1
|
Persson Kylén J, Björns S, Hägglin C, Grönbeck-Lindén I, Piper L, Wårdh I. Decisional needs for older adults, home health care nurses and dental hygienists during team-based oral health assessments in ordinary home settings - a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:779. [PMID: 39313790 PMCID: PMC11421118 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05367-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation by all actors involved in health planning is a prerequisite for person-centred care and healthy ageing. Understanding the multiple knowledge needs and the values that shape oral health assessments in home settings is important both to enable participation in oral health planning and to contribute to healthy ageing. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate decisional needs during oral health assessments in ordinary home settings from the perspectives of older adults, home health care nurses and dental hygienists. METHODS Data was collected in ordinary home settings through 24 team-based oral assessments and 39 brief, semi-structured interviews including older adults (n = 24), home health care nurses (n = 8) and dental hygienists (n = 7). Data was analysed using content analysis with a deductive approach. The analysis was guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Guide. RESULTS The analysis revealed that all participants considered participation in decision-making important but until now, older adults might not have participated in making decisions regarding oral health issues. The older adults considered participation important because the decisions had a strong impact on their lives, affecting their health. The professionals considered decision-making important for knowing what step to take next and to be able to follow up and evaluate previous goals and treatments. Organizational and personal barriers for shared decision-making among home health care nurses and dental hygienists were identified. Of the 24 older adults, 20 had different oral health conditions that objectively indicated the need for treatment. An initial important decision concerned whether the older adult wanted to make an appointment for dental care, and if so, how. Another decisional conflict concerned whether and how assisted oral care should be carried out. CONCLUSION It is important for key participants in ordinary home settings to participate in interprofessional teams in home health care. To further anchor this in theory, conceptual models for professionals from different care organizations (municipal care, dental care) need to be developed that also involve older adults as participants. Future research could bridge theory and practice by including theories of learning while exploring interorganizational oral health planning in home settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Persson Kylén
- Department of Health Sciences, University West, Trollhättan, 461 86, Sweden.
- Centre for Gerodontology, Public Dental Service, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, 402 33, Sweden.
| | - Sara Björns
- Department of Cariology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden
| | - Catharina Hägglin
- Centre for Gerodontology, Public Dental Service, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, 402 33, Sweden
- Department of Behavioural and Community Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden
| | - Ingela Grönbeck-Lindén
- Centre for Gerodontology, Public Dental Service, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, 402 33, Sweden
- Department of Behavioural and Community Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 405 30, Sweden
| | - Laurence Piper
- School of Business, Economics and IT, University West, Trollhättan, 461 86, Sweden
- Economic and Management Sciences, University of Western Cape, Bellville, 7535, South Africa
| | - Inger Wårdh
- Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, 141 04, Sweden
- Academic Centre for Geriatric Dentistry, Stockholm, 112 19, Sweden
- Department of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, 651 88, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harris E, Benham A, Stephenson J, Conway D, Chong AY, Curtis H, Astin F. Patient decision aids for aortic stenosis and chronic coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024; 23:561-581. [PMID: 38147507 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Shared decision-making is recommended for patients considering treatment options for severe aortic stenosis (AS) and chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). This review aims to systematically identify and assess patient decision aids (PtDAs) for chronic CAD and AS and evaluate the international evidence on their effectiveness for improving the quality of decision-making. METHODS AND RESULTS Five databases (Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo), clinical trial registers, and 30 PtDA repositories/websites were searched from 2006 to March 2023. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were completed independently by multiple reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted using Stata statistical software. Eleven AS and 10 CAD PtDAs were identified; seven were less than 5 years old. Over half of the PtDAs were web based and the remainder paper based. One AS and two CAD PtDAs fully/partially achieved international PtDA quality criteria. Ten studies were included in the review; four reported on the development/evaluation of AS PtDAs and six on CAD PtDAs. Most studies were conducted in the USA with White, well-educated, English-speaking participants. No studies fulfilled all quality criteria for reporting PtDA development and evaluation. Meta-analyses found that PtDAs significantly increased patient knowledge compared with 'usual care' (mean difference: 0.620; 95% confidence interval 0.396-0.845, P < 0.001) but did not change decisional conflict. CONCLUSION Patients who use PtDAs when considering treatments for AS or chronic CAD are likely to be better informed than those who do not. Existing PtDAs may not meet the needs of people with low health literacy levels as they are rarely involved in their development. REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42021264700.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Harris
- School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Walton Hall, Kents Hill, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
| | - Alex Benham
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
| | - John Stephenson
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
| | - Dwayne Conway
- Department of Cardiology, Chesterman Wing, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
| | - Aun-Yeong Chong
- Department of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4W7, Canada
| | - Helen Curtis
- The Library and Knowledge Service, Calderdale Royal Hospital, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Halifax HX3 0PW, UK
| | - Felicity Astin
- School of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Walton Hall, Kents Hill, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wall JA, Pozzar RA, Enzinger AC, Tavormina A, Howard C, Matulonis UA, Liu JF, Horowitz N, Meyer LA, Wright AA. Improving the palliative-procedure decision-making process for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A secondary analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 188:125-130. [PMID: 38954989 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is common in patients with advanced gynecologic and gastrointestinal cancers. Frequently, patients with PC undergo palliative surgery or procedures to manage disease-related complications and side effects. However, there are limited data regarding patients' and family caregivers' decision-making processes about these procedures. Thus, we sought to describe the decision-making experiences of patients with PC who elect to pursue palliative surgical procedures and their family caregivers. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected during a pilot randomized controlled trial of BOLSTER, a nurse-led telehealth intervention for patients with PC and their caregivers after an acute hospitalization and palliative procedure. Participants in both study arms described their experiences in semi-structured interviews. We re-analyzed coded qualitative data with a focus on understanding decision-making experiences surrounding palliative surgery and procedures using conventional content analysis. RESULTS Interviews from 32 participants, 23 patients and 9 caregivers, were analyzed. Participants reported their decision-making was complicated by illness uncertainty and a desire for clear, effective communication with surgical and medical oncology teams. Participants requested more information about the impact of palliative procedures on their daily life. Several also noted that, without improved understanding, a misalignment between patient and family caregiver goals and palliative procedures may inadvertently increase suffering. CONCLUSION Discussions related to patients' goals and preferences can improve the quality of treatment decision-making in patients with PC and their caregivers. Future research should test interventions to improve advanced cancer patients' illness understanding and decision-making surrounding palliative surgery and procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn A Wall
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
| | - Rachel A Pozzar
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea C Enzinger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Ursula A Matulonis
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Joyce F Liu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Neil Horowitz
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alexi A Wright
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaetani RS, Ladin K, Abelson JS. Journey through the Decades: The Evolution in Treatment and Shared Decision Making for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2807. [PMID: 39199579 PMCID: PMC11353159 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Revised: 08/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has undergone significant transformations over the decades and optimal treatment approaches continue to evolve. There have been numerous advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy from the first description of the abdominoperineal resection in 1908, timing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the late 20th and early 21st century, and most recently, the introduction of organ preservation or nonoperative management in 2004. Alongside these advancements, the concept of shared decision making in medicine has evolved, prompting a focus on patient-centered care. This evolution in practice has been fueled by a growing recognition of the importance of patient autonomy and the alignment of treatment options with patients' values and preferences. With the growing number of possible treatment options, variability in patient counseling exists, highlighting the need for a standardized approach to shared decision making in locally advanced rectal cancer. This narrative review will describe the evolution of treatment options of locally advanced rectal cancer as well as the concept of shared decision making and decision aids, and will introduce a decision aid for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have achieved a complete clinical response and are eligible for watch and wait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Racquel S. Gaetani
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA;
| | - Keren Ladin
- Department of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Abelson
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fallon L, Lau AY, Ciccia D, Duckworth TJ, Pereira C, Kopp E, Perica V, Sherman KA. Perceived challenges in treatment decision-making for endometriosis: healthcare professional perspectives. Health Psychol Behav Med 2024; 12:2383469. [PMID: 39100426 PMCID: PMC11295683 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2383469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Endometriosis, a systemic chronic inflammatory condition which has no cure, has a high symptom burden that can negatively impact every facet of life. Given the absence of a gold-standard treatment, the best symptom management regimen in endometriosis is heavily reliant on a patient's values and preferences, making shared decision-making (SDM) vital. However, a comprehensive patient decision aid (PtDA) intervention that could facilitate patient decision-making and promote SDM is lacking in endometriosis, and there is little research on the decisional support needs of individuals with this condition. This qualitative study aimed to explore healthcare professional (HP) perspectives of their clients' decisional support needs when choosing treatments to manage endometriosis symptoms, with a view to evaluating the need for a PtDA. Methods Australian HPs identified as specialising in endometriosis care (N = 13) were invited to participate in a short interview over the Internet by phone. Questions focussed on perceived facilitators and challenges of decision-making when choosing treatments for endometriosis. Transcribed qualitative data were thematically analysed and verified by multiple coders, using the template approach. Results Four themes were identified: (1) Identifying and setting priorities; (2) HPs' lack of time and perceived lack of knowledge; (3) Patient-centred care and SDM, including patient capacity; and (4) Decision-making blinded by hope. This is the first known study to explore HPs' perspectives on patient decision-making challenges in endometriosis. Discussion Findings draw attention to the difficulties people with endometriosis experience when assessing and choosing treatments, highlighting the need for a comprehensive PtDA intervention to support this decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynda Fallon
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Annie Y.S. Lau
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Donna Ciccia
- National Institute of Complementary Medicine (NICM), Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
- Endometriosis Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tanya Jane Duckworth
- Endometriosis Australia, Sydney, Australia
- School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Chantelle Pereira
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emily Kopp
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Valentina Perica
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kerry A. Sherman
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Lifespan Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koysombat K, Mukherjee A, Nyunt S, Pedder H, Vinogradova Y, Burgin J, Dave H, Comninos AN, Talaulikar V, Bailey JV, Dhillo WS, Abbara A. Factors affecting shared decision-making concerning menopausal hormone therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2024; 1538:34-44. [PMID: 39014999 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.15185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is an effective treatment for menopause-related symptoms. Menopause management guidelines recommend a personalized approach to menopause care, including MHT use. Decision-making around menopause care is a complex, iterative process influenced by multiple factors framed by perspectives from both women and healthcare providers (HCPs). This narrative review aims to summarize evidence around factors affecting decision-making regarding menopause-related care. For HCPs, the provision of individualized risk estimates is challenging in practice given the number of potential benefits and risks to consider, and the complexity of the data available, especially within time-limited consultations. Women seeking menopause care have the difficult task of making sense of the benefit versus risk profiles to make choices in line with their decisional needs influenced by sociocultural/economic, educational, demographic, and personal characteristics. The press, social media, and influential celebrities also impact the perception of menopause and decision-making around it. Understanding these factors can lead to improved participation in shared decision-making, satisfaction with the decision and decision-making process, adherence to treatment, reduced decisional regret, efficient use of resources, and ultimately long-term satisfaction with care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanyada Koysombat
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Sandhi Nyunt
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hugo Pedder
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yana Vinogradova
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jo Burgin
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Harshida Dave
- Woman representative with lived-experience of menopause, London, UK
| | - Alexander N Comninos
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Julia V Bailey
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Waljit S Dhillo
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ali Abbara
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mehta AB, Lockhart S, Lange AV, Matlock DD, Douglas IS, Morris MA. Identifying Decisional Needs for Adult Tracheostomy and Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Decision Making to Inform Shared Decision-Making Interventions. Med Decis Making 2024:272989X241266246. [PMID: 39082480 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241266246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision making for adult tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation is emotionally complex. Expectations of surrogate decision makers and physicians rarely align. Little is known about what surrogates need to make goal-concordant decisions. Currently, little is known about the decisional needs of surrogates and providers, impeding efforts to improve the decision-making process. METHODS Using a thematic analysis approach, we performed a qualitative study with semistructured interviews with surrogates of adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) being considered for tracheostomy and physicians routinely caring for patients receiving MV. Recruitment was stopped when thematic saturation was reached. We describe the decision-making process, identify core decisional needs, and map the process and needs for possible elements of a future shared decision-making tool. RESULTS Forty-three participants (23 surrogates and 20 physicians) completed interviews. Hope, Lack of Knowledge Data, and Uncertainty emerged as the 3 main themes that described the decision-making process and were interconnected with one another and, at times, opposed each other. Core decisional needs included information about patient wishes, past activity/medical history, short- and long-term outcomes, and meaningful recovery. The themes were the lens through which the decisional needs were weighed. Decision making existed as a balance between surrogate emotions and understanding and physician recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Tracheostomy and prolonged MV decision making is complex. Hope and Uncertainty were conceptual themes that often battled with one another. Lack of Knowledge & Data plagued both surrogates and physicians. Multiple tangible factors were identified that affected surrogate decision making and physician recommendations. IMPLICATIONS Understanding this complex decision-making process has the potential to improve the information provided to surrogates and, potentially, increase the goal-concordant care and alignment of surrogate and physician expectations. HIGHLIGHTS Decision making for tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation is a complex interactive process between surrogate decision makers and providers.Qualitative themes of Hope, Uncertainty, and Lack of Knowledge & Data shared by both providers and surrogates were identified and described the decision-making process.Concrete decisional needs of patient wishes, past activity/medical history, short- and long-term outcomes, and meaningful recovery affected each of the larger themes and represented key information from which surrogates and providers based decisions and recommendations.The qualitative themes and decisional needs identified provide a roadmap to design a shared decision-making intervention to improve adult tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuj B Mehta
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Denver Health & Hospital Association, Denver, CO, USA
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Steven Lockhart
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Allison V Lange
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Geriatric Medicine. Department of Medicine. University of Colorado School of Medicine. Aurora, CO, USA
- Veteran's Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center. Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ivor S Douglas
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Denver Health & Hospital Association, Denver, CO, USA
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Megan A Morris
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Elias S, Wenzel J, Cooper LA, Perrin N, Commodore‐Mensah Y, Lewis KB, Koirala B, Slone S, Byiringiro S, Marsteller J, Himmelfarb CR. Multiethnic Perspectives of Shared Decision-Making in Hypertension: A Mixed-Methods Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e032568. [PMID: 38989822 PMCID: PMC11292762 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) has the potential to improve hypertension care quality and equity. However, research lacks diverse representation and evidence about how race and ethnicity affect SDM. Therefore, this study aims to explore SDM in the context of hypertension management. METHODS AND RESULTS Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative data were sourced at baseline and 12-month follow up from RICH LIFE (Reducing Inequities in Care of Hypertension: Lifestyle Improvement for Everyone) participants (n=1212) with hypertension. Qualitative data were collected from semistructured individual interviews, at 12-month follow-up, with participants (n=36) selected based on their SDM scores and blood pressure outcome. Patients were cross- categorized based on high or low SDM scores and systolic blood pressure reduction of ≥10 or <10 mm Hg. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that predictors of SDM scores and blood pressure outcome were race and ethnicity (relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.64; P=0.029), age (RRR, 1.03; P=0.002), educational level (RRR, 1.87; P=0.016), patient activation (RRR, 0.98; P<0.001; RRR, 0.99; P=0.039), and hypertension knowledge (RRR, 2.2; P<0.001; and RRR, 1.57; P=0.045). Qualitative and mixed-methods findings highlight that provider-patient communication and relationship influenced SDM, being emphasized both as facilitators and barriers. Other facilitators were patients' understanding of hypertension; clinicians' interest in the patient, and clinicians' personality and attitudes; and barriers included perceived lack of compassion, relationship hierarchy, and time constraints. CONCLUSIONS Participants with different SDM scores and blood pressure outcomes varied in determinants of decision and descriptions of contextual factors influencing SDM. Results provide actionable information, are novel, and expand our understanding of factors influencing SDM in hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Wenzel
- Johns Hopkins School of NursingBaltimoreMDUSA
- Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Lisa A. Cooper
- Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMDUSA
| | | | - Yvonne Commodore‐Mensah
- Johns Hopkins School of NursingBaltimoreMDUSA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMDUSA
| | | | | | - Sarah Slone
- Johns Hopkins School of NursingBaltimoreMDUSA
| | | | - Jill Marsteller
- Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Cheryl R. Himmelfarb
- Johns Hopkins School of NursingBaltimoreMDUSA
- Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ding K, Bear B, Sood E, Alderfer M, Crosby L, Hildenbrand AK. Disease-modifying therapies for sickle cell disease: Decisional needs and supports among adolescents and young adults. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024; 71:e30999. [PMID: 38622789 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making is one promising solution to addressing barriers in use of disease-modifying therapies for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with sickle cell disease (SCD). A thorough understanding of decisional needs can guide the development of decisional supports and promote shared decision-making. PROCEDURE Informed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF), we conducted a qualitative analysis to assess decisional needs and supports reported by AYAs with SCD, their caregivers, and healthcare providers. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with AYAs and their caregivers, and online crowdsourcing was used with SCD providers. Thematic and descriptive content analyses were used to summarize perspectives on decisional needs and supports regarding disease-modifying therapies. RESULTS Fourteen AYAs (Mage = 21 years, 57% male, 93% non-Hispanic Black, 79% HbSS), 11 caregivers (80% female, 100% non-Hispanic Black), and 40 healthcare providers (65% female, 65% non-Hispanic White, Myears in practice = 14.8 years, 75% physicians) participated. Thematic analysis revealed needs related to: decisional conflict, inadequate knowledge, unclear expectations, and inadequate supports and resources. Six forms of support emerged as important for decision-making: establishing an open and trusting patient/family-provider relationship, providing information, accepting ambivalence and unreadiness, supporting implementation of a decision, addressing inadequate health and social services, and promoting adequate social, emotional, and instrumental help. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to assess decisional needs and supports for AYAs with SCD considering disease-modifying therapies. Additional research is needed to examine which decision supports are the most impactful to promote effective shared decision-making in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Ding
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Health, Nemours Children's Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Benjamin Bear
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Erica Sood
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Nemours Cardiac Center, Nemours Children's Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Melissa Alderfer
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lori Crosby
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Aimee K Hildenbrand
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Behavioral Health, Nemours Children's Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bushroe KM, Crisp KD, Politi MC, Brennan SK, Housten AJ. Evaluating caregiver-clinician communication for tracheostomy placement in the neonatal intensive care unit: a qualitative inquiry. J Perinatol 2024; 44:963-969. [PMID: 37833495 PMCID: PMC11014892 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01793-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identify stakeholders' tracheostomy decision-making information priorities in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN English-speaking caregivers and clinicians who participated in NICU tracheostomy discussions between January 2017 and December 2021 were eligible. They reviewed a pediatric tracheostomy communication guide prior to meeting. Interviews focused on tracheostomy decision-making experiences, communication preferences, and guide perceptions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using iterative inductive/deductive coding to inform thematic analysis. RESULTS Ten caregivers and nine clinicians were interviewed. Caregivers were surprised by the severity of their child's diagnosis and the intensive home care required, but proceeded with tracheostomy because it was the only chance for survival. All recommended that tracheostomy information be introduced early and in phases. Inadequate communication limited caregivers' understanding of post-surgical care and discharge requirements. All felt a guide could standardize communication. CONCLUSIONS Caregivers seek detailed information regarding expectations after tracheostomy placement in the NICU and at home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie M Bushroe
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital and Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Kelly D Crisp
- College of Health and Human Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mary C Politi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Steven K Brennan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Pulmonary Medicine, St. Louis Children's Hospital and Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ashley J Housten
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Juckett LA, Howard ML, Fields BE, Jarrott SE, Mion LC, Thomas KS. Supporting Mealtime Participation Among People Living With Dementia at Home: Challenges and Strategies for Caregivers. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2024; 64:gnad167. [PMID: 38113521 PMCID: PMC11194633 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Approximately 60% of people living with dementia at home are unable to routinely participate in mealtime activities (e.g., eating, safe food preparation), warranting assistance to ensure people with dementia meet their health and nutritional needs. The purpose of this study was to characterize these barriers to mealtime participation and identify potential caregiver-led strategies to enhance mealtime activities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We used a qualitative descriptive approach and obtained semistructured interview data from (a) allied health professionals and (b) community-based nutrition program providers who frequently serve people with dementia. Interview data were examined by means of directed content analysis and framework methodology until data saturation was reached. Codes from our analysis were categorized according to constructs drawn from the Socio-Ecological Model for Developing and Implementing Comprehensive Dementia Care. RESULTS Data were obtained from 20 participants who attributed common mealtime participation barriers to: impairments in functional status, cognitive status deficits, a lack of caregiver knowledge and skills, and unsafe living conditions. Caregiver-led strategies to overcome these barriers included: reducing auditory and visual distractions, providing written cues to perform mealtime activities, eliminating clutter and fall risk hazards, and leveraging community-based nutrition program providers (e.g., home-delivered meal providers). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS People with dementia face several eating and mealtime participation obstacles. Caregiver-led strategies implemented by family, friends, or community-based nutrition program providers may enhance mealtime activities at home. Findings point to opportunities to develop decision-making tools and resources for caregivers to optimize the health and nutrition of people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Juckett
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mequeil L Howard
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Beth E Fields
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Education, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Shannon E Jarrott
- College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Lorraine C Mion
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kali S Thomas
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ross R, Prater LC, Cole A, Mustafa A, Pham K, Gallagher A, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Phelan EA. Provider Perspectives on Addressing Firearm Safety with Older Adults in Primary Care. Clin Gerontol 2024; 47:555-570. [PMID: 37791738 PMCID: PMC10991080 DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2023.2264291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chronic conditions, including mild cognitive impairment and depression, place older adults at high risk of firearm suicide. Approximately 40% of older adults have access to a firearm, and many do not store their firearms safely. However, firearm counseling occurs infrequently in clinical settings. Using by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) to conceptualize the decisional support needed by patients and their providers to facilitate firearm counseling, we explore provider perspectives on desired resources for addressing firearm safety with older adult patients. METHODS From March - August 2022, we conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with primary care providers caring for older adults. We report deductive concepts as well as emergent themes. RESULTS Major themes were identified from the three components of the ODSF; decisional needs, decision support and decisional outcomes. Themes included: provider self-efficacy to conduct firearm counseling, clinical workflow considerations, stories for change, patient diagnosis implications, and caregiver involvement. CONCLUSIONS There is a need for decision aids in the clinical setting that facilitate firearm counseling and promotes shared decision-making about firearm storage. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Implementing a decision aid in the clinical setting can improve provider self-efficacy to conduct firearm counseling and help reduce risk factors associated with firearm-related harm among older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Ross
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Firearm Injury & Policy Research Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Laura C. Prater
- Firearm Injury & Policy Research Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavorial Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Allison Cole
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ayah Mustafa
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Firearm Injury & Policy Research Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kiet Pham
- School of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amy Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Firearm Injury & Policy Research Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ali Rowhani-Rahbar
- Firearm Injury & Policy Research Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A. Phelan
- School of Medicine, Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, School of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bortoli MMD, Kantymir S, Pacheco-Brousseau L, Dahl B, Hansen EH, Lewis KB, Zhang Q, Cole V, Westergren T, Stacey D. Decisional needs and interventions for young women considering contraceptive options: an umbrella review. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:336. [PMID: 38851748 PMCID: PMC11162067 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03172-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although women face a wide range of contraceptive options, globally, young women are at risk of unintended pregnancies. Our umbrella review aimed to determine the decisional needs of nulligravida women aged 11 to 30 considering contraceptive options and identify effective interventions to support their involvement in making decisions about contraceptive use. METHODS We followed Joanna Briggs Institute methods for umbrella reviews, theoretically guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. We searched six electronic databases. Two reviewers independently screened citations, extracted data, and appraised quality using AMSTAR2. We analysed findings descriptively. RESULTS Of 124 citations, we identified 11 reviews of variable quality (critically low to moderate quality): Six reported decisional needs and 5 reported on interventions. Decisional needs of young women were: (a) information needs about contraceptive options (e.g., mechanism of actions, eligibility, administration, side effects); (b) unclear values (concerns about hormone use) and features of different options (based on their religious values); and (c) need for support and resources (support from society and need for privacy). Compared to controls, decision support interventions including patient decision aids and patient education material increased knowledge and improved discussion of options with their clinicians. CONCLUSION Young women making contraceptive decisions experience unmet decisional needs. Effective interventions such as patient decision aids and general patient education materials may address their decisional needs and enhance their level of participation in making contraception decisions. Implications and contribution to the field: Young women's decisional needs when considering contraceptive use are informational needs, unclear values (including religious influences), need for support and resources when facing this decision. Interventions, such as patient decision aid and patient education material can, address decisional needs by improving young women's knowledge about contraceptive options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Müller De Bortoli
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South - Eastern Norway , Kjølnes ring 56, Porsgrunn, N3918, Norway.
| | | | | | - Bente Dahl
- University of South - Eastern Norway, Bakkenteigen, Norway
| | | | - Krystina B Lewis
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Qian Zhang
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Victoria Cole
- Research Librarian, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Thomas Westergren
- University of Agder & University of Stavanger, Kristiansand & Stavanger, Norway
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, Centre for Implementation Research Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aref HAT, Turk T, Dhanani R, Xiao A, Olson J, Paul P, Dennett L, Yacyshyn E, Sadowski CA. Development and evaluation of shared decision-making tools in rheumatology: A scoping review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 66:152432. [PMID: 38554593 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shared decision-making (SDM) tools are facilitators of decision-making through a collaborative process between patients/caregivers and clinicians. These tools help clinicians understand patient's perspectives and help patients in making informed decisions based on their preferences. Despite their usefulness for both patients and clinicians, SDM tools are not widely implemented in everyday practice. One barrier is the lack of clarity on the development and evaluation processes of these tools. Such processes have not been previously described in the field of rheumatology. OBJECTIVE To describe the development and evaluation processes of shared decision-making (SDM) tools used in rheumatology. METHODS Bibliographic databases (e.g., EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched for relevant articles. Guidelines for the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews were followed. Studies included were: addressing SDM among adults in rheumatology, focusing on development and/or evaluation of SDM tool, full texts, empirical research, and in the English language. RESULTS Of the 2030 records screened, forty-six reports addressing 36 SDM tools were included. Development basis and evaluation measures varied across the studies. The most commonly reported development basis was the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria (19/36, 53 %). Other developmental foundations reported were: The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) (6/36, 16 %), Informed Medical Decision Foundation elements (3/36, 8 %), edutainment principles (2/36, 5.5 %), and others (e.g. DISCERN and MARKOV Model) (9/31,29 %). The most commonly used evaluation measures were the Decisional Conflict Scale (18/46, 39 %), acceptability and knowledge (7/46, 15 %), and the preparation for decision-making scale (5/46,11 %). CONCLUSION For better quality and wider implementation of such tools, there is a need for detailed, transparent, systematic, and consistent reporting of development methods and evaluation measures. Using established checklists for reporting development and evaluation is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba A T Aref
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tarek Turk
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ruhee Dhanani
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew Xiao
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joanne Olson
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Pauline Paul
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Liz Dennett
- Geoffrey and Robyn Sperber Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elaine Yacyshyn
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cheryl A Sadowski
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Davies N, Aker N, West E, Rait G, Sampson EL. Acceptability of Using a Decision Aid to Support Family Carers of People With Dementia Towards the End of Life: A Qualitative Study. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14123. [PMID: 38896012 PMCID: PMC11187896 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the experiences, acceptability and utility of a decision aid for family carers of people with dementia towards the end of life. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of family carers enroled into a 6-month feasibility study in England, sampling to gain a range of experiences and views, based on relationship to person they cared for (e.g., spouse, adult child), age, gender, and self-reported use of the decision aid during the feasibility study. Interviews were conducted in March 2021-July 2021 and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. We used COREQ checklist to report our methods and results. RESULTS Family carers found the decision aid acceptable, describing it as comprehensive, accessible with relevant information and its presentation enabled good engagement. Experiences of the decision aid covered four main themes which demonstrated the perceived acceptability and utility: 1. A source of support and reassurance; 2. Empowering conversations and confidence; 3. Including the person living with dementia; and 4. Breaking down complexity. CONCLUSIONS An aid focussing on decisions about dementia end of life care supported family carers break down complex and emotive decisions, not only with making decisions in the moment but also in future planning. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Our three Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) members (all former family carers) were crucial throughout the wider study. PPI supported development of the topic guides, supported trialling the topic guide and interview procedures and finally supported the development of themes as part of the analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Davies
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population StudiesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Narin Aker
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Centre for Ageing Population StudiesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Emily West
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Greta Rait
- PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Elizabeth L. Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal London HospitalEast London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chan WT, Wu D, Lim XH, Du R, Jeyabal P, Ng L, Nabhan TI, Lim DKA, Stapleton F, Lim HL. Visual supplementation is an effective tool in cataract surgery counselling by eye-care practitioners. J Fr Ophtalmol 2024; 47:104175. [PMID: 38603893 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informed consent constitutes an important aspect of eye care. However, patients often experience difficulties understanding and retaining information presented to them during consultations. This study investigates the efficacy of pictorial aids in supplementing preoperative counselling of patients undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS Patients attending routine pre-cataract surgery counselling were randomized to receive either a standard verbal consultation (control) or a verbal consultation with a digitalized pictorial aid illustrating key surgical steps (intervention). Patients were assessed after the consultation on their knowledge, satisfaction, anxiety and preparedness using an anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS Seventy-six patients were recruited and randomized into the control and intervention groups. The intervention group attained better Knowledge Scores (control: 5 [2-6] vs. intervention: 6 [6]), and more patients "strongly agreed" that they were more prepared (control: 78.9% vs. intervention: 97.4%, P=0.028). A higher proportion of patients in the control group either "disagreed" or "neither disagree nor agreed (neutral)" that they were less worried (control: 15.8% vs. intervention: 0.0%, Fisher's Exact Test P=0.025). Although the consultation duration was shorter in the intervention group (21±4mins vs. 27±6mins, P<0.001), the use of digital pictorial aids during consultation resulted in more effective counselling with increased patient knowledge, easier decision-making process and reduced patient anxiety. CONCLUSION Pictorial aids add to the repository of tools available to eye-care practitioners and are low-cost, easy to implement, and can effectively augment existing preoperative counselling processes to ensure accurate and effective preoperative counselling of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W T Chan
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore
| | - D Wu
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore
| | - X H Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - R Du
- Biostatistics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - P Jeyabal
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore
| | - L Ng
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore
| | - T I Nabhan
- College of Optometry, University of Missouri-St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - D K-A Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - F Stapleton
- School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - H L Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, NUHS Tower Block, Level 7, 119228 Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Said CM, Ramage E, McDonald CE, Bicknell E, Hitch D, Fini NA, Bower KJ, Lynch E, Vogel AP, English K, McKay G, English C. Co-designing resources for rehabilitation via telehealth for people with moderate to severe disability post stroke. Physiotherapy 2024; 123:109-117. [PMID: 38458033 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid transition to telehealth. Telehealth presents challenges for rehabilitation of stroke survivors with moderate-to-severe physical disability, which traditionally relies on physical interactions. The objective was to co-design resources to support delivery of rehabilitation via telehealth for this cohort. DESIGN Four-stage integrated knowledge translation co-design approach. Stage 1: Research team comprising researchers, clinicians and stroke survivors defined the research question and approach. Stage 2: Workshops and interviews were conducted with knowledge users (participants) to identify essential elements of the program. Stage 3: Resources developed by the research team. Stage 4: Resources reviewed by knowledge users and adapted. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-one knowledge users (clinicians n = 11, stroke survivors n = 7, caregivers n = 3) RESULTS: All stakeholders emphasised the complexities of telehealth rehabilitation for stroke and the need for individualised programs. Shared decision-making was identified as critical. Potential risks and benefits of telehealth were acknowledged and strategies to ameliorate risks and deliver effective rehabilitation were identified. Four freely available online resources were co-designed; three resources to support clinicians with shared decision-making and risk management and a decision-aid to support stroke survivors and caregivers throughout the process. Over six months, 1129 users have viewed the webpage; clinician resources were downloaded 374 times and the decision-aid was downloaded 570 times. CONCLUSIONS The co-design process identified key elements for delivery of telehealth rehabilitation to stroke survivors with moderate-to-severe physical disability and led to development of resources to support development of an individualised telehealth rehabilitation plan. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these resources. CONTRIBUTION OF PAPER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M Said
- Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Physiotherapy, Western Health, St Albans, Australia; Australian Institute of Musculoskeletal Sciences, St Albans, Australia.
| | - Emily Ramage
- Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Physiotherapy, Western Health, St Albans, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, University of Newcastle, Australia; Allied Health Strategy, Planning, Innovation, Research and Education Unit, Western Health, St Albans, Australia.
| | - Cassie E McDonald
- Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Physiotherapy, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia; Allied Health, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Erin Bicknell
- Physiotherapy, Western Health, St Albans, Australia; Physiotherapy, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Danielle Hitch
- Allied Health Strategy, Planning, Innovation, Research and Education Unit, Western Health, St Albans, Australia; School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
| | - Natalie A Fini
- Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Kelly J Bower
- Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Elizabeth Lynch
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
| | - Adam P Vogel
- Audiology and Speech Pathology, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Redenlab Inc, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Gary McKay
- Consumer Representative, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Coralie English
- School of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, University of Newcastle, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lin X, Wang F, Li Y, Lei F, Chen W, Arbing RH, Chen WT, Huang F. Exploring shared decision-making needs in lung cancer screening among high-risk groups and health care providers in China: a qualitative study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:613. [PMID: 38773461 PMCID: PMC11107036 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12360-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intricate balance between the advantages and risks of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) impedes the utilization of lung cancer screening (LCS). Guiding shared decision-making (SDM) for well-informed choices regarding LCS is pivotal. There has been a notable increase in research related to SDM. However, these studies possess limitations. For example, they may ignore the identification of decision support and needs from the perspective of health care providers and high-risk groups. Additionally, these studies have not adequately addressed the complete SDM process, including pre-decisional needs, the decision-making process, and post-decision experiences. Furthermore, the East-West divide of SDM has been largely ignored. This study aimed to explore the decisional needs and support for shared decision-making for LCS among health care providers and high-risk groups in China. METHODS Informed by the Ottawa Decision-Support Framework, we conducted qualitative, face-to-face in-depth interviews to explore shared decision-making among 30 lung cancer high-risk individuals and 9 health care providers. Content analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS We identified 4 decisional needs that impair shared decision-making: (1) LCS knowledge deficit; (2) inadequate supportive resources; (3) shared decision-making conceptual bias; and (4) delicate doctor-patient bonds. We identified 3 decision supports: (1) providing information throughout the LCS process; (2) providing shared decision-making decision coaching; and (3) providing decision tools. CONCLUSIONS This study offers valuable insights into the decisional needs and support required to undergo LCS among high-risk individuals and perspectives from health care providers. Future studies should aim to design interventions that enhance the quality of shared decision-making by offering LCS information, decision tools for LCS, and decision coaching for shared decision-making (e.g., through community nurses). Simultaneously, it is crucial to assess individuals' needs for effective deliberation to prevent conflicts and regrets after arriving at a decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiujing Lin
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, No 1, Xueyu Road, Minhou county, Fujian, Fuzhou, 350108, China
| | - Fangfang Wang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, No 1, Xueyu Road, Minhou county, Fujian, Fuzhou, 350108, China
| | - Yonglin Li
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, No 1, Xueyu Road, Minhou county, Fujian, Fuzhou, 350108, China
| | - Fang Lei
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Weisheng Chen
- Department of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Rachel H Arbing
- School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Wei-Ti Chen
- School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
| | - Feifei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, No 1, Xueyu Road, Minhou county, Fujian, Fuzhou, 350108, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gendler Y, Blau A. Exploring Cultural and Religious Effects on HPV Vaccination Decision Making Using a Web-Based Decision Aid: A Quasi-experimental Study. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:426-436. [PMID: 38600776 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241240466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) poses a significant public health concern, as it is linked to various serious health conditions such as cancer and genital warts. Despite the vaccine's safety, efficacy, and availability through national school programs, HPV vaccination rates remain low in Israel, particularly within the ultra-Orthodox community due to religious and cultural barriers. Decision aids have shown promise in facilitating shared decision making and promoting informed choices in health care. This study aimed to assess the impact of a novel Web-based decision aid on HPV vaccination intentions, knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and decisional conflict among Israeli parents and young adults, with a specific focus on exploring differences between religious groups. METHODS Two Web-based decision aids were developed for parents of children aged 10 to 17 y (n = 120) and young adults aged 18 to 26 y (n = 160). A quasi-experimental study was conducted among Hebrew-speaking parents and young adults eligible for HPV vaccination. Participants completed pre- and postintervention questionnaires assessing vaccination intentions, knowledge about HPV, decision self-efficacy, and decisional conflict. RESULTS The decision aid significantly improved intentions toward HPV vaccination among most religious groups, except the Jewish ultra-Orthodox community. Ultra-Orthodox participants exhibited reluctance to vaccinate themselves or their children (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23, P < 0.001 for parents' group; OR = 0.43, P < 0.001 for young adults' group). Parental preference for vaccinating girls over boys (OR = 2.66, P < 0.001) and increased inclination for vaccination among Muslim-Arabs were observed (OR = 3.12, P < 0.001). Knowledge levels improved among ultra-Orthodox participants but not decisional conflict and self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS The Web-based decision aid positively influenced the quality of HPV vaccination decision making among various religious groups in Israel, except for the ultra-Orthodox community. Culturally tailored approaches that address specific community concerns are essential for informed decision making. HIGHLIGHTS Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in Israel are substantially lower than those of other routine vaccinations, particularly among religious and ultra-Orthodox communities, largely due to sociocultural beliefs and misinformation.A newly developed Web-based decision aid was implemented in a study involving parents and young adults to evaluate its impact on vaccination intent, knowledge about HPV, decision self-efficacy, and decisional conflict.While the decision aid significantly enhanced vaccination intention, knowledge, and perceived behavioral control among various religious groups, it did not yield the same outcomes within the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community.This study highlights the vital role of cultural adaptation in HPV vaccine decision aids within Israel, revealing significant disparities in vaccination perceptions and decisions among diverse religious and cultural groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia Gendler
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Ayala Blau
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Taqif H, Adisso L, Gomes Souza L, Dofara SG, Ghio SC, Rivest LP, Légaré F. Changes in intention to use an interprofessional approach to decision-making following training: a cluster before-and-after study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:437. [PMID: 38589863 PMCID: PMC11000315 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10899-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health professionals in home care work in interprofessional teams. Yet most training in decision support assumes a one-on-one relationship with patients. We assessed the impact of an in-person training session in interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) on home care professionals' intention to adopt this approach. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a cluster stepped-wedge trial using a before-and-after study design. We collected data among home care professionals from November 2016 to February 2018 in 9 health and social services centers in Quebec, Canada. The intervention was an in-person IP-SDM training session. Intention to engage in IP-SDM pre- and post-session (dependent variable) was compared using a continuing professional development evaluation scale (CPD-Reaction) informed by the Godin's Integrated Behavioral Model for health professionals. We also assessed socio-demographic and psychosocial variables (beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, social influence and moral norm). We performed bivariate and multivariate analysis to identify factors influencing post-intervention intention. We used the STROBE reporting guidelines for observational studies to report our results. RESULTS Of 134 respondents who provided complete pairs of questionnaires (pre- and post-), most were female (90.9%), mean age was 42 (± 9.3) years and 66.9% were social workers. Mean intention scores decreased from 5.84 (± 1.19) to 5.54 (± 1.35) (Mean difference = -0.30 ± 1.16; p = 0.02). Factors associated with higher intention post-intervention were social influence (ß = 0.34, p = 0.01) and belief about capabilities (ß = 0.49, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION After in-person IP-SDM training, healthcare professionals' intention to engage in IP-SDM decreased. However, the scope of this decrease is probably not clinically significant. Due to their association with intention, beliefs about capabilities, which translate into having a sense of self-competency in the new clinical behavior, and social influences, which translate into what important others think one should be doing, could be targets for future research aiming to implement IP-SDM in home care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajar Taqif
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Lionel Adisso
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Lucas Gomes Souza
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Suélène Georgina Dofara
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Sergio Cortez Ghio
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Louis-Paul Rivest
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM - Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zheng H, Yang L, Hu J, Yang Y. Behaviour, barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in breast cancer surgical treatment: A qualitative systematic review using a 'Best Fit' framework approach. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14019. [PMID: 38558230 PMCID: PMC10982676 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the diversity and high sensitivity of the treatment, there were difficulties and uncertainties in the breast cancer surgical decision-making process. We aimed to describe the patient's decision-making behaviour and shared decision-making (SDM)-related barriers and facilitators in breast cancer surgical treatment. METHODS We searched eight databases for qualitative studies and mixed-method studies about breast cancer patients' surgical decision-making process from inception to March 2021. The quality of the studies was critically appraised by two researchers independently. We used a 'best fit framework approach' to analyze and synthesize the evidence. RESULTS Twenty-eight qualitative studies and three mixed-method studies were included in this study. Four themes and 10 subthemes were extracted: (a) struggling with various considerations, (b) actual decision-making behaviours, (c) SDM not routinely implemented and (d) multiple facilitators and barriers to SDM. CONCLUSIONS Patients had various considerations of breast surgery and SDM was not routinely implemented. There was a discrepancy between information exchange behaviours, value clarification, decision support utilization and SDM due to cognitive and behavioural biases. When individuals made surgical decisions, their behaviours were affected by individual-level and system-level factors. Therefore, healthcare providers and other stakeholders should constantly improve communication skills and collaboration, and emphasize the importance of decision support, so as to embed SDM into routine practice. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This systematic review was conducted as part of a wider research entitled: Breast cancer patients' actual participation roles in surgical decision making: a mixed method research. The results of this project helped us to better analyze and generalize patients' views.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongying Zheng
- School of Nursing, School of MedicineShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Linning Yang
- School of Nursing, School of MedicineShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Jiale Hu
- Department of Nurse Anesthesia, College of Health ProfessionsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondVirginiaUSA
| | - Yan Yang
- Department of Nursing, Renji HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Veerhuis N, Merizzi A, Papoulias S, Bradbury C, Sheret K, Traynor V. 'It is empowering and gives people dignity in a very difficult process': A multistage, multimethod qualitative study to understand the views of end users in the cultural adaptation of a dementia and driving decision aid. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14006. [PMID: 38497286 PMCID: PMC10945392 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions about driving for individuals living with dementia (ILWD) can be challenging. There are limited evidence-based person-centred interventions in the United Kingdom that support decisions about transitioning to not driving or guidelines for developing decision aids for ILWD. This study aimed to understand the important features of a decision aid through the cultural adaptation of Australian dementia and driving decision aid (DDDA) for ILWD residing in the United Kingdom. METHODS This qualitative study was theoretically underpinned by a person-centred framework and conducted over three stages: (1) Development of a draft UK-specific DDDA; (2) semistructured interviews with ILWD and an online survey with stakeholders to obtain their views on a draft UK DDDA and (3) content analysis and synthesis of qualitative data to inform the final version of the decision aid. RESULTS Eleven ILWD and six of their spouses participated in interviews, and 102 stakeholders responded to an online survey. The four broad features identified as important to include in a decision aid for drivers living with dementia were: a structured and interactive format; positive and supportive messaging and presentation; relevant and concise content and choice-centred. The perceived benefits of the decision aid were identified as supporting conversations, enhancing collaborative decision making and enabling agency with decisions about driving and future mobility options. CONCLUSIONS Decision aids that are underpinned by interactive choice-driven questions enhance a person-centred approach to decisions about driving. Positively framing decision aids through the presentation and content can facilitate engagement with the decision-making process about driving. The findings have implications for the development of decision aids designed for ILWD on other important health and social topics. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Advocating for the development of a UK DDDA were ILWD. Healthcare professionals contributed to the development of a draft UK DDDA. Former and current drivers living with dementia, family members, healthcare professionals and other support networks of ILWD participated in interviews or an online survey which informed the final version of the UK DDDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Veerhuis
- Aged, Dementia, Health Education and Research Centre, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, School of NursingUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alessandra Merizzi
- Memory Assessment and Treatment ServicePennine Care National Health Service Foundation TrustOldhamUK
- Present address:
Research Department, Centre for Socio‐Economic Research on AgingNational Institute of Health and Science on Aging (INRCA)Via Santa Margherita, 5Ancona60124Italy
| | - Stephanie Papoulias
- Memory Assessment and Treatment ServicePennine Care National Health Service Foundation TrustOldhamUK
- Present address:
Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Fulwood HouseOld Fulwood RoadSheffieldS10 3THUK
| | - Claire Bradbury
- Memory Assessment ServiceDorset Healthcare University Foundation Trust, Alderney HospitalPooleUK
| | - Kathy Sheret
- Memory Assessment ServiceDorset Healthcare University Foundation Trust, Alderney HospitalPooleUK
| | - Victoria Traynor
- Aged, Dementia, Health Education and Research Centre, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, School of NursingUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pozzar RA, Seven M. Interventions to support decision making in people considering germline genetic testing for BRCA 1/2 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants: A scoping review. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:392-401. [PMID: 37328917 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) are medically actionable and may inform hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) treatment and prevention. However, rates of germline genetic testing (GT) in people with and without cancer are suboptimal. Individuals' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs may influence GT decisions. While genetic counseling (GC) provides decision support, the supply of genetic counselors is insufficient to meet demand. Accordingly, there is a need to explore the evidence on interventions that aim to support BRCA1/2 testing decisions. We conducted a scoping review of PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO using search terms related to HBOC, GT, and decision making. First, we screened records to identify peer-reviewed reports that described interventions to support BRCA1/2 testing decisions. Next, we reviewed full-text reports and excluded studies that lacked statistical comparisons or enrolled previously tested individuals. Finally, we extracted study characteristics and findings into a table. All records and reports were reviewed independently by two authors; decisions were tracked in Rayyan, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Of 2116 unique citations, 25 met the eligibility criteria. Articles were published between 1997 and 2021 and described randomized trials and nonrandomized, quasi-experimental studies. Most studies tested technology-based (12/25, 48%) or written (9/25, 36%) interventions. Nearly half (12/25, 48%) of interventions were designed to complement traditional GC. Of the interventions compared to GC, 75% (6/8) increased or had a noninferior effect on knowledge, and 67% (4/6) decreased or had a noninferior effect on decisional conflict. Intervention effects on GT uptake were mixed, which may reflect evolving eligibility criteria for GT. Our findings suggest novel interventions may promote informed GT decision making, but many were developed to complement traditional GC. Trials that assess the effects of decision support interventions in diverse samples and evaluate implementation strategies for efficacious interventions are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Pozzar
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Memnun Seven
- Elaine Marieb College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Irvine MK, Zimba R, Avoundjian T, Peterson M, Emmert C, Kulkarni SG, Philbin MM, Kelvin EA, Nash D. Patient Education and Decision Support for Long-Acting Injectable HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: Protocol for Tool Development and Pilot Testing with Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Medical Case Management Programs in New York. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e56892. [PMID: 38536227 PMCID: PMC11007615 DOI: 10.2196/56892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-acting injectable (LAI) HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) presents a major opportunity to facilitate and sustain HIV viral suppression, thus improving health and survival among people living with HIV and reducing the risk of onward transmission. However, realizing the public health potential of LAI ART requires reaching patients who face barriers to daily oral ART adherence and thus can clinically benefit from alternative treatment modalities. Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A medical case management (MCM) programs provide an array of services to address barriers to HIV care and treatment among economically and socially marginalized people living with HIV. These programs have demonstrated effectiveness in improving engagement along the continuum of care, but findings of limited program impact on durable viral suppression highlight the need to further innovate and hone strategies to support long-term ART adherence. OBJECTIVE This study aims to adapt and expand Ryan White MCM service strategies to integrate LAI ART regimen options, with the larger goal of improving health outcomes in the populations that could most benefit from alternatives to daily oral ART regimens. METHODS In 3 phases of work involving patient and provider participants, this study uses role-specific focus groups to elicit perceptions of LAI versus daily oral ART; discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveys to quantify preferences for different ART delivery options and related supports; and a nonrandomized trial to assess the implementation and utility of newly developed tools at 6 partnering Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A MCM programs based in urban, suburban, and semirural areas of New York. Findings from the focus groups and DCEs, as well as feedback from advisory board meetings, informed the design and selection of the tools: a patient-facing, 2-page fact sheet, including frequently asked questions and a side-by-side comparison of LAI with daily oral ART; a patient-facing informational video available on YouTube (Google Inc); and a patient-provider decision aid. Implementation outcomes, measured through provider interviews, surveys, and service reporting, will guide further specification of strategies to integrate LAI ART options into MCM program workflows. RESULTS The study was funded in late April 2021 and received approval from the institutional review board in May 2021 under protocol 20-096. Focus groups were conducted in late 2021 (n=21), DCEs ran from June 2022 to January 2023 (n=378), and tools for piloting were developed by May 2023. The trial (May 2023 through January 2024) has enrolled >200 patients. CONCLUSIONS This study is designed to provide evidence regarding the acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and utility of a package of patient-oriented tools for comparing and deciding between LAI ART and daily oral ART options. Study strengths include formative work to guide tool development, a mixed methods approach, and the testing of tools in real-world safety-net service settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05833542; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05833542. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/56892.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Kathryn Irvine
- Bureau of Hepatitis, HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (BHHS), New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rebecca Zimba
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, United States
| | - Tigran Avoundjian
- Bureau of Hepatitis, HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (BHHS), New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, United States
| | - Meghan Peterson
- Bureau of Hepatitis, HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (BHHS), New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, United States
| | - Connor Emmert
- Bureau of Hepatitis, HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (BHHS), New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sarah G Kulkarni
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, United States
| | - Morgan M Philbin
- Division of Vulnerable Populations, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth A Kelvin
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, United States
| | - Denis Nash
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lyu Y, Xu Q, Liu J. Exploring the medical decision-making patterns and influencing factors among the general Chinese public: a binary logistic regression analysis. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:887. [PMID: 38523310 PMCID: PMC10962172 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18338-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With the ongoing evolution of the healthcare system and shifts in cultural paradigms, there is a pressing need to delve into the medical decision-making behaviors of general Chinese public and understand their underlying motivations. This research seeks to elucidate the prevailing tendencies in these decision-making processes and to empirically validate the pivotal factors that shape their choices, offering valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and institutions. METHOD A comprehensive survey was administered to 2,696 Chinese residents to examine their medical decision-making patterns. These patterns were classified into two primary categories: Unilateral Decision-making (Doctor-dominant, Family-centric, and Patient-driven subtypes) and Collaborative Decision-making (Doctor-led, Doctor-Patient, Patient-Family, and Doctor-Patient-Family subtypes). Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to empirically pinpoint the significant factors influencing these decision-making frameworks. RESULTS The study's analysis reveals distinct preferences in medical decision-making among Chinese residents. In the Collaborative Decision-making category, chosen by 70.81% of participants, the subtypes are as follows: Doctor-led (29.90%), Doctor-Patient (13.54%), Patient-Family (2.93%), and Doctor-Patient-Family (24.44%). The Unilateral Decision-making, preferred by 29.19%, includes Doctor-dominant (23.22%), Family-centric (1.74%), and Patient-driven (4.23%) models. The preference for Collaborative Decision-making is associated with higher educational levels, specific marital statuses (particularly married but childless), and choices of rural residents' basic medical insurance or occupational basic medical insurance. In contrast, Unilateral Decision-making correlates with males, individuals with religious beliefs, certain occupational roles (like civil servants), and holders of commercial or publicly funded medical insurance. CONCLUSION This study elucidates the complex interplay of socio-cultural and individual determinants shaping medical decision-making in China. The findings reveal a marked inclination towards collaborative models, closely linked to educational level, marital status, and specific insurance types, reflecting an evolving trend towards participatory healthcare. Simultaneously, the persistence of unilateral models, influenced by gender, religious beliefs, and occupational roles, highlights the heterogeneity within Chinese healthcare preferences. These insights are crucial for policymakers and healthcare practitioners, underscoring the need for adaptable, culturally attuned healthcare frameworks that cater to this diversity, thereby enhancing patient engagement and healthcare efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwen Lyu
- Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China
| | - Qian Xu
- School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China
| | - Junrong Liu
- Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Anderson CB, Fatone S, Mañago MM, Swink LA, Kittelson AJ, Magnusson DM, Christiansen CL. Development and alpha testing of a patient shared decision aid for prosthesis design for new lower limb prosthesis users. Prosthet Orthot Int 2024:00006479-990000000-00229. [PMID: 38506643 PMCID: PMC11411013 DOI: 10.1097/pxr.0000000000000314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After lower limb amputation, several prosthesis design options exist. However, prosthesis design decisions do not always reflect a prosthesis user's needs, values, and preferences. OBJECTIVE To develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype for prosthetists and new prosthesis users facing prosthesis design decisions after lower limb amputation, and to assess its usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility. STUDY DESIGN Exploratory mixed methods. METHODS PDA development was informed by a qualitative needs assessment and guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The PDA was evaluated by steering groups of experienced prosthesis users and prosthetic professionals (prosthetists and researchers) to test usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility through focus groups, individual interviews, and rating on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10. RESULTS The resulting PDA included 6 sections: (1) Amputation and Early Recovery, (2) Communication, (3) Values, (4) Prosthesis Design, (5) Preferences, and (6) Prosthetic Journey. Usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility were rated as 9.2, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthetic professionals, and 9.4, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthesis users. DISCUSSION The PDA incorporated guidance by relevant stakeholders and was rated favorably, emphasizing a need for shared decision-making support in prosthesis design. One challenge was determining the amount of information in the PDA, highlighting the diversity in end users' informational needs. Future iterations of the PDA should undergo beta testing in clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS A standardized, iterative method was used to develop a PDA for new lower limb prosthesis users and prosthetists when considering prosthesis design decisions. The PDA was considered useable, accurate, and comprehensible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsey B Anderson
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence and the Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Stefania Fatone
- Division of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Mark M Mañago
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| | - Laura A Swink
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| | - Andrew J Kittelson
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Montana, Missoula, MT
| | - Dawn M Magnusson
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Cory L Christiansen
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
- Department of Research, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hopkins L, Carey M, Brown L, McCrea S, Milne M, Tokaryk D, Stacey D. The Development and Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Individuals with Homologous Recombinant Proficient Ovarian Cancer Who Are Considering Niraparib Maintenance Therapy. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1416-1425. [PMID: 38534940 PMCID: PMC10969309 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
New treatments for ovarian cancer are available that require trade-offs between progression-free survival and quality of life. The aim of this study was to develop a decision aid for patients with homologous recombinant proficient (HRP) tumors, as the benefit-harm ratio of niraparib needs consideration. This decision aid was created with a systematic and iterative development process based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. The decision aid was user-tested for acceptability, usability, and comprehensibility using a survey completed by a sample of patients with ovarian cancer and oncologists. This decision aid follows the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria in its development. User-test respondents (n = 13 patients; 13 physicians) reported that the decision aid used language that was easy to follow (69% patients; 85% physicians), was an appropriate length (69% patients; 62% physicians) and provided the right amount of information (54% patients; 54% physicians). Most respondents (92% patients; 62% physicians) would recommend this decision aid for HRP patients considering niraparib. This is the first decision aid for patients with HRP ovarian cancers who are considering niraparib maintenance therapy. It is available on-line and is being further evaluated in a pragmatic clinical trial in Saskatchewan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Hopkins
- Division of Oncology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7V 4H4, Canada
| | - Mark Carey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;
| | - Linda Brown
- Ovarian Cancer Canada, Toronto, ON M5A 1E3, Canada
| | - Sabryna McCrea
- Research Facilitators, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada; (S.M.); (M.M.)
| | - Mark Milne
- Research Facilitators, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A2, Canada; (S.M.); (M.M.)
| | - Dawne Tokaryk
- Saskatchewan Cancer Agency Patient and Family Advisory Council, Saskatoon, SK S7V 4H4, Canada;
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada;
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Park M, Doan TTT, Jung J, Giap TTT, Kim J. Decision aids for promoting shared decision-making: A review of systematic reviews. Nurs Health Sci 2024; 26:e13071. [PMID: 38356102 DOI: 10.1111/nhs.13071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
In the context of shared decision-making (SDM), experts have advocated the use of validated decision aids (DAs) as valuable tools for facilitating SDM in various healthcare scenarios. This comprehensive review attempts to analyze a vast corpus of DA research by performing thorough searches across four prominent databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science). Independent reviewers selected relevant reviews, extracted data, and assessed review quality using the AMSTAR II tool. A total of 34 systematic reviews were identified and evaluated in this review, encompassing a wide range of outcomes associated with using DAs. These outcomes include patient knowledge, patient involvement in SDM, decision conflict, decision regret, satisfaction, and adherence. In addition, DAs positively affect healthcare provider outcomes by increasing satisfaction, reducing decision conflicts, and lengthening clinical consultations. This review highlights the need for additional research in specific contexts such as long-term care, mental health, and reproductive health to better understand the benefits and challenges of implementing DAs in these settings. Such research can contribute to the improvement of SDM practices and patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myonghwa Park
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Thao Thi-Thu Doan
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- Faculty of Nursing, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hai Phong, Vietnam
| | - Jihye Jung
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Thi-Thanh-Tinh Giap
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- College of Health Sciences, Vin University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Jinju Kim
- Education and Research Center for Evidence-Based Nursing Knowledge, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li X, Meng M, Yang D, Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhao J, Yin Y, Pei X, Hao Y. "All about the value?" Decisional needs of breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the Chinese context: A mixed-methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 120:108102. [PMID: 38141445 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore breast cancer (BC) patients' participation in breast reconstruction (BR) decision-making and specific decisional needs, especially the manifestations and causes of decisional conflicts, in China. METHODS A mixed-methods study was conducted using triangulation of data from interviews and a questionnaire survey with health care professionals (HCPs) and BC patients with BR decision-making experience at 5 Beijing centers. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework guided (ODSF) the qualitative and quantitative data analyses. RESULTS A total of 82.53% of Chinese BC patients would consider BR. Seven themes captured patients' BR decisional needs per the ODSF: inadequate support/resources (100%, 58.82%) and knowledge (75%, 52.94%) were most frequently cited. Health beliefs (unclear values) reflected Chinese characteristics. Patients had inadequate knowledge (M=19.99/50, SD=8.67) but positive BR attitudes (M=59.48/95, SD=10.45). CONCLUSIONS BR decisions for Chinese BC patients are complex and often accompanied by decisional conflicts. Inadequate knowledge and inadequate support and resources contribute to these conflicts, emphasizing the need for culturally tailored information and support to promote SDM. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS HCPs need specialized training in SDM to guide patients in decision-making. It is essential to provide relevant resources and support that are culturally and clinically appropriate for Chinese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejing Li
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Meiqi Meng
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Yang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingyuan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Junqiang Zhao
- Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON L9M 1G3, Canada
| | - Yiyi Yin
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue Pei
- School of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yufang Hao
- School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Collaborating Center of Joanna Briggs Institute, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Best Practice Spotlight Organization, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kohut K, Morton K, Turner L, Foster R, Eccles D, Foster C. Codesign of Lynch Choices TM : Using implementation science to create a clinically deliverable patient decision support website to transform cancer genetics care pathways. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6330. [PMID: 38502032 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resources including Patient Decision Aids (PtDA) are useful and valued by patients and clinicians to provide information and complement shared decision-making. Despite their promise, few PtDA exist for patients with genetic cancer susceptibility facing difficult decisions about risk management. We aimed to fill this gap, partnering with patients to codesign Lynch ChoicesTM , a PtDA website for families with Lynch Syndrome. In addition to a Patient Reference Panel, we purposively invited an international stakeholder panel including charities, public bodies, clinical and academic experts. Implementation strategies and frameworks were employed to optimise translation of research findings to improve care. METHODS Patient/stakeholder suggestions were incorporated in a transparent Table of Changes and prioritised using the Person-Based Approach throughout planning and codesign of Lynch ChoicesTM . An interactive stakeholder meeting was convened to identify barriers and facilitators to clinical implementation of the PtDA. RESULTS Patient and stakeholder partnerships drove the direction of the research throughout codesign, resulting in several iterative refinements to the PtDA prior to roll out including the addition of illustrations/videos, clearer presentation of cancer risks and increased accessibility for lower literacy. Barriers and facilitators identified from stakeholders were used to create an implementation process map. CONCLUSIONS Creating an effective, engaging PtDA is not enough. Systematic uptake in real world clinical practice, with its resource limitations, is needed to optimise benefit to patients and clinicians. Assessment of speed and breadth of dissemination and usage will be collected to further evidence the benefit of embedding implementation science methods from the outset to translate research findings into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Kohut
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kate Morton
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lesley Turner
- Patient and Public Contributor, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rebecca Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van Lent LGG, van der Ham M, de Jonge MJA, Gort EH, van Mil M, Hasselaar J, van der Rijt CCD, van Gurp J, van Weert JCM. Patient values in patient-provider communication about participation in early phase clinical cancer trials: a qualitative analysis before and after implementation of an online value clarification tool intervention. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:32. [PMID: 38308286 PMCID: PMC10835819 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02434-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with advanced cancer who no longer have standard treatment options available may decide to participate in early phase clinical trials (i.e. experimental treatments with uncertain outcomes). Shared decision-making (SDM) models help to understand considerations that influence patients' decision. Discussion of patient values is essential to SDM, but such communication is often limited in this context and may require new interventions. The OnVaCT intervention, consisting of a preparatory online value clarification tool (OnVaCT) for patients and communication training for oncologists, was previously developed to support SDM. This study aimed to qualitatively explore associations between patient values that are discussed between patients and oncologists during consultations about potential participation in early phase clinical trials before and after implementation of the OnVaCT intervention. METHODS This study is part of a prospective multicentre nonrandomized controlled clinical trial and had a between-subjects design: pre-intervention patients received usual care, while post-intervention patients additionally received the OnVaCT. Oncologists participated in the communication training between study phases. Patients' initial consultation on potential early phase clinical trial participation was recorded and transcribed verbatim. Applying a directed approach, two independent coders analysed the transcripts using an initial codebook based on previous studies. Steps of continuous evaluation and revision were repeated until data saturation was reached. RESULTS Data saturation was reached after 32 patient-oncologist consultations (i.e. 17 pre-intervention and 15 post-intervention). The analysis revealed the values: hope, perseverance, quality or quantity of life, risk tolerance, trust in the healthcare system/professionals, autonomy, social adherence, altruism, corporeality, acceptance of one's fate, and humanity. Patients in the pre-intervention phase tended to express values briefly and spontaneously. Oncologists acknowledged the importance of patients' values, but generally only gave 'contrasting' examples of why some accept and others refuse to participate in trials. In the post-intervention phase, many oncologists referred to the OnVaCT and/or asked follow-up questions, while patients used longer phrases that combined multiple values, sometimes clearly indicating their weighing. CONCLUSIONS While all values were recognized in both study phases, our results have highlighted the different communication patterns around patient values in SDM for potential early phase clinical trial participation before and after implementation of the OnVaCT intervention. This study therefore provides a first (qualitative) indication that the OnVaCT intervention may support patients and oncologists in discussing their values. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry: NL7335, registered on July 17, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza G G van Lent
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mirte van der Ham
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maja J A de Jonge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eelke H Gort
- Department of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein van Mil
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Pharmacology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hasselaar
- Department of Pain, Anaesthesiology and Palliative Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Carin C D van der Rijt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle van Gurp
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Julia C M van Weert
- Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fisher A, Eugene Dit Rochesson S, Bisby MA, Scott AJ, Gandy M, Heriseanu A, Titov N, Dear B. Uptake of a self-guided digital treatment for depression and anxiety: A qualitative study exploring patient perspectives and decision-making. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13976. [PMID: 39102692 PMCID: PMC10799218 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the demonstrated efficacy and potential scalability of self-guided digital treatments for common mental health conditions, there is substantial variability in their uptake and engagement. This study explored the decision-making processes, influences and support needs of people taking up a self-guided digital treatment for anxiety and/or depression. METHODS Australian-based adults (n = 20) were purposively sampled from a trial of self-guided digital mental health treatment. One-to-one, semistructured interviews were conducted, based on the Ottawa Decision-Support Framework. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using framework methods. Baseline sociodemographic, clinical and decision-making characteristics were also collected. RESULTS Analyses yielded four themes. Theme 1 captured participants' openness to try self-guided digital treatment, despite limited deliberation on potential downsides or alternative options. Theme 2 highlighted that immediacy and ease of access were major drivers of uptake, which participants contrasted with gaps in access and continuity of care in face-to-face services, especially rurally. Theme 3 centred on participants as the main agents in their decision-making, with family and health professional attitudes also reportedly influencing decision-making. Theme 4 revealed participants' primary motivations for deciding to take up treatment (e.g., the potential to increase insight and coping skills), while also acknowledging that pre-existing characteristics (e.g., health and digital literacy, insight) determined participants' personal suitability for self-guided digital treatment. CONCLUSION Findings help to elucidate the decision-making influences and processes amongst people who started a self-guided treatment for depression and anxiety. Additional information and decision support resources appear warranted, which may also improve the accessibility of self-guided treatments. PUBLIC OR PATIENT CONTRIBUTION Patients were interviewed about their views and experiences of decision-making about accessing and taking up treatment. As such, patient contribution to the research was as study participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Fisher
- The eCentreClinicMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The MindSpot ClinicMQ HealthSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Madelyne A. Bisby
- The eCentreClinicMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The MindSpot ClinicMQ HealthSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Amelia J. Scott
- The eCentreClinicMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Milena Gandy
- The eCentreClinicMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Nick Titov
- The eCentreClinicMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The MindSpot ClinicMQ HealthSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Blake Dear
- The eCentreClinicMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The MindSpot ClinicMQ HealthSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ong C, Li AD, Marino JL, Peate M. Interventions to improve oncofertility knowledge and decision-making in patients with low health literacy: A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 119:108096. [PMID: 38070299 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of interventions that improve knowledge, health and decision-related outcomes in cancer, fertility or the intersection of both among low health literacy (LHL) patients. METHODS Articles published from 2000 to March 2022 in English were identified through searching MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Embase databases on 29/03/2022. Studies were independently screened against eligibility criteria and appraised for quality. A narrative synthesis of data was presented. RESULTS Of 235 citations, 11 studies (2585 participants) investigating three categories were included: decision-support tools (n = 8), mobile health applications (n = 2) and communication tools (n = 1). No eligible study was identified for fertility or oncofertility. All interventions integrated multimedia or interactivity to supplement plain-language text. Decision aids and mobile health applications improved knowledge, reduced decisional conflict and increased clarity around cancer-related choices. Overall, findings favoured the use of online interventions tailored for LHL patients. CONCLUSION There is a lack of data on LHL interventions in fertility and oncofertility. In cancer, LHL interventions improved knowledge and decision-making outcomes. The ideal intervention remains inconclusive. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Lack of engagement with LHL needs in oncofertility and fertility settings have implications for informed treatment decision-making. In cancer, further research is required to ascertain most effective intervention format.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Ong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Anna D Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Jennifer L Marino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kohut K, Morton K, Hurley K, Turner L, Dale C, Eastbrook S, Gold R, Henwood K, Patton S, Punjabi R, White H, Young C, Young J, Bancroft E, Barnett L, Cable S, Connolly G, Coad B, Forman A, Hanson H, Kavanaugh G, Sahan K, Snape K, Torr B, Way R, Winchester E, Youngs A, Eccles D, Foster C. 'A good decision is the one that feels right for me': Codesign with patients to inform theoretical underpinning of a decision aid website. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13844. [PMID: 37705192 PMCID: PMC10768874 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient decision aids (PtDA) complement shared decision-making with healthcare professionals and improve decision quality. However, PtDA often lack theoretical underpinning. We are codesigning a PtDA to help people with increased genetic cancer risks manage choices. The aim of an innovative workshop described here was to engage with the people who will use the PtDA regarding the theoretical underpinning and logic model outlining our hypothesis of how the PtDA would lead to more informed decision-making. METHODS Short presentations about psychological and behavioural theories by an expert were interspersed with facilitated, small-group discussions led by patients. Patients were asked what is important to them when they make health decisions, what theoretical constructs are most meaningful and how this should be applied to codesign of a PtDA. An artist created a visual summary. Notes from patient discussions and the artwork were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS The overarching theme was: It's personal. Contextual factors important for decision-making were varied and changed over time. There was no one 'best fit' theory to target support needs in a PtDA, suggesting an inductive, flexible framework approach to programme theory would be most effective. The PtDA logic model was revised based on patient feedback. CONCLUSION Meaningful codesign of PtDA including discussions about the theoretical mechanisms through which they support decision-making has the potential to lead to improved patient care through understanding the intricately personal nature of health decisions, and tailoring content and format for holistic care. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION Patients with lived experience were involved in codesign and coproduction of this workshop and analysis as partners and coauthors. Patient discussions were the primary data source. Facilitators provided a semi-structured guide, but they did not influence the patient discussions or provide clinical advice. The premise of this workshop was to prioritise the importance of patient lived experience: to listen, learn, then reflect together to understand and propose ideas to improve patient care through codesign of a PtDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Kohut
- School of Health Sciences, Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC)University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Kate Morton
- School of Health Sciences, Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC)University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Karen Hurley
- Stanford R. Weiss, MD Center for Hereditary Colorectal NeoplasiaCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elizabeth Bancroft
- Cancer Genetics Unit and Academic Urology UnitThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Lily Barnett
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Sarah Cable
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Gaya Connolly
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Beth Coad
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Andrea Forman
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Helen Hanson
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Grace Kavanaugh
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Katherine Sahan
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, The Ethox CentreUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Katie Snape
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Bethany Torr
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Rosalind Way
- Division of Genetics and EpidemiologyThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | | | - Alice Youngs
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | - Diana Eccles
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Claire Foster
- School of Health Sciences, Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer (CentRIC)University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ng WL, Hussein N, Ng CJ, Qureshi N, Lee YK, Kwan Z, Kee BP, Then SM, Abdul Malik TF, Mohd Zaidan FZ, Azmi SUF. Implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing prior to allopurinol initiation in Malaysian primary care setting: A qualitative study from doctors' and patients' perspective. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296498. [PMID: 38206925 PMCID: PMC10783771 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allopurinol, the first-line treatment for chronic gout, is a common causative drug for severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR). HLA-B*58:01 allele was strongly associated with allopurinol-induced SCAR in Asian countries such as Taiwan, Japan, Thailand and Malaysia. HLA-B*58:01 screening before allopurinol initiation is conditionally recommended in the Southeast-Asian population, but the uptake of this screening is slow in primary care settings, including Malaysia. This study aimed to explore the views and experiences of primary care doctors and patients with gout on implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing in Malaysia as part of a more extensive study exploring the feasibility of implementing it routinely. METHODS This qualitative study used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to obtain information from patients with gout under follow-up in primary care and doctors who cared for them. Patients and doctors shared their gout management experiences and views on implementing HLA-B*58:01 screening in primary care. Data were coded and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS 18 patients and 18 doctors from three different healthcare settings (university hospital, public health clinics, private general practitioner clinics) participated. The acceptability to HLA-B*58:01 screening was good among the doctors and patients. We discovered inadequate disclosure of severe side effects of allopurinol by doctors due to concerns about medication refusal by patients, which could potentially be improved by introducing HLA-B*58:01 testing. Barriers to implementation included out-of-pocket costs for patients, the cost-effectiveness of this implementation, lack of established alternative treatment pathway besides allopurinol, counselling burden and concern about genetic data security. Our participants preferred targeted screening for high-risk populations instead of universal screening. CONCLUSION Implementing HLA-B*58:01 testing in primary care is potentially feasible if a cost-effective, targeted screening policy on high-risk groups can be developed. A clear treatment pathway for patients who test positive should be made available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Leik Ng
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Norita Hussein
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Chirk Jenn Ng
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Department of Research, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nadeem Qureshi
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Yew Kong Lee
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Zhenli Kwan
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Boon Pin Kee
- Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sue-Mian Then
- Division of Biomedical Science, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Tun Firzara Abdul Malik
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ramakrishnan C, Widjaja N, Malhotra C, Finkelstein E, Khan BA, Ozdemir S. Unravelling complex choices: multi-stakeholder perceptions on dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care in kidney disease. BMC Nephrol 2024; 25:6. [PMID: 38172719 PMCID: PMC10765633 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03434-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients on dialysis with poor quality of life and prognosis, dialysis withdrawal and subsequent transition to palliative care is recommended. This study aims to understand multi-stakeholder perspectives regarding dialysis withdrawal and identify their information needs and support for decision-making regarding withdrawing from dialysis and end-of-life care. METHODS Participants were recruited through purposive sampling from eight dialysis centers and two public hospitals in Singapore. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 patients on dialysis, 8 family caregivers, and 16 renal healthcare providers. They were held in-person at dialysis clinics with patients and caregivers, and virtually via video-conferencing with healthcare providers. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework's decisional-needs manual was used as a guide for data collection and analysis, with two independent team members coding the data. RESULTS Four themes reflecting perceptions and support for decision-making were identified: a) poor knowledge and fatalistic perceptions; b) inadequate resources and support for decision-making; c) complexity of decision-making, unclear timing, and unpreparedness; and d) internal emotions of decisional conflict and regret. Participants displayed limited awareness of dialysis withdrawal and palliative care, often perceiving dialysis withdrawal as medical abandonment. Patient preferences regarding decision-making ranged from autonomous control to physician or family-delegated choices. Cultural factors contributed to hesitancy and reluctance to discuss end-of-life matters, resulting in a lack of conversations between patients and providers, as well as between patients and their caregivers. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making for dialysis withdrawal is complicated, exacerbated by a lack of awareness and conversations on end-of-life care among patients, caregivers, and providers. These findings emphasize the need for a culturally-sensitive tool that informs and prepares patients and their caregivers to navigate decisions about dialysis withdrawal and the transition to palliative care. Such a tool could bridge information gaps and stimulate meaningful conversations, fostering informed and culturally aligned decisions during this critical juncture of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrika Ramakrishnan
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke NUS Medical School, Signature Programme in Health Services and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nathan Widjaja
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke NUS Medical School, Signature Programme in Health Services and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke NUS Medical School, Signature Programme in Health Services and Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Behram Ali Khan
- Division of Nephrology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- National Kidney Foundation, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Singapore, Singapore.
- Duke NUS Medical School, Signature Programme in Health Services and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Linden I, Wolfs C, Hevink M, Dirksen C, Ponds R, Perry M. Why to test for dementia: perspectives of patients, significant others and general practitioners. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afad251. [PMID: 38251737 PMCID: PMC10801826 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to provide greater insight into the current decision-making process on diagnostic testing for dementia by exploring the expectations, needs and experiences of patients with memory complaints, significant others and general practitioners (GPs). METHODS We performed semi-structured interviews with patients (>60 years) who consulted their GP on memory complaints, significant others and GPs. Participants were recruited until data saturation was reached in thematic analysis of interview transcripts. RESULTS We performed 51 interviews (patients n = 20, significant others n = 15, GPs n = 16). Thematic analysis revealed four themes: (i) 'drivers to (not) testing', i.e. need to act on symptoms, beliefs on the necessity and expected outcomes of diagnostic testing; (ii) 'patient preferences and context are critical in the actual decision', i.e. in the actual decision-making process interpretation of symptoms, GPs' desire to meet patient preferences, social context and healthcare system dynamics guided the decision; (iii) 'need for individualised communication in the decision-making process', i.e. for patients feeling heard was a prerequisite for decision-making and GPs tailored communication strategies to individual patients and (iv) 'GP practice and barriers to shared decision-making (SDM)', i.e. although GPs value SDM in the decision on diagnostic testing for dementia, patients express limited awareness of the decision and options at stake. CONCLUSIONS Decision-making on diagnostic testing for dementia is a multifactorial and preference-guided process for all involved stakeholders, but decisions are often not explicitly jointly made. Development of patient decision aids could facilitate better involvement and more informed choices by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Linden
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Claire Wolfs
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maud Hevink
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf Ponds
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Perry
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sweeney J, Tichnell C, Christian S, Pendelton C, Murray B, Roter DL, Jamal L, Calkins H, James CA. Characterizing Decision-Making Surrounding Exercise in ARVC: Analysis of Decisional Conflict, Decisional Regret, and Shared Decision-Making. CIRCULATION. GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE 2023; 16:e004133. [PMID: 38014565 PMCID: PMC10729899 DOI: 10.1161/circgen.123.004133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limiting high-intensity exercise is recommended for patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) due to its association with penetrance, arrhythmias, and structural progression. Guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for exercise level, but there is little evidence regarding its impact. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the extent and implications of SDM for exercise, decisional conflict, and decisional regret in patients with ARVC and at-risk relatives. METHODS Adults diagnosed with ARVC or with positive genetic testing enrolled in the Johns Hopkins ARVC Registry were invited to complete a questionnaire that included exercise history and current exercise, SDM (SDM-Q-9), decisional conflict, and decisional regret. RESULTS The response rate was 64.8%. Two-thirds of participants (68.0%, n=121) reported clinically significant decisional conflict regarding exercise at diagnosis/genetic testing (DCS [decisional conflict scale]≥25), and half (55.1%, n=98) in the past year. Prevalence of decisional regret was also high with 55.3% (n=99) reporting moderate to severe decisional regret (DRS [decisional regret scale]≥25). The extent of SDM was highly variable ranging from no (0) to perfect (100) SDM (mean, 59.6±25.0). Those diagnosed in adolescence (≤age 21) reported significantly more SDM (P=0.013). Importantly, SDM was associated with less decisional conflict (ß=-0.66, R2=0.567, P<0.01) and decisional regret (ß=-0.37, R2=0.180, P<0.001) and no difference in vigorous intensity aerobic exercise in the 6 months after diagnosis/genetic testing or the past year (P=0.56; P=0.34, respectively). CONCLUSIONS SDM is associated with lower decisional conflict and decisional regret; and no difference in postdiagnosis exercise. Our data thus support SDM as the preferred model for exercise discussions for ARVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Sweeney
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (J.S., D.L.R.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
- National Human Genome Research Institute (J.S.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Crystal Tichnell
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Susan Christian
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (S.C.)
| | - Catherine Pendelton
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Brittney Murray
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Debra L. Roter
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (J.S., D.L.R.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Leila Jamal
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (L.J.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center (L.J.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Cynthia A. James
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Buur LE, Bekker HL, Mathiesen CL, Holm LT, Riise I, Finderup J, Stacey D. Decision coaching for people with kidney failure: A case study. J Ren Care 2023; 49:220-228. [PMID: 36734306 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the usefulness of decision coaching for people with kidney failure facing decisions about end-of-life care. OBJECTIVES To investigate experiences of people with kidney failure who received decision coaching for end-of-life care decisions. DESIGN We conducted a prospective case study bound by time (September to December 2021), location (one nephrology department), and guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. PARTICIPANTS Adults with kidney failure facing end-of-life care decisions. MEASUREMENTS A nurse trained in decision coaching screened for unmet decisional needs with the SURE test and provided decision coaching using the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide. Postcoaching, the participants were rescreened using the SURE test and interviewed to explore their experience with decision coaching. Change in SURE test findings was analysed descriptively and systematic text condensation was used for the analysis of interviews. Recorded decision coaching sessions underwent content analysis using the Decision Support Analysis Tool. RESULTS Decision coaching was provided to four adults with kidney failure. Median pre-SURE test score was 2.5 (range 2-4) and posttest score was 3 (range 3-4), indicating a decrease in decisional needs. Participants described that decision coaching provided an overview of features of options to consider, identified remaining decisional needs for further discussion with relatives and health professionals and clarified next steps. Median Decision Support Analysis Tool score was 9 (range 8-9). CONCLUSIONS After decision coaching, results suggest that the participants experienced fewer decisional needs and seemed clearer about the next steps in the decision making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Engelbrecht Buur
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hilary Louise Bekker
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Ida Riise
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dawn Stacey
- Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lu SJ, Ku SC, Liu KF, Chien CH. Decision Self-Efficacy and Decisional Conflict on Reintubation among Surrogates of Ventilated Patients Undergoing Planned Extubation. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2023; 17:235-244. [PMID: 37838098 DOI: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the medical decision-making process can be overwhelming for some surrogates, there is a lack of understanding regarding their experiences. The objectives of this study were to examine the decision self-efficacy and decisional conflict experienced by surrogates in intensive care units (ICUs) when faced with the decision of whether to reintubate patients with respiratory failure after a planned extubation. In addition, predictors and mediators influencing these decision-making processes were identified. METHODS This study utilized a cross-sectional design to investigate the decision-making processes of 174 surrogates who were faced with the decision of whether to reintubate patients with respiratory failure after a planned extubation in the internal ICU of a medical center between August 2021 and February 2022. Structured questionnaires were administered to collect data on the surrogates' background information, decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and positive and negative affect. The patients' background information was also collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to model the data. RESULTS The mean decision self-efficacy score of the surrogates was 82.41 points, and 20.7% surrogates had decisional conflict scores exceeding 37.5 points, suggesting that they faced challenges in the decision-making process. Surrogates' employment status and negative affect significantly predicted their decision self-efficacy. In addition, patients' activities of daily living prior to hospitalization and the decision self-efficacy of the surrogate significantly predicted surrogate decisional conflict. The impact of surrogates' negative affect on decisional conflict was fully mediated by decision self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Surrogate decision self-efficacy mediates the relationship between negative affect and decisional conflict. Providing clinical care interventions that focus on enhancing surrogate self-efficacy and reducing negative affect can help alleviate decisional conflict in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Ju Lu
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chi Ku
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuei-Fen Liu
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Hui Chien
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hamilton JG, Shah IH, Salafia C, Schofield E, Garzon MG, Cadet K, Stadler ZK, Hay JL, Offit K, Robson ME. Development of a novel measure of advanced cancer patients' perceived utility of secondary germline findings from tumor genomic profiling. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100124. [PMID: 37214538 PMCID: PMC10194097 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) can inform advanced cancer patients' treatment decisions, and also reveal secondary germline findings-information about inherited risks for cancer and other disorders. We sought to develop a measure of patient perceptions of the clinical and personal utility of secondary germline findings. Methods We developed a draft survey based on literature and patient interview data (n=40). We evaluated and refined the survey through cognitive interviews with advanced cancer patients who received secondary germline findings from TGP (n=10). The survey was psychometrically validated with data from two independent samples of advanced cancer patients undergoing TGP (total n=349). Results Cognitive interviews offered opportunities for survey refinement and confirmation of its comprehensible nature. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the survey identified 16 items across three subscales with strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.79): perceived utility for others, perceived utility for self and health, and confidence in secondary findings. Conclusion We developed a novel valid scale with promise for measuring advanced cancer patients' perceptions of the utility of secondary germline findings. Innovation We offer a new patient-derived measure of perceived utility of and confidence in secondary germline findings with potential applications for precision oncology research and clinical communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jada G. Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ibrahim H. Shah
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caroline Salafia
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaux Genoff Garzon
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kechna Cadet
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K. Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer L. Hay
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark E. Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Baharvand S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Nourizadeh R, Sattarzadeh Jahdi N, Mehrabi E, Vaezi M. The Effect of Decision Aid on Satisfaction With Decision and Anxiety Among Women With Abnormal Cervical Screening Results. Cancer Nurs 2023; 46:E405-E411. [PMID: 37272742 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most women in the face of stressful situations such as risk of a cancer diagnosis (abnormal Papanicolaou smear results) need guidance to choose the appropriate method to follow the diagnosis process, but few studies have identified appropriate interventions to support these women. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of decision aid on anxiety and satisfaction with decisions (SWD) regarding the type of follow-up method after receiving an abnormal Papanicolaou smear result. METHODS This interventional study was conducted on women referred to the oncology clinic in Tabriz, Iran. Women were assigned to the intervention (n = 27) and control groups (n = 27) in a ratio of 1:1 using blocked randomization. The intervention group received a decision aid booklet. Participants in both groups completed questionnaires assessing demographic and obstetric characteristics, anxiety, SWD, and shared decision-making before and after the intervention. RESULTS The mean score for SWD in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group after the intervention (median, 6.43 with 95% confidence interval of 3.11-7.76; P = .03). There was no significant difference between groups in the mean score of anxiety after intervention (median, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, -0.5 to 2.70; P = .19). CONCLUSION A decision aid can increase SWD among women with abnormal results in their cervical cancer screening. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE It is recommended that healthcare providers use decision aid tools to support and guide patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Baharvand
- Author Affiliations: Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Mrs Baharvand); Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Victoria, 3144, Australia (Dr Asghari-Jafarabadi); and School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3800, Australia (Dr Asghari- Jafarabadi); and Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia (Dr Asghari-Jafarabadi); Midwifery Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Drs Nourizadeh, Sattarzadeh Jahdi, and Mehrabi); Obstetric and Oncology Department, School of Medicine, Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Alzahra Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Dr Vaezi)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Oliverio AL, Lewallen M, Hladunewich MA, Kalpakjian CZ, Weber K, Hawley ST, Nunes JW. Supporting Patient-Centered Pregnancy Counseling in Nephrology Care: A Semistructured Interview Study of Patients and Nephrologists. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:2235-2242. [PMID: 38025233 PMCID: PMC10658226 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and are susceptible to disempowerment and decisional burden when receiving reproductive counseling and considering pregnancy. Nephrologists do not frequently counsel about reproductive health, and no tools exist to support patient-centered reproductive counseling for those with CKD. Methods A total of 30 patients aged 18 to 45 years with CKD stages 1 to 5 who were assigned female sex at birth and 12 nephrologists from a single academic medical center participated in semistructured qualitative interviews. They were asked about information needs, decision support needs, and facilitators and barriers to reproductive health care and counseling. Thematic analysis was performed. Results The following 4 main themes were identified: (i) assessing reproductive intentions; (ii) information about reproductive health and kidney disease; (iii) reproductive risk; and (iv) communication and decision-making needs. Patients' reproductive intentions varied over time and shaped the content of information needed from nephrologists. Patients and nephrologists both felt that risk communication could be improved but focused on different aspects to improve the quality of this counseling; nephrologists focused on providing individualized risk estimates and patients focused on balancing risks with benefits and management. Patients desired nephrologists to bring up the topic of reproductive health and counseling in kidney clinic, and this is not frequently or systematically done currently. Conclusion This work highlights a critical need for more dialog about reproductive health in kidney care, identified differences in what patients and nephrologists think is important in communication and decision-making, and provides an important step in developing patient-centered reproductive counseling tools in nephrology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L. Oliverio
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Maryn Lewallen
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michelle A. Hladunewich
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Z. Kalpakjian
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Kassandra Weber
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sarah T. Hawley
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Julie Wright Nunes
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mattebo M, Holmström IK, Höglund AT, Fredriksson M. Guideline documents on caesarean section on maternal request in Sweden: varying usability with a restrictive approach. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1117. [PMID: 37853465 PMCID: PMC10585794 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10077-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, studies illustrate different approaches among health care professionals to decision making about caesarean section (CS) and that attitudes regarding the extent to which a CS on maternal request (CSMR) can be granted vary significantly, both between professionals and countries. Absence of proper regulatory frameworks is one potential explanation for high CSMR rates in some countries, but overall, it is unclear how recommendations and guidelines on CSMR relate to CSMR rates. In Sweden, CSMR rates are low by international comparison, but statistics show that the extent to which maternity clinics perform CSMR vary among Sweden's 21 self-governing regions. These regions are responsible for funding and delivery of healthcare, while national guidelines provide guidance for the professions throughout the country; however, they are not mandatory. To further understand considerations for CSMR requests and existing practice variations, the aim was to analyse guideline documents on CSMR at all local maternity clinics in Sweden. METHODS All 43 maternity clinics in Sweden were contacted and asked for any guideline documents regarding CSMR. All clinics replied, enabling a total investigation. We used a combined deductive and inductive design, using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. RESULTS Overall, 32 maternity clinics reported guideline documents and 11 denied having any. Among those reporting no guideline documents, one referred to using national guideline document. Based on the Framework method, four theme categories were identified: CSMR is treated as a matter of fear of birth (FOB); How important factors are weighted in the decision-making is unclear; Birth contracts are offered in some regions; and The post-partum care is related to FOB rather than CSMR. CONCLUSION In order to offer women who request CS equal and just care, there is a pressing need to either implement current national guideline document at all maternity clinics or rewrite the guideline documents to enable clinics to adopt a structured approach. The emphasis must be placed on exploring the reasons behind the request and providing unbiased information and support. Our results contribute to the ongoing discussion about CSMR and lay a foundation for further research in which professionals, as well as stakeholders and both women planning pregnancy and pregnant women, can give their views on this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Mattebo
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
| | - Inger K Holmström
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna T Höglund
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mio Fredriksson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hinneburg J, Zacher S, Berger-Höger B, Berger-Thürmel K, Kratzer V, Steckelberg A, Lühnen J. Enhancing Transsectoral Interdisciplinary Patient-Centered Care for Patients With Rare Cancers: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Process Evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e49731. [PMID: 37824180 PMCID: PMC10603554 DOI: 10.2196/49731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rare cancers account for approximately 24% of all new cancers. The category of rare tumor diseases includes almost 200 different entities. In particular, the treatment of patients with extensive care needs requires cooperation between service providers, both between sectors (outpatient and inpatient) and within sectors (eg, between different medical disciplines). The treatment pathway is associated with a high need for coordination and information sharing between providers. When crossing sectoral boundaries in the German health care system, interface problems between the outpatient and inpatient sectors can lead to gaps in care delivery. The multicomponent program Trans-sectoral Personalised Care Concept for Patients with Rare Cancers aims to optimize transsectoral cooperation and coordination of care to enhance patient involvement and the medical care coordination of patients with rare cancers. OBJECTIVE This process evaluation will contribute to answering questions about intervention fidelity and the implementation of transsectoral communication, identifying and describing the intended and nonintended effects of the intervention, and exploring the barriers to and facilitators of the implementation. METHODS We will include patients who participate in the intervention phase; all persons and staff involved in the development and implementation of the intervention (Onco Coach, psychologists, physicians on the contact platform, IT staff, and staff of the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians); physicians from the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich and the hospital of the Technical University Munich who are involved in the treatment of patients during the course of the project; and participating office-based hematologists and oncologists. Data collection will be conducted at the beginning, during, and at the end of the intervention using mixed methods. Data will be collected from questionnaires, document analyses, semistructured interviews, and structured observations and will cover different aspects of process evaluation. These include examining the context to explore existing patterns, changes in patterns, attitudes, and interactions; analyzing the implementation of intervention elements; and exploring the complex causal pathways and mediators of the intervention. Qualitative data will be analyzed using thematic analysis. The data will then be combined using between-methods triangulation. RESULTS This project received funding on March 1, 2022. The intervention phase and recruitment for the process evaluation began on March 1, 2023, and the recruitment is expected to end on September 30, 2025. At the time of protocol submission in June 2023, a total of 8 doctors from hematology and oncology practices were enrolled. Data collection began on March 14, 2023. CONCLUSIONS The Trans-sectoral Personalised Care Concept for Patients with Rare Cancers project is a complex intervention that is to be implemented in an equally complex health care context. The process evaluation will help understand the influence of contextual factors and assess the mechanisms of change. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry ISRCTN16441179; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16441179. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/49731.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Hinneburg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Sandro Zacher
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Karin Berger-Thürmel
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vanessa Kratzer
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Julia Lühnen
- Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Clinical Nursing Science, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Goueth R, Darney B, Hoffman A, Eden KB. Evaluating the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Sexual Health-Focused Contraceptive Decision Aid for Diverse Young Adults: User-Centered Usability Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e44170. [PMID: 37788070 PMCID: PMC10582807 DOI: 10.2196/44170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adults with low sexual health literacy levels may find it difficult to make informed decisions about contraceptive methods. We developed and pilot-tested a web-based decision aid-Healthy Sex Choices-designed to support diverse young adults with their contraceptive decision-making. OBJECTIVE This pilot study aimed to evaluate whether the Healthy Sex Choices decision aid is acceptable and feasible to patients and clinicians. METHODS We used the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards to develop and pilot the decision tool. We first conducted a needs assessment with our advisory panel (5 clinicians and 2 patients) that informed decision aid development. All panelists participated in semistructured interviews about their experience with contraceptive counseling. Clinicians also completed a focus group session centered around the development of sex education content for the tool. Before commencing the pilot study, 5 participants from ResearchMatch (Vanderbilt University Medical Center) assessed the tool and suggested improvements. RESULTS Participants were satisfied with the tool, rating the acceptability as "good." Interviewees revealed that the tool made contraceptive decision-making easier and would recommend the tool to a family member or friend. Participants had a nonsignificant change in knowledge scores (53% before vs 45% after; P=.99). Overall, decisional conflict scores significantly decreased (16.1 before vs 2.8 after; P<.001) with the informed subscale (patients feeling more informed) having the greatest decline (23.1 vs 4.7; mean difference 19.0, SD 27.1). Subanalyses of contraceptive knowledge and decisional conflict illustrated that participants of color had lower knowledge scores (48% vs 55%) and higher decisional conflict (20.0 vs 14.5) at baseline than their white counterparts. CONCLUSIONS Participants found Healthy Sex Choices to be acceptable and reported reduced decisional conflict after using the tool. The development and pilot phases of this study provided a foundation for creating reproductive health decision aids that acknowledge and provide guidance for diverse patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Goueth
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Blair Darney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
- Portland State University School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
- Centro de Investigacion en Salud Poblacional (CISP), Insituto Nacional de Salud Publica (INSP), Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Aubri Hoffman
- Value Institute for Health and Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Karen B Eden
- Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
- Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
van Delft LCJ, Essers BAB, Nelemans PJ, Mosterd K, van Winden MEC, Romaen IFL, Retra SJJ, Arits AHMM, Steijlen PM, Lubeek SFK, Kelleners-Smeets NWJ. Effectiveness of a patient decision aid for patients with superficial basal cell carcinoma: A pre- and post-implementation study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 115:107907. [PMID: 37487347 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluates whether using a patient decision aid (PDA) for patients with superficial basal-cell carcinoma (sBCC) results in a decreased decisional conflict level and increased knowledge. METHODS In a prospective multicentre study, patient groups were included before and after implementation of a PDA. Decisional conflict levels were compared directly after making the treatment decision, measured once as the mean score on the decisional conflict scale (DCS). Higher scores correspond with higher conflict levels (0-100). Secondary outcomes were knowledge on treatment options, recognizing a BCC, and risk factors for developing a BCC measured on an adapted version of a validated knowledge questionnaire for melanoma patients, and patient satisfaction with the PDA. RESULTS Data was available for 103 patients in the control-group and 109 in the PDA-group. The mean DCS score in the control-group was 22.78 (SD 14.76) compared to 22.34 (SD 14.54) in the PDA-group; the decrease was non-significant (p = 0.828). The average percentage correct answers on the knowledge questionnaire increased from 76.5% in the control-group to 80.5% in the PDA-group (p = 0.044). According to the majority of patients in the PDA-group (73.7%) the PDA had added value. CONCLUSION Using the PDA had no significant effect on decisional conflict levels, but increased overall knowledge on relevant issues concerning sBCC. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The PDA can be used as an informational tool by patients with sBCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke C J van Delft
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
| | - Brigitte A B Essers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Patty J Nelemans
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Klara Mosterd
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ine F L Romaen
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Sean J J Retra
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Aimee H M M Arits
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Peter M Steijlen
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Satish F K Lubeek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole W J Kelleners-Smeets
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Politi MC, Forcino RC, Parrish K, Durand M, O'Malley AJ, Moses R, Cooksey K, Elwyn G. The impact of adding cost information to a conversation aid to support shared decision making about low-risk prostate cancer treatment: Results of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Health Expect 2023; 26:2023-2039. [PMID: 37394739 PMCID: PMC10485319 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision aids help patients consider the benefits and drawbacks of care options but rarely include cost information. We assessed the impact of a conversation-based decision aid containing information about low-risk prostate cancer management options and their relative costs. METHODS We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial in outpatient urology practices within a US-based academic medical center. We randomised five clinicians to four intervention sequences and enroled patients newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Primary patient-reported outcomes collected postvisit included the frequency of cost conversations and referrals to address costs. Other patient-reported outcomes included: decisional conflict postvisit and at 3 months, decision regret at 3 months, shared decision-making postvisit, financial toxicity postvisit and at 3 months. Clinicians reported their attitudes about shared decision-making pre- and poststudy, and the intervention's feasibility and acceptability. We used hierarchical regression analysis to assess patient outcomes. The clinician was included as a random effect; fixed effects included education, employment, telehealth versus in-person visit, visit date, and enrolment period. RESULTS Between April 2020 and March 2022, we screened 513 patients, contacted 217 eligible patients, and enroled 117/217 (54%) (51 in usual care, 66 in the intervention group). In adjusted analyses, the intervention was not associated with cost conversations (β = .82, p = .27), referrals to cost-related resources (β = -0.36, p = .81), shared decision-making (β = -0.79, p = .32), decisional conflict postvisit (β = -0.34, p= .70), or at follow-up (β = -2.19, p = .16), decision regret at follow-up (β = -9.76, p = .11), or financial toxicity postvisit (β = -1.32, p = .63) or at follow-up (β = -2.41, p = .23). Most clinicians and patients had positive attitudes about the intervention and shared decision-making. In exploratory unadjusted analyses, patients in the intervention group experienced more transient indecision (p < .02) suggesting increased deliberation between visit and follow-up. DISCUSSION Despite enthusiasm from clinicians, the intervention was not significantly associated with hypothesised outcomes, though we were unable to robustly test outcomes due to recruitment challenges. Recruitment at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted eligibility, sample size/power, study procedures, and increased telehealth visits and financial worry, independent of the intervention. Future work should explore ways to support shared decision-making, cost conversations, and choice deliberation with a larger sample. Such work could involve additional members of the care team, and consider the detail, quality, and timing of addressing these issues. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients and clinicians were engaged as stakeholder advisors meeting monthly throughout the duration of the project to advise on the study design, measures selected, data interpretation, and dissemination of study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C. Politi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health SciencesWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Rachel C. Forcino
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeDartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
| | - Katelyn Parrish
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health SciencesWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Marie‐Anne Durand
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeDartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
- Université Toulouse III Paul SabatierToulouseFrance
| | - A. James O'Malley
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeDartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
- Department of Biomedical Data ScienceGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
| | - Rachel Moses
- Section of Urology, Department of SurgeryDartmouth‐Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonNew HampshireUSA
| | - Krista Cooksey
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health SciencesWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeDartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jull J, Fairman K, Oliver S, Hesmer B, Pullattayil AK. Interventions for Indigenous Peoples making health decisions: a systematic review. Arch Public Health 2023; 81:174. [PMID: 37759336 PMCID: PMC10523645 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01177-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making facilitates collaboration between patients and health care providers for informed health decisions. Our review identified interventions to support Indigenous Peoples making health decisions. The objectives were to synthesize evidence and identify factors that impact the use of shared decision making interventions. METHODS An Inuit and non-Inuit team of service providers and academic researchers used an integrated knowledge translation approach with framework synthesis to coproduce a systematic review. We developed a conceptual framework to organize and describe the shared decision making processes and guide identification of studies that describe interventions to support Indigenous Peoples making health decisions. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases from September 2012 to March 2022, with a grey literature search. Two independent team members screened and quality appraised included studies for strengths and relevance of studies' contributions to shared decision making and Indigenous self-determination. Findings were analyzed descriptively in relation to the conceptual framework and reported using guidelines to ensure transparency and completeness in reporting and for equity-oriented systematic reviews. RESULTS Of 5068 citations screened, nine studies reported in ten publications were eligible for inclusion. We categorized the studies into clusters identified as: those inclusive of Indigenous knowledges and governance ("Indigenous-oriented")(n = 6); and those based on Western academic knowledge and governance ("Western-oriented")(n = 3). The studies were found to be of variable quality for contributions to shared decision making and self-determination, with Indigenous-oriented studies of higher quality overall than Western-oriented studies. Four themes are reflected in an updated conceptual framework: 1) where shared decision making takes place impacts decision making opportunities, 2) little is known about the characteristics of health care providers who engage in shared decision making processes, 3) community is a partner in shared decision making, 4) the shared decision making process involves trust-building. CONCLUSIONS There are few studies that report on and evaluate shared decision making interventions with Indigenous Peoples. Overall, Indigenous-oriented studies sought to make health care systems more amenable to shared decision making for Indigenous Peoples, while Western-oriented studies distanced shared decision making from the health care settings. Further studies that are solutions-focused and support Indigenous self-determination are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Jull
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Kimberly Fairman
- Institute for Circumpolar Health Research, Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Canada
| | | | - Brittany Hesmer
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Canada
| | | | - Not Deciding Alone Team
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
- Institute for Circumpolar Health Research, Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Canada
- University College London, London, UK
- Queen’s University, Kingston, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Suorsa-Johnson K, Delaney RK, Fagerlin A, Sandberg DE. Editorial: Shared Decision Making in Pediatric Differences/Disorders of Sex Development. FRONTIERS IN UROLOGY 2023; 3:1281181. [PMID: 37885905 PMCID: PMC10601991 DOI: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1281181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Suorsa-Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Rebecca K. Delaney
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Angela Fagerlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA
- Veterans Administration Health Services Research and Development Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center, Veterans Administration Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - David E. Sandberg
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation & Research (CHEAR) Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
- Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|