1
|
Tian Z, Jiang Y, Zhang N, Zhang Z, Wang L. Analysis of the Current State of COPD Nursing Based on a Bibliometric Approach from the Web of Science. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19:255-268. [PMID: 38283691 PMCID: PMC10813247 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s440715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aim COPD nursing plays a crucial role in alleviating disease symptoms, prolonging patient survival, and is therefore of paramount importance. However, authoritative research findings, research hotspots, and development trends in the field of COPD are still unclear. This study aimed to examine authoritative research findings, research hotspots, and trends in the field of COPD nursing. Descriptive statistics and bibliometric and visual analyses of the literature were conducted. Methods Bibliometric data were obtained from the Web of Science database. Citespace was used to explore publication trends, countries, institutions, journals, authors, keywords, and co-citation characteristics of the included literature in order to summarize the key research in the field of COPD nursing. Results In total, 693 articles on COPD nursing were published. 1998-2014 showed a rapid growth period in this research field, which stabilized in 2015-2022. The research content could mostly be summarized into five categories: acute exacerbation, quality of life, risk, evidence-based nursing, and pulmonary rehabilitation. The research hotspots in 1998-2014 included randomized controlled trials, education, elderly patients, nursing home residents, nursing homes, rehabilitation, and prevalence. Research in 2015-2022 focused on impact, palliative care, needs, and predictors. In recent years, research mainly concentrated on symptom management models, cost-effectiveness, and cumulative meta-analysis. Conclusion Bibliometric analysis of COPD nursing articles indicates that the focus of COPD nursing research is shifting from tertiary prevention to primary and secondary prevention. Helping patients achieve self-management of symptoms, reducing the financial burden of COPD on healthcare, and summarizing research evidence by meta-analyses will likely remain the focus of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Tian
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yachen Jiang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People’s Republic of China
| | - Nan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhijun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lan Wang
- School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pouw T, de Man‐van Ginkel J, Hardeman JA, Mager J, Trapman L, Jaarsma T, Weldam S. The association of resilience with self-care and quality of life in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open 2023; 10:7738-7748. [PMID: 37817549 PMCID: PMC10643849 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the association of resilience with self-care and quality of life in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. METHODS Data were collected between February and May 2021. Self-care was measured with the self-care of chronic illness inventory, quality of life was measured with the clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire and resilience was measured with the resilience evaluation scale. Possible confounders were included (sex, age, smoking, time since diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, educational level, social support and pulmonary function). Multiple regression analysis was performed among the determinants, confounders and both outcomes. RESULTS Participants scored fairly well on resilience (mean 22.5). Self-care scored reasonably well (mean maintenance 65.9, mean monitoring 70.9, mean management 59.9 and mean confidence 71.5). Quality of life scored mediocre (mean 2.6). The results of the linear multiple regression were resilience, which is associated with self-care confidence and quality of life when adjusted for possible confounders. This means people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with higher resilience have better self-care confidence and higher quality of life. The outcome contributes to strengthening nursing care and further developing nurses' knowledge. The results can contribute to increasing awareness for healthcare professionals that resilience can potentially increase self-care and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Pouw
- Nursing Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, Utrecht UniversityUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Division Lung, St. Antonius HospitalUtrecht/NieuwegeinNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Janneke de Man‐van Ginkel
- Nursing Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, Utrecht UniversityUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Nursing Science, Department of Gerontology and GeriatricsLeiden University Medical CentreLeidenThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lian Trapman
- Division Lung, St. Antonius HospitalUtrecht/NieuwegeinNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Tiny Jaarsma
- Nursing Science, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Faculty of Medical and health sciencesLinkoping UniversityLinkopingSweden
| | - Saskia Weldam
- Nursing Sciences, Program in Clinical Health Sciences, Utrecht UniversityUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Division Heart and LungsUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Swain R, Forsyth F, Bowers B, Early F, Kuhn I, Shrivastva S, Tufnell R, Fuld J. A critical interpretive synthesis of the lived experiences and health and patient-reported outcomes of people living with COPD who isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:230031. [PMID: 37495249 PMCID: PMC10369166 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0031-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To determine the lived experiences of people with COPD who isolated at home during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and explore how these experiences affected health and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS Keyword searches were performed in five bibliographic databases. Critical interpretative synthesis (CIS) methods were used to interrogate and understand patterns across studies. RESULTS 23 studies were identified; three employed qualitative methods and 20 quantitative methods. Application of CIS methods highlighted a core synthetic concept that appeared to underpin experiences and outcomes, that of a heightened perception of risk. Using the Risk Perception Model as a framework, we found that cognitive factors such as knowledge of underlying health status and the transmissibility of COVID-19; experiential factors including previous episodes of breathlessness and hospitalisation; and sociocultural factors such as access to trusted sources of information, influenced perceptions of risk. In turn, this influenced behaviour, which translated to outcomes such as reduced hospitalisations, deconditioning and social isolation as people avoided "high-risk" situations and settings. CONCLUSIONS Patients with COPD who isolated at home during the COVID-19 pandemic had a heightened perception of risk which was influenced by cognitive, experiential and sociocultural factors. The consequences of this were varied and included both positive (reduced exacerbations and hospitalisations) and negative (social isolation, deconditioning, diminished capacity for self-care) outcomes. Understanding risk and the impacts it can have could help clinicians to support people with COPD return to their pre-pandemic way of living and enable better communication of ongoing risk from respiratory viral illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Swain
- Department of Infection and Inflammation Research, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Faye Forsyth
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Ben Bowers
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Queen's Nursing Institute, London, UK
| | - Frances Early
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Isla Kuhn
- Medical Library, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sagar Shrivastva
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Rachel Tufnell
- Cambridge Breathlessness Intervention Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Fuld
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fernández Villar A, Golpe Gómez R, González Montaos A, Fernández García S, Pazos Area L, Priegue Carrera A, Ruano Raviña A, Represas Represas C. The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the demographic, clinical and social profiles of patients admitted to the Pneumology Department for a COPD exacerbation. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290156. [PMID: 37708160 PMCID: PMC10501653 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although a reduction in admissions for pathologies other than SARS-CoV-2 has been reported during the pandemic, there are hardly any specific studies in relation to COPD. The objective of this study was to analyse differences in the profile of those admitted for AEPOC and their prognosis during this period. METHODS Prospective study (SocioEPOC validation cohort) conducted in two hospitals. Demographic, clinical and social characteristics were compared among patients admitted for an AECOPD before and after the declaration of the COVID-19 healthcare emergency. Mortality and the need for hospital care in the following 3 months were analysed. RESULTS 340 patients (76.6% male, 72 years, FEV1 43.5%) were included, 174 in the post-pandemic phase. During pandemic, especially before population-level vaccination, admissions for AECOPD were in patients with more severe disease and with a higher level of eosinophils. No differences were found in social profile, except they had more informal caregivers. The mortality rate at 90 days was the same (9%), although those admitted during the pandemic came for more hospital visits in the following 3 months (53.8% vs. 42%; p = 0.003), with the pandemic phase being an independent predictor of this possibility (OR = 1.6.; 95% IC = 1.1-2.6). CONCLUSIONS In the first few months of the pandemic, the clinical profile of patients hospitalised for an AECOPD differed from that both prior to this period and during the latter months of the pandemic, with minimal changes at the social level. Although the mortality rate were similar, unscheduled hospital visits increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Fernández Villar
- Pulmonology Department, Álvaro Cunqueiro University Hospital, Vigo, Spain
- Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur (IISGS), Neumo I + i. Research Group, Pontevedra, Spain
| | | | - Almudena González Montaos
- Pulmonology Department, Álvaro Cunqueiro University Hospital, Vigo, Spain
- Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur (IISGS), Neumo I + i. Research Group, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - Sara Fernández García
- Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur (IISGS), Neumo I + i. Research Group, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - Luis Pazos Area
- Pulmonology Department, Álvaro Cunqueiro University Hospital, Vigo, Spain
- Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur (IISGS), Neumo I + i. Research Group, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - Ana Priegue Carrera
- Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur (IISGS), Neumo I + i. Research Group, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - Alberto Ruano Raviña
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública—CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Represas Represas
- Pulmonology Department, Álvaro Cunqueiro University Hospital, Vigo, Spain
- Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur (IISGS), Neumo I + i. Research Group, Pontevedra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taunque A, Li G, MacNeil A, Gulati I, Jiang Y, de Groh M, Fuller-Thomson E. Breathless and Blue in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging: Incident and Recurrent Depression Among Older Adults with COPD During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18:1975-1993. [PMID: 37724252 PMCID: PMC10505398 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s417218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health measures intensified risk factors for depression and concurrently heightened numerous health-related stressors for individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Utilizing a comprehensive longitudinal sample of Canadian older adults, this study examined the incidence and recurrence of depression among older adults with COPD, and identified factors that were associated with depression during the pandemic among this population. Methods Data came from four phases of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) (n=875 with COPD). The primary outcome of interest was a positive screen for depression based on the CES-D-10, during autumn of 2020. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors that were associated with depression. Results Approximately 1 in 6 (17%) respondents with COPD and no lifetime history of depression developed depression for the first time during the early stages of the pandemic. Approximately 1 in 2 (52%) participants with COPD and a history of depression experienced a recurrence of depressive symptoms during this period. Loneliness, functional limitations, and family conflict were associated with a higher risk of both incident and recurrent depression. The risk of incident depression only was higher among those who had difficulty accessing healthcare resources. The risk of recurrent depression only was higher among women, those with a post-secondary education, and those with more adverse childhood experiences. Conclusion Screening and interventions aimed at individuals with COPD, both with and without a history of depression, are warranted to potentially mitigate the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneisha Taunque
- Institute for Life Course and Aging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Grace Li
- Department of Sociology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Andie MacNeil
- Institute for Life Course and Aging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ishnaa Gulati
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ying Jiang
- Applied Research Division, Center for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Margaret de Groh
- Applied Research Division, Center for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Esme Fuller-Thomson
- Institute for Life Course and Aging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Awatade NT, Wark PAB, Chan ASL, Mamun SMAA, Mohd Esa NY, Matsunaga K, Rhee CK, Hansbro PM, Sohal SS. The Complex Association between COPD and COVID-19. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113791. [PMID: 37297985 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is mounting evidence suggesting that COPD patients are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes; however, it remains unclear whether they are more susceptible to acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this comprehensive review, we aim to provide an up-to-date perspective of the intricate relationship between COPD and COVID-19. We conducted a thorough review of the literature to examine the evidence regarding the susceptibility of COPD patients to COVID-19 infection and the severity of their disease outcomes. While most studies have found that pre-existing COPD is associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes, some have yielded conflicting results. We also discuss confounding factors such as cigarette smoking, inhaled corticosteroids, and socioeconomic and genetic factors that may influence this association. Furthermore, we review acute COVID-19 management, treatment, rehabilitation, and recovery in COPD patients and how public health measures impact their care. In conclusion, while the association between COPD and COVID-19 is complex and requires further investigation, this review highlights the need for careful management of COPD patients during the pandemic to minimize the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil T Awatade
- Immune Health Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute and University of Newcastle, Newcastle 2305, Australia
| | - Peter A B Wark
- Immune Health Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute and University of Newcastle, Newcastle 2305, Australia
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle 2305, Australia
| | - Andrew S L Chan
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards 2065, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
| | - S M Abdullah Al Mamun
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Sleep Medicine, Evercare Hospitals Dhaka, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
| | | | - Kazuto Matsunaga
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Disease Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, 1-1-1 Minami-kogushi, Ube 755-8505, Japan
| | - Chin Kook Rhee
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Philip M Hansbro
- Immune Health Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute and University of Newcastle, Newcastle 2305, Australia
- Centre for Inflammation, Faculty of Science, School of Life Sciences, Centenary Institute and University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2050, Australia
| | - Sukhwinder Singh Sohal
- Respiratory Translational Research Group, Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7248, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Madawala S, Quach A, Lim JY, Varatharaj S, Perera B, Osadnik C, Barton C. Healthcare experience of adults with COPD during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review of international literature. BMJ Open Respir Res 2023; 10:10/1/e001514. [PMID: 36858459 PMCID: PMC9979589 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are a group who may be particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. This vulnerability has been associated with increased anxiety or fear about exposure to the virus, which may also impact upon experience in healthcare settings. AIM/OBJECTIVES The aim of this narrative mixed-methods review was to systematically scope, identify and synthesise findings from peer-reviewed qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published in academic journals describing the healthcare experiences of adults living with COPD independently in the community, following the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019-June 2022. METHODS Databases including Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Ovid Emcare and CINAHL Plus were searched. Studies were uploaded to Covidence to support selection and appraisal of studies. Studies were appraised for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis of these themes was provided, and qualitative and quantitative findings are interpreted together in the discussion. FINDINGS The quality and experience of care for patients with COPD was impacted through the COVID-19 pandemic. Innovations and adoption of technologies such as telehealth and telerehabilitation were well received and mitigated the potential implications of severe disruption to care access to some extent. Patients feared feeling forgotten and experienced isolation and anxiety; however, telerehabilitation and exercise through modalities such as Zoom classes help support social connection and physical activity. IMPLICATIONS These innovations are likely to be useful to be offered to patients on an ongoing basis, and education and standardised protocols around their use will benefit healthcare providers and patients alike. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022341168.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanduni Madawala
- Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony Quach
- Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jia Yi Lim
- Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sanjay Varatharaj
- Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bianca Perera
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christian Osadnik
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chris Barton
- Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bhattacharyya P, Mukherjee S, Chatterjee M, Saha D, Sengupta S, Dey D. The impact of lockdown on symptoms and health status of patients with chronic airway diseases: An appraisal of patient perceived impressions. Lung India 2023; 40:128-133. [PMID: 37006096 PMCID: PMC10174645 DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_278_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The pandemic-specific lockdown may influence the health status of patients with chronic airflow obstruction (CAO) as COPD, COPD-PH, and chronic asthma. Objectives To find the impact of the lockdown on symptoms, and the degree of perceived change in physical activity and emotional health with possible reasons including the indicators of ambient air pollution. Methods A cohort of CAO patients was telephonically enquired regarding their perceived well-being in symptom status, physical activity, and emotional health with the perceived contribution from plausible reasons (regular medication, simple food, no pollution, and family attention) for the change; all being expressed in percentages. The change in symptom scores as 0-39, 40-79, and 80-100 were regarded as 'low', 'medium', and 'high' respectively. The impact of the individual contributing factor was calculated statistically. The assessment of the CAT (COPD assessment test) score and the ambient air pollution (PM2.5 and PM10) was also done for their association with well-being. Results There was a universal improvement (p < 0.5) in COPD (n = 113), COPD-PH, (n = 40), and chronic asthma, (n = 19) as regards symptoms, physical activity, and emotional health that tallies to overall and individual change in CAT score. There were concomitant reductions in PM10 and PM2.5 levels during the lockdown compared to the same period of the previous year. All the four listed factors contributed with the 'no/low pollution' and 'simple food being the most important; on acting together, they reduced the moderate and severe symptoms impressively. Conclusion Reduced air pollution and simple food appear most important for the improvement of CAO patients during the lockdown period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sikta Mukherjee
- Department of Airway Disease, Institute of Pulmocare and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Moumita Chatterjee
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Aliah University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Dipanjan Saha
- Department of Airway Disease, Institute of Pulmocare and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sayoni Sengupta
- Department of Airway Disease, Institute of Pulmocare and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Debkanya Dey
- Department of Airway Disease, Institute of Pulmocare and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Calle Rubio M, López-Campos JL, Miravitlles M, Michel de la Rosa FJ, Hernández Pérez JM, Montero Martínez C, Montoro Ronsano JB, Casas Maldonado F, Rodríguez Hermosa JL, Tabernero Huguet EM, Martínez Sesmero JM, Martínez Rivera C, Callejas González FJ, Torres Durán M. COVID-19's impact on care practice for alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:98. [PMID: 36717880 PMCID: PMC9885054 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09094-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD), commonly categorized as a rare disease, have been affected by the changes in healthcare management brought about by COVID-19. This study's aim was to identify the changes that have taken place in AATD patient care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain and to propose experts' recommendations aimed at ensuring humanized and quality care for people with AATD in the post-pandemic situation. METHODS A qualitative descriptive case study with a holistic single-case design was conducted, using focus groups with experts in AATD clinical management, including 15 health professionals with ties to the Spanish health system (12 pneumologists and 2 hospital pharmacists from 11 different hospitals in Spain) and 1 patient representative. RESULTS COVID-19 has had a major impact on numerous aspects of AATD clinical patient management in Spain, including diagnostic, treatment, and follow-up phases. The experts concluded that there is a need to strengthen coordination between Primary Care and Hospital Care and improve the coordination processes across all the organizations and actors involved in the healthcare system. Regarding telemedicine and telecare, experts have concluded that it is necessary to promote this methodology and to develop protocols and training programs. Experts have recommended developing personalized and precision medicine, and patient participation in decision-making, promoting self-care and patient autonomy to optimize their healthcare and improve their quality of life. The possibility of monitoring and treating AATD patients from home has also been proposed by experts. Another result of the study was the recommendation of the need to ensure that plasma donations are made on a regular basis by a sufficient number of healthy individuals. CONCLUSION The study advances knowledge by highlighting the challenges faced by health professionals and changes in AATD patient management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also proposes experts' recommendations aimed at ensuring humanized and quality care for people with AATD in the post-pandemic situation. This work could serve as a reference study for physicians on their daily clinical practice with AATD patients and may also provide guidance on the changes to be put in place for the post-pandemic situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myriam Calle Rubio
- grid.414780.ePulmonology Department, Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Madrid, Spain ,grid.4795.f0000 0001 2157 7667Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Luis López-Campos
- grid.411109.c0000 0000 9542 1158Medical-Surgical Unit for Respiratory Diseases, Biomedicine Institute of Sevilla (IBiS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | - Marc Miravitlles
- grid.411083.f0000 0001 0675 8654Pulmonology Department, Research Institute of Vall d’Hebron (VHIR), Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Network of Centers for Biomedical Research On Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - José María Hernández Pérez
- grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Network of Centers for Biomedical Research On Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain ,Pulmonology Department, Nuestra Señora de Candelaria University Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Carmen Montero Martínez
- grid.411066.40000 0004 1771 0279Pulmonology Department, A Coruña University Hospital, A Coruña, Spain
| | - José Bruno Montoro Ronsano
- grid.411083.f0000 0001 0675 8654Department of Pharmacy, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Casas Maldonado
- grid.411380.f0000 0000 8771 3783Pulmonology Department, San Cecilio Clinical University Hospital, Granada, Spain ,grid.4489.10000000121678994School of Health Science, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Rodríguez Hermosa
- grid.414780.ePulmonology Department, Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), San Carlos Clinical Hospital, Madrid, Spain ,grid.4795.f0000 0001 2157 7667Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Carlos Martínez Rivera
- grid.413448.e0000 0000 9314 1427Network of Centers for Biomedical Research On Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain ,grid.411438.b0000 0004 1767 6330Pulmonology Department, Research Institute of Germans Trias I Pujol (IGTiP), Germans Trias I Pujol University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - María Torres Durán
- Pulmonology Department, Health Research Institute of Galicia Sur (IISGS), Álvaro Cunqueiro Hospital, Estrada Clara Campoamor, 342. 36312 Vigo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Myers LC, Murray R, Donato B, Liu VX, Kipnis P, Shaikh A, Franchino-Elder J. Risk of hospitalization in a sample of COVID-19 patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 2023; 206:107064. [PMID: 36459955 PMCID: PMC9700393 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.107064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may have worse coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related outcomes. We compared COVID-19 hospitalization risk in patients with and without COPD. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥40 years, SARS-CoV-2 positive, and with Kaiser Permanente Northern California membership ≥1 year before COVID-19 diagnosis (electronic health records and claims data). COVID-19-related hospitalization risk was assessed by sequentially adjusted logistic regression models and stratified by disease severity. Secondary outcome was death/hospice referral after COVID-19. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Of 19,558 COVID-19 patients, 697 (3.6%) had COPD. Compared with patients without COPD, COPD patients were older (median age: 69 vs 53 years); had higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (5 vs 0) and more median baseline outpatient (8 vs 4), emergency department (2 vs 1), and inpatient (2 vs 1) encounters. Unadjusted analyses showed increased odds of hospitalization with COPD (odds ratio [OR]: 3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.40-4.60). After full risk adjustment, there were no differences in odds of hospitalization (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.93-1.40) or death/hospice referral (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72-1.27) between patients with and without COPD. Primary/secondary outcomes did not differ by COPD severity, except for higher odds of hospitalization in COPD patients requiring supplemental oxygen versus those without COPD (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.02-3.33). CONCLUSIONS Except for hospitalization among patients using supplemental oxygen, no differences in odds of hospitalization or death/hospice referral were observed in the COVID-19 patient sample depending on whether they had COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C. Myers
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA,Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA,Corresponding author. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland, CA, 94612, USA
| | | | - Bonnie Donato
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - Vincent X. Liu
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA,Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Patricia Kipnis
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA,Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Asif Shaikh
- Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| | - Jessica Franchino-Elder
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alkouri O, Khader Y, Hweidi IM, Gharaibeh MK, Jarrah M, Hamdan KM, Al Marzouqi A, Khamaiseh K. COVID-19 Fear and Anxiety among Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Cross Sectional Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:6586. [PMID: 36362814 PMCID: PMC9653698 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the current management of COVID-19 is mainly focused on efficacious vaccine and infection control, the most common psychological reactions (such as fear and anxiety) associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have not been investigated and even neglected in patients with heart failure who are at greater risk for morbidity and mortality. We assessed COVID-19 related fear and anxiety among patients with heart failure and determined their associated factors. A cross sectional survey was conducted among 300 consecutive patients with heart failure during the period of March 2021−June 2021. Almost 50.7% of patients had fear of COVID-19 and 36.3% had coronavirus anxiety. Age > 55 was significantly associated with increased odds of fear (OR = 2.6) and anxiety (OR = 4.3). Patients with angina were more likely to have fear (OR = 3.0) and anxiety (OR = 2.2) and patients with chronic lung disease were more likely to have fear (OR = 3.0) and anxiety (OR = 3.3). Increased age, having angina, and having chronic lung disease were associated with increased odds of fear of COVID-19 and coronavirus anxiety. Psychological support needs to be integrated in patient care with special attention to physiological risk factors that are associated with COVID-19 comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osama Alkouri
- Faculty of Nursing, Yarmouk University, Irbid 2116, Jordan
| | - Yousef Khader
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 2116, Jordan
| | - Issa M. Hweidi
- Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 2116, Jordan
| | | | - Mohamad Jarrah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 2116, Jordan
| | | | - Amina Al Marzouqi
- College of Health Sciences, Health Services Administration University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
| | - Khaldoun Khamaiseh
- Faculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa University, Al-Salt P.O. Box 19117, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Impact of COVID-19 primary healthcare service restrictions on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Cape Town, South Africa. S Afr Med J 2022; 112:760-764. [DOI: 10.7196/samj.2022.v112i9.16385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) typically experience multidimensional symptoms throughout the course of their disease, with burdensome physical symptoms, social isolation, and additional psychological suffering. COVID-19 lockdown resulted in restrictions on chronic care delivery at primary healthcare (PHC) facilities, and it is not known what the care experiences of patients with COPD were during this time.Objectives. To describe patient experiences of the impact of the lockdown on their needs and their experiences of the primary care received for their COPD.Methods. The data reported in this paper are from a cohort of 49 patients with COPD receiving primary care, recruited in February and March 2020, before recruitment was paused for COVID-19 lockdown, for a feasibility stepped-wedge hybrid type II design randomised controlled trial of integrated person-centred palliative care in primary care for patients with COPD in Cape Town, South Africa. Data are open-text responses from participants who responded to a single question on a validated measure of primary care consultation empathy (CARE), and describe patient experiences of the impact of the lockdown on the primary care received for their COPD, prior to crossover to trial intervention.Results. Thirty-two patients with COPD gave between 1 and 9 responses each to the open-ended question between March and December 2020. The average age of the participants was 58.6 years, and 53.1% (n=17) were female. Inductive analysis of the open-text data identified four main themes. Participants described decreased access to chronic care and a desire for more person-centred care in interactions with healthcare professionals. The socioeconomic ramifications of the COVID-19 lockdown added to the burden they experienced.Conclusion. The COVID-19 lockdown PHC service restrictions caused a disruption to the continuity of care for patients with COPD, with associated worry, anxiety and disappointment. Medication access was largely supported by the home delivery of chronic medication. We suggest that there are opportunities for providing more sustained support for patients with COPD through referrals to community health workers, and also through telephonic patient follow-up by primary care teams
Collapse
|
13
|
Arnaert A, Ahmad H, Mohamed S, Hudson E, Craciunas S, Girard A, Debe Z, Dantica JL, Denoncourt C, Côté-Leblanc G. Experiences of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving integrated telehealth nursing services during COVID-19 lockdown. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:205. [PMID: 35915510 PMCID: PMC9340700 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00967-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Even though telemonitoring existed prior to COVID-19, the need was accelerated for patients with COPD due to the limited medical consultations and the anxiety for being infected. To our knowledge, no qualitative study has explored the experiences of COPD patients and the potential benefits of receiving integrated telehealth nursing services during the lockdown. Methods Ten participants were interviewed after receiving telehealth nursing services for 3 months; data was analyzed thematically. Results Irrespective of COPD severity, all participants expressed that the existing fragmented follow-up care was intensified during COVID. The telenursing services provided them with the comfort and reassurance that a clinician is available for support, advice, and care during the times of isolation. Despite diverse opinions regarding the respiratory-related questions for follow-up, all were enthusiastic about the use of the oximeter in their daily lives. None perceived sharing data as an issue, instead they encouraged the exchange across levels of care. Conclusion Despite an appreciation for the service, it is imperative for sustainability reasons that standardized protocols are developed to balance patient preferences in terms of response frequency and the clinical data needed for a telenurse to provide appropriate interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Arnaert
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2M7, Canada.
| | - Hamza Ahmad
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2M7, Canada
| | - Shameera Mohamed
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2M7, Canada
| | - Emilie Hudson
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2M7, Canada
| | - Stephanie Craciunas
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2M7, Canada
| | - Alice Girard
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2M7, Canada
| | - Zoumanan Debe
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2M7, Canada
| | - Joséphine Lemy Dantica
- Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Service Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Candice Denoncourt
- Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Service Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Geneviève Côté-Leblanc
- Montreal West Island Integrated University Health and Social Service Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Akyıl FT, Önür ST, Sökücü S, Abalı H, Boyracı N, Çayır E, Altın S, Altin S. Lifestyle Changes and Exacerbation Frequency of COPD in Times of the Pandemic. Turk Thorac J 2022; 23:210-217. [PMID: 35579227 PMCID: PMC9450222 DOI: 10.5152/turkthoracj.2022.21165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to analyze chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation rates and the effect of patients' behavioral changes on the exacerbations during the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was conducted in a reference hospital for chest diseases and patients who were hospitalized with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease between March 11, 2019, and March 11, 2020, were designated. Patients' chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations requiring emergency department visits and/or hospitalization were com- pared between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Each patient was surveyed with 25 questions using telemedicine. RESULTS Of all the 256 patients, 203 (79%) were male and the mean age was 66 ± 10 years. Compared to the previous year, emer- gency department visits and hospitalizations in our hospital were significantly lower and less frequent (P < .0001, for both). Smoking habits decreased in 9% of patients, and 60% had hardly spent time outdoors. Only 3 patients reported to spend time indoors. The household mask-use rate while contacting the patient was 50%. As a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient, 33% expressed themselves as "feeling better." Overall, 92(36%) patients were recorded not to have any exacerbation, and 34 (13%) to have no attacks of worsening were managed at home. Novel exacerbation risk was found to independently correlate with younger age (odds ratio: 0.944, CI: 0.904-0.986, P = .010) and having more frequent episodes of exacerbation in the pre-pandemic period (odds ratio: 1.2, CI: 1.025-1.405, P = .023). CONCLUSION Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients specifically benefited from confinements, restrictions, and lifestyle changes. Further studies are needed to better identify the most critical factors leading to these positive outcomes. A permanent patient management guideline for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients could be formulated where the weight of lifestyle factors is elevated.
Collapse
|
15
|
Mak IL, Wan EYF, Wong TKT, Lee WWJ, Chan EWY, Choi EPH, Chui CSL, Ip MSM, Lau WCS, Lau KK, Lee SF, Wong ICK, Yu EYT, Lam CLK. The Spill-Over Impact of the Novel Coronavirus-19 Pandemic on Medical Care and Disease Outcomes in Non-communicable Diseases: A Narrative Review. Public Health Rev 2022; 43:1604121. [PMID: 35574567 PMCID: PMC9091177 DOI: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1604121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has claimed more than 5 million lives worldwide by November 2021. Implementation of lockdown measures, reallocation of medical resources, compounded by the reluctance to seek help, makes it exceptionally challenging for people with non-communicable diseases (NCD) to manage their diseases. This review evaluates the spill-over impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with NCDs including cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory disease, chronic kidney disease, dementia, mental health disorders, and musculoskeletal disorders.Methods: Literature published in English was identified from PubMed and medRxiv from January 1, 2019 to November 30, 2020. A total of 119 articles were selected from 6,546 publications found.Results: The reduction of in-person care, screening procedures, delays in diagnosis, treatment, and social distancing policies have unanimously led to undesirable impacts on both physical and psychological health of NCD patients. This is projected to contribute to more excess deaths in the future.Conclusion: The spill-over impact of COVID-19 on patients with NCD is just beginning to unravel, extra efforts must be taken for planning the resumption of NCD healthcare services post-pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivy Lynn Mak
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Eric Yuk Fai Wan
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited (D24H), Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- *Correspondence: Eric Yuk Fai Wan,
| | - Teenie Kwan Tung Wong
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Wendy Woo Jung Lee
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Esther Wai Yin Chan
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited (D24H), Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Edmond Pui Hang Choi
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Celine Sze Ling Chui
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited (D24H), Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mary Sau Man Ip
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Wallace Chak Sing Lau
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kui Kai Lau
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- The State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shing Fung Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ian Chi Kei Wong
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited (D24H), Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Esther Yee Tak Yu
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Cindy Lo Kuen Lam
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sakur FJ, Ward K, Khatri NN, Lau AYS. Self-care Behaviours and Technology utilised during COVID-19: Systematic Review. JMIR Hum Factors 2022; 9:e35173. [PMID: 35442904 PMCID: PMC9217152 DOI: 10.2196/35173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Self-care behaviors are essential for people living with chronic conditions; however, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has imposed additional complications on their daily routines. Few studies have analyzed how self-care behaviors have changed during COVID-19 and the role of digital technology, especially among people with chronic conditions. Objective This study aims to review how self-care behaviors have changed for people with chronic conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, and what technology they have adopted to manage their conditions during that period. Methods A systematic review was conducted using narrative synthesis. Data were extracted from PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Google Scholar, including articles from December 2019 onward. Eligible studies focused on adults diagnosed with chronic conditions undertaking any self-care tasks in line with the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness (ie, self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management). The methodological quality of the included articles was assessed with the McMaster Critical Review Forms for Quantitative or Qualitative Studies. Results In total, 36 primary research articles were included. Changes to self-care behaviors during COVID-19 among people with chronic conditions were organized according to the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness focusing on self-care maintenance (ie, medication adherence, physical activity, and diet control), self-care monitoring (ie, monitoring signs and symptoms), and self-care management (ie, consultations with health care providers). Positive self-care behaviors observed include the following: individuals trying to maintain good glycemic control during COVID-19 increased their medication adherence in 27% (10/36) of studies; and diet control improved in 50% (18/36) of studies. Negative self-care behaviors observed include the following: decline in physical activities and increased sedentariness were observed in 65% (23/36) of studies; poor diet control was observed in 57% (21/36) of studies; and self-monitoring of health status dropped in 43% (15/36) of studies. The use of technology to support self-care of chronic conditions during COVID-19 was reported in 72% (26/36) of studies. The actual use of telehealth in place of physical consultations during COVID-19 was observed in 50% (18/36) of studies, and other digital technologies (eg, social media apps, smartphone apps, web-based platforms, and web browsing) were used in 50% (18/36) of studies. Telehealth was discussed and recommended as the default technology in delivering future health care services during COVID-19 and beyond in 77% (28/36) of studies. Conclusions This review highlighted the necessity to rethink how models of self-care should continue to address the demands of chronic conditions while being responsive to the imminent threats of infectious diseases. Perhaps the silver lining of COVID-19 is that adoption of digital technology (especially telehealth) among a vast cross-section of people with chronic conditions is possible. Future research should investigate effective ways to incorporate evidence-based digital health tools into these new models of self-care that address the challenges of chronic and infectious conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fareeya Jan Sakur
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University,, 75 Talavera Rd,, North Ryde, AU
| | - Kanesha Ward
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, AU
| | - Neha Nafees Khatri
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, AU
| | - Annie Y S Lau
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, AU
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
White LK, Crowley TB, Finucane B, Garcia-Minaur S, Repetto GM, van den Bree M, Fischer M, Jacquemont S, Barzilay R, Maillard AM, Donald KA, Gur RE, Bassett AS, Swillen A, McDonald-McGinn DM. The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on worry and medical disruptions reported by individuals with chromosome 22q11.2 copy number variants and their caregivers. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH : JIDR 2022; 66:313-322. [PMID: 35191118 PMCID: PMC9725107 DOI: 10.1111/jir.12918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The world has suffered immeasurably during the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased distress and mental and medical health concerns are collateral consequences to the disease itself. The Genes to Mental Health (G2MH) Network consortium sought to understand how individuals affected by the rare copy number variations of 22q11.2 deletion and duplication syndrome, associated with neurodevelopmental/neuropsychiatric conditions, were coping. The article focuses on worry and disruptions in medical care caused by the pandemic. METHODS The University of Pennsylvania COVID-19 Stressor List and care disruption questions were circulated by 22 advocacy groups in English and 11 other languages. RESULTS A total of 512 people from 23 countries completed the survey; most were caregivers of affected individuals. Worry about family members acquiring COVID-19 had the highest average endorsed worry, whilst currently having COVID-19 had the lowest rated worry. Total COVID-19 worries were higher in individuals completing the survey towards the end of the study (later pandemic wave); 36% (n = 186) of the sample reported a significant effect on health due to care interruption during the pandemic; 44% of individuals (n = 111) receiving care for their genetic syndrome in a hospital setting reported delaying appointments due to COVID-19 fears; 12% (n = 59) of the sample reported disruptions to treatments; and of those reporting no current disruptions, 59% (n = 269) worried about future disruptions if the pandemic continued. Higher levels of care disruptions were related to higher COVID-19 worries (Ps < 0.005). Minimal differences by respondent type or copy number variation type emerged. CONCLUSIONS Widespread medical care disruptions and pandemic-related worries were reported by individuals with 22q11.2 syndrome and their family members. Reported worries were broadly consistent with research results from prior reports in the general population. The long-term effects of COVID-19 worries, interruptions to care and hospital avoidance require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L K White
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - T B Crowley
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - B Finucane
- Geisinger Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Lewisburg, PA, USA
| | - S Garcia-Minaur
- Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - G M Repetto
- Center for Genetics and Genomics, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana - Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - M van den Bree
- Medical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - M Fischer
- Clinic and Policlinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - S Jacquemont
- Sainte Justine Research Center, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - R Barzilay
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A M Maillard
- Service des Troubles du Spectre de l'Autisme (STSA), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - K A Donald
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - R E Gur
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A S Bassett
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University Health Network and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Swillen
- Center for Human Genetics, University Hospital Leuven and Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D M McDonald-McGinn
- Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ryan N, Meskell P. The experience of people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis living through the COVID-19 pandemic. J Adv Nurs 2022; 78:2232-2244. [PMID: 35179243 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIM To explore the experience of people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis living through the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN A qualitative descriptive design using semi-structured interviews. METHOD Purposive sampling was employed to recruit 13 participants with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis attending the respiratory department of a large urban teaching hospital in Limerick, Ireland. Data were collected between January 2021 and February 2021 through semi-structured interviews, using an online platform. Reflective thematic analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS Four key themes were identified from participant's experience of living through the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) fear of contracting COVID-19 disease, (2) living with reduced social interaction, (3) the adjustment in the relationship with healthcare professionals (HCP) and (4) navigating an altered landscape. CONCLUSION Healthcare professionals have a key role in protecting the physical and psychological health of the person with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis during this time and into the future. Through being cognisant of the additional supportive care needs of people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, HCP can focus on developing targeted interventions aimed to enhance care provision. IMPACT This study considers people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as a particularly vulnerable group whose experiences of living through the COVID-19 pandemic warrant specific attention. Participants felt compelled to self-isolate due to fear and anxiety of contracting COVID-19 disease. Participants reported increased social isolation with some experiencing anger and resentment at loss of precious time with loved ones. Participants felt an increased responsibility for self-monitoring their condition and had concerns about differentiating symptoms of COVID-19 disease from an exacerbation. A variety of strategies that helped them cope through the pandemic were identified and also the important role these played. The results from this study can be used to inform HCP' understanding of challenges experienced by people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis during enforced restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelle Ryan
- Respiratory Department, University Hospital of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Pauline Meskell
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Takeuchi E, Katanoda K, Cheli S, Goldzweig G, Tabuchi T. Restrictions on healthcare utilization and psychological distress among patients with diseases potentially vulnerable to COVID-19; the JACSIS 2020 study. Health Psychol Behav Med 2022; 10:229-240. [PMID: 35174000 PMCID: PMC8843161 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2037429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with comorbidity are at higher risk of deteriorating COVID-19, but they need to access healthcare services regularly for their primary disease. This study aimed to investigate whether patients restricted healthcare utilization due to the COVID-19 pandemic and to understand the relations between restriction of healthcare utilization and psychological distress of patients with a disease potentially vulnerable to COVID-19. Methods Participants were a sub-sample of 6,360 individuals suffering from chronic diseases with hypertension, diabetes, respiratory diseases, cerebrovascular disease, and cancer from the nationally representative cross-sectional internet survey data of Japan. Participants reported healthcare utilization during the first state of emergency, as well as psychological distress (K6: The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale 6) in three months after the state of emergency was ended. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to examine the correlation between psychological distress and healthcare utilization. Results In total, 16% restrained from visiting a hospital as scheduled or canceled a doctor visit. Approximately less than 2% experienced cancellation or delay of hospitalization, treatment, or nursing-care services. After controlling for confounders, multivariate linear regression analysis showed that those who lacked medicines, experienced deteriorated health conditions, and could not visit a hospital during the state of emergency reported severe psychological distress three months later among the patients with all disease types except cancer (β = 0.10∼0.25). Conclusions The study indicated the restriction in healthcare utilization might be a risk factor for psychological distress among patients. Careful attention to the mental status of patients, especially those who were restricted in healthcare utilization, is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emi Takeuchi
- Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kota Katanoda
- Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Simone Cheli
- School of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gil Goldzweig
- School of Behavioral Sciences, The Academic College of Tel Aviv Yafo, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Takahiro Tabuchi
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang WZ, LaBedz SL, Holbrook JT, Gangemi A, Baalachandran R, Eakin MN, Wise RA, Sumino K. Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Physical and Mental Health of Patients With COPD: Results From a Longitudinal Cohort Study Conducted in the United States (2020-2021). CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASES (MIAMI, FLA.) 2022; 9:510-519. [PMID: 35998338 PMCID: PMC9718577 DOI: 10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at higher risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). From the pandemic's onset there has been concern regarding effects on health and well-being of high-risk patients. Methods This was an ancillary study to the Losartan Effects on Emphysema Progression (LEEP) Trial and was designed to collect descriptive information longitudinally about the health and wellbeing of COPD patients who were enrolled in a clinical trial. Participants were interviewed by telephone about their health status every 2 weeks and their mental health, knowledge, and behaviors every 8 weeks from June 2020 to April 2021. There were no pre-specified hypotheses. Results We enrolled 157 of the 220 participants from the parent LEEP trial. Their median age was 69 years, 55% were male, and 82% were White; median forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)% predicted was 48%. Nine confirmed COVID-19 infections were reported, 2 resulting in hospitalization. Rates of elevated anxiety or depressive symptoms were 8% and 19% respectively in June 2020 and remained relatively stable during follow-up. By April 2021, 85% of participants said they were "very likely" to receive a vaccine; 91% were vaccinated (≥1 dose) by the end of December 2021. Conclusion Our select cohort of moderate to severe COPD patients who were well integrated into a health care network coped well with the COVID-19 pandemic. Few participants were diagnosed with COVID-19, levels of depression and anxiety were stable, most adopted accepted risk reduction behaviors, and did not become socially isolated; most were vaccinated by the end of 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Z. Zhang
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States,*Contributed equally as first author
| | - Stephanie L. LaBedz
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States,*Contributed equally as first author
| | - Janet T. Holbrook
- Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis, Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Andrew Gangemi
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | | | - Michelle N. Eakin
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Robert A. Wise
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Kaharu Sumino
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rocha V, Jácome C, Martins V, Marques A. Are in Person and Telephone Interviews Equivalent Modes of Administrating the CAT, the FACIT-FS and the SGRQ in People With COPD? FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2021; 2:729190. [PMID: 36188865 PMCID: PMC9397839 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2021.729190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought numerous challenges, namely in routine assessment of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness-Fatigue-Subscale (FACIT-FS) and the St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) are important patient-reported outcome measures used to assess people with COPD, but its face-to-face application has been compromised. The telephone interview offers a simple and effective alternative, yet uncertainty regarding its equivalence remains. This study aimed to establish the reliability and validity of the CAT, the FACIT-FS and the SGRQ administered by telephone interview in people with COPD. Methods: Data from an observational prospective study including people with COPD were analyzed. Participants answered to the CAT, FACIT-FS and SGRQ questionnaires in person and by telephone, with a maximum interval of 48-h. Participants were randomly selected to answer first to the in-person questionnaire followed by telephone or vice versa. Reliability measures included internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), test-retest measurement error with the standard error of measurement (SEM) and agreement with the Bland and Altman 95% limits of agreement. Validity was assessed with the Spearman correlation (rho). Results: Fifty-five people with COPD (44 men; 68.1 ± 7.9 years; FEV1: 59.1 ± 20.3% predicted) were included. Similar internal consistency was observed between in person vs. telephone interview for the CAT (0.82 vs. 0.84), the FACIT-FS (0.83 vs. 0.84) and the SGRQ (0.92 vs. 0.93). Test-retest reliability was excellent, with an ICC2,1 of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65; 0.86), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77; 0.92) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90; 0.96) for the CAT, FACIT-FS and SGRQ total scores, respectively. The SEM showed a low level of associated measurement error and the Bland and Altman plots illustrated a good level of agreement between both modes of administration, with no evidence of systematic bias. Robust positive correlations (rho 0.87–0.94, p < 0.001) were found for the CAT, FACIT-FS and SGRQ total scores applied by both methods. Conclusion: The telephonic administration of the CAT, the FACIT-FS and the SGRQ are a valid and reliable alternative approach to in person interviews for monitoring symptoms and health-related quality of life in people with COPD. The telephone might be an important add-on for personalized assessment and management of COPD thru remote monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vânia Rocha
- Lab3R-Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- iBiMED-Institute of Biomedicine, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Cristina Jácome
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Vitória Martins
- Pulmonology Department, Hospital Distrital da Figueira da Foz, Figueira da Foz, Portugal
| | - Alda Marques
- Lab3R-Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- iBiMED-Institute of Biomedicine, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- *Correspondence: Alda Marques
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kusk KH, Storgaard LH, Weinreich UM, Grønkjaer M, Thorup CB. Social Distancing among COPD Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Qualitative Study. COPD 2021; 18:549-556. [PMID: 34486469 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2021.1973981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
To limit the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing was introduced globally in the first half of 2020. COPD-patients were identified as a group at special risk in connection with the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hence, social distancing has been important in this group of patients. However, little is known of the motives and consequences of social distancing in these vulnerable patients. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives and experiences on social distancing among COPD-patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients in this qualitative study were selected strategically, equally allocated between gender and age to obtain maximum variation. Data were collected using individual semi-structured telephone interviews during June and July 2020. The interview guide focused on three themes; life before, under and after the COVID-19 lockdown. A total of 18 patients (8 females, 10 males) participated. Four themes were identified as important for social distancing among COPD-patients: 'Being at high-risk and obtaining control', 'Protecting one life while missing on another', 'Social relationships and distancing' and 'Looking into the future'. The results increased our knowledge of patients' experiences of living with COPD during COVID-19 in which anxiety and fear of getting infected made patients control their surroundings through strict precautions. This led to a feeling of loneliness due to social distance and an altered life-illness balance, as they protected one life while missing on another.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Line Hust Storgaard
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ulla Møller Weinreich
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mette Grønkjaer
- Clinical Nursing Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Brun Thorup
- Clinical Nursing Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Respiratory Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sigala I, Giannakas T, Giannakoulis VG, Zervas E, Brinia A, Gianiou N, Asimakos A, Dima E, Kalomenidis I, Katsaounou P. Effect of COVID-19-Related Lockdown οn Hospital Admissions for Asthma and COPD Exacerbations: Associations with Air Pollution and Patient Characteristics. J Pers Med 2021; 11:867. [PMID: 34575644 PMCID: PMC8465209 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted a retrospective observational study to assess the hospitalization rates for acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) during the first imposed lockdown in Athens, Greece. Patient characteristics and the concentration of eight air pollutants [namely, NO (nitrogen monoxide), NO2 (nitrogen dioxide), CO (carbon monoxide), PM2.5 (particulate matter 2.5), PM10 (particulate matter 10), O3 (ozone), SO2 (sulfur dioxide) and benzene] were considered. A total of 153 consecutive hospital admissions were studied. Reduced admissions occurred in the Lockdown period compared to the Pre-lockdown 2020 (p < 0.001) or the Control 2019 (p = 0.007) period. Furthermore, the concentration of 6/8 air pollutants positively correlated with weekly hospital admissions in 2020 and significantly decreased during the lockdown. Finally, admitted patients for asthma exacerbation during the lockdown were younger (p = 0.046) and less frequently presented respiratory failure (p = 0.038), whereas patients with COPD presented higher blood eosinophil percentage (p = 0.017) and count (p = 0.012). Overall, admissions for asthma and COPD exacerbations decreased during the lockdown. This might be partially explained by reduction of air pollution during this period while medical care avoidance behavior, especially among elderly patients cannot be excluded. Our findings aid in understanding the untold impact of the pandemic on diseases beyond COVID-19, focusing on patients with obstructive diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna Sigala
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Failure Department, First ICU, Evangelismos Hospital, Ipsilandou 45-7, 10676 Athens, Greece; (I.S.); (N.G.); (A.A.); (E.D.); (I.K.)
| | - Timoleon Giannakas
- Medical School, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece; (T.G.); (V.G.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Vassilis G. Giannakoulis
- Medical School, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece; (T.G.); (V.G.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Efthimios Zervas
- Laboratory of Technology and Policy of Energy and Environment, School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, Parodos Aristotelous 18, 26335 Patra, Greece;
| | - Aikaterini Brinia
- Medical School, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece; (T.G.); (V.G.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Niki Gianiou
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Failure Department, First ICU, Evangelismos Hospital, Ipsilandou 45-7, 10676 Athens, Greece; (I.S.); (N.G.); (A.A.); (E.D.); (I.K.)
| | - Andreas Asimakos
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Failure Department, First ICU, Evangelismos Hospital, Ipsilandou 45-7, 10676 Athens, Greece; (I.S.); (N.G.); (A.A.); (E.D.); (I.K.)
| | - Efi Dima
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Failure Department, First ICU, Evangelismos Hospital, Ipsilandou 45-7, 10676 Athens, Greece; (I.S.); (N.G.); (A.A.); (E.D.); (I.K.)
| | - Ioannis Kalomenidis
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Failure Department, First ICU, Evangelismos Hospital, Ipsilandou 45-7, 10676 Athens, Greece; (I.S.); (N.G.); (A.A.); (E.D.); (I.K.)
- Medical School, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece; (T.G.); (V.G.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Paraskevi Katsaounou
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Failure Department, First ICU, Evangelismos Hospital, Ipsilandou 45-7, 10676 Athens, Greece; (I.S.); (N.G.); (A.A.); (E.D.); (I.K.)
- Medical School, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece; (T.G.); (V.G.G.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kahnert K, Lutter JI, Welte T, Alter P, Behr J, Herth F, Kauczor HU, Söhler S, Pfeifer M, Watz H, Vogelmeier CF, Bals R, Jörres RA, Trudzinski FC. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the behaviour and health status of patients with COPD: results from the German COPD cohort COSYCONET. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7:00242-2021. [PMID: 34430659 PMCID: PMC8287574 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00242-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Infection control measures for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might have affected management and clinical state of patients with COPD. We analysed to which extent this common notion is fact-based. Methods: Patients of the COSYCONET cohort were contacted with three recurring surveys (COVID1, 2 and 3 at 0, 3 and 6 months, respectively). The questionnaires comprised behaviour, clinical and functional state, and medical treatment. The responses to the questionnaires were compared amongst themselves and with pre-COVID information from the last visit of COSYCONET. Results: Overall, 594 patients were contacted and 375 patients (58% males, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 61±22% predicted) provided valid data in COVID1 and COVID2. Five patients reported infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Most patients – except for patients with higher education – reported compliance with recommended protective measures, whereby compliance to hygiene, contact and access to physicians slightly improved between COVID1 and COVID2. Also, patients obtained more information from physicians than from public media. In the majority of cases, the personal physician could not be substituted by remote consultation. Over time, symptoms slightly increased and self-assessed physical capacity decreased. Results of COVID3 were similar. Women and patients with more exacerbations and dyspnoea avoided medical consultations, whereas Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) D patients were more amenable to tele-consultation. Conclusion: In well-characterised COPD patients, we observed on average slight deteriorations of clinical state during the period of COVID-19 restrictions, with high and partially increasing adherence to protective measures. The data suggest that in particular, women and GOLD D patients should be actively contacted by physicians to identify deteriorations. During the period of #COVID19 restrictions, slight deteriorations of clinical state with increasing adherence to protective measures were observed. In particular, women and GOLD D patients are at risk of deterioration.https://bit.ly/2S7fhEo
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Kahnert
- Dept of Medicine V, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Johanna I Lutter
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH - German Research Center for Environmental Health, CPC-M, DZL, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Welte
- Dept of Pneumology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Peter Alter
- Dept of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), DZL, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Behr
- Dept of Medicine V, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Felix Herth
- Dept of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik University of Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), DZL, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Dept of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, DZL, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Söhler
- Dept of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), DZL, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Pfeifer
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Donaustauf Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Henrik Watz
- Pulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), DZL, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Claus F Vogelmeier
- Dept of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg (UMR), DZL, Marburg, Germany
| | - Robert Bals
- Dept of Internal Medicine V - Pulmonology, Allergology, Critical Care Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf A Jörres
- Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, LMU, LMU University Hospital, CPC-M, DZL, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska C Trudzinski
- Dept of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik University of Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), DZL, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sánchez-Cantalejo C, Rueda MDM, Saez M, Enrique I, Ferri R, Fuente MDL, Villegas R, Castro L, Barceló MA, Daponte-Codina A, Lorusso N, Cabrera-León A. Impact of COVID-19 on the Health of the General and More Vulnerable Population and Its Determinants: Health Care and Social Survey-ESSOC, Study Protocol. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:8120. [PMID: 34360413 PMCID: PMC8345631 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18158120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
This manuscript describes the rationale and protocol of a real-world data (RWD) study entitled Health Care and Social Survey (ESSOC, Encuesta Sanitaria y Social). The study's objective is to determine the magnitude, characteristics, and evolution of the COVID-19 impact on overall health as well as the socioeconomic, psychosocial, behavioural, occupational, environmental, and clinical determinants of both the general and more vulnerable population. The study integrates observational data collected through a survey using a probabilistic, overlapping panel design, and data from clinical, epidemiological, demographic, and environmental registries. The data will be analysed using advanced statistical, sampling, and machine learning techniques. The study is based on several measurements obtained from three random samples of the Andalusian (Spain) population: general population aged 16 years and over, residents in disadvantaged areas, and people over the age of 55. Given the current characteristics of this pandemic and its future repercussions, this project will generate relevant information on a regular basis, commencing from the beginning of the State of Alarm. It will also establish institutional alliances of great social value, explore and apply powerful and novel methodologies, and produce large, integrated, high-quality and open-access databases. The information described here will be vital for health systems in order to design tailor-made interventions aimed at improving the health care, health, and quality of life of the populations most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Sánchez-Cantalejo
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública), 18080 Granada, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (A.D.-C.)
- Institute of Biosanitary Research, ibs.Granada. (IBS-E-10), 18080 Granada, Spain
| | - María del Mar Rueda
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain; (M.d.M.R.); (R.F.); (L.C.)
| | - Marc Saez
- Research Group on Statistics, Econometrics and Health (GRECS), University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.A.B.)
- Network Biomedical Research Center of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Iria Enrique
- Andalusian Institute of Statistics and Cartography, 41071 Seville, Spain;
| | - Ramón Ferri
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain; (M.d.M.R.); (R.F.); (L.C.)
| | | | | | - Luis Castro
- Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain; (M.d.M.R.); (R.F.); (L.C.)
| | - Maria Antònia Barceló
- Research Group on Statistics, Econometrics and Health (GRECS), University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.A.B.)
- Network Biomedical Research Center of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Daponte-Codina
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública), 18080 Granada, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (A.D.-C.)
- Institute of Biosanitary Research, ibs.Granada. (IBS-E-10), 18080 Granada, Spain
- Network Biomedical Research Center of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Andalusian Health and Environment Observatory (OSMAN), Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP), 18080 Granada, Spain
| | - Nicola Lorusso
- Health Surveillance Service, Department of Health and Families, Andalusian Regional Government, 41020 Seville, Spain;
| | - Andrés Cabrera-León
- Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública), 18080 Granada, Spain; (C.S.-C.); (A.D.-C.)
- Network Biomedical Research Center of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Volpato E, Centanni S, Banfi P, D’Antonio S, Peterle E, Bugliaro F, Grattagliano I, Piraino A, Cavalieri L, Pennisi A, Danesi G, Santoiemma L, Marini MG. Narrative Analysis of the Impact of COVID-19 on Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Their Caregivers, and Healthcare Professionals in Italy. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021; 16:2181-2201. [PMID: 34335023 PMCID: PMC8318732 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s312372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted many lives, including those of people suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and their caregivers. The main aim of this study was to use narrative medicine, a validated approach promoting quality of care to explore how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the quality of care, quality of life, psychological factors and social factors of people affected by COPD and their caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). A secondary aim was to explore the role of telemedicine in combating isolation and providing access to care. Methods A cross-sectional observational narrative medicine study was conducted between July and November 2020 across Italy. An online semi-structured questionnaire with a narrative plot was completed by 146 participants (79 COPD patients, 24 caregivers, and 43 HCPs). Narrations were analyzed with descriptive statistics and evaluated using NVivo 11 software to break down the text and identify recurring themes and major semantic clusters. Results During the first lockdown, 58.22% of responses from COPD patients indicated terror, fear and/or apprehension; at reopening, this figure was 35.44%. Among caregivers, these figures were 100% at first lockdown and 45.83% at reopening. The metaphors most commonly used by patients to describe COPD and COVID-19 were monster and murderer, respectively. Patients described their homes more often as clean and lonely than as offering no shelter. The narratives of 42 COPD patients (45.2%) described coping. Only 12.6% of COPD patients reported regular access to medical visits during lockdown, while 59.1% of general practitioners and pulmonologists reported using telemedicine, which was perceived as satisfactory by both patients and caregivers. Conclusion It is relevant to aim for a multidisciplinary and multilevel system of care that empowers telemedicine and integrates specific psychological support programs for COPD patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Volpato
- Healthcare Area, ISTUD Foundation, Milan, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
- Heart-Respiratory Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Centanni
- Department of Health Sciences Università degli Studi di Milano - Respiratory UnitASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Banfi
- Heart-Respiratory Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Peterle
- General Practitioner, Local Health Department 3 Serenissima, Venezia, Italy
| | - Filomena Bugliaro
- Federasma e Allergie-Federazione Italiana Pazienti OdV, Prato, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Alfio Pennisi
- Rehabilitation Clinic Monsignor Calaciura Biancavilla, Catania, Italy
| | - Gianluca Danesi
- Local Health Department Romagna Pulmonology Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cantero C, Pasquina P, Dao MD, Cedraschi C, Adler D, Plojoux J, Janssens JP. Impact of Confinement in Patients under Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation during the First Wave of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Remarkable Resilience. Respiration 2021; 100:909-917. [PMID: 34130277 PMCID: PMC8339039 DOI: 10.1159/000516327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background During the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Switzerland, confinement was imposed to limit transmission and protect vulnerable persons. These measures may have had a negative impact on perceived quality of care and symptoms in patients with chronic disorders. Objectives To determine whether patients under long-term home noninvasive ventilation (LTHNIV) for chronic respiratory failure (CRF) were negatively affected by the 56-day confinement (March–April 2020). Methods A questionnaire-based survey exploring mood disturbances (HAD), symptom scores related to NIV (S<sup>3</sup>-NIV), and perception of health-care providers during confinement was sent to all patients under LTHNIV followed up by our center. Symptom scores and data obtained by ventilator software were compared between confinement and the 56 days prior to confinement. Results Of a total of 100 eligible patients, 66 were included (median age: 66 years [IQR: 53–74]): 35 (53%) with restrictive lung disorders, 20 (30%) with OHS or SRBD, and 11 (17%) with COPD or overlap syndrome. Prevalence of anxiety (n = 7; 11%) and depressive (n = 2; 3%) disorders was remarkably low. Symptom scores were slightly higher during confinement although this difference was not clinically relevant. Technical data regarding ventilation, including compliance, did not change. Patients complained of isolation and lack of social contact. They felt supported by their relatives and caregivers but complained of the lack of regular contact and information by health-care professionals. Conclusions Patients under LTHNIV for CRF showed a remarkable resilience during the SARS-CoV-2 confinement period. Comments provided may be helpful for managing similar future health-care crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Cantero
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Pasquina
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Melissa Dominicé Dao
- Division of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christine Cedraschi
- Division of General Medical Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dan Adler
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Plojoux
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Paul Janssens
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cosio BG, Shafiek H, Toledo-Pons N, Iglesias A, Barcelo M, Represas-Represas C, Comeche L, Catalan P, Fernandez-Villar A, Lopez-Campos JL, Echave-Sustaeta J, Soler-Cataluna JJ. Characterization of COPD Admissions During the First COVID-19 Outbreak. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2021; 16:1549-1554. [PMID: 34113088 PMCID: PMC8184145 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s312493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) are a frequent cause of hospitalization that seemed to ameliorate during the COVID outbreak. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of COPD-related hospital admissions and mortality in relation to the presence of COVID-19. Patients and Methods We conducted a case-control study of patients admitted in four teaching hospitals throughout Spain between March 15 and April 30, 2020. Hospital admissions of respiratory cause with and without PCR-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with COPD were evaluated. Baseline and episode-related clinical characteristics were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk for mortality. Results During the study period, 2101 patients were admitted for respiratory worsening, 1200 (57.1%) with COVID-19. A total of 228 (10.8%) were admitted due to COPD worsening, of whom 52 (22.8%) tested positive for COVID-19. COPD patients with COVID-19, when compared to those without COVID-19, were more frequently males with better lung function (FEV1 postbronchodilator 71% vs 46% respectively, p<0.001) and had higher mortality (44.9% vs 13.6% respectively, p<0.001) despite similar age, comorbidities, total days of hospitalization and admission to intensive care unit. COVID-19 and eosinopenia were the strongest risk factors for mortality in the multivariate analysis in the overall COPD population. Inhaled corticosteroid use was not associated to mortality. Conclusion Hospitalizations for ECOPD without COVID-19 were more frequent than COPD with COVID-19 during the first outbreak, but the latter were associated with higher mortality and low eosinophil counts that warrant further analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borja G Cosio
- Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,CIBERES-IDISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Hanaa Shafiek
- Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,Chest Diseases Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Nuria Toledo-Pons
- Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,CIBERES-IDISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Amanda Iglesias
- Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.,CIBERES-IDISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Margalida Barcelo
- Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Lorena Comeche
- Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Catalan
- Respiratory Medicine, Hospital General de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cazzola M, Ora J, Bianco A, Rogliani P, Matera MG. Management of COPD patients during COVID: difficulties and experiences. Expert Rev Respir Med 2021; 15:1025-1033. [PMID: 33975511 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1929176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The role of COPD in COVID-19 is not yet well understood. However, there is increasing evidence showing that COPD patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of presenting a serious infection, a greater likelihood of requiring ICU support, and a higher mortality than other groups.Areas covered: In this article, we address some critical questions on COVID-19 as they pertain to COPD. In particular, we discuss whether the usual algorithms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological management in COPD still apply.Expert opinion: Patients with COPD must continue their regular therapy, regardless of whether they are affected by COVID-19. Corticosteroids reduce mortality in COVID-19 patients in need of supportive oxygen therapy or invasive mechanical ventilation. It is essential that a COPD patient who has tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 is closely followed over time because any delay in diagnosis and initiation of appropriate therapy could negatively affect his/her prognosis. However, we still do not know if COVID-19 infection occurs and evolves differently in each of the recognized COPD phenotypes and, therefore, whether it needs a different management. There are other open questions concerning COVID-19 and COPD that need to be considered. Future studies are absolutely necessary to answer these questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Cazzola
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Josuel Ora
- Respiratory Diseases Unit, "Tor Vergata" University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Bianco
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"/Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Paola Rogliani
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.,Respiratory Diseases Unit, "Tor Vergata" University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Gabriella Matera
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Alsallakh MA, Sivakumaran S, Kennedy S, Vasileiou E, Lyons RA, Robertson C, Sheikh A, Davies GA. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the incidence and mortality of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: national interrupted time series analyses for Scotland and Wales. BMC Med 2021; 19:124. [PMID: 33993870 PMCID: PMC8126470 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02000-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing national lockdowns have dramatically changed the healthcare landscape. The pandemic's impact on people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains poorly understood. We hypothesised that the UK-wide lockdown restrictions were associated with reductions in severe COPD exacerbations. We provide the first national level analyses of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and first lockdown on severe COPD exacerbations resulting in emergency hospital admissions and/or leading to death as well as those recorded in primary care or emergency departments. METHODS Using data from Public Health Scotland and the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank in Wales, we accessed weekly counts of emergency hospital admissions and deaths due to COPD over the first 30 weeks of 2020 and compared these to the national averages over the preceding 5 years. For both Scotland and Wales, we undertook interrupted time-series analyses to model the impact of instigating lockdown on these outcomes. Using fixed-effect meta-analysis, we derived pooled estimates of the overall changes in trends across the two nations. RESULTS Lockdown was associated with 48% pooled reduction in emergency admissions for COPD in both countries (incidence rate ratio, IRR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.58), relative to the 5-year averages. There was no statistically significant change in deaths due to COPD (pooled IRR 1.08, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.33). In Wales, lockdown was associated with 39% reduction in primary care consultations for acute exacerbation of COPD (IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.71) and 46% reduction in COPD-related emergency department attendances (IRR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.81). CONCLUSIONS The UK-wide lockdown was associated with the most substantial reductions in COPD exacerbations ever seen across Scotland and Wales, with no corresponding increase in COPD deaths. This may have resulted from reduced transmission of respiratory infections, reduced exposure to outdoor air pollution and/or improved COPD self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad A Alsallakh
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Park, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
- Health Data Research UK BREATHE Hub for Respiratory Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
| | - Shanya Sivakumaran
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Park, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Sharon Kennedy
- Health Protection Scotland, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Eleftheria Vasileiou
- Health Data Research UK BREATHE Hub for Respiratory Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Ronan A Lyons
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Park, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Chris Robertson
- Health Protection Scotland, Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Health Data Research UK BREATHE Hub for Respiratory Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Gwyneth A Davies
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Data Science Building, Singleton Park, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
- Health Data Research UK BREATHE Hub for Respiratory Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Faria N, Costa MI, Gomes J, Sucena M. Reduction of Severe Exacerbations of COPD during COVID-19 Pandemic in Portugal: A Protective Role of Face Masks? COPD 2021; 18:226-230. [PMID: 33764237 DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2021.1904387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Viral infections are known to be the main trigger for Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. Face masks are acknowledged for effective viral aerosol shedding reduction. COVID-19 pandemic generated an opportunity to study the impact of face masks and confinement on droplet transmission diseases, usually implicated in acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). We aimed to evaluate the variation on severe AECOPD (sAECOPD) rate in a Portuguese COPD cohort during the first COVID-19 lockdown and following months. This retrospective self-controlled study enrolled 322 adult patients followed at COPD-specialized consultation in a tertiary hospital from February 2016 to July 2020, of whom 286 met inclusion criteria. Severe AECOPD events were registered from March 2020 (beginning of state of emergency) until July 2020. From 2016 to 2019 there was a mean of 38 patients per year with sAECOPD. During 2020, 11 patients experienced sAECOPD. Over the course of 2020 there was a 73.4% (p < 0.001) decrease in sAECOPD events comparing with previous years' average. After the end of State of Emergency, the rate of sAECOPD events also declined by 74.6% (p < 0.001) comparing with the same timeline of previous years. Results were consistent and statistically significant when comparing 2020 with each of previous years for every period of analysis. Our findings suggest a sustained decrease in the rate of sAECOPD during confinement and in the following months. The widespread use of face mask and social distancing during COVID-19 pandemic may play an important role in preventing the transmission of respiratory infections and consequently reducing sAECOPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuno Faria
- Department of Pulmonology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria Inês Costa
- Department of Pulmonology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Joana Gomes
- Department of Pulmonology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria Sucena
- Department of Pulmonology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|