1
|
Bała MM, Poklepović Peričić T, Žuljević MF, Bralić N, Zając J, Motaze NV, Rohwer A, Gajdzica M, Young T. Adherence to the Guideline for Reporting Evidence-based practice Educational interventions and Teaching (GREET) of studies on evidence-based healthcare e-learning: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024:bmjebm-2023-112647. [PMID: 38862202 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study are to assess reporting of evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) e-learning interventions using the Guideline for Reporting Evidence-based practice Educational interventions and Teaching (GREET) checklist and explore factors associated with compliant reporting. DESIGN Methodological cross-sectional study. METHODS Based on the criteria used in an earlier systematic review, we included studies comparing EBHC e-learning and any other form of EBHC training or no EBHC training. We searched Medline, Embase, ERIC, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, Web of Knowledge, PsycInfo, ProQuest and Best Evidence Medical Education up to 4 January 2023. Screening of titles, abstracts, full-text articles and data extraction was done independently by two authors. For each study, we assessed adherence to each of the 17 GREET items and extracted information on possible predictors. Adequacy of reporting for each item of the GREET checklist was judged with yes (provided complete information), no (provided no information), unclear (when insufficient information was provided), or not applicable, when the item was clearly of no relevance to the intervention described (such as for item 8-details about the instructors-in the studies which used electronic, self-paced intervention, without any tutoring). Studies' adherence to the GREET checklist was presented as percentages and absolute numbers. We performed univariate analysis to assess the association of potential adherence predictors with the GREET checklist. We summarised results descriptively. RESULTS We included 40 studies, the majority of which assessed e-learning or blended learning and mostly involved medical and other healthcare students. None of the studies fully reported all the GREET items. Overall, the median number of GREET items met (received yes) per study was 8 and third quartile (Q3) of GREET items met per study was 9 (min. 4 max. 14). When we used Q3 of the number of items met as cut-off point, adherence to the GREET reporting checklist was poor with 7 out of 40 studies (17.5%) reporting items of the checklist on acceptable level (adhered to at least 10 items out of 17). None of the studies reported on all 17 GREET items. For 3 items, 80% of included studies well reported information (received yes for these items): item 1 (brief description of intervention), item 4 (evidence-based practice content) and item 6 (educational strategies). Items for which 50% of included studies reported complete information (received yes for these items) included: item 9 (modes of delivery), item 11 (schedule) and 12 (time spent on learning). The items for which 70% or more of included studies did not provide information (received no for these items) included: item 7 (incentives) and item 13 (adaptations; for both items 70% of studies received no for them), item 14 (modifications of educational interventions-95% of studies received no for this item), item 16 (any processes to determine whether the materials and the educational strategies used in the educational intervention were delivered as originally planned-93% of studies received no for this item) and 17 (intervention delivery according to schedule-100% of studies received no for this item). Studies published after September 2016 showed slight improvements in nine reporting items. In the logistic regression models, using the cut-off point of Q3 (10 points or above) the odds of acceptable adherence to GREET guidelines were 7.5 times higher if adherence to other guideline (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, etc) was reported for a given study type (p=0.039), also higher number of study authors increased the odds of adherence to GREET guidance by 18% (p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS Studies assessing educational interventions on EBHC e-learning still poorly adhere to the GREET checklist. Using other reporting guidelines increased the odds of better GREET reporting. Journals should call for the use of appropriate use of reporting guidelines of future studies on teaching EBHC to increase transparency of reporting, decrease unnecessary research duplication and facilitate uptake of research evidence or result. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER The Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/V86FR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Małgorzata M Bała
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Tina Poklepović Peričić
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Marija Franka Žuljević
- Department of Medical Humanities, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Nensi Bralić
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Joanna Zając
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Nkengafac Villyen Motaze
- Medicine Usage in South Africa, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | - Anke Rohwer
- Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Michalina Gajdzica
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Taryn Young
- Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hill J, Gratton N, Kulkarni A, Hamer O, Harrison J, Harris C, Chesters J, Duddy E, Collins L, Clegg A. The effectiveness of evidence-based healthcare educational interventions on healthcare professionals' knowledge, skills, attitudes, professional practice and healthcare outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2024. [PMID: 38817022 DOI: 10.1111/jep.14001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this systematic review is to assess the effectiveness of evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) educational interventions on healthcare professionals' knowledge, skills, attitudes, behaviour of EBHC, clinical process and care outcomes. A secondary aim of the review is to assess the effects of important pedagogical moderating factors for EBHC educational interventions. METHOD This systematic review used a forward and backward citation search strategy on the Web of Science platform (date of inception to 28 April 2023). Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs which compared EBHC educational interventions for healthcare professionals were included. A random effects meta-analysis was undertaken for EBHC compared with an active and nonactive control for all outcomes. RESULTS Sixty-one RCTs were identified which included a total of 5208 healthcare professionals. There was a large effect for EBHC educational interventions compared with waiting list/no treatment/sham control on knowledge (SMD, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.26-4.14, GRADE Low), skills (SMD, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.25-1.73, Very Low Certainty), attitude (SMD, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.16-1.47, Very Low Certainty) and behaviour of EBHC (SMD, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.25-1.40, Very Low Certainty). Over time the effect of EBHC educational interventions substantially decreased with no evidence of effect at 6 months for any outcome except behaviour (SMD,1.72; 95% CI, 0.74-2.71, Low Certainty). There was some evidence that blended learning, active learning and consistency in the individual delivering the intervention may be important positive moderating factors. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that EBHC educational interventions may have a large short-term effect on improving healthcare professionals' knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour of EBHC. These effects may be longer-lasting regarding EBHC behaviour. In terms of pedagogy, blended learning, active learning, and consistency of the individual delivering the intervention may be important positive moderating factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Hill
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Nikki Gratton
- Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, London, UK
| | - Amit Kulkarni
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jeong D, Park C, Sugimoto K, Jeon M, Kim D, Eun Y. Effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Practice Education Program for Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:637. [PMID: 38791851 PMCID: PMC11121330 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21050637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of evidence-based practice (EBP) education programs on undergraduate nursing students, focusing on enhancing EBP competency, critical thinking, and problem-solving ability. METHODS The search, conducted through PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to December 2023, included studies published in English and Korean and adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Qualitative appraisal of the studies was conducted using the revised ROB II for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I for non-randomized trials. For the meta-analysis, the effect size of the intervention was calculated as a standardized mean difference. RESULTS In our study, 11 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 8 studies of those were included in the meta-analysis. The effect sizes for EBP competency, critical thinking, and problem-solving ability were 1.55, 1.29, and 0.65, respectively. The meta-regression analysis indicated that tailored education programs of 4-7 weeks and being in the 4th grade significantly enhanced EBP competency. CONCLUSION These findings support the development of a customizable and applied EBP education actively for students, preparing nursing students to effectively implement EBP in clinical settings after graduation. Despite the significant effect size of the outcome variables, the high heterogeneity suggests the need for further investigation to validate the EBP educational outcomes for nursing students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dain Jeong
- College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (D.J.); (K.S.)
| | - Chang Park
- Department of Population Health Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Keiko Sugimoto
- College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (D.J.); (K.S.)
| | - Miyang Jeon
- College of Nursing, Institute of Medical Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52727, Republic of Korea;
| | - Dooyoung Kim
- College of Nursing, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52727, Republic of Korea;
| | - Young Eun
- College of Nursing, Institute of Medical Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52727, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simons M, Fisher G, Spanos S, Zurynski Y, Davidson A, Stoodley M, Rapport F, Ellis LA. Integrating training in evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making: a qualitative study of junior doctors and consultants. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:418. [PMID: 38637798 PMCID: PMC11027546 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05409-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past, evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision-making (SDM) have been taught separately in health sciences and medical education. However, recognition is increasing of the importance of EBM training that includes SDM, whereby practitioners incorporate all steps of EBM, including person-centered decision-making using SDM. However, there are few empirical investigations into the benefits of training that integrates EBM and SDM (EBM-SDM) for junior doctors, and their influencing factors. This study aimed to explore how integrated EBM-SDM training can influence junior doctors' attitudes to and practice of EBM and SDM; to identify the barriers and facilitators associated with junior doctors' EBM-SDM learning and practice; and to examine how supervising consultants' attitudes and authority impact on junior doctors' opportunities for EBM-SDM learning and practice. METHODS We developed and ran a series of EBM-SDM courses for junior doctors within a private healthcare setting with protected time for educational activities. Using an emergent qualitative design, we first conducted pre- and post-course semi-structured interviews with 12 junior doctors and thematically analysed the influence of an EBM-SDM course on their attitudes and practice of both EBM and SDM, and the barriers and facilitators to the integrated learning and practice of EBM and SDM. Based on the responses of junior doctors, we then conducted interviews with ten of their supervising consultants and used a second thematic analysis to understand the influence of consultants on junior doctors' EBM-SDM learning and practice. RESULTS Junior doctors appreciated EBM-SDM training that involved patient participation. After the training course, they intended to improve their skills in person-centered decision-making including SDM. However, junior doctors identified medical hierarchy, time factors, and lack of prior training as barriers to the learning and practice of EBM-SDM, whilst the private healthcare setting with protected learning time and supportive consultants were considered facilitators. Consultants had mixed attitudes towards EBM and SDM and varied perceptions of the role of junior doctors in either practice, both of which influenced the practice of junior doctors. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggested that future medical education and research should include training that integrates EBM and SDM that acknowledges the complex environment in which this training must be put into practice, and considers strategies to overcome barriers to the implementation of EBM-SDM learning in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Simons
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| | - Georgia Fisher
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Samantha Spanos
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Yvonne Zurynski
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Andrew Davidson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | - Marcus Stoodley
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Louise A Ellis
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heer BR, Gillette C, Geary A, McDaniel MJ. Clinical Physician Assistant Students' Perceptions of Evidence-Based Medicine Resources: A Cross-Sectional Examination. Med Ref Serv Q 2024; 43:119-129. [PMID: 38722610 DOI: 10.1080/02763869.2024.2329012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) instruction is required for physician assistant (PA) students. As a follow-up to an initial didactic year survey, this study seeks to understand which attributes of EBM resources clinical PA students find most and least useful, their self-efficacy utilizing medical literature, and their usage of EBM tools in the clinic. Results indicate that students preferred UpToDate and PubMed. PA students valued ease of use, which can inform instructors and librarians. Respondents utilized EBM tools daily or a few days a week, underscoring the importance of EBM tools in real-world scenarios. After their clinical year, students felt moderately confident utilizing the medical literature, emphasizing EBM training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris Gillette
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne Geary
- Department of PA Studies, College of Pharmacy & Health Science, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - M Jane McDaniel
- Yale School of Medicine Physician Assistant Online Program, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Al Zoubi FM, Bussières A, Chan HW, Leung KY, Ng YY, Lau KC, Ngai SPC, Tsang SMH, Wong AYL, Thomas A. Refining and adapting the measurement properties of evidence-based practice measures for physiotherapy students. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298611. [PMID: 38451977 PMCID: PMC10919638 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a lack of reliable and valid evidence-based practice (EBP) measures for physiotherapy students. This study validated EBP-student (EBP-S) measures for physiotherapy students. METHODS EBP measures developed from previous research were cross-culturally validated for use by physiotherapy students. The adapted EBP-S consisted of six measures: use of EBP, EBP activities, EBP knowledge, self-efficacy for EBP, attitudes towards EBP, and perceptions of the teaching and assessment of EBP in the curriculum. The final version was completed by physiotherapy students (n = 335). The psychometric properties for each EBP-S measure were estimated, including construct validity using Rasch model, internal consistency reliability using person separation index (PSI), test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and differential item functioning (DIF). RESULTS Two formative measures (use of EBP and EBP activities) were only linguistically modified for use with students. A Rasch model was applied to the other four reflective measures. For knowledge, 55% (6/11) items fit the Rasch model with chi-square fit statistic (χ2) = 34.46, p = 0.08; PSI = 0.85. For self-efficacy, 89% (8/9) items fit the Rasch model with χ2 = 25.11, p = 0.80; PSI = 0.89. For attitudes, 62% (8/13) items fit the Rasch model with χ2 = 61.49, p = 0.00; PSI = 0.71. For perception of the teaching and assessment of EBP in the curriculum, 62% (8/13) items fit the Rasch model with χ2 = 80.99, p = 0.45; PSI = 0.92. perception of the teaching and assessment of EBP in the curriculum showed DIF in three items. The ICCs ranged between 0.80 and 0.98. CONCLUSIONS The EBP-S measures were validated for physiotherapy students, including the testing of psychometric properties, which were not tested in the original studies. Further refinements should be considered for the use of the EBP-S with other groups of students or if changes are applied to the current curriculum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi M. Al Zoubi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hoi Wai Chan
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Kit Yat Leung
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Yui Yin Ng
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Ka Chun Lau
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Shirley P. C. Ngai
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Sharon M. H. Tsang
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Arnold Y. L. Wong
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Aliki Thomas
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Melesse GT, Amde T, Tezera R. Competency in evidence-based medicine and associated factors among medical radiology technologists in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Med Radiat Sci 2024. [PMID: 38445830 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence-based medicine integrates clinical expertise, patient values and best research evidence in clinical decision-making. This study aimed to assess evidence-based medicine knowledge, attitudes, practices and associated factors among medical radiology technologists in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among 392 medical radiology technologists from May to August 2022 using a self-administered questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression identified factors associated with evidence-based medicine practice. RESULTS Most medical radiology technologists (57.7%) had moderate evidence-based medicine knowledge and 94.9% had favourable attitudes. However, 64.8% demonstrated poor evidence-based medicine practice. Factors significantly associated with better evidence-based medicine practice were moderate knowledge (AOR 1.949, 95% CI 1.155-3.291), good statistical understanding (AOR 1.824, 95% CI 1.135-2.930), sufficient time for evidence-based medicine (AOR 1.892, 95% CI 1.140-3.141), institutional support (AOR 2.093, 95% CI 1.271-3.440) and evidence-based medicine resource access (AOR 1.653, 95% CI 1.028-2.656). CONCLUSION Despite moderate knowledge and positive attitudes towards evidence-based medicine, most medical radiology technologists had suboptimal utilisation. Strategies to improve knowledge, ensure dedicated time, provide institutional support and resources could enhance evidence-based radiology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girma Tufa Melesse
- Department of Midwifery, Institute of Health, Bule Hora University, Bule Hora, Ethiopia
| | - Tewodros Amde
- Department of Medical Radiology, College of Medical and Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Robel Tezera
- Department of Medical Radiology, College of Medical and Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
González LMP, Del Pilar Ureña M, Andrade D, Vergara-Escobar OJ, Palacios C, Camargo-Figuera FA. Validation of an instrument to measure knowledge, attitudes and skills towards Evidence-Based Practice in nursing students in Colombia. Nurse Educ Pract 2024; 76:103904. [PMID: 38402831 DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGOUND Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is crucial for the nursing profession, as it helps professionals make informed clinical decisions based on the best available evidence. Most EBP competency assessment tools focus on specific technical knowledge or skill components, and most have been tested on medical students. The Evidence-Based Practice Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ-E) is an instrument that assesses the competence in EBP in nursing students. The objective of the article was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the EBP-COQ-E instrument in final year nursing students in Colombia. DESIGN A validation study was conducted using a cross-sectional design. METHODS The population included nursing students from 19 programs in Colombia, who were selected during the years 2020 and 2021 based on their university enrollment in the last year of training in nursing programs with current qualified registration by the Ministry of Education and who had attended the least one subject related to research. The data were collected through a virtual platform and the researchers consolidated it into a general database. The EBP-COQ-E instrument consists of 25 items grouped into three factors: attitude towards EBP, skills for EBP and knowledge about EBP. The items were answered on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 5. An exploratory factor analysis was performed and an internal consistency analysis of the instrument. RESULTS A total of 1021 final year students from 19 university nursing programs participated, with a mean age of 23 years and where 83% identified themselves as female. The results showed good internal consistency and construct validity for the instrument, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89. In the exploratory factor analysis, 3 factors were found that explained 51% of the variance of the data. Together these three factors had statistically significant positive correlations. CONCLUSION The study contributes to the validation of the Evidence-Based Practice Competence Questionnaire (EBP-COQ-E) which is a valid and reliable tool to assess knowledge, attitudes and skills in EBP in nursing students in the Colombian context. Training in EBP is crucial to guarantee the quality of performance of future professionals in care practice and the EBP-COQ-E can be useful and applicable where it is necessary to evaluate this competence in training processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Andrade
- Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Johnson SG, Espehaug B, Larun L, Ciliska D, Olsen NR. Occupational Therapy Students' Evidence-Based Practice Skills as Reported in a Mobile App: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 10:e48507. [PMID: 38381475 PMCID: PMC10918542 DOI: 10.2196/48507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an important aspect of the health care education curriculum. EBP involves following the 5 EBP steps: ask, assess, appraise, apply, and audit. These 5 steps reflect the suggested core competencies covered in teaching and learning programs to support future health care professionals applying EBP. When implementing EBP teaching, assessing outcomes by documenting the student's performance and skills is relevant. This can be done using mobile devices. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess occupational therapy students' EBP skills as reported in a mobile app. METHODS We applied a cross-sectional design. Descriptive statistics were used to present frequencies, percentages, means, and ranges of data regarding EBP skills found in the EBPsteps app. Associations between students' ability to formulate the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome/Population, Interest, and Context (PICO/PICo) elements and identifying relevant research evidence were analyzed with the chi-square test. RESULTS Of 4 cohorts with 150 students, 119 (79.3%) students used the app and produced 240 critically appraised topics (CATs) in the app. The EBP steps "ask," "assess," and "appraise" were often correctly performed. The clinical question was formulated correctly in 53.3% (128/240) of the CATs, and students identified research evidence in 81.2% (195/240) of the CATs. Critical appraisal checklists were used in 81.2% (195/240) of the CATs, and most of these checklists were assessed as relevant for the type of research evidence identified (165/195, 84.6%). The least frequently correctly reported steps were "apply" and "audit." In 39.6% (95/240) of the CATs, it was reported that research evidence was applied. Only 61% (58/95) of these CATs described how the research was applied to clinical practice. Evaluation of practice changes was reported in 38.8% (93/240) of the CATs. However, details about practice changes were lacking in all these CATs. A positive association was found between correctly reporting the "population" and "interventions/interest" elements of the PICO/PICo and identifying research evidence (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS We assessed the students' EBP skills based on how they documented following the EBP steps in the EBPsteps app, and our results showed variations in how well the students mastered the steps. "Apply" and "audit" were the most difficult EBP steps for the students to perform, and this finding has implications and gives directions for further development of the app and educational instruction in EBP. The EBPsteps app is a new and relevant app for students to learn and practice EBP, and it can be used to assess students' EBP skills objectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne G Johnson
- Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Birgitte Espehaug
- Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lillebeth Larun
- Division of Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Donna Ciliska
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nina Rydland Olsen
- Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Redmond C, Farrell R, Cunningham C, Dineen A, Foley S, O'Donnell D, O'Reilly S, Stokes D, O'Neill E. Development of the EVIBEC Learning Outcomes Framework to support the delivery of evidence-based practice curricula in health care professional programmes: a codesign approach. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:3. [PMID: 38172823 PMCID: PMC10763008 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04972-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND All healthcare professional education programmes must adopt a systematic approach towards ensuring graduates achieve the competencies required to be an evidence-based practitioner. While a list of competencies for evidence-based practice exist, health care educators continue to struggle with effectively integrating the necessary competencies into existing curricula. The purpose of this project was to develop an open access cross-discipline, learning outcomes framework to support educators in integrating the teaching, learning and assessment required to ensure all graduates of health care professional programmes can achieve the necessary evidence-based practice competencies. METHODS An interdisciplinary team of health care professional educators and a librarian completed a review of the health professions literature on the teaching and assessment of evidence-based practice. The literature, coupled with the teams' collective experiences in evidence-based education and research, were used to identify relevant teaching, learning and evidence-based competency frameworks to inform the project design. The guide and toolkit for experience-based co-design developed by the National Health Service Institute for Innovation and Improvement was adopted for this study ( Institute for Innovation and Improvement: Experience Based Design: Guide & Tools In. Leeds: NHS; 2009.). A four-step approach involving three online participatory co-design workshops and a national validation workshop was designed. Students (n = 33), faculty (n = 12), and clinical educators (n = 15) participated in formulating and mapping learning outcomes to evidence-based competencies. RESULTS Through a rigorous, systematic co-design process the Evidenced-based Education Collaborative (EVIBEC) Learning Outcomes Framework was developed. This framework consists of a series of student-centred learning outcomes, aligned to evidence-based practice competencies, classified according to the 5 As of EBP and mapped to the cognitive levels of Bloom's taxonomy. Associated learning activities for each step of EBP are suggested. CONCLUSIONS A consensus-based, student-centred learning outcomes framework aligned to a contemporary set of EBP core competencies has been developed. The freely accessible EVIBEC framework may support entry level health care professional EBP education, by informing EBP curriculum development and offering the potential for interdisciplinary approaches to and sharing of valuable teaching and learning resources. Co-design proved an effective method in creating and refining this framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Redmond
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Robin Farrell
- UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, Area: Veterinary Nursing, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Catriona Cunningham
- UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Andrea Dineen
- UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, Area: Veterinary Nursing, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Shane Foley
- UCD School of Medicine, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Deirdre O'Donnell
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Sharleen O'Reilly
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, Area: Dietetics and Human Nutrition, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | | | - Emma O'Neill
- UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, Belfield, Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bralić N, Buljan I. The association between research design and the perceived treatment effectiveness: a cross-sectional study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1220999. [PMID: 38196834 PMCID: PMC10774223 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1220999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of research design on the perceived medical treatment effectiveness among researchers, healthcare workers (HCWs) and consumers in Croatia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to February 2022 using an online survey. The participants were researchers, HCWs and consumers from Croatia. The survey had six scenarios about the same medical treatment presented within different study designs and in random order. Participants were asked to assess on a scale from 1 to 10 if the descriptions presented a sufficient level of evidence to conclude that the treatment was effective. Results For researchers (n = 97), as the number of participants and degree of variable control in the study design increased, the perceived level of sufficient evidence also increased significantly. Among consumers (n = 286) and HCWs (n = 201), no significant differences in scores were observed between the cross-sectional study, cohort study, RCT, and systematic review. Conclusion There is a need to implement educational courses on basic research methodology in lower levels of education and as part of Continuing Medical Education for all stakeholders in the healthcare system. Trial registration: this study has been registered on the Open Science Framework prior to study commencement (https://osf.io/t7xmf).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nensi Bralić
- Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| | - Ivan Buljan
- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Split, Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barreto JOM, Romão DMM, Setti C, Machado MLT, Riera R, Gomes R, Machado DA, Abreu J, de Andrade KRC, Boeira LDS, Pozza L, Souza NM, Logullo P, Silva RB, de Oliveira SMDVL, Mota SEDC, Dias TS, Toma TS, da Silva SF. An evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) competency profile for the Brazilian Health System developed through consensus: process and outcomes. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:105. [PMID: 37828575 PMCID: PMC10571264 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01052-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-informed policymaking (EIPM) requires a set of individual and organizational knowledge, skills and attitudes that should be articulated with background factors and needs. In this regard, the development of an EIPM competency profile is important to support the diagnosis, planning and implementation of EIPM. PURPOSE To present the process and outcomes of the development of an EIPM competency profile by an expert committee, to be applied in different contexts of the Brazilian Health System. METHODS A committee of experts in EIPM shared different views, experiences and opinions to develop an EIPM competency profile for Brazil. In six consensus workshops mediated by facilitators, the committee defined from macro problems to key actions and performances essential for the competency profile. The development steps consisted of: (1) Constitution of the committee, including researchers, professionals with practical experience, managers, and educators; (2) Development of a rapid review on EIPM competency profiles; (3) Agreement on commitments and responsibilities in the processes; (4) Identification and definition of macro problems relating to the scope of the competency profile; and (5) Outlining of general and specific capacities, to be incorporated into the competency profile, categorized by key actions. RESULTS The development of the EIPM competency profile was guided by the following macro problems: (1) lack of systematic and transparent decision-making processes in health policy management; (2) underdeveloped institutional capacity for knowledge management and translation; and (3) incipient use of scientific evidence in the formulation and implementation of health policies. A general framework of key actions and performances of the EIPM Competency Profile for Brazil was developed, including 42 specific and general key actions distributed by area of activity (Health Management, Scientific Research, Civil Society, Knowledge Translation, and Cross-sectional areas). CONCLUSIONS The competency profile presented in this article can be used in different contexts as a key tool for the institutionalization of EIPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cecilia Setti
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Veredas Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rachel Riera
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Unifesp (Federal University of São Paulo), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Romeu Gomes
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- IFF/Fiocruz (National Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrícia Logullo
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine (CSM), Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Diseases (NDORMS), and UK EQUATOR Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Estalella I, Román Ó, Reichenberger TN, Maquibar A. Impact of a teaching strategy to promote evidence-based practice on nursing students' knowledge and confidence in simulated clinical intervention choices. BMC Nurs 2023; 22:361. [PMID: 37803349 PMCID: PMC10559451 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01540-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nurses self-efficacy, confidence and their competency for evidence-based practice have a relevant impact in the quality of care provided to patients. However, the implementation of evidence-based practice continues to be limited to date and the relationship between these elements has not been thoroughly understood. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the impact on confidence levels of a teaching strategy to promote evidence incorporation into clinical decisions made by student nurses in hypothetical scenarios. Besides, students' satisfaction with the new teaching strategy was assessed. METHODS The teaching strategy was asynchronous, on-line and based on multiple-choice questionnaires related to decision making on an intensive care unit patient. Confidence levels were assessed by introducing the scoring tool confidence-based marking. Changes between pre- and post-tests in correct answers, confidence levels and expected-observed ranges of accuracy at each level of certainty were analyzed through non-parametric McNemar's sign tests for paired-samples differences. To assess students' satisfaction with the teaching strategy, a mixed-methods approach was followed. Descriptive statistical methods and Qualitative Content Analysis were followed respectively in order to analyze students' satisfaction. RESULTS A total of 165 students completed the assignment, 101 answered the satisfaction survey and 7 participated in the interviews. Statistically significant better scoring and higher confidence levels were found in the post-intervention. Statistically significant differences in expected-observed ranges of accuracy were found for the three levels of certainty. Students were highly satisfied with the proposed task. In the qualitative analysis one category was elaborated which illustrated the students' perceived added value of this new assignment. CONCLUSIONS On-line teaching strategies based on clinical scenarios that focus on evidence-based decision-making have the potential to increase the confidence of nursing students. Additionally, interventions designed by teams incorporating clinical nurses, university librarians and academic nurses have the potential to bridge the evidence-practice gap in nursing education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itziar Estalella
- Department of Nursing I, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, B° Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Bizkaia, 48940, Spain
| | - Óscar Román
- Department of Nursing I, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, B° Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Bizkaia, 48940, Spain
| | - Theo Norbert Reichenberger
- University Library, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, B° Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Bizkaia, 48940, Spain
| | - Amaia Maquibar
- Department of Nursing I, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, B° Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Bizkaia, 48940, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lin AP, Chou YY, Tam KW. Use of simulation scenarios and vote cards in teaching critical appraisal concepts in evidence-based medicine. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:726. [PMID: 37794355 PMCID: PMC10548740 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04738-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most effective method of teaching critical appraisal concepts remains unclear. We used simulation scenarios in a Risk-of-Bias (RoB) 2.0 framework to teach the various biases that may affect randomized controlled trials and assessed whether including this interactive session in an evidence-based medicine (EBM) course for third-year preclinical medical students can optimize their understanding of critical appraisal concepts. METHODS The session had 13 modules, each corresponding to a particular risk of bias in RoB 2.0. Each module included a simulated scenario, followed by data presentation and a generalized conclusion. The students were subsequently asked to use colored vote cards to indicate whether they agreed, had some concern, or disagreed with the conclusion and to justify their answers. On the basis of the students' answers, the facilitator debriefed the scenario and addressed the specific bias. In each module, the students were required to demonstrate critical thinking in analyzing the claims and quality of the supporting evidence and in justifying their decisions, thus conceptualizing their understanding of research biases. RESULTS We included 306 students across two pilot sessions in spring 2020 and 2021, and the response rate was 97.4%. The students were least able to discern the following problems: baseline imbalances when assessing allocation bias (correct answers: 9.06%), missing outcome data when assessing attrition bias (correct answers: 11.65%), and balanced nonprotocol interventions when assessing performance bias (correct answers: 14.88%). The postcourse survey revealed several aspects of the interactive session that the students appreciated or found challenging. CONCLUSION Preclinical medical students generally appreciated the inclusion of simulation scenarios and vote cards in an EBM course. The use of vote cards facilitated medical students' understanding of critical appraisal concepts, uncovered areas that they found challenging to understand, and encouraged their active participation. Such interactive sessions should be increasingly included in medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashleigh Peng Lin
- Department of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Yun Chou
- Shared Decision Making Resource Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ka-Wai Tam
- Shared Decision Making Resource Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tomotaki A, Morioka N, Tsuda Y. Mapping of instruments in Japanese for measuring evidence-based practice among clinical nurses: A scoping review. Int J Nurs Pract 2023; 29:e13086. [PMID: 35903956 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This work aims to map instruments available in Japanese that have been assessed for reliability or validity for measuring evidence-based practice (EBP) among clinical nurses. BACKGROUND As EBP competencies comprise various domains, many EBP instruments have been developed. However, instruments available in Japanese for measuring EBP have not been reported systematically. DESIGN We conducted a scoping review. DATA SOURCES Two different bibliography databases were searched to identify EBP instruments published until 2019: ICHUSHI (for Japanese articles) and PubMed. REVIEW METHODS After relevant studies were screened and identified, study profile characteristics were extracted to identify EBP instruments in Japanese, and the quality of methodology for developing such instruments was evaluated. This information was recorded and the characteristics were descriptively summarized. RESULTS Ninety potentially relevant articles were identified, of which seven articles and nine instruments were included in this review. All instruments were based on self-reported self-efficacy and attitudes. Few Japanese instruments included all the steps required for EBP. The overall reporting quality of each instrument was low. CONCLUSIONS EBP instruments available in Japanese are extremely scarce. The study results show that it is difficult to measure the various aspects of EBP with the existing instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ai Tomotaki
- Nursing Informatics, School of Nursing, National College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriko Morioka
- Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ban JW, Perera R, Williams V. Influence of research evidence on the use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in primary care: an exploratory qualitative interview study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:194. [PMID: 37730553 PMCID: PMC10512575 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02155-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are widely used in primary care. They accumulate research evidence through derivation, external validation, and impact studies. However, existing knowledge about the influence of research evidence on the use of CPRs is limited. Therefore, we explored how primary care clinicians' perceptions of and experiences with research influence their use of cardiovascular CPRs. METHODS We conducted an exploratory qualitative interview study with thematic analysis. Primary care clinicians were recruited from the WWAMI (Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana and Idaho) region Practice and Research Network (WPRN). We used purposeful sampling to ensure maximum variation within the participant group. Data were collected by conducting semi-structured online interviews. We analyzed data using inductive thematic analysis to identify commonalities and differences within themes. RESULTS Of 29 primary care clinicians who completed the questionnaire, 15 participated in the interview. We identified two main themes relating to the influence of clinicians' perceptions of and experiences with cardiovascular CPR research on their decisions about using cardiovascular CPRs: "Seek and judge" and "be acquainted and assume." When clinicians are familiar with, trust, and feel confident in using research evidence, they might actively search and assess the evidence, which may then influence their decisions about using cardiovascular CPRs. However, clinicians, who are unfamiliar with, distrust, or find it challenging to use research evidence, might be passively acquainted with evidence but do not make their own judgment on the trustworthiness of such evidence. Therefore, these clinicians might not rely on research evidence when making decisions about using cardiovascular CPRs. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians' perceptions and experiences could influence how they use research evidence in decisions about using cardiovascular CPRs. This implies, when promoting evidence-based decisions, it might be useful to target clinicians' unfamiliarity, distrust, and challenges regarding the use of research evidence rather than focusing only on their knowledge and skills. Further, because clinicians often rely on evidence-unrelated factors, guideline developers and policymakers should recommend cardiovascular CPRs supported by high-quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong- Wook Ban
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Rafael Perera
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Landsverk NG, Olsen NR, Brovold T. Instruments measuring evidence-based practice behavior, attitudes, and self-efficacy among healthcare professionals: a systematic review of measurement properties. Implement Sci 2023; 18:42. [PMID: 37705031 PMCID: PMC10500884 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01301-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based practice (EBP) is well known to most healthcare professionals. Implementing EBP in clinical practice is a complex process that can be challenging and slow. Lack of EBP knowledge, skills, attitudes, self-efficacy, and behavior can be essential barriers that should be measured using valid and reliable instruments for the population in question. Results from previous systematic reviews show that information regarding high-quality instruments that measure EBP attitudes, behavior, and self-efficacy in various healthcare disciplines need to be improved. This systematic review aimed to summarize the measurement properties of existing instruments that measure healthcare professionals' EBP attitudes, behaviors, and self-efficacy. METHODS We included studies that reported measurement properties of instruments that measure healthcare professionals' EBP attitudes, behaviors, and self-efficacy. Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, HaPI, AMED via Ovid, and Cinahl via Ebscohost were searched in October 2020. The search was updated in December 2022. The measurement properties extracted included data on the item development process, content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, and measurement error. The quality assessment, rating of measurement properties, synthesis, and modified grading of the evidence were conducted in accordance with the COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews. RESULTS Thirty-four instruments that measure healthcare professionals' EBP attitudes, behaviors or self-efficacy were identified. Seventeen of the 34 were validated in two or more healthcare disciplines. Nurses were most frequently represented (n = 53). Despite the varying quality of instrument development and content validity studies, most instruments received sufficient ( +) ratings on content validity, with the quality of evidence graded as "very low" in most cases. Structural validity and internal consistency were the measurement properties most often assessed, and reliability and measurement error were most rarely assessed. The quality assessment results and overall rating of these measurement properties varied, but the quality of evidence was generally graded higher for these properties than for content validity. CONCLUSIONS Based on the summarized results, the constructs, and the population of interest, several instruments can be recommended for use in various healthcare disciplines. However, future studies should strive to use qualitative methods to further develop existing EBP instruments and involve the target population. TRIAL REGISTRATION This review is registered in PROSPERO. CRD42020196009. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020196009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Gunnar Landsverk
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Nina Rydland Olsen
- Department of Health and Functioning, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Therese Brovold
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Watowicz RP, Hand RK. Call for Standardized Language and Training to Bridge the Appraise/Apply Gap in Evidence-Based Dietetics Practice. J Acad Nutr Diet 2023; 123:1121-1126. [PMID: 37164109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna P Watowicz
- Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Rosa K Hand
- Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ramalho A, Petrica J. Knowledge in Motion: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence-Based Human Kinetics. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6020. [PMID: 37297624 PMCID: PMC10252659 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20116020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This comprehensive review examines critical aspects of evidence-based human kinetics, focusing on bridging the gap between scientific evidence and practical implementation. To bridge this gap, the development of tailored education and training programs is essential, providing practitioners with the expertise and skills to effectively apply evidence-based programs and interventions. The effectiveness of these programs in improving physical fitness across all age groups has been widely demonstrated. In addition, integrating artificial intelligence and the principles of slow science into evidence-based practice promises to identify gaps in knowledge and stimulate further research in human kinetics. The purpose of this review is to provide researchers and practitioners with comprehensive information on the application of scientific principles in human kinetics. By highlighting the importance of evidence-based practice, this review is intended to promote the adoption of effective interventions to optimize physical health and enhance performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Ramalho
- Sport, Health & Exercise Research Unit (SHERU), Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6000-266 Castelo Branco, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sgarbossa N, Marino S, Aletta L, Vázquez Peña FR, Franco JVA. Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the ACE tool for assessing competencies in evidence-based medicine in medical students. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023; 28:89-94. [PMID: 36150894 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To translate and culturally adapt the tool 'Assessing Competency in evidence-based medicine (EBM)' (ACE) to Spanish and to implement it in a cohort of medical students for the evaluation of the instrument's psychometric properties. DESIGN Bilingual translators produced a translation and backtranslation of the original instrument, with interim consensus in each stage with oversight and input by a group of experts. We then performed cognitive interviews to adapt the wording of the tool culturally. Finally, we implemented the final version in a cohort of medical students on a virtual general practice course with EBM modules. SETTING Medical School in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Due to restrictions to in-person teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted this study in the context of virtual learning. PARTICIPANTS We included 125 fourth and fifth-year medical students. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We measured internal consistency with the Kuder-Richardson coefficient (>0.6 as a threshold for reliability) and construct validity through a Pearson's correlation between the examinations carried out with the translated instrument and the results of the regular examinations of EBM in the same students (expected values of at least 0.3 to 0.7). We also compared the total score of the instrument of fifth-year students to fourth-year students. RESULTS As for measurements for internal consistency, the coefficient Kuder-Richardson resulted in a value of 0.268, below our prespecified threshold. For construct validity, the Pearson correlation between the sum of the items and regular examinations was 0.139, also below our prespecified threshold. However, fifth-year students averaged 0.94 points more than fourth-year students (95% CI 0.24 more to 1.65 more). CONCLUSION The translated and cross-culturally adapted version of the ACE tool into Spanish had low reliability and validity in an MBE course taught and evaluated in a virtual environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Sgarbossa
- Health Department, Universidad Nacional de La Matanza, San Justo, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
| | - Sofia Marino
- Health Department, Universidad Nacional de La Matanza, San Justo, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
| | - Lucas Aletta
- Health Department, Universidad Nacional de La Matanza, San Justo, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina
| | - Fernando Ramón Vázquez Peña
- Family and Community Medicine Division, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Federal District, Argentina
| | - Juan Victor Ariel Franco
- Research Department, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Institute of General Practice, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fernandez-Guzman D, Caira-Chuquineyra B, Baca-Rondan F, Yucra-Sosa MC, Ccami-Bernal F, Soriano-Moreno DR, Nieto-Gutierrez W, Benites-Zapata VA. Association between self-reported evidence-based medicine competencies and prescribing of drugs without scientific evidence against mild COVID-19 among recently graduated physicians in Peru. Heliyon 2023; 9:e15366. [PMID: 37064449 PMCID: PMC10082469 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the association between self-rated evidence-based medicine (EBM) competencies and the prescription of drugs without scientific evidence against mild COVID-19 (present with any of the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 but who do not have shortness of breath, dyspnea, or abnormal chest imaging) among recently graduated physicians in Peru. Methods We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study where we evaluated a non-probability sample of recently graduated physicians during June and July 2021 (end of second wave of COVID-19 in Peru). Self-rated EBM competencies were assessed by four domains (formulation of a clinical question, search, analysis, and application) using a Likert scale with scores from zero to four ("Very inadequate" = 0, to "Very Adequate" = 4), it was considered as "Adequate" if the score was three or four. In addition, the variable "General competence on EBM" was rated as "Adequate" if in all domains evaluated it presented an adequate self-rating. For the outcome, drug prescription, we considered the use of ivermectin, azithromycin, other antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, and anticoagulants (drugs with no efficacy demonstrated for patients with mild COVID-19). To assess the association, we used Poisson regression models with robust variances and obtaining crude (cPR) and adjusted (aPR) prevalence ratios with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results Of a total of 239 physicians included 70.7% prescribed at least one drug without scientific evidence. A total of 51.1% reported adequate ratings in all evaluated domains of EBM. Self-rating the "Clinical Question Formulation" competency as adequate was associated with a lower frequency of prescribing medications for mild COVID-19 (aPR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.95). While self-rating as adequate the competency of "Identify possible implications of investigations" was associated with an increase in the prescription of such drugs (aPR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.09-1.20). Additionally, self-rating all domains as adequate were associated with less prescription (aPR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.90-0.96). Conclusion Seven out of ten recently graduated physicians prescribed some type of medication without scientific evidence to treat patients with mild COVID-19. Having adequate self-perceived EBM competencies was associated with a lower frequency of prescribing medications without scientific evidence to manage patients with mild COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fiorella Baca-Rondan
- Escuela Profesional de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Peru
| | - Maria Cristina Yucra-Sosa
- Escuela Profesional de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Peru
| | - Fabricio Ccami-Bernal
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru
| | - David R Soriano-Moreno
- Unidad de Investigación Clínica y Epidemiológica, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Vicente A Benites-Zapata
- Unidad para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nguyen QT, Yeh ML, Ngo LTH, Chen C. Translating and Validating the Vietnamese Version of the Health Sciences Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:5325. [PMID: 37047941 PMCID: PMC10093985 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
No validated instrument is available for assessing the evidence-based practice capacity of Vietnamese health professionals. This study aimed to translate and validate the Health Sciences Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire (HS-EBP) from English to Vietnamese and ascertain its psychometric properties. Data were collected from two obstetric hospitals in Vietnam. Participants: A total of 343 midwives were randomly selected. The HS-EBP questionnaire was translated by a group of bilingual experts into Vietnamese (HS-EBP-V). Content validity was assessed by two experts. Internal consistency and test-retest reliabilities were assessed using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation (ICC), respectively. Construct validity was assessed using the contrasted groups approach. As a result, the content validity index of the HS-EBP-V reached 1.0. For the individual subscales, Cronbach's α was 0.92-0.97 and ICC was between 0.45 and 0.66. The validity of the contrasted-groups approach showed discrimination by a significant difference in the subscale scores among diploma holders compared with bachelor's degree holders (p < 0.001). The validation of the HS-EBP questionnaire indicated satisfactory psychometric properties. The results indicate that the HS-EBP is a reliable and valid instrument which assesses the competencies of as well as facilitators of and barriers to the five steps of EBP among midwives. The HS-EBP-V was deemed a reliable and validated tool for assessing the competency and application of EBP among Vietnamese healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quyen Thao Nguyen
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, 365 Mingde Road, Taipei City 112, Taiwan;
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Medical Technology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 201 Nguyen Chi Thanh Street, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam;
| | - Mei-Ling Yeh
- School of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, 365 Mingde Road, Taipei City 112, Taiwan;
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, 252 Wuxing Street, Taipei City 110, Taiwan;
| | - Ly Thi Hai Ngo
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Medical Technology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 201 Nguyen Chi Thanh Street, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam;
| | - Chiehfeng Chen
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, 252 Wuxing Street, Taipei City 110, Taiwan;
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, 252 Wuxing Street, Taipei City 110, Taiwan
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Street, Taipei City 116, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Barreto JOM, Romão DMM, Setti C, Machado MLT, Riera R, Gomes R, da Silva SF. Competency profiles for evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM): a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:16. [PMID: 36755283 PMCID: PMC9909856 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00964-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-informed policy-making (EIPM) requires a set of individual and organizational capacities, linked with background factors and needs. The identification of essential knowledge, skills and attitudes for EIPM can support the development of competency profiles and their application in different contexts. PURPOSE To identify elements of competency (knowledge, skills and attitudes) for EIPM, according to different professional profiles (researcher, health professional, decision-maker and citizen). METHODS Rapid umbrella review. A structured search was conducted and later updated in two comprehensive repositories (BVSalud and PubMed). Review studies with distinctive designs were included, published from 2010 onwards, without language restrictions. Assessment of the methodological quality of the studies was not performed. A meta-aggregative narrative synthesis was used to report the findings. RESULTS Ten reviews were included. A total of 37 elements of competency were identified, eight were categorized as knowledge, 19 as skills and 10 as attitudes. These elements were aggregated into four competency profiles: researcher, health professional, decision-maker and citizen. The competency profiles included different sets of EIPM-related knowledge, skills and attitudes. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS This study is innovative because it aggregates different profiles of competency from a practical perspective, favouring the application of its results in different contexts to support EIPM. Methodological limitations are related to the shortcuts adopted in this review: complementary searches of the grey literature were not performed, and the study selection and data extraction were not conducted in duplicate. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: EIPM requires the development of individual and organizational capacities. This rapid review contributes to the discussion on the institutionalization of EIPM in health systems. The competency profiles presented here can support discussions about the availability of capacity and the need for its development in different contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil. .,Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, Brazil.
| | - Davi Mamblona Marques Romão
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil ,Instituto Veredas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Maria Lúcia Teixeira Machado
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil ,grid.411247.50000 0001 2163 588XUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rachel Riera
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil ,grid.411249.b0000 0001 0514 7202Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Romeu Gomes
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Hospital Sírio-Libanês (HSL), São Paulo, Brazil ,grid.418068.30000 0001 0723 0931Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (IFF/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Roberge-Dao J, Maggio LA, Zaccagnini M, Rochette A, Shikako K, Boruff J, Thomas A. Challenges and future directions in the measurement of evidence-based practice: Qualitative analysis of umbrella review findings. J Eval Clin Pract 2023; 29:218-227. [PMID: 36440876 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: An important aspect of scholarly discussions about evidence-based practice (EBP) is how EBP is measured. Given the conceptual and empirical developments in the study of EBP over the last 3 decades, there is a need to better understand how to best measure EBP in educational and clinical contexts. The aim of this study was to identify and describe the main challenges, recommendations for practice, and areas of future research in the measurement of EBP across the health professions as reported by systematic reviews (SRs). METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data obtained in the context of a previously published umbrella review that aimed to compare SRs on EBP measures. Two reviewers independently extracted excerpts from the results and discussion/conclusion sections of the 10 included SRs that aligned with the three research aims. An iterative six-phase reflexive thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke was conducted. RESULTS Our thematic analysis produced five themes describing the main challenges associated with measuring EBP, four themes outlining main recommendations for practice, and four themes representing areas of future research. Challenges include limited psychometric testing and validity evidence for existing EBP measures; limitations with the self-report format; lack of construct clarity of EBP measures; inability to capture the complexity of the EBP process and outcomes; and the context-specific nature of EBP measures. Reported recommendations for practice include acknowledging the multidimensionality of EBP; adapting EBP measures to the context and re-examining the validity argument; and considering the feasibility and acceptability of measures. Areas of future research included the development of comprehensive, multidimensional EBP measures and the need for expert consensus on the operationalization of EBP. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that existing measures may be insufficient in capturing the multidimensional, contextual and dynamic nature of EBP. There is a need for a clear operationalization of EBP and an improved understanding and application of validity theory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Roberge-Dao
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Canada and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Lauren A Maggio
- Medicine and Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Marco Zaccagnini
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Canada and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Annie Rochette
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréa, Canada and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Keiko Shikako
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Canada and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Jill Boruff
- Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Aliki Thomas
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy and The Institute of Health Sciences Education, McGill University, Montréal, Canada and Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Balzer J, Jung A, Gerhard J, Reinecke S, Mijic M, Fichtmüller A, Jahjah A, Eggert M, Koch M, Ernst K, Haring R. Psychometric properties of questionnaires to assess evidence-based practice among occupational, physical and speech therapists: A systematic review. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2023; 176:1-11. [PMID: 36702639 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an important aspect of healthcare work, but the clinical implementation is complex. To be able to facilitate EBP implementation, valid measurement of the "EBP status quo" is essential. Therefore, we aimed to identify valid tools for EBP status assessment among occupational, physical and speech therapists in Germany. METHODS The databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were systematically searched from August 2011 until July 2022. Methodological quality and evidence level were scored by two independent raters via: i) the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, ii) updated criteria for good measurement properties, and iii) modified GRADE criteria. RESULTS Overall, 57 reports describing the development or validation of 31 EBP questionnaires were included. Six questionnaires showed "sufficient" evidence for content validity, three questionnaires showed "sufficient" evidence for reliability, two questionnaires showed "sufficient" evidence for structural validity as well as internal consistency, and nine questionnaires showed "sufficient" evidence for construct validity. Most questionnaires demonstrated moderate or low-quality evidence for the psychometric properties tested. DISCUSSION Overall, the present review found a lack of sufficient evidence on the psychometric properties of most questionnaires. The Evidence-Based Practice Inventory (EBPI), the Evidence-based Practice Confidence (EPIC) scale and the Health Sciences-Evidence-Based Practice (HS-EBP) questionnaire were the only questionnaires with "sufficient" content validity and, in addition, "sufficient" reliability or "sufficient" internal consistency. CONCLUSION Although a lack of high-quality psychometric properties of EBP tools became apparent, the EBPI, the EPIC scale and the HS-EBP questionnaire currently appear to be the best validated tools to assess EBP behavior/attitude and implementation in occupational, physical and speech therapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Balzer
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Andrés Jung
- Universität zu Lübeck, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research Luebeck (P.E.R.L), Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Janina Gerhard
- Gesellschaft für psychosoziale Einrichtungen gGmbH, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sarah Reinecke
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Marko Mijic
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Friedrich-Baur-Institut / Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Fichtmüller
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Marieke Eggert
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Maren Koch
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kathrin Ernst
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| | - Robin Haring
- European University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Applied Public Health, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alarcon-Ruiz CA, Soriano-Moreno DR, Taype-Rondan A. Undergraduate courses of evidence-based medicine in Peruvian medical schools: Characteristics and addressed topics. Heliyon 2023; 9:e13320. [PMID: 36816297 PMCID: PMC9932740 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Medical schools are increasingly including evidence-based medicine (EBM) courses in their curricula. However, little is known about the characteristics of these courses in Peru. Therefore, the present study aimed to describe the characteristics and topics addressed by undergraduate courses on EBM in Peruvian medical schools, and to compare the content of these courses with predefined EBM competencies. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study. We obtained the syllabi of undergraduate EBM courses from all medical schools for the latest year available. We extracted their characteristics and categorized the topics they included according to the five steps necessary to apply EBM, divided into 22 competencies. Results In 2021, Peru had 47 universities with active undergraduate medical schools, of which 9 (19.1%) had EBM courses. These courses were not mandatory in three of the universities, and were typically offered between the 2nd and 5th year of the degree program. When analysing the topics covered in the syllabi, we found that they addressed 7 to 13 of the 22 core competencies evaluated. The least addressed topics belonged to steps 4 (apply) and 5 (evaluate) of the EBM process. Conclusion We found that few Peruvian universities offer EBM courses, and that these courses have heterogeneous characteristics, with syllabi that do not include all essential topics for applying the five steps of EBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoper A. Alarcon-Ruiz
- Neurociencia, Efectividad Clínica y Salud Pública, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru
- EviSalud – Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru
| | | | - Alvaro Taype-Rondan
- EviSalud – Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru
- Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru
- Corresponding author. Alvaro Taype-Rondan Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola Av. la Fontana 550, La Molina 15024, Lima, Peru.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Romero-Robles MA, Soriano-Moreno DR, García-Gutiérrez FM, Condori-Meza IB, Sing-Sánchez CC, Bulnes Alvarez SP, Alarcon-Ruiz CA, Taype-Rondan A, Viteri‐García A. Self-perceived competencies on evidence-based medicine in medical students and physicians registered in a virtual course: a cross-sectional study. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE 2022; 27:2010298. [PMID: 34919030 PMCID: PMC8725743 DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2010298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is defined as the integration of the best available evidence from scientific studies with clinical experience (and context) and with patients' values and preferences. The objective of the present study was to describe self-perceived EBM competencies in physicians and medical students enrolled in a massive virtual EBM course. METHODS Analytical cross-sectional study. People interested in a free virtual EBM course fulfilled their data in a virtual form for their registration in September 2020. In this form, 22 competencies related to four dimensions of EBM were evaluated: asking a clinical question, search, analysis, and application; using a 5-option Likert scale. The resulting database was analyzed, selecting people who claimed to be physicians or medical students of 18 years or more. RESULTS 1793 participants were included: 1130 medical students and 663 physicians; more than 80% lived in Peru. The frequency of participants who agreed or strongly agreed with feeling qualified in each competence ranged: from 39.2% to 57.8% for the competencies of the 'Asking a clinical question' dimension, from 39.2% to 56.1% for 'Search,' from 19.9% to 32.0% for 'Analysis,' and from 19.6% to 29.9% for 'Application.' Both in physicians and students, the lowest frequencies were for the competencies of interpretation of impact measures, graphs, and results of systematic reviews; as well as shared decision making and calculation of expected benefit. Physicians who graduated more recently scored better on competencies from search and analysis dimensions. CONCLUSION Among physicians and medical students enrolled in the course, self-perception of competencies was lower in the dimensions of analysis and application. More recently graduated physicians seem to have a greater self-perception of their research and analysis skills, probably due to curricular updates.List of abbreviations: EBM: Evidence-based medicine; CIMBE, for its acronym in Spanish: International Course on Evidence-Based Medicine; SOCIMEP, for its acronym in Spanish: Peruvian Medical Student Scientific Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milton A. Romero-Robles
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Del Santa, Nuevo Chimbote, Ancash, Perú
- Comité Permanente Académico, Sociedad Científica Médico Estudiantil Peruana, Lima, Perú
| | - David R. Soriano-Moreno
- Comité Permanente Académico, Sociedad Científica Médico Estudiantil Peruana, Lima, Perú
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Perú
| | - Fabrizio M. García-Gutiérrez
- Comité Permanente Académico, Sociedad Científica Médico Estudiantil Peruana, Lima, Perú
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo, Perú
| | - I. Benjamín Condori-Meza
- Comité Permanente Académico, Sociedad Científica Médico Estudiantil Peruana, Lima, Perú
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Perú
| | - Caroline C. Sing-Sánchez
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Del Santa, Nuevo Chimbote, Ancash, Perú
- Comité Permanente Académico, Sociedad Científica Médico Estudiantil Peruana, Lima, Perú
| | - Sandy P. Bulnes Alvarez
- Comité Permanente Académico, Sociedad Científica Médico Estudiantil Peruana, Lima, Perú
- Escuela de Medicina, Universidad César Vallejo, Piura, Perú
| | - Christoper A. Alarcon-Ruiz
- Unidad de Investigación Clínica y Epidemiológica, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Perú
| | - Alvaro Taype-Rondan
- Unidad de Investigación Clínica y Epidemiológica, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Perú
| | - Andres Viteri‐García
- Centro de Investigación de Salud Pública Y Epidemiología Clínica (Cispec). Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad Ute, Quito, Ecuador
- Fundación Epistemonikos, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ehrenbrusthoff K, Braun T, Bahns C, Happe L, Kopkow C. Adherence to evidence-based practice across healthcare professionals in Germany: results from a cross-sectional, nationwide survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1285. [PMID: 36284307 PMCID: PMC9597997 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adherence to evidence-based practice (EBP) is considered a key competence to improve healthcare quality. In this study, we aimed to describe the EBP adherence of healthcare professionals working in Germany and to explore barriers and facilitators regarding the implementation of EBP in clinical practice. Methods A nationwide online survey was performed among healthcare professionals in Germany from January to April 2018 using the German version of the Evidence-based Practice Inventory (EBPI) questionnaire for a comprehensive assessment of adherence to EBP. Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between demographic and professional determinants and each EBPI dimension. Results We analysed data of 889 participants, including 318 physical therapists, 154 occupational therapists, 137 midwifes and 280 participants of six other healthcare professions. Approximately 70% of the participants generally demonstrated a positive attitude towards EBP and believed that EBP was useful in clinical practice. Broadly, 80% of the respondents evaluated themselves as being able to enact EBP behaviour in clinical practice. In contrast, less than 70% preferred to use quantitative information instead of their intuition to inform their habitual clinical behaviour. Still, 20 to 30% reported that EBP did not sufficiently account for their clinical experience and differences between patients. The strongest facilitators to EBP adherence across at least three dimensions of the EBPI were the availability of ≥ 60 min for scientific literature at work (OR: 9.67; 95% CI: 5.86; 16.30), followed by a master or higher academic degree (OR: 9.09, 95% CI: 5.86; 14.28) and the involvement in ≥ 1 scientific publication (OR: 7.06, 95% CI: 5.10; 9.85). Conclusions This study showed that healthcare professionals in Germany in general had a positive attitude towards EBP although they currently do not consider EBP principles in its entirety. The most important determinant positively influencing a healthcare professional’s decision to perform EBP was the time available for scientific literature at work. German healthcare professionals experience similar barriers towards the implementation of EBP in clinical practice compared to other international healthcare settings. These barriers should be targeted by future research. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00013792). Registered 19 January 2018. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08682-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Ehrenbrusthoff
- grid.454254.60000 0004 0647 4362Department of Applied Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule Für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Tobias Braun
- grid.454254.60000 0004 0647 4362Department of Applied Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Hochschule Für Gesundheit (University of Applied Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany ,grid.512879.0HSD Hochschule Döpfer GmbH (University of Applied Sciences), Waidmarkt 3 & 9, 50676 Cologne, Germany
| | - Carolin Bahns
- grid.8842.60000 0001 2188 0404Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus – Senftenberg, Universitätsplatz 1, 01968 Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Lisa Happe
- grid.5560.60000 0001 1009 3608Department for Health Services Research, Assistance Systems and Medical Device Technology, Carl Von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Kopkow
- grid.8842.60000 0001 2188 0404Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus – Senftenberg, Universitätsplatz 1, 01968 Senftenberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abelsson T, Karlsson AK, Morténius H. A Feeling of Ambiguity: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Managers' Experiences of Evidence-Based Practice in Swedish Primary Care. J Healthc Leadersh 2022; 14:143-153. [PMID: 36160473 PMCID: PMC9507276 DOI: 10.2147/jhl.s371643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Primary care manager plays a vital role in promoting a research culture in the healthcare center. The position involves both the implementation of organizational directives and patient care. The research culture and use of evidence influence each individual healthcare professional and ultimately the quality of patient care. Purpose To describe primary healthcare managers’ understanding of evidence-based practice in the Swedish primary healthcare context and their ability to influence its implementation. Methodology Qualitative content analysis of data collected in individual interviews. Results In general, managers expressed a positive view toward the use of evidence in daily practice. However, they were sometimes hesitant about fully implementing evidence-based results. This was mostly attributed to the struggle of balancing finances and allocating sufficient time for staff to keep up with and engage in evidence-based practice. Conclusion The organizational culture impacts the mind-set of all co-workers including managers. Those managers influenced by traditions and norms may fall into the trap of devaluing the benefit of research and evidence. The inherent feeling of being alone and without guidance in some matters related to evidence-based practice inevitably leads to inconsistency and ambiguity. The use of clinical pathways that constitute one form of evidence has become a substitute for proper, careful, individual investigation, implementation, and evaluation of each patient case. This means that managers experience moral and physical stress when trying to meet organizational, staff, and patient demands. Practice Implication Awareness of managers’ influence and experience of working according to evidence-based practice is valuable to gain an insight into how Swedish primary healthcare functions at local level. Illuminating and discussing evidence-based practice is an assurance of quality that contributes to many aspects of the overall safety of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Abelsson
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Research and Development, Region Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Ann-Kristin Karlsson
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Helena Morténius
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Region Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Teaching evidence-based practice: Case study of an integrated assessment task for diagnostic radiography students. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022; 53:341-346. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
31
|
Kataoka Y, Maeno T, Inaba T, Ninn S, Suzuki M, Maeno T. A qualitative study of factors promoting EBM learning among medical students in Japan. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 13:215-220. [PMID: 36036207 PMCID: PMC9904999 DOI: 10.5116/ijme.62eb.7c19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the elements needed to facilitate undergraduate EBM learning among Japanese medical students. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study based on individual semi-structured interviews. Participants were physicians working at universities, teaching hospitals, or clinics who teach EBM to medical students. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants via email through the researchers' acquaintances. Six physicians agreed to participate in the study and were interviewed individually from October 2019 to January 2020. The interviewees were asked about their own EBM learning and teaching experiences, what they kept in mind when teaching EBM to medical students, and what they felt was needed to improve current undergraduate EBM education. Interviews were recorded. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Thematic analysis extracted five themes: finding foreground questions, observing role models, active learning, understanding patient backgrounds, and understanding the reason for learning EBM. To promote EBM education for medical students, it is first necessary for students to actively participate in clinical practice and identify foreground questions by observing their supervisors practicing EBM. In addition to acquiring skills in information retrieval and critical appraisal, understanding a patient's background leads to understanding the significance of learning EBM, which improves students' motivation to learn EBM. CONCLUSIONS This study identified five themes that promote undergraduate EBM education. Curriculum development incorporating these elements would improve EBM education in Japan and other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Kataoka
- Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Takami Maeno
- Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Takashi Inaba
- Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Sayaka Ninn
- Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masatsune Suzuki
- Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Tetsuhiro Maeno
- Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zia Z, Salehi A, Amini M, Vardanjani HM, Tavabe MS. Relationship between research self-efficacy and evidence-based practice in the medical students. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION 2022; 11:221. [PMID: 36177414 PMCID: PMC9514302 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1233_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the rapid advancement of medical knowledge, promotion in research is necessary to have the best clinical practice. Research Self-efficacy (RSE) is the researcher's confidence in their ability to conduct a specific study. The Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) represents how to improve the quality of care and treatment of patients. RSE and EBP are the cornerstones of successful research and then efficacious medical practice. This study aims to evaluate RSE and acceptance of EBP and their correlation among medical students. MATERIALS AND MEHODS This is a cross-sectional study designed on 600 clinical students at the medical school of Shiraz, using a census method in 2020. Students were invited to fill out the standardized Phillips and Russell's questionnaires about RSE (4 domains, 33 questions) and Rubin and Parrish's questionnaire of EBP (10 questions). The gathered data were analyzed through the SPSS at α = 0.05 using descriptive statistics, t-test, Chi-square, and multiple linear regressions. RESULTS There was a positive correlation between EBP and RSE score (P < 0.05). The results of linear regression test showed that all variables had a significant effect on our response variables and their effect were significant (P < 0.05). The highest mean score in RSE was shown in the subscale of writing skills (52.54). The lowest score was observed in the subscale of quantitative (student's subjective assessment of their ability to work with statistically related data and formulas) as well as computer skills (35.61). CONCLUSIONS Students who participated in a research project, workshop, or Master of Public Health program got a higher RSE and EBP. Due to the positive correlation between RSE and EBP, we conclude that trained physicians who can research independently and use research evidence can find the best treatment approach for patients. These finding support the importance of integrating research education in medical curriculum to increase RSE and finally improvement of EBP among medical students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Zia
- Department of MPH, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Alireza Salehi
- MD, MPH, PhD Associate Professor of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mitra Amini
- Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | | | - Malihe Sousani Tavabe
- Research Center for Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kumaravel B, Stewart C, Ilic D. Face-to-face versus online clinically integrated EBM teaching in an undergraduate medical school: a pilot study. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022; 27:162-168. [PMID: 34635481 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and effectiveness of two models (face-to-face vs online teaching) of clinically integrating evidence-based medicine (EBM) teaching in an undergraduate medical school. DESIGN AND SETTING A pilot study of face-to-face versus online EBM teaching. PARTICIPANTS This study focused on undergraduate medical students who entered the University of Buckingham Medical School MBChB course in 2016 (n=65). Of the 65 students, 45 received face-to-face teaching, while 20 received online teaching. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Feasibility was assessed by the ability to deliver the content, students' engagement during teaching and their completion rates in formative assessments-Assessing Competency in EBM (ACE) tool, and educational prescriptions (EPs). Effectiveness of teaching for the two models was compared by evaluating students' performance in the formative assessments and in the summative final professional examination and final year EBM objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). RESULTS We had similar students' engagement and completion rates in formative assessments in both models. Students receiving face-to-face teaching performed better in EPs (mean difference=-2.28, 95% CI: -4.31 to -0.26). There was no significant difference in performances in the ACE tool (mean difference=-1.02, 95% CI: -2.20 to 0.16); the written final professional exams (mean difference=-0.11, 95% CI: -0.65 to 0.44) and the EBM OSCE station (mean difference=-0.81, 95% CI: -2.38 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS It was feasible to deliver both models of clinically integrated EBM teaching. While students in the face-to-face model scored higher in EPs; there was no significant difference between the two models of teaching as measured by performances in the ACE tool or the summative assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C Stewart
- University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Dragan Ilic
- Medical Education Research & Quality (MERQ) unit, Monash Medical School, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Helgøy KV, Bonsaksen T, Røykenes K. Research-based education in undergraduate occupational therapy and physiotherapy education programmes: a scoping review. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:358. [PMID: 35545770 PMCID: PMC9097417 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03354-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a research-based learning environment, students learn how to become critical thinkers and lifelong learners, and to generate discipline-enriching knowledge. Research training is important for all healthcare professionals and the integration of research in education can be one approach to improve evidence-based practice among future professionals. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify studies reporting on research-based education in undergraduate occupational therapy and physiotherapy curricula to document the current state of knowledge and to map factors that reflect and support the implementation of research-based education in undergraduate occupational therapy and physiotherapy programmes. METHODS A scoping review was used to systematically select and summarize existing literature. The search was conducted using a combination of keywords and MeSH terms in the following databases: EBSCO (Academic Search Elite, CINAHL, ERIC), MEDLINE, Embase, Education Source and grey literature. A thematic analysis identified strategies used to implement and promote research-based education in occupational therapy and physiotherapy bachelor programmes. RESULTS The database search identified 3068 records. 75 were eligible for full-text assessment and 27 studies were included. The studies were published between 1999 and 2021 and were conducted in Norway, Canada, South Africa, Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, New Zealand, Ireland, Taiwan, Italy, and Iran. The study designs were mainly quantitative and qualitative, and studies included primarily occupational therapy and physiotherapy students. We identified the following four strategies: 'student engagement in research', 'curriculum improvement regarding EBP', 'EBP teaching' and 'journal club', where 'EBP teaching' was most frequently identified. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this scoping review suggest that ensuring students' competence in research methods is necessary for students to be able to read and understand research articles, which are important as foundational skills in undergraduate research training. Journal clubs can be a foundation for student engagement with research literature, and students' basic research skills may be facilitated through their involvement in research projects and by conducting systematic reviews. Further, cooperation with clinical practice is important, and the awareness of research-based education should be increased among both faculty members and students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjersti Velde Helgøy
- Center of Diakonia and Professional Practice, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Tore Bonsaksen
- Department of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Science, Elverum, Norway
- Department of Health, Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Sandnes, Norway
| | - Kari Røykenes
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ruano ASM, Motter FR, Lopes LC. Design and validity of an instrument to assess healthcare professionals' perceptions, behaviour, self-efficacy and attitudes towards evidence-based health practice: I-SABE. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052767. [PMID: 35396280 PMCID: PMC8995964 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate an instrument to measure Brazilian healthcare professionals' perceptions, behaviour, self-efficacy and attitudes towards evidence-based health practice. DESIGN Validation of an instrument using the Delphi method to ensure content validity and data from a cross-sectional survey to evaluate psychometric characteristics (psychometric sensitivity, factorial validity and reliability). SETTING National Register of Health Establishments database. PARTICIPANTS We included clinical health professionals who were working in the Brazilian public health system. RESULTS The Instrument to assess Evidence-Based Health (I-SABE) was constructed with five domains: self-efficacy; behaviour; attitude; results/benefits and knowledge/skills. Content validity was done by 10-12 experts (three rounds). We applied I-SABE to 217 health professionals. Bartlett's sphericity test and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) index were adequate (χ2=1455.810, p<0.001; KMO=0.847). Considering the factorial loads of the items and the convergence between the Scree Plot and the Kaiser criterion the four domains tested in this analysis, explaining 59.2% of the total variance. The internal consistency varied between the domains: self-efficacy (α=0.76), behaviour (α=0.30), attitudes (α=0.644), results/benefits to the patient (α=0.835). CONCLUSIONS The results of the psychometric analysis of the I-SABE confirm the good quality of this tool. The I-SABE can be used both in educational activities as well as an assessment tool among healthcare professionals in the Brazilian public health settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabiane Raquel Motter
- Graduate Course in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba (Uniso), Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luciane Cruz Lopes
- Graduate Course in Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sorocaba (Uniso), Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Roberge-Dao J, Maggio LA, Zaccagnini M, Rochette A, Shikako-Thomas K, Boruff J, Thomas A. Quality, methods, and recommendations of systematic reviews on measures of evidence-based practice: an umbrella review. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 20:1004-1073. [PMID: 35220381 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of the review was to estimate the quality of systematic reviews on evidence-based practice measures across health care professions and identify differences between systematic reviews regarding approaches used to assess the adequacy of evidence-based practice measures and recommended measures. INTRODUCTION Systematic reviews on the psychometric properties of evidence-based practice measures guide researchers, clinical managers, and educators in selecting an appropriate measure for use. The lack of psychometric standards specific to evidence-based practice measures, in addition to recent findings suggesting the low methodological quality of psychometric systematic reviews, calls into question the quality and methods of systematic reviews examining evidence-based practice measures. INCLUSION CRITERIA We included systematic reviews that identified measures that assessed evidence-based practice as a whole or of constituent parts (eg, knowledge, attitudes, skills, behaviors), and described the psychometric evidence for any health care professional group irrespective of assessment context (education or clinical practice). METHODS We searched five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC) on January 18, 2021. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and quality appraisal following the JBI approach. A narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS Ten systematic reviews, published between 2006 and 2020, were included and focused on the following groups: all health care professionals (n = 3), nurses (n = 2), occupational therapists (n = 2), physical therapists (n = 1), medical students (n = 1), and family medical residents (n = 1). The overall quality of the systematic reviews was low: none of the reviews assessed the quality of primary studies or adhered to methodological guidelines, and only one registered a protocol. Reporting of psychometric evidence and measurement characteristics differed. While all the systematic reviews discussed internal consistency, feasibility was only addressed by three. Many approaches were used to assess the adequacy of measures, and five systematic reviews referenced tools. Criteria for the adequacy of individual properties and measures varied, but mainly followed standards for patient-reported outcome measures or The Standards of Educational and Psychological Testing. Two hundred and four unique measures were identified across 10 reviews. One review explicitly recommended measures for occupational therapists, and four reviews identified adequate measures for all health care professionals (n = 3) and medical students (n = 1). The 27 measures deemed adequate by these five systematic reviews are described. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest a need to improve the overall methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews on evidence-based practice measures to increase the trustworthiness of recommendations and allow comprehensive interpretation by end-users. Risk of bias is common to all the included systematic reviews as the quality of primary studies was not assessed. The diversity of tools and approaches used to evaluate the adequacy of evidence-based practice measures reflects tensions regarding the conceptualization of validity, suggesting a need to reflect on the most appropriate application of validity theory to evidence-based practice measures. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42020160874.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Roberge-Dao
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada Medicine and Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Braun T, Ehrenbrusthoff K, Bahns C, Happe L, Kopkow C. [Adherence to and influencing factors of evidence-based practice in physiotherapeutic care in Germany: a cross-sectional study]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 168:8-20. [PMID: 35027312 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) is a central goal in health care. As in other areas, the transfer of scientific knowledge into clinical practice is very delayed or incomplete in physiotherapy. The primary aim of the present study is to describe the adherence to EBP among physiotherapists working in Germany. The secondary goal is the exploratory analysis of selected factors influencing the implementation of EBP. METHODS The present exploratory analysis is based on the data of physiotherapists who participated in a cross-sectional study on the use of EBP by health care professionals (study registration no.: DRKS00013792). The participants in the online survey completed the "Evidence-based Practice Inventory", a questionnaire with five dimensions used to quantify the adherence to EBP. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the associations between various sociodemographic characteristics and EBP. RESULTS 318 physiotherapists participated in the survey (age: 37±12 years; 60 % female; professional experience: 14±11 years). Approximately 70-80 % of the participants, in principle, had a positive attitude towards EBP and perceived EBP as helpful and useful in clinical practice. About 60 % of the respondents felt able to apply the principles of the EBP (e. g., acquisition, appraisal and application of external evidence). However, the data also showed that the implementation of EBP in clinical physiotherapeutic care is insufficient. For example, only 20 % of the respondents reported that their facility paid great attention to applying the principles of the EBP in decision-making, and only about a third of the respondents said that they frequently searched for or used external evidence. The strongest facilitators of EBP include the participation in scientific publications and more than one hour per week to read scientific literature at work. CONCLUSION In principle, physiotherapists in Germany have a positive attitude towards EBP, but currently do not adequately take into account the principles of EBP. These factors should be further analyzed and targeted through effective interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Braun
- Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Department für Angewandte Gesundheitswissenschaften, Studienbereich Physiotherapie, Bochum, Deutschland; HSD Hochschule Döpfer, Fachbereich Gesundheit und Soziales, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - Katja Ehrenbrusthoff
- Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Department für Angewandte Gesundheitswissenschaften, Studienbereich Physiotherapie, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Carolin Bahns
- Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg, Fachgebiet Therapiewissenschaften I, Senftenberg, Deutschland
| | - Lisa Happe
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Department für Versorgungsforschung, Abteilung für Assistenzsysteme und Medizintechnik, Oldenburg, Deutschland
| | - Christian Kopkow
- Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg, Fachgebiet Therapiewissenschaften I, Senftenberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Agossa K, Sy K, Pinçon C, Nicolas T, Catteau C, Blaizot A, Dubar M. Knowledge, Attitude, Access and Confidence in Evidence-based practice amongst French dental undergraduates: A transcultural adaptation and psychometrics analysis of French version of the KACE questionnaire. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR DENTAL EDUCATION IN EUROPE 2022; 26:106-115. [PMID: 33548112 DOI: 10.1111/eje.12677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide a reliable instrument to assess evidence-based practice (EBP) dimensions in French-speaking dental students. To do so, a transcultural adaptation into French of the self-administered KACE questionnaire (Knowledge, Attitude, Access and Confidence Evaluation) and the evaluation of its psychometric properties in a sample of French dental students and teachers were performed. The effects of individual and academic factors on student performance in the KACE were also investigated. METHOD Teachers and fourth-year students completed once the translated KACE and fifth-year students completed twice the questionnaire before and after an epidemiology course. Cronbach's alpha coefficient analysis, Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Dunn's tests, paired samples Wilcoxon tests and a generalised linear mixed model were performed to assess the psychometric properties (reliability, internal consistency, discriminant validity and responsiveness) of the questionnaire and to identify the factors associated with KACE scores, respectively. RESULTS 186 participants completed the survey. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.06 to 0.48 for Knowledge, 0.21 to 0.59 for Attitude, 0.42 to 0.76 for Access and 0.82 to 0.93 for Confidence. The discriminant value and sensitivity of the French KACE revealed significant differences amongst students and teachers and accurately identified the effect the training course had on the students who had completed it. Preparing for a residency programme or having received add-on modules in science improved the students' performance in the test. Being female negatively impacted the KACE Confidence score. CONCLUSION This version of the KACE is appropriate to assess EBP dimensions in French dental students. Academic background and gender may affect test performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevimy Agossa
- Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille, France
| | - Kadiatou Sy
- Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille, France
| | - Claire Pinçon
- EA 2694 - Public Health: Epidemiology and Quality of Care, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Céline Catteau
- Department of Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille, France
| | - Alessandra Blaizot
- Department of Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille, France
| | - Marie Dubar
- Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Harrison L, Wong D, Traeger AC, Harmer AR, Jennings M, Moseley AM. Knowledge, skills and barriers to evidence-based practice and the impact of a flipped classroom training program for physical therapists: An observational study. Physiother Theory Pract 2021; 38:2702-2713. [PMID: 34704519 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1990450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the knowledge, skills and barriers to evidence-based practice and the impact of evidence-based practice training for physical therapy clinicians. METHODS Physical therapists from a health district in Sydney, Australia were invited to participate. The primary outcome was the Assessing Competency in Evidence-based Medicine scale (range 0-15; 15 is high knowledge and skill) to quantify knowledge and skills. The secondary outcomes were the four subscales of the BARRIERS scale (range 1-4; 4 is high barrier) to quantify barriers. Outcomes were collected at baseline and post an evidence-based practice training program (flipped classroom approach that addressed the core competencies for teaching evidence-based practice) of 3 months duration. Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Register (ACTRN12619000038190). RESULTS 104 participants completed baseline data and 94 completed post-training data. The mean score for the Assessing Competency in Evidence-based Medicine scale for knowledge and skills at baseline was 9.5 (standard deviation 1.6). The mean BARRIERS subscale scores at baseline were: Healthcare Provider 1.9 (0.5); Research 2.2 (0.5); Setting 2.6 (0.5); and Presentation 2.6 (0.5). On average, training increased the Assessing Competency in Evidence-based Medicine scale score by 0.1 points (95% confidence interval -0.2 to 0.5) and reduced barriers by -0.1 (-0.2 to 0.0; Setting subscale) to -0.2 (-0.3 to -0.1; Healthcare Provider subscale). CONCLUSIONS Physical therapists have knowledge and skill in evidence-based practice that is comparable to other allied health professionals, medical students and medical doctors, and encountered barriers to using high-quality clinical research to guide practice. Training did not change knowledge and skills but did reduce barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leora Harrison
- Physiotherapy Department, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Level 2, Health Services Building, Liverpool NSW Australia
| | - David Wong
- Physiotherapy Department, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Level 2, Health Services Building, Liverpool NSW Australia
| | - Adrian C Traeger
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown Nsw Australia
| | - Alison R Harmer
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building, Camperdown Campus, Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Matthew Jennings
- Physiotherapy Department, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Level 2, Health Services Building, Liverpool NSW Australia
| | - Anne M Moseley
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown Nsw Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nunan D, Lindblad A, Widyahening IS, Bernardo WM, Chi CC, Cowdell F, Becker K, Constantine S, East C, Myrhaug HT, Johnson SG, Jack E, Thompson R, Achilleos H, Berg RC, Snibsøer AK, Puscasiu L, Bartelink MLE, van Peet PG, Berti F, Tilson J, Tikkinen KA, Albarqouni L, Hoegen P. Ten papers for teachers of evidence-based medicine and health care: Sicily workshop 2019. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:224-227. [PMID: 33172938 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David Nunan
- Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Adrienne Lindblad
- Alberta College of Family Physicians (PEER) and the Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Indah S Widyahening
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
| | | | - Ching-Chi Chi
- Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Fiona Cowdell
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karen Becker
- Family and Social Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | - Christine East
- School of Nursing and Midwifery & Mercy Health, La Trobe University College of Science Health and Engineering, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hilde T Myrhaug
- Division For Health Sciences, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Susanne Grødem Johnson
- Department of Health and Functioning, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Edmund Jack
- Yealm Medical Centre, Yealmton, UK
- PenARC (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula, Exeter, UK
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Office of Medical Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Haris Achilleos
- Paediatrics, Royal London Hospital Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Rigmor C Berg
- Reviews and Health Technology Assessments, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Kristin Snibsøer
- Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lucian Puscasiu
- University of Medicine Pharmacy Science and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | | | - Petra G van Peet
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Franco Berti
- Gruppo Italiano per la Medicina Basata sulle Evidenze (GIMBE), Bologna, Italy
| | - Julie Tilson
- Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kari Ao Tikkinen
- Departments of Urology and Public Health, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Surgery, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter Hoegen
- School of Health and Social Care, Avans University of Applied Science, Breda, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Korownyk CS, Allan GM, McCormack J, Lindblad AJ, Horvey S, Kolber MR. Successes, lessons and opportunities: 15-year follow-up of an integrated evidence-based medicine curriculum. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:241-245. [PMID: 33355249 PMCID: PMC8479748 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
In 2005, the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta introduced an evidence-based practice curriculum into the 2-year Family Medicine Residency Program. The curriculum was based on best available evidence, had multiple components and was comprehensive in its approach. It prioritised preappraised summary evidence over in-depth evidence appraisal. This paper describes the lessons learnt over the past 15 years including components that were eventually discontinued. We also discuss additions to the programme including the development of accessible, preappraised, summarised resources. We review the difficulties associated with evaluation and the incorporation of evidence-based practice into all aspects of residency training. Future directions are discussed including the incorporation of shared decision-making at the point of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina S Korownyk
- Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - G Michael Allan
- Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- College of Family Physicians of Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - James McCormack
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Adrienne J Lindblad
- Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- College of Family Physicians of Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samantha Horvey
- Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Michael R Kolber
- Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hallé MC, Bussières A, Asseraf-Pasin L, Storr C, Mak S, Root K, Thomas A. Building evidence-based practice competencies among rehabilitation students: a qualitative exploration of faculty and preceptors' perspectives. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2021; 26:1311-1338. [PMID: 33895888 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-021-10051-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Medical education literature suggests clinically-integrated teaching may be the most effective approach to teach evidence-based practice (EBP). Before implementing this educational best practice in rehabilitation curricula, it is imperative to better understand the current context, barriers and facilitators to teach EBP in rehabilitation from the academic to the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to explore faculty and preceptors' experiences and perceptions of teaching EBP in rehabilitation professions, namely occupational therapy, physical therapy and speech-language pathology. We gathered data from seven focus groups and an individual interview with a sample of 24 faculty and 15 preceptors, i.e., clinical supervisors. Data collected were subjected to inductive thematic content analysis. We identified three overarching themes and corresponding strategies. First, "Recognizing EBP as a multifaceted concept" denoted participants' lack of consensus regarding the meaning and scope of EBP, and their awareness of such discrepancies. Second, "Complexity of EBP is at the core of teaching practices and experiences" referred to participants' perception of EBP as a complex process involving high-level cognitive skills, which influenced their teaching practices and challenged students and themselves. Third, "Connections and divides between research and practice" represented the limited and delicate connection between faculty and preceptors, the factors either bridging or maintaining the gap between them, and the impacts of such connections and divides on teaching. Improving collaboration between faculty and preceptors constitutes an essential first step towards more effective EBP training programs in rehabilitation that could be facilitated through online communities of practice or integrated knowledge translation research projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Christine Hallé
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada
- Département chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Liliane Asseraf-Pasin
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Caroline Storr
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Susanne Mak
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada
- Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Kelly Root
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Aliki Thomas
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
- Institute of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Araujo GA, Correia LCL, Siqueira JR, Nogueira LC, Meziat-Filho N, Costa LOP, Reis FJ. Consensus on evidence-based medicine curriculum contents for healthcare schools in Brazil. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:248. [PMID: 33441472 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Healthcare professionals need to take into account their knowledge, skills and attitudes to develop a focused clinical question, perform an effective search of the literature, critically appraise the evidence, and apply to the clinical context and evaluate the effectiveness of the process. To date, there is a lack of consensus on evidence-based medicine (EBM) curriculum for undergraduate healthcare students in Brazil. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus on EBM curriculum contents for healthcare schools in Brazil considering expert opinion. DESIGN Modified three-round Delphi methodology. SETTING Online survey. PARTICIPANTS The expert panel was composed of 40 healthcare professionals from different specialties. Most of the participants (n=24; 60%) were female with the age between 30 and 44 years. Participants were also experts in the field of epidemiology, biostatistics or public health. The mean experience of experts in teaching EBM was 9.5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES An online questionnaire consisting of 89 items related to EBM was sent to the experts. The experts ranked each item of EBM curriculum considering the importance of each item as omitted, mentioned, explained or practised. The last section of the questionnaire was composed of 'additional content' where the experts evaluated only if an item should be included or not, the form of offering the EBM contents and the total workload (in hours/semester). Open-ended questions were present in each section to give the opportunity to experts to insert suggestions. Items that reached values greater than or equal to 70% of agreement among experts was considered definitive for the curriculum. Items between 51% and 69% of agreement were included for the next round and those items with less than or equal to 50% of agreement were considered unnecessary and were excluded. In the third round, the EBM contents were classified according to the degree of consensus as follow: strong (≥70% of agreement), moderate (51%-69% of agreement) and weak (50% of agreement) based on the maximum consensus reached. RESULTS Of the 89 initial contents, 32 (35.9%) reached a strong degree of consensus, 23 (25.8%) moderate degree of consensus, two (2.2%) weak degree of consensus and 35 items were not recommended (≤50% of agreement). The workload suggested by experts should be between 61 and 90 hour/semester and an EBM curriculum should be offered with epidemiology and biostatistics as prerequisites. Regarding the importance of each item, 29 (72.5%) should be explained and 25 (27.5%) should be practised with exercises. CONCLUSIONS The consensus on an EBM curriculum for Brazilian healthcare schools consists of 54 items. This EBM curriculum also presents the degree of consensus (strong, moderate and weak), the importance of each item (mentioned, explained and practised with exercises). A total workload of between 60 and 90 hours per semester was suggested and the EBM curriculum should be offered with epidemiology and biostatistics as prerequisites, but also EBM contents should be included within other disciplines throughout the entire undergraduate course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Leandro Calazans Nogueira
- Physical Therapy, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitario Augusto Motta, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Ney Meziat-Filho
- Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitario Augusto Motta, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Felipe J Reis
- Physical Therapy, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
McCall MC, Fanshawe TR, McCartney D, Young D, Nunan D, Heneghan C. Online supplementation for teaching evidence-based medicine: feasibility of a randomised-controlled trial. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:254. [PMID: 32719050 PMCID: PMC8479740 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES As teaching technology advances, medical education is increasingly using digital mediums and exploring instructional models such as the flipped classroom and blended learning courses, where the in-class taught sessions are more groups on content delivered before class. Early evidence suggests lectures and foundational material can be equally provided online, but we have low-quality research to be convinced. We aim to test and develop an online evidence-based teaching resource that seeks to improve the availability and scalability of evidence-based medicine (EBM) learning tools. We evaluate the feasibility of a study design that could test for changes in academic performance in EBM skills using an online supplement. METHODS Mixed-methods feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in an undergraduate medical student cohort. RESULTS Of a small cohort (n=34), eight participants agreed to randomisation and completed the study. No study participant completed the EBM supplementary course in full. Students report time-management as a significant barrier in participation, and all aspects of the study and communications should be delivered with efficiency a key consideration. CONCLUSION Randomising students to an online EBM supplement within a medical school programme presents challenges of recruitment and student motivation, but the study design is potentially feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcy C McCall
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas R Fanshawe
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - David McCartney
- Medical Sciences Division, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Damion Young
- Medical Sciences Division, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - David Nunan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Welink L, de Groot E, Damoiseaux R, Bartelink ML. Educational strategies to enhance EBM teaching and learning in the workplace: a focus group study. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:247. [PMID: 33514649 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to gather and synthesise educational strategies that can improve teaching and learning of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the workplace, and make them concrete by listing ideas for implementing these strategies. Insight into current workplace-based EBM teaching and learning in general practice was the starting point to generate these strategies and ideas. DESIGN Exploratory, qualitative focus group study, applying the consensus method of the nominal group technique. SETTING Postgraduate medical education; general practitioner (GP) specialty training at University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands PARTICIPANTS: 33 GPs and 17 GP trainees, divided in four focus groups. Using opportunistic sampling, participants were selected from the GP workplace because of their role as supervisor or trainee. MAIN OUTCOMES An overview of educational strategies and ideas on how to implement these strategies in the workplace, followed by the participants' global ranking of the most useful ideas. RESULTS The supervisors and trainees generated a list of educational improvement strategies that can be applied in learning conversations, while observing each other's consultations, and in (multidisciplinary) learning opportunities in the workplace. Table 1 presents the educational strategies and suggestions for implementing them. Ideas regarded as most useful include taking turns to conduct consultations and observing the other, holding a structured, in-depth discussion after observation, preparing and discussing articles found in relevant journals and on-the-spot searching for relevant evidence during learning conversations. CONCLUSIONS Participants provided an extensive list of educational strategies and ideas on how to implement EBM learning in daily practice. As a great deal of GP training takes place in clinical practice, supervisors and trainees could apply the suggested ideas to enhance EBM teaching and learning in the workplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne Welink
- Julius Centre, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther de Groot
- Julius Centre, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roger Damoiseaux
- Julius Centre, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Song CE, Park H. Active Learning in E-Learning Programs for Evidence-Based Nursing in Academic Settings: A Scoping Review. J Contin Educ Nurs 2021; 52:407-412. [PMID: 34432581 DOI: 10.3928/00220124-20210804-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of e-learning in nursing education has increased substantially. The goal of this study is to identify how active e-learning for evidence-based practice (EBP) was implemented in academic settings. METHOD For a scoping review, literature from PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE was searched with keywords related to e-learning and EBP, and only articles pertaining to nursing academic settings were selected. Finally, 17 studies were included. Data on theories or instructional strategies and types and characteristics of online activities were extracted. RESULTS Of the included studies, 14 had a pedagogical background. Frequently used activities included discussions, asynchronous communications, and a combination of student-student and student-teacher interactions. Critical appraisal was the primary learning content. CONCLUSION This study summarizes evidence on active learning to enhance the EBP competency of nursing students through e-learning. To make EBP e-learning more meaningful, educators should plan, apply, and evaluate appropriate online activities. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2021;52(9):407-412.].
Collapse
|
47
|
Welink LS, de Groot E, Bartelink MLEL, Van Roy K, Damoiseaux RAMJ, Pype P. Learning Conversations with Trainees: An Undervalued but Useful EBM Learning Opportunity for Clinical Supervisors. TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE 2021; 33:382-389. [PMID: 33356617 PMCID: PMC8460359 DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1854766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Phenomenon: Supervisors and trainees can learn skills related to evidence-based medicine from each other in the workplace by collaborating and interacting, in this way benefiting from each other's strengths. This study explores supervisors' perceptions of how they currently learn evidence-based medicine by engaging in learning conversations with their trainee. Approach: Semi-structured, video-stimulated elicitation interviews were held with twenty-two Dutch and Belgian supervisors in general practice. Supervisors were shown fragments of their video-recorded learning conversations, allowing them to reflect. Recorded interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory-based approach.Findings: Supervisors did not immediately perceive workplace learning conversations as an opportunity to learn evidence-based medicine from their trainee. They mostly saw these conversations as a learning opportunity for trainees and a chance to maintain the quality of care within their practice. Nevertheless, during the interviews, supervisors did acknowledge that learning conversations help them to gain up-to-date knowledge and search skills or more awareness of their own knowledge or gaps in their knowledge. Not identified as a learning outcome was how to apply evidence-based medicine within a clinical practice by combining evidence with clinical expertise and the patient's preferences. Insights: Supervisors acknowledge that they learn elements of the three aspects of evidence-based medicine by having learning conversations with their trainee, but they currently see this as secondary to the trainee's learning process. Emphasizing opportunities for bidirectional learning could improve learning of evidence-based medicine during workplace learning conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisanne S. Welink
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther de Groot
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Louise E. L. Bartelink
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kaatje Van Roy
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roger A. M. J. Damoiseaux
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Pype
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
What are the effects of teaching Evidence-Based Health Care (EBHC) at different levels of health professions education? An updated overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254191. [PMID: 34292986 PMCID: PMC8297776 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based healthcare (EBHC) knowledge and skills are recognised as core competencies of healthcare professionals worldwide, and teaching EBHC has been widely recommended as an integral part of their training. The objective of this overview of systematic reviews (SR) was to update evidence and assess the effects of various approaches for teaching evidence-based health care (EBHC) at undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) medical education (ME) level on changes in knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour. METHODS AND FINDINGS This is an update of an overview that was published in 2014. The process followed standard procedures specified for the previous version of the overview, with a modified search. Searches were conducted in Epistemonikos for SRs published from 1 January 2013 to 27 October 2020 with no language restrictions. We checked additional sources for ongoing and unpublished SRs. Eligibility criteria included: SRs which evaluated educational interventions for teaching EBHC compared to no intervention or a different strategy were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected SRs, extracted data and evaluated quality using standardised instrument (AMSTAR2). The effects of strategies to teach EBHC were synthesized using a narrative approach. Previously published version of this overview included 16 SR, while the updated search identified six additional SRs. We therefore included a total of 22 SRs (with a total of 141 primary studies) in this updated overview. The SRs evaluated different educational interventions of varying duration, frequency, and format to teach various components of EBHC at different levels of ME (UG, PG, mixed). Most SRs assessed a range of EBHC related outcomes using a variety of assessment tools. Two SRs included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) only, while 20 reviews included RCTs and various types of non-RCTs. Diversity of study designs and teaching activities as well as aggregated findings at the SR level prevented comparisons of the effects of different techniques. In general, knowledge was improved across all ME levels for interventions compared to no intervention or pre-test scores. Skills improved in UGs, but less so in PGs and were less consistent in mixed populations. There were positive changes in behaviour among UGs and PGs, but not in mixed populations, with no consistent improvement in attitudes in any of the studied groups. One SR showed improved patient outcomes (based on non-randomised studies). Main limitations included: poor quality and reporting of SRs, heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures, and short-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS Teaching EBHC consistently improved EBHC knowledge and skills at all levels of ME and behaviour in UGs and PGs, but with no consistent improvement in attitudes towards EBHC, and little evidence of the long term influence on processes of care and patient outcomes. EBHC teaching and learning should be interactive, multifaceted, integrated into clinical practice, and should include assessments. STUDY REGISTRATION The protocol for the original overview was developed and approved by Stellenbosch University Research Ethics Committee S12/10/262. UPDATE OF THE OVERVIEW Young T, Rohwer A, Volmink J, Clarke M. What are the effects of teaching evidence-based health care (EBHC)? Overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086706.
Collapse
|
49
|
Dolezel J, Zelenikova R, Finotto S, Mecugni D, Patelarou A, Panczyk M, Ruzafa-Martínez M, Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Skela-Savič B, Gotlib J, Patelarou E, Smodiš M, Jarosova D. Core Evidence-Based Practice Competencies and Learning Outcomes for European Nurses: Consensus Statements. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2021; 18:226-233. [PMID: 34031973 PMCID: PMC8251814 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Consensus on evidence‐based practice (EBP) competencies and associated learning outcomes for registered nurses has not yet been achieved in the European context. Aims To establish a set of core EBP competencies for nurses and the most important EBP learning outcomes encompassing attitudes, knowledge, and skills dimensions for implementation into nursing education in European countries. Methods A multi‐phase modified Delphi survey was conducted: Phase 1, a literature review; Phase 2, a two‐round consensus of experts; and Phase 3, a Delphi survey. Experts from six European countries participated. Results In Phase 1, 88 records were selected and 835 statements extracted, which were grouped according to the seven steps of EBP. After removing 157 duplicates, the remaining competencies (n = 678) were evaluated in Phase 2. Then, a two‐round expert consensus was reached, with 24 competencies and 120 learning outcomes identified and divided into affective, cognitive, and skills domains. In Phase 3, based on a Delphi survey expert consensus, all evaluated statements were included in a final set of competencies and learning outcomes. Only two learning outcomes were recommended for allocation to a different domain, and four were reformulated as suggested, with no further changes to the others. Linking Evidence to Action The set of EBP competencies and learning outcomes can guide nurse educators, managers, and EBP stakeholders in the development of content that incorporates EBP knowledge, skills, and attitudes into educational programs. Prioritizing the EBP competencies and learning outcomes that are most necessary and adapting them to every context will provide healthcare organizations with guidelines for enhancing the continuing education of nurses. These results could facilitate the development of effective tools for assessing nursing students’ and nurses’ perception of competencies required for EBP processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub Dolezel
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Renata Zelenikova
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Athina Patelarou
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Crete, Greece
| | - Mariusz Panczyk
- Department of Education and Research in Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Joanna Gotlib
- Department of Education and Research in Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Evridiki Patelarou
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Crete, Greece
| | - Marta Smodiš
- Angela Boškin Faculty of Health Care, Jesenice, Slovenia
| | - Darja Jarosova
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kumaravel B, Stewart C, Ilic D. Development and evaluation of a spiral model of assessing EBM competency using OSCEs in undergraduate medical education. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:204. [PMID: 33838686 PMCID: PMC8035769 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02650-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical students often struggle to understand the relevance of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) to their clinical practice, yet it is a competence that all students must develop prior to graduation. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are a valued assessment tool to assess critical components of EBM competency, particularly different levels of mastery as they progress through the course. This study developed and evaluated EBM based OSCE stations with an aim to establish a spiral approach for EBM OSCE stations for undergraduate medical students. METHODS OSCE stations were developed with increasingly complex EBM tasks. OSCE stations were classified according to the classification rubric for EBP assessment tools (CREATE) framework and mapped against the recently published core competencies for evidence-based practice (EBP). Performance data evaluation was undertaken using Classical Test Theory analysing mean scores, pass rates, and station item total correlation (ITC) using SPSS. RESULTS Six EBM based OSCE stations assessing various stages of EBM were created for use in high stakes summative OSCEs for different year groups across the undergraduate medical degree. All OSCE stations, except for one, had excellent correlation coefficients and hence a high reliability, ranging from 0.21-0.49. The domain mean score ranged from 13.33 to 16.83 out of 20. High reliability was demonstrated for the each of the summative OSCE circuits (Cronbach's alpha = 0.67-0.85). In the CREATE framework these stations assessed knowledge, skills, and behaviour of medical students in asking, searching, appraising, and integrating evidence in practice. The OSCE stations were useful in assessing six core evidence-based practice competencies, which are meant to be practiced with exercises. A spiral model of OSCEs of increasing complexity was proposed to assess EBM competency as students progressed through the MBChB course. CONCLUSIONS The use of the OSCEs is a feasible method of authentically assessing leaner EBM performance and behaviour in a high stakes assessment setting. Use of valid and reliable EBM-based OSCE stations provide evidence for continued development of a hierarchy of assessing scaffolded learning and mastery of EBM competency. Further work is needed to assess their predictive validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Kumaravel
- The University of Buckingham Medical School, Hunter Street, Buckingham, MK18 1EG, UK.
| | - C Stewart
- University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - D Ilic
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|