Asthma during pregnancy in a population-based study--pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes

Effects of Pregnancy-Onset Asthma on Perinatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether women with pregnancy-onset asthma are predisposed to worse pregnancy outcomes compared with women with pre-pregnancy asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether pregnancy-onset asthma leads to worse perinatal outcomes compared with pre-pregnancy asthma.

METHODS

Women who were discharged with a diagnosis of asthma and gave birth to a live singleton were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Women were separated into groups based on whether the asthma was diagnosed during or before pregnancy. We compared clinical characteristics, perinatal outcomes, and asthma exacerbations (AEs) between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 335 women were included in this study, 39 of whom (11.6%) had pregnancy-onset asthma and 296 had pre-pregnancy asthma. All pregnant women in the pregnancy-onset group experienced AEs during pregnancy. The proportion of chronic hypertension, chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia, and spontaneous preterm births in the pregnancy-onset group was significantly higher than that in the pre-pregnancy asthma group. After adjusting for age, body mass index, onset of asthma during pregnancy, and severity of AEs through multivariate analysis, pregnancy-onset asthma was an independent risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio = 7.71; 95% CI, 1.30-46.12) and severe AE was an independent risk factor for gestational hypertension and preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio = 3.58; 95% CI, 1.30-9.87).

CONCLUSIONS

During pregnancy, pregnancy-onset asthma in women is associated with an exacerbation of the condition. Obstetricians should be vigilant for signs of asthma onset during pregnancy. Other health care providers should watch for symptoms of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in pregnant women with preexisting or new-onset asthma.

Impact of Asthma Medications During Pregnancy on Asthma Exacerbation, Maternal, and Neonatal Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Asthma affects 5% to 13% of pregnant women, and many require daily pharmacotherapy to achieve asthma control; however, adherence to medication during pregnancy often decreases.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the association between the use of or adherence to asthma medication with asthma exacerbation and maternal/neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

Using linked population-based administrative databases from Alberta, Canada (2012-2018), pregnant women with asthma were categorized based on asthma medication use 1 year before pregnancy: short-acting β-agonists (SABA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and ICS with long-acting β-agonists (ICS+LABA). Women on ICS+LABA were grouped by trajectory of adherence during pregnancy using group-based trajectory modeling. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the associations between the use of or trajectories of adherence to asthma medication during pregnancy with asthma exacerbation and maternal/neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 13,509 of 238,751 (5.7%) pregnant women had asthma before pregnancy (SABA: 24.7%; ICS: 12.5%; ICS+LABA: 25.1%; none: 36.1%). The use of SABA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 2.64), ICS (aOR: 3.37, 95% CI: 2.10, 5.39), and ICS+LABA (aOR: 3.64, 95% CI: 2.57, 5.17) had greater odds of disease exacerbation than no asthma medication during pregnancy. ICS+LABA adherence groups during pregnancy included low (79.8%), moderate-to-decreasing (14.0%), and moderate-to-increasing (6.2%). The moderate-to-decreasing (aOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.84) and moderate-to-increasing (aOR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.83) adherence groups had greater odds of disease exacerbation than the low adherence group. ICS use during pregnancy decreased odds of preterm birth (aOR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.97). Other group comparisons were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows the importance of continuing asthma maintenance medication during pregnancy to improve outcomes. Future research should study the postpartum and long-term outcomes with asthma medication during pregnancy.

The influence of asthma on neuroinflammation and neurodevelopment: From epidemiology to basic models

Asthma is a highly heterogeneous inflammatory disease that can have a significant effect on both the respiratory system and central nervous system. Population based studies and animal models have found asthma to be comorbid with a number of neurological conditions, including depression, anxiety, and neurodevelopmental disorders. In addition, maternal asthma during pregnancy has been associated with neurodevelopmental disorders in the offspring, such as autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In this article, we review the most current epidemiological studies of asthma that identify links to neurological conditions, both as it relates to individuals that suffer from asthma and the impacts asthma during pregnancy may have on offspring neurodevelopment. We also discuss the relevant animal models investigating these links, address the gaps in knowledge, and explore the potential future directions in this field.

Assessing adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with uncontrolled asthma vs. mild asthma: a retrospective comparative analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate perinatal outcomes between the uncontrolled asthma group and the mild asthma group and to reveal the relationship between disease severity and adverse maternal-fetal outcomes in this study.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 180 pregnant women diagnosed with asthma, hospitalized, and delivered at our center between September 1, 2019, and December 1, 2021. We compared two groups: 160 with mild asthma and 20 with uncontrolled asthma. Data encompassed maternal characteristics, obstetrical complications, medication use, emergency department admissions for exacerbations, smoking status, and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

In the uncontrolled asthma group, hospitalization rates, use of inhaled short-acting β-agonist (SABA), and systemic corticosteroids were significantly higher compared to the mild asthma group (p < 0.01). Maternal and fetal complications were more prevalent in the uncontrolled group, including asthma exacerbations (45% vs. 1.2%), anemia (10% vs. 4.4%), prematurity (25% vs. 9.6%), and intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) (10% vs. 0.6%). Neonatal outcomes in the uncontrolled group showed higher rates of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (50% vs. 25%), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (30% vs. 14%), and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (5% vs. 0%) compared to the mild asthma group.

CONCLUSION

Uncontrolled asthma during pregnancy is associated with higher adverse maternal-fetal and neonatal outcomes compared to mild asthma.

Managing Asthma During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in pregnancy and is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Asthma symptoms worsen in approximately 40% of women, and exacerbations requiring medical intervention occur in at least 20% of women. Factors associated with exacerbation and worsening asthma include multiparity, obesity, Black race, exacerbations before pregnancy, and poor asthma control. Exacerbations are associated with further increased risks for poor perinatal outcomes, including low birth weight, preterm birth, and small for gestational age (SGA) status, as well as an increase in the development of asthma in early childhood. Common medications used for asthma, including short-acting β-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids, are considered safe to use in pregnancy. Whereas guidelines generally suggest traditional step therapy for managing asthma in pregnancy, there are alternative models of care and management approaches that may be effective in pregnancy, but require more research. These include single-inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy, treatment adjustment with FeNO, treatable traits personalized medicine approaches, and telemedicine. Little is known about changes to asthma in the postpartum period. However, low adherence to medication and the potential effects of postpartum depression on asthma exacerbation risk warrant further research.

Maternal asthma in Australian indigenous women and perinatal outcomes: A whole population-linked study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between maternal asthma and adverse perinatal outcomes in an Australian Indigenous population.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included all Indigenous mother and baby dyads for births from 2001 to 2013 in Western Australia (n = 25 484). Data were linked from Western Australia Births, Deaths, Midwives, Hospital, and Emergency Department collections. Maternal asthma was defined as a self-reported diagnosis at an antenatal visit or hospitalization or emergency visit for asthma during pregnancy or less than 3 years before pregnancy. Associations with birth, labor, and pregnancy outcomes were assessed using generalized estimating equations. Asthma exacerbation during pregnancy and stratification by remoteness was also assessed.

RESULTS

Maternal asthma was associated with placental abruption (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-2.35]), threatened preterm labor (aOR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.39-1.79]), and emergency cesarean sections (aOR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.13-1.44]). These risks increased further with an asthma exacerbation during pregnancy or if the mother was from a remote area. No associations were found for low birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age, or perinatal mortality.

CONCLUSION

Maternal asthma in Indigenous women is associated with an increased risk of emergency cesarean sections, placental abruption, and threatened preterm labor. These risks may be mitigated by improved management of asthma exacerbations during pregnancy.

Longitudinal Changes in Upper and Lower Airway Function in Pregnancy

Physiologic changes during pregnancy have implications for both upper and lower airway function. Upper airway resistance increases, and total lung capacity decreases. Upper airway symptoms increase; some women develop pregnancy-induced rhinitis and there is an increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing compared to prepregnancy. Longitudinal studies examining changes in upper and lower airway function parameters are limited, particularly in women with asthma. Some studies have observed reduced lung function with advancing gestation; however, changes are small and unlikely to be of major clinical significance. Spirometry is therefore a useful tool for clinical assessment of women with asthma during pregnancy.

Use of Asthma Medication During Gestation and Risk of Specific Congenital Anomalies

Poorly controlled asthma can affect neonatal outcomes including congenital anomalies, which can be reduced with appropriate asthma care during pregnancy. Although there is a concern regarding the safety of asthma medication use during pregnancy and congenital anomalies, the risk of uncontrolled asthma outweighs any potential risks of controller and reliever medication use. Patient education before and during pregnancy is critical to ensure good compliance to therapy and reduce the risk of poor asthma control.

Beliefs about medicines and adherence to asthma medications during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Discontinuation of, and non-adherence to, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for asthma treatment is a significant issue in pregnancy. This study characterized beliefs about medicines in pregnant women with asthma and investigated associations with ICS adherence.

METHODS

Pregnant women with relatively mild asthma (n = 302) were grouped according to ICS use and self-reported adherence (≥80% doses taken). They completed questions about dislike of asthma medications and the validated Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), which consists of ten questions about asthma medicines ("necessity" questions about maintaining health, or "concern" questions about adverse effects), and eight general medicine questions, scored on five-point Likert scales. The Necessity Concerns differential (N-C) was calculated, with positive scores indicating that the patient perceives the benefits of medicines to outweigh the risks.

RESULTS

ICS was used by 87 (29%) women, with 49 (56%) self-reporting adherence. Of the 22% who disliked taking asthma medications during pregnancy, 20% had the belief that the medication was unsafe. ICS users had a significantly higher BMQ necessity score and higher necessity-concern differential score than nonusers; when adjusted for covariates, ICS non-adherence was associated with a lower necessity score (p = 0.015). Women adherent to ICS were more likely to agree to "my health at present depends on my asthma medication" compared to non-adherent ICS users.

CONCLUSIONS

ICS non-adherence was not associated with having relatively more concerns about asthma medicines; however, ICS users were more likely to perceive that the benefits of medication use outweighed any risks. Interventions to improve asthma medication adherence in pregnancy are needed.

Asthma in pregnancy - Management, maternal co-morbidities, and long-term health

Asthma is the most prevalent chronic disease in pregnancy, and as symptoms can change with pregnancy, and exacerbations of asthma are common, regular review of asthma symptoms, the provision of self-management education, and appropriate medication use are the hallmarks of management. Co-morbidities are also prevalent among pregnant women with asthma, with obesity, gestational diabetes, hypertension, rhinitis, depression, and anxiety, more common among women with asthma than women without asthma. Less is known about reflux, obstructive sleep apnoea and vocal cord dysfunction, along with nutritional deficiencies to iron and vitamin D. Maternal asthma impacts the offspring's long-term health, particularly in increasing the risk of early life wheeze and asthma in childhood. While breastfeeding may modify the risk of infant wheeze, less is known about the mechanisms involved. More research is needed to further understand the relationship between asthma in pregnancy and the risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes, such as autism.

Leukotrienes vs. Montelukast—Activity, Metabolism, and Toxicity Hints for Repurposing

Increasing environmental distress is associated with a growing asthma incidence; no treatments are available but montelukast (MTK)—an antagonist of the cysteinyl leukotrienes receptor 1—is widely used in the management of symptoms among adults and children. Recently, new molecular targets have been identified and MTK has been proposed for repurposing in other therapeutic applications, with several ongoing clinical trials. The proposed applications include neuroinflammation control, which could be explored in some neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases (AD and PD). However, this drug has been associated with an increasing number of reported neuropsychiatric adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Besides, and despite being on the market since 1998, MTK metabolism is still poorly understood and the mechanisms underlying neuropsychiatric ADRs remain unknown. We review the role of MTK as a modulator of leukotriene pathways and systematize the current knowledge about MTK metabolism. Known toxic effects of MTK are discussed, and repurposing applications are presented comprehensively, with a focus on AD and PD.

The safety of pranlukast and montelukast during the first trimester of pregnancy: A prospective, two-centered cohort study in Japan

For leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs), especially pranlukast, safety data during pregnancy is limited. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, two-centered cohort study using data from teratogen information services in Japan to clarify the effects of LTRA exposure during pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes. Pregnant women who being counseled on drug use during pregnancy at two facilities were enrolled. The primary outcome of this study was major congenital anomalies. The incidence of major congenital anomalies in women exposed to montelukast or pranlukast during the first trimester of pregnancy was compared with that of controls. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the effects of maternal LTRA use during the first trimester of pregnancy on major congenital anomalies. The outcomes of 231 pregnant women exposed to LTRAs (montelukast n = 122; pranlukast n = 106; both n = 3) and 212 live births were compared with those of controls. The rate of major congenital anomalies in the LTRA group was 1.9%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that LTRA exposure was not a risk factor for major congenital anomalies (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-2.05; p = 0.653). In addition, no significant difference was detected in stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, and low birth weight between the two groups. The present study revealed that montelukast and pranlukast were not associated with the risk of major congenital anomalies. Our findings suggest that LTRAs could be safely employed for asthma therapy during pregnancy.

Risk factors for asthma exacerbations during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Conflicting literature exists regarding the risk factors for exacerbations among pregnant women with asthma. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine risk factors for asthma exacerbations during pregnancy.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for the following terms: (asthma or wheeze) and (pregnan* or perinat* or obstet*) and (exacerb* or flare up or morbidit* or attack*).All studies published between 2000 and 24 August 2021 were considered for inclusion if they reported at least one potential risk factor of asthma exacerbations in pregnant women with asthma. Of the 3337 references considered, 35 publications involving 429 583 pregnant women with asthma were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine mean difference in risk factor between exacerbation groups, or the relative risks of exacerbation with certain risk factors. Good study quality was found through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (median score 8, interquartile range 7-9).

RESULTS

Increased maternal age (mean difference 0.62, 95% CI 0.11-1.13), obesity (relative risk 1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.37), smoking (relative risk 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-1.75), black ethnicity (relative risk 1.62, 95% CI 1.52-1.73), multiparity (relative risk 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.68), depression/anxiety (relative risk 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.59), moderate-severe asthma (relative risk 3.44, 95% CI 2.03-5.83, versus mild) and severe asthma (relative risk 2.70, 95% CI 1.85-3.95, versus mild-moderate) were associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbations during pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Future interventions aimed at reducing exacerbations in pregnancy could address the modifiable factors, such as smoking and depression/anxiety, and introduce more regular monitoring for those with nonmodifiable risk factors such as obesity and more severe asthma.

Management of allergic diseases in pregnancy

Allergic diseases like asthma, allergic rhinitis, food allergy, hymenoptera allergy, or atopic dermatitis are highly prevalent in women of childbearing age and may affect up to 30% of this age group. This review focuses on the management of allergic diseases during pregnancy. Furthermore, we discuss the challenges of counseling women with allergic diseases in the reproductive age, including considerations relevant to the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. To create the optimal milieu for the unborn child, a multitude of immunological changes occur during pregnancy which may favor type 2 responses and aggravate disease phenotypes. In co-occurrence with suboptimal preconception disease control, this elevated Th2 responses may aggravate allergic disease manifestations during pregnancy and pose a risk for mother and child. Due to limitations in conducting clinical trials in pregnant women, safety data on anti-allergic drugs during pregnancy are limited. The lack of information and concerns among pregnant patients demands counseling on the benefits of anti-allergic drugs and the potential and known risks. This includes information on the risk for mother and child of disease aggravation in the absence of treatment. By doing so, informed decisions and shared decision-making can take place.

A prospective study of preconception asthma and spontaneous abortion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationships among history of asthma, asthma severity, and spontaneous abortion (SAB).

METHODS

Pregnancy Study Online is a preconception cohort study of North American couples. During the preconception period, female participants reported their history of physician-diagnosed asthma, age at first diagnosis, and use of asthma medications in the previous 4 weeks. Asthma severity was classified by medication use proximal to conception, from level 0 to 3 in increasing severity. Pregnancy and SAB were identified using data from follow-up questionnaires. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Among 6325 participants who conceived, 19% experienced SAB and 17% reported a history of asthma. There was no appreciable association between asthma history and SAB incidence (HR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.14). HRs comparing severity levels 0, 1, and 2-3 with no asthma were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.67, 1.01), 1.20 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.60), and 1.31 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.78), respectively. Among women who conceived without the use of fertility treatment, level 2-3 severity was associated with SAB (HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.89).

CONCLUSIONS

While history of asthma diagnosis was not materially associated with SAB, having severe asthma (based on medication use) was associated with greater SAB risk.

Asthma severity and impact on perinatal outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Large-scale studies exploring the associations of asthma severity, exacerbations and medication use with adverse perinatal outcomes have been published in recent years.

OBJECTIVES

To update evidence on the associations of asthma severity, exacerbations and medication use with the adverse perinatal outcomes of preterm delivery (PD), low birthweight (LBW) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA).

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from inception to 1 January 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Cohort studies comparing the likelihood of adverse perinatal outcomes in groups of asthmatic women stratified by asthma severity, asthma exacerbations or medication use, or comparing the likelihood of adverse perinatal outcomes between non-asthmatic women and asthmatics of various levels of severity and exacerbation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects models were used to meta-analyse the results.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. The odds of delivering SGA babies increased with maternal asthma severity. Pregnant women with an asthma exacerbation had higher odds of delivering LBW babies and SGA babies, compared with pregnant women with asthma but without an exacerbation (pooled adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29 for LBW; number of studies with adjusted OR 3; I²  = 0%) (pooled adjusted OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.23 for SGA; number of studies with adjusted OR 4; I²  = 0%) and compared to pregnant women without asthma. Oral corticosteroids use during pregnancy was associated with increased odds of LBW, but not PD.

CONCLUSIONS

The available data suggest that maternal asthma severity and exacerbations are associated with increased odds of LBW and SGA babies.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

A systematic review and meta-analysis found that maternal asthma severity and exacerbations are associated with increased odds of delivering low birthweight and small-for-gestational-age babies.

Early Sensory and Temperament Features in Infants Born to Mothers With Asthma: A Cross-Sectional Study

Maternal asthma in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Adverse perinatal outcomes may result in poorer infant developmental outcomes, such as temperament and sensory difficulties. This study aimed to (1) assess differences in temperament and sensory features between infants born to mothers with and without asthma and (2) investigate differences in these infant behaviours as a function of maternal asthma severity and asthma control. Mothers completed the Carey Temperament Scales and the Sensory Profile 2 at either 6 weeks, 6 months, or 12 months postpartum. Overall, we observed no significant differences between infants born to mothers with and without asthma in their temperament or sensory features; scores in both domains fell within the normative range. More infants in the asthma group, however, were reported to be highly distractible. When compared with normative data, infants in both groups were reported to have poor predictability of biological functions and fewer infants engaged in low levels of sensory behaviours. Some infants were observed to experience difficulties with hyper-reactivity within several domains. Maternal asthma severity and control during pregnancy were not linked to significant differences between infant temperament and sensory features. The present findings indicate that infants born to mothers with asthma are not at an increased risk overall for temperament or sensory difficulties, compared to control infants. However, a subset of infants across both groups may be at risk for attention or sensory hyper-reactivity difficulties. Further research into the developmental outcomes of infants born to mothers with asthma is warranted.

Maternal asthma during pregnancy and risks of allergy and asthma in progeny: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this systematic review is to synthesize the best available evidence on the relationship between in utero exposure to maternal asthma and postnatal allergy. Secondary objectives are to investigate the impact of asthma loss of control, asthma exacerbation, and asthma severity during pregnancy on risks of allergy and asthma in progeny.

INTRODUCTION

Maternal asthma is a well-known risk factor for childhood asthma, with recent evidence suggesting that children of asthmatic mothers are also at increased risk of allergic diseases. Importantly, these do not appear to be purely genetic associations, since maternal asthma is more strongly associated with childhood asthma than paternal asthma. In addition, experimentally induced allergic asthma during pregnancy increases allergic responses to sensitization in mice. The strength of the relationships between exposure to maternal asthma or severity of maternal asthma, and progeny asthma and allergy are unknown.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will include primary studies that report incidence of physician-diagnosed asthma or allergic disease in human progeny who were exposed in utero to maternal asthma, in comparison to progeny not exposed to maternal asthma.

METHODS

Initial search terms include (pregnan∗ OR gestat∗) AND asthma∗ AND allerg∗. We will search the following electronic databases for published and unpublished evidence: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, Informit Health, MedNar, ProQuest, and Trove. There will be no restrictions on publication date. Only studies available as a full-text English publication will be considered for inclusion.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020201538.

[Management of asthma during pregnancy]

Asthma is the most common chronic condition in pregnant women. The risks of complications associated with asthma for the mother, the foetus and the pregnancy are mainly due to uncontrolled asthma and the occurrence of exacerbations. These events are promoted by the patient's difficulty in complying with treatment or by prescription insufficiency for an unjustified fear of teratogenicity. The challenge of the management of asthma during pregnancy is to ensure optimal maternal asthma control in order to prevent foetal hypoxia and thus, reduce the risk of complications. Preventing the occurrence of asthma symptoms and exacerbations, ensuring optimal lung function and managing the risk factors of poor asthma outcomes and comorbidities are the principles necessary to achieve this goal. Because of the low or non-existent risks of the main treatments of asthma for the foetus and the mother, it is widely recommended that all therapies initiated before conception are continued, in particular inhaled corticosteroids, and to adjust the dosage to the minimum effective dose. During the preconception period and throughout pregnancy, coordination of the different healthcare professionals (general practitioner, respiratory specialist and gynecologist) is essential, with the mother-to-be playing a central role in the management of her asthma.

Asthma and pregnancy in the 2020 decade: still a matter of concern

Asthma is a fairly common health problem for pregnant women and a potentially serious medical condition that may complicate pregnancy. Most complications are related to lack of disease control, which can adversely affect both maternal quality of life and perinatal outcomes. In this article, we review recent literature concerning asthma in pregnancy, describing the course of the disease and associated complications. Furthermore, we review and discuss asthma monitoring and management during pregnancy, labor and post-partum. The course of asthma symptoms during pregnancy is unpredictable but exacerbations are more common during the second trimester. The causes are multifactorial and asthma phenotype may have a role. It has been proposed that combined use of CARAT (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test) and lung function tests can be used to monitor and adjust therapy during pregnancy in patients with asthma. As a complement, an approach that considers airway inflammation assessment using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), a noninvasive marker of inflammation, may improve asthma control during pregnancy. It is important to consider a few but relevant differences in asthma management and treatment regarding pregnancy and the peri-partum period to safely achieve optimal management of asthma during all these phases for both mother and offsprings.

How biological sex of the host shapes its gut microbiota

The gut microbiota is a complex system, consisting of a dynamic population of microorganisms, involved in the regulation of the host's homeostasis. A vast number of factors are driving the gut microbiota composition including diet, antibiotics, environment, and lifestyle. However, in the past decade, a growing number of studies also focused on the role of sex in relationship to changes in the gut microbiota composition in animal experiments as well as in human beings. Despite the progress in investigation techniques, still little is known about the mechanism behind the observed sex-related differences. In this review, we summarized current knowledge on the sex-dependent differences of the intestinal commensals and discuss the probable direct impact of sex hormones and more indirect effects such as dietary habits or antibiotics. While we have to conclude limited data on specific developmental stages, a clear role for sexual hormones and most probably for testosterone emerges.

Maternal asthma and early fetal growth, the MAESTRO study

BACKGROUND

Several maternal conditions can affect fetal growth, and asthma during pregnancy is known to be associated with lower birth weight and shorter gestational age.

OBJECTIVE

In a new Swedish cohort study on maternal asthma exposure and stress during pregnancy (MAESTRO), we have assessed if there is evidence of early fetal growth restriction in asthmatic women or if a growth restriction might come later during pregnancy.

METHODS

We recruited women from eight antenatal clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. Questionnaires on background factors, asthma status and stress were assessed during pregnancy. The participants were asked to consent to collection of medical records including ultrasound measures during pregnancy, and linkage to national health registers. In women with and without asthma, we studied reduced or increased growth by comparing the second-trimester ultrasound with first-trimester estimation. We defined reduced growth as estimated days below the 10th percentile and increased growth as days above the 90th percentile. At birth, the weight and length of the newborn and the gestational age was compared between women with and without asthma.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1693 participants in early pregnancy and collected data on deliveries and ultrasound scans in 1580 pregnancies, of which 18% of the mothers had asthma. No statistically significant reduced or increased growth between different measurement points were found when women with and without asthma were compared; adjusted odds ratios for reduced growth between first and second trimester 1.11 95% CI (0.63-1.95) and increased growth 1.09 95% CI (0.68-1.77).

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In conclusion, we could not find evidence supporting an influence of maternal asthma on early fetal growth in the present cohort: Although the relatively small sample size, which may enhance the risk of a type II error, it is concluded that a potential difference is likely to be very small.

The safety of asthma medications during pregnancy and lactation: Clinical management and research priorities

Asthma is one of the most common underlying diseases in women of reproductive age that can lead to potentially serious medical problems during pregnancy and lactation. A group of key stakeholders across multiple relevant disciplines was invited to take part in an effort to prioritize, strategize, and mobilize action steps to fill important gaps in knowledge regarding asthma medication safety in pregnancy and lactation. The stakeholders identified substantial gaps in the literature on the safety of asthma medications used during pregnancy and lactation and prioritized strategies to fill those gaps. Short-term action steps included linking data from existing complementary study designs (US and international claims data, single drug pregnancy registries, case-control studies, and coordinated systematic data systems). Long-term action steps included creating an asthma disease registry, incorporating the disease registry into electronic health record systems, and coordinating care across disciplines. The stakeholders also prioritized establishing new infrastructures/collaborations to perform research in pregnant and lactating women and to include patient perspectives throughout the process. To address the evidence gaps, and aid in populating product labels with data that inform clinical decision making, the consortium developed a plan to systematically obtain necessary data in the most efficient and timely manner.

Biologicals in atopic disease in pregnancy: An EAACI position paper

Biologicals have transformed the management of severe disease phenotypes in asthma, atopic dermatitis, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. As a result, the number of approved biologicals for the treatment of atopic diseases is continuously increasing. Although atopic diseases are among the most common diseases in the reproductive age, investigations, and information on half-life, pharmacokinetics defining the neonatal Fc receptors (FcRn) and most important safety of biologicals in pregnancy are lacking. Given the complex sequence of immunological events that regulate conception, fetal development, and the intrauterine and postnatal maturation of the immune system, this information is of utmost importance. We conducted a systematic review on biologicals in pregnancy for indications of atopic diseases. Evidence in this field is scarce and mainly reserved to reports on the usage of omalizumab. This lack of evidence demands the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach for the management of pregnant women who receive biologicals and multicenter registries for long-term follow-up, drug trial designs suitable for women in the reproductive age, and better experimental models that represent the human situation. Due to the very long half-life of biologicals, preconception counseling and healthcare provider education are crucial to offer the best care for mother and fetus. This position paper integrates available data on safety of biologicals during pregnancy in atopic diseases via a systematic review with a detailed review on immunological considerations how inhibition of different pathways may impact pregnancy.

Effect of maternal asthma exacerbations on perinatal outcomes: a population-based study

Background

Although there is a growing body of literature about the impact of asthma exacerbations during pregnancy on adverse perinatal outcomes, it is still unclear whether asthma exacerbations themselves or asthma severity are the driving factor for negative outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the associations between maternal asthma exacerbations and perinatal outcomes, and whether this differed by asthma treatment regime as a proxy for severity.

Methods

We included births of women with asthma in Sweden from July 2006 to November 2013 (n=33 829). Asthma exacerbations were defined as unplanned emergency visits/hospitalisations or a short course of oral corticosteroids. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated for the associations between exacerbations during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes (small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth, birthweight and mode of delivery), stratified by preconception treatment regime.

Results

Exacerbations occurred in 1430 (4.2%) pregnancies. Exacerbations were associated with reduced birthweight (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.24–1.70), and elective (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.25–1.79) and emergency caesarean section (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13–1.61). Multiple exacerbations were associated with a 2.6-fold increased odds of SGA (95% CI 1.38–4.82). Amongst women treated prepregnancy with combination therapy (proxy for moderate–severe asthma), exacerbators were at increased odds of elective (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.30–2.2) and emergency (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.26–2.08) caesarean section, and SGA (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.18–2.57) versus non-exacerbators.

Conclusion

Maternal asthma exacerbations increase the risk of SGA and caesarean sections, particularly in women with multiple exacerbations or moderate–severe asthma. Adequate antenatal asthma care is needed to reduce exacerbations and reduce risks of poor outcomes.

Maternal asthma exacerbations are associated with lower birthweight and increased caesarean sections, particularly in women with moderate–severe asthma. Adequate antenatal asthma care is needed to reduce exacerbations and reduce risks of poor outcomes.https://bit.ly/3kF4x8N

Medicines prescribed for asthma, discontinuation and perinatal outcomes, including breastfeeding: A population cohort analysis

OBJECTIVES

To explore associations between exposures to medicines prescribed for asthma and their discontinuation in pregnancy and preterm birth [<37 or <32 weeks], SGA [<10th and <3rd centiles], and breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks.

METHODS

Design. A population-based cohort study. Setting. The Secure Anonymised Information Linkage [SAIL] databank in Wales, linking maternal primary care data with infant outcomes. Population. 107,573, 105,331, and 38,725 infants born 2000-2010 with information on premature birth, SGA and breastfeeding respectively, after exclusions. Exposures. maternal prescriptions for asthma medicines or their discontinuation in pregnancy. Methods. Odds ratios for adverse pregnancy outcomes were calculated for the exposed versus the unexposed population, adjusted for smoking, parity, age and socio-economic status.

RESULTS

Prescriptions for asthma, whether continued or discontinued during pregnancy, were associated with birth at<32 weeks' gestation, SGA <10th centile, and no breastfeeding (aOR 1.33 [1.10-1.61], 1.10 [1.03-1.18], 0.93 [0.87-1.01]). Discontinuation of asthma medicines in pregnancy was associated with birth at<37 weeks' and <32 weeks' gestation (aOR 1.22 [1.06-1.41], 1.53 [1.11-2.10]). All medicines examined, except ICS and SABA prescribed alone, were associated with SGA <10th centile.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription of asthma medicines before or during pregnancy was associated with higher prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly if prescriptions were discontinued during pregnancy. Women discontinuing medicines during pregnancy could be identified from prescription records. The impact of targeting close monitoring and breastfeeding support warrants exploration.

Exacerbations of asthma following step-up and step-down inhaled corticosteroid and long acting beta agonist therapy in the managing asthma in pregnancy study

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines for asthma management contain a consensus recommendation that inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose should not be stepped down in pregnancy. However, this is not consistent with consumer preferences and pharmacological principles to minimize medication exposure during pregnancy. We investigated exacerbations after changes to ICS and long acting beta agonist (LABA) therapy in pregnant women with asthma.

METHODS

Pregnant women (n = 220) were recruited to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where maintenance treatment was adjusted monthly based on either symptoms (control group), or fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO, to alter ICS) and symptoms (to alter LABA, FeNO group). Exacerbations were monitored prospectively.

RESULTS

ICS were used by 137 (62.3%) women at some time during pregnancy. ICS dose remained unchanged in 16 women (11.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-18%), increased in 37 women (27%, 95%CI 20-35%), decreased in 34 women (24.8%, 95%CI 18%-33%), or both increased and decreased in 50 women (36.5%, 95%CI 29-45%). Exacerbations occurred within 14 days of ICS step-down in 11 women (13%, 95%CI 7.5%-22%). This was not significantly different from exacerbations occurring within 14 days of step-up, in 7 women (8.1%, 95%CI 4%-16%, P = 0.294). There were no differences between management groups. Exacerbations occurred within 14 days of step-down in 14.7% (95%CI 7%-30%) of women in the control group, and in 12% (95%CI 6%-24%) of women in the FENO group.

CONCLUSIONS

ICS step-down could be considered when eosinophilic inflammation or symptoms are low, and may be a useful management approach for women, doctors, and midwives wishing to minimize ICS exposure during pregnancy.

Pharmacotherapeutic management of asthma in pregnancy and the effect of sex hormones

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common medical condition that can frequently affect pregnancy, and thus optimal management of asthma in pregnancy is important for both mother and baby. This article reviews recent developments of asthma pharmacotherapy and provides emerging data on the safety of asthma controller medications and biological therapies in pregnancy. The authors highlight the clinical outcomes of asthma during pregnancy, and summarize emerging new data related to the influence of sex hormones and fetal sex on asthma severity.

AREAS COVERED

This review of asthma pharmacotherapy during pregnancy examines the recent guidelines and reports the most pertinent publications on safety data and asthma management.

EXPERT OPINION

Asthma management during pregnancy follows the same principles as that of non-pregnant asthma. The available data for most asthma medications are reassuring, however there is a lack of adequate safety data available because pregnant women are generally excluded from clinical trials. More clarity is needed in guidelines regarding the management of asthma in pregnancy, and high-quality randomized control trials are required to strengthen the evidence base and inform future guidelines. In particular, safety studies examining biological therapies in pregnant women with severe asthma are needed.

Asthma and all-cause mortality in children and young adults: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest an increased all-cause mortality among adults with asthma. We aimed to study the relationship between asthma in children and young adults and all-cause mortality, and investigate differences in mortality rate by also having a life-limiting condition (LLC) or by parental socioeconomic status (SES).

METHODS

Included in this register-based study are 2 775 430 individuals born in Sweden between January 1986 and December 2012. We identified asthma cases using the National Patient Register (NPR) and the Prescribed Drug Register. Those with LLC were identified using the NPR. Parental SES at birth (income and education) was retrieved from Statistics Sweden. We estimated the association between asthma and all-cause mortality using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Effect modification by LLC or parental SES was studied using interaction terms in the adjusted model.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard rate (adjHR) for all-cause mortality in asthma cases versus non-asthma cases was 1.46 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.62). The highest increased rate appeared to be for those aged 5-15 years. In persons with asthma and without LLC, the adjHR remained increased at 1.33 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.50), but differed (p=0.002) from those with asthma and LLC, with an adjHR of 1.87 (95% CI 1.57 to 2.22). Parental SES did not alter the association (income, p=0.55; education, p=0.83).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that asthma is associated with an increased mortality in children and young adults regardless of LLC or parental SES. Further research is warranted to investigate the possible mechanisms for this association.

Timing of Maternal Asthma Diagnosis in Relation to Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if asthma diagnosed during pregnancy puts the fetus at a higher risk of poor perinatal outcomes than pre-existing asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess if the risks of prematurity, major malformations, and small-for-gestational age (SGA) are higher in women with asthma diagnosed during versus pre-pregnancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of pregnant women aged ≥15 years with and without incident asthma, constructed from health administrative databases. Follow-up began 24 months before pregnancy onset (cohort entry) and ended at delivery. Incident asthma was defined as a first diagnosis among those without asthma in the 8 years before cohort entry. Time was classified into pre-pregnancy and each trimester until delivery. We fit inverse probability weighted Poisson models to estimate marginal relative risks (RRs) for prematurity (delivery <37th week), major malformations, and SGA (birth weight <10th percentile) comparing women with and without asthma, assessing the asthma timing of diagnosis interaction term via a Wald test.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 122,880 deliveries, the increased risk of prematurity, but not SGA, due to incident asthma was higher in those diagnosed during the second (RR, 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.65; Wald P = .05) and third (RR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.62-2.29; Wald P < .01) trimesters relative to pre-pregnancy (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98-1.15). A trend toward an increased risk of major malformations was observed in those diagnosed during the first trimester (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.94-1.49; Wald P = .15) than pre-pregnancy (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.92-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma diagnosed during, versus before, pregnancy was associated with a greater prematurity risk, suggesting an important role of preconception and prenatal screening.

Recent developments in asthma in pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma affects up to 13% of pregnancies worldwide and has a varying and unpredictable clinical course during pregnancy. Pharmacological asthma treatment is recommended; however, studies show that some pregnant women with asthma cease their medication in early pregnancy. There is likely a large unmet disease burden arising from asthma in pregnancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antenatal and asthma guidelines lack sufficient information on asthma management in pregnant women, and implementation of the current guidelines seems inadequate. Prescription databases provide evidence of cessation of asthma medication during pregnancy on a population level. Population-based databases also provide evidence of rare adverse perinatal outcomes. The risk of childhood asthma in the offspring of women with asthma is reduced by adequate control of maternal asthma during pregnancy. Vitamin D sufficiency during pregnancy could also reduce the risk of childhood asthma.

SUMMARY

The findings of this review demonstrate the need for improved asthma and antenatal guidelines regarding asthma management during pregnancy, and the need of adequate implementation of these guidelines. Furthermore, adequate asthma control during pregnancy is needed to reduce the risk of childhood asthma. To maintain asthma control, prepregnancy medication should be continued throughout pregnancy and adjusted according to the current treatment steps if required.

Perinatal Outcomes Associated with Maternal Asthma and Its Severity and Control During Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Estimates of the effects of maternal asthma on pregnancy outcomes are inconsistent across studies, possibly because of differences in exposure definition.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with maternal asthma diagnosis, severity, and control in a large, nationally representative cohort.

METHODS

This study was conducted within the IBM Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (2011-2015) and the Medicaid Analytic eXtract database (2000-2014). Asthma was identified by diagnosis and treatment codes, severity was based on medications dispensed, and control was based on short-acting β-agonist dispensations and exacerbations. We estimated the relative risks (RRs) of stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and congenital malformations, comparing pregnancies with differing asthma disease status.

RESULTS

We identified 29,882 pregnancies complicated by asthma in the MarketScan database and 160,638 in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract database. We observed no consistent associations between asthma diagnosis, severity, or control, and stillbirth, abortions, or malformations. However, we observed increased risks of prematurity, SGA, and NICU admission among women with asthma compared with those without asthma. Compared with women with well-controlled asthma, women with poor control late in pregnancy had an increased risk of preterm birth (relative risk, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.32-1.46) and NICU admission (relative risk, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.35). More severe asthma was associated with SGA (relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe an increased risk of pregnancy losses or malformations among women with asthma. However, we found an association between asthma severity and SGA, and between exacerbations late in pregnancy and preterm delivery and NICU admission.

Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Asthmatic Women According to Steps of Treatment: A Population-Based Study

Bronchial asthma is the most common chronic disease in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of the steps of asthma treatment during pregnancy on adverse pregnancy, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes. The data of all women with singleton delivery in 2011–2017, including the diagnosis of asthma and its treatment for the same woman, were obtained from the National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services (NRRHS) of the Czech Republic. Relation of asthma and the steps of treatment to pregnancy, labour, and perinatal outcomes taken from the National Register of Reproduction Health (NRRH) for the period 2011–2015 were analysed using logistic regression and described by odds ratios, 95% confidence interval, and statistical significance. Of the total number of 752,000 women with singleton delivery, asthma and/or its treatment were found in 6.27% of deliveries. Data from 460,324 births, in which the combination of data sources was available, showed the association between asthma and pre-eclampsia, caesarean section, and birth weight ≤2,500 g, only for the fifth step of treatment (p<0.001). Caesarean section was more frequent in all evaluated groups of treatment compared with women without asthma (p<0.001). Gestational age of <37 weeks was found in children of mothers with asthma diagnosis and no treatment and for women at the fifth step of treatment (p=0.003). The incidence of birth defects and Apgar scores of <7 in 5 minutes were without statistical significance in all evaluated women. The authors concluded that pregnant women with asthma are at risk from adverse pregnancy, obstetric, and perinatal outcomes, especially upon the fifth stage of treatment.

Maternal asthma and the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Objective: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the association between maternal asthma and the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Methods: A systematic search of seven databases was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios and 95% CI using random-effects models.Results: Asthma was associated with an increased risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (RR 1.45, 95%CI 1.29-1.63), transient hypertension of pregnancy (RR 2.00, 95%CI 1.52-2.63), preeclampsia or eclampsia (RR 1.28, 95%CI 1.25-1.32), preeclampsia (RR 1.43, 95%CI 1.31-1.57) and eclampsia (RR 1.56, 95%CI 1.13-2.15).Conclusion: The meta-analysis illustrated that asthma was significantly increased risk of hypertension during pregnancy.

Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies

BACKGROUND

The French Emergency Medicine Society, the French Intensive Care Society and the Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine French-Speaking Group edited guidelines on severe asthma exacerbation (SAE) in adult and pediatric patients.

RESULTS

The guidelines were related to 5 areas: diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, oxygen therapy and ventilation, patients triage, specific considerations regarding pregnant women. The literature analysis and formulation of the guidelines were conducted according to the Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. An extensive literature research was conducted based on publications indexed in PubMed™ and Cochrane™ databases. Of the 21 formalized guidelines, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 7 a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). The GRADE method was inapplicable to 10 guidelines, which resulted in expert opinions. A strong agreement was reached for all guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The conjunct work of 36 experts from 3 scientific societies resulted in 21 formalized recommendations to help improving the emergency and intensive care management of adult and pediatric patients with SAE.

Maternal anxiety, depression and asthma and adverse pregnancy outcomes - a population based study

To evaluate associations between maternal anxiety or depression and adverse pregnancy outcomes, taking possible familial confounding and interaction with asthma into account, we conducted a cohort study of all singleton births in Sweden 2001–2013. We retrieved information about pregnancy, diagnoses of anxiety/depression, asthma, and prescribed medication from the Swedish Medical Birth, National Patient, and Prescribed Drug Registers. We estimated associations with regression models, performed cousin and sibling comparisons, and calculated interactions. In 950 301 identified pregnancies; 5.9% had anxiety/depression and 4.0% had asthma. Anxiety/depression was associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes (e.g. preeclampsia, adjusted Odds Ratio 1.17 (95% Confidence Interval 1.12, 1.22), instrumental delivery (1.14 (1.10, 1.18)), elective (1.62 (1.57, 1.68)) and emergency (1.32 (1.28, 1.35)) caesarean section (CS)). Their children had lower birth weight (−54 g (−59, −49)) and shorter gestational age (−0.29 weeks (−0.31, −0.28)). Associations were not confounded by familial factors and asthma did not modify the effect of anxiety/depression for outcomes other than elective CS, p < 0.001. In women with anxiety/depression diagnosis, untreated women had higher odds of elective CS compared to women on medication (1.30 (1.17, 1.43)). In conclusion, anxiety/depression should be considered when evaluating pregnant women’s risk of complications such as preeclampsia and non-vaginal deliveries.

Inhaled corticosteroid use during pregnancy among women with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies demonstrate the prescription rate for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) decreases in early pregnancy, possibly increasing exacerbation risk. This could be related to non-adherence to prescribed asthma medication or medication cessation by the patient or doctor. ICS use during pregnancy has not previously been summarized in a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the use of ICS during pregnancy among asthmatic women, specifically: (1) the prevalence of use, (2) changes of use during pregnancy compared with pre-pregnancy and (3) medication adherence among ICS users.

METHODS

We systematically searched literature in Embase, MEDLINE, CINAL and Cochrane, using terms related to asthma, pregnancy and medication use. All English articles reporting ICS among pregnant women with asthma were included. Prevalence, changes in ICS use during pregnancy and ICS adherence were pooled using STATA (version 15.0, StataCorp USA).

RESULTS

A total of 4237 references were retrieved in the initial search. Screening and review led to the inclusion of 52 articles for one or more aims (Aim 1: N = 45; Aim 2, N = 13; and Aim 3, N = 5). The pooled prevalence of ICS use during pregnancy was 41% (95%CI 36%-45%); 49% (95%CI 44%-55%) in Europe, 39% (95%CI 32%-47%) in Australia and 34% (95%CI 27%-41%) in North America. In eight prescription databases, ICS prescription rates lowered in the first trimester of pregnancy, compared with pre-pregnancy, increased in the second trimester and decreased in the third trimester. Five studies reported ICS adherence among pregnant women, using four measures of self-reported non-adherence. In two comparable studies, pooled ICS non-adherence was 40% (95%CI 36%-44%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ICS use among pregnant women with asthma is 41% and varies widely between countries and continents, and prescription rates for ICS change throughout pregnancy. More studies are needed to investigate ICS adherence during pregnancy in women with asthma.

Poorly Controlled Asthma During Pregnancy Remains Common in the United States

BACKGROUND

Asthma is among the most common preexisting medical conditions in pregnancy. Uncontrolled asthma may increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prevalence, severity, and control of asthma during pregnancy in the United States.

METHODS

We identified 2 cohorts of pregnancies ending in a live birth within 2 large US health care claims databases: the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (MarketScan, private insurance) for the period 2011 to 2015 and the nationwide Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX, public insurance) for the period 2000 to 2013. We defined asthma prevalence, severity, and control on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision diagnoses and asthma-related treatments. Severe asthma was defined as dispensing of 1 or more medium/high-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus additional therapy within the 12 months preceding delivery. Poor control was defined as having at least 1 of the following: 1 or more exacerbation (asthma-related hospitalization or emergency room visit, or a course of oral corticosteroids) or 5 or more filled prescriptions for short-acting β-agonists between the last menstrual period and delivery.

RESULTS

Among 604,420 pregnant women in MarketScan and 2,071,359 in MAX, 20,104 (3.3%) and 120,745 (5.8%) had asthma, respectively. Among pregnant women with asthma, 19.0% and 18.8% had severe asthma and 16.5% and 28.0% had poorly controlled asthma in MarketScan and MAX, respectively. Many women with poorly controlled asthma during pregnancy were not dispensed a long-term controller (38.4% in MarketScan and 43.3% in MAX). Within both cohorts, women with poor control were more often smokers and obese, had more comorbidities, and used more concomitant nonasthma medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Poorly controlled asthma is more frequent among publicly versus privately insured pregnancies in the United States. Dispensing of long-term controller medications during pregnancy remains low, even for symptomatic patients.

Observational study of mental health in asthmatic women during the prenatal and postnatal periods

Objective: We aimed to examine the prevalence and severity of psychological distress of women with asthma in both the prenatal and postnatal periods, and to determine whether asthmatic women with and without mental health problems differ in self-management, medications knowledge, and asthma symptoms.Methods: We assessed spirometry performance and asthma symptoms in 120 women (mean age 29.8 years) before 23 weeks gestation, as part of the Breathing for Life Trial (Trial ID: ACTRN12613000202763). Prenatal depression data was obtained from medical records. At 6 weeks postpartum, we assessed general health, self-reported asthma control, depression symptoms (with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale) and adaptive functioning (with the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment scales).Results: Twenty percent of our sample reported having a current mental health diagnosis, 14% reported currently receiving mental health care, while 47% reported having received mental health care in the past (and may/may not have received a diagnosis). The sample scored high on the Aggressive Behavior, Avoidant Personality, and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity scales. Poorer self-reported postnatal asthma control was strongly correlated with elevated somatic complaints, externalizing problems, antisocial personality problems, and greater withdrawal. Prenatal spirometry or asthma severity and control were largely not associated with measures of psychopathology.Conclusions: These findings indicate that pregnant women with asthma frequently report issues with psychopathology during the prenatal and postnatal periods, and that the subjective perception of asthma control may be more related to psychopathology than objective asthma measures. However, due to sample bias, these findings are likely to be understated.

Prevalence of asthma and respiratory symptoms during pregnancy in the middle belt of Nigeria

Background: Information about the burden of asthma during pregnancy in Africa is scarce.Objectives: To determine the prevalence of asthma and respiratory symptoms in pregnancy in Ilorin, Nigeria.Methods: This study uses the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) questionnaire and definitions to screen 870 pregnant women attending three hospitals for asthma.Results: The prevalence of possible asthma (i.e. awakened by shortness of breath, asthma attack(s) in the last 12 months, or currently taking asthma medication) was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.3-3.1%), physician-diagnosed asthma was 1.0% (95% CI: 0.5-1.7%), and current asthma (asthma attack in the last 12 months and currently taking asthma medication) was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.2-1.3%). The prevalence of respiratory symptoms ranged from 0.6% (95% CI: 0.1-1.1%) for wheezing without cold to 12.9% (95% CI: 10.7-15.2%) for nasal allergies. Less than 1% reported an asthma attack and using asthma medication in the last 12 months. None of the pregnant women smoked tobacco during pregnancy. Pregnant women with possible asthma experienced more respiratory symptoms and worsening symptoms than those without asthma (15.8% vs. 3.9%), and the most reported symptom was being awakened by shortness of breath. The majority (55.6%) with physician-diagnosed asthma had suffered an asthma attack in the current pregnancy with a median of two attacks.Conclusion: The prevalence of asthma and respiratory symptoms in pregnancy in this sample was low, but we observed an increase and worsening of respiratory symptoms during pregnancy in those with asthma. Hence, the priority of clinicians should be disease control to prevent feto-maternal morbidity and mortality.

Human placental androgen receptor variants: Potential regulators of male fetal growth

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies show that males have increased intrauterine growth compared to females, and that pregnancy complications may further these growth differences, but the regulatory mechanisms underlying these differences remain unknown. We propose that these growth outcomes may be due to sex-specific differences in androgen sensitivity - giving rise to altered growth signalling pathways - mediated by the differential expression of placental androgen receptor (AR) variants.

METHODS

Placental protein and mRNA were used to identify AR protein variant levels and AR-downstream target gene expression, and were then analysed against neonatal measurements. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-induced AR protein variant expression and downstream growth factors were examined in vitro.

RESULTS

Four known AR variants (AR-FL, AR-V1, AR-V7, and AR-45), and three unknown proteins (120, 90 and 55 kDa) immunoreactive to the anti-AR antibody were identified in human placentae. Male placentae from controlled asthmatic pregnancies had increased AR-45 and decreased AR-V1 and AR-V7 nuclear expression. Increased nuclear AR-45 expression was associated with increased insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R), and IGF-binding protein 5 (IGFBP-5) mRNA expression and normal male growth. AR-45 mRNA and protein did not change in the presence of uncontrolled maternal asthma and associated with an increase in small for gestational (SGA) male fetuses. In vitro DHT stimulation increased AR-45 protein and IGF-1R and IGFBP-5 mRNA expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our data shows altered AR protein expression and downstream signalling targets may contribute to sex-specific fetal growth outcomes in response to an adverse environment, and that AR-45 appears central in mediating these changes.

Parental asthma and risk of autism spectrum disorder in offspring: A population and family-based case-control study

BACKGROUND

Associations between parental asthma and prenatal exposure to asthma medications with offspring autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been reported. However, the associations might be confounded by unmeasured (genetic and shared environmental) familial factors.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the association between (a) maternal/paternal asthma and offspring ASD, and (b) prenatal exposures to β2-agonists, other asthma medications and offspring ASD using cases and controls selected from the population as well as biological relatives with different degrees of relatedness.

METHODS

We included all children (N = 1 579 263) born in Sweden 1992-2007. A nested case-control design was used to compare 22 894 ASD cases identified from the National Patient Register to (a) 228 940 age-, county- and sex-matched controls randomly selected from the population, (b) their eligible full-siblings (n = 1267), (c) half-siblings (n = 1323), (d) full-cousins (n = 11 477) and (e) half-cousins (n = 3337). Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ASD in children differentially exposed to parental asthma or prenatal asthma medications.

RESULTS

Maternal asthma was associated with increased risk of offspring ASD (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.38-1.49); there was a weaker association for paternal asthma (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.23). The risk of offspring ASD in mothers with asthma showed similar estimates when adjusting for shared familial factors among paternal half-siblings (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.80-1.81), full-cousins (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.41) and half-cousins (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10-1.54), albeit with wider confidence intervals. Prenatal exposure to asthma medications among subjects whose mothers had asthma was not associated with subsequent ASD.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In this large observational study, parental asthma was associated with slightly elevated risk of ASD in offspring. More specifically, the increased risk by maternal asthma did not seem to be confounded by familial factors. There was no evidence of an association between asthma medications during pregnancy and offspring ASD.

What is safe enough - asthma in pregnancy - a review of current literature and recommendations

Background

Although asthma is one of the most serious diseases causing complications during pregnancy, half of the women discontinue therapy thus diminishing the control of the disease, mostly due to the inadequate education and fear of adverse events. Sadly, this is sometimes encouraged by insufficiently educated physicians. Since the incidence and the prevalence of asthma is increasing, it is important to arouse the importance of proper asthma therapy during pregnancy. Inadequate therapy, as well as interrupting or discontinuing therapy, may result in adverse perinatal outcomes for both mother and child.

Main body

The main goal of asthma control during pregnancy is control of symptoms and prevention of exacerbations, same as in every asthmatic, but even more important. Maintaining optimal lung function, as well as regular daily activities, ensures maintenance of optimal fetal oxygenation. The therapy should be adapted depending on the frequency and severity of daily and nocturnal symptoms, demand for reliever therapy, by the limitations in everyday activities and the frequency of emergency asthma-related hospitalizations. Pre-conceptual education and therapy are very important and should be supported by an asthma action plan adjusted for the period of pregnancy. It is very important to note that most of the drugs used before pregnancy can be safely continued during pregnancy. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy should be used in parallel. Pregnant women should be informed about the nature of the disease, therapy used during pregnancy, possible complications, avoidance of triggers, proper administration of therapy and, most important, why should the therapy be continued throughout the pregnancy on individual basis. Although drug treatment should be based on using drugs with less harm risk, if control of severe symptoms is needed to be achieved in order to protect both mother and child, any anti-asthmatic drug would have the beneficial benefit/harm ratio.

Conclusion

There is no solid evidence that asthma treatment during pregnancy causes adverse outcomes for the mother and child but for many, especially new drugs, there is not enough data gathered. On the other hand, harmfulness of uncontrolled asthma during pregnancy is well documented so every effort should be put on preserving good control of asthma during pregnancy.