Latent Pulmonary Vascular Disease May Alter the Response to Therapeutic Atrial Shunt Device in Heart Failure

Nonpharmacological Approaches to Managing Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common subtype of heart failure marked by impaired left ventricular diastolic function and decreased myocardial compliance. Given the limited availability of evidence-based pharmacological treatments for HFpEF, there is a growing interest in nonpharmacological interventions as viable therapeutic alternatives. This review aims to explore the pathophysiology of HFpEF and present recent advancements in nonpharmacological management approaches, encompassing noninvasive therapies, invasive procedures and targeted treatments for comorbidities. An extensive literature review was undertaken to identify and synthesize emerging nonpharmacological treatment options for HFpEF, assessing their potential to enhance patient outcomes. Nonpharmacological strategies, such as vagus nerve stimulation, percutaneous pulmonary artery denervation, renal denervation, transcatheter insertion of atrial shunts and pericardial resection, demonstrate promising potential for alleviating HFpEF symptoms and improving patient prognosis. Moreover, addressing comorbidities, such as hypertension and diabetes, may offer additional therapeutic benefits. These cutting-edge techniques, in conjunction with well-established exercise therapies, pave the way for future research and clinical applications in the field. Nonpharmacological interventions hold promise for advancing HFpEF patient care and fostering a deeper understanding of these treatment approaches, which will facilitate new clinical applications and contribute to the development of more targeted therapies.

2-Year Outcomes of an Atrial Shunt Device in HFpEF/HFmrEF: Results From REDUCE LAP-HF II

BACKGROUND

The REDUCE LAP-HF II (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure II) trial found that, compared with a sham procedure, the Corvia Atrial Shunt did not improve outcomes in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. However, after 12-month follow-up, "responders" (peak-exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU and absence of a cardiac rhythm management device) were identified.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine: 1) the overall efficacy and safety of the atrial shunt vs sham control after 2 years of follow-up; and 2) whether the benefits of atrial shunting are sustained in responders during longer-term follow-up or are offset by adverse effects of the shunt.

METHODS

The study analyzed 2-year outcomes in the overall REDUCE LAP-HF II trial, as well as in responder and nonresponder subgroups. The primary endpoint was a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal ischemic/embolic stroke, total heart failure events, and change in health status.

RESULTS

In 621 randomized patients, there was no difference between the shunt (n = 309) and sham (n = 312) groups in the primary endpoint (win ratio: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.82-1.24]) or its individual components at 2 years. Shunt patency at 24 months was 98% in shunt-treated patients. Cardiovascular mortality and nonfatal ischemic stroke were not different between the groups; however, major adverse cardiac events were more common in those patients assigned to the shunt compared with sham (6.9% vs 2.7%; P = 0.018). More patients randomized to the shunt had an increase in right ventricular volume of ≥30% compared with the sham control (39% vs 28%, respectively; P < 0.001), but right ventricular dysfunction was uncommon and not different between the treatment groups. In responders (n = 313), the shunt was superior to sham (win ratio: 1.36 [95% CI: 1.02-1.83]; P = 0.037, with 51% fewer HF events [incidence rate ratio: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.25-0.95]; P = 0.034]). In nonresponders (n = 265), atrial shunting was inferior to sham (win ratio: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.54-0.98]).

CONCLUSIONS

At 2 years of follow-up in REDUCE LAP-HF II, there was no difference in efficacy between the atrial shunt and sham groups in the overall trial group. The potential clinical benefit identified in the responder group after 1 and 2 years of follow-up is currently being evaluated in the RESPONDER-HF (Re-Evaluation of the Corvia Atrial Shunt Device in a Precision Medicine Trial to Determine Efficacy in Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure) trial. (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure II [REDUCE LAP-HF II]; NCT03088033).

Dapagliflozin and Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Vascular Interaction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Increases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during exercise reduce pulmonary artery (PA) compliance, increase pulsatile right ventricular (RV) afterload, and impair RV-PA coupling in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The effects of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin on pulmonary vascular properties and RV-PA coupling are unknown.

Objective

To test the effect of dapagliflozin on right ventricular performance and pulmonary vascular load during exertion in HFpEF.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Evaluation of the Cardiac and Metabolic Effects of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (CAMEO-DAPA) randomized clinical trial demonstrated improvement in PCWP at rest and exercise over 24 weeks with dapagliflozin compared with placebo with participants recruited between February 2021 and May 2022. This secondary analysis evaluates the effects of dapagliflozin on pulsatile pulmonary vascular load and RV-PA coupling using simultaneous echocardiography and high-fidelity invasive hemodynamic testing with exercise. This was a single-center study including patients with hemodynamically confirmed HFpEF with exercise PCWP of 25 mm Hg or greater.

Interventions

Dapagliflozin or placebo for 24 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Pulsatile pulmonary vascular load (PA compliance and elastance) and right ventricular performance (PA pulsatility index, RV systolic velocity [s']/PA mean) during rest and exercise.

Results

Among 37 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [8.5] years; 25 female [65%]; mean [SD] body mass index, 34.9 [6.7]; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), there was no effect of dapagliflozin on PA loading or RV-PA interaction at rest. However, with exercise, dapagliflozin improved PA compliance (placebo-corrected mean difference, 0.57 mL/mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.11-1.03 mL/mm Hg; P = .02) and decreased PA elastance (stiffness; -0.17 mm Hg/mL; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.07 mm Hg/mL; P = .001). RV function during exercise improved, with increase in PA pulsatility index (0.33; 95% CI, 0.08-0.59; P = .01) and increase in exercise RV s' indexed to PA pressure (0.09 cm·s-1/mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16 cm·s-1/mm Hg; P = .01). Improvements in pulsatile RV load and RV-PA coupling were correlated with reduction in right atrial (RA) pressure (PA elastance Pearson r = 0.55; P =.008; RV s'/PA elastance Pearson r = -0.60; P =.002) and PCWP (PA elastance Pearson r = 0.58; P <.001; RV s'/PA elastance Pearson r = -0.47; P = .02). Dapagliflozin increased resistance-compliance time (dapagliflozin, median [IQR] change, 0.06 [0.03-0.15] seconds; placebo, median [IQR] change, 0.01 [-0.02 to 0.05] seconds; P =.046), resulting in higher PA compliance for any exercise pulmonary vascular resistance.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this randomized clinical trial reveal that treatment with dapagliflozin for 24 weeks reduced pulsatile pulmonary vascular load and enhanced dynamic RV-PA interaction during exercise in patients with HFpEF, findings that are related to the magnitude of PCWP reduction. Benefits on dynamic right ventricular-pulmonary vascular coupling may partially explain the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04730947.

Beyond Medical Therapy-An Update on Heart Failure Devices

Heart failure (HF) is a complex and progressive disease marked by substantial morbidity and mortality rates, frequent episodes of decompensation, and a reduced quality of life (QoL), with severe financial burden on healthcare systems. In recent years, several large-scale randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have widely expanded the therapeutic armamentarium, underlining additional benefits and the feasibility of rapid titration regimens. This notwithstanding, mortality is not declining, and hospitalizations are constantly increasing. It is widely acknowledged that even with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on board, HF patients have a prohibitive residual risk, which highlights the need for innovative treatment options. In this scenario, groundbreaking devices targeting valvular, structural, and autonomic abnormalities have become crucial tools in HF management. This has led to a full-fledged translational boost with several novel devices in development. Thus, the aim of this review is to provide an update on both approved and investigated devices.

Atrial Shunt Device Effects on Cardiac Structure and Function in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The REDUCE LAP-HF II Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Although the results of A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical Inc IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure (REDUCE LAP-HF II) trial were neutral overall, atrial shunt therapy demonstrated potential efficacy in responders (no latent pulmonary vascular disease and no cardiac rhythm management device). Post hoc analyses were conducted to evaluate the effect of shunt vs sham stratified by responder status.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of atrial shunt vs sham control on cardiac structure/function in the overall study and stratified by responder status.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a sham-controlled randomized clinical trial of an atrial shunt device in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)/HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF). Trial participants with evaluable echocardiography scans were recruited from 89 international medical centers. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to January 2024.

Interventions

Atrial shunt device or sham control.

Main Outcome Measures

Changes in echocardiographic measures from baseline to 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after index procedure.

Results

The modified intention-to-treat analysis of the REDUCE LAP-HF II trial included 621 randomized patients (median [IQR] age, 72.0 [66.0-77.0] years; 382 female [61.5%]; shunt arm, 309 [49.8%]; sham control arm, 312 [50.2%]). Through 24 months, 212 of 217 patients (98%) in the shunt arm with evaluable echocardiograms had patent shunts. In the overall trial population, the shunt reduced left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (mean difference, -5.65 mL; P <.001), left atrial (LA) minimal volume (mean difference, -2.8 mL; P =.01), and improved LV systolic tissue Doppler velocity (mean difference, 0.69 cm/s; P <.001) and LA emptying fraction (mean difference, 1.88 percentage units; P =.02) compared with sham. Shunt treatment also increased right ventricular (RV; mean difference, 9.58 mL; P <.001) and right atrial (RA; mean difference, 9.71 mL; P <.001) volumes but had no effect on RV systolic function, pulmonary artery pressure, or RA pressure compared with sham. In the shunt arm, responders had smaller increases in RV end-diastolic volume (mean difference, 5.71 mL vs 15.18 mL; interaction P =.01), RV end-systolic volume (mean difference, 1.58 mL vs 7.89 mL; interaction P =.002), and RV/LV ratio (mean difference, 0.07 vs 0.20; interaction P <.001) and larger increases in transmitral A wave velocity (mean difference, 5.08 cm/s vs -1.97 cm/s; interaction P =.02) compared with nonresponders randomized to the shunt, suggesting greater ability to accommodate shunted blood through the pulmonary circulation enabling LA unloading.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this post hoc analysis of the REDUCE LAP-HF II trial, over 2 years of follow-up, atrial shunting led to reverse remodeling of left-sided chambers and increases in volume of right-sided chambers consistent with the shunt flow but no change in RV systolic function compared with sham. Changes in cardiac structure/function were more favorable in responders compared with nonresponders treated with the shunt, supporting the previously identified responder group hypothesis and mechanism, although further evaluation with longer follow-up is needed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03088033.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment

The aetiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is heterogenous and overlaps with that of several comorbidities like atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, valvular heart disease, iron deficiency, or sarcopenia. The diagnosis of HFpEF involves evaluating cardiac dysfunction through imaging techniques and assessing increased left ventricular filling pressure, which can be measured directly or estimated through various proxies including natriuretic peptides. To better narrow down the differential diagnosis of HFpEF, European and American heart failure guidelines advocate the use of different algorithms including comorbidities that require diagnosis and rigorous treatment during the evaluation process. Therapeutic recommendations differ between guidelines. Whilst sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors have a solid evidence base, the recommendations differ with regard to the use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Unless indicated for specific comorbidities, the use of beta-blockers should be discouraged in HFpEF. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in HFpEF diagnosis, clinical evaluation, and treatment.

A roadmap for therapeutic discovery in pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart failure. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC and the ESC Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation & Right Ventricular Function

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with left heart failure (LHF) (PH-LHF) is one of the most common causes of PH. It directly contributes to symptoms and reduced functional capacity and negatively affects right heart function, ultimately leading to a poor prognosis. There are no specific treatments for PH-LHF, despite the high number of drugs tested so far. This scientific document addresses the main knowledge gaps in PH-LHF with emphasis on pathophysiology and clinical trials. Key identified issues include better understanding of the role of pulmonary venous versus arteriolar remodelling, multidimensional phenotyping to recognize patient subgroups positioned to respond to different therapies, and conduct of rigorous pre-clinical studies combining small and large animal models. Advancements in these areas are expected to better inform the design of clinical trials and extend treatment options beyond those effective in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Enrichment strategies, endpoint assessments, and thorough haemodynamic studies, both at rest and during exercise, are proposed to play primary roles to optimize early-stage development of candidate therapies for PH-LHF.

Interatrial shunt therapy in advanced heart failure: Outcomes from the open-label cohort of the RELIEVE-HF trial

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) outcomes remain poor despite optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). We assessed safety, effectiveness, and transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) outcomes during the 12 months after Ventura shunt implantation in the RELIEVE-HF open-label roll-in cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eligibility required symptomatic HF despite optimal GDMT with ≥1 HF hospitalization in the prior year or elevated natriuretic peptides. The safety endpoint was device-related major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events at 30 days, compared to a prespecified performance goal. Effectiveness evaluations included the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and TTE at baseline and 12 months. Overall, 97 patients were enrolled and implanted at 64 sites. Average age was 70 ± 11 years, 97% were in New York Heart Association class III, and half had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%. The safety endpoint was achieved (event rate 0%, p < 0.001). KCCQ overall summary score was improved by 12-16 points at all follow-up timepoints (all p < 0.004), with similar outcomes in patients with reduced and preserved LVEF. At 12 months, left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes were reduced (p = 0.020 and p = 0.038, respectively), LVEF improved (p = 0.009), right ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic areas were reduced (p = 0.001 and p = 0.030, respectively), and right ventricular fractional area change (p < 0.001) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (p < 0.001) improved.

CONCLUSION

Interatrial shunting with the Ventura device was safe and resulted in favourable clinical effects in patients with HF, regardless of LVEF. Improvements of left and right ventricular structure and function were consistent with reverse myocardial remodelling. These results would support the potential of this shunt device as a treatment for HF.

Rest and exercise-stress estimated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure using real-time free-breathing cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Identification of increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) by right heart catheterization (RHC) is the reference standard for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging estimation of PCWP at rest was introduced as a non-invasive alternative. Since many patients are only identified during physiological exercise-stress, we hypothesized that novel exercise-stress CMR-derived PCWP emerges superior compared to its assessment at rest.

METHODS

The HFpEF-Stress Trial prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea and diastolic dysfunction who then underwent rest and exercise-stress RHC and CMR. HFpEF was defined according to PCWP (overt HFpEF ≥15 mmHg at rest, masked HFpEF ≥25 mmHg during exercise-stress). CMR-derived PCWP was calculated based on previously published formula using left ventricular mass and either biplane left atrial volume (LAV) or monoplane left atrial area (LAA).

RESULTS

LAV (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and LAA PCWP (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.48, p < 0.001) correlated significantly with RHC-derived PCWP while numerically overestimating PCWP at rest and underestimating PCWP during exercise-stress. LAV and LAA PCWP showed good diagnostic accuracy to detect HFpEF (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) LAV rest 0.73, stress 0.81; LAA rest 0.72, stress 0.77) with incremental diagnostic value for the detection of masked HFpEF using exercise-stress (AUC LAV rest 0.54 vs stress 0.67, p = 0.019, LAA rest 0.52 vs stress 0.66, p = 0.012). LAV but not LAA PCWP during exercise-stress was a predictor for 24 months hospitalization independent of a medical history for atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.55, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive PCWP correlates well with the invasive reference at rest and during exercise stress. There is overall good diagnostic accuracy for HFpEF assessment using CMR-derived estimated PCWP despite deviations in absolute agreement. Non-invasive exercise derived PCWP may particularly facilitate detection of masked HFpEF in the future.

Advances in device-based treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: evidence from clinical trials

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a group of clinical syndromes that exhibit a remarkably heterogeneous phenotype, characterized by symptoms and signs of heart failure, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, elevated levels of natriuretic peptides, and an ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50%. With the aging of the population and the escalating prevalence of hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, the incidence of HFpEF is progressively rising. Drug therapy options for HFpEF are currently limited, and the associated high risk of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure rehospitalization significantly impact patients' quality of life and longevity while imposing a substantial economic burden on society. Recent research indicates that certain device-based therapies may serve as valuable adjuncts to drug therapy in patients with specific phenotypes of HFpEF, effectively improving symptoms and quality of life while reducing the risk of readmission for heart failure. These include inter-atrial shunt and greater splanchnic nerve ablation to reduce left ventricular filling pressure, implantable heart failure monitor to guide diuresis, left atrial pacing to correct interatrial dyssynchrony, cardiac contractility modulation to enhance cardiac calcium handling, as well as renal denervation, baroreflex activation therapy, and vagus nerve stimulation to restore the autonomic imbalance. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms and clinical evidence pertaining to these devices, with the aim of enhancing therapeutic strategies for HFpEF.

Biatrial myopathy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIM

Left atrial (LA) myopathy is increasingly recognized as an important phenotypic trait in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Right atrial (RA) remodelling and dysfunction also develop in HFpEF, but little data are available regarding the clinical characteristics and pathophysiology among patients with isolated LA, RA, or biatrial myopathy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HFpEF underwent invasive haemodynamic exercise testing, comprehensive imaging including speckle tracking strain echocardiography, and clinical follow-up at Mayo Clinic between 2006 and 2018. LA myopathy was defined as LA volume index >34 ml/m2 and/or LA reservoir strain ≤24% and RA myopathy by RA volume index >39 ml/m2 in men and >33 ml/m2 in women and/or RA reservoir strain ≤19.8%. Of 476 consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF defined by invasive exercise testing with evaluable atrial structure/function, 125 (26%) had no atrial myopathy, 147 (31%) had isolated LA myopathy, 184 (39%) had biatrial myopathy, and 20 (4%) had isolated RA myopathy. Patients with HFpEF and biatrial myopathy had more atrial fibrillation, poorer left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, more severe pulmonary vascular disease, tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular interdependence and right ventricular dysfunction, and poorer cardiac output reserve with exercise. There were 94 patients with events over a median follow-up of 2.9 (interquartile range 1.4-4.6) years. Individuals with biatrial myopathy had an 84% higher risk of HF hospitalization or death as compared to those with isolated LA myopathy (hazard ratio 1.84; 95% confidence interval 1.16-2.92, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Biatrial myopathy identifies patients with more advanced HFpEF characterized by more severe pulmonary vascular disease, right HF, poorer cardiac reserve, and a greater risk for adverse outcomes. Further study is required to define optimal strategies to treat and prevent biatrial myopathy in HFpEF.

Emerging devices for heart failure management

There have been significant advances in the treatment of heart failure (HF) in recent years, driven by significant strides in guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Despite this, HF is still associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality, and most patients do not receive optimal medical therapy. In conjunction with the improvement of GDMT, novel device therapies have been developed to better treat HF. These devices include technology capable of remotely monitoring HF physiology, devices that modulate the autonomic nervous system, and those that structurally change the heart with the ultimate aim of addressing the root causes of HF physiology As these device therapies gradually integrate into the fabric of HF patient care, it becomes increasingly important for modern cardiologists to become familiar with them. Hence, the objective of this review is to shed light on currently emerging devices for the treatment of HF.

Preload Reduction Therapies in Heart Failure

Preload reserve represents an important concept in the normal physiologic responses of the body to meet the changing metabolic demands. The recruitment of preload in healthy patients leads to an increase in effective circulating blood volume with a concomitant increase in cardiac output. However, in the setting of heart failure (HF), preload augmentation may precipitate HF decompensation. In this review, we focus on the role of splanchnic nerve modulation and pharmacological therapeutic interventions to prevent HF decompensation through preload reduction. Furthermore, we explore the emerging device-based approaches for cardiac preload reduction while reviewing the ongoing clinical trials.

Interatrial Shunt Devices

Elevated left atrial pressure during exercise is a hallmark of heart failure (HF) and is associated with adverse left atrial remodeling and poor outcomes. To decompress the pressure-overloaded left atrium in patients with HF, several device-based approaches have been developed to create a permanent, pressure-dependent, left-to-right interatrial shunt. Such approaches are currently in various stages of investigations in both HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and HF with preserved EF. This review discusses the evolution of the concept of left atrial decompression and summarizes the current landscape of device-based approaches used for left atrial decompression.

Obesity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the REDUCE LAP-HF II trial

AIMS

Obesity is causally related to the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but complicates the diagnosis and treatment of this disorder. We aimed to determine the relationship between severity of obesity and clinical, echocardiographic and haemodynamic parameters in a large cohort of patients with documented HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The REDUCE LAP-HF II trial randomized 626 patients with ejection fraction ≥40% and exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥25 mmHg to atrial shunt or sham procedure. We tested for associations between body mass index (BMI), clinical characteristics, cardiac structural and functional abnormalities, physical limitations, quality of life and outcomes with atrial shunt therapy. Overall, 60.9% of patients had BMI ≥30 kg/m2 . As the severity of obesity increased, symptoms (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score) and 6-min walk distance worsened. More severe obesity was associated with lower natriuretic peptide levels despite more cardiac remodelling, higher cardiac filling pressures, and higher cardiac output. Lower cut points for E/e' were needed to identify elevated PCWP in more obese patients. Strain measurements in all four chambers were maintained as BMI increased. Pulmonary vascular resistance at rest and exercise decreased with higher BMI. Obesity was associated with more first and recurrent heart failure events. However, there was no significant interaction between obesity and treatment effects of the atrial shunt.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing severity of obesity was associated with greater cardiac remodelling, higher right and left ventricular filling pressures, higher cardiac output and increased subsequent heart failure events. Despite significant obesity, many HFpEF patients have preserved right heart and pulmonary vascular function and thus, may be appropriate candidates for atrial shunt therapy.

Rationale and design of the PACE HFpEF trial: Physiologic accelerated pacing as a holistic treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Background

In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), it has been assumed that pharmacologic heart rate suppression should provide clinical benefits through an increase in diastolic filling time. Contrary to this assumption, heart rate lowering in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and hypertension or coronary artery disease results in adverse outcomes and suggests that the opposite may be beneficial. Namely, shortening the diastolic filling time with a higher heart rate might normalize the elevated filling pressures that are the sine qua non of HFpEF. Initial clinical studies that assessed the effects of accelerated heart rates in pacemaker patients with preclinical and overt HFpEF provide support for this latter hypothesis, having shown improvements in quality of life, natriuretic peptide and activity levels, and atrial fibrillation burden.

Objective

The study sought to determine the effects of continued resting heart rate elevation with and without superimposed nocturnal pacing in HFpEF patients without standard pacing indication.

Methods

The physiologic accelerated pacing as treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (PACE HFpEF) trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, patient-blinded multiple crossover pilot study that assesses the impact of accelerated pacing on quality of life, physical activity, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function.

Results

Twenty patients were enrolled and underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation under U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption with both atrial and ventricular physiologic lead placement targeting the Bachmann bundle and the His bundle.

Conclusion

This manuscript describes the rationale and design of the PACE HFpEF trial, which tests the safety and feasibility of continuous accelerated physiological pacing as a treatment strategy in HFpEF.

Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Left Heart Disease

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of diseases affecting the left heart, mostly found in patients suffering from heart failure, with or without preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Initially driven by a passive increase in left atrial pressure (postcapillary PH), several mechanisms may lead in a subset of patient to significant structural changes of the pulmonary vessels or a precapillary component. In addition, the right ventricle may be independently affected, which results in right ventricular to pulmonary artery uncoupling and right ventricular failure, all being associated with a worse outcome. The differential diagnosis of PH associated with left heart disease versus pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is especially challenging in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities and/or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A stepwise approach to diagnosis is proposed, starting with a proper clinical multidimensional phenotyping to identify patients in whom hemodynamic confirmation is deemed necessary. Provocative testing (exercise testing, fluid loading, or simple leg raising) is useful in the cath laboratory to identify patients with abnormal response who are more likely to suffer from HFpEF. In contrast with group 1 PH, management of PH associated with left heart disease must focus on the treatment of the underlying condition. Some PAH-approved targets have been unsuccessfully tried in clinical studies in a heterogeneous group of patients, some even leading to an increase in adverse events. There is currently no approved therapy for PH associated with left heart disease.

[Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (group 2)]

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD) corresponds to group two of pulmonary hypertension according to clinical classification. Haemodynamically, this group includes isolated post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (IpcPH) and combined post- and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH). PH-LHD is defined by an mPAP > 20 mmHg and a PAWP > 15 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with a cut-off value of 2 Wood Units (WU) is used to differentiate between IpcPH and CpcPH. A PVR greater than 5 WU indicates a dominant precapillary component. PH-LHD is the most common form of pulmonary hypertension, the leading cause being left heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF, HFrEF), valvular heart disease and, less commonly, congenital heart disease. The presence of pulmonary hypertension is associated with increased symptom burden and poorer outcome across the spectrum of left heart disease. Differentiating between group 1 pulmonary hypertension with cardiac comorbidities and PH-LHD, especially due to HFpEF, is a particular challenge. Therapeutically, no general recommendation for the use of PDE5 inhibitors in HFpEF-associated CpcPH can be made at this time. There is currently no reliable rationale for the use of PAH drugs in IpcPH, nor is therapy with endothelin receptor antagonists or prostacyclin analogues recommended for all forms of PH-LHD.

Atrial Shunt Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update

Transcatheter atrial shunt therapies, designed to dynamically lower left atrial (LA) pressure by shunting blood into the larger reservoir of the right atrium and central veins, have been developed as a novel treatment for heart failure (HF) over the past 10+ years. Several atrial shunt devices and procedures are currently in development with several pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCT) underway; however, only 2 sham-controlled RCT (both with the Atrial Shunt Device [Corvia Medical] in HF with EF ≥ 40%) have been reported thus far; a mechanistic RCT (n = 44) that demonstrated a reduction in exercise LA pressure at 1 month and a pivotal RCT (n = 626) that was neutral with no difference in outcomes or health status between shunt and sham groups. Subsequent analyses of the single completed pivotal RCT found that peak exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU plus the absence of a cardiac rhythm management device identified a responder group that benefited from LA unloading with atrial shunt implantation, a finding that is currently being confirmed in a follow-up RCT. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the field of atrial shunt therapeutics with a description of the following: (1) current HF treatment; (2) rationale and history of atrial shunt development; (3) design of and accumulated evidence for the various atrial shunt devices and procedures under investigation; (4) unanswered questions in the field; and (5) future considerations. Atrial shunts represent a potential innovative therapeutic for HF but the optimal design/approach and phenotype of HF most likely to benefit are yet to be determined.

Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Atrial Shunt Therapy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to describe AF burden and its clinical impact among individuals with HFpEF and HFmrEF who participated in a randomized clinical trial of atrial shunt therapy (REDUCE LAP-HF II [A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure]) and to evaluate the effect of atrial shunt therapy on AF burden.

METHODS

Study investigators characterized AF burden among patients in the REDUCE LAP-HF II trial by using ambulatory cardiac patch monitoring at baseline (median patch wear time, 6 days) and over a 12-month follow-up (median patch wear time, 125 days). The investigators determined the association of baseline AF burden with long-term clinical events and examined the effect of atrial shunt therapy on AF burden over time.

RESULTS

Among 367 patients with cardiac monitoring data at baseline and follow-up, 194 (53%) had a history of AF or atrial flutter (AFL), and median baseline AF burden was 0.012% (IQR: 0%-1.3%). After multivariable adjustment, baseline AF burden ≥0.012% was significantly associated with heart failure (HF) events (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.17-3.44; P = 0.01) both with and without a history of AF or AFL (P for interaction = 0.68). Adjustment for left atrial reservoir strain attenuated the baseline AF burden-HF event association (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 0.93-3.14; P = 0.08). Of the 367 patients, 141 (38%) had patch-detected AF during follow-up without a history of AF or AFL. Atrial shunt therapy did not change AF incidence or burden during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In HFpEF and HFmrEF, nearly 40% of patients have subclinical AF by 1 year. Baseline AF burden, even at low levels, is associated with HF events. Atrial shunt therapy does not affect AF incidence or burden. (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure [REDUCE LAP-HF II]; NCT03088033).

Shedding Light on Latent Pulmonary Vascular Disease in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a distinct hemodynamic phenotype has been recently described, ie, latent pulmonary vascular disease (HFpEF-latentPVD), defined by exercise pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >1.74 WU.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the pathophysiological significance of HFpEF-latentPVD.

METHODS

The authors analyzed a cohort of patients who had undergone supine exercise right heart catheterization with cardiac output (CO) measured by direct Fick method, between 2016 and 2021. HFpEF-latentPVD patients were compared with HFpEF control patients.

RESULTS

Out of 86 HFpEF patients, 21% qualified as having HFpEF-latentPVD, 78% of whom had PVR >2 WU at rest. Patients with HFpEF-latentPVD were older, with a higher pretest probability of HFpEF, and more frequently experienced atrial fibrillation and at least moderate tricuspid regurgitation (P < 0.05). PVR trajectories differed between HFpEF-latentPVD patients and HFpEF control patients (Pinteraction = 0.008), slightly increasing in the former and reducing in the latter. HFpEF-latentPVD patients displayed more frequent hemodynamically significant tricuspid regurgitation during exercise (P = 0.002) and had more impaired CO and stroke volume reserve (P < 0.05). Exercise PVR was correlated with mixed venous O2 tension (R2 = 0.33) and stroke volume (R2 = 0.31) in HFpEF-latentPVD patients. The HFpEF-latentPVD patients had had higher dead space ventilation during exercise and higher PaCO2 (P < 0.05), which correlated with resting PVR (R2 = 0.21). Event-free survival was reduced in HFpEF-latentPVD patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that when CO is measured by direct Fick, few HFpEF patients have isolated latent PVD (ie, normal PVR at rest, becoming abnormal during exercise). HFpEF-latentPVD patients present with CO limitation to exercise, associated with dynamic tricuspid regurgitation, altered ventilatory control, and pulmonary vascular hyperreactivity, portending a poor prognosis.

Group 2 pulmonary hypertension: from diagnosis to treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PHLHD) is common and associated with adverse prognosis. Proper diagnosis is critical to avoid inappropriate treatment. Practical approaches to noninvasive diagnosis are available, though invasive hemodynamics including volume loading or exercise are often necessary for definitive diagnosis. Treatment strategies and research in the field is rapidly evolving.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combined pre and post capillary pulmonary hypertension is associated with remodeling of the pulmonary vasculature that is proportional to the severity of the pulmonary hypertension. Even quite mild elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), (greater than 2.0 Wood units (WU)) is associated with adverse outcome. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for left heart failure has rapidly evolved, including approval of SGLT2 inhibitors for treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, full implementation of GDMT is lagging. Utilization of implanted pulmonary artery pressure monitoring can facilitate patient management in selected patient phenotypes and has been utilized to demonstrate improvement in pulmonary pressures with emerging therapies in HFpEF including SGLT2 inhibitors and sacubitril/valsartan. A variety of shunt devices to create a left-to-right shunt in order to decompress the left heart are available or undergoing clinical trials. There is concern that there could be adverse response to such devices in patients who have even mild elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance. Sleep disordered breathing is common in PHLHD and should be aggressively sought out and treated.

SUMMARY

Even mild elevation in pulmonary vascular resistance is associated with adverse outcome. A systematic approach to diagnosis of PHLHD is essential. Guideline-directed medical therapy for PHLHD prioritizes optimal management of the left heart disease. Pulmonary artery pressure sensors are useful in selected patients.

Exercise-Induced Left Atrial Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Many patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction have no overt volume overload and normal resting left atrial (LA) pressure.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to characterize patients with normal resting LA pressure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] <15 mm Hg) but exercise-induced left atrial hypertension (EILAH).

METHODS

The REDUCE LAP-HF II (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure) trial randomized 626 patients with ejection fraction ≥40% and exercise PCWP ≥25 mm Hg to atrial shunt or sham procedure. The primary trial outcome, a hierarchical composite of death, heart failure hospitalization, intensification of diuretics, and change in health status was compared between patients with EILAH and those with heart failure and resting left atrial hypertension (RELAH).

RESULTS

Patients with EILAH (29%) had similar symptom severity, but lower natriuretic peptide levels, higher 6-minute walk distance, less atrial fibrillation, lower left ventricular mass, smaller LA volumes, lower E/e', and better LA strain. PCWP was lower at rest, but had a larger increase with exercise in EILAH. Neither group as a whole had a significant effect from shunt therapy vs sham. Patients with EILAH were more likely to have characteristics associated with atrial shunt responsiveness (peak exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU) and no pacemaker (63% vs 46%; P < 0.001). The win ratio for the primary outcome was 1.56 (P = 0.08) in patients with EILAH and 1.51 (P = 0.04) in those with RELAH when responder characteristics were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EILAH had similar symptom severity but less advanced myocardial and pulmonary vascular disease. This important subgroup may be difficult to diagnose without invasive exercise hemodynamics, but it has characteristics associated with favorable response to atrial shunt therapy. (A Study to Evaluate the Corvia Medical, Inc. IASD System II to Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure [REDUCE LAP-HF TRIAL II]; NCT03088033).

Inferior vena cava diameter is associated with prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure independent of tricuspid regurgitation velocity

AIMS

A high, Doppler-derived, tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) indicates pulmonary hypertension, which may contribute to right ventricular dysfunction and worsening tricuspid regurgitation leading to systemic venous congestion, reflected by an increase in inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter. We hypothesized that venous congestion rather than pulmonary hypertension would be more strongly associated with prognosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

895 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) (median (25th and 75th centile) age 75 (67-81) years, 69% men, LVEF 44 (34-55)% and NT-proBNP 1133 (423-2465) pg/ml) were enrolled. Compared to patients with normal IVC (< 21 mm) and TRV (≤ 2.8 m/s; n = 504, 56%), those with high TRV but normal IVC (n = 85, 9%) were older, more likely to be women and to have LVEF ≥ 50%, whilst those with dilated IVC but normal TRV (n = 142, 16%) had more signs of congestion and higher NT-proBNP. Patients (n = 164, 19%) with both dilated IVC and high TRV had the most signs of congestion and the highest NT-proBNP. During follow-up of 860 (435-1121) days, 239 patients died. Compared to those with both normal IVC and TRV (reference), patients with high TRV but normal IVC did not have a significantly increased mortality (HR: 1.41; CI: 0.87-2.29; P = 0.16). Risk was higher for patients with a dilated IVC but normal TRV (HR: 2.51; CI: 1.80-3.51; P < 0.001) or both a dilated IVC and elevated TRV (HR: 3.27; CI: 2.40-4.46; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Amongst ambulatory patients with CHF, a dilated IVC is more closely associated with an adverse prognosis than an elevated TRV.

No-Implant Interatrial Shunt for HFpEF: 6-Month Outcomes From Multicenter Pilot Feasibility Studies

BACKGROUND

Most approaches to the creation of an interatrial shunt require placement of a permanent implant to maintain patency.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a no-implant interatrial shunt for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

METHODS

This was a multicenter, uncontrolled study of patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and NYHA functional class ≥II, ejection fraction >40%, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during supine exercise ≥25 mm Hg with PCWP-to-right atrial gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Follow-up was through 6 months with imaging to assess shunt durability.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were enrolled: mean age was 68 ± 9 years, and 68% were female. Baseline resting and peak exercise PCWP were 19 ± 7 mm Hg and 40 ± 11 mm Hg, respectively. All procedures displayed technical success with confirmation of left-to-right flow (shunt diameter 7.1 ± 0.9 mm). At 1 month, peak exercise PCWP decreased 5.4 ± 9.6 mm Hg (P = 0.011) with no change in right atrial pressure. There were no serious device or procedure-related adverse events through 6 months. Mean 6-minute walk distance increased 101 ± 71 meters (P < 0.001); Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score increased 26 ± 19 points (P < 0.001); N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide decreased 372 ± 857 pg/mL (P = 0.018); and shunt patency was confirmed with unchanged diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

In these feasibility studies of a no-implant interatrial shunt, HFpEF/HFmrEF shunts exhibited stability with favorable safety and early efficacy signals. The results show promise toward this new approach for treating patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and an appropriate hemodynamic profile. (Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of a Percutaneously Created Interatrial Shunt to Alleviate Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved or Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [ALLEVIATE-HF-1]; NCT04583527; Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Percutaneously Created Interatrial Shunt to Alleviate Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved or Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [ALLEVIATE-HF-2]; NCT04838353).

Device Interventions for Heart Failure

Despite remarkable advances in drug therapy for heart failure (HF), the residual HF-related morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations remain substantial across all HF phenotypes, and significant proportions of patients with HF remain symptomatic despite optimal drug therapy. Driven by these unmet clinical needs, the exponential growth of transcatheter interventions, and a recent shift in the regulatory landscape of device-based therapies, novel device-based interventions have emerged as a potential therapy for various phenotypes of HF. Device-based interventions can overcome some of the limitations of drug therapy (eg, intolerance, nonadherence, inconsistent delivery, and recurrent and long-term cost) and can target some HF-related pathophysiologic pathways more effectively than drug therapy. This paper reviews the current evolving landscape of device-based interventions in HF and highlights critical points related to implementation of these therapies in the current workflow of HF management.

Pulmonary Hypertension in Left Heart Diseases: Pathophysiology, Hemodynamic Assessment and Therapeutic Management

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with left heart diseases (PH-LHD), also termed group 2 PH, represents the most common form of PH. It develops through the passive backward transmission of elevated left heart pressures in the setting of heart failure, either with preserved (HFpEF) or reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction, which increases the pulsatile afterload of the right ventricle (RV) by reducing pulmonary artery (PA) compliance. In a subset of patients, progressive remodeling of the pulmonary circulation resulted in a pre-capillary phenotype of PH, with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) further increasing the RV afterload, eventually leading to RV-PA uncoupling and RV failure. The primary therapeutic objective in PH-LHD is to reduce left-sided pressures through the appropriate use of diuretics and guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure. When pulmonary vascular remodeling is established, targeted therapies aiming to reduce PVR are theoretically appealing. So far, such targeted therapies have mostly failed to show significant positive effects in patients with PH-LHD, in contrast to their proven efficacy in other forms of pre-capillary PH. Whether such therapies may benefit some specific subgroups of patients (HFrEF, HFpEF) with specific hemodynamic phenotypes (post- or pre-capillary PH) and various degrees of RV dysfunction still needs to be addressed.

Left atrial enlargement is associated with pulmonary vascular disease in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Elevated left atrial (LA) pressure is a pathophysiologic hallmark of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Chronically elevated LA pressure leads to LA enlargement, which may impair LA function and increase pulmonary pressures. We sought to evaluate the relationship between LA volume and pulmonary arterial haemodynamics in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 85 patients (aged 69 ± 8 years) who underwent exercise right heart catheterization and echocardiography were retrospectively analysed. All had symptoms of heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% and haemodynamic features of HFpEF. Patients were divided into LA volume index-based tertiles (≤34 ml/m2 , >34 to ≤45 ml/m2 , >45 ml/m2 ). A subgroup analysis was performed in patients with recorded LA global reservoir strain (n = 60), with reduced strain defined as ≤24%. Age, sex, body surface area and left ventricular ejection fraction were similar between volume groups. LA volume was associated with blunted increases in cardiac output with exercise (padjusted  <0.001), higher resting mean pulmonary artery pressure (padjusted  = 0.003), with similar wedge pressure (padjusted  = 1). Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) increased with increasing LA volume (padjusted  <0.001). Larger LA volumes featured reduced LA strain (padjusted  <0.001), with reduced strain associated with reduced PVR-compliance time (0.34 [0.28-0.40] vs. 0.38 [0.33-0.43], p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Increasing LA volume may be associated with more advanced pulmonary vascular disease in HFpEF, featuring higher PVR and pulmonary pressures. Reduced LA function, worse at increasing LA volumes, is associated with a disrupted PVR-compliance relationship, further augmenting impaired pulmonary haemodynamics.

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: JACC Scientific Statement

The incidence and prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) continue to rise in tandem with the increasing age and burdens of obesity, sedentariness, and cardiometabolic disorders. Despite recent advances in the understanding of its pathophysiological effects on the heart, lungs, and extracardiac tissues, and introduction of new, easily implemented approaches to diagnosis, HFpEF remains under-recognized in everyday practice. This under-recognition presents an even greater concern given the recent identification of highly effective pharmacologic-based and lifestyle-based treatments that can improve clinical status and reduce morbidity and mortality. HFpEF is a heterogenous syndrome and recent studies have suggested an important role for careful, pathophysiological-based phenotyping to improve patient characterization and to better individualize treatment. In this JACC Scientific Statement, we provide an in-depth and updated examination of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of HFpEF.

Obesity, Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure, and Left Ventricular Remodeling

Owing to the overwhelming obesity epidemic, preserved ejection fraction heart failure commonly ensues in patients with severe obesity and the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure is now commonplace in clinical practice. Severe obesity and preserved ejection fraction heart failure share congruent cardiovascular, immune, and renal derangements that make it difficult to ascertain whether the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure is the convergence of two highly prevalent conditions or severe obesity enables the development and progression of the syndrome of preserved ejection fraction heart failure. Nevertheless, the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure provides a unique opportunity to assess whether sustained and sizeable loss of excess body weight via metabolic bariatric surgery reverses the concentric left ventricular remodeling that patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure commonly display.

Supervised Exercise Training for Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is one of the most common forms of heart failure; its prevalence is increasing, and outcomes are worsening. Affected patients often experience severe exertional dyspnea and debilitating fatigue, as well as poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and a high mortality rate. Until recently, most pharmacological intervention trials for HFpEF yielded neutral primary outcomes. In contrast, trials of exercise-based interventions have consistently demonstrated large, significant, clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms, objectively determined exercise capacity, and usually quality of life. This success may be attributed, at least in part, to the pleiotropic effects of exercise, which may favorably affect the full range of abnormalities-peripheral vascular, skeletal muscle, and cardiovascular-that contribute to exercise intolerance in HFpEF. Accordingly, this scientific statement critically examines the currently available literature on the effects of exercise-based therapies for chronic stable HFpEF, potential mechanisms for improvement of exercise capacity and symptoms, and how these data compare with exercise therapy for other cardiovascular conditions. Specifically, data reviewed herein demonstrate a comparable or larger magnitude of improvement in exercise capacity from supervised exercise training in patients with chronic HFpEF compared with those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, although Medicare reimbursement is available only for the latter group. Finally, critical gaps in implementation of exercise-based therapies for patients with HFpEF, including exercise setting, training modalities, combinations with other strategies such as diet and medications, long-term adherence, incorporation of innovative and more accessible delivery methods, and management of recently hospitalized patients are highlighted to provide guidance for future research.

Disproportionate exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in relation to cardiac output in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a non-invasive echocardiographic study

AIMS

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and pulmonary vascular remodelling are common in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Many patients with HFpEF demonstrate an abnormal pulmonary haemodynamic response to exercise that is not identifiable at rest. This can be estimated non-invasively by the mean pulmonary artery pressure-cardiac output relationship (mPAP/CO slope). We sought to characterize the pathophysiology of disproportionate exercise-induced PH in relation to CO (DEi-PH) and its prognostic impact in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 345 patients (166 HFpEF and 179 controls) underwent ergometry exercise stress echocardiography with simultaneous expired gas analysis. DEi-PH was defined as the mPAP/CO slope >5.2 mmHg/L/min (median value). At rest, there were no differences in right ventricular (RV) function and severity of PH between HFpEF patients with and without DEi-PH. Compared with controls (n = 179) and HFpEF without DEi-PH (n = 83), HFpEF with DEi-PH (n = 83) demonstrated worse exercise capacity (lower peak oxygen consumption), depressed RV systolic function, impaired RV-pulmonary artery coupling, limitation in CO augmentation, more right-sided congestion, and worse ventilatory efficiency (higher minute ventilation vs. carbon dioxide volume) during peak exercise. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that HFpEF patients with DEi-PH had higher rates of composite outcomes of all-cause mortality or heart failure events than those without (log-rank p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HFpEF and DEi-PH demonstrated distinct pathophysiologic features that become apparent only during exercise. These data suggest that DEi-PH is a pathophysiologic phenotype of HFpEF and reinforce the importance of exercise stress echocardiography for detailed characterization of HFpEF.

Concomitant latent pulmonary vascular disease leads to impaired global cardiac performance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

The REDUCE-LAP II trial demonstrated adverse outcomes after interatrial shunt device (IASD) placement in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) attributed to latent pulmonary vascular disease (PVD). We hypothesized that exercise stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging could provide non-invasive characterization of cardiac and pulmonary physiology for improved patient selection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The HFpEF-Stress trial prospectively enrolled 75 patients with exertional dyspnoea and diastolic dysfunction. Patients underwent rest and exercise stress right heart catheterization, echocardiography and CMR imaging. Pulmonary artery and capillary wedge pressures, cardiac index (CI) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were calculated. Latent PVD was defined as increased PVR ≥ 1.74 Wood units during exercise stress. CMR assessed long-axis strains (LAS) and filling volumes of all cardiac chambers. Right ventricular (RV) function was further quantified by stroke and peak flow volumes. Patients with latent PVD (n = 24) showed lower RV function (rest tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, p = 0.010; stress RV LAS, p < 0.001) compared to patients without (n = 43). During exercise stress, RV stroke and peak flow volumes (p < 0.001) were reduced and led to impaired left atrial filling (p = 0.040) with a strong statistical trend to impaired ventricular (LV) filling (p = 0.098). This subsequently resulted in reduced LV-CI (p < 0.001) despite preserved LV systolic function (LV LAS p ≥ 0.255). The degree of RV dysfunction during exercise stress best predicted latent PVD (RV peak flow, area under the curve at rest 0.73 vs. stress 0.89, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Latent PVD is a feature of HFpEF and is associated with impaired RV functional reserve, global diastolic filling and LV-CI. This can be quantified by CMR and used to identify patients likely to benefit from IASD implantation.