1
|
Oikawa M, Takimoto Y. Public Perspectives on Consent for and Governance of Biobanking in Japan. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2024:15562646241286143. [PMID: 39328053 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241286143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
Through strengthened biobank governance, broad consent has been widely accepted as a means to replace donors' discretion based on the information of individual research protocols. Trust and other ethical and social notions, such as reciprocity and solidarity, are key concepts that support biobank governance. The types of allowed broad consent are several; however, they remain unclear, and whether these ethical and social notions are associated with public attitudes toward the consent model is not fully understood. This quantitative study examined two hypotheses: narrower and limited broad consent are more accepted by the public, and acceptance rates for broad consent increase with established measures related to biobank governance. This analysis supported both hypotheses, implying that the limited type of broad consent should be considered an important option, and that a specific type of governance is critical in promoting trust, reciprocity, and solidarity between biobanks and the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanori Oikawa
- Department of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Takimoto
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Domaradzki J, Walkowiak D. When Biobanks Meet Religion: Association Between Religiosity and Attitudes of Polish Medical Students Toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes. JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND HEALTH 2024; 63:1178-1213. [PMID: 37847446 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-023-01932-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
While biobanking is expanding globally, the empirical evidence concerning the impact of religion on future healthcare professionals' awareness and willingness to donate biospecimens for biobank research is lacking. To understand how medical students' religious beliefs can fuel their questions regarding how biospecimens would be stored, cared for, and used, we conducted a survey among 1500 medical students at Poznań University of Medical Sciences. Our findings suggest that, while both religious and nonreligious students supported the idea of biobanking of human biological material and were willing to donate for research purposes, nonreligious students felt more positive toward biobanking, supported the idea of establishing biobanks in Poland more often, and were more eager to donate most types of tissues and to participate in biobank research. Religious beliefs were also associated with medical students' perception of benefits and risks resulting from biobanking, perceived trust toward various biobank institutions, and preferred type of consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Domaradzki
- Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 7, St., 60-806, Poznan, Poland.
| | - Dariusz Walkowiak
- Department of Organization and Management in Health Care, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sánchez MC, Hernández Clemente JC, García López FJ. Public and Patients' Perspectives Towards Data and Sample Sharing for Research: An Overview of Empirical Findings. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2023; 18:319-345. [PMID: 37936410 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231212644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to review the attitudes and perspectives of the public and patients towards the sharing of data and biospecimens for research and to identify common dimensions, regardless of setting. Our review included systematic, scoping or thematic reviews of empirical studies retrieved from Medline (PubMed interface), Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest and Cochrane Reviews. The main themes identified and synthesised across the 14 reviews were readiness and motivations; potential risks and safeguards; trust, transparency and accountability; autonomy and preferred type of consent; and factors influencing data and biospecimen sharing and consent. Sociodemographic factors and research and individual context remain relevant influencing factors in all settings, while preferences for types of consent are highly heterogeneous. Trusted environments and adapted consent options with participant engagement are relevant to improve research participation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Oikawa M, Takimoto Y, Akabayashi A. Attitudes of the Public Toward Consent for Biobank Research in Japan. Biopreserv Biobank 2023; 21:518-526. [PMID: 36576410 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Parallel to the rapid advancement of biological and information technologies, the role and forms of biobank research have been constantly changing. The ethical, legal, and social implications of consent in biobank research are in a state of flux. This study aimed to clarify current Japanese public preferences regarding the consent model and explore how public attitudes are determined. Methods: We conducted an online, population-based quantitative survey among Japanese residents aged between 20 and 69 years. Statistical analyses consisted of univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of the 1580 respondents, 60.9% preferred autonomy-based consent (specific or dynamic consent) and 23.9% preferred broad-type consent (opt-out or broad consent). Marital status, gender, and privacy concerns were significantly associated with the preference for a consent model. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the public's current preference for autonomy-based consent, including dynamic consent. However, our findings also revealed that approximately half of the respondents considered broad consent as somewhat preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masanori Oikawa
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Takimoto
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Akabayashi
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parvinen L, Alamäki A, Hallikainen H, Mäki M. Exploring the challenges of and solutions to sharing personal genomic data for use in healthcare. Health Informatics J 2023; 29:14604582231152185. [PMID: 36651319 DOI: 10.1177/14604582231152185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the tightened General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) legislation within the European Union (EU), individuals have become increasingly concerned about privacy. This is also reflected in how willing individuals are to consent to sharing personal data, including their health data. To understand this behaviour better, this study focuses on willingness to consent in relation to genomic data. The study explores how the provision of educational information relates to willingness to consent, as well as differences in privacy concerns, information sensitivity and the perceived trade-off value between individuals willing versus unwilling to consent to sharing their genomic data. Of the respondents, 65% were initially willing to consent, but after educational information 89% were willing to consent and only 11% remained unwilling to consent. Educating individuals about potential health benefits can thus help to correct the beliefs that originally led to the unwillingness to share genomic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasse Parvinen
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Laboratory of Industrial Management Finland, 278232Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
| | - Ari Alamäki
- 52909Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Marko Mäki
- 52909Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Majchrowska A, Wiechetek M, Domaradzki J, Pawlikowski J. Social differentiation of the perception and human tissues donation for research purposes. Front Genet 2022; 13:989252. [PMID: 36186428 PMCID: PMC9521191 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.989252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The willingness to donate human biological material for research purposes is shaped by socio-cultural factors; however, there is a lack of studies analysing the social perception of different human tissues, which may affect such willingness. This study aimed to distinguish different sociocultural categories of human tissues and types of potential donors based on their willingness to donate material. Quantitative research was conducted on a sample of 1,100 adult Poles representative in terms of sex, place of residence and education. According to the study, people were most willing to donate urine (73.9%), blood (69.7%), hair and tears (69.6%) and the least willing to donate post-mortem brain fragments (20%), sperm (males; 36.4%) and egg cells (females; 39.6%). A factor analysis revealed four sociocultural categories of donated tissues: irrelevant, redundant, ordinary and sensitive. Based on these sociocultural categories of tissues, four types of donors were identified: reluctant, highly cooperative, average cooperative and selectively cooperative. The willingness to donate human samples for research is shaped by the sociocultural perception of different body parts and tissues. The lower the sense of “personal relationship” with a specific type of tissue, organ or part of the body, the higher the motivation to donate such biological material for research purposes. Additionally, the willingness to donate is mostly shaped by social trust in physicians and scientists, and potential donors’ engagement in charity activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Majchrowska
- Chair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Michał Wiechetek
- Institute of Psychology, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Jan Domaradzki
- Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
- *Correspondence: Jan Domaradzki,
| | - Jakub Pawlikowski
- Chair and Department of Humanities and Social Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Majchrowska A, Wiechetek M, Domaradzki J, Pawlikowski J. Social differentiation of the perception and human tissues donation for research purposes. Front Genet 2022; 13. [DOI: http:/doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.989252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The willingness to donate human biological material for research purposes is shaped by socio-cultural factors; however, there is a lack of studies analysing the social perception of different human tissues, which may affect such willingness. This study aimed to distinguish different sociocultural categories of human tissues and types of potential donors based on their willingness to donate material. Quantitative research was conducted on a sample of 1,100 adult Poles representative in terms of sex, place of residence and education. According to the study, people were most willing to donate urine (73.9%), blood (69.7%), hair and tears (69.6%) and the least willing to donate post-mortem brain fragments (20%), sperm (males; 36.4%) and egg cells (females; 39.6%). A factor analysis revealed four sociocultural categories of donated tissues: irrelevant, redundant, ordinary and sensitive. Based on these sociocultural categories of tissues, four types of donors were identified: reluctant, highly cooperative, average cooperative and selectively cooperative. The willingness to donate human samples for research is shaped by the sociocultural perception of different body parts and tissues. The lower the sense of “personal relationship” with a specific type of tissue, organ or part of the body, the higher the motivation to donate such biological material for research purposes. Additionally, the willingness to donate is mostly shaped by social trust in physicians and scientists, and potential donors’ engagement in charity activities.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Biobanks and health data repositories provide rich reservoirs of information for use in biomedical research. These repositories depend on participants donating identifiable health data and biospecimens that may be used in perpetuity by unlimited numbers of researchers for unnamed research topics. Since 1991, U.S. federal regulatory provisions, collectively known as the Common Rule, have required informed consent of participants in federally funded human subjects research, but recent changes to the Common Rule now sanction "broad consent" in the repository research context. Broad consent is not defined in the revised Common Rule; thus, researchers and their institutions are left to determine ad hoc what broad consent means and requires. Without leadership and guidance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, stakeholders with potential conflicts of interest will reach their own conclusions and craft new and varied standards for consent. The result will be uneven protections for participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa E Smilan
- Visiting scholar at the Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy at the University of Virginia and a member of the National Institutes of Health Intramural Institutional Review Board
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brall C, Berlin C, Zwahlen M, Vayena E, Egger M, Ormond KE. Public preferences towards data management and governance in Swiss biobanks: results from a nationwide survey. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060844. [PMID: 36028266 PMCID: PMC9422864 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This article aims to measure the willingness of the Swiss public to participate in personalised health research, and their preferences regarding data management and governance. SETTING Results are presented from a nationwide survey of members of the Swiss public. PARTICIPANTS 15 106 randomly selected Swiss residents received the survey in September 2019. The response rate was 34.1% (n=5156). Respondent age ranged from 18 to 79 years, with fairly uniform spread across sex and age categories between 25 and 64 years. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Willingness to participate in personalised health research and opinions regarding data management and governance. RESULTS Most respondents preferred to be contacted and reconsented for each new project using their data (39%, 95% CI: 37.4% to 40.7%), or stated that their preference depends on the project type (29.4%, 95% CI: 27.9% to 31%). Additionally, a majority (52%, 95% CI: 50.3% to 53.8%) preferred their data or samples be stored anonymously or in coded form (43.4%, 95% CI: 41.7% to 45.1%). Of those who preferred that their data be anonymised, most also indicated a wish to be recontacted for each new project (36.8%, 95% CI: 34.5% to 39.2%); however, these preferences are in conflict. Most respondents desired to personally own their data. Finally, most Swiss respondents trust their doctors, along with researchers at universities, to protect their data. CONCLUSION Insight into public preference can enable Swiss biobanks and research institutions to create management and governance strategies that match the expectations and preferences of potential participants. Models allowing participants to choose how to interact with the process, while more complex, may increase individual willingness to provide data to biobanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Brall
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Berlin
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Zwahlen
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Effy Vayena
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Egger
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eikemo H, Roten LT, Vaaler AE. Research based on existing clinical data and biospecimens: a systematic study of patients' opinions. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:60. [PMID: 35710552 PMCID: PMC9202664 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00799-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the present survey was to investigate newly discharged hospital patients’ opinions on secondary use of their hospital data and biospecimens within the context of health research in general and, more specifically, on genetic research, data sharing across borders and cooperation with the health industry. Methods A paper questionnaire was sent to 1049 consecutive newly discharged hospital patients. Results The vast majority of the respondents preferred to be informed (passive consent) or to receive no notification at all for secondary research on their health data and biospecimens (88% and 91% for data and biospecimens respectively). The rest wanted to be asked for active consent. The same trend applied for the other aspects also. 81% of respondents were positive towards genetic research without active consent. 95% were positive towards cooperating with the health industry, and 90% were positive towards data sharing. Conclusions These results suggest that hospital patients generally are very positive to secondary research and support the concept of opting out rather than opting in. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-022-00799-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Eikemo
- Regional Committee for Medical and Health Related Research Ethics Mid Norway, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), REK Midt V/Hilde Eikemo, Postboks 8900, 7491, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Linda Tømmerdal Roten
- Regional Committee for Medical and Health Related Research Ethics Mid Norway, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), REK Midt V/Hilde Eikemo, Postboks 8900, 7491, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Arne Einar Vaaler
- Østmarka Department of Psychiatry, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Silva P, Dahlke DV, Smith ML, Charles W, Gomez J, Ory MG, Ramos KS. An Idealized Clinicogenomic Registry to Engage Underrepresented Populations Using Innovative Technology. J Pers Med 2022; 12:713. [PMID: 35629136 PMCID: PMC9144063 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12050713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Current best practices in tumor registries provide a glimpse into a limited time frame over the natural history of disease, usually a narrow window around diagnosis and biopsy. This creates challenges meeting public health and healthcare reimbursement policies that increasingly require robust documentation of long-term clinical trajectories, quality of life, and health economics outcomes. These challenges are amplified for underrepresented minority (URM) and other disadvantaged populations, who tend to view the institution of clinical research with skepticism. Participation gaps leave such populations underrepresented in clinical research and, importantly, in policy decisions about treatment choices and reimbursement, thus further augmenting health, social, and economic disparities. Cloud computing, mobile computing, digital ledgers, tokenization, and artificial intelligence technologies are powerful tools that promise to enhance longitudinal patient engagement across the natural history of disease. These tools also promise to enhance engagement by giving participants agency over their data and addressing a major impediment to research participation. This will only occur if these tools are available for use with all patients. Distributed ledger technologies (specifically blockchain) converge these tools and offer a significant element of trust that can be used to engage URM populations more substantively in clinical research. This is a crucial step toward linking composite cohorts for training and optimization of the artificial intelligence tools for enhancing public health in the future. The parameters of an idealized clinical genomic registry are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Silva
- Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, 8441 Riverside Pkwy, Bryan, TX 77807, USA; (J.G.); (K.S.R.)
| | - Deborah Vollmer Dahlke
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 212 Adriance Lab Rd., College Station, TX 77843, USA; (D.V.D.); (M.L.S.); (M.G.O.)
| | - Matthew Lee Smith
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 212 Adriance Lab Rd., College Station, TX 77843, USA; (D.V.D.); (M.L.S.); (M.G.O.)
| | - Wendy Charles
- BurstIQ, 9635 Maroon Circle, #310, Englewood, CO 80112, USA;
| | - Jorge Gomez
- Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, 8441 Riverside Pkwy, Bryan, TX 77807, USA; (J.G.); (K.S.R.)
| | - Marcia G. Ory
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 212 Adriance Lab Rd., College Station, TX 77843, USA; (D.V.D.); (M.L.S.); (M.G.O.)
| | - Kenneth S. Ramos
- Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, 8441 Riverside Pkwy, Bryan, TX 77807, USA; (J.G.); (K.S.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lajonchere C, Naeim A, Dry S, Wenger N, Elashoff D, Vangala S, Petruse A, Ariannejad M, Magyar C, Johansen L, Werre G, Kroloff M, Geschwind D. An Integrated, Scalable, Electronic Video Consent Process to Power Precision Health Research: Large, Population-Based, Cohort Implementation and Scalability Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e31121. [PMID: 34889741 PMCID: PMC8701720 DOI: 10.2196/31121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obtaining explicit consent from patients to use their remnant biological samples and deidentified clinical data for research is essential for advancing precision medicine. OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the operational implementation and scalability of an electronic universal consent process that was used to power an institutional precision health biobank across a large academic health system. METHODS The University of California, Los Angeles, implemented the use of innovative electronic consent videos as the primary recruitment tool for precision health research. The consent videos targeted patients aged ≥18 years across ambulatory clinical laboratories, perioperative settings, and hospital settings. Each of these major areas had slightly different workflows and patient populations. Sociodemographic information, comorbidity data, health utilization data (ambulatory visits, emergency room visits, and hospital admissions), and consent decision data were collected. RESULTS The consenting approach proved scalable across 22 clinical sites (hospital and ambulatory settings). Over 40,000 participants completed the consent process at a rate of 800 to 1000 patients per week over a 2-year time period. Participants were representative of the adult University of California, Los Angeles, Health population. The opt-in rates in the perioperative (16,500/22,519, 73.3%) and ambulatory clinics (2308/3390, 68.1%) were higher than those in clinical laboratories (7506/14,235, 52.7%; P<.001). Patients with higher medical acuity were more likely to opt in. The multivariate analyses showed that African American (odds ratio [OR] 0.53, 95% CI 0.49-0.58; P<.001), Asian (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.77; P<.001), and multiple-race populations (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77; P<.001) were less likely to participate than White individuals. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the few large-scale, electronic video-based consent implementation programs that reports a 65.5% (26,314/40,144) average overall opt-in rate across a large academic health system. This rate is higher than those previously reported for email (3.6%) and electronic biobank (50%) informed consent rates. This study demonstrates a scalable recruitment approach for population health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Lajonchere
- Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Arash Naeim
- Center for SMART Health, Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sarah Dry
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Neil Wenger
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sitaram Vangala
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Antonia Petruse
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Maryam Ariannejad
- Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Clara Magyar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Liliana Johansen
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Gabriela Werre
- Embedded Clinical Research and Innovation Unit, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Maxwell Kroloff
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Daniel Geschwind
- Institute for Precision Health, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cook SH, Wood EP, Jaiswal J, Castro R, Calderon L, Qi Y, Llaneza A. Assessing Perceptions of Broad Consent Concerning Biological Specimen Collection in a Cohort of Young Sexual Minority Men. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR 2021; 50:3313-3321. [PMID: 34617188 PMCID: PMC8493942 DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-01964-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The use of broad consent to store human biospecimens to be used in future research studies has increased over the years. However, it is currently unknown how young sexual minority men (YSMM) perceive broad consent in these specific types of studies. Therefore, in this study we aimed to determine the extent to which YSMM are comfortable with providing broad consent concerning their identifiable biological specimens to a variety of entities, including external researchers and pharmaceutical companies and to examine the relationship between mistrust based on racial/ethnic identity or sexual orientation and attitudes toward broad consent. YSMM (N = 239) ages 24-27 years were recruited from a prospective cohort study in New York City in 2018 to complete a survey assessing attitudes about the use of broad consent concerning biospecimens for secondary research. We found that YSMM were most willing to provide broad consent to the researcher from the study they were enrolled in (85.3%), other researchers within the same university (82.4%), and researchers at other universities (74.5%). Participants were least willing to provide broad consent to government organizations (64.4%) and pharmaceutical companies (53.8%). Further, we found that medical mistrust based on racial/ethnic identity or sexual orientation was associated with attitudes toward the use of broad consent. Research institutions should consider modifying consent procedures around the use of broad consent in order to maximize recruitment and retention, especially among minority populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie H Cook
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
- Department of Social Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
- Center for Health, Identity, Behavior and Prevention Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| | - Erica P Wood
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA
- Department of Social Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Jaiswal
- Rory Meyers School of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Center for Health, Identity, Behavior and Prevention Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Robert Castro
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA
- Department of Social Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Liz Calderon
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA
- Department of Social Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ying Qi
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA
- Department of Social Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amanda Llaneza
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 715 Broadway, Room 1014, New York, NY, 10012, USA
- Department of Social Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mudd-Martin G, Cirino AL, Barcelona V, Fox K, Hudson M, Sun YV, Taylor JY, Cameron VA. Considerations for Cardiovascular Genetic and Genomic Research With Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups and Indigenous Peoples: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. CIRCULATION-GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE 2021; 14:e000084. [PMID: 34304578 DOI: 10.1161/hcg.0000000000000084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups and Indigenous peoples are burdened by significant health inequities that are compounded by their underrepresentation in genetic and genomic research. Of all genome-wide association study participants, ≈79% are of European descent, despite this group constituting only 16% of the global population. For underrepresented populations, polygenic risk scores derived from these studies are less accurate in predicting disease phenotypes, novel population-specific genetic variations may be misclassified as potentially pathogenic, and there is a lack of understanding of how different populations metabolize drugs. Although inclusion of marginalized racial and ethnic groups and Indigenous peoples in genetic and genomic research is crucial, scientific studies must be guided by ethical principles of respect, honesty, justice, reciprocity, and care for individuals and communities. Special considerations are needed to support research that benefits the scientific community as well as Indigenous peoples and marginalized groups. Before a project begins, collaboration with community leaders and agencies can lead to successful implementation of the study. Throughout the study, consideration must be given to issues such as implications of informed consent for individuals and communities, dissemination of findings through scientific and community avenues, and implications of community identity for data governance and sharing. Attention to these issues is critical, given historical harms in biomedical research that marginalized groups and Indigenous peoples have suffered. Conducting genetic and genomic research in partnership with Indigenous peoples and marginalized groups guided by ethical principles provides a pathway for scientific advances that will enhance prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease for everyone.
Collapse
|
15
|
Golembiewski EH, Mainous AG, Rahmanian KP, Brumback B, Rooks BJ, Krieger JL, Goodman KW, Moseley RE, Harle CA. An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine. Ann Fam Med 2021; 19:16-23. [PMID: 33431386 PMCID: PMC7800739 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients are frequently asked to share their personal health information. The objective of this study was to compare the effects on patient experiences of 3 electronic consent (e-consent) versions asking patients to share their health records for research. METHODS A multi-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2017 through November 2018. Adult patients (n = 734) were recruited from 4 family medicine clinics in Florida. Using a tablet computer, participants were randomized to (1) a standard e-consent (standard), (2) an e-consent containing standard information plus hyperlinks to additional interactive details (interactive), or (3) an e-consent containing standard information, interactive hyperlinks, and factual messages about data protections and researcher training (trust-enhanced). Satisfaction (1 to 5), subjective understanding (0 to 100), and other outcomes were measured immediately, at 1 week, and at 6 months. RESULTS A majority of participants (94%) consented to future uses of their health record information for research. No differences in study outcomes between versions were observed at immediate or 1-week follow-up. At 6-month follow-up, compared with the standard e-consent, participants who used the interactive e-consent reported greater satisfaction (B = 0.43; SE = 0.09; P <.001) and subjective understanding (B = 18.04; SE = 2.58; P <.001). At 6-month follow-up, compared with the interactive e-consent, participants who used the trust-enhanced e-consent reported greater satisfaction (B = 0.9; SE = 1.0; P <.001) and subjective understanding (B = 32.2; SE = 2.6, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients who used e-consents with interactive research details and trust-enhancing messages reported higher satisfaction and understanding at 6-month follow-up. Research institutions should consider developing and further validating e-consents that interactively deliver information beyond that required by federal regulations, including facts that may enhance patient trust in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arch G Mainous
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kiarash P Rahmanian
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Babette Brumback
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Benjamin J Rooks
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Janice L Krieger
- Department of Advertising, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kenneth W Goodman
- Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Ray E Moseley
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Christopher A Harle
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Donation of discarded ocular tissue in patients undergoing SMILE laser refractive surgery: developing appropriate guidelines. Cell Tissue Bank 2020; 21:605-613. [PMID: 32700115 DOI: 10.1007/s10561-020-09850-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Tissue Biobanks represent an invaluable resource. Despite the majority of people supporting tissue donation, the actual rate remains low overall. Tissue discarded from surgical procedures represents a further avenue for collection for use in research. We aim to understand the information and consent requirements in a cohort of healthy, post-ophthalmic surgical subjects to optimise future tissue collection in living donors. Patients attending an ophthalmic clinic following refractive surgery for myopia (SMILE) were identified. Patient consent was implied with the completion of the provided survey. The questionnaire included gender, age range and education status. The majority of 31 subjects identified a benefit for future patients as the main motive for potential donation of discarded tissue (71%). Payment for the discarded tissue would not influence their decision in 77.4%. Explanation of the potential benefits of research was the most important information to consider before making a decision to donate. Only 12.9% of patients would have refused to include further information. Almost half of patients felt that the Biobank became the owner of tissue following donation. Current surgical patients may be more inclined to participate in research than the general public because of a sense of duty or an increased understanding of the role of research in evolving treatment. Despite minor uncertainty about the eventual use of the tissue and data, most subjects were positive to donation of discarded ocular tissue and de-identified information. Consent and education processes should be revised within an ophthalmic practice to minimise future patient anxiety.
Collapse
|
17
|
Meagher KM, Curtis SH, Gamm KO, Sutton EJ, McCormick JB, Sharp RR. At a Moment's Notice: Community Advisory Board Perspectives on Biobank Communication to Supplement Broad Consent. Public Health Genomics 2020; 23:77-89. [PMID: 32396907 DOI: 10.1159/000507057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To address ethical concerns about the of future research authorization, biobanks employing a broad model of consent can design ongoing communication with contributors. Notifying contributors at the time of sample distribution provides one form of communication to supplement broad consent. However, little is known about how community-informed governance might anticipate contributor responses and inform communication efforts. OBJECTIVE We explored the attitudes of members of a three-site Community Advisory Board (CAB) network. CAB members responded to a hypothetical proposal for notifying biobank contributors at the time of sample distribution to researchers utilizing the biobank. METHODS We used regularly scheduled CAB meetings to facilitate 3 large-group and 6 small-group discussions. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content using descriptive thematic analysis. RESULTS The results challenged our expectation of general support for the proposed communications. While CAB members identified some advantages, they were concerned about several potential harms to biobank contributors and the biobank. The CABs understood biobank communication in terms of an ongoing relationship with the biobank and a personal contribution to research. CONCLUSION Our findings contribute to the emerging literature on community engagement in biobanking. Additional communication with biobank contributors can serve a variety of value-based objectives to supplement broad consent. Design of communication efforts by biobanks can be improved by CAB members' anticipation of the unintended consequences of additional contact with contributors. CAB members' holistic interpretation of communication efforts suggests that biobank leadership considers all communication options as part of a more comprehensive communications strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Meagher
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Susan H Curtis
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kylie O Gamm
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erica J Sutton
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jennifer B McCormick
- Department of Humanities, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Mayo Clinic Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Rochester, Minnesota, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Broad consent in practice: lessons learned from a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and medical data. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:915-924. [PMID: 32086443 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0585-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Broad consent is increasingly recommended as an acceptable consent model for biobanking human samples and health data with a view to their future use in research. Empirical evidence on the practice of broad consent and its implementation in the hospital setting, however, is still very limited. We analyse and discuss results from a qualitative study of perceptions of a sample of patients and biobank recruiters regarding broad consent to participate in a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and health data. Our findings suggest that contextual and relational factors play an important role in the practice of broad consent, and illustrate that broad consent relies as much on intuition as on reasoning. Moreover, we show that seeking broad consent in the hospital affects patient-recruiter interaction and that "conditional" trust plays a significant role in broad-consent decision-making. In conclusion, we provide recommendations to improve patient autonomy in the context of hospital-based broad consent.
Collapse
|
19
|
De Vries RG, Ryan KA, Gordon L, Krenz CD, Tomlinson T, Jewell S, Kim SYH. Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2019; 29:1942-1953. [PMID: 30095038 DOI: 10.1177/1049732318791826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Do members of the public believe that biobanks should accommodate the moral concerns of donors about the types of research done with their biospecimens? The answer to this question is critical to the future of genomic and precision medicine, endeavors that rely on a public willing to share their biospecimens and medical data. To explore public attitudes regarding the requirements of consent for biobank donations, we organized three democratic deliberations involving 180 participants. The deliberative sessions involved small group discussions informed by presentations given by experts in both biobank research and ethics. We found that participants had a sophisticated understanding of the ethical problems of biobank consent and the complexity of balancing donor concerns while promoting research important to the future of health care. Our research shows how deliberative methods can offer policy makers creative ideas for accommodating the moral concerns of donors in the biobank consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kerry A Ryan
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Linda Gordon
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Tom Tomlinson
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Scott Jewell
- Van Andel Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Scott Y H Kim
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16122209. [PMID: 31234457 PMCID: PMC6617000 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: During the past few decades there has been a growing interest on the part of many governments in the creation of biobanks. Nevertheless, this would be impossible without participation of many donors who offer samples of their biological material for scientific research. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the existing research on social attitudes towards biobanking. Material and Methods: A literature search was conducted in the database of MEDLINE (PubMed). 61 papers were included in the analysis. The retrieved articles were assessed using a thematic analysis. Results: Eight main themes were identified: (1) public knowledge about biobanks, (2) public views on biobanking, (3) willingness to donate, (4) donors’ motivations, (5) perceived benefits and risks of biobanking, (6) preferred type of consent, (7) trust toward biobanks, and (8) demographic characteristics of potential donors. Conclusions: Although the public lacks knowledge about biobanking, many individuals declare willingness to donate. Their will is influenced by: their knowledge about biobanking, the type of donated tissue, research purpose, concerns over the safety of the data, preferred type of consent, and trust towards biobanks.
Collapse
|
21
|
Domaradzki, Pawlikowski. Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:2209. [DOI: http:/doi:10.3390/ijerph16122209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
Background: During the past few decades there has been a growing interest on the part of many governments in the creation of biobanks. Nevertheless, this would be impossible without participation of many donors who offer samples of their biological material for scientific research. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the existing research on social attitudes towards biobanking. Material and Methods: A literature search was conducted in the database of MEDLINE (PubMed). 61 papers were included in the analysis. The retrieved articles were assessed using a thematic analysis. Results: Eight main themes were identified: (1) public knowledge about biobanks, (2) public views on biobanking, (3) willingness to donate, (4) donors’ motivations, (5) perceived benefits and risks of biobanking, (6) preferred type of consent, (7) trust toward biobanks, and (8) demographic characteristics of potential donors. Conclusions: Although the public lacks knowledge about biobanking, many individuals declare willingness to donate. Their will is influenced by: their knowledge about biobanking, the type of donated tissue, research purpose, concerns over the safety of the data, preferred type of consent, and trust towards biobanks.
Collapse
|
22
|
Tai CG, Harris-Wai J, Schaefer C, Liljestrand P, Somkin CP. Multiple Stakeholder Views on Data Sharing in a Biobank in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System: Implications for Biobank Governance. Public Health Genomics 2019; 21:207-216. [PMID: 31167204 DOI: 10.1159/000500442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beginning in 2005, researchers at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) Division of Research developed the Research Program on Genes, Environment, and Health (RPGEH), a research resource of linked biospecimens, health surveys, and electronic health records on more than 200,000 adult KPNC members. This study examined multiple stakeholders' values and preferences regarding protection of participants' privacy and wide sharing of participant data by RPGEH. METHODS We conducted 45 semi-structured interviews in person or via phone and two focus groups with seven stakeholder groups, including RPGEH participants and decliners who are KPNC members, KPNC research scientists, external scientists, leadership, Human Subjects Research Protection Program staff, and RPGEH Community Advisory Panel members. RESULTS Three major themes emerged related to: (1) perceived individual and social harms associated with data sharing; (2) concerns to address when governing access to RPGEH data; and (3) impact of a blurred boundary between research and clinical care in the context of biobanking. CONCLUSIONS The study results were considered in the development of RPGEH data governance and motivated the inclusion of KPNC Community Advisory Panel members and ELSI experts on committees that evaluate data access proposals. Our findings can help inform other biobanks going through similar processes developing data sharing and access policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline G Tai
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Julie Harris-Wai
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Catherine Schaefer
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Petra Liljestrand
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Carol P Somkin
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA, .,Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Spector-Bagdady K, De Vries RG, Gornick MG, Shuman AG, Kardia S, Platt J. Encouraging Participation And Transparency In Biobank Research. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019; 37:1313-1320. [PMID: 30080467 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Medical biobanks often struggle to obtain sustainable funding. Commercialization of specimens is one solution, but disclosure of commercial interests to potential contributors can be dissuasive. Recent revisions to the federal human subjects research regulations will soon mandate such commercialization disclosure in some circumstances, which raises questions about implications for practice. In this nationally representative, probability-based survey sample of the US adult population, we found that 67 percent of participants agreed that clear notification of potential commercialization of biospecimens is warranted, but only 23 percent were comfortable with such use. Sixty-two percent believed that profits should be used only to support future research, and 41 percent supported sharing profits with the public. We also considered other factors related to disclosure in our analysis and argue for a "disclosure plus" standard: informing potential contributors that their biospecimens might be accessed by commercial organizations and explaining how profits would be used to both enhance transparency and facilitate contributors' altruistic motivations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayte Spector-Bagdady
- Kayte Spector-Bagdady ( ) is an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology and chief of the Research Ethics Service of the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School, in Ann Arbor
| | - Raymond G De Vries
- Raymond G. De Vries is codirector of the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine and a professor of learning health sciences and of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Michigan Medical School. He is also a visiting professor at Maastricht University/CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, in the Netherlands
| | - Michele G Gornick
- Michele Gornick is a research investigator in internal medicine and faculty in the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School
| | - Andrew G Shuman
- Andrew G. Shuman is an assistant professor of otolaryngology and of head and neck surgery and co-chief of the Clinical Ethics Service of the Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School
| | - Sharon Kardia
- Sharon Kardia is the Millicent W. Higgins Collegiate Professor of Epidemiology and director of the Life Sciences and Society Program at the University of Michigan School of Public Health
| | - Jodyn Platt
- Jodyn Platt is an assistant professor of learning health sciences at the University of Michigan Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Makhlouf H, Alrabadi N, Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Al-Delaimy W. Population's perspectives toward biobanks in scientific research: a study from Jordan. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE 2019; 12:23-32. [PMID: 30962705 PMCID: PMC6432886 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s187657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Biobanks (biorepositories) were established to compile collected bio-specimens for future research and usage. The collection/storage of bio-specimens triggers several social, legal, and ethical implications where public attitudes can represent the core measurement/parameter in defining the most acceptable practices and ethical approaches when dealing with biobanks. Aim The aim of this study was to explore and understand population’s perspectives, expectations, and concerns toward biobanks in Jordan. Methods A cross-sectional survey that included closed-ended questions was distributed among Jordanians. A total of 500 participants who are representative of the Jordanian population were included in this study. Results There was overwhelming support (>85%) for the establishment of biobanks in Jordan, and most of the participants agreed on the importance of biobanks and samples’ donation for promoting medical research. Enthusiasm in biobanking participation was associated with the sociodemographic characteristics of participants including age, educational level, and previous knowledge of biobanks. Moreover, considering sample donation as a religiously good deed appeared to have the strongest positive correlation with willingness to donate bio-specimens for future research. Also, participants’ trust in medical and research services, especially the protection of their privacy and confidentiality, was the most critical concern when they decided to participate in biobanks. Conclusion Population’s attitude toward biobanks in Jordan was positive and promising, and can encourage the future establishment of different biobanks. It is also necessary to take into consideration certain sociodemographic characteristics when discussing specific information with potential biobanks’ donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanin Makhlouf
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Nasr Alrabadi
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan,
| | - Omar F Khabour
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Karem H Alzoubi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Wael Al-Delaimy
- Division of Global Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Matson M, Macapagal K, Kraus A, Coventry R, Bettin E, Fisher CB, Mustanski B. Sexual and gender minority youth's perspectives on sharing de-identified data in sexual health and HIV prevention research. SEXUALITY RESEARCH & SOCIAL POLICY : JOURNAL OF NSRC : SR & SP 2019; 16:1-11. [PMID: 31890053 PMCID: PMC6936765 DOI: 10.1007/s13178-018-0372-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Funding agencies encourage and sometimes require data sharing. However, there is limited empirical research on participant perspectives on sharing de-identified data from research on sensitive topics (e.g., HIV, sexual health) with other researchers, and virtually none from adolescents or sexual and gender minority (SGM) participants. SGM teens (N = 197) ages 14-17 completed an online survey with multiple choice and open-ended items assessing perspectives toward sharing survey responses and blood samples from sexual health and HIV testing studies with other researchers. SGM youth were willing to share data but frequently cited confidentiality and privacy concerns, including fears about parents finding out about their identities even after de-identification was explained. Researchers need to ensure youth understand explanations of data security protections in order to make well-informed decisions about participating in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Matson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences & Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (Chicago, IL)
| | - Kathryn Macapagal
- Department of Medical Social Sciences & Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (Chicago, IL)
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (Chicago, IL)
| | - Ashley Kraus
- Department of Medical Social Sciences & Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (Chicago, IL)
| | - Ryan Coventry
- Department of Medical Social Sciences & Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (Chicago, IL)
| | - Emily Bettin
- Department of Medical Social Sciences & Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (Chicago, IL)
| | - Celia B. Fisher
- Center for Ethics Education & Department of Psychology, Fordham University (Bronx, NY)
| | - Brian Mustanski
- Department of Medical Social Sciences & Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (Chicago, IL)
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (Chicago, IL)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fisher CB, Layman DM. Genomics, Big Data, and Broad Consent: a New Ethics Frontier for Prevention Science. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2018; 19:871-879. [PMID: 30145751 PMCID: PMC6182378 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0944-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Emerging technologies for analyzing biospecimens have led to advances in understanding the interacting role of genetics and environment on development and individual responsivity to prevention and intervention programs. The scientific study of gene-environment influences has also benefited from the growth of Big Data tools that allow linking genomic data to health, educational, and other information stored in large integrated datasets. These advances have created a new frontier of ethical challenges for scientists as they collect, store, or engage in secondary use of potentially identifiable information and biospecimens. To address challenges arising from technological advances and the expanding contexts in which potentially identifiable information and biospecimens are collected and stored, the Office of Human Research Protections has revised federal regulations for the protection of human subjects. The revised regulations create a new format, content, and transparency requirements for informed consent, including a new mechanism known as broad consent. Broad consent offers participants a range of choices regarding consent for the storage and future use of their personally identifiable data. These regulations have important implications for how prevention scientists and oversight boards acquire participant consent for the collection, storage, and future use of their data by other investigators for scientific purposes significantly different from the original study. This article describes regulatory changes and challenges affecting traditional informed consent for prevention research, followed by a description of the rationale and requirements for obtaining broad consent, and concludes with a discussion of future challenges involving ongoing transparency and protections for participants and their communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia B Fisher
- Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Dealy Hall 441, East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY, 10458, USA.
| | - Deborah M Layman
- Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Dealy Hall 441, East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY, 10458, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kirwan JA, Brennan L, Broadhurst D, Fiehn O, Cascante M, Dunn WB, Schmidt MA, Velagapudi V. Preanalytical Processing and Biobanking Procedures of Biological Samples for Metabolomics Research: A White Paper, Community Perspective (for "Precision Medicine and Pharmacometabolomics Task Group"-The Metabolomics Society Initiative). Clin Chem 2018; 64:1158-1182. [PMID: 29921725 DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.287045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The metabolome of any given biological system contains a diverse range of low molecular weight molecules (metabolites), whose abundances can be affected by the timing and method of sample collection, storage, and handling. Thus, it is necessary to consider the requirements for preanalytical processes and biobanking in metabolomics research. Poor practice can create bias and have deleterious effects on the robustness and reproducibility of acquired data. CONTENT This review presents both current practice and latest evidence on preanalytical processes and biobanking of samples intended for metabolomics measurement of common biofluids and tissues. It highlights areas requiring more validation and research and provides some evidence-based guidelines on best practices. SUMMARY Although many researchers and biobanking personnel are familiar with the necessity of standardizing sample collection procedures at the axiomatic level (e.g., fasting status, time of day, "time to freezer," sample volume), other less obvious factors can also negatively affect the validity of a study, such as vial size, material and batch, centrifuge speeds, storage temperature, time and conditions, and even environmental changes in the collection room. Any biobank or research study should establish and follow a well-defined and validated protocol for the collection of samples for metabolomics research. This protocol should be fully documented in any resulting study and should involve all stakeholders in its design. The use of samples that have been collected using standardized and validated protocols is a prerequisite to enable robust biological interpretation unhindered by unnecessary preanalytical factors that may complicate data analysis and interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Kirwan
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; .,Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch, Germany
| | - Lorraine Brennan
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, Institute of Food and Health, UCD, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Oliver Fiehn
- NIH West Coast Metabolomics Center, UC Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Marta Cascante
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine and IBUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBER-EHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Warwick B Dunn
- School of Biosciences and Phenome Centre Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael A Schmidt
- Advanced Pattern Analysis and Countermeasures Group, Research Innovation Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.,Sovaris Aerospace, LLC, Boulder, CO
| | - Vidya Velagapudi
- Metabolomics Unit, Institute for Molecular Medicine FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Warner TD, Weil CJ, Andry C, Degenholtz HB, Parker L, Carithers LJ, Feige M, Wendler D, Pentz RD. Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13:115-124. [PMID: 29390947 PMCID: PMC5869128 DOI: 10.1177/1556264617751204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Commentators are concerned that broad consent may not provide biospecimen donors with sufficient information regarding possible future research uses of their tissue. We surveyed with interviews 302 cancer patients who had recently provided broad consent at four diverse academic medical centers. The majority of donors believed that the consent form provided them with sufficient information regarding future possible uses of their biospecimens. Donors expressed very positive views regarding tissue donation in general and endorsed the use of their biospecimens in future research across a wide range of contexts. Concerns regarding future uses were limited to for-profit research and research by investigators in other countries. These results support the use of broad consent to store and use biological samples in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Latarsha J. Carithers
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (USA)
- Now at the National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (USA)
| | - Michelle Feige
- Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, Inc. (USA)
| | | | - Rebecca D. Pentz
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine (USA)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tomlinson T, De Vries RG, Kim HM, Gordon L, Ryan KA, Krenz CD, Jewell S, Kim SYH. Effect of deliberation on the public's attitudes toward consent policies for biobank research. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:176-185. [PMID: 29348694 PMCID: PMC5838972 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0063-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In this study, we evaluate the effect of education and deliberation on the willingness of members of the public to donate tissue to biobank research and on their attitudes regarding various biobank consent policies. Participants were randomly assigned to a democratic deliberation (DD) group, an education group that received only written materials, and a control group. Participants completed a survey before the deliberation and two surveys post-deliberation: one on (or just after) the deliberation day, and one 4 weeks later. Subjects were asked to rate 5 biobank consent policies as acceptable (or not) and to identify the best and worst policies. Analyses compared acceptability of different policy options and changes in attitudes across the three groups. After deliberation, subjects in the DD group were less likely to find broad consent (defined here as consent for the use of donations in an unspecified range of future research studies, subject to content and process restrictions) and study-by-study consent acceptable. The DD group was also significantly less likely to endorse broad consent as the best policy (OR = 0.34), and more likely to prefer alternative consent options. These results raise ethical challenges to the current widespread reliance on broad consent in biobank research, but do not support study-by-study consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Tomlinson
- Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
| | - Raymond G De Vries
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - H Myra Kim
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Linda Gordon
- Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Kerry A Ryan
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Chris D Krenz
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Scott Jewell
- Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - Scott Y H Kim
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Illes J, Sipp D, Kleiderman E, Benjaminy S, Isasi R, Lomax G, Master Z, McCormick J, Ogbogu U, Ravitsky V, Robillard JM, Rossi F, Wilson B, Zarzeczny A. A blueprint for the next generation of ELSI research, training, and outreach in regenerative medicine. NPJ Regen Med 2018; 2:21. [PMID: 29302357 PMCID: PMC5677945 DOI: 10.1038/s41536-017-0026-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Revised: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Regenerative medicine has attracted the interest of scientists, physicians, and patient communities, and as well as policy-makers and the broader public given related ethical, legal, and social implications. Here we examine past initiatives in the ethical, legal and social implications arena in regenerative medicine, and offer our views on actionable priorities for the future in six key areas: capacity building, policy, engagement with industry, resaerch ethics, communication, and community building.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy Illes
- National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Douglas Sipp
- RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Japan.,Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Keio Global Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Shelly Benjaminy
- National Core for Neuroethics and Department of Experimental Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Rosario Isasi
- John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL USA
| | - Geoff Lomax
- California Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Oakland, CA USA
| | - Zubin Master
- Alden March Bioethics Institute, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY USA
| | - Jennifer McCormick
- Department of Humanities, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA USA
| | - Ubaka Ogbogu
- Faculties of Law and Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Bioethics Program, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Julie M Robillard
- National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Fabio Rossi
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Brenda Wilson
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Amy Zarzeczny
- Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Regina, Regina, SK Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
From a research perspective, the interest in biobanking continues to intensify. Governments and industry have invested heavily in biobanks, as exemplified by initiatives like the United Kingdom Biobank and United States' Precision Medicine Initiative. But despite this enthusiasm, many profound legal and ethical challenges remain unresolved. Indeed, there continues to be disagreements about how best to obtain consent and the degree and nature of control that research participants retain over donated samples and health information. Emerging social trends-including concerns about commercialization and perceived rights of continuing control ("biorights")-seem likely to intensify these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Blake Murdoch
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Sabolch A, Jones R, Spence R, De Vries R, Grande D, Bradbury AR. Perspectives of Patients With Cancer on the Ethics of Rapid-Learning Health Systems. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2315-2323. [PMID: 28537812 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.72.0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To inform the evolving implementation of CancerLinQ and other rapid-learning systems for oncology care, we sought to evaluate perspectives of patients with cancer regarding ethical issues. Methods Using the GfK Group online research panel, representative of the US population, we surveyed 875 patients with cancer; 621 (71%) responded. We evaluated perceptions of appropriateness (scored from 1 to 10; 10, very appropriate) using scenarios and compared responses by age, race, and education. We constructed a scaled measure of comfort with secondary use of deidentified medical information and evaluated its correlates in a multivariable model. Results Of the sample, 9% were black and 9% Hispanic; 38% had completed high school or less, and 59% were age ≥ 65 years. Perceptions of appropriateness were highest when consent was obtained and university researchers used data to publish a research study (weighted mean appropriateness, 8.47) and lowest when consent was not obtained and a pharmaceutical company used data for marketing (weighted mean appropriateness, 2.7). Most respondents (72%) thought secondary use of data for research was very important, although those with lower education were less likely to endorse this (62% v 78%; P < .001). Overall, 35% believed it was necessary to obtain consent each time such research was to be performed; this proportion was higher among blacks/Hispanics than others (48% v 33%; P = .02). Comfort with the use of deidentified information from medical records varied by scenario and overall was associated with distrust in the health care system. Conclusion Perceptions of patients with cancer regarding secondary data use depend on the user and the specific use of the data, while also frequently differing by patient sociodemographic factors. Such information is critical to inform ongoing efforts to implement oncology learning systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reshma Jagsi
- Reshma Jagsi, Aaron Sabolch, Rochelle Jones, and Raymond De Vries, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Rebecca Spence, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and David Grande and Angela R. Bradbury, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kent A Griffith
- Reshma Jagsi, Aaron Sabolch, Rochelle Jones, and Raymond De Vries, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Rebecca Spence, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and David Grande and Angela R. Bradbury, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Aaron Sabolch
- Reshma Jagsi, Aaron Sabolch, Rochelle Jones, and Raymond De Vries, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Rebecca Spence, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and David Grande and Angela R. Bradbury, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rochelle Jones
- Reshma Jagsi, Aaron Sabolch, Rochelle Jones, and Raymond De Vries, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Rebecca Spence, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and David Grande and Angela R. Bradbury, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rebecca Spence
- Reshma Jagsi, Aaron Sabolch, Rochelle Jones, and Raymond De Vries, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Rebecca Spence, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and David Grande and Angela R. Bradbury, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Raymond De Vries
- Reshma Jagsi, Aaron Sabolch, Rochelle Jones, and Raymond De Vries, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Rebecca Spence, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and David Grande and Angela R. Bradbury, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David Grande
- Reshma Jagsi, Aaron Sabolch, Rochelle Jones, and Raymond De Vries, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Rebecca Spence, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and David Grande and Angela R. Bradbury, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Angela R Bradbury
- Reshma Jagsi, Aaron Sabolch, Rochelle Jones, and Raymond De Vries, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; Rebecca Spence, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; and David Grande and Angela R. Bradbury, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review describes advances in rising and continuing ethical issues in research in patients in pain. Although some of the issues focus directly on pain research, such as research in neonatal pain management, others focus on widespread ethical issues that are relevant to pain research, such as scientific misconduct, deception, placebo use and genomics. RECENT FINDINGS Scientific misconduct is more widespread than realized and requires greater awareness of the markers of misconduct like irreproducibility. More education about what qualifies as misconduct, such as consent violations, plagiarism and inappropriate patient recruitment along with data falsification needs to be implemented. Wayward researchers may attend a rehabilitation conference to improve their practices. Studies in neonatal pain management do not require comparing an intervention with the inadequate analgesia of a placebo; comparing with a standard approach is sufficient. Deception of research patients may be acceptable under narrow circumstances. The legitimacy of using broad informed consent for biobanking and genomic studies are being challenged as changes to the Common Rule are being considered. SUMMARY Increasing complexity and the desire to further medical knowledge complicates research methods and informed consent. The ethical issues surrounding these and offshoot areas will continue to develop.
Collapse
|