1
|
Husnik MJ, Heffron R, Hughes JP, Richardson B, van der Straten A, Palanee-Phillips T, Soto-Torres L, Singh D, Mirembe BG, Livant E, Gaffoor Z, Mansoor LE, Siva SS, Dadabhai S, Kiweewa FM, Baeten JM. Efficacy of the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring Accounting for Imperfect Adherence. AIDS Behav 2024:10.1007/s10461-024-04463-3. [PMID: 39158801 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04463-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
Product adherence is critical to obtaining objective estimates of efficacy of pre-exposure prophylactic interventions against HIV-1 infection. With imperfect adherence, intention-to-treat analyses assess the collective effects of complete, sub-optimal and non-adherence, providing a biased and attenuated estimate of the average causal effect of an intervention. Using data from the MTN-020/ASPIRE phase III trial evaluating HIV-1 efficacy of the dapivirine vaginal ring, we conducted per-protocol, and adherence-adjusted causal inference analyses using principal stratification and marginal structural models. We constructed two adherence cut offs of ≥ 0.9 mg (low cutoff) and > 4.0 mg (high cutoff) that represent drug released from the ring over a 28-day period. The HIV-1 efficacy estimate (95% CI) was 30.8% (3.6%, 50.3%) (P = 0.03) from the per-protocol analysis, and 53.6% (16.5%, 74.3%) (P = 0.01) among the highest predicted adherers from principal stratification analyses using the low cutoff. Marginal structural models produced efficacy estimates (95% CIs) ranging from 48.8 (21.8, 66.4) (P = 0.0019) to 56.5% (32.8%, 71.9%) (P = 0.0002). Application of adherence-adjusted causal inference methods are useful in interpreting HIV-1 efficacy in secondary analyses of PrEP clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla J Husnik
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Renee Heffron
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - James P Hughes
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Barbra Richardson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ariane van der Straten
- Department of Medicine, The Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- ASTRA Consulting, Kensington, CA, USA
| | - Thesla Palanee-Phillips
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Lydia Soto-Torres
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Devika Singh
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brenda Gati Mirembe
- Makerere University John Hopkins University Research Collaboration (MU-JHU), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Edward Livant
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zakir Gaffoor
- HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Leila E Mansoor
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Samantha S Siva
- HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sufia Dadabhai
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Flavia Matovu Kiweewa
- Makerere University John Hopkins University Research Collaboration (MU-JHU), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jared M Baeten
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Amundsen PA, Underwood M, Burton K, Grotle M, Engedahl MS, Malmberg-Heimonen I, Irgens PMS, Højen M, Kisa A, Hagen M, Holmgard TE, Martinsen A, Lothe J, Monsen SS, Froud R. Individual supported work placements (ReISE) for improving sustained return to work in unemployed people with persistent pain: an internal pilot study of a cohort randomised controlled approach. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:110. [PMID: 39138502 PMCID: PMC11321075 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01538-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent pain is a frequent cause of sick leave and work disability in Norway. A return-to-work intervention featuring supported work placements, developed in the UK, demonstrated feasibility, and a return-to-work rate of 20% within 6 months was observed in the sample. We sought to adapt the intervention for delivery in Norway and to confirm feasibility prior to a full-scale trial. METHODS In this internal pilot, we used a pragmatic cohort randomised controlled approach with national recruitment in Norway. We recruited people who were unemployed (for at least 1 month), having persistent pain (for at least 3 months), aged between 18 and 64, and wanting to return to work. We initially recruited people to an observational cohort study of the impact of being unemployed with persistent pain. After baseline measurement, we randomly sub-sampled participants to whom we offered the intervention, which featured individual case management and support, work-familiarisation sessions, and the offer of a 6-week part-time unpaid work placement. We assessed recruitment rates (aiming to recruit 66, and sub-sample 17 within 6 months); optimal recruitment pathways; intervention acceptance rates; the feasibility of data collection; using video links for work-familiarisation sessions and remote case manager support. RESULTS The pilot ran from June to November 2022. Of 168 people expressing interest, 94 consented. Recruitment posts on Facebook yielded the most 'expressions of interest' (66%, n = 111). After screening for eligibility, we included 55 participants. Of these, 19 were randomised to be offered the intervention. Of these, less than half (n = 8) consented to intervention participation. Remote case manager and work-familiarisation sessions appeared feasible. Following a delay in identifying placements, three participants received offers of work placements, with one starting and completing during the pilot period. Data collection methods were feasible, and no adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS Recruitment and logistical processes, such as remote management by video link, are feasible. However, delivery of the intervention is challenging. In particular, sourcing placements and the time required for identifying appropriate placements was more challenging than anticipated. A full-scale trial is feasible but will require improvements to the placement identification processes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN85437524 (Referring to the ReISE trial, of which this internal pilot was a part), Registered 31 of May 2022 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN85437524 TRIAL FUNDING: Norwegian Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pål André Amundsen
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, 0107, Sentrum, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Kim Burton
- University of Huddersfield, Queensgate Huddersfield, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Margreth Grotle
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, 0130, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Innovation and Education, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Building 37BNydalen, P.O. Box 4956, 0424, Ullevål Oslo, Norway
| | - Martin Stav Engedahl
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, 0107, Sentrum, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ira Malmberg-Heimonen
- Department of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Magnus Højen
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, 0107, Sentrum, Oslo, Norway
| | - Adnan Kisa
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, 0107, Sentrum, Oslo, Norway
- Department of International Health and Sustainable Development, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, 1440 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA
| | - Milada Hagen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thor Einar Holmgard
- Norwegian Back Pain Association, Fjellhagen, P.O.Box 9612, 3065, Drammen, Norway
| | - Amy Martinsen
- Department of Research, Innovation and Education, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Building 37BNydalen, P.O. Box 4956, 0424, Ullevål Oslo, Norway
- Co/FORMI, The Norwegian Council for Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo Universitetssykehus, 4956 Nydalen, P.O. Box , 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jakob Lothe
- Co/FORMI, The Norwegian Council for Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo Universitetssykehus, 4956 Nydalen, P.O. Box , 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Robert Froud
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, 0107, Sentrum, Oslo, Norway
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amstutz A, Schönenberger CM, Speich B, Griessbach A, Schwenke JM, Glasstetter J, James S, Verkooijen HM, Nickolls B, Relton C, Hemkens LG, Chammartin F, Gerber F, Labhardt ND, Schandelmaier S, Briel M. Characteristics, consent patterns, and challenges of randomized trials using the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design - A scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 174:111469. [PMID: 39032590 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) is a pragmatic design approach that may overcome frequent challenges of traditional randomized trials such as slow recruitment, burdensome consent procedures, or limited external validity. This scoping review aims to identify all randomized controlled trials using the TwiCs design and to summarize their design characteristics, ways to obtain informed consent, output, reported challenges and mitigation strategies. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane, trial registries and citation tracking up to December 2022. TwiCs were defined as randomized trials embedded in a cohort with postrandomization consent for the intervention group and no specific postrandomization consent for the usual care control group. Information from identified TwiCs was extracted in duplicate from protocols, publications, and registry entries. We analyzed the information descriptively and qualitatively to highlight methodological challenges and solutions related to nonuptake of interventions and informed consent procedure. RESULTS We identified a total of 46 TwiCs conducted between 2005 and 2022 in 14 different countries by a handful of research groups. The most common medical fields were oncology (11/46; 24%), infectious diseases (8/46; 17%), and mental health (7/46; 15%). A typical TwiCs was investigator-initiated (46/46; 100%), publicly funded (36/46; 78%), and recruited outpatients (27/46; 59%). Excluding eight pilot trials, only 16/38 (42%) TwiCs adjusted their calculated sample size for nonuptake of the intervention, anticipating a median nonuptake of 25% (interquartile range 10%-32%) in the experimental arm. Seventeen TwiCs (45%) planned analyses to adjust effect estimates for nonuptake. Regarding informed consent, we observed three patterns: 1) three separate consents for cohort participation, randomization, and intervention (17/46; 37%); 2) combined consent for cohort participation and randomization and a separate intervention consent (10/46; 22%); and 3) consent only for cohort participation and intervention (randomization consent not mentioned; 19/46; 41%). CONCLUSION Existing TwiCs are globally scattered across a few research groups covering a wide range of medical fields and interventions. Despite the potential advantages, the number of TwiCs remains small. The variability in consent procedures and the possibility of substantial nonuptake of the intervention warrants further research to guide the planning, implementation, and analysis of TwiCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alain Amstutz
- CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Oslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Christof M Schönenberger
- CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Benjamin Speich
- CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Griessbach
- CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Johannes M Schwenke
- CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jan Glasstetter
- CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sophie James
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Beverley Nickolls
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Clare Relton
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Lars G Hemkens
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Frédérique Chammartin
- International Clinical Health Services Research Unit, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Felix Gerber
- International Clinical Health Services Research Unit, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Niklaus D Labhardt
- International Clinical Health Services Research Unit, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schandelmaier
- CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; MTA-PET Lendület "Momentum" Evidence Group, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Matthias Briel
- CLEAR Methods Center, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Robertson CE, Akles M, Van Bavel JJ. Preregistered Replication and Extension of "Moral Hypocrisy: Social Groups and the Flexibility of Virtue". Psychol Sci 2024; 35:798-813. [PMID: 38743841 DOI: 10.1177/09567976241246552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The tendency for people to consider themselves morally good while behaving selfishly is known as moral hypocrisy. Influential work by Valdesolo and DeSteno (2007) found evidence for intergroup moral hypocrisy such that people were more forgiving of transgressions when they were committed by an in-group member than an out-group member. We conducted two experiments to examine moral hypocrisy and group membership in an online paradigm with Prolific workers from the United States: a direct replication of the original work with minimal groups (N = 610; nationally representative) and a conceptual replication with political groups (N = 606; 50% Democrats and 50% Republicans). Although the results did not replicate the original findings, we observed evidence of in-group favoritism in minimal groups and out-group derogation in political groups. The current research finds mixed evidence of intergroup moral hypocrisy and has implications for understanding the contextual dependencies of intergroup bias and partisanship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jay J Van Bavel
- Department of Psychology, New York University
- Center for Neural Science, New York University
- Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Larkin F, Oostenbroek J, Lee Y, Hayward E, Fernandez A, Wang Y, Mitchell A, Li LY, Meins E. A smartphone app effectively facilitates mothers' mind-mindedness: A randomized controlled trial. Child Dev 2024; 95:831-844. [PMID: 37965827 DOI: 10.1111/cdev.14039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
The efficacy of a smartphone app intervention (BabyMind©) in facilitating mind-mindedness was investigated in a randomized controlled trial, assigning mothers and their 6-month-olds (N = 152; 72 girls, 146 White) to intervention or active control conditions. Mothers who had received the BabyMind© app intervention scored higher for appropriate (d = .61, 95% CI .28, .94) and lower for non-attuned (d = -.55, 95% CI -.92, -.18) mind-related comments at follow-up (age 12 months), compared with their control group counterparts. Adjusting for missing data did not alter this pattern of findings. Mothers' baseline parental reflective functioning did not moderate these relations. Results are discussed in terms of the benefits of early intervention and exploring the efficacy of the app in more diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Ying Wang
- Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Lydia Y Li
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lawton R, Murray J, Baxter R, Richardson G, Cockayne S, Baird K, Mandefield L, Brealey S, O'Hara J, Foy R, Sheard L, Cracknell A, Breckin E, Hewitt C. Evaluating an intervention to improve the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home for older people (Your Care Needs You): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation. Trials 2023; 24:671. [PMID: 37838678 PMCID: PMC10576890 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07716-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients often experience safety issues when transitioning from hospital to home. The 'Your Care Needs You' (YCNY) intervention aims to support older people to 'know more' and 'do more' whilst in hospital so that they are better prepared for managing at home. METHODS A multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the YCNY intervention. Forty acute hospital wards (clusters) in England from varying medical specialities will be randomised to deliver YCNY or care-as-usual on a 1:1 basis. The primary outcome will be unplanned hospital readmission rates within 30 days of discharge. This will be extracted from routinely collected data of at least 5440 patients (aged 75 years and older) discharged to their own homes during the 4- to 5-month YCNY intervention period. A nested cohort of up to 1000 patients will be recruited to the study to collect secondary outcomes via follow-up questionnaires at 5-, 30- and 90-day post-discharge. These will include measures of patient experience of transitions, patient-reported safety events, quality of life and healthcare resource use. Unplanned hospital readmission rates at 60 and 90 days of discharge will be collected from routine data. A process evaluation (primarily interviews and observations with patients, carers and staff) will be conducted to understand the implementation of the intervention and the contextual factors that shape this, as well as the intervention's underlying mechanisms of action. Fidelity of intervention delivery will also be assessed across all intervention wards. DISCUSSION This study will establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the YCNY intervention which aims to improve patient safety and experience for older people during transitions of care. The process evaluation will generate insights about how the YCNY intervention was implemented, what elements of the intervention work and for whom, and how to optimise its implementation so that it can be delivered with high fidelity in routine service contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION UK Clinical Research Network Portfolio: 44559; ISTCRN: ISRCTN17062524. Registered on 11/02/2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Lawton
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Jenni Murray
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Ruth Baxter
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jane O'Hara
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Alison Cracknell
- Leeds Centre for Older People's Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Edmund Breckin
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Antoun L, Middleton L, Smith P, Saridogan E, Cooper K, Brocklehurst P, McKinnon W, Bevan S, Woolley R, Jones L, Fullard J, Morgan M, Roberts T, Clark TJ. LAparoscopic Versus Abdominal hysterectomy (LAVA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070218. [PMID: 37669836 PMCID: PMC10481847 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is uncertainty about the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy, particularly the relative rate of complications of the two procedures. While uptake of laparoscopic hysterectomy has been slow, the situation is changing with greater familiarity, better training, better equipment and increased proficiency in the technique. Thus, a large, robust, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare contemporary laparoscopic hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy to determine the safest and most cost-effective technique. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A parallel, open, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised controlled, expertise-based surgery trial with integrated health economic evaluation and an internal pilot with an embedded qualitative process evaluation. A within trial-based economic evaluation will explore the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. We will aim to recruit 3250 women requiring a hysterectomy for a benign gynaecological condition and who were suitable for either laparoscopic or open techniques. The primary outcome is major complications up to six completed weeks postsurgery and the key secondary outcome is time from surgery to resumption of usual activities using the personalised Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function questionnaire. The principal outcome for the economic evaluation is to be cost per QALY at 12 months' postsurgery. A secondary analysis is to be undertaken to generate costs per major surgical complication avoided and costs per return to normal activities. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the West Midlands-Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee, 18 February 2021 (Ethics ref: 21/WM/0019). REC approval for the protocol version 2.0 dated 2 February 2021 was issued on 18 February 2021.We will present the findings in national and international conferences. We will also aim to publish the findings in high impact peer-reviewed journals. We will disseminate the completed paper to the Department of Health, the Scientific Advisory Committees of the RCOG, the Royal College of Nurses (RCN) and the BSGE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN14566195.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Antoun
- Department of Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lee Middleton
- School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Smith
- Department of Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ertan Saridogan
- Department of Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Kevin Cooper
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
- University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | | | | | - Rebecca Woolley
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Laura Jones
- Public Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Tracy Roberts
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - T Justin Clark
- Department of Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kessels R, May AM, Koopman M, Roes KCB. The Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) study design in oncology: experience and methodological reflections. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:117. [PMID: 37179306 PMCID: PMC10183126 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01941-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
A Trial within Cohorts (TwiCs) study design is a trial design that uses the infrastructure of an observational cohort study to initiate a randomized trial. Upon cohort enrollment, the participants provide consent for being randomized in future studies without being informed. Once a new treatment is available, eligible cohort participants are randomly assigned to the treatment or standard of care. Patients randomized to the treatment arm are offered the new treatment, which they can choose to refuse. Patients who refuse will receive standard of care instead. Patients randomized to the standard of care arm receive no information about the trial and continue receiving standard of care as part of the cohort study. Standard cohort measures are used for outcome comparisons. The TwiCs study design aims to overcome some issues encountered in standard Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). An example of an issue in standard RCTs is the slow patient accrual. A TwiCs study aims to improve this by selecting patients using a cohort and only offering the intervention to patients in the intervention arm. In oncology, the TwiCs study design has gained increasing interest during the last decade. Despite its potential advantages over RCTs, the TwiCs study design has several methodological challenges that need careful consideration when planning a TwiCs study. In this article, we focus on these challenges and reflect on them using experiences from TwiCs studies initiated in oncology. Important methodological challenges that are discussed are the timing of randomization, the issue of non-compliance (refusal) after randomization in the intervention arm, and the definition of the intention-to-treat effect in a TwiCs study and how this effect is related to its counterpart in standard RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Kessels
- Dutch Oncology Research Platform, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131 , P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kit C B Roes
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Section Biostatistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Amundsen PA, Underwood M, Burton K, Grotle M, Malmberg-Heimonen I, Kisa A, Småstuen MC, Holmgard TE, Martinsen A, Lothe J, Irgens PMS, Højen M, Monsen SS, Froud R. Individual supported work placements (ReISE) for improving sustained return to work in unemployed people with persistent pain: study protocol for a cohort randomised controlled trial with embedded economic and process evaluations. Trials 2023; 24:179. [PMID: 36906593 PMCID: PMC10006572 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07211-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around one-third of workdays lost in Norway are due to musculoskeletal conditions, with persistent (chronic) pain being the most frequent cause of sick leave and work disability. Increasing work participation for people with persistent pain improves their health, quality of life, and well-being and reduces poverty; however, it is not clear how to best help unemployed people who have persistent pain to return to work. The aim of this study is to examine if a matched work placement intervention featuring case manager support and work-focused healthcare improves return to work rates and quality of life for unemployed people in Norway with persistent pain who want to work. METHODS We will use a cohort randomised controlled approach to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a matched work placement intervention featuring case manager support and work-focused healthcare compared to those receiving usual care in the cohort alone. We will recruit people aged 18-64, who have been out of work for at least 1 month, had pain for more than 3 months, and want to work. Initially, all (n = 228) will be recruited to an observational cohort study on the impact of being unemployed with persistent pain. We will then randomly select one in three to be offered the intervention. The primary outcome of sustained return to work will be measured using registry and self-reported data, while secondary outcomes include self-reported levels of health-related quality of life and physical and mental health. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months post-randomisation. We will run a process evaluation parallel to the intervention exploring implementation, continuity of the intervention, reasons for participating, declining participation, and mechanisms behind cases of sustained return to work. An economic evaluation of the trial process will also be conducted. DISCUSSION The ReISE intervention is designed to increase work participation for people with persistent pain. The intervention has the potential to improve work ability by collaboratively navigating obstacles to working. If successful, the intervention may be a viable option for helping people in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry 85,437,524 Registered on 30 March 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pål André Amundsen
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, Sentrum, 0107, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Martin Underwood
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Kim Burton
- Professor of Occupational Healthcare, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK
| | - Margreth Grotle
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ira Malmberg-Heimonen
- Department of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Adnan Kisa
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, Sentrum, 0107, Oslo, Norway
| | - Milada Cvancarova Småstuen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thor Einar Holmgard
- User representative from the Norwegian Back Pain Association, Fjellhagen, P.O. Box 9612, 3065, Drammen, Norway
| | - Amy Martinsen
- Department of Research, Innovation and Education, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Building 37B, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jakob Lothe
- Co/FORMI, The Norwegian Council for Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo Universitetssykehus, Nydalen, P.O. Box 4956, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Magnus Højen
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, Sentrum, 0107, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Robert Froud
- School of Health Sciences, Kristiana University College, PB 1190, Sentrum, 0107, Oslo, Norway.,Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marshman Z, Rodd H, Fairhurst C, Porritt J, Dawett B, Day P, Innes N, Vernazza C, Newton T, Ronaldson S, Cross L, Ross J, Baker SR, Hewitt C, Torgerson D, Ainsworth H. The CALM trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial of a guided self-help cognitive behavioural therapy intervention to reduce dental anxiety in children. Trials 2023; 24:15. [PMID: 36609355 PMCID: PMC9817252 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-07046-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, around 13% of children experience dental anxiety (DA). This group of patients frequently miss dental appointments, have greater reliance on treatment under general anaesthesia (GA) and have poorer oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) than their non-dentally anxious peers. Recently, a low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based, self-help approach has been recommended for management of childhood anxiety disorders. A feasibility study conducted in secondary care found this guided self-help CBT resource reduced DA and a randomised controlled trial was recommended. The present study aims to establish the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a guided self-help CBT intervention to reduce DA in children attending primary dental care sites compared to usual care. METHODS This 4-year randomised controlled trial will involve 600 children (aged 9-16 years) and their parent/carers in 30 UK primary dental care sites. At least two dental professionals will participate in each site. They will be assigned, using random allocation, to receive the CBT training and deliver the intervention or to deliver usual care. Children with DA attending these sites, in need of treatment, will be randomly allocated to be treated either by the intervention (CBT) or control (usual care) dental professional. Children will complete questionnaires relating to DA, OHRQoL and HRQoL before treatment, immediately after treatment completion and 12 months post-randomisation. Attendance, need for sedation/GA and costs of the two different approaches will be compared. The primary outcome, DA, will be measured using the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale. Scores will be compared between groups using a linear mixed model. DISCUSSION Treating dentally anxious patients can be challenging and costly. Consequently, these children are frequently referred to specialist services for pharmacological interventions. Longer waiting times and greater travel distances may then compound existing healthcare inequalities. This research will investigate whether the intervention has the potential to reduce DA and improve oral health outcomes in children over their life-course, as well as upskilling primary dental healthcare professionals to better manage this patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION This clinical trial has been registered with an international registry and has been allocated an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN27579420).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Marshman
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helen Rodd
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Caroline Fairhurst
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jenny Porritt
- grid.5884.10000 0001 0303 540XCentre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Bhupinder Dawett
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Peter Day
- grid.9909.90000 0004 1936 8403 Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicola Innes
- grid.5600.30000 0001 0807 5670School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Christopher Vernazza
- grid.1006.70000 0001 0462 7212School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tim Newton
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Ronaldson
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Liz Cross
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jennie Ross
- Richmond Dental Care, 427-429 Richmond Road, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah R. Baker
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - David Torgerson
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Hannah Ainsworth
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Giraudeau B, Caille A, Eldridge SM, Weijer C, Zwarenstein M, Taljaard M. Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management. BMC Med 2022; 20:372. [PMID: 36303153 PMCID: PMC9615398 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02569-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pragmatic trials aim to generate evidence to directly inform patient, caregiver and health-system manager policies and decisions. Heterogeneity in patient characteristics contributes to heterogeneity in their response to the intervention. However, there are many other sources of heterogeneity in outcomes. Based on the expertise and judgements of the authors, we identify different sources of clinical and methodological heterogeneity, which translate into heterogeneity in patient responses-some we consider as desirable and some as undesirable. For each of them, we discuss and, using real-world trial examples, illustrate how heterogeneity should be managed over the whole course of the trial. MAIN TEXT Heterogeneity in centres and patients should be welcomed rather than limited. Interventions can be flexible or tailored and control interventions are expected to reflect usual care, avoiding use of a placebo. Co-interventions should be allowed; adherence should not be enforced. All these elements introduce heterogeneity in interventions (experimental or control), which has to be welcomed because it mimics reality. Outcomes should be objective and possibly routinely collected; standardised assessment, blinding and adjudication should be avoided as much as possible because this is not how assessment would be done outside a trial setting. The statistical analysis strategy must be guided by the objective to inform decision-making, thus favouring the intention-to-treat principle. Pragmatic trials should consider including process analyses to inform an understanding of the trial results. Needed data to conduct these analyses should be collected unobtrusively. Finally, ethical principles must be respected, even though this may seem to conflict with goals of pragmatism; consent procedures could be incorporated in the flow of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Giraudeau
- Université de Tours, Université de Nantes, INSERM, SPHERE U1246, 2 Bd Tonnellé, 37044, Tours cedex 9, France.
- INSERM CIC1415, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.
| | - Agnès Caille
- Université de Tours, Université de Nantes, INSERM, SPHERE U1246, 2 Bd Tonnellé, 37044, Tours cedex 9, France
- INSERM CIC1415, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Sandra M Eldridge
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - Charles Weijer
- Departments of Medicine and Philosophy, Western University, Stevenson Hall 4130, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Merrick Zwarenstein
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Saya S, Boyd L, Chondros P, McNamara M, King M, Milton S, Lourenco RDA, Clark M, Fishman G, Marker J, Ostroff C, Allman R, Walter FM, Buchanan D, Winship I, McIntosh J, Macrae F, Jenkins M, Emery J. The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care. Trials 2022; 23:810. [PMID: 36163034 PMCID: PMC9513012 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can predict the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and target screening more precisely than current guidelines using age and family history alone. Primary care, as a far-reaching point of healthcare and routine provider of cancer screening and risk information, may be an ideal location for their widespread implementation. Methods This trial aims to determine whether the SCRIPT intervention results in more risk-appropriate CRC screening after 12 months in individuals attending general practice, compared with standard cancer risk reduction information. The SCRIPT intervention consists of a CRC PRS, tailored risk-specific screening recommendations and a risk report for participants and their GP, delivered in general practice. Patients aged between 45 and 70 inclusive, attending their GP, will be approached for participation. For those over 50, only those overdue for CRC screening will be eligible to participate. Two hundred and seventy-four participants will be randomised to the intervention or control arms, stratified by general practice, using a computer-generated allocation sequence. The primary outcome is risk-appropriate CRC screening after 12 months. For those in the intervention arm, risk-appropriate screening is defined using PRS-derived risk; for those in the control arm, it is defined using family history and national screening guidelines. Timing, type and results of the previous screening are considered in both arms. Objective health service data will capture screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes include cancer-specific worry, risk perception, predictors of CRC screening behaviour, screening intentions and health service use at 1, 6 and 12 months post-intervention delivery. Discussion This trial aims to determine whether a PRS-derived personalised CRC risk estimate delivered in primary care increases risk-appropriate CRC screening. A future population risk-stratified CRC screening programme could incorporate risk assessment within primary care while encouraging adherence to targeted screening recommendations. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12621000092897p. Registered on 1 February 2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibel Saya
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia. .,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Lucy Boyd
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Patty Chondros
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Mairead McNamara
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michelle King
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shakira Milton
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - George Fishman
- Consumer Advisory Group, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Carlton, Australia
| | - Julie Marker
- Consumer Advisory Group, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Carlton, Australia
| | - Cheri Ostroff
- Centre for Workplace Excellence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Richard Allman
- Genetic Technologies/Phenogen Sciences, Fitzroy, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Buchanan
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Genetic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer McIntosh
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,HumaniSE Lab, Department of Software Systems and Cybersecurity, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Finlay Macrae
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cro S, Kahan BC, Rehal S, Chis Ster A, Carpenter JR, White IR, Cornelius VR. Evaluating how clear the questions being investigated in randomised trials are: systematic review of estimands. BMJ 2022; 378:e070146. [PMID: 35998928 PMCID: PMC9396446 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate how often the precise research question being addressed about an intervention (the estimand) is stated or can be determined from reported methods, and to identify what types of questions are being investigated in phase 2-4 randomised trials. DESIGN Systematic review of the clarity of research questions being investigated in randomised trials in 2020 in six leading general medical journals. DATA SOURCE PubMed search in February 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES Phase 2-4 randomised trials, with no restrictions on medical conditions or interventions. Cluster randomised, crossover, non-inferiority, and equivalence trials were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Number of trials that stated the precise primary question being addressed about an intervention (ie, the primary estimand), or for which the primary estimand could be determined unambiguously from the reported methods using statistical knowledge. Strategies used to handle post-randomisation events that affect the interpretation or existence of patient outcomes, such as intervention discontinuations or uses of additional drug treatments (known as intercurrent events), and the corresponding types of questions being investigated. RESULTS 255 eligible randomised trials were identified. No trials clearly stated all the attributes of the estimand. In 117 (46%) of 255 trials, the primary estimand could be determined from the reported methods. Intercurrent events were reported in 242 (95%) of 255 trials; but the handling of these could only be determined in 125 (49%) of 255 trials. Most trials that provided this information considered the occurrence of intercurrent events as irrelevant in the calculation of the treatment effect and assessed the effect of the intervention regardless (96/125, 77%)-that is, they used a treatment policy strategy. Four (4%) of 99 trials with treatment non-adherence owing to adverse events estimated the treatment effect in a hypothetical setting (ie, the effect as if participants continued treatment despite adverse events), and 19 (79%) of 24 trials where some patients died estimated the treatment effect in a hypothetical setting (ie, the effect as if participants did not die). CONCLUSIONS The precise research question being investigated in most trials is unclear, mainly because of a lack of clarity on the approach to handling intercurrent events. Clear reporting of estimands is necessary in trial reports so that all stakeholders, including clinicians, patients and policy makers, can make fully informed decisions about medical interventions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021238053.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzie Cro
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Brennan C Kahan
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - James R Carpenter
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ian R White
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria R Cornelius
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Axford N, Berry V, Lloyd J, Wyatt K. How can we optimise learning from trials in child and adolescent mental health? EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH 2022; 25:ebmental-2022-300500. [PMID: 35820994 PMCID: PMC10231499 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Improving child and adolescent mental health requires the careful development and rigorous testing of interventions and delivery methods. This includes universal school-based mindfulness training, evaluated in the My Resilience in Adolescence (MYRIAD) trial reported in this special edition. While discovering effective interventions through randomised controlled trials is our ultimate aim, null or negative results can and should play an important role in progressing our understanding of what works. Unfortunately, alongside publication bias there can be a tendency to ignore, spin or unfairly undermine disappointing findings. This creates research waste that can increase risk and reduce benefits for future service users. We advocate several practices to help optimise learning from all trials, whatever the results: stronger intervention design reduces the likelihood of foreseeable null or negative results; an evidence-informed conceptual map of the subject area assists with understanding how results contribute to the knowledge base; mixed methods trial designs aid explanation of outcome results; various open science practices support the dispassionate analysis of data and transparent reporting of trial findings; and preparation for null or negative results helps to temper stakeholder expectations and increase understanding of why we conduct trials in the first place. To embed these practices, research funders must be willing to pay for pilot studies and 'thicker' trials, and publishers should judge trials according to their conduct and not their outcome. MYRIAD is an exemplar of how to design, conduct and report a trial to optimise learning, with important implications for practice.
Collapse
|
15
|
Robson E, Kamper SJ, Lee H, Palazzi K, O'Brien KM, Williams A, Hodder RK, Williams CM. Compliance with telephone-based lifestyle weight loss programs improves low back pain but not knee pain outcomes: complier average causal effects analyses of 2 randomised trials. Pain 2022; 163:e862-e868. [PMID: 34924557 PMCID: PMC9199109 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT We conducted a complier average causal effect (CACE) analyses for 2 pragmatic randomised controlled trials. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of telephone-based lifestyle weight loss interventions compared with usual care among compliers. Participants from 2 trials with low back pain (n = 160) and knee osteoarthritis (n = 120) with a body mass index ≥27 kg/m2 were included. We defined adherence to the telephone-based lifestyle weight loss program as completing 60% (6 from 10) of telephone health coaching calls. The primary outcomes for CACE analyses were pain intensity (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for low back pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for knee osteoarthritis). Secondary outcomes were weight, physical activity, and diet. We used an instrumental variable approach to estimate CACE in compliers. From the intervention groups of the trials, 29% of those with low back pain (n = 23/80) and 34% of those with knee osteoarthritis (n = 20/60) complied. Complier average causal effect estimates showed potentially clinically meaningful effects, but with low certainty because of wide confidence intervals, for pain intensity (-1.4; 95% confidence interval, -3.1, 0.4) and small but also uncertain effects for disability (-2.1; 95% confidence interval, -8.6, 4.5) among compliers in the low back pain trial intervention compared with control but not in the knee osteoarthritis trial. Our findings showed that compliers of a telephone-based weight loss intervention in the low back pain trial generally had improved outcomes; however, there were inconsistent effects in compliers from the knee osteoarthritis trial. Complier average causal effect estimates were larger than intention-to-treat results but must be considered with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Robson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
| | - Steven J. Kamper
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - Hopin Lee
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Statistics in Medicine and Rehabilitation Research in Oxford, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kerrin Palazzi
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate M. O'Brien
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda Williams
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca K. Hodder
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher M. Williams
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Current practice in the measurement and interpretation of intervention adherence in randomised controlled trials: A systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 118:106788. [PMID: 35562000 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ideally all participants in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) should fully receive their allocated intervention; however, this rarely occurs in practice. Intervention adherence affects Type II error so influences the interpretation of trial results and subsequent implementation. We aimed to describe current practice in the definition, measurement, and reporting of intervention adherence in non-pharmacological RCTs, and how this data is incorporated into a trial's interpretation and conclusions. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of phase III RCTs published between January 2018 and June 2020 in the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library for the Health Technology Assessment, Programme Grants for Applied Research, and Public Health Research funding streams. RESULTS Of 237 reports published, 76 met the eligibility criteria and were included. Most RCTs (n = 68, 89.5%) reported adherence, though use of terminology varied widely; nearly three quarters of these (n = 49, 72.1%) conducted a sensitivity analysis. Adherence measures varied between intervention types: behavioural change (n = 10, 43.5%), psychological therapy (n = 5, 83.3%) and physiotherapy/rehabilitation (n = 8, 66.7%) interventions predominately measured adherence based on session attendance. Whereas medical device and surgical interventions (n = 17, 73.9%) primarily record the number of participants receiving the allocated intervention, a third (n = 33, 67.3%) of studies reported a difference in findings between primary and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Although most trials report elements of adherence, terminology was inconsistent, and there was no systematic approach to its measurement, analyses, interpretation, or reporting. Given the importance of adherence within clinical trials, there is a pressing need for a standardised approach or framework.
Collapse
|
17
|
Maheshwari A, Bari V, Bell JL, Bhattacharya S, Bhide P, Bowler U, Brison D, Child T, Chong HY, Cheong Y, Cole C, Coomarasamy A, Cutting R, Goodgame F, Hardy P, Hamoda H, Juszczak E, Khalaf Y, King A, Kurinczuk JJ, Lavery S, Lewis-Jones C, Linsell L, Macklon N, Mathur R, Murray D, Pundir J, Raine-Fenning N, Rajkohwa M, Robinson L, Scotland G, Stanbury K, Troup S. Transfer of thawed frozen embryo versus fresh embryo to improve the healthy baby rate in women undergoing IVF: the E-Freeze RCT. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-142. [PMID: 35603917 PMCID: PMC9376799 DOI: 10.3310/aefu1104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Freezing all embryos, followed by thawing and transferring them into the uterine cavity at a later stage (freeze-all), instead of fresh-embryo transfer may lead to improved pregnancy rates and fewer complications during in vitro fertilisation and pregnancies resulting from it. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate if a policy of freeze-all results in a higher healthy baby rate than the current policy of transferring fresh embryos. DESIGN This was a pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial. SETTING Eighteen in vitro fertilisation clinics across the UK participated from February 2016 to April 2019. PARTICIPANTS Couples undergoing their first, second or third cycle of in vitro fertilisation treatment in which the female partner was aged < 42 years. INTERVENTIONS If at least three good-quality embryos were present on day 3 of embryo development, couples were randomly allocated to either freeze-all (intervention) or fresh-embryo transfer (control). OUTCOMES The primary outcome was a healthy baby, defined as a live, singleton baby born at term, with an appropriate weight for their gestation. Secondary outcomes included ovarian hyperstimulation, live birth and clinical pregnancy rates, complications of pregnancy and childbirth, health economic outcome, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory scores. RESULTS A total of 1578 couples were consented and 619 couples were randomised. Most non-randomisations were because of the non-availability of at least three good-quality embryos (n = 476). Of the couples randomised, 117 (19%) did not adhere to the allocated intervention. The rate of non-adherence was higher in the freeze-all arm, with the leading reason being patient choice. The intention-to-treat analysis showed a healthy baby rate of 20.3% in the freeze-all arm and 24.4% in the fresh-embryo transfer arm (risk ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.15). Similar results were obtained using complier-average causal effect analysis (risk ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 1.10), per-protocol analysis (risk ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.26) and as-treated analysis (risk ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 1.29). The risk of ovarian hyperstimulation was 3.6% in the freeze-all arm and 8.1% in the fresh-embryo transfer arm (risk ratio 0.44, 99% confidence interval 0.15 to 1.30). There were no statistically significant differences between the freeze-all and the fresh-embryo transfer arms in the live birth rates (28.3% vs. 34.3%; risk ratio 0.83, 99% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.06) and clinical pregnancy rates (33.9% vs. 40.1%; risk ratio 0.85, 99% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.11). There was no statistically significant difference in anxiety scores for male participants (mean difference 0.1, 99% confidence interval -2.4 to 2.6) and female participants (mean difference 0.0, 99% confidence interval -2.2 to 2.2) between the arms. The economic analysis showed that freeze-all had a low probability of being cost-effective in terms of the incremental cost per healthy baby and incremental cost per live birth. LIMITATIONS We were unable to reach the original planned sample size of 1086 and the rate of non-adherence to the allocated intervention was much higher than expected. CONCLUSION When efficacy, safety and costs are considered, freeze-all is not better than fresh-embryo transfer. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN61225414. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 25. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abha Maheshwari
- Aberdeen Fertility Centre, NHS Grampian and University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Vasha Bari
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer L Bell
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Priya Bhide
- Assisted Conception Unit, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ursula Bowler
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel Brison
- Assisted Conception Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Tim Child
- Oxford Fertility, The Fertility Partnership, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Huey Yi Chong
- Aberdeen Fertility Centre, NHS Grampian and University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Ying Cheong
- Complete Fertility Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Christina Cole
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rachel Cutting
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, London, UK
| | - Fiona Goodgame
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Pollyanna Hardy
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Haitham Hamoda
- Assisted Conception Unit, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Edmund Juszczak
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Yacoub Khalaf
- Assisted Conception Unit and Centre for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew King
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer J Kurinczuk
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stuart Lavery
- Assisted Conception Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Louise Linsell
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nick Macklon
- London Women's Clinic, London, UK
- Gynaecology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Raj Mathur
- Assisted Conception Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - David Murray
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jyotsna Pundir
- Assisted Conception Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Lynne Robinson
- Gyanecology and Assisted Conception, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Graham Scotland
- Aberdeen Fertility Centre, NHS Grampian and University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kayleigh Stanbury
- Clinical Trials Unit National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kennedy DP, Osilla KC, Hunter SB, Golinelli D, Maksabedian Hernandez E, Tucker JS. Restructuring personal networks with a Motivational Interviewing social network intervention to assist the transition out of homelessness: A randomized control pilot study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0262210. [PMID: 35061795 PMCID: PMC8782388 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social relationships play a key role in both substance use and homelessness. Transitioning out of homelessness often requires reduction in substance use as well as changes in social networks. A social network-based behavior change intervention that targets changes personal social networks may assist the transition out of homelessness. Most behavior change interventions that incorporate social networks assume a static network. However, people experiencing homelessness who transition into housing programs that use a harm reduction approach experience many changes in their social networks during this transition. Changes may include disconnecting from street-based network contacts, re-connecting with former network contacts, and exposure to new network members who actively engage in substance use. An intervention that helps people transitioning out of homelessness make positive alterations to their social networks may compliment traditional harm reduction housing program services. METHODS We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an innovative Social Network Intervention (MI-SNI), which combines network visualization and Motivational Interviewing to assist adults transitioning out of homelessness. The MI-SNI provides feedback to new residents about their social environments and is designed to motivate residents to make positive changes in both their individual behavior and their personal network. In a sample of 41 adult housing program residents with past year risky substance use, we examined whether participants randomized to receive a MI-SNI showed greater changes in their personal networks over 3 months compared to those receiving usual care. RESULTS There were significant differences in the networks of the MI-SNI group compared to the group receiving usual care at follow-up, controlling for baseline network characteristics. The MI-SNI group had greater reductions in the proportion of their network members who influenced alcohol or other drug use (AOD) use, such as drinking partners, and more frequently changed their relationships in the direction of lower AOD risk with network members who were retained in their networks across waves. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first pilot test of a MI-SNI customized for assisting the transition out of homelessness to test for personal network changes. Results indicate that MI-SNIs can have a positive impact on short-term network changes and thus may serve as a useful adjunct to behavioral change interventions. These findings suggest that a MI-SNI approach may help individuals experiencing homelessness and risky AOD use positively restructure their social networks while transitioning into supportive housing. These promising results suggest the need for a larger RCT test of this innovative intervention approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02140359.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P. Kennedy
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Karen Chan Osilla
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America
| | - Sarah B. Hunter
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America
| | - Daniela Golinelli
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America
| | | | - Joan S. Tucker
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cochrane A, Booth A, Walker I, Morgan S, Mitchell A, Barlow-Pay M, Hewitt C, Taylor B, Chapman C, Raftery J, Fleming J, Torgerson D, Parkes J. Examining the effectiveness of Gateway-an out-of-court community-based intervention to reduce recidivism and improve the health and well-being of young adults committing low-level offences: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:939. [PMID: 34923999 PMCID: PMC8684788 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05905-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adult offenders represent a third of the UK prison population and are at risk of poor health outcomes including drug and alcohol misuse, self-harm and suicide. Court diversion interventions aim to reduce the negative consequences of formal criminal justice sanctions and focus resources on addressing the root causes of offending. Although diversions are widely used, evidence of their effectiveness has not yet been established. Hampshire Constabulary, working together with local charities, have developed the Gateway programme, an out-of-court intervention aimed at improving the life chances of young adults. Issued as a conditional caution, participants undertake a health and social care needs assessment, attend workshops encouraging analysis of own behaviour and its consequences and agree not to re-offend during the 16-week caution. METHODS This is a pragmatic, multi-site, parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial with a target sample size of 334. Participants are aged 18-24, reside in Hampshire and Isle of Wight and are being questioned for an eligible low-level offence. Police investigators offer potential participants a chance to receive the Gateway caution, and those interested are also invited to take part in the study. Police officers obtain Stage 1 consent and carry out an eligibility check, after which participants are randomised on a 1:1 basis either to receive Gateway or follow the usual process, such as court appearance or a different conditional caution. Researchers subsequently obtain Stage 2 consent and collect data at weeks 4 and 16, and 1 year post-randomisation. The primary outcome is the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS). Secondary outcomes include health status, alcohol and drug use, recidivism and resource use. The primary analysis will compare the WEMWBS score between the two groups at 12 months. DISCUSSION This pioneering trial aims to address the evidence gap surrounding diversion in 18-24-year-olds. The findings will inform law enforcement agencies, third sector organisations, policymakers and commissioners, as well as researchers working in related fields and with vulnerable target populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register ( ISRCTN 11888938 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Cochrane
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - A Booth
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - I Walker
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - S Morgan
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - A Mitchell
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - M Barlow-Pay
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - C Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - B Taylor
- Hampshire Constabulary, Southampton Central Police Station, Southampton, SO15 1AN, UK
| | - C Chapman
- Hampshire Constabulary, Southampton Central Police Station, Southampton, SO15 1AN, UK
| | - J Raftery
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - J Fleming
- Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - D Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - J Parkes
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Preferences regarding emerging HIV prevention technologies among Toronto men who have sex with men: a discrete choice experiment. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22252. [PMID: 34782691 PMCID: PMC8592986 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01634-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
New forms of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) include long-acting injectables and topical microbicides, each with unique attributes that may appeal to distinct users. We used a discrete choice experiment to characterize preferences for new PrEP formulations among Toronto men who have sex with men. MSM undergoing anonymous HIV testing completed a discrete choice experiment with 12 choice sets by selecting their preferred option within each set. Each set included “usual methods to prevent HIV” (excluding PrEP) as one alternative and two hypothetical PrEP alternatives, which differed according formulation/dosing, side effects (none/mild), risk of drug resistance (none/low/moderate), and HIV prevention efficacy (50%, 65%, 80% or 99% risk reduction). We used mixed logistic regression to infer preferences for PrEP attributes and calculate the marginal rate of substitution between efficacy and other PrEP attributes. 306 men with median (interquartile range) age = 29 (25, 36) years participated, and reported 6 (3, 10) partners and 0 (0, 2) condomless receptive anal sex acts in the preceding six months. An on-demand pill was the most preferred formulation, followed by a monthly injection, daily pill, and on-demand rectal gel. Drug resistance was an important determinant of preferences if the risk was moderate, but not if it was low. The minimum efficacy required for an on-demand pill to be preferred over no PrEP was 32.6% (95%CI = 21.2–43.9%); for a daily pill, injections, and rectal gel, minimum efficacy was 57.9% (95%CI = 44.1–71.7%), 40.1% (27.0–53.2%), and 71.3% (60.5–82.1%), respectively. Attitudes towards PrEP formulations vary among men who have sex with men, with on-demand pills and monthly injections having the highest average preference scores. Understanding these preferences may help to predict uptake.
Collapse
|
21
|
Stuttard L, Boyle P, Fairhurst C, Hewitt C, Longo F, Walker S, Weatherly H, Mayhew E, Beresford B. Hearing dogs for people with severe and profound hearing loss: a wait-list design randomised controlled trial investigating their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Trials 2021; 22:700. [PMID: 34649618 PMCID: PMC8515662 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05607-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hearing loss increases the risk of poor outcomes across a range of life domains. Where hearing loss is severe or profound, audiological interventions and rehabilitation have limited impact. Hearing dogs offer an alternative, or additional, intervention. They live permanently with recipients, providing sound support and companionship. Methods A single-centre, randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the impacts of a hearing dog on mental well-being, anxiety, depression, problems associated with hearing loss (responding to sounds, fearfulness/social isolation), and perceived dependency on others. Participants were applicants to the UK charity ‘Hearing Dogs for Deaf People’. Eligibility criteria were as follows: first-time applicant; applying for a hearing dog (as opposed to other support provided by the charity). Participants were randomised 1:1 to the following: receive a hearing dog sooner than usual [HD], or within the usual application timeframe (wait-list [WL] comparator). The primary outcome was mental well-being (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale) 6 months (T1) after HD received a hearing dog. The cost-effectiveness analysis took a health and social care perspective. Results In total, 165 participants were randomised (HD n = 83, WL n = 82). A total of 112 (67.9%) were included in the primary analysis (HD n = 55, WL n = 57). At T1, mental well-being was significantly higher in the HD arm (adjusted mean difference 2.53, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.79, p < 0.001). Significant improvements in anxiety, depression, functioning, fearfulness/social isolation, and perceived dependency, favouring the HD arm, were also observed. On average, HD participants had used fewer statutory health and social care resources. In a scenario whereby costs of provision were borne by the public sector, hearing dogs do not appear to be value for money. If the public sector made a partial contribution, it is possible that hearing dogs would be cost-effective from a public sector perspective. Conclusions Hearing dogs appear to benefit recipients across a number of life domains, at least in the short term. Within the current funding model (costs entirely borne by the charity), hearing dogs are cost-effective from the public sector perspective. Whilst it would not be cost-effective to fully fund the provision of hearing dogs by the public sector, a partial contribution could be explored. Trial registration The trial was retrospectively registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry on 28.1.2019: ISRCTN36452009. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05607-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Stuttard
- Social Policy Research Unit, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, Church Lane Building, York Science Park, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DF, UK.
| | - Philip Boyle
- Social Policy Research Unit, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, Church Lane Building, York Science Park, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DF, UK
| | | | | | - Francesco Longo
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Simon Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Helen Weatherly
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Emese Mayhew
- Social Policy Research Unit, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, Church Lane Building, York Science Park, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DF, UK
| | - Bryony Beresford
- Social Policy Research Unit, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, Church Lane Building, York Science Park, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cockayne S, Pighills A, Adamson J, Fairhurst C, Crossland S, Drummond A, Hewitt CE, Rodgers S, Ronaldson SJ, McCaffery J, Whiteside K, Scantlebury A, Robinson-Smith L, Cochrane A, Lamb SE, Boyes S, Gilbody S, Relton C, Torgerson DJ. Home environmental assessments and modification delivered by occupational therapists to reduce falls in people aged 65 years and over: the OTIS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2021; 25:1-118. [PMID: 34254934 PMCID: PMC8287374 DOI: 10.3310/hta25460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls and fall-related fractures are highly prevalent among older people and are a major contributor to morbidity and costs to individuals and society. Only one small pilot trial has evaluated the effectiveness of a home hazard assessment and environmental modification in the UK. This trial reported a reduction in falls as a secondary outcome, and no economic evaluation was undertaken. Therefore, the results need to be confirmed and a cost-effectiveness analysis needs to be undertaken. OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a home hazard assessment and environmental modification delivered by occupational therapists for preventing falls among community-dwelling people aged ≥ 65 years who are at risk of falling, relative to usual care. DESIGN This was a pragmatic, multicentre, modified cohort randomised controlled trial with an economic evaluation and a qualitative study. SETTING Eight NHS trusts in primary and secondary care in England. PARTICIPANTS In total, 1331 participants were randomised (intervention group, n = 430; usual-care group, n = 901) via a secure, remote service. Blinding was not possible. INTERVENTIONS All participants received a falls prevention leaflet and routine care from their general practitioner. The intervention group were additionally offered one home environmental assessment and modifications recommended or provided to identify and manage personal fall-related hazards, delivered by an occupational therapist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the number of falls per participant during the 12 months from randomisation. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of fallers and multiple fallers, time to fall, fear of falling, fracture rate, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS The primary analysis included all 1331 randomised participants and indicated weak evidence of a difference in fall rate between the two groups, with an increase in the intervention group relative to usual care (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.38; p = 0.07). A similar proportion of participants in the intervention group (57.0%) and the usual-care group (56.2%) reported at least one fall over 12 months. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. The base-case cost-effectiveness analysis from an NHS and Personal Social Services perspective found that, on average per participant, the intervention was associated with additional costs (£18.78, 95% confidence interval £16.33 to £21.24), but was less effective (mean quality-adjusted life-year loss -0.0042, 95% confidence interval -0.0041 to -0.0043). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated uncertainty in these findings. No serious, related adverse events were reported. The intervention was largely delivered as intended, but recommendations were followed to a varying degree. LIMITATIONS Outcome data were self-reported by participants, which may have led to inaccuracies in the reported falls data. CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence that an occupational therapist-delivered home assessment and modification reduced falls in this population of community-dwelling participants aged ≥ 65 years deemed at risk of falling. The intervention was more expensive and less effective than usual care, and therefore it does not provide a cost-effective alternative to usual care. FUTURE WORK An evaluation of falls prevention advice in a higher-risk population, perhaps those previously hospitalised for a fall, or given by other professional staff could be justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN22202133. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 46. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Cockayne
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Alison Pighills
- Mackay Institute of Research and Innovation, Queensland Health, Mackay Base Hospital, Mackay, QLD, Australia
- Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Joy Adamson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Caroline Fairhurst
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Avril Drummond
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Catherine E Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sara Rodgers
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sarah J Ronaldson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jennifer McCaffery
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Katie Whiteside
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Lyn Robinson-Smith
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Ann Cochrane
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Institute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sophie Boyes
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Clare Relton
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - David J Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cheung YTD, Jiang N, Jiang CQ, Zhuang RS, Gao WH, Zhou J, Lu JH, Li H, Wang JF, Lai YS, Sun JS, Wu JC, Ye C, Li N, Zhou G, Chen JY, Ou XY, Liu LQ, Huang ZH, Ho SY, Li HCW, Su SH, Yang Y, Jiang Y, Zhu WH, Yang L, Lin P, He Y, Cheng KK, Lam TH. Physicians' very brief (30-sec) intervention for smoking cessation on 13 671 smokers in China: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Addiction 2021; 116:1172-1185. [PMID: 32918512 PMCID: PMC8246886 DOI: 10.1111/add.15262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Three to 10 minutes of smoking cessation advice by physicians is effective to increase quit rates, but is not routinely practised. We examined the effectiveness of physicians' very brief (approximately 30 sec) smoking cessation intervention on quit rates among Chinese outpatient smokers. DESIGN A pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized controlled trial. SETTING Seventy-two medical outpatient departments of hospitals and/or community health centers in Guangdong, China. PARTICIPANTS Chinese adults who were daily cigarette smokers (n = 13 671, 99% males) were invited by their physician to participate during outpatient consultation. Smokers who were receiving smoking cessation treatment or were judged to need specialist treatment for cessation were excluded. INTERVENTIONS The intervention group (n = 7015) received a 30-sec intervention including physician's very brief advice, a leaflet with graphic warnings and a card with contact information of available cessation services. The control group (n = 6656) received a very brief intervention on consuming vegetables and fruit. A total of 3466 participants in the intervention group were further randomized to receive a brief booster advice from trained study personnel via telephone 1 month following their doctor visit. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) in the intervention and control groups at the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included self-reported 30-day abstinence and biochemically validated abstinence at 12-month follow-up. FINDINGS By intention-to-treat, the intervention (versus control) group had greater self-reported 7-day abstinence [9.1 versus 7.8%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.26, P = 0.008] and 30-day abstinence (8.0 versus 6.9%, OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03-1.27, P = 0.01) at 12-month follow-up. The effect size increased when only participants who received the intervention from compliant physicians were included (7-day PPA, OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.11-1.74). The group difference in biochemically validated abstinence was small (0.8 versus 0.8%, OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.71-1.42, P = 0.99). CONCLUSION A 30-sec smoking cessation intervention increased self-reported abstinence among mainly male smokers in China at 12-month follow-up (risk difference = 1.3%), and should be feasible to provide in most settings and delivered by all health-care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nan Jiang
- Department of Population Health, Grossman School of MedicineNew York UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Run Sen Zhuang
- Shenzhen Health Education and Promotion CentreShenzhenChina
| | - Wen Hui Gao
- Shenzhen Health Education and Promotion CentreShenzhenChina
| | - Jian Zhou
- Department of Respiratory MedicineGuangzhou Medical University Second Affiliated HospitalGuangzhouChina
| | - Jin Hong Lu
- Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital of HuangpuGuangzhouChina
| | - Hui Li
- Shenzhen Bao'an District Songgang People's Hospital, Hongqiaotou Community Health Service CenterShenzhenChina
| | - Jun Feng Wang
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University, ZhongshangChina
| | - Yi Sheng Lai
- Shenzhen Longgang District Central HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Jun Sheng Sun
- Shenzhen Longgang District Central HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Jiu Chang Wu
- Shenzhen Bao'an District Fuyong HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Chiang Ye
- Division of EndocrinologyShenzhen Bao'an District People's HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Na Li
- Shenzhen Longgang District Central HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Gang Zhou
- Guangzhou No. 12 HospitalGuangzhou Guangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Jing Ying Chen
- Shenzhen Longgang District Second People's HospitalShenzhenChina
| | - Xiu Yan Ou
- ZhongShan City People's Hospital, ZhongShanChina
| | - Liu Qing Liu
- Longhua District People's Hospital Yansong Community CenterShenzhenChina
| | - Zhuang Hong Huang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College Guan Bu Zhai Mei Healthcare StationShantouChina
| | - Sai Yin Ho
- School of Public HealthThe University of Hong KongHong Kong, China
| | | | - Sheng Hua Su
- Health Care Center for Cadre of Guangdong ProvinceGuangzhouChina
| | - Yan Yang
- Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and PreventionChina
| | - Yuan Jiang
- Tobacco Control Office, Chinese Center for Disease Control and PreventionChina
| | - Wei Hua Zhu
- Guangzhou No. 12 HospitalGuangzhou Guangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Lie Yang
- Guangzhou No. 12 HospitalGuangzhou Guangdong ProvinceChina
| | - Peiru Lin
- Guangzhou First Municipal People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
| | - Yao He
- Institute of Geriatrics, Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Kar Keung Cheng
- Institute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamUK
| | - Tai Hing Lam
- School of Public HealthThe University of Hong KongHong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Axford N, Bjornstad G, Matthews J, Whybra L, Berry V, Ukoumunne OC, Hobbs T, Wrigley Z, Brook L, Taylor R, Eames T, Kallitsoglou A, Blower S, Warner G. The Effectiveness of a Community-Based Mentoring Program for Children Aged 5-11 Years: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2021; 22:100-112. [PMID: 32720189 PMCID: PMC7762747 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-020-01132-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The study, a two-arm, randomized controlled, parallel group, superiority trial, aimed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of a 12-month one-to-one volunteer mentoring program designed to improve behavioral and emotional outcomes in children aged 5 to 11 years who have teacher- and parent/carer-reported behavioral difficulties. Participants were 246 children (123 intervention, 123 control; mean age 8.4 years; 87% boys) in five sites in London, UK, scoring in the "abnormal" range on the teacher-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties measure and in the "borderline" or abnormal range on the parent-rated SDQ Total Difficulties measure. Randomization on a 1:1 ratio took place using a computer-generated sequence and stratifying by site. Data collectors and statisticians were blind to participant allocation status. Outcome measures focused on parent- and teacher-rated child behavior and emotions, and child-rated self-perception and hope. Intention-to-treat analysis on all 246 randomized participants (using imputed data where necessary) showed that at post-intervention (16 months after randomization), there were no statistically significant effects on the primary outcome-parent-rated SDQ Total Difficulties (adjusted standardized mean difference = - 0.12; 95% CI: -0.38 to 0.13; p = 0.33)-or any secondary outcomes. Results from complier average causal effect (CACE) analysis using the primary outcome indicated the intervention was not effective for children who received the recommended duration of mentoring. Exploratory analyses found no sub-group effects on the primary outcome. The article concludes that the mentoring program had no effect on children's behavior or emotional well-being, and that program content needs revising to satisfactorily address key risk and protective factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Axford
- NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tim Hobbs
- Dartington Service Design Lab, Dartington, UK
| | | | | | - Rod Taylor
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Tim Eames
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Sarah Blower
- NIHR ARC Yorkshire and Humber, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Batenburg MCT, van den Bongard HJGD, Kleynen CE, Maarse W, Witkamp A, Ernst M, Doeksen A, van Dalen T, Sier M, Schoenmaeckers EJP, Baas IO, Verkooijen HM. Assessing the effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in breast cancer patients with late radiation toxicity (HONEY trial): a trial protocol using a trial within a cohort design. Trials 2020; 21:980. [PMID: 33246494 PMCID: PMC7694912 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04869-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer treatment with radiotherapy can induce late radiation toxicity, characterized by pain, fibrosis, edema, impaired arm mobility, and poor cosmetic outcome. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as treatment for late radiation toxicity; however, high-level evidence of effectiveness is lacking. As HBOT is standard treatment and reimbursed by insurers, performing classic randomized controlled trials is difficult. The “Hyperbaric OxygeN therapy on brEast cancer patients with late radiation toxicity” (HONEY) trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HBOT on late radiation toxicity in breast cancer patients using the trial within cohorts (TwiCs) design. Methods The HONEY trial will be conducted within the Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaluation (UMBRELLA). Within UMBRELLA, breast cancer patients referred for radiotherapy to the University Medical Centre Utrecht are eligible for inclusion. Patients consent to collection of clinical data and patient-reported outcomes and provide broad consent for randomization into future intervention studies. Patients who meet the HONEY in- and exclusion criteria (participation ≥ 12 months in UMBRELLA, moderate/severe breast or chest wall pain, completed primary breast cancer treatment except hormonal treatment, no prior treatment with HBOT, no contraindications for HBOT, no clinical signs of metastatic or recurrent disease) will be randomized to HBOT or control group on a 2:1 ratio (n = 120). Patients in the control group will not be informed about participation in the trial. Patients in the intervention arm will undergo 30–40 HBOT treatment sessions in a high pressure chamber (2.4 atmospheres absolute) where they inhale 100% oxygen through a mask. Cohort outcome measures (i.e., physical outcomes, quality of life, fatigue, and cosmetic satisfaction) of the HBOT group will be compared to the control group at 3 months follow-up. Discussion This pragmatic trial within the UMBELLA cohort was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of HBOT on late radiation toxicity in breast cancer patients using the TwiCs design. Use of the TwiCs design is expected to address issues encountered in classic randomized controlled trials, such as contamination (i.e., HBOT in the control group) and disappointment bias, and generate information about acceptability of HBOT. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04193722. Registered on 10 December 2019. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-020-04869-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C T Batenburg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CZ, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - H J G D van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CZ, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C E Kleynen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CZ, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - W Maarse
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - A Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Ernst
- Department of Surgery, Alexander Monro Ziekenhuis, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - A Doeksen
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Sier
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuis Rivierenland, Tiel, the Netherlands
| | | | - I O Baas
- Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H M Verkooijen
- Imaging Division, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Marian IR, Hopewell S, Keene DJ, Cureton L, Lamb SE, Dutton SJ. Progressive exercise compared with best practice advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, for the treatment of rotator cuff disorders: statistical analysis plan for the Getting it Right: Addressing Shoulder Pain (GRASP) 2 × 2 factorial multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:767. [PMID: 32894159 PMCID: PMC7487843 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04704-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Getting it Right: Addressing Shoulder Pain (GRASP) trial assesses the clinical and cost-effectiveness of individually tailored, progressive exercise compared with best practice advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, in adults with a rotator cuff disorder. This article describes the statistical analysis plan for the GRASP randomised controlled trial. METHODS/DESIGN GRASP is a multicentre randomised controlled trial using a 2 × 2 factorial design. Adults aged ≥ 18 years with a new episode of shoulder pain related to a rotator cuff disorder, not currently receiving physiotherapy or being considered for surgery, are randomised (centralised computer-generated 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio) to one of four interventions: (1) progressive exercise (up to 6 physiotherapy sessions), (2) best practice advice (one physiotherapy session), (3) subacromial corticosteroid injection then progressive exercise and (4) subacromial corticosteroid injection then best practice advice. The primary outcome is the mean difference in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) total score over 12 months. Secondary outcomes are as follows: pain and function SPADI subdomains, health-related quality of life (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L), sleep disturbance, return to activity, global impression of change, health resource use, out-of-pocket expenses and work disability. Here, we describe in detail the following: sample size calculation, descriptive statistics of the primary and secondary outcomes, statistical models used for the analysis of the main outcomes, handling of missing data, planned sensitivity and subgroup analyses. This pre-specified statistical analysis plan was written and submitted without prior knowledge of the trial results. DISCUSSION Publication of the statistical analysis plan for the GRASP trial aims to reduce the risk of outcome reporting bias and increase transparency of the data analysis. Any deviations or changes to the current SAP will be described and justified in the final study report and any results publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN16539266 . Registered on 14 June 2016. EudraCT number 2016-002991-28. Registered on 12 June 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana R Marian
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Old Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - Sally Hopewell
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Old Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - David J Keene
- Kadoorie Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Lucy Cureton
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Old Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,College of Medicine and Health, Institute for Health Research, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK
| | - Susan J Dutton
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Old Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yount KM, Minh TH, Trang QT, Cheong YF, Bergenfeld I, Sales JM. Preventing sexual violence in college men: a randomized-controlled trial of GlobalConsent. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1331. [PMID: 32873262 PMCID: PMC7466489 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09454-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sexual violence—any sexual act committed against a person without freely given consent—disproportionately affects women. Women’s first experiences of sexual violence often occur in adolescence. In Asia and the Pacific, 14% of sexually experienced adolescent girls report forced sexual debut. Early prevention with men that integrates a bystander framework is one way to address attitudes and behavior while reducing potential resistance to participation. Methods This paper describes a study protocol to adapt RealConsent for use in Vietnam and to test the impact of the adapted program—GlobalConsent—on cognitive/attitudinal/affective mediators, and in turn, on sexual violence perpetration and prosocial bystander behavior. RealConsent is a six-session, web-based educational entertainment program designed to prevent sexual violence perpetration and to enhance prosocial bystander behavior in young men. The program has reduced the incidence of sexual violence among men attending an urban, public university in the Southeastern United States. We used formative qualitative research and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Map of the Adaptation Process to adapt RealConsent. We conducted semi-structured interviews with college men (n = 12) and women (n = 9) to understand the social context of sexual violence. We conducted focus group discussions with university men and stakeholders (n = 14) to elicit feedback on the original program. From these data, we created scripts in storyboard format of the adapted program. We worked closely with a small group of university men to elicit feedback on the storyboards and to refine them for acceptability and production. We are testing the final program—GlobalConsent—in a randomized controlled trial in heterosexual or bisexual freshmen men 18–24 years attending two universities in Hanoi. We are testing the impact of GlobalConsent (n = 400 planned), relative to a health-education attention control condition we developed (n = 400 planned), on cognitive/attitudinal/affective mediators, prosocial bystander behavior, and sexual violence perpetration. Discussion This project is the first to test the impact of an adapted, theoretically grounded, web-based educational entertainment program to prevent sexual violence perpetration and to promote prosocial bystander behavior among young men in a middle-income country. If effective, GlobalConsent will have exceptional potential to prevent men’s sexual violence against women globally. Trial registration U.S. National Library of Medicine Clinicaltrials.govNCT04147455 on November 1, 2019 (Version 1). Retrospectively registered. Protocol amendments will be submitted to clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Yount
- Hubert Department of Global Health and Department of Sociology, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Tran Hung Minh
- Center for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population, 48, 251/8 Nguyen Khang str, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Quach Thu Trang
- Center for Creative Initiatives in Health and Population, 48, 251/8 Nguyen Khang str, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Yuk Fai Cheong
- Department of Psychology, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Irina Bergenfeld
- Hubert Department of Global Health and Department of Sociology, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Jessica M Sales
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Promoting Learning from Null or Negative Results in Prevention Science Trials. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2020; 23:751-763. [PMID: 32748164 PMCID: PMC7398716 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-020-01140-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
There can be a tendency for investigators to disregard or explain away null or negative results in prevention science trials. Examples include not publicizing findings, conducting spurious subgroup analyses, or attributing the outcome post hoc to real or perceived weaknesses in trial design or intervention implementation. This is unhelpful for several reasons, not least that it skews the evidence base, contributes to research “waste”, undermines respect for science, and stifles creativity in intervention development. In this paper, we identify possible policy and practice responses when interventions have null (ineffective) or negative (harmful) results, and argue that these are influenced by: the intervention itself (e.g., stage of gestation, perceived importance); trial design, conduct, and results (e.g., pattern of null/negative effects, internal and external validity); context (e.g., wider evidence base, state of policy); and individual perspectives and interests (e.g., stake in the intervention). We advance several strategies to promote more informative null or negative effect trials and enable learning from such results, focusing on changes to culture, process, intervention design, trial design, and environment.
Collapse
|
29
|
Warner G, Durbeej N, Salari R, Fängström K, Lampa E, Baghdasaryan Z, Osman F, Gupta Löfving S, Perez Aronsson A, Feldman I, Sampaio F, Ssegonja R, Bjärtå A, Rondung E, Leiler A, Wasteson E, Calam R, Oppedal B, Keeshin B, Sarkadi A. Evaluation of the teaching recovery techniques community-based intervention for accompanied refugee children experiencing post-traumatic stress symptoms (Accompanied refugeeS In Sweden Trial; ASsIST): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035459. [PMID: 32713847 PMCID: PMC7383950 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refugee children have often experienced traumas and are at significant risk of developing mental health problems, such as symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and anxiety, which can continue for years after resettlement. The Accompanied refugeeS In Sweden Trial (ASsIST) aims to evaluate a community-based intervention, called 'Teaching Recovery Techniques' (TRT), for accompanied refugee minors experiencing PTSD symptoms. METHODS/DESIGN A cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted in which participants will be randomly allocated to one of the two possible arms: the intervention arm (n=113) will be offered the TRT programme and the waitlist-control arm (n=113) will receive services as usual, followed by the TRT programme around 20 weeks later. Outcome data will be collected at three points: pre-intervention (T1), post-intervention (T2; c.8 weeks after randomisation) and follow-up (T3; c.20 weeks after randomisation). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was granted by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Uppsala (Ref. 2018/382) (24th February 2019). Results will be published in scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS ISRCTN17754931. Prospectively registered on 4th June 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina Warner
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Natalie Durbeej
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Raziye Salari
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin Fängström
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Elin Lampa
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Zaruhi Baghdasaryan
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Fatumo Osman
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sandra Gupta Löfving
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Perez Aronsson
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Inna Feldman
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Filipa Sampaio
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Richard Ssegonja
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Bjärtå
- Department of Psychology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Elisabet Rondung
- Department of Psychology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Anna Leiler
- Department of Psychology, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
| | | | - Rachel Calam
- Division of Clinical Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Brit Oppedal
- Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Brooks Keeshin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Anna Sarkadi
- Child Health and Parenting, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Marian IR, Williamson E, Garrett A, Lamb SE, Dutton SJ. Better Outcomes for Older people with Spinal Trouble (BOOST) trial: statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial of a combined physical and psychological intervention for older adults with neurogenic claudication. Trials 2020; 21:667. [PMID: 32693842 PMCID: PMC7372766 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04590-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurogenic claudication is a common spinal condition affecting older adults that has a major effect on mobility and implicitly independence. The effectiveness of conservative interventions in this population is not known. We describe the statistical analysis plan for the Better Outcomes for Older people with Spinal trouble (BOOST) randomised controlled trial. METHODS/DESIGN BOOST is a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel, two-arm, randomised controlled trial. Participants are community-dwelling adults, 65 years or older, with neurogenic claudication, registered prospectively, and randomised 2:1 (intervention to control) to the combined physical and psychological BOOST group physiotherapy programme or best practice advice. The primary outcome is the Oswestry Disability Index at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the Short Physical Performance Battery, Swiss Spinal Stenosis Scale, 6 Minute Walk Test, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and Tilburg Frailty Indicator. Outcomes are measured at 6 and 12 months by researchers blinded to treatment allocation. The primary statistical analysis is by intention to treat. Further study design details are published in the BOOST protocol. DISCUSSION The planned statistical analyses for the BOOST trial aim to reduce the risk of outcome reporting bias from prior data knowledge. Any changes or deviations from this statistical analysis plan will be described and justified in the final study report. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study has been registered in the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, reference number ISRCTN12698674 . Registered on 10 November 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana R. Marian
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Old Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Esther Williamson
- Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Angela Garrett
- Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah E. Lamb
- Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Nuffield Department of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- College of Medicine and Health, Institute for Health Research, University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK
| | - Susan J. Dutton
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Old Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bell JL, Hardy P, Greenland M, Juszczak E, Cole C, Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S, Linsell L. E-Freeze - a randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a policy of freezing embryos followed by thawed frozen embryo transfer compared with a policy of fresh embryo transfer, in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a statistical analysis plan. Trials 2020; 21:596. [PMID: 32605633 PMCID: PMC7329511 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04441-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The E-Freeze trial is a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation. This paper describes the statistical analysis plan for the E-Freeze trial. Methods and design E-Freeze is a two-arm parallel-group, multi-centre, individually randomised controlled trial to determine if a policy of freezing embryos, followed by thawed frozen embryo transfer, results in a higher healthy baby rate when compared with the current policy of transferring fresh embryos. Couples undergoing their first, second or third cycle of in vitro fertilisation at fertility centres in the UK were randomised to either fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The primary outcome is a healthy baby, defined as a live singleton baby born at term with an appropriate weight for gestation. This paper describes the statistical analysis plan for the trial, including the analysis principles, definitions of outcomes, methods for primary analysis, pre-specified subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. This plan was finalised prior to completion of recruitment to the trial. Trial registration ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN61225414. Registered on 29 December 2015.
Collapse
|
32
|
Achilles MR, Anderson M, Li SH, Subotic-Kerry M, Parker B, O'Dea B. Adherence to e-mental health among youth: Considerations for intervention development and research design. Digit Health 2020; 6:2055207620926064. [PMID: 32547775 PMCID: PMC7249594 DOI: 10.1177/2055207620926064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
E-mental health programmes have great potential to provide young people with
access to mental health support. However, it is commonly reported that adherence
to these programmes is low. Low adherence can be problematic, particularly if
young people do not receive the full benefits of a programme. In a research
trial setting, non-adherence to treatment recommendations can prevent
researchers from drawing strong conclusions about effectiveness. Although
adherence has been recognised as an issue in need of attention, many of the
reviews available are focused on adults and lack clear direction towards what
strategies to employ. This paper presents a broad review of the adherence
literature, focusing on factors associated with improving adherence to e-mental
health among youth. Our view on the key elements to improve adherence identified
from the existing literature are presented, and key recommendations for e-mental
health intervention design are provided. These include: developing and
communicating adherence guidelines based on individuals’ needs and symptom
severity, including customisable features to provide a tailored experience and
promote a sense of agency, including engagement checks and adopting a
user-centred approach by utilising strategies such as co-design. This paper
provides guidance to intervention designers and researchers by outlining
recommendations and considerations for intervention development and research
design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sophie H Li
- Black Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Australia.,School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Belinda Parker
- Black Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Australia
| | - Bridianne O'Dea
- Black Dog Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Australia.,School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tucker JS, Pedersen ER, Linnemayr S, Shadel WG, DeYoreo M, Zutshi R. A text message intervention for quitting cigarette smoking among young adults experiencing homelessness: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2020; 15:11. [PMID: 32075695 PMCID: PMC7031942 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-020-00187-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cigarette smoking is much more prevalent among young people experiencing homelessness than in the general population of adolescents and young adults. Although many young homeless smokers are motivated to quit, there are no empirically-evaluated smoking cessation programs for this population. It is important that any such program address the factors known to be associated with quitting-related outcomes among homeless young people, to provide ongoing support in a way that accommodates the mobility of this population, and does not rely on scarce service provider resources for its delivery. The objective of this project is to develop and pilot test a text messaging-based intervention (TMI), as an adjunct to brief cessation counseling and provision of nicotine patches, to help homeless young people who want to quit smoking. METHODS/DESIGN This pilot study will utilize a cluster cross-over randomized controlled design with up to 80 current smokers who desire to quit and are recruited from three drop-in centers serving young people experiencing homelessness in the Los Angeles area. All participants will be provided with a minimum standard of care: a 30-min group-based smoking cessation counseling session and free nicotine replacement. Half of these smokers will then also receive the TMI, as an adjunct to this standard care, which will provide 6 weeks of ongoing support for quitting. This support includes continued and more intensive education regarding nicotine dependence, quitting smoking, and relapse; does not require additional agency resources; can be available "on demand" to users; and includes features to personalize the quitting experience. This study will investigate whether receiving the TMI adjunct to standard smoking cessation care results in greater reductions in cigarette smoking compared to standard care alone over a 3-month period. DISCUSSION This study has the potential to address an important gap in the clinical research literature on cigarette smoking cessation and provide empirical support for using a TMI to provide ongoing assistance and support for quitting among young smokers experiencing homelessness. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03874585. Registered March 14, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03874585.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan S Tucker
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA.
| | - Eric R Pedersen
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA
| | - Sebastian Linnemayr
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA
| | - William G Shadel
- RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Ave, Ste. #600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Maria DeYoreo
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA
| | - Rushil Zutshi
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Llewellyn CD, Abraham C, Pollard A, Jones CI, Bremner S, Miners A, Smith H. A randomised controlled trial of a telephone administered brief HIV risk reduction intervention amongst men who have sex with men prescribed post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV after sexual exposure in the UK: Project PEPSE. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0216855. [PMID: 31120898 PMCID: PMC6532860 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In western countries, men who have sex with men (MSM) are most affected by HIV and increasingly likely to engage in risky sexual behaviour. MSM who experience a potential sexual exposure to HIV (PEPSE) and receive a preventative regimen of anti-HIV treatment are at particularly high risk of acquiring HIV and could potentially benefit from targeted risk reduction behavioural interventions such as motivational interviewing (MI). PURPOSE The aim of this trial was to examine the impact of augmented MI (MI plus information provision and behavioural skills building), over and above routine care, on reducing risky sexual behaviour in MSM prescribed PEPSE. Secondary aims of the research were to examine whether the intervention reduced sexually transmitted infections (STI) and further requests for PEP. METHODS A parallel-group pragmatic randomised controlled trial was conducted with 175 MSM recruited from five sexual health (SH) clinics in the south east of England. The intervention was two fixed-duration sessions of telephone administered augmented MI. A manual guided the selection of individualised persuasive communication strategies based on underlying change mechanisms specified by the Information, Motivation and Behavioural Skills (IMB) model. Primary outcomes were the number of receptive and active anal intercourse (AI) partners, the use of condoms every time during receptive and active AI and the use of condoms sometimes during receptive and active AI. RESULTS There were no significant impacts on sexual risk behaviour or any of the psychological measures, and no discernible reduction in requests for repeat PEP or rates of STIs within a year. CONCLUSION Our behavioural intervention of augmented MI did not affect risky sexual behaviour, rates of further PEP and STIs, and psychological factors, in MSM prescribed PEPSE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS UKCRN ID:11436; ISRCTN00746242.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles Abraham
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex Pollard
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stephen Bremner
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Alec Miners
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Smith
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Larsen LB, Thilsing T, Sondergaard J, Bjerregaard AL. A third perspective on the effects of general health checks may provide a less biased estimate (letter commenting J Clin Epidemiol 2016;71:120-2). J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 102:144-145. [PMID: 29802936 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Bruun Larsen
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A DK-5000, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Trine Thilsing
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A DK-5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jens Sondergaard
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A DK-5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anne-Louise Bjerregaard
- Department of Public Health, Institute of General Medical Practice, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kramer MS, Davies N, Oken E, Martin RM, Dahhou M, Zhang X, Yang S. Infant feeding and growth: putting the horse before the cart. Am J Clin Nutr 2018; 107:635-639. [PMID: 29635502 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous observational studies have consistently shown slower weight and length gains in infants with prolonged breastfeeding than in those who were formula-fed from birth or breastfed for a shorter duration. These studies inferred that prolonged breastfeeding causes slower growth in infancy. Objective We compared infant growth associated with ≥12 mo of breastfeeding with a shorter duration of breastfeeding on the basis of 3 different analytic approaches to the same data from a randomized trial: intention-to-treat (ITT; "as randomized"), observational ("as fed"), and instrumental variable (IV; by using randomization as an "instrument" to achieve ≥12 mo of breastfeeding). Design This was a cluster-randomized trial of a breastfeeding-promotion intervention. Anthropometric measurements were obtained at birth and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo. Results The 3 analytic approaches yielded different results. The ITT approach showed more rapid growth in the first 2 mo among infants randomly assigned to the breastfeeding-promotion intervention than among control infants, with a decreasing difference over the ensuing months and nearly identical weight, length, and body mass index by 12 mo. The observational analysis showed a different trend: higher weight and length in infants who were breastfed ≥12 mo than in those who were breastfed <12 mo during the first 3 mo and no difference by 6 mo, while infants who were breastfed <12 mo showed increasingly higher weight and length from 6 to 12 mo. The IV analysis showed a temporal pattern that was similar to that seen in the ITT analysis, but with larger (and less precise) differences between infants breastfed for ≥12 compared with <12 mo. Conclusions We observed major differences in experimental (ITT and IV) compared with observational approaches to analyzing data obtained from the same children. These approaches lead to opposite causal inferences about the relation between infant feeding and growth and underline the importance of ensuring that the postulated cause (feeding) temporally precedes its hypothesized effect (growth). This trial is registered at http://www.isrctn.org/ as ISRCTN37687716.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Kramer
- Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada.,Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada
| | - Neil Davies
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Oken
- Division of Chronic Disease Research Across the Lifecourse, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Richard M Martin
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.,National Institute for Health Research, Bristol Biomedical Research Center, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Mourad Dahhou
- Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada
| | - Xun Zhang
- Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada
| | - Seungmi Yang
- Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Whybra L, Warner G, Bjornstad G, Hobbs T, Brook L, Wrigley Z, Berry V, Ukoumunne OC, Matthews J, Taylor R, Eames T, Kallitsoglou A, Blower S, Axford N. The effectiveness of Chance UK's mentoring programme in improving behavioural and emotional outcomes in primary school children with behavioural difficulties: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychol 2018. [PMID: 29530067 PMCID: PMC5848446 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-018-0220-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a need to build the evidence base of early interventions to promote children’s health and development in the UK. Chance UK is a voluntary sector organisation based in London that delivers a 12-month mentoring programme for primary school children identified by teachers and parents as having behavioural and emotional difficulties. The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of the programme in terms of children’s behaviour and emotional well-being; this is the primary outcome of the trial. Methods/Design A randomised controlled trial will be conducted in which participants are randomly allocated on a dynamic basis to one of two possible arms: the intervention arm (n = 123) will be offered the mentoring programme, and the control arm (n = 123) will be offered services as usual. Outcome data will be collected at three points: pre-intervention (baseline), mid-way through the mentoring year (c.9 months after randomisation) and post- mentoring programme (c.16 months after randomisation). Discussion This study will further enhance the evidence for early intervention mentoring programmes for child behaviour and emotional well-being in the UK. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47154925. Retrospectively registered 9 September 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Whybra
- Dartington Service Design Lab, Higher Mills, Buckfast Abbey, Buckfastleigh, TQ11 0EE, UK
| | - Georgina Warner
- Autistica, St Saviour's House, 39-41 Union Street, London, SE1 1SD, UK
| | - Gretchen Bjornstad
- Peninsula Cerebra Research Unit (PenCRU), University of Exeter Medical School, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Tim Hobbs
- Dartington Service Design Lab, Higher Mills, Buckfast Abbey, Buckfastleigh, TQ11 0EE, UK
| | - Lucy Brook
- Depression and Anxiety Service, Sherborne House, Kingsteignton Road, Newton Abbot, TQ12 2PF, UK
| | - Zoe Wrigley
- School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Postgraduate Office, 1-3 Museum Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BD, UK
| | - Vashti Berry
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Obioha C Ukoumunne
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Justin Matthews
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Rod Taylor
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Tim Eames
- Exeter Clinical Trials Support Network, Royal Devon & Exeter Foundation NHS Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Angeliki Kallitsoglou
- School of Education, University of Roehampton, Roehampton Lane, London, SW15 5PJ, UK
| | - Sarah Blower
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Area 2 ATB/152 Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Nick Axford
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gates S, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, Lamb SE, Slowther AM, Woollard M, Carson A, Smyth M, Wilson K, Parcell G, Rosser A, Whitfield R, Williams A, Jones R, Pocock H, Brock N, Black JJ, Wright J, Han K, Shaw G, Blair L, Marti J, Hulme C, McCabe C, Nikolova S, Ferreira Z, Perkins GD. Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-176. [PMID: 28393757 DOI: 10.3310/hta21110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical chest compression devices may help to maintain high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but little evidence exists for their effectiveness. We evaluated whether or not the introduction of Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assistance System-2 (LUCAS-2; Jolife AB, Lund, Sweden) mechanical CPR into front-line emergency response vehicles would improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). OBJECTIVE Evaluation of the LUCAS-2 device as a routine ambulance service treatment for OHCA. DESIGN Pragmatic, cluster randomised trial including adults with non-traumatic OHCA. Ambulance dispatch staff and those collecting the primary outcome were blind to treatment allocation. Blinding of the ambulance staff who delivered the interventions and reported initial response to treatment was not possible. We also conducted a health economic evaluation and a systematic review of all trials of out-of-hospital mechanical chest compression. SETTING Four UK ambulance services (West Midlands, North East England, Wales and South Central), comprising 91 urban and semiurban ambulance stations. Clusters were ambulance service vehicles, which were randomly assigned (approximately 1 : 2) to the LUCAS-2 device or manual CPR. PARTICIPANTS Patients were included if they were in cardiac arrest in the out-of-hospital environment. Exclusions were patients with cardiac arrest as a result of trauma, with known or clinically apparent pregnancy, or aged < 18 years. INTERVENTIONS Patients received LUCAS-2 mechanical chest compression or manual chest compressions according to the first trial vehicle to arrive on scene. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Survival at 30 days following cardiac arrest; survival without significant neurological impairment [Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2]. RESULTS We enrolled 4471 eligible patients (1652 assigned to the LUCAS-2 device and 2819 assigned to control) between 15 April 2010 and 10 June 2013. A total of 985 (60%) patients in the LUCAS-2 group received mechanical chest compression and 11 (< 1%) patients in the control group received LUCAS-2. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 30-day survival was similar in the LUCAS-2 (104/1652, 6.3%) and manual CPR groups [193/2819, 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.15]. Survival with a CPC score of 1 or 2 may have been worse in the LUCAS-2 group (adjusted OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.99). No serious adverse events were noted. The systematic review found no evidence of a survival advantage if mechanical chest compression was used. The health economic analysis showed that LUCAS-2 was dominated by manual chest compression. LIMITATIONS There was substantial non-compliance in the LUCAS-2 arm. For 272 out of 1652 patients (16.5%), mechanical chest compression was not used for reasons that would not occur in clinical practice. We addressed this issue by using complier average causal effect analyses. We attempted to measure CPR quality during the resuscitation attempts of trial participants, but were unable to do so. CONCLUSIONS There was no evidence of improvement in 30-day survival with LUCAS-2 compared with manual compressions. Our systematic review of recent randomised trials did not suggest that survival or survival without significant disability may be improved by the use of mechanical chest compression. FUTURE WORK The use of mechanical chest compression for in-hospital cardiac arrest, and in specific circumstances (e.g. transport), has not yet been evaluated. TRIAI REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN08233942. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gates
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Ranjit Lall
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Tom Quinn
- Surrey Peri-operative Anaesthesia Critical Care Collaborative Research Group, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK (current address: Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University London and St George's, University of London, London, UK)
| | - Charles D Deakin
- South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Otterbourne, UK
| | - Matthew W Cooke
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jessica Horton
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Malcolm Woollard
- Surrey Peri-operative Anaesthesia Critical Care Collaborative Research Group, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK (current address: Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University London and St George's, University of London, London, UK)
| | - Andy Carson
- West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Brierley Hill, UK
| | - Mike Smyth
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Brierley Hill, UK
| | - Kate Wilson
- West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Brierley Hill, UK
| | - Garry Parcell
- West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Brierley Hill, UK
| | - Andrew Rosser
- West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Brierley Hill, UK
| | | | | | | | - Helen Pocock
- South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Otterbourne, UK
| | - Nicola Brock
- South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Otterbourne, UK
| | - John Jm Black
- South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Otterbourne, UK
| | - John Wright
- North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kyee Han
- North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Gary Shaw
- North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Laura Blair
- North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joachim Marti
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher McCabe
- Department of Emergency Medicine Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Silviya Nikolova
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Zenia Ferreira
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gavin D Perkins
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Axford N, Warner G, Hobbs T, Heilmann S, Raja A, Berry V, Ukoumunne OC, Matthews J, Eames T, Kallitsoglou A, Blower S, Wilkinson T, Timmons L, Bjornstad G. The effectiveness of the Inspiring Futures parenting programme in improving behavioural and emotional outcomes in primary school children with behavioural or emotional difficulties: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychol 2018; 6:3. [PMID: 29458423 PMCID: PMC5819163 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-018-0214-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need to build the evidence base of early interventions promoting children's health and development in the UK. Malachi Specialist Family Support Services ('Malachi') is a voluntary sector organisation based in the UK that delivers a therapeutic parenting group programme called Inspiring Futures to parents of children identified as having behavioural and emotional difficulties. The programme comprises two parts, delivered sequentially: (1) a group-based programme for all parents for 10-12 weeks, and (2) one-to-one sessions with selected parents from the group-based element for up to 12 weeks. METHODS/DESIGN A randomised controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate Malachi's Inspiring Futures parenting programme. Participants will be allocated to one of two possible arms, with follow-up measures at 16 weeks (post-parent group programme) and at 32 weeks (post-one-to-one sessions with selected parents). The sample size is 248 participants with a randomisation allocation ratio of 1:1. The intervention arm will be offered the Inspiring Futures programme. The control group will receive services as usual. The aim is to determine the effectiveness of the Inspiring Futures programme on the primary outcome of behavioural and emotional difficulties of primary school children identified as having behavioural or emotional difficulties. DISCUSSION This study will further enhance the evidence for early intervention parenting programmes for child behavioural and emotional problems in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN32083735 . Retrospectively registered 28 October 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Axford
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, ITTC, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK.
| | - Georgina Warner
- Autistica, St Saviour's House, 39-41 Union Street, London, SE1 1SD, UK
| | - Tim Hobbs
- Dartington Service Design Lab, Lower Hood Barn, Dartington, TQ9 6AB, UK
| | - Sarah Heilmann
- Department of Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Mandeville Building, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, T16-37, The Netherlands
| | - Anam Raja
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Vashti Berry
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Obioha C Ukoumunne
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Justin Matthews
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Tim Eames
- Exeter Clinical Trials Support Network, Royal Devon & Exeter Foundation NHS Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Angeliki Kallitsoglou
- School of Education, University of Roehampton, Roehampton Lane, London, SW15 5PJ, UK
| | - Sarah Blower
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Area 2 ATB/152 Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Tom Wilkinson
- Torbay Depression and Anxiety Service, 266 Torquay Road, Paignton, TQ3 2EZ, UK
| | - Luke Timmons
- RSA (Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce), 8 John Adam Street, London, WC2N 6EZ, UK
| | - Gretchen Bjornstad
- Peninsula Cerebra Research Unit (PenCRU), University of Exeter Medical School, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brealey S, Armstrong AL, Brooksbank A, Carr AJ, Charalambous CP, Cooper C, Corbacho B, Dias J, Donnelly I, Goodchild L, Hewitt C, Keding A, Kottam L, Lamb SE, McDaid C, Northgraves M, Richardson G, Rodgers S, Shah S, Sharp E, Spencer S, Torgerson D, Toye F, Rangan A. United Kingdom Frozen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), multi-centre, randomised, 12 month, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of Early Structured Physiotherapy versus manipulation under anaesthesia versus arthroscopic capsular release for patients referred to secondary care with a primary frozen shoulder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:614. [PMID: 29273079 PMCID: PMC5741880 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2352-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frozen shoulder (also known as adhesive capsulitis) occurs when the capsule, or the soft tissue envelope around the ball and socket shoulder joint, becomes scarred and contracted, making the shoulder tight, painful and stiff. It affects around 1 in 12 men and 1 in 10 women of working age. Although this condition can settle with time (typically taking 1 to 3 years), for some people it causes severe symptoms and needs referral to hospital. Our aim is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two invasive and costly surgical interventions that are commonly used in secondary care in the National Health Service (NHS) compared with a non-surgical comparator of Early Structured Physiotherapy. METHODS We will conduct a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of 500 adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of frozen shoulder, and who have radiographs that exclude other pathology. Early Structured Physiotherapy with an intra-articular steroid injection will be compared with manipulation under anaesthesia with a steroid injection or arthroscopic (keyhole) capsular release followed by manipulation. Both surgical interventions will be followed with a programme of post-procedural physiotherapy. These treatments will be undertaken in NHS hospitals across the United Kingdom. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Oxford Shoulder Score (a patient self-reported assessment of shoulder function) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months after randomisation; and on the day that treatment starts and 6 months later. Secondary outcomes include the Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, the EQ-5D-5 L score, pain, extent of recovery and complications. We will explore the acceptability of the different treatments to patients and health care professionals using qualitative methods. DISCUSSION The three treatments being compared are the most frequently used in secondary care in the NHS, but there is uncertainty about which one works best and at what cost. UK FROST is a rigorously designed and adequately powered study to inform clinical decisions for the treatment of this common condition in adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register, ID: ISRCTN48804508 . Registered on 25 July 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Brealey
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Alison L. Armstrong
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW UK
| | | | - Andrew Jonathan Carr
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Charalambos P. Charalambous
- Blackpool Victoria Hospital and Blackpool and School of Medicine University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE UK
| | - Cushla Cooper
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Belen Corbacho
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Joseph Dias
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW UK
| | - Iona Donnelly
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary Orthopaedic Research Unit, Gatehouse Building, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF UK
| | - Lorna Goodchild
- James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Ada Keding
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Lucksy Kottam
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, South Tees Institute of Learning Research and Innovation, The James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW UK
| | - Sarah E. Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculo-skeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, Ox4 7AL UK
| | - Catriona McDaid
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Matthew Northgraves
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Gerry Richardson
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Sara Rodgers
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Sarwat Shah
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Emma Sharp
- Orthopaedic Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF UK
| | - Sally Spencer
- Edge Hill University, St. Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire L39 4QP UK
| | - David Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of York, ARRC Building, York, YO10 5DD UK
| | - Francine Toye
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7HE UK
| | - Amar Rangan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK
- Faculty of Medical Sciences and NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design was found to be highly susceptible to low statistical power and internal validity biases. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 95:111-119. [PMID: 29277558 PMCID: PMC5844670 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Revised: 11/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The “cohort multiple randomized controlled trial” (cmRCT) is a recent innovation by which novel interventions are trialed within large longitudinal cohorts of patients to gain efficiencies and align trials more closely to standard clinical practice. The use of cmRCTs is outpacing its methodological understanding, and more appropriate methods for designing and analyzing such trials are urgently needed. Study Design and Setting We established the UK Comprehensive Longitudinal Assessment of Salford Integrated Care cohort of 4,377 patients with long-term conditions within which we are conducting a cmRCT (“Proactive Telephone Coaching and Tailored Support”) of telephone-based health coaching. Results We identify some key methodological challenges to the use of the cmRCT in actual practice. Principal are issues around statistical power, sample size, and treatment effect estimation, for which we provide appropriate methods. Sampling procedures commonly applied in conventional RCTs can result in unintentional selection bias. The fixed data collection points that feature in cmRCTs can also threaten validity. Conclusion The cmRCT may offer advantages over conventional trial designs. However, a cmRCT requires appropriate power calculation, sampling, and analysis procedures; else, studies may be underpowered or subject to validity biases. We offer solutions to some of the key issues, but further methodological investigations are needed. Cohort multiple RCT–specific Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidance may be indicated.
Collapse
|
42
|
Kennedy DP, Osilla KC, Hunter SB, Golinelli D, Maksabedian Hernandez E, Tucker JS. A pilot test of a motivational interviewing social network intervention to reduce substance use among housing first residents. J Subst Abuse Treat 2017; 86:36-44. [PMID: 29415849 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 12/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
This article presents findings of a pilot test of a Motivational Interviewing social network intervention (MI-SNI) to enhance motivation to reduce high risk alcohol and other drug (AOD) use among formerly homeless individuals transitioning to housing. Delivered in-person by a facilitator trained in MI, this four-session computer-assisted intervention provides personalized social network visualization feedback to help participants understand the people in their network who trigger their alcohol and other drug (AOD) use and those who support abstinence. If ready, participants are encouraged to make changes to their social network to help reduce their own high-risk behavior. Participants were 41 individuals (33 male, 7 female, 1 other; 23 African-American, 5 non-Latino White, 6 Latino, 7 other, mean age 48) who were transitioning from homelessness to permanent supportive housing. They were randomly assigned to either the MI-SNI condition or usual care. Readiness to change AOD use, AOD abstinence self-efficacy, and AOD use were assessed at baseline and shortly after the final intervention session for the MI-SNI arm and around 3-months after baseline for the control arm. Acceptability of the intervention was also evaluated. MI-SNI participants reported increased readiness to change AOD use compared to control participants. We also conducted a subsample analysis for participants at one housing program and found a significant intervention effect on readiness to change AOD use, AOD abstinence self-efficacy, and alcohol use compared to control participants. Participants rated the intervention as highly acceptable. We conclude that a brief computer-assisted Motivational Interviewing social network intervention has potential to efficaciously impact readiness to change AOD use, AOD abstinence self-efficacy, and AOD use among formerly homeless individuals transitioning to permanent supportive housing, and warrants future study in larger clinical trials.
Collapse
|
43
|
Gal R, Monninkhof EM, Groenwold RHH, van Gils CH, van den Bongard DHJG, Peeters PHM, Verkooijen HM, May AM. The effects of exercise on the quality of life of patients with breast cancer (the UMBRELLA Fit study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:504. [PMID: 29078800 PMCID: PMC5659016 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2252-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that exercise has beneficial effects on quality of life (QoL) in patients with breast cancer. However, these effects were often small. Blinding in an exercise trial is not possible, which has the possible disadvantage of difficult accrual, drop-out after randomization to control and contamination between study groups (controls adopting the behaviour of the intervention group). The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) is an alternative for conventional RCTs and has the potential to overcome these disadvantages. METHODS This cmRCT will be performed within the Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaLuAtion (UMBRELLA). Patients with breast cancer who visit the radiotherapy department of the University Medical Center Utrecht are asked to participate in UMBRELLA. Patients give consent for collection of medical information, providing patient-reported outcomes through regular questionnaires and randomization into future intervention studies. Patients who fulfill the UMBRELLA Fit study eligibility criteria (12 to 18 months post inclusion in UMBRELLA, low physical activity level) will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group (1:1 ratio). Patients randomized to the intervention group will be offered a 12-week exercise programme. The control group will not be informed. Regular cohort measurements will be used for outcome assessment. Feasiblity (including participation, contamination, generalizability and retention) of the cmRCT design and effects of the intervention on QoL will be evaluated. DISCUSSION We will examine the feasibility of the cmRCT design in exercise-oncology research and compare this with conventional RCTs. Furthermore, the effectiveness of an exercise intervention on the QoL of patients with breast cancer in the short term (6 months) and long term (24 months) will be studied. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5482/NL.52062.041.15 . Retrospectively registered on 7 December 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Gal
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M. Monninkhof
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rolf H. H. Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Petra H. M. Peeters
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne M. May
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression. Trials 2017; 18:308. [PMID: 28683809 PMCID: PMC5501505 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2059-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials which test the effectiveness of interventions compared with the status quo frequently encounter challenges. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design is an innovative approach to the design and conduct of pragmatic trials which seeks to address some of these challenges. MAIN TEXT In this article, we report our experiences with the first completed randomised controlled trial (RCT) using the cmRCT design. This trial-the Depression in South Yorkshire (DEPSY) trial-involved comparison of treatment as usual (TAU) with TAU plus the offer of an intervention for people with self-reported long-term moderate to severe depression. In the trial, we used an existing large population-based cohort: the Yorkshire Health Study. We discuss our experiences with recruitment, attrition, crossover, data analysis, generalisability of results, and cost. The main challenges in using the cmRCT design were the high crossover to the control group and the lower questionnaire response rate among patients who refused the offer of treatment. However, the design did help facilitate efficient and complete recruitment of the trial population as well as analysable data that were generalisable to the population of interest. Attrition rates were also smaller than those reported in other depression trials. CONCLUSION This first completed full trial using the cmRCT design testing an intervention for self-reported depression was associated with a number of important benefits. Further research is required to compare the acceptability and cost effectiveness of standard pragmatic RCT design with the cmRCT design. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN02484593 . Registered on 7 Jan 2013.
Collapse
|
45
|
Viksveen P, Relton C, Nicholl J. Depressed patients treated by homeopaths: a randomised controlled trial using the "cohort multiple randomised controlled trial" (cmRCT) design. Trials 2017; 18:299. [PMID: 28666463 PMCID: PMC5493124 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2040-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite controversy regarding homeopathy, some patients consult homeopaths for depression. Evidence is required to determine whether this is an effective, acceptable and safe intervention for these patients. METHODS A pragmatic trial using the "cohort multiple randomised controlled trial" design was used to test the effectiveness of adjunctive treatment by homeopaths compared to usual care alone, over a period of 12 months in patients with self-reported depression. One third of patients were randomly selected for an offer of treatment provided by a homeopath. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included depression scores at 12 months; and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) outcome at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The trial over-recruited by 17% with a total of 566 patients. Forty percent took up the offer and received treatment. An intention-to-treat analysis of the offer group at 6 months reported a 1.4-point lower mean depression score than the no offer group (95% CI 0.2, 2.5, p = 0.019), with a small standardized treatment effect size (d = 0.30). Using instrumental variables analysis, a moderate treatment effect size in favour of those treated was found (d = 0.57) with a between group difference of 2.6 points (95% CI 0.5, 4.7, p = 0.018). Results were maintained at 12 months. Secondary analyses showed similar results. Similar results were found for anxiety (GAD-7). No evidence suggested any important risk involved with the intervention. CONCLUSION This trial provides preliminary support for both the acceptability and the effectiveness of treatment by a homeopath for patients with self-reported depression. Our results provide support for further pragmatic research to provide more precise estimates of treatment effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN02484593 . Registered on 7 January 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petter Viksveen
- The Department of Health Studies, The University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms hus, Kjell Arholms gate 39, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Clare Relton
- The University of Sheffield, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Jon Nicholl
- The University of Sheffield, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Candlish J, Pate A, Sperrin M, van Staa T. Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017; 17:17. [PMID: 28143408 PMCID: PMC5282910 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0295-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design provides an opportunity to incorporate the benefits of randomisation within clinical practice; thus reducing costs, integrating electronic healthcare records, and improving external validity. This study aims to address a key concern of the cmRCT design: refusal to treatment is only present in the intervention arm, and this may lead to bias and reduce statistical power. Methods We used simulation studies to assess the effect of this refusal, both random and related to event risk, on bias of the effect estimator and statistical power. A series of simulations were undertaken that represent a cmRCT trial with time-to-event endpoint. Intention-to-treat (ITT), per protocol (PP), and instrumental variable (IV) analysis methods, two stage predictor substitution and two stage residual inclusion, were compared for various refusal scenarios. Results We found the IV methods provide a less biased estimator for the causal effect when refusal is present in the intervention arm, with the two stage residual inclusion method performing best with regards to minimum bias and sufficient power. We demonstrate that sample sizes should be adapted based on expected and actual refusal rates in order to be sufficiently powered for IV analysis. Conclusion We recommend running both an IV and ITT analyses in an individually randomised cmRCT as it is expected that the effect size of interest, or the effect we would observe in clinical practice, would lie somewhere between that estimated with ITT and IV analyses. The optimum (in terms of bias and power) instrumental variable method was the two stage residual inclusion method. We recommend using adaptive power calculations, updating them as refusal rates are collected in the trial recruitment phase in order to be sufficiently powered for IV analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Candlish
- Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, University of Manchester, Vaughan House, Portsmouth Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. .,School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Alexander Pate
- Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, University of Manchester, Vaughan House, Portsmouth Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Matthew Sperrin
- Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, University of Manchester, Vaughan House, Portsmouth Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Tjeerd van Staa
- Health eResearch Centre, Farr Institute for Health Informatics Research, University of Manchester, Vaughan House, Portsmouth Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.,Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cockayne S, Adamson J, Clarke A, Corbacho B, Fairhurst C, Green L, Hewitt CE, Hicks K, Kenan AM, Lamb SE, McIntosh C, Menz HB, Redmond AC, Richardson Z, Rodgers S, Vernon W, Watson J, Torgerson DJ. Cohort Randomised Controlled Trial of a Multifaceted Podiatry Intervention for the Prevention of Falls in Older People (The REFORM Trial). PLoS One 2017; 12:e0168712. [PMID: 28107372 PMCID: PMC5249075 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls are a major cause of morbidity among older people. A multifaceted podiatry intervention may reduce the risk of falling. This study evaluated such an intervention. DESIGN Pragmatic cohort randomised controlled trial in England and Ireland. 1010 participants were randomised (493 to the Intervention group and 517 to Usual Care) to either: a podiatry intervention, including foot and ankle exercises, foot orthoses and, if required, new footwear, and a falls prevention leaflet or usual podiatry treatment plus a falls prevention leaflet. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of self-reported falls per participant in the 12 months following randomisation. Secondary outcomes included: proportion of fallers and those reporting multiple falls, time to first fall, fear of falling, Frenchay Activities Index, Geriatric Depression Scale, foot pain, health related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS In the primary analysis were 484 (98.2%) intervention and 507 (98.1%) control participants. There was a small, non statistically significant reduction in the incidence rate of falls in the intervention group (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.05, p = 0.16). The proportion of participants experiencing a fall was lower (49.7 vs 54.9%, adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.00, p = 0.05) as was the proportion experiencing two or more falls (27.6% vs 34.6%, adjusted odds ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.90, p = 0.01). There was an increase (p = 0.02) in foot pain for the intervention group. There were no statistically significant differences in other outcomes. The intervention was more costly but marginally more beneficial in terms of health-related quality of life (mean quality adjusted life year (QALY) difference 0.0129, 95% CI -0.0050 to 0.0314) and had a 65% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of £30,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION There was a small reduction in falls. The intervention may be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN ISRCTN68240461.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Cockayne
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Joy Adamson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Arabella Clarke
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Belen Corbacho
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Fairhurst
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine Green
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine E. Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Hicks
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Anne-Maree Kenan
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah E. Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Kadoorie Critical Care Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hylton B. Menz
- School of Allied Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony C. Redmond
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Zoe Richardson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Rodgers
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Wesley Vernon
- Podiatry Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Jordanthorpe Health Centre, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Watson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - David J. Torgerson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Patel V, Weobong B, Weiss HA, Anand A, Bhat B, Katti B, Dimidjian S, Araya R, Hollon SD, King M, Vijayakumar L, Park AL, McDaid D, Wilson T, Velleman R, Kirkwood BR, Fairburn CG. The Healthy Activity Program (HAP), a lay counsellor-delivered brief psychological treatment for severe depression, in primary care in India: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017; 389:176-185. [PMID: 27988143 PMCID: PMC5236064 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31589-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Revised: 08/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although structured psychological treatments are recommended as first-line interventions for depression, only a small fraction of people globally receive these treatments because of poor access in routine primary care. We assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a brief psychological treatment (Healthy Activity Program [HAP]) for delivery by lay counsellors to patients with moderately severe to severe depression in primary health-care settings. METHODS In this randomised controlled trial, we recruited participants aged 18-65 years scoring more than 14 on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) indicating moderately severe to severe depression from ten primary health centres in Goa, India. Pregnant women or patients who needed urgent medical attention or were unable to communicate clearly were not eligible. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to enhanced usual care (EUC) alone or EUC combined with HAP in randomly sized blocks (block size four to six [two to four for men]), stratified by primary health centre and sex, and allocation was concealed with use of sequential numbered opaque envelopes. Physicians providing EUC were masked. Primary outcomes were depression symptom severity on the Beck Depression Inventory version II and remission from depression (PHQ-9 score of <10) at 3 months in the intention-to-treat population, assessed by masked field researchers. Secondary outcomes were disability, days unable to work, behavioural activation, suicidal thoughts or attempts, intimate partner violence, and resource use and costs of illness. We assessed serious adverse events in the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN95149997. FINDINGS Between Oct 28, 2013, and July 29, 2015, we enrolled and randomly allocated 495 participants (247 [50%] to the EUC plus HAP group [two of whom were subsequently excluded because of protocol violations] and 248 [50%] to the EUC alone group), of whom 466 (95%) completed the 3 month primary outcome assessment (230 [49%] in the EUC plus HAP group and 236 [51%] in the EUC alone group). Participants in the EUC plus HAP group had significantly lower symptom severity (Beck Depression Inventory version II in EUC plus HAP group 19·99 [SD 15·70] vs 27·52 [13·26] in EUC alone group; adjusted mean difference -7·57 [95% CI -10·27 to -4·86]; p<0·0001) and higher remission (147 [64%] of 230 had a PHQ-9 score of <10 in the HAP plus EUC group vs 91 [39%] of 236 in the EUC alone group; adjusted prevalence ratio 1·61 [1·34-1·93]) than did those in the EUC alone group. EUC plus HAP showed better results than did EUC alone for the secondary outcomes of disability (adjusted mean difference -2·73 [-4·39 to -1·06]; p=0·001), days out of work (-2·29 [-3·84 to -0·73]; p=0·004), intimate partner physical violence in women (0·53 [0·29-0·96]; p=0·04), behavioural activation (2·17 [1·34-3·00]; p<0·0001), and suicidal thoughts or attempts (0·61 [0·45-0·83]; p=0·001). The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was $9333 (95% CI 3862-28 169; 2015 international dollars), with an 87% chance of being cost-effective in the study setting. Serious adverse events were infrequent and similar between groups (nine [4%] in the EUC plus HAP group vs ten [4%] in the EUC alone group; p=1·00). INTERPRETATION HAP delivered by lay counsellors plus EUC was better than EUC alone was for patients with moderately severe to severe depression in routine primary care in Goa, India. HAP was readily accepted by this previously untreated population and was cost-effective in this setting. HAP could be a key strategy to reduce the treatment gap for depressive disorders, the leading mental health disorder worldwide. FUNDING Wellcome Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Patel
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India; Centre for Global Mental Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Benedict Weobong
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Helen A Weiss
- Medical Research Council Tropical Epidemiology Group; Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Arpita Anand
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India
| | - Bhargav Bhat
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India
| | | | - Sona Dimidjian
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Steve D Hollon
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Michael King
- Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lakshmi Vijayakumar
- Sneha, Voluntary Health Services, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - A-La Park
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - David McDaid
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Terry Wilson
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers School of Arts and Sciences, NJ, USA
| | - Richard Velleman
- Sangath Centre, Socorro Village, Bardez-Goa, Goa, India; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Betty R Kirkwood
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jerosch-Herold C, Houghton J, Miller L, Shepstone L. Does sensory relearning improve tactile function after carpal tunnel decompression? A pragmatic, assessor-blinded, randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41:948-956. [PMID: 27402282 PMCID: PMC5070493 DOI: 10.1177/1753193416657760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2016] [Revised: 06/06/2016] [Accepted: 06/09/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome being effective in 80%-90% of cases, chronic numbness and hand disability can occur. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sensory relearning improves tactile discrimination and hand function after decompression. In a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial, 104 patients were randomized to a sensory relearning ( n = 52) or control ( n = 52) group. A total of 93 patients completed a 12-week follow-up. Primary outcome was the shape-texture identification test at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes were touch threshold, touch localization, dexterity and self-reported hand function. No significant group differences were seen for the primary outcome (Shape-Texture Identification) at 6 weeks or 12 weeks. Similarly, no significant group differences were observed on secondary outcomes, with the exception of self-reported hand function. A secondary complier-averaged-causal-effects analysis showed no statistically significant treatment effect on the primary outcome. Sensory relearning for tactile sensory and functional deficits after carpal tunnel decompression is not effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - J. Houghton
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - L. Miller
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - L. Shepstone
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Asher L, De Silva M, Hanlon C, Weiss HA, Birhane R, Ejigu DA, Medhin G, Patel V, Fekadu A. Community-based Rehabilitation Intervention for people with Schizophrenia in Ethiopia (RISE): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:299. [PMID: 27342215 PMCID: PMC4919867 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1427-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Care for most people with schizophrenia is best delivered in the community and evidence-based guidelines recommend combining both medication and a psychosocial intervention, such as community-based rehabilitation. There is emerging evidence that community-based rehabilitation for schizophrenia is effective at reducing disability in middle-income country settings, yet there is no published evidence on the effectiveness in settings with fewer mental health resources. This paper describes the protocol of a study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based rehabilitation as an adjunct to health facility-based care in rural Ethiopia. Methods This is a cluster randomised trial set in a rural district in Ethiopia, with sub-district as the unit of randomisation. Participants will be recruited from an existing cohort of people with schizophrenia receiving treatment in primary care. Fifty-four sub-districts will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to facility-based care plus community-based rehabilitation (intervention arm) or facility-based care alone (control arm). Facility-based care consists of treatment by a nurse or health officer in primary care (antipsychotic medication, basic psychoeducation and follow-up) with referral to a psychiatric nurse-led outpatient clinic or psychiatric hospital when required. Trained community-based rehabilitation workers will deliver a manualised community-based rehabilitation intervention, with regular individual and group supervision. We aim to recruit 182 people with schizophrenia and their caregivers. Potential participants will be screened for eligibility, including enduring or disabling illness. Participants will be recruited after providing informed consent or, for participants without decision-making capacity, after the primary caregiver gives permission on behalf of the participant. The primary outcome is disability measured with the 36-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) version 2.0 at 12 months. The sample size will allow us to detect a 20 % difference in WHODAS 2.0 scores between treatment arms with 85 % power. Secondary outcomes include change in symptom severity, economic activity, physical restraint, discrimination and caregiver burden. Discussion This is the first trial of community-based rehabilitation for schizophrenia and will determine, as a proof of concept, the added value of community-based rehabilitation compared to facility-based care alone in a low-income country with scarce mental health resources. Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier NCT02160249. Registered on 3 June 2014. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1427-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Asher
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. .,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Mary De Silva
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.,Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Helen A Weiss
- MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rahel Birhane
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Dawit A Ejigu
- Department of Pharmacology, St Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Girmay Medhin
- Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Vikram Patel
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.,Sangath, Goa, India
| | - Abebaw Fekadu
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.,Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|