1
|
Veenhuizen SGA, van Grinsven SEL, Laseur IL, Bakker MF, Monninkhof EM, de Lange SV, Pijnappel RM, Mann RM, Lobbes MBI, Duvivier KM, de Jong MDF, Loo CE, Karssemeijer N, van Diest PJ, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH. Re-attendance in supplemental breast MRI screening rounds of the DENSE trial for women with extremely dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10685-9. [PMID: 38639912 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10685-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Supplemental MRI screening improves early breast cancer detection and reduces interval cancers in women with extremely dense breasts in a cost-effective way. Recently, the European Society of Breast Imaging recommended offering MRI screening to women with extremely dense breasts, but the debate on whether to implement it in breast cancer screening programs is ongoing. Insight into the participant experience and willingness to re-attend is important for this discussion. METHODS We calculated the re-attendance rates of the second and third MRI screening rounds of the DENSE trial. Moreover, we calculated age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) to study the association between characteristics and re-attendance. Women who discontinued MRI screening were asked to provide one or more reasons for this. RESULTS The re-attendance rates were 81.3% (3458/4252) and 85.2% (2693/3160) in the second and third MRI screening round, respectively. A high age (> 65 years), a very low BMI, lower education, not being employed, smoking, and no alcohol consumption were correlated with lower re-attendance rates. Moderate or high levels of pain, discomfort, or anxiety experienced during the previous MRI screening round were correlated with lower re-attendance rates. Finally, a plurality of women mentioned an examination-related inconvenience as a reason to discontinue screening (39.1% and 34.8% in the second and third screening round, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The willingness of women with dense breasts to re-attend an ongoing MRI screening study is high. However, emphasis should be placed on improving the MRI experience to increase the re-attendance rate if widespread supplemental MRI screening is implemented. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT For many women, MRI is an acceptable screening method, as re-attendance rates were high - even for screening in a clinical trial setting. To further enhance the (re-)attendance rate, one possible approach could be improving the overall MRI experience. KEY POINTS • The willingness to re-attend in an ongoing MRI screening study is high. • Pain, discomfort, and anxiety in the previous MRI screening round were related to lower re-attendance rates. • Emphasis should be placed on improving MRI experience to increase the re-attendance rate in supplemental MRI screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie G A Veenhuizen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Stratenum 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie E L van Grinsven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Stratenum 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle L Laseur
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Stratenum 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije F Bakker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Stratenum 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Stratenum 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stéphanie V de Lange
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Stratenum 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, P.O. Box 6873, 6503 GJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5500, 6130 MB, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Katya M Duvivier
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathijn D F de Jong
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, P.O. Box 90153, 5200 ME, 'S-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nico Karssemeijer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Stratenum 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang H, H M van der Velden B, Verburg E, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH, Gilhuijs KGA. Automated rating of background parenchymal enhancement in MRI of extremely dense breasts without compromising the association with breast cancer in the DENSE trial. Eur J Radiol 2024; 175:111442. [PMID: 38583349 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) as rated by radiologists is subject to inter- and intrareader variability. We aim to automate BPE category from DCE-MRI. METHODS This study represents a secondary analysis of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening trial. 4553 women with extremely dense breasts who received supplemental breast MRI screening in eight hospitals were included. Minimal, mild, moderate and marked BPE rated by radiologists were used as reference. Fifteen quantitative MRI features of the fibroglandular tissue were extracted to predict BPE using Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and KNN classifiers. Majority voting was used to combine the predictions. Internal-external validation was used for training and validation. The inverse-variance weighted mean accuracy was used to express mean performance across the eight hospitals. Cox regression was used to verify non inferiority of the association between automated rating and breast cancer occurrence compared to the association for manual rating. RESULTS The accuracy of majority voting ranged between 0.56 and 0.84 across the eight hospitals. The weighted mean prediction accuracy for the four BPE categories was 0.76. The hazard ratio (HR) of BPE for breast cancer occurrence was comparable between automated rating and manual rating (HR = 2.12 versus HR = 1.97, P = 0.65 for mild/moderate/marked BPE relative to minimal BPE). CONCLUSION It is feasible to rate BPE automatically in DCE-MRI of women with extremely dense breasts without compromising the underlying association between BPE and breast cancer occurrence. The accuracy for minimal BPE is superior to that for other BPE categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Erik Verburg
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije F Bakker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Beers MA, Speksnijder CM, van Gils CH, Frederix GWJ, Dankbaar JW, de Bree R. Prophylactic pectoralis major flap to compensate for increased risk of pharyngocutaneous fistula in laryngectomy patients with low skeletal muscle mass (PECTORALIS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:76. [PMID: 38225572 PMCID: PMC10788993 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11773-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total laryngectomy (TL) is a surgical procedure commonly performed on patients with advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal carcinoma. One of the most common postoperative complications following TL is the development of a pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF), characterized by a communication between the neopharynx and the skin. PCF can lead to extended hospital stays, delayed oral feeding, and compromised quality of life. The use of a myofascial pectoralis major flap (PMMF) as an onlay technique during pharyngeal closure has shown potential in reducing PCF rates in high risk patients for development of PCF such as patients undergoing TL after chemoradiation and low skeletal muscle mass (SMM). Its impact on various functional outcomes, such as shoulder and neck function, swallowing function, and voice quality, remains less explored. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of PMMF in reducing PCF rates in patients with low SMM and its potential consequences on patient well-being. METHODS This multicenter study adopts a randomized clinical trial (RCT) design and is funded by the Dutch Cancer Society. Eligible patients for TL, aged ≥ 18 years, mentally competent, and proficient in Dutch, will be enrolled. One hundred and twenty eight patients with low SMM will be centrally randomized to receive TL with or without PMMF, while those without low SMM will undergo standard TL. Primary outcome measurement involves assessing PCF rates within 30 days post-TL. Secondary objectives include evaluating quality of life, shoulder and neck function, swallowing function, and voice quality using standardized questionnaires and functional tests. Data will be collected through electronic patient records. DISCUSSION This study's significance lies in its exploration of the potential benefits of using PMMF as an onlay technique during pharyngeal closure to reduce PCF rates in TL patients with low SMM. By assessing various functional outcomes, the study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of PMMF deployment. The anticipated results will contribute valuable insights into optimizing surgical techniques to enhance patient outcomes and inform future treatment strategies for TL patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NL8605, registered on 11-05-2020; International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje A van Beers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M Speksnijder
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Dankbaar
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eijkelboom AH, de Munck L, Larsen M, Bijlsma MJ, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Gils CH, Broeders MJM, Nygård JF, Lobbes MBI, Helsper CW, Pijnappel RM, Strobbe LJA, Wesseling J, Hofvind S, Siesling S. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer incidence and tumor stage in the Netherlands and Norway: A population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 87:102481. [PMID: 37897970 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of newly diagnosed breast tumors and their tumor stage between the Netherlands and Norway will help us understand the effect of differences in governmental and social reactions towards the pandemic. METHODS Women newly diagnosed with breast cancer in 2017-2021 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Cancer Registry of Norway. The crude breast cancer incidence rate (tumors per 100,000 women) during the first (March-September 2020), second (October 2020-April 2021), and Delta COVID-19 wave (May-December 2021) was compared with the incidence rate in the corresponding periods in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Incidence rates were stratified by age group, method of detection, and clinical tumor stage. RESULTS During the first wave breast cancer incidence declined to a larger extent in the Netherlands than in Norway (27.7% vs. 17.2% decrease, respectively). In both countries, incidence decreased in women eligible for screening. In the Netherlands, incidence also decreased in women not eligible for screening. During the second wave an increase in the incidence of stage IV tumors in women aged 50-69 years was seen in the Netherlands. During the Delta wave an increase in overall incidence and incidence of stage I tumors was seen in Norway. CONCLUSION Alterations in breast cancer incidence and tumor stage seem related to a combined effect of the suspension of the screening program, health care avoidance due to the severity of the pandemic, and other unknown factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk H Eijkelboom
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Linda de Munck
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marthe Larsen
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304 Oslo, Norway
| | - Maarten J Bijlsma
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands; PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, 9700 AD Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille J M Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, 6538 SW, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan F Nygård
- Department of Register Informatics, Cancer Registry Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304 Oslo, Norway
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center Sittard-Geleen, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands; School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 40, 6220 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Charles W Helsper
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, 6538 SW, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Luc J A Strobbe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Divisions of Diagnostic Oncology and Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, P.O. Box 5313, 0304 Oslo, Norway; Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, P.O. 6050, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schaeffers AWMA, Devriese LA, van Gils CH, Dankbaar JW, Voortman J, de Boer JP, Slingerland M, Hendriks MP, Smid EJ, Frederix GWJ, de Bree R. Low dose cisplatin weekly versus high dose cisplatin every three weeks in primary chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients with low skeletal muscle mass: The CISLOW-study protocol. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294147. [PMID: 38011186 PMCID: PMC10681175 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin in a triweekly regimen of 100 mg/m2 body surface area, is used to treat locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with curative intent. Cisplatin dose limiting toxicity (CDLT) occurs often and impedes obtaining the planned cumulative cisplatin dose. A cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m2 or more is warranted for better survival and locoregional control. Patients with a low skeletal muscle mass (SMM) have a three-fold higher risk of developing CDLT than patients with a normal SMM. SMM can be assessed through measurements on routinely performed diagnostic head and neck CT- or MRI-scans. A weekly regimen of 40 mg/m2 body surface area cisplatin is proposed as a less toxic schedule, which possibly decreases the risk of developing CDLT and enables reaching a higher cumulative cisplatin dose. The aim of this multicenter randomized clinical trial (NL76533.041.21, registered in the Netherlands Trial Register) is to identify whether a regimen of weekly cisplatin increases compliance to the planned chemotherapy scheme in HNSCC patients with low SMM. The primary outcome is the difference in compliance rate, defined as absence of CDLT, between low SMM patients receiving either the weekly or triweekly regimen. Secondary outcomes consist of toxicities, the cumulative cisplatin dose, time to recurrence, incidence of recurrence at two years of follow-up, location of recurrence, 2-year overall, disease free and disease specific survival, quality of life, patient's experiences, and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk W. M. A. Schaeffers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lot A. Devriese
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Dankbaar
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jens Voortman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Paul de Boer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ernst J. Smid
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W. J. Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang H, van der Velden BHM, Verburg E, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, van Gils CH, Gilhuijs KGA. Assessing Quantitative Parenchymal Features at Baseline Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI and Cancer Occurrence in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts. Radiology 2023; 308:e222841. [PMID: 37552061 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.222841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Automated identification of quantitative breast parenchymal enhancement features on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI scans could provide added value in assessment of breast cancer risk in women with extremely dense breasts. Purpose To automatically identify quantitative properties of the breast parenchyma on baseline DCE MRI scans and assess their association with breast cancer occurrence in women with extremely dense breasts. Materials and Methods This study represents a secondary analysis of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening trial. MRI was performed in eight hospitals between December 2011 and January 2016. After segmentation of fibroglandular tissue, quantitative features (including volumetric density, volumetric morphology, and enhancement characteristics) of the parenchyma were extracted from baseline MRI scans. Principal component analysis was used to identify parenchymal measures with the greatest variance. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to assess the association between breast cancer occurrence and quantitative parenchymal features, followed by stratification of significant features into tertiles. Results A total of 4553 women (mean age, 55.7 years ± 6 [SD]) with extremely dense breasts were included; of these women, 122 (3%) were diagnosed with breast cancer. Five principal components representing 96% of the variance were identified, and the component explaining the greatest independent variance (42%) consisted of MRI features relating to volume of enhancing parenchyma. Multivariable analysis showed that volume of enhancing parenchyma was associated with breast cancer occurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.18; P = .02). Additionally, women in the high tertile of volume of enhancing parenchyma showed a breast cancer occurrence twice that of women in the low tertile (HR, 2.09; 95% CI: 1.25, 3.61; P = .005). Conclusion In women with extremely dense breasts, a high volume of enhancing parenchyma on baseline DCE MRI scans was associated with increased occurrence of breast cancer as compared with a low volume of enhancing parenchyma. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Grimm in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas H M van der Velden
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Verburg
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marije F Bakker
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
- From the Image Sciences Institute (H.W., B.H.M.v.d.V., E.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Verburg E, van Gils CH, van der Velden BH, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, Gilhuijs KG. Validation of Combined Deep Learning Triaging and Computer-Aided Diagnosis in 2901 Breast MRI Examinations From the Second Screening Round of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening Trial. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:293-298. [PMID: 36256783 PMCID: PMC9997620 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Computer-aided triaging (CAT) and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of screening breast magnetic resonance imaging have shown potential to reduce the workload of radiologists in the context of dismissing normal breast scans and dismissing benign disease in women with extremely dense breasts. The aim of this study was to validate the potential of integrating CAT and CAD to reduce workload and workup on benign lesions in the second screening round of the DENSE trial, without missing cancer. METHODS We included 2901 breast magnetic resonance imaging scans, obtained from 8 hospitals in the Netherlands. Computer-aided triaging and CAD were previously developed on data from the first screening round. Computer-aided triaging dismissed examinations without lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations triaged to radiological reading were counted and subsequently processed by CAD. The number of benign lesions correctly classified by CAD was recorded. The false-positive fraction of the CAD was compared with that of unassisted radiological reading in the second screening round. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed and the generalizability of CAT and CAD was assessed by comparing results from first and second screening rounds. RESULTS Computer-aided triaging dismissed 950 of 2901 (32.7%) examinations with 49 lesions in total; none were malignant. Subsequent CAD classified 132 of 285 (46.3%) lesions as benign without misclassifying any malignant lesion. Together, CAT and CAD yielded significantly fewer false-positive lesions, 53 of 109 (48.6%) and 89 of 109 (78.9%), respectively ( P = 0.001), than radiological reading alone. Computer-aided triaging had a smaller area under the ROC curve in the second screening round compared with the first, 0.83 versus 0.76 ( P = 0.001), but this did not affect the negative predictive value at the 100% sensitivity operating threshold. Computer-aided diagnosis was not associated with significant differences in area under the ROC curve (0.857 vs 0.753, P = 0.08). At the operating thresholds, the specificities of CAT (39.7% vs 41.0%, P = 0.70) and CAD (41.0% vs 38.2%, P = 0.62) were successfully reproduced in the second round. CONCLUSION The combined application of CAT and CAD showed potential to reduce workload of radiologists and to reduce number of biopsies on benign lesions. Computer-aided triaging (CAT) correctly dismissed 950 of 2901 (32.7%) examinations with 49 lesions in total; none were malignant. Subsequent computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) classified 132 of 285 (46.3%) lesions as benign without misclassifying any malignant lesion. Together, CAT and CAD yielded significantly fewer false-positive lesions, 53 of 109 (48.6%) and 89 of 109 (78.9%), respectively ( P = 0.001), than radiological reading alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ruud M. Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter B. Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
El Sharouni MA, Lo SN, Scolyer RA, van Gils CH, Thompson JF. REPLY to MS#JAAD-D-23-00002R1. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023:S0190-9622(23)00440-1. [PMID: 36935017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
El Sharouni MA, Rawson RV, Potter AJ, Paver EC, Wilmott JS, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, van Diest PJ, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Lo SN, van Gils CH. Melanomas in children and adolescents: Clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:609-616. [PMID: 36509217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.08.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanomas in the first 2 decades of life are uncommon and poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To assess clinicopathologic features and survival of children (≤11 years) and adolescents (12-19 years) diagnosed with melanoma. METHODS A pooled cohort of 514 patients was analyzed (397 Dutch, 117 Australian; 62 children, 452 adolescents). Pathology reports were reevaluated to determine melanoma subtypes. Multivariable Cox models were generated for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Melanoma subtypes were conventional melanoma (superficial spreading, nodular, desmoplastic, and acral lentiginous), spitzoid melanoma, and melanoma associated with a congenital nevus in 428, 78, and 8 patients, respectively. Ten-year RFS was 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.4%-100%) in children and 86.4% (95% CI, 82.7%-90.3%) in adolescents (P = .32). Ten-year OS was 100% in children and 92.7% (95% CI, 89.8%-95.8%) in adolescents (P = .09). On multivariable analysis possible only for the adolescent cohort due to the small number of children, ulceration status, and anatomic site were associated with RFS and OS, whereas age, sex, mitotic index, sentinel node status and melanoma subtype were not. Breslow thickness >4 mm was associated with worse RFS. LIMITATIONS Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS Survival rates for children and adolescents with melanomas were high. Ulceration, head or neck location and Breslow thickness >4 mm predicted worse survival in adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Robert V Rawson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison J Potter
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth C Paver
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James S Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vigfús Sigurdsson
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cömert D, van Gils CH, Veldhuis WB, Mann RM. Challenges and Changes of the Breast Cancer Screening Paradigm. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:706-726. [PMID: 36349728 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Since four decades mammography is used for early breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women and still remains the gold standard imaging modality. However, population screening programs can be personalized and women can be divided into different groups based on risk factors and personal preferences. The availability of new and evolving imaging modalities, for example, digital breast tomosynthesis, dynamic-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abbreviated MRI protocols, diffusion-weighted MRI, and contrast-enhanced mammography leads to new challenges and perspectives regarding the feasibility and potential harms of breast cancer screening. The aim of this review is to discuss the current guidelines for different risk groups, to analyze the recent published studies about the diagnostic performance of the imaging modalities and to discuss new developments and future perspectives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didem Cömert
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sharouni MAE, Lo SN, Varey AH, Elias SG, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, Suijkerbuijk KP, van Diest PJ, van Gils CH, Blokx WA, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF. Plain Language Summary - Development and validation of risk calculators for people with "thin" melanomas on their skin to predict the likelihood that their cancer will return. Future Oncol 2023; 19:97-102. [PMID: 36762595 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT? This is a summary of an article describing the development of risk calculators for use in people who develop a type of melanoma on their skin called "thin" melanoma to predict the likelihood that their cancer will return. The article was originally published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2021. HOW WERE THE CALCULATORS DEVELOPED? Calculations were performed to predict the chance of people with thin melanomas surviving without their melanoma recurring. Three graphical prediction calculators (called nomograms) were developed, along with easy-to-use online calculators using the same underlying calculation methods. The model was developed using data for 25,930 Dutch people diagnosed with thin melanomas (called the "development set"). To test its ability to predict melanoma recurrence, it was then compared with data for 2,968 Australian people with melanoma (the "validation set"). The calculators developed in the Dutch patients were found to accurately predict the risk of melanoma recurring for people with melanoma in the Australian "validation" group. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN? The calculators provide estimates of the risk of the melanoma returning for people with thin melanomas. The easy-to-use online calculators are freely available on a smartphone, tablet or computer, and will assist in providing accurate estimates of recurrence risks for individuals with thin melanomas, allowing more intensive follow-up of those whose predicted risk of their melanoma returning is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Department of Dermatology, University Medic al Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander Hr Varey
- Department of Dermatology, University Medic al Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vigfús Sigurdsson
- Department of Dermatology, University Medic al Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karijn Pm Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Willeke Am Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Melanoma & Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Song CV, van Gils CH, Yip CH, Soerjomataram I, Taib NAM, See MH, Lim A, Abdul Satar NF, Bhoo-Pathy N. Discriminatory Ability and Clinical Utility of the AJCC7 and AJCC8 Staging Systems for Breast Cancer in a Middle-Income Setting. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:674. [PMID: 36832162 PMCID: PMC9955895 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Differences in access to biomarker testing and cancer treatment in resource-limited settings may affect the clinical utility of the AJCC8 staging system compared to the anatomical AJCC7 system. (2) Methods: A total of 4151 Malaysian women who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2020 were followed-up until December 2021. All patients were staged using the AJCC7 and AJCC8 systems. Overall survival (OS) and relative survival (RS) were determined. Concordance-index was used to compare the discriminatory ability between the two systems. (3) Results: Migration from the AJCC7 to AJCC8 staging system resulted in the downstaging of 1494 (36.0%) patients and the upstaging of 289 (7.0%) patients. Approximately 5% of patients could not be staged using the AJCC8 classification. Five-year OS varied between 97% (Stage IA) and 66% (Stage IIIC) for AJCC7, and 96% (Stage IA) and 60% (Stage IIIC) for AJCC8. Concordance-indexes for predicting OS using the AJCC7 and AJCC8 models were 0.720 (0.694-0.747) and 0.745 (0.716-0.774), and for predicting RS they were 0.692 (0.658-0.728) and 0.710 (0.674-0.748), respectively. (4) Conclusions: Given the comparable discriminatory ability between the two staging systems in predicting the stage-specific survival of women with breast cancer in the current study, the continued use of the AJCC7 staging system in resource-limited settings seems pragmatic and justifiable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Vern Song
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Ramsay Sime Darby Health Care, Jalan SS12, Subang Jaya 47500, Malaysia
| | - Isabelle Soerjomataram
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cr Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
- Department of Surgery, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Jalan Professor Diraja Ungku Aziz, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur 59100, Malaysia
| | - Mee-Hoong See
- Department of Surgery, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Jalan Professor Diraja Ungku Aziz, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur 59100, Malaysia
| | - Alexander Lim
- Hospital Seberang Jaya, Jalan Tun Hussein Onn, Seberang Jaya, Permatang Pauh, Pulau Pinang 13700, Malaysia
| | - Nur Fadhlina Abdul Satar
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Jalan Professor Diraja Ungku Aziz, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur 59100, Malaysia
| | - Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Siepman Van den Berg MFR, Grant M, van Erp N, van Gils CH, Muris J, Brandenbarg D, van Asselt KM, de Wit NJ, Helsper CW. Cancer detection during the COVID-19 pandemic-Experiences in primary care and recommendations for the future. J Gen Fam Med 2022; 24:JGF2597. [PMID: 36718286 PMCID: PMC9877740 DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To describe general practitioners (GPs) experiences with the impact COVID-19 on the duration of cancer detection. Methods Cross-sectional survey study among Dutch GPs. Results Fifty-eight GPs participated. During the first wave, COVID-19-related delays were experienced by 88%, 52%, and 67% of GPs in the contact-seeking, primary care, and referral phases, respectively. GPs reported delays due to telehealth consultations, longer waiting times and patient's concerns of COVID infections and overburdening GPs. Conclusions The majority of GPs experienced delays in cancer diagnostic processes during the beginning of the COVID pandemic, which was most prominent in the timeliness in which patients sought GP care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew Grant
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary CareUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Nicole van Erp
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary CareUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary CareUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Jean Muris
- Department of General PracticeMaastricht University Care and Public Health Research InstituteMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Daan Brandenbarg
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care MedicineUniversity Medical Centre GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Kristel M. van Asselt
- Department of General PracticeAmsterdam UMC location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Niek J. de Wit
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary CareUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Charles W. Helsper
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary CareUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grant MP, Helsper CW, Stellato R, van Erp N, van Asselt KM, Slottje P, Muris J, Brandenbarg D, de Wit NJ, van Gils CH. The Impact of the COVID Pandemic on the Incidence of Presentations with Cancer-Related Symptoms in Primary Care. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215353. [PMID: 36358772 PMCID: PMC9656532 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The coronavirus pandemic profoundly affected how patients access health care services, as many individuals attempted to minimise risks of infectious contact and reduce burdens on health systems. This study aims to explore the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on patient presentations for cancer-related symptoms in primary care. It utilises routine clinical data for 1.23 million people in the Netherlands, comparing the first year of the pandemic to the two years prior. These data identify a 34% reduction in the incidence of cancer-related symptoms during the first wave (March to June 2020), with overall incidence returning to pre-corona levels after this period. In the first wave, the incidence of many symptoms was substantially reduced: breast lump (−17%), haematuria (−15%), abdominal mass (−21%), tiredness (−45%), lymphadenopathy (−25%), and naevus (−37%). In the second wave (October 2020 to February 2021), the incidence of breast lump and rectal bleeding was increased (both +14%), and tiredness was decreased (−20%), with the majority of other symptoms being similar to pre-COVID levels. These data describe large-scale primary care avoidance that did not increase until the end of the first COVID year for many cancer-related symptoms, suggestive that substantial numbers of patients delayed presenting to primary care. Abstract Introduction: In the Netherlands, the onset of the coronavirus pandemic saw shifts in primary health service provision away from physical consultations, cancer-screening programs were temporarily halted, and government messaging focused on remaining at home. In March and April 2020, weekly cancer diagnoses decreased to 73% of their pre-COVID levels, and 39% for skin cancer. This study aims to explore the effect of the COVID pandemic on patient presentations for cancer-related symptoms in primary care in The Netherlands. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical primary care data. Monthly incidences of patient presentations for cancer-related symptoms in five clinical databases in The Netherlands were analysed from March 2018 to February 2021. Results: Data demonstrated reductions in the incidence of cancer-related symptom presentations to primary care during the first COVID wave (March-June 2020) of −34% (95% CI: −43 to −23%) for all symptoms combined. In the second wave (October 2020–February 2021) there was no change in incidence observed (−8%, 95% CI −20% to 6%). Alarm-symptoms demonstrated decreases in incidence in the first wave with subsequent incidences that continued to rise in the second wave, such as: first wave: breast lump −17% (95% CI: −27 to −6%) and haematuria −15% (95% CI −24% to −6%); and second wave: rectal bleeding +14% (95% CI: 0 to 30%) and breast lump +14% (95% CI: 2 to 27%). Presentations of common non-alarm symptom such as tiredness and naevus demonstrated decreased in-cidences in the first wave of 45% (95% CI: −55% to −33%) and 37% (95% CI −47% to −25%). In the second wave, tiredness incidence was reduced by 20% (95% CI: −33% to −3%). Subgroup analy-sis did not demonstrate difference in incidence according to sex, age groups, comorbidity status, or previous history of cancer. Conclusions: These data describe large-scale primary care avoidance that did not increase until the end of the first COVID year for many cancer-related symptoms, suggestive that substantial numbers of patients delayed presenting to primary care. For those patients who had underlying cancer, this may have had impacted the cancer stage at diagnosis, treatment, and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P. Grant
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Charles W. Helsper
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca Stellato
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole van Erp
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kristel M. van Asselt
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Program, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline Slottje
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Program, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean Muris
- Department of General Practice, Maastricht University Care and Public Health Research Institute, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Brandenbarg
- Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Niek J. de Wit
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vissers TACM, Piek L, Patuleia SIS, Duinmeijer AJ, Bakker MF, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ, van Gils CH, Moelans CB. Elevated miR-29c-5p Expression in Nipple Aspirate Fluid Is Associated with Extremely High Mammographic Breast Density. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153805. [PMID: 35954468 PMCID: PMC9367509 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary High mammographic density is a known risk factor for breast cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms of high mammographic density development and breast cancer are unknown. MicroRNAs are potential biomarkers indicative of carcinogenesis and can be assessed in nipple aspirate fluid. We used nipple aspirate fluid from women with very low and extremely high mammographic density to examine differences in expression of multiple miRNAs between both extremes in the spectrum of mammographic density. We found that hsa-miR-29c-5p was upregulated in an extremely high mammographic density context and potential targets were identified that might provide clues of the relationship between high mammographic density and breast cancer risk. Understanding the relationship between high mammographic density and breast cancer is of great value for early breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. With our research we provide new insight into this relationship and further research could determine the effects of dysregulated hsa-miR-29c-5p on the identified candidate targets. Abstract High mammographic density (MD) is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, however the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. This research aimed to identify microRNAs (miRNAs) that play a role in the development of extremely dense breast tissue. In the discovery phase, 754 human mature miRNAs were profiled in 21 extremely high MD- and 20 very low MD-derived nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) samples from healthy women. In the validation phase, candidate miRNAs were assessed in a cohort of 89 extremely high MD and 81 very low MD NAF samples from healthy women. Independent predictors of either extremely high MD or miRNA expression were identified by logistic regression and linear regression analysis, respectively. mRNA targets and pathways were identified through miRTarBase, TargetScan, and PANTHER pathway analysis. Statistical analysis identified four differentially expressed miRNAs during the discovery phase. During the validation, linear regression (p = 0.029; fold change = 2.10) and logistic regression (p = 0.048; odds ratio = 1.38) showed that hsa-miR-29c-5p was upregulated in extremely high MD-derived NAF. Identified candidate mRNA targets of hsa-miR-29c-5p are CFLAR, DNMT3A, and PTEN. Further validation and exploration of targets and downstream pathways of has-miR-29c-5p will provide better insight into the processes involved in the development of high MD and in the associated increased risk of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa A. C. M. Vissers
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Piek
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Susana I. S. Patuleia
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Aafke J. Duinmeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije F. Bakker
- Department of Epidemiology of the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology of the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy B. Moelans
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-887-556-882
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Verdiesen RM, von Berg J, Said MA, van der Harst P, Mahajan A, van Gils CH, van der Schouw YT, Onland-Moret NC. Anti-Müllerian Hormone and Cardiometabolic Disease in Women: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2022. [DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2308269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
17
|
Verdiesen RMG, Onland-Moret NC, van Gils CH, van der Schouw YT. Circulating anti-Müllerian hormone levels and markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older men. Maturitas 2022; 163:38-45. [PMID: 35709631 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Recent research suggests that higher circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are associated with less frequent occurrence of (subclinical) cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women, but evidence in men is limited. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether circulating AMH levels are associated with measures of subclinical CVD in middle-aged and older men. DESIGN Prospective cohort study with a median follow-up time of 8.7 years. Serum AMH was measured at baseline. We assessed both cross-sectional and longitudinal associations using linear regression models adjusted for confounders. SETTING Dutch middle-aged and older men from the community. PARTICIPANTS 394 men (aged 40-80 years) with an available AMH measurement at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES At baseline (2001-2002): carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), pulse wave velocity (PWV), abdominal aortic diameter, and Framingham risk score (FRS) predictions. At follow-up (2010-2011): CIMT, mean carotid aortic plaque score, PWV, and FRS predictions. All outcomes were transformed using rank-based inverse normal transformation to meet the normality assumption. RESULTS Higher AMH levels were associated with lower CIMT at baseline (β = -0.04; 95%CI = 0.07, -0.01), but not with the other measures of subclinical CVD at baseline. Longitudinal analyses suggested that higher baseline AMH levels were associated with lower mean plaque scores at follow-up (β = -0.03, 95%CI = -0.07, 0.00), but not with the other follow-up outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that AMH is associated with current CIMT and future carotid aortic plaque burden in men, implying that circulating AMH levels are potentially associated with local atherosclerosis rather than with total aortic stiffness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée M G Verdiesen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne T van der Schouw
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Verdiesen RMG, van der Schouw YT, van Gils CH, Verschuren WMM, Broekmans FJM, Borges MC, Gonçalves Soares AL, Lawlor DA, Eliassen AH, Kraft P, Sandler DP, Harlow SD, Smith JA, Santoro N, Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Murray A, Ruth KS, Onland-Moret NC. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies three novel loci for circulating anti-Müllerian hormone levels in women. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:1069-1082. [PMID: 35274129 PMCID: PMC9071229 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can additional genetic variants for circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels be identified through a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis including a large sample of premenopausal women? SUMMARY ANSWER We identified four loci associated with AMH levels at P < 5 × 10-8: the previously reported MCM8 locus and three novel signals in or near AMH, TEX41 and CDCA7. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY AMH is expressed by antral stage ovarian follicles in women, and variation in age-specific circulating AMH levels has been associated with disease outcomes. However, the physiological mechanisms underlying these AMH-disease associations are largely unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We performed a GWAS meta-analysis in which we combined summary statistics of a previous AMH GWAS with GWAS data from 3705 additional women from three different cohorts. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In total, we included data from 7049 premenopausal female participants of European ancestry. The median age of study participants ranged from 15.3 to 48 years across cohorts. Circulating AMH levels were measured in either serum or plasma samples using different ELISA assays. Study-specific analyses were adjusted for age at blood collection and population stratification, and summary statistics were meta-analysed using a standard error-weighted approach. Subsequently, we functionally annotated GWAS variants that reached genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10-8). We also performed a gene-based GWAS, pathway analysis and linkage disequilibrium score regression and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We identified four loci associated with AMH levels at P < 5 × 10-8: the previously reported MCM8 locus and three novel signals in or near AMH, TEX41 and CDCA7. The strongest signal was a missense variant in the AMH gene (rs10417628). Most prioritized genes at the other three identified loci were involved in cell cycle regulation. Genetic correlation analyses indicated a strong positive correlation among single nucleotide polymorphisms for AMH levels and for age at menopause (rg = 0.82, FDR = 0.003). Exploratory two-sample MR analyses did not support causal effects of AMH on breast cancer or polycystic ovary syndrome risk, but should be interpreted with caution as they may be underpowered and the validity of genetic instruments could not be extensively explored. LARGE SCALE DATA The full AMH GWAS summary statistics will made available after publication through the GWAS catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Whilst this study doubled the sample size of the most recent GWAS, the statistical power is still relatively low. As a result, we may still lack power to identify more genetic variants for AMH and to determine causal effects of AMH on, for example, breast cancer. Also, follow-up studies are needed to investigate whether the signal for the AMH gene is caused by reduced AMH detection by certain assays instead of actual lower circulating AMH levels. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Genes mapped to the MCM8, TEX41 and CDCA7 loci are involved in the cell cycle and processes such as DNA replication and apoptosis. The mechanism underlying their associations with AMH may affect the size of the ovarian follicle pool. Altogether, our results provide more insight into the biology of AMH and, accordingly, the biological processes involved in ovarian ageing. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Nurses' Health Study and Nurses' Health Study II were supported by research grants from the National Institutes of Health (CA172726, CA186107, CA50385, CA87969, CA49449, CA67262, CA178949). The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the listed authors, who will serve as guarantors for the contents of this article. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). Funding for the collection of genotype and phenotype data used here was provided by the British Heart Foundation (SP/07/008/24066), Wellcome (WT092830M and WT08806) and UK Medical Research Council (G1001357). M.C.B., A.L.G.S. and D.A.L. work in a unit that is funded by the University of Bristol and UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/6). M.C.B.'s contribution to this work was funded by a UK Medical Research Council Skills Development Fellowship (MR/P014054/1) and D.A.L. is a National Institute of Health Research Senior Investigator (NF-0616-10102). A.L.G.S. was supported by the study of Dynamic longitudinal exposome trajectories in cardiovascular and metabolic non-communicable diseases (H2020-SC1-2019-Single-Stage-RTD, project ID 874739). The Doetinchem Cohort Study was financially supported by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports of the Netherlands. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. Ansh Labs performed the AMH measurements for the Doetinchem Cohort Study free of charge. Ansh Labs was not involved in the data analysis, interpretation or reporting, nor was it financially involved in any aspect of the study. R.M.G.V. was funded by the Honours Track of MSc Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht with a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (022.005.021). The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) has grant support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), DHHS, through the National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) and the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH) (U01NR004061; U01AG012505, U01AG012535, U01AG012531, U01AG012539, U01AG012546, U01AG012553, U01AG012554, U01AG012495). The SWAN Genomic Analyses and SWAN Legacy have grant support from the NIA (U01AG017719). The Generations Study was funded by Breast Cancer Now and the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR). The ICR acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent official views of the funders. The Sister Study was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES044005 to D.P.S.); the AMH assays were supported by the Avon Foundation (02-2012-065 to H.B. Nichols and D.P.S.). The breast cancer genome-wide association analyses were supported by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the 'Ministère de l'Économie, de la Science et de l'Innovation du Québec' through Genome Québec and grant PSR-SIIRI-701, The National Institutes of Health (U19 CA148065, X01HG007492), Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118, C1287/A16563, C1287/A10710) and The European Union (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175 and H2020 633784 and 634935). All studies and funders are listed in Michailidou et al. (Nature, 2017). F.J.M.B. has received fees and grant support from Merck Serono and Ferring BV. D.A.L. has received financial support from several national and international government and charitable funders as well as from Medtronic Ltd and Roche Diagnostics for research that is unrelated to this study. N.S. is scientific consultant for Ansh Laboratories. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée M G Verdiesen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne T van der Schouw
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W M Monique Verschuren
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J M Broekmans
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria C Borges
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ana L Gonçalves Soares
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Deborah A Lawlor
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Siobán D Harlow
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer A Smith
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nanette Santoro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado, USA
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Anna Murray
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Katherine S Ruth
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ruiter LN, van Dijk BAC, Bruggink AH, Doornaert PAH, Philippens MEP, de Bree R, van Gils CH, Willems SM. Association of histological features with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma recurrences: a population-based study of 1502 patients in the Netherlands. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:444. [PMID: 35459142 PMCID: PMC9034596 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09533-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recurrences remain an important problem in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Little has been described about histological characteristics of the primary laryngeal tumor that may be associated with recurrences. Identifying risk factors for recurrences might help in adapting treatment or follow-up. Using real-life population-based data, we aimed to identify histological features of the primary tumor associated with recurrences and overall survival. Material and methods Demographic, clinical and treatment information on all first primary invasive laryngeal tumors diagnosed in 2010–2014 (N = 3705) were extracted from the population-based nationwide Netherlands cancer registry (NCR) and linked to PALGA, the nationwide Dutch pathology registry, to obtain data on histological factors and recurrences. For a random 1502 patients histological information i.e., keratinization, perineural invasion (PNI+), vascular invasion (VI+), growth pattern, degree of differentiation, extracapsular spread (ECS+), cartilage- and bone invasion and extralaryngeal extension, was manually extracted from narrative pathology reports and analyzed for locoregional recurrence and overall survival using cox regression analysis. Results In total, 299 patients developed a locoregional recurrence and 555 patients died. Keratinization (HR = 0.96 (95%CI: 0.68–1.34) p = 0.79), two or three adverse characteristics (PNI+, VI+, non-cohesive growth) (HR = 1.38 (95% CI: 0.63–3.01) p = 0.42), and ECS+ (HR = 1.38 (95% CI: 0.48–4.02) p = 0.55) were not associated to recurrence. For death, also no significant association was found. Conclusion In this population-based real-life dataset on laryngeal carcinoma in the Netherlands, histological factors were not associated with locoregional recurrences or overall survival, but future studies should investigate the role of these features in treatment decisions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09533-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian N Ruiter
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.
| | - Boukje A C van Dijk
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Annette H Bruggink
- Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA Foundation), De Bouw 123, Houten, 3991 SZ, the Netherlands
| | - Patricia A H Doornaert
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle E P Philippens
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan M Willems
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, the Netherlands.,Present address: Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
El Sharouni MA, Scolyer RA, van Gils CH, Ch'ng S, Nieweg OE, Pennington TE, Saw RP, Shannon K, Spillane A, Stretch J, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, Thompson JF, van Diest PJ, Lo SN. Time interval between diagnostic excision-biopsy of a primary melanoma and sentinel node biopsy: effects on the sentinel node positivity rate and survival outcomes. Eur J Cancer 2022; 167:123-132. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
21
|
El Sharouni MA, Scolyer RA, van Gils CH, Ch'ng S, Nieweg OE, Pennington TE, Saw RP, Shannon K, Spillane A, Stretch J, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, Thompson JF, van Diest PJ, Lo SN. Effect of the time interval between melanoma diagnosis and sentinel node biopsy on the size of metastatic tumour deposits in node-positive patients. Eur J Cancer 2022; 167:133-141. [PMID: 35216870 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study sought to assess whether the interval between diagnostic excision-biopsy of a primary melanoma and definitive wide excision with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) influenced the size of SN metastatic deposits, which might have implications for management and prognosis. METHODS Data were collected for (i) a Dutch population-based cohort of patients treated between 2004 and 2014 who underwent SNB within 100 days of complete excision of their primary melanoma and who were SN-positive with known SN metastasis diameter (n = 1027) and (ii) a cohort from a large Australian melanoma treatment centre (n = 541) who presented in the same time period. The effects of SNB timing on the size of SN metastatic deposits were analysed. RESULTS Dutch patients whose SNB was performed in the second or third months after diagnosis had significantly larger SN metastasis diameters than patients who had their SNB in the first month (median increases of 17% (95%CI -14, 60%, p = 0.211) and 71% (95%CI 15, 119%, p = 0.004), respectively). No significant difference in tumour diameter for early and late SNB was found in the Australian cohort. CONCLUSIONS SN metastasis diameter became progressively greater with SN biopsy in the second and third months after primary melanoma diagnosis in the larger, population-based patient cohort. An increase in metastasis diameter was not observed in the smaller, institutional cohort, possibly due to detection of larger SN metastases by routine pre-operative ultrasound, with fine-needle biopsy confirmation. These patients did not proceed to SNB and were therefore not included in the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas E Pennington
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn Pm Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kerwin Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vigfús Sigurdsson
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wanders AJT, Mees W, Bun PAM, Janssen N, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Dalmış MU, Karssemeijer N, van Gils CH, Sechopoulos I, Mann RM, van Rooden CJ. Interval Cancer Detection Using a Neural Network and Breast Density in Women with Negative Screening Mammograms. Radiology 2022; 303:269-275. [PMID: 35133194 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.210832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Inclusion of mammographic breast density (BD) in breast cancer risk models improves accuracy, but accuracy remains modest. Interval cancer (IC) risk prediction may be improved by combining assessments of BD and an artificial intelligence (AI) cancer detection system. Purpose To evaluate the performance of a neural network (NN)-based model that combines the assessments of BD and an AI system in the prediction of risk of developing IC among women with negative screening mammography results. Materials and Methods This retrospective nested case-control study performed with screening examinations included women who developed IC and women with normal follow-up findings (from January 2011 to January 2015). An AI cancer detection system analyzed all studies yielding a score of 1-10, representing increasing likelihood of malignancy. BD was automatically computed using publicly available software. An NN model was trained by combining the AI score and BD using 10-fold cross-validation. Bootstrap analysis was used to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity at 90% specificity, and 95% CIs of the AI, BD, and NN models. Results A total of 2222 women with IC and 4661 women in the control group were included (mean age, 61 years; age range, 49-76 years). AUC of the NN model was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77,0.81), which was higher than AUC of the AI cancer detection system or BD alone (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.76] and 0.69 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.71], respectively; P < .001 for both). At 90% specificity, the NN model had a sensitivity of 50.9% (339 of 666 women; 95% CI: 45.2, 56.3) for prediction of IC, which was higher than that of the AI system (37.5%; 250 of 666 women; 95% CI: 33.0, 43.7; P < .001) or BD percentage alone (22.4%; 149 of 666 women; 95% CI: 17.9, 28.5; P < .001). Conclusion The combined assessment of an artificial intelligence detection system and breast density measurements enabled identification of a larger proportion of women who would develop interval cancer compared with either method alone. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J T Wanders
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Willem Mees
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Petra A M Bun
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Natasja Janssen
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Mehmet Ufuk Dalmış
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Nico Karssemeijer
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Carla H van Gils
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Ioannis Sechopoulos
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Ritse M Mann
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| | - Cornelis Jan van Rooden
- From the Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Program, Region South-West, Laan 20, 2512 GB, The Hague, the Netherlands (A.J.T.W., W.M., P.A.M.B., C.J.v.R.); Screen-Point Medical, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.J., A.R., M.U.D., N.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (N.K., I.S., R.M.M.); Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (C.H.v.G.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (I.S.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); and Department of Radiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands (C.J.v.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patuleia SIS, van der Wall E, van Gils CH, Bakker MF, Jager A, Voorhorst-Ogink MM, van Diest PJ, Moelans CB. The changing microRNA landscape by color and cloudiness: a cautionary tale for nipple aspirate fluid biomarker analysis. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2021; 44:1339-1349. [PMID: 34655415 PMCID: PMC8648697 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-021-00641-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Investigation of nipple aspirate fluid (NAF)-based microRNAs (miRNAs) as a potential screening tool for women at increased risk of developing breast cancer is the scope of our research. While aiming to identify discriminating NAF-miRNAs between women with different mammographic densities, we were confronted with an unexpected confounder: NAF sample appearance. Here we report and alert for the impact of NAF color and cloudiness on miRNA assessment. METHODS Seven classes of NAF colors coupled with cloudiness appearance were established. Using 173 NAF samples from 154 healthy women (19 samples were bilaterally collected), the expression of 14 target and 2 candidate endogenous control (EC) miRNAs was investigated using Taqman Advanced miRNA assays to identify significant differential expression patterns between color-cloudiness classes. Inter- and intra-individual variation of miRNA expression was analyzed using the coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS We found that between the seven NAF classes, fold change miRNA expression differences ranged between 2.4 and 19.6 depending on the interrogated miRNA. Clear NAF samples exhibited higher miRNA expression levels compared to cloudy NAF samples with fold change differences ranging between 1.1 and 6.2. Inter-individual and intra-individual miRNA expression was fairly stable (CV < 15 %), but nevertheless impacted by NAF sample appearance. Within NAF classes, inter-individual variation was largest for green samples (CV 6-15 %) and smallest for bloody samples (CV 2-6 %). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that NAF color and cloudiness influence miRNA expression and should, therefore, be systematically registered using an objective color classification system. Given that sample appearance is an inherent feature of NAF, these variables should be statistically controlled for in multivariate data analyses. This cautionary note and recommendations could be of value beyond the field of NAF-miRNAs, given that variability in sample color and cloudiness is likewise observed in liquid biopsies such as urine, cerebrospinal fluid and sputum, and could thereby influence the levels of miRNAs and other biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana I S Patuleia
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology of the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marije F Bakker
- Department of Epidemiology of the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen M Voorhorst-Ogink
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy B Moelans
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Geuzinge HA, Bakker MF, Heijnsdijk EAM, van Ravesteyn NT, Veldhuis WB, Pijnappel RM, de Lange SV, Emaus MJ, Mann RM, Monninkhof EM, de Koekkoek-Doll PK, van Gils CH, de Koning HJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breast Tissue. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1476-1483. [PMID: 34585249 PMCID: PMC8562952 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extremely dense breast tissue is associated with increased breast cancer risk and limited sensitivity of mammography. The DENSE trial showed that additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening in women with extremely dense breasts resulted in a substantial reduction in interval cancers. The cost-effectiveness of MRI screening for these women is unknown. METHODS We used the MISCAN-breast microsimulation model to simulate several screening protocols containing mammography and/or MRI to estimate long-term effects and costs. The model was calibrated using results of the DENSE trial and adjusted to incorporate decreases in breast density with increasing age. Screening strategies varied in the number of MRIs and mammograms offered to women ages 50-75 years. Outcomes were numbers of breast cancers, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), breast cancer deaths, and overdiagnosis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated (3% discounting), with a willingness-to-pay threshold of €22 000. RESULTS Calibration resulted in a conservative fit of the model regarding MRI detection. Both strategies of the DENSE trial were dominated (biennial mammography; biennial mammography plus MRI). MRI alone every 4 years was cost-effective with €15 620 per QALY. Screening every 3 years with MRI alone resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €37 181 per QALY. All strategies with mammography and/or a 2-year interval were dominated because other strategies resulted in more additional QALYs per additional euro. Alternating mammography and MRI every 2 years was close to the efficiency frontier. CONCLUSIONS MRI screening is cost-effective for women with extremely dense breasts, when applied at a 4-year interval. For a willingness to pay more than €22 000 per QALY gained, MRI at a 3-year interval is cost-effective as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Amarens Geuzinge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marije F Bakker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eveline A M Heijnsdijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolien T van Ravesteyn
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Stéphanie V de Lange
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen J Emaus
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Petra K de Koekkoek-Doll
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Harry J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Verburg E, van Gils CH, van der Velden BHM, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Veldhuis WB, Gilhuijs KGA. Deep Learning for Automated Triaging of 4581 Breast MRI Examinations from the DENSE Trial. Radiology 2021; 302:29-36. [PMID: 34609196 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Supplemental screening with MRI has proved beneficial in women with extremely dense breasts. Most MRI examinations show normal anatomic and physiologic variation that may not require radiologic review. Thus, ways to triage these normal MRI examinations to reduce radiologist workload are needed. Purpose To determine the feasibility of an automated triaging method using deep learning (DL) to dismiss the highest number of MRI examinations without lesions while still identifying malignant disease. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of data from the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening, or DENSE, trial evaluated breast MRI examinations from the first screening round performed in eight hospitals between December 2011 and January 2016. A DL model was developed to differentiate between breasts with lesions and breasts without lesions. The model was trained to dismiss breasts with normal phenotypical variation and to triage lesions (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] categories 2-5) using eightfold internal-external validation. The model was trained on data from seven hospitals and tested on data from the eighth hospital, alternating such that each hospital was used once as an external test set. Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis. At 100% sensitivity for malignant disease, the fraction of examinations dismissed from radiologic review was estimated. Results A total of 4581 MRI examinations of extremely dense breasts from 4581women (mean age, 54.3 years; interquartile range, 51.5-59.8 years) were included. Of the 9162 breasts, 838 had at least one lesion (BI-RADS category 2-5, of which 77 were malignant) and 8324 had no lesions. At 100% sensitivity for malignant lesions, the DL model considered 90.7% (95% CI: 86.7, 94.7) of the MRI examinations with lesions to be nonnormal and triaged them to radiologic review. The DL model dismissed 39.7% (95% CI: 30.0, 49.4) of the MRI examinations without lesions. The DL model had an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.85) in the differentiation between normal breast MRI examinations and MRI examinations with lesions. Conclusion Automated analysis of breast MRI examinations in women with dense breasts dismissed nearly 40% of MRI scans without lesions while not missing any cancers. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01315015 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Joe in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Verburg
- From the Image Sciences Institute (E.V., B.H.M.v.d.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (C.H.v.G., M.F.B.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- From the Image Sciences Institute (E.V., B.H.M.v.d.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (C.H.v.G., M.F.B.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Bas H M van der Velden
- From the Image Sciences Institute (E.V., B.H.M.v.d.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (C.H.v.G., M.F.B.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Marije F Bakker
- From the Image Sciences Institute (E.V., B.H.M.v.d.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (C.H.v.G., M.F.B.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- From the Image Sciences Institute (E.V., B.H.M.v.d.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (C.H.v.G., M.F.B.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- From the Image Sciences Institute (E.V., B.H.M.v.d.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (C.H.v.G., M.F.B.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| | - Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
- From the Image Sciences Institute (E.V., B.H.M.v.d.V., K.G.A.G.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (C.H.v.G., M.F.B.), and Department of Radiology (R.M.P., W.B.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CX, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Eijkelboom AH, de Munck L, Lobbes MBI, van Gils CH, Wesseling J, Westenend PJ, Guerrero Paez C, Pijnappel RM, Verkooijen HM, Broeders MJM, Siesling S. Impact of the suspension and restart of the Dutch breast cancer screening program on breast cancer incidence and stage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev Med 2021; 151:106602. [PMID: 34217417 PMCID: PMC9755636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic forced the Dutch national breast screening program to a halt in week 12, 2020. In week 26, the breast program was resumed at 40% capacity, which increased to 60% in week 34. We examined the impact of the suspension and restart of the screening program on the incidence of screen-detected and non-screen-detected breast cancer. We selected women aged 50-74, diagnosed during weeks 2-35 of 2018 (n = 7250), 2019 (n = 7302), or 2020 (n = 5306), from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Weeks 2-35 were divided in seven periods, based on events occurring at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Incidence of screen-detected and non-screen-detected tumors was calculated overall and by age group, cT-stage, and cTNM-stage for each period in 2020, and compared to the incidence in the same period of 2018/2019 (averaged). The incidence of screen-detected tumors decreased during weeks 12-13, reached almost zero during weeks 14-25, and increased during weeks 26-35. Incidence of non-screen-detected tumors decreased to a lesser extent during weeks 12-16. The decrease in incidence was seen in all age groups and mainly occurred for cTis, cT1, DCIS, and stage I tumors. Due to the suspension of the breast cancer screening program, and the restart at reduced capacity, the incidence of screen-detected breast tumors decreased by 67% during weeks 9-35 2020, which equates to about 2000 potentially delayed breast cancer diagnoses. Up to August 2020 there was no indication of a shift towards higher stage breast cancers after restart of the screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk H Eijkelboom
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Linda de Munck
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center Sittard-Geleen, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6220 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Divisions of Diagnostic Oncology and Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Pieter J Westenend
- Laboratory of Pathology, Karel Lotsyweg 145, 3318 AL Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Cristina Guerrero Paez
- Dutch Breast Cancer Society (BVN), Godebaldkwartier 363, 3511 DT Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Mireille J M Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Wijchenseweg 101, 6538 SW Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
El Sharouni MA, Aivazian K, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, van Gils CH, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, van Diest PJ, Lo SN. Association of Histologic Regression With a Favorable Outcome in Patients With Stage 1 and Stage 2 Cutaneous Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:166-173. [PMID: 33355600 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Importance Although regression is commonly observed in cutaneous melanoma, it is uncertain whether it is associated with patient prognosis. Objective To determine whether histologically confirmed regression was associated with better or worse survival in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed data from 2 large cohorts of adults (one in the Netherlands and the other in Australia) with histologically proven, stage 1 and 2 primary, invasive cutaneous melanoma with known regression status treated between 2000 and 2014, with median follow-up times of 4.5 and 11.1 years for the Dutch and Australian cohorts, respectively. For the Dutch patients, population-based data from PALGA, the Dutch Pathology Registry, were used, and follow-up data were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. For the Australian patients, data from the database of a large, specialized melanoma treatment center were used. Main Outcomes and Measures Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed per cohort to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), and subgroup analyses according to Breslow thickness category and melanoma subtype were performed. Results A total of 17 271 Dutch patients and 4980 Australian patients were included. In both cohorts, survival outcomes were better for patients with disease regression. For Dutch patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for those with disease regression was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.48-0.63; P < .001) for RFS and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96; P = .004) for OS; for the Australian patients, the HR was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.52-0.72; P < .001) for RFS and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64-0.84; P < .001) for OS. Subgroup analyses showed that the presence of regression improved RFS within thin and intermediate Breslow thickness melanomas in both cohorts. For patients with superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) subtype, regression improved RFS and OS in both cohorts. For Dutch patients with SSM, the HR for those with disease regression was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.46-0.63; P < .001) for RFS and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.76-0.96; P = .009) for OS; for the Australian patients with SSM, the HR was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.85; P = .001) for RFS and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = .001) for OS. Conclusions and Relevance In 2 large patient cohorts from 2 different continents, regression was a favorable prognostic factor for patients with stage 1 and 2 melanomas, especially in those with thin and intermediate thickness tumors and those with SSM subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karina Aivazian
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vigfús Sigurdsson
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gal R, Monninkhof EM, van Gils CH, Groenwold RHH, Elias SG, van den Bongard DHJG, Peeters PHM, Verkooijen HM, May AM. Effects of exercise in breast cancer patients: implications of the trials within cohorts (TwiCs) design in the UMBRELLA Fit trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 190:89-101. [PMID: 34427806 PMCID: PMC8557193 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06363-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design aims to overcome problems faced in conventional RCTs. We evaluated the TwiCs design when estimating the effect of exercise on quality of life (QoL) and fatigue in inactive breast cancer survivors. Methods UMBRELLA Fit was conducted within the prospective UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort. Patients provided consent for future randomization at cohort entry. We randomized inactive patients 12–18 months after cohort enrollment. The intervention group (n = 130) was offered a 12-week supervised exercise intervention. The control group (n = 130) was not informed and received usual care. Six-month exercise effects on QoL and fatigue as measured in the cohort were analyzed with intention-to-treat (ITT), instrumental variable (IV), and propensity scores (PS) analyses. Results Fifty-two percent (n = 68) of inactive patients accepted the intervention. Physical activity increased in patients in the intervention group, but not in the control group. We found no benefit of exercise for dimensions of QoL (ITT difference global QoL: 0.8, 95% CI = − 2.2; 3.8) and fatigue, except for a small beneficial effect on physical fatigue (ITT difference: − 1.1, 95% CI = − 1.8; − 0.3; IV: − 1.9, 95% CI = − 3.3; − 0.5, PS: − 1.2, 95% CI = − 2.3; − 0.2). Conclusion TwiCs gave insight into exercise intervention acceptance: about half of inactive breast cancer survivors accepted the offer and increased physical activity levels. The offer resulted in no improvement on QoL, and a small beneficial effect on physical fatigue. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (NTR5482/NL.52062.041.15), date of registration: December 07, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Gal
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Petra H M Peeters
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
den Dekker BM, Bakker MF, de Lange SV, Veldhuis WB, van Diest PJ, Duvivier KM, Lobbes MBI, Loo CE, Mann RM, Monninkhof EM, Veltman J, Pijnappel RM, van Gils CH. Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rate in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts Using Prediction Models Based on Data from the DENSE Trial. Radiology 2021; 301:283-292. [PMID: 34402665 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021210325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background High breast density increases breast cancer risk and lowers mammographic sensitivity. Supplemental MRI screening improves cancer detection but increases the number of false-positive screenings. Thus, methods to distinguish true-positive MRI screening results from false-positive ones are needed. Purpose To build prediction models based on clinical characteristics and MRI findings to reduce the rate of false-positive screening MRI findings in women with extremely dense breasts. Materials and Methods Clinical characteristics and MRI findings in Dutch breast cancer screening participants (age range, 50-75 years) with positive first-round MRI screening results (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3, 4, or 5) after a normal screening mammography with extremely dense breasts (Volpara density category 4) were prospectively collected within the randomized controlled Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening (DENSE) trial from December 2011 through November 2015. In this secondary analysis, prediction models were built using multivariable logistic regression analysis to distinguish true-positive MRI screening findings from false-positive ones. Results Among 454 women (median age, 52 years; interquartile range, 50-57 years) with a positive MRI result in a first supplemental MRI screening round, 79 were diagnosed with breast cancer (true-positive findings), and 375 had false-positive MRI results. The full prediction model (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC], 0.88; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.92), based on all collected clinical characteristics and MRI findings, could have prevented 45.5% (95% CI: 39.6, 51.5) of false-positive recalls and 21.3% (95% CI: 15.7, 28.3) of benign biopsies without missing any cancers. The model solely based on readily available MRI findings and age had a comparable performance (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.88; P = .15) and could have prevented 35.5% (95% CI: 30.4, 41.1) of false-positive MRI screening results and 13.0% (95% CI: 8.8, 18.6) of benign biopsies. Conclusion Prediction models based on clinical characteristics and MRI findings may be useful to reduce the false-positive first-round screening MRI rate and benign biopsy rate in women with extremely dense breasts. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01315015 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Imbriaco in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca M den Dekker
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Marije F Bakker
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Stéphanie V de Lange
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Paul J van Diest
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Katya M Duvivier
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Claudette E Loo
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Ritse M Mann
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Jeroen Veltman
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | - Carla H van Gils
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| | -
- From the Department of Radiology (B.M.d.D., S.V.d.L., W.B.V., R.M.P.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (M.F.B., S.V.d.L., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, and Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (C.E.L.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
So R, Chen J, Mehta AJ, Liu S, Strak M, Wolf K, Hvidtfeldt UA, Rodopoulou S, Stafoggia M, Klompmaker JO, Samoli E, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Atkinson R, Bauwelinck M, Bellander T, Boutron-Ruault MC, Brandt J, Brunekreef B, Cesaroni G, Concin H, Forastiere F, van Gils CH, Gulliver J, Hertel O, Hoffmann B, de Hoogh K, Janssen N, Lim YH, Westendorp R, Jørgensen JT, Katsouyanni K, Ketzel M, Lager A, Lang A, Ljungman PL, Magnusson PKE, Nagel G, Simonsen MK, Pershagen G, Peter RS, Peters A, Renzi M, Rizzuto D, Sigsgaard T, Vienneau D, Weinmayr G, Severi G, Fecht D, Tjønneland A, Leander K, Hoek G, Andersen ZJ. Long-term exposure to air pollution and liver cancer incidence in six European cohorts. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:1887-1897. [PMID: 34278567 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Particulate matter air pollution and diesel engine exhaust have been classified as carcinogenic for lung cancer, yet few studies have explored associations with liver cancer. We used six European adult cohorts which were recruited between 1985 and 2005, pooled within the "Effects of low-level air pollution: A study in Europe" (ELAPSE) project, and followed for the incidence of liver cancer until 2011 to 2015. The annual average exposure to nitrogen dioxide (NO2 ), particulate matter with diameter <2.5 μm (PM2.5 ), black carbon (BC), warm-season ozone (O3 ), and eight elemental components of PM2.5 (copper, iron, zinc, sulfur, nickel, vanadium, silicon, and potassium) were estimated by European-wide hybrid land-use regression models at participants' residential addresses. We analyzed the association between air pollution and liver cancer incidence by Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for potential confounders. Of 330 064 cancer-free adults at baseline, 512 developed liver cancer during a mean follow-up of 18.1 years. We observed positive linear associations between NO2 (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval: 1.17, 1.02-1.35 per 10 μg/m3 ), PM2.5 (1.12, 0.92-1.36 per 5 μg/m3 ), and BC (1.15, 1.00-1.33 per 0.5 10-5 /m) and liver cancer incidence. Associations with NO2 and BC persisted in two-pollutant models with PM2.5 . Most components of PM2.5 were associated with the risk of liver cancer, with the strongest associations for sulfur and vanadium, which were robust to adjustment for PM2.5 or NO2 . Our study suggests that ambient air pollution may increase the risk of liver cancer, even at concentrations below current EU standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rina So
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jie Chen
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Amar J Mehta
- Statistics Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Shuo Liu
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maciej Strak
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Kathrin Wolf
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Sophia Rodopoulou
- Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Massimo Stafoggia
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service / ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Jochem O Klompmaker
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Evangelia Samoli
- Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Richard Atkinson
- Population Health Research Institute and MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Mariska Bauwelinck
- Interface Demography, Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tom Bellander
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jørgen Brandt
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.,iClimate, Aarhus University interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Change, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Bert Brunekreef
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Giulia Cesaroni
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service / ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Hans Concin
- Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Bregenz, Austria
| | - Francesco Forastiere
- Environmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.,Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), National Research Council, Palermo, Italy
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John Gulliver
- Centre for Environmental Health and Sustainability & School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Ole Hertel
- Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Barbara Hoffmann
- Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Kees de Hoogh
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Janssen
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Youn-Hee Lim
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rudi Westendorp
- Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanette T Jørgensen
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klea Katsouyanni
- Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.,Environmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Matthias Ketzel
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.,Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Anton Lager
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alois Lang
- Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Bregenz, Austria
| | - Petter L Ljungman
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Cardiology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Patrik K E Magnusson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gabriele Nagel
- Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Bregenz, Austria.,Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mette K Simonsen
- Department of Neurology and Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Göran Pershagen
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Raphael S Peter
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Annette Peters
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Matteo Renzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service / ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Debora Rizzuto
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University and The Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torben Sigsgaard
- Department of Public Health, Environment Occupation and Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Danielle Vienneau
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gudrun Weinmayr
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Gianluca Severi
- CESP, UMR 1018, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Applications "G. Parenti" (DISIA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Fecht
- UK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karin Leander
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Cardiology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gerard Hoek
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Zorana J Andersen
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Baeten IGT, Hoogendam JP, Jeremiasse B, Braat AJAT, Veldhuis WB, Jonges GN, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, van Gils CH, Zweemer RP, Gerestein CG. Indocyanine green versus technetium-99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 5:e1401. [PMID: 33973745 PMCID: PMC8789613 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background The fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a promising tracer for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early‐stage cervical cancer. Although researchers suggest the SLN detection of ICG is equal to the more conventional combined approach of a radiotracer and blue dye, no consensus has been reached. Aims We aimed to assess the differences in overall and bilateral SLN detection rates with ICG versus the combined approach, the radiotracer technetium‐99m (99mTc) with blue dye. Methods and Results We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 1, 2020 and included studies reporting on a comparison of SLN detection with ICG versus 99mTc with blue dye in early‐stage cervical cancer. The overall and bilateral detection rates were pooled with random‐effects meta‐analyses. From 118 studies retrieved seven studies (one cross‐sectional; six retrospective cohorts) were included, encompassing 589 patients. No significant differences were found in the pooled overall SLN detection rate of ICG versus 99mTc with blue dye. Meta‐analyses of all studies showed ICG to result in a higher bilateral SLN detection rate than 99mTc with blue dye; 90.3% (95%CI, 79.8‐100.0%) with ICG versus 73.5% (95%CI, 66.4‐80.6%) with 99mTc with blue dye. This resulted in a significant and clinically relevant risk difference of 16.6% (95%CI, 5.3‐28.0%). With sensitivity analysis, the risk difference of the bilateral detection rate maintained in favor of ICG but was no longer significant (13.2%, 95%CI −0.8‐27.3%). Conclusion ICG appears to provide higher bilateral SLN detection rates compared to 99mTc with blue dye in patients with early‐stage cervical cancer. However, in adherence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines, the quality of evidence is too low to provide strong recommendations and directly omit the combined approach of 99mTc with blue dye.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse G T Baeten
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob P Hoogendam
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bernadette Jeremiasse
- Department of Surgery, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur J A T Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geertruida N Jonges
- Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis G Gerestein
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
El Sharouni MA, Ahmed T, Varey AHR, Elias SG, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, Suijkerbuijk KPM, van Diest PJ, Scolyer RA, van Gils CH, Thompson JF, Blokx WAM, Lo SN. Development and Validation of Nomograms to Predict Local, Regional, and Distant Recurrence in Patients With Thin (T1) Melanomas. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1243-1252. [PMID: 33600211 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the prognosis of patients with thin primary cutaneous melanomas (T1, ≤ 1.0 mm) is generally excellent, some develop recurrence. We sought to develop and validate a model predicting recurrences in patients with thin melanomas. METHODS A Dutch population-based cohort (n = 25,930, development set) and a cohort from an Australian melanoma treatment center (n = 2,968, validation set) were analyzed (median follow-up 6.7 and 12.0 years, respectively). Multivariable Cox models were generated for local, regional, and distant recurrence-free survival (RFS). Discrimination was assessed using Harrell's C-statistic for each outcome. Each nomogram performance was evaluated using calibration plots defining low-risk and high-risk groups as the lowest and top 5% of the nomogram risk score, respectively. The nomograms' C-statistics were compared with those of a model including the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging parameters (T-stage and sentinel node status). RESULTS Local, regional, and distant recurrences were found in 209 (0.8%), 503 (1.9%), and 203 (0.8%) Dutch patients, respectively, and 23 (0.8%), 61 (2.1%), and 75 (2.5%) Australian patients, respectively. C-statistics of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.82) for local RFS, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.78) for regional RFS, and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.83) for distant RFS were obtained for the development model. External validation showed C-statistics of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.90), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.82), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.80), respectively. Calibration plots showed a good match between predicted and observed rates. Using the nomogram, the C-statistic was increased by 9%-12% for the development cohort and by 11%-15% for the validation cohort, compared with a model including only T-stage and sentinel node status. CONCLUSION Most patients with thin melanomas have an excellent prognosis, but some develop recurrence. The presented nomograms can accurately identify a subgroup at high risk. An online calculator is available at www.melanomarisk.org.au.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vigfús Sigurdsson
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Willeke A M Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
El Sharouni MA, Laeijendecker AE, Suijkerbuijk KP, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, van Diest PJ, van Gils CH, Blokx WA. High discordance rate in assessing sentinel node positivity in cutaneous melanoma: Expert review may reduce unjustified adjuvant treatment. Eur J Cancer 2021; 149:105-113. [PMID: 33848712 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Identification of sentinel node (SN) metastases can set the adjuvant systemic therapy indication for patients with stage III melanoma. Studies re-evaluating the diagnosis of initially positive SN biopsies are scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dutch patients with melanoma who underwent SN biopsy between 2003 and 2014 were selected from PALGA, the Dutch Pathology Registry. Histopathological slides of SN-positive patients were retrieved for review. A random sample was reassessed by an expert melanoma pathologist. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients who were misclassified (false-positive) was compared with those with a true positive SN status. For comparison, a group of SN-negative patients was included. Multivariable logistic analysis was performed to assess clinicopathological characteristics associated with misclassification of SN status. RESULTS Diagnosis was downgraded from melanoma metastasis to nodal nevus in 38 of the 322 reviewed patients (11.8%). Considering the inclusion criteria of phase III adjuvant trials, at least 4.3% of patients would have falsely qualified for adjuvant therapy. In multivariable analysis, patients with a low SN tumour burden and subcapsular SN tumour location had a significantly higher chance of being misclassified. The five-year RFS of the 38 downgraded patients was 86.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 72.6-96.6), similar to the 85.9% (95% CI = 84.9-86.8, p = 0.18) for 6413 SN-negative patients and better than the 53.2% (95% CI = 47.2-59.9, p = 0.009) of 284 patients who were truly SN positive upon review. CONCLUSION More than 10% of originally positive SN biopsies of patients with melanoma concern misclassified nodal nevi. We advocate that when adjuvant treatment is considered in patients with stage III melanoma, SN biopsies should be reassessed by an expert melanoma pathologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Annelien E Laeijendecker
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karijn Pm Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vigfús Sigurdsson
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Willeke Am Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Veenhuizen SGA, de Lange SV, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Mann RM, Monninkhof EM, Emaus MJ, de Koekkoek-Doll PK, Bisschops RHC, Lobbes MBI, de Jong MDF, Duvivier KM, Veltman J, Karssemeijer N, de Koning HJ, van Diest PJ, Mali WPTM, van den Bosch MAAJ, van Gils CH, Veldhuis WB. Supplemental Breast MRI for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts: Results of the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial. Radiology 2021; 299:278-286. [PMID: 33724062 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background In the first (prevalent) supplemental MRI screening round of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening (DENSE) trial, a considerable number of breast cancers were found at the cost of an increased false-positive rate (FPR). In incident screening rounds, a lower cancer detection rate (CDR) is expected due to a smaller pool of prevalent cancers, and a reduced FPR, due to the availability of prior MRI examinations. Purpose To investigate screening performance indicators of the second round (incidence round) of the DENSE trial. Materials and Methods The DENSE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01315015) is embedded within the Dutch population-based biennial mammography screening program for women aged 50-75 years. MRI examinations were performed between December 2011 and January 2016. Women were eligible for the second round when they again had a negative screening mammogram 2 years after their first MRI. The recall rate, biopsy rate, CDR, FPR, positive predictive values, and distributions of tumor characteristics were calculated and compared with results of the first round using 95% CIs and χ2 tests. Results A total of 3436 women (median age, 56 years; interquartile range, 48-64 years) underwent a second MRI screening. The CDR was 5.8 per 1000 screening examinations (95% CI: 3.8, 9.0) compared with 16.5 per 1000 screening examinations (95% CI: 13.3, 20.5) in the first round. The FPR was 26.3 per 1000 screening examinations (95% CI: 21.5, 32.3) in the second round versus 79.8 per 1000 screening examinations (95% CI: 72.4, 87.9) in the first round. The positive predictive value for recall was 18% (20 of 110 participants recalled; 95% CI: 12.1, 26.4), and the positive predictive value for biopsy was 24% (20 of 84 participants who underwent biopsy; 95% CI: 16.0, 33.9), both comparable to that of the first round. All tumors in the second round were stage 0-I and node negative. Conclusion The incremental cancer detection rate in the second round was 5.8 per 1000 screening examinations-compared with 16.5 per 1000 screening examinations in the first round. This was accompanied by a strong reduction in the number of false-positive results. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Moy and Gao in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie G A Veenhuizen
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Stéphanie V de Lange
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Marije F Bakker
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Ruud M Pijnappel
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Ritse M Mann
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Evelyn M Monninkhof
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Marleen J Emaus
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Petra K de Koekkoek-Doll
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Robertus H C Bisschops
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Marc B I Lobbes
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Mathijn D F de Jong
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Katya M Duvivier
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Jeroen Veltman
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Nico Karssemeijer
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Harry J de Koning
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Paul J van Diest
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Willem P T M Mali
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Maurice A A J van den Bosch
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Carla H van Gils
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | - Wouter B Veldhuis
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| | -
- From the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (S.G.A.V., S.V.d.L., M.F.B., E.M.M., C.H.v.G.), Department of Radiology (S.V.d.L., R.M.P., M.J.E., W.P.T.M.M., M.A.A.J.v.d.B., W.B.V.), and Department of Pathology (P.J.v.D.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.M.M., N.K.); Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.d.K.D.); Department of Radiology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (R.H.C.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands (M.D.F.d.J.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands (J.V.); and Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (H.J.d.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Eijkelboom AH, de Munck L, Lobbes MB, Wesseling J, van Gils CH, Westenend PJ, Paez CG, Pijnappel RM, Verkooijen HM, Broeders MJ, Siesling S. Abstract S02-02: The impact of resuming the breast cancer screening program in the Netherlands on breast cancer incidence and stage after its discontinuation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.covid-19-21-s02-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The burden of the COVID-19 pandemic forced the Dutch health care services to discontinue their national screening programs on 16 March 2020 (week 12). For breast cancer, the program invites women aged 50–74 years for biennial screening mammography. From mid-June 2020 (week 25) the breast cancer screening program was resumed, albeit with reduced capacity (max 60%). We aimed to investigate the impact of resuming the screening program on incidence, tumor-, and T-stage of screen- and non-screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer (IBC) in the Netherlands. Methods: Women, 50-74 years of age, diagnosed with DCIS or IBC in weeks 2–35 of 2018, 2019 and 2020 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Weekly incidence of screen- and non-screen-detected tumors was calculated and expressed per 1 million women aged 50-74 years living in the Netherlands. Weeks 2-35 were divided in seven periods, representing separate phases of the pandemic. For each period, incidence of screen- and non-screen-detected tumors was stratified by clinical tumor stage (TNM) and clinical T-stage. Incidence in each period of 2020 was compared with the incidence in the same period of 2018/2019 (averaged). Results: In weeks 2-35, 7,250 patients were diagnosed in 2018, 7,299 in 2019, and 5,300 in 2020. During weeks 2-12 2020 the weekly average incidence of screen-detected tumors was 42/1 million women aged 50-74. In week 13 incidence dropped to 19, and was almost zero during weeks 14-25. Incidence increased to 4 in week 26, when the screening was gradually restarted, and increased to an weekly average of 24 tumors/1 million in weeks 30-35, when screening had restarted in most of the Netherlands. During weeks 14-16, 17-25, 26-29, and 30-35 2020 incidence of screen-detected DCIS, stage I-II tumors and T0-2 tumors was lower than in the same period of 2018/2019. Distribution of tumor- and T-stage in newly diagnosed tumors did not differ between the periods (24% DCIS, 57% stage I, 18% stage II, 1% stage III, 1% stage IV; 24% T0, 59% T1, 15% T2, 2% T3, 0% T4). During weeks 2-11 2020 the weekly average incidence of non-screen-detected tumors was 38/1 million women aged 50-74. Incidence dropped to 16 in week 14, and increased to an average of 37 tumors per week in weeks 17-35. During weeks 17-25, 26-29, and 30-35 the incidence and distribution of non-screen-detected DCIS, stage I-IV and T0-4 tumors was comparable with 2018/2019 (weekly incidence (distribution): 3 DCIS (9%), 15 stage I (40%), 13 stage II (36%), 3 stage III (7%), 3 stage IV (8%); 3 T0 (9%), 17 T1 (45%), 12 T2 (34%), 3 T3 (8%), 2 T4 (5%)). Conclusion: The temporary suspension of the breast cancer screening program reduced the incidence of breast cancer. After resuming screening the incidence did not raise above the incidence in 2018/2019, therefore it is expected that the incidence will rise during the next months. The results to date did not show a shift towards a higher tumor stage or T-stage.
Citation Format: Anouk H. Eijkelboom, Linda de Munck, Marc B.I. Lobbes, Jelle Wesseling, Carla H. van Gils, Pieter J. Westenend, Cristina Guerrero Paez, Ruud M. Pijnappel, Helena M. Verkooijen, Mireille J.M. Broeders, Sabine Siesling. The impact of resuming the breast cancer screening program in the Netherlands on breast cancer incidence and stage after its discontinuation due to the COVID-19 pandemic [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2021 Feb 3-5. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(6_Suppl):Abstract nr S02-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk H. Eijkelboom
- 1Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands,
| | - Linda de Munck
- 1Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands,
| | - Marc B.I. Lobbes
- 2Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Geleen, Netherlands,
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- 3Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands,
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- 4Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands,
| | | | | | - Ruud M. Pijnappel
- 7University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands,
| | | | | | - Sabine Siesling
- 1Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands,
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Patuleia SIS, Hagenaars SC, Moelans CB, Ausems MGEM, van Gils CH, Tollenaar RAEM, van Diest PJ, Mesker WE, van der Wall E. Lessons Learned from Setting Up a Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter Study with Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:441-449. [PMID: 33082203 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Women identified with an increased risk of breast cancer due to mutations in cancer susceptibility genes or a familial history of breast cancer undergo tailored screening with the goal of detecting tumors earlier, when potential curative interventions are still possible. Ideally, screening would identify signs of carcinogenesis even before a tumor is detectable by imaging. This could be achieved by timely signaling of altered biomarker levels for precancerous processes in liquid biopsies. Currently, the Nipple Aspirate Fluid (NAF) and the Trial Early Serum Test BREAST cancer (TESTBREAST), both ongoing, prospective, multicenter studies, are investigating biomarkers in liquid biopsies to improve breast cancer screening in high-risk women. The NAF study focuses on changes over time in miRNA expression levels both in blood and NAF samples, whereas the TESTBREAST study analyzes changes in protein levels in blood samples at sequential interval timepoints. These within-subject changes are studied in relation to later occurrence of breast cancer using a nested case-control design. These longitudinal studies face their own challenges in execution, such as hindrances in logistics and in sample processing that were difficult to anticipate. This article offers insight into those challenges and concurrently aims to provide useful strategies for the set-up of similar studies.See related commentary by Sauter, p. 429.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana I S Patuleia
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sophie C Hagenaars
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Cathy B Moelans
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology of the Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wilma E Mesker
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Elsken van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hvidtfeldt UA, Chen J, Andersen ZJ, Atkinson R, Bauwelinck M, Bellander T, Brandt J, Brunekreef B, Cesaroni G, Concin H, Fecht D, Forastiere F, van Gils CH, Gulliver J, Hertel O, Hoek G, Hoffmann B, de Hoogh K, Janssen N, Jørgensen JT, Katsouyanni K, Jöckel KH, Ketzel M, Klompmaker JO, Lang A, Leander K, Liu S, Ljungman PLS, Magnusson PKE, Mehta AJ, Nagel G, Oftedal B, Pershagen G, Peter RS, Peters A, Renzi M, Rizzuto D, Rodopoulou S, Samoli E, Schwarze PE, Severi G, Sigsgaard T, Stafoggia M, Strak M, Vienneau D, Weinmayr G, Wolf K, Raaschou-Nielsen O. Long-term exposure to fine particle elemental components and lung cancer incidence in the ELAPSE pooled cohort. Environ Res 2021; 193:110568. [PMID: 33278469 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An association between long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and lung cancer has been established in previous studies. PM2.5 is a complex mixture of chemical components from various sources and little is known about whether certain components contribute specifically to the associated lung cancer risk. The present study builds on recent findings from the "Effects of Low-level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe" (ELAPSE) collaboration and addresses the potential association between specific elemental components of PM2.5 and lung cancer incidence. METHODS We pooled seven cohorts from across Europe and assigned exposure estimates for eight components of PM2.5 representing non-tail pipe emissions (copper (Cu), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn)), long-range transport (sulfur (S)), oil burning/industry emissions (nickel (Ni), vanadium (V)), crustal material (silicon (Si)), and biomass burning (potassium (K)) to cohort participants' baseline residential address based on 100 m by 100 m grids from newly developed hybrid models combining air pollution monitoring, land use data, satellite observations, and dispersion model estimates. We applied stratified Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounders (age, sex, calendar year, marital status, smoking, body mass index, employment status, and neighborhood-level socio-economic status). RESULTS The pooled study population comprised 306,550 individuals with 3916 incident lung cancer events during 5,541,672 person-years of follow-up. We observed a positive association between exposure to all eight components and lung cancer incidence, with adjusted HRs of 1.10 (95% CI 1.05, 1.16) per 50 ng/m3 PM2.5 K, 1.09 (95% CI 1.02, 1.15) per 1 ng/m3 PM2.5 Ni, 1.22 (95% CI 1.11, 1.35) per 200 ng/m3 PM2.5 S, and 1.07 (95% CI 1.02, 1.12) per 200 ng/m3 PM2.5 V. Effect estimates were largely unaffected by adjustment for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). After adjustment for PM2.5 mass, effect estimates of K, Ni, S, and V were slightly attenuated, whereas effect estimates of Cu, Si, Fe, and Zn became null or negative. CONCLUSIONS Our results point towards an increased risk of lung cancer in connection with sources of combustion particles from oil and biomass burning and secondary inorganic aerosols rather than non-exhaust traffic emissions. Specific limit values or guidelines targeting these specific PM2.5 components may prove helpful in future lung cancer prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jie Chen
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, Utrecht, NL 3508 TD, the Netherlands.
| | - Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark.
| | - Richard Atkinson
- Population Health Research Institute and MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
| | - Mariska Bauwelinck
- Interface Demography - Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels, 1050, Belgium.
| | - Tom Bellander
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden; Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Region Stockholm, Solnavägen 4, Plan 10, Stockholm, SE-113 65, Sweden.
| | - Jørgen Brandt
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark; IClimate - Aarhus University Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Change, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark.
| | - Bert Brunekreef
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, Utrecht, NL 3508 TD, the Netherlands.
| | - Giulia Cesaroni
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service / ASL Roma 1, Via Cristoforo Colombo 112, Rome, 00147, Italy.
| | - Hans Concin
- Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Rheinstraße 61, Bregenz, 6900, Austria.
| | - Daniela Fecht
- UK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W2 1PG, UK.
| | - Francesco Forastiere
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), National Research Council, Palermo, 90146, Italy; Environmental Research Group, Imperial College, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, GA, Utrecht, 3508, the Netherlands.
| | - John Gulliver
- Centre for Environmental Health and Sustainability & School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Ole Hertel
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark.
| | - Gerard Hoek
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, Utrecht, NL 3508 TD, the Netherlands.
| | - Barbara Hoffmann
- Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Gurlittstraße 55, Dusseldorf, 40223, Germany.
| | - Kees de Hoogh
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, Basel, 4051, Switzerland; University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, Postfach, Basel, 4001, Switzerland.
| | - Nicole Janssen
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Jeanette Therming Jørgensen
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark.
| | - Klea Katsouyanni
- Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School 75, Mikras Asias Street, Athens, 115 27, Greece; NIHR HPRU Health Impact of Environmental Hazards, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | - Karl-Heinz Jöckel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.
| | - Matthias Ketzel
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark; Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
| | - Jochem O Klompmaker
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, Utrecht, NL 3508 TD, the Netherlands; Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 45147, Germany.
| | - Alois Lang
- Cancer Registry Vorarlberg, Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Rheinstraße 61, Bregenz, 6900, Austria.
| | - Karin Leander
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden.
| | - Shuo Liu
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark.
| | - Petter L S Ljungman
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden; Department of Cardiology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Patrik K E Magnusson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Box 281, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Amar Jayant Mehta
- Statistics Denmark, Sejrøgade 11, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark; Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Gabriele Nagel
- Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Rheinstraße 61, Bregenz, 6900, Austria; Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr. 22, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Bente Oftedal
- Section of Air Pollution and Noise, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, N-0213, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Göran Pershagen
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden; Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Region Stockholm, Solnavägen 4, Plan 10, Stockholm, SE-113 65, Sweden.
| | - Raphael Simon Peter
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr. 22, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Annette Peters
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany; Chair of Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matteo Renzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service / ASL Roma 1, Via Cristoforo Colombo 112, Rome, 00147, Italy.
| | - Debora Rizzuto
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, 17165, Sweden; Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stockholm, 11346, Sweden.
| | - Sophia Rodopoulou
- Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School 75, Mikras Asias Street, Athens, 115 27, Greece.
| | - Evangelia Samoli
- Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School 75, Mikras Asias Street, Athens, 115 27, Greece.
| | - Per Everhard Schwarze
- Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Gianluca Severi
- CESP, UMR 1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Applications "G. Parenti" (DISIA), University of Florence, Italy.
| | - Torben Sigsgaard
- Department of Public Health, Environment Occupation and Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Massimo Stafoggia
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, Stockholm, SE-171 77, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service / ASL Roma 1, Via Cristoforo Colombo 112, Rome, 00147, Italy.
| | - Maciej Strak
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, Utrecht, NL 3508 TD, the Netherlands; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Danielle Vienneau
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, Postfach, Basel, 4001, Switzerland; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Gudrun Weinmayr
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr. 22, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Kathrin Wolf
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark; Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, Roskilde, 4000, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Verdiesen RMG, Onland-Moret NC, van Gils CH, Stellato RK, Spijkerman AMW, Picavet HSJ, Broekmans FJM, Verschuren WMM, van der Schouw YT. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetologia 2021; 64:375-384. [PMID: 33048171 PMCID: PMC7801305 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-020-05302-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Given its role in ovarian follicle development, circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is considered to be a marker of reproductive ageing. Although accelerated reproductive ageing has been associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes, research on the relationship between AMH and type 2 diabetes risk is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether age-specific AMH levels and age-related AMH trajectories are associated with type 2 diabetes risk in women. METHODS We measured AMH in repeated plasma samples from 3293 female participants (12,460 samples in total), aged 20-59 years at recruitment, from the Doetinchem Cohort Study, a longitudinal study with follow-up visits every 5 years. We calculated age-specific AMH tertiles at baseline to account for the strong AMH-age correlation. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounders were used to assess the association between baseline age-specific AMH tertiles and incident type 2 diabetes. We applied linear mixed models to compare age-related AMH trajectories for women who developed type 2 diabetes with trajectories for women who did not develop diabetes. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 20 years, 163 women developed type 2 diabetes. Lower baseline age-specific AMH levels were associated with a higher type 2 diabetes risk (HRT2vsT3 1.24 [95% CI 0.81, 1.92]; HRT1vsT3 1.62 [95% CI 1.06, 2.48]; ptrend = 0.02). These findings seem to be supported by predicted AMH trajectories, which suggested that plasma AMH levels were lower at younger ages in women who developed type 2 diabetes compared with women who did not. The trajectories also suggested that AMH levels declined at a slower rate in women who developed type 2 diabetes, although differences in trajectories were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION We observed that lower age-specific AMH levels were associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Longitudinal analyses did not show clear evidence of differing AMH trajectories between women who developed type 2 diabetes compared with women who did not, possibly because these analyses were underpowered. Further research is needed to investigate whether AMH is part of the biological mechanism explaining the association between reproductive ageing and type 2 diabetes. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée M G Verdiesen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rebecca K Stellato
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke M W Spijkerman
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - H Susan J Picavet
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J M Broekmans
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - W M Monique Verschuren
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne T van der Schouw
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Aglago EK, Rinaldi S, Freisling H, Jiao L, Hughes DJ, Fedirko V, Schalkwijk CG, Weiderpass E, Dahm CC, Overvad K, Eriksen AK, Kyrø C, Boutron-Ruault MC, Rothwell JA, Severi G, Katzke V, Kühn T, Schulze MB, Aleksandrova K, Masala G, Krogh V, Panico S, Tumino R, Naccarati A, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, van Gils CH, Sandanger TM, Gram IT, Skeie G, Quirós JR, Jakszyn P, Sánchez MJ, Amiano P, Huerta JM, Ardanaz E, Johansson I, Harlid S, Perez-Cornago A, Mayén AL, Cordova R, Gunter MJ, Vineis P, Cross AJ, Riboli E, Jenab M. Soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products (sRAGE) and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study Nested within a European Prospective Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:182-192. [PMID: 33082206 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overexpression of the receptor for advanced glycation end-product (RAGE) has been associated with chronic inflammation, which in turn has been associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. Soluble RAGE (sRAGE) competes with RAGE to bind its ligands, thus potentially preventing RAGE-induced inflammation. METHODS To investigate whether sRAGE and related genetic variants are associated with colorectal cancer risk, we conducted a nested case-control study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Plasma sRAGE concentrations were measured by ELISA in 1,361 colorectal cancer matched case-control sets. Twenty-four SNPs encoded in the genes associated with sRAGE concentrations were available for 1,985 colorectal cancer cases and 2,220 controls. Multivariable adjusted ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using conditional and unconditional logistic regression for colorectal cancer risk and circulating sRAGE and SNPs, respectively. RESULTS Higher sRAGE concentrations were inversely associated with colorectal cancer (ORQ5vs.Q1, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00). Sex-specific analyses revealed that the observed inverse risk association was restricted to men (ORQ5vs.Q1, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.94), whereas no association was observed in women (ORQ5vs.Q1, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.68-1.48; P heterogeneity for sex = 0.006). Participants carrying minor allele of rs653765 (promoter region of ADAM10) had lower colorectal cancer risk (C vs. T, OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99). CONCLUSIONS Prediagnostic sRAGE concentrations were inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk in men, but not in women. An SNP located within ADAM10 gene, pertaining to RAGE shedding, was associated with colorectal cancer risk. IMPACT Further studies are needed to confirm our observed sex difference in the association and better explore the potential involvement of genetic variants of sRAGE in colorectal cancer development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elom K Aglago
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Sabina Rinaldi
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Heinz Freisling
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Li Jiao
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - David J Hughes
- Cancer Biology and Therapeutics Group (CBT), Conway Institute, School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science (SBBS), University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Veronika Fedirko
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Casper G Schalkwijk
- Department of Internal Medicine, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- Office of the Director, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | | | - Kim Overvad
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Cecilie Kyrø
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
- CESP, Faculté de Médecine - Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, Villejuif, Paris, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Paris, France
| | - Joseph A Rothwell
- CESP, Faculté de Médecine - Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, Villejuif, Paris, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Paris, France
| | - Gianluca Severi
- CESP, Faculté de Médecine - Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, Villejuif, Paris, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Paris, France
- Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Applications (DISIA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Verena Katzke
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Foundation under Public Law, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Kühn
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Foundation under Public Law, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias B Schulze
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
- Institute of Nutrition Science, University of Potsdam, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Krasimira Aleksandrova
- Institute of Nutrition Science, University of Potsdam, Nuthetal, Germany
- Nutrition, Immunity and Metabolism Senior Scientist Group, Department of Nutrition and Gerontology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE), Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Giovanna Masala
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - ISPRO, Florence, Italy
| | - Vittorio Krogh
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Via Venezian, Milano, Italy
| | - Salvatore Panico
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Department of Cancer Registry and Histopathology, Provincial Health Authority (ASP), Ragusa, Italy
| | - Alessio Naccarati
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine (IIGM), c/o IRCCS Candiolo, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
- Department for Determinants of Chronic Diseases (DCD), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Torkjel M Sandanger
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Inger T Gram
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Guri Skeie
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Paula Jakszyn
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
- Blanquerna School of Health Sciences, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria-Jose Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Pilar Amiano
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, BioDonostia Research Institute, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain
| | - José María Huerta
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Eva Ardanaz
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain
- IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ingegerd Johansson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Sophia Harlid
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Aurora Perez-Cornago
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
| | - Ana-Lucia Mayén
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Reynalda Cordova
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Marc J Gunter
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Paolo Vineis
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, England, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda J Cross
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, England, United Kingdom
| | - Elio Riboli
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, England, United Kingdom
| | - Mazda Jenab
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hvidtfeldt UA, Severi G, Andersen ZJ, Atkinson R, Bauwelinck M, Bellander T, Boutron-Ruault MC, Brandt J, Brunekreef B, Cesaroni G, Chen J, Concin H, Forastiere F, van Gils CH, Gulliver J, Hertel O, Hoek G, Hoffmann B, de Hoogh K, Janssen N, Jöckel KH, Jørgensen JT, Katsouyanni K, Ketzel M, Klompmaker JO, Krog NH, Lang A, Leander K, Liu S, Ljungman PLS, Magnusson PKE, Mehta AJ, Nagel G, Oftedal B, Pershagen G, Peter RS, Peters A, Renzi M, Rizzuto D, Rodopoulou S, Samoli E, Schwarze PE, Sigsgaard T, Simonsen MK, Stafoggia M, Strak M, Vienneau D, Weinmayr G, Wolf K, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Fecht D. Long-term low-level ambient air pollution exposure and risk of lung cancer - A pooled analysis of 7 European cohorts. Environ Int 2021; 146:106249. [PMID: 33197787 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Ambient air pollution has been associated with lung cancer, but the shape of the exposure-response function - especially at low exposure levels - is not well described. The aim of this study was to address the relationship between long-term low-level air pollution exposure and lung cancer incidence. METHODS The "Effects of Low-level Air Pollution: a Study in Europe" (ELAPSE) collaboration pools seven cohorts from across Europe. We developed hybrid models combining air pollution monitoring, land use data, satellite observations, and dispersion model estimates for nitrogen dioxide (NO2), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), black carbon (BC), and ozone (O3) to assign exposure to cohort participants' residential addresses in 100 m by 100 m grids. We applied stratified Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for potential confounders (age, sex, calendar year, marital status, smoking, body mass index, employment status, and neighborhood-level socio-economic status). We fitted linear models, linear models in subsets, Shape-Constrained Health Impact Functions (SCHIF), and natural cubic spline models to assess the shape of the association between air pollution and lung cancer at concentrations below existing standards and guidelines. RESULTS The analyses included 307,550 cohort participants. During a mean follow-up of 18.1 years, 3956 incident lung cancer cases occurred. Median (Q1, Q3) annual (2010) exposure levels of NO2, PM2.5, BC and O3 (warm season) were 24.2 µg/m3 (19.5, 29.7), 15.4 µg/m3 (12.8, 17.3), 1.6 10-5m-1 (1.3, 1.8), and 86.6 µg/m3 (78.5, 92.9), respectively. We observed a higher risk for lung cancer with higher exposure to PM2.5 (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.23 per 5 µg/m3). This association was robust to adjustment for other pollutants. The SCHIF, spline and subset analyses suggested a linear or supra-linear association with no evidence of a threshold. In subset analyses, risk estimates were clearly elevated for the subset of subjects with exposure below the EU limit value of 25 µg/m3. We did not observe associations between NO2, BC or O3 and lung cancer incidence. CONCLUSIONS Long-term ambient PM2.5 exposure is associated with lung cancer incidence even at concentrations below current EU limit values and possibly WHO Air Quality Guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gianluca Severi
- CESP, UMR 1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Applications "G. Parenti" (DISIA), University of Florence, Italy.
| | - Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Richard Atkinson
- Population Health Research Institute and MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
| | - Mariska Bauwelinck
- Interface Demography - Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Tom Bellander
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | - Jørgen Brandt
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark; iClimate - Aarhus University Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Change, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
| | - Bert Brunekreef
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, NL 3508 TD Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Giulia Cesaroni
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service/ASL Roma 1, 00147 Rome, Italy.
| | - Jie Chen
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, NL 3508 TD Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Hans Concin
- Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Rheinstraße 61, 6900 Bregenz, Austria.
| | - Francesco Forastiere
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), National Research Council, 90146 Palermo, Italy; Environmental Research Group, King's College, London SE1 9NH, UK
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - John Gulliver
- Centre for Environmental Health and Sustainability & School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Ole Hertel
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
| | - Gerard Hoek
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, NL 3508 TD Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Barbara Hoffmann
- Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Gurlittstraße 55, 40223 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - Kees de Hoogh
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, Postfach, 4001 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Nicole Janssen
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Karl-Heinz Jöckel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Jeanette Therming Jørgensen
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Klea Katsouyanni
- Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodstrian University of Athens, Medical School 75, Mikras Asias Street 115 27 Athens, Greece; NIHR HPRU Health Impact of Environmental Hazards, Environmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | - Matthias Ketzel
- Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark; Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
| | - Jochem O Klompmaker
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, NL 3508 TD Utrecht, the Netherlands; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Norun Hjertager Krog
- Section of Air Pollution and Noise, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, N-0213 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Alois Lang
- Cancer Registry Vorarlberg, Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Rheinstraße 61, Bregenz 6900, Austria.
| | - Karin Leander
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Shuo Liu
- Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Petter L S Ljungman
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cardiology, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Patrik K E Magnusson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Amar Jayant Mehta
- Statistics Denmark, Sejrøgade 11, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Gabriele Nagel
- Agency for Preventive and Social Medicine, Rheinstraße 61, 6900 Bregenz, Austria; Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr. 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
| | - Bente Oftedal
- Section of Air Pollution and Noise, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 222, Skøyen, N-0213 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Göran Pershagen
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Raphael Simon Peter
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr. 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
| | - Annette Peters
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Chair of Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matteo Renzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service/ASL Roma 1, 00147 Rome, Italy.
| | - Debora Rizzuto
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm 17165, Sweden; Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stockholm 11346, Sweden.
| | - Sophia Rodopoulou
- Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodstrian University of Athens, Medical School 75, Mikras Asias Street 115 27 Athens, Greece.
| | - Evangelia Samoli
- Dept. of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, National and Kapodstrian University of Athens, Medical School 75, Mikras Asias Street 115 27 Athens, Greece.
| | - Per Everhard Schwarze
- Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Torben Sigsgaard
- Department of Public Health, Environment Occupation and Health, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
| | | | - Massimo Stafoggia
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Box 210, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Region Health Service/ASL Roma 1, 00147 Rome, Italy.
| | - Maciek Strak
- Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80177, NL 3508 TD Utrecht, the Netherlands; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
| | - Danielle Vienneau
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, Postfach, 4001 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Gudrun Weinmayr
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstr. 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
| | - Kathrin Wolf
- Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Ole Raaschou-Nielsen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O.Box 358, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
| | - Daniela Fecht
- UK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, W2 1PG London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Verdiesen RMG, van der Schouw YT, van Gils CH, Verschuren WMM, Broekmans FJM, Borges MC, Soares ALG, Lawlor DA, Eliassen AH, Kraft P, Sandler DP, Harlow SD, Smith JA, Santoro N, Schoemaker MJ, Swerdlow AJ, Murray A, Ruth KS, Onland-Moret NC. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies three novel loci for circulating anti-Müllerian hormone levels in women. medRxiv 2020:2020.10.29.20221390. [PMID: 33173903 PMCID: PMC7654897 DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.29.20221390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is expressed by antral stage ovarian follicles in women. Consequently, circulating AMH levels are detectable until menopause. Variation in age-specific AMH levels has been associated with breast cancer and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), amongst other diseases. Identification of genetic variants underlying variation in AMH levels could provide clues about the physiological mechanisms that explain these AMH-disease associations. To date, only one variant in MCM8 has been identified to be associated with circulating AMH levels in women. We aimed to identify additional variants for AMH through a GWAS meta-analysis including data from 7049 premenopausal women of European ancestry, which more than doubles the sample size of the largest previous GWAS. We identified four loci associated with AMH levels at p < 5×10 -8 : the previously reported MCM8 locus and three novel signals in or near AMH, TEX41 , and CDCA7 . The strongest signal was a missense variant in the AMH gene (rs10417628). Most prioritized genes at the other three identified loci were involved in cell cycle regulation. Genetic correlation analyses indicated a strong positive correlation among SNPs for AMH levels and for age at menopause (r g = 0.82, FDR=0.003). Exploratory Mendelian randomization analyses did not support a causal effect of AMH on breast cancer or PCOS risk, but should be interpreted with caution as they may be underpowered and the validity of genetic instruments could not be extensively explored. In conclusion, we identified a variant in the AMH gene and three other loci that may affect circulating AMH levels in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée MG Verdiesen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne T van der Schouw
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - WM Monique Verschuren
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Frank JM Broekmans
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Maria C Borges
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Ana LG Soares
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
| | - Deborah A Lawlor
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK
- Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston MA, 02115, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston MA, 02115, USA
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, 27709, USA
| | - Sioban D Harlow
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Michigan, 48109-2029, USA
| | - Jennifer A Smith
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Michigan, 48109-2029, USA
| | - Nanette Santoro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado, 80045, USA
| | - Minouk J Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Anthony J Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Anna Murray
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Katherine S Ruth
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Verdiesen RMG, van Gils CH, Stellato RK, Verschuren WMM, Broekmans FJM, de Kat AC, van der Schouw YT, Onland-Moret NC. Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels and Risk of Cancer in Women. Maturitas 2020; 143:216-222. [PMID: 33308632 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine if age-specific anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are associated with cancer risk; and to investigate if age-related AMH trajectories differ between women who develop cancer and women who do not. More specifically, we examined associations with breast cancer, cancers in other tissues expressing AMH receptor AMHR2, and cancers in non-AMHR2-expressing tissues. STUDY DESIGN We included longitudinal data from 3025 women in the prospective Doetinchem Cohort Study. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association of baseline age-specific AMH tertiles with cancer. We applied linear mixed models to compare age-related AMH trajectories between women who were diagnosed with cancer and women who were not. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cancer (n = 385; 139 breast cancers, 112 cancers in other AMHR2-expressing tissues, 134 cancers in non-AMHR2-expressing tissues). RESULTS Overall, baseline age-specific AMH levels were not associated with cancer risk, although in women ≤ 40 years an increased risk was suggested for breast cancer (HRT2:T1 = 2.06, 95%CI = 0.95-4.48; HRT3:T1 = 2.03, 95%CI = 0.91-4.50). Analysis of age-related AMH trajectories suggested that AMH levels were higher at younger ages and declined faster in women who were diagnosed with cancer compared with women who were not, but our results did not provide evidence for actual differences in trajectories. CONCLUSIONS Our results did not provide evidence for an association between age-specific AMH levels and age-related trajectories and risk of cancer. However, effect estimates for breast cancer were in line with risk-increasing effects found in previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée M G Verdiesen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rebecca K Stellato
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - W M Monique Verschuren
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Center for Nutrition, Prevention, and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J M Broekmans
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annelien C de Kat
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne T van der Schouw
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Young-Afat DA, Gal R, Gerlich S, Burbach JPM, van der Velden JM, van den Bongard DHJG, Intven MPW, Kasperts N, May AM, van der Graaf R, van Gils CH, Verkooijen HM. Oncology patients were found to understand and accept the Trials within Cohorts design. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 130:135-142. [PMID: 33130236 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The Trials within Cohorts design aims to reduce recruitment difficulties and disappointment bias in pragmatic trials. On cohort enrollment, broad informed consent for randomization is asked, after which cohort participants can be randomized to interventions or serve as controls without further notification. We evaluated patients' recollection, understanding, and acceptance of broad consent in a clinical oncology setting. METHODS We surveyed 610 patients with cancer participating in ongoing TwiCs; 482 patients (79%) responded, of which 312 patients shortly after cohort enrollment, 108 patients after randomization to an intervention (12-18 months after cohort enrollment), and a random sample of 62 cohort participants who had not been selected for interventions (1-6 months after cohort enrollment). RESULTS Shortly after providing cohort consent, 76% of patients (238/312) adequately remembered whether they had given broad consent for randomization. Of patients randomly offered interventions, 76% (82/108) remembered giving broad consent for randomization; 41% (44/108) understood they were randomly selected, 44% (48/108) were not interested in selection procedures, and 10% (11/108) did not understand selection was random. Among patients not selected for interventions, 42% (26/62) understood selection was random; 89% felt neutral regarding the scenario of "not being selected for an intervention while your data were being used in comparison with patients receiving interventions," 10% felt reassured (6/62) and 2% scared/insecure (2/62). CONCLUSION Patients adequately remember giving broad consent for randomization shortly after cohort enrollment and after being offered an intervention, but recollection is lower in those never selected for interventions. Patients are acceptant of serving as control without further notifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny A Young-Afat
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Roxanne Gal
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Gerlich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joanne M van der Velden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolien Kasperts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rieke van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Fortner RT, Hüsing A, Dossus L, Tjønneland A, Overvad K, Dahm CC, Arveux P, Fournier A, Kvaskoff M, Schulze MB, Bergmann M, Trichopoulou A, Karakatsani A, La Vecchia C, Masala G, Pala V, Mattiello A, Tumino R, Ricceri F, van Gils CH, Monninkhof EM, Bonet C, Quirós JR, Sanchez M, Rodríguez‐Palacios D, Gurrea AB, Amiano P, Allen NE, Travis RC, Gunter MJ, Viallon V, Weiderpass E, Riboli E, Kaaks R. Theoretical potential for endometrial cancer prevention through primary risk factor modification: Estimates from the EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1325-1333. [PMID: 32011733 PMCID: PMC8611794 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) incidence rates vary ~10-fold worldwide, in part due to variation in EC risk factor profiles. Using an EC risk model previously developed in the European EPIC cohort, we evaluated the prevention potential of modified EC risk factor patterns and whether differences in EC incidence between a European population and low-risk countries can be explained by differences in these patterns. Predicted EC incidence rates were estimated over 10 years of follow-up for the cohort before and after modifying risk factor profiles. Risk factors considered were: body mass index (BMI, kg/m2 ), use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) and oral contraceptives (OC) (potentially modifiable); and, parity, ages at first birth, menarche and menopause (environmentally conditioned, but not readily modifiable). Modeled alterations in BMI (to all ≤23 kg/m2 ) and HT use (to all non-HT users) profiles resulted in a 30% reduction in predicted EC incidence rates; individually, longer duration of OC use (to all ≥10 years) resulted in a 42.5% reduction. Modeled changes in not readily modifiable exposures (i.e., those not contributing to prevention potential) resulted in ≤24.6% reduction in predicted EC incidence. Women in the lowest decile of a risk score based on the evaluated exposures had risk similar to a low risk countries; however, this was driven by relatively long use of OCs (median = 23 years). Our findings support avoidance of overweight BMI and of HT use as prevention strategies for EC in a European population; OC use must be considered in the context of benefits and risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée T. Fortner
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Anika Hüsing
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Laure Dossus
- Nutrition and Metabolism SectionInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)LyonFrance
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Department of Public HealthUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Diet, Genes and EnvironmentCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Kim Overvad
- Department of Public HealthAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
- Department of CardiologyAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
| | | | - Patrick Arveux
- CESP, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris‐Sud, UVSQ, INSERMUniversité Paris‐SaclayVillejuifFrance
- Gustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
- Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges‐François Leclerc Cancer CentreUNICANCERDijonFrance
| | - Agnès Fournier
- CESP, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris‐Sud, UVSQ, INSERMUniversité Paris‐SaclayVillejuifFrance
- Gustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| | - Marina Kvaskoff
- CESP, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris‐Sud, UVSQ, INSERMUniversité Paris‐SaclayVillejuifFrance
- Gustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| | - Matthias B. Schulze
- Department of Molecular EpidemiologyGerman Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam‐RehbrueckeNuthetalGermany
- Institute of Nutrition ScienceUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
| | - Manuela Bergmann
- Human Study CenterGerman Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam‐RehbrueckeNuthetalGermany
| | | | - Anna Karakatsani
- Hellenic Health FoundationAthensGreece
- 2nd Pulmonary Medicine Department, School of MedicineNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “ATTIKON” University HospitalHaidariGreece
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Hellenic Health FoundationAthensGreece
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community HealthUniversità Degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Giovanna Masala
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life‐Style Epidemiology UnitInstitute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network – ISPROFlorenceItaly
| | - Valeria Pala
- Epidemiology and Prevention UnitFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di MilanoMilanItaly
| | - Amalia Mattiello
- Dipartimento Di Medicina Clinica e ChirurgiaFederico II UniversityNaplesItaly
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Cancer Registry and Histopathology DepartmentProvincial Health Authority (ASP)RagusaItaly
| | - Fulvio Ricceri
- Department of Clinical and Biological SciencesUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
- Unit of EpidemiologyRegional Health Service ASL TO3TurinItaly
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Evelyn M. Monninkhof
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Catalina Bonet
- Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO‐IDIBELL)|Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Unit of Nutrition and CancerL'Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelonaSpain
| | | | - Maria‐Jose Sanchez
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP)GranadaSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA)GranadaSpain
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
- Universidad de GranadaGranadaSpain
| | | | - Aurelio B Gurrea
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
- Navarra Public Health InstitutePamplonaSpain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA)PamplonaSpain
| | - Pilar Amiano
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
- Public Health Division of GipuzkoaBiodonostia Health Research Institute, Ministry of Health of the Basque GovernmentSan SebastianSpain
| | - Naomi E. Allen
- Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Ruth C. Travis
- Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Marc J. Gunter
- Nutrition and Metabolism SectionInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)LyonFrance
| | - Vivian Viallon
- Nutrition and Metabolism SectionInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)LyonFrance
| | | | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthImperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lujan-Barroso L, Botteri E, Caini S, Ljungberg B, Roswall N, Tjønneland A, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, Gram IT, Tumino R, Kiemeney LA, Liedberg F, Stocks T, Gunter MJ, Murphy N, Cervenka I, Fournier A, Kvaskoff M, Häggström C, Overvad K, Lund E, Waaseth M, Fortner RT, Kühn T, Menéndez V, Sánchez MJ, Santiuste C, Perez-Cornago A, Zamora-Ros R, Cross AJ, Trichopoulou A, Karakatsani A, Peppa E, Palli D, Krogh V, Sciannameo V, Mattiello A, Panico S, van Gils CH, Onland-Moret NC, Barricarte A, Amiano P, Khaw KT, Boeing H, Weiderpass E, Duell EJ. Menstrual Factors, Reproductive History, Hormone Use, and Urothelial Carcinoma Risk: A Prospective Study in the EPIC Cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:1654-1664. [PMID: 32467345 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urothelial carcinoma is the predominant (95%) bladder cancer subtype in industrialized nations. Animal and epidemiologic human studies suggest that hormonal factors may influence urothelial carcinoma risk. METHODS We used an analytic cohort of 333,919 women from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Cohort. Associations between hormonal factors and incident urothelial carcinoma (overall and by tumor grade, tumor aggressiveness, and non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma) risk were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS During a mean of 15 years of follow-up, 529 women developed urothelial carcinoma. In a model including number of full-term pregnancies (FTP), menopausal status, and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), number of FTP was inversely associated with urothelial carcinoma risk (HR≥5vs1 = 0.48; 0.25-0.90; P trend in parous women = 0.010) and MHT use (compared with nonuse) was positively associated with urothelial carcinoma risk (HR = 1.27; 1.03-1.57), but no dose response by years of MHT use was observed. No modification of HRs by smoking status was observed. Finally, sensitivity analyses in never smokers showed similar HR patterns for the number of FTP, while no association between MHT use and urothelial carcinoma risk was observed. Association between MHT use and urothelial carcinoma risk remained significant only in current smokers. No heterogeneity of the risk estimations in the final model was observed by tumor aggressiveness or by tumor grade. A positive association between MTH use and non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma risk was observed. CONCLUSIONS Our results support that increasing the number of FTP may reduce urothelial carcinoma risk. IMPACT More detailed studies on parity are needed to understand the possible effects of perinatal hormone changes in urothelial cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Lujan-Barroso
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Gran Via de L'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute - IDIBELL, Gran Via de L'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nursing of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternity and Child Health School of Nursing, Universitat de Barcelona, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga s/n, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 64, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit for Women's Health, Women's Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo, Norway
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, Florence, Italy
| | - Börje Ljungberg
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Nina Roswall
- Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
- Department for Determinants of Chronic Diseases (DCD), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Pantai Valley, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Inger T Gram
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Department of Cancer Registry and Histopathology, "Civic -M.P. Arezzo" Hospital, ASP Ragusa, Ragusa, Italy
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital and Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 5, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Tanja Stocks
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Barngatan 4, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marc J Gunter
- International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Neil Murphy
- International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Iris Cervenka
- Inserm U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP) "Health across Generations" Team, Gustave Roussy 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - Agnès Fournier
- Inserm U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP) "Health across Generations" Team, Gustave Roussy 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - Marina Kvaskoff
- Inserm U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP) "Health across Generations" Team, Gustave Roussy 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - Christel Häggström
- Department of Biobank Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset entrence 70, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kim Overvad
- Department of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eiliv Lund
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Marit Waaseth
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Renée Turzanski Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DFKZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Kühn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DFKZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Virginia Menéndez
- Public Health Directorate, C/Ciriaco Miguel Virgil 9, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Maria-Jose Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Cuesta del Observatorio 4, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas 2, Granada, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Av. Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Madrid, Spain
- Universidad de Granada, Av. del Hospicio 1, Granada, Spain
| | - Carmen Santiuste
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Av. Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Ronda de Levante 11, Murcia, Spain
| | - Aurora Perez-Cornago
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Raul Zamora-Ros
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Gran Via de L'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute - IDIBELL, Gran Via de L'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amanda J Cross
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anna Karakatsani
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Kaisareias 13 & Alexandroupoleos, Athens, Greece
- 2nd Pulmonary Medicine Department, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "ATTIKON" University Hospital, Haidari, Greece
| | - Eleni Peppa
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Kaisareias 13 & Alexandroupoleos, Athens, Greece
| | - Domenico Palli
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, Florence, Italy
| | - Vittorio Krogh
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumouri, Via Venezian 1, Milano, Italy
| | - Veronica Sciannameo
- Unit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service ASL TO3, Grugliasco (Turin), Italy
| | - Amalia Mattiello
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Panico
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University, Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Aurelio Barricarte
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Av. Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Madrid, Spain
- Navarra Public Health Institute, C/Leyre 15, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), C/Irunlarrea 3, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pilar Amiano
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Av. Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Madrid, Spain
- Ministry of Health of the Basque Government, Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, Biodonostia Research Institute, Paseo Doctor Begiristain s/N, 20014 Donostia/Gipuzkoa, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Kay-Tee Khaw
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Heiner Boeing
- German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE), Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114 - 116, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Eric J Duell
- Unit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Oncology Data Analytics Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Gran Via de L'Hospitalet 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- ONCOBELL Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Gran Via de L'Hospitalet 199-203, 08908, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Christakoudi S, Kakourou A, Markozannes G, Tzoulaki I, Weiderpass E, Brennan P, Gunter M, Dahm CC, Overvad K, Olsen A, Tjønneland A, Boutron-Ruault MC, Madika AL, Severi G, Katzke V, Kühn T, Bergmann MM, Boeing H, Karakatsani A, Martimianaki G, Thriskos P, Masala G, Sieri S, Panico S, Tumino R, Ricceri F, Agudo A, Redondo-Sánchez D, Colorado-Yohar SM, Mokoroa O, Melander O, Stocks T, Häggström C, Harlid S, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, van Gils CH, Vermeulen RC, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Tong TY, Freisling H, Johansson M, Lennon H, Aune D, Riboli E, Trichopoulos D, Trichopoulou A, Tsilidis KK. Blood pressure and risk of cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Cancer 2020; 146:2680-2693. [PMID: 31319002 PMCID: PMC7115826 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Several studies have reported associations of hypertension with cancer, but not all results were conclusive. We examined the association of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure with the development of incident cancer at all anatomical sites in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by EPIC-participating center and age at recruitment, and adjusted for sex, education, smoking, body mass index, physical activity, diabetes and dietary (in women also reproductive) factors. The study included 307,318 men and women, with an average follow-up of 13.7 (standard deviation 4.4) years and 39,298 incident cancers. We confirmed the expected positive association with renal cell carcinoma: HR = 1.12 (1.08-1.17) per 10 mm Hg higher SBP and HR = 1.23 (1.14-1.32) for DBP. We additionally found positive associations for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC): HR = 1.16 (1.07-1.26) (SBP), HR = 1.31 (1.13-1.51) (DBP), weaker for head and neck cancers: HR = 1.08 (1.04-1.12) (SBP), HR = 1.09 (1.01-1.17) (DBP) and, similarly, for skin SCC, colon cancer, postmenopausal breast cancer and uterine adenocarcinoma (AC), but not for esophageal AC, lung SCC, lung AC or uterine endometroid cancer. We observed weak inverse associations of SBP with cervical SCC: HR = 0.91 (0.82-1.00) and lymphomas: HR = 0.97 (0.93-1.00). There were no consistent associations with cancers in other locations. Our results are largely compatible with published studies and support weak associations of blood pressure with cancers in specific locations and morphologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Christakoudi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, King’s College London, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Artemisia Kakourou
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Georgios Markozannes
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Ioanna Tzoulaki
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France
| | - Paul Brennan
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France
| | - Marc Gunter
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France
| | - Christina C. Dahm
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, DK-8000, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kim Overvad
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, DK-8000, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anja Olsen
- Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Diet, Genes and Environment, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
- Centre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations (CESP), Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Anne-Laure Madika
- Centre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations (CESP), Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
- Université Lille, CHU Lille, EA2694, Lille, France
| | - Gianluca Severi
- Centre de recherche en Epidemiologie et Sante des Populations (CESP), Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Verena Katzke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Kühn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuela M. Bergmann
- Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke (DIfE), Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Heiner Boeing
- Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke (DIfE), Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Anna Karakatsani
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- 2 Pulmonary Medicine Department, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “ATTIKON” University Hospital, Haidari, Greece
| | | | | | - Giovanna Masala
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - ISPRO, Florence, Italy
| | - Sabina Sieri
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133, Milano, Italy
| | - Salvatore Panico
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Cancer Registry and Histopathology Department, "M.P.Arezzo" Hospital, ASP Ragusa, Italy
| | - Fulvio Ricceri
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Italy
- Unit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service ASL TO3, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
| | - Antonio Agudo
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Research Program. Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL. L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Redondo-Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Universidad de Granada. Granada, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sandra M. Colorado-Yohar
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Research Group on Demography and Health, National Faculty of Public Health, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Olatz Mokoroa
- Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, BioDonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Olle Melander
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Tanja Stocks
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christel Häggström
- Department of Biobank Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sophia Harlid
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
- Dept. for Determinants of Chronic Diseases (DCD), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Dept. of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Pantai Valley, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roel C.H. Vermeulen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
- Environmental Epidemiology Group, Institute of Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Public Health Department, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kay-Tee Khaw
- University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas J. Wareham
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Tammy Y.N. Tong
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford. United Kingdom
| | - Heinz Freisling
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France
| | - Mattias Johansson
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France
| | - Hannah Lennon
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 69372 Lyon CEDEX 08, France
| | - Dagfinn Aune
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
- Department of Nutrition, Bjørknes University College, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
| | - Dimitrios Trichopoulos
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Bureau of Epidemiologic Research, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Konstantinos K. Tsilidis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Campus, Norfolk place, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kühn T, Stepien M, López-Nogueroles M, Damms-Machado A, Sookthai D, Johnson T, Roca M, Hüsing A, Maldonado SG, Cross AJ, Murphy N, Freisling H, Rinaldi S, Scalbert A, Fedirko V, Severi G, Boutron-Ruault MC, Mancini FR, Sowah SA, Boeing H, Jakszyn P, Sánchez MJ, Merino S, Colorado-Yohar S, Barricarte A, Khaw KT, Schmidt JA, Perez-Cornago A, Trichopoulou A, Karakatsani A, Thriskos P, Palli D, Agnoli C, Tumino R, Sacerdote C, Panico S, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, van Gils CH, Heath AK, Gunter MJ, Riboli E, Lahoz A, Jenab M, Kaaks R. Prediagnostic Plasma Bile Acid Levels and Colon Cancer Risk: A Prospective Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112:516-524. [PMID: 31435679 PMCID: PMC7225675 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bile acids have been proposed to promote colon carcinogenesis. However, there are limited prospective data on circulating bile acid levels and colon cancer risk in humans. METHODS Associations between prediagnostic plasma levels of 17 primary, secondary, and tertiary bile acid metabolites (conjugated and unconjugated) and colon cancer risk were evaluated in a nested case-control study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Bile acid levels were quantified by tandem mass spectrometry in samples from 569 incident colon cancer cases and 569 matched controls. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for colon cancer risk across quartiles of bile acid concentrations. RESULTS Positive associations were observed between colon cancer risk and plasma levels of seven conjugated bile acid metabolites: the primary bile acids glycocholic acid (ORquartile 4 vs quartile 1= 2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.52 to 3.26), taurocholic acid (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.23 to 2.58), glycochenodeoxycholic acid (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.48), taurochenodeoxycholic acid (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.36), and glycohyocholic acid (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.40), and the secondary bile acids glycodeoxycholic acid (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.12 to 2.54) and taurodeoxycholic acid (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.02 to 2.31). By contrast, unconjugated bile acids and tertiary bile acids were not associated with risk. CONCLUSIONS This prospective study showed that prediagnostic levels of certain conjugated primary and secondary bile acids were positively associated with risk of colon cancer. Our findings support experimental data to suggest that a high bile acid load is colon cancer promotive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilman Kühn
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Stepien
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Nutritional Epidemiology Group
| | - Marina López-Nogueroles
- Section of Nutrition and Metabolism, Lyon, France; Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, Analytical Unit, Biomarkers and Precision Medicine Unit Valencia, Spain
| | - Antje Damms-Machado
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Disorn Sookthai
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Theron Johnson
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marta Roca
- Section of Nutrition and Metabolism, Lyon, France; Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, Analytical Unit, Biomarkers and Precision Medicine Unit Valencia, Spain
| | - Anika Hüsing
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Amanda J Cross
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, UK
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Neil Murphy
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Nutritional Epidemiology Group
| | | | | | | | - Veronika Fedirko
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta
| | - Gianluca Severi
- CESP, Fac. de médecine-Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine-UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
- CESP, Fac. de médecine-Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine-UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Francesca Romana Mancini
- CESP, Fac. de médecine-Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine-UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Solomon A Sowah
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heiner Boeing
- Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Paula Jakszyn
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitallet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramón Llull, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J Sánchez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Sandra Colorado-Yohar
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Research Group on Demography and Health, National Faculty of Public Health, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Aurelio Barricarte
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research Pamplona, Spain
| | - Kay Tee Khaw
- University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Gerontology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julie A Schmidt
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aurora Perez-Cornago
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Anna Karakatsani
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- 2nd Pulmonary Medicine Department, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Attikon" University Hospital, Haidari, Greece
| | | | - Domenico Palli
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network, Florence, Italy
| | - Claudia Agnoli
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Cancer Registry and Histopathology Department, "Civic - M.P. Arezzo" Hospital, ASP, Ragusa, Italy
| | - Carlotta Sacerdote
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza University-Hospital and Center for Cancer Prevention, Turin, Italy
| | - Salvatore Panico
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, UK
- Department for Determinants of Chronic Diseases, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Alicia K Heath
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, UK
| | - Marc J Gunter
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Nutritional Epidemiology Group
| | - Elio Riboli
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, UK
| | - Agustín Lahoz
- Section of Nutrition and Metabolism, Lyon, France; Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe, Analytical Unit, Biomarkers and Precision Medicine Unit Valencia, Spain
| | - Mazda Jenab
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Nutritional Epidemiology Group
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Assi N, Rinaldi S, Viallon V, Dashti SG, Dossus L, Fournier A, Cervenka I, Kvaskoff M, Turzanski-Fortner R, Bergmann M, Boeing H, Panico S, Ricceri F, Palli D, Tumino R, Grioni S, José Sánchez Pérez M, Chirlaque MD, Bonet C, Barricarte Gurrea A, Amiano Etxezarreta P, Merino S, Bueno de Mesquita B, van Gils CH, Onland-Moret C, Tjønneland A, Overvad K, Trichopoulou A, Martimianaki G, Karakatsani A, Key T, Chistakoudi S, Ellingjord-Dale M, Tsilidis K, Riboli E, Kaaks R, Gunter MJ, Ferrari P. Mediation analysis of the alcohol-postmenopausal breast cancer relationship by sex hormones in the EPIC cohort. Int J Cancer 2020; 146:759-768. [PMID: 30968961 PMCID: PMC6786903 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Alcohol consumption is associated with higher risk of breast cancer (BC); however, the biological mechanisms underlying this association are not fully elucidated, particularly the extent to which this relationship is mediated by sex hormone levels. Circulating concentrations of estradiol, testosterone, their free fractions and sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG), were examined in 430 incident BC cases and 645 matched controls among alcohol-consuming postmenopausal women nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Mediation analysis was applied to assess whether individual hormone levels mediated the relationship between alcohol intake and BC risk. An alcohol-related hormonal signature, obtained by partial least square (PLS) regression, was evaluated as a potential mediator. Total (TE), natural direct and natural indirect effects (NIE) were estimated. Alcohol intake was positively associated with overall BC risk and specifically with estrogen receptor-positive tumors with respectively TE = 1.17(95%CI: 1.01,1.35) and 1.36(1.08,1.70) for a 1-standard deviation (1-SD) increase of intake. There was no evidence of mediation by sex steroids or SHBG separately except for a weak indirect effect through free estradiol where NIE = 1.03(1.00,1.06). However, an alcohol-related hormonal signature negatively associated with SHBG and positively with estradiol and testosterone was associated with BC risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25 [1.07,1.47]) for a 1-SD higher PLS score, and had a statistically significant NIE accounting for a mediated proportion of 24%. There was limited evidence of mediation of the alcohol-BC association by individual sex hormones. However, a hormonal signature, reflecting lower levels of SHBG and higher levels of sex steroids, mediated a substantial proportion of the association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nada Assi
- Nutritional Methodology and Biostatistics Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Sabina Rinaldi
- Biomarkers Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Vivian Viallon
- Nutritional Methodology and Biostatistics Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - S. Ghazaleh Dashti
- Nutritional Methodology and Biostatistics Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
- Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Laure Dossus
- Nutritional Methodology and Biostatistics Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Agnès Fournier
- CESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
- Nutritional Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Iris Cervenka
- CESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Marina Kvaskoff
- CESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Manuela Bergmann
- Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Heiner Boeing
- Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Salvatore Panico
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Fulvio Ricceri
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Italy
- Unit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service ASL TO3, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
| | - Domenico Palli
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - ISPRO, Florence, Italy
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Cancer Registry and Histopathology Department, “Civic -M.P.Arezzo” Hospital, ASP Ragusa, Italy
| | - Sara Grioni
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - María José Sánchez Pérez
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, IBS GRANADA, Universidad de Granada. Granada, Spain
| | - María-Dolores Chirlaque
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Catalina Bonet
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Av. Granvia de L’Hospitalet 199-203, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Aurelio Barricarte Gurrea
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA) Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pilar Amiano Etxezarreta
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, BioDonostia Research Institue, San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | - Bas Bueno de Mesquita
- Department. for Determinants of Chronic Diseases (DCD), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place W2 1PG London, UK
- Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Pantai Valley, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Carla H. van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Cancer Epidemiology University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Onland-Moret
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Cancer Epidemiology University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kim Overvad
- The Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Anna Karakatsani
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- Pulmonary Medicine Department, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “ATTIKON” University Hospital, Haidari, Greece
| | - Tim Key
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sofia Chistakoudi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place W2 1PG London, UK
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, King’s College London, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
| | - Merete Ellingjord-Dale
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place W2 1PG London, UK
| | - Kostas Tsilidis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place W2 1PG London, UK
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place W2 1PG London, UK
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc J Gunter
- Nutritional Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Pietro Ferrari
- Nutritional Methodology and Biostatistics Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Heath AK, Muller DC, van den Brandt PA, Papadimitriou N, Critselis E, Gunter M, Vineis P, Weiderpass E, Fagherazzi G, Boeing H, Ferrari P, Olsen A, Tjønneland A, Arveux P, Boutron-Ruault MC, Mancini FR, Kühn T, Turzanski-Fortner R, Schulze MB, Karakatsani A, Thriskos P, Trichopoulou A, Masala G, Contiero P, Ricceri F, Panico S, Bueno-de-Mesquita B, Bakker MF, van Gils CH, Olsen KS, Skeie G, Lasheras C, Agudo A, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Sánchez MJ, Amiano P, Chirlaque MD, Barricarte A, Drake I, Ericson U, Johansson I, Winkvist A, Key T, Freisling H, His M, Huybrechts I, Christakoudi S, Ellingjord-Dale M, Riboli E, Tsilidis KK, Tzoulaki I. Nutrient-wide association study of 92 foods and nutrients and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res 2020; 22:5. [PMID: 31931881 PMCID: PMC6958698 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1244-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several dietary factors have been reported to be associated with risk of breast cancer, but to date, unequivocal evidence only exists for alcohol consumption. We sought to systematically assess the association between intake of 92 foods and nutrients and breast cancer risk using a nutrient-wide association study. METHODS Using data from 272,098 women participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study, we assessed dietary intake of 92 foods and nutrients estimated by dietary questionnaires. Cox regression was used to quantify the association between each food/nutrient and risk of breast cancer. A false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 was used to select the set of foods and nutrients to be replicated in the independent Netherlands Cohort Study (NLCS). RESULTS Six foods and nutrients were identified as associated with risk of breast cancer in the EPIC study (10,979 cases). Higher intake of alcohol overall was associated with a higher risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio (HR) for a 1 SD increment in intake = 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07), as was beer/cider intake and wine intake (HRs per 1 SD increment = 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06 and 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06, respectively), whereas higher intakes of fibre, apple/pear, and carbohydrates were associated with a lower risk of breast cancer (HRs per 1 SD increment = 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98; 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99; and 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, respectively). When evaluated in the NLCS (2368 cases), estimates for each of these foods and nutrients were similar in magnitude and direction, with the exception of beer/cider intake, which was not associated with risk in the NLCS. CONCLUSIONS Our findings confirm a positive association of alcohol consumption and suggest an inverse association of dietary fibre and possibly fruit intake with breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia K Heath
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK.
| | - David C Muller
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
| | - Piet A van den Brandt
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Nikos Papadimitriou
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Elena Critselis
- Proteomics Facility, Center for Systems Biology, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece
| | - Marc Gunter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Paolo Vineis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Guy Fagherazzi
- Center of Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Paris-South Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Department of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Heiner Boeing
- Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Pietro Ferrari
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Anja Olsen
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patrick Arveux
- Center of Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Paris-South Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, Dijon, France
| | - Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault
- Center of Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Paris-South Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Francesca Romana Mancini
- Center of Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Inserm U1018, Paris-South Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Tilman Kühn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Matthias B Schulze
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany
- Institute of Nutritional Sciences, University of Potsdam, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Anna Karakatsani
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- 2nd Pulmonary Medicine Department, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "ATTIKON" University Hospital, Haidari, Greece
| | | | | | - Giovanna Masala
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Contiero
- Environmental Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Fulvio Ricceri
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Unit of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service ASL TO3, Grugliasco, Italy
| | - Salvatore Panico
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
- Department for Determinants of Chronic Diseases (DCD), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Pantai Valley, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Marije F Bakker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karina Standahl Olsen
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Guri Skeie
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Cristina Lasheras
- Functional Biology Department, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Antonio Agudo
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology - ICO, Group of Research on Nutrition and Cancer, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute - IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet of Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Universidad de Granada (UGR), Granada, Spain
| | - Maria-José Sánchez
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Universidad de Granada (UGR), Granada, Spain
| | - Pilar Amiano
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, BioDonostia Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - María-Dolores Chirlaque
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia University, Murcia, Spain
| | - Aurelio Barricarte
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Isabel Drake
- Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Ericson
- Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Anna Winkvist
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Tim Key
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heinz Freisling
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Mathilde His
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Inge Huybrechts
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Sofia Christakoudi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
- MRC Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Merete Ellingjord-Dale
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
| | - Konstantinos K Tsilidis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Ioanna Tzoulaki
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Karavasiloglou N, Hüsing A, Masala G, van Gils CH, Turzanski Fortner R, Chang-Claude J, Huybrechts I, Weiderpass E, Gunter M, Arveux P, Fournier A, Kvaskoff M, Tjønneland A, Kyrø C, Dahm CC, Vistisen HT, Bakker MF, Sánchez MJ, Chirlaque López MD, Santiuste C, Ardanaz E, Menéndez V, Agudo A, Trichopoulou A, Karakatsani A, La Vecchia C, Peppa E, Palli D, Agnoli C, Panico S, Tumino R, Sacerdote C, Butt ST, Borgquist S, Skeie G, Schulze M, Key T, Khaw KT, Tsilidis KK, Ellingjord-Dale M, Riboli E, Kaaks R, Dossus L, Rohrmann S, Kühn T. Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research cancer prevention recommendations and risk of in situ breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. BMC Med 2019; 17:221. [PMID: 31787099 PMCID: PMC6886197 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1444-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Even though in situ breast cancer (BCIS) accounts for a large proportion of the breast cancers diagnosed, few studies have investigated potential risk factors for BCIS. Their results suggest that some established risk factors for invasive breast cancer have a similar impact on BCIS risk, but large population-based studies on lifestyle factors and BCIS risk are lacking. Thus, we investigated the association between lifestyle and BCIS risk within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. METHODS Lifestyle was operationalized by a score reflecting the adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) cancer prevention recommendations. The recommendations utilized in these analyses were the ones pertinent to healthy body weight, physical activity, consumption of plant-based foods, energy-dense foods, red and processed meat, and sugary drinks and alcohol, as well as the recommendation on breastfeeding. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association between lifestyle score and BCIS risk. The results were presented as hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS After an overall median follow-up time of 14.9 years, 1277 BCIS cases were diagnosed. Greater adherence to the WCRF/AICR cancer prevention recommendations was not associated with BCIS risk (HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.03; per one unit of increase; multivariable model). An inverse association between the lifestyle score and BCIS risk was observed in study centers, where participants were recruited mainly via mammographic screening and attended additional screening throughout follow-up (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99), but not in the remaining ones (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.05). CONCLUSIONS While we did not observe an overall association between lifestyle and BCIS risk, our results indicate that lifestyle is associated with BCIS risk among women recruited via screening programs and with regular screening participation. This suggests that a true inverse association between lifestyle habits and BCIS risk in the overall cohort may have been masked by a lack of information on screening attendance. The potential inverse association between lifestyle and BCIS risk in our analyses is consistent with the inverse associations between lifestyle scores and breast cancer risk reported from previous studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nena Karavasiloglou
- Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Institute for Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Anika Hüsing
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Giovanna Masala
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - ISPRO, Florence, Italy
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Marc Gunter
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Patrick Arveux
- CESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
- Breast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Centre, UNICANCER, Dijon, France
| | - Agnès Fournier
- CESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Marina Kvaskoff
- CESP, Fac. de médecine - Univ. Paris-Sud, Fac. de médecine - UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Anne Tjønneland
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Kyrø
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Marije F Bakker
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria-Jose Sánchez
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ibs. GRANADA), Granada, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - María Dolores Chirlaque López
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, Murcia University, Murcia, Spain
| | - Carmen Santiuste
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Eva Ardanaz
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain
- IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Agudo
- Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology - ICO, Nutrition and Cancer Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute - IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Karakatsani
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- 2nd Pulmonary Medicine Department, School of Medicine, "ATTIKON" University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Haidari, Greece
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Domenico Palli
- Cancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network - ISPRO, Florence, Italy
| | - Claudia Agnoli
- Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Panico
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Cancer Registry and Histopathology Department, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale (ASP), Ragusa, Italy
| | - Carlotta Sacerdote
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza University-Hospital and Center for Cancer Prevention (CPO), Turin, Italy
| | - Salma Tunå Butt
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Signe Borgquist
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Guri Skeie
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthias Schulze
- Department of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke (DIfE), Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Timothy Key
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kay-Tee Khaw
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kostantinos K Tsilidis
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Merete Ellingjord-Dale
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laure Dossus
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Sabine Rohrmann
- Division of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Institute for Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Cancer Registry Zurich and Zug, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tilman Kühn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|