Clinical Perspectives on the Use of Subcutaneous and Oral Formulations of Semaglutide

Real-world Evidence on Oral Semaglutide for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. A Narrative Review for Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

Oral semaglutide is the first oral glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) available for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management, whose effectiveness and tolerability have extensively been demonstrated in the PIONEER clinical trial program. Nevertheless, data from real-world are crucial to evaluate treatment performance under routine care. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize available evidence regarding real-world utilization patterns of oral semaglutide, and discuss efficacy, safety, and dosing regimen data in routine scenarios.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for real-world studies evaluating oral semaglutide up to August 2024, and specific search terms were: "oral semaglutide," and "real-world studies" or "observational studies" or "retrospective studies".

FINDINGS

19 real-world studies were included in the narrative review. In real-world settings, oral semaglutide provided significant glycemic (median HbA1c reduction at 6 months of 1%) and weight (median body weight reduction of 2 to 3 kg) benefits across the spectrum of T2DM, aligning with pre-clinical evidence from the PIONEER program. No new tolerability and safety issue has emerged from oral semaglutide administration in routine clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS

Oral semaglutide constitutes an effective and safe option for T2DM management, and its increased acceptance has the potential to favor the early introduction of GLP-1RAs along the disease course. Nevertheless, continuous evaluation of real-world data is critical to better define the optimal positioning of oral semaglutide along T2DM trajectory and fully exploit its potential in everyday clinical practice.

Oral Semaglutide Use in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes from Seven PIONEER REAL Prospective Real-World Studies

INTRODUCTION

Oral semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) approved for improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The PIONEER REAL program evaluates clinical and patient-reported outcomes of oral semaglutide treatment as part of routine clinical practice across 13 countries. Here, data from Canada, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK are pooled and analyzed to address treatment satisfaction as well as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and body weight changes in relevant subgroup analyses.

METHODS

This pooled analysis encompasses seven country-specific, non-interventional, multicenter, phase 4, prospective, single-arm clinical studies assessing the use of oral semaglutide in adults with T2D. Primary endpoint was the change in HbA1C from baseline to end of study (EOS), and secondary endpoints included changes in body weight and treatment satisfaction. For the analyses, results were stratified by age, T2D duration, and oral semaglutide dose at EOS as well as baseline HbA1C, body weight, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Oral semaglutide treatment was initiated by 1615 participants. At EOS, 1222 (76%) participants out of the 1483 (92%) who completed the study were on treatment. Estimated changes in HbA1C and body weight from baseline to week 38 were - 1.0%-point (95% CI - 1.08 to - 0.97; P < 0.0001) and - 5.0% (CI - 5.37 to - 4.72; P < 0.0001). Treatment satisfaction increased significantly during the study. Shorter T2D duration interacted with higher HbA1C reduction and body weight loss. Interaction was also observed between higher baseline HbA1C and more pronounced decrease in HbA1C. No significant interactions were detected between clinical outcomes and age or physician setting.

CONCLUSION

The PIONEER REAL pooled analysis shows that people initiating oral semaglutide treatment experience improved glycemic control and body weight loss across age groups and T2D duration. This occurs regardless of specialist or primary care practice setting and is accompanied by an increased treatment satisfaction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

NCT04559815 (Canada), NCT04537637 (Denmark), NCT05230615 (Italy), NCT04601740 (the Netherlands), NCT04601753 (Sweden), NCT04537624 (Switzerland), NCT04862923 (UK).

The cost-effectiveness analysis of semaglutide for the treatment of adult and adolescent patients with overweight and obesity: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to systematically collect and synthesize available cost-effectiveness studies of semaglutide in patients with obesity or overweight in comparison with other interventions.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched multiple electronic databases to identify relevant literature. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of studies was appraised using the "Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards" (CHEERS) tool. This study is conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 252 items, after review, 32 articles were fully reviewed, and, finally, 7 studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The discount rate was in the range of 1.5-3.5%. Studies included showed semaglutide offered more QALYs than anti-obesity drugs but because of higher cost, in some cases, ICER exceeds the willingness to pay threshold. Results show that semaglutide creates higher total cost compared to conventional interventions in patients with class I, II, and III obesities. Results show that in patients with class I obesity (BMI 33) lifestyle intervention (LI), endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), Sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and semaglutide create $124,195; $126,732; $139,971; and $370,776, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current systematic review showed that semaglutide provides more QALYs and creates more costs in comparison with phentermine-topiramate, phentermine, and naltrexone-bupropion. Semaglutide may be cost-effective with substantial cost reduction. Semaglutide appears to be cost-effective versus diet and exercise (D&E) and liraglutide but it was not cost-effective versus sleeve gastrectomy, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and gastric bypass.

Differential Efficacy of Weight Loss Interventions in Patients with Versus Without Diabetes

Obesity is both a major risk factor for diabetes and a serious comorbidity of the condition. The twin epidemics of obesity and diabetes have spread globally over the past few decades. Treatment of obesity in patients with diabetes provides a host of clinical benefits that encompass virtually all body systems. Despite this, multiple lines of evidence suggest that the efficacy of most therapies for weight loss is significantly reduced among patients with diabetes. With this background, we summarize the evidence of a differential effect of lifestyle, pharmacological, and surgical treatments for obesity in patients with existing diabetes, and explore the potential mechanisms involved in this phenomenon. This information is then used to formulate strategies to improve weight loss outcomes for patients with diabetes.

Research Progress on Peptide Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes and the Possibility of Oral Administration

Diabetes is a global disease that can lead to a range of complications. Currently, the treatment of type 2 diabetes focuses on oral hypoglycemic drugs and insulin analogues. Studies have shown that drugs such as oral metformin are useful in the treatment of diabetes but can limit the liver's ability to release sugar. The development of glucose-lowering peptides has provided new options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Peptide drugs have low oral utilization due to their easy degradation, short half-life, and difficulty passing through the intestinal mucosa. Therefore, improving the oral utilization of peptide drugs remains an urgent problem. This paper reviews the research progress of peptide drugs in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and proposes that different types of nano-formulation carriers, such as liposomes, self-emulsifying drug delivery systems, and polymer particles, should be combined with peptide drugs for oral administration to improve their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract.

Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin in a predominantly Chinese population with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin: PIONEER 12, a double-blind, Phase IIIa, randomised trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin in a predominantly Chinese population with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin treatment.

METHODS

The Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment (PIONEER) 12 trial was a randomised, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group, Phase IIIa trial conducted over 26 weeks at 90 sites across the China region (including mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong) and five other countries. Adults aged ≥18 years (≥20 years in Taiwan) with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, HbA1c between 53 and 91 mmol/mol (inclusive) and treated with a stable daily dose of metformin were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomised (1:1:1:1) using a web-based randomisation system to either once-daily oral semaglutide (3 mg, 7 mg or 14 mg) or once-daily oral sitagliptin 100 mg. Treatment allocation was masked to both participants and investigators. Randomisation was stratified according to whether participants were from the China region or elsewhere. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. The confirmatory secondary endpoint was change in body weight (kg) from baseline to week 26. All randomised participants were included in the full analysis set (FAS). All participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product were included in the safety analysis (SAS).

RESULTS

Of 1839 participants screened, 1441 were randomly assigned to oral semaglutide 3 mg (n=361), 7 mg (n=360), 14 mg (n=361) or sitagliptin 100 mg (n=359) and included in the FAS. A total of 1438 participants were included in the SAS. In total, 75.2% of participants were from the China region. A total of 1372 (95.2%) participants completed the trial and 130 participants prematurely discontinued treatment (8.3%, 8.6% and 15.0% for oral semaglutide 3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg, respectively; 4.2% for sitagliptin 100 mg). Significantly greater reductions in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 were reported for all doses of oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin 100 mg. For oral semaglutide 3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg vs sitagliptin 100 mg, the estimated treatment differences (ETDs [95% CI]) were -2 (-4, -1) mmol/mol, -8 (-9, -6) mmol/mol and -11 (-12, -9) mmol/mol, respectively. The corresponding ETDs (95% CI) in percentage points vs sitagliptin 100 mg were -0.2 (-0.3, -0.1), -0.7 (-0.8, -0.6) and -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8), respectively. Reductions in body weight were significantly greater for all doses of oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin 100 mg (ETD [95% CI] -0.9 [-1.4, -0.4] kg, -2.3 [-2.8, -1.8] kg and -3.3 [-3.8, -2.8] kg for 3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg, respectively). In the subpopulation of participants from the China region (75.2% of trial participants), reductions in HbA1c and body weight from baseline to week 26 were similar to those seen in the overall population. The most frequent adverse events in the semaglutide treatment arms were gastrointestinal, although these were mostly transient and mild/moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Significantly greater reductions in both HbA1c and body weight over 26 weeks were seen with oral semaglutide 3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg than with sitagliptin 100 mg in a predominantly Chinese population with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin treatment. Oral semaglutide was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that seen in the global PIONEER trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04017832.

FUNDING

This trial was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.

Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide monotherapy vs placebo in a predominantly Chinese population with type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 11): a double-blind, Phase IIIa, randomised trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide monotherapy vs placebo in a predominantly Chinese population with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with diet and exercise alone.

METHODS

The Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment (PIONEER) 11 trial was a double-blind, randomised, Phase IIIa trial conducted across 52 sites in the China region (mainland China and Taiwan), Hungary, Serbia and Ukraine. Eligible participants were ≥18 years (≥20 years in Taiwan), had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes with HbA1c 53-86 mmol/mol (7.0-10.0%) and were not receiving any glucose-lowering drugs. After a 4-week run-in period in which participants were treated with diet and exercise alone, those who fulfilled the randomisation criteria were randomised (1:1:1:1) using a web-based randomisation system to receive once-daily oral semaglutide 3 mg, 7 mg or 14 mg or placebo for 26 weeks (using a 4-week dose-escalation regimen for the higher doses). Randomisation was stratified according to whether participants were from the China region or elsewhere. The primary and confirmatory secondary endpoints were change from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c and body weight (kg), respectively. Safety was assessed in all participants exposed to at least one dose of the trial product.

RESULTS

Between October 2019 and October 2021, a total of 774 participants were screened and 521 participants were randomised to oral semaglutide 3 mg (n=130), 7 mg (n=130), 14 mg (n=130) or placebo (n=131); most participants (92.5%, n=482) completed the trial, with 39 participants prematurely discontinuing treatment. The number of participants contributing to the trial analyses was based on the total number of participants who were randomised at the beginning of the trial. The majority of participants were male (63.7%), and the mean age of participants was 52 years. At baseline, mean HbA1c and body weight were 63 mmol/mol (8.0%) and 79.6 kg, respectively. Oral semaglutide resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1c than placebo at week 26 (p<0.001 for all doses). The estimated treatment differences (ETDs [95% CIs]) for oral semaglutide 3 mg, 7 mg and 14 mg vs placebo were -11 (-13, -9) mmol/mol, -16 (-18, -13) mmol/mol and -17 (-19, -15) mmol/mol, respectively. The corresponding ETDs in percentage points (95% CI) vs placebo were -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8), -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2) and -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3), respectively. Significantly greater reductions in body weight were also observed for oral semaglutide 7 mg and 14 mg than for placebo at week 26 (ETD [95% CI] -1.2 kg [-2.0 kg, -0.4 kg; p<0.01] and -2.0 kg [-2.8 kg, -1.2 kg; p<0.001], respectively), but not for oral semaglutide 3 mg (ETD [95% CI] -0.0 kg [-0.9 kg, 0.8 kg; not significant]). Similar reductions in HbA1c and body weight were observed in the Chinese subpopulation, which represented 74.9% of participants in the overall population. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in between 65.4% and 72.3% of participants receiving oral semaglutide (for all doses) and 57.3% of participants with placebo. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity, with few serious AEs reported; the most commonly reported AEs were gastrointestinal-related and were more frequent with semaglutide (all doses) than with placebo. The proportion of AEs was slightly higher in the Chinese subpopulation.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Oral semaglutide resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1c across all doses and in significant body weight reductions for the 7 mg and 14 mg doses when compared with placebo in predominantly Chinese participants with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled by diet and exercise alone. Oral semaglutide was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that seen in the global PIONEER trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04109547.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk A/S.

Daphnetin modulates GLP-1R to alleviate cognitive dysfunction in diabetes: implications for inflammation and oxidative stress

Daphnetin exerts certain pharmacological function on a variety of diseases, but its role in diabetic cognitive dysfunction has not been elucidated. In this study, we carried a series of pharmacological studies of GLP-1R with daphnetin. In rats and PC12 cells, we found that daphnetin could alleviate diabetic cognitive dysfunction and increase the expression level of GLP-1R. Additionally, the anti-diabetic cognitive dysfunction effect of DAP was accompanied by the inhibition of inflammation and oxidative stress. Further in-depth studies demonstrated that the inhibition GLP-1R enhanced the protective effect of daphnetin, whilst, the overexpression of GLP-1R weakened the protective effect of daphnetin. These results indicated that daphnetin protects diabetes cognitive dysfunction by regulating GLP-1R-mediated inflammation and oxidative stress, act as a GLP-1R agonist. The study further demonstrated that daphnetin has great value in preventing cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetes, and GLP-1R is a key potential target for the treatment of related diseases.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of a novel GLP-1 receptor biased agonist-SAL0112

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

GLP-1 receptor agonists are clinically utilized for type 2 diabetes and obesity. In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies were performed to assess the druggability of a novel small molecule GLP-1 receptor biased agonist SAL0112.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The HTRF assay, FLIPR assay, TR-FRET assay, and PathHunter assay were utilized for in vitro studies. Liver transporter tests were conducted using the HEK293-OATP1B1 and HEK293-OATP1B3 cell lines. In vitro stability assessments of various species and in vivo PK studies in rodents were performed. A model of type 2 diabetes and obesity induced by a high-energy diet in transgenic C57BL/6 mice expressing the human GLP-1 receptor gene was conducted.

PRINCIPAL RESULTS

SAL0112 demonstrated high potency and selectivity in activating the Gαs pathway of the GLP-1 receptor, with no observed desensitization. SAL0112 demonstrated greater stability in human and rat liver microsomes compared to Danuglipron. In vivo PK studies revealed higher absorption of SAL0112 in rats. SAL0112 displayed a significantly lower potential for DDI on liver transporters compared to Danuglipron. SAL0112 led to significant reductions in body weight (P<0.001), blood glucose levels in OGTT (P<0.001), HbA1c (P<0.05) and improved insulin resistance (P<0.01). Notably, it increased peripheral adipocyte density and resolved hepatic steatosis. The efficacy of SAL0112 was found to be comparable to that of Danuglipron and Liraglutide.

CONCLUSION

SAL0112 demonstrated potent and selective GLP-1 receptor biased agonism, effectively alleviating signs of type 2 diabetes in a mouse model. These promising findings pave the way for the advancement of SAL0112 into clinical trials.

Real-World Use of Oral Semaglutide in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the PIONEER REAL Netherlands Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

In this phase 4, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional PIONEER REAL Netherlands study, we assessed clinical outcomes associated with once-daily oral semaglutide use in real-world clinical practice in adults living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) naïve to injectable glucose-lowering medication.

METHODS

Participants initiated on oral semaglutide were followed for 34-44 weeks. Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (BL) to end of study (EOS) was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included change in body weight (BW) from BL to EOS, the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7.0% at EOS and the composite endpoints of HbA1c reduction ≥ 1.0%-points with BW reduction ≥ 3% or ≥ 5% at EOS. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ status/change). Safety was evaluated in all participants who initiated oral semaglutide treatment.

RESULTS

Oral semaglutide was initiated in 187 participants; 94.1% completed the study and 78.6% remained on treatment at EOS. At BL, 54.0% of participants were male, mean age was 58.8 years, mean duration of T2D was 8.7 years and mean body mass index was 35.1 kg/m2; mean HbA1c was 8.6% and mean BW was 103.1 kg. Significant improvements from BL to EOS were observed for HbA1c and BW (estimated change [95% confidence interval]: - 1.16%-points [- 1.48 to - 0.85]; p < 0.0001, and - 5.84 kg [- 6.88 to - 4.80]; p < 0.0001, respectively). At EOS, 47.5% of participants had an HbA1c level < 7.0%; 41.8% and 35.5% of participants achieved composite endpoints of HbA1c reduction ≥ 1.0%-points plus BW reduction ≥ 3% or ≥ 5%, respectively. DTSQ status and change scores improved by 2.1 (p = 0.0003) and 10.8 points (p < 0.0001), respectively. Oral semaglutide was easy or very easy to consume for 81.5% of participants. Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world population, we reported clinically significant reductions in HbA1c and BW, improved treatment satisfaction and no new safety concerns. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04601740.

Enhanced Oral Efficacy of Semaglutide via an Ionic Nanocomplex with Organometallic Phyllosilicate in Type 2 Diabetic Rats

This study aimed to develop an effective oral formulation of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, using an organometallic phyllosilicate-based colonic delivery system. The core nanocomplex (AMP-Sema) of 3-aminopropyl-functionalized magnesium phyllosilicate (AMP) and semaglutide was prepared via electrostatic interactions. Subsequently, AMP-Sema was coated with a polymer showing pH-dependent solubility (Eudragit® S100) for preferential colonic delivery. The surface-coated nanoparticles (EAMP-Sema) showed a narrow size distribution, and the encapsulated semaglutide maintained its conformational stability. The pH-dependent drug release property of EAMP-Sema yielded around 20% and 62% drug release at pH 1.2 and 7.4, respectively. The nanoparticles exhibited significantly decreased size and surface charge at pH 7.4, which indicated the pH-dependent dissolution of the coating layer. Furthermore, EAMP-Sema effectively improved the membrane permeability and metabolic stability of semaglutide in the gastrointestinal tract. It protected the encapsulated drugs from proteolysis in simulated intestinal fluids and increased drug transport by 2.5-fold in Caco-2 cells. Consequently, orally administered EAMP-Sema (equivalent to 8 mg/kg of semaglutide) showed significant therapeutic benefits, yielding effective glycemic control and weight loss in high-fat diet/streptozotocin (40 mg/kg)-induced type 2 diabetic rats. These results demonstrate that EAMP-Sema could improve the efficacy of orally administered semaglutide by enhancing the GI stability and cellular uptake of protein drugs.

Adverse events in different administration routes of semaglutide: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system

Background

With the continuously increasing incidence of type 2 diabetes, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, known for their dual benefits of effectively controlling blood glucose levels while also reducing weight and lowering cardiovascular disease risks, have been widely employed in the treatment of this condition. In recent years, semaglutide has garnered significant attention as the only injectable and orally administered glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). However, it is important to note that different routes of administration may lead to varying adverse events in patients. The aim of this study is to compare the adverse event profiles of semaglutide across different routes of administration by analyzing the adverse event reporting system of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The findings from this analysis will provide valuable insights for clinical practice and drug surveillance.

Methods

Data was extracted from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, specifically focusing on the period from the fourth quarter of 2017 to the fourth quarter of 2023. A comparative analysis was conducted using disproportionality analysis, reporting odds ratio (ROR), and stratified analysis methods to assess and compare the signals of adverse events (AE) and the time to onset of adverse reactions associated with different routes of administration of semaglutide from 2017 to 2023.

Results

A total of 22,287 adverse reaction records related to semaglutide were identified in the FAERS database. A comparative analysis was performed on 16,346 records of subcutaneous administration and 2,496 records of oral administration. Different routes of administration can lead to varying adverse reaction outcomes. Compared to oral administration, subcutaneous injection is more likely to result in adverse events related to the endocrine system. Oral administration is more likely to induce adverse events in the gastrointestinal system. Additionally, it significantly accelerates the onset of adverse reactions. The comparative analysis of all relevant results indicates that semaglutide can lead to different adverse reaction events depending on the route of administration. Furthermore, there are significant differences in the time of onset for these adverse reactions.

Conclusion

Semaglutide exhibits variations in adverse reaction events and the time of onset across different routes of administration. Therefore, when selecting the route of administration for semaglutide, clinicians should consider the risk of adverse events and weigh them against the clinical benefits. Based on these considerations, appropriate guidance and recommendations can be provided to patients.

Effectiveness of oral semaglutide on glucose control and body weight up to 18 months: a multicenter retrospective real-world study

AIM

Oral semaglutide, an innovative orally administered GLP-1 receptor agonist for type 2 diabetes (T2D) management was herein evaluated for its effectiveness in a multi-center retrospective real-world study.

METHODS

We included new-users of oral semaglutide from 18 specialist care centres and collected retrospective data on baseline clinical characteristics. Updated values of HbA1c and body weight were analyzed using the mixed model for repeated measures.

RESULTS

The study included 166 individuals with T2D, predominantly men (64.5%), with a mean age of 64.4 years and a mean diabetes duration of 10.1 years. In the majority of patients (68.3%) oral semaglutide was used as a second-line drug, mostly with metformin. At baseline, mean BMI was 28.9 kg/m2 and HbA1c was 7.5%. During the 18-month observation period, oral semaglutide demonstrated significant reductions in HbA1c, with a maximum change of - 0.9%, and 42.1% of patients achieved HbA1c values below 7.0%. Additionally, there was a substantial reduction in body weight, with an estimated change of - 3.4 kg at 18 months, and 30.3% of patients experienced a 5% or greater reduction in baseline body weight. Only 24.2% of patients reached the 14 mg dose. Subgroup analysis revealed that baseline HbA1c > 7%, persistence on drug, not being on a prior therapy with DPP-4 inhibitors, and loosing 5% or more the initial body weight were associated with greater HbA1c reductions.

CONCLUSION

This study supports oral semaglutide as an effective option for T2D treatment, offering improved glucose control and weight management in a real-world setting.

Oral or injectable semaglutide for the management of type 2 diabetes in routine care: A multicentre observational study comparing matched cohorts

AIM

To investigate the real-world utilization and comparative clinical outcomes of injectable and oral semaglutide in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with the aim of enhancing understanding of the practical implications associated with choosing between these formulations.

METHODS

New users of oral or injectable semaglutide were selected from a cohort of 14 079 initiators of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was employed to create balanced groups, ensuring comparability. The analysis encompassed dose exposure, drug persistence, and clinical outcomes, including changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight, with up to 18 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

We analysed two matched groups of 107 participants each, who comprised on average 63.6% men, aged 64 years, with diabetes duration of approximately 10 years, body mass index of 29 kg/m2 and HbA1c level of 7.7-7.8% (61-62 mmol/mol). The proportion of low, intermediate and high doses were similar with the oral and the injectable formulation. The change in HbA1c was similar between groups (-0.9% / -10 mmol/mol at 18 months) as was the proportion of individuals reaching HbA1c <6.5% (48 mmol/mol). The average change in body weight was similar in the two groups (-3.7 kg with injectable and -3.3 kg with oral at 18 months) but more new users of injectable semaglutide lost ≥5% body weight. Persistence on drug was longer with injectable than with oral semaglutide.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, improvements in HbA1c and body weight were similar after initiation of oral or injectable semaglutide. These results may be specific to the features of the matched cohorts under investigation, with limited generalizability to populations with different characteristics.

Gastrointestinal safety evaluation of semaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Semaglutide, as an innovative weekly formulation, has attracted much attention. Nevertheless, the predominant occurrence of gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs) poses a noteworthy challenge linked to the use of this medication, substantially affecting its clinical applicability and the overall well-being of patients. Therefore, this systematic review aims to comprehensively discuss the GIAEs, providing a basis for clinical therapeutic decisions.

METHODS

We systematically searched 4 independent databases for randomized controlled trials investigating the application of semaglutide in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. The search period spanned from the inception of the databases to December 2023. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis, employing Review Manager 5.4.1 software, to systematically analyze and evaluate potential biases. Our primary emphasis was on assessing the gastrointestinal safety profile of semaglutide.

RESULTS

The outcomes unveiled a noteworthy rise in the collective occurrence of GIAEs across all dosage groups of semaglutide in comparison with the control group (P < .05). Upon further analysis, it was observed that semaglutide showed a heightened occurrence of GIAEs in contrast to the placebo. However, statistically significant distinction was not observed when compared to the reduction of conventional doses or the transition to other types of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. Additionally, an extended treatment duration with semaglutide (>30 weeks) demonstrated an association with a certain degree of decrease in the incidence of gastrointestinal events. Funnel plot assessment for publication bias demonstrated high-quality inclusion of studies with no apparent publication bias.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of GIAEs in using semaglutide was observed to be elevated in comparison to the control group. However, it was comparable to other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist or low-dose treatment regimens. Additionally, an extended treatment duration played a role in decreasing the frequency of GIAEs. These findings provide valuable insights for clinical practice. Nonetheless, further research is crucial to explore supplementary data indicators, informing clinical practices and better serving the interests of patients.

Real-World Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (OW GLP-1RAs) in Comparison with Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors (DPP-4is) for Glycemic Control and Weight Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (RELATE)

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of once-weekly (OW) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has been established in several trials in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, real-world evidence on their effectiveness is limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of OW GLP-1RA regarding glycemic and weight outcomes, and relative to DPP-4i in a comparator analysis.

METHODS

This observational cohort study evaluated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight outcomes in people with T2DM with two or more prescription claims for the same OW GLP-1RA using a pre-post study design (including for a semaglutide OW T2DM subgroup, hereafter referred to as semaglutide). Comparator analysis for the same outcome was performed for OW GLP-1RAs versus DPP-4i and semaglutide subgroup versus DPP-4i. A linked patient population from the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database and the Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records (AEMR) database was analyzed using data from January 2017 to April 2022. HbA1c and weight were assessed at baseline and at the end of the 12-month post-index period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics in the comparator analysis.

RESULTS

In the pre-post analysis, a greater numerical reduction in HbA1c and weight was observed for the semaglutide subgroup (N = 354) relative to the OW GLP-1RA cohort (N = 921). In the semaglutide subgroup, 52.5% and 34.2% of patients achieved HbA1c of < 7.0% and ≥ 5% weight loss, respectively. For the comparator analysis, the OW GLP-1RAs (N = 651) were significantly more effective (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA1c (- 1.5% vs. -  1.0%) and weight (- 3.2 kg vs. -  1.0 kg) than the DPP-4is (N = 431). Similarly, the semaglutide cohort (N = 251) also displayed more effectiveness (p < 0.001) in reducing HbA1c (- 1.7% vs. -  0.9%) and weight (- 4.1 kg vs. -  1.3 kg) than the respective DPP-4i cohort (N = 417). Patients initiating OW GLP-1RAs, including the semaglutide cohort, were at least twice as likely to achieve HbA1c and weight outcomes as well as composite outcomes compared with those initiating DPP-4is.

CONCLUSION

The study reinforces that OW GLP-1RAs are more effective in glycemic control and weight reduction compared with DPP-4is in people with T2DM in the real-world setting. These findings align with the recommendation in the current guidelines for utilizing glucose-lowering treatment regimens that support weight-management goals in people with T2DM.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of HRS-7535, a novel oral small molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in healthy participants: A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending dose, and food effect trial

AIM

To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics of HRS-7535, a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), in healthy participants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This phase 1 trial consisted of single-ascending dose (SAD), food effect (FE) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) parts. In the SAD part, participants were randomized (6:2) to receive HRS-7535 (at doses of 15, 60 and 120 mg; administered orally once daily) or placebo. In the FE part, participants were randomized (8:2) to receive a single dose of 90-mg HRS-7535 or placebo, in both fed and fasted states. In the MAD part, participants were randomized (18:6) to receive daily HRS-7535 (120 mg [30/60/90/120-mg titration scheme]) or placebo for 28 days. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently reported AEs across all three parts. In the SAD part, the median Tmax was 5.98-5.99 hours and the geometric mean t1/2 was 5.28-9.08 hours across the HRS-7535 dosing range. In the MAD part, the median Tmax was 5.98-10.98 hours and the geometric mean t1/2 was 6.48-8.42 hours on day 28 in participants on HRS-7535. PKs were approximately dose-proportional. On day 29 in the MAD part, the mean (percentage) reduction in body weight from baseline was 4.38 kg (6.63%) for participants who received HRS-7535, compared with 0.8 kg (1.18%) for those participants who received a placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

HRS-7535 exhibited a safety and tolerability profile consistent with other GLP-1RAs and showed PKs suitable for once-daily dosing. These findings support further clinical development of HRS-7535 for type 2 diabetes.

Physician Perceptions of Dose Escalation for Type 2 Diabetes Medications in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Medications used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) often require dose escalation to optimize effectiveness. Physician and patient perceptions of treatment characteristics of T2D medications have previously been examined, but little is known about perceptions of escalation to the optimal dose for each patient. This study examined physicians' perceptions of dose escalation for medications used to treat T2D.

METHODS

Data on dose escalation and other factors influencing decision-making for treatment of T2D were collected via an online survey of endocrinologists and primary care physicians in the USA.

RESULTS

The sample included 501 physicians (348 primary care physicians and 153 endocrinologists). Dose escalation was not frequently considered by physicians as a primary factor keeping patients' from reaching treatment goals (mentioned as a factor by only 7.6% of the sample) or a barrier to prescribing T2D medication (16.2%). Factors more likely to keep patients from reaching treatment goals included an unhealthy diet (86.6%) and medication adherence (77.4%). The most common reasons that physicians reported for escalating dose levels were the need for better glycemic control (reported by 89.8% of the sample), ability to decrease the total number of medications by increasing the dose of one medication (39.9%), and the need for the patient to lose weight (39.3%). Data reported by primary care physicians and endocrinologists followed similar patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Although common with T2D treatments, escalating the dose of T2D medication was not perceived by physicians to be a significant barrier to attaining treatment goals or prescribing medication. Multiple factors contribute to the decision to escalate the dose of T2D medication.

Clinical Features, Cardiovascular Risk Profile, and Therapeutic Trajectories of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Candidate for Oral Semaglutide Therapy in the Italian Specialist Care

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to address therapeutic inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) by investigating the potential of early treatment with oral semaglutide.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted between October 2021 and April 2022 among specialists treating individuals with T2D. A scientific committee designed a data collection form covering demographics, cardiovascular risk, glucose control metrics, ongoing therapies, and physician judgments on treatment appropriateness. Participants completed anonymous patient questionnaires reflecting routine clinical encounters. The preferred therapeutic regimen for each patient was also identified.

RESULTS

The analysis was conducted on 4449 patients initiating oral semaglutide. The population had a relatively short disease duration (42% < 5 years), and a minority (15.6%) had a history of cardiovascular events. Importantly, oral semaglutide was started in subjects with various disease durations and background therapies. Notably, its initiation was accompanied by de-prescription of sulfonylureas, pioglitazone, DPP-4 inhibitors, and insulin. Choice of oral semaglutide was influenced by patient profiles and ongoing glucose-lowering regimens. Factors such as younger age, higher HbA1c, and ongoing SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy drove the choice of oral semaglutide with the aim of improving glycemic control. Projected glycemic effectiveness analysis revealed that oral semaglutide could potentially lead HbA1c to target in > 60% of patients, and more often than sitagliptin or empagliflozin.

CONCLUSION

The study supports the potential of early implementation of oral semaglutide as a strategy to overcome therapeutic inertia and enhance T2D management.

Real-World Retrospective Study into the Effects of Oral Semaglutide (As a Switchover or Add-On Therapy) in Type 2 Diabetes

(1) Background: Oral semaglutide represents the first oral GLP-1 RA approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This real-world retrospective study aimed at evaluating its effectiveness and tolerability in the treatment of patients with T2DM when patients switched from a glucose-lowering agent to it and when it was added to the usual therapy. (2) Methods: Adult patients with T2DM taking oral semaglutide and followed in the ASUGI Diabetes Center were identified with the use of electronic medical records between October 2022 and May 2023. (3) Results: A total of 129 patients were recruited. The median follow-up was 6 months. Be it as a switchover or as an add-on therapy, oral semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1c and BMI. Switching from DPPIV inhibitors to oral semaglutide was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c and BMI, switching from SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c, and switching from sulphonylureas was associated with a significant reduction in BMI. The median HbA1c change was associated with baseline HbA1c. SBP significantly decreased in the add-on group. Oral semaglutide was well tolerated. (4) Conclusions: This study shows that in the real-world setting, oral semaglutide is effective and safe as a switchover or as an add-on therapy for the treatment of T2DM.

Oral semaglutide 50 mg taken once per day in adults with overweight or obesity (OASIS 1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

We assessed the efficacy and safety of the oral glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, semaglutide 50 mg, taken once per day versus placebo for the treatment of overweight or obesity in adults without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3, superiority trial enrolled adults with a BMI of at least 30 kg/m2, or at least 27 kg/m2 with bodyweight-related complications and comorbidities, without type 2 diabetes. The trial was done at 50 outpatient clinics in nine countries across Asia, Europe, and North America. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) via an interactive web-response system to oral semaglutide escalated to 50 mg, or visually matching placebo, once per day for 68 weeks, plus lifestyle intervention. Group assignment was masked for participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes. Coprimary endpoints were the percentage change in bodyweight and whether participants reached a bodyweight reduction of at least 5% at week 68 for oral semaglutide 50 mg versus placebo, assessed regardless of treatment discontinuation or use of other bodyweight-lowering therapies (an intention-to-treat analysis). Safety was assessed in participants who received at least one dose of trial drug. This trial, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05035095), is now complete.

FINDINGS

From Sept 13 to Nov 22, 2021, 709 participants were screened, of whom 667 were randomly assigned to oral semaglutide 50 mg (n=334) or placebo (n=333). The estimated mean bodyweight change from baseline to week 68 was -15·1% (SE 0·5) with oral semaglutide 50 mg versus -2·4% (0·5) with placebo (estimated treatment difference -12·7 percentage points, 95% CI -14·2 to -11·3; p<0·0001). More participants reached bodyweight reductions of at least 5% (269 [85%] of 317 vs 76 [26%] of 295; odds ratio [OR] 12·6, 95% CI 8·5 to 18·7; p<0·0001), 10% (220 [69%] vs 35 [12%]; OR 14·7, 9·6 to 22·6), 15% (170 [54%] vs 17 [6%]; OR 17·9, 10·4 to 30·7), and 20% (107 [34%] vs 8 [3%]; OR 18·5, 8·8 to 38·9) at week 68 with oral semaglutide 50 mg versus placebo. Adverse events were more frequent with oral semaglutide 50 mg (307 [92%] of 334) than with placebo (285 [86%] of 333). Gastrointestinal adverse events (mostly mild to moderate) were reported in 268 (80%) participants with oral semaglutide 50 mg and 154 (46%) with placebo.

INTERPRETATION

In adults with overweight or obesity without type 2 diabetes, oral semaglutide 50 mg once per day led to a superior and clinically meaningful decrease in bodyweight compared with placebo.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk.

Bariatric surgery, novel glucose-lowering agents, and insulin for type 2 diabetes and obesity: Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of bariatric surgery, novel glucose-lowering agents (SGLT2i, GLP1RA, DPP4i), and insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity.

METHODS

Four databases were searched from inception to April 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bariatric surgery, SGLT2i, GLP1RA, DPP4i, insulin, and/or placebo/usual care among patients with T2DM and obesity in the achievement of HbA1c < 7.0 per cent within one year, and 12-month changes in HbA1c and body weight.

RESULTS

A total of 376 eligible RCTs (149 824 patients) were analysed. Bariatric surgery had significantly higher rates of achieving HbA1c < 7.0 per cent than SGLT2i (RR = 2.46, 95 per cent c.i. = 1.28, 4.92), DPP4i (RR = 2.59, 95 per cent c.i. = 1.36, 5.13), insulin (RR = 2.27, 95 per cent c.i. = 1.18, 4.58) and placebo/usual care (RR = 4.02, 95 per cent c.i. = 2.13, 7.93), but had no statistically significant difference from GLP1RA (RR = 1.73, 95 per cent c.i. = 0.91, 3.44), regardless of oral (RR = 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. = 0.66, 2.79) or injectable (RR = 1.75, 95 per cent c.i. = 0.92, 3.45) administration. Significantly more GLP1RA patients achieved HbA1c < 7.0 per cent than other non-surgical treatments. Bariatric surgery had the greatest reductions in HbA1c (∼1 per cent more) and body weight (∼15 kg more) at 12 months. Among novel glucose-lowering medications, GLP1RA was associated with greater reductions in HbA1c than SGLT2i (-0.39 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. = -0.55, -0.22) and DPP4i (-0.51 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. = -0.64, -0.39) at 12 months, while GLP1RA (-1.74 kg, 95 per cent c.i. = -2.48, -1.01) and SGLT2i (-2.23 kg, 95 per cent c.i. = -3.07, -1.39) showed greater reductions in body weight than DPP4i at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery showed superiority in glycaemic control and weight management compared to non-surgical approaches. GLP1RA administered by oral or injectable form demonstrated reduced HbA1c and body weight at 12 months, and was preferable over other non-surgical treatments among patients with T2DM and obesity.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO

CRD42020201507.

Greater Combined Reductions of HbA1c ≥ 1.0% and Body Weight Loss ≥ 5.0% or ≥ 10.0% with Orally Administered Semaglutide Versus Comparators

INTRODUCTION

A post hoc analysis of the PIONEER 1-5 and 8 trials assessed the clinically relevant composite endpoints of HbA_1c (glycated haemoglobin) reduction ≥ 1% and body weight loss of ≥ 5% or ≥ 10% with orally administered semaglutide versus comparators.

METHODS

In the PIONEER trials, people with type 2 diabetes were randomised to orally administered semaglutide versus placebo (PIONEER 1, 4, 5 and 8), empagliflozin (PIONEER 2), sitagliptin (PIONEER 3) and liraglutide (PIONEER 4) for 26-78 weeks. This analysis assessed the proportion of people achieving an HbA_1c reduction of ≥ 1% and body weight loss of ≥ 5% at week 26 and at end of treatment, and the proportion of people achieving an HbA_1c reduction of ≥ 1% and body weight loss of ≥ 10% at end of treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, 3506 people in PIONEER 1-5 and 8 were included. At week 26 and at end of treatment, odds of achieving the composite endpoint of an HbA_1c reduction of ≥ 1% and body weight loss of ≥ 5% were significantly greater with orally administered semaglutide 14 mg than with placebo (PIONEER 1, 4, 5 and 8; all p < 0.0001), empagliflozin 25 mg (PIONEER 2, p < 0.0001), sitagliptin 100 mg (PIONEER 3, p < 0.0001) and liraglutide 1.8 mg (PIONEER 4, p < 0.0001). Odds of achieving the composite endpoint of HbA_1c reduction of ≥ 1% and body weight loss of ≥ 10% at end of treatment were also significantly greater with orally administered semaglutide versus comparators.

CONCLUSION

In PIONEER 1-5 and 8, odds of achieving clinically relevant reductions in both HbA_1c and body weight were significantly greater with orally administered semaglutide versus comparators.

Semaglutide-eye-catching results

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used either orally every day or subcutaneously once a week for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and, more recently, at higher doses, for the treatment of obesity. Both diseases are reaching epidemic proportions and often coexist, posing patients with a high risk for cardiovascular disease and death. Therefore, an agent such as semaglutide, which offers clinically significant weight loss and cardiovascular benefits, is essential and will be increasingly used in high-risk patients. However, during the SUSTAIN clinical trial program (Semaglutide Unabated Sustainability in treat-ment of type 2 diabetes), a safety issue concerning the progression and worsening of diabetic retinopathy emerged. The existing explanation so far mainly supports the role of the magnitude and speed of HbA1c reduction, a phenomenon also associated with insulin treatment and bariatric surgery. Whether and to which extent the effect is direct is still a matter of debate and an intriguing topic to investigate for suitable preventative and rehabilitative purposes. In this minireview, we will summarize the available data and suggest guidelines for a comprehensive semaglutide clinical utilization until new evidence becomes available.

Learn from failures and stay hopeful to GPR40, a GPCR target with robust efficacy, for therapy of metabolic disorders

GPR40 is a class A G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) mainly expressed in pancreas, intestine, and brain. Its endogenous ligand is long-chain fatty acids, which activate GPR40 after meal ingestion to induce secretion of incretins in the gut, including GLP-1, GIP, and PYY, the latter control appetite and glucose metabolism. For its involvement in satiety regulation and metabolic homeostasis, partial and AgoPAM (Positive Allosteric Modulation agonist) GPR40 agonists had been developed for type 2 diabetes (T2D) by many pharmaceutical companies. The proof-of-concept of GPR40 for control of hyperglycemia was achieved by clinical trials of partial GPR40 agonist, TAK-875, demonstrating a robust decrease in HbA1c (-1.12%) after chronic treatment in T2D. The development of TAK-875, however, was terminated due to liver toxicity in 2.7% patients with more than 3-fold increase of ALT in phase II and III clinical trials. Different mechanisms had since been proposed to explain the drug-induced liver injury, including acyl glucuronidation, inhibition of mitochondrial respiration and hepatobiliary transporters, ROS generation, etc. In addition, activation of GPR40 by AgoPAM agonists in pancreas was also linked to β-cell damage in rats. Notwithstanding the multiple safety concerns on the development of small-molecule GPR40 agonists for T2D, some partial and AgoPAM GPR40 agonists are still under clinical development. Here we review the most recent progress of GPR40 agonists development and the possible mechanisms of the side effects in different organs, and discuss the possibility of developing novel strategies that retain the robust efficacy of GPR40 agonists for metabolic disorders while avoid toxicities caused by off-target and on-target mechanisms.

Therapeutic Potential of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonists in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: From Current Clinical Evidence to Future Perspectives

Despite the continuous effort to understand the pathophysiology and determine potential therapeutic targets, PCOS treatment largely depends on lifestyle intervention and symptomatic management of individual signs and symptoms. International guidelines recognize the importance of weight reduction as a cornerstone for the achievement of better metabolic, reproductive, and cardiovascular outcomes in PCOS women who are overweight or obese. With its profound weight loss potential in patients with or without diabetes, the administration of GLP-1 receptor agonists has been investigated in overweight/obese women with PCOS in several single-center randomized control trials with considerable variation in the dosing regimen, follow-up duration, and outcome measurements over recent years. Most trials reported superior weight loss effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists compared to lifestyle changes or metformin, with additional metabolic, reproductive, and cardiovascular benefits in this population. However, their use is currently not widely accepted by the clinical community that treats this population. The major concern is how to balance the reproductive and metabolic treatment strategies since the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists requires effective contraception while on therapy and a washout period before pregnancy. Both approaches are not mutually exclusive, yet the best choice requires a careful assessment of the clinical context. Knowing a patient's individual circumstances, precise clinical sub-phenotyping, and regular monitoring are crucial components for the safe and effective use of these new tools. In the present narrative review, we explore the current clinical evidence and provide the future perspectives and challenges for their implementation in PCOS management.

The mTORC1/AMPK pathway plays a role in the beneficial effects of semaglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist) on the liver of obese mice

PURPOSE

The liver regulates lipid metabolism. Decreasing mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) and enhancing AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) help degrade hepatic diet-induced accumulated lipids. Therefore, the glucagon-like peptide type 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1) is indicated to treat obesity-related liver metabolic alterations. Then, we investigated the effects of semaglutide (recent GLP-1) by analyzing the liver mTORC1/AMPK pathway genes in obese mice.

BASIC PROCEDURES

C57BL/6 male mice were separated into two groups and submitted for 16 weeks of obesity induction. Then they were treated for an additional four weeks with semaglutide (subcutaneous, 40 μg/kg once every three days). The groups formed were: C, control group; CS, control group plus semaglutide; HF, high-fat group; HFS, high-fat group plus semaglutide. Next, the livers were dissected, and rapidly fragments of all lobes were kept and frozen at -80° C for analysis (RT-qPCR).

MAIN FINDINGS

Liver markers for the mTOR pathway associated with anabolism and lipogenesis de novo were increased in the HF group compared to the C group but comparatively attenuated by semaglutide. Also, liver markers for the AMPK pathway, which regulates chemical pathways involving the cell's primary energy source, were impaired in the HF group than in the C group but partly restored by semaglutide.

CONCLUSION

the mTOR pathway was attenuated, and the insulin signaling and the AMPK pathway were enhanced by semaglutide, ameliorating the liver gene expressions related to the metabolism of obese mice. These findings are promising in delaying the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Semaglutide: a game changer for metabolic diseases?

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) molecule approved for the treatment of both type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. Semaglutide has a greater impact on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction, compared to other GLP-1 RAs, and is the first molecule of this class available in oral formulation for T2D therapy, representing a useful option for subjects and physicians less prone to start an injective drug. Interestingly, due to its remarkable effects on weight reduction, higher than other GLP-1 RAs and very close to bariatric surgery, semaglutide is designated to change the approach to obesity therapy also in the subject not affected by diabetes. In addition to these favorable features, semaglutide, similarly to other GLP-1 RAs, offers beneficial effects on cardio-vascular (CV), renal, and liver protection, making this molecule an advantageous choice in the therapeutic management of “diabesity” (coexistence of both diabetes and obesity) and its co-morbidity.

Dual-agonist incretin peptides from fish with potential for obesity-related Type 2 diabetes therapy - A review

The long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonist, semaglutide and the unimolecular glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR)/GLP1R dual-agonist, tirzepatide have been successfully introduced as therapeutic options for patients with Type-2 diabetes (T2DM) and obesity. Proglucagon-derived peptides from phylogenetically ancient fish act as naturally occurring dual agonists at the GLP1R and the glucagon receptor (GCGR) with lamprey GLP-1 and paddlefish glucagon being the most potent and effective in stimulating insulin release from BRIN-BD11 clonal β-cells. These peptides were also the most effective in lowering blood glucose and elevating plasma insulin concentrations when administered intraperitoneally to overnight-fasted mice together with a glucose load. Zebrafish GIP acts as a dual agonist at the GIPR and GLP1R receptors. Studies with the high fat-fed mouse, an animal model with obesity, impaired glucose-tolerance and insulin-resistance, have shown that twice-daily administration of the long-acting analogs [D-Ala²]palmitoyl-lamprey GLP-1 and [D-Ser²]palmitoyl-paddlefish glucagon over 21 days improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. This was associated with β-cell proliferation, protection of β-cells against apoptosis, decreased pancreatic glucagon content, improved lipid profile, reduced food intake and selective alteration in the expression of genes involved in β-cell stimulus-secretion coupling. In insulin-deficient Glu^CreERT2;ROSA26-eYFP transgenic mice, the peptides promoted an increase in β-cell mass with positive effects on transdifferentiation of glucagon-producing to insulin-producing cells. Naturally occurring fish dual agonist peptides, particularly lamprey GLP-1 and paddlefish glucagon, provide templates for development into therapeutic agents for obesity-related T2DM.

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous and Oral Semaglutide Administration in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to combine the data available from clinical trials to assess the effects of subcutaneous and oral semaglutide administration on glycemic control, weight management, and safety outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: We systematically searched for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared semaglutide with placebo or other anti-diabetic drugs in T2D patients. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) levels. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the change from baseline in body weight, achievement of HbA_1c targets, and clinically significant weight loss. Key safety outcomes were also assessed.

Results: In this meta-analysis, 24 trials with a total of 22185 patients were included. Subcutaneous semaglutide administration reduced HbA_1c levels (weighted mean difference [WMD]: −1.14% and −1.37%, for 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively) and body weight (WMD: −2.73 kg and −4.09 kg, for 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively) when compared with placebo; its efficacy was also superior to other anti-diabetic drugs in reducing HbA_1c levels (WMD: −0.71% and −0.86%, for 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively) and body weight (WMD: −2.65 kg and −3.78 kg, for 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively). Oral semaglutide administration was superior to placebo in decreasing HbA_1c levels (WMD: −0.96% and −1.02%, for 7 mg and 14 mg, respectively). Moreover, oral administration of 14 mg of semaglutide also showed a significant reduction in HbA_1c levels (WMD: −0.36%) compared with other anti-diabetic drugs. Furthermore, oral semaglutide administration resulted in substantial weight loss compared with other anti-diabetic drugs (WMD: −1.53 kg and −1.73 kg, for 7 mg and 14 mg, respectively). Notably, subcutaneous and oral semaglutide administration also resulted in higher numbers of patients achieving the targets of HbA_1c levels and weight loss than placebo and other anti-diabetic drugs. Overall, we noted no clear evidence of detrimental effects on safety endpoints due to semaglutide treatment, except for some gastrointestinal adverse events.

Conclusion: Both subcutaneous and oral semaglutide administration could enable the achievement of sufficient glycemic control and weight management without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia, which were effective and safe for the treatment of T2D.