Humanized CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells in CAR-Naive and CAR-Exposed Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Overcoming the challenges of primary resistance and relapse after CAR-T cell therapy

INTRODUCTION

While CAR T-cell therapy has led to remarkable responses in relapsed B-cell hematologic malignancies, only 50% of patients ultimately have a complete, sustained response. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance and relapse after CAR T-cell therapy is crucial to future development and improving outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

We review reasons for both primary resistance and relapse after CAR T-cell therapies. Reasons for primary failure include CAR T-cell manufacturing problems, suboptimal fitness of autologous T-cells themselves, and intrinsic features of the underlying cancer and tumor microenvironment. Relapse after initial response to CAR T-cell therapy may be antigen-positive, due to CAR T-cell exhaustion or limited persistence, or antigen-negative, due to antigen-modulation on the target cells. Finally, we discuss ongoing efforts to overcome resistance to CAR T-cell therapy with enhanced CAR constructs, manufacturing methods, alternate cell types, combinatorial strategies, and optimization of both pre-infusion conditioning regimens and post-infusion consolidative strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a continued need for novel approaches to CAR T-cell therapy for both hematologic and solid malignancies to obtain sustained remissions. Opportunities for improvement include development of new targets, optimally combining existing CAR T-cell therapies, and defining the role for adjunctive immune modulators and stem cell transplant in enhancing long-term survival.

CAR-T Therapy Followed by Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Can Improve Survival in Children Relapsed/Refractory Philadelphia Chromosome-positive B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BACKGROUND

Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has a high complete remission (CR) rate, but relapse and prolonged measurable residual disease remain serious problems. We sought to describe the CR rate measurable residual disease negative rate and address the results and safety of pediatric patients who underwent after receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) specific for CD19 (CAR-19) followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for the treatment of Ph-positive ALL.

METHODS

A descriptive study was conducted at Peking University People's Hospital from September 2013 to January 2021. 13 patients with relapsed/refractory Ph-positive B-ALL who received CAR-T therapy followed by allo-HSCT were included. We concentrated on the overall patient survival and CR rate.

RESULTS

The median time between CAR-T therapy and allo-HSCT was 58 days. Among all the patients, the CR rate was 100%, the flow cytometry negativity rate was 84.62%, and the BCR-ABL negativity rate was 53.85% at 1 month after CAR-T infusion. All the patients achieved a major molecular response in 6 months after HSCT. After a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year OS rate was 66.7%, and the 3-year DFS rate was 61.5%. The 3-year OS rate of patients with BCR-ABL-positive pre-HSCT was significantly lower than that in the BCR-ABL-negative group (40.0% vs. 85.7%, P =0.042). Also, the same trend was observed for the 3-year DFS rate but did not differ significantly (40.0% vs. 75.0%, P =0.233).

CONCLUSIONS

CAR-T therapy followed by allo-HSCT can be a safe and effective treatment for Ph-positive B-ALL pediatric patients.

CD19 CAR T cells for multiple sclerosis: Forging further into the new frontier

The efficacy of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in B cell malignancies has generated recent interest in their application to other B cell-related pathologies, such as autoimmune diseases. Fischbach et al.1 report on the use of CD19 CAR T cells in two patients with progressive multiple sclerosis, demonstrating feasibility and safety for the first time in this disease process.

Updates of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Lymphoma occurring in the central nervous system is considered primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), usually without systematic lesions. Over the last few decades, a deep understanding of PCNSL has been lacking due to the low incidence rate, and the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with PCNSL are lower than those with other types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Recently, there have been several advancements in research on PCNSL. Advances in diagnosis of the disease are primarily reflected in the promising diagnostic efficiency of novel biomarkers. Pathogenesis mainly involves abnormal activation of nuclear factor kappa-B signaling pathways, copy number variations, and DNA methylation. Novel therapies such as Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are being evaluated as possible treatment options for PCNSL, especially for relapsed/refractory (R/R) cases. Several clinical trials also indicated the promising feasibility and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for selected R/R PCNSL patients. This review focuses on discussing recent updates, including the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and novel therapy of PCNSL.

Immune Microenvironment in Childhood Cancers: Characteristics and Therapeutic Challenges

The tumor immune microenvironment is pivotal in cancer initiation, advancement, and regulation. Its molecular and cellular composition is critical throughout the disease, as it can influence the balance between suppressive and cytotoxic immune responses within the tumor's vicinity. Studies on the tumor immune microenvironment have enriched our understanding of the intricate interplay between tumors and their immunological surroundings in various human cancers. These studies illuminate the role of significant components of the immune microenvironment, which have not been extensively explored in pediatric tumors before and may influence the responsiveness or resistance to therapeutic agents. Our deepening understanding of the pediatric tumor immune microenvironment is helping to overcome challenges related to the effectiveness of existing therapeutic strategies, including immunotherapies. Although in the early stages, targeted therapies that modulate the tumor immune microenvironment of pediatric solid tumors hold promise for improved outcomes. Focusing on various aspects of tumor immune biology in pediatric patients presents a therapeutic opportunity that could improve treatment outcomes. This review offers a comprehensive examination of recent literature concerning profiling the immune microenvironment in various pediatric tumors. It seeks to condense research findings on characterizing the immune microenvironment in pediatric tumors and its impact on tumor development, metastasis, and response to therapeutic modalities. It covers the immune microenvironment's role in tumor development, interactions with tumor cells, and its impact on the tumor's response to immunotherapy. The review also discusses challenges targeting the immune microenvironment for pediatric cancer therapies.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for autoimmune disease

Infusion of T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) that target B cells has proven to be a successful treatment for B cell malignancies. This success inspired the development of CAR T cells to selectively deplete or modulate the aberrant immune responses that underlie autoimmune disease. Promising results are emerging from clinical trials of CAR T cells targeting the B cell protein CD19 in patients with B cell-driven autoimmune diseases. Further approaches are being designed to extend the application and improve safety of CAR T cell therapy in the setting of autoimmunity, including the use of chimeric autoantibody receptors to selectively deplete autoantigen-specific B cells and the use of regulatory T cells engineered to express antigen-specific CARs for targeted immune modulation. Here, we highlight important considerations, such as optimal target cell populations, CAR construct design, acceptable toxicities and potential for lasting immune reset, that will inform the eventual safe adoption of CAR T cell therapy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Reinfusion of CD19 CAR T cells for relapse prevention and treatment in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

ABSTRACT

Relapse after CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells remains a substantial challenge. Short CAR T-cell persistence contributes to relapse risk, necessitating novel approaches to prolong durability. CAR T-cell reinfusion (CARTr) represents a potential strategy to reduce the risk of or treat relapsed disease after initial CAR T-cell infusion (CARTi). We conducted a retrospective review of reinfusion of murine (CTL019) or humanized (huCART19) anti-CD19/4-1BB CAR T cells across 3 clinical trials or commercial tisagenlecleucel for relapse prevention (peripheral B-cell recovery [BCR] or marrow hematogones ≤6 months after CARTi), minimal residual disease (MRD) or relapse, or nonresponse to CARTi. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at day 28 after CARTr, defined as complete remission with B-cell aplasia. Of 262 primary treatments, 81 were followed by ≥1 reinfusion (investigational CTL019, n = 44; huCART19, n = 26; tisagenlecleucel, n = 11), representing 79 patients. Of 63 reinfusions for relapse prevention, 52% achieved CR (BCR, 15/40 [38%]; hematogones, 18/23 [78%]). Lymphodepletion was associated with response to CARTr for BCR (odds ratio [OR], 33.57; P = .015) but not hematogones (OR, 0.30; P = .291). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 29% at 24 months for CR vs 61% for nonresponse to CARTr (P = .259). For MRD/relapse, CR rate to CARTr was 50% (5/10), but 0/8 for nonresponse to CARTi. Toxicity was generally mild, with the only grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (n = 6) or neurotoxicity (n = 1) observed in MRD/relapse treatment. Reinfusion of CTL019/tisagenlecleucel or huCART19 is safe, may reduce relapse risk in a subset of patients, and can reinduce remission in CD19+ relapse.

CAR-macrophage versus CAR-T for solid tumors: The race between a rising star and a superstar

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has been demonstrated to be one of the most promising cancer immunotherapy strategies due to its active antitumor capabilities in vivo. Engineering T cells to overexpress chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), for example, has shown potent efficacy in the therapy of some hematologic malignancies. However, the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy against solid tumors is still limited due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) of solid tumors, difficulty in infiltrating tumor sites, lack of tumor-specific antigens, antigen escape, and severe side effects. In contrast, macrophages expressing CARs (CAR-macrophages) have emerged as another promising candidate in immunotherapy, particularly for solid tumors. Now at its nascent stage (with only one clinical trial progressing), CAR-macrophage still shows inspiring potential advantages over CAR-T in treating solid tumors, including more abundant antitumor mechanisms and better infiltration into tumors. In this review, we discuss the relationships and differences between CAR-T and CAR-macrophage therapies in terms of their CAR structures, antitumor mechanisms, challenges faced in treating solid tumors, and insights gleaned from clinical trials and practice for solid tumors. We especially highlight the potential advantages of CAR-macrophage therapy over CAR-T for solid tumors. Understanding these relationships and differences provides new insight into possible optimization strategies of both these two therapies in solid tumor treatment.

Engineering immune-evasive allogeneic cellular immunotherapies

Allogeneic cellular immunotherapies hold a great promise for cancer treatment owing to their potential cost-effectiveness, scalability and on-demand availability. However, immune rejection of adoptively transferred allogeneic T and natural killer (NK) cells is a substantial obstacle to achieving clinical responses that are comparable to responses obtained with current autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies. In this Perspective, we discuss strategies to confer cell-intrinsic, immune-evasive properties to allogeneic T cells and NK cells in order to prevent or delay their immune rejection, thereby widening the therapeutic window. We discuss how common viral and cancer immune escape mechanisms can serve as a blueprint for improving the persistence of off-the-shelf allogeneic cell therapies. The prospects of harnessing genome editing and synthetic biology to design cell-based precision immunotherapies extend beyond programming target specificities and require careful consideration of innate and adaptive responses in the recipient that may curtail the biodistribution, in vivo expansion and persistence of cellular therapeutics.

Leveraging CD19CAR T cells early in the treatment of older patients with B-ALL: are we there yet?

Older adults (≥55 years old) with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have dismal outcomes with standard chemotherapy as the result of low treatment efficacy and considerable risks for treatment-related morbidity and mortality. There has been a recent success with the introduction of novel therapies, such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab, in the frontline therapeutic paradigm in older adults with B-ALL. However, these agents have their own challenges including the limited durability of remission, the need for additional concurrent chemotherapy and the prolonged course of treatment, and limited efficacy in the setting of extramedullary disease. Here, we hypothesize that the incorporation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy as a consolidation treatment in older adults with B-cell ALL in their first complete remission is the ideal setting to advance treatment outcomes by reducing treatment toxicity, enhancing remission durability, and expanding the use of this effective therapy in this age population.

Application of thromboelastography to predict the severity of bleeding after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with hematological malignancy

OBJECTIVES

We aim to analyze the predictive value of thromboelastography on bleeding severity of patients with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with refractory/relapsed hematological malignancy were enrolled and divided into two groups: the severe bleeding group and the non-severe bleeding group. The thromboelastography data was collected on the day of CAR-T infusion and the 3rd, 7th, 10th, 13th, 17th, and 20th day after CAR-T cell infusion.

RESULTS

The patients of the severe bleeding group had lower platelet (p < .007), maximum amplitude (p = .002), coagulation index (p = .005), and longer coagulation time (p = .019). Increasing trend in reaction time and coagulation time and decreasing trend in Alpha, maximum amplitude, and coagulation index on Days 0-10, opposite on Days 10-20. Univariate logistic regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed maximum amplitude on the 3rd day after CAR-T cell infusion (MA3) (OR = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.84-0.95; p < .001) and cytokine release syndrome grade (OR = 2.57; 95% CI = 1.35-5.32; p = .006) were significantly associated with high bleeding severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Thromboelastography was considered to be a good predictor of bleeding severity.

Enhanced potency of immunotherapy against B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia by combination of an Fc-engineered CD19 antibody and CD47 blockade

CD19-directed immunotherapy has become a cornerstone in the therapy of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). CD19-directed cellular and antibody-based therapeutics have entered therapy of primary and relapsed disease and contributed to improved outcomes in relapsed disease and lower therapy toxicity. However, efficacy remains limited in many cases due to a lack of therapy response, short remission phases, or antigen escape. Here, BCP-ALL cell lines, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) samples, human macrophages, and an in vivo transplantation model in NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice were used to examine the therapeutic potency of a CD19 antibody Fc-engineered for improved effector cell recruitment (CD19-DE) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), in combination with a novel modified CD47 antibody (Hu5F9-IgG2σ). For the in vivo model, only samples refractory to CD19-DE monotherapy were chosen. Hu5F9-IgG2σ enhanced ADCP by CD19-DE in various BCP-ALL cell line models with varying CD19 surface expression and cytogenetic backgrounds, two of which contained the KMT2A-AFF1 fusion. Also, the antibody combination was efficient in inducing ADCP by human macrophages in pediatric PDX samples with and adult samples with and without KMT2A-rearrangement in vitro. In a randomized phase 2-like PDX trial using seven KMT2A-rearranged BCP-ALL samples in NSG mice, the CD19/CD47 antibody combination proved highly efficient. Our findings support that the efficacy of Fc-engineered CD19 antibodies may be substantially enhanced by a combination with CD47 blockade. This suggests that the combination may be a promising therapy option for BCP-ALL, especially in relapsed patients and/or patients refractory to CD19-directed therapy.

Quartic CAR-T Cell Bridging to Twice Allo-HSCT Therapy in a Patient with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is an effective bridging treatment for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, repetitive CAR-T cell therapy and allo-HSCT can only be performed in a few patients because of technical difficulties and patients' physical, economic, and social conditions.

Case Presentation

A 23-year-old female patient with second relapsed B-cell ALL (B-ALL) underwent human-murine chimeric CD19 CAR-T cell therapy twice, human-murine chimeric CD22 CAR-T cell therapy once, and humanized CD19 CAR-T cell therapy once. Moreover, she was sequentially bridged to her mother donor allo-HSCT once and cousin donor allo-HSCT once.

Conclusion

Repetitive CAR-T cell therapy bridging to repetitive allo-HSCT is still a safe and active therapeutic strategy for patients with relapsed or refractory ALL.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 4A: Access to CAR T Cell Therapy in Unique Populations with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The approval of tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) for use in children with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) was based on the phase 2 ELIANA trial, a global registration study. However, the ELIANA trial excluded specific subsets of patients facing unique challenges and did not include a sufficient number of patients to adequately evaluate outcomes in rare subpopulations. Since the commercialization of tisa-cel, data have become available that support therapeutic indications beyond the specific cohorts previously eligible for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeted to CD19 (CD19 CAR-T) therapy on the registration clinical trial. Substantial real-world data and aggregate clinical trial data have addressed gaps in our understanding of response rates, longer-term efficacy, and toxicities associated with CD19 CAR-T in special populations and rare clinical scenarios. These include patients with central nervous system relapsed disease, who were excluded from ELIANA and other early CAR-T trials owing to concerns about risk of neurotoxicity that have not been born out. There is also interest in the use of CD19 CAR-T for very-high-risk patients earlier in the course of therapy, such as patients with persistent minimal residual disease after 2 cycles of upfront chemotherapy and patients with first relapse of B-ALL. However, these indications are not specified on the label for tisa-cel and historically were not included in eligibility criteria for most clinical trials; data addressing these populations are needed. Populations at high risk of relapse, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic lesions, infants with B-ALL, patients with trisomy 21, and young adults with B-ALL, also may benefit from earlier treatment with CD19 CAR-T. It is important to prospectively study patient-reported outcomes given the differential toxicity expected between CD19 CAR-T and the historic standard of care, hematopoietic cell transplantation. Now that CD19 CAR-T therapy is commercially available, studies evaluating potential access disparities created by this very expensive novel therapy are increasingly pressing.

Practice Preferences for Consolidative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Following Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Treatment with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) achieves excellent complete remission rates in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but approximately 50% maintain long-term remission. Consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (cHSCT) is a potential strategy to reduce relapse risk, but it carries substantial short- and long-term toxicities. Additionally, several strategies for management of B cell recovery (BCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) positivity post-tisa-cel exist, without an accepted standard. We hypothesized that practice preferences surrounding cHSCT, as well as management of BCR and NGS positivity, varies across tisa-cel-prescribing physicians and sought to characterize current practice preferences. A survey focusing on preferences regarding the use of cHSCT, management of BCR, and NGS positivity was distributed to physicians who prescribe tisa-cel for children and young adults with B-ALL. Responses were collected from August 2022 to April 2023. Fifty-nine unique responses were collected across 43 institutions. All respondents prescribed tisa-cel for children and young adults. The clinical focus of respondents was HSCT in 71%, followed by leukemia/lymphoma in 24%. For HSCT-naive patients receiving tisa-cel, 57% of respondents indicated they made individualized decisions for cHSCT based on patient factors, whereas 22% indicated they would avoid cHSCT and 21% indicated they would pursue cHSCT when feasible. Certain factors influenced >50% of respondents towards recommending cHSCT (either an increased likelihood of recommending or always recommending), including preinfusion disease burden >25%, primary refractory B-ALL, M3 bone marrow following reinduction for relapse, KMT2A-rearranged B-ALL, history of blinatumomab nonresponse, and HSCT-naive status. Most respondents indicated they would pursue HSCT for HSCT-naive, total body irradiation (TBI) recipients with BCR before 6 months post-tisa-cel or with NGS positivity at 1 or 3 months post-tisa-cel, although there was variability in responses regarding whether to proceed to HSCT directly or provide intervening therapy prior to HSCT. Fewer respondents recommended HSCT for BCR or NGS positivity in patients with a history of HSCT, in noncandidates for TBI, and in patients with trisomy 21. The results of this survey indicate there exists significant practice variability regarding the use of cHSCT, as well as interventions for post-tisa-cel BCR or NGS positivity. These results highlight areas in which ongoing clinical trials could inform more standardized practice.

Building safety into CAR-T therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy is an innovative immunotherapeutic approach that utilizes genetically modified T-cells to eliminate cancer cells using the specificity of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) coupled to the potent cytotoxicity of the T-lymphocyte. CAR-T therapy has yielded significant improvements in relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Given these successes, CAR-T has quickly spread to other hematologic malignancies and is being increasingly explored in solid tumors. From early clinical applications to present day, CAR-T cell therapy has been accompanied by significant toxicities, namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and on-target off-tumor (OTOT) effects. While medical management has improved for CRS and ICANS, the ongoing threat of refractory symptoms and unanticipated idiosyncratic toxicities highlights the need for more powerful safety measures. This is particularly poignant as CAR T-cell therapy continues to expand into the solid tumor space, where the risk of unpredictable toxicities remains high. We will review CAR-T as an immunotherapeutic approach including emergence of unique toxicities throughout development. We will discuss known and novel strategies to mitigate these toxicities; additional safety challenges in the treatment of solid tumors, and how the inducible Caspase 9 "safety switch" provides an ideal platform for continued exploration.

Preventing relapse after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric ALL: the role of transplant and enhanced CAR T cells

CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become an integral part of our treatment armamentarium for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, despite initial remission rates of greater than 80%, durable remission occurs in only 40% to 50% of patients. In this review we summarize our current knowledge of the role of consolidative hematopoietic cell transplantation in the management of pediatric patients who achieved a minimal residual disease-negative complete response post CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. In addition, we review approaches to enhance effector function CD19 CAR T cells, focusing on how to improve persistence and prevent the emergence of CD19- B-ALL blasts.

The Current State of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for B Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Over the past decade, CAR T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-ALL in children and adults. CD19-directed CAR T cells can induce complete remissions in a large majority of patients with B-ALL, and up to half of these patients will go on to maintain durable remissions. However, significant challenges remain for patients who relapse or do not respond. This review will discuss the history of CAR T cell therapy for B-ALL, the treatment considerations for CAR T cell recipients, and current clinical trials and future directions for CAR T cell therapy in B-ALL.

γδ T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy

The intricacy of diseases, shaped by intrinsic processes like immune system exhaustion and hyperactivation, highlights the potential of immune renormalization as a promising strategy in disease treatment. In recent years, our primary focus has centered on γδ T cell-based immunotherapy, particularly pioneering the use of allogeneic Vδ2+ γδ T cells for treating late-stage solid tumors and tuberculosis patients. However, we recognize untapped potential and optimization opportunities to fully harness γδ T cell effector functions in immunotherapy. This review aims to thoroughly examine γδ T cell immunology and its role in diseases. Initially, we elucidate functional differences between γδ T cells and their αβ T cell counterparts. We also provide an overview of major milestones in γδ T cell research since their discovery in 1984. Furthermore, we delve into the intricate biological processes governing their origin, development, fate decisions, and T cell receptor (TCR) rearrangement within the thymus. By examining the mechanisms underlying the anti-tumor functions of distinct γδ T cell subtypes based on γδTCR structure or cytokine release, we emphasize the importance of accurate subtyping in understanding γδ T cell function. We also explore the microenvironment-dependent functions of γδ T cell subsets, particularly in infectious diseases, autoimmune conditions, hematological malignancies, and solid tumors. Finally, we propose future strategies for utilizing allogeneic γδ T cells in tumor immunotherapy. Through this comprehensive review, we aim to provide readers with a holistic understanding of the molecular fundamentals and translational research frontiers of γδ T cells, ultimately contributing to further advancements in harnessing the therapeutic potential of γδ T cells.

Case report: Deep molecular remissions post two separate CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies do not prevent disease from relapsing in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) is an aggressive B-cell malignancy. The management of a relapsed Ph+ ALL patient is challenging. Currently, either allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) or CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) are usually employed as salvage modalities for a relapsed patient. However, there are few reports concerning cases that had both allo-SCT and multiple CAR T-cell therapies, and the optimal management of such patients is unclear. Here, we report a relapsed Ph+ ALL male who was first salvaged with autologous CAR T-cell therapy, followed by allo-SCT. Unfortunately, he had a second relapse even with complete molecular remission (CMR) response after the first CAR T and allo-SCT. This patient was then successfully salvaged by a second CAR T-cell product that is donor-derived. However, even with a CMR response once again following the second CAR T-cell therapy and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion, he experienced a molecular relapse; ponatinib was employed as the subsequent salvage treatment. He achieved a CMR response following ponatinib and was still in remission at the last follow-up. No ABL kinase mutation was detected during the whole course of the disease. This case indicated that a repeated CD19-targeted CAR T-cell treatment is feasible and may be effective in a relapsed Ph+ ALL patient that had previous CAR T-cell and allo-SCT, even though both CAR T-cell have the same construction. However, even with a deep response after each CAR T-cell therapy and allo-SCT, there is still a very small amount of undetectable leukemic cells. The optimal management of Ph+ ALL patients who have a deep response after a second CAR T-cell therapy deserves further exploration.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 2: Prevention and Management of Relapse Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Although CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has been transformative in inducing and sustaining remission, relapse rates remain unacceptably high, with approximately 50% of children and young adults experiencing relapse within the first year postinfusion. Emerging strategies to extend the durability of remission involve the use of prognostic biomarkers to identify those at high risk of relapse or incorporate strategies aimed to enhancing functional CAR T cell persistence. Nonetheless, with antigen loss/down-regulation or evolution to lineage switch as major mechanisms of relapse, optimizing single antigen targeting alone is insufficient. Here, with a focus on relapse prevention strategies, including postinfusion surveillance and treatment approaches being explored to optimize post-CAR-T management (eg, combinatorial antigen targeting strategies, preemptive hematopoietic cell transplantation), we review the current state of the art in the prevention and management of post CAR-T relapse. We highlight the advancements in the field and identify gaps in the literature to guide future research in optimizing the prevention and management of post-CAR-T relapse in children and young adults with B-ALL.

CAR-T cells for pediatric malignancies: Past, present, future and nursing implications

The treatment landscape for pediatric cancers over the last 11 years has undergone a dramatic change, especially with relapsed and refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), due to the introduction of chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy. Because of the success of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell ALL, this promising therapy is undergoing trials in multiple other pediatric malignancies. This article will focus on the introduction of CAR-T cell therapy in pediatric B-cell ALL and discuss past and current trials. We will also discuss trials for CAR-T cell therapy in other pediatric malignancies. This information was gathered through a comprehensive literature review along with using first hand institutional experience. Due to the potential severe toxicities related to CAR-T cell therapy, safe practices and monitoring are key. These authors demonstrate that nurses have a profound responsibility in preparing and caring for patients and families, monitoring and managing side effects in these patients, ensuring that study guidelines are followed, and providing continuity for patients, families, and referring providers. Education of nurses is crucial for improved patient outcomes.

CAR T-Cells for the Treatment of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common subtype of acute leukemia in the pediatric population. The prognosis and treatment of B-ALL have dramatically improved over the past decade with the adoption of intensive and prolonged combination chemotherapy regimens. The advent of novel immunologic agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab has changed the treatment landscape of B-ALL. However, patients have continued to relapse, raising the need for novel therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells have achieved a milestone in the treatment of B-ALL. Two CD19-targeting CAR T-cells were approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory B-ALL. In this review, we review the available data regarding CD19-targeting CAR T-cells with their safety profile as well as the mechanism of resistance to these agents and the way to overcome this resistance.

Alliance between titans: combination strategies of CAR-T cell therapy and oncolytic virus for the treatment of hematological malignancies

There have been several clinical studies using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy for different hematological malignancies. It has transformed the therapy landscape for hematologic malignancies dramatically. Nonetheless, in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and T cell malignancies, it still has a dismal prognosis. Even in the most promising locations, recurrence with CAR-T treatment remains a big concern. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) can directly lyse tumor cells or cause immune responses, and they can be manipulated to create therapeutic proteins, increasing anticancer efficacy. Oncolytic viruses have been proven in a rising number of studies to be beneficial in hematological malignancies. There are limitations that cannot be avoided by using either treatment alone, and the combination of CAR-T cell therapy and oncolytic virus therapy may complement the disadvantages of individual application, enhance the advantages of their respective treatment methods and improve the treatment effect. The alternatives for combining two therapies in hematological malignancies are discussed in this article.

[Long-term follow-up of humanized and murine CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia]

Objective: Murine CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products have been approved for the treatment of refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) ; moreover, humanized products are also undergoing clinical trials. This study aimed to explore the differences in safety and short- and long-term follow-up efficacy between humanized and murine CD19 CAR-T-cells for treating relapsed and refractory B-ALL. Methods: Clinical data of 80 patients with R/R B-ALL treated with CD19-targeted CAR-T-cells at the Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology between May 2016 and March 2023 were analyzed, which included 31 patients with murine CAR-T and 49 with humanized products. Results: The proportion of patients with cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) in the murine and humanized groups was 63.1% and 65.3%, respectively. Moreover, a higher proportion of patients suffered from severe CRS in the murine group than in the humanized CAR-T group (19.4% vs 8.2%, P=0.174). Furthermore, one patient per group died of grade 5 CRS. The incidence of grade 1-2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was 12.9% and 6.1%, respectively; severe ICANS were not observed. Among patients receiving murine CAR-T-cells, an overall response (OR) was observed in 74.2%. Conversely, the OR rate of patients receiving humanized CAR-T-cells was 87.8%. During the median follow-up time of 10.5 months, the median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with murine CAR-T-cells was 12 months, which was as long as that of patients with humanized CAR-T-cells. The median overall survival (OS) were not reached in both groups. Of the 45 patients with a bone marrow burden over 20% at baseline, humanized CAR-T therapy was associated with a significantly improved RFS (43.25% vs 33.33%, P=0.027). Bridging transplantation was an independent factor in prolonging OS (χ(2)=8.017, P=0.005) and PFS (χ(2)=6.584, P=0.010). Common risk factors, such as age, high proportion of bone marrow blasts, and BCR-ABL fusion gene expression, had no significant effect on patients' long-term follow-up outcomes. Three patients reached complete remission after reinfusion of humanized CAR-T-cells. However, one patient relapsed one month after his second infusion of murine CAR-T-cells. Conclusions: The results indicate that humanized CAR-T therapy showed durable efficacy in patients with a higher tumor burden in the bone marrow without any influence on safety. Moreover, it could overcome immunogenicity-induced CAR-T resistance, providing treatment options for patients who were not treated successfully with CAR-T therapies.

Incidence of CD19-negative relapse after CD19-targeted immunotherapy in R/R BCP acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review

There are inconsistencies in the reporting of CD19 antigen status following treatment with CD19-targeted therapies. A majority of evidence comes from studies reporting small sample sizes. In this review, we systematically summarize published studies that have reported rates of CD19-negative relapse after treatment with either blinatumomab or CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy and report the rates of CD19-negative relapse when evaluated in a standardized way across trials. CD19-negative relapse appears to occur more commonly in relapses following CAR T-cell therapy compared with blinatumomab, whether proportions are calculated among all treated patients (8.7% vs 4.5%) or among patients who relapse (30% vs 22.5%). The median (range) duration of follow-up was 29.3 (17.4-50.8) and 20.4 (6.9-49.0) months for publications on blinatumomab (n = 10) and CAR T-cell therapies (n = 23), respectively. There is a need for standardized reporting of CD19 antigen status in the setting of relapse following novel immunotherapies to inform clinical practice.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 1: Clinical Variables Associated with Improved Outcomes for Children and Young Adults treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells for B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CAR-T) targeting the CD19 antigen on B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has transitioned from a highly investigational therapy with limited access to a commercial therapy with established toxicities, response and survival rates, and access in numerous countries. With more than a decade of clinical study and 5 years of commercial access, data showing associations with success and failure have emerged. To address functional limitations of CAR-T and overcome constrained sample sizes when studying single-trial or single-center data, collaborative groups, including the Pediatric Real World CAR Consortium, the CAR-Multicenter Analysis, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, and the International BFM Study Group, among others, have been retrospectively interrogating the amassed clinical experience. The high patient numbers and varied clinical experiences compiled by these groups have defined clinical variables impacting CAR-T outcomes. Here we review published CAR-T trials and consortium/collaborative outcomes to establish variables associated with optimal response to CAR-T in children and young adults with B-ALL. We focus on findings with clinical relevance that have emerged, including data implicating pretreatment disease burden, presence of extramedullary disease, nonresponse to prior CD19 antigen targeting (blinatumomab therapy), CAR T cell dose, and fludarabine pharmacokinetics as factors impacting post-CAR-T survival. Additionally, we address the role of collaborative efforts going forward in guiding clinical practice evolution and further optimizing post-CAR-T outcomes.

Bringing cell therapy to tumors: considerations for optimal CAR binder design

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells have revolutionized the immunotherapy of B-cell malignancies and are poised to expand the range of their impact across a broad range of oncology and non-oncology indications. Critical to the success of a given CAR is the choice of binding domain, as this is the key driver for specificity and plays an important role (along with the rest of the CAR structure) in determining efficacy, potency and durability of the cell therapy. While antibodies have proven to be effective sources of CAR binding domains, it has become apparent that the desired attributes for a CAR binding domain do differ from those of a recombinant antibody. This review will address key factors that need to be considered in choosing the optimal binding domain for a given CAR and how binder properties influence and are influenced by the rest of the CAR.

Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell consolidation therapy combined with CD19+ feeding T cells and TKI for Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia

We conducted a single-arm, open-label, single-center phase 1 study to assess the safety and efficacy of multicycle-sequential anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in combination with autologous CD19+ feeding T cells (FTCs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as consolidation therapy in patients under the age of 65 years with de novo Ph-positive CD19+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Participants were given induction chemotherapy as well as systemic chemotherapy with TKI. Afterward, they received a single cycle of CD19 CAR T-cell infusion and another 3 cycles of CD19 CAR T-cell and CD19+ FTC infusions, followed by TKI as consolidation therapy. CD19+ FTCs were given at 3 different doses. The phase 1 results of the first 15 patients, including 2 withdrawals, are presented. The most common adverse events were cytopenia (13/13) and hypogammaglobinemia (12/13). There was no incidence of cytokine release syndrome above grade 2 or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome or grade 4 nonhematological toxicities. All 13 patients achieved complete remission, including 12 patients with a complete molecular response (CMR) at the data cutoff. The relapse-free survival was 84%, and the overall survival was 83% with a median follow-up of 27 months. The total number of CD19-expressing cells decreased with an increasing CMR rate. CD19 CAR T cells survived for up to 40 months, whereas CD19+ FTCs vanished in 8 patients 3 months after the last infusion. These findings could form the basis for the development of an allo-HSCT-free consolidation paradigm. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03984968.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells as Salvage Therapy for Post-Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Failure

Outcomes for post-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy (CART) relapse are poor. The utilization of a unique CAR T cell construct for post-CART failure is increasing, but this approach is not well described. In this study, with CART-A the first unique CAR T cell construct received and CART-B the second, the primary objective was to characterize outcomes following CART-B. Secondary objectives included evaluating safety and toxicity with sequential CART infusions; investigating the impact of potential factors, such as antigen modulation and interval therapy, on CART-B response; and characterizing long-term outcomes in patients receiving multiple CARTs. This was a retrospective review (NCT03827343) of children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) undergoing CART therapy who received at least 2 unique CART constructs, excluding interim CART reinfusions of the same product. Of 135 patients, 61 (45.1%) received 2 unique CART constructs, including 13 who received >2 CARTs over time. Patients included in this analysis received 14 distinct CARTs targeting CD19 and/or CD22. The median age at CART-A was 12.6 years (range, 3.3 to 30.4 years). The median time from CART-A to CART-B was 302 days (range, 53 to 1183 days). CART-B targeted a different antigen than CART-A in 48 patients (78.7%), owing primarily to loss of CART-A antigen target. The rate of complete remission (CR) was lower with CART-B (65.5%; 40 of 61) than with CART-A (88.5%; 54 of 61; P = .0043); 35 of 40 (87.5%) CART-B responders had CART-B targeting a different antigen than CART-A. Among the 21 patients with a partial response or nonresponse to CART-B, 8 (38.1%) received CART-B with the same antigen target as CART-A. Of 40 patients with CART-B complete response (CR), 29 (72.5%) relapsed. For the 21 patients with evaluable data, the relapse immunophenotype was antigennegative in 3 (14.3%), antigendim in 7 (33.3%), antigenpositive in 10 (47.6%), and lineage switch in 1 (4.8%). The median relapse-free survival following CART-B CR was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1 to 13.2 months), and overall survival was 15.0 months (95% CI, 13.0 to 22.7 months). Given the limited salvage options for post-CART relapse, identifying optimizing strategies for CART-B is critical. We raise awareness about the emerging use of CART for post-CART failure and highlight clinical implications accompanying this paradigm shift.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: state-of-the-(C)ART and the road ahead

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has recently been added to the armamentarium in the battle against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). In this review, we discuss the trials that led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of CAR T-cell therapies in patients with B-ALL. We evaluate the evolving role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the CAR T-cell era and discuss lessons learned from the first steps with CAR T-cell therapy in ALL. Upcoming innovations in CAR technology, including combined and alternative targets and off-the-shelf allogeneic CAR T-cell strategies are presented. Finally, we envision the role that CAR T cells could take in the management of adult patients with B-ALL in the near future.

From barriers to novel strategies: smarter CAR T therapy hits hard to tumors

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for solid tumors shows promise, but several hurdles remain. Strategies to overcome barriers such as CAR T therapy-related toxicities (CTT), immunosuppression, and immune checkpoints through research and technology are needed to put the last nail to the coffin and offer hope for previously incurable malignancies. Herein we review current literature and infer novel strategies for the mitigation of CTT while impeding immune suppression, stromal barriers, tumor heterogeneity, on-target/off-tumor toxicities, and better transfection strategies with an emphasis on clinical research and prospects.

Fine-Tuning through Generations: Advances in Structure and Production of CAR-T Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a promising form of immunotherapy that has seen significant advancements in the past few decades. It involves genetically modifying T cells to target cancer cells expressing specific antigens, providing a novel approach to treating various types of cancer. However, the initial success of first-generation CAR-T cells was limited due to inadequate proliferation and undesirable outcomes. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made in CAR-T cell engineering, leading to the development of the latest fifth-generation CAR-T cells that can target multiple antigens and overcome individual limitations. Despite these advancements, some shortcomings prevent the widespread use of CAR-T therapy, including life-threatening toxicities, T-cell exhaustion, and inadequate infiltration for solid tumors. Researchers have made considerable efforts to address these issues by developing new strategies for improving CAR-T cell function and reducing toxicities. This review provides an overview of the path of CAR-T cell development and highlights some of the prominent advances in its structure and manufacturing process, which include the strategies to improve antigen recognition, enhance T-cell activation and persistence, and overcome immune escape. Finally, the review briefly covers other immune cells for cancer therapy and ends with the discussion on the broad prospects of CAR-T in the treatment of various diseases, not just hematological tumors, and the challenges that need to be addressed for the widespread clinical application of CAR-T cell therapies.

Harnessing the Immune System: Current and Emerging Immunotherapy Strategies for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Treatment for relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children and young adults continues to evolve. Despite optimization of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic approaches and risk-adapted therapy, about 12% of pediatric patients still relapse, and survival rates in this population remain poor. Salvage therapy for relapsed patients continues to be challenging as attempts to further intensify chemotherapy have resulted in excessive toxicity without improving outcomes. Immunotherapy has profoundly impacted the landscape of relapsed ALL by harnessing the patient's immune system to target and eliminate leukemia cells. In this review, we provide an overview and summary of immunotherapy agents that have been approved and remain under investigation for children, including blinatumomab, inotuzumab, daratumomab, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We discuss the landmark clinical trials that have revolutionized the field and provide an update on ongoing clinical trials involving these agents for children in the relapsed and upfront setting. The incorporation of these novel immunotherapies into ALL treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy, has demonstrated promising potential to augment outcomes while decreasing toxicity. However, we also highlight the many challenges we still face and the research critically needed to achieve our goals for cure in children.

The future of CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in pediatrics and adolescents

INTRODUCTION

Antigen down-regulation and early chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell loss have emerged as 2 major challenges threatening outcomes following CD19-specific CAR T cell therapy for children and young adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). In addressing the future of CAR T cell therapy for B-ALL, innovative strategies to avert antigen downregulation and enhance CAR persistence warrant prioritized focus.

AREAS COVERED

We describe promising engineering strategies to refine CAR constructs to reverse exhaustion, develop regulatable CARs, optimize manufacturing, enrich for immune memory and disrupt immune inhibition. We additionally focus on alternative targeting to CD19-monospecific targeting and contextualize possibilities for expanded CAR utilization.

EXPERT OPINION

We describe research advances as they are independently reported, however anticipate an integrative strategy incorporating complementary modifications will be required to effectively address CAR loss, overcome antigen downregulation and enhance reliability and durability of CAR T cell responses for B-ALL.

Advances in chimeric antigen receptor T cells therapy in the treatment of breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently occurring cancer type seriously threatening the lives of women worldwide. Clinically, the high frequency of diverse resistance to current therapeutic strategies advocates a demand to develop novel and effective approaches for the efficient treatment of BC. The chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells therapy, one of the immunotherapies, has displayed powerful capacity to specifically kill and eliminate tumors. Due to the success of CAR-T therapy achieved in treating hematological malignancy, the effect of CAR-T cells therapy has been tested in various human diseases including breast cancer. This review summarized and discussed the landscape of the CAR-T therapy for breast cancer, including the advances, challenge and countermeasure of CAR-T therapy in research and clinical application. The roles of potential antigen targets, tumor microenvironment, immune escape in regulating CAR-T therapy, the combination of CAR-T therapy with other therapeutic strategies to further enhance therapeutic efficacy of CAR-T treatment were also highlighted. Therefore, our review provided a comprehensive understanding of CAR-T cell therapy in breast cancer which will awake huge interests for future in-depth investigation of CAR-T based therapy in cancer treatment.

Long-term response to autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment approach for patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, identifying the factors that influence long-term response to this therapy is necessary to optimize patient selection and treatment allocation. We conducted a literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the use of autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy in both pediatric and adult patients with R/R B-ALL, using several databases including MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Journals@Ovid, Embase, and clinicaltrial.gov. A total of 38 reports were analyzed, which enrolled 2134 patients. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using reconstructed patient survival data. The study explored key modulators of response, including costimulatory domains, disease status, age, and lymphodepletion. The median overall survival and event-free survival were 36.2 months [95% CI 28.9, NR] and 13.3 months [95% CI 12.2, 17], respectively. The overall response rate was 76% [95% CI 71, 81]. The use of 4-1BB costimulatory domain in the CAR construct, administration of low-dose cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion, and pretreatment morphologic remission were associated with better overall survival, with hazard ratios of 0.72, 0.56, and 0.66, respectively. Morphologic remission and 4-1BB domain were associated with better event-free survival, with hazard ratios of 0.66 and 0.72, respectively. These findings suggest that CAR T cell therapy may offer long-term benefits to patients with R/R B-ALL. However, further research is needed to optimize patient selection and better understand the impact of various factors on the outcome of CAR T cell therapy.

Difference in Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Containing 4-1BB and CD28 Co-Stimulatory Domains for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

This study quantified the differences in the efficacy and safety of different stimulation domains of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Clinical trials related to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for B-ALL were searched in public databases from database inception to 13 November 2021. The differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of B-ALL patients treated with anti-CAR T-cell therapy containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains were compared by establishing a parametric survival function. The overall remission rate (ORR), the proportion of people with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR), the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and the neurotoxicity across different co-stimulatory domains was assessed using a random-effects model. The correlation between the ORR, MRD-negative CR, PFS, and OS was tested. The results showed that the median OS of anti-CAR T-cell treatment containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.0-20.0) and 8.5 months (95% CI: 5.0-14.0), and the median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-11.5) and 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.5-7.0), respectively. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain showed superior benefits in patients who achieved ORR. The incidence of neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the CD28 co-stimulatory domain of anti-CD19 CAR T-cells than in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. In addition, the ORR and MRD-negative CR were strongly correlated with OS and PFS, and PFS and OS were strongly correlated. The 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain suggested a better benefit-risk ratio than the CD28 co-stimulatory domain in B-ALL.

Durable remissions achieved with reinfusion of CD19-directed CAR-T despite failure to induce or maintain B-cell aplasia and single-center experience with reinfusion of tisagenlecleucel

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T lymphocytes (CAR-T) have led to durable remissions in children with refractory and/or multiply relapsed B-lymphoblastic leukemia. For those who relapse or lose B-cell aplasia post CAR-T, the role of CAR-T reinfusion is unclear. We report two cases of durable remission with tisagenlecleucel reinfusion despite failure to achieve or maintain B-cell aplasia, and compare these cases to six additional children who received multiple tisagenlecleucel infusions at our institution. Our experience suggests that reinfusion is safe and may be a definitive therapy for a small subset of patients. Reinfusion can also reintroduce remission and/or B-cell aplasia, allowing for subsequent therapies.

Gene Targets of CAR-T Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis following conventional therapeutic interventions. Moreover, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) severely impedes the permeation of chemotherapy drugs, thereby reducing their efficacy. Consequently, it is essential to develop novel GBM treatment methods. A novel kind of pericyte immunotherapy known as chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell treatment uses CAR-T cells to target and destroy tumor cells without the aid of the antigen with great specificity and in a manner that is not major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted. It has emerged as one of the most promising therapy techniques with positive clinical outcomes in hematological cancers, particularly leukemia. Due to its efficacy in hematologic cancers, CAR-T cell therapy could potentially treat solid tumors, including GBM. On the other hand, CAR-T cell treatment has not been as therapeutically effective in treating GBM as it has in treating other hematologic malignancies. CAR-T cell treatments for GBM have several challenges. This paper reviewed the use of CAR-T cell therapy in hematologic tumors and the selection of targets, difficulties, and challenges in GBM.

Therapeutic efficacy and infectious complications of CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cell immunotherapy

Lymphocyte depletion chemotherapy CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cell immunotherapy is an innovative approach for the treatment of refractory or relapsed B-cell malignancies. This method also has the occurrence of infection, and there has been no systematic analysis of infectious complications. In our study, we intend to analyze the infection in patients between day 0 and day 90 by analyzing the data of 40 patients who received CD19 CAR-T cell therapy collected in our hospital. We assessed risk factors for infection before and after treatment using Poisson and Cox regression, respectively. A cohort study was used, including patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. 40 patients were infected for the first time occurred at a median of 6 days after CAR-T cell infusion, and 8 (20%) had 10 infections within 28 days after CAR-T cell infusion, on days 29 and 29. The infection density between 90 days was lower at 0.67. This resulted in an infection density of 1.19 infections per 100 days. Two patients (5%) developed invasive fungal infections and two patients (5%) developed life-threatening or fatal infections. In an adjusted model for baseline characteristics, patients with ALL, ≥4 prior antitumor regimens, and receiving the highest CAR-T cell dose had higher infection densities at 28 days. The incidence of infection was comparable to that observed in clinical trials of salvage associated with infection after CAR-T cell infusion.

Safety and efficacy of co-administration of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T cells in children with B-ALL relapse after CD19 CAR-T therapy

BACKGROUND

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has shown remarkable efficacy in treating relapsed or refractory pediatric B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, poor results are obtained when the same product is reused in patients who relapse after CAR-T. Therefore, there is a need to explore the safety and efficacy of co-administration of CD19- and CD22-targeted CAR-T as a salvage second CAR-T therapy (CART2) in B-ALL patients who relapse after their first CD19 CAR-T treatment (CART1).

METHODS

In this study, we recruited five patients who relapsed after CD19-targeted CAR-T. CD19- and CD22-CAR lentivirus-transfected T cells were cultured separately and mixed before infusion in an approximate ratio of 1:1. The total dose range of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T was 4.3 × 10⁶-1.5 × 10⁷/kg. Throughout the trial, we evaluated the patients' clinical responses, side effects, and the expansion and persistence of CAR-T cells.

RESULTS

After CART2, all five patients had minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR). The 6- and 12-month overall survival (OS) rates were 100%. The median follow-up time was 26.3 months. Three of the five patients bridged to consolidated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after CART2 and remained in MRD-negative CR at the cut-off time. In patient No. 3 (pt03), CAR-T cells were still detected in the peripheral blood (PB) at 347 days post-CART2. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) only occurred with a grade of ≤ 2, and no patients experienced symptoms of neurologic toxicity during CART2.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed infusion of CD19- and CD22-targeted CAR-T cells is a safe and effective regimen for children with B-ALL who relapse after prior CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy. Salvage CART2 provides an opportunity for bridging to transplantation and long-term survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000032211. Retrospectively registered: April 23, 2020.

How I use risk factors for success or failure of CD19 CAR T cells to guide management of children and AYA with B-cell ALL

By overcoming chemotherapeutic resistance, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells facilitate deep, complete remissions and offer the potential for long-term cure in a substantial fraction of patients with chemotherapy refractory disease. However, that success is tempered with 10% to 30% of patients not achieving remission and over half of patients treated eventually experiencing relapse. With over a decade of experience using CAR T cells in children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) to treat relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and 5 years since the first US Food and Drug Administration approval, data defining the nuances of patient-specific risk factors are emerging. With the commercial availability of 2 unique CD19 CAR T-cell constructs for B-ALL, in this article, we review the current literature, outline our approach to patients, and discuss how individual factors inform strategies to optimize outcomes in children and AYA receiving CD19 CAR T cells. We include data from both prospective and recent large retrospective studies that offer insight into understanding when the risks of CAR T-cell therapy failure are high and offer perspectives suggesting when consolidative hematopoietic cell transplantation or experimental CAR T-cell and/or alternative immunotherapy should be considered. We also propose areas where prospective trials addressing the optimal use of CAR T-cell therapy are needed.

Diagnosis and management of lymphoblastic lymphoma in children, adolescents and young adults

Lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) in children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA), accounting for 25-35% of all cases. T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) comprises 70-80% of cases, while precursor B-lymphoblastic lymphoma (pB-LBL) makes up the remaining 20-25% of cases. Event-free and overall survival (EFS and OS) for paediatric LBL patients both exceed 80% with current therapies. Treatment regimens, especially in T-LBL with large mediastinal tumours, are complex with significant toxicity and long-term complications. Though prognosis overall is good for T-LBL and pB-LBL with upfront therapy, outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) disease remain dismal. Here, we review new understanding about the pathogenesis and biology of LBL, recent clinical results and future directions for therapy, and remaining obstacles to improve outcomes while reducing toxicity.

Anti-BCMA/CD19 CAR T Cells with Early Immunomodulatory Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma Responding to Initial or Later-Line Therapy

We conducted a phase I clinical trial of anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART-BCMA) with or without anti-CD19 CAR T cells (huCART19) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients responding to third- or later-line therapy (phase A, N = 10) or high-risk patients responding to first-line therapy (phase B, N = 20), followed by early lenalidomide or pomalidomide maintenance. We observed no high-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and only one instance of low-grade neurologic toxicity. Among 15 subjects with measurable disease, 10 exhibited partial response (PR) or better; among 26 subjects responding to prior therapy, 9 improved their response category and 4 converted to minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response/stringent complete response. Early maintenance therapy was safe, feasible, and coincided in some patients with CAR T-cell reexpansion and late-onset, durable clinical response. Outcomes with CART-BCMA + huCART19 were similar to CART-BCMA alone. Collectively, our results demonstrate favorable safety, pharmacokinetics, and antimyeloma activity of dual-target CAR T-cell therapy in early lines of MM treatment.

SIGNIFICANCE

CAR T cells in early lines of MM therapy could be safer and more effective than in the advanced setting, where prior studies have focused. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of CAR T cells in patients with low disease burden, responding to current therapy, combined with standard maintenance therapy. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 101.

Preclinical evaluation of CD70-specific CAR T cells targeting acute myeloid leukemia

Backgrounds

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has achieved unprecedented success in treating hematopoietic malignancies. However, this cell therapy is hampered in treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML) due to lack of ideal cell surface targets that only express on AML blasts and leukemia stem cells (LSCs) but not on normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

Methods

We detected the CD70 expression on the surfaces of AML cell lines, primary AML cells, HSC, and peripheral blood cells and generated a second-generation CD70-specific CAR-T cells using a construct containing a humanized 41D12-based scFv and a 41BB-CD3ζ intracellular signaling domain. Cytotoxicity, cytokine release, and proliferation in antigen stimulation, CD107a assay, and CFSE assays were used to demonstrate the potent anti-leukemia activity in vitro. A Molm-13 xenograft mouse model was established to evaluate the anti-leukemic activity of CD70 CAR-T in vivo. CFU assay was explored to assess the safety of CD70 CAR-T on HSC.

Results

CD70 heterogeneously expressed on AML primary cells, including leukemia blasts, leukemic progenitor, and stem cells, but not expressed on normal HSCs and majority of blood cells. Anti-CD70 CAR-T cells exhibited potent cytotoxicity, cytokines production, and proliferation when incubated with CD70⁺ AML cell lines. It also displayed robust anti-leukemia activity and prolonged survival in Molm-13 xenograft mouse model. However, such CAR-T cell therapy did not completely eliminate leukemia in vivo.

Discussion

Our study reveals that anti-CD70 CAR-T cells are a new potential treatment for AML. However, such CAR-T cell therapy did not completely eliminate leukemia in vivo, suggesting that future studies aiming to generate innovative combinatorial CAR constructs or to increase CD70 expression density on leukemia cell surface to prolong the life-span of CAR-T cells in the circulation will be needed in order to optimize CAR-T cell responses for AML.

Impact of poverty and neighborhood opportunity on outcomes for children treated with CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy

Children living in poverty experience excessive relapse and death from newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The influence of household poverty and neighborhood social determinants on outcomes from chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory (r/r) leukemia is poorly described. We identified patients with r/r CD19+ ALL/lymphoblastic lymphoma treated on CD19-directed CAR T-cell clinical trials or with commercial tisagenlecleucel from 2012 to 2020. Socioeconomic status (SES) was proxied at the household level, with poverty exposure defined as Medicaid-only insurance. Low-neighborhood opportunity was defined by the Childhood Opportunity Index. Among 206 patients aged 1 to 29, 35.9% were exposed to household poverty, and 24.9% had low-neighborhood opportunity. Patients unexposed to household poverty or low-opportunity neighborhoods were more likely to receive CAR T-cell therapy with a high disease burden (>25%), a disease characteristic associated with inferior outcomes, as compared with less advantaged patients (38% vs 30%; 37% vs 26%). Complete remission (CR) rate was 93%, with no significant differences by household poverty (P = .334) or neighborhood opportunity (P = .504). In multivariate analysis, patients from low-opportunity neighborhoods experienced an increased hazard of relapse as compared with others (P = .006; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.1). There was no difference in hazard of death (P = .545; adjusted HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.4). Among children who successfully receive CAR T-cell therapy, CR and overall survival are equitable regardless of proxied SES and neighborhood opportunity. Children from more advantaged households and neighborhoods receive CAR T-cell therapy with a higher disease burden. Investigation of multicenter outcomes and access disparities outside of clinical trial settings is warranted.