Association of Albuminuria Levels With the Prescription of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade

Navigating the Global Economic Landscape of Dialysis: A Summary of Expert Opinions from The 4th International Congress of Chinese Nephrologists

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to be a significant global public health issue. The escalating burden of CKD is probably driven by the aging population and the rising prevalence of diabetes. CKD not only adversely impacts an individual's health and well-being, but also poses significant challenge on the economy of the society.

Summary

Experts from ten countries and regions around the world (Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States) convened in the 4th International Congress of Chinese Nephrologists on December 1, 2023 to discuss the global dialysis burden. Although the cost of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) accounts for 2-3% of total healthcare expenditure in developed countries, patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) only represent a small percentage (<0.5%) of the population. Importantly, the economic impact of ESKD is not limited to direct medical costs, but extends to indirect societal costs, such as productivity loss by patients and caregivers. Primary prevention of CKD, early screening and treatment to delay progression to ESKD (where treatment costs rise dramatically), and utilization of home-based dialysis therapy (including peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis) shall be implemented as part of cost-containment strategy. Kidney transplant provides better outcomes than dialysis and is cost-effective in long run, whereas conservative kidney management should be considered for elderly frail patients.

Key Messages

Implementation of preventive measures and cost-effective treatment strategies are the cornerstone to combat the global CKD epidemic.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors prescriptions in Chinese hospitalized chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Many guidelines have recommended renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) as the first-line treatment for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We studied RASI prescription trends from 2010 to 2019, and analyzed the characteristics associated with RASI prescription in Chinese hospitalized CKD patients.

AIM

To study the prescription of renin angiotensin system inhibitors in hospitalized patients with CKD in China.

METHODS

It was retrospectively, cross-sectional reviewed RASI prescriptions in hospitalized CKD patients in China from 2010 to 2019. RASI prescribing trends were analyzed from 2010 to 2019, and bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify characteristics associated with RASI prescription.

RESULTS

A total of 35090 CKD patients were included, with 10043 (28.6%) RASI prescriptions. Among these patients, 18919 (53.9%) met the criteria for RASI treatments based on the 2012 kidney disease: Improving global outcomes guidelines. Of these, 7246 (38.3%) patients received RASI prescriptions. RASI prescriptions showed an initial rapid increase from 2011 to 2012, reached its peak around 2015 and 2016, and then exhibited a subsequent slight decreasing trend. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that several characteristics, including the male gender, age less than 60-year-old, nephrology department admission, lower CKD stage, history of hypertension or diabetes, proteinuria, glomerulonephritis as the CKD etiology, and non-acute kidney injury were associated with RASI prescriptions.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of RASI prescriptions showed an initial increase but a slight decreasing trend in more recent years. CKD patients with certain characteristics such as elderly age, advanced disease stage, surgery department admission, or acute kidney injury were less likely to receive RASI prescriptions. In the application of RASI in hospitalized CKD patients is insufficient. The actual clinical practice needs to be improved. The development of related research is helpful to guide the correct choice of clinical treatment strategy.

[Association Between the Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation and Albuminuria: A Cross-Sectional Study of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018]

Objective

Prior studies have established a connection between albuminuria and various inflammatory reactions, highlighting that an increase in C-reactive protein by 1 mg/L increases the likelihood of albuminuria by 2%. Recent investigations indicate a positive correlation between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and increased urinary protein excretion. In addition, elevated levels of the systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) also correlate with a higher prevalence of albuminuria. The aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) offers a more comprehensive indicator of inflammation, providing an extensive assessment of systemic inflammatory status compared to SII and SIRI. Yet, the specific relationship between AISI and albuminuria remains unclear. This study aims to explore this association in U.S. adults.

Methods

We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for 2007-2018, excluding pregnant women and individuals under 18. Cases with missing data on AISI, urinary albumin concentration, and other covariates were also excluded. AISI was computed using the formula: AISI=(platelet count×neutrophil count×monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. Albuminuria was defined as the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio exceeding 30 mg/g. Continuous variables were presented in the form of the mean±standard error, and categorical variables in percentages. We utilized weighted t-tests and chi-square tests for baseline comparisons. We applied weighted multivariable logistic regression and generalized additive models (GAM) to explore the association between AISI and albuminuria and to assess potential nonlinear relationships.

Results

The study included 32273 participants, with an average age of (46.75±0.24) years old. The cohort comprised 48.73% males and 51.27% females. The prevalence of albuminuria was 9.64%. The average logarithmic value of log2AISI was 7.95±0.01, and were categorized into tertiles as follows: Quartile 1 (Q1) (4.94 to 7.49), Q2 (7.49 to 8.29), and Q3 (8.29 to 10.85). As log2AISI increased, so did the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and albuminuria, all showing statistically significant increases (P<0.001). Similarly, the use of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, and hypoglycemic drugs was also more prevalent (P<0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed across the three groups concerning age, race and ethnicity, formal education, alcohol consumption, smoking status, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, HbA1c, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, creatinine, uric acid, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P<0.05). However, no significant differences were noted in the total cholesterol or the sex ratios among the groups. The association between log2AISI and albuminuria was assessed using weighted multivariable logistic regression, and the detailed results are presented in Table 2. In model 1, without adjusting for covariates, each unit increase in log2AISI was associated with a 32% increase in the risk of albuminuria (odds ratio [OR]=1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.38, P<0.001). Model 2 was adjusted for age, gender, race, and education level, and showed a similar trend, with each unit increase in log2AISI associated with a 31% increased risk (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.26-1.37, P<0.001). Model 3, which was further adjusted for all covariates, revealed that each unit increase in log2AISI was associated with a 20% increase in the risk of albuminuria (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 1.15-1.26, P<0.001). The study also transformed log2AISI from a continuous to a categorical variable for analysis. Compared with Q1, the risk of albuminuria in Q3, after adjusting for all covariates, significantly increased (OR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.22-1.55, P<0.001). Q2 also demonstrated a higher risk compared with Q1 (OR=1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.36, P=0.004). The trend test indicated a dose-effect relationship between increasing log2AISI and the rising risk of albuminuria. GAM revealed a nonlinear relationship between log2AISI and albuminuria, with distinct trends noted between sexes. Segmented regression based on turning points showed significant effects among women, although the slope difference between the segments was not significant. In men, a significant threshold effect was observed; below the log2AISI of 7.25, increases in log2AISI did not enhance the risk of albuminuria, but above this threshold, the risk significantly increased. As part of a sensitivity analysis, weighted multivariable logistic regression was performed by changing the outcome variable to macroalbuminuria and adjusting for all covariates. The analysis showed that for every unit increase in log2AISI, the risk of developing macroalbuminuria increased by 31% (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.15-1.49, P<0.001). Compared with Q1, the risk of albuminuria in Q3 increased by 69% (OR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.27-2.25, P<0.001), and in Q2, it increased by 40% (OR=1.40, 95% CI: 1.03-1.92, P=0.030). Subgroup analysis and interaction results showed that the positive association between AISI and proteinuria risk was stronger in men than in women. Similarly, the association was stronger in people with hypertension compared with those with normal blood pressure, and higher in overweight people compared with those of normal weight. Furthermore, smokers and drinkers showed a stronger positive association between AISI and the risk of proteinuria than non-smokers and non-drinkers do. These results suggest that sex, blood pressure, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption interact with AISI to influence the risk of proteinuria.

Conclusion

There is a robust positive association between AISI and increased risks of albuminuria in US adults. As log2AISI increases, so does the risk of albuminuria. However, further validation of this conclusion through large-scale prospective studies is warranted.

Differences in the epidemiology, management and outcomes of kidney disease in men and women

Improved understanding of differences in kidney disease epidemiology, management and outcomes in men and women could help nephrologists to better meet the needs of their patients from a sex- and gender-specific perspective. Evidence of sex differences in the risk and outcomes of acute kidney injury is mixed and dependent on aetiology. Women have a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5 than men, whereas men have a higher prevalence of albuminuria and hence CKD stages 1-2. Men show a faster decline in kidney function, progress more frequently to kidney failure and have higher mortality and risk of cardiovascular disease than women. However, the protective effect of female sex is reduced with CKD progression. Women are less likely than men to be aware of, screened for and diagnosed with CKD, started on antiproteinuric medication and referred to nephrologist care. They also consistently report a poorer health-related quality of life and a higher symptom burden than men. Women experience greater barriers than men to access the waiting list for kidney transplantation, particularly with respect to older age and obesity. However, women also have longer survival than men after transplantation, which may partly explain the comparable prevalence of transplantation between the sexes.

Why do we keep ignoring sex in kidney disease?

Throughout the history of nephrology, little attention has been paid to the sex and gender differences in kidney disease. This lack of awareness prevents optimal diagnosis and management of kidney disease. In today's world of precision medicine, it is imperative to appreciate the differential factors regarding gender and kidney disease. This editorial summarizes the up-to-date literature regarding sex and gender differences in kidney disease and considers areas where knowledge is incomplete and where further research is needed. We address sex-specific effects on chronic kidney disease epidemiology; risks of dialysis underdosing and medication overdosing in women; unexplained loss of female sex advantage in life expectancy during dialysis, and impact of sex on diagnosis and management of genetic kidney disease. We also aim to highlight the impact of gender on kidney health and raise awareness of disparities that may be faced by women, and transgender and gender-diverse persons when a male-model approach is used by healthcare systems. By understanding the link between sex and kidney disease, kidney specialists can improve the care and outcomes of their patients. In addition, research on this topic can inform the development of targeted prevention and intervention strategies that address the specific needs and risk factors of different populations.

Estimated Prevalence and Testing for Albuminuria in US Adults at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease

Importance

Albuminuria testing is crucial for guiding evidence-based treatments to mitigate chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and cardiovascular morbidity, but it is widely underutilized among persons with or at risk for CKD.

Objective

To estimate the extent of albuminuria underdetection from lack of testing and evaluate its association with CKD treatment in a large US cohort of patients with hypertension or diabetes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study examined adults with hypertension or diabetes, using data from the 2007 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) and the Optum deidentified electronic health record (EHR) data set of diverse US health care organizations. Analyses were conducted from October 31, 2022, to May 19, 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Using NHANES as a nationally representative sample, a logistic regression model was developed to estimate albuminuria (urine albumin-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g). This model was then applied to active outpatients in the EHR from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. The prevalence of albuminuria among those with and without albuminuria testing during this period was estimated. A multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between having albuminuria testing and CKD therapies within the subsequent year (prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEi] or angiotensin II receptor blocker [ARB], prescription for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor [SGLT2i], and blood pressure control to less than 130/80 mm Hg or less than 140/90 mm Hg on the latest outpatient measure).

Results

The total EHR study population included 192 108 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [15.1] years; 185 589 [96.6%] with hypertension; 50 507 [26.2%] with diabetes; mean [SD] eGFR, 84 [21] mL/min/1.73 m2). There were 33 629 patients (17.5%) who had albuminuria testing; of whom 11 525 (34.3%) had albuminuria. Among 158 479 patients who were untested, the estimated albuminuria prevalence rate was 13.4% (n = 21 231). Thus, only 35.2% (11 525 of 32 756) of the projected population with albuminuria had been tested. Albuminuria testing was associated with higher adjusted odds of receiving ACEi or ARB treatment (OR, 2.39 [95% CI, 2.32-2.46]), SGLT2i treatment (OR, 8.22 [95% CI, 7.56-8.94]), and having blood pressure controlled to less than 140/90 mm Hg (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.16-1.23]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of patients with hypertension or diabetes, it was estimated that approximately two-thirds of patients with albuminuria were undetected due to lack of testing. These results suggest that improving detection of CKD with albuminuria testing represents a substantial opportunity to optimize care delivery for reducing CKD progression and cardiovascular complications.

Estimated Lifetime Benefit of Combined RAAS and SGLT2 Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Albuminuric CKD without Diabetes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite high rates of complications in patients with CKD without diabetes, the implementation of proven therapies in this group remains low. Expressing the clinical benefit of a therapy in terms of extra years free from the disease or death may facilitate implementation. We estimated lifetime survival free of kidney failure for patients with albuminuric CKD without diabetes treated with the combination therapy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors relative to patients not treated.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We used trial-level estimates of the effect of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ramipril/benazepril; n=690) and SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin; n=1398) compared with placebo to derive the effect of combination therapy versus no treatment. Using this effect, we estimated treatment effect of combination therapy to the active treatment group of patients with albuminuric CKD without diabetes participating in the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD) trial (n=697) and projected eventfree and overall survival for those treated and not treated with combination therapy. We also performed our calculations anticipating lower adherence and less pronounced benefits than were observed in the clinical trials. The primary outcome was a composite of doubling of serum creatinine, kidney failure, or death.

RESULTS

The aggregate estimated hazard ratio comparing combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and SGLT2 inhibitor versus no treatment for the primary end point was 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.41). For a 50-year-old patient until the age of 75 years, the estimated survival free from the primary composite end point was 17.0 (95% confidence interval, 12.4 to 19.6) years with the combination therapy and 9.6 years (95% confidence interval, 8.4 to 10.7) with no treatment with any of these agents, corresponding to a gain in eventfree survival of 7.4 (95% confidence interval, 6.4 to 8.7) years. When assuming lower adherence and less pronounced efficacy of combination therapy, the gain in eventfree survival ranged from 5.3 years (95% confidence interval, 4.4 to 6.1) to 5.8 years (95% confidence interval, 4.8 to 6.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and SGLT2 inhibitor in patients with albuminuric CKD without diabetes is expected to substantially increase kidney failure-free survival.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Benazepril for Advanced Chronic Renal Insufficiency, NCT00270426, and a Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dapagliflozin on Renal Outcomes and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (Dapa-CKD), NCT03036150.

ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents

Since the 2018 ISPAD guidelines on this topic, follow-up of large cohorts from around the globe have continued informing the current incidence and prevalence of co-morbidities and complications in young adults with youth-onset type 2 diabetes (T2D). This chapter focuses on the risk factors, diagnosis and presentation of youth-onset T2D, the initial and subsequent management of youth-onset T2D, and management of co-morbidities and complications. We include key updates from the observational phase of the multi-center Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) clinical trial, the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) study and new data from the Restoring Insulin Secretion (RISE) study, a head-to-head comparison of youth onset vs adult-onset T2D. We also include an expanded section on risk factors associated with T2D, algorithms and tables for treatment, management, and assessment of co-morbidities and complications, and sections on recently approved pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of youth-onset T2D, social determinants of health, and settings of care given COVID-19 pandemic.

Sex Differences in the Recognition, Monitoring, and Management of CKD in Health Care: An Observational Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Reported sex differences in the etiology, population prevalence, progression rates, and health outcomes of people with CKD may be explained by differences in health care.

METHODS

We evaluated sex as the variable of interest in a health care-based study of adults (n=227,847) with at least one outpatient eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 measurement denoting probable CKD in Stockholm from 2009 to 2017. We calculated the odds ratios for diagnosis of CKD and provision of RASi and statins at inclusion, and hazard ratios for CKD diagnosis, visiting a nephrologist, or monitoring creatinine and albuminuria during follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 227,847 subjects, of whom 126,289 were women (55%). At inclusion, women had lower odds of having received a diagnostic code for CKD and were less likely to have received RASi and statins, despite having guideline-recommended indications. In time-to-event analyses, women were less likely to have received a CKD diagnosis (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.45) and visited a nephrologist (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.48) regardless of disease severity, presence of albuminuria, or criteria for referral. Women were also less likely to undergo monitoring of creatinine or albuminuria, including those with diabetes or hypertension. These differences remained after adjustment for comorbidities, albuminuria, and highest educational achievement, and among subjects with confirmed CKD at retesting. Although in absolute terms all nephrology-care indicators gradually improved over time, the observed sex gap persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

There were profound sex differences in the detection, recognition, monitoring, referrals, and management of CKD. The disparity was also observed in people at high risk and among those who had guideline-recommended indications.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2022_10_11_JASN2022030373.mp3.

The Other Way Around: Living With Chronic Kidney Disease From the Perspective of Men

A wealth of evidence has suggested sex (biological) and gender (sociocultural) differences in the prevalence, progression, and outcomes of persons with chronic kidney disease. Much of this evidence tends to emphasize differences in which women are disadvantaged, and less attention is paid to findings in which women are better off or similar to men. However, gender medicine recognizes that men and women have different disease determinants, presentation, and attitudes, and it pertains to both sexes. In this review, we revisit chronic kidney disease through the perspective of men, and illustrate a population segment at need of stringent preventative and management strategies.

Chronic Kidney Disease Testing Among At-Risk Adults in the U.S. Remains Low: Real-World Evidence From a National Laboratory Database

OBJECTIVE

An estimated 37 million Americans have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nearly 90% do not know about their condition because of low awareness about the importance of CKD testing and diagnosis among practitioners and people at risk for CKD. This study uses data from a national clinical laboratory to identify guideline-recommended CKD testing rates across the U.S.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Labcorp) testing between 2013 and 2019 were defined as at risk for CKD if they had any testing ordered with diagnosis codes for diabetes and/or hypertension. Guideline-concordant CKD assessment was defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) testing within the study year.

RESULTS

We identified 28,295,982 at-risk patients (mean age 60.6 ± 14.8 years; 53.6% women): 16.2% had diabetes, 63.8% had hypertension, and 20.1% had both comorbidities. Of these, 80.3% did not receive guideline-concordant assessment during the study period. Furthermore, only 21.0% had uACR testing versus 89.6% with eGFR. CKD assessment occurred at least once in 28.7% of patients with diabetes, 10.5% of patients with hypertension, and 41.4% of patients with both conditions. In a state-by-state comparison, annual testing rates ranged from 5 to 30%. The nationwide rate increased modestly each year between 2013 and 2018 (from 10.7% to 15.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite guideline recommendations, testing for CKD with uACR and eGFR in U.S. adults with diabetes and hypertension is low in routine clinical care. These data highlight the need for strategies to improve routine CKD assessment nationwide.

Potential implications of the 2021 KDIGO blood pressure guideline for adults with chronic kidney disease in the United States

The 2021 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) recommends a target systolic blood pressure under 120 mmHg based on standardized office blood pressure measurement. Here, we examined the potential implications of this new guideline for blood pressure lowering with antihypertensive medication among adults in the United States with CKD compared to the 2012 KDIGO guideline (target blood pressure 130/80 mmHg or under with albuminuria or 140/90 mmHg or under without albuminuria) and the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (target blood pressure under 130/80 mmHg) guideline. Additionally, we determined implications of the 2021 KDIGO guideline for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin II-receptor blocker (ARB) use for those with albuminuria (recommended at systolic blood pressure of 120 mmHg or over) compared to the 2012 KDIGO guideline (recommended at blood pressures over 130/80 mmHg). Data were analyzed from 1,699 adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15-59 ml/min/1.73m2 or a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 30 mg/g or more) in the 2015-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and averaged up to three standardized blood pressure measurements. Among adults with CKD, 69.5% were eligible for blood pressure lowering according to the 2021 KDIGO guideline, compared with 49.8% as per 2012 KDIGO or 55.6% as per 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Among those with albuminuria, 78.2% were eligible for ACEi/ARB use by the 2021 KDIGO guideline compared with 71.0% by the 2012 KDIGO guideline. However, only 39.1% were taking an ACEi/ARB. Thus, our findings highlight opportunities to improve blood pressure management and reduce cardiovascular risk among adults in the United States with CKD.

Chronic kidney disease detection, staging and treatment in cardiovascular disease prevention

Globally, nearly 10% of the population has chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as a glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² and/or a urinary albumin to creatinine ratio greater than 30 mg/g (3 mg/mmol). Persons with CKD have a substantially high risk of cardiovascular disease. Indeed, most persons with CKD are far more likely to develop a cardiovascular event than to progress to end-stage kidney disease. Although early detection and staging of CKD could help prevent its cardiovascular consequences, current rates of testing for CKD are very low, even among high-risk populations such as persons with diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease. In this review, we first describe the need to test for both estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria among persons at high risk of CKD in order to properly stage CKD and enhance cardiovascular risk stratification. We then discuss how detection and staging for CKD could help prioritise patients at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure who could derive the largest benefit from cardiovascular preventive interventions. In addition, we discuss the central role of CKD detection and staging in the initiation of cardiorenal preventive therapies, such as the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, which have shown overwhelming evidence of cardiorenal protection. We conclude by discussing strategies to overcome historical barriers to CKD detection and treatment.