Interaction between discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and morphine

Ulotaront, a novel TAAR1 agonist with 5-HT1A agonist activity, lacks abuse liability and attenuates cocaine cue-induced relapse in rats

BACKGROUND

Ulotaront (SEP-363856) is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist with 5-hydroxytryptamine type 1A (5-HT1A) agonist activity that is currently in Phase 3 clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. Unlike available antipsychotics, the efficacy of ulotaront is not mediated by blockade of dopamine D2 or serotonin 5-HT2A receptors. In a short-term randomized clinical trial, ulotaront has demonstrated significant efficacy in the treatment of adults with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Given ulotaront's novel mechanism of action a series of preclinical studies were performed to evaluate its potential abuse liability.

METHODS

A battery of studies were conducted in male and female rats to evaluate whether ulotaront produces behavioral changes suggestive of human abuse potential. In addition, studies were undertaken to probe the potential for ulotaront to block reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in male rats.

RESULTS

Ulotaront was not self-administered by rats trained to self-administer amphetamine, cocaine, or heroin. The subjective qualities of ulotaront were distinct from those produced by amphetamine in a drug discrimination procedure. Ulotaront, and buspirone, a non-scheduled anxiolytic with 5-HT1A agonism, partially generalized to the interoceptive cue elicited by 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). In addition, ulotaront demonstrated a trend to reduce cocaine-primed induced reinstatement, and dose-dependently reduced cue-reinstated responding.

CONCLUSION

The current results suggest that the TAAR1/5-HT1A agonist ulotaront is not likely to pose a risk for recreational abuse in humans and may have potential therapeutic utility as a treatment of substance use disorders.

Synergistic effects of MDMA and ethanol on behavior: Possible effects of ethanol on dopamine D2 -receptor-related signaling

Polydrug abuse is common among drug abusers. In particular, psychostimulants are often taken with ethanol, and the combination of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and alcohol is one of the most common forms of polydrug abuse. However, the mechanism by which these drugs influence behavior remains unclear. The present study was designed to delineate the mechanisms that underlie the effects of the interaction between MDMA and ethanol on behavior in rodents. The combination of MDMA with ethanol enhanced their locomotor-increasing, rewarding, and discriminative stimulus effects without enhancing their effects on the release of dopamine from the nucleus accumbens in rodents. In addition, ethanol potently enhanced locomotor activity produced by the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine in mice. In antagonism tests, the dopamine D₁ -receptor antagonist SCH23390, but not the D₂ -receptor antagonist haloperidol, completely suppressed hyperlocomotion induced by MDMA. However, hyperlocomotion induced by the co-administration of MDMA and ethanol was potently suppressed by haloperidol. These results suggest that the synergistic effects of MDMA and ethanol are mediated through dopamine transmission, especially through postsynaptical regulation of D₂ -receptor-mediated functions.

Differential substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and methylphenidate in rats

Previous studies have demonstrated that methylphenidate, MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine), and other psychostimulants exert stimulant-like subjective effects in humans. Furthermore, MDMA and methylphenidate substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of psychostimulants, such as amphetamine and cocaine, in animals, which suggests that MDMA and methylphenidate may produce similar discriminative stimulus effects in rats. However, there is no evidence regarding the similarities between the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA and methylphenidate. To explore this issue, cross-substitution, substitution, and combination tests were conducted in rats that had been trained to discriminate between MDMA (2.5 mg/kg) or methylphenidate (5.0 mg/kg) and saline. In the cross-substitution tests, MDMA and methylphenidate did not cross-substitute for each other. In the substitution test, methamphetamine substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate, but not for those of MDMA. Furthermore, ephedrine and bupropion, which activate dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems, substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate. On the other hand, serotonin (5-HT) receptor agonists 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA. These results suggest that activation of the noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems is important for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate, whereas activation of the serotonergic system is crucial for the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA. Even though MDMA, like psychostimulants, exerts stimulant-like effects, our findings clearly indicate that the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA are distinctly different from those of other psychostimulants in rats.

Asymmetric generalization and interaction profiles in rhesus monkeys discriminating intravenous cocaine or intravenous heroin from vehicle

Many polydrug abusers combine cocaine with heroin in the form of a "speedball." This study investigated the discriminative stimulus (DS) effects of speedballs in rhesus monkeys trained to discriminate either intravenous cocaine or intravenous heroin from vehicle. Initial substitution tests revealed an asymmetry in the generalization profile of dopamine and opioid agonists such that mu agonists partially substituted for cocaine, but direct and indirect dopamine agonists did not substitute for heroin. Subsequent speedball tests in which drug mixtures were administered by coinjecting the component drugs while keeping the dose-ratio constant revealed an additional asymmetry. In cocaine-trained monkeys, coadministration of cocaine and heroin produced leftward shifts in the cocaine dose-response function. Heroin's cocaine-enhancing effects were mimicked by the mu agonists fentanyl and methadone and less consistently by the delta agonist (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC 80) and reversed by the mu antagonist naltrexone and the delta antagonist naltrindole. In heroin-trained monkeys, coadministration of cocaine and heroin attenuated the DS effects of heroin. Cocaine's heroin-attenuating effects were mimicked by the D1-like agonist 6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine (SKF 81297) and the D2-like agonist R-(-)-propylnorapomorphine and reversed by the D1-like antagonist (6aS-trans)-11-chloro-6,6a,7,8,9,13b-hexahydro-7-methyl-5H- benzo[d] aphtha[2,1-b]azepin-12-ol hydrobromide (SCH 39166) and the D2-like antagonist raclopride. Attenuation of the effects of heroin was accompanied by decreases in response rate. These results suggest that heroin enhances the DS effects of cocaine via mu, and to a lesser extent delta, receptor mechanisms; whereas cocaine-induced inhibition of the DS effects of heroin probably was due at least in part to masking of the heroin DS presumably via stimulation of both D1- and D2-like receptors.

Complicated interaction between psychostimulants and morphine in expression of phenotype of behavior in the dopaminergic system of BALB/c mice

It is believed that BALB/c mice appear to be less sensitive to the locomotor effects of abused drugs compared to other strains, and several behaviors induced by abused drugs depend on genetic factors. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of the interaction between psychostimulants and morphine on behavior in BALB/c mice. Morphine and cocaine induced hyperlocomotion and hypolocomotion, respectively, while methamphetamine did not affect locomotor activity and high doses of methamphetamine significantly increased self-injurious behavior. Cocaine or methamphetamine increased the effects of morphine on locomotor behavior. Haloperidol (a dopamine-receptor antagonist) attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by the combination of cocaine or methamphetamine plus morphine. These results indicate that the synergistic effects of methamphetamine or cocaine and morphine on locomotor activity are mediated through enhancement of the dopaminergic system and that combinations of psychostimulants and morphine enhance the locomotor activity in BALB/c mice. On the other hand, morphine completely attenuated methamphetamine-induced self-injurious behavior. Furthermore, a low dose (0.01 mg/kg) of haloperidol significantly increased the effects of methamphetamine and morphine on the locomotor activity. Hyperlocomotion induced by psychostimulants is mediated by the mesolimbic dopaminergic system, whereas stereotyped behaviors is mediated by the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. Our findings suggest that balances of the activation of dopaminergic neurons (between mesolimbic and nigrostriatal systems) may play an important role to engender corresponding behavioral outcomes in BALB/c mice.

Differential effects of μ-opioid, δ-opioid and κ-opioid receptor agonists on dopamine receptor agonist-induced climbing behavior in mice

Interactions between the dopaminergic system and opioids have not been adequately clarified. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of micro-opioid (morphine), delta-opioid (SNC80) and kappa-opioid (U50 488H) receptor agonists on dopamine receptor agonist-induced climbing behavior in mice. Apomorphine (dopamine-receptor agonist) increased stereotyped climbing behavior, unlike methamphetamine, morphine, U-50 488H and (+/-)7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin hydrobromide (D2-like receptor agonist). Furthermore, SKF81297 (D1 receptor agonist) and SNC80 caused climbing behavior. In addition, while morphine (20 mg/kg), but not U50 488H or SNC80, significantly attenuated high-dose apomorphine (2.0 mg/kg)-induced climbing behavior, it significantly potentiated low-dose apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg)-induced climbing behavior. These results suggest that morphine may have dual effects on the behavioral effects induced by apomorphine. Furthermore, we interestingly showed that the combination of apomorphine or SKF81297 and SNC80 enhanced frequent nonstereotypic climbing behavior, suggesting that delta/D1 interactions may play a prominent role in the expression of certain types of behavior in mice. Thus, micro-opioid, delta-opioid and kappa-opioid receptor agonists induce possible differential effects on the dopaminergic system in mice.

Effects of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists on methamphetamine-induced self-injurious behavior in mice

Opioid receptor agonists can differentially modify the behavioral effects of direct/indirect dopamine receptor agonists, such as methamphetamine, cocaine and apomorphine. However, the effects of opioid receptor agonists on high-dose methamphetamine-induced behavior have not yet been clarified. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to investigate the effects of mu (morphine)-, delta (SNC80)- and kappa (U50,488H)-opioid receptor agonists on methamphetamine-induced self-injurious behavior and locomotor activity in mice. Methamphetamine (20 mg/kg) induced severe self-injurious behavior. In a combination test, some opioid receptor agonists significantly attenuated methamphetamine-induced self-injurious behavior, with potencies in the order morphine>buprenorphine (mu-opioid and kappa-opioid receptor agonist/antagonist) >U50,488H, as maximum effects. These results suggest that the stimulation of mu- and kappa-opioid receptors plays an inhibitory role in high-dose methamphetamine-induced stereotypic self-injurious behavior in mice, without affecting locomotor activity.

Underlying mechanism of combined effect of methamphetamine and morphine on lethality in mice and therapeutic potential of cooling

An increase in polydrug abuse is a major problem worldwide. A previous study showed that coadministration of methamphetamine and morphine induced lethality in rodents and humans. However, the underlying mechanisms by which the lethality is increased by the coadministration of methamphetamine and morphine have not been fully understood. Therefore, the present study was designed to determine the mechanism of increased lethality induced by methamphetamine and morphine. Coadministered methamphetamine and morphine increased the lethality by more than 70% in BALB/c mice. Pretreatment with NMDA-receptor antagonists, such as MK-801 and 3-((R)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl) propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP), and benzamide [poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor] significantly attenuated the increased lethality induced by methamphetamine and morphine. Furthermore, the lethal effect induced by methamphetamine and morphine was completely attenuated by immediate cooling after the coadministration of methamphetamine and morphine. It has been reported that methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity can be blocked by lowering the temperature, and this effect might be mediated by a reduction of release of free radicals. These results suggest that activation of NMDA receptors and PARP play an important role in the increased lethality induced by methamphetamine and morphine.

Effects of dopamine- and serotonin-related compounds on methamphetamine-induced self-injurious behavior in mice

Methamphetamine induces hyperlocomotion, and high doses of methamphetamine induce self-injurious behavior (SIB) in rodents. It is well known that the monoaminergic system is involved in methamphetamine-induced behavior. However, the effects of dopamine- and serotonin (5-HT)-related compounds on high-dose methamphetamine-induced behavior have not been sufficiently clarified. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists and indirect 5-HT receptor agonists on high-dose methamphetamine-induced behavior in mice. Methamphetamine (20 mg/kg) initially increased locomotor activity. As the dosage increased, continuous SIB accompanied by a reduction in locomotor activity was observed. The hyperlocomotion and SIB induced by 20 mg/kg of methamphetamine was abolished by high doses of SCH23390 and haloperidol, indicating that the hyperlocomotion and SIB induced by high doses of methamphetamine are mediated by the activation of D1- and D2-receptors. Furthermore, haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) potently increased locomotor activity in combination with 20 mg/kg methamphetamine. These results suggest that excess dopaminergic activation, especially activation of dopamine D2-receptors, may be involved in the decrease in locomotor activity induced by a high dose of methamphetamine. On the other hand, indirect 5-HT receptor agonists attenuated methamphetamine-induced SIB, suggesting that the stimulation of 5-HT receptors plays an important role in high-dose methamphetamine-induced SIB in mice.

Involvement of histaminergic system in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine

The interactions between morphine and the histaminergic system are not yet fully clarified. More especially, the involvement of the histaminergic system in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine has not been determined. Therefore, the effects of histamine-related compounds on the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine were examined in rats. Combination tests using histamine-related compounds with morphine were initiated in rats trained to discriminate between 3.0 mg/kg morphine and saline. Zolantidine (central histamine H2-receptor antagonist), but not pyrilamine (central histamine H1-receptor antagonist) or ranitidine (peripheral histamine H2-receptor antagonist), significantly attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. The histamine precursor L-histidine significantly potentiated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine are, at least in part, mediated through the central activation of histamine H2-receptors in rats.

Combined Effects of Psychostimulants and Morphine on Locomotor Activity in Mice

Simultaneous administration of psychostimulants and opioids is a major drug abuse problem worldwide. This combination appears to produce synergistic effects on behavior at low doses; however, there is little direct evidence that the combination is stronger than either drug alone. Therefore, we investigated interactions between psychostimulants and morphine on locomotor activity in mice. Low doses of cocaine (5.0 mg/kg) or methamphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) and morphine (10 mg/kg) enhance locomotor activity in a synergistic fashion. Effective doses of cocaine (20 mg/kg) and morphine (20 mg/kg) increased locomotion in an additive fashion. In contrast, combination of methamphetamine (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) and morphine (10 and 20 mg/kg) did not merely enhance their effects (or attenuated the peak effects of methamphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion). These results indicate that different mechanisms explain the interaction between morphine and methamphetamine or cocaine. It is well known that psychostimulants- and opioids-induced hyperlocomotion is mediated by the activation of the dopaminergic system, however, haloperidol (a dopamine receptor antagonist) and U50,488H (which attenuates dopamine release from nerve terminals) significantly increased the effects of methamphetamine and morphine on the locomotor activity. These results suggest that excess dopaminergic activation may be involved in the effects of methamphetamine and morphine on locomotor activity in mice.

Cocaine and Other Indirect-Acting Monoamine Agonists Differentially Attenuate a Naltrexone Discriminative Stimulus in Morphine-Treated Rhesus Monkeys

Monoaminergic drugs can modify opioid withdrawal in nonhumans, and cocaine is reported to attenuate opioid withdrawal in humans. Drug discrimination was used to examine whether s.c. cocaine or other indirect-acting monoamine agonists attenuate morphine (3.2 mg/kg/day) withdrawal induced by naltrexone and by 27 h of morphine deprivation. Naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal was attenuated not only by morphine but also by cocaine, amphetamine, and imipramine. However, reversal of naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal was greater for morphine than for any of the indirect-acting monoamine agonists. Attenuation of the naltrexone discriminative stimulus by indirect-acting monoamine agonists was pharmacologically selective insofar as drugs lacking affinity for monoamine transporters (ketamine and triazolam) were without effect. Twenty-seven hours of morphine deprivation occasioned naltrexone-lever responding and decreased response rate, and both effects were reversed by morphine, cocaine, and amphetamine and not by imipramine, desipramine, ketamine, and triazolam. Thus, indirect-acting monoamine agonists attenuate some (e.g., discriminative) aspects of naltrexone-precipitated withdrawal, whereas only indirect-acting agonists with high affinity for dopamine transporters attenuate deprivation-induced withdrawal. These results suggest that dopamine is differentially involved in naltrexone- and deprivation-induced withdrawal and support the notion that opioid-dependent individuals use stimulants, in part, to attenuate withdrawal.

8-OH DPAT can restore the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine blocked by haloperidol

In the first experiment, separate groups of rats (n = 7) were treated with either saline, cocaine (10 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), or cocaine (10 mg/kg) plus haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg). Locomotor behavior was measured in an open-field environment, and cocaine induced a reliable locomotor stimulant effect compared to saline-treated animals. Haloperidol produced a progressive decline in locomotion over the 5 test days. Haloperidol also blocked cocaine stimulant effects compared to cocaine-treated animals. In the second experiment, five groups (n = 7) of animals were treated either with saline, cocaine (10 mg/kg), 8-OH DPAT (0.2 mg/kg), 8-OH DPAT (0.2 mg/kg) plus haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), or 8-OH DPAT (0.2 mg/kg) plus haloperidol 0.1 mg/kg plus cocaine (10 mg/kg). Over the course of 5 days of treatment, cocaine induced a locomotor stimulant effect. Saline and 8-OH DPAT animals did not differ in terms of locomotion. The 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol plus 0.2 mg/kg 8-OH DPAT treatment decreased locomotion compared to the saline group, but the group given 0.2 mg/kg 8-OH DPAT plus 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol plus cocaine (10 mg/kg) exhibited a locomotor stimulant effect equivalent to the cocaine group. In a third experiment, it was found that the 0.2 mg/kg 8-OH DPAT treatment did not enhance the locomotor stimulant effect of cocaine. Thus, the 8-OH DPAT treatment was able to restore a cocaine locomotor stimulant effect in animals treated with haloperidol without directly enhancing the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine. In Experiments 2 and 3, entries into the central zone of the open field were measured. Cocaine reliably increased central zone entries. The 8-OH DPAT treatment, however, selectively blocked this behavioral effect of cocaine suggesting a qualitative influence of 5-HT(1A) receptors upon cocaine, independent of locomotion activation by cocaine. Ex vivo measurements of dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine metabolism in limbic tissue were consistent with the established effects of cocaine, haloperidol, and 8-OH DPAT upon dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine neurotransmission. In addition, measurement of cocaine brain concentration indicated that neither haloperidol or 8-OH DPAT affected cocaine concentration in brain.

Modulation of cocaine-induced antinociception by opioid-receptor agonists

Cocaine can produce antinociception in a number of animal models. The present experiments were designed to determine if opioid receptor agonists modulate cocaine-induced antinociception in rats. Cocaine produced a dose-dependent increase in antinociception in the hot-plate, but not paw-pressure, test. The combination of cocaine and morphine or [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE) produced results no greater than simple additivity in the hot-plate test. However, the combination of cocaine and morphine produced greater antinociception than morphine alone in the paw-pressure test. A low dose of U69,593 potentiated the effects of cocaine in the hot-plate test. In contrast, cocaine attenuated the effect of U69,593 in the paw-pressure test. Both naltrexone and the selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphamine (nor-BNI) blocked the potentiation of cocaine-induced antinociception by U69,593. The combination of U69,593 and cocaine can produce superadditive or subadditive effects, depending upon the doses and antinociceptive assay used.

mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists do not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine or d-amphetamine in rats

Opioid receptor agonists can modulate the activity of dopamine neurons and could therefore, modify the behavioral effects of drugs that act through the dopamine systems, such as d-amphetamine and cocaine. We tested the ability of agonists selective for the mu- (morphine, methadone, buprenorphine, nalbuphine and heroin), delta-(DPDPE and SCH32615), and kappa- (U69593 and bremazocine) opioid receptors to alter the discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine in rats. Separate groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate between 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine or 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline. Rats were pretreated with vehicle or an agonist, then dose-response curves for d-amphetamine or cocaine were generated. None of the opioid agonists changed significantly the ED50 values of cocaine and d-amphetamine. As a positive control, we tested for antagonism of these effects by the D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists, SCH23390 and eticlopride, respectively. Both antagonists at least partially attenuated the stimulus effects of both training drugs. Our results suggest that any modulation of dopaminergic neurotransmission by the agonists tested in the present study is not sufficient to affect the stimulus effects of d-amphetamine and cocaine in rats.

The role of delta-opioid receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of a low dose of methamphetamine

The effects of selective mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists and antagonists on the discriminative stimulus properties of methamphetamine were examined in rats that had been trained to discriminate between methamphetamine (0.4 mg/kg) and saline. Methamphetamine produced a dose-related increase in methamphetamine-appropriate responses in all of the rats. In generalization tests, neither morphine (a mu-opioid receptor agonist: 0.3-10 mg/kg) nor 3,4-dichloro-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexo]benzeneacetamide (U50,488H: a kappa-opioid receptor agonist: 1.0-8.0 mg/kg) generalized to the discriminative stimulus properties of methamphetamine. A newly synthesized non-peptide selective delta-opioid receptor agonist 2-methyl-4aalpha-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,12,12aalpha- octahydroquinolino(2,3,3,-g)isoquinoline (TAN-67: 32 mg/kg) partially generalized (70% methamphetamine-appropriate responses) to the discriminative stimulus properties of methamphetamine. In combination tests, pretreatment with the mu- and kappa-opioid receptor antagonists, beta-funaltrexamine (9.0 mg/kg) and nor-binaltorphimine (10 mg/kg), respectively, had little or no influence on the discriminative stimulus properties of methamphetamine. In contrast, pretreatment with naltrindole (a non-selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist: 3.0 mg/kg) or naltriben (a selective delta2-opioid receptor antagonist: 1.0 mg/kg), but not with 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (a selective delta1-opioid receptor antagonist: 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg), significantly attenuated the discriminative stimulus properties of methamphetamine. However, naltrindole (3.0 mg/kg) did not significantly attenuate the discriminative stimulus properties of methamphetamine at a higher training dose (1.0 mg/kg). Our findings may have some bearing on the relative importance of the role of delta-opioid (especially delta2-opioid) receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of a low dose of methamphetamine.

Differential effects of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine in rats

The effects of selective mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine were examined in rats trained to discriminate between cocaine (10 mg/kg) and saline. Cocaine produced a dose-related increase in cocaine-appropriate responses in all of the rats. In generalization tests, neither morphine (mu-opioid receptor agonist) nor N-methyl-N-7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-8-11-4-benzofu ranacetamide (U50,488H: kappa-opioid receptor agonist) generalized to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. On the other hand, the newly synthesized non-peptide selective delta-opioid receptor agonist 2-methyl-4a alpha-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,12,12a alpha-octahydro-quinolino(2,3,3,-g)isoquinoline (TAN-67) partially generalized (56.7% cocaine-appropriate responses) to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II (peptide delta 2-opioid receptor agonist) completely generalized, while neither [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO: mu-opioid receptor agonist) nor [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE; delta 1-opioid receptor agonist) generalized to the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine may be partially mediated by delta-opioid (especially delta 2-opioid) receptors. In combination tests, pretreatment with morphine (3.0 mg/kg) and TAN-67 (3.0 and 10 mg/kg) significantly potentiated the discriminative stimulus properties cocaine. In contrast, pretreatment with U50,488H (2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg) scarcely shifted the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. Furthermore, the potentiating effect of 3.0 mg/kg morphine on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine was attenuated by 2.0 mg/kg U50,488H. In contrast, the potentiating effect of 10 mg/kg TAN-67 on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine was not reversed by either 2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg U50,488H. These results suggest that mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptor agonists modulate the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine through different mechanisms, perhaps through different effects on the dopaminergic system.

Endogenous opiates: 1995

This article is the eighteenth installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It includes articles published during 1995 reporting the behavioral effects of the opiate peptides and antagonists, excluding the purely analgesic effects. The specific topics covered this year include stress: tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.

Discriminative stimulus properties of morphine mediated by mu 1-opioid receptors

The mu-opioid receptor subtypes involved in the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine were investigated in rats that had been trained to discriminate between 3.0 mg/kg morphine and saline. The discriminative stimulus properties of morphine were significantly attenuated by beta-funaltrexamine (an irreversible mu-opioid receptor antagonist: 10 and 20 mg/kg) and naloxonazine (an irreversible mu 1-opioid receptor antagonist: 20 mg/kg). These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine may be mediated by mu 1-opioid receptors.