Benefits and pitfalls of pegylated interferon-α2a therapy in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis: a French Intergroup of Myeloproliferative neoplasms (FIM) study

Association of JAK2V617F allele burden and clinical correlates in polycythemia vera: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation is present in most patients with polycythemia vera (PV). One persistently puzzling aspect unresolved is the association between JAK2V617F allele burden (also known as variant allele frequency) and the relevant clinical characteristics. Numerous studies have reported associations between allele burden and both hematologic and clinical features. While there are strong indications linking high allele burden in PV patients with symptoms and clinical characteristics, not all associations are definitive, and disparate and contradictory findings have been reported. Hence, this study aimed to synthesize existing data from the literature to better understand the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and relevant clinical correlates. Out of the 1,851 studies identified, 39 studies provided evidence related to the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and clinical correlates, and 21 studies were included in meta-analyses. Meta-analyses of correlation demonstrated that leucocyte and erythrocyte counts were significantly and positively correlated with JAK2V617F allele burden, whereas platelet count was not. Meta-analyses of standardized mean difference demonstrated that leucocyte and hematocrit were significantly higher in patients with higher JAK2V617F allele burden, whereas platelet count was significantly lower. Meta-analyses of odds ratio demonstrated that patients who had higher JAK2V617F allele burden had a significantly greater odds ratio for developing pruritus, splenomegaly, thrombosis, myelofibrosis, and acute myeloid leukemia. Our study integrates data from approximately 5,462 patients, contributing insights into the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and various hematological parameters, symptomatic manifestations, and complications. However, varied methods of data presentation and statistical analyses prevented the execution of high-quality meta-analyses.

Ratio of stemness to interferon signalling as a biomarker and therapeutic target of myeloproliferative neoplasm progression to acute myeloid leukaemia

Progression to aggressive secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (sAML) poses a significant challenge in the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Since the physiopathology of MPN is closely linked to the activation of interferon (IFN) signalling and that AML initiation and aggressiveness is driven by leukaemia stem cells (LSCs), we investigated these pathways in MPN to sAML progression. We found that high IFN signalling correlated with low LSC signalling in MPN and AML samples, while MPN progression and AML transformation were characterized by decreased IFN signalling and increased LSC signature. A high LSC to IFN expression ratio in MPN patients was associated with adverse clinical prognosis and higher colony forming potential. Moreover, treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) activates the IFN signalling pathway in MPN cells by inducing a viral mimicry response. This response is characterized by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) formation and MDA5/RIG-I activation. The HMA-induced IFN response leads to a reduction in LSC signature, resulting in decreased stemness. These findings reveal the frequent evasion of viral mimicry during MPN-to-sAML progression, establish the LSC-to-IFN expression ratio as a progression biomarker, and suggests that HMAs treatment can lead to haematological response in murine models by re-activating dsRNA-associated IFN signalling.

Significant heterogeneity in management of calreticulin-mutated essential thrombocythemia and its progression to myelofibrosis: results of a national survey

Despite the recent publication of calreticulin (CALR)-mutated essential thrombocythemia (ET) management guidelines by the European Leukemia Net (ELN), there remains a paucity of data regarding the optimal way to manage this condition. To determine practice around Australia, we constructed a survey asking investigation and treatment questions in a hypothetical case of a young woman with CALR-mutated ET and subsequent progression to myelofibrosis. 51 of 88 hematologists replied. The responses demonstrated significant heterogeneity in specific issues such as the use of aspirin, when to initiate cytoreduction, the preferred type of cytoreduction, and platelet targets. These observations support the ELN acknowledgment that a strong evidence base for many management recommendations is lacking in this disease, and that substantial further research is needed.

Effectiveness of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2B in High-Risk Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms- Evaluation of Clinicohaematologic Response, and Safety Profile: Single Centre Experience

Background: Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph - MPNs) requires individualized approach depending on multiple factors. Novel pegylated Interferon (IFN) formulations have become an attractive therapeutic option in young Ph- MPN patients associated with better patient compliance. Methods: In this retrospective observational study a total of 16 high-risk Ph- MPN patients treated off-label with ropeginterferon alfa-2b given twice monthly, were included. Median follow-up was 24 months. High-risk patients were defined using the IPSET score. Response to treatment was evaluated using ELN, IWG-MET EUMNET standardized criteria and occurrence of side effects was documented. Results: 11 patients were female (68.8%) and 5 male (31.2%); average age at diagnosis was 36 years (17-51); 12 patients (75%) had ET, one (6.2%) PV and three (18.8%) hypercellular phase of PMF. JAK2V617F mutation was detected in 10 patients (62.5%), CALR in three (18.8%), and three (18.7%) were triple-negative cases. In 7 patients (43.7%), ropeginterferon alfa-2b was used in first-line, and 9 (56.3%) were previously treated with HU and/or standard IFN. Among initially ropeginterferon alfa-2b treated patients, complete haematological response was observed in 4/7 (57.1%), partial in 2/7 (28.6%) and suboptimal in one (14.3%). Complete haematological response was observed in 8/9 (88.9%) among previously treated patients. Average time to blood count normalization was 8 weeks, at a dose ranging between 100mcg and 300mcg. Side effects were observed in one patient (6.2%). Conclusion: Our experience is in support of previous studies regarding ropeginterferon alfa-2b efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of young patients with Ph- MPNs.

Recent advances in therapies for primary myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) form the classical BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) that are driven by a constitutive activation of JAK2 signaling. PMF as well as secondary MF (post-ET and post-PV MF) are the most aggressive MPNs. Presently, there is no curative treatment, except allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. JAK inhibitors, essentially ruxolitinib, are the therapy of reference for intermediate and high-risk MF. However, presently the current JAK inhibitors behave mainly as anti-inflammatory drugs, improving general symptoms and spleen size without major impact on disease progression. A better understanding of the genetics of MF, the biology of its leukemic stem cells (LSCs), the mechanisms of fibrosis and of cytopenia and the role of inflammatory cytokines has led to new approaches with the development of numerous therapeutic agents that target epigenetic regulation, telomerase, apoptosis, cell cycle, cytokines and signaling. Furthermore, the use of a new less toxic form of interferon-α has been revived, as it is presently one of the only molecules that targets the mutated clone. These new approaches have different aims: (a) to provide alternative therapy to JAK inhibition; (b) to correct cytopenia; and (c) to inhibit fibrosis development. However, the main important goal is to find new disease modifier treatments, which will profoundly modify the progression of the disease without major toxicity. Presently the most promising approaches consist of the inhibition of telomerase and the combination of JAK2 inhibitors (ruxolitinib) with either a BCL2/BCL-xL or BET inhibitor. Yet, the most straightforward future approaches can be considered to be the development of and/or selective inhibition of JAK2V617F and the targeting MPL and calreticulin mutants by immunotherapy. It can be expected that the therapy of MF will be significantly improved in the coming years.

Mutations, inflammation and phenotype of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Knowledge on the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) - polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), primary myelofibrosis (PMF) - has accumulated since the discovery of the JAK/STAT-activating mutations associated with MPNs: JAK2V617F, observed in PV, ET and PMF; and the MPL and CALR mutations, found in ET and PMF. The intriguing lack of disease specificity of these mutations, and of the chronic inflammation associated with MPNs, triggered a quest for finding what precisely determines that MPN patients develop a PV, ET or PMF phenoptype. The mechanisms of action of MPN-driving mutations, and concomitant mutations (ASXL1, DNMT3A, TET2, others), have been extensively studied, as well as the role played by these mutations in inflammation, and several pathogenic models have been proposed. In parallel, different types of drugs have been tested in MPNs (JAK inhibitors, interferons, hydroxyurea, anagrelide, azacytidine, combinations of those), some acting on both JAK2 and inflammation. Yet MPNs remain incurable diseases. This review aims to present current, detailed knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms specifically associated with PV, ET or PMF that may pave the way for the development of novel, curative therapies.

Myelofibrosis

The clinical phenotype of primary and post-polycythemia vera and postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (MF) is dominated by splenomegaly, symptomatology, a variety of blood cell alterations, and a tendency to develop vascular complications and blast phase. Diagnosis requires assessing complete cell blood counts, bone marrow morphology, deep genetic evaluations, and disease history. Driver molecular events consist of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutations, whereas about 8% to 10% of MF are "triple-negative." Additional myeloid-gene variants are described in roughly 80% of patients. Currently available clinical-based and integrated clinical/molecular-based scoring systems predict the survival of patients with MF and are applied for conventional treatment decision-making, indication to stem cell transplant (SCT) and allocation in clinical trials. Standard treatment consists of anemia-oriented therapies, hydroxyurea, and JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. Overall, spleen volume reduction of 35% or greater at week 24 can be achieved by 42% of ruxolitinib-, 47% of fedratinib-, 19% of pacritinib-, and 27% of momelotinib-treated patients. Now, it is time to move towards new paradigms for evaluating efficacy like disease modification, that we intend as a robust and unequivocal effect on disease biology and/or on patient survival. The growing number of clinical trials potentially pave the way for new strategies in patients with MF. Translational studies of some molecules showed an early effect on bone marrow fibrosis and on variant allele frequencies of myeloid genes. SCT is still the only curative option, however, it is associated with relevant challenges. This review focuses on the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of MF.

Splenomegaly in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who are candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a Position Paper on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Splenomegaly is a hallmark of myelofibrosis, a debilitating haematological malignancy for which the only curative option is allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Considerable splenic enlargement might be associated with a higher risk of delayed engraftment and graft failure, increased non-relapse mortality, and worse overall survival after HCT as compared with patients without significantly enlarged splenomegaly. Currently, there are no standardised guidelines to assist transplantation physicians in deciding optimal management of splenomegaly before HCT. Therefore, the aim of this Position Paper is to offer a shared position statement on this issue. An international group of haematologists, transplantation physicians, gastroenterologists, surgeons, radiotherapists, and radiologists with experience in the treatment of myelofibrosis contributed to this Position Paper. The key issues addressed by this group included the assessment, prevalence, and clinical significance of splenomegaly, and the need for a therapeutic intervention before HCT for the control of splenomegaly. Specific scenarios, including splanchnic vein thrombosis and COVID-19, are also discussed. All patients with myelofibrosis must have their spleen size assessed before allogeneic HCT. Myelofibrosis patients with splenomegaly measuring 5 cm and larger, particularly when exceeding 15 cm below the left costal margin, or with splenomegaly-related symptoms, could benefit from treatment with the aim of reducing the spleen size before HCT. In the absence of, or loss of, response, patients with increasing spleen size should be evaluated for second-line options, depending on availability, patient fitness, and centre experience. Splanchnic vein thrombosis is not an absolute contraindication for HCT, but a multidisciplinary approach is warranted. Finally, prevention and treatment of COVID-19 should adhere to standard recommendations for immunocompromised patients.

Innovative strategies to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcomes in myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by inflammation, marrow fibrosis, and an inherent risk of blastic transformation. Hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative therapy for this disease, however, survival gains observed for other transplant indications over the past two decades have not been realized for MF. The role of transplantation may also evolve with the use of novel targeted agents. The chronic inflammatory state associated with MF necessitates pretransplantation assessment of end-organ function. Applying the transplant methodology employed for other myeloid disorders to patients with MF fails to acknowledge differences in the underlying disease pathophysiology. Limited understanding of the causes of poor transplant outcomes in this cohort has prevented refinement of transplant eligibility criteria in MF. There is increasing evidence of heterogeneity in molecular disease grade, beyond the clinical manifestations which have traditionally guided transplant timing. Exploring the physiological consequences of disease chronicity unique to MF, acknowledging the heterogeneity in disease grade, and using advanced prognostic models, molecular diagnostics and other organ function diagnostic tools, we present an innovative review of strategies with the potential to improve transplant outcomes in this disease. Larger, prospective studies which consider the impact of molecular-based disease grade are needed for MF transplantation.

Clonogenic assays improve determination of variant allele frequency of driver mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Molecular diagnostics moves more into focus as technology advances. In patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), identification and monitoring of the driver mutations have become an integral part of diagnosis and monitoring of the disease. In some patients, none of the known driver mutations (JAK2V617F, CALR, MPL) is found, and they are termed "triple negative" (TN). Also, whole-blood variant allele frequency (VAF) of driver mutations may not adequately reflect the VAF in the stem cells driving the disease. We reasoned that colony forming unit (CFU) assay-derived clonogenic cells may be better suited than next-generation sequencing (NGS) of whole blood to detect driver mutations in TN patients and to provide a VAF of disease-driving cells. We have included 59 patients carrying the most common driver mutations in the establishment or our model. Interestingly, cloning efficiency correlated with whole blood VAF (p = 0.0048), suggesting that the number of disease-driving cells correlated with VAF. Furthermore, the clonogenic VAF correlated significantly with the NGS VAF (p < 0.0001). This correlation was lost in patients with an NGS VAF <15%. Further analysis showed that in patients with a VAF <15% by NGS, clonogenic VAF was higher than NGS VAF (p = 0.003), suggesting an enrichment of low numbers of disease-driving cells in CFU assays. However, our approach did not enhance the identification of driver mutations in 5 TN patients. A significant correlation of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum levels with both CFU- and NGS-derived VAF was found. Our results demonstrate that enrichment for clonogenic cells can improve the detection of MPN driver mutations in patients with low VAF and that LDH levels correlate with VAF.

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The classic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) consist of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia and are a heterogeneous group of clonal blood disorders characterized by an overproduction of blood cells. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for MPN were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel with expertise in MPN, with the goal of providing recommendations for the management of MPN in adults. The Guidelines include recommendations for the diagnostic workup, risk stratification, treatment, and supportive care strategies for the management of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Assessment of symptoms at baseline and monitoring of symptom status during the course of treatment is recommended for all patients. This article focuses on the recommendations as outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis of MPN and the risk stratification, management, and supportive care relevant to MF.

Impact of molecular profiling on the management of patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical course, which can be complicated by severe constitutional symptoms, massive splenomegaly, progressive bone marrow failure, cardiovascular events, and development of acute leukemia. Constitutive signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway plays a fundamental role in its pathogenesis, generally due to activating mutations of JAK2, CALR and MPL genes (i.e., the MPN driver mutations), present in most MF patients. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel testing has shown that additional somatic mutations can already be detected at the time of diagnosis in more than half of patients, and that they accumulate along the disease course. These mutations, mostly affecting epigenetic modifiers or spliceosome components, may cooperate with MPN drivers to favor clonal dominance or influence the clinical phenotype, and some, such as high molecular risk mutations, correlate with a more aggressive clinical course with poor treatment response. The current main role of molecular profiling in clinical practice is prognostication, principally for selecting high-risk patients who may be candidates for transplantation, the only curative treatment for MF to date. To this end, contemporary prognostic models incorporating molecular data are useful tools to discriminate different risk categories. Aside from certain clinical situations, decisions regarding medical treatment are not based on patient molecular profiling, yet this approach may become more relevant in novel treatment strategies, such as the use of vaccines against the mutant forms of JAK2 or CALR, or drugs directed against actionable molecular targets.

Defining disease modification in myelofibrosis in the era of targeted therapy

The development of targeted therapies for the treatment of myelofibrosis highlights a unique issue in a field that has historically relied on symptom relief, rather than survival benefit or modification of disease course, as key response criteria. There is, therefore, a need to understand what constitutes disease modification of myelofibrosis to advance appropriate drug development and therapeutic pathways. Here, the authors discuss recent clinical trial data of agents in development and dissect the potential for novel end points to act as disease modifying parameters. Using the rationale garnered from latest clinical and scientific evidence, the authors propose a definition of disease modification in myelofibrosis. With improved overall survival a critical outcome, alongside the normalization of hematopoiesis and improvement in bone marrow fibrosis, there will be an increasing need for surrogate measures of survival for use in the early stages of trials. As such, the design of future clinical trials will require re-evaluation and updating to incorporate informative parameters and end points with standardized definitions and methodologies.

State-of-the-Art Review on Myelofibrosis Therapies

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by anemia, extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms and acute myeloid leukemia progression. Currently, allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) therapy is the only curative option for MF patients. However, AHSCT is strictly limited due to the high rates of morbidity and mortality. Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor Ruxolitinib is the first-line treatment for intermediate-II or high-risk MF patients with splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, but most MF patients develop resistance or intolerance to Ruxolitinib. Therefore, MF treatment is a challenge for the medical community. This review summarizes 3 investigated directions for MF therapy: monotherapies of JAK inhibitors, monotherapies of non-JAK targeted agents, combination therapies of Ruxolitinib and other agents. We emphasize combination of Ruxolitinib and other agents is a promising strategy.

Inflammatory Cytokines Shape an Altered Immune Response During Myeloid Malignancies

The immune microenvironment is a critical driver and regulator of leukemic progression and hematological disease. Recent investigations have demonstrated that multiple immune components play a central role in regulating hematopoiesis, and dysfunction at the immune cell level significantly contributes to neoplastic disease. Immune cells are acutely sensitive to remodeling by leukemic inflammatory cytokine exposure. Importantly, immune cells are the principal cytokine producers in the hematopoietic system, representing an untapped frontier for clinical interventions. Due to a proinflammatory cytokine environment, dysregulation of immune cell states is a hallmark of hematological disease and neoplasia. Malignant immune adaptations have profound effects on leukemic blast proliferation, disease propagation, and drug-resistance. Conversely, targeting the immune landscape to restore hematopoietic function and limit leukemic expansion may have significant therapeutic value. Despite the fundamental role of the immune microenvironment during the initiation, progression, and treatment response of hematological disease, a detailed examination of how leukemic cytokines alter immune cells to permit, promote, or inhibit leukemia growth is lacking. Here we outline an immune-based model of leukemic transformation and highlight how the profound effect of immune alterations on the trajectory of malignancy. The focus of this review is to summarize current knowledge about the impacts of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines on immune cells subsets, their modes of action, and immunotherapeutic approaches with the potential to improve clinical outcomes for patients suffering from hematological myeloid malignancies.

Recent Advances in Molecular Diagnostics and Targeted Therapy of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal hematologic malignancies with dysregulated myeloid blood cell production driven by JAK2, calreticulin, and MPL gene mutations. Technological advances have revealed a heterogeneous genomic landscape with additional mutations mainly in epigenetic regulators and splicing factors, which are of diagnostic and prognostic value and may inform treatment decisions. Thus, genetic testing has become an integral part of the state-of-the-art work-up for MPN. The finding that JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations activate JAK2 signaling has promoted the development of targeted JAK2 inhibitor therapies. However, their disease-modifying potential remains limited and investigations of additional molecular vulnerabilities in MPN are imperative to advance the development of new therapeutic options. Here, we summarize the current insights into the genetic basis of MPN, its use as diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical settings, and recent advances in targeted therapies for MPN.

Abstract

Somatic mutations in JAK2, calreticulin, and MPL genes drive myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and recent technological advances have revealed a heterogeneous genomic landscape with additional mutations in MPN. These mainly affect genes involved in epigenetic regulation and splicing and are of diagnostic and prognostic value, predicting the risk of progression and informing decisions on therapeutic management. Thus, genetic testing has become an integral part of the current state-of-the-art laboratory work-up for MPN patients and has been implemented in current guidelines for disease classification, tools for prognostic risk assessment, and recommendations for therapy. The finding that JAK2, CALR, and MPL driver mutations activate JAK2 signaling has provided a rational basis for the development of targeted JAK2 inhibitor therapies and has fueled their translation into clinical practice. However, the disease-modifying potential of JAK2 inhibitors remains limited and is further impeded by loss of therapeutic responses in a substantial proportion of patients over time. Therefore, the investigation of additional molecular vulnerabilities involved in MPN pathogenesis is imperative to advance the development of new therapeutic options. Combination of novel compounds with JAK2 inhibitors are of specific interest to enhance therapeutic efficacy of molecularly targeted treatment approaches. Here, we summarize the current insights into the genetic basis of MPN, its use as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical settings, and the most recent advances in targeted therapies for MPN.

Inferring the dynamic of mutated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells induced by IFNα in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal disorders of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) caused mainly by recurrent mutations in genes encoding JAK2 (JAK2), calreticulin (CALR), or the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL). Interferon alpha (IFNα) has demonstrated some efficacy in inducing molecular remission in MPN. In order to determine factors that influence molecular response rate, we evaluated the long-term molecular efficacy of IFNα in MPN patients by monitoring the fate of cells carrying driver mutations in a prospective observational and longitudinal study of 48 patients over more than 5 years. We measured several times per year the clonal architecture of early and late hematopoietic progenitors (84,845 measurements) and the global variant allele frequency in mature cells (409 measurements). Using mathematical modeling and hierarchical Bayesian inference, we further inferred the dynamics of IFNα-targeted mutated HSC. Our data support the hypothesis that IFNα targets JAK2V617F HSC by inducing their exit from quiescence and differentiation into progenitors. Our observations indicate that treatment efficacy is higher in homozygous than heterozygous JAK2V617F HSC and increases with high IFNα dosage in heterozygous JAK2V617F HSC. Besides, we found that the molecular responses of CALRm HSC to IFNα were heterogeneous, varying between type 1 and type 2 CALRm, and high dosage of IFNα correlates with worse outcomes. Together, our work indicates that the long-term molecular efficacy of IFNα implies an HSC exhaustion mechanism and depends on both the driver mutation type and IFNα dosage.

PPARγ agonists promote the resolution of myelofibrosis in preclinical models

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a non-BCR-ABL myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with poor outcomes. Current treatment has little effect on the natural history of the disease. MF results from complex interactions between (a) the malignant clone, (b) an inflammatory context, and (c) remodeling of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. Each of these points is a potential target of PPARγ activation. Here, we demonstrated the therapeutic potential of PPARγ agonists in resolving MF in 3 mouse models. We showed that PPARγ agonists reduce myeloproliferation, modulate inflammation, and protect the BM stroma in vitro and ex vivo. Activation of PPARγ constitutes a relevant therapeutic target in MF, and our data support the possibility of using PPARγ agonists in clinical practice.

The clinical role of interferon alpha in Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell malignancies. Chronic inflammation and a dysregulated immune system are central to the pathogenesis and progression of MPNs. Interferon alpha (IFNα) was first used for the treatment of MPNs approximately 40 years ago. It has significant antiviral effects and plays a role in anti-proliferative, pro-apoptotic, and immunomodulatory responses. IFNα is an effective drug that can simultaneously induce significant rates of clinical, hematological, molecular, and histopathological responses, suggesting that the disease may be cured in some patients. However, its frequent dosage and toxicity profile are major barriers to its widespread use. Pegylated IFNα (peg-IFNα), and more recently, ropeginterferon alpha-2b (ropeg-IFNα-2b), are expected to overcome these drawbacks. The objective of this article is to discuss the clinical role of IFNα in Philadelphia-negative MPNs through a review of recent studies. In particular, it is expected that new IFNs, such as peg-IFNα and ropeg-IFNα-2b, with lower rates of discontinuation due to fewer adverse effects, will play important clinical roles.

The 2020 revision of the guidelines for the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms

In 2016, the World Health Organization revised the diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) based on the discovery of disease-driving genetic aberrations and extensive analysis of the clinical characteristics of patients with MPNs. Recent studies have suggested that additional somatic mutations have a clinical impact on the prognosis of patients harboring these genetic abnormalities. Treatment strategies have also advanced with the introduction of JAK inhibitors, one of which has been approved for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and those with hydroxyurea-resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera. Recently developed drugs aim to elicit hematologic responses, as well as symptomatic and molecular responses, and the response criteria were refined accordingly. Based on these changes, we have revised the guidelines and present the diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification of MPNs encountered in Korea.

Challenges and Perspectives for Therapeutic Targeting of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic stem cell disorders with dysregulated myeloid blood cell production and propensity for transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, thrombosis, and bleeding. Acquired mutations in JAK2, MPL, and CALR converge on hyperactivation of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) signaling as a central feature of MPN. Accordingly, JAK2 inhibitors have held promise for therapeutic targeting. After the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, similar JAK2 inhibitors as fedratinib are entering clinical use. While patients benefit with reduced splenomegaly and symptoms, disease-modifying effects on MPN clone size and clonal evolution are modest. Importantly, response to ruxolitinib may be lost upon treatment suggesting the MPN clone acquires resistance. Resistance mutations, as seen with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have not been described in MPN patients suggesting that functional processes reactivate JAK2 signaling. Compensatory signaling, which bypasses JAK2 inhibition, and other processes contribute to intrinsic resistance of MPN cells restricting efficacy of JAK2 inhibition overall. Combinations of JAK2 inhibition with pegylated interferon-α, a well-established therapy of MPN, B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibition, and others are in clinical development with the potential to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Novel single-agent approaches targeting other molecules than JAK2 are being investigated clinically. Special focus should be placed on myelofibrosis patients with anemia and thrombocytopenia, a delicate patient population at high need for options. The extending range of new treatment approaches will increase the therapeutic options for MPN patients. This calls for concomitant improvement of our insight into MPN biology to inform tailored therapeutic strategies for individual MPN patients.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with hydroxyurea, pegylated interferon alpha-2A or ruxolitinib: clinicohematologic responses, quality-of-life changes and safety in the real-world setting

Introduction: Real-world data of responses, quality-of-life (QOL) changes and adverse events in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) on conventional therapy (hydroxyurea ± anagrelide), pegylated interferon alpha-2A (PEG-IFNα-2A) or ruxolitinib are limited. Methods: We prospectively studied MPN patients receiving conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A or ruxolitinib. Next-generation sequencing of 69 myeloid-related genes was performed. Clinicohematologic responses, adverse events, and QOL (determined by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score, MPN-SAF TSS) were evaluated. Results: Seventy men and fifty-five women with polycythemia vera (PV) (N = 23), essential thrombocythemia (ET) (N = 56) and myelofibrosis (MF) (N = 46) were studied for a median of 36 (range: 19-42) months. In PV, responses were comparable for different modalities. CREBBP mutations were associated with inferior responses. In ET, PEG-IFNα-2A resulted in superior clinicohematologic complete responses (CHCR) (P = 0.045). In MF, superior overall response rates (ORR) were associated with ruxolintib (P = 0.018) and JAK2V617F mutation (P = 0.04). For the whole cohort, ruxolitinib led to rapid and sustained reduction in spleen size within the first 6 months, and significant improvement of QOL as reflected by reduction in MPN-SAF TSS (P < 0.001). Adverse events of grades 1-2 were observed in 44%, 62% and 20% of patients receiving conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib respectively; and of grade 3-4 in 7% and 9% of patients receiving PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib. Conclusions: Conventional therapy, PEG-IFNα-2A and ruxolitinib induced responses in all MPN subtypes. PEG-IFNα-2A led to superior CHCR in ET; whereas ruxolitinib resulted in superior ORR in MF, and significant reduction in spleen size and improvement in QOL.

The Genetic Basis of Primary Myelofibrosis and Its Clinical Relevance

Among classical BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive subtype from a clinical standpoint, posing a great challenge to clinicians. Whilst the biological consequences of the three MPN driver gene mutations (JAK2, CALR, and MPL) have been well described, recent data has shed light on the complex and dynamic structure of PMF, that involves competing disease subclones, sequentially acquired genomic events, mostly in genes that are recurrently mutated in several myeloid neoplasms and in clonal hematopoiesis, and biological interactions between clonal hematopoietic stem cells and abnormal bone marrow niches. These observations may contribute to explain the wide heterogeneity in patients' clinical presentation and prognosis, and support the recent effort to include molecular information in prognostic scoring systems used for therapeutic decision-making, leading to promising clinical translation. In this review, we aim to address the topic of PMF molecular genetics, focusing on four questions: (1) what is the role of mutations on disease pathogenesis? (2) what is their impact on patients' clinical phenotype? (3) how do we integrate gene mutations in the risk stratification process? (4) how do we take advantage of molecular genetics when it comes to treatment decisions?

[Myelofibrosis: A review]

Myelofibrosis is a BCR-ABL1-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm that includes primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. It is characterized by stem cell-derived clonal proliferation that is often, but not always, accompanied by somatic mutations, which are classified into driver mutations (JAK2, CALR, or MPL), subclonal mutations and fibrosis on bone marrow biopsy. Myelofibrosis commonly demonstrates splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, anemia, thrombocytosis, or thrombocytopenia. Patients may also be asymptomatic. Complications as thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events can reveal the disease. Primary myelofibrosis is the least common myeloproliferative neoplasm but is associated with poor survival and acute leukemic transformation. In contrast to the significant progress made in understanding the disease's pathogenesis, treatment for myelofibrosis remains largely palliative. The JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib is not sufficient in eliminating the underlying myeloid progenitor clone, as disease inevitably returns with therapy discontinuation. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only therapeutic option that offers potential cure. The development of novel treatment strategies aimed at slowing or even reversing disease progression, prolonging patient survival and preventing evolution to blast-phase are still lacking.

Interferon Therapy in Myelofibrosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by progressive bone marrow failure, increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia, and constitutional symptoms. For over 3 decades, various formulations of interferon (IFN) have been used for the treatment of MF, with variable results, and the role of IFN in the treatment of MF is evolving.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, Medline and Embase via Ovid, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science were searched from inception through March 2019 for studies of pegylated IFN (peg-IFN) and non-peg-IFN in MF patients. The primary outcome of overall response rate was defined as a composite of complete response, partial response, complete hematologic response, and partial hematologic response. Random-effects models were used to pool overall response rate, and metaregression analyses were performed to compare peg-IFN and non--peg-IFN formulations.

RESULTS

Among the 10 studies with 141 MF patients included, the overall response rate was 49.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.4-69.3), and there was no statistically significant difference (P = .99) between peg-IFN (50.0%; 95% CI, 26.2-73.9; I2 = 76.9%) and non-peg-IFN (49.6%; 95% CI, 20.5-79.0; I2 = 56.7%). Treatment discontinuation resulting from adverse events was common with non-peg-IFN at 35.8% (95% CI, 3.5-68.1) per year, and less in the one study on peg-IFN (0.5% per year).

CONCLUSION

IFN can lead to hematologic improvements in a subset of MF patients, but study quality is limited and heterogenous. Biomarkers predicting response to IFN and formulations with improved tolerability are needed.

[The prognostic value of ASXL1 mutation in primary myelofibrosis. Literature review and clinical case description]

Primary myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that occurs de novo, characterized by clonal proliferation of stem cells, abnormal expression of cytokines, bone marrow fibrosis, hepatosplenomegaly as a result of extramedullary hematopoiesis, symptoms of tumor intoxication, cachexemia, peripheral blood leukoerythroblastosis, leukemic progression and low survival. Primary myelofibrosis is a chronic incurable disease. The aims of therapy: preventing progression, increasing overall survival, improving quality of life. The choice of therapeutic tactics is limited. Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only method that gives a chance for a cure. The role of mutations in a number of genes in the early identification of candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is being actively studied. The article describes the clinical case of the detection ofASXL1gene mutations in a patient with prefibrous primary myelofibrosis. The diagnosis was established on the basis of WHO criteria 2016. The examination revealed a mutation ofASXL1. Interferon alfa therapy is carried out, against the background of which clinico-hematological remission has been achieved. Despite the identified mutation, the patient is not a candidate for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Given the unfavorable prognostic value of theASXL1mutation, the patient is subject to active dynamic observation and aggressive therapeutic tactics when signs of disease progression appear.

MPN: The Molecular Drivers of Disease Initiation, Progression and Transformation and their Effect on Treatment

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) constitute a group of disorders identified by an overproduction of cells derived from myeloid lineage. The majority of MPNs have an identifiable driver mutation responsible for cytokine-independent proliferative signalling. The acquisition of coexisting mutations in chromatin modifiers, spliceosome complex components, DNA methylation modifiers, tumour suppressors and transcriptional regulators have been identified as major pathways for disease progression and leukemic transformation. They also confer different sensitivities to therapeutic options. This review will explore the molecular basis of MPN pathogenesis and specifically examine the impact of coexisting mutations on disease biology and therapeutic options.

Next Generation Sequencing in MPNs. Lessons from the Past and Prospects for Use as Predictors of Prognosis and Treatment Responses

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are acquired hematological stem cell neoplasms characterized by driver mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL. Additive mutations may appear in predominantly epigenetic regulator, RNA splicing and signaling pathway genes. These molecular mutations are a hallmark of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic assessment in patients with MPNs. Over the past decade, next generation sequencing (NGS) has identified multiple somatic mutations in MPNs and has contributed substantially to our understanding of the disease pathogenesis highlighting the role of clonal evolution in disease progression. In addition, disease prognostication has expanded from encompassing only clinical decision making to include genomics in prognostic scoring systems. Taking into account the decreasing costs and increasing speed and availability of high throughput technologies, the integration of NGS into a diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic pipeline is within reach. In this review, these aspects will be discussed highlighting their role regarding disease outcome and treatment modalities in patients with MPNs.

The Rationale for Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The classic, chronic Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN)-essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF)-are clonal malignancies of hematopoietic stem cells and are associated with myeloproliferation, organomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. Expanding knowledge that chronic inflammation and a dysregulated immune system are central to the pathogenesis and progression of MPNs serves as a driving force for the development of agents affecting the immune system as therapy for MPN. This review describes the rationale and potential impact of anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and targeted agents in MPNs.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advances in molecular insights, especially the discovery of the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation and its role in JAK-STAT pathway dysregulation, led to the development of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib, which currently represents the cornerstone of medical therapy in MF and hydroxyurea-resistant/intolerant PV. However, there remain significant unmet needs in the treatment of these patients, and many agents continue to be investigated. Novel, more selective JAK inhibitors might offer reduced myelosuppression or even improvement of blood counts. The recent approval of a novel, long-acting interferon for PV patients in Europe, might eventually lead to its broader clinical use in all MPNs. Targeted immunotherapy involving monoclonal antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, or therapeutic vaccines against selected MPN epitopes could further enhance tumor-specific immune responses. Immunotherapeutic approaches are expanding and hopefully will extend the therapeutic armamentarium in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Use of Interferon Alfa in the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Perspectives and Review of the Literature

Interferon alfa was first used in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) over 30 years ago. However, its initial use was hampered by its side effect profile and lack of official regulatory approval for MPN treatment. Recently, there has been renewed interest in the use of interferon in MPNs, given its potential disease-modifying effects, with associated molecular and histopathological responses. The development of pegylated formulations and, more recently, ropeginterferon alfa-2b has resulted in improved tolerability and further expansion of interferon's use. We review the evolving clinical use of interferon in essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF). We discuss interferon's place in MPN treatment in the context of the most recent clinical trial results evaluating interferon and its pegylated formulations, and its role in special populations such as young and pregnant MPN patients. Interferon has re-emerged as an important option in MPN patients, with future studies seeking to re-establish its place in the existing treatment algorithm for MPN, and potentially expanding its use for novel indications and combination therapies.

Polycythemia vera: the current status of preclinical models and therapeutic targets

INTRODUCTION

Polycythemia vera (PV) is the most common myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). PV is characterized by erythrocytosis, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, increased hematocrit, and hemoglobin in the peripheral blood. Splenomegaly and myelofibrosis often occur in PV patients. Almost all PV patients harbor a mutation in the JAK2 gene, mainly represented by the JAK2^V617F point mutation.

AREAS COVERED

This article examines the recent in vitro and in vivo available models of PV and moreover, it offers insights on emerging biomarkers and therapeutic targets. The evidence from mouse models, resembling a PV-like phenotype generated by different technical approaches, is discussed. The authors searched PubMed, books, and clinicaltrials.gov for original and review articles and drugs development status including the terms Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Polycythemia Vera, erythrocytosis, hematocrit, splenomegaly, bone marrow fibrosis, JAK2^V617F, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, MPN cytoreductive therapy, JAK2 inhibitor, histone deacetylase inhibitor, PV-like phenotype, JAK2^V617F BMT, transgenic JAK2^V617F mouse, JAK2 physiologic promoter.

EXPERT OPINION

Preclinical models of PV are valuable tools for enabling an understanding of the pathophysiology and the molecular mechanisms of the disease. These models provide new biological insights on the contribution of concomitant mutations and the efficacy of novel drugs in a 'more faithful' setting. This may facilitate an enhanced understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms and targeted therapy.

Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Diseases

Myeloproliferative diseases, including myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), are driven by genetic abnormalities and increased inflammatory signaling and are at high risk to transform into acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Myeloid-derived suppressor cells were reported to enhance leukemia immune escape by suppressing an effective anti-tumor immune response. MPNs are a potentially immunogenic disease as shown by their response to interferon-α treatment and allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Novel immunotherapeutic approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibition, tumor vaccination, or cellular therapies using target-specific lymphocytes have so far not shown strong therapeutic efficacy. Potential reasons could be the pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive microenvironment in the bone marrow of patients with MPN, driving tumor immune escape. In this review, we discuss the biology of MPNs with respect to the pro-inflammatory milieu in the bone marrow (BM) and potential immunotherapeutic approaches.

Current and future therapies for myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is classified as a 'Philadelphia-chromosome negative' clonal myeloproliferative disorder. The heterogeneity of this condition and patient population and array of often challenging clinical manifestations can frequently make therapeutic decisions challenging. Despite many advances in therapy with targeted and combination approaches, following an enhanced understanding of underlying disease pathogenesis, cure only remains achievable with allogeneic stem cell transplant. This option is often limited to a small group of younger transplant-eligible patients with more advanced disease who have both a suitable donor and no or few co-morbidities. In this article, we will discuss up-to-date disease prognostication, common clinical challenges associated with myelofibrosis and both standard and novel therapeutic approaches. Increasingly complex prognostic modelling utilises patient-specific, haematological and genomic parameters to improve the accuracy of risk assessment and predict disease progression. We will also focus on difficult clinical scenarios such as disease-associated anaemia, thrombocytopenia and extremes of age. Future and evolving therapies within this field are highly anticipated and novel JAK inhibitor and non-JAK inhibitor-based therapy will also be discussed, including the new challenge of how to switch from one JAK inhibitor therapy to another.

Recommendations for the use of pegylated interferon-α in the treatment of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms

The classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are uncommon clonal haemopoietic malignancies characterised by excessive production of mature blood cells. Clinically, they are associated with thrombosis, haemorrhage, varying degrees of constitutional disturbance and a risk of progression to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukaemia. Many of the disease manifestations may be ameliorated by treatment with interferon-α (IFN), but its use in Australian MPN patients has been limited due to the inconvenience of frequent injections and side-effects. The pegylated form of IFN is a long-acting preparation, which is better tolerated, and its Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing is likely to lead to increased usage. We review the literature on risks and benefits of IFN treatment for MPN, suggest criteria for patient selection in each of these diseases and discuss strategies to manage the side-effects of pegylated IFN.

A provider's guide to primary myelofibrosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Although understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular biology of primary myelofibrosis continues to improve, treatment options are limited, and several biological features remain unexplained. With an appropriate clinical history, exam, laboratory evaluation, and bone marrow biopsy, the diagnosis can often be established. Recent studies have better characterized prognostic factors and driver mutations in myelofibrosis, facilitated by use of next-generation sequencing. These advances have facilitated development of a management strategy that is based on both risk factors and clinical phenotype. For low-risk patients, treatment will depend on symptom severity. For patients with higher-risk disease, several treatments are available including JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and clinical trials using novel molecularly targeted therapies and rational drug combinations. In this review, we outline what is known about the disease pathogenesis, discuss an approach to reaching the diagnosis, review the prognosis of myelofibrosis, and detail current therapeutic strategies.

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are traditionally seen in older adults, making them poorly understood in younger patients. Clinical presentation, genetic landscape, outcomes, and best management practices are inadequately described in this group. Over the past decade, more research has focused on younger patients, and this paper seeks to review and describe the current status of the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent review analyzed the available pediatric MPN literature and highlighted the paucity of published data. Pediatric patients showed lower rates of the common mutations found in adults, thrombotic events, and disease transformation to myelofibrosis and acute leukemia. A number of centers have recently shared their experience with young adult patients. Better survival outcomes were confirmed for young adult patients compared to older patients. There is still much to learn about myeloproliferative neoplasms in pediatric and young adult patients, but currently available data showing better outcomes is reassuring.

Progress in elucidation of molecular pathophysiology of myeloproliferative neoplasms and its application to therapeutic decisions

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematological diseases that are driven by somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. These mutations include JAK2, CALR and MPL mutations as the main disease drivers, mutations driving clonal expansion, and mutations that contribute to progression of chronic MPNs to myelodysplasia and acute leukemia. JAK-STAT pathway has played a central role in the disease pathogenesis of MPNs. Mutant JAK2, CALR or MPL constitutively activates JAK-STAT pathway independent of the cytokine regulation. Symptomatic management is the primary goal of MPN therapy in ET and low-risk PV patients. JAK2 inhibitors and interferon-α are the established therapies in MF and high-risk PV patients.

Distinct effects of ruxolitinib and interferon-alpha on murine JAK2V617F myeloproliferative neoplasm hematopoietic stem cell populations

JAK2V617F is the most common mutation in patients with BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The eradication of JAK2V617F hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is critical for achieving molecular remissions and cure. We investigate the distinct effects of two therapies, ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor) and interferon-alpha (IFN-α), on the disease-initiating HSC population. Whereas ruxolitinib inhibits Stat5 activation in erythroid progenitor populations, it fails to inhibit this same pathway in HSCs. In contrast, IFN-α has direct effects on HSCs. Furthermore, STAT1 phosphorylation and pathway activation is greater after IFN-α stimulation in Jak2V617F murine HSCs with increased induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage and reduction in quiescence after chronic IFN-α treatment. Interestingly, ruxolitinib does not block IFN-α induced reactive oxygen species and DNA damage in Jak2V617F murine HSCs in vivo. This work provides a mechanistic rationale informing how pegylated IFN-α reduces JAK2V617F allelic burden in the clinical setting and may inform future clinical efforts to combine ruxolitinib with pegylated IFN-α in patients with MPN.

Myelofibrosis: best practices, controversies and 2019 update

Introduction: Recent advances in the prognostic scheme and treatment of primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) have resulted in an overwhelming amount of clinical information to assimilate. The authors believe a comprehensive review that summarizes the most recent published literature, could serve as guidelines for the practicing hematologist.Areas covered: The authors provide a summary of landmark articles regarding epidemiology, symptoms, and pathogenesis of disease. The authors conducted a systematic literature review to answer questions regarding differences between primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and secondary myelofibrosis (SMF), appropriate use and selection of the current risk-stratification models, early versus late treatment of MF and current practices in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for MF. The authors conclude the article with their clinical opinion based on their experience and literature review. The purpose of this article is to identify current practices, address any variation, identify and investigate conflicting results and produce statements to guide decision-making.Expert opinion: In this section, the authors advocate for and provide examples of a standardized way of incorporating future discoveries in the pathogenesis and risk-stratification models of MF. They also discuss the importance of using only one risk-stratification model for PMF and one for SMF and their reasoning for early instead of late treatment of MF.

Emerging translational science discoveries, clonal approaches, and treatment trends in chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms

The 60th American Society of Hematology (ASH) held in San Diego in December 2018 was followed by the 13th Post-ASH chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) workshop on December 4 and 5, 2018. This closed annual workshop, first introduced in 2006 by Goldman and Mughal, was organized in collaboration with Alpine Oncology Foundation and allowed experts in preclinical and clinical research in the chronic MPNs to discuss the current scenario, including relevant presentations at ASH, and address pivotal open questions that impact translational research and clinical management. This review is based on the presentations and deliberations at this workshop, and rather than provide a resume of the proceedings, we have selected some of the important translational science and treatment issues that require clarity. We discuss the experimental and observational evidence to support the intimate interaction between aging, inflammation, and clonal evolution of MPNs, the clinical impact of the unfolding mutational landscape on the emerging targets and treatment of MPNs, new methods to detect clonal heterogeneity, the challenges in managing childhood and adolescent MPN, and reflect on the treatment of systemic mastocytosis (SM) following the licensing of midostaurin.

Differential roles of STAT1 and STAT2 in the sensitivity of JAK2V617F- vs. BCR-ABL-positive cells to interferon alpha

BACKGROUND

Interferon alpha (IFNa) monotherapy is recommended as the standard therapy in polycythemia vera (PV) but not in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Here, we investigated the mechanisms of IFNa efficacy in JAK2V617F- vs. BCR-ABL-positive cells.

METHODS

Gene expression microarrays and RT-qPCR of PV vs. CML patient PBMCs and CD34+ cells and of the murine cell line 32D expressing JAK2V617F or BCR-ABL were used to analyze and compare interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression. Furthermore, using CRISPR/Cas9n technology, targeted disruption of STAT1 or STAT2, respectively, was performed in 32D-BCR-ABL and 32D-JAK2V617F cells to evaluate the role of these transcription factors for IFNa efficacy. The knockout cell lines were reconstituted with STAT1, STAT2, STAT1Y701F, or STAT2Y689F to analyze the importance of wild-type and phosphomutant STATs for the IFNa response. ChIP-seq and ChIP were performed to correlate histone marks with ISG expression.

RESULTS

Microarray analysis and RT-qPCR revealed significant upregulation of ISGs in 32D-JAK2V617F but downregulation in 32D-BCR-ABL cells, and these effects were reversed by tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Similar expression patterns were confirmed in human cell lines, primary PV and CML patient PBMCs and CD34+ cells, demonstrating that these effects are operational in patients. IFNa treatment increased Stat1, Stat2, and Irf9 mRNA as well as pY-STAT1 in all cell lines; however, viability was specifically decreased in 32D-JAK2V617F. STAT1 or STAT2 knockout and reconstitution with wild-type or phospho-deficient STAT mutants demonstrated the necessity of STAT2 for IFNa-induced STAT1 phosphorylation in BCR-ABL- but not in JAK2V617F-expressing cells. STAT1 was essential for IFNa activity in both BCR-ABL- and JAK2V617F-positive cells. Furthermore, ChIP experiments demonstrate higher repressive and lower active chromatin marks at the promoters of ISGs in BCR-ABL-expressing cells.

CONCLUSIONS

JAK2V617F but not BCR-ABL sensitizes MPN cells to interferon, and this effect was dependent on STAT1. Moreover, STAT2 is a survival factor in BCR-ABL- and JAK2V617F-positive cells but an IFNa-sensitizing factor solely in 32D-JAK2V617F cells by upregulation of STAT1 expression.

JAK2 (and other genes) be nimble with MPN diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy

Now that the spectrum of somatic mutations that initiate, propagate, and drive the progression of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) has largely been defined, recent efforts have focused on integrating this information into clinical decision making. In this regard, the greatest progress has been made in myelofibrosis, in which high-molecular-risk mutations have been identified and incorporated into prognostic models to help guide treatment decisions. In this chapter, we focus on advances in 4 main areas: (1) What are the MPN phenotypic driver mutations? (2) What constitutes high molecular risk in MPN (focusing on ASXL1)? (3) How do we risk-stratify patients with MPN? And (4) What is the significance of molecular genetics for MPN treatment? Although substantial progress has been made, we still have an incomplete understanding of the molecular basis for phenotypic diversity in MPN, and few rationally designed therapeutic approaches to target high-risk mutations are available. Ongoing research efforts in these areas are critical to understanding the biological consequences of genetic heterogeneity in MPN and to improving outcomes for patients.

JAK2V617F but not CALR mutations confer increased molecular responses to interferon-α via JAK1/STAT1 activation

Pegylated interferon-α (peg-IFNa) treatment induces molecular responses (MR) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including partial MR (PMR) in 30-40% of patients. Here, we compared the efficacy of IFNa treatment in JAK2V617F- vs. calreticulin (CALR)-mutated cells and investigated the mechanisms of differential response. Retrospective analysis of MPN patients treated with peg-IFNa demonstrated that patients harboring the JAK2V617F mutation were more likely to achieve PMR than those with mutated CALR (p = 0.004), while there was no significant difference in hematological response. In vitro experiments confirmed an upregulation of IFN-stimulated genes in JAK2V617F-positive 32D cells as well as patient samples (peripheral blood mononuclear cells and CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells) compared to their CALR-mutated counterparts, and higher IFNa doses were needed to achieve the same IFNa response in CALR- as in JAK2V617F-mutant 32D cells. Additionally, Janus-activated kinase-1 (JAK1) and signal transducers and activators of transcription 1 (STAT1) showed constitutive phosphorylation in JAK2V617F-mutated but not CALR-mutated cells, indicating priming towards an IFNa response. Moreover, IFN-induced growth arrest was counteracted by selective JAK1 inhibition but enhanced by JAK2 inhibition. In conclusion, our data suggest that, clinically, higher doses of IFNa are needed in CALR-mutated vs. JAK2V617F-positive patients and we suggest a model of JAK2V617F-JAK1/STAT1 crosstalk leading to a priming of JAK2V617F-positive cells to IFNa resulting in differential sensitivity.