS

We here demonstrate anti-inflammatory as well as Th17-promoting effects of apremilast when studying blood precursors of human inflammatory dermal dendritic cells. In the concert of the broad anti-inflammatory effects of apremilast on keratinocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells, the dual effect on slan⁺ inflammatory dermal DCs should be taken into account and may constrain therapeutic responses.