1
|
Anfinogenova ND, Maksimova AS, Shelkovnikova TA, Ryumshina NI, Kuznetsova AD, Chesalov NP, Karpov RS, Ussov WY, Repin AN. Community-Based View on Diagnostic Imaging at the End of COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Survey-Assisted Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1269. [PMID: 38928684 PMCID: PMC11202513 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14121269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: An online survey-based observational cross-sectional study aimed at elucidating the experience and attitudes of an unstructured population regarding diagnostic imaging. (2) Methods: Invitations to participate were distributed using mixed-mode design to deidentified residents aged 18 years and older. Main outcome measures included morbidity structure and incidence of diagnostic imaging administrations. (3) Results: Respondents (n = 1069) aged 44.3 ± 14.4 years; 32.8% suffered from cardiovascular diseases (CVD); 9.5% had chronic respiratory pathology; 28.9% considered themselves healthy. Respondents with COVID-19 history (49.7%) reported higher rates of computed tomography (CT) (p < 0.0001), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (p < 0.001), and ultrasound (p < 0.05). COVID-19 history in CVD respondents shifted imaging administrations towards CT and MRI (p < 0.05). Every tenth respondent received MRI, CT, and ultrasound on a paid basis; 29.0% could not pay for diagnostic procedures; 13.1% reported unavailable MRI. Professional status significantly affected the pattern of diagnostic modalities (p < 0.05). MRI and CT availability differed between respondents in urban and rural areas (p < 0.0001). History of technogenic events predisposed responders to overestimate diagnostic value of fluorography (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Preparedness to future pandemics requires the development of community-based outreach programs focusing on people's awareness regarding medical imaging safety and diagnostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina D. Anfinogenova
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Aleksandra S. Maksimova
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Tatiana A. Shelkovnikova
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Nadezhda I. Ryumshina
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Alina D. Kuznetsova
- School of Computer Science & Robotics, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia;
| | - Nazary P. Chesalov
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Rostislav S. Karpov
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Wladimir Y. Ussov
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia
- Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, 630055 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Alexey N. Repin
- Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balan L, Secosan C, Sorop VB, Pirtea M, Cimpean AM, Chiriac D, Balan C, Borsi E, Iorga A, Pirtea L. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on the Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer and Precursor Lesions-A Single-Center Retrospective Study. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:909. [PMID: 38929526 PMCID: PMC11206154 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Our aim was to perform a retrospective analysis of the volume of cervical screening tests, the number of patients treated with an excision method, and the incidence of invasive and non-invasive cervical during a pandemic and pre-pandemic period of 24 months. Materials and Methods: The study compared 404 patients who underwent cervical cone biopsy for cervical cancer. The study examined patients' specimens based on histopathological characteristics and categorized cervical lesions based on pap smear. Results: There was a statistically significant age difference between the two study periods. The mean difference was 32 years before the pandemic and 35 years during the pandemic (p-value > 0.05). The biggest patient loss ratio identified by age group was in the 50-59-year group, with a 14.53% loss in the pre-pandemic period and a 9.1% loss in the pandemic period. In the pandemic period, patients from rural areas presented in the clinical trial with a lower rate of 39.52% (83 patients) vs. 60.47% (127 patients) in urban areas. A higher percentage of patients experiencing cervicorrhagia as a clinical manifestation in the pandemic period vs. the pre-pandemic period, with an increase in more severe lesions in the pandemic period, had a statistical significance of 8% more newly diagnosed compared to the pre-pandemic period. Conclusions: The addressability of the patients during the COVID period was not affected in a drastic way in our study. We encountered a decrease in appointments in the age group of 50-59 years and a decrease in patients with rural residence. In our study, we found an increase in cervical bleeding as a reason for consultation in the pandemic period with a higher lesion degree, both on a pap smear and on a cervical biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lavinia Balan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (L.B.); (V.-B.S.); (M.P.); (D.C.); (L.P.)
| | - Cristina Secosan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (L.B.); (V.-B.S.); (M.P.); (D.C.); (L.P.)
| | - Virgiliu-Bogdan Sorop
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (L.B.); (V.-B.S.); (M.P.); (D.C.); (L.P.)
| | - Marilena Pirtea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (L.B.); (V.-B.S.); (M.P.); (D.C.); (L.P.)
| | - Anca Maria Cimpean
- Department of Microscopic Morphology/Histology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Daniela Chiriac
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (L.B.); (V.-B.S.); (M.P.); (D.C.); (L.P.)
| | - Catalin Balan
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Ema Borsi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Discipline of Hematology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Ariana Iorga
- Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonology “Dr. Victor Babes”, 300310 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Laurentiu Pirtea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (L.B.); (V.-B.S.); (M.P.); (D.C.); (L.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robles C, Monfil L, Ibáñez R, Roura E, Font R, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Brotons M, Martínez-Bueno C, de Sanjosé S, Espinàs JA, Bruni L. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening participation, abnormal cytology prevalence and screening interval in Catalonia. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1338859. [PMID: 38873256 PMCID: PMC11171128 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1338859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic led to a national lockdown and the interruption of all cancer preventive services, including cervical cancer screening. We aimed to assess the COVID-19 pandemic impact on opportunistic screening participation, abnormal cytology (ASCUS+) prevalence and screening interval in 2020 and 2021 within the Public Health System of Catalonia, Spain. Methods Individual data on cytology and HPV testing of women aged 25-65 from 2014 to 2021 were retrieved from the Information System for Primary Care Services (SISAP). Time-series regression models were used to estimate expected screening participation and abnormal cytology prevalence in 2020 and 2021. The impact was determined by comparing observed and expected values (ratios). Additionally, changes in screening interval trends between 2014 and 2021 were assessed by fitting a Piecewise linear regression model. Results Cervical cancer screening participation decreased by 38.8% and 2.2% in 2020 and 2021, respectively, with the most significant impact on participation (-96.1%) occurring in April 2020. Among older women, participation was lower, and it took longer to recover. Abnormal cytology prevalence was 1.4 times higher than expected in 2020 and 2021, with variations by age (range=1.1-1.5). From June 2020 onwards, the screening interval trend significantly changed from an increase of 0.59 to 3.57 months per year, resulting in a median time of 48 months by December 2021. Conclusions During the pandemic, fewer women have participated in cervical cancer screening, abnormal cytology prevalence has increased, and the screening interval is more prolonged than before. The potential cervical cancer lifetime risk implications highlight the need for organized HPV-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Robles
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Monfil
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Raquel Ibáñez
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther Roura
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebeca Font
- Catalan Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Paula Peremiquel-Trillas
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Brotons
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Martínez-Bueno
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Atenció a la Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (ASSIR) Catalunya, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
- Grup de Recerca en Salut Sexual i Reproductiva (GRASSIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia de Sanjosé
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States
- Institut de Salut Global (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Laia Bruni
- Unit of Infections and Cancer – Information and Interventions, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Infections and Cancer Group, Epidemiology, Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Palliative Care Program, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP - CB06/02/0073), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Olthof EMG, Aitken CA, Siebers AG, van Kemenade FJ, de Kok IMCM. Resilience of the Dutch HPV-based cervical screening programme during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health 2024; 227:42-48. [PMID: 38103276 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Organisation of a screening programme influences programme resilience to a disruption as COVID-19. Due to COVID-19, the Dutch human papillomavirus-based cervical screening programme was temporarily suspended. Afterwards, multiple measures have been taken to catch-up participation. This study aimed to investigate programme resilience by examining the effect of COVID-19 and programme measures taken on participation in cervical screening. STUDY DESIGN Observational cohort study. METHODS Data from the national screening registry and Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga) were used on invitations and follow-up in 2018/2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020 (COVID). Sending invitations, reminders and self-sampling kits were suspended from March to July 2020. Main outcome measures include distribution of participant characteristics (age, region and screening history), participation rates by age and region, time between invitation and participation (i.e. response time) and self-sampling use per month. RESULTS Participation rate was significantly lower in 2020 (49.8%) compared to 2018/19 (56.8%, P < 0.001), in all ages and regions. Compared to 2018/19, participation rates decreased most in women invited from January to March 2020 (-6.7%, -9.1% and -10.4%, respectively). From August, participation rates started to recover (difference between -0.8% and -2.7%). Median response time was longer in February and March (2020: 143 and 173 days; 2018/19: 53 and 55 days) and comparable from July onwards (median difference 0-6 days). Self-sampling use was higher in 2020 (16.3%) compared to 2018/19 (7.6%). CONCLUSIONS The pandemic impacted participation rates in the Dutch cervical screening programme, especially of women invited before the programme pause. Implementation of self-sampling in national cervical screening programmes could increase participation rates and could serve as an alternative screening method in times of exceptional health care circumstances, such as a pandemic. Due to the well-organised programme and measures taken to catch-up participation, the impact of COVID-19 on the screening programme remained small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M G Olthof
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - C A Aitken
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Pathology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A G Siebers
- The Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (PALGA Foundation), Houten, the Netherlands
| | - F J van Kemenade
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Pathology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I M C M de Kok
- Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Andrade Natal R, Bedin AR, Giongo AA, Dias EM, Paschoalini RB, Volpato AHC, Melo ALAD, Santos CDC, Delgado ALJ, Dufloth RM, Soares FA, da Cunha Santos G. Thyroid FNA cytology: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination in a Brazilian series. Cancer Cytopathol 2024; 132:22-29. [PMID: 37747447 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic prompted changes in medical practice, with a reduction in cytopathology volumes and a relative increase in the malignancy rate during lockdown and the initial postlockdown period. To date, no study has evaluated the impact of these changes on the volume of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) or on the frequency of cases according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) categories after vaccination. METHODS Ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and ROSE assessments performed from January 2019 to May 2022 were evaluated retrospectively according to TBSRTC categories for three periods: prepandemic (period 1), from transmission to expansion (period 2), and after vaccination (period 3). RESULTS There were 7531 nodules from 5815 patients. FNA cases increased throughout the pandemic despite a drop during lockdown. The frequency of TBSRTC categories changed. Nondiagnostic cases had an increase of 18.1% in period 2 and 76.2% after vaccination compared with prepandemic levels. Malignant cases increased from 2.3% to 4.2% in period 2 and to 5.1% in period 3, representing increases of 83.1% and 121.2%, respectively, compared with period 1. Data corrected by time showed increases in categories IV, V, and VI and a decrease in benign nodules during the two pandemic periods. ROSE was performed in 787 cases during the prepandemic period, and there were decreases of 29.4% and 22.8% in periods 2 and 3, respectively. The ROSE-to-category I ratio was reduced significantly after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS Increased volume with sustained lower benign rates and higher malignant rates before and after vaccination indicate better selection of patients for FNA. A worse adequacy rate was correlated with a decrease in the number of ROSE assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo de Andrade Natal
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Aline Alencar Giongo
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Everton Mesquita Dias
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rafael Bispo Paschoalini
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - André Luís Alves de Melo
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Caio de Carvalho Santos
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rozany Mucha Dufloth
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fernando Augusto Soares
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gilda da Cunha Santos
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Anatomic Pathology, Rede D'Or, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tambuyzer T, Vanhauwaert D, Boterberg T, De Vleeschouwer S, Peacock HM, Bouchat J, Silversmit G, Verdoodt F, De Gendt C, Van Eycken L. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Incidence and Observed Survival of Malignant Brain Tumors in Belgium. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:63. [PMID: 38201490 PMCID: PMC10778220 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: This study evaluates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, treatment, and survival of adults diagnosed with malignant brain tumors in Belgium in 2020. (2) Methods: We examined patients aged 20 and older with malignant brain tumors (2004-2020) from the Belgian Cancer Registry database, assessing incidence, WHO performance status, vital status, and treatment data. We compared 2020 incidence rates with projected rates and age-standardized rates to 2015-2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess observed survival (OS). (3) Results: In 2020, there was an 8% drop in age-specific incidence rates, particularly for those over 50. Incidence rates plunged by 37% in April 2020 during the first COVID-19 peak but partially recovered by July. For all malignant brain tumors together, the two-year OS decreased by four percentage points (p.p.) in 2020 and three p.p. in 2019, compared to that in 2015-2018. Fewer patients (-9 p.p.) with glioblastoma underwent surgery, and the proportion of patients not receiving surgery, radiotherapy, or systemic therapy increased by six percentage points in 2020. (4) Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted the diagnosis, treatment strategies, and survival of brain tumor patients in Belgium during 2020. These findings should guide policymakers in future outbreak responses, emphasizing the need to maintain or adapt (neuro)-oncological care pathways and promote informed decision making when care capacity is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Tambuyzer
- Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium; (T.T.); (J.B.); (L.V.E.)
| | | | - Tom Boterberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| | - Steven De Vleeschouwer
- Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Laboratory of Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department Neurosciences, LEUVEN BRAIN INSTITUTE (LBI), KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hanna M. Peacock
- Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium; (T.T.); (J.B.); (L.V.E.)
| | - Joanna Bouchat
- Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium; (T.T.); (J.B.); (L.V.E.)
| | - Geert Silversmit
- Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium; (T.T.); (J.B.); (L.V.E.)
| | - Freija Verdoodt
- Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium; (T.T.); (J.B.); (L.V.E.)
| | - Cindy De Gendt
- Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium; (T.T.); (J.B.); (L.V.E.)
| | - Liesbet Van Eycken
- Belgian Cancer Registry, 1210 Brussels, Belgium; (T.T.); (J.B.); (L.V.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Devleesschauwer B, Willem L, Jurčević J, Smith P, Scohy A, Wyper GMA, Pires SM, Van Goethem N, Beutels P, Franco N, Abrams S, Van Cauteren D, Speybroeck N, Hens N, De Pauw R. The direct disease burden of COVID-19 in Belgium in 2020 and 2021. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1707. [PMID: 37667264 PMCID: PMC10476343 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16572-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Burden of disease estimates have become important population health metrics over the past decade to measure losses in health. In Belgium, the disease burden caused by COVID-19 has not yet been estimated, although COVID-19 has emerged as one of the most important diseases. Therefore, the current study aims to estimate the direct COVID-19 burden in Belgium, observed despite policy interventions, during 2020 and 2021, and compare it to the burden from other causes. METHODS Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) are the sum of Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) and Years of Life Lost (YLLs) due to disease. DALYs allow comparing the burden of disease between countries, diseases, and over time. We used the European Burden of Disease Network consensus disease model for COVID-19 to estimate DALYs related to COVID-19. Estimates of person-years for (a) acute non-fatal disease states were calculated from a compartmental model, using Belgian seroprevalence, social contact, hospital, and intensive care admission data, (b) deaths were sourced from the national COVID-19 mortality surveillance, and (c) chronic post-acute disease states were derived from a Belgian cohort study. RESULTS In 2020, the total number of COVID-19 related DALYs was estimated at 253,577 [252,541 - 254,739], which is higher than in 2021, when it was 139,281 [136,704 - 142,306]. The observed COVID-19 burden was largely borne by the elderly, and over 90% of the burden was attributable to premature mortality (i.e., YLLs). In younger people, morbidity (i.e., YLD) contributed relatively more to the DALYs, especially in 2021, when vaccination was rolled out. Morbidity was mainly attributable to long-lasting post-acute symptoms. CONCLUSION COVID-19 had a substantial impact on population health in Belgium, especially in 2020, when COVID-19 would have been the main cause of disease burden if all other causes had maintained their 2019 level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brecht Devleesschauwer
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Lander Willem
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jure Jurčević
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Aline Scohy
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Grant M A Wyper
- School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Nina Van Goethem
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Beutels
- Centre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Franco
- Data Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
- Namur Institute for Complex Systems (naXys) and Department of Mathematics, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium
| | - Steven Abrams
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Data Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | | | - Niko Speybroeck
- Institute of Health and Society, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Niel Hens
- Centre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Data Science Institute, Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics (I-BioStat), UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Robby De Pauw
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Demaerel PG, Leloup A, Brochez L, Van Eycken L, Garmyn M. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence and Thickness of Cutaneous Melanoma in Belgium. Biomedicines 2023; 11:1645. [PMID: 37371740 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11061645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: COVID-19 had a major impact on cancer diagnostics and treatment. Delays in diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma were particularly feared, given the impact on survival and morbidity that comes with advanced stages. Moreover, its incidence in Belgium has been rapidly increasing in recent decades. This Belgian population-level study quantifies the pandemic effect on the number of melanoma diagnoses and Breslow thickness in 2020 and 2021. (2) Methods: In using an automated algorithm, the number of cutaneous melanoma diagnoses and Breslow thickness were extracted from all pathology protocols from 2017-2021 by the Belgian Cancer Registry. Monthly variations, as well as year-to-year differences, were studied. (3) Results: Annual incidence of cutaneous melanoma fell by 1% in 2020, compared to 2019, mainly due to a diagnostic deficit in March, April, and May 2020. An 8% incidence increase occurred in 2021, primarily reflecting an increase in the number of the thinnest melanomas (≤1 mm). Both the mean and median Breslow thicknesses were higher in spring 2020, resulting from an underrepresentation of thinner tumors. However, no particulars stood out on a full-year basis in either 2020 or 2021. (4) Conclusions: Considering the expected incidence increase, we estimate almost 210 melanoma diagnoses were missed in Belgium in 2020, corresponding to 6% of the expected number. This deficit occurred mainly during the first COVID-19 wave. Despite some rebound, the 2021 total was still 3% short of the expected number, leaving around 325 diagnoses remaining pending in 2020 and 2021, corresponding to a two-year deficit of 4.35%. Fortunately, mainly thin melanomas were missed, without any detectable shift toward thicker tumors later in 2020 and or 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lieve Brochez
- Department of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Marjan Garmyn
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shelkovnikova TA, Maksimova AS, Ryumshina NI, Mochula OV, Vaizov VK, Ussov WY, Anfinogenova ND. Transformative Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Services in One Tertiary Cardiovascular Center. J Imaging 2023; 9:108. [PMID: 37367456 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging9060108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of study was to investigate the transformative effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) services in one tertiary cardiovascular center. The retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data of MRI studies (n = 8137) performed from 1 January 2019 to 1 June 2022. A total of 987 patients underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI (CE-CMR). Referrals, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, gender, age, past COVID-19, MRI study protocols, and MRI data were analyzed. The annual absolute numbers and rates of CE-CMR procedures in our center significantly increased from 2019 to 2022 (p-value < 0.05). The increasing temporal trends were observed in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCMP) and myocardial fibrosis (p-value < 0.05). The CE-CMR findings of myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, ischemic cardiomyopathy, HCMP, postinfarction cardiosclerosis, and focal myocardial fibrosis prevailed in men compared with the corresponding values in women during the pandemic (p-value < 0.05). The frequency of myocardial fibrosis occurrence increased from ~67% in 2019 to ~84% in 2022 (p-value < 0.05). The COVID-19 pandemic increased the need for MRI and CE-CMR. Patients with a history of COVID-19 had persistent and newly occurring symptoms of myocardial damage, suggesting chronic cardiac involvement consistent with long COVID-19 requiring continuous follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana A Shelkovnikova
- Cardiology Research Institute, Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Aleksandra S Maksimova
- Cardiology Research Institute, Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Nadezhda I Ryumshina
- Cardiology Research Institute, Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Olga V Mochula
- Cardiology Research Institute, Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Valery K Vaizov
- Cardiology Research Institute, Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Wladimir Y Ussov
- Cardiology Research Institute, Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 634012 Tomsk, Russia
- Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, 630055 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Nina D Anfinogenova
- Cardiology Research Institute, Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences", 634012 Tomsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Calpbinici P, Uzunkaya Öztoprak P. The Effect of Fear of COVID-19 on Women's Attitudes toward Cancer Screening and Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors: A Cross-Sectional Study. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2023; 21:45. [PMID: 37214638 PMCID: PMC10186287 DOI: 10.1007/s40944-023-00719-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of fear of COVID-19 on women's attitudes toward cancer screening and healthy lifestyle behaviors. Method The study is of descriptive and cross-sectional type. The sample of the study consisted of 221 women living in Turkey. Research data were collected using Introductory Information Form, Attitude Scale for Cancer Screening, The Fear of COVID-19 Scale and Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale II (HLBS-II). Results It was found out that 92.3% of the women did not have cancer screening during the pandemic period, 33.0% of the women who did not have it because they were afraid of the contamination, 33.0% thought they were healthy, 13.1% did not have screening tests because they thought that screening tests were not easy and accessible during the pandemic period. While no significant relationship was found between women's attitudes toward cancer screenings and fear of COVID-19 (P > 0.05), a positive significant relationship was found between women's attitudes toward cancer screenings and spiritual growth, health responsibility and interpersonal relations scores, which are sub-dimensions of the HLBS-II scale (P > 0.05). In addition, it was found out that women's fear of COVID-19 affected interpersonal relations and stress management (P < 0.05). Conclusion In our study, it was concluded that most of the women did not have cancer screening during the pandemic, and that the fear of COVID-19 affected such healthy lifestyle behaviors as interpersonal relations and stress management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pelin Calpbinici
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Semra and Vefa Küçük Faculty of Health Sciences, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University, Nevşehir, Turkey
| | - Pınar Uzunkaya Öztoprak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wouters E, Verbrugghe C, Abdelnabi R, Devloo R, De Clippel D, Jochmans D, De Bleser D, Weynand B, Compernolle V, Neyts J, Feys HB. Intranasal administration of convalescent plasma protects against SARS-CoV-2 infection in hamsters. EBioMedicine 2023; 92:104597. [PMID: 37148586 PMCID: PMC10171892 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Convalescent plasma (CP) transfusion is an early option for treating infections with pandemic potential, often preceding vaccine or antiviral drug rollout. Heterogenous findings from randomized clinical trials on transfusion of COVID-19 CP (CCP) have been reported. However, meta-analysis suggests that transfusion of high titer CCP is associated with a mortality benefit for COVID-19 outpatients or inpatients treated within 5 days after symptom onset, indicating the importance of early administration. METHODS We tested if CCP is an effective prophylactic against SARS-CoV-2 infection by the intranasal administration of 25 μL CCP/nostril (i.e. 0.01-0.06 mg anti-RBD antibodies/kg) in hamsters exposed to infected littermates. FINDINGS In this model, 40% of CCP treated hamsters were fully protected and 40% had significantly reduced viral loads, the remaining 20% was not protected. The effect seems dose-dependent because high-titer CCP from a vaccinated donor was more effective than low-titer CCP from a donation prior to vaccine rollout. Intranasal administration of human CCP resulted in a reactive (immune) response in hamster lungs, however this was not observed upon administration of hamster CCP. INTERPRETATION We conclude that CCP is an effective prophylactic when used directly at the site of primary infection. This option should be considered in future prepandemic preparedness plans. FUNDING Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (VLAIO) and the Foundation for Scientific Research of the Belgian Red Cross Flanders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Wouters
- Transfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Caro Verbrugghe
- Transfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Ghent, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rana Abdelnabi
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rosalie Devloo
- Transfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Jochmans
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Birgit Weynand
- KU Leuven Department of Imaging and Pathology, Translational Cell and Tissue Research, Division of Translational Cell and Tissue Research, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Veerle Compernolle
- Transfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Ghent, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Blood Services of the Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium; Transfusion Innovation Center, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Johan Neyts
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hendrik B Feys
- Transfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Ghent, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Blood Services of the Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Greene GJ, Thomson CS, Donnelly D, Chung D, Bhatti L, Gavin AT, Lawler M, Huws DW, Rolles MJ, Bennée F, Morrison DS. Whole-population trends in pathology-confirmed cancer incidence in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A retrospective observational study. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 84:102367. [PMID: 37119604 PMCID: PMC10121133 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 epidemic interrupted normal cancer diagnosis procedures. Population-based cancer registries report incidence at least 18 months after it happens. Our goal was to make more timely estimates by using pathologically confirmed cancers (PDC) as a proxy for incidence. We compared the 2020 and 2021 PDC with the 2019 pre-pandemic baseline in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland (NI). METHODS Numbers of female breast (ICD-10 C50), lung (C33-34), colorectal (C18-20), gynaecological (C51-58), prostate (C61), head and neck (C00-C14, C30-32), upper gastro-intestinal (C15-16), urological (C64-68), malignant melanoma (C43), and non-melanoma skin (NMSC) (C44) cancers were counted. Multiple pairwise comparisons generated incidence rate ratios (IRR). RESULTS Data were accessible within 5 months of the pathological diagnosis date. Between 2019 and 2020, the number of pathologically confirmed malignancies (excluding NMSC) decreased by 7315 (14.1 %). Scotland experienced early monthly declines of up to 64 % (colorectal cancers, April 2020 versus April 2019). Wales experienced the greatest overall change in 2020, but Northern Ireland experienced the quickest recovery. The pandemic's effects varied by cancer type, with no significant change in lung cancer diagnoses in Wales in 2020 (IRR 0.97 (95 % CI 0.90-1.05)), followed by an increase in 2021 (IRR 1.11 (1.03-1.20). CONCLUSION PDC are useful in reporting cancer incidence quicker than cancer registrations. Temporal and geographical differences between participating countries mirrored differences in responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating face validity and the potential for quick cancer diagnosis assessment. To verify their sensitivity and specificity against the gold standard of cancer registrations, however, additional research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giles J Greene
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence & Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales Knowledge Directorate, Floor 5, Capital Quarter 2, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK.
| | - Catherine S Thomson
- Scottish Cancer Registry, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, UK
| | - David Donnelly
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast UK
| | - David Chung
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence & Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales Knowledge Directorate, Floor 5, Capital Quarter 2, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Lesley Bhatti
- Scottish Cancer Registry, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, UK
| | - Anna T Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast UK
| | - Mark Lawler
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast, Belfast UK; DATA-CAN, the UK's Health Data Research Hub for Cancer, UK
| | - Dyfed Wyn Huws
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence & Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales Knowledge Directorate, Floor 5, Capital Quarter 2, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Martin J Rolles
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea SA2 8QA, UK
| | - Felicity Bennée
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence & Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales Knowledge Directorate, Floor 5, Capital Quarter 2, Tyndall Street, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - David S Morrison
- Scottish Cancer Registry, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cruz-Valdez A, Palacio-Mejía LS, Quezada-Sánchez AD, Hernández-Ávila JE, Galicia-Carmona T, Cetina-Pérez LDC, Arango-Bravo EA, Isla-Ortiz D, Aranda-Flores CE, Uscanga-Sánchez SR, Madrid-Marina V, Torres-Poveda K. Cervical cancer prevention program in Mexico disrupted due to COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1008560. [PMID: 36969022 PMCID: PMC10034019 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1008560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the preventive services for cervical cancer (CC) control programs in Mexico, which will result in increased mortality. This study aims to assess the impact of the pandemic on the interruption of three preventive actions in the CC prevention program in Mexico. Methods This study is a retrospective time series analysis based on administrative records for the uninsured population served by the Mexican Ministry of Health. Patient data were retrieved from the outpatient service information system and the hospital discharge database for the period 2017-2021. Data were aggregated by month, distinguishing a pre-pandemic and a pandemic period, considering April 2020 as the start date of the pandemic. A Poisson time series analysis was used to model seasonal and secular trends. Five process indicators were selected to assess the disruption of the CC program, these were analyzed as monthly data (N=39 pre-pandemic, N=21 during the pandemic). HPV vaccination indicators (number of doses and coverage) and diagnostic characteristics of CC cases were analyzed descriptively. The time elapsed between diagnosis and treatment initiation in CC cases was modeled using restricted cubic splines from robust regression. Results Annual HPV vaccination coverage declined dramatically after 2019 and was almost null in 2021. The number of positive Papanicolaou smears decreased by 67.8% (90%CI: -72.3, -61.7) in April-December 2020, compared to their expected values without the pandemic. The immediate pandemic shock (April 2020) in the number of first-time and recurrent colposcopies was -80.5% (95%CI:-83.5, -77.0) and -77.9% (95%CI: -81.0, -74.4), respectively. An increasing trend was observed in the proportion of advanced stage and metastatic CC cases. The fraction of CC cases that did not receive medical treatment or surgery increased, as well as CC cases that received late treatment after diagnosis. Conclusions Our analyses show significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic with declines at all levels of CC prevention and increasing inequalities. The restarting of the preventive programs against CC in Mexico offers an opportunity to put in place actions to reduce the disparities in the burden of disease between socioeconomic levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelio Cruz-Valdez
- Center for Population Health Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Lina Sofia Palacio-Mejía
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT)—Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Amado D. Quezada-Sánchez
- Center for Evaluation and Surveys Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | | | - Tatiana Galicia-Carmona
- Department of Clinical Research and Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Eder A. Arango-Bravo
- Department of Clinical Research and Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - David Isla-Ortiz
- Department of Oncology Gynecology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCAN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Vicente Madrid-Marina
- Chronic Infections and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Kirvis Torres-Poveda
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT)—Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
- Chronic Infections and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ferrara P, Dallagiacoma G, Alberti F, Gentile L, Bertuccio P, Odone A. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer: A systematic review of the impact of COVID-19 on patient care. Prev Med 2022; 164:107264. [PMID: 36150446 PMCID: PMC9487163 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare services, including cervical cancer management, and an increased burden for this condition is expected. This systematic review synthetizes the available evidence on the impact of the pandemic on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer. Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for relevant studies on these topics with the purpose of comparing service access and care delivery before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the methodological heterogeneity among the studies, findings were narratively discussed. Of the 715 screened titles and abstracts, 33 articles were included, corresponding to 42 reports that covered the outcomes of interest: vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) (6 reports), cancer screening (19), diagnosis (8), and treatment (8). Seven studies observed reductions in HPV vaccination uptake and coverage during COVID-19. Reports on cervical screening and cancer diagnosis activities showed a substantial impact of the pandemic on access to screening services and diagnostic procedures. All but one study that investigated cervical cancer treatment reported changes in the number of women with cervical lesions who received treatments, as well as treatment delay and interruption. With a major impact during the first wave in 2020, COVID-19 and restriction measures resulted in a substantial disruption in cervical cancer prevention and management, with declines in screening and delays in treatment. Taken together, findings from this systematic review calls for urgent policy interventions for recovering cervical cancer prevention and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Ferrara
- Center for Public Health Research, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20145 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Dallagiacoma
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Federica Alberti
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Leandro Gentile
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Paola Bertuccio
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Odone
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening in Gynecological Practices in Germany. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194820. [PMID: 36230743 PMCID: PMC9562656 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: the aim of this cross-sectional study was to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening (CCS) in gynecological practices in Germany. Methods: The basis of the analysis was the Uniform Evaluation Standard (EBM) of the Statutory Health Insurance Scheme. This cross-sectional study included all women aged ≥20 years with at least one CCS (clinical and cytological examination) in 223 gynecological practices in Germany during the period 2018−2021. The number of patients with CCS per practice was shown for each year. The average number of patients per year was compared between the pre-pandemic time period (2018, 2019) and the pandemic time period (2020, 2021) using Wilcoxon tests. Analyses were conducted separately for clinical investigations and cytological investigations and were also stratified by age group (20−34, 35−50, >50 years). Results: CCS in gynecological practices significantly decreased in Germany between the pre-pandemic time period of 2018−2019 and the pandemic years of 2020−2021. This decrease was observed in all age groups but was stronger in women aged 20−34 (−25.6%) and weaker in women aged >50 (−15.2%). Conclusions: We found a statistically and clinically relevant decrease of patients receiving CCS in gynecological practices in Germany. This finding is even more exceptional because the new screening algorithm with direct invitations for each patient started in 2020 and was supposed to lead to a higher number of patients in its first years. However, the observed decline in the detection of cervical precancer lesions may lead to increased cervical cancer burden. Risk-based screening strategies and further measures are necessary to adapt to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and return to pre-pandemic CCS numbers.
Collapse
|
16
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Surgical Activities: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e30785. [PMID: 36447702 PMCID: PMC9701314 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim The aim of this article is to investigate the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on our surgical department, which is situated in Athens, Greece, as well as to review published literature on the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on surgical activities in our department. Material and methods We retrospectively reviewed the surgical procedures that were performed in the surgical department of a tertiary University hospital in Athens, Greece, before and during the pandemic. Furthermore, we performed a literature review evaluating articles on surgical activity and COVID-19 published from the beginning of the pandemic up until the January of 2022 on the PubMed database. Results In total, 894 patients were included in the study. Of those, 264 (29.5%) underwent surgery during the control period and 630 (70.5%) in the pandemic period. Overall, we performed 20.5% fewer surgeries in the post-sanitary period. In particular, elective surgeries decreased on average by 23.9%, emergency procedures decreased by 8.9%, and oncology surgeries increased by an average of 6.4% after the year 2020. Concerning the review of literature, 51 studies were selected for this review. According to them, the main effect of the pandemic on the surgical sector was reflected in the reduction of total surgeries, mainly due to the postponement of elective surgical procedures, which showed a median reduction of 54% compared to the pre-COVID-19 period. A smaller decrease was observed in the number of emergency and oncological surgeries. Conclusions Reduced surgical activity during the pandemic, due to the health measures imposed, requires courageous corrective interventions to avoid its adverse effects, such as disease progression, increased treatment costs, reduced quality of life, and ultimately the survival of the patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Rucinska M, Nawrocki S. COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Cancer Patients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12470. [PMID: 36231769 PMCID: PMC9564768 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
In December 2019, there were first reports of an atypical pneumonia detected in Wuhan city, China [...]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Rucinska
- Department of Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Sergiusz Nawrocki
- Department of Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Valls Martínez MDC, Grasso MS, Montero JM. Regional well-being inequalities arising from healthcare expenditure public policies in Spain. Front Public Health 2022; 10:953827. [PMID: 36211653 PMCID: PMC9533108 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.953827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Well-being inequalities arising from different healthcare expenditure public policies is currently a hot topic at a national scale, but especially so at a sub-national level because the inequalities in question are among citizens of the same country. Spain is an optimal study area to carry out research on this topic because it is considered to have one of the best health systems in the world, it is one of the top-ranking countries in terms of life expectancy rates (the indicators we use for well-being), and it has a decentralized public health system with significantly different regional healthcare expenditure public policies. Given that the factors involved in the complex direct, indirect, and second-order relationships between well-being and health spending are latent in nature, and that there are more hypotheses than certainties regarding these relationships, we propose a partial least squares structural equation modeling specification to test the research hypotheses and to estimate the corresponding impacts. These constructs are proxied by a set of 26 indicators, for which annual values at a regional scale were used for the period 2005-2018. From the estimation of this model, it can be concluded that mortality, expenditure and resources are the factors that have the greatest impact on well-being. In addition, a cluster analysis of the indicators for the constructs included in this research reveals the existence of three clearly differentiated groups of autonomous communities: the northern part of the country plus Extremadura (characterized by the lowest well-being and the highest mortality rates), Madrid (with the best results in well-being and mortality, the lowest public health expenditure per inhabitant and percentage of pharmaceutical spending, and the highest percentage in specialty care services and medical staff spending), and the rest of the country (south-eastern regions, with similar well-being values to those of the first group but with less health expenditure). Finally, a principal component analysis reveals that "healthiness" and "basic spending" are the optimal factors for mapping well-being and health spending in Spain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María del Carmen Valls Martínez
- European Research Center on Economics and Sustainable Development, Economics and Business Department, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| | - Mayra Soledad Grasso
- European Research Center on Economics and Sustainable Development, Economics and Business Department, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| | - José-María Montero
- Department of Political Economy and Public Finance, Economic and Business Statistics, and Economic Policy, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nadauld L, Goldman DP. Considerations in the implementation of multicancer early detection tests. Future Oncol 2022; 18:3119-3124. [PMID: 36062430 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dana P Goldman
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Allahqoli L, Mazidimoradi A, Salehiniya H, Alkatout I. Impact of COVID-19 on cancer screening: a global perspective. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2022; 16:102-109. [PMID: 35862881 PMCID: PMC9451605 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cancer screening disruption due to COVID-19 may have a significant impact on patients, healthcare practitioners, and healthcare systems. In this present review, we aim to offer a comprehensive view of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening programs worldwide. RECENT FINDINGS The present review comprised 33 publications. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the rates of cancer screening investigations were drastically reduced worldwide. Screening rates plummeted for all types of cancer, all ages, and racial/ethnic groups. Reductions in screening percentages were higher in several underserved racial groups. Cancer screening was suspended for at least 30 days in 13 countries. SUMMARY Screenings for all types of cancer fell sharply. In the chain of cancer management, delays in any step are liable to change the outcome of the next step. Further long-term research will be needed to fully comprehend the impact of the pandemic on cancer services and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hamid Salehiniya
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| | - Ibrahim Alkatout
- University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel School of Gynaecological Endoscopy, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Belkić K, Andersson S, Alder S, Mints M, Megyessi D. Predictors of treatment failure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: Up to 14 years of recorded follow‑up. Oncol Lett 2022; 24:357. [PMID: 36168314 PMCID: PMC9478621 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix is rising, with invasive adenocarcinoma becoming increasingly common relative to squamous cell carcinoma. The present study reviewed a cohort of 84 patients first-time treated by conization for histologically-confirmed AIS from January 2001 to January 2017, to identify risk factors associated with recurrent/persistent AIS as well as progression to invasive cervical cancer. Nearly 80% of the patients were age 40 or younger at conization. Endocervical and ectocervical margins were deemed clear in 42 of the patients. All but two patients had ≥1 follow-up, with post-conization high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) results documented in 52 patients. Altogether, 12 histopathologically-confirmed recurrences (14.3%) were detected; two of these patients had microinvasive or invasive carcinoma. In three other patients cytology showed AIS, but without recorded histopathology. Eight patients underwent hysterectomy for incomplete resection very soon after primary conization; they were not included in bivariate or multivariate analyses. Having ≥1 post-follow-up positive HPV finding yielded the highest sensitivity for histologically-confirmed recurrence: 87.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.4-99.7]. Current or historical smoking status provided highest specificity: 94.4 (95% CI 72.7-99.9) and overall accuracy: 88.0 (95% CI 68.8-97.5) for histologically-confirmed recurrence. With multiple logistic regression (MLR), adjusting for age at conization and abnormal follow-up cytology, positive HPV18 was the strongest predictor of histologically-confirmed recurrence (P<0.005). Having ≥2 positive HPV results also predicted recurrence (P<0.02). Any unclear margin yielded an odds ratio 7.21 (95% CI 1.34-38.7) for histologically-confirmed recurrence adjusting for age, but became non-significant when including abnormal cytology in the MLR model. The strong predictive value of HPV, particularly HPV18 and persistent HPV positivity vis-à-vis detected recurrence indicated that regular HPV testing for patients treated for AIS is imperative. In conclusion, furthering a participatory approach, including attention to smoking with encouragement to attend needed long-term follow-up, can better protect these patients at high risk for cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Belkić
- Department of Oncology‑Pathology, Karolinska Institute, SE‑17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sonia Andersson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics‑Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SE‑17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Susanna Alder
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics‑Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SE‑17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Miriam Mints
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics‑Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SE‑17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Megyessi
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics‑Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SE‑17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee K, Lee YY, Suh M, Jun JK, Park B, Kim Y, Choi KS. Impact of COVID-19 on cancer screening in South Korea. Sci Rep 2022; 12:11380. [PMID: 35790880 PMCID: PMC9255521 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15778-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic significantly declined cancer screening rates worldwide. Its impact on the South Korean population is unclear, depending on socioeconomic status (SES), residence, and history of chronic disease. This study utilized data (2018-2020) from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, an annual cross-sectional study employing nationally representative random sampling. Cancer screening rates were defined as the proportion of the eligible population who received respective cancer screening within the last 1 year and investigated four major cancers (stomach, colorectal, breast, and cervical). Screening rates every year were compared with screening rate ratios (SRRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Between 2019 and 2020, screening rates declined significantly by 23%, 17%, 12%, and 8% for colorectal cancer (SRR 0.77; 95% CI 0.73-0.82), stomach cancer (SRR 0.83; 95% CI 0.79-0.87), breast cancer (SRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.93), and cervical cancer (SRR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97), respectively. Regardless of cancer type, screening was significantly lower in metropolitan residents, those with higher SES, and, interestingly, those without a history of chronic diseases. The significant decline in cancer screening during the pandemic requires urgent political intervention to reduce the burden of future cancer incidence and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyeonmin Lee
- National Cancer Center, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Korea
| | - Yun Yeong Lee
- National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Mina Suh
- National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Jae Kwan Jun
- National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Bomi Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeol Kim
- National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Kui Son Choi
- National Cancer Center, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, 323, Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, 10408, Korea.
- National Cancer Center, National Cancer Control Institute, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Purpose for Review This perspective piece aims to understand the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the field of oncology, exploring the factors provoking a fall in cancer diagnostic rates, interruption of cancer screening programmes, disruption of oncological treatment and adjuvant care, and the necessary adaption oncological practice has undergone (and will be required to undergo) post-pandemic, including the shift to digital consultations. Recent Findings During the COVID-19 pandemic, the field of oncological research has faced significant challenges. Yet, innovation has prevailed with new developments being made across the globe. Looking to the future of oncology, this piece will also suggest potential solutions to overcome the late-stage ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic. Summary The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a global health crisis, the ramifications of which have reached every corner of the world and overwhelmed already overburdened healthcare systems. However, we are still yet to see the full domino effect of the pandemic as it continues to reveal and exacerbate pre-existing weaknesses in healthcare systems across the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Boniface
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Gonzalo Tapia-Rico
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Icon Cancer Centre Adelaide, Kurralta Park, South Australia, 5037, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vigliar E, Pisapia P, Dello Iacovo F, Alcaraz‐Mateos E, Alì G, Ali SZ, Baloch ZW, Bellevicine C, Bongiovanni M, Botsun P, Bruzzese D, Bubendorf L, Büttner R, Canberk S, Capitanio A, Casadio C, Cazacu E, Cochand‐Priollet B, D’Amuri A, Davis K, Eloy C, Engels M, Fadda G, Fontanini G, Fulciniti F, Hofman P, Iaccarino A, Ieni A, Jiang XS, Kakudo K, Kern I, Kholova I, Linton McDermott KM, Liu C, Lobo A, Lozano MD, Malapelle U, Maleki Z, Michelow P, Mikula MW, Musayev J, Özgün G, Oznur M, Peiró Marqués FM, Poller D, Pyzlak M, Robinson B, Rossi ED, Roy‐Chowdhuri S, Saieg M, Savic Prince S, Schmitt FC, Seguí Iváñez FJ, Štoos‐Veić T, Sulaieva O, Sweeney BJ, Tuccari G, van Velthuysen M, VanderLaan PA, Vielh P, Viola P, Voorham QJM, Weynand B, Zeppa P, Faquin WC, Pitman MB, Troncone G. COVID-19 pandemic impact on cytopathology practice in the post-lockdown period: An international, multicenter study. Cancer Cytopathol 2022; 130:344-351. [PMID: 35006650 PMCID: PMC9015399 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a previous worldwide survey, the authors showed a drastic reduction in the number of cytological specimens processed during the coronavirus disease 2019 "lockdown" period along with an increase in malignancy rates. To assess the continued impact of the pandemic on cytological practices around the world, they undertook a second follow-up worldwide survey collecting data from the post-lockdown period (2020). METHODS Participants were asked to provide data regarding their cytopathology activity during the first 12 weeks of their respective national post-lockdown period (2020), which ranged from April 4 to October 31. Differences between the post-lockdown period and the corresponding 2019 period were evaluated, and the authors specifically focused on rates of malignant diagnoses. RESULTS A total of 29 respondents from 17 countries worldwide joined the survey. Overall, a lower number of cytological specimens (n = 236,352) were processed in comparison with the same period in 2019 (n = 321,466) for a relative reduction of 26.5%. The overall malignancy rate showed a statistically significant increase (12,442 [5.26%] vs 12,882 [4.01%]; P < .001) during the same time period. Similar results were obtained if both malignancy and suspicious for malignancy rates were considered together (15,759 [6.58%] vs 16,011 [4.98%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The data showed a persistent reduction in the cytological specimen volume during the post-lockdown period (2020). However, the relative increase in the cytological workload in the late part of the post-lockdown is a promising finding of a slow return to normality.
Collapse
|
25
|
Sabeena S, Ravishankar N. The Short-Term Impact Of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2022; 23:1497-1504. [PMID: 35633530 PMCID: PMC9587860 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2022.23.5.1497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out to assess the pooled proportion of women screened for cervical cancer before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS After ruling out registered or ongoing systematic reviews in the PROSPERO database regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in cervical cancer screening, the protocol of our systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021279305). The electronic databases were searched for articles published in English between January 2020 and October 2021and the study was designed based on PRISMA guidelines updated in 2020. Meta-analysis was accomplished in STATA version 13.0 (College Station, Texas 77,845 USA). The pooled proportion of women who had undergone cervical cancer screening was reported with 95% CI. In order to quantify the heterogeneity, Chi2 statistic (Q statistic) and I2 index were used. RESULTS The meta-analysis included seven studies from Slovenia, Italy, Ontario (Canada), Scotland, Belgium, and the USA, comprising 403,986 women and 199,165 women who were screened for cervical cancer before the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 and during the pandemic in 2020, respectively. The pooled proportion of women screened for cervical cancer in 2019 was 9.79% (95% CI 6.00%-13.59%, 95% prediction interval 0.42%-23.81%). During the pandemic, the pooled proportion of screened women declined to 4.24% (95% CI 2.77%-5.71%, 95% prediction interval 0.9%-17.49%). CONCLUSION There was a substantial drop in the cervical cancer screening rate due to lockdowns and travel restrictions to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. Scaling up cervical cancer screening strategies is essential to prevent the long-term impact of cervical cancer burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nagaraja Ravishankar
- Department of Biostatistics, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Carretero-Barrio I, Lop-Gros J, Iglesias M, Martínez C, Matias-Guiu X, Pérez-Mies B, Palacios J. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pathology training: a survey among Spanish residents. Virchows Arch 2022; 481:505-509. [PMID: 35352148 PMCID: PMC8964236 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-022-03303-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training of Spanish pathology residents by conducting an online survey. It was distributed among the pathologists who had been residents during the pandemic and consisted of 31 questions about the demographics and the impact of the pandemic on their pathology training. In total, 114 residents completed the survey; they reported a decrease in the number of biopsies, cytology samples, autopsies, research activities, sessions, case corrections, and courses, as well as the detrimental effect this had on their training. Half of the residents had to cancel rotations and 32% were redeployed to other departments. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected pathology training, and our results can be used to understand the challenges residents have faced and mitigate their impact.
Collapse
|
27
|
US Cancer Screening Recommendations: Developments and the Impact of COVID-19. Med Sci (Basel) 2022; 10:medsci10010016. [PMID: 35323215 PMCID: PMC8949858 DOI: 10.3390/medsci10010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The USPSTF and ACS recommend screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancers. Rates of cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment decreased significantly in the US and other developed nations during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown (April 2020) and have since recovered, although not to baseline levels in many cases. For breast cancer, the USPSTF recommends biennial screening with mammography for women aged 50−74, while the ACS recommends annual screening for women aged 45−54, who may transition to biennial after 55. Minority and rural populations have lower rates of screening and lower utilization of DBT, which offers superior sensitivity and specificity. Among 20 US health networks in April 2020, mammography rates were down 89.2% and new breast cancer diagnoses down by 50.5%. For cervical cancer, the USPSTF recommends cervical cytology every three years for women 21−65, or cytology+hrHPV co-testing every five years for women aged 30−65. Cervical cancer screening rates declined by 87% in April 2020 and recovered to a 40% decline by June 2020, with American Indians and Asians most severely affected. For colorectal cancer (CRC), the USPSTF and ACS recommend screening for ages 45−75, recently lowered from a starting age of 50. Most commonly-used modalities include annual FIT testing, FIT+DNA testing every three years, and colonoscopy every ten years, with shorter repeat if polyps are found. In the US, CRC screenings were down by 79−84.5% in April 2020 across several retrospective studies. Patient encounters for CRC were down by 39.9%, and a UK-based model predicted that 5-year-survival would decrease by 6.4%. The USPSTF recommends screening low dose CT scans (LDCTs) for ages 50−80 with a >20 pack-year smoking history who have smoked within the past 15 years. In April 2020, screening LDCTs fell by 72−78% at one US institution and lung cancer diagnoses were down 39.1%.
Collapse
|
28
|
Jidkova S, Hoeck S, Kellen E, le Cessie S, Goossens MC. Flemish population-based cancer screening programs: impact of COVID-19 related shutdown on short-term key performance indicators. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:183. [PMID: 35177021 PMCID: PMC8853842 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09292-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening programs were disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to estimate the short-term impact of the temporary shutdown (from March until May- June) of the cancer screening programs invitations in Flanders (Belgium) by looking at invitation coverage, percentage of people screened after invitation and the screening interval. Methods Yearly invitation coverage was calculated as the number of people who received an invitation, as a proportion of the people who should have received an invitation that year. Weekly response to the invitation was calculated as the number of people who were screened within 40 days of their date of invitation, as a percentage of the people who received an invitation that week (as a proxy for willingness to screen). Weekly screening interval was calculated as the mean number of months between the current screening and the previous screening of all the people who screened that week. The two last indicators were calculated for each week in 2019 and 2020, after which the difference between that week’s value in 2020 and 2019 with 95% confidence intervals. Results of these two indicators were also analysed after stratification for gender, age and participation history. Results Invitation coverage was not impacted in the colorectal and cervical cancer screening program. In the breast cancer screening program invitation coverage went down from 97.5% (2019) to 88.7% (2020), and the backlog of invitations was largely resolved in the first six months of 2021. The willingness to screen was minimally influenced by COVID-19. The breast cancer screening program had a temporary increase in screening interval in the first months following the restart after COVID-19 related shutdown, when it was on average 2.1 months longer than in 2019. Conclusions Willingness to screen was minimally influenced by COVID-19, but there may be an influence on screening coverage because of lower invitation coverage, mainly for the for breast Cancer Screening Program. The increases in screening intervals for the three Cancer Screening Program seem reasonable and would probably not significantly increase the risk of delayed screening cancer diagnoses. When restarting a Cancer Screening Program after a COVID-19 related shutdown, monitoring is crucial. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09292-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svetlana Jidkova
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. .,Centre for Cancer Detection, Ruddershove, Bruges, Belgium.
| | - Sarah Hoeck
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Ruddershove, Bruges, Belgium.,Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Eliane Kellen
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Ruddershove, Bruges, Belgium.,University Hospital Leuven, Campus St. Rafael, Kapucijnenvoer, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Saskia le Cessie
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Mathijs C Goossens
- Centre for Cancer Detection, Ruddershove, Bruges, Belgium.,Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Velthuysen MLF, van Eeden S, le Cessie S, de Boer M, van Boven H, Koomen BM, Roozekrans F, Bart J, Timens W, Voorham QJM. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic pathology in the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:166. [PMID: 35139847 PMCID: PMC8826665 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07546-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has a huge impact on healthcare provided. The nationwide pathology registry of the Netherlands, PALGA, offers an outstanding opportunity to measure this impact for diseases in which pathology examinations are involved. METHODS Pathology specimen numbers in 2020 were compared with specimen numbers in 2019 for 5 periods of 4 weeks, representing two lockdowns and the periods in between, taking into account localization, procedure and benign versus malignant diagnosis. RESULTS The largest decrease was seen during the first lockdown (spring 2020), when numbers of pathology reports declined up to 88% and almost all specimen types were affected. Afterwards each specimen type showed its own dynamics with a decrease during the second lockdown for some, while for others numbers remained relatively low during the whole year. Generally, for most tissue types resections, cytology and malignant diagnoses showed less decrease than biopsies and benign diagnoses. A significant but small catch-up (up to 17%) was seen for benign cervical cytology, benign resections of the lower gastro-intestinal tract, malignant skin resections and gallbladder resections. CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant effect on pathology diagnostics in 2020. This effect was most pronounced during the first lockdown, diverse for different anatomical sites and for cytology compared with histology. The data presented here can help to assess the consequences on (public) health and provide a starting point in the discussion on how to make the best choices in times of scarce healthcare resources, considering the impact of both benign and malignant disease on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S van Eeden
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - S le Cessie
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - M de Boer
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - H van Boven
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - B M Koomen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - F Roozekrans
- Laboratory of Pathology Oost Nederland (LABPON), Hengelo, Netherlands
| | - J Bart
- Dutch Society of Pathology (NVVP), Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - W Timens
- Dutch Society of Pathology (NVVP), Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Q J M Voorham
- Pathologisch Anatomisch Landelijk Geautomatiseerd Archief (PALGA), Houten, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nogami Y, Makabe T, Komatsu H, Kawana K, Okamoto A, Mikami M, Katabuchi H. Impact of COVID-19 on cervical cancer screening in Japan: A survey of population-based screening in urban Japan by the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 48:757-765. [PMID: 34939263 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the impact of COVID-19 on cervical cancer screening. METHOD The Japanese Society of Gynecologic Oncology launched COVID-19 Task Force surveyed the municipalities in urban areas of Japan. Questionnaires were sent to 20 ordinance-designated cities and 23 wards of Tokyo metropolitan area in Japan via telephone and mail in January 2021. An additional survey was conducted in March and April 2021, counted the monthly checkups in 2020 and, as a control data, the number of monthly checkups in 2019. "The State of Emergency" between April 7 and May 25, 2020, included 13 prefectures. The data collected in this research involved the number of screenings only. The chi-square test was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS The number of cancer screenings from March to August, with May being the month with the lowest number of screenings, was less than 50% of that in the previous year. In particular, the drop in the number of cancer screenings in the "Prefectures operating under special safety precautions" was remarkable and significantly lower than that in other Prefectures. However, after August, the number recovered to the usual level, despite the second wave of the pandemic occurring nationwide. The initial "the State of Emergency" caused a significant decrease in the number of people receiving population-based screenings, but the recovery has been remarkable, and the total number is expected to be the same as in previous years. CONCLUSION The initial "the State of Emergency" caused a significant decrease in the number of people receiving population-based screenings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuya Nogami
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Makabe
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Komatsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Tottori, Yonago, Japan
| | - Kei Kawana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mikio Mikami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University Kanagawa, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Katabuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Leeson S, Evered A, Powell G, Lilly K, Singh N, Hillier S, Dunk L. Early Welsh cervical screening programme learning as a consequence of the coronavirus pandemic. Cytopathology 2021; 33:350-356. [PMID: 34935223 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus pandemic has had a profound impact on the cervical screening programme in Wales for the eligible women, sample takers and laboratory and colposcopy services. AIMS To explore what changes due the pandemic have adversely affected screening outcomes in Wales and what lessons can be learned to improve cervical screening in Wales and elsewhere. METHODS A review of the screening performance in 2020 and the first quarter of 2021 in Wales as well as a comparison with other cervical screening programme responses to the pandemic. RESULTS A three-month pause of screening together with a change in a variety of working practices, including social distancing, use of personal protective equipment, use of virtual meetings and home working have been implemented. The combination of a pause to the issue of invitations, plus reduced services in primary and secondary care, together with population lockdown, have contributed to longer waiting times for colposcopy and potentially delayed cancer diagnoses. Some programme changes which were being evaluated prior to the pandemic could be developed now to mitigate the impact of the pandemic such as improved information, increased screening intervals for human papillomavirus-based screening programmes and home working for call and recall staff. CONCLUSIONS Despite a considerable short-term interruption to the cervical screening programme, some changes introduced as a result of the coronavirus pandemic could provide key lessons learnt for improvement for cervical cancer prevention services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Leeson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, LL57 2PW, UK
| | - Andrew Evered
- Cervical Screening Wales, Screening Division Laboratory, Green Meadow, Pontyclun, Llantrisant, Mid Glamorgan, CF72 8XT, UK
| | - Gareth Powell
- Cervical Screening Wales, Screening Division Laboratory, Green Meadow, Pontyclun, Llantrisant, Mid Glamorgan, CF72 8XT, UK
| | - Kate Lilly
- Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Neelam Singh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, LL57 2PW, UK
| | - Sharon Hillier
- Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - Louise Dunk
- Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Istrate-Ofițeru AM, Berbecaru EIA, Ruican D, Nagy RD, Rămescu C, Roșu GC, Iovan L, Dîră LM, Zorilă GL, Țieranu ML, Iliescu DG. The Influence of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Dysplasia. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:1101. [PMID: 34684138 PMCID: PMC8539291 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57101101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives. The risk of developing invasive cancer increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in Romania, where the incidence of this disease is high due to limited medical education and broad screening. This study's objective is to analyze the number of patients admitted with different types of cervical dysplasia and the treatment applied for the lesions during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic compared to the same period for the year before the pandemic. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study that took place in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics I/II (OG I/II) of the Emergency County Hospital of Craiova during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (SP) (15.03.2020-14.03.2021) and in the 12 months before (non-pandemic period) (NPP) (15.03.2019-14.03.2020). The study includes 396 patients with pathological PAP smear results. All the patients included in this study were clinically examined and with colposcopy. The patients with Low-Grade Dysplasia were managed in a conservatory manner and reevaluated after six months. The patients with High-Grade Dysplasia were admitted for an excisional biopsy of the lesion. The excised fragments were sent to the Pathological Anatomy Laboratory for a histopathological examination. Results: This study reveals a decrease of more than half in the number of patients admitted with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions during the pandemic compared to the same period of the year before. The number of biopsies and excisional procedures has been decreasing by more than a factor of three during the pandemic period compared to the year before. Conclusion: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we found that the patients' admission rate, diagnosis, and treatment was almost four times lower. As hospital restrictions were not dictated for cancer/precancer management during SP, we may assume that the differences were due to the fear of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 due to hospitalization. In the context of poor screening performance and high cervical cancer incidence, the influence of the SP may result in a further increase of severe cases related to this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anca-Maria Istrate-Ofițeru
- Department of Histology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania; (A.-M.I.-O.); (G.-C.R.); (L.I.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - Elena-Iuliana-Anamaria Berbecaru
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - Dan Ruican
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - Rodica Daniela Nagy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - Cătălina Rămescu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - Gabriela-Camelia Roșu
- Department of Histology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania; (A.-M.I.-O.); (G.-C.R.); (L.I.)
| | - Larisa Iovan
- Department of Histology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania; (A.-M.I.-O.); (G.-C.R.); (L.I.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - Laurențiu Mihai Dîră
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - George-Lucian Zorilă
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - Maria-Loredana Țieranu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| | - Dominic-Gabriel Iliescu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency County Hospital of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.-I.-A.B.); (D.R.); (R.D.N.); (C.R.); (L.M.D.); (G.-L.Z.); (D.-G.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kortlever TL, de Jonge L, Wisse PHA, Seriese I, Otto-Terlouw P, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MCW, Dekker E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. The national FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev Med 2021; 151:106643. [PMID: 34217421 PMCID: PMC8241645 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected many healthcare services worldwide. Like many other nations, the Netherlands experienced large numbers of individuals affected by COVID-19 in 2020, leading to increased demands on hospitals and intensive care units. The Dutch Ministry of Health decided to suspend the Dutch biennial fecal immunochemical test (FIT) based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program from March 16, 2020. FIT invitations were resumed on June 3. In this study, we describe the short-term effects of this suspension on a myriad of relevant screening outcomes. As a result of the suspension, a quarter of the individuals due for screening between March and November 2020 had not received their invitation for FIT screening by November 30, 2020. Furthermore, 57.8% of those who received a consecutive FIT between the restart and November 30, 2020, received it outside the upper limit of the standard screening interval (26 months). Median time between positive FIT and colonoscopy did not change as a result of the pandemic. Participation rates of FIT screening and follow-up colonoscopy in the months just before and during the suspension were significantly lower than expected, but returned to normal levels after the suspension. Based on the anticipated 2020 cohort size, we estimate that the number of individuals with advanced neoplasia currently detected up until November 2020 was 31.2% lower compared to what would have been expected without a pandemic. Future studies should monitor the impact on long-term screening outcomes as a result of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim L Kortlever
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter H A Wisse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Seriese
- Center for Population Screening, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Patricia Otto-Terlouw
- Dutch Foundations of Population Screening, Population Screening South-West, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Andersson S, Megyessi D, Belkić K, Alder S, Östensson E, Mints M. Age, margin status, high-risk human papillomavirus and cytology independently predict recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia up to 6 years after treatment. Oncol Lett 2021; 22:684. [PMID: 34434283 PMCID: PMC8335741 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2021.12945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to identify the factors that independently contribute to disease recurrence among women first-time treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) during 4–6 years of follow-up. Overall, 529 of 530 eligible patients participated; these patients all attended a 1st follow-up appointment ~6 months post-conization, at which time high-risk human-papillomavirus (HPV) testing, liquid-based cytology and colposcopy were performed. Full data on margin excision status, other aspects of initial treatment and comorbidity were obtained. At least one subsequent follow-up was attended by 88% of patients. A total of 22 recurrent cases were detected during follow-up. Detected recurrence was the outcome of focus for multiple logistic regression analysis, with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) computed. Four significant independent risk factors were identified: Age 45 years or above (OR=3.5, 95% CI=1.3–9.9), one or both unclear or uncertain margins (OR=5.3, 95% CI=2.0–14.2), positive HPV at 1st follow-up (OR=5.8, 95% CI=2.0–16.8), and abnormal cytology at 1st follow-up (OR=3.9, 95% CI=1.4–11.0). Bivariate analysis revealed that persistent HPV positivity was associated with recurrence (P<0.01). These findings indicated that incomplete excision of the CIN lesion may warrant more intensive subsequent screening, regardless of early post-conization HPV findings. Although early post-conization positive HPV was a powerful, independent predictor of recurrent high-grade CIN, over one-third of the patients with detected recurrence had a negative early post-conization HPV finding. These patients returned for routine screening, at which time, in most cases, HPV status was positive, thus indicating the need for repeated HPV evaluation. Especially during the on-going pandemic, home vaginal self-sampling is recommended. Particular attention is required for women aged ≥45 years. In addition, although not statistically significant, relevant comorbidities, especially autoimmune conditions, warrant consideration in clinical decision-making. Women who have been treated for high-grade CIN are at risk for recurrent disease and progression to cervical cancer; therefore, they require careful, individualized follow-up to avoid these adverse consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Andersson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Megyessi
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karen Belkić
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.,School of Community/Global Health, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.,Institute for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA
| | - Susanna Alder
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ellinor Östensson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Miriam Mints
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics-Gynecology Division, Karolinska Institute, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.,School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine-Health, Örebrö University, SE-70182 Örebrö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Spartalis E, Plakopitis N, Theodori MA, Karagiannis SP, Athanasiadis DI, Spartalis M, Boutzios G, Paschou SA, Nikiteas N, Troupis T. Thyroid cancer surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: perioperative management and oncological and anatomical considerations. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4389-4395. [PMID: 34431326 PMCID: PMC8386469 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed many aspects of our everyday lives and medical practice, including oncology treatment; thyroid cancer surgery is not an exception. The reported number of fine-needle aspirations performed during the first semester of 2020 was significantly reduced. Poorly differentiated, medullary and anaplastic thyroid tumors are considered important indications for immediate surgical intervention. By contrast, most well-differentiated carcinomas present slow growth, and thus surgery can be deferred for a short period of time during which patients are under active surveillance. Thyroid surgeries have decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, prior to any intervention, negative COVID-19 status - with the use of a nasopharyngeal swab and reverse transcription PCR assay as the gold standard and chest CT scan as a complementary modality in some cases - must be confirmed to achieve a COVID-free pathway. Thorough preoperative assessment regarding both oncological and anatomical aspects should be performed to identify optimal timing for safe management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleftherios Spartalis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery & Surgical Research 'N S Christeas', Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece.,Department of Anatomy, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Plakopitis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery & Surgical Research 'N S Christeas', Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| | - Maria Anna Theodori
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery & Surgical Research 'N S Christeas', Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| | - Sotirios P Karagiannis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery & Surgical Research 'N S Christeas', Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| | | | - Michael Spartalis
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery & Surgical Research 'N S Christeas', Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| | - Georgios Boutzios
- Department of Pathophysiology, Endocrine Unit, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| | - Stavroula A Paschou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11528, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Nikiteas
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| | - Theodore Troupis
- Department of Anatomy, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Peacock HM, Tambuyzer T, Verdoodt F, Calay F, Poirel HA, De Schutter H, Francart J, Van Damme N, Van Eycken L. Decline and incomplete recovery in cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a year-long, population-level analysis. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100197. [PMID: 34474811 PMCID: PMC8411068 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncological care was considerably impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Worrisome declines in diagnostic procedures and cancer diagnoses in 2020 have been reported; however, nationwide, population-based evidence is limited. Quantification of the magnitude and distribution of the remaining outstanding diagnoses is likewise lacking. METHODS Using accelerated delivery of data from pathology laboratories to the Belgian Cancer Registry, we compared the nationwide rates of new diagnoses of invasive cancers in 2020 to 2019. RESULTS We observed a 44% reduction in total diagnoses of invasive cancers in April 2020 compared with April 2019, coinciding with the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The reduction was largest in older patients and for skin cancers (melanoma and nonmelanoma). Reductions in diagnosis were less pronounced among children and adolescents (0-19 years). A smaller decline was observed for most cancers with typically poorer prognosis or obvious symptoms, including some hematological malignancies, lung, and pancreatic cancer. Suspension of organized population screening programs was reflected in a strong decline in diagnosis in the screening age groups for female breast cancer (56%) and for colorectal cancer in both men (49%) and women (60%). The number of diagnoses began to increase from the end of April and stabilized at the beginning of June at or just above 2019 levels. There has yet to be a complete recovery in cancer diagnoses, with an estimated 6%, or ∼4000 diagnoses, still outstanding for all of 2020. Among solid tumors, head and neck cancers have the largest remaining year-over-year decrease in diagnoses at 14%. CONCLUSION These results add to the evidence of a profound impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care and identify groups at risk for continuing diagnostic delays. These data should stimulate health care providers worldwide to facilitate targeted, accessible, and efficient procedures for detection of cancers affected by this delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - F Verdoodt
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Calay
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium
| | - H A Poirel
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - J Francart
- Belgian Cancer Registry, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Luxenburg O, Saban M, Myers V, Vaknin S, Boldor N, Wilf-Miron R. National and regional trends in MRI utilization in the face of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Isr J Health Policy Res 2021; 10:40. [PMID: 34266476 PMCID: PMC8280577 DOI: 10.1186/s13584-021-00472-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Marked reductions in imaging exams have been documented during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aimed to examine the effect of the two waves of COVID-19 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization at the national and regional level. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective-archive study was conducted in Israel, comparing March-December 2020 with March-December 2018 and 2019. Data on MRI utilization were obtained from the national MRI registry, while data on confirmed COVID-19 cases, by place of residence, were obtained from the Israeli Ministry of Health open COVID-19 database. RESULTS The number and rate of MRI examinations decreased during the first COVID-19 wave, with the steepest drop in April 2020: 47.5% relative decrease compared to April 2019, and 42.2% compared to 2018. This was followed by a compensatory increase between the waves and a return to almost pre-pandemic levels of use, with just a modest decrease, during the second, more intense COVID wave, compared with the previous year. Existing differences between regions increased during the pandemic. The rate ratio of MRI exams between Tel-Aviv and the Northern periphery increased from 2.89 in April 2019 to 3.94 in April 2020. Jerusalem metropolitan region, with the largest burden of COVID disease, demonstrated only a modest decrease (1%) in MRI utilization during the first 10 months of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS At the national level, time trends in reduced MRI utilization followed the first wave of COVID-19, and were accompanied by increased regional disparities. These changes were not explained by differences in the burden of COVID-19 disease but might be explained by unequal distribution of MRI scanners among regions. Reduced utilization was not evident during the second wave, nor at the beginning of the third wave, despite higher COVID-19 case load, demonstrating adaptation to the new normal. Patterns of MRI utilization might help policy-makers and healthcare managers predict the behavior of imaging as well as other sectors, such as elective surgical procedures, during an ongoing pandemic. This forecast might help to manage the lasting effects of the pandemic, including extended waiting times, in the months and years following its remission. In preparation for future national emergencies, timely and detailed data on MRI utilization can serve as a "sensor" for a wide array of diagnostic and interventional medical activities, providing policy-makers with an updated snapshot to guide their response at the regional and national levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osnat Luxenburg
- Medical Technology, Health Information and Research Directorate, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Mor Saban
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, 1 Emek dotan Street, 5262100 Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Vicki Myers
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, 1 Emek dotan Street, 5262100 Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Sharona Vaknin
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, 1 Emek dotan Street, 5262100 Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Noga Boldor
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, 1 Emek dotan Street, 5262100 Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Rachel Wilf-Miron
- The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, 1 Emek dotan Street, 5262100 Ramat-Gan, Israel
- School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ivanuš U, Jerman T, Gašper Oblak U, Meglič L, Florjančič M, Strojan Fležar M, Premru Sršen T, Smrkolj Š, Pakiž M, Primic Žakelj M, Kloboves Prevodnik V, Pogačnik A, Josipović I, Mate T, Gobec M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on organised cervical cancer screening: The first results of the Slovenian cervical screening programme and registry. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2021; 5:100101. [PMID: 34557821 PMCID: PMC8454727 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic threatens the impact of cervical cancer screening and global cervical cancer elimination goals. As cervical cancer screening programmes were adjusting to the new situation, we evaluated the intensity, quality, and outcomes of cervical cancer screening in Slovenia in the first seven months of the pandemic. METHODS Historical observational study on data from a population-based cervical cancer screening registry. Number of cervical cytopathology (screening and follow-up), histopathology (diagnostic procedures, invasive procedures and number of newly diagnosed CIN2+ cases) and HPV test results from the entire Slovenian women population between January 1st and September 30th 2020 were compared to a three-year average of the years 2017-19. FINDINGS A two-month screening lock-down between March 12th and May 8th 2020 resulted in an epidemic deficit of screening (-92%), follow-up (-70%), and HPV triage tests (-68%), as well as invasive diagnostic (-47%) and treatment (-15%) of cervical lesions. Time to diagnosis and treatment did not increase; times to laboratory results fluctuated but stayed within standards. Slovenia has entered the second epidemic intending to add as little as possible to the pandemic deficit of screening smears (-23%) and yearly CIN2+ cases (-10%). Women aged 30-39 were most affected, with the highest pandemic deficit of screening smears (-26%) and yearly CIN2+ cases (-19%). INTERPRETATION The pandemic has deeply affected all levels of our lives. New vulnerable groups and inequalities have emerged that require recognition and action. To prevent long-term increases in the cervical cancer burden due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial that organised screening is maintained and monitored in settings where it can be safely and comprehensively provided. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urška Ivanuš
- Cervical Cancer Screening and Registry ZORA, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Association of Slovenian Cancer Societies, Trubarjeva cesta 76A, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tine Jerman
- Cervical Cancer Screening and Registry ZORA, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Urška Gašper Oblak
- Gynaecologist Outpatient Clinic, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Preglov trg 14, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Leon Meglič
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška ulica 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mojca Florjančič
- Cervical Cancer Screening and Registry ZORA, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Tanja Premru Sršen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška ulica 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Špela Smrkolj
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška ulica 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Pakiž
- Department of Gynaecologic and Breast Oncology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska ulica 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Maja Primic Žakelj
- Cervical Cancer Screening and Registry ZORA, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Veronika Kloboves Prevodnik
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Cytopathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Ana Pogačnik
- Cervical Cancer Screening and Registry ZORA, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Cytopathology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Igor Josipović
- Department of Informatics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tanja Mate
- Directorate for Public Health, Ministry of Health of Republic of Slovenia, Štefanova ulica 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mojca Gobec
- Directorate for Public Health, Ministry of Health of Republic of Slovenia, Štefanova ulica 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Alkatout I, Biebl M, Momenimovahed Z, Giovannucci E, Hadavandsiri F, Salehiniya H, Allahqoli L. Has COVID-19 Affected Cancer Screening Programs? A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:675038. [PMID: 34079764 PMCID: PMC8165307 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.675038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health care services across the world have been enormously affected by the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Services in oncology have been curtailed because medical services have been focused on preventing the spread of the virus and maximizing the number of available hospital beds. The present study was designed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on cancer screening. Methods Databases such as Medline, Web of Science Core Collection (Indexes = SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, A & HCI Timespan) and Scopus were searched comprehensively for articles published until January 2021. The keywords used were COVID-19 and cancer screening, Articles dealing with cancer screening in the COVID-19 pandemic were included in the review. Results The review comprised 17 publications. The impact of COVID-19 was categorized into four dimensions: a significant decline in cancer screening and pathology samples, the cancer diagnosis rate, an increase in advanced cancers, mortality rate and years of life lost (YLLs). Conclusion Cancer screening programs have been clearly interrupted since the onset of the COVID-19 disease. The anticipated outcomes include delayed diagnosis and marked increases in the numbers of avoidable cancer deaths. Urgent policy interventions are needed to handle the backlog of routine diagnostic services and minimize the harmful effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Alkatout
- Kiel School of Gynaecological Endoscopy, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Zohre Momenimovahed
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Departments of Nutrition and Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Fatemeh Hadavandsiri
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamid Salehiniya
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| | - Leila Allahqoli
- School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cytopathology Practice in the COVID-19 Era: Focus on Sample Workload. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/jmp2020011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak was declared a pandemic, the magnitude of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has continued to grow, putting an unprecedented strain on all medical fields. Its effects on cytopathology workloads have been dramatic. Indeed, despite the implementation of several laboratory biosafety recommendations, cytological screening activities and cytological sampling of patients at low risk of malignancy have been postponed to limit the risk of contagion and to lessen the strain on overwhelmed hospital facilities. In this scenario, a drastic reduction in the total number of cytological specimens has been observed worldwide. This review summarizes the current evidence of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cytopathology practice by focusing on its impact on cytological sample workload.
Collapse
|
41
|
Bechard LE, Bergelt M, Neudorf B, DeSouza TC, Middleton LE. Using the Health Belief Model to Understand Age Differences in Perceptions and Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychol 2021; 12:609893. [PMID: 33935865 PMCID: PMC8082183 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 severity and mortality risk are greater for older adults whereas economic impact is deeper for younger adults. Using the Health Belief Model (HBM) as a framework, this study used a web-based survey to examine how perceived COVID-19 susceptibility and severity and perceived efficacy of recommended health behaviors varied by age group and were related to the adoption of health behaviors. Proportional odds logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between age group and perceived COVID-19 susceptibility, severity, impact, and health behavior efficacy and adoption. Structural equation modeling based on HBM constructs examined the relationships between health beliefs and behaviors. Data from 820 participants (Ontario, Canada) were analyzed (age: 42.7, 16.2 years; 79% women). Middle-aged and older adults reported greater concerns about the personal risk of hospitalization and mortality, economic impact, and social impact of COVID-19 than young adults. Middle-aged adults also reported greatest concern for other age groups. Adoption and perceived efficacy of health behaviors was similar across age groups with few exceptions. Both middle-aged and older-adults were more likely to perceive their own and each other's age groups as responding adequately to COVID-19 compared to young adults. Structural equation modeling indicated perceived benefits of health behaviors were the primary driver of behavior uptake, with socioeconomic factors and perceived severity and susceptibility indirectly associated with uptake through their influence on perceived benefits. Overall, these results suggest adoption of health behaviors is very high with few differences between age groups, despite differences in perceived impact of COVID-19. Public health communications should focus on the benefits of health behaviors to drive adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Bechard
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | | | - Bobby Neudorf
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Tamara C DeSouza
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Laura E Middleton
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vigliar E, Cepurnaite R, Iaccarino A, Pisapia P, De Luca C, Malapelle U, Bellevicine C, Troncone G. Cytopathology practice during the COVID-19 postlockdown: An Italian experience. Cancer Cytopathol 2021; 129:548-554. [PMID: 33595924 PMCID: PMC8013362 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background During the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, the cytopathology workload has decreased remarkably worldwide as all screening and elective procedures have been postponed to prioritize the clinical management of patients at high oncological risk. In the current study, the authors provide data on the lasting impact of COVID‐19 on cytopathology practice during the initial phases of the Italian postlockdown period. Methods The percentages of the cytological sample types processed at the University of Naples Federico II during the first 12 weeks of the Italian postlockdown period were compared with those of the same period in 2019. The study period was divided into four 3‐week periods. Differences in the rates of malignant diagnoses were also assessed. Results During the 12‐week study period, the overall cytological sample workload decreased by 41.6% in comparison with 2019. In particular, the workload significantly declined for each sample type: Pap smears, –33.3%; urine, –42.8%; serous fluids, –14.4%; thyroid, –54.5%; breast, –43%; lymph node, –27.3%; and salivary gland, –61%. By contrast, the overall malignancy rate was significantly increased (P = .0011). Conclusions The reduction in the cytological sample workload during the postlockdown period still represents an ongoing effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic. On the other hand, the rise in the overall malignancy rate reflects the importance of prioritizing diagnostic procedures for patients at high oncological risk. The reduction in the cytological sample workload during the postlockdown period represents an ongoing effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic. On the other hand, the rise in the overall malignancy rate reflects the importance of prioritizing diagnostic procedures for patients at high oncological risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Vigliar
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Rima Cepurnaite
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonino Iaccarino
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Caterina De Luca
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Claudio Bellevicine
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Delay in the diagnosis of breast cancer during coronavirus pandemic. EXCLI JOURNAL 2021; 20:142-144. [PMID: 33564283 PMCID: PMC7868637 DOI: 10.17179/excli2020-3318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hamid Salehiniya
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of MedicalSciences, Birjand, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Menter T, Tzankov A. Investigations of Pathologists as a Key to Understanding Coronavirus Disease 2019. Pathobiology 2020; 88:11-14. [PMID: 33341799 PMCID: PMC7801993 DOI: 10.1159/000513602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Menter
- Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexandar Tzankov
- Pathology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland,
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Iaccarino A, Pisapia P, Vigliar E, Vielh P, Troncone G. Juggling the COVID-19 pandemic: A cytopathology point of view. Cytopathology 2020; 32:299-303. [PMID: 33145830 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Since its first identification in China at the end of 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has rapidly spread all over the world, becoming an international healthcare emergency. In the era of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), several aspects of normal life, including those related to the medical activities, have been radically changed. Extraordinary measures have been adopted by different nations to cope with the rapid diffusion of COVID-19 all over the world. In hospitals, careful attention has been paid to manage infected patients with a possible detrimental effect for patients affected by other diseases. As with other medical fields, cytopathology laboratories have also drastically modified their activities to cope with the COVID-19 healthcare emergency. Here, the main effects of COVID-19 pandemic on the routine practice of cytopathology are summarised, focusing on the prioritisation policy adopted by cytopathologists worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Iaccarino
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Elena Vigliar
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Vigliar E, Cepurnaite R, Alcaraz-Mateos E, Ali SZ, Baloch ZW, Bellevicine C, Bongiovanni M, Botsun P, Bruzzese D, Bubendorf L, Büttner R, Canberk S, Capitanio A, Casadio C, Cazacu E, Cochand-Priollet B, D'Amuri A, Eloy C, Engels M, Fadda G, Fontanini G, Fulciniti F, Hofman P, Iaccarino A, Ieni A, Jiang XS, Kakudo K, Kern I, Kholova I, Liu C, Lobo A, Lozano MD, Malapelle U, Maleki Z, Michelow P, Musayev J, Özgün G, Oznur M, Peiró Marqués FM, Pisapia P, Poller D, Pyzlak M, Robinson B, Rossi ED, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Saieg M, Savic Prince S, Schmitt FC, Javier Seguí Iváñez F, Štoos-Veić T, Sulaieva O, Sweeney BJ, Tuccari G, van Velthuysen ML, VanderLaan PA, Vielh P, Viola P, Voorham R, Weynand B, Zeppa P, Faquin WC, Pitman MB, Troncone G. Global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cytopathology practice: Results from an international survey of laboratories in 23 countries. Cancer Cytopathol 2020; 128:885-894. [PMID: 33108683 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To the authors' knowledge, the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on cytopathology practices worldwide has not been investigated formally. In the current study, data from 41 respondents from 23 countries were reported. METHODS Data regarding the activity of each cytopathology laboratory during 4 weeks of COVID-19 lockdown were collected and compared with those obtained during the corresponding period in 2019. The overall number and percentage of exfoliative and fine-needle aspiration cytology samples from each anatomic site were recorded. Differences in the malignancy and suspicious rates between the 2 periods were analyzed using a meta-analytical approach. RESULTS Overall, the sample volume was lower compared with 2019 (104,319 samples vs 190,225 samples), with an average volume reduction of 45.3% (range, 0.1%-98.0%). The percentage of samples from the cervicovaginal tract, thyroid, and anorectal region was significantly reduced (P < .05). Conversely, the percentage of samples from the urinary tract, serous cavities, breast, lymph nodes, respiratory tract, salivary glands, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, liver, and biliary tract increased (P < .05). An overall increase of 5.56% (95% CI, 3.77%-7.35%) in the malignancy rate in nongynecological samples during the COVID-19 pandemic was observed. When the suspicious category was included, the overall increase was 6.95% (95% CI, 4.63%-9.27%). CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a drastic reduction in the total number of cytology specimens regardless of anatomic site or specimen type. The rate of malignancy increased, reflecting the prioritization of patients with cancer who were considered to be at high risk. Prospective monitoring of the effect of delays in access to health services during the lockdown period is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Vigliar
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Rima Cepurnaite
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Eduardo Alcaraz-Mateos
- Pathology Department, Jose M. Morales Meseguer University General Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - Syed Z Ali
- Division of Cytopathology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Zubair W Baloch
- Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Claudio Bellevicine
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Dario Bruzzese
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Bubendorf
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Büttner
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sule Canberk
- Medical Faculty, IPATIMUP, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Arrigo Capitanio
- Department of Pathology, Linkoping University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Chiara Casadio
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Eugeniu Cazacu
- Department of Morphopathology, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Moldova
| | | | - Alessandro D'Amuri
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, A. Perrino Hospital, ASL Brindisi, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Catarina Eloy
- Medical Faculty, IPATIMUP, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marianne Engels
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Guido Fadda
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Human Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", A.O.U. Polyclinic G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - Gabriella Fontanini
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Franco Fulciniti
- Clinical Cytopathology Service, Histopathology Service, Cantonal Institute of Pathology, Locarno Cantonal Hospital, Locarno, Switzerland
| | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Hospital-related Biobank (BB-0033-00025), FHU OncoAge, Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Antonino Iaccarino
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Ieni
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Human Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", A.O.U. Polyclinic G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | - Xiaoyin Sara Jiang
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kennichi Kakudo
- Department of Pathology, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | | | - Ivana Kholova
- Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Chinhua Liu
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anandi Lobo
- Department of Pathology, Kapoor Path Laboratories, Raipur, India
| | - Maria D Lozano
- Department of Pathology, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Zahra Maleki
- Division of Cytopathology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Pamela Michelow
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Gonca Özgün
- Department of Pathology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Meltem Oznur
- Department of Pathology, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Suleymanpaşa/Tekirdag, Turkey
| | | | - Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - David Poller
- Department of Pathology and Cytology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Betsy Robinson
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Esther Diana Rossi
- Division of Anatomic Pathology and Histology, Catholic University-University Polyclinic Foundation "A. Gemini," Rome, Italy
| | - Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mauro Saieg
- Department of Pathology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Santa Casa Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Medical Faculty, IPATIMUP, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Tajana Štoos-Veić
- Department of Pathology and Cytology, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Brenda J Sweeney
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Giovanni Tuccari
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Human Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", A.O.U. Polyclinic G. Martino, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Paul A VanderLaan
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Patrizia Viola
- North West London Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare, NHS Trust Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rinus Voorham
- Quirinus JM Voorham, PALGA Foundation, Houten, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit Weynand
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pio Zeppa
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy
| | - William C Faquin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Martha Bishop Pitman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pisapia P, Troncone G. The Two Sides of Cytopathology during the COVID-19 Health Emergency: Screening versus Diagnosis. Pathobiology 2020; 88:1-2. [PMID: 32694257 PMCID: PMC7445381 DOI: 10.1159/000509958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|