1
|
McGill K, Whyte IM, Sawyer L, Adams D, Delamothe K, Lewin TJ, Robinson J, Kay-Lambkin FJ, Carter GL. Effectiveness of the Hunter Way Back Support Service: An historical controlled trial of a brief non-clinical after-care program for hospital-treated deliberate self-poisoning. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2022; 52:500-514. [PMID: 35122297 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Active contact and follow-up interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing repetition of hospital-treated self-harm. The Way Back Support Service (WBSS) is a new service funded by the Australian government to provide three months of non-clinical after-care following a hospital-treated suicide attempt. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of WBSS in reducing deliberate self-poisoning (DSP) and psychiatric hospital admissions over a 12-month follow-up period for a population of DSP patients within the Hunter (Australia) region. METHODS A non-randomized, historical controlled (two periods) trial design with intention-to-treat analyses. Outcome data were drawn from hospital records. RESULTS There were a total of 2770 participants across study periods. There were no significant differences between cohorts for proportion with any, or number of, re-admissions for DSP in the follow-up period. For psychiatric admissions, the intervention cohort had a non-significantly greater proportion with any psychiatric admission and significantly more admissions compared to one of the control cohorts. CONCLUSION The WBSS model of care should be modified to strengthen treatment engagement and retention and to include established, clinical, evidence-based treatments shown to reduce DSP repetition. Any modified WBSS model should be subject to further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie McGill
- MH-READ, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian M Whyte
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa Sawyer
- Hunter Primary Care, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Danielle Adams
- Hunter Primary Care, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Terry J Lewin
- MH-READ, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jo Robinson
- Orygen, Parkvillle, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkvillle, Victoria, Australia
| | - Frances J Kay-Lambkin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gregory L Carter
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quinlivan L, Gorman L, Littlewood DL, Monaghan E, Barlow SJ, Campbell S, Webb RT, Kapur N. ‘Wasn’t offered one, too poorly to ask for one’ – Reasons why
some patients do not receive a psychosocial assessment following
self-harm: Qualitative patient and carer survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2022; 56:398-407. [PMID: 34015945 PMCID: PMC8941717 DOI: 10.1177/00048674211011262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychosocial assessment following self-harm presentations to hospital is an important aspect of care. However, many people attending hospital following self-harm do not receive an assessment. We sought to explore reasons why some patients do not receive a psychosocial assessment following self-harm from the perspective of patients and carers. METHODS Between March and November 2019, we recruited 88 patients and 14 carers aged ⩾18 years from 16 mental health trusts and community organisations in the United Kingdom, via social media, to a co-designed qualitative survey. Thematic analyses were used to interpret the data. RESULTS Patients' reasons for refusing an assessment included long waiting times, previous problematic interactions with staff and feeling unsafe when in the emergency department. Two people refused an assessment because they wanted to harm themselves again. Participants reported organisational reasons for non-assessment, including clinicians not offering assessments and exclusion due to alcohol intoxication. Other patients felt they did not reach clinically determined thresholds because of misconceptions over perceived heightened fatality risk with certain self-harm methods (e.g. self-poisoning vs self-cutting). CONCLUSION Our results provide important insights into some of the reasons why some people may not receive a psychosocial assessment following self-harm. Parallel assessments, compassionate care and specialist alcohol services in acute hospitals may help reduce the number of people who leave before an assessment. Education may help address erroneous beliefs that self-injury and self-harm repetition are not associated with greatly raised suicide risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Quinlivan
- Division of Psychology and Mental
Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester,
Manchester, UK,Manchester Academic Health
Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient
Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester,
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK,Leah Quinlivan, Centre for Mental
Health and Safety, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane
Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Louise Gorman
- Division of Psychology and Mental
Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester,
Manchester, UK,Manchester Academic Health
Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient
Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester,
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Donna L Littlewood
- Division of Psychology and Mental
Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester,
Manchester, UK,Manchester Academic Health
Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient
Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester,
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Elizabeth Monaghan
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient
Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester,
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen J Barlow
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient
Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester,
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen Campbell
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient
Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester,
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Roger T Webb
- Division of Psychology and Mental
Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester,
Manchester, UK,Manchester Academic Health
Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient
Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester,
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Nav Kapur
- Division of Psychology and Mental
Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester,
Manchester, UK,Manchester Academic Health
Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,NIHR Greater Manchester Patient
Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester,
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK,Greater Manchester Mental Health
NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruane-McAteer E, Corcoran P, Browne J, Hursztyn P, Griffin E. Study designs and outcomes used in evaluation studies of hospital-presenting self-harm: protocol for a methodological systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044993. [PMID: 34362798 PMCID: PMC8351496 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Self-harm is the most common risk factor for suicide, and so those who present to hospital following self-harm provide an opportunity for targeted clinical care interventions. Observational studies evaluating such interventions may be useful in overcoming limitations of controlled trials, but study design, statistical analyses and outcomes used must be appropriate. This methodological systematic review will describe, categorise, synthesise and compare the methodological aspects of studies evaluating interventions and aspects of clinical management following hospital-presenting self-harm in both observational and experimental (ie, controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies) study designs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Protocol guidelines were followed in drafting this protocol. Search terms were developed (related to self-harm, hospital presentation and evaluation studies) and adapted for MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and grey literature databases. Two reviewers will independently screen 100 titles/abstracts until consensus is reached, with the remaining screened by one reviewer. Full-text screening will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted by one reviewer, and a second will check all data extracted. Validated risk of bias tools will be used. Data synthesis will focus on the heterogeneity of outcomes used in individual studies. Descriptive summary statistics of the data (eg, key study characteristics, type and frequency of outcomes) will be provided in categorical format, using frequencies and percentages. Outcomes will be reported separately for trials (both randomised and non-randomised trials), observational and quasi-experimental studies. Categorisation of outcomes will be guided by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care resources for reviews of health systems interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Findings will be used to inform future studies in the area of hospital-presenting self-harm. Ethical approval is not required for this review. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020208714.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Ruane-McAteer
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - John Browne
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Pawel Hursztyn
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, Ireland
| | - Eve Griffin
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quinlivan LM, Gorman L, Littlewood DL, Monaghan E, Barlow SJ, Campbell SM, Webb RT, Kapur N. 'Relieved to be seen'-patient and carer experiences of psychosocial assessment in the emergency department following self-harm: qualitative analysis of 102 free-text survey responses. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044434. [PMID: 34024759 PMCID: PMC8149433 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to explore patient and carer experiences of psychosocial assessments following presentations to hospital after self-harm. DESIGN Thematic analysis of free-text responses to an open-ended online survey. SETTING Between March and November 2019, we recruited 88 patients (82% women) and 14 carers aged ≥18 years from 16 English mental health trusts, community organisations, and via social media. RESULTS Psychosocial assessments were experienced as helpful on some occasions but harmful on others. Participants felt better, less suicidal and less likely to repeat self-harm after good-quality compassionate and supportive assessments. However, negative experiences during the assessment pathway were common and, in some cases, contributed to greater distress, less engagement and further self-harm. Participants reported receiving negative and stigmatising comments about their injuries. Others reported that they were refused medical care or an anaesthetic. Stigmatising attitudes among some mental health staff centred on preconceived ideas over self-harm as a 'behavioural issue', inappropriate use of services and psychiatric diagnosis. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight important patient experiences that can inform service provision and they demonstrate the value of involving patients/carers throughout the research process. Psychosocial assessments can be beneficial when empathetic and collaborative but less helpful when overly standardised, lacking in compassion and waiting times are unduly long. Patient views are essential to inform practice, particularly given the rapidly changing service context during and after the COVID-19 emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah M Quinlivan
- Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise Gorman
- Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Donna L Littlewood
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Elizabeth Monaghan
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Steven J Barlow
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen M Campbell
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Roger T Webb
- Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Navneet Kapur
- Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 4:CD013668. [PMID: 33884617 PMCID: PMC8094743 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013668.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm (SH; intentional self-poisoning or self-injury regardless of degree of suicidal intent or other types of motivation) is a growing problem in most counties, often repeated, and associated with suicide. There has been a substantial increase in both the number of trials and therapeutic approaches of psychosocial interventions for SH in adults. This review therefore updates a previous Cochrane Review (last published in 2016) on the role of psychosocial interventions in the treatment of SH in adults. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of psychosocial interventions for self-harm (SH) compared to comparison types of care (e.g. treatment-as-usual, routine psychiatric care, enhanced usual care, active comparator) for adults (aged 18 years or older) who engage in SH. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialised Register, the Cochrane Library (Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL] and Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews [CDSR]), together with MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PsycINFO (to 4 July 2020). SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interventions of specific psychosocial treatments versus treatment-as-usual (TAU), routine psychiatric care, enhanced usual care (EUC), active comparator, or a combination of these, in the treatment of adults with a recent (within six months of trial entry) episode of SH resulting in presentation to hospital or clinical services. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a repeated episode of SH over a maximum follow-up period of two years. Secondary outcomes included treatment adherence, depression, hopelessness, general functioning, social functioning, suicidal ideation, and suicide. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently selected trials, extracted data, and appraised trial quality. For binary outcomes, we calculated odds ratio (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, we calculated mean differences (MDs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95% CIs. The overall quality of evidence for the primary outcome (i.e. repetition of SH at post-intervention) was appraised for each intervention using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included data from 76 trials with a total of 21,414 participants. Participants in these trials were predominately female (61.9%) with a mean age of 31.8 years (standard deviation [SD] 11.7 years). On the basis of data from four trials, individual cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based psychotherapy may reduce repetition of SH as compared to TAU or another comparator by the end of the intervention (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.02; N = 238; k = 4; GRADE: low certainty evidence), although there was imprecision in the effect estimate. At longer follow-up time points (e.g., 6- and 12-months) there was some evidence that individual CBT-based psychotherapy may reduce SH repetition. Whilst there may be a slightly lower rate of SH repetition for dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) (66.0%) as compared to TAU or alternative psychotherapy (68.2%), the evidence remains uncertain as to whether DBT reduces absolute repetition of SH by the post-intervention assessment. On the basis of data from a single trial, mentalisation-based therapy (MBT) reduces repetition of SH and frequency of SH by the post-intervention assessment (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.73; N = 134; k = 1; GRADE: high-certainty evidence). A group-based emotion-regulation psychotherapy may also reduce repetition of SH by the post-intervention assessment based on evidence from two trials by the same author group (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.88; N = 83; k = 2; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little to no effect for different variants of DBT on absolute repetition of SH, including DBT group-based skills training, DBT individual skills training, or an experimental form of DBT in which participants were given significantly longer cognitive exposure to stressful events. The evidence remains uncertain as to whether provision of information and support, based on the Suicide Trends in At-Risk Territories (START) and the SUicide-PREvention Multisite Intervention Study on Suicidal behaviors (SUPRE-MISS) models, have any effect on repetition of SH by the post-intervention assessment. There was no evidence of a difference for psychodynamic psychotherapy, case management, general practitioner (GP) management, remote contact interventions, and other multimodal interventions, or a variety of brief emergency department-based interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, there were significant methodological limitations across the trials included in this review. Given the moderate or very low quality of the available evidence, there is only uncertain evidence regarding a number of psychosocial interventions for adults who engage in SH. Psychosocial therapy based on CBT approaches may result in fewer individuals repeating SH at longer follow-up time points, although no such effect was found at the post-intervention assessment and the quality of evidence, according to the GRADE criteria, was low. Given findings in single trials, or trials by the same author group, both MBT and group-based emotion regulation therapy should be further developed and evaluated in adults. DBT may also lead to a reduction in frequency of SH. Other interventions were mostly evaluated in single trials of moderate to very low quality such that the evidence relating to the use of these interventions is inconclusive at present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina G Witt
- Orygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah E Hetrick
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gowri Rajaram
- Orygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip Hazell
- Speciality of Psychiatry, University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury
- Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ellen Townsend
- Self-Harm Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Keith Hawton
- Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
da Silva APC, Henriques MR, Rothes IA, Zortea T, Santos JC, Cuijpers P. Effects of psychosocial interventions among people cared for in emergency departments after a suicide attempt: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev 2021; 10:68. [PMID: 33766137 PMCID: PMC7992994 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01609-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The care of the emergency department (ED) for a person after a suicide attempt can act as a protector against future suicidal behavior. For this reason, it is essential that the ED ensure an assistance that involves effective interventions in preventing suicidal behaviors. Among suicidal behaviors, it is known that suicide attempt is one of the most lethal risk factors for consummated suicide. In addition, the risk for further attempts is greater in the period from the immediate post-discharge up to 12 months after the last attempt. This makes the ED a key link in the suicide prevention chain. The purpose of this review is to investigate the effects of psychosocial interventions on suicide prevention, when applied in the ED after a suicide attempt. METHODS This systematic review protocol was built and registered with the collaboration of a multidisciplinary scientific team. The review will include randomized clinical studies, quasi-experimental trials, and comparative observational studies, all conducted with people (11 years old or more) who have received a psychosocial suicide prevention intervention initiated in the ED after a suicide attempt. The research will be conducted across databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and DARE. The repetition of a suicide attempt and death by suicide as primary outcomes will be analyzed. The eligibility of the studies and data extraction will be carried out by matched and blind researchers. The risk of bias will be addressed using appropriate instruments. The analyses and synthesis of the results will be both qualitative and quantitative. DISCUSSION From a public health point of view, suicide is in itself a public health problem and requires appropriate interventions at different levels of care in order to be prevented. Taking into account that a high percentage of people who died by suicide sought the ED for suicide attempt in the year before their death, the ED is a clinical context with a privileged potential to implement these interventions. Presently, several clinical studies seek to validate interventions to be adopted regarding the prevention of suicidal behavior. Current evidence indicates that different interventions must be strategically combined to reduce suicide attempts and their mortality. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42019131040.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paula Coutinho da Silva
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal FPCEUP/Center for Psychology at University of Porto CPUP, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Clinical Nursing, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, João Pessoa/PB, CEP: 58051-900 Brazil
| | - Margarida Rangel Henriques
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal FPCEUP/Center for Psychology at University of Porto CPUP, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês Areal Rothes
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Portugal FPCEUP/Center for Psychology at University of Porto CPUP, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-392 Porto, Portugal
| | - Tiago Zortea
- Suicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Academic Centre, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow, Scotland G12 0XH UK
| | - José Carlos Santos
- Nursing School of Coimbra, Avenida Bissaya Barreto s/n, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The risk of suicide is significant during the transition of care; the highest in the first few weeks after discharge from a healthcare facility. This systematic review summarizes the evidence for interventions providing care during this high-risk period. In January 2019, PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched using the search terms: Suicide AND (Hospital OR Emergency department) AND Discharge. Articles relevant to interventions targeting suicidal behaviors during the transition of care were selected after the title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening. This review article included 40 articles; with a total patient population of 24,568. The interventions included telephone contacts, letters, green cards, postcards, structured visits, and community outreach programs. An improvement in the engagement of patients in outpatient services was observed but the evidence for suicidal behaviors was conflicting. The reviewed interventions were efficacious in linking patients to outpatient services, reducing feelings of social isolation and helping patients in navigating the available community resources. For patients with repetitive suicidal behaviors, psychosocial interventions such as dialectical behavioral therapy can be helpful. Patients should be followed by targeted interventions based on risk categorization of the patients by using evidence-based tools.
Collapse
|
8
|
Witt K, Townsend E, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury T, Van Heeringen K, Hawton K. Psychosocial Interventions for People Who Self-Harm: Methodological Issues Involved in Trials to Evaluate Effectiveness. Arch Suicide Res 2020; 24:S32-S93. [PMID: 30955501 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2019.1592043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
We have assessed the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to prevent self-harm repetition and suicide. Trials were identified in two systematic reviews of RCTs of psychosocial treatments following a recent (within six months) episode of self-harm indexed in any of five electronic databases (CCDANCTR-Studies and References, CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO) between 1 January, 1998 and 29 April, 2015. A total of 66 trials were included, 55 in adults and 11 in children and adolescents. While evidence for efficacy of some approaches has grown, there were few trials from low-to-middle income countries, little information on interventions for males, information on the control condition was often limited, data on suicides were often not reported, and, while trials have increased in size in recent years, most have included too few participants to detect clinically significant results. There are major limitations in many trials of interventions for individuals who self-harm. Improved methodology, especially with regard to study size, provision of details of control therapy, and evaluation of key outcomes, would enhance the evidence base for clinicians and service users.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Although recent years have seen large decreases in the overall global rate of suicide fatalities, this trend is not reflected everywhere. Suicide and suicidal behaviour continue to present key challenges for public policy and health services, with increasing suicide deaths in some countries such as the USA. The development of suicide risk is complex, involving contributions from biological (including genetics), psychological (such as certain personality traits), clinical (such as comorbid psychiatric illness), social and environmental factors. The involvement of multiple risk factors in conveying risk of suicide means that determining an individual's risk of suicide is challenging. Improving risk assessment, for example, by using computer testing and genetic screening, is an area of ongoing research. Prevention is key to reduce the number of suicide deaths and prevention efforts include universal, selective and indicated interventions, although these interventions are often delivered in combination. These interventions, combined with psychological (such as cognitive behavioural therapy, caring contacts and safety planning) and pharmacological treatments (for example, clozapine and ketamine) along with coordinated social and public health initiatives, should continue to improve the management of individuals who are suicidal and decrease suicide-associated morbidity.
Collapse
|
10
|
Reger MA, Gebhardt HM, Lee JM, Ammerman BA, Tucker RP, Matarazzo BB, Wood AE, Ruskin DA. Veteran Preferences for the Caring Contacts Suicide Prevention Intervention. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2019; 49:1439-1451. [PMID: 30451311 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Caring Contacts intervention has been implemented with a variety of methodologies. The purpose of this study was to examine high-risk inpatient preferences for the Caring Contacts intervention. METHOD Veteran psychiatric inpatients (N = 154) completed an anonymous patient preferences survey to obtain feedback on Caring Contact methods such as message wording, preferred correspondent, frequency of contact, duration of the intervention, imagery, and mailing modality. RESULTS Eighty-five percent of veterans Agreed or Strongly Agreed that they would like to receive Caring Contacts from at least one of the correspondent options, with inpatient or outpatient mental health counselor, or primary care physician most preferred. Example messages based on prior studies were overwhelmingly rated as caring and helpful; 84% believed that Caring Contacts could help suicidal individuals. Letters or postcards sent through postal mail were preferred over e-mail or text messages. Participants most commonly thought Caring Contacts should be sent monthly for a period of a year. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that most high-risk veterans would perceive Caring Contacts as helpful and caring. The results provide several practical, helpful tips for programs seeking to establish a Caring Contacts program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Reger
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Jacob M Lee
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Raymond P Tucker
- Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Bridget B Matarazzo
- Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) for Suicide Prevention, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Amanda E Wood
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David A Ruskin
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martínez-Alés G, Keyes KM. Fatal and Non-fatal Self-Injury in the USA: Critical Review of Current Trends and Innovations in Prevention. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019; 21:104. [PMID: 31522256 PMCID: PMC7027360 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-019-1080-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To examine current trends in suicide and self-injury in the USA, as well as potential contributors to their change over time, and to reflect on innovations in prevention and intervention that can guide policies and programs to reduce the burden of suicide and self-injury in the USA. RECENT FINDINGS Suicide and non-fatal self-injury are on the rise in the USA. Reasons for such trends over time remain speculative, although they seem linked to coincident increases in mood disorders and drug use and overdose. Promising innovative prevention and intervention programs that engage new technologies, such as machine learning-derived prediction tools and computerized ecologic momentary assessments, are currently in development and require additional evidence. Recent increases in fatal and non-fatal self-harm in the USA raise questions about the causes, interventions, and preventive measures that should be taken. Most innovative prevention efforts target individuals seeking to improve risk prediction and access to evidence-based care. However, as Durkheim pointed out over 100 years ago, suicide rates vary enormously between societal groups, suggesting that certain causal factors of suicide act and, hence, should be targeted at an ecological level. In the next generation of suicide research, it is critical to examine factors beyond the proximal and clinical to allow for a reimagining of prevention that is life course and socially focused.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo Martínez-Alés
- Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, 722W 168th St, Suite 1030, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Katherine M Keyes
- Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, 722W 168th St, Suite 1030, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Milner A, Aitken Z, Law PCF, LaMontagne AD, Mann C, Cooper T, Witt K. The relationship between an electronic mental health stigma campaign and suicidal thoughts and behaviours: a two-arm randomized controlled trial in the Australian construction industry. Health Promot Int 2019; 35:478-485. [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daz034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Males employed in the construction industry are at greater risk of suicide than other employed males. It is plausible that a high level of stigma against mental health problems explains the elevated rates of suicide among this group. This study sought to test the effectiveness of an electronic mental health stigma intervention on suicide ideation, communication about suicide and attempts. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a series of brief contact interventions over a 6-week period or a wait list control. Suicidal ideation, communication about suicide and suicide attempts were assessed using the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised at post-intervention. We used linear regression to assess effectiveness at post-intervention, adjusting for relevant covariates using both conventional methods and a propensity score approach. Results indicate that the intervention had no significant impact on suicidal thoughts, communication or suicide attempts. There was some indication that individuals in the intervention group reported a slight increase in attempts and communication about suicide. These observations underscore an urgent need for more research to understand the complex and nuanced relationship between stigma and suicide in non-clinical populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Milner
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Z Aitken
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - P C F Law
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - A D LaMontagne
- School of Health and Social Development, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Australia
| | - C Mann
- Incolink – Victoria, 1 Pelham Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
| | - T Cooper
- Incolink – Victoria, 1 Pelham Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
| | - K Witt
- Turning Point, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Australia
- Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comtois KA, Kerbrat AH, DeCou CR, Atkins DC, Majeres JJ, Baker JC, Ries RK. Effect of Augmenting Standard Care for Military Personnel With Brief Caring Text Messages for Suicide Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76:474-483. [PMID: 30758491 PMCID: PMC6495345 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Accessible and cost-effective interventions for suicidality are needed to address high rates of suicidal behavior among military service members. Caring Contacts are brief periodic messages that express unconditional care and concern and have been previously shown to prevent suicide deaths, attempts, ideation, and hospitalizations. OBJECTIVE To test the effectiveness of augmenting standard military health care with Caring Contacts delivered via text message to reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors over 12 months. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 military installations in the southern and western United States. Soldiers and Marines identified as being at risk of suicide were recruited between April 2013 and September 2016. The final follow-up was in September 2017. INTERVENTIONS Both groups received standard care, and the Caring Contacts group also received consisted of 11 text messages delivered on day 1, at week 1, at months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, and on participants' birthdays. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were current suicidal ideation and suicide risk incidents (hospitalization or medical evacuation). Secondary outcomes were worst-point suicidal ideation, emergency department visits, and suicide attempts. Suicidal ideation was measured by the Scale for Suicide Ideation, suicide risk incidents, and emergency department visits by the Treatment History Interview; attempted suicide was measured by the Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Count. RESULTS Among 658 randomized participants (329 randomizely assigned to each group), data were analyzed for 657 individuals (mean [SD] age, 25.2 [6.1] years; 539 men [82.0%]). All participants reported suicidal ideation at baseline, and 291 (44.3%) had previously attempted suicide. Of the 657 participants, 461 (70.2%) were assessed at 12 months. Primary outcomes were nonsignificant. There was no significant effect on likelihood or severity of current suicidal ideation or likelihood of a suicide risk incident; there was also no effect on emergency department visits. However, participants who received Caring Contacts (172 of 216 participants [79.6%]) had lower odds than those receiving standard care alone (179 of 204 participants [87.7%]) of experiencing any suicidal ideation between baseline and follow-up (odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.33-0.95]; P = .03) and fewer had attempted suicide since baseline (21 of 233 [9.0%] in the group receiving Caring Contacts vs 34 of 228 [14.9%] in the standard-care group; odds ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.29-0.92]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This trial provides inconsistent results on the effectiveness of caring text messages between primary and secondary outcomes, but this inexpensive and scalable intervention offers promise for preventing suicide attempts and ideation in military personnel. Additional research is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01829620.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Anne Comtois
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Amanda H. Kerbrat
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Christopher R. DeCou
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - David C. Atkins
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Justin C. Baker
- Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
| | - Richard K. Ries
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Inagaki M, Kawashima Y, Yonemoto N, Yamada M. Active contact and follow-up interventions to prevent repeat suicide attempts during high-risk periods among patients admitted to emergency departments for suicidal behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:44. [PMID: 30683075 PMCID: PMC6347824 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2017-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence that several intervention types, including psychotherapy, reduce repeat suicide attempts. However, these interventions are less applicable to the heterogeneous patients admitted to emergency departments (EDs). The risk of a repeat suicide attempt is especially high in the first 6 months after the initial attempt. Therefore, it is particularly important to develop effective ED interventions to prevent repeat suicide attempts during this 6-month period. METHODS We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of ED-initiated interventions for suicidal patients admitted to EDs using the databases MEDLINE, PsychoINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE up to January 2015 in accordance with an a priori published protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42013005463). Interventions were categorized into four types, including active contact and follow-up interventions (intensive care plus outreach, brief interventions and contact, letter/postcard, telephone, and composite of letter/postcard and telephone), and a meta-analysis was conducted to determine pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of a repeat suicide attempt within 6 months. RESULTS Of the 28 selected trials, 14 were active contact and follow-up interventions. Two of these trials (n = 984) reported results at 6 months (pooled RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.76). There were not enough trials of other interventions to perform meta-analysis. Some trials included in the meta-analysis were judged as showing risk of bias. CONCLUSION Active contact and follow-up interventions are recommended for suicidal patients admitted to an ED to prevent repeat suicide attempts during the highest-risk period of 6 months. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42013005463 (27 August 2013).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatoshi Inagaki
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, 89-1, Enya-cho, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
| | - Yoshitaka Kawashima
- 0000 0000 9832 2227grid.416859.7Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawahigashimachi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553 Japan
| | - Naohiro Yonemoto
- 0000 0004 0372 2033grid.258799.8Department of Biostatistics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501 Japan
| | - Mitsuhiko Yamada
- 0000 0000 9832 2227grid.416859.7Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1, Ogawahigashimachi, Kodaira, Tokyo, 187-8553 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sayal K, Roe J, Ball H, Atha C, Kaylor-Hughes C, Guo B, Townsend E, Morriss R. Feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of remotely delivered problem-solving cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for young people with depression and repeat self-harm: lessons learnt (e-DASH). BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:42. [PMID: 30678674 PMCID: PMC6346566 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-018-2005-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm and depression are strong risk factors for repeat self-harm and suicide. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of remotely delivered problem-solving cognitive behaviour therapy (PSCBT) plus treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU in young people with repeat self-harm and depression. METHODS Single-blind multi-centre RCT with an internal pilot, pre-set stop-go criteria and qualitative semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants (aged 16-30 years) were recruited from 9 adult or child and adolescent self-harm and crisis services; had ≥ 2 lifetime self-harm episodes, one in the preceding 96 h; and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) score ≥ 17. Participants were randomised (1:1) to either TAU or TAU and 10-12 sessions of PSCBT delivered by mobile phone or video-calling. RESULTS Twenty-two participants were recruited (11 in each arm), 10 (46%) completed follow-up at 6 months, 9 (82%) started the PSCBT and 4 (36%) completed it. The study did not meet three of its four stop-go criteria, reflecting considerable barriers to recruitment and retention. Participants had severe depression symptoms: with mean BDI-II 38.9 in the PSCBT and 37.2 in TAU groups, respectively. Three (14%) unblindings occurred for immediate safety concerns. Barriers to recruitment and retention included lack of agency for participants, severity of depression, recency of crisis with burden for participants and clinicians who diagnosed depression according to pervasiveness. CONCLUSIONS RCTs of PSCBT for young people with depression and self-harm are not feasible using recruitment through mental health services that conduct assessments following self-harm presentations. Clinician assessment following self-harm presentation mainly identifies those with severe rather than mild-moderate depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02377011 ); Date of registration: March 3rd 2015. Retrospectively registered: within 21 days of recruitment of the first participant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kapil Sayal
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. .,Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK. .,Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - James Roe
- 0000 0004 1936 8868grid.4563.4Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK ,Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK
| | - Harriet Ball
- 0000 0004 1936 8868grid.4563.4Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK ,Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK
| | - Christopher Atha
- 0000 0004 1936 8868grid.4563.4Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK ,Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK
| | - Catherine Kaylor-Hughes
- 0000 0004 1936 8868grid.4563.4Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK ,Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- 0000 0004 1936 8868grid.4563.4Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK ,Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ellen Townsend
- Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK ,0000 0004 1936 8868grid.4563.4School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Richard Morriss
- 0000 0004 1936 8868grid.4563.4Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK ,Centre for Mood Disorders, Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Falcone G, Nardella A, Lamis DA, Erbuto D, Girardi P, Pompili M. Taking care of suicidal patients with new technologies and reaching-out means in the post-discharge period. World J Psychiatry 2017; 7:163-176. [PMID: 29043154 PMCID: PMC5632601 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v7.i3.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 05/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Suicide is a global public health problem with over one million people dying by suicide each year worldwide. Research efforts have focused on developing and testing novel suicide prevention strategies employing recent technological advances. In order to provide a review regarding the role of new technologies (e.g., postcards/letters, text messages, crisis cards, telephone contacts, online interventions) in suicide prevention, we searched PubMed, ScienceDirect, ResearchGate, and Crisis to identify all papers in English from 1977 to 2016. Our results indicated that brief contact interventions show promise in reducing the number of episodes of repeated self-harm and/or suicide attempts following discharge from the Emergency Department or psychiatric units. Innovative methods of contact (e.g., text messages) are easily implemented by clinicians and received by patients in the period of post discharge and have been shown to be beneficial. However, more research employing randomized clinical trials investigating the potential benefits of these novel suicide prevention methods is warranted. Future researchers should continue improving and testing new technologies in the prevention of suicide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Falcone
- Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Adele Nardella
- Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Dorian A Lamis
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30303, United States
| | - Denise Erbuto
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Girardi
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aggarwal S, Patton G, Reavley N, Sreenivasan SA, Berk M. Youth self-harm in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review of the risk and protective factors. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2017; 63:359-375. [PMID: 28351292 DOI: 10.1177/0020764017700175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm (defined here as an act of intentionally causing harm to own self, irrespective of the type, motive or suicidal intent) is one of the strongest antecedents of suicide in youth. While there have been a number of studies of youth self-harm in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is currently no systematic review of studies of prevalence rates and risk and protective factors. AIM To systematically review the evidence relating to the prevalence rates and forms of self-harm in youth in LMICs and its relationship to family economic status, family functioning, relationship with the peer group, social relationships and academic performance. METHODS Electronic searches of three databases, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus, were performed. In total, 27 school-, community- and hospital-based studies evaluating self-harm in LMICs with youth focus (with participants between 12 and 25 years) were included. RESULTS The self-harm was divided into suicidal and non-suicidal depending on the nature of self-harm. The 12-month prevalence rates of non-suicidal self-harm varied from 15.5% to 31.3%, and the range of suicidal behaviour rates was from 3.2% to 4.7%. Banging and hitting were the most common in the community-based studies, followed by cutting, scratching and wound picking. Self-poisoning with pesticides was most commonly reported in hospital-based studies. Risk factors for self-harm were family conflict, peer groups with members indulging in self-harm, truancy and school absenteeism. Protective factors were having an understanding family, having friends and higher school competence. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and attempts were lack of close friends and history of suicide by a friend. CONCLUSION The 12-month prevalence rates of youth self-harm in LMICs are comparable to high-income countries (HICs). The profile of risk and protective factors suggests that family-based interventions could be useful in treatment and prevention. Future studies should aim for greater consistency in assessment methods and the constructs under evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilpa Aggarwal
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - George Patton
- 2 Department of Pediatrics, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,3 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicola Reavley
- 3 Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Michael Berk
- 1 IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.,4 Orygen: The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gysin-Maillart AC, Soravia LM, Gemperli A, Michel K. Suicide Ideation Is Related to Therapeutic Alliance in a Brief Therapy for Attempted Suicide. Arch Suicide Res 2017; 21:113-126. [PMID: 26984644 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2016.1162242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the role of therapeutic alliance on suicide ideation as outcome measure in a brief therapy for patients who attempted suicide. Sixty patients received the 3-session therapy supplemented by follow-up contact through regular letters. Therapeutic alliance was measured with the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ). Outcome at 6 and 12 months was measured with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS). Therapeutic alliance increased from session 1 to session 3. Higher alliance measures correlated with lower suicidal ideation at 12 months follow-up. A history of previous attempts and depression had a negative affect on therapeutic alliance. The results suggest that in the treatment of suicidal patients therapeutic alliance may be a moderating factor for reducing suicide ideation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ 2016; 355:i5239. [PMID: 27777223 PMCID: PMC5076380 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1385] [Impact Index Per Article: 173.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra M Eldridge
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Claire L Chan
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michael J Campbell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Christine M Bond
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Sally Hopewell
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gillian A Lancaster
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2016; 2:64. [PMID: 27965879 PMCID: PMC5154046 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 651] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement is a guideline designed to improve the transparency and quality of the reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In this article we present an extension to that statement for randomised pilot and feasibility trials conducted in advance of a future definitive RCT. The checklist applies to any randomised study in which a future definitive RCT, or part of it, is conducted on a smaller scale, regardless of its design (eg, cluster, factorial, crossover) or the terms used by authors to describe the study (eg, pilot, feasibility, trial, study). The extension does not directly apply to internal pilot studies built into the design of a main trial, non-randomised pilot and feasibility studies, or phase II studies, but these studies all have some similarities to randomised pilot and feasibility studies and so many of the principles might also apply. The development of the extension was motivated by the growing number of studies described as feasibility or pilot studies and by research that has identified weaknesses in their reporting and conduct. We followed recommended good practice to develop the extension, including carrying out a Delphi survey, holding a consensus meeting and research team meetings, and piloting the checklist. The aims and objectives of pilot and feasibility randomised studies differ from those of other randomised trials. Consequently, although much of the information to be reported in these trials is similar to those in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing effectiveness and efficacy, there are some key differences in the type of information and in the appropriate interpretation of standard CONSORT reporting items. We have retained some of the original CONSORT statement items, but most have been adapted, some removed, and new items added. The new items cover how participants were identified and consent obtained; if applicable, the prespecified criteria used to judge whether or how to proceed with a future definitive RCT; if relevant, other important unintended consequences; implications for progression from pilot to future definitive RCT, including any proposed amendments; and ethical approval or approval by a research review committee confirmed with a reference number. This article includes the 26 item checklist, a separate checklist for the abstract, a template for a CONSORT flowchart for these studies, and an explanation of the changes made and supporting examples. We believe that routine use of this proposed extension to the CONSORT statement will result in improvements in the reporting of pilot trials. Editor's note: In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on the BMJ and Pilot and Feasibility Studies journal websites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra M. Eldridge
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Claire L. Chan
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michael J. Campbell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Christine M. Bond
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Sally Hopewell
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Carter G, Page A, Large M, Hetrick S, Milner AJ, Bendit N, Walton C, Draper B, Hazell P, Fortune S, Burns J, Patton G, Lawrence M, Dadd L, Dudley M, Robinson J, Christensen H. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guideline for the management of deliberate self-harm. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2016; 50:939-1000. [PMID: 27650687 DOI: 10.1177/0004867416661039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide guidance for the organisation and delivery of clinical services and the clinical management of patients who deliberately self-harm, based on scientific evidence supplemented by expert clinical consensus and expressed as recommendations. METHOD Articles and information were sourced from search engines including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO for several systematic reviews, which were supplemented by literature known to the deliberate self-harm working group, and from published systematic reviews and guidelines for deliberate self-harm. Information was reviewed by members of the deliberate self-harm working group, and findings were then formulated into consensus-based recommendations and clinical guidance. The guidelines were subjected to successive consultation and external review involving expert and clinical advisors, the public, key stakeholders, professional bodies and specialist groups with interest and expertise in deliberate self-harm. RESULTS The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm provide up-to-date guidance and advice regarding the management of deliberate self-harm patients, which is informed by evidence and clinical experience. The clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm is intended for clinical use and service development by psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians and others with an interest in mental health care. CONCLUSION The clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm address self-harm within specific population sub-groups and provide up-to-date recommendations and guidance within an evidence-based framework, supplemented by expert clinical consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Carter
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia Department of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Page
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Centre for Health Research, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Large
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School of Psychiatry, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah Hetrick
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Allison Joy Milner
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood VIC, Australia Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nick Bendit
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia School of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla Walton
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Centre for Psychotherapy, Hunter New England Mental Health Service and Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Draper
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School of Psychiatry, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia Academic Department for Old Age Psychiatry, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Hazell
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah Fortune
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Kidz First, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jane Burns
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Brain & Mind Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - George Patton
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia Centre for Adolescent Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Lawrence
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Tauranga Hospital, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
| | - Lawrence Dadd
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Mental Health & Substance Use Service, Hunter New England, NSW Health, Waratah, NSW, Australia Awabakal Aboriginal Medical Service, Hamilton, NSW, Australia Pital Tarkin, Aboriginal Medical Student Mentoring Program, The Wollotuka Institute, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia Specialist Outreach NT, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | | | - Jo Robinson
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Christensen
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Deliberate Self-harm Working Group, RANZCP, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Black Dog Institute, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hawton K, Witt KG, Salisbury TLT, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Hazell P, Townsend E, van Heeringen K. Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3:740-750. [PMID: 27422028 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30070-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2016] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm (intentional acts of non-fatal self-poisoning or self-injury) is common, particularly in young adults aged 15-35 years, often repeated, and strongly associated with suicide. Effective aftercare of individuals who self-harm is therefore important. We have undertaken a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. METHODS We searched five electronic databases (CCDANCTR-Studies and References, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO) between Jan 1, 1998, and April 29, 2015, for randomised controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for adults after a recent (within 6 months) episode of self-harm. Most interventions were assessed in single trials. We report results for interventions for which at least three randomised controlled trials comparing interventions with treatment as usual have been published and hence might contribute to clinical guidance. The primary outcome was repetition of self-harm at the conclusion of treatment and at 6, 12, and 24 months' follow-up analysed, when available, with the intention-to-treat method; if this was not possible, we analysed with all available case data. FINDINGS We identified 29 non-overlapping randomised controlled trials with three independent trials of the same intervention. Cognitive-behavioural-based psychotherapy (CBT; comprising cognitive-behavioural and problem-solving therapy) was associated with fewer participants repeating self-harm at 6 months' (odds ratio 0·54, 95% CI 0·34-0·85; 12 trials; n=1317) and at 12 months' follow-up (0·80, 0·65-0·98; ten trials; n=2232). There were also significant improvements in the secondary outcomes of depression, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, and problem solving. Patients receiving dialectical behaviour therapy (in three trials) were not less likely to repeat self-harm compared with those provided with treatment as usual at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 0·59, 95% CI 0·16-2·15; n=267, three trials) or at 12 months (0·36, 0·05-2·47; n=172, two trials). However, the secondary endpoint of frequency of self-harm was associated with a significant reduction with use of dialectical behaviour therapy (mean difference -18·82, 95% CI -36·68 to -0·95). Four trials each of case management (OR 0·78, 95% CI 0·47-1·30; n=1608) and sending regular postcards (OR 0·87, 95% CI 0·62-1·23; n=3277) did not reduce repetition of self-harm. INTERPRETATION CBT seems to be effective in patients after self-harm. Dialectical behaviour therapy did not reduce the proportion of patients repeating self-harm but did reduce the frequency of self-harm. However, aside from CBT, there were few trials of other promising interventions, precluding firm conclusions as to their effectiveness. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Hawton
- Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
| | - Katrina G Witt
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ella Arensman
- National Suicide Research Foundation and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - David Gunnell
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Philip Hazell
- Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Sydney, Concord West, NSW, Australia
| | - Ellen Townsend
- Self-Harm Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kees van Heeringen
- Unit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Owens C, Charles N. Implementation of a text-messaging intervention for adolescents who self-harm (TeenTEXT): a feasibility study using normalisation process theory. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2016; 10:14. [PMID: 27354855 PMCID: PMC4924323 DOI: 10.1186/s13034-016-0101-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Accepted: 05/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few interventions that directly address self-harming behaviour among adolescents. At the request of clinicians in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in England and working with them, we redeveloped an adult SMS text-messaging intervention to meet the needs of adolescents under the care of CAMHS who self-harm. METHODS We used normalisation process theory (NPT) to assess the feasibility of delivering it through CAMHS. We planned to recruit 27 young people who self-harm and their clinicians, working as dyads and using the intervention (TeenTEXT) for 6 months. RESULTS Despite strong engagement in principle from CAMHS teams, in practice we were able to recruit only three clinician/client dyads. Of these, two dropped out because the clients were too unwell. We identified a number of barriers to implementation. These included: a context of CAMHS in crisis, with heavy workloads and high stress levels; organisational gatekeeping practices, which limited the extent to which clinicians could engage with the intervention; perceived burdensomeness and technophobia on the part of clinicians, and a belief by many clinicians that CAMHS may be the wrong delivery setting and that the intervention may have better fit with schools and universal youth services. CONCLUSIONS User-centred design principles and the use of participatory methods in intervention development are no guarantee of implementability. Barriers to implementation cannot always be foreseen, and early clinical champions may overestimate the readiness of colleagues to embrace new ideas and technologies. NPT studies have an important role to play in identifying whether or not interventions are likely to receive widespread clinical support. This study of a text-messaging intervention to support adolescents who self-harm (TeenTEXT) showed that further work is needed to identify the right delivery setting, before testing the efficacy of the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christabel Owens
- University of Exeter Medical School, College House, St. Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU UK
| | - Nigel Charles
- University of Exeter Medical School, College House, St. Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Milner A, Spittal MJ, Kapur N, Witt K, Pirkis J, Carter G. Mechanisms of brief contact interventions in clinical populations: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16:194. [PMID: 27277833 PMCID: PMC4898450 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0896-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2015] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brief Contact Interventions (BCIs) have been of increasing interest to suicide prevention clinicians, researchers and policy makers. However, there has been no systematic assessment into the mechanisms underpinning BCIs. The aim of the current paper is to provide a systematic review of the proposed mechanisms underpinning BCIs across trial studies. METHOD A systematic review was conducted of trials using BCIs (post-discharge telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts) for suicide or self-harm. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all past reviews in the area. Secondary searches of reference lists were undertaken. RESULTS Sixteen papers provided a description of possible mechanisms which we grouped into three main areas: social support; suicide prevention literacy, and; learning alternative coping behaviours. After assessment of the studies and considering the plausibility of mechanisms, we suggest social support and improved suicide prevention literacy are the most likely mechanisms underpinning BCIs. CONCLUSION Researchers need to better articulate and measure the mechanisms they believe underpin BCIs in trial studies. Understanding more about the mechanisms of BCIs' will inform the development of future interventions for self-harm and suicide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Milner
- Work, Health and Wellbeing Unit, Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, 3125, VIC, Australia.
| | - Matthew J. Spittal
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010 VIC Australia
| | - Nav Kapur
- Centre for Suicide Prevention, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Institute of Brain Behaviour and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katrina Witt
- Work, Health and Wellbeing Unit, Centre for Population Health Research, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, 3125 VIC Australia
| | - Jane Pirkis
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010 VIC Australia
| | - Greg Carter
- Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Doki S, Kaneko H, Oi Y, Usami K, Sasahara S, Matsuzaki I. Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation Among Telephone Crisis Hotline Callers in Japan. CRISIS 2016; 37:438-444. [PMID: 27245813 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telephone hotlines are a widely used type of suicide prevention program. AIMS The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for suicidal ideation by investigating its association with a number of characteristics among telephone hotline callers. METHOD Data were collected over a 10-year period from a total of 246,595 calls to Inochi No Denwa, a telephone crisis hotline in Ibaraki, Japan, and subsequently analyzed. Odds ratios for suicidal compared with nonsuicidal ideation were also calculated. RESULTS About 6% of the calls to the hotline were suicide related, and about 2% of the callers had attempted suicide in the past. Odds ratios for suicidal ideation increased during winter, but no daily tendencies were evident. Those whose problems were related to their way of life were at the highest risk of suicidal ideation, followed by those with health-related concerns. CONCLUSION We were able to identify risk factors for suicidal ideation based on an analysis of enormous amounts of data from a telephone crisis hotline in Japan. Knowledge of these risk factors is expected to lead to improvements in suicide prevention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shotaro Doki
- 1 Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Japan.,2 Hospital Bando, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Kaneko
- 1 Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Japan.,3 Soubu Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuichi Oi
- 4 Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kazuya Usami
- 4 Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | | | - Ichiyo Matsuzaki
- 4 Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.,5 International Institute for Integrative Sleep Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hawton K, Witt KG, Taylor Salisbury TL, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Hazell P, Townsend E, van Heeringen K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016:CD012189. [PMID: 27168519 PMCID: PMC8786273 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm (SH; intentional self-poisoning or self-injury) is common, often repeated, and associated with suicide. This is an update of a broader Cochrane review first published in 1998, previously updated in 1999, and now split into three separate reviews. This review focuses on psychosocial interventions in adults who engage in self-harm. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of specific psychosocial treatments versus treatment as usual, enhanced usual care or other forms of psychological therapy, in adults following SH. SEARCH METHODS The Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) trials coordinator searched the CCDAN Clinical Trials Register (to 29 April 2015). This register includes relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from: the Cochrane Library (all years), MEDLINE (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date), and PsycINFO (1967 to date). SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs comparing psychosocial treatments with treatment as usual (TAU), enhanced usual care (EUC) or alternative treatments in adults with a recent (within six months) episode of SH resulting in presentation to clinical services. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used Cochrane's standard methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS We included 55 trials, with a total of 17,699 participants. Eighteen trials investigated cognitive-behavioural-based psychotherapy (CBT-based psychotherapy; comprising cognitive-behavioural, problem-solving therapy or both). Nine investigated interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder, comprising emotion-regulation group-based psychotherapy, mentalisation, and dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT). Four investigated case management, and 11 examined remote contact interventions (postcards, emergency cards, telephone contact). Most other interventions were evaluated in only single small trials of moderate to very low quality.There was a significant treatment effect for CBT-based psychotherapy compared to TAU at final follow-up in terms of fewer participants repeating SH (odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 0.88; number of studies k = 17; N = 2665; GRADE: low quality evidence), but with no reduction in frequency of SH (mean difference (MD) -0.21, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.26; k = 6; N = 594; GRADE: low quality).For interventions typically delivered to individuals with a history of multiple episodes of SH/probable personality disorder, group-based emotion-regulation psychotherapy and mentalisation were associated with significantly reduced repetition when compared to TAU: group-based emotion-regulation psychotherapy (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.88; k = 2; N = 83; GRADE: low quality), mentalisation (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.73; k = 1; N = 134; GRADE: moderate quality). Compared with TAU, dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) showed a significant reduction in frequency of SH at final follow-up (MD -18.82, 95% CI -36.68 to -0.95; k = 3; N = 292; GRADE: low quality) but not in the proportion of individuals repeating SH (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.59, k = 3; N = 247; GRADE: low quality). Compared with an alternative form of psychological therapy, DBT-oriented therapy was also associated with a significant treatment effect for repetition of SH at final follow-up (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.49; k = 1; N = 24; GRADE: low quality). However, neither DBT vs 'treatment by expert' (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.35 to 3.95; k = 1; N = 97; GRADE: very low quality) nor prolonged exposure DBT vs standard exposure DBT (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.08 to 5.68; k = 1; N =18; GRADE: low quality) were associated with a significant reduction in repetition of SH.Case management was not associated with a significant reduction in repetition of SH at post intervention compared to either TAU or enhanced usual care (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.30; k = 4; N = 1608; GRADE: moderate quality). Continuity of care by the same therapist vs a different therapist was also not associated with a significant treatment effect for repetition (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.10; k = 1; N = 136; GRADE: very low quality). None of the following remote contact interventions were associated with fewer participants repeating SH compared with TAU: adherence enhancement (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.02; k = 1; N = 391; GRADE: low quality), mixed multimodal interventions (comprising psychological therapy and remote contact-based interventions) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.43; k = 1 study; N = 684; GRADE: low quality), including a culturally adapted form of this intervention (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.55; k = 1; N = 167; GRADE: low quality), postcards (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.23; k = 4; N = 3277; GRADE: very low quality), emergency cards (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.14; k = 2; N = 1039; GRADE: low quality), general practitioner's letter (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.44; k = 1; N = 1932; GRADE: moderate quality), telephone contact (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.32; k = 3; N = 840; GRADE: very low quality), and mobile telephone-based psychological therapy (OR not estimable due to zero cell counts; GRADE: low quality).None of the following mixed interventions were associated with reduced repetition of SH compared to either alternative forms of psychological therapy: interpersonal problem-solving skills training, behaviour therapy, home-based problem-solving therapy, long-term psychotherapy; or to TAU: provision of information and support, treatment for alcohol misuse, intensive inpatient and community treatment, general hospital admission, or intensive outpatient treatment.We had only limited evidence on whether the intervention had different effects in men and women. Data on adverse effects, other than planned outcomes relating to suicidal behaviour, were not reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS CBT-based psychological therapy can result in fewer individuals repeating SH; however, the quality of this evidence, assessed using GRADE criteria, ranged between moderate and low. Dialectical behaviour therapy for people with multiple episodes of SH/probable personality disorder may lead to a reduction in frequency of SH, but this finding is based on low quality evidence. Case management and remote contact interventions did not appear to have any benefits in terms of reducing repetition of SH. Other therapeutic approaches were mostly evaluated in single trials of moderate to very low quality such that the evidence relating to these interventions is inconclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Hawton
- Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK, OX3 7JX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gysin-Maillart A, Schwab S, Soravia L, Megert M, Michel K. A Novel Brief Therapy for Patients Who Attempt Suicide: A 24-months Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Study of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP). PLoS Med 2016; 13:e1001968. [PMID: 26930055 PMCID: PMC4773217 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attempted suicide is the main risk factor for suicide and repeated suicide attempts. However, the evidence for follow-up treatments reducing suicidal behavior in these patients is limited. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) in reducing suicidal behavior. ASSIP is a novel brief therapy based on a patient-centered model of suicidal behavior, with an emphasis on early therapeutic alliance. METHODS AND FINDINGS Patients who had recently attempted suicide were randomly allocated to treatment as usual (n = 60) or treatment as usual plus ASSIP (n = 60). ASSIP participants received three therapy sessions followed by regular contact through personalized letters over 24 months. Participants considered to be at high risk of suicide were included, 63% were diagnosed with an affective disorder, and 50% had a history of prior suicide attempts. Clinical exclusion criteria were habitual self-harm, serious cognitive impairment, and psychotic disorder. Study participants completed a set of psychosocial and clinical questionnaires every 6 months over a 24-month follow-up period. The study represents a real-world clinical setting at an outpatient clinic of a university hospital of psychiatry. The primary outcome measure was repeat suicide attempts during the 24-month follow-up period. Secondary outcome measures were suicidal ideation, depression, and health-care utilization. Furthermore, effects of prior suicide attempts, depression at baseline, diagnosis, and therapeutic alliance on outcome were investigated. During the 24-month follow-up period, five repeat suicide attempts were recorded in the ASSIP group and 41 attempts in the control group. The rates of participants reattempting suicide at least once were 8.3% (n = 5) and 26.7% (n = 16). ASSIP was associated with an approximately 80% reduced risk of participants making at least one repeat suicide attempt (Wald χ21 = 13.1, 95% CI 12.4-13.7, p < 0.001). ASSIP participants spent 72% fewer days in the hospital during follow-up (ASSIP: 29 d; control group: 105 d; W = 94.5, p = 0.038). Higher scores of patient-rated therapeutic alliance in the ASSIP group were associated with a lower rate of repeat suicide attempts. Prior suicide attempts, depression, and a diagnosis of personality disorder at baseline did not significantly affect outcome. Participants with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (n = 20) had more previous suicide attempts and a higher number of reattempts. Key study limitations were missing data and dropout rates. Although both were generally low, they increased during follow-up. At 24 months, the group difference in dropout rate was significant: ASSIP, 7% (n = 4); control, 22% (n = 13). A further limitation is that we do not have detailed information of the co-active follow-up treatment apart from participant self-reports every 6 months on the setting and the duration of the co-active treatment. CONCLUSIONS ASSIP, a manual-based brief therapy for patients who have recently attempted suicide, administered in addition to the usual clinical treatment, was efficacious in reducing suicidal behavior in a real-world clinical setting. ASSIP fulfills the need for an easy-to-administer low-cost intervention. Large pragmatic trials will be needed to conclusively establish the efficacy of ASSIP and replicate our findings in other clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02505373.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Gysin-Maillart
- Outpatient Department, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simon Schwab
- Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Leila Soravia
- Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Millie Megert
- Psychiatric Department, General Hospital, Thun, Switzerland
| | - Konrad Michel
- Outpatient Department, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Skovgaard Larsen JL, Frandsen H, Erlangsen A. MYPLAN - A Mobile Phone Application for Supporting People at Risk of Suicide. CRISIS 2016; 37:236-40. [PMID: 26831213 DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safety plans have been suggested as an intervention for people at risk of suicide. Given the impulsive character of suicidal ideation, a safety plan in the format of a mobile phone application is likely to be more available and useful than traditional paper versions. AIMS The study describes MYPLAN, a mobile phone application designed to support people at risk of suicide by letting them create a safety plan. METHOD MYPLAN was developed in collaboration with clinical psychiatric staff at Danish suicide preventive clinics. The mobile application lets the user create an individualized safety plan by filling in templates with strategies, actions, and direct links to contact persons. RESULTS MYPLAN was developed in 2013 and is freely available in Denmark and Norway. It is designed for iPhone and android platforms. As of December 2015, the application has been downloaded almost 8,000 times. Users at risk of suicide as well as clinical staff have provided positive feedback on the mobile application. CONCLUSION Support via mobile phone applications might be particularly useful for younger age groups at risk of suicide as well as in areas or countries where support options are lacking. Yet, it is important to examine the effectiveness of this type of intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanne Frandsen
- 1 Competence Centre for Suicide Prevention, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Annette Erlangsen
- 2 Suicide Prevention Research, Research Unit, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.,3 Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Grimholt TK, Jacobsen D, Haavet OR, Sandvik L, Jorgensen T, Norheim AB, Ekeberg O. Effect of Systematic Follow-Up by General Practitioners after Deliberate Self-Poisoning: A Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0143934. [PMID: 26629812 PMCID: PMC4667913 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess whether systematic follow-up by general practitioners (GPs) of cases of deliberate self-poisoning (DSP) by their patients decreases psychiatric symptoms and suicidal behaviour compared with current practice. Design Randomised clinical trial with two parallel groups. Setting General practices in Oslo and the eastern part of Akershus County. Participants Patients aged 18–75 years admitted to hospital for DSP. We excluded patients diagnosed with psychoses, without a known GP, those not able to complete a questionnaire, and patients admitted to psychiatric in-patient care or other institutions where their GP could not follow them immediately after discharge. Intervention The GPs received a written guideline, contacted the patients and scheduled a consultation within one week after discharge, and then provided regular consultations for six months. We randomised the patients to either intervention (n = 78) or treatment as usual (n = 98). Main Outcome Measures Primary outcome measure was the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI). Secondary outcomes were Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), self-reported further self-harm and treatment for DSP in a general hospital or an emergency medical agency (EMA). We assessed patients on entry to the trial and at three and six months. We collected data from interviews, self-report questionnaires, and hospital and EMA medical records. Results There were no significant differences between the groups in SSI, BDI, or BHS mean scores or change from baseline to three or six months. During follow-up, self-reported DSP was 39.5% in the intervention group vs. 15.8% in controls (P = 0.009). Readmissions to general hospitals were similar (13% in both groups (P = 0.963), while DSP episodes treated at EMAs were 17% in the intervention group and 7% in the control group (P = 0.103). Conclusion Structured follow-up by GPs after an episode of DSP had no significant effect on suicide ideation, depression or hopelessness. There was no significant difference in repeated episodes of DSP in hospitals or EMAs. However, the total number of incidents of deliberate self-harm reported by the patients was significantly higher in the intervention group. Trial registration Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01342809
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine K. Grimholt
- Department of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Regional Centre of Violence, Traumatic Stress and Suicide Prevention Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway
- * E-mail:
| | - Dag Jacobsen
- Department of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole Rikard Haavet
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leiv Sandvik
- Department of Biostatistics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trond Jorgensen
- Psychiatric Consultation Team, Akershus University Hospital, Akershus,Norway
| | - Astrid Berge Norheim
- Regional Centre of Violence, Traumatic Stress and Suicide Prevention Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo,Norway
| | - Oivind Ekeberg
- Department of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Inagaki M, Kawashima Y, Kawanishi C, Yonemoto N, Sugimoto T, Furuno T, Ikeshita K, Eto N, Tachikawa H, Shiraishi Y, Yamada M. Interventions to prevent repeat suicidal behavior in patients admitted to an emergency department for a suicide attempt: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2015; 175:66-78. [PMID: 25594513 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Revised: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A huge number of patients with self-harm and suicide attempt visit emergency departments (EDs). We systematically reviewed studies and examined the effect of interventions to prevent repeat suicidal behavior in patients admitted to EDs for a suicidal attempt. METHOD We searched the databases of MEDLINE, PsychoINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE through August 2013. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials assessing the effects on repeat suicidal behavior of interventions initiated in suicidal patients admitted to EDs. Interventions in each trial were classified into groups by consensus. Meta-analyses were performed to determine pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of repetition of suicide attempt for interventions in each group. RESULTS Out of 5390 retrieved articles, 24 trials were included and classified into four groups (11 trials in the Active contact and follow-up, nine in the Psychotherapy, one in the Pharmacotherapy, and three in the Miscellaneous). Active contact and follow-up type interventions were effective in preventing a repeat suicide within 12 months (n=5319; pooled RR=0.83; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.97). However, the effect at 24 months was not confirmed (n=925; pooled RR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.76-1.22). The effects of the other interventions on preventing a repetition of suicidal behavior remain unclear. LIMITATION Caution is needed regarding the heterogeneity of the effects. CONCLUSION Interventions of active contact and follow-up are recommended to reduce the risk of a repeat suicide attempt at 12 months in patients admitted to EDs with a suicide attempt. However, the long-term effect was not confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoshitaka Kawashima
- Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan
| | - Chiaki Kawanishi
- Health Management and Promotion Center, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Naohiro Yonemoto
- Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sugimoto
- Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital, Japan
| | - Taku Furuno
- Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital Organization Yokohama Medical Center, Japan
| | - Katsumi Ikeshita
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Institute, Nara Medical University, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Eto
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Fukuoka University, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Tachikawa
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yohko Shiraishi
- Department of Psychiatry, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiko Yamada
- Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Milner AJ, Carter G, Pirkis J, Robinson J, Spittal MJ. Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide. Br J Psychiatry 2015; 206:184-90. [PMID: 25733570 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing interest in brief contact interventions for self-harm and suicide attempt. AIMS To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide. METHOD A systematic review and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted of randomised controlled trials using brief contact interventions (telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts). Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine study quality and subgroup effects. RESULTS We found 14 eligible studies overall, of which 12 were amenable to meta-analyses. For any subsequent episode of self-harm or suicide attempt, there was a non-significant reduction in the overall pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.04, P = 0119) for intervention compared with control. The number of repetitions per person was significantly reduced in intervention v. control (incidence rate ratio IRR = 066, 95% CI 0.54-0.80, P<0001). There was no significant reduction in the odds of suicide in intervention compared with control (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.24-1.38). CONCLUSIONS A non-significant positive effect on repeated self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide and a significant effect on the number of episodes of repeated self-harm or suicide attempts per person (based on only three studies) means that brief contact interventions cannot yet be recommended for widespread clinical implementation. We recommend further assessment of possible benefits in well-designed trials in clinical populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison J Milner
- Allison J. Milner, BPsych (Hons), MEpi, PhD, McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Greg Carter, MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD, Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan; Jane Pirkis, BA (Hons), MPsych, MAppEpid, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Jo Robinson, BSc (Hons) Master Psych, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Matthew J. Spittal, BSc (Hons), MBio, PhD, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Greg Carter
- Allison J. Milner, BPsych (Hons), MEpi, PhD, McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Greg Carter, MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD, Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan; Jane Pirkis, BA (Hons), MPsych, MAppEpid, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Jo Robinson, BSc (Hons) Master Psych, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Matthew J. Spittal, BSc (Hons), MBio, PhD, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Pirkis
- Allison J. Milner, BPsych (Hons), MEpi, PhD, McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Greg Carter, MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD, Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan; Jane Pirkis, BA (Hons), MPsych, MAppEpid, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Jo Robinson, BSc (Hons) Master Psych, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Matthew J. Spittal, BSc (Hons), MBio, PhD, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jo Robinson
- Allison J. Milner, BPsych (Hons), MEpi, PhD, McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Greg Carter, MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD, Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan; Jane Pirkis, BA (Hons), MPsych, MAppEpid, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Jo Robinson, BSc (Hons) Master Psych, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Matthew J. Spittal, BSc (Hons), MBio, PhD, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew J Spittal
- Allison J. Milner, BPsych (Hons), MEpi, PhD, McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Greg Carter, MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD, Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan; Jane Pirkis, BA (Hons), MPsych, MAppEpid, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Jo Robinson, BSc (Hons) Master Psych, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Matthew J. Spittal, BSc (Hons), MBio, PhD, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chakravarthy B, Frumin E, Lotfipour S. Increasing suicide rates among middle-age persons and interventions to manage patients with psychiatric complaints. West J Emerg Med 2014; 15:11-3. [PMID: 24578763 PMCID: PMC3935781 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2013.12.19513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2013] [Revised: 12/26/2013] [Accepted: 12/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has published significant data and trends related to suicide rates in the United States (U.S.). Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in U.S. adults, and rates are increasing across all geographic regions. There is a significant increase in the suicide rate among adults in the 35–64 age range. We present findings from the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) with commentary on current resources and barriers to psychiatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharath Chakravarthy
- University of California Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, California
| | - Erica Frumin
- University of California Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, California
| | - Shahram Lotfipour
- University of California Irvine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orange, California
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gunnell D, Hawton K, Bennewith O, Cooper J, Simkin S, Donovan J, Evans J, Longson D, O'Connor S, Kapur N. A multicentre programme of clinical and public health research in support of the National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2013. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar01010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
ObjectivesTo carry out a programme of linked research studies aimed at improving the management of self-harm, reducing the incidence of suicide and providing reliable data to evaluate the impact of theNational Suicide Prevention Strategy for England(2002).MethodsThere were four research streams: (1) we studied inquest records from 12 coroners and Ministry of Justice data to assess the accuracy of official suicide statistics; (2) we used Office for National Statistics mortality statistics, data from the Multicentre Study of Self-harm in England, national liver unit data, prescription data and patient interviews to assess (a) the impact of paracetamol (acetaminophen) pack size restrictions (1998), (b) the impact of withdrawal of co-proxamol in 2007 and (c) the relative toxicity in overdose of commonly used antidepressants; (3) we carried out 3-month audits of self-harm management in 32 hospitals to investigate variations between hospitals and the impact of management on repeat self-harm; and (4) we developed and piloted letter-based contact interventions aimed at reducing self-harm.Key findings(1) Between 1990 and 2005, the proportion of researcher-defined suicides given a verdict of suicide by the 12 coroners studied decreased by almost 7%, largely because of the increased use of misadventure/accident verdicts for deaths thought, on clinical review, to be suicides. Use of narrative verdicts increased markedly. Coroners who gave more narrative verdicts also gave fewer suicide verdicts, and geographical variations in the use of narrative verdicts appeared to distort reliable assessment of small-area differences in suicide rates. 2(a) UK legislation to reduce pack sizes of paracetamol was followed by a 43% reduction in number of deaths and a 61% reduction in registrations for liver transplantation over the next 11 years. Paracetamol overdoses were often impulsive and some were influenced by media (including the internet); sales outlets appeared mostly to be adhering to sales guidance. Smaller pack sizes of paracetamol for sale in Ireland compared with England did not result in a smaller number of tablets being taken in overdose. There was no clear evidence of an effect of the legislation on prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nor on resulting gastrointestinal bleeds. 2(b) Withdrawal of co-proxamol from use in the UK resulted in approximately 600 fewer deaths than predicted between 2005 and 2010 based on previous trends, with no evidence of substitution by poisoning with other analgesics. 2(c) Of the tricyclic antidepressants, dosulepin and doxepin had the greatest toxicity. Citalopram was more toxic than other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. (3) There was marked variation between hospitals in the management of self-harm; effects of this variation on patient outcomes were unclear, although psychosocial assessment may have been associated with reduced repetition. Levels of specialist assessment remained static between 2001–2 and 2010–11, but service quality appeared to improve. (4) Findings of two pilot randomised controlled trials suggested that, although it would be feasible to scale up these interventions to full trials, these interventions might have low generalisability and be of limited benefit to patients.ConclusionWithin the context of the strengths and limitations of the individual studies, this research programme has made significant additions to the evidence base related to suicide and self-harm prevention in the UK.Study registrationA pilot study of a contact and information based intervention to reduce repeat self-harm; ISRCTN65171515.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gunnell
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - K Hawton
- Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - O Bennewith
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - J Cooper
- Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - S Simkin
- Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - J Evans
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Chippenham, UK
| | - D Longson
- Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S O'Connor
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Chippenham, UK
| | - N Kapur
- Centre for Suicide Prevention, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|