Outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after azacitidine treatment failure

Soluble PD-L1 as a novel biomarker predicts poor outcomes and disease progression in de novo myelodysplastic syndromes

The role of the compromised immune microenvironment, including immune checkpoints, in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been identified as critical This study aimed to investigate the expression patterns of immune checkpoints, particularly soluble PD-1/PD-L1 (sPD-1/sPD-L1) as well as PD-1 on effector T cell subsets, and assess their prognostic value and potential regulatory roles in MDS. 161 MDS patients were enrolled, including 129 patients were primarily diagnosed with de novo MDS, together with 59 MDS patients who underwent hypomethylating agents (HMAs) therapy. Plasma sPD-L1 level was elevated in newly diagnosed MDS patients, which was also found to be associated with MDS disease progression that further increase in higher IPSS-R score group. Patients with increased sPD-L1 expression at diagnosis exhibited notably poorer overall survival, and multivariate Cox analysis indicated that elevated sPD-L1 was an independent risk factor. Furthermore, the levels of multiple cytokines and membrane-bound PD-1 on T cells were found to correlate with sPD-1/sPD-L1 levels in plasma. Importantly, we also found sPD-L1 levels significantly increased in MDS patients who showed progression of disease following HMAs therapy. In conclusion, we found elevated plasma sPD-L1 levels in MDS patients are associated with disease progression and poorer overall survival. This study showed that sPD-L1 is a potential biomarker for prognosis and a target for immunotherapy in MDS.

Molecular profiling of pre- and post- 5-azacytidine myelodysplastic syndrome samples identifies predictors of response

Treatment with the hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine (AZA) increases survival in high-risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients, but predicting patient response and overall survival remains challenging. To address these issues, we analyzed mutational and transcriptional profiles in CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) before and following AZA therapy in MDS patients. AZA treatment led to a greater reduction in the mutational burden in both blast and hematological responders than non-responders. Blast and hematological responders showed transcriptional evidence of pre-treatment enrichment for pathways such as oxidative phosphorylation, MYC targets, and mTORC1 signaling. While blast non-response was associated with TNFa signaling and leukemia stem cell signature, hematological non-response was associated with cell-cycle related pathways. AZA induced similar transcriptional responses in MDS patients regardless of response type. Comparison of blast responders and non-responders to normal controls, allowed us to generate a transcriptional classifier that could predict AZA response and survival. This classifier outperformed a previously developed gene signature in a second MDS patient cohort, but signatures of hematological responses were unable to predict survival. Overall, these studies characterize the molecular consequences of AZA treatment in MDS HSPCs and identify a potential tool for predicting AZA therapy responses and overall survival prior to initiation of therapy.

Glutaminase inhibition in combination with azacytidine in myelodysplastic syndromes: a phase 1b/2 clinical trial and correlative analyses

Malignancies are reliant on glutamine as an energy source and a facilitator of aberrant DNA methylation. We demonstrate preclinical synergy of telaglenastat (CB-839), a selective glutaminase inhibitor, combined with azacytidine (AZA), followed by a single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 study in persons with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The dual primary endpoints evaluated clinical activity, safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints evaluated pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, overall survival, event-free survival and duration of response. The dose-escalation study included six participants and the dose-expansion study included 24 participants. Therapy was well tolerated and led to an objective response rate of 70% with (marrow) complete remission in 53% of participants and a median overall survival of 11.6 months, with evidence of myeloid differentiation in responders determined by single-cell RNA sequencing. Glutamine transporter solute carrier family 38 member 1 in MDS stem cells was associated with clinical responses and predictive of worse prognosis in a large MDS cohort. These data demonstrate the safety and efficacy of CB-839 and AZA as a combined metabolic and epigenetic approach in MDS. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03047993 .

Altered RNA export by SF3B1 mutants confers sensitivity to nuclear export inhibition

SF3B1 mutations frequently occur in cancer yet lack targeted therapies. Clinical trials of XPO1 inhibitors, selinexor and eltanexor, in high-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) revealed responders were enriched with SF3B1 mutations. Given that XPO1 (Exportin-1) is a nuclear exporter responsible for the export of proteins and multiple RNA species, this led to the hypothesis that SF3B1-mutant cells are sensitive to XPO1 inhibition, potentially due to altered splicing. Subsequent RNA sequencing after XPO1 inhibition in SF3B1 wildtype and mutant cells showed increased nuclear retention of RNA transcripts and increased alternative splicing in the SF3B1 mutant cells particularly of genes that impact apoptotic pathways. To identify novel drug combinations that synergize with XPO1 inhibition, a forward genetic screen was performed with eltanexor treatment implicating anti-apoptotic targets BCL2 and BCLXL, which were validated by functional testing in vitro and in vivo. These targets were tested in vivo using Sf3b1K700E conditional knock-in mice, which showed that the combination of eltanexor and venetoclax (BCL2 inhibitor) had a preferential sensitivity for SF3B1 mutant cells without excessive toxicity. In this study, we unveil the mechanisms underlying sensitization to XPO1 inhibition in SF3B1-mutant MDS and preclinically rationalize the combination of eltanexor and venetoclax for high-risk MDS.

Beyond HMAs: Novel Targets and Therapeutic Approaches

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) constitute a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic disorders with extremely variable clinical features and outcomes. Management of MDS is largely based on risk stratification of patients into either lower-risk or higher-risk categories using the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised and, more recently, on the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System. Lower-risk MDS is often managed with the goal of ameliorating cytopenias and improving quality of life, while higher-risk MDS is treated with therapies aimed at extending survival and delaying progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Therapeutic strategies in lower-risk MDS patients may consist of erythropoiesis stimulating agents, luspatercept, and lenalidomide for selected patients. Furthermore, imetelstat has recently been added to the FDA-approved therapeutic armamentarium for lower-risk MDS. In higher-risk MDS, monotherapy with hypomethylating agents continues to be the standard of care. While several novel hypomethylating agent combinations have and are being studied in large randomized phase 3 clinical trials, including the combination of azacitidine and venetoclax, no combination to date have improved overall survival to azacitidine monotherapy. Moreover, biomarker-directed therapies as well as immonotherapeutic approaches are currently being evaluated in early phase trials. Despite recent advancements, the lack of therapeutic agents, particularly after the failure of first line therapy in higher risk MDS, continues to be a major hurdle in the management of MDS. In this review, we discuss the current treatment landscape of MDS and provide an overview of novel agents currently in clinical development that have the potential to alter our current treatment paradigms.

TOPORS E3 ligase mediates resistance to hypomethylating agent cytotoxicity in acute myeloid leukemia cells

Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are frontline therapies for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). However, acquired resistance and treatment failure are commonplace. To address this, we perform a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen in a human MDS-derived cell line, MDS-L, and identify TOPORS as a loss-of-function target that synergizes with HMAs, reducing leukemic burden and improving survival in xenograft models. We demonstrate that depletion of TOPORS mediates sensitivity to HMAs by predisposing leukemic blasts to an impaired DNA damage response (DDR) accompanied by an accumulation of SUMOylated DNMT1 in HMA-treated TOPORS-depleted cells. The combination of HMAs with targeting of TOPORS does not impair healthy hematopoiesis. While inhibitors of TOPORS are unavailable, we show that inhibition of protein SUMOylation with TAK-981 partially phenocopies HMA-sensitivity and DDR impairment. Overall, our data suggest that the combination of HMAs with inhibition of SUMOylation or TOPORS is a rational treatment option for High-Risk MDS (HR-MDS) or AML.

Final phase 1 substudy results of ivosidenib for patients with mutant IDH1 relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic syndrome

ABSTRACT

Ivosidenib is a first-in-class mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) inhibitor with efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced mIDH1 hematologic malignancies, leading to approval in frontline and relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 acute myeloid leukemia. We report final data from a phase 1 single-arm substudy of once-daily ivosidenib in patients with R/R mIDH1 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after failure of standard-of-care therapies. Primary objectives were to determine safety, tolerability, and clinical activity. The primary efficacy end point was the complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) rate. Nineteen patients were enrolled; 18 were included in the efficacy analysis. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8 (42.1%) patients, including a grade 1 QT interval prolongation in 1 (5.3%) patient and grade 2 differentiation syndrome in 2 (10.5%) patients. Rates of CR + PR and objective response (CR + PR + marrow CR) were 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3-64.3) and 83.3% (95% CI, 58.6-96.4), respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a 68.6% probability of patients in CR achieving a remission duration of ≥5 years, and a median overall survival of 35.7 months. Of note, 71.4% and 75.0% baseline red blood cell (RBC)- and platelet-transfusion-dependent patients, respectively, became transfusion independent (TI; no transfusion for ≥56 days); 81.8% and 100% of baseline RBC and platelet TI patients, respectively, remained TI. One (5.3%) patient proceeded to a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In conclusion, ivosidenib is clinically active, with durable remissions and a manageable safety profile observed in these patients. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02074839.

Phase 1 study of azacitidine in combination with quizartinib in patients with FLT3 or CBL mutated MDS and MDS/MPN

We conducted a phase 1 study evaluating 3 dose levels of quizartinib (30 mg, 40 mg or 60 mg) in combination with azacitidine for HMA-naïve or relapsed/refractory MDS or MDS/MPN with FLT3 or CBL mutations. Overall, 12 patients (HMA naïve: n=9, HMA failure: n=3) were enrolled; 7 (58 %) patients had FLT3 mutations and 5 (42 %) had CBL mutations. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=5, 42 %), anemia (n=4, 33 %), lung infection (n=2, 17 %), skin infection (n=2, 17 %), hyponatremia (n=2, 17 %) and sepsis (n=2, 17 %). The overall response rate was 83 % with median relapse-free and overall survivals of 15.1 months (95 % CI 0.0-38.4 months) and 17.5 months (95 % CI NC-NC), respectively. FLT3 mutation clearance was observed in 57 % (n=4) patients. These data suggest quizartinib is safe and shows encouraging activity in FLT3-mutated MDS and MDS/MPN. This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04493138.

Management of adult patients with CMML undergoing allo-HCT: recommendations from the EBMT PH&G Committee

ABSTRACT

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a heterogeneous disease presenting with either myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic features. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only potentially curative option, but the inherent toxicity of this procedure makes the decision to proceed to allo-HCT challenging, particularly because patients with CMML are mostly older and comorbid. Therefore, the decision between a nonintensive treatment approach and allo-HCT represents a delicate balance, especially because prospective randomized studies are lacking and retrospective data in the literature are conflicting. International consensus on the selection of patients and the ideal timing of allo-HCT, specifically in CMML, could not be reached in international recommendations published 6 years ago. Since then, new, CMML-specific data have been published. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Practice Harmonization and Guidelines (PH&G) Committee assembled a panel of experts in the field to provide the first best practice recommendations on the role of allo-HCT specifically in CMML. Recommendations were based on the results of an international survey, a comprehensive review of the literature, and expert opinions on the subject, after structured discussion and circulation of recommendations. Algorithms for patient selection, timing of allo-HCT during the course of the disease, pretransplant strategies, allo-HCT modality, as well as posttransplant management for patients with CMML were outlined. The keynote message is, that once a patient has been identified as a transplant candidate, upfront transplantation without prior disease-modifying treatment is preferred to maximize chances of reaching allo-HCT whenever possible, irrespective of bone marrow blast counts.

Enhanced ALOX12 Gene Expression Predicts Therapeutic Susceptibility to 5-Azacytidine in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

5-azacytidine (AZA), a representative DNA-demethylating drug, has been widely used to treat myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, it remains unclear whether AZA's DNA demethylation of any specific gene is correlated with clinical responses to AZA. In this study, we investigated genes that could contribute to the development of evidence-based epigenetic therapeutics with AZA. A DNA microarray identified that AZA specifically upregulated the expression of 438 genes in AZA-sensitive MDS-L cells but not in AZA-resistant counterpart MDS-L/CDA cells. Of these 438 genes, the ALOX12 gene was hypermethylated in MDS-L cells but not in MDS-L/CDA cells. In addition, we further found that (1) the ALOX12 gene was hypermethylated in patients with MDS compared to healthy controls; (2) MDS classes with excess blasts showed a relatively lower expression of ALOX12 than other classes; (3) a lower expression of ALOX12 correlated with higher bone marrow blasts and a shorter survival in patients with MDS; and (4) an increased ALOX12 expression after AZA treatment was associated with a favorable response to AZA treatment. Taking these factors together, an enhanced expression of the ALOX12 gene may predict favorable therapeutic responses to AZA therapy in MDS.

Single-cell transcriptomics dissects the transcriptome alterations of hematopoietic stem cells in myelodysplastic neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are myeloid neoplasms characterized by disordered differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells and a predisposition to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The underline pathogenesis remains unclear.

METHODS

In this study, the trajectory of differentiation and mechanisms of leukemic transformation were explored through bioinformatics analysis of single-cell RNA-Seq data from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in MDS patients.

RESULTS

Among the HSPC clusters, the proportion of common myeloid progenitor (CMP) was the main cell cluster in the patients with excess blasts (EB)/ secondary AML. Cell cycle analysis indicated the CMP of MDS patients were in an active proliferative state. The genes involved in the cell proliferation, such as MAML3 and PLCB1, were up-regulated in MDS CMP. Further validation analysis indicated that the expression levels of MAML3 and PLCB1 in patients with MDS-EB were significantly higher than those without EB. Patients with high expression of PLCB1 had a higher risk of transformation to AML. PLCB1 inhibitor can suppress proliferation, induce cell cycle arrest, and activate apoptosis of leukemic cells in vitro.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the transcriptomic change of HSPCs in MDS patients along the pseudotime and indicated that PLCB1 plays a key role in the transformation of MDS into leukemia.

Cost-Effectiveness of Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Analysis of BMT CTN 1102

PURPOSE

BMT CTN 1102 was a phase III trial comparing reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC alloHCT) to standard of care for persons with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We report results of a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside the clinical trial.

METHODS

Three hundred eighty-four patients received HCT (n = 260) or standard of care (n = 124) according to availability of a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from US commercial and Medicare perspectives over a 20-year time horizon. Health care utilization and costs were estimated using propensity score-matched cohorts of HCT recipients in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (age 50-64 years) and Medicare (age 65 years and older). EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) surveys of trial participants were used to derive health state utilities.

RESULTS

Extrapolated 20-year overall survival for those age 50-64 years was 29% for HCT (n = 105) versus 13% for usual care (n = 44) and 31% for HCT (n = 155) versus 12% for non-HCT (n = 80) for those age 65 years and older. HCT was more effective (+2.36 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] for age 50-64 years and +2.92 QALYs for age 65 years and older) and more costly (+$452,242 in US dollars (USD) for age 50-64 years and +$233,214 USD for age 65 years and older) than usual care, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $191,487 (USD)/QALY and $79,834 (USD)/QALY, respectively. For persons age 50-64 years, there was a 29% chance that HCT was cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150K (USD)/QALY and 51% at a $200K (USD)/QALY. For persons age 65 years and older, the probability was 100% at a WTP >$150K (USD)/QALY.

CONCLUSION

Among patients age 65 years and older with high-risk MDS, RIC HCT is a high-value strategy. For those age 50-64 years, HCT is a lower-value strategy but has similar cost-effectiveness to other therapies commonly used in oncology.

TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: biology, treatment challenges, and upcoming approaches

Improved understanding of TP53 biology and the clinicopathological features of TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasms has led to the recognition of TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (TP53m AML/MDS) as a unique entity, characterized by dismal outcomes following conventional therapies. Several clinical trials have investigated combinations of emerging therapies for these patients with the poorest molecular prognosis among myeloid neoplasms. Although some emerging therapies have shown improvement in overall response rates, this has not translated into better overall survival, hence the notion that p53 remains an elusive target. New therapeutic strategies, including novel targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies, represent a shift away from cytotoxic and hypomethylating-based therapies, towards approaches combining non-immune and novel immune therapeutic strategies. The triple combination of azacitidine and venetoclax with either magrolimab or eprenetapopt have demonstrated safety in early trials, with phase III trials currently underway, and promising interim clinical results. This review compiles background on TP53 biology, available and emerging therapies along with their mechanisms of action for the TP53m disease entity, current treatment challenges, and recently published data and status of ongoing clinical trials for TP53m AML/MDS.

First-in-human study of JNJ-67571244, a CD33 × CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome

Relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) outcomes remain poor. A targeted cluster of differentiation (CD)33 × CD3 bispecific antibody, JNJ-67571244, was assessed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety and tolerability, and preliminary clinical activity in patients with r/rAML or r/rMDS. This first-in-human, open-label, phase I, dose-escalation/dose-expansion study included patients with r/rAML or r/rMDS who were ineligible for or had exhausted standard therapeutic options. JNJ-67571244 was administered intravenously or subcutaneously using step-up dosing until ≥1 discontinuation condition was met. Outcomes included safety/tolerability, preliminary clinical activity, and systemic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The study was terminated after evaluating 10 dose-escalation cohorts (n = 68) and before starting dose-expansion. Overall, 11 (16.2%) patients experienced ≥1 dose-limiting toxicity; all experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; treatment related: 60 [88.2%]); and 64 (94.1%) experienced ≥1 TEAE of Grade ≥3 toxicity (treatment related: 28 [41.2%]). Although some patients had temporary disease burden reductions, no responses were seen. JNJ-67571244 administration increased multiple cytokines, which coincided with incidence of cytokine release syndrome, infusion-related reactions, and elevated liver function tests. A prolonged step-up strategy was tested to improve tolerability, though this approach did not prevent hepatotoxicity. T-cell activation following treatment suggested target engagement but did not correlate with clinical activity. Safely reaching the projected exposure level for JNJ-67571244 efficacy was not achieved, thus MTD and RP2D were not determined.

Phase 1/2 study of CPX-351 for patients with Int-2 or high risk International Prognostic Scoring System myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia after failure to hypomethylating agents

Failure after hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is associated with dismal outcomes in higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML). We aimed to evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of lower doses of CPX-351, a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin, in a single-centre, phase 1/2 study for patients with HR-MDS or CMML after HMA failure. Four doses of CPX-351 (10, 25, 50 and 75 units/m2 ) administered on Days 1, 3 and 5 of induction and Days 1 and 3 of consolidation were evaluated. Between June 2019 and June 2023, 25 patients were enrolled (phase 1: n = 15; phase 2: n = 10) including 19 (76%) with HR-MDS and 6 (24%) with CMML. Most common grade 3-4 non-haematological treatment-emergent adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n = 12, 48%) and lung infection (n = 5, 20%). Three patients (age >75) experienced cardiac toxicity at the 75 units/m2 dose. Further enrolment continued at 50 units/m2 . Four- and 8-week mortality were 0% and 8% respectively. The overall response rate was 56% with median relapse-free and overall survivals of 9.2 (95% CI 3.2-15.1 months) and 8.7 months (95% CI 1.8-15.6 months) respectively. These data suggest that lower doses of CPX-351 are safe. Further studies are needed to evaluate its activity.

Preclinical characterization and clinical trial of CFI-400945, a polo-like kinase 4 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms

CFI-400945 is a selective oral polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) inhibitor that regulates centriole duplication. PLK4 is aberrantly expressed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical studies indicate that CFI-400945 has potent in vivo efficacy in hematological malignancies and xenograft models, with activity in cells harboring TP53 mutations. In this phase 1 study in very high-risk patients with relapsed/refractory AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (NCT03187288), 13 patients were treated with CFI-400945 continuously in dose escalation from 64 mg/day to 128 mg/day. Three of the 9 efficacy evaluable AML patients achieved complete remission (CR). Two of 4 AML patients (50%) with TP53 mutations and complex monosomal karyotype achieved a CR with 1 patient proceeding to allogenic stem cell transplant. A third patient with TP53 mutated AML had a significant reduction in marrow blasts by > 50% with an improvement in neutrophil and platelet counts. Responses were observed after 1 cycle of therapy. Dose-limiting toxicity was enteritis/colitis. A monotherapy and combination therapy study with a newer crystal form of CFI-400945 in patients with AML, MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is ongoing (NCT04730258).

Defining the mutational profile of lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasm patients with respect to disease progression using next-generation sequencing and pyrosequencing

Introduction

Lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (LR-MDS) comprise the majority of MDS. Despite favourable prognoses, some patients remain at risk of rapid progression. We aimed to define the mutational profile of LR-MDS using next-generation sequencing (NGS), Sanger Sequencing (SSeq), and pyrosequencing.

Material and methods

Samples from 5 primary LR-MDS (67 exons of SF3B1, U2AF1, SRSF2, ZRSR2, TET2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, TP53, and RUNX1 genes) were subjected to NGS. Next, a genomic study was performed to test for the presence of identified DNA sequence variants on a larger group of LR-MDS patients (25 bone marrow [BM], 3 saliva [SAL], and one peripheral blood [PB] sample/s). Both SSeq (all selected DNA sequence variants) and pyrosequencing (9 selected DNA sequence variants) were performed.

Results

Next-generation sequencing results identified 13 DNA sequence variants in 7 genes, comprising 8 mutations in 6 genes (ASXL1, DNMT3A, RUNX1, SF3B1, TET2, ZRSR2) in LR-MDS. The presence of 8 DNA variants was detected in the expanded LR-MDS group using SSeq and pyrosequencing. Mutation acquisition was observed during LR-MDS progression. Four LR-MDS and one acute myeloid leukaemia myelodysplasia-related patient exhibited the presence of at least one mutation. ASXL1 and SF3B1 alterations were most commonly observed (2 patients). Five DNA sequence variants detected in BM (patients: 9, 13) were also present in SAL.

Conclusions

We suggest using NGS to determine the LR-MDS mutational profile at diagnosis and suspicion of disease progression. Moreover, PB and SAL molecular testing represent useful tools for monitoring LR-MDS at higher risk of progression. However, the results need to be confirmed in a larger group.

Phase Ib study of sabatolimab (MBG453), a novel immunotherapy targeting TIM-3 antibody, in combination with decitabine or azacitidine in high- or very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

The safety and efficacy of sabatolimab, a novel immunotherapy targeting T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3), was assessed in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in patients with HMA-naive revised International Prognostic System Score (IPSS-R) high- or very high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR/vHR-MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Sabatolimab + HMA had a safety profile similar to that reported for HMA alone and demonstrated durable clinical responses in patients with HR/vHR-MDS. These results support the ongoing evaluation of sabatolimab-based combination therapy in MDS, CMML, and acute myeloid leukemia.

Beyond the horizon: emerging therapeutic approaches in myelodysplastic neoplasms

Management of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) requires a personalized approach, with a focus on improving quality of life and extending lifespan. The International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised and the molecular International Prognostic Scoring System are key tools for risk stratification and management of MDS. They provide a framework for predicting survival and the risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. However, a major challenge in MDS management remains the limited therapeutic options available, especially after the failure of first-line therapies. In lower-risk MDS, the failure of erythropoietin-stimulating agents often leaves few alternatives, although in higher-risk MDS, the prognosis after hypomethylating agent failure is dismal. This highlights the urgent need for novel, more personalized therapeutic approaches. In this review, we discuss emerging novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of MDS. Several new therapeutic targets are currently being evaluated, offering hope for improved management of MDS in the future.

Phase to phase: Navigating drug combinations with hypomethylating agents in higher-risk MDS trials for optimal outcomes

Recent developments in high-risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (HR MDS) treatment are confronted with challenges in study design due to evolving drug combinations with Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs). The shift from the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) to its molecular revision (IPSS-M) has notably influenced research and clinical practice. Introducing concepts like the MDS/AML overlap complicate classifications and including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) in MDS studies introduces another layer of complexity. The International Consortium for MDS emphasizes aligning HR MDS criteria with the 2022 ELN criteria for AML. Differences in advancements between AML and MDS treatments and hematological toxicity in HR MDS underline the importance of detailed trial designs. Effective therapeutic strategies require accurate reporting of adverse events, highlighting the need for clarity in criteria like the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). We provide an overview on negative clinical trials in HR MDS, analyze possible reasons and explore possibilities to optimize future clinical trials in this challenging patient population.

Glutaminase 1 plays critical roles in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia cells

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) features bone marrow failure and a heightened risk of evolving into acute myeloid leukemia (AML), increasing with age and reducing overall survival. Given the unfavorable outcomes of MDS, alternative treatments are necessary. Glutamine, the most abundant amino acid in the blood, is metabolized first by the enzyme glutaminase (GLS).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether GLS is involved in the progression of MDS. The efficacy of GLS inhibitors (CB839 or IPN60090) and BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax was also examined.

METHODS

We employed GLS inhibitors (CB839, IPN60090) and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, prepared as detailed. MDS and AML cell lines were cultured under standard and modified (hypoxic, glutamine-free) conditions. Viability, proliferation, and caspase activity were assessed with commercial kits. RT-PCR quantified gene expression post-shRNA transfection. Mitochondrial potential, ATP levels, proteasome activity, and metabolic functions were evaluated using specific assays. Statistical analyses (t-tests, ANOVA) validated the findings.

RESULTS

The glutamine-free medium inhibited the growth of MDS cells. GLS1 expression was higher in AML cells than in normal control samples (GSE15061), whereas GLS2 expression was not. Treatment of MDS and AML cells for 72 h was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by GLS inhibitors. Co-treatment with the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor venetoclax and GLS inhibitors increased potency. Cells transfected with GLS1 short hairpin RNA showed suppressed proliferation under hypoxic conditions and increased sensitivity to venetoclax.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting glutaminolysis and BCL2 inhibition enhances the therapeutic efficacy and has been proposed as a novel strategy for treating high-risk MDS and AML.

A multicenter phase Ib trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms or acute myeloid leukemia refractory to hypomethylating agents

Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with hypomethylating agent failure have a poor prognosis. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) can contribute to MDS progression and mediate resistance to anti-PD1 therapy. As histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) decrease MDSCs in preclinical models, we conducted an investigator-initiated, NCI-Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored, multicenter, dose escalation, and expansion phase Ib trial (NCT02936752) of the HDACi entinostat and the anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab. Twenty-eight patients (25 MDS and 3 AML) were enrolled. During dose escalation (n=13 patients), there was one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) on dose level (DL) 1 (G5 pneumonia/bronchoalveolar hemorrhage) and two DLTs at DL 2 (G3 pharyngeal mucositis and G3 anorexia). Per the 3 + 3 dose escalation design, DL 1 (entinostat 8 mg PO days 1 and 15 + pembrolizumab 200 mg IV day 1 every 21 days) was expanded and another 15 patients were enrolled. Hematologic adverse events (AEs) were common. The most common non-hematologic ≥G3 AEs were infection (32%), hypoxia/respiratory failure (11%), and dyspnea (11%). There were no protocol-defined responses among the 28 patients enrolled. Two patients achieved a marrow complete remission (mCR). Using a systems immunology approach with mass cytometry and machine learning analysis, mCR patients had increased classical monocytes and macrophages but there was no significant change of MDSCs. In conclusion, combining entinostat with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced MDS and AML was associated with limited clinical efficacy and substantial toxicity. Absence of an effect on MDSCs could be a potential explanation for the limited efficacy of this combination. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT02936752.

Treatment patterns, resource utilization and clinical outcomes in patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in United States community practices

Management of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) is challenging in the real world. We studied 200 patients with HR-MDS within a large US community hospital network. We describe the clinical presentation, patient-related factors, prognostic characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes and resource utilization. Patients with HR-MDS, treated in our community setting, were elderly (median age 76 years) with a high comorbidity burden. First-line therapy was hypomethylating agent (HMA) monotherapy (20%), lenalidomide (2%), and venetoclax (2%), while the rest were treated with supportive care. Sixty-one percent of the 200, were subsequently hospitalized within 6 months of initial diagnosis. Overall survival was 11.8 months. Curative transplantation was infrequent, HMA-based therapy was underutilized, responses were not durable, most patients became transfusion-dependent or transformed to AML, and resource utilization was substantial and was highly correlated with total in-hospital days. There is a clear unmet need for tolerable treatments that can produce durable remissions in this population.

Are We Ready For "Triplet" Therapy in Higher-Risk MDS?

Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS) represent an ongoing therapeutic challenge, with few effective therapies, many of which may have limited use in this older patient population often with considerations around comorbidities. Outside of transplant, azacitidine and decitabine remain the only disease-modifying therapies, and are palliative in nature. Recent interest has grown in extending combination chemotherapies used to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to patients with MDS, including novel combination chemotherapy "doublets" and "triplets." In this review, we discuss considerations around combination chemotherapy in MDS, specifically as relates to study design, appropriate endpoints, supportive considerations, and how to integrate these into the current treatment paradigm. New therapies in MDS are desperately needed but also require considerations particular to this unique patient population.

Treatment of refractory or relapsed myelodysplastic neoplasms with luspatercept: a multicenter Chinese study

Few effective therapies are available to treat patients with relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Luspatercept was shown to display good efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial for lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) patients, yet real-world data are limited, especially in China. Therefore, data from patients diagnosed as having MDS with low blasts and SF3B1 mutation (MDS-SF3B1) and MDS with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 23 enrolled patients, 17 (73.9%) were males (median age 67 years: range 29 to 80 years). Previously, a total of 22 (95.7%) patients had received recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), 9 (39.1%) roxadustat, 7 (30.4%) lenalidomide and 3 (13.0%) hypomethylating agents (HMA). The median treatment time was 22.9 weeks (9.0-32.4). At week 12, 60.9% (14/23) of the patients achieved a hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) response. Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 8 weeks was found in 57.1% (8/14) of transfusion-dependent patients. The median hemoglobin concentration was 84 g/L, and patients had significantly higher hemoglobin concentrations after 12 weeks of treatment (P < 0.001). It is noteworthy that responders had a greater reduction in serum ferritin (P = 0.021). Those with serum EPO < 500 IU/L at baseline tended to have a higher HI-E rate (P = 0.081), but only patients in non-transfusion and low transfusion burden (LTB) subgroups had statistical differences (P = 0.024). The most commonly occurring adverse events were blood bilirubin increase (17.4%), fatigue (13.0%) and dizziness (13.0%). Luspatercept was effective and tolerated well in refractory LR-MDS-SF3B1 patients. In particular, baseline non-transfusion and LTB patients exhibited a greater response rate to treatment.

Noncoding rules of survival: epigenetic regulation of normal and malignant hematopoiesis

Hematopoiesis is an essential process for organismal development and homeostasis. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression is critical for stem cell self-renewal and differentiation in normal hematopoiesis. Increasing evidence shows that disrupting the balance between self-renewal and cell fate decisions can give rise to hematological diseases such as bone marrow failure and leukemia. Consequently, next-generation sequencing studies have identified various aberrations in histone modifications, DNA methylation, RNA splicing, and RNA modifications in hematologic diseases. Favorable outcomes after targeting epigenetic regulators during disease states have further emphasized their importance in hematological malignancy. However, these targeted therapies are only effective in some patients, suggesting that further research is needed to decipher the complexity of epigenetic regulation during hematopoiesis. In this review, an update on the impact of the epigenome on normal hematopoiesis, disease initiation and progression, and current therapeutic advancements will be discussed.

DNA methyltransferase inhibitor exposure-response: Challenges and opportunities

Although DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis), such as azacitidine and decitabine, are used extensively in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia, there remain unanswered questions about DNMTi's mechanism of action and predictors of clinical response. Because patients often remain on single-agent DNMTis or DNMTi-containing regimens for several months before knowing whether clinical benefit can be achieved, the development and clinical validation of response-predictive biomarkers represents an important unmet need in oncology. In this review, we will summarize the clinical studies that led to the approval of azacitidine and decitabine, as well as the real-world experience with these drugs. We will then focus on biomarker development for DNMTis-specifically, efforts at determining exposure-response relationships and challenges that remain impacting the broader clinical translation of these methods. We will highlight recent progress in liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry technology that has allowed for the simultaneous measurement of decitabine genomic incorporation and global DNA methylation, which has significant potential as a mechanism-of-action based biomarker in patients on DNMTis. Last, we will cover important research questions that need to be addressed in order to optimize this potential biomarker for clinical use.

A phase 1/2 study of azacitidine, venetoclax and pevonedistat in newly diagnosed secondary AML and in MDS or CMML after failure of hypomethylating agents

BACKGROUND

Pevonedistat is a first-in-class, small molecular inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme that has clinical activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Preclinical data suggest synergy of pevonedistat with azacitidine and venetoclax.

METHODS

This single-center, phase 1/2 study evaluated the combination of azacitidine, venetoclax and pevonedistat in older adults with newly diagnosed secondary AML or with MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) after failure of hypomethylating agents. Patients received azacitidine 75 mg/m2 IV on days 1-7, venetoclax at maximum dose of 200-400 mg orally on days 1-21 (AML cohort) or days 1-14 (MDS/CMML cohort) and pevonedistat 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 3 and 5 for up to 24 cycles. The primary endpoints for the phase 2 portion of the study were the CR/CRi rate in the AML cohort and the overall response rate (CR + mCR + PR + HI) in the MDS/CMML cohort.

FINDINGS

Forty patients were enrolled (32 with AML and 8 with MDS/CMML). In the AML cohort, the median age was 74 years (range 61-86 years), and 27 patients (84%) had at least one adverse risk cyto-molecular feature, including 15 (47%) with a TP53 mutation or MECOM rearrangement; seventeen patients (53%) had received prior therapy for a preceding myeloid disorder. The CR/CRi rate was 66% (CR 50%; CRi 16%), and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.1 months. In the MDS/CMML cohort, 7 patients (87%) were high or very high risk by the IPSS-R. The overall response rate was 75% (CR 13%; mCR with or without HI 50%; HI 13%). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were infection in 16 patients (35%), febrile neutropenia in 10 patients (25%) and hypophosphatemia in 9 patients (23%). In an exploratory analysis, early upregulation of NOXA expression was observed, with subsequent decrease in MCL-1 and FLIP, findings consistent with preclinical mechanistic studies of pevonedistat. Upregulation of CD36 was observed, which may have contributed to therapeutic resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The triplet combination of azacitidine, venetoclax and pevonedistat shows encouraging activity in this very poor-risk population of patients with AML, MDS or CMML. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03862157).

CCRL2 affects the sensitivity of myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia cells to azacitidine

Better understanding of the biology of resistance to DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors is required to identify therapies that can improve their efficacy for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). CCRL2 is an atypical chemokine receptor that is upregulated in CD34+ cells from MDS patients and induces proliferation of MDS and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) cells. In this study, we evaluated any role that CCRL2 may have in the regulation of pathways associated with poor response or resistance to DNMT inhibitors. We found that CCRL2 knockdown in TF-1 cells downregulated DNA methylation and PRC2 activity pathways and increased DNMT suppression by azacitidine in MDS/sAML cell lines (MDS92, MDS-L and TF-1). Consistently, CCRL2 deletion increased the sensitivity of these cells to azacitidine in vitro and the efficacy of azacitidine in an MDS-L xenograft model. Furthermore, CCRL2 overexpression in MDS-L and TF-1 cells decreased their sensitivity to azacitidine. Finally, CCRL2 levels were higher in CD34+ cells from MDS and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm patients with poor response to DNMT inhibitors. In conclusion, we demonstrated that CCRL2 modulates epigenetic regulatory pathways, particularly DNMT levels, and affects the sensitivity of MDS/sAML cells to azacitidine. These results support CCRL2 targeting as having therapeutic potential in MDS/sAML.

Why do we not have more drugs approved for MDS? A critical viewpoint on novel drug development in MDS

Approval of new agents to treat higher risk (HR) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has stalled since the approval of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi). In addition, the options for patients with lower risk (LR) MDS who have high transfusion needs and do not harbor ring sideroblasts or 5q- syndrome are limited. Here, we review the current treatment landscape in MDS and identify areas of unmet need, such as treatment after failure of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or DNMTis, TP53-mutated disease, and MDS with potentially targetable mutations. We discuss how our understanding of MDS pathogenesis can inform therapy development, including treating HR-MDS similarly to AML and pursuing therapies to address splicing factor mutations and dysregulated inflammation. We then bring a critical lens to current methodology of MDS studies and propose solutions to improve the efficiency and yield of these clinical trials, including using the most meaningful response metrics and expanding enrollment.

Resistance of Leukemia Cells to 5-Azacytidine: Different Responses to the Same Induction Protocol

Three AML cell variants (M/A, M/A* from MOLM-13 and S/A from SKM-1) were established for resistance by the same protocol using 5-azacytidine (AZA) as a selection agent. These AZA-resistant variants differ in their responses to other cytosine nucleoside analogs, including 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC), as well as in some molecular features. Differences in global DNA methylation, protein levels of DNA methyltransferases, and phosphorylation of histone H2AX were observed in response to AZA and DAC treatment in these cell variants. This could be due to changes in the expression of uridine-cytidine kinases 1 and 2 (UCK1 and UCK2) demonstrated in our cell variants. In the M/A variant that retained sensitivity to DAC, we detected a homozygous point mutation in UCK2 resulting in an amino acid substitution (L220R) that is likely responsible for AZA resistance. Cells administered AZA treatment can switch to de novo synthesis of pyrimidine nucleotides, which could be blocked by inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase by teriflunomide (TFN). This is shown by the synergistic effect of AZA and TFN in those variants that were cross-resistant to DAC and did not have a mutation in UCK2.

Novel Therapies in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Where Do Venetoclax and Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors Fit in?

ABSTRACT

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders with treatment approaches tailored to the presence of cytopenias, disease risk, and molecular mutation profile. In higher-risk MDSs, the standard of care are DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, otherwise referred to as hypomethylating agents (HMAs), with consideration for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in appropriate candidates. Given modest complete remission rates (15%-20%) with HMA monotherapy and median overall survival of approximately 18 months, there is much interest in the investigation of combination and targeted treatment approaches. Furthermore, there is no standard treatment approach in patients with progression of disease after HMA therapy. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence for the B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, and a variety of isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors in the treatment of MDSs along with discussing their potential role in the treatment paradigm of this disease.

Therapeutic Targets in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: Beyond Hypomethylating Agents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss novel targeted therapies under investigation for treatment of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS).

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last few years, results of phase 3 trials assessing novel therapies for high-risk MDS have been largely disappointing. Pevonedistat (NEDD-8 inhibitor) and APR-246 (TP53 reactivator) both did not meet trial endpoints. However, early phase trials of BCL-2, TIM3, and CD47 inhibitors have shown exciting data and are currently under phase 3 investigation. Moreover, combination of hypomethylating agents (HMA) with novel therapies targeting the mutational (IDH, FLT3, spliceosome complex) or immune (PD-1/PDL-1, TIM-3, IRAK-4) pathways are being investigated in early phase clinical trials and have shown adequate safety and promising efficacy. Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a group of hematopoietic neoplasms defined by cytopenias and morphological dysplasia. They are characterized by clonal proliferation of aberrant hematopoietic stem cells caused by recurrent genetic abnormalities. This leads to ineffective erythropoiesis, peripheral blood cytopenias, abnormal cell maturation, and a high risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative therapy; however, it is not a suitable option for majority patients due to their age, comorbidities, and the high rate of treatment-related complications. HMAs remain the only FDA-approved treatment option for high-risk MDS. Due to intolerance, primary, and secondary resistance to HMA, there is a large unmet need to develop new safe and effective therapies for patients with MDS. In this review, we focus on the current management strategies and novel therapies in development for treatment of high-risk MDS.

What's Next after Hypomethylating Agents Failure in Myeloid Neoplasms? A Rational Approach

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as azacitidine and decitabine are a mainstay in the current management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as either single agents or in multidrug combinations. Resistance to HMA is not uncommon, and it can result due to several tumor cellular adaptations. Several clinical and genomic factors have been identified as predictors of HMA resistance. However, the management of MDS/AML patients after the failure of HMA remains challenging in the absence of standardized guidelines. Indeed, this is an area of active research with several potential therapeutic agents currently under development, some of which have demonstrated therapeutic potential in early clinical trials, especially in cases with particular mutational characteristics. Here, we review the latest findings and give a rational approach for such a challenging scenario.

Poor post-induction outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia previously treated with hypomethylating agents

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have failed hypomethylating agents (HMA) have a poor prognosis. We examined whether high intensity induction chemotherapy could abrogate negative outcomes in 270 patients with AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms. Prior HMA therapy was significantly associated with a lower overall survival (OS) as compared to a reference group of patients with secondary disease without prior HMA therapy (median 7.2 vs 13.1 months). In patients with prior HMA therapy, high intensity induction was associated with a non-significant trend toward longer OS (median 8.2 vs 4.8 months) and decreased rates of treatment failure (39% vs 64%). These results redemonstrate poor outcomes in patients with prior HMA and suggest possible benefit of high intensity induction that should be evaluated in future studies.

Understanding the Continuum between High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by bone marrow dysplasia, failure of hematopoiesis and variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent large-scale studies have demonstrated that distinct molecular abnormalities detected at earlier stages of MDS alter disease biology and predict progression to AML. Consistently, various studies analyzing these diseases at the single-cell level have identified specific patterns of progression strongly associated with genomic alterations. These pre-clinical results have solidified the conclusion that high-risk MDS and AML arising from MDS or AML with MDS-related changes (AML-MRC) represent a continuum of the same disease. AML-MRC is distinguished from de novo AML by the presence of certain chromosomal abnormalities, such as deletion of 5q, 7/7q, 20q and complex karyotype and somatic mutations, which are also present in MDS and carry crucial prognostic implications. Recent changes in the classification and prognostication of MDS and AML by the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) reflect these advances. Finally, a better understanding of the biology of high-risk MDS and the mechanisms of disease progression have led to the introduction of novel therapeutic approaches, such as the addition of venetoclax to hypomethylating agents and, more recently, triplet therapies and agents targeting specific mutations, including FLT3 and IDH1/2. In this review, we analyze the pre-clinical data supporting that high-risk MDS and AML-MRC share the same genetic abnormalities and represent a continuum, describe the recent changes in the classification of these neoplasms and summarize the advances in the management of patients with these neoplasms.

STIMULUS-MDS2 design and rationale: a phase III trial with the anti-TIM-3 sabatolimab (MBG453) + azacitidine in higher risk MDS and CMML-2

Patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) unfit for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have poor outcomes. Novel therapies that provide durable benefit with favorable tolerability and clinically meaningful improvement in survival are needed. T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) is an immuno-myeloid regulator expressed on immune and leukemic stem cells in myeloid malignancies. Sabatolimab is a novel immunotherapy targeting TIM-3 with a potential dual mechanism of reactivating the immune system and directly targeting TIM-3+ leukemic blasts suppressing the growth of cancer cells. Here, we describe the aims and design of the phase III STIMULUS-MDS2 trial, which aims to demonstrate the potential for sabatolimab plus azacitidine to improve survival for patients with higher-risk MDS and CMML-2 (NCT04266301). Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04266301 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Glutaminase inhibition in combination with azacytidine in myelodysplastic syndromes: Clinical efficacy and correlative analyses

Malignancies can become reliant on glutamine as an alternative energy source and as a facilitator of aberrant DNA methylation, thus implicating glutaminase (GLS) as a potential therapeutic target. We demonstrate preclinical synergy of telaglenastat (CB-839), a selective GLS inhibitor, when combined with azacytidine (AZA), in vitro and in vivo, followed by a phase Ib/II study of the combination in patients with advanced MDS. Treatment with telaglenastat/AZA led to an ORR of 70% with CR/mCRs in 53% patients and a median overall survival of 11.6 months. scRNAseq and flow cytometry demonstrated a myeloid differentiation program at the stem cell level in clinical responders. Expression of non-canonical glutamine transporter, SLC38A1, was found to be overexpressed in MDS stem cells; was associated with clinical responses to telaglenastat/AZA and predictive of worse prognosis in a large MDS cohort. These data demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a combined metabolic and epigenetic approach in MDS.

Emerging treatments for myelodysplastic syndromes: Biological rationales and clinical translation

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by myeloid dysplasia, peripheral blood cytopenias, and increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The standard of care for patients with MDS is hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy; however, nearly 50% of patients have no response to the treatment. Patients with MDS in whom HMA therapy has failed have a dismal prognosis and no approved second-line therapy options, so enrollment in clinical trials of experimental agents represents these patients' only chance for improved outcomes. A better understanding of the molecular and biological mechanisms underpinning MDS pathogenesis has enabled the development of new agents that target molecular alterations, cell death regulators, signaling pathways, and immune regulatory proteins in MDS. Here, we review novel therapies for patients with MDS in whom HMA therapy has failed, with an emphasis on the biological rationale for these therapies' development.

Inhibition of SUMOylation enhances DNA hypomethylating drug efficacy to reduce outgrowth of hematopoietic malignancies

Combination therapies targeting malignancies aim to increase treatment efficacy and reduce toxicity. Hypomethylating drug 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-2') enhances transcription of tumor suppressor genes and induces replication errors via entrapment of DNMT1, yielding DNA-protein crosslinks. Post-translational modification by SUMO plays major roles in the DNA damage response and is required for degradation of entrapped DNMT1. Here, we combine SUMOylation inhibitor TAK981 and DNA-hypomethylating agent 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine to improve treatment of MYC driven hematopoietic malignancies, since MYC overexpressing tumors are sensitive to SUMOylation inhibition. We studied the classical MYC driven malignancy Burkitt lymphoma, as well as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with and without MYC translocation. SUMO inhibition prolonged the entrapment of DNMT1 to DNA, resulting in DNA damage. An increase in DNA damage was observed in cells co-treated with TAK981 and 5-Aza-2'. Both drugs synergized to reduce cell proliferation in vitro in a B cell lymphoma cell panel, including Burkitt lymphoma and DLBCL. In vivo experiments combining TAK981 (25 mg/kg) and 5-Aza-2' (2.5 mg/kg) showed a significant reduction in outgrowth of Burkitt lymphoma in an orthotopic xenograft model. Our results demonstrate the potential of tailored combination of drugs, based on insight in molecular mechanisms, to improve the efficacy of cancer therapies.

Solute Carrier Family 29A1 Mediates In Vitro Resistance to Azacitidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cell Lines

Azacitidine (AZA) is commonly used hypomethylating agent for higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although some patients achieve remission, eventually most patients fail AZA therapy. Comprehensive analysis of intracellular uptake and retention (IUR) of carbon-labeled AZA (¹⁴C-AZA), gene expression, transporter pump activity with or without inhibitors, and cytotoxicity in naïve and resistant cell lines provided insight into the mechanism of AZA resistance. AML cell lines were exposed to increasing concentrations of AZA to create resistant clones. ¹⁴C-AZA IUR was significantly lower in MOLM-13- (1.65 ± 0.08 ng vs. 5.79 ± 0.18 ng; p < 0.0001) and SKM-1- (1.10 ± 0.08 vs. 5.08 ± 0.26 ng; p < 0.0001) resistant cells compared to respective parental cells. Importantly, ¹⁴C-AZA IUR progressively reduced with downregulation of SLC29A1 expression in MOLM-13- and SKM-1-resistant cells. Furthermore, nitrobenzyl mercaptopurine riboside, an SLC29A inhibitor, reduced ¹⁴C-AZA IUR in MOLM-13 (5.79 ± 0.18 vs. 2.07 ± 0.23, p < 0.0001) and SKM-1-naive cells (5.08 ± 2.59 vs. 1.39 ± 0.19, p = 0.0002) and reduced efficacy of AZA. As the expression of cellular efflux pumps such as ABCB1 and ABCG2 did not change in AZA-resistant cells, they are unlikely contribute to AZA resistance. Therefore, the current study provides a causal link between in vitro AZA resistance and downregulation of cellular influx transporter SLC29A1.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the Management of Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An Evidence-Based Review from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines

The sole curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Here this therapeutic modality is reviewed and critically evaluated in the context of the evidence. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. A panel of MDS experts comprising transplantation and nontransplantation physicians developed consensus treatment recommendations. This review summarizes the standard MDS indications for HCT and addresses areas of controversy. Recent prospective trials have confirmed that allogeneic HCT confers survival benefits in patients with advanced or high-risk MDS compared with nontransplantation approaches, and the use of HCT is increasing in older patients with good performance status. However, patients with high-risk cytogenetic or molecular mutations remain at high risk for relapse. It is unknown whether administration of novel therapies before or after transplantation may decrease the risk of disease relapse in selected populations. Ongoing and future studies will investigate revised approaches to disease risk stratification, patient selection, and post-transplantation approaches to optimize allogeneic HCT outcomes for patients with MDS.

A phase 1b study of venetoclax and azacitidine combination in patients with relapsed or refractory myelodysplastic syndromes

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have a dismal median overall survival (OS) after failing hypomethylating agent (HMA) treatment. There is no standard of care for patients after HMA therapy failure; hence, there is a critical need for effective therapeutic strategies. Herein, we present the safety and efficacy of venetoclax + azacitidine in patients with R/R MDS. This phase 1b, open-label, multicenter study enrolled patients ≥18 years. Patients were treated with escalating doses of oral venetoclax: 100, 200, or 400 mg daily for 14 days every 28-day cycle. Azacitidine was administered on Days 1-7 every cycle at 75 mg/m² /day intravenously/subcutaneously. Responses were assessed per modified 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Forty-four patients (male 86%, median age 74 years) received venetoclax + azacitidine treatment. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Hematological adverse events of Grade ≥ 3 included febrile neutropenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (32%), neutropenia (27%), and anemia (18%). Pneumonia (23%) was the most common Grade ≥ 3 infection. Marrow responses were seen including complete remission (CR, n = 3, 7%) and marrow CR (mCR, n = 14, 32%); 36% (16/44) achieved transfusion independence (TI) for RBCs and/or platelets, and 43% (6/14) with mCR achieved hematological improvement (HI). The median time to CR/mCR was 1.2 months, and the median duration of response for CR + mCR was 8.6 months. Median OS was 12.6 months. Venetoclax + azacitidine shows activity in patients with R/R MDS following prior HMA therapy failure and provides clinically meaningful benefits, including HI and TI, and encouraging OS.

Characterizing crosstalk in epigenetic signaling to understand disease physiology

Epigenetics, the inheritance of genomic information independent of DNA sequence, controls the interpretation of extracellular and intracellular signals in cell homeostasis, proliferation and differentiation. On the chromatin level, signal transduction leads to changes in epigenetic marks, such as histone post-translational modifications (PTMs), DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility to regulate gene expression. Crosstalk between different epigenetic mechanisms, such as that between histone PTMs and DNA methylation, leads to an intricate network of chromatin-binding proteins where pre-existing epigenetic marks promote or inhibit the writing of new marks. The recent technical advances in mass spectrometry (MS) -based proteomic methods and in genome-wide DNA sequencing approaches have broadened our understanding of epigenetic networks greatly. However, further development and wider application of these methods is vital in developing treatments for disorders and pathologies that are driven by epigenetic dysregulation.

Safety, Outcomes, and T-Cell Characteristics in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory MDS or CMML Treated with Atezolizumab in Combination with Guadecitabine

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that resistance to hypomethylating agents (HMA) among patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) would be overcome by combining a programmed death-ligand 1 antibody with an HMA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a Phase I/II, multicenter clinical trial for patients with MDS not achieving an International Working Group response after at least 4 cycles of an HMA ("refractory") or progressing after a response ("relapsed") with 3+ or higher risk MDS by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) and CMML-1 or -2. Phase I consisted of a 3+3 dose-escalation design beginning with guadecitabine at 30 mg/m2 and escalating to 60 mg/m2 Days 1 to 5 with fixed-dose atezolizumab: 840 mg intravenously Days 8 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients, median age 73 (range 54-85), were treated. Thirty patients had MDS and 3 had CMML, with 30% relapsed and 70% refractory. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in Phase I. There were 3 (9%) deaths in ≤ 30 days. Five patients (16%) came off study for drug-related toxicity. Immune-related adverse events (IRAE) occurred in 12 (36%) patients (4 grade 3, 3 grade 2, and 5 grade1). ORR was 33% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19%-52%] with 2 complete remission (CR), 3 hematologic improvement, 5 marrow CR, and 1 partial remission. Median overall survival was 15.1 (95% CI, 8.5-25.3) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Guadecitabine with atezolizumab has modest efficacy with manageable IRAEs and typical cytopenia-related safety concerns for patients with relapsed or refractory MDS and CMML.

SOHO State of the Art and Next Questions: Treatment of Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) carry a dismal prognosis with rapid disease progression, disease-related complications that impact quality of life, high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and poor long-term survival. Higher-risk disease is determined by a number of factors including the depth and type of cytopenias, percentage of myeloblasts occupying the bone marrow, cytogenetic abnormalities, and increasingly also by the presence of higher-risk molecular alterations. In addition to disease characteristics, a patient's performance status and degree of co-morbidity strongly influence treatment decisions and clinical outcomes. A critical first step in the management of patients with higher-risk MDS is evaluating eligibility for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT), which currently remains the only curative therapy, and is available to an ever-increasing number of patients. Outside of stem cell transplant, treatment with hypomethylating agent chemotherapy, azacitidine or decitabine, remains the cornerstone of therapy with improvements in overall survival and reduced transformation to AML; however, these approaches are palliative in nature and outcomes remain very poor overall. With a deepening understanding of disease pathophysiology has come a burgeoning array of novel targeted therapies that are currently in pre-clinical and early phase clinical trials offering hope for new treatment options for this malignancy.

Hypomethylating agents for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: Past discoveries and future directions

Azacitidine and decitabine are hypomethylating agents that have dose-dependent epigenetic and cytotoxic effects and are widely used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this review, we discuss the path to regulatory approval of azacitidine and decitabine, highlighting the substantial efforts that have been made to optimize the dosing schedule and administration of these drugs, including the development of new, oral formulations of both agents. We also review novel combination strategies that are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials for patients with MDS and AML, as well as efforts to expand the current indications of these agents.