Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Early rhythm control compared to rate control in atrial fibrillation - A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of early rhythm control to rate control, and whether catheter ablation derived more benefit compared to other methods of rhythm control.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, SCOPUS, and EuropePMC up to July 2, 2024. The primary outcome of this study was major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as a composite of mortality, stroke/systemic embolism, heart failure hospitalization (HFH), and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the follow-up period. Outcome measures were adjusted hazard ratios (aHR).

RESULTS

A total of 504,124 patients from 11 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Early rhythm control was significantly associated with reduction in MACCE (aHR 0.85 [95 % CI 0.80, 0.90], p < 0.001; I2: 23 %), stroke (aHR 0.79 [95 % CI 0.72, 0.86], p < 0.001; I2: 25 %), HFH (aHR 0.87 [95 % CI 0.78, 0.96], p = 0.008; I2: 48 %), and ACS (aHR 0.80 [95 % CI 0.66, 0.96], p = 0.018; I2: 40 %). No mortality benefit (aHR 0.93 [95 % CI 0.85, 1.01], p = 0.066; I2: 67 %) was observed; however, mortality benefit became evident (aHR 0.87 [95 % CI 0.85, 0.89], p < 0.001) upon removal of a study during a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. Meta-regression analysis showed that the benefits of early rhythm control in terms of MACCE were more pronounced with ablation (coefficient -0.004, p = 0.010, R2: 100 %).

CONCLUSION

Early rhythm control was associated with better outcomes compared to rate control in AF, with a more pronounced benefit observed for ablation.

Impact of Diagnosis to Ablation Time on Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Outcomes After Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data

BACKGROUND

Current clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of rhythm control with catheter ablation but lack guidance on the timing of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation relative to the diagnosis time. We aim to investigate the latest evidence on the impact of diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) on clinical outcomes after AF ablation.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through August 2024. Pairwise, prognostic, and reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analyses were conducted using R V. 4.3.1. Our primary end point was time to first AF recurrence, with secondary end points of all-cause mortality, tamponade, stroke, and heart failure.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 23 studies with 43 711 patients. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with reduced AF recurrence across both paroxysmal and persistent AF subgroups (P<0.01). There was a significant decrease in benefit for paroxysmal AF over time and a slight decrease in benefit for persistent AF over time. However, the benefit remained significant in both over time. DAT per year was significantly associated with a 10% increased risk of AF recurrence. Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that DAT >1 year was significantly associated with a 70% increased risk of AF recurrence in paroxysmal AF and 30% in persistent AF. DAT ≤1 year was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality (P<0.01) and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke (P=0.08). However, there was no significant difference in heart failure between DAT ≤1 year and DAT >1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Early ablation is more beneficial in paroxysmal AF, with a notable decrease in benefit over time, while in persistent AF, the benefit remains significant but slightly decreases over time. Shorter DAT was significantly associated with decreased all-cause mortality and showed a trend toward an association with a lower incidence of stroke.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?; Unique identifier: CRD42024525542.

A Bayesian Interpretation of CABANA and Other Randomized Controlled Trials for Catheter Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation improves symptoms and quality of life in atrial fibrillation patients, but its effect on adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality remains uncertain. Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials offers a deeper understanding of treatment effects beyond conventional p-value thresholds.

METHODS

We conducted a post hoc Bayesian reanalysis of CABANA and four similar trials to estimate catheter ablation's effect on cardiovascular and survival outcomes. Using publicly available, trial-level data, we fitted ordinal Bayesian regression models to assess the impact of catheter ablation on the primary composite outcome-comprising all-cause mortality, stroke with disability, serious bleeding, and cardiac arrest-as well as mortality alone. We considered two sets of prior distributions: (1) a noninformative prior, where all effect sizes are equally probable and inference is primarily based on trial data, and (2) a treatment effect distribution derived from four trials using a random effects model.

RESULTS

In this analysis, refined probability distributions for treatment effects were obtained by integrating data from CABANA with diverse priors through Bayes' theorem, offering a novel, nuanced probabilistic understanding of the potential impact of ablation compared with medical therapy on cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality. In contrast to CABANA's original frequentist estimates, which were inconclusive, Bayesian analyses indicated probabilities of 82.6% and 81.1% that ablation is superior in reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality, respectively. Incorporating results from four other similar trials increased the probability of improved effects on mortality to 86.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bayesian analysis augmented the interpretation of previously inconclusive findings, suggesting a clinically relevant probability of benefit from catheter ablation compared to medical therapy in a broad population with atrial fibrillation.

Risk factors for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The rate at which atrial fibrillation (AF) patients experience a return of symptoms after catheter ablation is significant, and there are multiple risk factors involved. This research intends to perform a meta-analysis to explore the risk factors connected to the recurrence of AF in patients following catheter ablation.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, WOS, Embase, SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were explored for studies from January 1, 2000 to August 10, 2021, and research meeting the established inclusion requirements was chosen. Two authors separately gathered details regarding the study structure. The strength of the link between various risk factors and AF returning after CA was evaluated using odds ratios. All statistical evaluations were conducted with RevMan5.3 software.

RESULTS

In total, 44 articles and 62,674 patients were included. The OR for AF recurrence in patients with diabetes was 2.04 compared with the reference group (95% CI 1.51-2.76, p < 0.00001); that of lower left ventricular ejection fraction was 1.38 (95% CI 1.25-1.52, p < 0.00001); that of female was 1.34 (95% CI 1.18-1.52, p < 0.00001); that of increased age was 1.03 (95% CI 1.02-1.04, p < 0.00001); that of persistent AF was 1.72 (95% CI 1.58-1.87, p < 0.00001); that of AF duration over 2 years was 1.17 (95% CI 1.08-1.26, p < 0.00001); that of increased left atrial diameter (LAD) was 1.12 (95% CI 1.08-1.17, p < 0.00001); that of larger left atrial volume index (LAVi) was 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03, p < 0.00001); that of higher hs-CRP was 1.19 (95% CI 1.04-1.36, p = 0.04); that of early recurrence (ER) was 3.22 (95% CI 2.74-3.77, p < 0.00001); and that of long ablation duration was 1.00 (95% CI 0.98-1.02, p = 0.72). Heterogeneity and slight publication bias were observed for each factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence indicates that diabetes, low left ventricular ejection fraction, being female, older age, longer duration of atrial fibrillation, elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, large left atrial dimension, large left atrial volume index, persistent atrial fibrillation, and exercise rehabilitation are factors that increase the chances of getting atrial fibrillation again after catheter ablation. However, the length of the ablation procedure does not relate to the recurrence of AF.

Atrial fibrillation ablation timing: where is the sweet spot?

Convincing evidence for the efficacy of ablation as first-line therapy in paroxysmal AF (PAF) and its clear superiority to medical therapy for rhythm control in both PAF and persistent AF (PsAF) has generated considerable interest in the optimal timing of ablation. Based on this data, there is a widespread view that the principle of 'the earlier the better' should be generally applied. However, the natural history of AF is highly variable and non-linear, and for this reason, it is difficult to be emphatic that all patients are best served by ablation early after their initial AF episodes. Sufficient evidence exists to indicate a conservative approach is reasonable in patients with infrequent and non-progressive episodes (i.e. absence of progressive increase in burden culminating in PsAF) in whom symptoms remain mild and well-controlled. A conservative management phase should be marked by assiduous attention to risk factor modification, changes in frequency and duration of AF episodes, and patient preferences. If and when AF does begin to progress, accumulating evidence indicates that early ablation accompanied by ongoing attention to risk factors provides the best outcomes.

Procedural volume and outcomes with atrial fibrillation ablation: A report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry

BACKGROUND

The association of hospital and physician procedure volume with outcome has not been well evaluated for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in contemporary practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the association between hospital and physician AF ablation volume and procedural success (isolation of all pulmonary veins) and major adverse events (MAEs).

METHODS

Procedures reported to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry AFib Ablation Registry between July 2019 and June 2022 were included. Hospital and physician procedural volumes were annualized and stratified into quartiles to compare outcomes. Three-level hierarchical (patient, hospital, and physician) models were used to assess the procedural volume-outcome relationship.

RESULTS

A total of 70,296 first-time AF ablations at 186 US hospitals were included. Overall, procedural success and MAE rates were 98.5% and 1.0%, respectively. With hospital volume (Q4) as a reference, the likelihood of procedural success was lower for Q1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.68), Q2 (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33-0.75), and Q3 (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89); the results were similarly significant for physician volume. With MAE for hospitals, there was an inverse procedural volume relationship for Q1 (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.26-2.52) but not for Q2 (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.46) or Q3 (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.89-1.58) and similarly for physicians in Q1 and Q2 but not in Q3. An adjusted MAE ≤1% was predicted by an annual volume of approximately 190 for hospitals and 60 for physicians.

CONCLUSION

In this national cohort, hospital and physician AF ablation procedural volumes were directly related to acute procedural success and inversely related to rates of MAE.

Hospital readmissions following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with THERMOCOOL™ STSF/ THERMOCOOL™ ST catheter with CARTO™ 3 system versus TactiCath™ catheter with EnSite™ system

Aim: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) is a mainstay treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). RF catheters with contact force (CF) sensing technology and electroanatomical mapping systems enable real-time assessment of catheter tip-tissue interface CF, facilitating individualized and precise CA. This study examined inpatient hospital readmissions in patients with AF treated with THERMOCOOL™ ST/ THERMOCOOL™ STSF catheter with the CARTO™ 3 System versus TactiCath™ catheter with the EnSite™ System. Materials & methods: Patients undergoing CA for AF between 1 July 2019 to 30 November 2021 were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database and grouped based on use of THERMOCOOL ST/STSF or TactiCath™. Study outcomes were all-cause, cardiovascular (CV)-, and AF-related inpatient readmission at 91-365-day post-CA. Inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity scores balanced baseline patient, comorbidity and hospital characteristics. A weighted generalized estimating equation (GEE) model examined differences in readmission outcomes. Results: A total of 15,518 patients met inclusion criteria (THERMOCOOL ST/STSF, n = 13,001; TactiCath™, n = 2517). Patient characteristics were generally well-balanced after weighting. Patients treated with THERMOCOOL ST/STSF + CARTO 3 had a 20% lower likelihood of all-cause inpatient readmissions (7.8 vs 9.3%, chi-square p = 0.041; odds ratio [OR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.96, GEE p = 0.019) and a 21% lower likelihood of CV-related inpatient readmission (5.2 vs 6.2%, chi-square p = 0.133, OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99, GEE p = 0.043) in 91-365-days post-CA versus those treated with TactiCath™ + Ensite. No significant differences were observed for AF-related readmissions. Conclusion: Patients undergoing CA for AF treated with THERMOCOOL ST/STSF + CARTO 3 had a significantly lower risk of all-cause and CV-related inpatient hospital readmission versus those treated with TactiCath™ + Ensite.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Impact of Catheter Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Symptoms in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is more common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is often highly symptomatic. The impact of catheter ablation (CA) may be under-reported when evaluated by long-term freedom from any atrial arrhythmia.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate whether CA of AF in patients with HCM would significantly reduce AF burden and improve symptoms.

METHODS

A multicenter registry was established to enroll HCM patients with pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing CA of AF between 2017 and 2021. The first AF recurrence and burden 12 months before and after CA were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 81 HCM patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices underwent CA of AF. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 1-year (35 [Q1-Q3: 23-50] months). AF was paroxysmal in 38 of 81 (46.9%) patients and burden pre-CA was 27.0% (Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 99.0%). A total of 35 (43.2%) patients had AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence within 12 months. AF burden reduced after CA to 0.5% (Q1-Q3 range: 0.0% to 11.1%) (P = 0.001); a 95% CI (13.8% to 100%) relative reduction. European Hearth Rhythm Association class improved by 1.8 ± 1.3 classes (P < 0.001). Of those with AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence, the reduction in AF burden was -33.7% (Q1-Q3: -88.9% to -13.8%) (P < 0.001) and 20 (57.1%) patients reported symptomatic improvement by ≥1 European Hearth Rhythm Association class. AF burden reduction was associated with symptomatic improvement. (r = -0.67; P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence is common after CA in HCM patients, but this may under-represent the impact of CA in this cohort. CA significantly reduced AF burden and improved symptoms. A comprehensive evaluation of AF burden, symptoms, and hard endpoints is needed to determine the utility of CA in this context.

Three-year incidence of pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus node dysfunction receiving ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs

BACKGROUND

Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is commonly seen in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of pacemaker implantation among patients with SND and AF treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs).

METHODS

The 2013-2022 Optum Clinformatics database, an administrative claims database for commercially insured individuals in the United States (US), was used for this study. Patients with AF and SND and a history of at least one AAD prescription were identified and classified into CA or AAD cohorts based on subsequent treatment received. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to balance socio-demographic and clinical characteristics between the cohorts. Weighted Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the differential risk of incident permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Sub-analyses were performed by AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent).

RESULTS

A total of 1206 patients in the AAD cohort and 1624 patients in the CA cohort were included. Study cohorts were well-balanced post-weighting. The incidence rate of PPM implantation (per 1000 person-year) was 55.8 for the CA cohort and 117.8 for the AAD cohort. Regression analysis demonstrated that the CA cohort had 42% lower risk of incident PPM implantation than those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.72, p < 0.001). CA-treated patients had lower risks of PPM implantation versus AAD-treated patients among those with paroxysmal AF (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.69, p < 0.001) and persistent AF (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.81, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with AF and SND treated with CA have significantly lower risks of incident PPM implantation compared with those treated with an AAD.

Lesion characteristics using high-frequency low-tidal volume ventilation versus standard ventilation during ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been shown to be superior to standard ventilation (SV) in terms of procedural efficiency, acute and long-term clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare ablation lesions characteristics utilizing HFLTV ventilation versus SV during RFCA of PAF.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for PAF between August 2022 and March 2023, using high-power short-duration ablation. Thirty-five patients underwent RFCA with HFLTV ventilation and were matched with another cohort of 35 patients who underwent RFCA with SV. Parameters including ablation duration, contact force (CF), impedance drop, and ablation index were extracted from the CARTONET database for each ablation lesion.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were included (HFLTV = 35/2484 lesions, SV = 35/2830 lesions) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. While targeting the same ablation index, the HFLTV ventilation group demonstrated shorter average ablation duration per lesion (12.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.4 ± 8.4 s, p < .001), higher average CF (17.0 ± 8.5 vs. 10.5 ± 4.6 g, p < .001), and greater impedance reduction (9.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 ohms, p < .001). HFLTV ventilation group also demonstrated shorter total procedural time (61.3 ± 25.5 vs. 90.8 ± 22.8 min, p < .001), ablation time (40.5 ± 18.6 vs. 65.8 ± 22.5 min, p < .001), and RF time (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 22.9 ± 9.7 min, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

HFLTV ventilation during PVI for PAF was associated with improved ablation lesion parameters and procedural efficiency compared to SV.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Relationship between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on the postoperative recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with persistent AF undergoing an initial radiofrequency ablation is not yet established. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on the recurrence of AF after radiofrequency ablation in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated persistent AF.

METHODS

A total of 182 patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent AF, who underwent their first radiofrequency ablation for AF at our center, were enrolled and divided into two groups: the SGLT2 inhibitor group and the non-SGLT2 inhibitor group. The main outcome of the follow-up was the postoperative recurrence of AF.

RESULTS

A total of 49 participants experienced AF recurrence. The use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent AF ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of AF recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.83; p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with a decreased risk of arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation in patients with type 2 diabetes complicated with persistent AF.

Meta-analysis of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Thermal Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in AF: A Broad Overview Focusing on Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes

The recently established non-thermal, single-shot pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a potential tool for achieving rapid pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to cause cell death by electroporation, yet data regarding this state-of-the-art technology remain sparse. In this meta-analysis, we included 3,857 patients from 20 studies. There was no significant difference in AF recurrence between the PFA and control groups. Subgroup analysis showed that additional ablation beyond PVI has a similar rate of AF recurrence to PVI alone (10% versus 13%, respectively). PVI durability was achieved in 83% (mean), 95% CI [65-99%] of the PFA group and in 79% (mean), 95% CI [60-98%] of the control group, with no significant difference in the rate of PVI durability between the two groups. The PFA group had considerably reduced procedure duration, but not fluoroscopy time. No statistically significant differences in periprocedural complications were observed. PFA is associated with shorter procedural time than thermal ablation. Cardiac complications were uncommon and mainly reversible in both the PFA and control groups.

Early versus Late Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: Timing Matters

Background: Despite the progressive course of atrial fibrillation (AF), the optimal timing of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) during disease course is still unknown. We aimed to investigate the impact of early RFCA within a year after AF diagnosis on procedural outcomes. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on symptomatic AF patients (n = 130) referred for RFCA with a 16-month median follow-up. Patients were stratified based on the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) into early (≤1 year) and late (>1 year) RFCA groups. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence after single RFCA was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular hospitalizations, AF progression, and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use. Results: Within a year of AF diagnosis, 33 patients (25.4%) underwent RFCA. In the early-RFCA group, 84.4% of patients did not have recurrent atrial arrhythmia, in contrast to 60.8% in the late-RFCA group (p = 0.039). Late RFCA (HR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.062-7.052, p = 0.037) and AF recurrence during the blanking period (HR = 4.57, 95% CI = 2.38-8.57, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of atrial arrhythmia recurrence on multivariate analysis. Compared to the late-RFCA group, the early-RFCA group had significantly lower rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations (18% vs. 42%, p = 0.023), AF progression (0.0% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.044), and AAD use (45.4% vs. 81.4%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Early RFCA within a year of AF diagnosis is associated with less atrial arrhythmia recurrence, fewer cardiovascular hospitalizations, less AF progression, and less AAD use. DAT of more than one year and AF recurrence during the blanking period are independent predictors of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after single RFCA.

Multidisciplinary Approach in Atrial Fibrillation: As Good as Gold

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common sustained arrhythmia necessitating dual focus: acute complication management and sustained longitudinal oversight to modulate disease progression and ensure comprehensive patient care over time. AF is a multifaceted disorder; due to such a great number of potential exacerbating conditions, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) should manage AF patients by cooperating with a cardiologist. Effective management of AF patients necessitates the implementation of a well-coordinated and tailored care pathway aimed at delivering optimized treatment through collaboration among various healthcare professionals. Management of AF should be carefully evaluated and mutually agreed upon in consultation with healthcare providers. It is crucial to recognize that treatment may evolve due to the emergence of new risk factors, symptoms, disease progression, and advancements in treatment modalities. In the context of multidisciplinary AF teams, a coordinated approach involves assembling a diverse team tailored to meet individual patients' unique needs based on local services' availability.

Silent pulmonary veins at redo ablation for atrial fibrillation: Implications and approaches

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Despite promising success rates, redo ablation is sometimes required. At redo, PVs may be found to be isolated (silent) or reconnected. We studied patients with silent vs reconnected PVs at redo and analysed associations with adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing redo AF ablations between 2013 and 2019 at our institution were included and stratified into silent PVs or reconnected PVs. The primary outcome was a composite of further redo ablation, non-AF ablation, atrioventricular nodal ablation, and death. Secondary outcomes included arrhythmia recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 467 patients were included with mean 4.6 ± 1.7 years follow-up, of whom 48 (10.3%) had silent PVs. The silent PV group had had more often undergone >1 prior ablation (45.8% vs 9.8%; p<0.001), had more persistent AF (62.5% vs 41.1%; p=0.005) and had more non-PV ablation performed both at prior ablation procedures and at the analysed redo ablation. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in those with silent PVs (25% vs 13.8%; p=0.053). Arrhythmia recurrence was also more common in the silent PV group (66.7% vs 50.6%; p=0.047). After multivariable adjustment, female sex (aHR 2.35 [95% CI 2.35-3.96]; p=0.001) and ischaemic heart disease (aHR 3.21 [95% CI 1.56-6.62]; p=0.002) were independently associated with the primary outcome, and left atrial enlargement (aHR 1.58 [95% CI 1.20-2.08]; p=0.001) and >1 prior ablation (aHR 1.88 [95% CI 1.30-2.72]; p<0.001) were independently associated with arrhythmia recurrence. Whilst a finding of silent PVs was not itself significant after multivariable adjustment, this provides an easily assessable parameter at clinically indicated redo ablation which informs the clinician of the likelihood of a worse future prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with silent PVs at redo AF ablation have worse clinical outcomes.

Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation

BACKGROUND

Relationship between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use prior to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and subsequent AF recurrence is not well-understood.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the effects of GLP-1 RA use within 1 year before ablation and its association with AF recurrence and associated outcomes.

METHODS

The TriNetX research database was used to identify patients aged ≥18 years undergoing AF ablation (2014-2023). Patients were categorized into 2 groups, and propensity score matching (1:1) between preablation GLP-1 RA users and nonusers was performed based on demographics, comorbidities, body mass index, laboratory tests, AF subtype, and medications. Primary outcome was composite of cardioversion, new antiarrhythmic drug therapy, or repeat AF ablation after a 3-month blanking period following the index ablation. Additional outcomes included ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality during 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

After 1:1 propensity score matching, the study cohort comprised 1,625 GLP-1 RA users and 1,625 matched GLP-1 RA nonusers. Preablation GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with a lower risk of cardioversion, new AAD therapy, and repeat AF ablation after the index procedure (HR: 1.04 [95% CI: 0.92-1.19]; log-rank P = 0.51). Furthermore, the risk of ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality during the 12-month follow-up period did not differ between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that preprocedural use of GLP-1 RAs is not associated with a reduced risk of AF recurrence or associated adverse outcomes following ablation, and underscore the need for future research to determine whether these agents improve outcome in AF patients.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Rhythm vs Rate Control Strategy for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Rhythm control, either with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation, and rate control strategies are the cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Despite the increasing role of rhythm control over the past few years, it remains inconclusive which strategy is superior in improving clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study summarizes the total and time-varying evidence regarding the efficacy of rhythm- vs rate-control strategies in the management of AF.

METHODS

We systematically perused the MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials from inception to November 2023. We included studies that compared the efficacy of rhythm control (ie, antiarrhythmic drugs classes Ia, Ic, or III, AF catheter ablation, and electrical cardioversion) and rate control (ie, beta-blocker, digitalis, or calcium antagonist) strategies among patients with nonvalvular AF. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, whereas secondary outcomes included all-cause death, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), sinus rhythm at the end of the follow-up, and rhythm control-related adverse events. A cumulative meta-analysis to assess temporal trends and a meta-regression analysis using the percentage of ablation use was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies with a total of 17,536 patients (mean age: 68.6 ± 9.7 years, 37.9% females) and a mean follow-up of 28.5 months. Of those, 31.9% had paroxysmal AF. A rhythm control strategy reduced CV death (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.96), stroke (HR: 0.801; 95% CI: 0.643-0.998), and hospitalization for HF (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.94) but not all-cause death (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-1.02) compared with a rate control strategy. This benefit was driven by contemporary studies, whereas more ablation use within the rhythm control arm was associated with improved outcomes, except stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF, a contemporary rhythm control strategy leads to reduced CV mortality, HF events, and stroke compared with a rate control strategy.

Diagnosis to Ablation in Persistent AF: Any Time Can Be a Good Time to Ablate

BACKGROUND

Nonrandomized data suggest that longer diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) is associated with poorer outcomes; however, a recent randomized trial found no difference in recurrences when ablation was delayed by 12 months.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the impact of DAT on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent AF.

METHODS

CAPLA (Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA randomized clinical trial) was a multicenter trial that randomized patients with persistent AF to pulmonary vein isolation + posterior wall isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Follow-up was 12 months. Outcomes were assessed after a 3-month blanking period.

RESULTS

Median DAT in the 334 patients was 28 months (Q1-Q3: 12-66 months). Patients were divided into quartile groups: Q1 was DAT 0 to 12 months (n = 84, median DAT 7 months), Q2 was DAT 13 to 28 months (n = 85, median DAT 20 months), Q3 was DAT 29 to 66 months (n = 84, median DAT 41 months), and Q4 was DAT ≥67 months (n = 81, median DAT 119 months). AF recurrence rate was 36.9% for Q1, 44.7% for Q2, 47.6% for Q3, and 56.8% for Q4 (P = 0.082). On multivariable analysis, DAT Q4 was the only factor significantly associated with risk of recurrence (HR: 1.607; 95% CI: 1.005-2.570; P = 0.048). Median AF burden was 0% (Q1-Q3: 0%-0.47%) in Q1 and 0.33% (Q1-Q3: 0%-4.6%) in Q4 (P = 0.002). Quality of life (assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life questionnaire) improved markedly in all quartiles (Q1: Δ28.8 ± 24, Q2: Δ24.4 ± 23.4, Q3: Δ21.7 ± 26.6, Q4: Δ24.6 ± 21.4; P = 0.331).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of patients with persistent AF undergoing ablation in a prospective trial with standardized entry criteria and intensive electrocardiogram monitoring, those with shorter DAT had lower rates of AF recurrence. However, differences were modest, and all quartiles demonstrated very low AF burden and improvements in quality of life.

Atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation is associated with RAD51 and p63 proteins

Catheter ablation has been demonstrated to reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. The mechanisms of AF recurrence after catheter ablation are unknown, and the present study aimed to identify serum proteins associated with AF recurrence. The present prospective study comprised a cohort of patients with AF, which was divided into two groups after one-year follow-up: group 1 included patients with compensated AF after catheter ablation and group 2 included patients with AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Initial microarray profiling of the serum proteins was performed in small subgroups M1 and M2 recruited from groups 1 and 2, respectively, by an antibody microarray to evaluate potentially relevant proteins. The data of initial proteomic profiling identified candidate proteins in groups 1 and 2, and their levels were then measured by ELISA. The data of profiling suggested an overall increase in the levels of RAD51 and p63 proteins in the M2 subgroup versus that in the M1 subgroup, indicating potential relevance of these two proteins to AF recurrence. The results of ELISA of the levels of RAD51 and p63 in the groups 1 and 2 demonstrated an increase in the levels of RAD51 (11.11 ± 4.36 vs 8.45 ± 4.85 ng/mL; P = 0.009) and p63 (165.73 ± 113.75 vs 100.05 ± 37.56 units of normalized optical density; P = 0.0007) in the group 2 (with AF recurrence or substrate AF) compared with that in the group 1 (compensated AF). Thus, RAD51 and p63 were associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation and may represent possible etiological factors for subsequent outcomes.

Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice timely and fully, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2‑VASc‑60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of the Asian AF population. The guidelines also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control.

Association of Paroxysmal Versus Persistent Atrial Fibrillation with In-hospital Outcomes and 30-day Readmission After Inpatient Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Knowledge of the impact of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation on in-hospital outcomes and 30-day readmission remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission rates among patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who were hospitalized for AF ablation. Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years with AF who were hospitalized and underwent catheter ablation during 2017-2020. Then, we compared the in-hospital procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission rates between patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively. Our study included 7310 index admissions for paroxysmal AF ablation and 9179 index admissions for persistent AF ablation. According to our analysis, there was no significant difference in procedural complications-namely, cerebrovascular accident, vascular complications, major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, phrenic nerve palsy, pericardial complications, and systemic embolization-between the persistent and paroxysmal AF groups. There was also no significant difference in early mortality between these groups (0.5% vs. 0.7%; P = .22). Persistent AF patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (9.9% vs. 7.2%; P < .01) and non-home discharge (4.8% vs. 3.1%; P < .01). The 30-day readmission rates were comparable in both groups (10.0% vs. 9.5%; P = .34), with recurrent AF and heart failure being two of the most common causes of cardiac-related readmissions. Catheter ablation among hospitalized patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF resulted in no significant difference in procedural complications, early mortality, or 30-day readmission. This suggests that catheter ablation of AF can be performed with a relatively similar safety profile for both paroxysmal and persistent AF.

Treatment Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) management has witnessed a paradigm shift, with an increasing emphasis on rhythm control strategies. This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess and compare the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation versus medical therapy in the treatment of AF. A systematic search was conducted across major electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to the present. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing catheter ablation with medical therapy for AF were included. The primary outcomes included rhythm control success, recurrence rates, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes encompassed quality of life, hospitalization rates, and mortality. A total of six studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 2,859 participants. Catheter ablation significantly improved rhythm control success compared to medical therapy. Subgroup analyses demonstrated variations in outcomes based on patient characteristics, procedural techniques, and follow-up durations. Recurrence rates favored ablation; however, ablation was associated with a higher incidence of minor complications and major adverse events. Catheter ablation demonstrates superior efficacy in achieving and maintaining rhythm control compared to medical therapy in the management of AF. Despite the increased risk of procedural complications, the overall safety profile remains acceptable. This systematic review provides valuable insights for clinicians and informs shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers when choosing between catheter ablation and medical therapy for AF treatment.

Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial

BACKGROUND

Clinically detected atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a significant increase in mortality and other adverse cardiovascular events. Since the advent of effective methods for AF rhythm control, investigators have attempted to determine how much these adverse prognostic AF effects could be mitigated by the restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) and whether the method used mattered.

METHODS

The CABANA trial (Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation) randomized 2204 AF patients to ablation versus drug therapy, of which 1240 patients were monitored in follow-up using the CABANA ECG rhythm monitoring system. To assess the prognostic benefits of SR, we performed a prespecified analysis using Cox survival modeling with heart rhythm as a time-dependent variable and randomized treatment group as a stratification factor.

RESULTS

In the 1240 patient study cohort, 883 (71.2%) had documented AF at some point during their postblanking follow-up. Among the 883 patients, 671 (76.0%) experienced AF within the first year of postblanking follow-up, and 212 (24.0%) experienced their first AF after ≥1 year of postblanking follow-up. The primary CABANA end point (death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest) occurred in 95 (10.8%) of the 883 patients with documented AF and in 29 (8.1%) of the 357 patients with no AF recorded during follow-up. In multivariable time-dependent analysis, the presence of SR (compared with non-SR) was associated with a significantly reduced risk of the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85]; P=0.006; independent of treatment strategy [ablation versus drugs]). Corresponding results for all-cause mortality were adjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-1.01]; P=0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients in the CABANA trial with detailed long-term rhythm follow-up, increased time in SR was associated with a clinically consequential decrease in mortality and other adverse prognostic events. The predictive value of SR was independent of the therapeutic approach responsible for reducing the burden of detectable AF.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00911508.

An Economic Evaluation of a Streamlined Day-Case Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Protocol and Conventional Cryoballoon Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in a UK Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Population

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Symptom control for atrial fibrillation can be achieved by catheter ablation or drug therapy. We assessed the cost effectiveness of a novel streamlined atrial fibrillation cryoballoon ablation protocol (AVATAR) compared with optimised antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy and a conventional catheter ablation protocol, from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective.

METHODS

Data from the AVATAR study were assessed to determine the cost effectiveness of the three protocols in a two-step process. In the first stage, statistical analysis of clinical efficacy outcomes was conducted considering either a three-way comparison (AVATAR vs. conventional ablation vs. optimised AAD therapies) or a two-way comparison (pooled ablation protocol data vs. optimised AAD therapies). In the second stage, models assessed the cost effectiveness of the protocols. Costs and some of the clinical inputs in the models were derived from within-trial cost analysis and published literature. The remaining inputs were derived from clinical experts.

RESULTS

No significant differences between the ablation protocols were found for any of the clinical outcomes used in the model. Results of a within-trial cost analysis show that AVATAR is cost-saving (£1279 per patient) compared with the conventional ablation protocol. When compared with optimised AAD therapies, AVATAR (pooled conventional and AVATAR ablation protocols efficacy) was found to be more costly while offering improved clinical benefits. Over a lifetime time horizon, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AVATAR was estimated as £21,046 per quality-adjusted life-year gained (95% credible interval £7086-£71,718).

CONCLUSIONS

The AVATAR streamlined protocol is likely to be a cost-effective option versus both conventional ablation and optimised AAD therapy in the UK NHS healthcare setting.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice in a timely and comprehensive manner, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of the Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of the Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering have jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines have comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2-VASc-60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of AF in the Asian population. The guidelines have also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control.

Does asymptomatic atrial fibrillation exist?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently defined as symptomatic by asking patients if they are aware of when they are in AF and if they feel better in sinus rhythm. However, this approach of defining AF as symptomatic and asymptomatic fails to adequately consider the adverse effects of AF in patients who are unaware of their rhythm including progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF, and the development of dementia, stroke, sinus node dysfunction, valvular regurgitation, ventricular dysfunction, and heart failure. Labeling these patients as asymptomatic falsely suggests that their AF requires less intense therapy and puts into question the notion of truly asymptomatic AF. Because focusing on patient awareness ignores other important consequences of AF, clinical endpoints that are independent of symptoms are being developed. The concept of AF burden has more recently been used as a clinical endpoint in clinical trials as a more clinically relevant endpoint compared to AF-related symptoms or time to first recurrence, but its correlation with symptoms and other clinical outcomes remains unclear. This review will explore the impact of AF on apparently asymptomatic patients, the use of AF burden as an endpoint for AF management, and potential refinements to the AF burden metric. The review is based on a presentation by the senior author during the 2023 16th annual European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS) congress in Paris, France.

Catheter ablation versus medical therapy in atrial fibrillation: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials

This umbrella review synthesizes data from 17 meta-analyses investigating the comparative outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) and medical treatment (MT) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Outcomes assessed were mortality, risk of hospitalization, AF recurrence, cardiovascular events, pulmonary vein stenosis, major bleeding, and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and MLHFQ score. The findings indicate that CA significantly reduces overall mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization with high strength of evidence. The risk of AF recurrence was notably lower with CA, with moderate strength of evidence. Two associations reported an increased risk of pulmonary vein stenosis and major bleeding with CA, supported by high strength of evidence. Improved LVEF and a positive change in MLHFQ were also associated with CA. Among patients with AF and heart failure, CA appears superior to MT for reducing mortality, improving LVEF, and reducing cardiovascular rehospitalizations. In nonspecific populations, CA reduced mortality and improved LVEF but had higher complication rates. Our findings suggest that CA might offer significant benefits in managing AF, particularly in patients with heart failure. However, the risk of complications, including pulmonary vein stenosis and major bleeding, is notable. Further research in understudied populations may help refine these conclusions.

Ablation versus medical therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation: An updated meta-analysis

To investigate the effect of ablation compared to medical therapy on clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched using ablation, medical treatment, AF, and related words. The effect of ablation and medical therapy was sought to be gathered on stroke or transitional ischemic attack, mortality, hospitalization, recurrence of AF, progression of AF, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Analyses were performed using R software. 31 studies (the results of 27 randomized controlled trials), compromising an overall 6965 patients (Ablation, n = 3643; Medical treatment, n = 3322) were reviewed in our study, revealed that catheter ablation would result in substantial benefits for patients with AF without significant difference in serious adverse events compared to medical management (Risk Ratio: 0.92, [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.64-1.33]). Catheter ablation in patients with AF significantly resulted in a 29% reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.71, [95% CI, 0.57-0.88]), a 57% reduction in hospitalization (RR: 0.43, [95% CI, 0.27-0.67]), a 53% reduction in AF recurrence (RR: 0.47, [95% CI, 0.36-0.61]), and a dramatic reduction, 89%, in progression of paroxysmal to persistent AF (RR: 0.11, [95% CI, 0.02-0.65]); also associated with a remarkable improvement in their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (Mean Difference, MD: 6.84%, [95% CI, 3.27-10.42]) compared to medical therapy. Our study showed that ablation may be superior to medical therapy in patients with AF regarding AF recurrence, mortality, LVEF improvement, hospitalization, and AF progression outcomes.

Atrial fibrillation: comorbidities, lifestyle, and patient factors

Modern anticoagulation therapy has dramatically reduced the risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, AF still impairs quality of life, increases the risk of stroke and heart failure, and is linked to cognitive impairment. There is also a recognition of the residual risk of thromboembolic complications despite anticoagulation. Hence, AF management is evolving towards a more comprehensive understanding of risk factors predisposing to the development of this arrhythmia, its' complications and interventions to mitigate the risk. This review summarises the recent advances in understanding of risk factors for incident AF and managing these risk factors. It includes a discussion of lifestyle, somatic, psychological, and socioeconomic risk factors. The available data call for a practice shift towards a more individualised approach considering an increasingly broader range of health and patient factors contributing to AF-related health burden. The review highlights the needs of people living with co-morbidities (especially with multimorbidity), polypharmacy and the role of the changing population demographics affecting the European region and globally.

Improved left atrial catheterization efficiency and consistency using a novel steerable transseptal puncture sheath

BACKGROUND

While steerable sheaths are widely used to improve catheter stability and contact force during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), steerable sheaths are less commonly used during transseptal puncture. This study evaluated whether left atrial catheterization efficiency can be improved using the VersaCross combined steerable sheath and transseptal system compared to previous standard workflow.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed AF ablation performed using the VersaCross Workflow consisting of VersaCross steerable sheath and RF wire for transseptal puncture and catheter ablation (VCW) to the standard workflow using a fixed curve sheath with RF needle followed by exchange for an Agilis steerable sheath for catheter ablation (STW).

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent RF ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF, 15 using the VCW and 15 using the STW. Transseptal puncture time was 10.8 mins faster with the VCW compared to the standard workflow (20.9 ± 5.9 min vs. 31.7 ± 15.1 min; p = 0.024). Time to left atrial catheterization was 40% faster with the VCW compared to the STW (21.3 ± 5.8 min vs. 35.2 ± 14.4 min; p = 0.003). Overall procedure time was 14.2 min faster in the VCW compared to the STW (86.3 ± 16.1 min vs. 100.5 ± 19.3 min; p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the VersaCross steerable system significantly reduced time to transseptal puncture, time to left atrial catheterization, and overall RF ablation time.

Age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score as predictive values for late non-valvular atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation

The clinical risk factors associated with late recurrence in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) (NVAF) undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) remain unknown. Furthermore, the current prognostic risk score system is commonly used in such patients as a noninvasive method to assess late AF recurrence. According to recent research, the Age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score is a useful risk score for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. As a result, we hypothesized that pre-ablation ACEF score could be used to assess late recurrence in patients with NVAF. We included 325 NVAF patients undergoing RFCA. During a median follow-up period of 12 months, patients with late AF recurrence had higher ACEF scores (P < .001). The pre-ablation ACEF score was a risk factor for late AF recurrence after RFCA (P = .027). The ACEF score was a predictor of late AF recurrence after RFCA, with an AUC of 0.624 (P = .001). Moreover, the AUC of left atrial diameter (LAD) was 0.7 (P < .001), which was higher than the ACEF score, but no significant difference was found (P = .104). The ACEF score was positively correlated with LAD, advanced age, and B-type natriuretic peptide. In patients with NVAF, the pre-ablation ACEF score is a valuable risk score for assessing late AF recurrence after RFCA, as with LAD.

Development and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Model Predicting the Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Risk for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Nifekalant During the First Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to establish and assess a prediction model for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with nifekalant during the first radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

METHODS

In this study, 244 patients with persistent AF from January 17, 2017 to December 14, 2017, formed the derivation cohort, and 205 patients with persistent AF from December 15, 2017 to October 28, 2018, constituted the validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for variable screening and the multivariable Cox survival model for nomogram development. The accuracy and discriminative capability of this predictive model were assessed according to discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) and calibration. Clinical practical value was evaluated using decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Body mass index, AF duration, sex, left atrial diameter, and the different responses after nifekalant administration were identified as AF recurrence-associated factors, all of which were selected for the nomogram. In the development and validation cohorts, the AUC for predicting 1-year AF-free survival was 0.863 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.801-0.926) and 0.855 (95% CI 0.782-0.929), respectively. The calibration curves showed satisfactory agreement between the actual AF-free survival and the nomogram prediction in the derivation and validation cohorts. In both groups, the prognostic score enabled stratifying the patients into different AF recurrence risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This predictive nomogram can serve as a quantitative tool for estimating the 1-year AF recurrence risk for patients with persistent AF treated with nifekalant during the first RFCA.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Importance

Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile.

Objective

To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Exposure

PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs).

Results

Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19).

Conclusion and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

Atrial Ablation Lesion Evaluation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Review of Imaging Strategies and Histological Correlations

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a valuable noninvasive tool for evaluating tissue response following catheter ablation of atrial tissue. This review provides an overview of the contemporary CMR strategies to visualize atrial ablation lesions in both the acute and chronic postablation stages, focusing on their strengths and limitations. Moreover, the accuracy of CMR imaging in comparison to atrial lesion histology is discussed. T2-weighted CMR imaging is sensitive to edema and tends to overestimate lesion size in the acute stage after ablation. Noncontrast agent-enhanced T1-weighted CMR imaging has the potential to provide more accurate assessment of lesions in the acute stage but may not be as effective in the chronic stage. Late gadolinium enhancement imaging can be used to detect chronic atrial scarring, which may inform repeat ablation strategies. Moreover, novel imaging strategies are being developed, but their efficacy in characterizing atrial lesions is yet to be determined. Overall, CMR imaging has the potential to provide virtual histology that aids in evaluating the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation and monitoring of postprocedural myocardial changes. However, technical factors, scanning during arrhythmia, and transmurality assessment pose challenges. Therefore, further research is needed to develop CMR strategies to visualize the ablation lesion maturation process more effectively.

Atrial fibrillation: mechanism and clinical management

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia, is associated with a range of symptoms, including palpitations, cognitive impairment, systemic embolism, and increased mortality. It places a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Despite decades of research, the precise mechanisms underlying AF remain elusive. Current understanding suggests that factors like stretch-induced fibrosis, epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), chronic inflammation, autonomic nervous system (ANS) imbalances, and genetic mutations all play significant roles in its development. In recent years, the advent of wearable devices has revolutionized AF diagnosis, enabling timely detection and monitoring. However, balancing early diagnosis with efficient resource utilization presents new challenges for healthcare providers. AF management primarily focuses on stroke prevention and symptom alleviation. Patients at high risk of thromboembolism require anticoagulation therapy, and emerging pipeline drugs, particularly factor XI inhibitors, hold promise for achieving effective anticoagulation with reduced bleeding risks. The scope of indications for catheter ablation in AF has expanded significantly. Pulsed field ablation, as a novel energy source, shows potential for improving success rates while ensuring safety. This review integrates existing knowledge and ongoing research on AF pathophysiology and clinical management, with emphasis on diagnostic devices, next-generation anticoagulants, drugs targeting underlying mechanisms, and interventional therapies. It offers a comprehensive mosaic of AF, providing insights into its complexities.

Atrial fibrillation cryoablation is an effective day case treatment: the UK PolarX vs. Arctic Front Advance experience

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). There are limited data on the PolarX Cryoballoon. The study aimed to establish the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of same day discharge for Cryoballoon PVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Multi-centre study across 12 centres. Procedural metrics, safety profile, and procedural efficacy of the PolarX Cryoballoon with the Arctic Front Advance (AFA) Cryoballoon were compared in a cohort large enough to provide definitive comparative data. A total of 1688 patients underwent PVI with cryoablation (50% PolarX and 50% AFA). Successful PVI was achieved with 1677 (99.3%) patients with 97.2% (n = 1641) performed as day case procedures with a complication rate of <1%. Safety, procedural metrics, and efficacy of the PolarX Cryoballoon were comparable with the AFA cohort. The PolarX Cryoballoon demonstrated a nadir temperature of -54.6 ± 7.6°C, temperature at 30 s of -38.6 ± 7.2°C, time to -40°C of 34.1 ± 13.7 s, and time to isolation of 49.8 ± 33.2 s. Independent predictors for achieving PVI included time to reach -40°C [odds ratio (OR) 1.34; P < 0.001] and nadir temperature (OR 1.24; P < 0.001) with an optimal cut-off of ≤34 s [area under the curve (AUC) 0.73; P < 0.001] and nadir temperature of ≤-54.0°C (AUC 0.71; P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This large-scale UK multi-centre study has shown that Cryoballoon PVI is a safe, effective day case procedure. PVI using the PolarX Cryoballoon was similarly safe and effective as the AFA Cryoballoon. The cryoablation metrics achieved with the PolarX Cryoballoon were different to that reported with the AFA Cryoballoon. Modified cryoablation targets are required when utilizing the PolarX Cryoballoon.

The higher recurrence rate after catheter ablation in younger patients with atrial fibrillation suggesting different pathophysiology

BACKGROUND

Young atrial fibrillation (AF) patients have been underrepresented in studies of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and the outcome of RFCA has not been widely addressed. We investigated age-related differences in clinical features, the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia, and its predictors of patients who underwent RFCA for AF.

METHODS

This is a multicenter prospective study of 2799 patients who underwent RFCA for AF in 2017-2020. The patients were divided into two groups - group A (age < 60 years, n = 1269) and group B (age ≥ 60 years, n = 1530) - and a recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia 1 year after RFCA following a 90-day blanking period was compared.

RESULTS

The mean age was 51.6 ± 6.7 and 66.8 ± 5.2 years for groups A and B, respectively. Higher body mass index, smaller left atrium, and more prevalent cardiomyopathy and obstructive sleep apnea were observed in group A. Overall, 1-year atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival was 85.6% and lower in young patients (83.1% in group A vs. 87.7% in group B, log-rank p < 0.01): adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of recurrence (95% confidence interval (CI)), 1.45 (1.13-1.86) for group A compared to group B (p < 0.01). The association between younger age and higher recurrence was continuously observed in patients under 60 years. Any non-PV ablation was associated with a lower recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia in group B (aHR 0.68 (0.47-0.96), p < 0.05), but not in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

AF patients younger than 60 years had a higher 1-year AF recurrence after RFCA. Young AF patients might have distinctive pathophysiology of AF requiring more integrated management.

Impact of SGLT2 Inhibitors on AF Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) on recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients undergoing catheter ablation is not well described.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the impact of SGLT2-Is on the recurrence of AF among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) after catheter ablation.

METHODS

Using the TriNetX research network, we identified, by means of Current Procedural Terminology codes, patients ≥18 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) who had undergone AF ablation from April 1, 2014, to November 30, 2021. Patients were stratified based on the baseline SGLT2-I use. Propensity-score matching resulted in 2,225 patients in each cohort. The primary outcome was a composite of cardioversion, new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, or re-do AF ablation after a blanking period after the index ablation. Additional outcomes included heart failure exacerbations, ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and death during 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

SGLT2-I use in patients with type 2 DM undergoing AF ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardioversion, new AAD therapy, and re-do AF ablation (adjusted OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.602-0.776; P < 0.0001). At 12 months, patients on SGLT2-Is had a higher probability of event-free survival (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95; log-rank test chi-square = 8.7; P = 0.003). All secondary outcomes were lower in the SGLT2I group; however, the ischemic stroke did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of SGLT2-Is in patients with type 2 DM is associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation and thence a reduced need for cardioversion, AAD therapy, or re-do AF ablation.

Psychosocial risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

The association of psychosocial risk factors with cardiovascular disease is well-established, and there is a growing recognition of their influence on atrial fibrillation (AF) . A recent National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop called for transforming AF research to integrate social determinants of health. There is limited data examining the impact of psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs) on outcomes in patients with an established diagnosis of AF. Catheter ablation for AF has been shown to improve arrhythmia burden and quality of life compared with medical treatment alone. It is unknown how PSRFs affect clinical outcomes in patients undergoing AF ablation. It is important to understand this relationship, especially given the increasing adoption of catheter ablation in clinical practice.

Safety of an esophageal deviator for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Background

Esophageal thermal injury is a complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and it can be avoided by esophageal deviation during left atrial posterior wall radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a nitinol-based mechanical esophageal displacement device (MEDD) and its performance.

Methods

This preclinical safety study was conducted on 20 pigs, with 10 undergoing radiofrequency AF ablation using the MEDD and 10 serving as a control group under anticoagulation but without radiofrequency application. Esophageal traumatic injuries were classified from 0 to 4 and were grouped as absent (grade 0), minor (grade 1 or 2), moderate (grade 3), or major risk lesions (grade 4) by anatomopathological study. Grades 1 and 2 were considered acceptable. Fluoroscopy was used to measure displacement.

Results

Five (25%) pigs developed traumatic lesions, 4 with grade 1 and 1 with grade 2 (2-mm superficial ulcer). There was no difference in lesion occurrence between the radiofrequency and control groups (30% and 20%, respectively; P = .43). Under rightward displacement, the right edge moved 23.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 21.3-26.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.3 (IQR 13.8-18.4) mm (P < .001) from baseline. Under leftward displacement, the right edge moved 13.5 (IQR 10.9-15.3) mm and the left edge moved 16.5 (IQR 12.3-18.5) mm (P = .07). A perforation to the pharyngeal diverticulum occurred in 1 pig, related to an accidental extubation.

Conclusion

In pigs, the MEDD demonstrated safety in relation to esophageal tissue, and successful deviation. Esophageal traumatic injuries were acceptable, but improper manipulation led to pharyngeal lesion.

Cardiac Tamponade During Catheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Life-Threatening Complication

Catheter ablation has become an important treatment strategy for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in symptomatic patients. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly used to restore rhythm in patients with AF and flutter. The serious procedural complication rate has significantly reduced over time and most patients undergo PVI without any adverse events. We present the case of a 70-year-old man with symptomatic AF who underwent elective PVI that was complicated by large pericardial effusion from left atrial appendage (LAA) perforation resulting in cardiac tamponade requiring emergency pericardiocentesis followed by sternotomy to suture the LAA. The perforated LAA was sutured and the LAA was closed surgically through sternotomy by using AtriClip and a large amount of blood was evacuated achieving good cardiac output and hemodynamic stability. A surgical PVI was performed twice restoring normal sinus rhythm. The patient was discharged home, however, he returned to the hospital a few days later with atrial flutter with a rapid ventricular response. He underwent direct current cardioversion (DCCV) and remained in sinus rhythm during the rest of his admission. His bisoprolol was switched to Sotalol to maintain normal sinus rhythm and he was discharged home with outpatient follow-up.