1
|
Bani M, Russo S, Raggi E, Gasperini S, Motta S, Menni F, Furlan F, Cefalo G, Paci S, Banderali G, Marchisio P, Biondi A, Strepparava MG. Parents' experience of the communication process of positivity at newborn screening for metabolic diseases: A qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev 2023; 49:961-971. [PMID: 36787987 DOI: 10.1111/cch.13105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The process of receiving a communication of positivity for metabolic diseases at expanded newborn screening (ENBS) is extremely articulated, involves a variety of actors (parents, maternal and child departments, clinical centres and laboratories) and is open to a variety of outcomes from false positive to true positive cases. Receiving communication of positivity can be highly stressful for parents and requires an adequate communication process to give clear and reliable information without causing excessive worry. This qualitative study describes the parents' experience of receiving a communication of positivity to metabolic diseases at ENBS, and their assessment of the quality of the communication process and steps, with the main aim to identify the process' strengths and weaknesses and to advance tailored recommendations to improve the communication process. METHOD Fourteen in-depth, semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with parents whose children resulted positive to the ENBS. As part of the ENBS communication process, parents received a first phone call communication of positivity and a second in-person communication at metabolic clinical centres (MCC). The framework analysis method was used to organize the data and identify emerging themes. RESULTS Parents were largely dissatisfied with the quality and depth of the information received and with the way the healthcare staff delivered the first communication phone call, which failed to create a caring, empathic and safe setting. Many parents tried to reduce the uncertainty by searching online information or consulting with other providers. Nevertheless, the majority of parents described the in-person visit at MCC as clear, welcoming and reassuring. CONCLUSION More efforts are needed to improve the quality of the communication process of the ENBS. Guidelines, recommendations and standard scripts to communicate positivity are needed along with programmes and educational resources to train tailored communication skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bani
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Selena Russo
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Erika Raggi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Serena Gasperini
- Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Menni
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Clinical Metabolic Reference Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Furlan
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Clinical Metabolic Reference Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Graziella Cefalo
- Pediatric Department, Ospedale San Paolo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabrina Paci
- Pediatric Department, Ospedale San Paolo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Banderali
- Pediatric Department, Ospedale San Paolo, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Marchisio
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Clinical Metabolic Reference Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Biondi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Strepparava
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Clinical Psychology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
di Gangi C, Hermans M, Rayyan M, Eyskens F, Allegaert K. What Mothers Know about Newborn Bloodspot Screening and the Sources They Use to Acquire This Knowledge: A Pilot Study in Flanders. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:1567. [PMID: 37761528 PMCID: PMC10529094 DOI: 10.3390/children10091567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
To learn what mothers know about newborn bloodspot screening (NBS), the procedure, and the sources used, a pilot study was performed. An online questionnaire was developed, with the first part focused on characteristics and the NBS procedure, and the second on knowledge, information sources, and health care providers (HCPs). This questionnaire was accessible until 200 answers were received. The characteristics of respondents were representative for the population. Mothers gave verbal consent in 69.5% of cases, 12.5% did not, and 18% stated that no consent was requested. The 'knowledge' part contained 12 closed questions, five multiple-choice questions on sources, and assessments (5-point Likert scores) of the information transfer. The mean knowledge level was 7.2/12. Screening concepts (consequences, likelihood, sensitivity, carrier) and absence of notification of normal findings were well known. The fact that NBS is not compulsory was poorly known, and post-analysis sample handling procedures were poorly understood. Key HCPs were midwifes (80.5%) and nurses (38.5%). When the leaflet (44%) was provided, the majority read it. Mean Likert scores were 3.36, 3.38, 3.11 and 3.35 for clarity, timing appropriateness, sufficiency, and usefulness. The knowledge level and consent practices were reasonably good. Key HCP were midwives and nurses, the leaflets were supporting. This should enable a quality improvement program to a sustainable NBS program in Flanders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline di Gangi
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (C.d.G.); (M.H.)
| | - Maren Hermans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (C.d.G.); (M.H.)
| | - Maissa Rayyan
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals, UZ Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - François Eyskens
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium;
| | - Karel Allegaert
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Child & Youth Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pinel J, Bellanger A, Jamet C, Moreau C. Information and Parental Consent for French Neonatal Screening: A Qualitative Study on Parental Opinion. Int J Neonatal Screen 2023; 9:ijns9020026. [PMID: 37218891 DOI: 10.3390/ijns9020026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Neonatal screening has excellent coverage in France. Data from the foreign literature raise questions about the informed consent to this screening. The Neonatal Screening and Informed Consent Dépistage Néonatal Information et Consentement Eclairé (DENICE) study was designed to assess whether information on neonatal screening provided for families in Brittany allows for informed consent. A qualitative methodology was chosen to collect parents' opinions on this topic. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-seven parents whose children had positive neonatal screening for one of six diseases. The five main themes from the qualitative analysis were knowledge of neonatal screening, information received by parents, parental choice, the experience of the screening process, and parents' perspectives and wishes. Informed consent was weakened by parents' lack of knowledge regarding choice and the absence of a parent after birth. The study found that more information about screening during pregnancy would be preferable. The information should be repeated and accessible and should make it clear that neonatal screening is not mandatory, but informed consent should be obtained from parents who choose to screen their newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Pinel
- Departement of Paediatrics, Rennes University Hospital, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Amandine Bellanger
- Department of Neonatal Special Care, Rennes University Hospital, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Carole Jamet
- Department of General Practice, Rennes University Hospital, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Caroline Moreau
- Biochemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, Rennes University Hospital, 35000 Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Padilla PJD, Manalo EM. Newborn Screening Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices among Obstetrics-Gynecology Residents, Pediatric Residents, and Newborn Screening Nurses in a Tertiary Government Hospital in the Philippines during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Neonatal Screen 2023; 9:ijns9020019. [PMID: 37092513 PMCID: PMC10123634 DOI: 10.3390/ijns9020019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Newborn Screening (NBS) saves babies from mental retardation and death. In the Philippines, it was formally established by law in 2004. Program success requires physicians, nurses, and midwives to educate and motivate parents. The COVID-19 pandemic reduced NBS coverage from 91.6% to 80% between December 2019 and December 2020. This study aimed to (1) determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of residents and nurses relative to NBS during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) identify possible factors that may have affected NBS services at the Philippine General Hospital during the pandemic. Participants' demographics were also compared with NBS practices. The study enrolled 189 participants employed during 2020. The results of a self-administered online questionnaire were evaluated. Only 31% of participants scored above a mean passing level for NBS knowledge set by experts. Most participants expressed a favorable attitude towards NBS. Knowledge scores were a significant factor in favorable attitude. Obstetrics-gynecology residents had lower attitude scores than Pediatric residents and NBS Nurses. Prenatal parent education was only practiced by 1/3 of participants. Despite the obstacles of the COVID-19 pandemic, participants appreciated the value of the NBS and were willing to perform specimen collection using safety precautions. Participants identified the need for additional NBS training. The challenges identified provide an avenue for further research with the goal of strengthening NBS, especially during a public health emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Jose D Padilla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital, Manila 1000, Philippines
| | - Eileen M Manalo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital, Manila 1000, Philippines
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ulph F, Bennett R. Psychological and Ethical Challenges of Introducing Whole Genome Sequencing into Routine Newborn Screening: Lessons Learned from Existing Newborn Screening. New Bioeth 2023; 29:52-74. [PMID: 36181705 DOI: 10.1080/20502877.2022.2124582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
As a psychologist and an ethicist, we have explored empirically newborn screening consent and communication processes. In this paper we consider the impact on families if newborn screening uses whole genome sequencing. We frame this within the World Health Organization's definition of health and contend that proposals to use whole genome sequencing in newborn screening take into account the ethical, practical and psychological impact of such screening. We argue that the important psychological processes occurring in the neonatal phase necessitate a clear justification that providing risk information at this stage provides a health benefit. We illustrate how research on current newborn screening can inform whole genome sequencing debates, whilst highlighting important gaps. Obtaining explicit, voluntary, and sufficiently informed consent for newborn screening is challenging, however we stress that such consent is ethically and legally appropriate and psychologically and practically important. We conclude by outling how this might be done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Ulph
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Bennett
- Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Department of Law, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gapp S, Garbade SF, Feyh P, Brockow I, Nennstiel U, Hoffmann GF, Sommerburg O, Gramer G. German newborn screening for Cystic fibrosis: Parental perspectives and suggestions for improvements. Pediatr Pulmonol 2023; 58:844-852. [PMID: 36444714 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.26263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cystic fibrosis (CF) was added to the German newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) panel in 2016. This study assesses parental perceptions of CF-NBS and confirmatory testing. METHODS Prospective questionnaire-based survey administered to parents of children with positive CF-NBS over 40 months after initiation of CF-NBS in Southwest Germany. Parental perceptions were compared to results from Bavaria and Switzerland. RESULTS Questionnaires with 29 standardized questions were sent to 343 families with children born between October 2016 and January 2020. A total of 178 (51.9%) replied. Although required by law, only a minority were informed about CF-NBS by a physician. The information provided about NBS was sufficient for 78% of parents. Regarding the information about positive CF-NBS, 52.9% were satisfied but the majority expressed negative emotions (89.5%). While most of these were resolved after confirmatory diagnostics, 17% of parents of children with false-positive CF-NBS and 66.7% of children confirmed with CF remained anxious. Waiting time for sweat testing was >3 days in 56.1%, considerably longer than in more centralized screening systems. Parents who waited for a maximum of 3 days were significantly more satisfied. 70.7% of parents were satisfied with the information given during confirmatory diagnostics and 91.4% were satisfied with participating in CF-NBS. CONCLUSIONS CF-NBS stands in high regard with parents. Smooth organization, timely initiation of confirmatory testing, and professional communication are most important to limit parental anxiety. A more centralized system of confirmatory diagnostics appears advantageous in several regards as it reduces time from positive NBS to final diagnosis and increases parental satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gapp
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sven F Garbade
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrik Feyh
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Inken Brockow
- Screening Center, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Uta Nennstiel
- Screening Center, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Georg F Hoffmann
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olaf Sommerburg
- Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), German Lung Research Center (DZL), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology & Allergy and Cystic Fibrosis Center, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gwendolyn Gramer
- Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neuropediatrics and Metabolic Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Children's Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Giugliani R, Castillo Taucher S, Hafez S, Oliveira JB, Rico-Restrepo M, Rozenfeld P, Zarante I, Gonzaga-Jauregui C. Opportunities and challenges for newborn screening and early diagnosis of rare diseases in Latin America. Front Genet 2022; 13:1053559. [PMID: 36568372 PMCID: PMC9773081 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1053559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Rare diseases (RDs) cause considerable death and disability in Latin America. Still, there is no consensus on their definition across the region. Patients with RDs face a diagnostic odyssey to find a correct diagnosis, which may last many years and creates a burden for caregivers, healthcare systems, and society. These diagnostic delays have repercussions on the health and economic burden created by RDs and continue to represent an unmet medical need. This review analyzes barriers to the widespread adoption of newborn screening (NBS) programs and early diagnostic methods for RDs in Latin America and provides recommendations to achieve this critical objective. Increasing the adoption of NBS programs and promoting early diagnosis of RDs are the first steps to improving health outcomes for patients living with RDs. A coordinated, multistakeholder effort from leaders of patient organizations, government, industry, medical societies, academia, and healthcare services is required to increase the adoption of NBS programs. Patients' best interests should remain the guiding principle for decisions regarding NBS implementation and early diagnosis for RDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Giugliani
- Department of Genetics UFRGS, Medical Genetics Service HCPA, DASA and Casa dos Raros, Porto Alegre, Brazil,*Correspondence: Roberto Giugliani, ; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui,
| | - Silvia Castillo Taucher
- Clinical Geneticist, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Joao Bosco Oliveira
- Laboratório de Genética Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Paula Rozenfeld
- Instituto de Estudios Inmunológicos y Fisiopatológicos (IIFP), UNLP, CONICET, asociado CIC PBA, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, La Plata, Argentina
| | - Ignacio Zarante
- Instituto de Genética Humana, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui
- International Laboratory for Human Genome Research, Laboratorio Internacional de Investigación sobre el Genoma Humano, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Juriquilla, México,*Correspondence: Roberto Giugliani, ; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Assessing the Content Quality of Online Parental Resources about Newborn Metabolic Disease Screening: A Content Analysis. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:ijns8040063. [PMID: 36547380 PMCID: PMC9782861 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8040063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Parents increasingly utilise the internet to obtain information on health practices, but the quality of online information about screening for inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) needs to be improved. A content analysis examined how IMD blood and urine tests were described online in local healthcare sectors between May and June 2021. Among the nine resources, four were blood test providers and five were urine test providers. All mentioned the test benefits and procedures. Other information, such as false-positive/negative or risk of pain, was infrequently mentioned. The descriptions of urine tests are advertised as outperforming blood tests and can be purchased from commercial laboratory sites without medical guidance. Two urine test providers claimed no false results were reported. A few commercial advertisements highlighted the simplicity of the urine test and potentially overstated the invasiveness of the blood test. We found that some advertisements described IMD as "silent killers" and emphasised the advantage of getting "reassurance" in controlling the child's developmental health and well-being. To better protect the parents, or broadly, the public interest, regulatory and oversight measures on the urine tests should be implemented to promote the proper use of genetic tests. Without timely regulation and oversight, the incorrect descriptions might create a public misconception about utilising these commercial laboratory tests to inform health decisions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tluczek A, Ersig AL, Lee S. Psychosocial Issues Related to Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review and Synthesis. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:ijns8040053. [PMID: 36278623 PMCID: PMC9589938 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8040053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic advances have contributed to a proliferation of newborn screening (NBS) programs. Psychosocial consequences of NBS have been identified as risks to these public health initiatives. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review synthesizes findings from 92 evidence-based, peer-reviewed research reports published from 2000 through 2020 regarding psychosocial issues associated with NBS. Results describe parents' knowledge of and attitudes towards NBS, reactions to and understanding of positive NBS results, experiences of communication with health providers, decisions about carrier testing, and future pregnancies. Findings also explain the impact of positive NBS results on parent-child relationships, child development, informing children about carrier status, family burden, quality of life, and disparities. In conclusion, psychosocial consequences of receiving unexpected neonatal screening results and unsolicited genetic information remain significant risks to expansion of NBS. Findings suggest that risks may be mitigated by improved parent NBS education, effective communication, individualized genetic counseling, and anticipatory developmental guidance. Clinicians need to take extra measures to ensure equitable service delivery to marginalized subpopulations. Future investigations should be more inclusive of culturally and socioeconomically diverse families and conducted in low-resource countries. Providing these countries with adequate resources to develop NBS programs is an essential step towards achieving international health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Tluczek
- School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 701 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Anne L. Ersig
- School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 701 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Shinhyo Lee
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, 560 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Crossen K, Berry L, Myers MF, Leslie N, Goueli C. A Qualitative Study: Mothers' Experiences of Their Child's Late-Onset Pompe Disease Diagnosis Following Newborn Screening. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:ijns8030043. [PMID: 35892473 PMCID: PMC9326644 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8030043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Pompe disease was added to the United States recommended uniform screening panel in 2015 to avoid diagnostic delay and implement prompt treatment, specifically for those with infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD). However, most newborns with abnormal newborn screening (NBS) for Pompe disease have late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). An early diagnosis of LOPD raises the question of when symptoms will arise which is challenging for parents, patients, and providers managing an LOPD diagnosis. This study aimed to characterize mothers' experiences of their child's LOPD diagnosis and medical monitoring. A qualitative descriptive approach was chosen to gain an in-depth understanding of parental experiences. Eight mothers were interviewed about their experiences with positive NBS and diagnosis, experiences with living with the diagnosis, and experiences with medical monitoring. Interview transcripts were analyzed through conventional content analysis. Negative emotions like fear were more frequent with communication of NBS results. Participants expressed uncertainty surrounding age of symptom onset and the future. The medical monitoring experience increased worry but participants expressed that being vigilant with management reassured them. Parental emotions shifted to thankfulness and reassurance with time and education. These findings can provide guidance to providers about the psychosocial implications of receiving positive NBS results and an LOPD diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaylee Crossen
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; (L.B.); (M.F.M.); (N.L.); (C.G.)
- College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 3230 Eden Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
- Genetic Center, Akron Children’s Hospital, 215 West Bowery Street, Level 5, Akron, OH 44308, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Lisa Berry
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; (L.B.); (M.F.M.); (N.L.); (C.G.)
| | - Melanie F. Myers
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; (L.B.); (M.F.M.); (N.L.); (C.G.)
- College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 3230 Eden Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA
| | - Nancy Leslie
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; (L.B.); (M.F.M.); (N.L.); (C.G.)
| | - Cecilia Goueli
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; (L.B.); (M.F.M.); (N.L.); (C.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Armstrong B, Christensen KD, Genetti CA, Parad RB, Robinson JO, Blout Zawatsky CL, Zettler B, Beggs AH, Holm IA, Green RC, McGuire AL, Smith HS, Pereira S. Parental Attitudes Toward Standard Newborn Screening and Newborn Genomic Sequencing: Findings From the BabySeq Study. Front Genet 2022; 13:867371. [PMID: 35571041 PMCID: PMC9091188 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: With increasing utility and decreasing cost of genomic sequencing, augmentation of standard newborn screening (NBS) programs with newborn genomic sequencing (nGS) has been proposed. Before nGS can be integrated into newborn screening, parents' perspectives must be better understood. Objective: Using data from surveys administered to parents of healthy newborns who were enrolled in the BabySeq Project, a randomized clinical trial of nGS alongside NBS, this paper reports parents' attitudes regarding population-based NBS and nGS assessed 3 months after results disclosure. Methods: Parental attitudes regarding whether all newborns should receive, and whether informed consent should be required for, NBS and nGS, as well as whether nGS should be mandated were assessed using 5-point scales from strongly disagree (=1) to strongly agree (=5). Parents' interest in receiving types of results from nGS was assessed on a 5-point scale from not at all interested (=1) to very interested (=5). Survey responses were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests, paired t-tests, and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: At 3 months post-disclosure, 248 parents of 174 healthy newborns submitted a survey. Support for every newborn receiving standard NBS (mean 4.67) was higher than that for every newborn receiving nGS (mean 3.60; p < 0.001). Support for required informed consent for NBS (mean 3.44) was lower than that for nGS (mean 4.27, p < 0.001). Parents' attitudes toward NBS and nGS were not significantly associated with self-reported political orientation. If hypothetically receiving nGS outside of the BabySeq Project, most parents reported being very interested in receiving information on their baby's risk of developing a disease in childhood that can be prevented, treated, or cured (86.8%) and their risk of developing a disease during adulthood that can be prevented, treated, or cured (84.6%). Discussion: Parents' opinions are crucial to inform design and delivery of public health programs, as the success of the program hinges on parents' trust and participation. To accommodate parents' preferences without affecting the current high participation rates in NBS, an optional add-on consent to nGS in addition to NBS may be a feasible approach. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittan Armstrong
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kurt D. Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Casie A. Genetti
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Richard B. Parad
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jill Oliver Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Carrie L. Blout Zawatsky
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Medical and Population Genetics, The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, United States
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
- The MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bethany Zettler
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alan H. Beggs
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Ingrid A. Holm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Robert C. Green
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Hadley Stevens Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Conway M, Vuong TT, Hart K, Rohrwasser A, Eilbeck K. Pain points in parents' interactions with newborn screening systems: a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:167. [PMID: 35361157 PMCID: PMC8967687 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03160-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Objectives This study aims to explore and elucidate parents’ experience of newborn screening [NBS], with the overarching goal of identifying desiderata for the development of informatics-based educational and health management resources. Methods We conducted four focus groups and four one-on-one qualitative interviews with a total of 35 participants between March and September 2020. Participants were grouped into three types: parents who had received true positive newborn screening results; parents who had received false positive results; and soon-to-be parents who had no direct experience of the screening process. Interview data were subjected to analysis using an inductive, constant comparison approach. Results Results are divided into five sections: (1) experiences related to the process of receiving NBS results and prior knowledge of the NBS program; (2) approaches to the management of a child’s medical data; (3) sources of additional informational and emotional support; (4) barriers faced by parents navigating the health system; and (5) recommendations and suggestions for new parents experiencing the NBS process. Conclusion Our analysis revealed a wide range of experiences of, and attitudes towards the newborn screening program and the wider newborn screening system. While parents’ view of the screening process was – on the whole – positive, some participants reported experiencing substantial frustration, particularly related to how results are initially communicated and difficulties in accessing reliable, timely information. This frustration with current information management and education resources indicates a role for informatics-based approaches in addressing parents’ information needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Conway
- School of Computing and Information Systems , University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Truc Thuy Vuong
- Cell, Molecular, and Cancer Biology Graduate Program and Medical Sciences Graduate Program, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Kim Hart
- Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Karen Eilbeck
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chudleigh J, Holder P, Moody L, Simpson A, Southern K, Morris S, Fusco F, Ulph F, Bryon M, Bonham JR, Olander E. Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050773. [PMID: 34452966 PMCID: PMC8404436 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To implement and evaluate co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results and make recommendations for future research and practice. DESIGN A process evaluation underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory. SETTING Three National Health Service provider organisations in England. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-four healthcare professionals (7 newborn screening laboratory staff and 24 clinicians) and 18 parents were interviewed. INTERVENTIONS Three co-designed interventions were implemented in practice: standardised laboratory proformas, communication checklists and an email/letter template. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Acceptability and feasibility of the co-designed interventions. RESULTS Auditing the implementation of these interventions revealed between 58%-76% of the items on the laboratory proforma and 43%-80% of items on the communication checklists were completed. Interviews with healthcare professionals who had used the interventions in practice provided positive feedback in relation to the purpose of the interventions and the ease of completion both of which were viewed as enhancing communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. Interviews with parents highlighted the perceived benefit of the co-designed interventions in terms of consistency, pacing and tailoring of information as well as providing reliable information to families following communication of the positive newborn bloodspot screening result. The process evaluation illuminated organisational and contextual barriers during implementation of the co-designed interventions in practice. CONCLUSION Variations in communication practices for positive newborn bloodspot screening results continue to exist. The co-designed interventions could help to standardise communication of positive newborn screening results from laboratories to clinicians and from clinicians to parents which in turn could improve parents' experience of receiving a positive newborn bloodspot screening result. Implementation highlighted some organisational and contextual barriers to effective adoption of the co-designed interventions in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN15330120.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Chudleigh
- School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Pru Holder
- School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Louise Moody
- Centre for Arts, Memory and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry, West Midlands, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- Health Services and Population Research, King's College London, London, UK
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College, London, UK
| | - Kevin Southern
- Paediatrics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Francesco Fusco
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mandy Bryon
- Paediatric Psychology and Play Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James R Bonham
- Pharmacy, Diagnostics and Genetics, Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ellinor Olander
- School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Coupal E, Hart K, Wong B, Rothwell E. Newborn Screening Knowledge and Attitudes Among Midwives and Out-of-Hospital-Birth Parents. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2021; 34:357-364. [PMID: 33079810 PMCID: PMC7808409 DOI: 10.1097/jpn.0000000000000525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Midwifery and nursing are collaborative partners in both education and practice. Understanding needs and barriers to clinical services such as newborn screening is essential. This study examined knowledge and attitudes of midwives and out-of-hospital-birth parents about newborn blood spot screening (NBS). Descriptive and cross-sectional surveys were distributed to midwives and out-of-hospital-birth parents from birth center registries and the Utah Health Department of Vital Records. Seventeen midwife surveys (response rate: 17%) and 113 parent surveys (response rate: 31%) were returned. Most midwives and out-of-hospital-birth parents reported satisfactory knowledge scores about NBS. Only 5% of parents (n = 6) did not participate in NBS. Most midwives reported that NBS is important and encouraged patients to consider undergoing NBS. Some concerns included the lack of education for both midwives and out-of-hospital patients and the trauma and accuracy of the heel prick soon after birth. Both midwives and out-of-hospital-birth parents expressed a need for improved NBS education. Additional studies are needed to ascertain whether this trend is seen with similar populations throughout the United States, to further elucidate the factors that drive NBS nonparticipation, and to develop educational resources for midwives and their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Coupal
- ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City (Ms Coupal); Utah Kim Hart, Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City (Ms Coupal); Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City (Ms Hart); College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Dr Wong); and Department of Ob/Gyn, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Dr Rothwell)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peterson L, Siemon A, Olewiler L, McBride KL, Allain DC. A qualitative assessment of parental experiences with false-positive newborn screening for Krabbe disease. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:252-260. [PMID: 34265137 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Numerous US states have implemented newborn screening for Krabbe disease (Krabbe NBS) as a result of legislative state mandates. While healthcare provider opinions toward Krabbe NBS have been documented, few studies have explored parental experiences and opinions regarding Krabbe NBS. Eleven families, who received a false-positive Krabbe NBS result and received genetic counseling at an institution in central Ohio, were consented to participate in semistructured interviews. Interviews explored parents' experiences throughout the NBS process and ascertained their opinions regarding Krabbe NBS. Three major themes emerged from thematic analysis: (1) improved understanding of the NBS process from a parent perspective, (2) the role of healthcare provider communication, and (3) the value of Krabbe NBS. Parents saw value in Krabbe NBS, despite many disclosing emotional distress and uncertainty throughout the NBS process. Parent experiences throughout the NBS process varied widely. Due to the expressed emotional distress, further research assessing effective communication during the NBS process is warranted. The researchers suggest additional NBS education for non-genetics healthcare providers (i.e., nurses or primary care physicians) and further participation of genetic counselors in the NBS process may benefit families with a positive Krabbe NBS result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laiken Peterson
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Amy Siemon
- Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Leah Olewiler
- Division of Medical Genetics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - Kim L McBride
- Division of Genetic and Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Center for Cardiovascular Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Dawn C Allain
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Carlton J, Griffiths HJ, Horwood AM, Mazzone PP, Walker R, Simonsz HJ. Acceptability of childhood screening: a systematic narrative review. Public Health 2021; 193:126-138. [PMID: 33831694 PMCID: PMC8128098 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Objectives A systematic narrative literature review was undertaken to assess the acceptability of childhood screening interventions to identify factors to consider when planning or modifying childhood screening programs to maximize participation and uptake. Study design This is a systematic narrative literature review. Methods Electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO via Ovid, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) to identify primary research studies that assessed screening acceptability. Studies were categorized using an existing theoretical framework of acceptability consisting of seven constructs: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. A protocol was developed and registered with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42018099763) Results The search identified 4529 studies, and 46 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies involved neonatal screening. Programs identified included newborn blood spot screening (n = 22), neonatal hearing screening (n = 13), Duchenne muscular dystrophy screening (n = 4), cystic fibrosis screening (n = 3), screening for congenital heart defects (n = 2), and others (n = 2). Most studies assessed more than one construct of acceptability. The most common constructs identified were affective attitude (how a parent feels about the program) and intervention coherence (parental understanding of the program, and/or the potential consequences of a confirmed diagnosis). Conclusions The main acceptability component identified related to parental knowledge and understanding of the screening process, the testing procedure(s), and consent. The emotional impact of childhood screening mostly explored maternal anxiety. Further studies are needed to examine the acceptability of childhood screening across the wider family unit. When planning new (or refining existing) childhood screening programs, it is important to assess acceptability before implementation. This should include assessment of important issues such as information needs, timing of information, and when and where the screening should occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - H J Griffiths
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Health Sciences School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
| | - A M Horwood
- Infant Vision Laboratory, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Infant Vision Laboratory, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK.
| | - P P Mazzone
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - R Walker
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - H J Simonsz
- Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, NL-3000CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Franková V, Driscoll RO, Jansen ME, Loeber JG, Kožich V, Bonham J, Borde P, Brincat I, Cheillan D, Dekkers E, Fingerhut R, Kuš IB, Girginoudis P, Groselj U, Hougaard D, Knapková M, la Marca G, Malniece I, Nanu MI, Nennstiel U, Olkhovych N, Oltarzewski M, Pettersen RD, Racz G, Reinson K, Salimbayeva D, Songailiene J, Vilarinho L, Vogazianos M, Zetterström RH, Zeyda M. Regulatory landscape of providing information on newborn screening to parents across Europe. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 29:67-78. [PMID: 33040093 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00716-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) is an important part of public healthcare systems in many countries. The provision of information to parents about NBS is now recognised as an integral part of the screening process. Informing parents on all aspects of screening helps to achieve the benefits, promote trust and foster support for NBS. Therefore, policies and guidelines should exist to govern how the information about NBS is provided to parents, taking into account evidence-based best practices. The purpose of our survey was to explore whether any legally binding provisions, guidelines or recommendations existed pertaining to the provision of information about NBS to parents across Europe. Questions were designed to determine the regulatory process of when, by whom and how parents should be informed about screening. Twenty-seven countries participated in the survey. The results indicated that most countries had some sort of legal framework or guidelines for the provision of information to parents. However, only 37% indicated that the provision of information was required prenatally. The majority of countries were verbally informing parents with the aid of written materials postnatally, just prior to sample collection. Information was provided by a neonatologist, midwife or nurse. A website dedicated to NBS was available for 67% of countries and 89% had written materials about NBS for parents. The survey showed that there is a lack of harmonisation among European countries in the provision of information about NBS and emphasised the need for more comprehensive guidelines at the European level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Věra Franková
- Department of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. .,Institute for Medical Humanities, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Riona O Driscoll
- Department of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marleen E Jansen
- Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - J Gerard Loeber
- International Society for Neonatal Screening Office, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Viktor Kožich
- Department of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - James Bonham
- Division of Pharmacy, Diagnostics and Genetics, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffiled, UK
| | | | | | | | - Eugenie Dekkers
- RIVM Centre for Population Screening, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Urh Groselj
- UMC-University Children's Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Mária Knapková
- Children's University Hospital, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
| | | | | | - Michaela Iuliana Nanu
- National Health Programs Management Unit of National Institute for Mother & Child Health, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Uta Nennstiel
- Screening Center of the Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | | | - Rolf D Pettersen
- Norwegian National Unit for Newborn Screening, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gabor Racz
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Damilya Salimbayeva
- Scientific centre of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | | | - Laura Vilarinho
- National Institute of Health Dr Ricardo Jorge, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Rolf H Zetterström
- Centre for inherited metabolic diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Maximilian Zeyda
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Raspa M, Lynch M, Squiers L, Gwaltney A, Porter K, Peay H, Huston A, Fitzek B, Boyle JG. Information and Emotional Support Needs of Families Whose Infant Was Diagnosed With SCID Through Newborn Screening. Front Immunol 2020; 11:885. [PMID: 32435251 PMCID: PMC7218061 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Now that severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) has been added to newborn screening panels in all 50 states in the U.S., there is a need to develop and disseminate well-designed educational materials to parents who need information to make informed decisions about treatment and care for identified infants. SCID Compass was designed to address this gap. We summarize the results of two needs assessment activities for parents—a journey mapping exercise and online survey—which will inform the development of a website and new resources. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with seven parents of children with SCID identified through newborn screening. Participants were asked to complete a journey map to describe key timepoints related to SCID, starting at diagnosis through present day. This qualitative information informed an online survey that was completed by 76 parents who had a child with SCID. All participants were from the United States. Results: Analysis of journey maps revealed five distinct stages that parents experience: (1) Diagnosis, (2) Pre-Treatment, (3) Treatment, (4) Post-Treatment, and (5) The New Normal. At each stage, parents described unique emotions, challenges, contextual factors that can make a difference in their experience, and information and resource needs. Survey results indicated the highest-rated information needs for parents were understanding available treatment options and what to expect across the SCID lifespan. Emotional support needs included dealing with uncertainty about child's future and additional opportunities to connect with other families. Parents preferred receiving new materials from their healthcare provider or other families, and preferred materials in print, from social media, or online. Several differences were found among subgroups of parents, including those whose child had been identified through newborn screening as well as those considered medically underserved. Conclusions: Findings about unmet parent needs and informational preferences will serve as the foundation for creating a suite of resources for those who have a child with SCID. The materials will be tailored to specific stages of the journey. By using a family-centered approach, we will help to ensure that the materials designed and developed as part of SCID Compass will be understandable, comprehensive, and useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Raspa
- RTI International Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Molly Lynch
- RTI International Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Linda Squiers
- RTI International Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Angela Gwaltney
- RTI International Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Katherine Porter
- RTI International Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Holly Peay
- RTI International Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Alissa Huston
- Immune Deficiency Foundation Towson, Towson, MD, United States
| | - Brian Fitzek
- Immune Deficiency Foundation Towson, Towson, MD, United States
| | - John G Boyle
- Immune Deficiency Foundation Towson, Towson, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Evans A, Lynch M, Johnson M, Bonhomme N. Assessing the newborn screening education needs of families living in medically underserved areas. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:658-667. [PMID: 32227550 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) is a public health service available to all babies born in the United States (US). NBS is one of the first experiences families have in the US healthcare system with a new baby. A positive experience with NBS can give families a strong start to their child's health care and build trusting relationships with providers. A lack of easily accessible NBS education for families can exacerbate health inequalities through negative interactions with the healthcare system. Expecting Health, a maternal and child health education and advocacy initiative of Genetic Alliance, partnered with RTI International to implement an online survey assessing needs and preferences around NBS-related health education, with a particular interest in those of families living within medically underserved areas (MUAs). A total of 500 participants completed the survey, including 200 participants living in MUAs. The results of the survey showed that, compared with US families living outside of MUAs, families living in MUAs are generally less aware of NBS and do not receive NBS education at the optimal time (i.e., before birth), which could indicate they experience inequities in NBS education. While families across different geographic areas seem to have similar preferences in terms of content for NBS education, the results show that some distinct communication methods are needed to reach families living in MUAs. To bridge the gap in NBS education to families living in MUAs, the Expecting Health team built an online NBS educational module, using preferred communication methods-specified through the survey-for families living in MUAs.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ulph F, Dharni N, Bennett R, Lavender T. Consent for newborn screening: screening professionals' and parents' views. Public Health 2019; 178:151-158. [PMID: 31698137 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Expansion of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) within England, which practices an informed consent model, justified examining acceptability and effectiveness of alternative consent models. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative focus groups. METHODS Forty-five parents and 37 screening professionals (SPs) participated. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Parents and SPs initially appeared to have differing views about appropriate consent models. Most parents accepted assumed consent, if adequately informed; however, once aware of bloodspot storage, informed consent was wanted. SPs valued informed consent, but acknowledged it was difficult to obtain. Both samples wanted parents to be informed but were unclear how this could be achieved. Most parents felt NBS was not presented as optional. CONCLUSION The simultaneous exploration of parents and SPs views, in real time is original. This rigour avoided the reliance on retrospective accounts which make it difficult to establish how decisions were made at the time. It is also unique in providing pre-interview consent models to drive the depth of data. It was rigorous in member checking. Findings suggested a preference for full disclosure of all information with some parents valuing this more than choice. Both samples queried whether current consent was sufficiently informed and voluntary. Results suggest differing tolerances of consent type if screening is solely for diagnostic purposes vs bloodspot storage. Results highlight the need for caution when examining consent model preferences without also checking knowledge, as opinions may be based on incomplete knowledge. Future research is needed to examine efficacy of proposed changes. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment HTAProgramme (11/62/02). TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN70227207.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ulph
- University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - N Dharni
- University of Manchester, Now Bradford Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
| | - R Bennett
- University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - T Lavender
- University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Factors Influencing Parental Awareness about Newborn Screening. Int J Neonatal Screen 2019; 5:35. [PMID: 33072994 PMCID: PMC7510194 DOI: 10.3390/ijns5030035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Appropriate and timely education about newborn screening (NBS) helps to foster benefits such as prompt follow up, to promote parents' autonomy via informed consent and minimize the harms such as reducing the impact of NBS false-positive results. The aim of this study was to ascertain how mothers are informed about NBS in the Czech Republic and to identify the variables associated with awareness about NBS. The questionnaires evaluating awareness and its determinants were mailed to a random sample of 3000 mothers 3 months post-delivery. The overall response rate was 42%. We analysed 1100 questionnaires and observed that better awareness about NBS was significantly associated with age, parity, number of information sources, child health status, size of maternity hospital and an obstetrician as the source of prenatally obtained information. Although the majority of mothers (77%) in our study recalled being informed by a physician or nurse in the neonatal ward, results have revealed that over 40% of participants did not have sufficient awareness about the principal aspects of NBS. Several measures including seminars for healthcare providers and the development and distribution of new educational materials were adopted to improve parental education about NBS in the Czech Republic.
Collapse
|
22
|
Rubanovich CK, Cheung C, Torkamani A, Bloss CS. Physician Communication of Genomic Results in a Diagnostic Odyssey Case Series. Pediatrics 2019; 143:S44-S53. [PMID: 30600271 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099i] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS) is increasing in clinical care, and WGS is a promising tool in diagnostic odyssey cases. Physicians' ability to effectively communicate genomic information with patients, however, is unclear. In this multiperspective study, we assessed physicians' communication of patient genome sequencing information in a diagnostic odyssey case series. METHODS We evaluated physician communication of genome sequencing results in the context of an ongoing study of the utility of WGS for the diagnosis of rare and idiopathic diseases. A modified version of the Medical Communication Competence Scale was used to compare patients' ratings of their physicians' communication of general medical information to communication of genome sequencing information. Physician self-ratings were also compared with patient ratings. RESULTS A total of 47 patients, parents, and physicians across 11 diagnostic odyssey cases participated. In 6 of 11 cases (54%), the patient respondent rated the physician's communication of genome sequencing information as worse than that of general medical information. In 9 of 11 cases (82%), physician self-ratings of communication of genome sequencing information were worse than the patient respondent's rating. Identification of a diagnosis via WGS was positively associated with physician self-ratings (P = .021) but was not associated with patient respondent ratings (P = .959). CONCLUSIONS These findings reveal that even in diagnostic odyssey cases, in which genome sequencing may be clinically beneficial, physicians may not be well-equipped to communicate genomic information to patients. Future studies may benefit from multiperspective approaches to assessing and understanding physician-patient communication of genome-sequencing information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich
- San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Ali Torkamani
- Scripps Genomic Medicine Division, Scripps Translational Science Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA.,Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA; and
| | - Cinnamon S Bloss
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wright SJ, Ulph F, Lavender T, Dharni N, Payne K. Understanding Midwives' Preferences for Providing Information About Newborn Bloodspot Screening. MDM Policy Pract 2018; 3:2381468317746170. [PMID: 30288434 PMCID: PMC6125045 DOI: 10.1177/2381468317746170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Understanding preferences for information provision in
the context of health care service provision is challenging because of the
number of potential attributes that may influence preferences. This study aimed
to identify midwives’ preferences for the process and outcomes of information
provision in an expanded national newborn bloodspot screening program.
Design: A sample of practicing midwives completed a
hybrid-stated preference survey including a conjoint analysis (CA) and discrete
choice experiment to quantify preferences for the types of, and way in which,
information should be provided in a newborn bloodspot screening program. Six
conjoint analysis questions captured the impact of different types of
information on parents’ ability to make a decision, and 10 discrete choice
experiment questions identified preferences for four process attributes
(including parents’ ability to make a decision). Results: Midwives
employed by the UK National Health Service (n = 134) completed the survey. All
types of information content were perceived to improve parents’ ability to make
a decision except for the possibility of false-positive results. Late pregnancy
was seen to be the best time to provide information, followed by day 3
postbirth. Information before 20 weeks of pregnancy was viewed as reducing
parents’ ability to make a decision. Midwives preferred information to be
provided by an individual discussion and did not think parents should receive
information on the Internet. Conclusion: A hybrid stated preference
survey design identified that a wide variety of information should be provided
to maximize parents’ ability to make a decision ideally provided late in
pregnancy or on day 3 postbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart James Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care (SJW, KP).,Division of Psychology and Mental Health (FU, ND).,Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work (TL), the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care (SJW, KP).,Division of Psychology and Mental Health (FU, ND).,Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work (TL), the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tina Lavender
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care (SJW, KP).,Division of Psychology and Mental Health (FU, ND).,Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work (TL), the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nimarta Dharni
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care (SJW, KP).,Division of Psychology and Mental Health (FU, ND).,Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work (TL), the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care (SJW, KP).,Division of Psychology and Mental Health (FU, ND).,Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work (TL), the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ulph F, Wright S, Dharni N, Payne K, Bennett R, Roberts S, Walshe K, Lavender T. Provision of information about newborn screening antenatally: a sequential exploratory mixed-methods project. Health Technol Assess 2018; 21:1-240. [PMID: 28967862 DOI: 10.3310/hta21550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation in the UK Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programme (NBSP) requires parental consent but concerns exist about whether or not this happens in practice and the best methods and timing to obtain consent at reasonable cost. OBJECTIVES To collate all possible modes of prescreening communication and consent for newborn (neonatal) screening (NBS); examine midwives', screening professionals' and users' views about the feasibility, efficiency and impact on understanding of each; measure midwives' and parents' preferences for information provision; and identify key drivers of cost-effectiveness for alternative modes of information provision. DESIGN Six study designs were used: (1) realist review - to generate alternative communication and consent models; (2) qualitative interviews with parents and health professionals - to examine the implications of current practice for understanding and views on alternative models; (3) survey and observation of midwives - to establish current costs; (4) stated preference surveys with midwives, parents and potential future parents - to establish preferences for information provision; (5) economic analysis - to identify cost-effectiveness drivers of alternative models; and (6) stakeholder validation focus groups and interviews - to examine the acceptability, views and broader impact of alternative communication and consent models. SETTING Providers and users of NBS in England. PARTICIPANTS Study 2: 45 parents and 37 health professionals; study 3: 22 midwives and eight observations; study 4: 705 adults aged 18-45 years and 134 midwives; and study 6: 12 health-care professionals and five parents. RESULTS The realist review identified low parental knowledge and evidence of coercive consent practices. Interview, focus group and stated preference data suggested a preference for full information, with some valuing this more than choice. Health professionals preferred informed choice models but parents and health professionals queried whether or not current consent was fully informed. Barriers to using leaflets effectively were highlighted. All studies indicated that a 'personalised' approach to NBS communication, allowing parents to select the mode and level of information suited to their learning needs, could have added value. A personalised approach should rely on midwife communication and should occur in the third trimester. Overall awareness was identified as requiring improvement. Starting NBS communication by alerting parents that they have a choice to make and telling them that samples could be stored are both likely to enhance engagement. The methods of information provision and maternal anxiety causing additional visits to health-care professionals were the drivers of relative cost-effectiveness. Lack of data to populate an economic analysis, confirmed by value of information analysis, indicated a need for further research. LIMITATIONS There are some limitations with regard to the range of participants used in studies 2 and 3 and so caution should be exercised when interpreting some of the results. CONCLUSIONS This project highlighted the importance of focusing on information receipt and identified key communication barriers. Health professionals strongly preferred informed consent, which parents endorsed if they were made aware of sample storage. Uniform models of information provision were perceived as ineffective. A choice of information provision was supported by health professionals and parents, which both enhances cost-effectiveness and improves engagement, understanding and the validity of consent. Remaining uncertainties suggest that more research is needed before new communication modes are introduced into practice. Future research should measure the impact of the suggested practice changes (informing in third trimester, information toolkits, changed role of midwife). TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN70227207. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 55. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Ulph
- Division of Mental Health and Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stuart Wright
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nimarta Dharni
- Division of Mental Health and Psychology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Stephen Roberts
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kieran Walshe
- Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tina Lavender
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Newborn screening programs aim to achieve presymptomatic diagnosis of treatable disorders allowing for early initiation of medical care to prevent or reduce significant morbidity and mortality. Many of the conditions included in the newborn screening panels are inborn errors of metabolism; however, screening for endocrine, hematologic, immunologic, and cardiovascular diseases, and hearing loss is also included in many panels. Newborn screening tests are not diagnostic and therefore diagnostic testing is needed to confirm or exclude the suspected diagnosis. Further advancement in technology is expected to allow continuous expansion of newborn screening.
Collapse
|
26
|
Raz AE, Amano Y, Timmermans S. Coming to terms with the imperfectly normal child: attitudes of Israeli parents of screen-positive infants regarding subsequent prenatal diagnosis. J Community Genet 2018; 10:41-50. [PMID: 29504050 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0361-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examines the interface between newborn screening and prenatal diagnosis from the point-of-view of parents of screen-positive children. Many conditions covered by newborn screening represent classic (autosomal recessive) Mendelian disorders. Parents of screen-positive infants therefore often come to learn that they are carriers of the disease, and face a decision whether to test for it in future pregnancies. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2015-2017 with 34 Israeli parents whose child was screen positive. Three major themes emanated from the parents' attitudes toward prenatal testing for the disease in prospective hypothetical pregnancies: rejection of prenatal testing for the disease associated with the screen positive, and relying instead on newborn screening to reveal if a future baby is also sick (18/34, 53%); support of prenatal testing to get more information (7/34, 21%) and support of prenatal testing in order to abort in case of a test positive (9/34, 26%). We discuss the importance of newborn screening for reproductive decision-making, highlighting the arguments associated with positive and negative parental views of the possibility of having another child with the same condition associated with the screen-positive of the child that had already been born. The conclusions challenge the common assertion that parents pursue the dream of the "perfect child" through prenatal diagnosis that "naturally" leads to selective abortion. The diversity of views expressed by Israeli parents of screen-positive children highlights the diversity of normative scripts of "genetic responsibility" in the context of parenthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviad E Raz
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
| | - Yael Amano
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Education for fathers about newborn screening and leftover dried blood spots. J Community Genet 2017; 8:239-241. [PMID: 28510049 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0305-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of an educational intervention on paternal knowledge, attitudes, and support about newborn screening (NBS) and dried blood spots (DBS). Participants (n = 147) were randomized into one of two groups. The results from this study indicated that video education tools about NBS and DBS is associated with significantly increased knowledge, support, and satisfaction for both NBS and research use of DBS and an opt-out consent approach for DBS among fathers.
Collapse
|
28
|
Healthcare professionals' and parents' experiences of the confirmatory testing period: a qualitative study of the UK expanded newborn screening pilot. BMC Pediatr 2017; 17:121. [PMID: 28482885 PMCID: PMC5422997 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0873-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With further expansion of the number of conditions for which newborn screening can be undertaken, it is timely to consider the impact of positive screening results and the confirmatory testing period on the families involved. This study was undertaken as part of a larger programme of work to evaluate the Expanded Newborn Screening (ENBS) programme in the United Kingdom (UK). It was aimed to determine the views and experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and parents on communication and interaction during the period of confirmatory testing following a positive screening result. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with parents of children who had received a positive ENBS result and HCPs who had been involved with the diagnosis and support of parents. Ten parents and 11 healthcare professionals took part in the in-depth interviews. Questions considered the journey from the positive screening result through confirmatory testing to a confirmed diagnosis and the communication and interaction between the parents and HCPs that they had been experienced. Key themes were identified through thematic analysis. RESULTS The results point to a number of elements within the path through confirmatory testing that are difficult for parents and could be further developed to improve the experience. These include the way in which the results are communicated to parents, rapid turnaround of results, offering a consistent approach, exploring interventions to support family relationships and reviewing the workload and scheduling implications for healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS As technology enables newborn screening of a larger number of conditions, there is an increasing need to consider and mediate the potentially negative effects on families. The findings from this study point to a number of elements within the path through confirmatory testing that are difficult for parents and could be further developed to benefit the family experience.
Collapse
|
29
|
Engaging a state: Facebook comments on a large population biobank. J Community Genet 2017; 8:183-197. [PMID: 28382416 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0302-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Scholarship on newborn screening, dried bloodspot retention, and large population biobanking call consistently for improved public engagement. Communication with participants likely occurs only in the context of collection, consent, or notification, if at all. We ran an 11-week advertising campaign to inform Michigan Facebook users unlikely to know that their or their children's dried bloodspots (DBSs) were stored in a state biobank. We investigated the pattern and content of comments posted during the campaign, focusing on users' questions, attitudes and concerns, and the role the moderator played in addressing them. We used Facebook data to quantitatively assess engagement and employed conventional content analysis to investigate themes, attitudes, and social dynamics among user and moderator comments. Five ad sets elicited comments during campaign weeks 4-8, reaching ∼800,000 Facebook users ($6000). Gravitating around broad, underlying ethical, legal, and social issues, 180 posts from 129 unique users related to newborn screening or biobanking. Thirty six conveyed negative attitudes and 33 conveyed positive attitudes; 53 posed questions. The most prevalent themes identified were consent, privacy, bloodspot use, identifiability, inclusion criteria, research benefits, (mis)trust, genetics, DBS destruction, awareness, and the role of government. The moderator's 81 posts were responsive-answering questions, correcting or clarifying information, or providing information about opting out. Facebook ad campaigns can improve engagement by pushing out relevant content and creating dynamic, responsive, visible forums for discussion. Reduced control over messaging may be worth the trade-off for creating accessible, transparent, people-centered engagement on public health issues that are sensitive and complex.
Collapse
|
30
|
Wright SJ, Ulph F, Dharni N, Payne K. Eliciting Preferences for Information Provision in Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programs. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 20:651-661. [PMID: 28408008 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Revised: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/13/2016] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The national newborn bloodspot screening programs (NBSPs) are continually expanding to screen for more conditions. OBJECTIVES To quantify parents' preferences for information and the way in which this is provided in example NBSPs. METHODS A hybrid choice experiment, combining a conjoint analysis and a discrete choice experiment, was designed. A sample of current and future parents between the ages of 18 and 45 years was identified via an Internet panel. Respondents completed one of two survey versions (9 conditions and 20 conditions) comprising a validated measure of attitudes toward involvement in decision making, 6 CA questions (11 information attributes), 10 DCE questions (4 attributes: 3 process and the ability to make an informed decision), and demographic questions. RESULTS Of the 702 respondents who completed the survey, 58% were women, 48% were between 25 and 34 years old, and 48% were current parents. All types of information were identified to statistically significantly improve parents' ability to make a decision. Participants preferred taking an "active" role in decision making. Respondents to the 9-condition survey preferred information before 20 weeks (willingness to pay [WTP] £11.88; CI £5.56 to £19.53) and the 20-condition group after 20 weeks (WTP £15.91; CI £10.64 to £21.63). All respondents disliked receiving information 3 days after birth, with the 20-condition group also being averse to receiving it on day 5 (WTP -£11.20; CI -£18.40 to 5.72). Respondents in both groups preferred to receive their information in an individual discussion. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that parents' preferences for receiving NBS information differ from how this information is given in current UK practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nimarta Dharni
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kumar P, Iyengar H, Kumar P. Public Views on Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2017; 8:130-134. [DOI: 10.1177/2150135116674468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: To understand public views on pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease. Methods: Two hundred thirteen adults read a brief vignette describing the importance of early detection of critical congenital heart disease and then answered five questions on a five-point scale of how likely or unlikely they were to support pulse oximetry screening. Responses were tabulated and analyzed using a Fisher exact test, and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for adjusted associations using generalized estimating equations. Results: Almost 90% of all participants expressed support for routine pulse oximetry screening. The possibility of false positives leading to a delay in discharge, and the potential need for transfer to another facility lowered support but did not reach a statistical significance. The overall support for pulse oximetry screening was strong and consistent between different participant demographics. Conclusion: A large majority of participants in this study support pulse oximetry screening for the early detection of critical congenital heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen Kumar
- Departments of Pediatrics, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Illinois, University of Illinois, Peoria, IL, USA
| | - Hari Iyengar
- Departments of Pediatrics, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Prerna Kumar
- Departments of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Newborn screening: a review of history, recent advancements, and future perspectives in the era of next generation sequencing. Curr Opin Pediatr 2016; 28:694-699. [PMID: 27552071 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000000414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to summarize the development and recent advancements of newborn screening. RECENT FINDINGS Early initiation of medical care has modified the outcome for many disorders that were previously associated with high morbidity (such as cystic fibrosis, primary immune deficiencies, and inborn errors of metabolism) or with significant neurodevelopmental disabilities (such as phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism). The new era of mass spectrometry and next generation sequencing enables the expansion of the newborn screen panel, and will help to address technical issues such as turnaround time, and decreasing false-positive and false-negative rates for the testing. SUMMARY The newborn screening program is a successful public health initiative that facilitates early diagnosis of treatable disorders to reduce long-term morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
|
33
|
Fitzgerald C, Heery E, Conneally N, Linnane B, George S, Fitzpatrick P. An evaluation of pregnant women's knowledge and attitudes about newborn bloodspot screening. Midwifery 2016; 45:21-27. [PMID: 27978478 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Revised: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES research suggests that information provided to parents about newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) can be inconsistent. The majority of international NBS programmes recommend that parents should receive information about NBS in the antenatal period, however prior studies have mostly focused on postnatal women's knowledge, with no quantitative study of women's knowledge in the antenatal period conducted to date. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine if antenatal women received information about NBS in the antenatal period and to evaluate their knowledge and attitudes about NBS. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS we conducted a cross-sectional study among antenatal attendees at three maternity hospitals in Ireland. A total of 662 antenatal women (≥36 weeks gestation) were recruited into the study (279 primiparous, 368 multiparous). Women were asked to complete a self reported knowledge and attitude questionnaire about NBS. FINDINGS primiparity (OR 2.75; 95% CI 1.65, 4.59) lower educational status (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.02, 3.15) and not having private health insurance (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.19, 2.85) were independently associated with poor NBS knowledge. Fourteen per cent of antenatal women recalled receiving an information leaflet about NBS, yet over 87 % reported that they would like more information. Thirty four per cent of women agreed that they understand everything they need to know about NBS. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE the process of providing women with information about NBS in the antenatal period is inconsistent; consequently their awareness about NBS is limited. To make an informed choice about NBS women require information to be provided in a more structured format. There are many missed opportunities in the antenatal period for maternity care providers to provide women with information about NBS. Our study recommends that healthcare providers should have a more formal and structured approach with regard to the provision of information about NBS in the antenatal period. This could be achieved by incorporating NBS education into antenatal education classes or through multimedia while women are waiting in the antenatal clinic. Healthcare providers may need education about the importance and benefits of providing women with information about NBS in the antenatal period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Fitzgerald
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Woodview House, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - Emily Heery
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Woodview House, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Neasa Conneally
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Woodview House, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Barry Linnane
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Limerick, Ireland; Graduate Entry Medical School and Centre for Interventions in Infection, Inflammation & Immunity (4i), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Sherly George
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Woodview House, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Patricia Fitzpatrick
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Woodview House, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Paquin RS, Peay HL, Gehtland LM, Lewis MA, Bailey DB. Parental intentions to enroll children in a voluntary expanded newborn screening program. Soc Sci Med 2016; 166:17-24. [PMID: 27526258 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Revised: 07/16/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Nearly all babies in the United States are tested at birth for rare, serious, and treatable disorders through mandatory state newborn screening (NBS). Recently, there have been calls for an expanded, voluntary model to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of a wider range of disorders. We applied the reasoned action framework to examine parental intentions to participate in voluntary expanded screening. METHODS We recruited a national cohort of recent and expectant parents living in the U.S. who completed a self-administered online survey (N = 1001). Using a mixed-level fractional factorial experiment, we studied parental participation intentions and preferences for timing of consent, cost, consent format, and testing options. RESULTS We conducted a hierarchical regression analysis assessing parental intentions to participate in voluntary expanded NBS. Attitudes, perceived normative influence, and perceived behavioral control explained substantial variance in intention, with perceived normative influence emerging as the strongest predictor. We found no evidence that the manipulated program features altered mean levels of intention, but timing of parental permission, cost, and permission format moderated the relative importance of reasoned action constructs on intention. CONCLUSION Program design features may impact the psychological mechanisms underlying parental decision making for voluntary expanded screening. These results have important implications for parent education, outreach, and informed parental permission procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S Paquin
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
| | - Holly L Peay
- Center for P-12 Education, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Lisa M Gehtland
- Center for P-12 Education, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Megan A Lewis
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Donald B Bailey
- Education and Workforce Development, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kelly N, Makarem DC, Wasserstein MP. Screening of Newborns for Disorders with High Benefit-Risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2016; 44:231-240. [PMID: 27338599 PMCID: PMC5381153 DOI: 10.1177/1073110516654133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Newborn screening has evolved to include an increasingly complex spectrum of diseases, raising concerns that screening should be optional and require parental consent. Early detection of disorders like PKU and MCAD is essential to prevent serious disability and death in affected children. These are examples of high benefit-risk ratio disorders because of the irrefutable health benefits of early detection, coupled with the low risks of treatment. The dire consequences of not diagnosing an infant with a treatable disorder because of parental refusal to screen are wholly unacceptable. Thus, we believe that newborn screening for disorders with high benefit-risk ratios should continue to be mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Kelly
- Nicole Kelly, M.P.H., is the Research Program Manager for the Pilot Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She is the Research Manager for the Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore. Dalia Chehayeb Makarem, M.P.H., is the Clinical Research Coordinator for the Pilot Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Melissa P. Wasserstein, M.D., is an Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Chief of Pediatric Genetic Medicine at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore in the Bronx, NY. She is a clinical biochemical geneticist, specializing in the care of individuals with rare inborn errors of metabolism
| | - Dalia Chehayeb Makarem
- Nicole Kelly, M.P.H., is the Research Program Manager for the Pilot Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She is the Research Manager for the Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore. Dalia Chehayeb Makarem, M.P.H., is the Clinical Research Coordinator for the Pilot Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Melissa P. Wasserstein, M.D., is an Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Chief of Pediatric Genetic Medicine at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore in the Bronx, NY. She is a clinical biochemical geneticist, specializing in the care of individuals with rare inborn errors of metabolism
| | - Melissa P Wasserstein
- Nicole Kelly, M.P.H., is the Research Program Manager for the Pilot Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. She is the Research Manager for the Division of Pediatric Genetic Medicine at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore. Dalia Chehayeb Makarem, M.P.H., is the Clinical Research Coordinator for the Pilot Newborn Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Melissa P. Wasserstein, M.D., is an Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and the Chief of Pediatric Genetic Medicine at The Children's Hospital at Montefiore in the Bronx, NY. She is a clinical biochemical geneticist, specializing in the care of individuals with rare inborn errors of metabolism
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Botkin JR, Rothwell E, Anderson RA, Rose NC, Dolan SM, Kuppermann M, Stark LA, Goldenberg A, Wong B. Prenatal Education of Parents About Newborn Screening and Residual Dried Blood Spots: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170:543-9. [PMID: 27043416 PMCID: PMC7755042 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Research clearly indicates that current approaches to newborn blood spot screening (NBS) education are ineffective. Incorporating NBS education into prenatal care is broadly supported by lay and professional opinion. OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and effect of prenatal education about newborn screening and use of residual dried blood spots (DBS) in research on parental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized clinical trial of prenatal educational interventions, with outcomes measured by survey at 2 to 4 weeks postpartum. Participants were recruited from obstetric clinics in Salt Lake City, Utah; San Francisco, California; and the Bronx, New York. Eligible women were English- or Spanish-speaking adults and did not have a high-risk pregnancy. A total of 901 women were enrolled. Participants who completed the follow-up survey included 212 women in the usual care group (70% retention), 231 in the NBS group (77% retention), and 221 women in the NBS + DBS group (75% retention). Those who completed the survey were similar across the 3 groups with respect to age, ethnicity, race, education, marital status, income, obstetric history, and language. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups: usual care (n = 305), those viewing an NBS movie and brochure (n = 300), and those viewing both the NBS and DBS movies and brochures (n = 296). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Two to four weeks postpartum, women completed a 91-item survey by telephone, addressing knowledge, attitudes, and behavior with respect to opting out of NBS or DBS for their child. RESULTS A total of 901 women (mean age, 31 years) were randomized and 664 completed the follow-up survey. The total correct responses on the knowledge instrument in regard to NBS were 69% in the usual care group, 79% in the NBS group, and 75% in the NBS + DBS group, a significant between-group difference (P < .05). Although all groups showed strong support for NBS, the percentage of women who were "very supportive" was highest in the NBS group (94%), followed by the NBS + DBS group (86%) and was lowest in the usual care group (73%) (P < .001). The interventions were not associated with decisions to decline newborn screening or withdraw residual DBS. Nine women stated that they had declined NBS (all the usual care group; P < .001). With respect to DBS, 5 participants indicated that they contacted the health department to have their child's sample withdrawn after testing: 3 in the NBS + DBS group and 2 in the usual care group (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Educational interventions can be implemented in the prenatal clinic, using multimedia tools and electronic platforms. Prenatal education is effective in increasing postnatal knowledge and support for these programs. These results are relevant to other contexts in which residual clinical specimens and data are used for research purposes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02676245.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nancy C. Rose
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City2Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Siobhan M. Dolan
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | | | | | | | - Bob Wong
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Platt T, Platt J, Thiel DB, Kardia SLR. Facebook Advertising Across an Engagement Spectrum: A Case Example for Public Health Communication. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2016; 2:e27. [PMID: 27244774 PMCID: PMC4906239 DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.5623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The interpersonal, dialogic features of social networking sites have untapped potential for public health communication. We ran a Facebook advertising campaign to raise statewide awareness of Michigan’s newborn screening and biobanking programs. Objective We ran a Facebook advertising campaign to stimulate public engagement on the complex and sensitive issue of Michigan’s newborn screening and biobank programs. Methods We ran an 11-week, US $15,000 Facebook advertising campaign engaging Michigan Facebook users aged 18-64 years about the state’s newborn screening and population biobank programs, and we used a novel “engagement spectrum” framework to contextualize and evaluate engagement outcomes ranging from observation to multi-way conversation. Results The campaign reached 1.88 million Facebook users, yielding a range of engagement outcomes across ad sets that varied by objective, content, budget, duration, and bid type. Ad sets yielded 9009 page likes (US $4125), 15,958 website clicks (US $5578), and 12,909 complete video views to 100% (US $3750). “Boosted posts” yielded 528 comments and 35,966 page post engagements (US $1500). Overall, the campaign led to 452 shares and 642 comments, including 176 discussing newborn screening and biobanking. Conclusions Facebook advertising campaigns can efficiently reach large populations and achieve a range of engagement outcomes by diversifying ad types, bid types, and content. This campaign provided a population-based approach to communication that also increased transparency on a sensitive and complex topic by creating a forum for multi-way interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tevah Platt
- School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chaves JN, Libardi AL, Agostinho-Pesse RS, Morettin M, Alvarenga KDF. Tele-health: assessment of websites on newborn hearing screening in Portuguese Language. Codas 2016; 27:526-33. [PMID: 26691616 DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Accepted: 03/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To verify the aspects of technical quality and the content of websites on neonatal hearing screening in Portuguese. METHODS Eighteen audiologists, invited to participate according to the inclusion criteria, selected descriptors of websites for research using the Delphi technique. Later, they were fed into Google Trends to get the possible terms to be used by parents in finding information on the Internet about the subject. They were then fed into Google to search the websites. The following assessment instruments were used: list of topics on newborn hearing screening, Flesch Reading Ease Score Formula, Health-Related Web Site Evaluation Emory Form, and PageRank. RESULTS The most discussed topics in the 19 websites were on the objectives and benefits of neonatal hearing screening, as well as the process of audiological diagnosis. The least discussed were about the false-negative result, development of hearing and language, false-positive results, audiologic, interpretation of results - "Pass"/"Do not pass", retest, and protocol. Difficult reading level was prevalent, with aspects of technical quality considered the best quality-related content, audience, navigation, and structure. The results also showed there is no culture of inserting links on Brazilian national websites, so they had little relevance on Google. CONCLUSIONS The sites differed in the aspects addressed because there is a need to revise the reading level of the content and quality of the technical aspects regarding the accuracy and timeliness of information, authorship, and links.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Lívia Libardi
- Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Marina Morettin
- Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
| | - Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga
- Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
This article discusses a new approach for the conduct of focus groups in health research. Identifying ways to educate and inform participants about the topic of interest prior to the focus group discussion can promote more quality data from informed opinions. Data on this deliberative discussion approach are provided from research within three federally funded studies. As healthcare continues to improve from scientific and technological advancements, educating the research participants prior to data collection about these complexities is essential to gather quality data.
Collapse
|
40
|
Joseph G, Chen F, Harris-Wai J, Puck JM, Young C, Koenig BA. Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. Pediatrics 2016; 137 Suppl 1:S36-46. [PMID: 26729702 PMCID: PMC4939888 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The potential application of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to state-mandated standard newborn screening (NBS) challenges the traditional public health approach to NBS and raises ethical, policy, and clinical practice issues. This article examines the perspectives and values of diverse healthy pregnant women and parents of children diagnosed with a primary immunodeficiency disorder about traditional NBS and expanded NBS with the use of WGS. METHODS We conducted 4 focus groups (3 in English and 1 in Spanish) with socioeconomically and ethnically diverse pregnant women (n = 26), and a comparison group with parents of children diagnosed with a primary immunodeficiency disorder (n = 5). RESULTS Pediatric policy-relevant themes that emerged from our analysis of the focus group data are presented within 4 categories: (1) perspectives on traditional NBS, (2) informed consent, (3) return of results, and (4) storage and retrieval of results. Analyses indicate that study participants desired greater inclusion in the NBS process. Despite an optimistic orientation to the potential benefits and limited harms likely to result from genomic applications of NBS, parents voiced concerns about privacy and control over test results. Limited trust in the medical system and the state-run NBS program informed these concerns. CONCLUSIONS Expanded NBS with WGS for pediatricians may require management of more genetic conditions, including mutations that convey risk to both the child and parents for adult-onset disorders, and an informed-consent process to manage the genomic data and storage of blood spots. Attention to how these technologies are understood in diverse populations is needed for effective implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galen Joseph
- Address correspondence to Galen Joseph, PhD, Department of Anthropology, History, and Social Medicine, Box 0128, UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94143-0128. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wright SJ, Jones C, Payne K, Dharni N, Ulph F. The Role of Information Provision in Economic Evaluations of Newborn Bloodspot Screening: A Systematic Review. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2015; 13:615-26. [PMID: 25995075 PMCID: PMC4751163 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-015-0177-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent to which economic evaluations have included the healthcare resource and outcome-related implications of information provision in national newborn bloodspot screening programmes (NBSPs) is not currently known. OBJECTIVES To identify if, and how, information provision has been incorporated into published economic evaluations of NBSPs. METHODS A systematic review of economic evaluations of NBSPs (up to November 2014) was conducted. Three electronic databases were searched (Ovid: Medline, Embase, CINAHL) using an electronic search strategy combining a published economic search filter with terms related to national NBSPs and screening-related technologies. These electronic searches were supplemented by searching the NHS Economic Evaluations Database (NHS EED) and hand-searching identified study reference lists. The results were tabulated and summarised as part of a narrative synthesis. RESULTS A total of 27 economic evaluations [screening-related technologies (n = 11) and NBSPs (n = 16)] were identified. The majority of economic evaluations did not quantify the impact of information provision in terms of healthcare costs or outcomes. Five studies did include an estimate of the time cost associated with information provision. Four studies included a value to reflect the disutility associated with parental anxiety caused by false-positive results, which was used as a proxy for the impact of imperfect information. CONCLUSION A limited evidence base currently quantifies the impact of information provision on the healthcare costs and impact on the users of NBSPs; the parents of newborns. We suggest that economic evaluations of expanded NBSPs need to take account of information provision otherwise the impact on healthcare costs and the outcomes for newborns and their parents may be underestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Cheryl Jones
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Nimarta Dharni
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Burgard P, Wendel U. Strukturierte Aufklärung und Beratung bei monogen vererbten Stoffwechselkrankheiten. MED GENET-BERLIN 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s11825-015-0060-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Monogene Stoffwechselkrankheiten werden rezessiv, x-chromosomal oder dominant vererbt und stellen für die Mehrzahl konkret oder potenziell betroffener Personen (Patienten, Eltern, Verwandte), aber auch für medizinische und paramedizinische Berufe wenig bis völlig unbekannte Diagnosen dar. Sie sind einzeln selten (mit Prävalenzen zwischen 1:1.000.000 und 1:7000), insgesamt jedoch relativ häufig (ca. 1:800). Zur Erklärung reicht selbst das Standardvokabular der Sprache bildungsnaher Menschen nicht aus. Besondere Anforderungen stellt die Erstinformation nach Diagnosestellung, da bei Krankheiten vom Intoxikationstyp sofort mit der Behandlung begonnen werden muss. Vorhersagen des metabolischen bzw. klinischen Phänotyps auf der Basis des Genotyps sind in der Regel statistischer Natur. Individualprognosen können, wenn überhaupt, meist nur aus dem Verlauf des Phänotyps abgeleitet werden. Adäquate Aufklärung und Beratung ist nicht zuletzt deshalb notwendig, weil die Behandlung von den Familien bzw. Patienten meist lebenslang selbst durchgeführt werden muss und sich im Verlauf stets neue Fragen und Anforderungen zur weiteren Diagnostik und Therapie ergeben. Im Falle einer Schwangerschaft zum Schutz des ungeborenen Kindes notwendige intensivierte Therapien müssen bereits präkonzeptionell eingeübt werden. Die Aufklärung und Beratung von Patienten und deren Familien sollte in enger Kooperation von Stoffwechselmedizinern und Humangenetikern unter Verwendung von anschaulichen grafischen und schriftlichen Materialien unterstützt und diese den Ratsuchenden anschließend ausgehändigt werden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Burgard
- Aff1 grid.7708.8 0000 0000 9428 7911 Sektion für Neuropädiatrie und Stoffwechselmedizin Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin Im Neuenheimer Feld 669 69120 Heidelberg Deutschland
| | - Udo Wendel
- Aff2 grid.14778.3d 0000000089227789 Ehemals Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ethical Considerations When Including Lysosomal Storage Disorders in Newborn Screening Programs. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40142-015-0081-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
44
|
Al-Sulaiman A, Kondkar AA, Saeedi MY, Saadallah A, Al-Odaib A, Abu-Amero KK. Assessment of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Saudi Mothers towards Newborn Screening. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:718674. [PMID: 26543864 PMCID: PMC4620516 DOI: 10.1155/2015/718674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the attitude and knowledge of the Saudi mothers toward newborn screening (NBS) program. METHODS A total of 425 Saudi women (only mothers who have at least one pregnancy) participated in the study from different regions in Saudi Arabia and completed the structured questionnaire which sought their views on the NBS services. RESULTS A majority of the participating women (91.1%) supported the NBS program and felt it was very important and useful. However, knowledge of NBS was found to be very limited and only 34.6% knew that NBS was a test to detect genetic disorders. A lack of communication and counseling to NBS clients by health authorities offering screening is implied. CONCLUSION In general, there is a positive attitude towards the NBS program among Saudi women. However, they have several concerns to improve the availability of medication and formulas, genetic counseling, medical interventions, communication, education materials, and awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman Al-Sulaiman
- Department of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Altaf A. Kondkar
- Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
- Glaucoma Research Chair, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Y. Saeedi
- Ministry of Health, Hereditary and Chronic Diseases Control Department, Riyadh 11176, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amal Saadallah
- Department of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Al-Odaib
- Department of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khaled K. Abu-Amero
- Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
- Glaucoma Research Chair, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Botkin JR, Belmont JW, Berg JS, Berkman BE, Bombard Y, Holm IA, Levy HP, Ormond KE, Saal HM, Spinner NB, Wilfond BS, McInerney JD. Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 2015; 97:6-21. [PMID: 26140447 PMCID: PMC4570999 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 299] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2015] [Accepted: 05/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In 1995, the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) jointly published a statement on genetic testing in children and adolescents. In the past 20 years, much has changed in the field of genetics, including the development of powerful new technologies, new data from genetic research on children and adolescents, and substantial clinical experience. This statement represents current opinion by the ASHG on the ethical, legal, and social issues concerning genetic testing in children. These recommendations are relevant to families, clinicians, and investigators. After a brief review of the 1995 statement and major changes in genetic technologies in recent years, this statement offers points to consider on a broad range of test technologies and their applications in clinical medicine and research. Recommendations are also made for record and communication issues in this domain and for professional education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jonathan S Berg
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | | | - Yvonne Bombard
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Howard M Saal
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Nancy B Spinner
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lillie SE, Tarini BA, Janz NK, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Framing optional genetic testing in the context of mandatory newborn screening tests. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2015; 15:50. [PMID: 26123051 PMCID: PMC4485334 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-015-0173-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Parents are increasingly faced with decisions about optional newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) despite no consistent policy for communicating information about such testing. We examined whether framing optional NBS alongside mandatory NBS influenced intention to participate in optional NBS. Methods For this Internet-administered study, 2,991 adults read a hypothetical vignette in which optional NBS for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) was either presented by itself (in isolation), alongside a description including the total number of mandatory NBS tests (“bundled” mandatory context), or alongside a listing of each mandatory NBS test (“unbundled” mandatory context). We assessed associations with participants’ intended participation using ordered logistic regression models, and associations with attitudes towards optional DMD NBS and subjective norms using Analysis of Variance. Results Participants were more likely to choose optional DMD NBS if they also read information about mandatory NBS (either bundled or unbundled) versus when DMD NBS was presented in isolation. Participants who read about optional DMD NBS in isolation also reported such testing to be less important and that they would worry more about the results than those who also saw mandatory NBS information. Conclusions Future NBS programs should pay attention to the framing of optional testing communication, as it influences parental behavior. Predictors of NBS uptake will become increasingly important as NBS programs continue expanding. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0173-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Lillie
- Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, USA.
| | - Beth A Tarini
- Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.,Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Nancy K Janz
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.,Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.,Risk Science Center, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Newborn screening is a mandatory state-based public health program that provides all newborns in the United States with presymptomatic testing and necessary follow-up health care for a variety of medical conditions. The goal of this essential public health program is to decrease morbidity and mortality by screening for disorders in which early intervention will improve neonatal and long-term health outcomes. The results of surveys and focus groups of expectant parents demonstrate that women and their families would like to receive information about newborn screening during their prenatal care visits. Providing newborn screening information during prenatal care visits can be accomplished in a number of ways and should be adapted to individual practice style.
Collapse
|
48
|
Finan C, Nasr SZ, Rothwell E, Tarini BA. Primary care providers' experiences notifying parents of cystic fibrosis newborn screening results. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2015; 54:67-75. [PMID: 25104730 PMCID: PMC4257864 DOI: 10.1177/0009922814545619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study examines primary care provider (PCP) experiences with the initial parental disclosure of cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) results in order to identify methods to improve parent-provider communication during the CF NBS process. PCPs of infants who received positive CF NBS results participated in semistructured phone interviews. Interviews were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis. PCPs acknowledged the difficulty of "breaking bad news" to parents, and emphasized minimizing parental anxiety and maximizing parental understanding. PCPs used a variety of methods to notify parents, and shared varying information about the significance of the results. Variation in the method of parental notification, information discussed, and attention to parents' emotional needs may limit successful follow-up of children with positive CF NBS results. A multifaceted intervention to improve PCP knowledge, management, and communication could improve provider confidence, optimize information transfer, and minimize parental distress during the initial disclosure of CF NBS results.
Collapse
|
49
|
Nicholls SG, Tessier L, Etchegary H, Brehaut JC, Potter BK, Hayeems RZ, Chakraborty P, Marcadier J, Milburn J, Pullman D, Turner L, Wilson BJ. Stakeholder attitudes towards the role and application of informed consent for newborn bloodspot screening: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2014; 4:e006782. [PMID: 25421341 PMCID: PMC4244491 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) involves testing a small sample of blood taken from the heel of the newborn for a number of serious and life-limiting conditions. In Canada, newborn screening programmes fall under provincial and territorial jurisdiction with no federal coordination. To date, we know very little about the underlying beliefs around different consent practices or how terminology is interpreted by different individuals. Differences in attitudes may have important healthcare consequences. This study will provide empirical data comparing stakeholder opinions on their understanding of consent-related terminology, the perceived applicability of different consent approaches to newborn screening, and the requirements of these different approaches. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Parents, healthcare professionals and policymakers will be recruited in the provinces of Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador. Parents will be identified through records held by each provincial screening programme. Healthcare professionals will be purposively sampled on the basis of engagement with newborn screening. Within each province we will identify policymakers who have policy analysis or advisory responsibilities relating to NBS. Data collection will be by qualitative interviews. We will conduct 20 interviews with parents of young children, 10 interviews with key healthcare professionals across the range of appropriate specialties and 10 with policymakers at each site (40 per site, total, N=80). The examination of the transcripts will follow a thematic analysis approach. Recruitment started in June 2014 and is expected to be complete by June 2015. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study received ethics approval from the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board, the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Ethics Board (both Ontario), and the Health Research Ethics Authority (Newfoundland and Labrador). RESULTS These will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The results will have specific application to the development of parent education materials for newborn screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S G Nicholls
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - L Tessier
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - H Etchegary
- Clinical Epidemiology, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - J C Brehaut
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B K Potter
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - P Chakraborty
- Newborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Marcadier
- Newborn Screening Ontario, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Milburn
- Better Outcomes Registry and Network (BORN), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Pullman
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. Johns, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - L Turner
- Eastern Health, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - B J Wilson
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Potter BK, Etchegary H, Nicholls SG, Wilson BJ, Craigie SM, Araia MH. Education and parental involvement in decision-making about newborn screening: understanding goals to clarify content. J Genet Couns 2014; 24:400-8. [PMID: 25403898 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9780-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Accepted: 09/24/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A challenge in designing effective education for parents about newborn screening (NBS) has been uncertainty about appropriate content. Arguing that the goals of education may be usefully tied to parental decision-making, we sought to: (1) explore how different ways of implementing NBS differ in their approaches to parental engagement in decision-making; (2) map the potential goals of education onto these "implementation models"; and (3) consider the content that may be needed to support these goals. The resulting conceptual framework supports the availability of comprehensive information about NBS for parents, irrespective of the model of implementation. This is largely because we argue that meeting parental expectations and preferences for communication is an important goal regardless of whether or notparents are actively involved in making a decision. Our analysis supports a flexible approach, in which some educational messages are emphasized as important for all parents to understand while others are made available depending on parents' preferences. We have begun to define the content of NBS education for parents needed to support specific goals. Further research and discussion is important to determine the most appropriate strategies for delivering the tailored approach to education that emerged from our analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth K Potter
- Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, Canada,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|