Effects of losartan on blood pressure, plasma renin activity, and angiotensin II in volunteers

A Pilot Study of Renin-Guided Angiotensin-II Infusion to Reduce Kidney Stress After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Vasoplegia is common after cardiac surgery, is associated with hyperreninemia, and can lead to acute kidney stress. We aimed to conduct a pilot study to test the hypothesis that, in vasoplegic cardiac surgery patients, angiotensin-II (AT-II) may not increase kidney stress (measured by [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7]).

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with vasoplegia (cardiac index [CI] > 2.1l/min, postoperative hypotension requiring vasopressors) and Δ-renin (4-hour postoperative-preoperative value) ≥3.7 µU/mL, to AT-II or placebo targeting a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mm Hg for 12 hours. The primary end point was the incidence of kidney stress defined as the difference between baseline and 12 hours [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] levels. Secondary end points included serious adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

We randomized 64 patients. With 1 being excluded, 31 patients received AT-II, and 32 received placebo. No significant difference was observed between AT-II and placebo groups for kidney stress (Δ-[TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] 0.06 [ng/mL] 2 /1000 [Q1-Q3, -0.24 to 0.28] vs -0.08 [ng/mL] 2 /1000 [Q1-Q3, -0.35 to 0.14]; P = .19; Hodges-Lehmann estimation of the location shift of 0.12 [ng/mL] 2 /1000 [95% confidence interval, CI, -0.1 to 0.36]). AT-II patients received less fluid during treatment than placebo patients (2946 vs 3341 mL, P = .03), and required lower doses of norepinephrine equivalent (0.19 mg vs 4.18mg, P < .001). SAEs were reported in 38.7% of patients in the AT-II group and in 46.9% of patients in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

The infusion of AT-II for 12 hours appears feasible and did not lead to an increase in kidney stress in a high-risk cohort of cardiac surgery patients. These findings support the cautious continued investigation of AT-II as a vasopressor in hyperreninemic cardiac surgery patients.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system dynamics after targeted blood pressure control using angiotensin II or norepinephrine in cardiac surgery: mechanistic randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis in vasoplegia after cardiac surgery remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that, compared with norepinephrine, infusion of angiotensin II titrated to achieve similar mean arterial pressure (MAP) would suppress plasma renin concentration (PRC) while maintaining aldosterone levels.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, subjects received either an infusion of angiotensin II or norepinephrine to maintain MAP 70-80 mm Hg from induction of anaesthesia. We compared PRC, aldosterone, dipeptidyl peptidase-3, and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity between treatment groups, before surgery, on ICU admission, and 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

In 60 patients (11.7% female; mean age 68 yr [11 yr]), norepinephrine increased median PRC at ICU admission (median difference [MD] 46 [inter-quartile range, IQR, 3-88] μU ml-1; P<0.001) but angiotensin II did not (MD -3 [IQR -62 to 35] μU ml-1; P=0.36). Aldosterone levels increased with both. The aldosterone:PRC ratio did not change with norepinephrine (MD -0.01 [IQR -0.14 to 0.03] μU ml-1 per ng dl-1, P=0.76) but increased with angiotensin II (MD 0.05 [IQR 0.004-0.26] μU ml-1 per ng dl-1, P<0.001). The upper quartile of PRC before surgery was associated with higher vasopressor requirements when norepinephrine was used to maintain MAP, but not angiotensin II. Dipeptidyl peptidase-3 levels and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activities were similar at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin II suppressed renin release while maintaining aldosterone levels compared with norepinephrine. Higher plasma renin concentration before surgery was associated with greater vasopressor requirement for norepinephrine, but not angiotensin II.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry-ACTRN12621000195853 23/02/2021.

Quantitation of plasma angiotensin II in healthy Chinese subjects by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method

INTRODUCTION

Quantitation of plasma angiotensin (Ang) II, the active mediator of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), is challenging due to its low physiological concentration. We report a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) method to overcome this challenge.

METHOD

Ang II was extracted from EDTA plasma by an offline solid-phase extraction procedure with Waters MAX μElution plate. LCMS quantitation was performed on the Waters TQS system, monitoring the 3+ ions of the peptide. The analytical performance of the LCMS method was validated. The stability of Ang II was studied with or without the presence of a protease inhibitor. Local reference intervals were established from 143 healthy normotensive subjects (57% female, 21-60 years old).

RESULTS

The Ang II LCMS method had a measurable range of 3.3 - 700 pmol/L. Between batch precision coefficient of variation was <7% over the Ang II concentrations of 8.6 - 110 pmol/L. No significant matrix interference and carryover was observed. There was no significant difference in Ang II concentration in EDTA blood and plasma for at least 2 hours and 1 hour at room temperature, respectively. Ang II was stable for at least one year when stored at -80 ^o C, with or without the protease inhibitor. Age-dependent Ang II reference intervals were established: 4.4-17.7 pmol/L (21-30 years) and 3.9-12.8 pmol/L (31-60 years).

CONCLUSION

The present LCMS method is suitable for quantitation of Ang II to study the RAS system. Ang II collected at room temperature into EDTA bottles was stable at -80 ^o C for at least 1 year. The first age-dependent reference intervals of plasma Ang II were established for a healthy normotensive Chinese population.

Kinetic Changes of Plasma Renin Concentrations Predict Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiac Surgery Patients

Rationale: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is a major pathway in regulating blood pressure, glomerular filtration, and fluid homeostasis. During inflammatory diseases, generation of angiotensin II might be disturbed, leading to increased renin concentrations. Cardiac surgery and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass both induce inflammatory response and cardiovascular instability, which can contribute to acute kidney injury (AKI).Objectives: To investigate whether renin concentrations are associated with hypotension and AKI.Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational study among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Measurements and Main Results: The primary endpoint was the occurrence of AKI within 72 hours after cardiac surgery. A total of 197 patients were available for the primary analysis. The median renin serum concentration was 40.2 μU/ml (quartile 1 [Q1]-Q3, 9.3-144.4) at baseline and 51.3 μU/ml (Q1-Q3, 19.1-167.0) 4 hours after cardiac surgery, whereas the difference between postoperation and preoperation concentrations (Δ-renin) was 3.7 μU/ml (Q1-Q3, -22.7 to 50.9). Patients with an elevated Δ-renin developed an AKI significantly more often (43% vs. 12.2%; P < 0.001). High Δ-renin after cardiac surgery was associated with a significantly lower mean arterial pressure, longer time on vasopressors, and longer length of ICU and hospital stay. The area under the curve (AUC) of Δ-renin for the prediction of AKI (AUC, 0.817; 95% confidence interval, 0.747-0.887) was significantly greater compared with the AUC of the postoperative renin concentrations (AUC, 0.702; 95% CI, 0.610-0.793; P = 0.007).Conclusions: Elevated renin concentrations were associated with cardiovascular instability and increased AKI after cardiac surgery. Elevated renin concentrations could be used to identify high-risk patients for cardiovascular instability and AKI who would benefit from timely intervention that could improve their outcomes.

Renin and Survival in Patients Given Angiotensin II for Catecholamine-Resistant Vasodilatory Shock. A Clinical Trial

Rationale: Exogenous angiotensin II increases mean arterial pressure in patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock (CRVS). We hypothesized that renin concentrations may identify patients most likely to benefit from such therapy.

Objectives: To test the kinetic changes in renin concentrations and their prognostic value in patients with CRVS.

Methods: We analyzed serum samples from patients enrolled in the ATHOS-3 (Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock) trial for renin, angiotensin I, and angiotensin II concentrations before the start of administration of angiotensin II or placebo and after 3 hours.

Measurements and Main Results: Baseline serum renin concentration (normal range, 2.13–58.78 pg/ml) was above the upper limits of normal in 194 of 255 (76%) study patients with a median renin concentration of 172.7 pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 60.7 to 440.6 pg/ml), approximately threefold higher than the upper limit of normal. Renin concentrations correlated positively with angiotensin I/II ratios (r = 0.39; P < 0.001). At 3 hours after initiation of angiotensin II therapy, there was a 54.3% reduction (IQR, 37.9% to 66.5% reduction) in renin concentration compared with a 14.1% reduction (IQR, 37.6% reduction to 5.1% increase) with placebo (P < 0.0001). In patients with renin concentrations above the study population median, angiotensin II significantly reduced 28-day mortality to 28 of 55 (50.9%) patients compared with 51 of 73 patients (69.9%) treated with placebo (unstratified hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 0.88; P = 0.012) (P = 0.048 for the interaction).

Conclusions: The serum renin concentration is markedly elevated in CRVS and may identify patients for whom treatment with angiotensin II has a beneficial effect on clinical outcomes.

Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 02338843).

Low-dose angiotensin AT1 receptor β-arrestin-biased ligand, TRV027, protects against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Recruitment of β-arrestin to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), initially described to cause receptor desensitization, has recently been shown to take active roles in cell signaling. We investigated the effects of TRV027, an angiotensin AT₁ receptor β-arrestin-biased ligand, as well as losartan and valsartan on cisplatin-induced kidney injury.

METHOD

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with angiotensin receptor ligands (1 or 10 mg/kg/day) with or without cisplatin, and kidney variables were monitored using animal SPECT, histopathology, and serum parameters.

RESULTS

TRV027, losartan, and valsartan did not alter renal dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) uptake, histopathological manifestations of kidney injury, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine or Na⁺ and K⁺ levels, per se. However, when rats co-treated with cisplatin and either of the AT₁ receptor blockers at higher doses, we observed aggravation of cisplatin-induced reduction of radiotracer uptake but improvement of cisplatin-induced hypokalemia, and insignificant effect on histological findings. Furthermore, we noted an additional increase in cisplatin-induced augmentation of BUN and creatinine levels in cisplatin plus valsartan group. TRV027 (1 mg/kg/day) inhibited cisplatin adverse effects on radiotracer uptake, kidney histology, BUN, and creatinine as well as electrolyte levels, but it failed to produce protective effects at higher dose (10 mg/kg/day).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose TRV027 may offer potential benefits in kidney injury due to cisplatin.

Angiotensin II-Type I Receptor Antagonism Does Not Influence the Chemoreceptor Reflex or Hypoxia-Induced Central Sleep Apnea in Men

Components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) situated within the carotid body or central nervous system may promote hypoxia-induced chemoreceptor reflex sensitization or central sleep apnea (CSA). We determined if losartan, an angiotensin-II type-I receptor (AT₁R) antagonist, would attenuate chemoreceptor reflex sensitivity before or after 8 h of nocturnal hypoxia, and consequently CSA severity. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover protocol, 14 men (age: 25 ± 2 years; BMI: 24.6 ± 1.1 kg/m²; means ± SEM) ingested 3 doses of either losartan (50 mg) or placebo every 8 h. Chemoreceptor reflex sensitivity was assessed during hypoxic and hyperoxic hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR) tests and during six-20s hypoxic apneas before and after 8 h of sleep in normobaric hypoxia (F_IO₂ = 0.135). Loop gain was assessed from a ventilatory control model fitted to the ventilatory pattern of CSA recorded during polysomnography. Prior to nocturnal hypoxia, losartan had no effect on either the hyperoxic (losartan: 3.6 ± 1.1, placebo: 4.0 ± 0.6 l/min/mmHg; P = 0.9) or hypoxic HCVR (losartan: 5.3 ± 1.4, placebo: 5.7 ± 0.68 l/min/mmHg; P = 1.0). Likewise, losartan did not influence either the hyperoxic (losartan: 4.2 ± 1.3, placebo: 3.8 ± 1.1 l/min/mmHg; P = 0.5) or hypoxic HCVR (losartan: 6.6 ± 1.8, placebo: 6.3 ± 1.5 l/min/mmHg; P = 0.9) after nocturnal hypoxia. Cardiorespiratory responses to apnea and participants’ apnea hypopnea indexes during placebo and losartan were similar (73 ± 15 vs. 75 ± 14 events/h; P = 0.9). Loop gain, which correlated with CSA severity (r = 0.94, P < 0.001), was similar between treatments. In summary, in young healthy men, hypoxia-induced CSA severity is strongly associated with loop gain, but the AT₁R does not modulate chemoreceptor reflex sensitivity before or after 8 h of nocturnal hypoxia.

Losartan and Vitamin D Inhibit Colonic Tumor Development in a Conditional Apc-Deleted Mouse Model of Sporadic Colon Cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is upregulated in colorectal cancer, and epidemiologic studies suggest RAS inhibitors reduce cancer risk. Because vitamin D (VD) receptor negatively regulates renin, we examined anticancer efficacy of VD and losartan (L), an angiotensin receptor blocker. Control Apc^+/LoxP mice and tumor-forming Apc^+/LoxP Cdx2P-Cre mice were randomized to unsupplemented Western diet (UN), or diets supplemented with VD, L, or VD+L, the latter to assess additive or synergistic effects. At 6 months, mice were killed. Plasma Ca²⁺, 25(OH)D3, 1α, 25(OH)2D3, renin, and angiotensin II (Ang II) were quantified. Colonic transcripts were assessed by qPCR and proteins by immunostaining and blotting. Cancer incidence and tumor burden were significantly lower in Cre+ VD and Cre+ L, but not in the Cre+ VD+L group. In Apc^+/LoxP mice, VD increased plasma 1,25(OH)2D3 and colonic VDR. In Apc^+/LoxP-Cdx2P-Cre mice, plasma renin and Ang II, and colonic tumor AT1, AT2, and Cyp27B1 were increased and VDR downregulated. L increased, whereas VD decreased plasma renin and Ang II in Cre+ mice. VD or L inhibited tumor development, while exerting differential effects on plasma VD metabolites and RAS components. We speculate that AT1 is critical for tumor development, whereas RAS suppression plays a key role in VD chemoprevention. When combined with L, VD no longer increases active VD and colonic VDR in Cre- mice nor suppresses renin and Ang II in Cre+ mice, likely contributing to lack of chemopreventive efficacy of the combination.

H3K9 histone methyltransferase G9a ameliorates dilated cardiomyopathy via the downregulation of cell adhesion molecules

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is one of the leading causes of mortality; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms of DCM remain to be elucidated. H3K9 histone methyltransferase G9a has been previously characterized, although its functions in DCM are not yet understood. Cell adhesion molecules (CAM) are highly expressed in diseased human hearts and were thought to contribute to chronic degeneration in cardiac incompetence; however, it has been suggested that G9a may suppress the effects of CAM. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether G9a decreased the risk of DCM via regulation of CAM expression. A rat model of DCM was induced using furazolidone (FZ) treatment and numerous parameters were examined. G9a RNA interference (RNAi) was applied to primary neonatal cardiomyocytes (PNCs). Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analyses were used to examine the expression levels of G9a in the DCM model and PNCs. The growth rate of PNCs was evaluated following G9a RNAi and FZ treatment. The results confirmed that the expression levels of G9a were significantly decreased in the DCM model compared with those in the control group (P<0.01). Conversely, CAM expression levels were significantly increased in the DCM model compared with those in the control group (P<0.01). In PNCs, the expression of CAM was upregulated following G9a silencing using RNAi. Following three‑day culture, the growth rate of PNCs was inhibited by 70 and 35% following FZ treatment and G9a RNAi, respectively. In conclusion, G9a ameliorated DCM via downregulation of CAMs, therefore indicating its potential for use in the treatment of DCM.

A model-based approach to investigating the pathophysiological mechanisms of hypertension and response to antihypertensive therapies: extending the Guyton model

Reproducibly differential responses to different classes of antihypertensive agents are observed among hypertensive patients and may be due to interindividual differences in hypertension pathology. Computational models provide a tool for investigating the impact of underlying disease mechanisms on the response to antihypertensive therapies with different mechanisms of action. We present the development, calibration, validation, and application of an extension of the Guyton/Karaaslan model of blood pressure regulation. The model incorporates a detailed submodel of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), allowing therapies that target different parts of this pathway to be distinguished. Literature data on RAAS biomarker and blood pressure responses to different classes of therapies were used to refine the physiological actions of ANG II and aldosterone on renin secretion, renal vascular resistance, and sodium reabsorption. The calibrated model was able to accurately reproduce the RAAS biomarker and blood pressure responses to combinations of dual-RAAS agents, as well as RAAS therapies in combination with diuretics or calcium channel blockers. The final model was used to explore the impact of underlying mechanisms of hypertension on the blood pressure response to different classes of antihypertensive agents. Simulations indicate that the underlying etiology of hypertension can impact the magnitude of response to a given class of therapy, making a patient more sensitive to one class and less sensitive others. Given that hypertension is usually the result of multiple mechanisms, rather than a single factor, these findings yield insight into why combination therapy is often required to adequately control blood pressure.

Antihypertensive effect of formononetin through regulating the expressions of eNOS, 5-HT2A/1B receptors and α1-adrenoceptors in spontaneously rat arteries

One of the main pathological changes of hypertension is the dysfunction of blood vessels. We have found in our previous study that formononetin, one kind of phytoestrogens, has an acute antihypertensive effect. Therefore, we hypothesized that formononetin might produce a chronic antihypertensive effect through regulating the expressions of contractile receptors and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in artery. The present study was conducted to verify this effect. Male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) were divided into two groups, orally administrated formononetin (50mg/kg per day) and Tween 80 vehicle, respectively, for 8 weeks. The blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff method. Isometric tension of arterial rings was recorded by a myograph system. The mRNA and protein expression in arteries was determined with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Results showed that the systolic blood pressure of SHRs decreased significantly in formononetin group compared to Tween 80 group. The vasoconstriction induced by phenylephrine or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the mesenteric artery segments in formononetin group was decreased, and the relaxation induced by acetylcholine was increased compared with that in Tween 80 group. In the mesenteric arteries of the formononetin-treated SHRs, the expressions of α(1)-adrenoceptors and 5-HT(2A/1B) receptors at both mRNA and protein levels decreased, while the mRNA and protein expressions of eNOS increased. In conclusion, formononetin has a chronic antihypertensive effect in SHRs. The antihypertensive mechanism may be associated with the down-regulation of α(1)-adrenoceptors and 5-HT(2A/1B) receptors, and the up-regulation of eNOS expression in arteries.

TRV120027, a novel β-arrestin biased ligand at the angiotensin II type I receptor, unloads the heart and maintains renal function when added to furosemide in experimental heart failure

BACKGROUND

TRV120027 is a novel β-arrestin biased ligand of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor; it antagonizes canonical G-protein-mediated coupling while, in contrast to classical angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists, it engages β-arrestin-mediated signaling. Consequently, TRV120027 inhibits angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction while, via β-arrestin coupling, it increases cardiomyocyte contractility. We hypothesized that TRV120027 would elicit beneficial cardiorenal actions when added to furosemide in experimental heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two groups of anesthetized dogs (n=6 each) with tachypacing-induced heart failure were studied. After a baseline clearance, 1 group (F+V) received furosemide (1 mg/kg per hour) plus saline for 90 minutes, whereas the other (F+T) received the same dose of furosemide plus TRV120027 (0.3 and 1.5 µg/kg per minute for 45 minutes each); 2 clearances were done during drug infusion. After a washout, a postinfusion clearance was done; *P<0.05 between groups. F+V and F+T increased diuresis and natriuresis to a similar extent during drug administration, but urine flow* and urinary sodium excretion* were higher in the postinfusion clearance with F+T. Glomerular filtration rate was preserved in both groups. Renal blood flow increased with F+T but this was not significant versus F+V. Compared with F+V, F+T decreased mean arterial pressure*, systemic* and pulmonary* vascular resistances, and atrial natriuretic peptide*. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure* decreased to a larger extent with F+T than with F+V.

CONCLUSIONS

When added to furosemide, TRV120027, a novel β-arrestin biased angiotensin II type 1 receptor ligand, preserved furosemide-mediated natriuresis and diuresis, while reducing cardiac preload and afterload. These results provide support for TRV120027 as a promising novel therapeutic for the treatment of heart failure.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of losartan

INTRODUCTION

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system is one of the major therapeutic strategies in the management of patients with essential hypertension, congestive heart failure and diabetic as well as non-diabetic renal diseases. As the first angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) on the market, losartan belongs to the most frequently prescribed ARB.

AREA COVERED

The present review examines the pharmacokinetics of losartan with a special discussion on the dose of losartan that should be used in clinical practice to obtain the maximal benefits of the drug. Readers are provided with arguments suggesting that the dose of 50 mg losartan is probably too low and that losartan should preferably be prescribed at the dose of 100 mg/day or higher.

EXPERT OPINION

Losartan is an effective antagonist of angiotensin II AT(1) receptors which has been shown to provide important clinical benefits in patients with hypertension, congestive heart failure and renal diseases. Losartan should be prescribed at the dose of 100 mg/day and the use of higher doses should be reconsidered in future studies to improve its clinical efficacy.

Effects of losartan on angiotensin receptors in the hypertrophic rat heart

The effects of losartan on angiotensin receptors in hypertrophic rat hearts were studied. The study was prompted by inconsistent findings of either an increase or decrease in the mRNA of the AT1 receptor in the hearts of cardiac hypertrophic rats treated with losartan, and a paucity of information on the effects of losartan on functional angiotensin receptors in the heart. Losartan, administered i.p. to aortic coarcted rats, dose-dependently attenuated the cardiac hypertrophy. Significant effect was observed with a dose of 2.72 micromol/kg/day for four days. Hypertrophy was accompanied by an increase in [125I]-Sar1-Ile8-angiotensin II binding sites (due mainly to an increase in AT2 binding) and AT2 receptor protein in cardiac ventricles of aortic coarcted rats. Treatment with effective anti-hypertrophic doses of losartan dose-dependently downregulated the [125I]-Sar1-Ile8-angiotensin II binding sites, constitutive AT1 receptor protein, and the over expressed AT2 receptor protein. It was suggested that the anti-cardiac hypertrophic action of losartan resulted from its ability to suppress the expression of both the basal and enhanced cardiac angiotensin receptors. This raises the question as to whether such drastic action could form the therapeutic basis for the use of losartan in cardiac pathologies.

The effect of AST-120 on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of losartan and losartan acid (E-3174) in healthy subjects

AST-120 is an orally administered adsorbent used to slow the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This was a randomized, open-label, 5-way crossover study to assess the effect of AST-120 on the pharmacokinetics of losartan and its active metabolite (E-3174) in healthy subjects. Losartan (100 mg) was administered alone under fasting (A) and fed (B) conditions, and results were compared when AST-120 (3 g thrice daily for 2 days) was administered 60 minutes after (C), 30 minutes prior to (D), and 30 minutes after (E) losartan. Plasma concentrations of losartan and E-3174 were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry detection. Under fed conditions, treatment C had no significant effect on the AUC(0-t) and Cmax of losartan and E-3174. Treatments D and E resulted in a marked decrease in Cmax of losartan and E-3174. Therefore, administration of AST-120 60 minutes after losartan under fed conditions may be preferred over other dosing regimens for CKD patients.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of losartan

Losartan is the first orally available angiotensin-receptor antagonist without agonist properties. Following oral administration, losartan is rapidly absorbed, reaching maximum concentrations 1-2 hours post-administration. After oral administration approximately 14% of a losartan dose is converted to the pharmacologically active E 3174 metabolite. E 3174 is 10- to 40-fold more potent than its parent compound and its estimated terminal half-life ranges from 6 to 9 hours. The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E 3174 are linear, dose-proportional and do not substantially change with repetitive administration. The recommended dosage of losartan 50 mg/day can be administered without regard to food. There are no clinically significant effects of age, sex or race on the pharmacokinetics of losartan, and no dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with mild hepatic impairment or various degrees of renal insufficiency. Losartan, or its E 3174 metabolite, is not removed during haemodialysis. The major metabolic pathway for losartan is by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, 2C9 and 2C10 isoenzymes. Overall, losartan has a favorable drug-drug interaction profile, as evidenced by the lack of clinically relevant interactions between this drug and a range of inhibitors and stimulators of the CYP450 system. Losartan does not have a drug-drug interaction with hydrochlorothiazide, warfarin or digoxin. Losartan should be avoided in pregnancy, as is the case with all other angiotensin-receptor antagonists. When given in the second and third trimester of pregnancy, losartan is often associated with serious fetal toxicity. Losartan is a competitive antagonist that causes a parallel rightward shift of the concentration-contractile response curve to angiotensin-II, while E 3174 is a noncompetitive "insurmountable" antagonist of angiotensin-II. The maximum recommended daily dose of losartan is 100mg, which can be given as a once-daily dose or by splitting the same total daily dose into two doses. Losartan reduces blood pressure comparably to other angiotensin-receptor antagonists. Losartan has been extensively studied relative to end-organ protection, with studies having been conducted in diabetic nephropathy, heart failure, post-myocardial infarction and hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. The results of these studies have been sufficiently positive to support a more widespread use of angiotensin-receptor antagonists in the setting of various end-organ diseases. Losartan, like other angiotensin-receptor antagonists, is devoid of significant adverse effects.

Angiotensin II-Receptor Antagonist Losartan Does not Prevent Nitroglycerin Tolerance in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

The study evaluated the effect of Losartan in preventing nitrate tolerance during continuous transdermal nitroglycerin (TD-GTN) therapy in patients with coronary disease. Fifteen subjects with chronic stable ischemia evaluated by exercise test, were randomized to 28 days of TD-GTN 20 mg once a day without free interval plus Losartan 100 mg or Losartan-placebo with a double blind crossover design. Myocardial ischemic parameters during stress test were evaluated after each test period and results of Losartan therapy were compared to those with placebo. Time to onset 1 mm ST-depression was significantly higher after acute TD-GTN 20 mg with respect to placebo run-in, sustained TD-GTN 20 mg plus Losartan 100 mg or Losartan-placebo (p < 0.001). ST-depression at peak exercise and time to recovery of ST segment were markedly lower after acute TD-GTN 20 mg compared to placebo run-in (p < 0.05), sustained TD-GTN 20 mg plus Losartan 100 mg (p < 0.001) or Losartan-placebo (p < 0.05). At 1 mm-ST depression and at peak exercise, systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product significantly decreased after sustained TD-GTN 20 mg plus Losartan 100 mg (p < 0.001, p < 0.05 respectively) with respect to placebo run-in, acute and sustained TD-GTN 20 mg plus Losartan-placebo. Moreover at peak exercise, these data were also observed after acute TD-GTN 20 mg compared to placebo run-in and sustained TD-GTN 20 mg plus Losartan-placebo (p < 0.001). The AT(1) antagonist Losartan administration does not prevent the development of nitrate tolerance during continuous TD-GTN therapy.

Cardiac modulations of ANG II receptor expression in rats with hypoxic pulmonary hypertension

Right ventricular myocardial hypertrophy during hypoxic pulmonary hypertension is associated with local renin-angiotensin system activation. The expression of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) and type 2 (AT(2)) receptors in this setting has never been investigated. We have therefore examined the chronic hypoxia pattern of AT(1) and AT(2) expression in the right and left cardiac ventricles, using in situ binding and RT-PCR assays. Hypoxia produced right, but not left, ventricular hypertrophy after 7, 14, and 21 days, respectively. Hypoxia for 2 days was associated in each ventricle with a simultaneous and transient increase (P < 0.05) in AT(1) binding and AT(1) mRNA levels in the absence of any significant change in AT(2) expression level. Only after 14 days of hypoxia, AT(2) binding increased (P < 0.05) in the two ventricles, concomitantly with a right ventricular decrease (P < 0.05) in AT(2) mRNA. Along these data, AT(1) and AT(2) binding remained unchanged in both the left and hypertrophied right ventricles from rats treated with monocrotaline for 30 days. These results indicate that chronic hypoxia induces modulations of AT(1) and AT(2) receptors in both cardiac ventricles probably through direct and indirect mechanisms, respectively, which modulations may participate in myogenic (at the level of smooth or striated myocytes) rather than in the growth response of the heart to hypoxia.

A low-sodium diet potentiates the effects of losartan in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic subjects have a high prevalence of hypertension, increased total body exchangeable sodium levels, and an impaired ability to excrete a sodium load. This study assessed the effect of dietary sodium restriction on the efficacy of losartan in hypertensive subjects with type 2 diabetes and albumin excretion rates of 10-200 microg/min.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this study, 20 subjects were randomized to losartan 50 mg/day (n = 10) or placebo (n = 10). Drug therapy was given in two 4-week phases separated by a washout period. In the last 2 weeks of each phase, patients were assigned to low- or regular-sodium diets, in random order. In each phase, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), and renal hemodynamics were measured.

RESULTS

Achieved urinary sodium on a low-sodium diet was 85 +/- 14 and 80 +/- 22 mmol/day in the losartan and placebo groups, respectively. In the losartan group, the additional blood pressure-lowering effects of a low-sodium diet compared with a regular-sodium diet for 24-h systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures were 9.7 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-17.2; P = 0.002), 5.5 mmHg (2.6-8.4; P = 0.002), and 7.3 mmHg (3.3- 11.3; P = 0.003), respectively. In the losartan group, the ACR decreased significantly on a low-sodium diet versus on a regular-sodium diet (-29% [CI -50.0 to -8.5%] vs. + 14% [-19.4 to 47.9%], respectively; P = 0.02). There was a strong correlation between fall in blood pressure and percent reduction in the ACR (r = 0.7, P = 0.02). In the placebo group, there were no significant changes in blood pressure or ACR between regular- and low-sodium diets. There were no significant changes in renal hemodynamics in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrated that a low-sodium diet potentiates the antihypertensive and antiproteinuric effects of losartan in type 2 diabetes. The blood pressure reduction resulting from the addition of a low-sodium diet to losartan was of similar magnitude to that predicted from the addition of a second antihypertensive agent.

Long-term effects of olmesartan, an Ang II receptor antagonist, on blood pressure and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive patients

The object of this study is to evaluate the long-term effects of olmesartan on hypertension and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in hypertensive patients. This study evaluated 26 hypertensive male and female outpatients, 38-69 years of age, with a systolic blood pressure > or = 160 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 mmHg. Oral doses of 5 to 40 mg olmesartan were administered once daily. Blood pressure and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone parameters (plasma renin activity and plasma angiotensin I, II, and aldosterone concentrations) were evaluated at 12-16 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after the start of olmesartan administration. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly decreased following the administration of olmesartan. The observed decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures after 1 year of treatment were 28.8+/-2.1 mmHg and 15.8+/-1.3 mmHg, respectively. No change was observed in the pulse rate. The plasma renin activity increased significantly from a baseline premedication mean of 1.26+/-0.31 ng/ml/h to a mean of 2.58+/-0.74 ng/ml/h and 2.87+/-0.72 ng/ml/h after 6 months and 1 year of treatment, respectively. Angiotensin II levels decreased significantly from a baseline of 20.4+/-3.2 pg/ml to a mean of 8.6+/-2.1 pg/ml and 6.8+/-1.8 pg/ml after 6 months and 1 year of treatment, respectively. The plasma aldosterone level also decreased significantly after 6 months of treatment. In hypertensive patients, the long-term administration of olmesartan, a novel AT1 receptor antagonist, decreased both blood pressure and plasma angiotensin II levels.

Dose-dependent blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor with losartan in normal volunteers

Losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonist, was developed as a more specific alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. At a daily dose of 50 mg, losartan is currently evaluated in large outcome trials involving patients with hypertension and postmyocardial infarction. The current study evaluated the level and duration of blockade of a pressor response to angiotensin II by 50 and 150 mg of losartan, compared with 32 mg of candesartan. Eight normotensive volunteers were randomly assigned to a single dose of losartan 50 or 150 mg, candesartan 32 mg, or placebo. Subjects were re-randomized after a 2-week washout period to complete all four study arms. Radial artery systolic pressure response to exogenous angiotensin II was measured at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after administration of drug. Losartan 50 mg reduced the pressure response to exogenous angiotensin II significantly only at 6 h. In contrast, candesartan and losartan 150 mg produced a greater reduction in the pressure response to angiotensin II throughout the 24-h period. This suppression was not paralleled by a reduction in resting systemic arterial pressure. Higher doses than 50 mg of losartan might be evaluated to elicit optimal clinical effects.

Pharmacotherapy in congestive heart failure: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in congestive heart failure: do they differ in their renal effects in man?

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are used in the management of a wide range of cardiovascular conditions, including congestive heart failure (CHF). Although the experimental evidence in support of their use in CHF is incontrovertible, their pattern of usage has failed to keep pace with the research findings. One factor that has fueled the hesitancy to use ACE inhibitors in CHF has been the concern that renal function might worsen upon their receipt. Although the glomerular filtration rate may decline when ACE inhibitor or angiotension receptor blocker therapy is started in CHF, in most cases it is not a reason to discontinue therapy other than temporarily. Although ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may differ theoretically in their renal effects, published information to date has not shown such a difference. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.

Left ventricular hypertrophy with exercise and ACE gene insertion/deletion polymorphism: a randomized controlled trial with losartan

BACKGROUND

Local cardiac renin-angiotensin systems may regulate left ventricular (LV) hypertrophic responses. The absence (deletion [D]) of a 287-bp marker in the ACE gene is associated with greater myocardial ACE levels and exercise-related LV growth than is its presence (insertion [I]), an effect potentially mediated through either increased activity of the cellular growth factor angiotensin II on the angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor or increased degradation of growth-inhibiting kinins. We sought to confirm ACE genotype-associated exertional LV growth and to clarify the role of the AT(1) receptor in this association.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred forty-one British Army recruits homozygous for the ACE gene (79 DD and 62 II) were randomized to receive losartan (25 mg/d, a subhypotensive dose inhibiting tissue AT(1) receptors) or placebo throughout a 10-week physical training program. LV mass, determined by cardiac magnetic resonance, increased with training (8.4 g, P:<0.0001 overall; 12.1 versus 4.8 g for DD versus II genotype in the placebo limb, P:=0.022). LV growth was similar in the losartan arm: 11.0 versus 3.7 g for DD versus II genotypes (P:=0.034). When indexed to lean body mass, LV growth in the II subjects was abolished, whereas it remained in the DD subjects (-0.022 versus 0.131 g/kg, respectively; P:=0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

ACE genotype dependence of exercise-induced LV hypertrophy is confirmed. Additionally, LV growth in DD (unlike II) subjects is in excess of the increase in lean body mass. These effects are not influenced by AT(1) receptor antagonism with the use of losartan (25 mg/d). The 2.4-fold greater LV growth in DD men may be due to the effects of angiotensin II on other receptors (eg, angiotensin type 4) or lower degradation of growth-inhibitory kinins.

Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II receptor blockers in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension

The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the pathogenesis of hypertensive disease has long been recognized, and the interruption of this cascade with angiotensin-converting enzyme-I has been beneficial in the management of hypertension. Recently, a new class of drugs, the angiotensin receptor blockers, emerged, enlarging the antihypertensive armamentarium. Since elderly patients are more prone to adverse drug reactions, in this paper we review several trials, most of which were of short duration, on the efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockers in the geriatric population with mild to moderate hypertension. These studies established that the drugs are well-tolerated, safe, and in most instances as efficacious as other classes of antihypertensive medications. Combination therapy with angiotensin receptor blockers and hydrochlorothiazide was additive, without any significant effect on the safety profile.

ACE inhibition or angiotensin receptor blockade: impact on potassium in renal failure. VAL-K Study Group

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system is known to raise serum potassium [K(+)] levels in patients with renal insufficiency or diabetes. No study has evaluated the comparative effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor versus an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) on the changes in serum [K(+)] in people with renal insufficiency.

METHODS

The study was a multicenter, randomized, double crossover design, with each period lasting one month. A total of 35 people (21 males and 14 females, 19 African Americans and 16 Caucasian) participated, with the mean age being 56 +/- 2 years. Mean baseline serum [K(+)] was 4.4 +/- 0.1 mEq/L. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 65 +/- 5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and blood pressure was 150 +/- 2/88 +/- 1 mm Hg. The main outcome measure was the difference from baseline in the level of serum [K+], plasma aldosterone, and GFR following the initial and crossover periods.

RESULTS

For the total group, serum [K(+)] changes were not significantly different between the lisinopril or valsartan treatments. The subgroup with GFR values of < or = 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) who received lisinopril demonstrated significant increases in serum [K(+)] of 0.28 mEq/L above the mean baseline of 4.6 mEq/L (P = 0.04). This increase in serum [K(+)] was also accompanied by a decrease in plasma aldosterone (P = 0.003). Relative to the total group, the change in serum [K(+)] from baseline to post-treatment in the lisinopril group was higher among those with GFR values of < or = 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The lower GFR group taking valsartan, however, demonstrated a smaller rise in serum [K(+)], 0.12 mEq/L above baseline (P = 0.1), a 43% lower value when compared with the change in those who received lisinopril. This blunted rise in [K(+)] in people taking valsartan was not associated with a significant decrease in plasma aldosterone (P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of renal insufficiency, the ARB valsartan did not raise serum [K(+)] to the same degree as the ACE inhibitor lisinopril. This differential effect on serum [K(+)] is related to a relatively smaller reduction in plasma aldosterone by the ARB and is not related to changes in GFR. This study provides evidence that increases in serum [K(+)] are less likely with ARB therapy compared with ACE inhibitor therapy in people with renal insufficiency.

The involvement of AT(2)-receptor in the antithrombotic effect of losartan in renal hypertensive rats

In previous studies, we have shown that losartan possesses nitric oxide-dependent antithrombotic properties in various models of hypertension in rats. It was demonstrated that stimulation of AT2-receptors plays an important role in the pharmacological effects of AT1-receptor antagonists. Thus, in this study, we examine the participation of AT2-receptors in the antithrombotic action of losartan in renal hypertensive rats on venous thrombosis induced by a two-hour ligation of the vena cava. Losartan administration(30 mg/kg, p.o.) resulted in a marked decrease in thrombus weight (by 85%, p<0.001). PD123319, an AT2-receptor antagonist (10 mg/kg, i.v.), administered concomitantly with losartan, abolished its antithrombotic effect, whilst it had no influence on thrombus weight when given alone. A significant decrease in systolic blood pressure was observed in animals given losartan. PD123319 administration didnot abolish this action of losartan and did not alter blood pressure when given alone. No changes in prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, or euglobulin clot lysis time were observed in animals administered losartan and/or PD123319.Similarly, primary haemostatics evaluated by bleeding time and platelet count did not change in any group of rats. In conclusion, we have shown that AT2-receptor stimulation is involved in the antithrombotic action of losartan in renal hypertensive rats.

Pharmacokinetics and blood pressure response of losartan in end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

Losartan is a selective angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist currently employed in the management of essential hypertension. This compound is in common use in populations with renal failure and end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan in patients with ESRD in order to establish administration guidelines.

METHODS

Patients were administered losartan 100 mg/day for 7 days, and after the seventh and final dose pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for both losartan and its active metabolite E-3174. During the study, the haemodialytic clearances of losartan and E-3174 were measured during a standard 4-hour dialysis session. Neurohumoral and biochemical changes were assessed during losartan administration.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 in haemodialysis patients did not alter to a clinically significant level. Losartan administration was accompanied by a decline in plasma aldosterone level as well as by an increase in plasma renin activity. Losartan administration resulted in a decline in plasma uric acid level, despite the fact that the study participants had no residual renal function. Losartan and E-3174 were not dialysable.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174 are minimally altered in ESRD; thus, dosage adjustment is not required in the presence of advanced dialysis-dependent renal failure. In addition, postdialysis supplementation is not required for losartan because of the negligible dialysability of losartan and E-3174.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan and its active metabolite, E-3174, were studied in 8 stable, hypertensive continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. Following a 1-week washout period, subjects received 100 mg of losartan orally for 7 days. On Days 1 and 7, hemodynamic and hormonal responses were determined, as were PK parameters on Day 7. Peritoneal equilibration testing was performed pre-Day 1 and on Day 7. AUC0-24 and t1/2 for losartan and E-3174 were 95 +/- 49.9 micrograms.min/mL and 176 +/- 82.1 micrograms.min/mL and 172.5 +/- 86.7 minutes and 628 +/- 575 minutes, respectively. These values are similar to those of normal subjects and subjects on hemodialysis. Peritoneal clearance of losartan and E-3174 was negligible. All subjects demonstrated a substantial reduction in blood pressure with at least a 10 mmHg drop in diastolic BP. Plasma renin activity (PRA) values increased, but aldosterone, endothelin, norepinephrine, and epinephrine values did not change following 7 days of losartan. Losartan was well tolerated in all study subjects.

Inhibition of arterial thrombogenesis by quinapril but not losartan

The cardioprotective effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin type I (AT1) receptor blockers may relate to their antithrombotic effect. We determined the differential effects of the ACE inhibitor quinapril and the AT1 receptor blocker losartan on arterial thrombus formation in the rat. Sprague-Dawley rats were fed regular chow or chow mixed with low-dose quinapril (0. 6 mg/kg/day), high-dose quinapril (1.2 mg/kg/day), or losartan (10 mg/kg/day) for 15 days. Abdominal aorta was exposed and wrapped with Whatman paper impregnated with 29% FeCl(3) (ferric chloride). Time to occlusive thrombus formation and weight of the thrombus were recorded. Aortic superoxide anion generation, platelet aggregation, plasma angiotensin II levels, and morphology of the thrombus were also examined. Both losartan and quinapril caused similar reductions in arterial pressure. Losartan did not affect the time to thrombus formation, whereas quinapril (both low and high doses) delayed the time to thrombus formation (P<.01 vs control). Weight of the thrombus was similar in all groups of rats. Platelet aggregation was inhibited by approximately 50 in both quinapril- and losartan-treated rats. The high-dose quinapril-treated rats showed markedly reduced vascular superoxide anion generation compared with the control rats (P<.05). Plasma angiotensin II levels were unaffected by quinapril treatment but were elevated 7-fold in losartan-treated rats (P <.001 vs. control rats). The thrombi in the control rats consisted of platelet aggregates, fibrin, and red blood cells. The intravascular platelet aggregates were much smaller in the quinapril-treated rats (P<.05 vs. control), but were similar in control and losartan-treated rats. In conclusion, quinapril but not losartan prolongs time to arterial thrombus formation and results in smaller platelet aggregates in the thrombus. Both quinapril and losartan decrease platelet aggregation, but only quinapril decreases superoxide anion generation. This effect on superoxide anion generation as well as mechanisms other than AT1 receptor blockade may underlie the salutary effect of quinapril on arterial thrombogenesis.

Losartan: a review of its use, with special focus on elderly patients

Losartan is an orally active, nonpeptide, selective angiotensin subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist. It provides a more specific and complete blockade of the actions of angiotensin II than renin or ACE inhibitors. Short term (up to 12 weeks' duration) clinical trials have shown losartan to be as effective at lowering blood pressure (BP) [causes a decrease in BP < or = 26/20 mm Hg] in elderly patients with hypertension as recommended dosages of captopril, atenolol, enalapril, felodipine and nifedipine. In patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) the efficacy of losartan was similar to that of atenolol. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide to losartan therapy provides greater antihypertensive efficacy, equivalent to that seen with captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide. Preliminary evidence also indicates that losartan therapy contributes to the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy associated with chronic hypertension. Exercise capacity is increased by losartan in patients with either asymptomatic or symptomatic heart failure. Results from the Losartan Heart Failure Survival or ELITE II (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly II) study indicate that there was no statistically significant difference between losartan and captopril in reducing overall deaths or in reducing sudden cardiac death and/or resuscitated cardiac arrest in patients with heart failure. Other than ELITE II, little conclusive long term mortality and morbidity data exist for losartan. Additional long term trials to evaluate the survival benefits of losartan in elderly patients with hypertension, renal disease or after an acute myocardial infarction are currently in progress. In elderly patients with hypertension, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events associated with once daily losartan (alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide) [19 to 27%] was similar to felodipine (23%) and nifedipine (21%), however, losartan tended to be better tolerated than captopril (11 vs 16%). Losartan was also better tolerated than atenolol in patients with ISH (10.4 vs 23%). In patients with heart failure the renal tolerability of losartan was similar to that of captopril, but losartan was associated with a lower withdrawal rate because of adverse events. No dosage adjustment is required in elderly or in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, and the risk of first-dose hypotension is low.

CONCLUSIONS

comparative data have shown losartan to be as effective as other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of elderly patients with hypertension. Treatment with losartan is therefore an option for first-line therapy in all patients with hypertension, particularly those who are not well managed with or who are intolerant of their current therapy. Morbidity and mortality data from the Losartan Heart Failure Survival (ELITE II) study show that losartan has potential in the treatment of heart failure.

The angiotensin II-receptor antagonist losartan does not prevent hemodynamic or vascular tolerance to nitroglycerin

Tolerance may involve increased production of angiotensin II. We tested the hypothesis that losartan would prevent the development of tolerance to continuous transdermal nitroglycerin (GTN). Twenty volunteers received losartan, 75 mg/day, or placebo in a randomized, double-blind, parallel fashion. After 1 week, continuous transdermal GTN, 0.6 mg/h, was given, in addition to losartan or placebo, to all volunteers for 1 week. Standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate were measured, and forearm venous volume responses to sublingual GTN were evaluated. Measurements were made at baseline, after 1 week of losartan versus placebo, 3 h after initial therapy with transdermal GTN, and after 1 week of continuous transdermal GTN given in combination with losartan versus placebo. After sustained GTN therapy, SBP was unchanged from baseline in both groups, indicating that losartan did not prevent the development of tolerance. Tolerance also developed to the forearm venous volume responses and was not prevented by losartan. Therapy with an angiotensin II-receptor antagonist does not prevent the development of tolerance to continuous transdermal GTN.

The effects of fenoldopam, a selective dopamine receptor agonist, on systemic and renal hemodynamics in normotensive subjects

OBJECTIVE

Acute renal failure, frequently a consequence of renal vasoconstriction and subsequent renal ischemia, is a common problem for which no proven preventive or therapeutic agents exist. Fenoldopam is a new, selective, dopamine-1 receptor agonist that causes both systemic and renal arteriolar vasodilation. In hypertensive patients, fenoldopam rapidly decreases blood pressure, increases renal blood flow, and maintains or improves the glomerular filtration rate. We sought to determine a dose of fenoldopam that increases renal blood flow without inducing hypotension in normotensive patients and to explore the role of volume status (sodium replete vs. deplete) in these effects.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.

SETTING

Clinical research unit.

PATIENTS

Fourteen normal male volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

Renal plasma flow (para-aminohippurate clearance) and glomerular filtration rate (inulin clearance) were measured during three fixed, escalating doses of fenoldopam (0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 Lg/kg/min) on both a high-sodium and a low-sodium diet.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Fenoldopam significantly increased renal plasma flow in a dose-dependent manner compared with placebo: 670 + 148 vs. 576 + 85 mUmin at 0.03 iLg/kg/min; 777 + 172 vs. 579 + 80 mUmin at 0.1 tig/kg/min; and 784 + 170 vs. 592 + 165 mUmin at 0.3 ilg/kg/min (p < .05 fenoldopam vs. placebo at all three doses). Glomerular filtration rate was maintained. At the lowest dose (i.e., 0.03 ILg/kg/min), significant renal blood flow increases occurred without changes in systemic blood pressure or heart rate. At 0.1 and 0.3 Lgl/kg/ min, systolic blood pressure did not change, but diastolic blood pressure was slightly lower in the fenoldopam group than in the placebo group: 62.5 + 6.4 vs. 63.6 + 2.6 mm Hg, respectively, at 0.3 tg/kg/min (p < .05). None of the effects of fenoldopam were altered by volume status.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenoldopam increased renal blood flow in a dose-dependent manner compared with placebo, and, at the lowest dose, significantly increased renal blood flow occurred without changes in systemic blood pressure or heart rate. These findings will be useful in designing future studies exploring the role of fenoldopam in preventing or treating renal failure in patients who are not hypertensive.

Comparative effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism on plasma fibrinolytic balance in humans

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition significantly decreases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) without altering tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) during activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in humans. Because ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists differ in their effects on angiotensin II formation and bradykinin degradation, the present study compared the effect of equivalent hypotensive doses of an ACE inhibitor and AT(1) antagonist on fibrinolytic balance. Plasma PAI-1 antigen, tPA antigen, plasma renin activity, and aldosterone were measured in 25 normotensive subjects (19 white, 6 black; 14 men, 11 women; mean age 38.5+/-1.8 years; mean body mass index 25.3+/-0.7 kg/m(2)) during low salt intake alone (10 mmol Na/d), low salt intake + quinapril (40 mg PO bid), and low salt intake + losartan (50 mg PO bid). Compared with low salt alone (systolic blood pressure [BP] 118.8+/-2.2 mm Hg), both quinapril (106.3+/-2.5 mm Hg, P<0.001) and losartan (105.4+/-2. 8 mm Hg, P<0.001) reduced BP. No statistical difference was found between quinapril and losartan in their BP lowering effect. Losartan (P=0.009), but not quinapril, lowered heart rate. Both drugs significantly lowered aldosterone (P<0.001 versus low salt alone for each); however, this effect was significantly greater for quinapril than for losartan (P<0.001 for quinapril versus losartan). Treatment with quinapril, but not with losartan, was associated with a decrease in both PAI-1 antigen (P=0.03) and activity (P=0.018). PAI-1 activity was lower during treatment with quinapril than with losartan (P=0.015). The average PAI-1 antigen concentration was 13. 0+/-2.0 ng/mL during low salt alone, 10.5+/-1.6 ng/mL during quinapril treatment, and 12.3+/-2.1 ng/mL during losartan treatment. In contrast, plasma tPA antigen concentrations were reduced during treatment with losartan (P=0.03) but not with quinapril. This study provides the first evidence that ACE inhibitors and AT(1) antagonists differ in their effects on fibrinolytic balance under conditions of activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Further studies are needed to address the mechanism for the contrasting effects of these 2 classes of drugs on fibrinolysis and to define the clinical significance of these differences.

Does the addition of losartan improve the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with anterior myocardial infarction? A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To verify the efficacy of the combination of captopril (75 mg day) and losartan (25 mg/day) in early postinfarction phases of reperfused anterior acute myocardial infarction.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

99 patients, hospitalised for suspected anterior acute myocardial infarction within four hours from the onset of symptoms, were randomised into two groups: group A included 50 patients who received captopril 75 mg/day and placebo; group B included 49 patients who received captopril 75 mg/day within three days of admission plus losartan 12.5 mg, as a first dose, and 25 mg/day successively. An additional 23 patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction received losartan 25 mg alone and acted as controls (group C) to check the effects of losartan on plasma angiotensin II (AII) concentrations. Noradrenaline (norepinephrine) (NA) and AII plasma concentrations were measured on the third and 10th day after admission in 93 patients (35 from group A, 35 from group B, and 23 from group C). 90 days after admission patients underwent echocardiography to determine end systolic volume (ESV) and ejection fraction (EF).

RESULTS

Patients in groups A and B were similar with regard to age, sex, creatine kinase peak, EF, ESV, and risk factors. Group B (captopril plus losartan) patients showed a significant reduction in mean (SD) systolic blood pressure within the group (basal 128 (10) mm Hg; 10 days after admission 105 (9) mm Hg, p < 0.001), and in comparison with group A (captopril) patients (basal 127 (11) mm Hg; 10 days after admission 116 (10) mm Hg, p < 0. 001). Diastolic blood pressure was also lower in group B patients versus group A (66 (11) v 77 (11) mm Hg). Group C (losartan) patients also showed a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (131 (13) mm Hg down to 121 (12) mm Hg, p < 0.001). Neither NA nor AII plasma concentrations in groups A and B differed significantly in basal samples (NA 673 (138) v 675 (141) pg/ml; AII 12.77 (4.79) v 12.65 (4.71) pg/ml) or 10 days after admission (NA 283 (93) v 277 (98) pg/ml; AII 5.31 (2.25) v 6.09 (3.31) pg/ml). However, patients in group C had higher plasma concentrations of AII (14.79 (5.7) pg/ml on the third day and 7.98 (4.92) pg/ml on the 10th day) than patients in either group A or B (p = 0.006). After 90 days following treatment, group B (captopril plus losartan) patients had a smaller ESV than patients in group A (captopril) and group C (losartan).

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that the combination of captopril plus losartan is feasible in the early treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients, and it appears that this combination has more effect on ESV than captopril alone in the short term.

Additive antiproteinuric effect of converting enzyme inhibitor and losartan in normotensive patients with IgA nephropathy

We tested the hypothesis that the combination of converting enzyme inhibitor (CEI) with losartan (LOS) produces a more profound antiproteinuric effect than either drug alone in normotensive patients with immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy. Eight normotensive (mean blood pressure, 88.9 +/- 2.1 mm Hg) patients with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy, nonnephrotic proteinuria (protein, 1 to 3 g/d), and normal or slightly reduced creatinine clearance (range, 69 to 119 mL/min) were studied. Clinical evaluations and laboratory tests were performed (1) before CEI treatment (basal) and after (2) CEI alone (CEI, 12 weeks); (3) the combination of CEI and LOS, the latter at a dosage of 50 mg/d (CEI + LOS, 4 weeks); (4) LOS alone (LOS; 50 mg/d; 12 weeks); (5) the combination of LOS and CEI (LOS + CEI, 4 weeks, at the same dosage as CEI + LOS); and (6) a doubled dose of either CEI alone or LOS alone for 4 weeks. CEI and LOS as monotherapy significantly reduced proteinuria by 38% and 30%, respectively. No further reduction of proteinuria was achieved by doubling the dose of CEI or LOS. Both combinations induced a more remarkable reduction of proteinuria (73%; P < 0.05 v other periods) than either drug administered alone. The antiproteinuric effect of CEI or LOS and the more remarkable effect achieved with both combinations was not dependent on the reduction of blood pressure and/or creatinine clearance. In conclusion, this study provides first-time evidence that the combination of CEI and LOS in normotensive patients with IgA nephropathy produces a more profound decrease in proteinuria than either drug. This additive antiproteinuric effect is not dependent on changes in systemic blood pressure and creatinine clearance. Nevertheless, a larger controlled study is required to confirm this novel observation.

Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Irbesartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension

BACKGROUND: The pharmacodynamics (plasma angiotensin II [AII], plasma renin activity [PRA], renal function, blood pressure [BP], urinary excretion of major metabolites of prostacyclin [PGI(2)-M], and thromboxane A(2) [TXA(2)-M]) and pharmacokinetics of irbesartan were assessed in hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-four white patients with seated diastolic blood pressure 95 to 110 mmHg were randomized to double-blind irbesartan 300 mg or placebo once daily for 4 weeks, following a placebo lead-in. Irbesartan-treated patients had significantly greater 24-hour area under the curve values for mean change from baseline in AII and PRA versus placebo-treated patients on day B15 (AII [pg |mZ h/mL]: 261 +/- 515 vs 12 +/- 51; PRA [(ng/mL/h); h]:74 +/-162 vs -2 +/-14; P values >.05). Irbesartan significantly lowered BP without clinically important changes in renal function. Irbesartan had no effect on 24-hour urinary TXA(2)-M excretion, but significantly increased 24-hour PGI(2)-M excretion versus placebo on day B29 (20.7 +/- 23 pg/mg creatinine vs _2.3 +/- 43 pg/mg creatinine; P <.05). Pharmacokinetics were comparable to those from previous studies. The hourly relationship between plasma irbesartan concentration and antihypertensive effect indicated a broad, clockwise hysteresis, with peak concentration occurring at 1.5 hours, whereas peak antihypertensive effect occurred at 4 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Irbesartan increases plasma AII and PRA and lowers BP consistent with AT(1) receptor blockade, without clinically important effects on renal function.

The renal profile of eprosartan

The angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonist eprosartan is a highly selective, nonpeptide drug specific for the AT1 receptor subtype that completely inhibits pressor, aldosterone secretory, and renal vasoconstrictive effects produced by AII infusions in healthy humans. It increases effective renal plasma flow in both salt-replete and salt-restricted healthy men, and maintains glomerular filtration rates in patients with essential hypertension and those with renal insufficiency after either single or multiple doses. In healthy salt-restricted men, the drug suppresses and stimulates aldosterone and renin, respectively, in the initial few hours after administration. This feedback inhibition for renin release and suppression of aldosterone is reduced with normal sodium intake. Eprosartan is natriuretic in salt-restricted subjects and does not induce sodium retention even when it reduces blood pressure. These properties, in addition to antagonism of AII effect at the AT1 receptor, no doubt contribute to the agent's antihypertensive effect in patients with essential hypertension. Pharmacodynamic studies predict that doses of up to 400 mg are safe. Additional preliminary studies suggest that doses as high as 1200 mg are safe and well tolerated, while producing meaningful hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects in patients with essential hypertension.

Downregulation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in the rat remnant kidney

Chronic renal failure is associated with disturbances in nitric oxide (NO) production. This study was conducted to determine the effect of 5/6 nephrectomy (5/6 Nx) on expression of intrarenal neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in the rat. In normal rat kidney, nNOS protein was detected in the macula densa and in the cytoplasm and nuclei of cells of the inner medullary collecting duct by both immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. Western blot analysis revealed that 2 wk after 5/6 Nx, there were significant decreases in nNOS protein expression in renal cortex (sham: 95.42+/-15.60 versus 5/6 Nx: 47.55+/-12.78 arbitrary units, P<0.05, n = 4) and inner medulla (sham: 147.70+/-26.96 versus 5/6 Nx: 36.95+/-17.24 arbitrary units, P<0.005, n = 8). Losartan treatment was used to determine the role of angiotensin II (AngII) AT1 receptors in the inhibition of nNOS expression in 5/6 Nx. Losartan had no effect on the decreased expression of nNOS in the inner medulla, but partially increased nNOS protein expression in the cortex of 5/6 Nx rats. In contrast, in sham rats losartan significantly inhibited nNOS protein expression in the cortex (0.66+/-0.04-fold of sham values, P<0.05, n = 6) and inner medulla (0.74+/-0.12-fold of sham values, P<0.05, n = 6). nNOS mRNA was significantly decreased in cortex and inner medulla from 5/6 Nx rats, and the effects of losartan on nNOS mRNA paralleled those observed on nNOS protein expression. These data indicate that 5/6 Nx downregulates intrarenal nNOS mRNA and protein expression. In normal rats, AngII AT1 receptors exert a tonic stimulatory effect on expression of intrarenal nNOS. These findings suggest that the reduction in intrarenal nNOS expression in 5/6 Nx may play a role in contributing to hypertension and altered tubular transport responses in chronic renal failure.

Renal and hemodynamic effects of losartan in conscious dogs during controlled mechanical ventilation

In 12 conscious dogs, we investigated whether the angiotensin II-receptor antagonist losartan increases renal sodium excretion and urine volume during controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with positive end-expiratory pressure. In four experimental protocols, the dogs were extracellular volume (ECV) expanded (electrolyte solution, 0.5 ml. kg-1. min-1 iv) or not and received losartan (100 micrograms. kg-1. min-1 iv) or not. They breathed spontaneously during the 1st and 4th hour and received CMV with positive end-expiratory pressure (mean airway pressure 20 cmH2O) during the 2nd and 3rd hours. In the expansion group, dogs with losartan excreted approximately 18% more sodium (69 +/- 7 vs. 38 +/- 5 micromol. min-1. kg-1) and 15% more urine during the 2 h of CMV because of a higher glomerular filtration rate (5.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.5 +/- 0.2 ml. min-1. kg-1) and the tubular effects of losartan. In the group without expansion, sodium excretion (2.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.6 +/- 1.0 micromol. min-1. kg-1) and glomerular filtration rate (3.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.8 +/- 0.4 ml. min-1. kg-1) did not change, and urine volume decreased similarly in both groups during CMV. Plasma vasopressin and aldosterone increased in both groups, and plasma renin activity increased from 4.9 +/- 0.7 to 7.8 +/- 1.3 ng ANG I. ml-1. h-1 during CMV in nonexpanded dogs without losartan. Mean arterial pressure decreased by 10 mmHg in nonexpanded dogs with losartan. In conclusion, losartan increases sodium excretion and urine volume during CMV if the ECV is expanded. If the ECV is not expanded, a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure and/or an increase in aldosterone and vasopressin during CMV attenuates the renal effects of losartan.

Effect of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on portal pressure in cirrhosis

Administration of angiotensin II causes an increase in portal pressure, and plasma concentration of angiotensin II is elevated in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting that angiotensin II may be involved in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. We evaluated the effect of the orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Thirty patients with severe (hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] >/= 20 mm Hg) and 15 patients with moderate (HVPG < 20 mm Hg) portal hypertension at baseline measurement were treated with an oral dose of 25 mg losartan once daily for 1 week and compared with 15 (HVPG >/= 20 mm Hg) and 10 (HVPG < 20 mm Hg), respectively, cirrhotic controls. On the seventh day, HVPG was determined again, and blood pressure, heart rate, body weight, and parameters of liver and kidney function were recorded. Losartan induced a significant (P <.001) decrease of HVPG in the patients with severe (-46.8% +/- 15.5%) and moderate (-44.1% +/- 14.7%) portal hypertension, while no significant change was seen in the controls. Losartan caused a slight but significant (P <.01) fall in mean arterial blood pressure (-3.1 +/- 5.0 and -3.5 +/- 4.3 mm Hg, respectively). One patient treated with losartan had a short symptomatic hypotensive reaction after the first dose of losartan that did not recur despite continued treatment. No deterioration of liver or kidney function was observed. The present study indicates that angiotensin II blockade with orally administered losartan is safe and highly effective in the treatment of portal hypertension.

Absence of effect of chronic angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on endogenous kinin concentrations-induced paw edema model in the rat

The effects of chronic treatment with losartan. an AT1 receptor antagonist, on the tissue content of bradykinin (BK) and des-Arg9-BK and on their pharmacological effects were examined in the carrageenan-induced paw edema model (0.5% solution, 50 microl/paw) in the rat. These effects were compared with those of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi). For this purpose, rats were chronically treated with losartan (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg/day) and enalapril or quinapril (1 mg/kg/day). Endogenous BK and des-Arg9-BK tissue contents at the site of local inflammation were measured by highly sensitive and specific enzyme immunoassays. Losartan 3 mg/kg/day for 7, 14 and 28 days had no significant effect on carrageenan-induced paw edema, but both losartan 10 and 30 mg/kg/day for 14 days significantly increased the hindpaw volume by 50% at 3 h and by 59% at 5 h. These effects, similar to those measured for ACEi, were inhibited by icatibant, a B2 kinin receptor antagonist (32.5 nmol/paw), that reduced carrageenan-induced paw edema to the level seen in vehicle-treated rats. In the same model, and contrary to ACEi, losartan 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg/day for 14 days had no significant effect on endogenous BK and des-Arg9-BK levels in the local inflammatory site or on circulating and tissue ACE activities. These results show, at least in that model, that the potentiating effects of losartan on carrageenan-induced paw edema are independent of the concentrations of endogenous kinins.