1
|
Siripongboonsitti T, Tawinprai K, Porntharukcharoen T, Sirisreetreerux S, Thongchai T, Soonklang K, Mahanonda N. Unveiling therapeutic dynamics: An in-depth comparative analysis of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and favipiravir in alleviating COVID-19 outpatients impacts among middle-aged and special populations (MA-FAST). J Infect Public Health 2024; 17:102471. [PMID: 38865775 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (NMabs) are recognized for their efficacy against non-severe COVID-19. However, spike protein mutations may confer resistance. This study evaluates the effectiveness of favipiravir (FPV) versus NMabs in preventing severe COVID-19 in special populations. METHODS A retrospective cohort was conducted on middle-aged, elderly, diabetic, or obese patients with COVID-19 treated with either FPV or NMabs. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used for analysis. RESULTS The study included 1410 patients, resulting in four cohorts: middle-aged (36), elderly (48), diabetic (46), and obese (28) post-PSM. No significant differences were noted in 28-day emergency department (ED) visits across all groups between NMabs and FPV treatments, despite lower immunity in the FPV group. However, the diabetic group treated with FPV had higher 28-day hospitalization and oxygen supplemental, with no differences in the other groups. Intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, invasive mechanical ventilation, and mortality rates were similar between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS Early dose-adjusted FPV showed no difference from NMabs in preventing ED visits, ICU admissions, ventilator needs, or mortality among patients with major comorbidities. Diabetic patients on FPV experienced higher hospitalizations and oxygen needs, with no observed differences in other groups. FPV may be a viable alternative, especially in settings with limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Kriangkrai Tawinprai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | - Thitapha Thongchai
- Center of Learning and Research in Celebration of HRH Princess Chulabhorn 60th Birthday Anniversary, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kamonwan Soonklang
- Center of Learning and Research in Celebration of HRH Princess Chulabhorn 60th Birthday Anniversary, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nithi Mahanonda
- Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sabır MA, Çelik AO, Mercan Demirtaş E, Çopuroğlu C. The effect of favipiravir on fracture healing. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA 2024; 58:149-154. [PMID: 39162690 PMCID: PMC11363164 DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.23176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of favipiravir on fracture healing. Forty-eight female rats which had a femur fracture with intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation performed were divided into 6 groups; 2 control groups (C1, C2) and 4 experimental groups (F1, F2, F3, F4). The control groups (C1, C2) received physiological saline by oral gavage for 14 days. Two of the experimental groups (F1, F2) received favipiravir by oral gavage for 5 days, whereas the other groups (F3, F4) received it for 14 days. C1, F1 and F3 groups were sacrificed and evaluated on the 14th day, and C2, F2 and F4 groups were sacrificed and evaluated on the 28th day. The fracture sites were assessed for healing radiologically using the Lane and Sandhu scoring system, and assessed histologically using the Huo et al. scoring system. There was no difference between the groups regarding radiological and histological evaluations made on the 14th day (P > .05, P=.216, respectively). On the 28th day, the radiological scores were found to be significantly higher in the control group when compared to the experimental groups (P < .05). Histologically, the control group demonstrated better fracture healing than the groups that had favipiravir administered (P < .001). This study has shown that favipiravir can have negative effects on fracture healing both radiologically and histologically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Ali Sabır
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kastamonu Training and Research Hospital, Kastamonu, Türkiye
| | - Ahmet Onur Çelik
- Department of Radiology, Çanakkale Mehmet Akif Ersoy State Hospital, Çanakkale, Türkiye
| | | | - Cem Çopuroğlu
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Israr J, Alam S, Kumar A. Drug repurposing for respiratory infections. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2024; 207:207-230. [PMID: 38942538 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2024.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Respiratory infections such as Coronavirus disease 2019 are a substantial worldwide health challenge, frequently resulting in severe sickness and death, especially in susceptible groups. Conventional drug development for respiratory infections faces obstacles such as extended timescales, substantial expenses, and the rise of resistance to current treatments. Drug repurposing is a potential method that has evolved to quickly find and reuse existing medications for treating respiratory infections. Drug repurposing utilizes medications previously approved for different purposes, providing a cost-effective and time-efficient method to tackle pressing medical needs. This chapter summarizes current progress and obstacles in repurposing medications for respiratory infections, focusing on notable examples of repurposed pharmaceuticals and their probable modes of action. The text also explores the significance of computational approaches, high-throughput screening, and preclinical investigations in identifying potential candidates for repurposing. The text delves into the significance of regulatory factors, clinical trial structure, and actual data in confirming the effectiveness and safety of repurposed medications for respiratory infections. Drug repurposing is a valuable technique for quickly increasing the range of treatments for respiratory infections, leading to better patient outcomes and decreasing the worldwide disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juveriya Israr
- Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India; Department of Biotechnology, Era University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shabroz Alam
- Department of Biotechnology, Era University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ajay Kumar
- Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Rama University, Mandhana, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bahar MA, Kusuma IY, Visnyovszki Á, Matuz M, Benkő R, Ferenci T, Szabó BG, Hajdú E, Pető Z, Csupor D. Favipiravir does not improve viral clearance in mild to moderate COVID-19 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29808. [PMID: 38694066 PMCID: PMC11058284 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Favipiravir has been used in the therapy of COVID-19, including patients with mild to moderate symptoms in certain countries. The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate its efficacy and safety in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 infections. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed for articles reporting the results of randomized controlled trials published until January 6, 2023, resulting in the identification of 20 eligible studies. Results There were no significant differences in viral clearance time (HR = 1.20, p = 0.09) compared to those without favipiravir therapy. However, in the subgroup analyses, favipiravir treatment significantly increased viral clearance by 59 % (HR = 1.59, p < 0.01) and 42 % (HR = 1.42, p < 0.01], I2 = 20 %) compared to the comparator group in patients with moderate severity of COVID-19 and in the inpatient care setting, respectively. Favipiravir had no beneficial effects in the case of patients with mild symptoms and treated in ambulatory care. Conclusions The use of favipiravir is questionable in the treatment of outpatients with COVID-19 with mild symptoms. Moderate beneficial effects in the case of patients with moderate symptoms and inpatients should be treated with care due to the limitations of the analysed trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muh Akbar Bahar
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
| | - Ikhwan Yuda Kusuma
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Pharmacy Study Program, Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Purwokerto, Indonesia
| | - Ádám Visnyovszki
- Internal Medicine Clinic, Infectiology Unit, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Mária Matuz
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ria Benkő
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Central Pharmacy, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tamás Ferenci
- Physiological Controls Research Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Statistics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bálint Gergely Szabó
- South Pest Central Hospital, National Institute of Haematology and Infectious Diseases, Budapest, Hungary
- School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Departmental Group of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Edit Hajdú
- Internal Medicine Clinic, Infectiology Unit, Albert Szent Györgyi Medical Center, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Pető
- Emergency Care Department, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Center, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Dezső Csupor
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siripongboonsitti T, Tawinprai K, Avirutnan P, Jitobaom K, Auewarakul P. A randomized trial to assess the acceleration of viral clearance by the combination Favipiravir/Ivermectin/Niclosamide in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 adult patients (FINCOV). J Infect Public Health 2024; 17:897-905. [PMID: 38569269 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of the viral clearance and clinical outcomes of favipiravir (FPV) in outpatients being treated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. Ivermectin (IVM), niclosamide (NCL), and FPV demonstrated synergistic effects in vitro for exceed 78% inhibiting severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication. METHODS A phase 2, open-label, 1:1, randomized, controlled trial was conducted on Thai patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received either combination FPV/IVM/NCL therapy or FPV alone to assess the rate of viral clearance among individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. RESULTS Sixty non-high-risk comorbid patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 were randomized; 30 received FPV/IVM/NCL, and 30 received FPV alone. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression analysis of the cycle threshold value from SARS-CoV-2 PCR demonstrated no statistically significant differences in viral clearance rates between the combined FPV/IVM/NCL therapy group and the FPV-alone group. World Health Organization Clinical Progression scores and symptomatic improvement did not differ between arms on days 3, 6, and 10, and no adverse events were reported. No patients required hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or supplemental oxygen or died within 28 days. C-reactive protein on day 3 was lower in the FPV/IVM/NCL group. CONCLUSION Viral clearance rates did not differ significantly between the FPV/IVM/NCL combination therapy and FPV-alone groups of individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, although the combined regimen demonstrated a synergistic effect in vitro. No discernible clinical benefit was observed. Further research is required to explore the potential benefits of FVP beyond its antiviral effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION TCTR20230403007, Registered 3 April 2023 - Retrospectively registered,https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=TCTR20230403007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand; Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Kriangkrai Tawinprai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand; Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Panisadee Avirutnan
- Division of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever Research, Department of Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Siriraj Center of Research Excellence in Dengue and Emerging Pathogens, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kunlakanya Jitobaom
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Prasert Auewarakul
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoseininezhad-Namin MS, Rahimpour E, Jouyban A. Favipiravir, remdesivir, and lopinavir: metabolites, degradation products and their analytical methods. Drug Metab Rev 2024; 56:127-144. [PMID: 38445647 DOI: 10.1080/03602532.2024.2326415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic all over the world. Several studies have suggested that antiviral drugs such as favipiravir (FAV), remdesivir (RDV), and lopinavir (LPV) may potentially prevent the spread of the virus in the host cells and person-to-person transmission. Simultaneously with the widespread use of these drugs, their stability and action mechanism studies have also attracted the attention of many researchers. This review focuses on the action mechanism, metabolites and degradation products of these antiviral drugs (FAV, RDV and LPV) and demonstrates various methods for their quantification and discrimination in the different biological samples. Herein, the instrumental methods for analysis of the main form of drugs or their metabolite and degradation products are classified into two types: optical and chromatography methods which the last one in combination with various detectors provides a powerful method for routine and stability analyses. Some representative studies are reported in this review and the details of them are carefully explained. It is hoped that this review will be a good guideline study and provide a better understanding of these drugs from the aspects investigated in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mir Saleh Hoseininezhad-Namin
- Pharmaceutical Analysis Research Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Elaheh Rahimpour
- Pharmaceutical Analysis Research Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Abolghasem Jouyban
- Pharmaceutical Analysis Research Center and Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siripongboonsitti T, Nontawong N, Tawinprai K, Suptawiwat O, Soonklang K, Poovorawan Y, Mahanonda N. Efficacy of combined COVID-19 convalescent plasma with oral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor treatment versus neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapy in COVID-19 outpatients: a multi-center, non-inferiority, open-label randomized controlled trial (PlasMab). Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0325723. [PMID: 37975699 PMCID: PMC10714803 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03257-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE This pivotal study reveals that high neutralizing titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) combined with favipiravir (FPV) is non-inferior to sotrovimab in preventing hospitalization and severe outcomes in outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and high-risk comorbidities. It underscores the potential of CPT-FPV as a viable alternative to neutralizing monoclonal antibodies like sotrovimab, especially amid emerging variants with spike protein mutations. The study's unique approach, comparing a monoclonal antibody with CPT, demonstrates the efficacy of early intervention using high neutralizing antibody titer CPT, even in populations with a significant proportion of elderly patients. These findings are crucial, considering the alternative treatment challenges, especially in resource-limited countries, posed by the rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus and the need for adaptable therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Kriangkrai Tawinprai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ornpreya Suptawiwat
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kamonwan Soonklang
- Center of Learning and Research in Celebration of HRH Princess Chulabhorn 60th Birthday Anniversary, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Yong Poovorawan
- Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nithi Mahanonda
- Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Siripongboonsitti T, Tawinprai K, Payoong P, Mahanonda N. The real-world effectiveness of fluvoxamine therapy in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients; A historical cohort study (Fluvoxa Trial). J Infect Public Health 2023; 16:2010-2016. [PMID: 37890224 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluvoxamine (FVX) has been proposed as a potential treatment for severe COVID-19 by the σ-1 receptor agonist, which can reduce cytokine production. However, the efficacy of FVX remains controversial. METHODS A historical retrospective cohort study was conducted in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients, 2:1 ratio of standard of care (SOC) and FVX treatments to assess the effectiveness of FVX in preventing deterioration by the fifth day of treatment. RESULTS Of 752 eligible patients, 234 received FVX while 518 received SOC, and there was no significant difference in the effectiveness of FVX and SOC in preventing clinical deterioration. On the fifth day after treatment, 86.1 % of patients in the FVX-treated group did not experience clinical deterioration compared to 78.7 % in the SOC group. Notably, the FVX group had higher rates of pneumonia development and hospitalization, requiring more oxygen supplementation while showing less reduction in viral shedding than the SOC group. However, no difference in mechanical ventilation use, ICU admission, and survival was observed. CONCLUSION Fluvoxamine treatment is failed to demonstrate effectiveness in preventing deterioration in mild to moderate COVID-19 and may lead to a higher incidence of pneumonia, hospitalization, and oxygen supplementation, necessitating careful consideration before prescribing the drug for COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand; Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Kriangkrai Tawinprai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand; Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Paruspak Payoong
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Siripongboonsitti T, Ungtrakul T, Tawinprai K, Auewarakul C, Chartisathian W, Jansala T, Julsawad R, Soonklang K, Mahanonda N, Mahidol C. Efficacy of Andrographis paniculata extract treatment in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients being treated with favipiravir: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (APFaVi trial). PHYTOMEDICINE : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOTHERAPY AND PHYTOPHARMACOLOGY 2023; 119:155018. [PMID: 37625206 DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.155018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While favipiravir had been the standard anti-SARS-CoV-3 drug for COVID-19 treatment in Thailand, the efficacy of favipiravir treatment is controversial. Andrographis paniculata extract (APE) inhibits viral entry, exhibits immunomodulatory effects, and proposes to have the potential for early-stage COVID-19 treatment. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in Thailand during June - September 2021. Non-severe COVID-19 patients were randomized 1:1 to groups receiving 180 mg/day of APE plus favipiravir (APE-FPV group) or placebo plus favipiravir (placebo-FPV group). Efficacy in preventing disease progression to severe COVID-19 was assessed on day 4, using World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHOCPS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for acute respiratory tract infection symptoms. RESULTS Of 146 patients, there were 73 patients in each group. Non-deterioration of WHOCPS scores on day 4 was 98.63% versus 97.26% of patients in the APE-FPV and placebo-FPV groups (p = 1.000). No difference in supplemental oxygen, hospitalization, and death was shown in both groups. The oxygen supplemental was 4.11% in the placebo-FPV group. The interleukin (IL)-1β was significantly lower in the APE than in the placebo-FPV group throughout the study. We found no difference in virologic outcomes between groups and no substantial adverse events. CONCLUSIONS APE treatment did not demonstrate additional clinical and virological benefits in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 being treated with favipiravir. Early reduction of IL-1β with APE may be advantageous in preventing cytokine storms in severe COVID-19 and requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand; Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Teerapat Ungtrakul
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kriangkrai Tawinprai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chirayu Auewarakul
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wipada Chartisathian
- Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thitikan Jansala
- Pharmacy and Medical Supplies Department, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rattana Julsawad
- Nursing Department, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kamonwan Soonklang
- Center of Learning and Research in Celebration of HRH Princess Chulabhorn's 60(th) Birthday Anniversary, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Chulabhorn Mahidol
- Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand; Chulabhorn Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Siripongboonsitti T, Muadchimkaew M, Tawinprai K, Issaranon O, Meepholkij W, Arttawejkul P, Vararungzarit A, Thavornwattana K, Mahanonda N. Favipiravir treatment in non-severe COVID-19: promising results from multicenter propensity score-matched study (FAVICOV). Sci Rep 2023; 13:14884. [PMID: 37689754 PMCID: PMC10492810 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42195-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of favipiravir (FPV) in preventing the development of severe COVID-19 in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. The study evaluated 1037 COVID-19 patients treated with FPV or standard treatment between April and September 2021, analyzed by propensity score matching. 149 patients were included in each arm after propensity score matching. The clinical outcomes showed no deterioration of the WHO clinical progression scale in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group on day 5 (83.2% vs. 69.1%, p < 0.001). The WHO clinical progression scale also showed improvements on day 14 in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group (66.4% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.001). The rates of oxygen supplementation and hospitalization were significantly lower in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group (0% vs. 12.1% and 0.7% vs. 17.4%, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). There were no differences in adverse events between the two groups. The study highlights the effectiveness of FPV in preventing severe COVID-19 and hospitalization in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. The findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment plans for COVID-19 patients, starting FPV treatment early, and adjusting dosages based on ethnicity and body weight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Infection Control Unit, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Marisa Muadchimkaew
- Infection Control Unit, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kriangkrai Tawinprai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
- Infection Control Unit, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | - Pureepat Arttawejkul
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Burapha University Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand
| | - Apiradee Vararungzarit
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Burapha University Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand
| | - Kaewklao Thavornwattana
- Health Data Science Unit, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nithi Mahanonda
- Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Siripongboonsitti T, Ungtrakul T, Tawinprai K, Nimmol T, Buttakosa M, Sornsamdang G, Jarrusrojwuttikul T, Silapant P, Mahanonda N. Efficacy of combination therapy of fluvoxamine and favipiravir vs favipiravir monotherapy to prevent severe COVID-19 among mild to moderate COVID-19 patients: Open-label randomized controlled trial (EFFaCo study). Int J Infect Dis 2023; 134:211-219. [PMID: 37393041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Fluvoxamine (FVX) is an antidepressant proposed to its immunomodulatory effects in preventing deterioration in mild and moderate COVID-19. METHODS An open-label, 1:1 randomized controlled trial was assigned either combination therapy 50 mg twice daily of FVX for 10 days and favipiravir (FPV) or FPV alone to assess the efficacy in preventing disease progression in mild to moderate COVID-19 on the 5th day. RESULTS In total, 134 patients with mild COVID-19 received FPV and 132 received FVX/FPV, 31 patients with moderate COVID-19 received FPV/dexamethasone (FPV/Dex), and 30 received FVX/FPV/Dex. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed no difference of no clinical deterioration on the 5th day in both mild COVID-19 (100% in FPV vs 97% in FVX/FPV) and moderate COVID-19 (83.9% in FPV/Dex vs 86.7% in FVX/FPV/Dex). However, there was a low rate of oxygen supplemental, hospitalization, or intensive care in both groups and zero death in all groups. No significant difference in oxygen supplemental, hospitalization, radiological, virological, or biochemical outcomes, and the immunomodulatory effect was observed between the group. CONCLUSION The combined fluvoxamine treatment did not add benefit in preventing deterioration in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 without the immunomodulatory effect observed, although it demonstrated low hospitalization rates, oxygen supplemental, intensive care needed, and zero mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION Thai clinical trials registry (TCTR) no. 20210615002.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand; Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Teerapat Ungtrakul
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kriangkrai Tawinprai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tararin Nimmol
- Pharmacy Department, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mullika Buttakosa
- Nursing Department, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Gaidganok Sornsamdang
- Central Laboratory Center, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tanadul Jarrusrojwuttikul
- Faculty of Health Science Technology, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Radiology, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
AlQadheeb N, AlMubayedh H, AlBadrani S, Salam A, AlOmar M, AlAswad A, AlMualim M, AlQamariat Z, AlHubail R. Impact of common comorbidities on antimicrobial consumption and mortality amongst critically ill COVID-19 patients: A retrospective two center study in Saudi Arabia. CLINICAL INFECTION IN PRACTICE 2023; 19:100229. [PMID: 37168925 PMCID: PMC10156636 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinpr.2023.100229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine the association between common comorbidities, ICU mortality and antimicrobial consumption among critically ill COVID 19 patients in Saudi Arabia. Methods A retrospective observational study of patients admitted to the ICU from March 1st, 2020, through August 31st, 2021. We excluded patients who stayed <24 h in the ICU and with no confirmed COVID-19 PCR testing. Results Of the 976 screened ICU patients, 848 were included. While there was no difference in mortality between patients with and without comorbidities, those with at least one comorbidity had a higher severity of illness (p = 0.013). Compared to survivors, non-survivors were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and vasopressor support (P < 0.001). Almost all patients received at least one antimicrobial therapy. Predictors independently associated with ICU mortality were: older age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.04), vancomycin use (AOR, 2.69; 95% [CI], 1.65-4.37), linezolid use (AOR, 2.65; 95% [CI], 1.65-4.04), sepsis or septic shock (AOR, 6.39; 95% [CI], 3.68-11.08), Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) (AOR, 2.51; 95% [CI], 1.61-3.92) and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) (AOR, 2.03; 95% [CI], 1.61-3.92). Conclusion Older age, vancomycin and linezolid use, sepsis/septic shock, AKI, and ARDS were negative prognostic factors in critically ill COVID-19 patients. More studies are needed to evaluate the outcomes of survived critically ill patients in relation to their vaccination status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nada AlQadheeb
- Pharmacy Department, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hanine AlMubayedh
- College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarah AlBadrani
- College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdul Salam
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mukhtar AlOmar
- Pharmacy Department, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed AlAswad
- Critical Care Department, Qatif Central Hospital, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed AlMualim
- Critical Care Department, Qatif Central Hospital, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zahra AlQamariat
- Pharmacy Department, Dammam Medical Complex, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rasheed AlHubail
- Critical Care Department, Dammam Medical Complex, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Siripongboonsitti T, Tawinprai K, Cheirsilpa K, Ungtrakul T, Krisorakun W, Chotipanich C, Wimolsiri N, Noitun P, Srirattana N, Mahanonda N. The Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Favipiravir Treatment with Telemedicine Monitoring in Preventing Disease Progression in Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Patients; A Retrospective Cohort Study. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1098. [PMID: 37374302 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Background: Favipiravir has complex pharmacokinetics, and varied efficacy has been reported in treating COVID-19. Telehealth and telemonitoring are disruptive challenges used for COVID-19 care during pandemics. Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcome of favipiravir treatment to prevent clinical deterioration in mild to moderate COVID-19 cases with adjunctive telemonitoring during the COVID-19 surge. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of PCR-confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 cases subjected to home isolation. Chest computed tomography (CT) was performed in all cases, and favipiravir was administrated. Results: This study involved 88 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases. In addition, 42/42 (100%) cases were Alpha variants. COVID-19 pneumonia was found in 71.5% of the cases, according to chest X-rays and chest CT on the first visit. Favipiravir started 4 days after symptoms, which was part of the standard of care. The 12.5% of the patients required supplemental oxygen and intensive care unit admission rate was 1.1%; 1.1% required mechanical ventilation, and the rate of all-cause mortality was 1.1%, with a value of 0% of severe COVID-19 deaths. All mild illness cases showed no clinical deterioration or requirement for supplemental oxygen. No significant deterioration in either obesity or diabetes mellitus was observed. Conclusions: Favipiravir treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19 cases in outpatient settings, coupled with telemonitoring, was both safe and effective in preventing clinical deterioration, including the need for oxygen supplementation. This approach proved valuable during surges of COVID-19 cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taweegrit Siripongboonsitti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Kriangkrai Tawinprai
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Kunsuda Cheirsilpa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Teerapat Ungtrakul
- Princess Srisavangavadhana College of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Wasanai Krisorakun
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Chanisa Chotipanich
- National Cyclotron and PET Center, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Nat Wimolsiri
- Department of Radiology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Permpen Noitun
- Cardiovascular Center, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Netnapis Srirattana
- Cardiovascular Center, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Villanacci A, Grassi F, Grassi R, Di Stefano F, Petrone A, Fusco N, Ianniello S. Qualitative and semi-quantitative ultrasound assessment in delta and Omicron Covid-19 patients: data from high volume reference center. Infect Agent Cancer 2023; 18:34. [PMID: 37245026 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-023-00515-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to evaluate the efficacy of US, both qualitatively and semi-quantitatively, in the selection of treatment for the Covid-19 patient, using patient triage as the gold standard. METHODS Patients admitted to the Covid-19 clinic to be treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) or retroviral treatment and undergoing lung ultrasound (US) were selected from the radiological data set between December 2021 and May 2022 according to the following inclusion criteria: patients with proven Omicron variant and Delta Covid-19 infection; patients with known Covid-19 vaccination with at least two doses. Lung US (LUS) was performed by experienced radiologists. The presence, location, and distribution of abnormalities, such as B-lines, thickening or ruptures of the pleural line, consolidations, and air bronchograms, were evaluated. The anomalous findings in each scan were classified according to the LUS scoring system. Nonparametric statistical tests were performed. RESULTS The LUS score median value in the patients with Omicron variant was 1.5 (1-20) while the LUS score median value in the patients with Delta variant was 7 (3-24). A difference statistically significant was observed for LUS score values among the patients with Delta variant between the two US examinations (p value = 0.045 at Kruskal Wallis test). There was a difference in median LUS score values between hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients for both the Omicron and Delta groups (p value = 0.02 on the Kruskal Wallis test). For Delta patients groups the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, considering a value of 14 for LUS score for the hospitalization, were of 85.29%, 44.44%, 85.29% and 76.74% respectively. CONCLUSIONS LUS is an interesting diagnostic tool in the context of Covid-19, it could allow to identify the typical pattern of diffuse interstitial pulmonary syndrome and could guide the correct management of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", 80131, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Alberta Villanacci
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, "Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Division of Radiology, "Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Di Stefano
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149, Rome, Italy
| | - Ada Petrone
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Fusco
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Ianniello
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Regalado-Méndez A, Zavaleta-Avendaño J, Peralta-Reyes E, Natividad R. Convex optimization for maximizing the degradation efficiency of chloroquine in a flow-by electrochemical reactor. J Solid State Electrochem 2023:1-14. [PMID: 37363394 PMCID: PMC10088624 DOI: 10.1007/s10008-023-05452-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
The degradation efficiency of chloroquine phosphate (CQ), an anti-COVID-19 drug, was investigated in a flow-by electrochemical reactor (FBER) provided with two boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes (as cathode and anode) under batch recirculation mode. A central composite rotatable design (CCRD) was run down to model and assess the influence of initial pH in an interval of 3.71 to 11.28, the current density in an interval of 34.32 to 185.68 mA cm-2, and liquid volumetric flow rate in an interval of 0.58 to 1.42 L min-1, and conduct the convex optimization to obtain the maximum degradation efficiency. Experimental results were modeled through a second-order polynomial equation having a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.9705 with a variance coefficient of 1.1%. Optimal operating conditions found (initial pH of 5.38, current density (j) of 34.4 mA cm-2, and liquid flow rate (Q) of 1.42 L min-1) led to a global maximum degradation efficiency, COD removal efficiency, and mineralization efficiency of 89.3, 51.6 and 53.1%, respectively, with an energy consumption of 0.041 kWh L-1 within 9 h of treatment. Additionally, a pseudo-zero-order kinetic model was demonstrated to fit the experimental data and the calculated pseudo-zero-order kinetic constant (kapp) was 13.14 mg L-1 h-1 (2.54 × 10-5 mol dm-3 h-1). Furthermore, the total operating cost was of 0.47 US$ L-1. Finally, this research could be helpful for the treatment of wastewater containing an anti-COVID-19 drug such as CQ. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10008-023-05452-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ever Peralta-Reyes
- Investigation Laboratories, Universidad del Mar, Puerto Ángel, 70902 Oaxaca, México
| | - Reyna Natividad
- Chemical Engineering Laboratory, Centro Conjunto de Investigación en Química Sustentable, UAEMex-UNAM, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Estado de México, Toluca, 50200 México
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Alamer A, Almutairi AR, Halloush S, Al-jedai A, Alrashed A, AlFaifi M, Mohzari Y, Almutairi M, AlHassar F, Howaidi J, Almutairi W, Abraham I, Alkhatib N. Cost-effectiveness of Favipiravir in moderately to severely ill COVID-19 patients in the real-world setting of Saudi arabian pandemic referral hospitals. Saudi Pharm J 2023; 31:510-516. [PMID: 36819111 PMCID: PMC9930375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of Favipiravir treatment versus standard of care (SC) in moderately to severely ill COVID-19 patients from the Saudi healthcare payer perspective. Methods We used the patient-level simulation method to simulate a cohort of 415 patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 disease who were admitted to two Saudi COVID-19 referral hospitals: 220 patients on Favipiravir and 195 patients on SC. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of Favipiravir versus SC in terms of the probability to be discharged alive from hospital and the mean time in days to discharge one patient alive. The model was performed twice: first, using unweighted, and second, using weighted clinical and economic data. Weighting using the inverse weight probability method was performed to achieve balance in baseline characteristics. Results In the unweighted model, base case (probabilistic) ICER estimates favored Favipiravir at savings of Saudi Riyal (SAR)1,611,511 (SAR1,998,948) per 1% increase in the probability of being discharged alive. As to mean time to discharging one patient alive, ICERs favored Favipiravir at savings of SAR11,498 (SAR11,125). Similar results were observed in the weighted model with savings using Favipiravir of SAR1,514,893 (SAR2,453,551) per 1% increase in the probability of being discharged alive, and savings of SAR11,989 (SAR11,277) for each day a patient is discharged alive. Conclusion From the payer perspective, the addition of Favipiravir in moderately to severely ill COVID-19 patients was cost-savings over SC. Favipiravir was associated with a higher probability of discharging patients alive and lower daily spending on hospitalization than SC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Alamer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
- Center for Health Outcomes & Pharmacoeconomics Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Shiraz Halloush
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Ahmed Al-jedai
- Ministry of Health, Deputyship of Therapeutic Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- College of Pharmacy, Al-Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Alrashed
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Malak Almutairi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Almaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fatimah AlHassar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jude Howaidi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wedad Almutairi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ivo Abraham
- Center for Health Outcomes & Pharmacoeconomics Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Nimer Alkhatib
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- PI pharma intelligence, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Usman M, Khadka S, Saleem M, Rasheed H, Kunwar B, Ali M. Pharmacometrics: A New Era of Pharmacotherapy and Drug Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Adv Pharmacol Pharm Sci 2023; 2023:3081422. [PMID: 36925562 PMCID: PMC10014156 DOI: 10.1155/2023/3081422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacotherapy, in many cases, is practiced at a suboptimal level of performance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) although stupendous amounts of data are available regularly. The process of drug development is time-consuming, costly, and is also associated with loads of hurdles related to the safety concerns of the compounds. This review was conducted with the objective to emphasize the role of pharmacometrics in pharmacotherapy and the drug development process in LMICs for rational drug therapy. Pharmacometrics is widely applied for the rational clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) practice through the population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modeling and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach. The scope of pharmacometrics practice is getting wider day by day with the untiring efforts of pharmacometricians. The basis for pharmacometrics analysis is the computer-based modeling and simulation of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) data supplemented by characterization of important aspects of drug safety and efficacy. Pharmacometrics can be considered an invaluable tool not only for new drug development with maximum safety and efficacy but also for dose optimization in clinical settings. Due to the convenience of using sparse and routine patient data, a significant advantage exists in this regard for LMICs which would otherwise lag behind in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Usman
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Sitaram Khadka
- Shree Birendra Hospital, Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Mohammad Saleem
- Punjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Huma Rasheed
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Bimal Kunwar
- Nobel College, Pokhara University, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Moshin Ali
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Govt. College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kamali A, Sarmadian H, Mahmoodiyeh B, Valibeik S, Farmani F, Bashirgonbadi Z. Evaluation of the effect of favipiravir on patients with COVID-19. J Family Med Prim Care 2023; 12:242-245. [PMID: 37091030 PMCID: PMC10114572 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1058_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The novel coronavirus disease 2019 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. No specific drug has been accepted for COVID-19 treatment up to now. Favipiravir as an antiviral drug affects RNA viruses like influenza and Ebola. Accordingly, the aim of this study is the evaluation of favipiravir's effect on COVID-19 outcomes. Method This is a randomized controlled study including 97 patients with COVID-19 randomly allocated into favipiravir or control groups. The primary outcomes were improvement of clinical manifestations and atrial oxygen saturation (SpO2), and the secondary outcome was the length of hospitalization. Results Clinical manifestations recovery of COVID-19 patients was better in the favipiravir group, and the mortality rates were less than in the control group (P = 0.0001 for both). The level of blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) was significantly higher in the favipiravir group (P = 0.0001). The mean lymphocyte count was lower in the control group (P = 0.004). In addition, levels of blood urine nitrogen (BUN) were higher in the favipiravir group (P = 0.033). The length of hospitalization was similar in both groups (P = 0.586). Conclusion Favipiravir can be effective for clinical and laboratory improvement of COVID-19 patients, and it is a promising drug for decreasing of mortality rate in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Kamali
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Arak University of Medical Science, Arak, Iran
| | - Hossein Sarmadian
- Department of Infection Disease, Arak University of Medical Science, Arak, Iran
| | - Behnam Mahmoodiyeh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Arak University of Medical Science, Arak, Iran
| | - Shamim Valibeik
- General Practitioner, Researcher in Vice-Chancellor for Research, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Farzane Farmani
- General Practitioner, Researcher in Vice-Chancellor for Research, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Comparison of Different Antiviral Regimens in the Treatment of Patients with Severe COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59020260. [PMID: 36837462 PMCID: PMC9962820 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes respiratory disorders, with disease severity ranging from asymptomatic to critical manifestations. The current retrospective study compared the efficacies of different antiviral regimens used in patients suffering from severe COVID-19 disease from 19 January 2020 to December 2021 in a single center in Saudi Arabia. In total, 188 patients were enrolled in the current study, including 158 patients treated with different antiviral regimens, and 30 who did not receive any antiviral treatment. Different antiviral regimens, including favipiravir, remdesivir, oseltamivir, favipiravir/remdesivir, and favipiravir/oseltamivir were adopted. The effects of using different antivirals and antibiotics on the survival rate were evaluated, as well as the presence of comorbidities. Among all severely affected patients, 39/188 (20.7%) survived. Both age and comorbidities, including diabetes and hypertension, were significantly correlated with high case fatality following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Remdesivir alone and the combination of favipiravir and remdesivir increased the survival rate. Surprisingly, both imipenem and linezolid helped in the deterioration of disease outcome in the patients. A negative correlation was detected between increased mortality and the use of favipiravir and the use of either imipenem or linezolid. Among the compared antiviral regimens used in the treatment of severe COVID-19, remdesivir was found to be an effective antiviral that reduces COVID-19 case fatality. Antibiotic treatment using imipenem and/or linezolid should be carefully re-evaluated.
Collapse
|
20
|
Vaezi A, Salmasi M, Soltaninejad F, Salahi M, Javanmard SH, Amra B. Favipiravir in the Treatment of Outpatient COVID-19: A Multicenter, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Adv Respir Med 2023; 91:18-25. [PMID: 36825938 PMCID: PMC9951951 DOI: 10.3390/arm91010004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Finding effective outpatient treatments to prevent COVID-19 progression and hospitalization is necessary and is helpful in managing limited hospital resources. Repurposing previously existing treatments is highly desirable. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of Favipiravir in the prevention of hospitalization in symptomatic COVID-19 patients who were not eligible for hospitalization. METHODS This study was a triple-blind randomized controlled trial conducted between 5 December 2020 and 31 March 2021 in three outpatient centers in Isfahan, Iran. Patients in the intervention group received Favipiravir 1600 mg daily for five days, and the control group received a placebo. Our primary outcome was the proportion of hospitalized participants from day 0 to day 28. The outcome was assessed on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 through phone calls. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were randomly allocated to Favipiravir and placebo groups. There was no significant difference between groups considering baseline characteristics. During the study period, 10.5% of patients in the Favipiravir group and 5.1% of patients in the placebo group were hospitalized, but there was no significant difference between them (p-value = 0.3). No adverse event was reported in the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that Favipiravir did not reduce the hospitalization rate of mild to moderate COVID-19 patients in outpatient settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atefeh Vaezi
- Cancer Prevention Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
| | - Mehrzad Salmasi
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
| | - Forogh Soltaninejad
- Bamdad Respiratory and Sleep Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
| | - Mehrdad Salahi
- Department of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
- Correspondence:
| | - Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard
- Department of Physiology, Applied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
| | - Babak Amra
- Bamdad Respiratory and Sleep Research Center, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 8174673461, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Hassan A, Bseiso O, Tehseen Z, Pizzorno G, Rodriguez Reyes Y, Saleem F. Efficacy and Safety of Favipiravir in Treating COVID-19 Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Cureus 2023; 15:e33676. [PMID: 36788824 PMCID: PMC9918851 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
This meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to assess the safety and efficacy of favipiravir in treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed a thorough search of online databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from their inceptions to November 30, 2022, using the following search terms: "Favipiravir" AND "COVID-19". We included randomized control trials (RCTs) that were conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of favipiravir for COVID-19. Efficacy outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included time to viral clearance in days, time to clinical improvement in days, need for supplementary oxygen, and requirement of ICU admission. For safety outcomes, we compared overall adverse events and serious adverse events that had occurred during the treatment between the patients in the treatment group and the control group. Eight studies involving 1,448 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of time to viral clearance, time to clinical improvement, and the need for supplementary oxygen and ICU admission. In terms of safety, no significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to adverse events and serious adverse events. The current study found that favipiravir did not exert any beneficial impact on reducing ICU admission, the need for oxygen therapy, and time to viral clearance. However, a slight benefit was reported with regard to the time for clinical improvement, but it was insignificant between the two study groups.
Collapse
|
22
|
Cheng Q, Zhao G, Chen J, Jia Q, Fang Z. Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for severe COVID-19 patients: An updated network meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30998. [PMID: 36254081 PMCID: PMC9575403 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, there has been little agreement on what drug is the "best" drug for treating severe COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of different medications available at present for severe COVID-19. METHODS We searched databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to February 28, 2022, with no language restrictions, of medications recommended for patients (aged 16 years or older) with severe COVID-19 infection. We extracted data on trials and patient characteristics, and the following primary outcomes: all-cause mortality (ACM), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS We identified 4021 abstracts and of these included 48 RCTs comprising 9147 participants through database searches and other sources. For decrease in ACM, we found that ivermectin/doxycycline, C-IVIG (i.e., a hyperimmune anti-COVID-19 intravenous immunoglobulin), methylprednisolone, interferon-beta/standard-of-care (SOC), interferon-beta-1b, convalescent plasma, remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, immunoglobulin gamma, high dosage sarilumab (HS), auxora, and imatinib were effective when compared with placebo or SOC group. We found that colchicine and interferon-beta/SOC were only associated with the TEAEs of severe COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSION This study suggested that ivermectin/doxycycline, C-IVIG, methylprednisolone, interferon-beta/SOC, interferon-beta-1b, convalescent plasma (CP), remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, immunoglobulin gamma, HS, auxora, and imatinib were efficacious for treating severe COVID-19 patients. We found that most medications were safe in treating severe COVID-19. More large-scale RCTs are still needed to confirm the results of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinglin Cheng
- Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
- School of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Qinglin Cheng, Division of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 568 Mingshi Road, Hangzhou 310021, China (e-mail: )
| | - Gang Zhao
- Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
| | - Junfang Chen
- Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qingjun Jia
- Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zijian Fang
- Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mohseni M, Ameri H, Arab-Zozani M. Potential limitations in systematic review studies assessing the effect of the main intervention for treatment/therapy of COVID-19 patients: An overview. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:966632. [PMID: 36203750 PMCID: PMC9531544 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.966632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although several studies have assessed the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of interventions in treating the COVID-19, many of them have limitations that can have an immense impact on their results. This study aims to assess the potential limitations in systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluate the effect of interventions on the treatment of the COVID-19. Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Sciences (WOS) databases were searched from inception to January 1, 2022. All systematic reviews investigated the effectiveness, efficacy, safety, and outcome of the main intervention (Favipiravir, Remdesivir, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Lopinavir/Ritonavir, or Tocilizumab) for the treatment of COVID-19 patients and reported the potential limitations of the included studies. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Quality Assessment Tool (QAT) for review articles. We conducted a content analysis and prepared a narrative summary of the limitations. Results Forty-six studies were included in this review. Ninety one percent of the included studies scored as strong quality and the remaining (9%) as moderate quality. Only 29.7% of the included systematic reviews have a registered protocol. 26% of the included studies mentioned a funding statement. The main limitations of the included studies were categorized in 10 domains: sample size, heterogeneity, follow-up, treatment, including studies, design, definitions, synthesis, quality, and search. Conclusion Various limitations have been reported in all the included studies. Indeed, the existence of limitations in studies can affect their results, therefore, identifying these limitations can help researchers design better studies. As a result, stronger studies with more reliable results will be reported and disseminated. Further research on COVID-19 SRs is essential to improve research quality and also, efficiency among scientists across the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Mohseni
- Knowledge Utilization Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hosein Ameri
- Health Policy and Management Research Center, Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Morteza Arab-Zozani
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sirijatuphat R, Manosuthi W, Niyomnaitham S, Owen A, Copeland KK, Charoenpong L, Rattanasompattikul M, Mahasirimongkol S, Wichukchinda N, Chokephaibulkit K. Early Treatment of Favipiravir in COVID-19 Patients Without Pneumonia: A Multicentre, Open-Labelled, Randomized Control Study. Emerg Microbes Infect 2022; 11:2197-2206. [PMID: 35997325 PMCID: PMC9518247 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2117092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
We investigated Favipiravir (FPV) efficacy in mild cases of COVID-19 without pneumonia and its effects towards viral clearance, clinical condition, and risk of COVID-19 pneumonia development. PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients without pneumonia were enrolled (2:1) within 10 days of symptomatic onset into FPV and control arms. The former received 1800 mg FPV twice-daily (BID) on Day 1 and 800 mg BID 5-14 days thereafter until negative viral detection, while the latter received only supportive care. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement, defined by a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of ≤1. 62 patients (41 female) comprised the FPV arm (median age: 32 years, median BMI: 22 kg/m²) and 31 patients (19 female) comprised the control arm (median age: 28 years, median BMI: 22 kg/m²). The median time to sustained clinical improvement, by NEWS, was 2 and 14 days for FPV and control arms respectively (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 2.77, 95% CI 1.57-4.88, P < 0.001). The FPV arm also had significantly higher likelihoods of clinical improvement within 14 days after enrolment by NEWS (79% vs 32% respectively, P < 0.001), particularly female patients (aOR 6.35, 95% CI 1.49-27.07, P < 0.001). 8 (12.9%) and 7 (22.6%) patients in FPV and control arms developed mild pneumonia at a median (range) of 6.5 (1-13) and 7 (1-13) days after treatment, respectively (P = 0.316). All recovered well without complications. We can conclude that early treatment of FPV in symptomatic COVID-19 patients without pneumonia was associated with faster clinical improvement.Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry identifier: TCTR20200514001..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rujipas Sirijatuphat
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
| | - Weerawat Manosuthi
- Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Suvimol Niyomnaitham
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.,Siriraj Institute of Clinical Research (SICRES), Mahidol University, Thailand
| | - Andrew Owen
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lantharita Charoenpong
- Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Manoch Rattanasompattikul
- Medical Department, Golden Jubilee Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
| | - Surakameth Mahasirimongkol
- Division of Genomic Medicine and Innovation Support, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Nuanjun Wichukchinda
- Division of Genomic Medicine and Innovation Support, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit
- Siriraj Institute of Clinical Research (SICRES), Mahidol University, Thailand.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Medhat MA, El-Kassas M, Karam-Allah H, Al Shafie A, Abd-Elsalam S, Moustafa E, Hassany SM, Salama M, Abd Elghafar MS, Sayed H, Badr M, Kamal DT, Shamseldeen A, Ossimi A, Moaz I, Esmael HED, Ezz Eldin AM, Ezzat S, Abdelghaffar H, Abdelghaffar K. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in combination or nitazoxanide alone are safe and efficient treatments for COVID-19 infection: A randomized controlled trial for repurposing antivirals. Arab J Gastroenterol 2022; 23:165-171. [PMID: 35690556 PMCID: PMC9116423 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajg.2022.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Currently, there is no therapy approved for COVID-19. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and nitazoxanide for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial included one hundred and ninety patients with non-severe COVID-19 infection. Patients were randomized into three groups. All groups received standard care treatment (SCT). In addition, group 1 received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, and group 2 received nitazoxanide. Follow-up by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was done at intervals of 5, 8, 11, and 14 days. The primary endpoint was viral clearance. RESULTS Viral clearance was significantly higher in the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and nitazoxanide groups compared to the SCT group in all follow-up intervals (p < 0.001). In the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir arm, 36.9% showed early viral clearance by day 5. By day 14, 83.1% of the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir group, 39.7% of the nitazoxanide group, and 19.4% of the SCT group tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and nitazoxanide treatment were the only significant factors in Cox regression of negative RT-PCR with the highest OR (17.88, 95% CI: 6.66-47.98 and 2.59, 95% CI: 1.11-6.07, respectively). No mortality or serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION The addition of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir or nitazoxanide to the SCT results in an early and high viral clearance rate in mild and moderate patients with COVID-19. These drugs represent a safe and affordable treatment for COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed A Medhat
- Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Mohamed El-Kassas
- Endemic Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Haidi Karam-Allah
- Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Al Shafie
- Endemic Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sherief Abd-Elsalam
- Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Ehab Moustafa
- Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Sahar M Hassany
- Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Marwa Salama
- Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Mohamed S Abd Elghafar
- Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Hamdy Sayed
- Endemic Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Badr
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Dalia T Kamal
- Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Shamseldeen
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ashima'a Ossimi
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Inas Moaz
- Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Hossam El-Deen Esmael
- Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Azza M Ezz Eldin
- Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Sameera Ezzat
- Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Department, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hung DT, Ghula S, Aziz JMA, Makram AM, Tawfik GM, Abozaid AAF, Pancharatnam RA, Ibrahim AM, Shabouk MB, Turnage M, Nakhare S, Karmally Z, Kouz B, Le TN, Alhijazeen S, Phuong NQ, Ads AM, Abdelaal AH, Nam NH, Iiyama T, Kita K, Hirayama K, Huy NT. The efficacy and adverse effects of favipiravir on patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials and observational studies. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 120:217-227. [PMID: 35470021 PMCID: PMC9023375 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of favipiravir in patients with COVID-19. METHODS Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020206305). Fourteen databases were searched until February 8th, 2021. An update search for new RCTs was done on March 2nd, 2022. Meta-analysis was done for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. RESULTS Overall, 157 studies (24 RCTs, 1 non-RCT, 21 observational studies, 2 case series, and 106 case reports) were included. On hospitalized patients, in comparison to standard of care, favipiravir showed a higher rate of viral clearance at day 5 (RR = 1.60, p = 0.02), defervescence at day 3-4 (RR = 1.99, p <0.01), chest radiological improvement (RR = 1.33, p <0.01), hospital discharge at day 10-11 (RR = 1.19, p <0.01), and shorter clinical improvement time (MD = -1.18, p = 0.05). Regarding adverse events, favipiravir groups had higher rates of hyperuricemia (RR = 9.42, p <0.01), increased alanine aminotransferase (RR = 1.35, p <0.01) but lower rates of nausea (RR = 0.42, p <0.01) and vomiting (R R= 0.19, p=0.02). There were no differences regarding mortality (RR=1.19, p=0.32), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (RR = 1.11, p = 0.25). On nonhospitalized patients, no significant differences were reported. CONCLUSIONS Adding favipiravir to the standard of care provides better outcomes for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Pregnant, lactating women, and patients with a history of hyperuricemia should avoid using favipiravir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dang The Hung
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan.
| | - Suhaib Ghula
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; School of Medicine, The University of Buckingham, Buckingham, UK.
| | - Jeza Muhamad Abdul Aziz
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College Health Science, University of Human Development, Sulaimani, Iraq; Baxshin Research centre, Baxshin Hospital, Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq.
| | - Abdelrahman M Makram
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.
| | - Gehad Mohamed Tawfik
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Ali Ahmed-Fouad Abozaid
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Rohan Andrew Pancharatnam
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; School of Medicine, The University of Buckingham, Buckingham, UK.
| | - Amr Mohamed Ibrahim
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.
| | - Muhammad Besher Shabouk
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria.
| | - Morgan Turnage
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Einstein Medical Center Montgomery, East Norriton, Pennsylvania, USA; American University of the Caribbean, School of Medicine, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten.
| | - Saloni Nakhare
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; School of Medicine, The University of Buckingham, Buckingham, UK.
| | - Zahra Karmally
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; School of Medicine, The University of Buckingham, Buckingham, UK.
| | - Basel Kouz
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Damascus Governorate, Syria.
| | - Tran Nhat Le
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Faculty of Medicine, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue, Vietnam.
| | - Suleiman Alhijazeen
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Graduate of Faculty of Medicine, Mutah University, Karak, Jordan.
| | - Nguyen Quoc Phuong
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Faculty of Biology - Biotechnology, University of Science, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam.
| | - Alaa Mohamed Ads
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
| | - Ali Hussein Abdelaal
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
| | - Nguyen Hai Nam
- Online Research Club (http://www.onlineresearchclub.org), Nagasaki, Japan; Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Harvard Medical School, Global Clinical Scholars Research Training Program, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
| | - Tatsuo Iiyama
- Department of International Trials, Center of Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kyoshi Kita
- Department of International Trials, Center of Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kenji Hirayama
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.
| | - Nguyen Tien Huy
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Terada J, Fujita R, Kawahara T, Hirasawa Y, Kinoshita T, Takeshita Y, Isaka Y, Kinouchi T, Tajima H, Tada Y, Tsushima K. Favipiravir, camostat, and ciclesonide combination therapy in patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia with/without oxygen therapy: An open-label, single-center phase 3 randomized clinical trial. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 49:101484. [PMID: 35692220 PMCID: PMC9165527 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of combination therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia remains unclear. We evaluated favipiravir, camostat, and ciclesonide combination therapy in patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS In this open-label phase 3 study, hospitalized adults who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 and had COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled prior to official vaccination drive in Japan. Participants were randomly assigned to favipiravir monotherapy or favipiravir + camostat + ciclesonide combination therapy. The primary outcome was the length of hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection after study treatment. The hospitalization period was calculated from the time of admission to the time of patient discharge using the clinical management guide of COVID-19 for front-line healthcare workers developed by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (Version 3). Cases were registered between November 11, 2020, and May 31, 2021. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials registration: jRCTs031200196. FINDINGS Of 121 enrolled patients, 56 received monotherapy and 61 received combination therapy. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the groups. The median time of hospitalization was 10 days for the combination and 11 days for the monotherapy group. The median time to discharge was statistically significantly lower in the combination therapy vs monotherapy group (HR, 1·67 (95% CI 1·03-2·7; P = 0·035). The hospital discharge rate was statistically significantly higher in the combination therapy vs monotherapy group in patients with less severe COVID-19 infections and those who were ≤60 years. There were no significant differences in clinical findings between the groups at 4, 8, 11, 15, and 29 days. Adverse events were comparable between the groups. There were two deaths, with one in each group. INTERPRETATION Combination oral favipiravir, camostat and, ciclesonide therapy could decrease the length of hospitalization stays without safety concerns in patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia. However, lack of hard clinical primary outcome is one of the major limitations of the study. FUNDING This research was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Number 20fk0108261h0001.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiro Terada
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
- Correspondence: 852 Hatakeda, Narita city, 286-8520, Chiba, Japan, Telephone: 81-476-35-5600, Fax: 81-476-35-5586.
| | - Retsu Fujita
- Innovation and Research Support Center, Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuya Kawahara
- Clinical Research Promotion Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Hirasawa
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Taku Kinoshita
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Takeshita
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuri Isaka
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toru Kinouchi
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tajima
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuji Tada
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenji Tsushima
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chandra S, Narang A, Choudhuri P, Gupta K. COVID 19: Airway Management and Pharmacological Strategies. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC CRITICAL CARE TSS 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractCoronavirus disease 2019 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has since resulted in more than 250 million cases worldwide and over 50 million deaths. Although treatment is mainly supportive, with oxygen therapy being the mainstay, various pharmacological treatment modalities have also been explored. In this review, we have evaluated the available evidence on airway management as well as medical management and highlighted the possible interventions that may be effective in care of critically ill patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonal Chandra
- Anaesthesia and Critical care VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Aditi Narang
- Anaesthesia and Critical care VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Pratiti Choudhuri
- Anaesthesia and Critical care VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Kapil Gupta
- Anaesthesia and Critical care VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Supplemental Medicines-Nutritions Used by Health Personnel in their own Covid-19 Treatment Schedule. JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES 2022. [DOI: 10.30621/jbachs.1035057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE. İn this study, with a view to investigate drug use behaviors of healthcare personnels who had Covid 19 infection in the first 1 year of the pandemic, it was aimed to determine the additional drugs and nutritional supplements they used in their own treatment.
MATERIAL METHOD This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. The data were obtained through an online survey voluntarily completed under pandemic conditions by doctors, dentists, nurses, pharmacists and other health personnel who declared that they had Covid-19.
RESULTS The study consisted of 405 individuals. 98% of healthcare personnels preferred to support their treatment. The medicines and herbal products that the participants started to use by their own decisions, without the advice of the physician who examined them, and the frequency of their use were vitamin C 53.3%, vitamin D 48.1%, acetylsalicylic acid 26.7%, paracetamol 23%, zinc 26.4%, multivitamin 19%, acetylcysteine 14.8%, famotidine 14.3%, subcutaneous heparin 12.6%. As for herbal products, inhaling thyme oil was noted in 11.6%, drinking thyme oil 10.1%, consuming ginger 14.3% of the participants. Non-prescription support products were found to be beneficial in 44.4%.
CONCLUSION Almost all of the participants took a supplement with an intention to support the treatment. The fact that one out of two participants declared that they benefited from over-the-counter supplements reveals that further studies are needed to support the rational use of over-the-counter products in the treatment of Covid 19.
Collapse
|
30
|
Joshi S, Vora A, Venugopal K, Dadhich P, Daxini A, Bhagat S, Patil S, Barkate H. Real-World Experience with Favipiravir for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 in India. Pragmat Obs Res 2022; 13:33-41. [PMID: 35656155 PMCID: PMC9154000 DOI: 10.2147/por.s364066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Favipiravir, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor (RdRp), is a broad-spectrum oral antiviral agent approved in India under emergency use authorization, for the treatment of mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The present study was planned to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of favipiravir in real-world clinical practice. Materials and Methods This was a multicentric, retrospective, single-arm study conducted across four centres in India, after obtaining permission from the independent ethics committee. Medical records were analysed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of patients who were prescribed favipiravir. Results The medical records of a total of 360 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 358 of them available for the final analysis. Males made up 58.46% of the study population. The average age of enrolled patients was 51.80 ± 16.45 years. The most common symptoms were fever, cough, and myalgia-fatigue. The median time to clinical cure and fever relief was five and four days, respectively. The average length of stay in the hospital was six days. In total, 8% of the patients experienced adverse events. Hepatic enzyme elevation, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, headache, fatigue, and giddiness were the common symptoms. Conclusion In our real-world study, favipiravir was found to have a clinical cure rate of more than 90% in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients. This supports the use of favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19. Favipiravir was well tolerated, with only minimal side effects, which were transient in nature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashank Joshi
- Department of Endocrinology, Joshi Clinic and Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Agam Vora
- Department of Pulmonology, Vora Clinic, Mumbai, India
| | - K Venugopal
- Department of Pulmonology, Sooriya Hospital, Chennai, India
| | | | - Anil Daxini
- Department of Medicine, Fortis Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sagar Bhagat
- Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| | - Saiprasad Patil
- Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| | - Hanmant Barkate
- Global Medical Affairs, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cao L, Li Y, Yang S, Li G, Zhou Q, Sun J, Xu T, Yang Y, Liao R, Shi Y, Yang Y, Zhu T, Huang S, Ji Y, Cong F, Luo Y, Zhu Y, Luan H, Zhang H, Chen J, Liu X, Luo R, Liu L, Wang P, Yu Y, Xing F, Ke B, Zheng H, Deng X, Zhang W, Lin C, Shi M, Li CM, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Dai J, Lu H, Zhao J, Zhang X, Guo D. The adenosine analog prodrug ATV006 is orally bioavailable and has preclinical efficacy against parental SARS-CoV-2 and variants. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14:eabm7621. [PMID: 35579533 PMCID: PMC9161374 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abm7621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus driving the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, continues to rapidly evolve. Due to the limited efficacy of vaccination in prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and continuous emergence of variants of concern (VOC), orally bioavailable and broadly efficacious antiviral drugs are urgently needed. Previously we showed that the parent nucleoside of remdesivir, GS-441524, possesses potent anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. Herein, we report that esterification of the 5′-hydroxyl moieties of GS-441524 markedly improved antiviral potency. This 5′-hydroxyl-isobutyryl prodrug, ATV006, demonstrated excellent oral bioavailability in rats and cynomolgus monkeys and exhibited potent antiviral efficacy against different SARS-CoV-2 VOCs in vitro and in three mouse models. Oral administration of ATV006 reduced viral loads and alleviated lung damage when administered prophylactically and therapeutically to K18-hACE2 mice challenged with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. These data indicate that ATV006 represents a promising oral antiviral drug candidate for SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liu Cao
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Yingjun Li
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Small Molecule Drug Discovery and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
| | - Sidi Yang
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Guanguan Li
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Small Molecule Drug Discovery and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China.,Medi-X Pingshan, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518118, China
| | - Qifan Zhou
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Small Molecule Drug Discovery and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
| | - Jing Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510182, China
| | - Tiefeng Xu
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Immunity, National Clinical Research Center for infectious disease, State Key Discipline of Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Second Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518112, China
| | - Ruyan Liao
- Guangzhou Customs District Technology Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510623, China
| | - Yongxia Shi
- Guangzhou Customs District Technology Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510623, China
| | - Yujian Yang
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Small Molecule Drug Discovery and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
| | - Tiaozhen Zhu
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Small Molecule Drug Discovery and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
| | - Siyao Huang
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Yanxi Ji
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Feng Cong
- Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510663, China
| | - Yinzhu Luo
- Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510663, China
| | - Yujun Zhu
- Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals, Guangdong Laboratory Animals Monitoring Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510663, China
| | - Hemi Luan
- School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511430, China
| | - Jingdiao Chen
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511430, China
| | - Xue Liu
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Renru Luo
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Lihong Liu
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Medi-X Pingshan, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518118, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Small Molecule Drug Discovery and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
| | - Fan Xing
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Bixia Ke
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511430, China
| | - Huanying Zheng
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511430, China
| | - Xiaoling Deng
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511430, China
| | - Wenyong Zhang
- School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
| | - Chuwen Lin
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Mang Shi
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Chun-Mei Li
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Guangzhou Customs District Technology Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510623, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Immunity, National Clinical Research Center for infectious disease, State Key Discipline of Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Second Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518112, China
| | - Jun Dai
- Guangzhou Customs District Technology Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510623, China
| | - Hongzhou Lu
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Immunity, National Clinical Research Center for infectious disease, State Key Discipline of Infectious Disease, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Second Hospital Affiliated to Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518112, China
| | - Jincun Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510182, China.,Guangzhou Laboratory, Bio-island, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510320, People's Republic of China
| | - Xumu Zhang
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Small Molecule Drug Discovery and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China.,Medi-X Pingshan, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518118, China
| | - Deyin Guo
- Centre for Infection and Immunity Studies (CIIS), School of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong 518107, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ng TI, Correia I, Seagal J, DeGoey DA, Schrimpf MR, Hardee DJ, Noey EL, Kati WM. Antiviral Drug Discovery for the Treatment of COVID-19 Infections. Viruses 2022; 14:961. [PMID: 35632703 PMCID: PMC9143071 DOI: 10.3390/v14050961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a recently emerged human coronavirus. COVID-19 vaccines have proven to be successful in protecting the vaccinated from infection, reducing the severity of disease, and deterring the transmission of infection. However, COVID-19 vaccination faces many challenges, such as the decline in vaccine-induced immunity over time, and the decrease in potency against some SARS-CoV-2 variants including the recently emerged Omicron variant, resulting in breakthrough infections. The challenges that COVID-19 vaccination is facing highlight the importance of the discovery of antivirals to serve as another means to tackle the pandemic. To date, neutralizing antibodies that block viral entry by targeting the viral spike protein make up the largest class of antivirals that has received US FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 treatment. In addition to the spike protein, other key targets for the discovery of direct-acting antivirals include viral enzymes that are essential for SARS-CoV-2 replication, such as RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and proteases, as judged by US FDA approval for remdesivir, and EUA for Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir + ritonavir) for treating COVID-19 infections. This review presents an overview of the current status and future direction of antiviral drug discovery for treating SARS-CoV-2 infections, covering important antiviral targets such as the viral spike protein, non-structural protein (nsp) 3 papain-like protease, nsp5 main protease, and the nsp12/nsp7/nsp8 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa I. Ng
- Virology Drug Discovery, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL 60064, USA;
| | - Ivan Correia
- Department of Cell and Protein Sciences, Drug Discovery Science and Technology, AbbVie Inc., Worcester, MA 01605, USA;
| | - Jane Seagal
- Department of Biologics Discovery, Drug Discovery Science and Technology, AbbVie Inc., Worcester, MA 01605, USA;
| | - David A. DeGoey
- Department of Centralized Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery Science and Technology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL 60064, USA; (D.A.D.); (M.R.S.); (D.J.H.)
| | - Michael R. Schrimpf
- Department of Centralized Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery Science and Technology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL 60064, USA; (D.A.D.); (M.R.S.); (D.J.H.)
| | - David J. Hardee
- Department of Centralized Medicinal Chemistry, Drug Discovery Science and Technology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL 60064, USA; (D.A.D.); (M.R.S.); (D.J.H.)
| | - Elizabeth L. Noey
- Department of Structural Biology, Drug Discovery Science and Technology, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL 60064, USA;
| | - Warren M. Kati
- Virology Drug Discovery, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL 60064, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Drug Repurposing for COVID-19: A Review and a Novel Strategy to Identify New Targets and Potential Drug Candidates. MOLECULES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 27:molecules27092723. [PMID: 35566073 PMCID: PMC9099573 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
In December 2019, the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first identified in the province of Wuhan, China. Since then, there have been over 400 million confirmed cases and 5.8 million deaths by COVID-19 reported worldwide. The urgent need for therapies against SARS-CoV-2 led researchers to use drug repurposing approaches. This strategy allows the reduction in risks, time, and costs associated with drug development. In many cases, a repurposed drug can enter directly to preclinical testing and clinical trials, thus accelerating the whole drug discovery process. In this work, we will give a general overview of the main developments in COVID-19 treatment, focusing on the contribution of the drug repurposing paradigm to find effective drugs against this disease. Finally, we will present our findings using a new drug repurposing strategy that identified 11 compounds that may be potentially effective against COVID-19. To our knowledge, seven of these drugs have never been tested against SARS-CoV-2 and are potential candidates for in vitro and in vivo studies to evaluate their effectiveness in COVID-19 treatment.
Collapse
|
34
|
Chavda VP, Kapadia C, Soni S, Prajapati R, Chauhan SC, Yallapu MM, Apostolopoulos V. A global picture: therapeutic perspectives for COVID-19. Immunotherapy 2022; 14:351-371. [PMID: 35187954 PMCID: PMC8884157 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2021-0168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is a lethal virus outbreak by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which has severely affected human lives and the global economy. The most vital part of the research and development of therapeutic agents is to design drug products to manage COVID-19 efficiently. Numerous attempts have been in place to determine the optimal drug dose and combination of drugs to treat the disease on a global scale. This article documents the information available on SARS-CoV-2 and its life cycle, which will aid in the development of the potential treatment options. A consolidated summary of several natural and repurposed drugs to manage COVID-19 is depicted with summary of current vaccine development. People with high age, comorbity and concomitant illnesses such as overweight, metabolic disorders, pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, renal failure, fatty liver and neoplastic disorders are more prone to create serious COVID-19 and its consequences. This article also presents an overview of post-COVID-19 complications in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek P Chavda
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India
- Department of Pharmaceutics, K B Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidhyalaya, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382023, India
| | - Carron Kapadia
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India
| | - Shailvi Soni
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India
| | - Riddhi Prajapati
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India
| | - Subhash C Chauhan
- Department of Immunology & Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78503, USA
- South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78503, USA
| | - Murali M Yallapu
- Department of Immunology & Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78503, USA
- South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78503, USA
| | - Vasso Apostolopoulos
- Institute for Health & Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, 3030, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chavda VP, Kapadia C, Soni S, Prajapati R, Chauhan SC, Yallapu MM, Apostolopoulos V. A global picture: therapeutic perspectives for COVID-19. Immunotherapy 2022. [PMID: 35187954 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2021-0168.10.2217/imt-2021-0168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is a lethal virus outbreak by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which has severely affected human lives and the global economy. The most vital part of the research and development of therapeutic agents is to design drug products to manage COVID-19 efficiently. Numerous attempts have been in place to determine the optimal drug dose and combination of drugs to treat the disease on a global scale. This article documents the information available on SARS-CoV-2 and its life cycle, which will aid in the development of the potential treatment options. A consolidated summary of several natural and repurposed drugs to manage COVID-19 is depicted with summary of current vaccine development. People with high age, comorbity and concomitant illnesses such as overweight, metabolic disorders, pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, renal failure, fatty liver and neoplastic disorders are more prone to create serious COVID-19 and its consequences. This article also presents an overview of post-COVID-19 complications in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek P Chavda
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India
- Department of Pharmaceutics, K B Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidhyalaya, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 382023, India
| | - Carron Kapadia
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India
| | - Shailvi Soni
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India
| | - Riddhi Prajapati
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmaceutical Technology, L.M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380009, India
| | - Subhash C Chauhan
- Department of Immunology & Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78503, USA
- South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78503, USA
| | - Murali M Yallapu
- Department of Immunology & Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78503, USA
- South Texas Center of Excellence in Cancer Research, School of Medicine, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, McAllen, TX 78503, USA
| | - Vasso Apostolopoulos
- Institute for Health & Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, 3030, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Deng W, Yang C, Yang S, Chen H, Qiu Z, Chen J. Evaluation of favipiravir in the treatment of COVID-19 based on the real-world. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2022; 20:555-565. [PMID: 34846960 PMCID: PMC8787837 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2012155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of favipiravir (FVP) as a COVID-19 treatment is recognized but not fully elucidated. We aimed to evaluate whether FVP has definite clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of COVID-19. METHODS International and Chinese databases were searched for randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating FVP for the treatment of COVID-19. A meta-analysis was performed and published literature was synthesized to evaluate the corresponding therapeutic effects. RESULTS We included 13 studies (1430 patients in total). Meta-analysis showed that patients with mild-to-moderate disease treated with FVP had a significantly higher viral clearance rate than those in the control group 10 and 14 days after initiation of treatment [RR: 1.13 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.28), P = 0.04; I2 = 39% for day 10 and RR: 1.16 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.30), P = 0.008; I2 = 38% for day 14] and a significantly shorter hospital stay [MD: -1.52 (95% CI: -2.82, -0.23), P = 0.02; I2 = 0%]. CONCLUSIONS FVP significantly promotes viral clearance and reduces the hospitalization duration in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients, which can reduce the risk of severe disease outcomes in patients. However, more importantly, the results showed no benefit of FVP in severe patients, and caution should be taken regarding the treatment options of FVP in severe patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weishang Deng
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Changyuan Yang
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sensen Yang
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Haitao Chen
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhikun Qiu
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jisheng Chen
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
- CONTACT Jisheng Chen The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province510080, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Takahashi H, Iwasaki Y, Watanabe T, Ichinose N, Oda T. Pulmonary embolism after dexamethasone treatment for COVID-19: a case report. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:277. [PMID: 35317729 PMCID: PMC8938737 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07228-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although the RECOVERY trial showed that dexamethasone was efficacious for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), its impact on the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and other serious procoagulant events was not assessed. Case presentation Here we report the case of a previously healthy 83-year-old woman with COVID-19, without any genetic predisposition to thrombosis. She developed moderate respiratory distress 12 days after symptom onset and a 10-day course of dexamethasone therapy was initiated. Her clinical condition and imaging findings improved initially; however, they deteriorated after the completion of dexamethasone therapy, despite the improvement in her pneumonia and viral clearance. Laboratory tests showed markedly raised serum D-dimer, ferritin, and sIL-2R levels, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the left iliac vein and PE of the right pulmonary artery. The DVT and PE were successfully treated using intravenous heparin administration. Conclusions This case illustrates the potential risk of rebound inflammation and procoagulant events following dexamethasone withdrawal. We believe that COVID-19-induced DVT and PE can be affected by dexamethasone therapy. Although dexamethasone reduces procoagulant factors, increases anticoagulant factors, and modulates cytokines, which can suppress/delay thrombus formation during treatment, it confers the risk for rebound cytokine production after treatment completion, triggering cytokine and coagulation cascades that can lead to thromboembolic diseases. In this critical clinical period, the patient’s deteriorating condition may be overlooked because of the masking effects of dexamethasone treatment on fever and other clinical conditions and laboratory changes. Clinicians should follow-up coagulation markers carefully and contrast-enhanced computed tomography is useful for detecting coagulation; and, if PE occurs, therapeutic heparin administration is essential because emboli can also generate cytokines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Showa General Hospital, 8-1-1 Hanakoganei, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8510, Japan.
| | - Yoshinobu Iwasaki
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Showa General Hospital, 8-1-1 Hanakoganei, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8510, Japan
| | - Takayasu Watanabe
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Showa General Hospital, 8-1-1 Hanakoganei, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8510, Japan
| | - Naoki Ichinose
- Department of Infection Control, Showa General Hospital, Kodaira, Japan
| | - Toshimi Oda
- Department of Infection Control, Showa General Hospital, Kodaira, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hassaniazad M, Farshidi H, Gharibzadeh A, Bazram A, Khalili E, Noormandi A, Fathalipour M. Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon-beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon-beta in moderately ill patients with COVID-19: A randomized clinical trial. J Med Virol 2022; 94:3184-3191. [PMID: 35292989 PMCID: PMC9088571 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Favipiravir (FVP), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and interferon‐beta (INF‐beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID‐19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF‐beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF‐beta combinations for the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2. It was a single‐center randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF‐beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF‐beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in‐hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3). Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n = 33) and LPV/RTV (n = 33) groups. The viral clearance on Day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV groups (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in‐hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). The median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [interquartile range; IQR = 5.0–11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR = 5.5–12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p = 0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups. The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Hassaniazad
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Hossein Farshidi
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Abdollah Gharibzadeh
- Social Determinants in Health Promotion Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Ali Bazram
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Elham Khalili
- Student Research Committee, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - Afsaneh Noormandi
- Department of Inpatient Services, Iran Food and Drug Administration, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Fathalipour
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.,Endocrinology and Metabolic Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Strategies for fighting pandemic virus infections: Integration of virology and drug delivery. J Control Release 2022; 343:361-378. [PMID: 35122872 PMCID: PMC8810279 DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Respiratory viruses have sometimes resulted in worldwide pandemics, with the influenza virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) being major participants. Long-term efforts have made it possible to control the influenza virus, but seasonal influenza continues to take many lives each year, and a pandemic influenza virus sometimes emerges. Although vaccines for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been developed, we are not yet able to coexist with the SARS-CoV-2. To overcome such viruses, it is necessary to obtain knowledge about international surveillance systems, virology, ecology and to determine that immune responses are effective. The information must then be transferred to drugs. Delivery systems would be expected to contribute to the rational development of drugs. In this review, virologist and drug delivery system (DDS) researchers discuss drug delivery strategies, especially the use of lipid-based nanocarriers, for fighting to respiratory virus infections.
Collapse
|
40
|
Smyk JM, Majewska A. Favipiravir in the Battle with Respiratory Viruses. Mini Rev Med Chem 2022; 22:2224-2236. [DOI: 10.2174/1389557522666220218122744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Abstract:
Among antiviral drugs, the vast majority targets only one or two related viruses. The conventional model, one virus - one drug, significantly limits therapeutic options. Therefore, in the strategy of controlling viral infections, there is a necessity to develop compounds with pleiotropic effects. Favipiravir (FPV) emerged as a strong candidate to become such a drug. The aim of the study is to present up-to-date information on the role of favipiravir in the treatment of viral respiratory infections. The anti-influenza activity of favipiravir has been confirmed in cell culture experiments, animal models and clinical trials. Thoroughly different - from the previously registered drugs - mechanism of action suggests that FVP can be used as a countermeasure for the novel or re-emerging influenza virus infections.
In recent months, favipiravir has been broadly investigated due to its potential efficacy in the treatment of Covid-19. Based on preclinical and clinical studies and a recently published meta-analysis it seems that favipiravir may be a promising antiviral drug in the treatment of patients with Covid-19.
FPV is also effective against other RNA respiratory viruses and may be a candidate for the treatment of serious infections caused by human rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza viruses and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia M. Smyk
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Chalubinskiego 5 Str., 02-004 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Majewska
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Chalubinskiego 5 Str., 02-004 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mutair AA, Shamou J, Alhumaid S, Layqah L, Ahmad GY, Thoyaja K, Mohaini MA, Almahmoud S, Barry M, Khan A, Dhama K, Al-Jamea LH, Woodman A, Rabaan AA. Overview of Clinical Outcome and Therapeutic Effectiveness of Favipiravir in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to Intensive Care Unit, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health 2022; 15:389-394. [PMID: 35299062 PMCID: PMC8845266 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prior to the availability of the current COVID-19 vaccine, the need to control the pandemic worldwide was focused on management of the disease using previously approved antivirals, including Favipiravir which inhibits viral replication through the RNA dependent RNA polymerase enzyme. Favipiravir’s efficacy against different viral infections has made it a potential treatment for COVID-19. We are aiming in this study to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Favipiravir in treating critically ill patients admitted with COVID-19 to Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Methods This is a retrospective cohort study was conducted in five tertiary hospitals in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The studied sample was randomized from a huge pool of data collected primarily for critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to (ICUs) during the period between April 2020 to March 2021. Two groups of patients matched 1: 1 for age and body mass index (BMI) was enrolled in the study; one group received Favipiravir and another comparison group received other antimicrobial medications, not including Favipiravir. Results A total data of 538 COVID-19 patients were analyzed, 269 (50.%) received Favipiravir and 269 (50%) the control group received different treatments. More than two-thirds 201 (74.7%) were Saudi citizens, the majority 177 (65.8%) were males and the mean age and (BMI) were; (57.23 ± 15.16) years and (31.61 ± 7.33) kg/m2 respectively. The most frequent symptoms of presentation were shortness of breath (SOB), fever, and cough, and the most frequent comorbidity was diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease. In the supplemental therapy, corticosteroid, tocilizumab and chloroquine were statistically significant (P = 0.001) when combined in the FVP group more than in the comparison group. Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was more frequent among Favipiravir group, while the overall mortality rate among the Favipiravir group was not statistically significant (p-value 0.4). Conclusion According to the study’s results revealing FVP is not superior to other antivirals, patients who received Favipiravir presented with more severe symptoms, more comorbidities, more complications, and is not effective in controlling the cytokine storm which negatively impact the efficacy of Favipiravir. FVP therapy had no influence on ICU and hospital length of stay in comparison with the control group as well as in the overall mortality rate among the FVP group was not statistically significant. further research is needed to understand how FVP along with other treatments can improve the length of stay among COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU.
Collapse
|
42
|
DrugDevCovid19: An Atlas of Anti-COVID-19 Compounds Derived by Computer-Aided Drug Design. Molecules 2022; 27:molecules27030683. [PMID: 35163948 PMCID: PMC8838031 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, numerous compounds against COVID-19 have been derived by computer-aided drug design (CADD) studies. They are valuable resources for the development of COVID-19 therapeutics. In this work, we reviewed these studies and analyzed 779 compounds against 16 target proteins from 181 CADD publications. We performed unified docking simulations and neck-to-neck comparison with the solved co-crystal structures. We computed their chemical features and classified these compounds, aiming to provide insights for subsequent drug design. Through detailed analyses, we recommended a batch of compounds that are worth further study. Moreover, we organized all the abundant data and constructed a freely available database, DrugDevCovid19, to facilitate the development of COVID-19 therapeutics.
Collapse
|
43
|
Alhazzani W, Alshahrani M, Alshamsi F, Aljuhani O, Eljaaly K, Hashim S, Alqahtani R, Alsaleh D, Al Duhailib Z, Algethamy H, Al-Musawi T, Alshammari T, Alqarni A, Khoujah D, Tashkandi W, Dahhan T, Almutairi N, Alserehi HA, Al-Yahya M, Al-Judaibi B, Arabi YM, Abualenain J, Alotaibi JM, Al Bshabshe A, Alharbi R, Al-Hameed F, Elhazmi A, Almaghrabi RS, Almaghlouth F, Abedalthagafi M, Al Khathlan N, Al-Suwaidan FA, Bunyan RF, Baw B, Alghamdi G, Al Hazmi M, Mandourah Y, Assiri A, Enani M, Alawi M, Aljindan R, Aljabbary A, Alrbiaan A, Algurashi F, Alsaawi A, Alenazi TH, Alsultan MA, Alqahtani SA, Memish Z, Al-Tawfiq JA, Al-Jedai A. The Saudi Critical Care Society practice guidelines on the management of COVID-19 in the ICU: Therapy section. J Infect Public Health 2022; 15:142-151. [PMID: 34764042 PMCID: PMC8527699 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rapid increase in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases during the subsequent waves in Saudi Arabia and other countries prompted the Saudi Critical Care Society (SCCS) to put together a panel of experts to issue evidence-based recommendations for the management of COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS The SCCS COVID-19 panel included 51 experts with expertise in critical care, respirology, infectious disease, epidemiology, emergency medicine, clinical pharmacy, nursing, respiratory therapy, methodology, and health policy. All members completed an electronic conflict of interest disclosure form. The panel addressed 9 questions that are related to the therapy of COVID-19 in the ICU. We identified relevant systematic reviews and clinical trials, then used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach as well as the evidence-to-decision framework (EtD) to assess the quality of evidence and generate recommendations. RESULTS The SCCS COVID-19 panel issued 12 recommendations on pharmacotherapeutic interventions (immunomodulators, antiviral agents, and anticoagulants) for severe and critical COVID-19, of which 3 were strong recommendations and 9 were weak recommendations. CONCLUSION The SCCS COVID-19 panel used the GRADE approach to formulate recommendations on therapy for COVID-19 in the ICU. The EtD framework allows adaptation of these recommendations in different contexts. The SCCS guideline committee will update recommendations as new evidence becomes available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Canada; GUIDE Center, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada.
| | - Mohammed Alshahrani
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fayez Alshamsi
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ohoud Aljuhani
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Eljaaly
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Samaher Hashim
- Department of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rakan Alqahtani
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Doaa Alsaleh
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn's School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NYC, USA; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, NGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zainab Al Duhailib
- Critical Care Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Haifa Algethamy
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tariq Al-Musawi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Dr Sulaiman AlHabib Hospital, AlKhobar, Saudi Arabia; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland- Medical University of Bahrain, Bahrain
| | - Thamir Alshammari
- Medication Safety Research Chair, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Pharmacy, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Alqarni
- Department of Emergencies, Disasters, and Medical Transportation, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Danya Khoujah
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wail Tashkandi
- Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Critical Care, Fakeeh Care Group, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Talal Dahhan
- Critical Care Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Najla Almutairi
- Department of Emergencies, Disasters, and Medical Transportation, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Maytha Al-Yahya
- Department of Emergency Medicine, King AbdulAziz Medical City (KAMC), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Yaseen M Arabi
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jameel Abualenain
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jawaher M Alotaibi
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Al Bshabshe
- Department of Medicine/Adult Critical Care, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reham Alharbi
- Critical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahad Al-Hameed
- Department of Intensive Care, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alyaa Elhazmi
- Dr. Sulaiman Al-Habib Medical Group, Critical Care Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reem S Almaghrabi
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fatma Almaghlouth
- Respiratory Care Department, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Malak Abedalthagafi
- Genomics Research Department, Saudi Human Genome Project, King Fahad Medical City and King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Noor Al Khathlan
- Respiratory Care Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal A Al-Suwaidan
- Clinical Excellence Administration and King Fahad Medical City, Second Health Cluster in Riyadh, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reem F Bunyan
- Center for Improving Value in Health, Saudi Arabia; Department of Neurology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bandar Baw
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, King AbdulAziz Medical City (KAMC), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghassan Alghamdi
- Department of Medicine and Intensive Care, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Manal Al Hazmi
- Department of Medicine, King Fahad Specialist-Dammam, E1 Cluster, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yasser Mandourah
- General Directorate of Military Medical Services, Ministry of Defense, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Assiri
- Infection Prevention and Control, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mushira Enani
- Section of Infectious Diseases Medical Specialties Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maha Alawi
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Parasitology, Infection Control and Environmental Health Unit, King Abdulaziz Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reem Aljindan
- Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Aljabbary
- Department of Intensive Care, Security Forces Hospital Program in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah Alrbiaan
- Critical Care Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahd Algurashi
- Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulmohsen Alsaawi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, King AbdulAziz Medical City (KAMC), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Thamer H Alenazi
- King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Saleh A Alqahtani
- Liver Transplant Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Ziad Memish
- Research and Innovation Center, King Saud Medical City, Ministry of Health, & College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jaffar A Al-Tawfiq
- Infectious Disease Division, Indiana University School of Medicine, IN, USA; Infectious Disease Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Quality Department, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Al-Jedai
- Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Therapeutic Affairs, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nasseri Atashani F, Nasseri E, Zeinali E, Zamani R, Salahshouri A, Ghourchibeigi M, Heidari P, Koushan A, Naseri Atashani N, Heidari B. Clinical, demographic, and laboratory characteristics of COVID -19 infection and risk of in-hospital mortality. A single center 4. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 2022; 13:221-227. [PMID: 35872689 PMCID: PMC9272956 DOI: 10.22088/cjim.13.0.211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: Frequent waves of corona virus disease (COVID-19) and lack of specific drugs against that, warrant studies to reduce the morbidity and mortality of this pandemic disease. In this study, we investigated the association between influenza vaccination and the severity and outcome of COVID-19 disease in Iranian patients living in the North. Methods: This retrospective case-control study was performed on186 patients with COVID-19 infection between March and April, 2020. Patients with positive PCR were divided into two groups of case and control; Patients with moderate to severe and normal to mild lung involvement, respectively. The lung opacities in all of the 5 lobes were evaluated on chest CT images using a CT severity scoring system. The history of influenza vaccination during the fall of 2019-2020 was determined by a phone call. Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test, student’s t-test, and logistic regression. The significance level was p<0.05. Results: The mean age of patients was 54.67±15.05years. Most patients had pulmonary manifestations including ground-glass opacity (57%), consolidation (80%) and pleural effusion (3.2%). Adjusting for age, gender, and history of underlying disease, vaccination is an effective factor in the severity of pulmonary involvement (AOR=0.39; 95%CI: (0.21, 0.73); P=0.003). Furthermore, the chance of ICU admission decreased via influenza vaccination (OR=0.21, P=0.001). Conclusion: The results showed that the severity of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement and outcome as ICU admission, and severe symptoms in patients with history of influenza vaccination were significantly lower than those without history of vaccination. This strategy can be used to prevent and reduce the complications of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elham Nasseri
- Emergency Clinic, Shahriyar Hospital, Shahriyar, Karaj, Iran
| | - Esmaeil Zeinali
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shahriyar Hospital, Karaj, Iran
| | - Roya Zamani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shahriyar Hospital, Karaj, Iran
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Behzad Heidari
- Mobility Impairment Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Turan DB, Menteş M, Özel Y, Şerefhanoğlu K, Aydoğan B, İbil N, Güneşdoğdu F, Orucova HM, Saltürk C, Çelik H. The effect of favipiravir versus hydroxychloroquine on clinical and laboratory findings in COVID-19 in healthcare workers. Braz J Infect Dis 2022; 26:102328. [PMID: 35139366 PMCID: PMC8806128 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2022.102328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
46
|
ÖMEROĞLU ŞK, TEMEL F, ALTUN D, ÖZTOP B. Effects of hydroxychloroquine and favipiravir on clinical course in outpatients with COVID-19. Turk J Med Sci 2021; 51:2827-2834. [PMID: 34165273 PMCID: PMC10734880 DOI: 10.3906/sag-2101-146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/aim Due to the importance of early outpatient treatment to prevent hospitalization and disease progression, we examined the effects of hydroxychloroquine and favipiravir, which were initiated in early period, on the clinical course of COVID-19 outpatients. Materials and methods Data of confirmed COVID-19 outpatients over a 4-month period were analyzed retrospectively. Public Health Management System (HSYS) was used for the case-based follow-up. Patients on antiviral therapy for at least five days, including hydroxychloroquine and / or favipiravir and patients who were followed-up for 30 days were included in this analysis. Results We enrolled 1489 patients in this study. Overall, 775 (52%) patients were male and a mean age of patients was 38.9 ± 11.1 years. Of these patients, 537 of them were received favipiravir, 545 of them were received hydroxychloroquine and 407 of them were received both favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine. Symptoms improvement on the 14th day of follow-up was 1.8 times higher in the group of patients receiving hydroxychloroquine compared to patients who received favipiravir (p = 0.003). On the 3rd day of follow- up, PCR negativity rate was higher in patients who received hydroxychloroquine (p = 0.004). Hospitalization rates were similar in patients receiving favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine (p = 0.144). However, in the presence of pneumonia at the time of diagnosis, the hospitalization rate was 6.6 times higher in patients who received favipiravir than those who received hydroxychloroquine. Conclusion The subgroups of patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and/or favipiravir did not have similar disease severities in our study. Therefore, further studies with homogeneous patient groups to be arranged prospectively are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dilek ALTUN
- Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Health, Ankara,
Turkey
| | - Burak ÖZTOP
- İzmir Provincial Health Directorate, İzmir,
Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gök S, Bahçecioğlu ÖF, Durmuş M, Gün ZÜ, Ersoy Y, Aytemur ZA, Ulutaş Ö. The safety profile of favipiravir in COVID-19 patients with severe renal impairment. Int J Clin Pract 2021; 75:e14938. [PMID: 34605126 PMCID: PMC8646880 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The safety profile of favipiravir in patients with severe renal impairment has not been investigated and available data are insufficient. The study aimed to compare the incidence of favipiravir-associated adverse events amongst patients with varying renal function statuses. METHODS Records of 921 patients who were hospitalised for COVID-19 and had received at least 5 days of favipiravir treatment were retrospectively evaluated and 228 patients were included in the study. Patients' age, sex, comorbidities, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and haematological and biochemical values were recorded. The incidence of adverse events was compared with the age, sex, comorbidities and eGFR of the patients. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 59.3 ± 15.6 years, and 38.2% of the patients were women. One hundred and thirty-one (57.5%) patients had experienced adverse events. These adverse effects consisted of ALT elevation (35.5%), AST elevation (21.5%), anaemia (16.2%), hyperuricaemia (10.5%), hepatocellular injury (9.2%), neutropenia (3.5%) and thrombocytopenia (2.6%). The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different when patients had eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P > .05), but significantly increased when the eGFR dropped to <30 (P < .05). The differences seen with hyperuricaemia and anaemia were significant (P < .05). CONCLUSION Even though favipiravir appeared to be well tolerated in the individuals with renal failure in this study, its use in this population remains a challenge that requires more research and analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selim Gök
- Department of Clinical Pharmacyİnönü University Faculty of PharmacyMalatyaTurkey
| | | | - Mefküre Durmuş
- Department of Clinical Pharmacyİnönü University Faculty of PharmacyMalatyaTurkey
| | - Zeynep Ülkü Gün
- Department of Clinical Pharmacyİnönü University Faculty of PharmacyMalatyaTurkey
| | - Yasemin Ersoy
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiologyİnönü University Faculty of MedicineMalatyaTurkey
| | | | - Özkan Ulutaş
- Department of Nephrologyİnönü University Faculty of MedicineMalatyaTurkey
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jonny, Violetta L, Kartasasmita AS, Amirullah Roesli RM, Rita C. Pharmacological Treatment Options for Coronavirus Disease-19 in Renal Patients. Int J Nephrol 2021; 2021:4078713. [PMID: 34858665 PMCID: PMC8632427 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4078713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including dialysis and transplant patients, are at greater risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 due to kidney dysfunction and preexisting comorbidities. To date, a specific guideline on managing these high-risk patients infected with COVID-19 has not been established. As the current management of COVID-19 comprises mainly experimental drugs, the authors aim to provide information on dosing adjustments at different stages of kidney dysfunction and notable renal side effects. We performed a nonsystematical review of currently available COVID-19 drugs exploring several different clinical trial databases and search browsers. Several antivirals and monoclonal antibodies used in COVID-19 treatment require dosage adjustments in kidney dysfunction. In a global pandemic setting, nephrologists need to consider the appropriate dosage according to the renal function and closely monitor the side effects of different drug combinations to obtain the optimum therapeutic effect while avoiding further renal damage. Further studies are required to determine the safety and efficacy of these drugs in renal patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonny
- Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Gatot Soebroto Indonesia Army Central Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Laurencia Violetta
- Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Gatot Soebroto Indonesia Army Central Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | | | | - Coriejati Rita
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chuah CH, Chow TS, Hor CP, Cheng JT, Ker HB, Lee HG, Lee KS, Nordin N, Ng TK, Zaid M, Zaidan NZ, Abdul Wahab S, Adnan NA, Nordin N, Tee TY, Ong SM, Chidambaram SK, Mustafa M. Efficacy of Early Treatment with Favipiravir on Disease Progression among High Risk COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 75:e432-e439. [PMID: 34849615 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Role of favipiravir in preventing disease progression in COVID-19 remains uncertain. We aimed to determine its effect in preventing disease progression from non-hypoxia to hypoxia among high risk COVID-19 patients. STUDY DESIGN This was an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 14 public hospitals across Malaysia from February to June 2021 among 500 symptomatic, RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients, aged ≥50 years with ≥1 co-morbidity, and hospitalized within first 7 days of illness. Patients were randomized on 1:1 ratio to favipiravir plus standard care or standard care alone. Favipiravir was administered at 1800mg twice-daily on day 1 followed by 800mg twice-daily until day 5. The primary endpoint was rate of clinical progression from non-hypoxia to hypoxia. Secondary outcomes included rates of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Among 500 patients were randomized (mean age, 62.5 [SD 8.0] years; 258 women [51.6%]; and 251 [50.2%] had COVID-19 pneumonia), 487 (97.4%) patients completed the trial. Clinical progression to hypoxia occurred in 46 (18.4%) patients on favipiravir plus standard care and 37 (14.8%) on standard care alone (OR 1.30; 95%CI, 0.81-2.09; P=.28). All three pre-specified secondary end points were similar between both groups. Mechanical ventilation occurred in 6 (2.4%) vs 5 (2.0%) (OR 1.20; 95%CI, 0.36-4.23; P=.76), ICU admission in 13 (5.2%) vs 12 (4.8%) (OR 1.09; 95%CI, 0.48-2.47; P=.84), and in-hospital mortality in 5 (2.0%) vs 0 (OR 12.54; 95%CI, 0.76- 207.84; P=.08). CONCLUSIONS Among COVID-19 patients at high risk of disease progression, early treatment with oral favipiravir did not prevent their disease progression from non-hypoxia to hypoxia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan Huan Chuah
- Department of Medicine, Penang General Hospital, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Ting Soo Chow
- Department of Medicine, Penang General Hospital, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Chee Peng Hor
- Department of Medicine, Kepala Batas Hospital, Penang, Malaysia.,Clinical Research Centre, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Joo Thye Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Hong Bee Ker
- Department of Medicine, Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital, Perak, Malaysia
| | - Heng Gee Lee
- Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Kok Soon Lee
- Department of Medicine, Enche' Besar Hajjah Khalsom Hospital, Johor, Malaysia
| | - Noridah Nordin
- Department of Medicine, Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Tiang Koi Ng
- Department of Medicine, Tuanku Ja'afar Hospital, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Masliza Zaid
- Department of Medicine, Sultanah Aminah Hospital, Johor, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Nurul Ashikin Adnan
- Department of Medicine, Sultanah Nur Zahirah Hospital, Terrengganu, Malaysia
| | - Noorlina Nordin
- Department of Medicine, Tengku Ampuan Afzan Hospital, Pahang, Malaysia
| | - Tze Yuan Tee
- Department of Medicine, Tawau Hospital, Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Su Miin Ong
- Institute for Clinical Research, National Institute of Health, Malaysia
| | | | - Mahiran Mustafa
- Department of Medicine, Raja Perempuan Zainab II Hospital, Kelantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Morikawa G, Kubota K, Kondo D, Takanashi Y, Minami S, Kinjo T, Moriiwa Y, Yanagida A, Okazawa K, Chiaki T. Elevated blood favipiravir levels are inversely associated with ferritin levels and induce the elevation of uric acid levels in COVID-19 treatment: A retrospective single-center study. J Infect Chemother 2021; 28:73-77. [PMID: 34711508 PMCID: PMC8523481 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Measurement of blood Favipiravir (FPV) levels and accumulation of data in COVID-19 patients are critical for assessing FPV efficacy and safety. We performed a retrospective study based on measurements of blood levels of FPV and related factors in COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital. Furthermore, we also investigated the association between blood FPV levels and uric acid level alterations before and after FPV administration. Methods We enrolled 27 COVID-19 patients who had received FPV treatment at Hokushin General Hospital from April 1 to December 31, 2020. Age, gender, COVID-19 severity, presence of comorbidities, and laboratory data for each subject were investigated to identify factors that correlate with blood FPV levels. Uric acid levels were measured before and after FPV administration and a difference between the levels (i.e., a change of uric acid level) was evaluated. Results When a significant univariate variable was input by the stepwise method and a combination of variables that maintained statistical superiority was searched, serum ferritin was the only factor that independently affected blood FPV level. Furthermore, in the high-FPV group (20 μg/mL or more), a significant increase in uric acid levels was observed after FPV administration. The increment value was significantly larger than that in the low-FPV group (less than 20 μg/mL). Conclusions Ferritin level was an important independent factor inversely affecting blood FPV level. Furthermore, a high blood FPV level induced the elevation of uric acid levels in COVID-19 treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Go Morikawa
- Department of Pharmacy, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63, Nishi, Nakano, Nagano, 383-8505, Japan.
| | - Ken Kubota
- Department of Pharmacy, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63, Nishi, Nakano, Nagano, 383-8505, Japan
| | - Daichi Kondo
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63, Nishi, Nakano, Nagano, 383-8505, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Takanashi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63, Nishi, Nakano, Nagano, 383-8505, Japan
| | - Satoshi Minami
- Department of Nephrology, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63, Nishi, Nakano, Nagano, 383-8505, Japan
| | - Tsunemichi Kinjo
- Department of Arrhythmia, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63, Nishi, Nakano, Nagano, 383-8505, Japan
| | - Yukiko Moriiwa
- Department of Biomedical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan
| | - Akio Yanagida
- Department of Biomedical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo, 192-0392, Japan
| | - Katsuko Okazawa
- Department of Pharmacy, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63, Nishi, Nakano, Nagano, 383-8505, Japan
| | - Tomoshige Chiaki
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hokushin General Hospital, 1-5-63, Nishi, Nakano, Nagano, 383-8505, Japan
| |
Collapse
|