Effects of fenofibrate on plasma lipids. Double-blind, multicenter study in patients with type IIA or IIB hyperlipidemia

Prospective randomized comparative study of the effect of pemafibrate add-on or double statin dose on small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia on statin therapy

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) is a more potent atherogenic lipoprotein than LDL. As sdLDL-cholesterol (C) levels are determined by triglyceride and LDL-C levels, pemafibrate and statins can reduce sdLDL-C levels. However, it remains unclear whether adding pemafibrate or increasing statin doses would more effectively reduce sdLDL-C levels in patients receiving statin therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 97 patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia who were treated with statins were randomly assigned to the pemafibrate 0.2 mg/day addition or statin dose doubled, and followed for 12 weeks. sdLDL-C was measured by our established homogenous assay.

RESULTS

The percentage and absolute reductions of sdLDL-C levels were significantly greater in the pemafibrate add-on group than the statin doubling group (-32.8 vs -8.1%; -16 vs -3 mg/dL, respectively). Triglyceride levels were reduced only in the pemafibrate add-on group (-44%), and LDL-C levels were reduced only in the statin doubling group (-8%), whereas levels of non-high-density lipoprotein-C and apolipoprotein B were similarly decreased (7-9%) in both groups. The absolute reductions of sdLDL-C levels were closely associated with decreased triglyceride, LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein-C and apolipoprotein B. In the subgroup analysis, the effect of pemafibrate add-on on sdLDL-C reductions was observed irrespective of baseline lipid parameters or statin type. No serious adverse effects were observed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia, the addition of pemafibrate to a statin is superior to doubling a statin in reducing sdLDL-C without increasing adverse effects.

"Fenofibrate as an adjuvant to phototherapy in pathological unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in neonates: a randomized control trial."

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread phototherapy usage, many new-born infants remain in need of other invasive lines of therapy, such as intravenous immunoglobulins and exchange transfusions.

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of the efficacy and the safety of adding fenofibrate to phototherapy for the treatment of pathological jaundice in full-term infants.

DESIGN/METHODS

We conducted a double blinded randomized control study on 180 full-term infants with pathological unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia admitted to the NICU at Mansoura University Children's Hospital. They were randomly assigned to receive either oral fenofibrate 10 mg/kg/day for 1 day or 2 days or placebo in addition to phototherapy. The primary outcome was total serum bilirubin values after 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h from intervention. Secondary outcomes were total duration of treatment, need for exchange transfusions and intravenous immunoglobulin, exclusive breast-feeding on discharge, and adverse effects of fenofibrate. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04418180).

RESULTS

A total of 180 full-term infants were included, 60 in each group. Infants in group I and II showed significant reduction of bilirubin levels at 36, 48, and 72 h from intervention compared to group III, respectively. Fenofibrate administration was associated with significantly shorter duration of phototherapy, shorter hospital stay, and higher frequency of exclusive breast-feeding compared to phototherapy alone.

CONCLUSION(S)

Fenofibrate as an adjuvant to phototherapy in term neonate with pathological jaundice is well tolerated and associated with significant reduction of serum bilirubin levels, a shorter duration of phototherapy, shorter hospital stay and higher frequency of exclusive breast-feeding, without significant adverse effects in either the single or double dosage.

Fenofibrate therapy to lower serum triglyceride concentrations in persons with spinal cord injury: A preliminary analysis of its safety profile

Context: Fenofibrate is used to treat elevated serum triglyceride (TG) concentrations (e.g. ≥150 mg/dl). The lipoprotein profile of most individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) would not satisfy conventional criteria to initiate lipid-lowering therapies. Serum TG concentrations of 115 and 137 mg/dl were recently identified as potential intervention thresholds for persons with a SCI proximal to the 4th and below the 5th thoracic vertebrae, respectively. Fenofibrate therapy has not been tested for safety in persons with SCI. Methods: An open-label trial was performed in 15 persons with SCI to determine the safety profile of 4 months of once-daily fenofibrate (145 mg tablet) treatment when initiated using modified intervention thresholds. Fasting blood tests and a review of systems were performed monthly to determine changes in liver and kidney function, as well as overall health status. Results: Fifteen subjects participated and 4 had an adverse event (e.g. 2 with gastrointestinal distress; 2 with elevated liver enzymes). Three subjects discontinued the trial within the first month and one participant remained in the trial with no further adverse events. Two participants were discontinued from fenofibrate after 2 months after not responding to treatment, as per protocol, and 10 participants completed the 4-month trial without experiencing an adverse event. Conclusion: In persons with SCI, 4 months of fenofibrate therapy initiated at lower threshold serum TG concentrations did not result in an increased incidence of adverse events compared to that reported in the general population. Fenofibrate therapy appears to be well tolerated in persons with SCI.

Alzheimer's Disease, a Lipid Story: Involvement of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia in the elderly. Mutations in genes encoding proteins involved in amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) production are responsible for inherited AD cases. The amyloid cascade hypothesis was proposed to explain the pathogeny. Despite the fact that Aβ is considered as the main culprit of the pathology, most clinical trials focusing on Aβ failed and suggested that earlier interventions are needed to influence the course of AD. Therefore, identifying risk factors that predispose to AD is crucial. Among them, the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene that encodes the major brain lipid carrier and metabolic disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes were identified as AD risk factors, suggesting that abnormal lipid metabolism could influence the progression of the disease. Among lipids, fatty acids (FAs) play a fundamental role in proper brain function, including memory. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) is a master metabolic regulator that regulates the catabolism of FA. Several studies report an essential role of PPARα in neuronal function governing synaptic plasticity and cognition. In this review, we explore the implication of lipid metabolism in AD, with a special focus on PPARα and its potential role in AD therapy.

A Four Month Randomized Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Once-daily Fenofibrate Monotherapy in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury

An open-label, randomized clinical trial of once-daily fenofibrate monotherapy administered for 2- (Mo2) and 4- (Mo4) months using modified intervention thresholds for triglyceride (TG) was performed in persons with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Fenofibrate (145 mg tablet) was self-administered daily in 10 persons with SCI for 4 months with monthly blood testing to quantify the lipoprotein profile (e.g., serum TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C concentrations). Eight SCI participants were control subjects. In comparison to the control group, the treatment group at Mo2 had a 40% (±12%; p < 0.05) reduction in serum TG concentration, a 28% (±21%; p < 0.05) increase in HDL-C and 14% (±20%; p < 0.05) decline in LDL-C. In the same comparison at Mo4, the treatment group maintained a 40% (±20%; p < 0.05) reduction in serum TG concentration, had an 18% in reduction in LDL-C (±12%; p < 0.05) and a 23% (±23%; p < 0.05) increase in HDL-C. Fenofibrate monotherapy for Mo2 and Mo4 initiated in persons with SCI resulted in a robust and favorable change in the serum lipoprotein profile and ratios, suggesting reduced risk for cardiovascular disease.

Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate (K-877), a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator, in patients with dyslipidemia: Results from a 24-week, randomized, double blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

To overcome the concerns associated with the use of fibrates, pemafibrate (K-877), a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulator, was developed. In a previous phase 2 trial, we showed excellent efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in patients with dyslipidemia.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate over 24 weeks in adults with dyslipidemia in comparison with fenofibrate.

METHODS

In this multicenter, 24-week, double-blind, clinical study, 225 patients with high triglyceride (TG; ≥150 mg/dL [1.7 mmol/L] and <500 mg/dL [5.7 mmol/L]) and relatively low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<50 mg/dL [1.3 mmol/L] in men or 55 mg/dL [1.4 mmol/L] in women) levels were randomized to receive either pemafibrate at 0.2 or 0.4 mg/d or fenofibrate 106.6 mg/d.

RESULTS

Pemafibrate 0.2, 0.4 mg/d and fenofibrate significantly reduced TG levels from baseline by -46.2%, -45.9%, and -39.7%, respectively. As compared with fenofibrate, the least squares mean differences (95% confidence intervals) in TG were -6.5% (-12.0, -1.1) and -6.2% (-11.6, -0.8) in pemafibrate 0.2 and 0.4 mg/d respectively, which showed the superiority of these doses of pemafibrate to 106.6 mg/d of fenofibrate. The incidence rates of adverse drug reactions in pemafibrate groups (2.7% and 6.8%) were significantly lower than that in the fenofibrate group (23.7%). Pemafibrate significantly decreased alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, whereas fenofibrate increased both of them. The increments of serum creatinine and cystatin C were smaller in pemafibrate than those in fenofibrate.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemafibrate was superior to fenofibrate in terms of serum TG-lowering effect and hepatic and renal safety.

Effect of fibrate treatment on liver function tests in patients with the metabolic syndrome

Background

Fibrates are used especially in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia, a feature of the metabolic syndrome. Elevated LFTs are often observed in these patients perhaps related to fatty infiltration.

Aim

We wished to study changes seen in LFTs (GGT, ALT and ALP) following fibrate therapy and then determine associated factors.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study in which data was collected from case notes of patients started on fibrates (n = 118, 2002–2008) in the lipid clinic at Good Hope Hospital and pre/post-fibrate lipid and LFT values were obtained. All biochemistry was performed on the Roche P-Unit using supplied reagents. Statistical analyses included t tests and regression analyses (factorised when quartiles were compared).

Results

Of the study population 106 patients were on fenofibrate; the remaining on bezafibrate. Significant lowering of GGT (p < 0.0001), ALT (p = 0.0014) and ALP (p < 0.0001) levels were observed following fibrate treatment. Baseline lipid (cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL) concentrations, alcohol intake, length of treatment, gender, concurrent statin treatment and diabetes did not correlate with these changes in LFT in a multiple regression analysis. Higher pre-fibrate GGT (p < 0.0001), ALT (p < 0.0001) and ALP (p < 0.0001) concentrations were associated with larger decreases in each of these tests respectively with the highest 2 quartiles (GGT > 57 IU/l, ALT > 34 IU/l and ALP > 94 IU/l) significantly different to the lowest quartile. The above associations remained significant even when the regression analyses were corrected for changes in lipid values (which did not show an association).

Conclusions

Fibrate treatment led to improvements in LFT, the greatest benefit seen in patients with higher baseline LFT values. It appears that baseline and changes in lipid values post fibrate treatment were not associated with change in LFT.

Rare PPARA variants and extreme response to fenofibrate in the Genetics of Lipid-Lowering Drugs and Diet Network Study

OBJECTIVE

Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) agonist, reduces triglyceride (TG) concentrations by 25-60%. Given significant interindividual variations in the TG response, we investigated the association of PPARA rare variants with treatment response in the Genetics of Lipid-Lowering Drugs and Diet Network study.

METHODS

We calculated the change in the TG concentration (ΔTG) among 861 GOLDN participants treated with fenofibrate (160 mg/day) for 3 weeks. From the distribution of ΔTG adjusted for age and sex, the 150 highest and 150 lowest fenofibrate responders were selected from the tails of the distribution for PPARA resequencing. The resequencing strategy was based on VariantSEQr technology for the amplification of exons and regulatory regions.

RESULTS

We identified 73 variants with an average minor allele frequency of 4.8% (range: 0.2-16%). We tested the association of rare variants located in a coding or a regulatory region (minor allele frequency<1%, 13 variants) with treatment response group by an indicator variable (presence/absence of ≥1 rare variant) using general linear mixed models to allow for adjustment for family relationship. After adjusting for baseline, fasting TG concentration carrying at least one rare variant was associated with a low fenofibrate response (odds ratio=6.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-30.8). Carrier status was also associated with a relative change in the total cholesterol concentration (P=0.02), but not high-density lipoprotein or low-density lipoprotein concentration.

CONCLUSION

Rare, potentially functional variants in PPARA may play a role in the TG response to fenofibrate, but future experimental studies will be necessary to replicate the findings and confirm functional effects.

Effects of prescription omega-3-acid ethyl esters on fasting lipid profile in subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia

This double-blind, randomized crossover study investigated the effects of 6 weeks of treatment with prescription omega-3-acid ethyl esters (POM3, 4 g/day) versus placebo (soy oil) on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and other aspects of the fasting lipid profile in 31 men and women with primary, isolated hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C 130-220 mg/dL and triglycerides less than 150 mg/dL while free of lipid-altering therapies). Mean ± standard error of the mean baseline concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were 229 ± 3, 146 ± 3, 60 ± 2, 23 ± 2, and 113 ± 8 mg/dL, respectively. POM3 produced a modest increase from baseline in LDL-C (3.4%) versus the placebo response (-0.7%, P = 0.010). Significant changes (P < 0.05) for POM3 (placebo-corrected) were observed for very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-18.8%), triglycerides (-18.7%), and HDL-C (3.3%). Nuclear magnetic resonance-determined very-low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size and HDL particle concentration decreased significantly more with POM3 versus placebo, whereas LDL and HDL particle sizes increased significantly more with POM3 versus placebo. Total cholesterol, non-HDL-C, apolipoproteins A1 and B, and LDL particle concentration responses did not differ between treatments. These results did not confirm the hypothesis that POM3 treatment would lower LDL-C in primary, isolated hypercholesterolemia. Effects on other variables were consistent with prior results in mixed dyslipidemia.

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol: leveraging practice-based biobank cohorts to characterize clinical and genetic predictors of treatment outcome

Over the past decade, large multicenter trials have unequivocally demonstrated that decreasing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol can reduce both primary and secondary cardiovascular events in patients at risk. However, even in the context of maximal LDL lowering, there remains considerable residual cardiovascular risk. Some of this risk can be attributed to variability in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. As such, there is tremendous interest in defining determinants of HDL homeostasis. Risk prediction models are being constructed based upon (1) clinical contributors, (2) known molecular determinants and (3) the genetic architecture underlying HDL cholesterol levels. To date, however, no single resource has combined these factors within the context of a practice-based data set. Recently, a number of academic medical centers have begun constructing DNA biobanks linked to secure encrypted versions of their respective electronic medical record. As these biobanks combine resources, the clinical community is in a position to characterize lipid-related treatment outcome on an unprecedented scale.

Low glycemic diet for weight loss in hypertriglyceridemic patients attending a lipid clinic

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of low glycemic dietary counseling for weight loss among moderately hypertriglyceridemic patients in an academic referral lipid clinic.

METHODS

During 1998 to 2000, weight loss advice followed traditional guidelines. Beginning in 2001, hypertriglyceridemic patients were advised to greatly reduce intake of high glycemic carbohydrates. The clinic database was queried for all patients initiating consultative treatment from 1998 through 2004. Subjects were included if initial fasting triglyceride was 200 to 800 mg/dL and if at least two follow-up visits were made during a period of 365 days or more. Mean percent changes from baseline in weight and lipid/lipoproteins beyond 1 year were calculated. Macronutrient composition was determined 3- to 5-day food diaries submitted by subjects from the highest quartile of weight loss.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 56) first seen in 1998-2000 had 0.2 ± 0.7% mean weight gain beyond one year compared with 3.0 ± 0.5% weight loss for patients (n = 141) initially seen in 2001 to 2004 (P < .001 comparing groups). Weight loss correlated with triglyceride reduction (-2.6 mg/dL per kilogram body weight, r = 0.29, P < .001) and with HDL-C increase (0.22 mg/dL per kilogram body weight, r = 0.16; P = .038). Highest quartile weight losers in the low glycemic group (n = 15) reported consuming 44% carbohydrate calories, 32% fat, 22% protein, and 2% alcohol.

CONCLUSION

Hypertriglyceridemic patients who received low glycemic dietary counseling and maintained clinic attendance more than 1 year achieved mean 3.0% weight loss. This was improved compared with historical controls with traditional dietary counseling. Food diaries from successful weight losers suggested compliance with a low glycemic, moderately reduced carbohydrate diet plan.

Treatment of hyperlipidaemia with fenofibrate and related fibrates

BACKGROUND

Fenofibrate is the most widely used fibrate. Its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of hypertriglyceridaemia and combined hyperlipidaemia have been demonstrated in several clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, lipid-lowering and extra-lipid effects of fenofibrate and to preview ABT-335, an investigational new fenofibric acid molecule.

RESULTS

The effects of fenofibrate are mediated through the active metabolite fenofibric acid, and are described in detail in the paper. ABT-335 is a salt of fenofibric acid and, unlike fenofibrate, does not require first pass metabolism to the active moiety. ABT-335 is being developed for combination use with statins, and has recently completed three large Phase III randomised controlled trials in which the efficacy and safety of ABT-335 in combination with the three most commonly prescribed statins, atorvastatin, simvastatin and rosuvastatin, was evaluated in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia.

CONCLUSION

ABT-335 in combination with statins may provide a safe and efficacious treatment modality that enables achievement of several therapeutic goals in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia who have high cardiovascular risk.

Is there evidence-based hypolipidemic treatment with clinical benefit beyond statins?

Aggressive therapy with statins to lower the low density lipoprotein cholesterol decreases cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, administration of the highest approved statin dose only offers limited additional benefit at the expense of an increased incidence of side effects. Therefore, novel compounds that further reduce the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and at the same time have beneficial effects on other lipid parameters when added to statin therapy are under investigation. Nicotinic acid lowers the levels of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides while raising the concentration of the protective high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. A significant inverse association exists between long-term intake of omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular mortality; these fish oils lower serum triglycerides levels. Fibrates substantially decrease triglycerides, increase high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and modestly decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Ezetimibe selectively inhibits cholesterol absorption in the gut. Combined therapy with ezetimibe and a statin provides an incremental reduction in the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Determination of fenofibric acid concentrations by HPLC after anion exchange solid-phase extraction from human serum

Triglycerides are increasingly being recognized as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Research efforts to identify sources of variability in triglyceride-lowering response to the lipid-lowering drug fenofibrate require quantification of the active acidic form of this PPAR-alpha agonist. Anion-exchange solid-phase extraction, in combination with reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), rapidly and accurately determines steady-state fenofibric acid serum concentrations. Chromatographic separation under isocratic conditions, with use of ultraviolet detection at 285 nm, provides clean baseline and sharp peaks for clofibric acid, 1-napthyl acetic acid (internal standards), and fenofibric acid. Commonly prescribed and over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were screened for assay interference, and the assay was employed to quantify fenofibric acid in more than 800 human subject specimens. Fenofibric acid analysis was found to be linear over the range of 0.5 to 40 mg/L and was validated with either internal standard. Accuracies ranged from 98.65% to 102.4%, whereas the within- and between-day precisions ranged from 1.0% to 2.2% and 2.0% to 6.2%, respectively. NSAIDs had minimal interference with the assay, which succeeded in quantifying fenofibric acid in more than 843 of 846 serum samples from human subjects, many taking a variety of coadministered medications. Anion-exchange solid-phase extraction in combination with reverse-phase HPLC accurately determines steady-state fenofibric acid serum concentrations in humans without interference from NSAIDs or commonly administered medications. This method is suitable for quantification of fenofibric acid for clinical pharmacokinetic studies in patients with dyslipidemia.

Expert commentary: the safety of fibrates in lipid-lowering therapy

The use of fibrates in the management of lipoprotein disorders has a history dating back to the mid-1960s. This group of drugs has now been tested in several large long-term trials with cardiovascular end points. Overall, there is good evidence for the reduction of cardiovascular disease in primary prevention studies and in those of subjects with manifest disease. More recent trials have suffered from high interference due to 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) introduction, particularly in their placebo control groups. However, there is very good evidence for overall safety from a combined study of >20,000 patients in these controlled clinical trials lasting approximately 5 years. Abdominal pain has been observed more frequently in the statin vs placebo group. Myopathy, liver enzyme elevations, and cholecystitis have been potential adverse reactions of interest. However, these have occurred at a very low rate and are rarely found to be statistically more frequent in the active-treatment group compared with the subjects taking placebo. The recent Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study found a slightly higher incidence of pancreatitis, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Small creatinine and homocysteine elevations are observed in many patients taking fibrates, and the effect of this on long-term outcomes is under study. The FIELD study also described a significant reduction in the rates of progression of proteinuria and vascular retinopathy with fibrate therapy. To date, there has been no study exclusive to patients with elevated triglycerides, raising the question of the potential benefit of these drugs in patients with the lipid abnormalities most effectively treated with fibrates.

Safety considerations with fibrate therapy

Fibrates are an important class of drugs for the management of dyslipidemia. This class of drugs is generally well tolerated but is infrequently associated with several safety issues. Fibrates, most likely by an effect mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha, may reversibly increase creatinine and homocysteine but are not associated with an increased risk for renal failure in clinical trials. Fibrates are associated with a slightly increased risk (<1.0%) for myopathy, cholelithiasis, and venous thrombosis. In clinical trials, patients without elevated triglycerides and/or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels, fibrates are associated with an increase in noncardiovascular mortality. In combination with statins, gemfibrozil generally should be avoided. The preferred option is fenofibrate, which is not associated with an inhibition of statin metabolism. Clinicians are advised to measure serum creatinine before fibrate use and adjust the dose accordingly for renal impairment. Routine monitoring of creatinine is not required, but if a patient has a clinically important increase in creatinine, and other potential causes of creatinine increase have been excluded, consideration should be given to discontinuing fibrate therapy or reducing the dose.

An open-label, crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of Insoluble Drug Delivery®-MicroParticle fenofibrate in combination with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and extended-release niacin in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Fenofibrate has been prescribed concomitantly with other lipid-lowering agents as a treatment for dyslipidemia. However, combination therapy, particularly a statin-fibrate combination, may be associated with an increased risk of myopathy, although this risk appears to be less with fenofibrate than with other fibrates.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of administering a single dose of atorvastatin, simvastatin, or extended-release (ER) niacin on the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single dose of fenofibrate Insoluble Drug Delivery-MicroParticle (IDD-P).

METHODS

This was an open-label, single-center,randomized, 4-treatment, 4-period crossover study in healthy adult volunteers. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment sequences, administered 1 week apart, that included all 4 of the following treatments: 1 IDD-P fenofibrate 160-mg tablet alone; 1 IDD-P fenofibrate 160-mg tablet plus 1 atorvastatin 10-mg tablet; 1 IDD-P fenofibrate 160-mg tablet plus 1 simvastatin 10-mg tablet; and 1 IDD-P fenofibrate 160-mg tablet plus 1 ER niacin 500-mg tablet. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained immediately before and up to 72 hours after administration during each of the 4 treatment periods. If the 90% CI for the log-transformed parameter was between 0.80 and 1.25, and the 90% CI for the nontransformed parameter was between 0.80 and 1.20, then the absence of a clinically significant drug interaction was assumed. However, the absence of a drug interaction was not to be ruled out if one or more of the CIs exceeded the boundary, provided the CI included 1.00.

RESULTS

Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled. Sixteen (80%) of the subjects were male and 17 (85%) were black; mean (SD) age was 35 (9.3) years. The mean C(max), AUC from the time of administration to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t)), and AUC from the time of administration to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) were 5%, 6%, and 2% lower, respectively, with IDD-P fenofibrate plus atorvastatin than with IDD-P fenofibrate alone; the mean C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were 6% lower, and 10% and 9% higher, respectively, with IDD-P fenofibrate plus simvastatin than with IDD-P fenofibrate alone; and the mean C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were 12%, 6%, and 5% lower, respectively, with IDD-P fenofibrate plus ER niacin than with IDD-P fenofibrate alone. The 90% CIs surrounding the mean ratios for AUC(0-infinity) and AUC(0-infinity) for all 3 comparisons were between 0.80 and 1.25, suggesting the absence of a drug interaction for these parameters. For C(max), an absence of a drug interaction was observed between concomitantly administered IDD-P fenofibrate and both atorvastatin and simvastatin; absence of drug interaction was not found for IDD-P fenofibrate plus ER niacin. All treatments were well tolerated; headache was the most common adverse event (AE) (10%). One subject with creatinine kinase levels of 1300 IU/L (>6 times the upper limit of normal) at baseline experienced a seizure approximately 12 to approximately 13 hours after administration of IDD-P fenofibrate plus atorvastatin; this serious AE was deemed to be possibly related to study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant administration of a single dose of either atorvastatin or simvastatin had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of IDD-P fenofibrate. A drug interaction between concomitantly administered single doses of IDD-P fenofibrate and ER niacin could not be ruled out.

Efficacy and safety profile of fenofibrate-coated microgranules 130 mg, with and without food, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and the metabolic syndrome: An 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

The limited bioavailability of certain fenofibrate formulations necessitates administration with food, raising concerns about efficacy and compliance. There is a need for new formulations that have improved bioavailability and eliminate the requirement for administration with food.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the food-related efficacy of a new formulation of micronized fenofibrate coated on inert microgranules (FF-muG) for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia in patients exhibiting the metabolic syndrome.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, parallel-group study in patients who had fasting triglyceride (TG) concentrations > or =300 mg/dL and <1000 mg/dL and met National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria for the metabolic syndrome. A 6-week washout and diet lead-in period was followed by an 8-week treatment period. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either FF-muG 130 mg with food, FF-muG 130 mg without food, or placebo every day for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the mean percent change in TG levels from baseline to the end of treatment; changes in other lipid end points were also assessed. Safety profiles were assessed based on adverse-event reports, changes in clinical laboratory values and vital signs (including electrocardiography), and the findings of physical examinations.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six patients took part in the study: 54 received FF-muG 130 mg with food, 42 received FF-muG 130 mg without food, and 50 received placebo. The groups were similar in terms of mean age (56 years), sex (59.5%-63.0% men; 37.0%-40.5% women), race (83.3%-100% white), mean body weight (92 kg), mean height (172 cm), mean fasting baseline TG concentrations (480 mg/dL), and other components of the metabolic syndrome. The 2 FF-muG groups (with and without food) showed similar improvements in the dyslipidemia associated with the metabolic syndrome: TG levels decreased a mean of 36.7% and 36.6%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs placebo). The overall frequency of adverse events was similar in the 2 FF-muG groups and did not differ significantly from placebo (63.0%, 61.9%, and 52.0%, respectively). Gastrointestinal disturbances (eg, diarrhea, dyspepsia) occurred more frequently in the 2 FF-muG groups compared with the placebo group (31.5%, 26.2%, and 12.0%; P = NS). Significant increases from baseline in alanine aminotransferase were seen in both FF-muG groups (mean [SEM], 3.77 [2.60] and 11.69 [7.42] U/L, respectively; P < or = 0.05 vs placebo); however, these increases were considered clinically significant in only 5 cases, none of them requiring discontinuation of study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no inequivalence in the TG-lowering effects of the 2 fenofibrate regimens compared with placebo. Both regimens were well tolerated. Thus, FF-muG 130 mg administered without regard to meals appears to be efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia in patients exhibiting the metabolic syndrome.

Efficacy and safety of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol-increasing compounds: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this research was to estimate the efficacy and safety of current high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)-increasing drugs.

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic evidence has shown that HDL-C is inversely related to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. However, the evidence for reducing CHD risk by raising HDL-C is thin, predominantly due to the paucity of effective and safe HDL-increasing drugs.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials with fibrates and niacin, published between 1966 through February 2004 (MEDLINE), were retrieved. Information on treatment, baseline characteristics, serum lipids, end points, and side-effects were independently abstracted by two authors using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS

Data from 53 trials (16,802 subjects) using fibrates and 30 trials (4,749 subjects) using niacin were included. Random-effects model showed 11% versus 10% reduction in total cholesterol, 36% versus 20% reduction in triglycerides, 8% versus 14% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 10% versus 16% increase in HDL-C for fibrates and niacin, respectively. Apart from flushes in the niacin group, both fibrates and niacin were shown to be well-tolerated and safe. Fibrates reduced the risk for major coronary events by 25% (95% confidence interval 10% to 38%), whereas current available data for niacin indicate a 27% reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrates reduce major coronary events and increase HDL-C levels without significant toxicity. Niacin has a more potent effect on HDL-C levels, whereas data on cardiovascular event rate reduction are limited. Future studies need to evaluate whether additional HDL increase by fibrates or particularly newer niacin formulations on top of statin therapy translates into further event reduction in high-risk subjects, without significant toxicity.

2-Alkoxydihydrocinnamates as PPAR agonists. Activity modulation by the incorporation of phenoxy substituents

Herein we describe a series of potent and selective PPARgamma agonists with moderate PPARalpha affinity and little to no affinity for other nuclear receptors. In vivo studies in a NIDDM animal model (ZDF rat) showed that these compounds are efficacious at low doses in glucose normalization and plasma triglyceride reduction. Compound 1b (LY519818) was selected from our SAR studies to be advanced to clinical evaluation for the treatment of type II diabetes.

Rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes patients with combined hyperlipidaemia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of rosuvastatin and fenofibrate alone and in combination in type 2 diabetes associated with combined hyperlipidaemia. A total of 216 patients with total cholesterol >/=200 mg/dl (>/=5.17 mmol/l) and triglycerides >/=200 and <800 mg/dl (>/=2.26 and <9.03 mmol/l) were randomised to one of two placebo groups, rosuvastatin 5 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg for 6 weeks (fixed-dose phase). During the subsequent 18-week dose-titration phase, one placebo group received titrated rosuvastatin 10, 20 and 40 mg (placebo/rosuvastatin); one placebo group received titrated fenofibrate 67 mg once, twice and three times daily (placebo/fenofibrate); and patients receiving 5 or 10 mg rosuvastatin received titrated fenofibrate as above (rosuvastatin 5mg/fenofibrate and rosuvastatin 10 mg/fenofibrate groups). Doses were increased at 6-week intervals if low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol remained >50 mg/dl (>1.3 mmol/l). At 24 weeks, the placebo/rosuvastatin group and placebo per fenofibrate group had triglyceride reductions of 30.3% versus 33.6%, respectively (P = NS), and LDL cholesterol was reduced by 46.7% in the rosuvastatin group and increased by 0.7% in the fenofibrate group (P < 0.001). The triglyceride reduction in the rosuvastatin 10 mg/fenofibrate group (47.1%) was significantly greater than in the placebo/rosuvastatin group (P = 0.001), with no significant differences in other lipid measures found between these two groups. No significant differences in effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were observed among treatment groups. In the fixed-dose phase, rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg reduced triglycerides by 24.5 and 29.5%, respectively, and decreased LDL cholesterol by 40.7 and 45.8%, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. These results indicated that rosuvastatin produces marked reductions in triglycerides and LDL cholesterol when used alone or in combination with fenofibrate in type 2 diabetes patients with elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels and may constitute a valuable treatment option in the diabetic population.

Comparison of micronized fenofibrate and pravastatin in patients with primary hyperlipidemia

Micronized fenofibrate lowers total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to a similar extent as statins but raises high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lowers triglycerides to a greater extent. The comparative lipid-modifying efficacy of micronized fenofibrate and pravastatin has not been evaluated in dyslipidemic patients. This prospective, multicenter, randomized trial compared the efficacy of 3 months' treatment with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg once daily) or pravastatin (20 mg once daily) in hypercholesterolemic type IIa and mixed dyslipidemic type IIb patients. Two hundred sixty-five male and female patients (18-75 years) were recruited from 28 European centers, and 151 were analyzed. Micronized fenofibrate was at least as effective as pravastatin in reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol in primary dyslipidemia but was significantly more effective than pravastatin in raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (respectively, 13.2% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0084) and lowering triglycerides (-38.7% vs. -11.8%; p = 0.0001). In type IIa dyslipidemia, micronized fenofibrate was as effective as pravastatin in raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+8.6% vs. +8.0%) but was fivefold more effective in lowering triglycerides (-34.3% vs. -7.2%; p = 0.0001). In type IIb dyslipidemic patients with low baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, micronized fenofibrate was 10-fold and nearly 3-fold superior to pravastatin in raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lowering triglycerides, respectively. Micronized fenofibrate may be considered an effective first-line therapy for patients with primary hyperlipidemia, particularly those with type IIb mixed dyslipidemia or type 2 diabetes.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-hyperlipidemic agent fenofibrate

We evaluated the economic efficiency as well as the clinical effectiveness on serum lipid levels of a change in drug therapy from bezafibrate or a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor to fenofibrate. Subjects were 26 outpatients suffering from type IIb or type IV hyperlipidemia who visited our hospital between October 2000 and January 2001. Medication doses, and serum lipid levels were recorded prior to the change to fenofibrate and at 6 months after the change. Medical costs were also calculated at the same time points. A significant reduction in medical costs of 14.9% was observed following the change to fenofibrate. Serum lipid levels were not significantly different, although an increase in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol) was observed in patients changing from the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. The actual drug costs were reduced by 21.8% in the bezafibrate to fenofibrate group and by 23.7% in the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor to fenofibrate group. Although the drug costs of changing to fenofibrate decreased significantly, other costs remained almost unchanged.

Fenofibrate in the treatment of dyslipidemia: a review of the data as they relate to the new suprabioavailable tablet formulation

BACKGROUND

The fibric acid derivative fenofibrate is indicated as an adjunct to dietary modification in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia (types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia, Fredrickson classification) to reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and apolipoprotein (apo) B, and to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A. It is also indicated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia (types IV and V hyperlipidemia). Initially approved in the United States in a micronized capsule formulation, fenofibrate is now available in a new "suprabioavailable" tablet formulation that has increased bioavailability, achieving equivalent plasma concentrations at lower doses. The 67- and 200-mg micronized capsules can be considered equivalent to the 54- and 160-mg suprabioavailable tablets, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the pharmacologic properties, clinical usefulness, and safety profile of fenofibrate in the management of dyslipidemias.

METHODS

Recent studies, abstracts, reviews, and consensus statements published in the English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-January 2002), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-January 2002), and PharmaProjects (1990-January 2002) using the search terms fenofibrate, fibrates, hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and dyslipidemia.

RESULTS

Fenofibrate is well absorbed after oral administration, with peak plasma levels attained in 6 to 8 hours. The absolute bioavailability of fenofibrate cannot be determined due to its being virtually insoluble in aqueous media suitable for injection; however, after oral administration of a single dose of radiolabeled fenofibrate, approximately 60% of the dose appeared in urine, primarily as fenofibric acid and its glucuronated conjugate, and approximately 25% was excreted in the feces. The apparent volume of distribution is 0.89 L/kg in healthy volunteers, and protein binding is approximately 99% in healthy and hyperlipidemic patients. Neither fenofibrate nor fenofibric acid appears to undergo significant oxidative metabolism in vivo. Fenofibric acid has a half-life of 20 hours. Fenofibrate is effective in lowering TG levels and increasing HDL-C levels. Its LDL-C-lowering effect is greater than that of gemfibrozil. Adverse effects of fenofibrate appear to be similar to those of other fibrates, including gastrointestinal symptoms, cholelithiasis, hepatitis, myositis, and rash. Fenofibrate therapy has been associated with increases in serum aminotransferase levels, and clinical monitoring of these markers of liver function should be performed regularly.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate is effective in reducing levels of TG, TC, and LDL-C, and increasing levels of HDL-C in patients with dyslipidemias. Its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and combined hyperlipidemia have been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. Its use is accompanied by a low incidence of adverse effects and laboratory abnormalities. Fenofibrate protects against coronary heart disease not only through its effects on lipid parameters but also by producing alterations in LDL structure and, possibly, alterations in the various hemostatic parameters. Its uricosuric property may prove to be a useful adjunctive attribute.

Micronised fenofibrate: an updated review of its clinical efficacy in the management of dyslipidaemia

Micronised fenofibrate is a synthetic phenoxy-isobutyric acid derivative (fibric acid derivative) indicated for the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Recently, a new tablet formulation of micronised fenofibrate has become available with greater bioavailability than the older capsule formulation. The micronised fenofibrate 160mg tablet is bioequivalent to the 200mg capsule. The lipid-modifying profile of micronised fenofibrate 160mg (tablet) or 200mg (capsule) once daily is characterised by a decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) levels, a marked reduction in plasma triglyceride (TG) levels and an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. Micronised fenofibrate 200mg (capsule) once daily produced greater improvements in TG and, generally, in HDL-C levels than the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors simvastatin 10 or 20 mg/day, pravastatin 20 mg/day or atorvastatin 10 or 40 mg/day. Combination therapy with micronised fenofibrate 200mg (capsule) once daily plus fluvastatin 20 or 40 mg/day or atorvastatin 40 mg/day was associated with greater reductions from baseline than micronised fenofibrate alone in TC and LDL-C levels. Similar or greater changes in HDL-C and TG levels were seen in combination therapy, compared with monotherapy, recipients. Micronised fenofibrate 200mg (capsule) once daily was associated with significantly greater improvements from baseline in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG levels than placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus enrolled in the double-blind, randomised Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS) [> or =3 years follow-up]. Moreover, angiography showed micronised fenofibrate was associated with significantly less progression of coronary atherosclerosis than placebo. Micronised fenofibrate has also shown efficacy in patients with metabolic syndrome, patients with HIV infection and protease inhibitor-induced hypertriglyceridaemia and patients with dyslipidaemia secondary to heart transplantation. Micronised fenofibrate was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. The results of a large (n = 9884) 12-week study indicated that gastrointestinal disorders are the most frequent adverse events associated with micronised fenofibrate therapy. Elevations in serum transaminase and creatine phosphokinase levels have been reported rarely with micronised fenofibrate. In conclusion, micronised fenofibrate improves lipid levels in patients with primary dyslipidaemia; the drug has particular efficacy with regards to reducing TG levels and raising HDL-C levels. Micronised fenofibrate is also effective in diabetic dyslipidaemia; as well as improving lipid levels, the drug reduced progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results of large ongoing studies (e.g. FIELD with approximately 10 000 patients) will clarify whether the beneficial lipid-modifying effects of micronised fenofibrate result in a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Fenofibrate of gemfibrozil for treatment of types IIa and IIb primary hyperlipoproteinemia: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the hypolipidemic effects of gemfibrozil and micronized fenofibrate in patients with primary hyperlipoproteinemia, phenotypes IIa and IIb, with emphasis on their cholesterol-lowering effectiveness.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study was performed to assess the effects of gemfibrozil (900 mg) and micronized fenofibrate (200 mg), administered once daily, to 21 patients (45 to 70 years old)-16 with type IIa and 5 with type IIb primary hyperlipidemia. The two treatment periods lasted 6 weeks each; the run-in and washout periods were 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Both drugs significantly reduced total cholesterol, calculated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, and fibrinogen (P<0.01 for all calculations, except P<0.05 for fibrinogen with gemfibrozil therapy) and increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (P<0.01). Neither drug affected Lp(a) lipoprotein, whereas uric acid was reduced only by fenofibrate (P<0.01). The percentage decrease in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol was greater with fenofibrate than with gemfibrozil (-22% versus -15%, P<0.02; and -27% versus -16%, P<0.02, respectively). In contrast, reductions in levels of triglycerides (-54% versus -46.5%), apolipoprotein B, and fibrinogen, as well as the increase in HDL (+9% for both drugs), showed no significant difference between treatments. Separate analysis of patients with type IIb hyperlipoproteinemia showed essentially the same plasma lipid changes as for the overall group, but with greater modifications in triglyceride and HDL concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Fenofibrate and gemfibrozil induced similar variations from baseline values in triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and fibrinogen, but the decreases in total and LDL cholesterol levels were greater with fenofibrate, in this group of patients with primary hyperlipidemia.

[Studies on the risk factors for fenofibrate-induced elevation of liver function tests]

We evaluated risk factors for elevation of liver function test values after administration of fenofibrate to 45 hyperlipidemic patients. The effects of 23 factors of physical examinations, clinical laboratory test values, and the background of the patients on the elevation of liver function test values were analyzed by the logistic regression method. The increase of the values of liver function tests was found to be correlated with BMI, serum levels of triglycerides, and ALP before therapy, especially sex, serum gamma-GTP level before therapy and reduced serum triglyceride levels. These results suggest that caution must be exercised to avoid liver dysfunction in patients treated with fenofibrate.

Effects of fibrates on serum metabolic parameters

Fibric acid derivatives are a class of hypolipidaemic drugs used in the treatment of patients with hypertriglyceridaemia, mixed hyperlipidaemia and diabetic dyslipidaemia. Fibrate therapy results in a significant decrease in serum triglycerides and an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. The latest drugs of this class are also effective in lowering low-density (LDL) cholesterol levels and can change the distribution of LDL towards higher and larger particles. The effects of fibrates on lipid metabolism are mostly mediated through the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARalpha). A number of angiographic and clinical trials have confirmed that fibrates can slow the progression of atherosclerotic disease and decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recently published data suggest that the ability of fibrates to prevent atherosclerosis is not related only to their hypolipidaemic effects but also to other 'pleiotropic effects', such as their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antithrombotic effects, as well as their ability to improve endothelial function. Interestingly, fibrates may favourably influence the thrombotic/fibrinolytic system. In fact, most of these drugs can significantly decrease plasma fibrinogen levels and inhibit tissue factor expression and activity in human monocytes and macrophages. Some studies have shown that fibrates can improve carbohydrate metabolism in patients with dyslipidaemia, including diabetic patients. Among fibrates only fenofibrate can significantly decrease serum uric acid levels by increasing renal urate excretion. Fibrates, with the possible exception of gemfibrozil, can significantly increase serum creatinine and homocysteine levels. Finally, a reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyltranspeptidase (gammaGT) activity is a well-documented effect of therapy with fibrates. The fibrates are generally well-tolerated drugs with few side-effects. The most important side-effect is myositis, which is observed in patients with impaired renal function or when statins are given concomitantly.

Fenofibrate-Induced elevation in serum creatinine

Fenofibrate, a fibric acid derivative, is used as adjunctive therapy with diet for treatment of hyperlipidemia. Side effects include gastrointestinal complaints and, rarely, elevations in liver function tests. According to the drug's package insert, elevations in serum creatinine may occur; although, no postmarketing case reports of fenofibrate-induced elevations in serum creatinine are on file with the manufacturer. Fenofibrate was the probable cause of elevations in serum creatinine concentrations in six patients at our clinic. As the implications of these elevations may be serious, routine serum creatinine monitoring is recommended at baseline and 1-2 months after starting fenofibrate.

Comparative effects of cerivastatin and fenofibrate on the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype in proteinuric renal disease

Patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria have impaired clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. This results in the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype (mild hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoproteins [HDL], and excess small, dense low-density lipoproteins [LDLIII]). Excess remnant lipoproteins (RLP) are linked to hypertriglyceridemia and may contribute to the atherogenicity of nephrotic dyslipidemia. A randomized crossover study compared the effects of a statin (cerivastatin) and a fibrate (fenofibrate) on LDLIII and RLP in 12 patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria. Cerivastatin reduced cholesterol (21%, P: < 0.01), triglyceride (14%, P: < 0.05), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C; 23%, P: < 0.01), total LDL (18%, P: < 0.01), and LDLIII concentration (27% P: < 0.01). %LDLIII, RLP-C, and RLP triglyceride (RLP-TG) were unchanged. Plasma LDLIII reduction with cerivastatin treatment correlated with LDL-C reduction (r(2) = 34%, P: < 0.05). Fenofibrate lowered cholesterol (19%), triglyceride (41%), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (52%), LDLIII concentration (49%), RLP-C (35%), and RLP-TG (44%; all P: < 0.01). Fenofibrate also reduced %LDLIII from 60 to 33% (P: < 0.01). HDL-C (19%, P: < 0.01) increased with fenofibrate treatment; LDL-C and total LDL were unchanged. The reduction in LDLIII concentration and RLP-C with fenofibrate treatment correlated with plasma triglyceride reduction (LDLIII r(2) = 67%, P: < 0.001; RLP cholesterol r(2) = 58%, P: < 0.005). Serum creatinine increased with fenofibrate treatment (14%, P: < 0.01); however, creatinine clearance was unchanged. LDLIII concentration was 187 +/- 85 mg/dl after cerivastatin treatment and 133 +/- 95 mg/dl after fenofibrate treatment. Cerivastatin and fenofibrate reduce LDLIII concentration in nephrotic-range proteinuria. However, atherogenic concentrations of LDLIII remain prevalent after either treatment. Fenofibrate but not cerivastatin reduces remnant lipoproteins. The two treatments seem to reduce LDLIII by different mechanisms, suggesting a potential role for combination therapy to optimize lowering of LDLIII and RLP.

Raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with niacin and fibrates: a comparative review

A growing number of trials that used fibrates and niacin alone or in combination with other lipid-altering agents have shown that both these drugs are effective for reducing total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides, and for increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels. These lipid changes are associated with a reduction in events such as fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and transient ischemic attack. In angiographic trials, they are associated with disease regression, increased minimal luminal diameter, and protection from risk of new lesions. In a head-to-head comparison study, niacin 2,000 mg/day increased HDL-C more than gemfibrozil 1,200 mg/day, and decreased the total cholesterol-to-HDL-C ratio, lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]), and fibrinogen levels significantly more. Combination therapies of niacin plus a resin or statin are effective, well tolerated, and safe.

Current perspectives on the management of hypertriglyceridemia

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have demonstrated that triglycerides are an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease. Atherothrombosis may be mediated by uptake and incorporation of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by macrophages and through an association with small, dense LDL and HDL particles. There are considerable data that lowering LDL cholesterol reduces cardiovascular events. However, the importance of triglyceride lowering remains elusive.

METHODS

A summary of major arteriographic and clinical end point trials is reviewed. Studies evaluating various strategies, including dietary and hygienic measures as well as pharmacologic therapies, are discussed.

RESULTS

Dietary reduction of saturated fat, coupled with aerobic activity, reduces triglyceride levels approximately 20% to 24%. Omega-3 fatty acids may also reduce triglyceride levels appreciably. Effective pharmacologic therapies that lower triglyceride levels include nicotinic acid (20% to 40%), fibrates (20% to 55%), and statins (10% to 30%). Nevertheless, an independent benefit of triglyceride lowering on coronary event rate has not been demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

There are little data that triglyceride reduction improves cardiovascular event rate. In contrast, lowering LDL cholesterol and, more recently, raising HDL cholesterol are proven therapies in coronary heart disease prevention. As such, these modalities remain the top priority in the management of dyslipidemia with triglyceride reduction as an adjunctive consideration.

The effect of fenofibrate treatment on endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by oxidative modified low density lipoprotein from hyperlipidemic patients

The objective of the research project was to investigate whether fenofibrate treatment may alter the biochemical content of the oxidized LDL and consequently its ability to impair the endothelium-dependent relaxation in hyperlipidemic patients. We hypothesized that fenofibrate treatment of hyperlipidemic patients may attenuate the ability of their oxidized LDL to impair the endothelium-dependent relaxation of the blood vessels as a consequence of fenofibrate-induced changes to the content and composition of lysoPC in the LDL molecule. Hyperlipidemic patients (Type IIb and Type IV) were recruited from the Lipid Clinic, HSC, Winnipeg, Canada, for this study. A blood sample was taken immediately after the recruitment, a second sample was taken after 6 weeks of dietary treatment, and a third sample was taken after 8 weeks of fenofibrate treatment. LDL was isolated from the plasma and oxidized by copper sulfate. Fenofibrate was shown to be highly effect in the reduction of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides in these patients. Fenofibrate treatment also caused the attenuation of impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxation by the oxidized LDL from these patients. A slight reduction of lysophosphatidylcholine level was also found in the oxidized LDL of the fenofibrate treated patients, relative to LDL isolated after dietary treatment. In addition there were no changes in the fatty acid levels of the lysophosphatidylcholine isolated from LDL. Taken together, our results suggest that while the reduced lysophosphatidylcholine levels may contribute to the attenuated impairment of the endothelium-dependent relaxation of the aortic ring, other unidentified factors impacted by fenofibrate are likely to contribute to the attenuated effects.

Micronized fenofibrate: a new fibric acid hypolipidemic agent

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in the management of hyperlipidemias.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1974-October 1998), Current Contents search, additional references from article bibliographies, and the package insert from the manufacturer were used to identify data for evaluation. Studies evaluating fenofibrate (peer-reviewed publications, package insert data) were considered for inclusion. Abstracts and data on file with the manufacturer were not considered for inclusion.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language literature was reviewed to evaluate the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, and tolerability of fenofibrate. Data from animals and in vitro systems were included only when necessary to explain the drug's pharmacology.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Micronized fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 1998 for the treatment of types IV and V hyperlipidemia. Data from the peer-reviewed literature also support the use of fenofibrate in types IIa, IIb, and III hyperlipidemias. Micronized fenofibrate 67-201 mg/d is useful as monotherapy or as an adjunct to other hypolipidemics and dietary therapy. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, regular formulation fenofibrate 300-400 mg/d lowered serum triglyceride (TG) concentrations by 24-55%, total cholesterol by 9-25%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations by 6-35%, and raised high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations by 8-38%. Few comparative data exist regarding fenofibrate versus clofibrate and gemfibrozil. In noncomparative and comparative clinical trials, fenofibrate appeared to be well tolerated. The most common causally related adverse events were digestive, musculoskeletal, and dermatologic in nature. Concurrent use of fenofibrate and a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A inhibitor may increase the risk of myopathy and/or rhabdomyolysis, although recent data suggest that concurrent use of fenofibrate with low-dose simvastatin or pravastatin is safe. Fenofibrate may enhance the effect of oral anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate reduces serum TG, total cholesterol, and LDL-C, and raises HDL-C to clinically relevant degrees. Its spectrum of activity appears to exceed that recommended for types IV and V hyperlipidemia to encompass types IIa, IIb, and III hyperlipidemias as well. To this extent, it may be considered a broader-spectrum fibrate than is indicated by its FDA approval. Adverse effects of fenofibrate appear to be similar to those of other fibrates and require routine monitoring (clinical, liver function). Long-term safety data are readily available from drug registries in many countries where the product has been available for nearly two decades. Cost-effectiveness studies comparing fenofibrate with other hypolipidemics demonstrate benefits of fenofibrate over simvastatin in types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia. The need for dosage titration of the micronized preparation from 67 mg/d upward to a final dose of 200 mg/d is also not supported by peer-reviewed literature (except in the case of renal impairment). Although preliminary data on plaque regression are encouraging, published clinical studies evaluating the impact of fenofibrate on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are awaited. Micronized fenofibrate is worthy of formulary inclusion.

Fenofibrate modifies transaminase gene expression via a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha-dependent pathway

Fibrates modify the expression of genes implicated in lipoprotein and fatty acid metabolism via the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha(PPARalpha), leading to reductions in serum triglycerides and cholesterol. The expression of certain genes regulated by PPARalpha have been shown to be modified in a species dependent manner. Aspartate aminotransferase (AspAT or GOT) and alanine aminotransferase (AlaAT or GPT) are enzymes involved in intermediate metabolism in all cells and in hepatic gluconeogenesis. These enzymes are also widely used as serum markers of possible tissue damage. This study investigated whether fenofibrate could modify the expression of liver AspAT and/or AlaAT and thus possibly alter transaminase levels independently of a cytotoxic effect. In human Hep G2 cells, fenofibrate increased cytosolic AspAT (cAspAT) activity by 40% and AlaAT activity by 100%, as well as both mRNAs. Nuclear run on assays showed that this effect was, at least in part, transcriptional. Increases in mRNA were also observed in human hepatocyte cultures at concentrations of the drug attained in patients. In C57BL/6 mice, fenofibrate decreased cAspAT and cAlaAT mRNA, while these effects were abolished in PPARalpha knock-out mice. In conclusion, fenofibrate has been shown to modify cAspAT and AlaAT gene expression in a species and PPARalpha dependent manner. This is the first demonstration that cAspAT and AlaAT activities may be pharmacologically altered, independently of a toxic phenomenon.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate and lovastatin in patients with primary type IIa or IIb hyperlipidaemia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate and lovastatin in patients with type IIa or IIb hyperlipidaemia.

METHODS

One hundred patients entered this single-centre, open, comparative trial. After 2 months of diet therapy, 33 patients (16 with type IIa and 17 with type IIb hyperlipidaemia) were randomized to treatment for 3 months with a single daily 300 mg dose of fenofibrate or 20 mg of lovastatin.

RESULTS

After 3 months of drug therapy, fenofibrate and lovastatin produced significant reductions in levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in type IIa hyperlipidaemia. In type IIb, the levels of total cholesterol were significantly decreased by both drugs, but only lovastatin significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in these patients. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly increased by lovastatin in type IIa and fenofibrate in type IIb. Fenofibrate decreased total triglyceride levels in both types of hyperlipidaemia significantly more effectively than lovastatin. The most important and commonly observed adverse effects in the fenofibrate group were dermatological events (three patients), myalgia (two patients) and asymptomatic increase in aminotransferase values (nine patients), while in the lovastatin group cardiovascular events (five patients) were the most common. All five patients had coronary heart disease at baseline. In general terms, both drugs were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison between fenofibrate and lovastatin after 3 months of drug therapy in both types IIa and IIb hyperlipidaemia demonstrated that both drugs produced similar reductions in levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, fenofibrate decreased total triglyceride levels in both types of hyperlipidaemia, more effectively than lovastatin. Thus, fenofibrate is suitable for both primary hypercholesterolaemia and combined hyperlipidaemia.

Micronised fenofibrate: a review of its pharmacodynamic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of dyslipidaemia

Micronised fenofibrate is a new formulation of the fibric acid derivative fenofibrate. It is indicated for the treatment of patients with type IIa, IIb, III or IV dyslipidaemia who have failed to respond to dietary control or other nonpharmacological interventions. Micronised fenofibrate has improved absorption characteristics compared with the standard preparation, allowing a lower daily dosage and once-daily administration. The lipid-modifying profile of micronised fenofibrate is characterised by a decrease in low density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels, a marked reduction in elevated plasma triglyceride levels and an increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Consistent with the standard formulation, which is administered as 300mg daily in divided doses, the micronised preparation has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of type IIa, IIb and IV primary dyslipidaemias but at a lower daily dosage of 200mg once daily. Because of its significant triglyceride-lowering effect, micronised fenofibrate appears to be of greatest benefit in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia (with or without hypercholesterolaemia), including patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. In the comparisons available, micronised fenofibrate 200mg once daily was of similar efficacy to or less effective than the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors simvastatin 20mg daily and pravastatin 20mg daily at reducing LDL and total cholesterol levels. However micronised fenofibrate produced greater improvements in triglyceride and, generally, HDL cholesterol levels than both simvastatin and pravastatin. Data on the long term tolerability of micronised fenofibrate are limited. However, data from a large short term (3-month) study have indicated that gastrointestinal disorders are the most frequent adverse events associated with therapy. Elevations in serum transaminase and creatine phosphokinase levels have been reported rarely with micronised fenofibrate. In conclusion, available data suggest that the more convenient lower once-daily dosage of micronisedfeno fibrate retains the beneficial lipid-modifying effects of the standard formulation. Further studies are required to determine whether the lipid changes achieved with micronised fenofibrate result in a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Diffuse plane xanthomatosis associated with a monoclonal band displaying anti-smooth muscle antibody activity

We report a patient with diffuse planar xanthomatous lesions associated with a benign monoclonal gammopathy. This patient has a very high titre of anti-smooth muscle antibody (1:10,240), but normal liver function tests and a normal liver biopsy. The paraprotein band displays anti-smooth muscle antibody activity. There is no evidence of any other underlying disease process. The findings are consistent with a diagnosis of diffuse plane xanthomatosis, but the mechanism of xanthoma formation remains unclear.

The effects of fibrates on lipoprotein and hemostatic coronary risk factors

The effects of fibrates on lipoprotein profiles and lipoprotein physiology, as well as on selected coagulation and fibrinolytic factors are reviewed. It is concluded that the action of fibrates on these systems is such as to render the fibrates beneficial in atherosclerosis prevention.

Efficacy and tolerance of 200 mg micronised fenofibrate administered over a 6-month period in hyperlipidaemic patients: an open Belgian multicenter study

The authors report the results of a large open multicenter study using 200 mg micronised fenofibrate once a day. Among 1545 selected patients who underwent a 3-month period with nutritional advice, 1334 were included in a 6-month drug study. Inclusion criteria were total serum cholesterol equal to or above 250 mg/dl and/or serum triglycerides equal to or above 200 mg/dl. At 6 months, average changes from inclusion levels were -20.5, -26.1. -7.5 and +15.2% for total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dl on inclusion, plasma fibrinogen and HDL-cholesterol, respectively. Median decrease of serum triglycerides was 46.5%. Trial discontinuation for clinical and biological adverse events were 5 and 1%, respectively. In conclusion, micronised fenofibrate at a daily dose of 200 mg had significant lipid-modifying properties but also exhibited a beneficial effect on other related risk factors such as fibrinogen reduction. The safety profile was very satisfactory providing an excellent benefit/risk ratio.

Drug interactions with fibric acids

Fibric acid derivatives may interact with other drugs and the interactions can be of clinical relevance. The pharmacological properties and effects of these drugs which pertain to their potential for drug interactions, are: (a) a very high binding affinity to plasma proteins, especially albumin; (b) the changes produced in vitamin K kinetics; (c) endoplasmic reticulum hyperplasia; (d) induction of cytochrome P450; (e) changes in xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes; (f) their capability to have a direct effect on carbohydrate metabolism and/or regulation; and (g) potential pharmacokinetic interactions with antidiabetic drugs. Other types of interactions may affect the safety and/or the therapeutic efficacy of fibrates. These interactions are not necessarily risky, but may be important in the long term. Other clinically relevant interactions with less commonly used drugs have been described. Fibrates will continue to be used because they have proved to be safe and effective in correcting many types of dyslipidemia by reducing serum levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides and by increasing high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Furthermore, they have been proven to decrease morbidity and morality from coronary heart disease. Therefore, awareness of their potential drug interactions is most relevant to their safe clinical therapeutic use.

Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in hyperlipidaemic long-term survivors of heart transplantation. Lack of interaction with the lipid-lowering agent, fenofibrate

Cyclosporine (Cy) binds to lipoproteins in plasma. In order to test if its pharmacokinetics would be modified when efficient lipid-lowering treatment is introduced, a study has been done of Cy pharmacokinetics and any interaction with the lipid-lowering agent fenofibrate in hyperlipidaemic long-term, survivors of heart transplantation. Fenofibrate 200 mg once daily significantly reduced blood lipids (cholesterol 6.5 vs 7.7 mmol/l; apoprotein B 1.2 vs 1.6 g/l) but did not modify mean whole blood Cy trough levels (113 before fenofibrate vs 103 ng.ml-1), Cmax (812 ng.ml-1 by RIA and 757 ng.ml-1 by HPLC before fenofibrate versus 865 and 741 respectively, during fenofibrate); tmax (1.6 and 1.7 h before fenofibrate versus 1.4 and 1.4 h respectively), and t1/2 (13.9 and 11.1 h versus 9.5 and 10.7 h). The only adverse effect was an increase in creatinine (157 vs 145 mmol/l). Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanism of Cy-fenofibrate nephrotoxicity and to evaluate the long-term efficiency and safety of fenofibrate after heart transplantation.

Fenofibrate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in dyslipidaemia

Fenofibrate is a lipid-regulating drug which is structurally related to other fibric acid derivatives, such as clofibrate. At the recommended dosage of 200 to 400 mg daily, it produces substantial reductions in plasma triglyceride levels in hypertriglyceridaemic patients and in plasma total cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolaemic patients. High density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels are generally increased in patients with low pretreatment values. Fenofibrate appears to be equally effective in diabetic patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia without adversely affecting glycaemic control. The influence of fenofibrate on the plasma lipid profile is sustained during long term (2 to 7 years) treatment. Comparative studies conducted to date have involved only small groups of patients--in overall terms fenofibrate was at least as effective as other fibrates, but larger comparative studies are needed before valid conclusions on its relative efficacy compared with nonfibrate lipid-lowering drugs can be drawn. The influence of fenofibrate on morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease has not been studied. Clinical adverse reactions to fenofibrate have mainly consisted of gastrointestinal disturbances, headache and muscle cramps. Transient elevations in transaminase and creatine phosphokinase levels commonly occur. Isolated cases of hepatitis with substantially elevated transaminase levels have been reported. Fenofibrate induces hepatomegaly, peroxisome proliferation and hepatic carcinomas in rodents, but this type of hepatotoxicity has not been observed in humans. The biliary lithogenic index is increased by fenofibrate, but this has not been shown to have increased the incidence of gallstones in treated patients. Thus, fenofibrate offers an effective and well tolerated alternative to clofibrate or other fibric acid derivatives, but its relative efficacy and tolerability compared with other types of lipid-lowering drugs, and its effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, remain to be clarified.