1
|
Aouabdi S, Aboalola D, Zakari S, Alwafi S, Nedjadi T, Alsiary R. Protective potential of mesenchymal stem cells against COVID-19 during pregnancy. Future Sci OA 2024; 10:FSO924. [PMID: 38836262 PMCID: PMC11149780 DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2023-0179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19. COVID-19 has led to severe clinical illnesses and an unprecedented death toll. The virus induces immune inflammatory responses specifically cytokine storm in lungs. Several published reports indicated that pregnant females are less likely to develop severe symptoms compared with non-pregnant. Putative protective role of maternal blood circulating fetal mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has emerged and have been put forward as an explanation to alleviated symptoms. MSCs with immune-modulatory, anti-inflammatory and anti-viral roles, hold great potential for the treatment of COVID-19. MSCs could be an alternative to treat infections resulting from the SARS-CoV-2 and potential future outbreaks. This review focuses on the MSCs putative protective roles against COVID-19 in pregnant females.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sihem Aouabdi
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Doaa Aboalola
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Samer Zakari
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Suliman Alwafi
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Taoufik Nedjadi
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rawiah Alsiary
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
- King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Çıplak G, Becerir C, Sarı FN, Alyamaç Dizdar E. Effect of Maternal Coronavirus Disease on Preterm Morbidities. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:e1835-e1840. [PMID: 37257488 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during pregnancy may have an impact on preterm morbidities due to the inflammatory nature of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Exposure to intrauterine inflammation could result in adverse consequences in preterm infants. We aimed to determine the effect of maternal coronavirus disease on preterm morbidities at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. STUDY DESIGN This observational cohort study compared the clinical outcomes of preterm infants < 37 gestational weeks with and without maternal COVID-19. The study was conducted in a tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit between March 2020 and December 2021. Demographics and clinical data of the study groups were collected from the medical files. RESULTS A total of 254 infants (127 in the maternal COVID-19 group and 127 in the control group) were included in the study. Respiratory distress syndrome, early and late neonatal sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and retinopathy of prematurity rates were similar between groups. In the subgroup analysis, the rate of PDA was significantly higher in preterm infants ≤1,500 g with maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection (38 vs. 15% p = 0.023). Presence of maternal COVID-19 was found to be an independent predictor for PDA in very low birthweight infants, as revealed by multivariate analyses (odds ratio: 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-10.4; p = 0.031). Mortality rates and duration of hospitalization were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy seems to have no adverse effect on preterm morbidities and mortality. However, maternal COVID-19 was found to be a risk factor for PDA in preterm infants ≤1,500 g. KEY POINTS · The effect of maternal COVID-19 on preterm morbidities still has not well defined.. · Maternal COVID-19 seems to have no adverse effect on preterm morbidities and mortality.. · The exact impact of the COVID-19 on fetal/neonatal health is yet to be clarified..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gökçe Çıplak
- Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Cem Becerir
- Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Fatma N Sarı
- Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Evrim Alyamaç Dizdar
- Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bajaj M, Romero R, Myers L, Duncan J, Yeo L, Jani S, Natarajan G. Population-Level Study on Fetal Deaths and Preterm Births during SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in the State of Michigan. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:e236-e248. [PMID: 35709722 PMCID: PMC10065952 DOI: 10.1055/a-1878-0503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to explore the effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic on preterm birth at different gestational ages and fetal death in the state of Michigan. STUDY DESIGN Data on live births and fetal deaths in the state of Michigan from March to November in the years 2017 through 2020 were obtained from Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS). Preterm birth rate, fetal death rate (per 1,000 live births) overall and stratified by race and maternal comorbidities during the period of pandemic (March-November 2020) were compared with the same period (March-November) in the prepandemic years (2017-2019). RESULTS Of 328,879 live births and 1,470 fetal deaths during the study period, 77,983 live births and 242 fetal deaths were reported in 2020. Compared with prepandemic years, fetal death rate per 1,000 live births was significantly lower in 2020 (3.1 vs. 4.7 [2017], 5.2 [2018], 4.4 [2019], p-value <0.001). The adjusted risk for fetal death in 2020 was decreased (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-0.74], p <0.0001), compared with prepandemic years. Fetal death was significantly associated with African-American race, pregnancy hypertension and prepregnancy diabetes. No significant difference in the proportion of preterm births (<37 weeks' gestation) was noted between pandemic and prepandemic years (9.9 vs. 10.0%, p = 0.50). There was no significant difference in the risk of preterm birth across gestational age strata (<28, 28-316/7, 32-366/7, 37-416/7, and >42 weeks) between pandemic and prepandemic years on multinomial analysis. Significant associations with preterm birth across all years included African American race, lower level of maternal education, pregnancy-induced hypertension, chronic hypertension, prepregnancy diabetes, congenital anomalies, previous preterm birth, and prolonged rupture of membranes >12 hours. CONCLUSION Fetal death rate was significantly lower whereas preterm births remained unchanged during pandemic in comparison with prepandemic years in the state of Michigan. KEY POINTS · A decrease in fetal death rate was noted during SARS CoV-2 pandemic in the State of Michigan.. · Overall state-wide rates of preterm birth did not change in 2020, compared to previous years.. · Significant risk factors associated with preterm birth and fetal deaths did not differ between prepandemic and pandemic years..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Bajaj
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Central Michigan University, Children's Hospital of Michigan and Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Roberto Romero
- Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
- Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Lindsey Myers
- Division for Vital Records and Health Statistics, Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, Michigan
| | - Jeffrey Duncan
- Division for Vital Records and Health Statistics, Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, Michigan
| | - Lami Yeo
- Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS), Bethesda, Maryland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Sanket Jani
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Central Michigan University, Children's Hospital of Michigan and Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Girija Natarajan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Central Michigan University, Children's Hospital of Michigan and Hutzel Women's Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asumadu ODK, Boah M, Chirawurah D, Ndago JA, Yakong VN, Kanligi DA, Adokiya MN. Pregnancy outcomes before and during COVID-19 pandemic in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302589. [PMID: 38687775 PMCID: PMC11060567 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic affected expectant mothers seeking maternal health services in most developing countries. Access and utilization of maternal health services including antenatal care (ANC) attendance and skilled delivery declined drastically resulting in adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study assessed pregnancy outcomes before and during COVID-19 pandemic in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. METHODS/DESIGN A retrospective cohort study design was employed. A random sampling technique was used to select 450 women who delivered before or during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. The respondents were interviewed using structured questionnaire at their homes. In this study, the data collected were socio-demographics characteristics, ANC attendance, before or during pandemic delivery, place of delivery and birth outcomes. Chi-square test and bivariate logistic regression analyses were performed under significant level of 0.05 to determine factors associated with the outcome variables. RESULT Of the 450 respondents, 51.8% were between 26 and 30 years of age. More than half (52.2%) of the respondents had no formal education and 93.3% were married. The majority (60.4%) of the respondents described their residence as urban setting. About 31.6% of the women delivered before the pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic influenced place of delivery. The proportion of women who attended at least one ANC visit (84.5% before vs 70.5% during), and delivered at a hospital (76.8% before vs 72.4% during) were higher before the pandemic. More women were likely to deliver at home during COVID-19 (OR: 2.38, 95%CI: 1.52-3.74, p<0.001). Similarly, there was statistically significance difference between before and during COVID-19 delivery on at least one ANC attendance (OR: 2.72, 95%CI: 1.58-1.67, p<0.001). Women who delivered during COVID-19 were about twice more likely to develop complications (OR: 1.72, 95%CI: 1.03-2.87, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION ANC attendance and health facility delivery decreased while pregnancy complications increased during COVID-19. During disease outbreaks, outreach engagement strategies should be devised to increase access and utilization of maternal health services for marginalized and underserved populations. The capacity of health workers should be strengthened through skills training to manage adverse birth outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Obed Duah Kwaku Asumadu
- Department of Social and Behavioural Change, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| | - Michael Boah
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Disease Control, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| | - Dennis Chirawurah
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| | - Joyce Aputere Ndago
- Department of Social and Behavioural Change, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| | - Vida Nyagre Yakong
- Department of Preventive Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| | - David Abatanie Kanligi
- Pediatric Unit, Savelugu Municipal Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Tamale, Northern Region, Ghana
| | - Martin Nyaaba Adokiya
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Disease Control, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ghosh R, Gutierrez JP, de Jesús Ascencio-Montiel I, Juárez-Flores A, Bertozzi SM. SARS-CoV-2 infection by trimester of pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes: a Mexican retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075928. [PMID: 38604636 PMCID: PMC11015228 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Conflicting evidence for the association between COVID-19 and adverse perinatal outcomes exists. This study examined the associations between maternal COVID-19 during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA) and fetal death; as well as whether the associations differ by trimester of infection. DESIGN AND SETTING The study used a retrospective Mexican birth cohort from the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mexico, between January 2020 and November 2021. PARTICIPANTS We used the social security administrative dataset from IMSS that had COVID-19 information and linked it with the IMSS routine hospitalisation dataset, to identify deliveries in the study period with a test for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. OUTCOME MEASURES PTB, LBW, SGA, LGA and fetal death. We used targeted maximum likelihood estimators, to quantify associations (risk ratio, RR) and CIs. We fit models for the overall COVID-19 sample, and separately for those with mild or severe disease, and by trimester of infection. Additionally, we investigated potential bias induced by missing non-tested pregnancies. RESULTS The overall sample comprised 17 340 singleton pregnancies, of which 30% tested positive. We found that those with mild COVID-19 had an RR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) for PTB and those with severe COVID-19 had an RR of 1.53 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.19) for LGA. COVID-19 in the first trimester was associated with fetal death, RR=2.36 (95% CI 1.04, 5.36). Results also demonstrate that missing non-tested pregnancies might induce bias in the associations. CONCLUSIONS In the overall sample, there was no evidence of an association between COVID-19 and adverse perinatal outcomes. However, the findings suggest that severe COVID-19 may increase the risk of some perinatal outcomes, with the first trimester potentially being a high-risk period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakesh Ghosh
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Juan Pablo Gutierrez
- Center for Policy, Population & Health Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Arturo Juárez-Flores
- Center for Policy, Population & Health Research, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Stefano M Bertozzi
- School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
- University of Washington - Seattle Campus, Seattle, Washington, USA
- National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chundru KJ, Korte JE, Wen CC, Neelon B, Wilson DA, Mateus J, Pearce JL, Alkis M, Finneran M, Simpson S, Florez H, Hunt KJ, Malek AM. Increasing Preterm Delivery and Small for Gestational Age Trends in South Carolina during the COVID-19 Pandemic. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:465. [PMID: 38673376 PMCID: PMC11050409 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21040465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Preterm delivery (PTD) complications are a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess trends in PTD and small for gestational age (SGA) and whether trends varied between race-ethnic groups in South Carolina (SC). We utilized 2015-2021 SC vital records linked to hospitalization and emergency department records. PTD was defined as clinically estimated gestation less than (<) 37 weeks (wks.) with subgroup analyses of PTD < 34 wks. and < 28 wks. SGA was defined as infants weighing below the 10th percentile for gestational age. This retrospective study included 338,532 (243,010 before the COVID-19 pandemic and 95,522 during the pandemic) live singleton births of gestational age ≥ 20 wks. born to 260,276 mothers in SC. Generalized estimating equations and a change-point during the first quarter of 2020 helped to assess trends. In unadjusted analyses, pre-pandemic PTD showed an increasing trend that continued during the pandemic (relative risk (RR) = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06). PTD < 34 wks. rose during the pandemic (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.12) with a significant change in the slope. Trends in SGA varied by race and ethnicity, increasing only in Hispanics (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04) before the pandemic. Our study reveals an increasing prevalence of PTD and a rise in PTD < 34 wks. during the pandemic, as well as an increasing prevalence of SGA in Hispanics during the study period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalyan J. Chundru
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Jeffrey E. Korte
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Chun-Che Wen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Brian Neelon
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401, USA
| | - Dulaney A. Wilson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Julio Mateus
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
| | - John L. Pearce
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Mallory Alkis
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Matthew Finneran
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Sarah Simpson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Hermes Florez
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401, USA
| | - Kelly J. Hunt
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401, USA
| | - Angela M. Malek
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
AlJohi A, Alohali A, Alsaeed S, Sakkijah HM, Obeid DA. Outcome of pregnant women admitted to critical care unit with confirmed severe COVID-19: A center experience. Saudi Med J 2024; 45:379-386. [PMID: 38657988 PMCID: PMC11147573 DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.4.20240022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the traits and risk factors of pregnant women admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with COVID-19. Moreover, the study classifies outcomes based on differing levels of required respiratory support during their intensive care stay. METHODS This retrospective and descriptive study included all pregnant women with COVID-19 admitted to the adult critical care unit at a specialized tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Between January 2020 and December 2022. A total of 38 pregnant women were identified and were eligible for our study. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 32.9 (19-45) years, and the average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHI IV) score was 49.9 (21-106). Approximately 60.5% of the patients suffered from superimposed infections during their ICU stay. Approximately 81.6% patients were delivered by C-section, 33 of the newborns survived, and 5 died. The crude mortality rate among pregnant women in our cohort was 15.8%. Patients treated with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) were mostly discharged or delivered normally, while the mechanical ventilation (MV) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation groups mostly underwent C-sections. Most of the surviving newborns were on HFNC and MV. Patients with multiple infections had the longest ICU stay and had the highest risk of death. CONCLUSION The results of this study highlight the characteristics of pregnant women admitted to the ICU at a specialized tertiary healthcare center in Saudi Arabia. The APACHI IV scores accurately predicted patient's mortality, duration of MV, and length of ICU stay. In our study, we shared our experience of managing severe COVID-19 infections in pregnant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amani AlJohi
- From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AlJohi, Alsaeed); from the Department of Critical Care Services Administration (Alohali, Sakkijah), King Fahad Medical City, and from the Department of Tissue/Organ Bioengineering and BioMEMS Lab, Organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, Transplant Research and Innovation (Obeid), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Ahmad Alohali
- From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AlJohi, Alsaeed); from the Department of Critical Care Services Administration (Alohali, Sakkijah), King Fahad Medical City, and from the Department of Tissue/Organ Bioengineering and BioMEMS Lab, Organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, Transplant Research and Innovation (Obeid), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Saffanah Alsaeed
- From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AlJohi, Alsaeed); from the Department of Critical Care Services Administration (Alohali, Sakkijah), King Fahad Medical City, and from the Department of Tissue/Organ Bioengineering and BioMEMS Lab, Organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, Transplant Research and Innovation (Obeid), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Hussam M. Sakkijah
- From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AlJohi, Alsaeed); from the Department of Critical Care Services Administration (Alohali, Sakkijah), King Fahad Medical City, and from the Department of Tissue/Organ Bioengineering and BioMEMS Lab, Organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, Transplant Research and Innovation (Obeid), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Dalia A. Obeid
- From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AlJohi, Alsaeed); from the Department of Critical Care Services Administration (Alohali, Sakkijah), King Fahad Medical City, and from the Department of Tissue/Organ Bioengineering and BioMEMS Lab, Organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, Transplant Research and Innovation (Obeid), King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Skhvitaridze N, Gamkrelidze A, Manjavidze T, Brenn T, Rylander C. SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and the risk of adverse maternal outcomes in the Republic of Georgia: a national birth registry-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:156. [PMID: 38388360 PMCID: PMC10882809 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06329-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Georgia experienced an increase in maternal deaths (MD) during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, which warrants further investigation. This study aimed to assess associations between timing of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and MD, post-delivery intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and caesarean section (CS) delivery. METHODS We performed a national birth registry-based cohort study of pregnant women who had completed 22 weeks of gestation and delivered between February 28, 2020, and August 31, 2022. The data were linked to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing, vital, and immunization registries. Pregnant women were classified into three groups: confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from conception through 31 days before delivery; confirmed infection within 30 days before or at delivery; and women negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection or without any test results (reference group). Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Among 111,493 pregnant women, 16,751 had confirmed infection during pregnancy, and 7,332 were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 before delivery. Compared to the reference group, those with confirmed infection within 30 days before or at delivery experienced increased odds of MD (aOR: 43.11, 95% CI, 21.99-84.55), post-delivery ICU admission (aOR: 5.20, 95% CI, 4.05-6.67), and CS delivery (aOR: 1.11, 95% CI, 1.03-1.20). CONCLUSIONS Pregnant women in Georgia with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 30 days before or at delivery experienced a considerably higher risk of MD and post-delivery ICU admission and a slightly higher risk for CS delivery. Additionally, the results highlighted that most pregnant women were not vaccinated against COVID-19. These findings should alert stakeholders that adherence to public health preventive measures needs to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natia Skhvitaridze
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Langnes, Tromsø, PO Box 6050, Norway.
- National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, 99 Kakheti highway, Tbilisi, Georgia.
- The University of Georgia, 77a Kostava Street, Tbilisi, Georgia.
| | | | - Tinatin Manjavidze
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Langnes, Tromsø, PO Box 6050, Norway
- National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, 99 Kakheti highway, Tbilisi, Georgia
- The University of Georgia, 77a Kostava Street, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Tormod Brenn
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Langnes, Tromsø, PO Box 6050, Norway
| | - Charlotta Rylander
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037, Langnes, Tromsø, PO Box 6050, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Celik IH, Ozkaya Parlakay A, Canpolat FE. Management of neonates with maternal prenatal coronavirus infection and influencing factors. Pediatr Res 2024; 95:436-444. [PMID: 37857851 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02855-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnancy causes adverse outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Neonates are at risk of vertical transmission and in-utero infection. Additionally, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and impairment in the organ systems of the mother are associated with neonatal outcomes, including impaired intrauterine growth, prematurity, and neonatal ICU admission. The management of neonates born from infected mothers has changed over the progress of the pandemic. At the beginning of the pandemic, cesarean section, immediate separation of mother-infant dyads, isolation of neonates, and avoiding of skin-to-skin contact, breast milk, and breastfeeding were the main practices to reduce vertical and horizontal transmission risk in the era of insufficient knowledge. The effects of antenatal steroids and delayed cord clamping on COVID-19 were also not known. As the pandemic progressed, data showed that prenatal, delivery room, and postnatal care of neonates can be performed as pre-pandemic practices. Variants and vaccines that affect clinical course and outcomes have emerged during the pandemic. The severity of the disease and the timing of infection in pregnancy also influence maternal and neonatal outcomes. The knowledge and lessons from COVID-19 will be helpful for the next pandemic if it happens. IMPACT: Prenatal infection with COVID-19 is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Our review includes the management of neonates with prenatal COVID-19 infection exposure, maternal-fetal, delivery room, and postnatal care of neonates, clinical features, treatment of neonates, and influencing factors such as variants, vaccination, severity of maternal disease, and timing of infection during pregnancy. There is a growing body of data and evidence about the COVID-19 pandemic. The knowledge and lessons from the pandemic will be helpful for the next pandemic if it happens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Istemi Han Celik
- University of Health Sciences Turkey; Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Ankara, Türkiye.
| | - Aslinur Ozkaya Parlakay
- Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University; Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Fuat Emre Canpolat
- University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Celik IH, Tanacan A, Canpolat FE. Neonatal outcomes of maternal prenatal coronavirus infection. Pediatr Res 2024; 95:445-455. [PMID: 38057579 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-023-02950-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to significant changes in life and healthcare all over the world. Pregnant women and their newborns require extra attention due to the increased risk of adverse outcomes. Adverse pregnancy outcomes include intensive care unit (ICU) admission, pulmonary, cardiac, and renal impairment leading to mortality. Immaturity and variations of the neonatal immune system may be advantageous in responding to the virus. Neonates are at risk of vertical transmission and in-utero infection. Impaired intrauterine growth, prematurity, vertical transmission, and neonatal ICU admission are the most concerning issues. Data on maternal and neonatal outcomes should be interpreted cautiously due to study designs, patient characteristics, clinical variables, the effects of variants, and vaccination beyond the pandemic. Cesarean section, immediate separation of mother-infant dyads, isolation of neonates, and avoidance of breast milk were performed to reduce transmission risk at the beginning of the pandemic in the era of insufficient knowledge. Vertical transmission was found to be low with favorable short-term outcomes. Serious fetal and neonatal outcomes are not expected, according to growing evidence. Long-term effects may be associated with fetal programming. Knowledge and lessons from COVID-19 will be helpful for the next pandemic if it occurs. IMPACT: Prenatal infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Our review includes the effects of COVID-19 on the fetus and neonates, transmission routes, placental effects, fetal and neonatal outcomes, and long-term effects on neonates. There is a growing body of data and evidence about the COVID-19 pandemic. Knowledge and lessons from the pandemic will be helpful for the next pandemic if it happens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Istemi Han Celik
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye; Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Teaching and Research Hospital, 06010, Ankara, Türkiye.
| | - Atakan Tanacan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatology Clinic, University of Health Sciences Turkiye, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Fuat Emre Canpolat
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kuriloff M, Patel E, Mueller A, Dada T, Duncan C, Arnolds D, Rana S. COVID-19 and obstetric outcomes: a single-center retrospective experience in a predominantly Black population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2023; 36:2196364. [PMID: 37005011 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2196364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective, single-center case series was designed to characterize the effects of perinatal COVID-19 diagnosis on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in a predominantly high-risk, urban Black population.Study Design: Data were collected via retrospective chart review on all COVID-19-positive obstetric patients and their neonates who presented to the University of Chicago Medical Center between March 2020 and November 2020, before the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine. Patient demographics, delivery outcomes, COVID-19 symptoms, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed.Results: A total of 56 COVID-19-positive obstetric patients were included in the study, of which four were lost to follow-up before delivery. The median age of patients was 27 years (IQR 23, 32), with 73.2% publicly insured and 66.1% Black. Patients had a median body mass index (BMI) of 31.6 kg/m2 (IQR 25.9, 35.5). 3.6% of patients had chronic hypertension, 12.5% had diabetes, and 16.1% had asthma. Perinatal complications were common. Twenty-six patients (50.0%) had a diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP). 28.8% had gestational hypertension, and 21.2% had preeclampsia (with and without severe features). The rate of maternal ICU admission was 3.6%. Furthermore, 23.5% of patients delivered preterm (<37 weeks gestation), and 50.9% of infants were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).Conclusion: In our study of a predominantly Black, publicly-insured, unvaccinated group of COVID-19-positive pregnant patients, we found high rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, and NICU admission compared to rates reported in existing literature before widespread vaccine availability. Our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, irrespective of maternal disease severity, may exacerbate existing obstetric health disparities by disproportionately impacting Black, publicly insured patients. Larger comparative studies are needed to better characterize possible racial and socioeconomic disparities in obstetric outcomes in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. These studies should examine the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, as well as potential associations between adverse perinatal outcomes and disparities in access to care, COVID-19 vaccination, and other social determinants of health amongst more vulnerable populations infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Kuriloff
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Easha Patel
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine/Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ariel Mueller
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Colleen Duncan
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine/Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Arnolds
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sarosh Rana
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine/Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mariño-Narvaez C, Puertas-Gonzalez JA, Romero-Gonzalez B, Kraneis MC, Peralta-Ramirez MI. Pregnant women's mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic according to the trimester of pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2023:1-16. [PMID: 37942780 DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2023.2279039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to analyse the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant women according to the pregnancy trimester, comparing their psychopathological symptomatology, pregnancy-specific stress, resilience and perceived stress to those of women pregnant before the pandemic. METHODS A total of 797 pregnant women participated in the study, one group of 393 women pregnant before the pandemic and the other of 404 women pregnant during the pandemic. Student-t test was used to analyse continuous data and the Chi-square test was used for categorical data. RESULTS Psychopathological symptomatology was significantly higher in six subscales of the SCL-90-R in pregnant women during COVID-19: somatisation, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, phobic anxiety, obsessions-compulsions, mainly on the first two trimesters. There is also a higher level of pregnancy-specific stress in pregnant women during the pandemic on the first two trimesters, most likely due to the hypervigilance and fears related to the COVID-19 disease. Nevertheless, perceived stress, usually elevated during pregnancy, was lower in women pregnant during the pandemic in comparison to those pregnant before, as a positive consequence of being on lockdown and diminishing the exposure to daily stressful situations. CONCLUSIONS Knowing the struggles these women go through during each trimester of pregnancy can be the key to a better health professional-patient relationship, consequently having a positive impact on their mental and physical health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose A Puertas-Gonzalez
- Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Borja Romero-Gonzalez
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of Valladolid, Soria, Spain
| | - Marie-Christin Kraneis
- Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Maria Isabel Peralta-Ramirez
- Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ferreira DP, Bolognani CV, Santana LA, Fernandes SES, de Moraes MSF, Fernandes LAS, Pereira CDS, Ferreira GB, Göttems LBD, Amorim FF. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Births, Vaginal Deliveries, Cesarian Sections, and Maternal Mortality in a Brazilian Metropolitan Area: A Time-Series Cohort Study. Int J Womens Health 2023; 15:1693-1703. [PMID: 38020934 PMCID: PMC10631387 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s429122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic posed a worldwide challenge, leading to radical changes in healthcare. The primary objective of the study was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on birth, vaginal delivery, and cesarian section (c-section) rates. The secondary objective was to compare the maternal mortality before and after the pandemic. Patients and Methods Time-series cohort study including data of all women admitted for childbirth (vaginal delivery or c-section) at the maternities in the Public Health System of Federal District, Brazil, between March 2018 and February 2022, using data extracted from the Hospital Information System of Brazilian Ministry of Health (SIH/DATASUS) on September 30, 2022. Causal impact analysis was used to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on birth, vaginal delivery, and c-section using the CausalImpact R package, and a propensity score matching was used to evaluate the effect on maternal mortality rate using the Easy R (EZR) software. Results There were 150,617 births, and considering total births, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic was not statistically significant (absolute effect per week: 5.5, 95% CI: -24.0-33.4). However, there was an increase in c-sections after COVID-19 (absolute effect per week: 18.1; 95% CI: 11.9-23.9). After propensity score matching, the COVID-19 period was associated with increased maternal mortality (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.53-6.81). The e-value of the adjusted OR for the association between the post-COVID-19 period and maternal mortality was 5.89, with a 95% CI: 2.43, suggesting that unmeasured confounders were unlikely to explain the entirety of the effect. Conclusion Our study revealed a rise in c-sections and maternal mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly due to disruptions in maternal care. These findings highlight that implementing effective strategies to protect maternal health in times of crisis and improve outcomes for mothers and newborns is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilson Palhares Ferreira
- Graduation Program in Health Sciences, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Vicari Bolognani
- Department of Research and Scientific Communication, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
- Medical School, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | - Levy Aniceto Santana
- Department of Research and Scientific Communication, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | - Sérgio Eduardo Soares Fernandes
- Department of Research and Scientific Communication, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
- Medical School, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | | | | | - Camila de Sousa Pereira
- Medical School, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | | | - Leila Bernarda Donato Göttems
- Department of Research and Scientific Communication, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
- Medical School, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| | - Fábio Ferreira Amorim
- Graduation Program in Health Sciences, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
- Department of Research and Scientific Communication, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
- Medical School, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
- Graduation Program in Health Sciences of School Health Sciences, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
DuBose B, Tembunde Y, Goodman KE, Pineles L, Nadimpalli G, Baghdadi JD, Parchem JG, Harris AD, Pineles BL. Delivery outcomes in a cohort of pregnant patients with COVID-19 with and without viral pneumonia. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:101077. [PMID: 37399892 PMCID: PMC11018246 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among pregnant people, COVID-19 can lead to adverse outcomes, but the specific pregnancy outcomes that are affected by the disease are unclear. In addition, the effect of the severity of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes has not been clearly identified. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the associations between COVID-19 with and without viral pneumonia and cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, and stillbirth. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective cohort study (April 2020-May 2021) of deliveries between 20 and 42 weeks of gestation from US hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database. The primary outcomes were cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, preeclampsia, and stillbirth. We used a viral pneumonia diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases -Tenth-Clinical Modification codes J12.8 and J12.9) to categorize patients by severity of COVID-19. Pregnancies were categorized into 3 groups: NOCOVID (no COVID-19), COVID (COVID-19 without viral pneumonia), and PNA (COVID-19 with viral pneumonia). Groups were balanced for risk factors by propensity-score matching. RESULTS A total of 814,649 deliveries from 853 US hospitals were included (NOCOVID: n=799,132; COVID: n=14,744; PNA: n=773). After propensity-score matching, the risks of cesarean delivery and preeclampsia were similar in the COVID group compared with the NOCOVID group (matched risk ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.00; and matched risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.07; respectively). The risks of preterm delivery and stillbirth were greater in the COVID group than in the NOCOVID group (matched risk ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.19; and matched risk ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.66; respectively). The risks of cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, and preterm delivery were higher in the PNA group than in the COVID group (matched risk ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.03; matched risk ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.74; and matched risk ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 2.56-4.33; respectively). The risk of stillbirth was similar in the PNA and COVID group (matched risk ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-3.44). CONCLUSION Within a large national cohort of hospitalized pregnant people, we found that the risk of some adverse delivery outcomes was elevated in people with COVID-19 with and without viral pneumonia, with much higher risks in the group with viral pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna DuBose
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mses DuBose and Tembunde)
| | - Yazmeen Tembunde
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Mses DuBose and Tembunde)
| | - Katherine E Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Lisa Pineles
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Gita Nadimpalli
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Jonathan D Baghdadi
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Jacqueline G Parchem
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX (Dr Parchem)
| | - Anthony D Harris
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Goodman, Ms L Pineles, and Drs Nadimpalli, Baghdadi, and Harris)
| | - Beth L Pineles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (Dr B Pineles).
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Darwin KC, Kohn JR, Shippey E, Uribe KA, Gaur P, Eke AC. Reduction in preterm birth among COVID-19-vaccinated pregnant individuals in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:101114. [PMID: 37543141 PMCID: PMC10592173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies investigating preterm birth and COVID-19 vaccination have suggested no difference in preterm birth rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant individuals; however, 1 recent study suggested a protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination on preterm birth rates in Australia. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether a similar association and protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination on preterm birth would be found in our multistate, US cohort. STUDY DESIGN A cohort study was conducted using the Vizient Clinical Database, which included data from 192 hospitals in 38 states. Pregnant individuals who delivered between January 2021 and April 2022 were included. Propensity score matching was used to match a "treated" group of pregnant individuals with any COVID-19 vaccination (incomplete or complete vaccination) to a group that had not received any COVID-19 vaccination (the "untreated" group). A complete vaccination series of ≥2 doses of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines or at least 1 dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine was considered. An incomplete series was receipt of 1 dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine. We examined the association between COVID-19 vaccination status and preterm birth at <28, <34, and <37 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders, with adjusted odds ratios as the measure of treatment effect. RESULTS Matching with replacement was performed for 5749 treated participants. After propensity score matching, there was no difference in maternal demographics of age, race, insurance status, parity, or comorbid conditions. Vaccinated individuals were 26% less likely to deliver at <37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.75; P<.001), 37% less likely to deliver at <34 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.64; P<.001), and 43% less likely to deliver at <28 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.60; P<0.001) than unvaccinated individuals. CONCLUSION Vaccination against COVID-19 may be protective against preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin C Darwin
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Drs Darwin, Uribe, and Eke).
| | - Jaden R Kohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Drs Kohn and Gaur)
| | | | - Katelyn A Uribe
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Drs Darwin, Uribe, and Eke)
| | - Priyanka Gaur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Drs Kohn and Gaur)
| | - Ahizechukwu C Eke
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Drs Darwin, Uribe, and Eke); Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Dr Eke)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Eltayeb MM, Mohamad RMA, Alhawiti IS, Alsulami GM, Buraei SSEM, Mohammed SSH, Awaji HH. Neonatal Outcome of Mothers With COVID-19 in King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2023; 15:e45257. [PMID: 37842358 PMCID: PMC10576630 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study was conducted to assess the neonatal outcome of mothers with COVID-19 in King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. METHODS This was a hospital record-based, retrospective cohort study. The case group included neonates born to mothers who were positive for the COVID-19 virus during pregnancy, whereas the control group included neonates born to mothers who were not infected with the COVID-19 virus during pregnancy. The data were collected from the records and were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS This study covered the hospital records of 342 women (114 cases and 228 control). The rates of cesarean sections and small for gestational age were significantly higher among the cases compared to the controls (71.1% versus 43.4%, p < 0.001 and 24.6% versus 11.8%, p = 0.003; respectively). The mean birth weight was significantly lower among the cases group (3.0 ± 0.6 versus 3.3 ± 0.6 kg, p = 0.022). Only the case group reported the occurrence of neonatal COVID-19 infection (7.9%, p < 0.001). The study reported only a single case of intrauterine fetal death and one stillbirth in the cases group, but no neonatal deaths (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Maternal COVID-19 may be associated with undesirable neonatal outcomes. There is a possibility of vertical transmission of COVID-19 from the mother to the neonate, but this cannot be confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hosam Hadi Awaji
- Preventive Medicine Department, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dandona R, Kumar GA, Akbar M, Dora SSP, Dandona L. Substantial increase in stillbirth rate during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a population-based study in the Indian state of Bihar. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:e013021. [PMID: 37491108 PMCID: PMC10373740 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report on the stillbirth rate (SBR) and associated risk factors for births during the COVID-19 pandemic, and change in SBR between prepandemic (2016) and pandemic periods in the Indian state of Bihar. METHODS Births between July 2020 and June 2021 (91.5% participation) representative of Bihar were listed. Stillbirth was defined as fetal death with gestation period of ≥7 months where the fetus did not show any sign of life. Detailed interviews were conducted for all stillbirths and neonatal deaths, and for 25% random sample of surviving live births. We estimated overall SBR, and during COVID-19 peak and non-peak periods per 1000 births. Multiple logistic regression models were run to assess risk factors for stillbirth. The change in SBR for Bihar from 2016 to 2020-2021 was estimated. RESULTS We identified 582 stillbirths in 30 412 births with an estimated SBR of 19.1 per 1000 births (95% CI 17.7 to 20.7); SBR was significantly higher in private facility (38.4; 95% CI 34.3 to 43.0) than in public facility (8.6; 95% CI 7.3 to 10.1) births, and for COVID-19 peak (21.2; 95% CI 19.2 to 23.4) than non-peak period (16.3; 95% CI 14.2 to 18.6) births. Pregnancies with the last pregnancy trimester during the COVID-19 peak period had 40.4% (95% CI 10.3% to 70.4%) higher SBR than those who did not. Risk factor associations for stillbirths were similar between the COVID-19 peak and non-peak periods, with gestation age of <8 months with the highest odds of stillbirth followed by referred deliveries and deliveries in private health facilities. A statistically significant increase of 24.3% and 68.9% in overall SBR and intrapartum SBR was seen between 2016 and 2020-2021, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study documented an increase in SBR during the COVID-19 pandemic as compared with the prepandemic period, and the varied SBR based on the intensity of the COVID-19 pandemic and by the place of delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhi Dandona
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - G Anil Kumar
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India
| | - Md Akbar
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Lalit Dandona
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Steiner ML, Cunha BCR, de Almeida JFM, Carrijo G, Dutra L, Suano F, Giovanelli S, Carneiro M, da Silva MH. Evaluation of Maternal Fetal Outcomes of Pregnant Women and Mothers with Suspected Infection by SARS-CoV-2 Treated at the Municipal Hospital of São Bernardo do Campo (HMU-SBC), Brazil. Matern Child Health J 2023:10.1007/s10995-023-03685-6. [PMID: 37306822 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03685-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The impact of Covid-19 infection on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes is not fully known. To describe the risk factors and perinatal outcome of pregnant women with suspected COVID-19 infection. METHODS We evaluated medical records of women with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received health care services at the University Hospital of São Bernardo do Campo from March 1 to July 31, 2020, and personal, clinical, and laboratory data of these women and their newborns. RESULTS Of the 219 women identified, 29% were asymptomatic. Considering the total population, 26% and 17% had obesity and hypertensive syndrome, respectively. Fever measured in the emergency room was the main reason for hospitalization. The presence or not of flu-like symptoms did not impact on perinatal outcomes. Pregnant women requiring hospitalization had newborns with lower birth weight (p < 0.01), shorter length (p = 0.02), and smaller head circumference (p = 0.03), and, in these cases, a higher number of cesarean section deliveries was observed. CONCLUSION COVID-19 infection did not affect the prognosis of pregnancy and newborns. However, the worst clinical outcome, requiring hospitalization, had an impact on the anthropometric measurements of newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Luis Steiner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, FMABC University Center, Avenida Lauro Gomes, 2000 - Vila Sacadura Cabral, Santo André, SP, 09060-870, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | | - Fabiola Suano
- Department of Pediatrics, FMABC University Center, Santo André, Brazil
- Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Mônica Carneiro
- São Bernardo Do Campo City University Hospital, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vayalumkal JV, Soraisham AS, Abou Mehrem A, Ghosh A, Dunn JKE, Fonseca K, Zhou H, Berenger BM, Chan ES, Brundler MA, Lin YC, Evans DH, Rousso S, Kuret V, Conly JM. Congenital SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Two Neonates with Confirmation by Viral Culture of the Placenta in One Case. Viruses 2023; 15:1310. [PMID: 37376610 DOI: 10.3390/v15061310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Congenital infections with SARS-CoV-2 are uncommon. We describe two confirmed congenital SARS-CoV-2 infections using descriptive, epidemiologic and standard laboratory methods and in one case, viral culture. Clinical data were obtained from health records. Nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens, cord blood and placentas when available were tested by reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Electron microscopy and histopathological examination with immunostaining for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted on the placentas. For Case 1, placenta, umbilical cord, and cord blood were cultured for SARS-CoV-2 on Vero cells. This neonate was born at 30 weeks, 2 days gestation by vaginal delivery. RT-PCR tests were positive for SARS-CoV-2 from NP swabs and cord blood; NP swab from the mother and placental tissue were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Placental tissue yielded viral plaques with typical morphology for SARS-CoV-2 at 2.8 × 102 pfu/mL confirmed by anti-spike protein immunostaining. Placental examination revealed chronic histiocytic intervillositis with trophoblast necrosis and perivillous fibrin deposition in a subchorionic distribution. Case 2 was born at 36 weeks, 4 days gestation. RT-PCR tests from the mother and infant were all positive for SARS-CoV-2, but placental pathology was normal. Case 1 may be the first described congenital case with SARS-CoV-2 cultivated directly from placental tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph V Vayalumkal
- Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Amuchou S Soraisham
- Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Ayman Abou Mehrem
- Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Anirban Ghosh
- Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Jessica K E Dunn
- Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Kevin Fonseca
- Alberta Public Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Calgary, AB T2N 4W4, Canada
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Hong Zhou
- Alberta Public Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Calgary, AB T2N 4W4, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Byron M Berenger
- Alberta Public Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Calgary, AB T2N 4W4, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Elaine S Chan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Marie-Anne Brundler
- Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - Yi-Chan Lin
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - David H Evans
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - Sharon Rousso
- Department of Pediatrics, Red Deer Regional Hospital, Red Deer, AB T4N 4E7, Canada
| | - Verena Kuret
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| | - John M Conly
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
- Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Charuta A, Smuniewska M, Woźniak Z, Paziewska A. Effect of COVID-19 on Pregnancy and Neonate's Vital Parameters: A Systematic Review. J Pregnancy 2023; 2023:3015072. [PMID: 37215313 PMCID: PMC10199793 DOI: 10.1155/2023/3015072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 is a new pandemic, which was declared by the World Health Organization in 2019 as a threat to public health. According to numerous reports, it can have negative consequences for pregnant women, labour, and neonates born to infected mothers. The aim of this paper was to gather the evidence and to present a summary of the results of studies concerning COVID-19 in pregnant women and their neonates. Methods Articles from prestigious journals covering the period from 2020 to February 2023, relevant review papers, and original research articles from PubMed were analysed. In order to analyse the available research literature, the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases were used, in which the search for articles was conducted using terms ("pregnancy," "coronavirus," "SARS-CoV-2," and "newborn") and using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines for clinical trials. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews (2022-2023) on symptoms, neonatal course, and risk of COVID-19 infection have been summarized. Summary of meta-analyses and systematic reviews (2022-2023) on the effect and adverse reaction of the COVID-19 vaccination is presented. Results As a result of the research conducted, it was confirmed that in most pregnant women, no serious signs of the infection were observed, although isolated cases of death related to COVID-19 in pregnant women were reported. Several authors called attention to the more severe course of the infection in pregnant women with obesity. It seemed that no vertical transmission from mother to child was occurring. Nevertheless, the information was not clinching. The condition of the neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 was in most cases described as normal; however, some papers reported deaths of infected neonates. Conclusions Due to insufficient data, further research is necessary. Further studies and follow-up are recommended, which would make possible an assessment of remote effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy and vital parameters of the newborn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Charuta
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Poland
| | - Monika Smuniewska
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Mazowiecki Provincial Hospital in Siedlce Named after Saint John Paul II in Siedlce, Poland
| | - Zofia Woźniak
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Independent Public Health Care Center in Sokołów Podlaski, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Paziewska
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Isokääntä S, Koivula K, Kokki H, Palokangas S, Tavast K, Toivonen I, Kokki M. Psychiatric symptoms and couple satisfaction in parents of newborns before and during the COVID-19 pandemic-A comparison of two prospective studies. Nurs Open 2023; 10:2667-2677. [PMID: 36380141 PMCID: PMC10006651 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To assess anxiety, depression, perceived stress, couple satisfaction and life satisfaction of parents of healthy newborns in two cohorts in 2015 and in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN A prospective follow-up study. METHODS We enrolled 60 parents of healthy newborns (n = 30 dyads) in 2015 and 60 parents (n = 30 dyads) in 2020. Both parents completed six valid and reliable questionnaires independently 1-2 days and 12 months after delivery: Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Couple Satisfaction Index and Life Satisfaction Scale-4. RESULTS Anxiety was more common but couple satisfaction better in both parents during the COVID-19 pandemic than in 2015. Depressive symptoms and perceived stress were similarly low, and life satisfaction was similarly high in both cohorts, indicating ample parental resilience. There was a moderate positive association between previous mental health disorders and parental anxiety after delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siiri Isokääntä
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.,School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Krista Koivula
- Department of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Hannu Kokki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sinivaula Palokangas
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Kati Tavast
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Iines Toivonen
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Merja Kokki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ahmed AK, Sijercic VC, Sayad R, Ruthig GR, Abdelwahab SF, El-Mokhtar MA, Sayed IM. Risks and Preventions for Pregnant Women and Their Preterm Infants in a World with COVID-19: A Narrative Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030640. [PMID: 36992224 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background and Aim: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is linked to increasing cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) around the world. COVID-19 infections have an important impact on pregnancy, preterm birth (PTB) and delivery. Although several complications have been reported in infected pregnant women, the effect of infection on PTB is controversial. The purpose of this study was to summarize the existing literature on the effects and complications of COVID-19 on the health of pregnant women and preterm babies and its impact on the incidence of PTB. We also discuss the effect of current COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. (2) Methods: We carried out a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed for studies on preterm births associated with COVID-19. (3) Results and Conclusions: We discovered contradictory results regarding the prevalence of PTB during the pandemic compared to earlier years. While most studies indicated an increase in PTBs with COVID-19, some indicated a decline in the preterm delivery rate during this time. During pregnancy, COVID-19 infection can increase the incidence of cesarean section, stillbirth, ICU admission, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and mortality rates. In the treatment of pregnant women with severe COVID-19, methylprednisolone was favored over prednisolone, and a brief course of dexamethasone is advised for pregnant women with anticipated PTB to accelerate the development of the fetal lung. Generally, vaccination for COVID-19 in pregnant and lactating women stimulates anti-SARS-CoV2 immune responses, and it does not result in any noteworthy negative reactions or outcomes for the mother or baby.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Reem Sayad
- Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| | - Gregory R Ruthig
- Department of Biology, North Central College, Naperville, IL 60540, USA
| | - Sayed F Abdelwahab
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed A El-Mokhtar
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
- Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sphinx University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| | - Ibrahim M Sayed
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
- Department of Biomedical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Penna AL, de Aquino CM, Pinheiro MSN, do Nascimento RLF, Farias-Antúnez S, Araújo DABS, Mita C, Machado MMT, Castro MC. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal mental health, early childhood development, and parental practices: a global scoping review. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:388. [PMID: 36823592 PMCID: PMC9950022 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15003-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In March 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), generating stark economic and social repercussions that directly or indirectly affected families' wellbeing and health status. AIMS This review aims at mapping the existing evidence on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal mental health, early childhood development, and parental practices, worldwide, to identify evidence gaps and better inform future delivery of care and health policy measures. METHODS Following the protocol defined by PRISMA-ScR, this scoping review has searched for relevant studies published between January 2020 and June 2021, selecting evidence sources based on pre-established criteria. From a total of 2,308 articles, data were extracted from 537 publications from 35 countries on all three health domains. RESULTS The combined stressors brought forth by the pandemic have exerted a heavy burden on the mental health of mothers and the development of young children, partly mediated by its impact on parental practices. CONCLUSIONS Despite remaining gaps, we have identified sufficient evidence pointing to an urgent need for more concerted global research efforts and rapid policy responses to timely address severe and pervasive negative impacts to the mental health of mothers and children at a key developmental stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Luiza Penna
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
| | - Camila Machado de Aquino
- grid.8395.70000 0001 2160 0329Department of Community Health, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | | | | | - Simone Farias-Antúnez
- grid.411237.20000 0001 2188 7235Department of Health Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Araranguá, Brazil
| | | | - Carol Mita
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XCountway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | - Marcia C. Castro
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Koç E, Dilli D. How does COVID-19 affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? J Perinat Med 2023; 51:277-283. [PMID: 36580338 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this article, we aimed to evaluate the most recent information on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health of mothers and their babies. METHODS We conducted a literature search by utilizing online sources. Scientific papers that were written in English on the effects of COVID-19 on both mother and their newborn were assessed. RESULTS COVID-19 can be fatal, especially in pregnant women with accompanying chronic diseases. The timing and mode of delivery should be decided by the status of the mother and fetus instead of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in pregnant women. At the nursery, routine separation of SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers and their infants is not recommended. However, it is important to take preventive measures to reduce the risk of transmission. The advantages of breastfeeding seem to outweigh the potential dangers of viral transmission. Neonatal COVID-19 infections may cause different clinical pictures from asymptomatic infections to life-threatening diseases. International health authorities specifically recommend that pregnant and lactating women get vaccinated to diminish the risk of transmission of the virus to the mother and fetus, not giving preference to a certain vaccine. It is prudent to apply universal screening only in populations with a high prevalence of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare professionals should carefully manage the perinatal period during the COVID-19 outbreak, using the most up-to-date information to protect and promote maternal and newborn health. Further scientific studies are needed to clarify the early and long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal-neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esin Koç
- Department of Neonatology, Chief of Neonatology Division, Gazi University, Gazi School of Medicine, Chief of Turkish Neonatal Society, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Dilek Dilli
- Department of Neonatology, Dr Sami Ulus Maternity and Children Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences of Türkiye, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yamaguchi T, Makino Y, Mabuchi Y, Okuda K, Hayashi H, Kato N, Fujii T, Hirate H. Severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women and their neonates during the Omicron period compared to the pre-Omicron period: A retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023; 49:1348-1354. [PMID: 36781158 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
AIM To compare the clinical outcomes among women diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy, and their neonates, during the period when the Omicron variant predominated in Japan with those of the pre-Omicron variant period. METHODS We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study between August 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. The cohort was divided into pre-Omicron group (August 1, 2020 to November 30, 2021) and Omicron group (December 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022). The primary outcome was maternal intensive care unit (ICU) admission during the perinatal period. The secondary outcomes were maternal oxygen administration before and after delivery, preterm birth (PTB), and low birth weight (LBW). RESULTS During the study period, 81 pregnant women were admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection (pre-Omicron period, n = 28; Omicron period, n = 53). SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron period was associated with lower risk of maternal ICU admission (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR]: 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01-1.23, p = 0.072), oxygen administration via a nasal cannula or mask (aOR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-0.96, p = 0.045), PTB (aOR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.51, p = 0.002), and LBW (aOR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.55, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION Among pregnant women, SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Omicron period was associated with reduced risk of maternal ICU admission, requiring supplemental oxygen, PTB, and LBW. This can be attributable to lower virulence of the Omicron variant and higher vaccination coverage during the Omicron period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takumi Yamaguchi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuto Makino
- Department of Preventive Services, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuki Mabuchi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Keito Okuda
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroe Hayashi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Noriko Kato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Fujii
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Hirate
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Narang K, Miller M, Trinidad C, Wick M, Theiler R, Weaver AL, Mehta RA, Schenone M. Impact of asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infection on fetal growth during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 281:63-67. [PMID: 36549070 PMCID: PMC9760615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During pregnancy, certain viral infections are known to significantly affect fetal development. Data regarding the impact of COVID-19 viral infection in pregnancy, specifically in asymptomatic or mild cases, remains limited. This presents a challenge in providing prenatal counseling and antepartum surveillance in pregnancies complicated by COVID-19 infection. Placenta studies have demonstrated that vascular malperfusion patterns attributed to COVID-19 appear to depend on the timing of infection. Given these placental changes, we aim to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on fetal growth in pregnant patients with asymptomatic or mild disease, stratified by trimester of infection. We hypothesize that COVID-19 infection, especially early in pregnancy, increases the risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR). STUDY DESIGN This is a single institution, retrospective cohort study of patients ages 16-55 years old with a singleton delivery between December 10, 2020, and April 19, 2021 who had not received a COVID-19 vaccination prior to delivery. COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. FGR was defined as an estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age or abdominal circumference less than the 10th percentile for gestational age. Maternal and fetal characteristics, including FGR, were compared between women with versus without COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. RESULTS Among 1971 women with a singleton delivery, 208 (10.6 %) had a prior asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. With the exception in the median prenatal BMI being significantly higher in the COVID-19 group (median, 27.5 vs 26.3, p = 0.04), there were no significant differences in demographics, baseline maternal comorbidities or gestational age between those with versus without COVID-19 infection during pregnancy, or in the proportion of their offspring with FGR (3.4 % (7/208) vs 4.8 % (84/1763), p = 0.36). When the 208 women were stratified by the timing of their COVID-19 infection, the proportion with an offspring with FGR was 8.7 % (2/23), 1.2 % (1/84), and 4.0 % (4/101), for those first diagnosed with COVID-19 during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimesters, respectively (p = 0.72 Cochran-Armitage test for trend). CONCLUSION Asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection in pregnancy, regardless of timing of infection, does not appear to be associated with FGR. Routine serial fetal growth assessment may not be warranted solely for history of COVID-19 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavita Narang
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States,Corresponding author
| | - Megan Miller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Charisse Trinidad
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Myra Wick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Regan Theiler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Amy L. Weaver
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States
| | - Ramila A. Mehta
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States
| | - Mauro Schenone
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Angulo-Fernandez K, Olivera-Rojas A, Mougenot B, Herrera-Añazco P. Association between symptoms of COVID-19 infection and adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes in pregnant women at a referral hospital. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2023; 40:34-41. [PMID: 37377233 PMCID: PMC10953637 DOI: 10.17843/rpmesp.2023.401.11205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES. To determine the association between symptoms of COVID-19 infection and adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes in pregnant women from a referral hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Analytical cross-sectional study of women in the third trimester of pregnancy hospitalized due to COVID-19 in the gynecology and obstetrics area of a general hospital in Lima during 2020. Clinical and obstetric variables were collected. Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test were used during the descriptive analysis. Poisson regression was used to find the association between the variables of interest, with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI). RESULTS. A total of 272 pregnant women were included, 50.3% of whom had symptoms of infection. Of these, 35.7% of the pregnant women and 16.5% of the newborns had an adverse outcome. Having symptoms of COVID-19 infection increased the risk of maternal complications as a whole (PR= 2.32 95%CI: 1.61-3.34), premature rupture of membranes (PR= 2.73 95%CI: 1.51-4.94) and preeclampsia (PR= 2.73 95%CI: 1.51-4.94). Similarly, symptoms of COVID-19 infection increased the risk of perinatal complications as a whole (PR= 2.51 95%CI: 1.34-4.68) and acute fetal distress (PR= 2.99 95%CI: 1.07-8.38). CONCLUSIONS. The presence of symptoms of COVID-19 infection increase the risk of adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Benoît Mougenot
- Centro de Excelencia en Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales en Salud, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú
| | - Percy Herrera-Añazco
- Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Perú
- Red Peruana de Salud Colectiva, Lima, Perú
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rood M, ten Kate L, Boeddha NP, van ‘t Kruys K. Clinical Characteristics, Transmission Rate and Outcome of Neonates Born to COVID-19-Positive Mothers: A Prospective Case Series From a Resource-Limited Setting. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2023; 42:35-42. [PMID: 36476523 PMCID: PMC9725735 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection during pregnancy could damage the placenta, but data on neonates born to COVID-19-positive mothers is scarce. In this case series, we aim to describe clinical characteristics, transmission rate and outcomes at 3 months of age among neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 diagnosed near the time of delivery. METHODS Prospective, multicenter case series from Suriname. We collected clinical data of neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 infection between June and August 2021. COVID-19 swabs were taken within 5 days and 2 weeks after birth. Follow-up took place at 3 months. RESULTS We enrolled 18 neonates. However, 18/18 (100%) mothers were infected in the third trimester and 10/18 (55.6%) had severe COVID-19 infection requiring ICU admission and 2/10 (20%) died. In total 16/18 (77.8%) neonates were born after cesarean section and 13/18 (72.2%) were born preterm (median 35 weeks, Interquartile range 32 + 4-38 + 0). Neonatal intensive care unit admission was needed in 7/18 (38.9%) neonates. Respiratory symptoms occurred in 12/18 (66.7%), 5/18 (27.8%) were suspected of early-onset sepsis and 1/18(5.6%) of late-onset sepsis. One preterm neonate developed necrotizing enterocolitis. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive in 1/18 (5.5%) neonates within 5 days of life and in 0/11 (0%) neonates after 2 weeks. Follow-up showed mild neurodevelopmental delay in 2/14 (14.3%) patients. CONCLUSION We describe a high proportion of severely ill mothers due to COVID-19 infection with subsequent cesarean delivery and prematurity. Accounting for gestational age at birth, the neonatal clinical course and findings at follow-up appeared similar to neonates born to COVID-19-negative mothers. Maternal vaccination is recommended to prevent neonatal risks associated with prematurity and cesarean delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marloes Rood
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Wagnerlaan, Arnhem, The Netherlands,Department of Pediatrics, Academic Pediatric Hospital Suriname, Academic Hospital Suriname, Flustraat, Paramaribo, Suriname
| | - Lisa ten Kate
- Department of Pediatrics, Academic Pediatric Hospital Suriname, Academic Hospital Suriname, Flustraat, Paramaribo, Suriname
| | - Navin P. Boeddha
- Department of Pediatrics, Academic Pediatric Hospital Suriname, Academic Hospital Suriname, Flustraat, Paramaribo, Suriname,Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Wytemaweg, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin van ‘t Kruys
- Department of Pediatrics, Academic Pediatric Hospital Suriname, Academic Hospital Suriname, Flustraat, Paramaribo, Suriname
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vizheh M, Allahdadian M, Ghasemi-Tehrani H, Muhidin S, Hashemi M, Dehghan M. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of COVID-19 Infection in Pregnancy. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE 2023; 26:43-49. [PMID: 37543921 PMCID: PMC10685811 DOI: 10.34172/aim.2023.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2022] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data is available on the full spectrum of maternal COVID-19 infection in terms of pregnancy outcomes. The present study aimed to compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19 in infected and non-infected pregnant women. METHODS A dual-site retrospective cohort study was conducted in two tertiary hospitals in Isfahan, Iran. The sample included 104 infected and 210 non-infected hospitalized pregnant women. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS There were significant differences between COVID-19-infected and non-infected pregnant women regarding preterm labor (PTL) (odds ratio [OR]: 11.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-48.54, P=0.035); hospitalization days (OR: 7.21, 95% CI: 4.05-12.85, P≤0.001); cesarean section (CS) (OR: 4.76, 95% CI: 1.78-12.45, P=0.002); neonatal admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12-1.67, P=0.004); and neonatal respiratory distress (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.02- 5.47, P=0.044). No significant association was found between COVID-19 infection and abortion (OR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-1.45, P=0.084); stillbirth (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 0.05-39.68, P=0.743); Apgar score (1 minute) (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.13, P=0.382); Apgar score (5 minutes) (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.81-1.18, P=0.765); and low birth weight (LBW) (OR: 4.76, 95% CI: 1.78-12.45, P=0.002). CONCLUSION PTL, CS, neonatal admission in NICU, neonatal respiratory distress, and hospitalization days were significantly higher in pregnant women with COVID-19 compared to those without infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Vizheh
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, 2109, Australia
- Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Allahdadian
- Department of Midwifery, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Falavarjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Hatav Ghasemi-Tehrani
- Fertility Department, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Salut Muhidin
- Department of Management, Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Australia
| | - Maryam Hashemi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Maryam Dehghan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cincera T, Conde N, von Felten S, Leeners B, von Orelli S. Did the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic impact the cesarean delivery rate? A retrospective cohort study at a primary care center in Switzerland. J Perinat Med 2022:jpm-2022-0378. [PMID: 36474332 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES During the first 3 months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, our hospital's quality management team determined a decline in the rate of cesarean deliveries (CD). Thus, in this study we examined both the factors associated with this decrease as well as neonatal outcomes. METHODS This was a retrospective observational cohort study comparing deliveries (n=597) between March and May 2020 (first nationwide "lockdown" in Switzerland) with those during the same period in 2018 and 2019 (n=1,063). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between CD and the pandemic, adjusting for relevant risk factors for CD. RESULTS The overall rate of CD during the pandemic period was lower (30.0%), than during the pre-pandemic period (38.7%, unadjusted odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.55 to 0.84, p=0.0004) a result that was supported by the adjusted odds ratio (0.73, 95%CI: 0.54 to 0.99, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study confirmed a significant reduction in the rate of CD in early 2020, during the first lockdown period due to COVID-19, but without major differences in maternal and infant health indicators or in obstetric risk factors than before the pandemic. These results may have been due to a difference in the composition of the obstetric team as well as the behavior of the obstetrics team and in the patients during the pandemic, given the burden it placed on healthcare systems. However, this hypothesis remains to be tested in further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabea Cincera
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Medicine, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Natalia Conde
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie von Felten
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Brigitte Leeners
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie von Orelli
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Triemli Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Al-Hajjar S, Ibrahim L, Kurdi W, Tulbah M, Alnemer M, Bin Jabr M, Elsaidawi W, Binmanee A, Ali M, Bukhari H, Altuwaijri L, Allaboon R, Alghamdi R, Saeed B, Adi Y, Alhamlan F. Observational cohort study of perinatal outcomes of women with COVID-19. J Infect Public Health 2022; 15:1503-1507. [PMID: 36427409 PMCID: PMC9650259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes and of pregnancy on COVID-19 outcomes is critical for ensuring proper prenatal and antenatal care. No similar studies have been published in Saudi Arabia. METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study of pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who presented at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC) in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. COVID-19 staging was performed, pregnancy-related complications were assessed, and neonatal infection was evaluated. RESULTS We enrolled 81 patients (mean age 31.75 years, SD 5.25) of which there were 17 cases in the first trimester, 20 in the second trimester, and 34 in the third trimester. The distribution of COVID-19 severity was 40 patients with Stage A, 36 with Stage B, 4 with Stage C, and 1 with Stage D. Complications were pregnancy loss in 2 patients (one in each first and second trimester) and 1 fetal death after 20 weeks of pregnancy, 7 patients with fetal growth restriction, and 8 with pre-term delivery. CONCLUSIONS We did not observe an unusual frequency of pregnancy-related complications due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in this high-risk obstetric population and there was no evidence of vertical transmission in newborns from women who delivered while positive for the virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami Al-Hajjar
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia,Correspondence to: Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, PO Box 3354, 11211 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Lina Ibrahim
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia
| | - Wesam Kurdi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia
| | - Maha Tulbah
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia
| | - Maha Alnemer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia
| | - Mohammed Bin Jabr
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia
| | - Weam Elsaidawi
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Binmanee
- Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia
| | - Mohanned Ali
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hanifa Bukhari
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Leena Altuwaijri
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Bashayer Saeed
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yasser Adi
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
| | - Fatima Alhamlan
- Department of Infection and Immunity,King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,College of Medicine, alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi arabia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Four Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of Clinical and Pregnancy Outcomes. Viruses 2022; 14:v14122648. [PMID: 36560652 PMCID: PMC9783983 DOI: 10.3390/v14122648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
During the last two and a half years, clinical manifestations, disease severity, and pregnancy outcomes have differed among pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. These changes were preceded by the presence of new variants of SARS-CoV-2, known in the literature as variants of concern. The aim of this study is to describe the differences between maternal clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19 during four waves of the COVID-19 epidemic in Serbia. This retrospective study included a series of 192 pregnant patients who were hospitalized due to the severity of their clinical status of SARS-CoV-2 infection. During four outbreaks of COVID-19 infection in Serbia, we compared and analyzed three sets of variables, including signs, symptoms, and characteristics of COVID-19 infection, clinical endpoints, and maternal and newborn parameters. During the dominance of the Delta variant, the duration of hospitalization was the longest (10.67 ± 1.42 days), the frequency of stillbirths was the highest (17.4%), as well as the frequency of progression of COVID infection (28.9%) and the requirement for non-invasive oxygen support (37%). The dominance of the Delta variant was associated with the highest number of prescribed antibiotics (2.35 ± 0.28), the most common presence of nosocomial infections (21.7%), and the highest frequency of corticosteroid therapy use (34.8%). The observed differences during the dominance of four variants of concern are potential pathways for risk stratification and the establishment of timely and proper treatments for pregnant patients. Early identification of the Delta variant, and possibly some new variants with similar features in the future, should be a priority and, perhaps, even an opportunity to introduce more accurate and predictive clinical algorithms for pregnant patients.
Collapse
|
33
|
The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Maternal and Fetal Wellbeing in New Mexico. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12112856. [PMID: 36428914 PMCID: PMC9689040 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been shown to affect the vasculature, including placental changes. Insults to the placenta, especially in the first and second trimester, can affect placental functionality with a resultant impact on fetal growth and wellbeing. Thus, we explored the relationship between antenatally acquired maternal COVID-19 infection and neonatal birth characteristics. A retrospective chart review was completed using the University of New Mexico electronic medical record system. ICD-10 codes were used to identify individuals that had a positive pregnancy test and positive COVID-19 screening test between 1 March 2020 to 24 March 2021. Chi-square and nonparametric Wilcoxon analyses were used, with p < 0.05 considered significant. A total of 487 dyad charts was analyzed, with 76 (16%) individuals identified as being COVID-19-positive (CovPos) during pregnancy. CovPos mothers were significantly more likely to deliver via a cesarean section compared to CovNeg mothers (33% vs. 20%, p < 0.01). There was a significant difference in gestational age at delivery, with infants born to CovPos individuals born at an earlier gestational age than those born to CovNeg individuals (37.6 vs. 38.5 weeks; p < 0.01). Our findings showed differences in maternal and infant characteristics following COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Additional investigations are required to further delineate these relationships with a focus on potential long-term impacts on the neonate.
Collapse
|
34
|
Chung Y, Kim EJ, Kim HS, Park KH, Baek JH, Kim J, Lee JY, Lee CS, Lim S, Kim SW, Kim ES, Shi HJ, Hong SH, Jun JB, Hong KW, Choi JP, Kim J, Yang KS, Yoon YK. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2022; 37:e297. [PMID: 36281486 PMCID: PMC9592939 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to describe the maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and identify the predictors associated with the severity of COVID-19. METHODS This multicenter observational study included consecutive pregnant women admitted because of COVID-19 confirmed using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test at 15 hospitals in the Republic of Korea between January 2020 and December 2021. RESULTS A total of 257 women with COVID-19 and 62 newborns were included in this study. Most of the patients developed this disease during the third trimester. Nine patients (7.4%) developed pregnancy-related complications. All pregnant women received inpatient treatment, of whom 9 (3.5%) required intensive care, but none of them died. The gestational age at COVID-19 diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.096, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.15) and parity (OR, 1.703, 95% CI, 1.13-2.57) were identified as significant risk factors of severe diseases. Among women who delivered, 78.5% underwent cesarean section. Preterm birth (38.5%), premature rupture of membranes (7.7%), and miscarriage (4.6%) occurred, but there was no stillbirth or neonatal death. The RT-PCR test of newborns' amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood samples was negative for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. CONCLUSION At the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, gestational age and parity of pregnant women were the risk factors of disease severity. Vertical transmission of COVID-19 was not observed, and maternal severity did not significantly affect the neonatal prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youseung Chung
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Jin Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hee-Sung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
| | - Kyung-Hwa Park
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Ji Hyeon Baek
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jungok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Division of Infectious Disease, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Lee
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Chang-Seop Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Seungjin Lim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Shin-Woo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Eu Suk Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hye Jin Shi
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Shin Hee Hong
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jae-Bum Jun
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Kyung-Wook Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Jae-Phil Choi
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinyeong Kim
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Kyung Sook Yang
- Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Kyung Yoon
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alqahtani RT, Musa SS, Yusuf A. Unravelling the dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic with the effect of vaccination, vertical transmission and hospitalization. RESULTS IN PHYSICS 2022; 39:105715. [PMID: 35720511 PMCID: PMC9192123 DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a newly emerged virus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), transmitted through air droplets from an infected person. However, other transmission routes are reported, such as vertical transmission. Here, we propose an epidemic model that considers the combined effect of vertical transmission, vaccination and hospitalization to investigate the dynamics of the virus's dissemination. Rigorous mathematical analysis of the model reveals that two equilibria exist: the disease-free equilibrium, which is locally asymptotically stable when the basic reproduction number ( R 0 ) is less than 1 (unstable otherwise), and an endemic equilibrium, which is globally asymptotically stable when R 0 > 1 under certain conditions, implying the plausibility of the disease to spread and cause large outbreaks in a community. Moreover, we fit the model using the Saudi Arabia cases scenario, which designates the incidence cases from the in-depth surveillance data as well as displays the epidemic trends in Saudi Arabia. Through Caputo fractional-order, simulation results are provided to show dynamics behaviour on the model parameters. Together with the non-integer order variant, the proposed model is considered to explain various dynamics features of the disease. Further numerical simulations are carried out using an efficient numerical technique to offer additional insight into the model's dynamics and investigate the combined effect of vaccination, vertical transmission, and hospitalization. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is conducted on the model parameters against the R 0 and infection attack rate to pinpoint the most crucial parameters that should be emphasized in controlling the pandemic effectively. Finally, the findings suggest that adequate vaccination coupled with basic non-pharmaceutical interventions are crucial in mitigating disease incidences and deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubayyi T Alqahtani
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Salihu S Musa
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Mathematics, Near East University TRNC, Mersin 10, Nicosia 99138, Turkey
| | - Abdullahi Yusuf
- Department of Computer Engineering, Biruni University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Mathematics, Federal University Dutse, Jigawa, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vazquez-Alejo E, Tarancon-Diez L, Carrasco I, Vigil-Vázquez S, Muñoz-Chapuli M, Rincón-López E, Saavedra-Lozano J, Santos-Sebastián M, Aguilera-Alonso D, Hernanz-Lobo A, Santiago-García B, de León-Luis JA, Muñoz P, Sánchez-Luna M, Navarro ML, Muñoz-Fernández MÁ. SARS-CoV2 Infection During Pregnancy Causes Persistent Immune Abnormalities in Women Without Affecting the Newborns. Front Immunol 2022; 13:947549. [PMID: 35911743 PMCID: PMC9330630 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.947549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV2 infection in pregnancy and exposed newborns is poorly known. We performed a longitudinal analysis of immune system and determined soluble cytokine levels in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV2 and in their newborns. Women with confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection and their exposed uninfected newborns were recruited from Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), cord cells and plasma were collected at birth and 6 months later. Immunophenotyping of natural killer (NK), monocytes and CD4/CD8 T-cells were studied in cryopreserved PBMCs and cord cells by multiparametric flow cytometry. Up to 4 soluble pro/anti-inflammatory cytokines were assessed in plasma/cord plasma by ELISA assay. SARS-CoV2-infected mothers and their newborns were compared to matched healthy non-SARS-CoV2-infected mothers and their newborns. The TNFα and IL-10 levels of infected mothers were higher at baseline than those of healthy controls. Infected mothers showed increased NK cells activation and reduced expression of maturation markers that reverted after 6 months. They also had high levels of Central Memory and low Effector Memory CD4-T cell subsets. Additionally, the increased CD4- and CD8-T cell activation (CD154 and CD38) and exhaustion (TIM3/TIGIT) levels at baseline compared to controls remained elevated after 6 months. Regarding Treg cells, the levels were lower at infected mothers at baseline but reverted after 6 months. No newborn was infected at birth. The lower levels of monocytes, NK and CD4-T cells observed at SARS-CoV2-exposed newborns compared to unexposed controls significantly increased 6 months later. In conclusion, SARS-CoV2 infection during pregnancy shows differences in immunological components that could lead newborns to future clinical implications after birth. However, SARS-CoV2 exposed 6-months-old newborns showed no immune misbalance, whereas the infected mothers maintain increased activation and exhaustion levels in T-cells after 6 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Vazquez-Alejo
- Immunology Section, Laboratory of ImmunoBiology Molecular, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), HIV-HGM BioBank, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Tarancon-Diez
- Immunology Section, Laboratory of ImmunoBiology Molecular, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), HIV-HGM BioBank, Madrid, Spain
| | - Itzíar Carrasco
- Infectious Diseases in Paediatric Population, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute (IiSGM) and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- CIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Vigil-Vázquez
- Department of Neonatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mar Muñoz-Chapuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Rincón-López
- Infectious Diseases in Paediatric Population, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute (IiSGM) and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Saavedra-Lozano
- Infectious Diseases in Paediatric Population, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute (IiSGM) and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- CIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mar Santos-Sebastián
- Infectious Diseases in Paediatric Population, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute (IiSGM) and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - David Aguilera-Alonso
- Infectious Diseases in Paediatric Population, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute (IiSGM) and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alicia Hernanz-Lobo
- Infectious Diseases in Paediatric Population, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute (IiSGM) and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Begoña Santiago-García
- Infectious Diseases in Paediatric Population, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute (IiSGM) and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio de León-Luis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Muñoz
- Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Sánchez-Luna
- Department of Neonatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Luisa Navarro
- Infectious Diseases in Paediatric Population, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute (IiSGM) and University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Infectious Diseases Section, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- CIBER of Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mª Ángeles Muñoz-Fernández
- Immunology Section, Laboratory of ImmunoBiology Molecular, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (HGUGM), HIV-HGM BioBank, Madrid, Spain
- *Correspondence: M Ángeles Muñoz-Fernández,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Melov SJ, Elhindi J, McGee TM, Lee VW, Cheung NW, Chua SC, McNab J, Alahakoon TI, Pasupathy D. Investigating service delivery and perinatal outcomes during the low prevalence first year of COVID-19 in a multiethnic Australian population: a cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062409. [PMID: 35820747 PMCID: PMC9277027 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal outcomes in an Australian high migrant and low COVID-19 prevalent population to identify if COVID-19 driven health service changes and societal influences impact obstetric and perinatal outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study with pre COVID-19 period 1 January 2018-31 January 2020, and first year of global COVID-19 period 1 February 2020-31 January 2021. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted adjusting for confounders including age, area-level socioeconomic status, gestation, parity, ethnicity and body mass index. SETTING Obstetric population attending three public hospitals including a major tertiary referral centre in Western Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS Women who delivered with singleton pregnancies over 20 weeks gestation. Ethnically diverse women, 66% overseas born. There were 34 103 births in the district that met inclusion criteria: before COVID-19 n=23 722, during COVID-19 n=10 381. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Induction of labour, caesarean section delivery, iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), composite neonatal adverse outcome and full breastfeeding at hospital discharge. RESULTS During the first year of COVID-19, there was no change for induction of labour (adjusted OR, aOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.02, p=0.26) and a 25% increase in caesarean section births (aOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.32, p<0.001). During the COVID-19 period, we found no change in iatrogenic preterm births (aOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.09) but a 15% reduction in spontaneous preterm birth (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97, p=0.02) and a 10% reduction in SGA infants at birth (aOR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, p=0.02). Composite adverse neonatal outcomes were marginally higher (aOR 1.08; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.15, p=0.04) and full breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge reduced by 15% (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.90, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Despite a low prevalence of COVID-19, both positive and adverse obstetric outcomes were observed that may be related to changes in service delivery and interaction with healthcare providers. Further research is suggested to understand the drivers for these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Melov
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Institute for Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Women's and Newborn Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Elhindi
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Therese M McGee
- Women's and Newborn Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vincent W Lee
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - N Wah Cheung
- Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Seng Chai Chua
- Women's and Newborn Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin McNab
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thushari I Alahakoon
- Westmead Institute for Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Women's and Newborn Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dharmintra Pasupathy
- Reproduction and Perinatal Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Institute for Maternal & Fetal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kulkarni RK, Valvi C, Dawre R, Rajput U, Nagpal R, Deshmukh I, Kamath P, Harwani R, Srinivasarangan R, Sonteke S, R A, Kamble S, Naik S, Bhosale R, Waghmare R, Modi D, Gajbhiye R, Kinikar AA. Clinical Profile of SARS-CoV-2-Infected Neonates. Cureus 2022; 14:e26298. [PMID: 35898362 PMCID: PMC9308998 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are conflicting data on the mother-to-child transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and few studies have described the clinical course of neonates infected with SARS-CoV-2. Objectives This study investigates the mother-to-child transmission rate and clinical profile of SARS-CoV-2-infected newborns. Methods Data on 304 newborns of 301 mothers with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were prospectively collected and analyzed. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) determined the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the placenta, umbilical cord stump, and nasopharyngeal swabs collected within 24h of birth. Clinical and laboratory data of SARS-CoV-2-infected newborns was entered in a structured proforma. Results A total of 20 neonates (6.5%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2, of which 12 were positive only in the nasopharyngeal swab, four cases had the umbilical stump positive, three were positive in the placenta, and one case was positive in all the three specimens collected. Six of the 20 SARS-CoV-2-positive neonates developed severe symptoms. The SARS-CoV-2-positive symptomatic neonates required a more extended stay in hospital compared to their non-symptomatic infected counterparts. Conclusions A proportion of the babies born to SARS-CoV2-infected mothers tested positive and some of these newborns had severe symptoms.
Collapse
|
39
|
Chao M, Menon C, Elgendi M. A Ranking of the Most Common Maternal COVID-19 Symptoms: A Systematic Review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:865134. [PMID: 35774993 PMCID: PMC9239403 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.865134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to devastate health systems worldwide, there is particular concern over the health and safety of one high-risk group, pregnant women, due to their altered immune systems. Since health workers regularly rely on symptoms to inform clinical treatment, it became critical to maintain a ranked list of COVID-19 symptoms specific to pregnant women. This systematic review investigated the prevalence of common COVID-19 symptoms in pregnant women and compared the ranked list of symptoms to articles of various sizes. Articles were included if they discussed pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 using polymerase chain reaction testing, and women present symptoms of COVID-19 and were published between December 1, 2019, and December 1, 2021; while articles were excluded if they did not report on pregnant women with COVID-19 displaying symptoms of COVID-19. Articles were identified on OVID MedLine and Embase in January of 2022. The risk of bias and quality appraisal was assessed using a nine-item modified Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklist for case-control studies. The search results included 78 articles that described 41,513 pregnant women with 42 unique COVID-19 symptoms. When ranked, the most common symptoms were found to be cough (10,843 cases, 16.02%), fever (7,653 cases, 11.31%), myalgia (6,505 cases, 9.61%), headache (5,264 cases, 7.78%), and dyspnea (5,184 cases, 7.66%). When compared to other articles in the literature with sample sizes of n = 23,434, n = 8,207, and n = 651, the ranking largely aligned with those in other articles with large sample sizes and did not align with the results of articles with small sample sizes. The symptom ranking may be used to inform testing for COVID-19 in the clinic. Research is rapidly evolving with the ongoing nature of the pandemic, challenging the generalizability of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Chao
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Carlo Menon
- Biomedical and Mobile Health Technology Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Elgendi
- Biomedical and Mobile Health Technology Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Mohamed Elgendi
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Evaluation of 254 cesarean sections with COVID-19 in terms of anesthesia and clinical course: 1-year experience. J Anesth 2022; 36:514-523. [PMID: 35691987 PMCID: PMC9188761 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-022-03086-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The study aims to compare anesthesia methods, clinical course, and maternal and fetal outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic pregnant women undergoing cesarean operation with confirmed COVID-19. Methods 254 pregnant women with COVID-19 who had a cesarean section in our hospital between March 2020 and March 2021 were included in the study. Demographic information, laboratory test results, radiological data, treatments, anesthesia methods, and prognoses of the patients were evaluated retrospectively. Results On admission, 160 (63%) patients were asymptomatic (Group A), and 94 (37%) patients were symptomatic (Group S). The ratio of patients who needed oxygen therapy in the obstetric ward (p < 0.001) and intraoperative period (p < 0.001) and ICU admission (p = 0.005) was higher in Group S. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), ferritin, procalcitonin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were higher in Group S. In both groups, spinal anesthesia was performed predominantly. The rate of general anesthesia was significantly higher in Group S (16.0% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.003). No difference was found in the amount of sedatives during the spinal anesthesia. Conclusion Close follow-up of the laboratory values and comorbidities (especially asthma) of pregnant will provide information about the clinical course as in other patient groups. Spinal anesthesia is a safe and sufficient anesthesia method in both symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 pregnant women when performed by experienced hands.
Collapse
|
41
|
Kato M, Yamaguchi K, Maegawa Y, Komine-Aizawa S, Kondo E, Ikeda T. Intrauterine fetal death during COVID-19 pregnancy: Typical fetal heart rate changes, coagulopathy, and placentitis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48:1978-1982. [PMID: 35605975 PMCID: PMC9348471 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Although various perinatal outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pregnancies have been reported, the fetal and neonatal consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection remain unclear. Several reports of miscarriages and stillbirths have been recorded, but vertical transmission by SARS‐CoV‐2 is considered very rare, and the cause remains unknown. We report a case of a 22‐year‐old uncomplicated Japanese woman infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 during the second trimester, resulting in intrauterine fetal death due to placental insufficiency associated with COVID‐19 placentitis. This report emphasizes the importance of longitudinal assessment of fetal well‐being by fetal heart rate monitoring and early detection of maternal coagulation dysfunction representing SARS‐CoV‐2 inflammation to manage COVID‐19 in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Kato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie Central Medical Center, Mie, Japan
| | - Kyohei Yamaguchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie Central Medical Center, Mie, Japan
| | - Yuka Maegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie Central Medical Center, Mie, Japan
| | - Shihoko Komine-Aizawa
- Division of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Kondo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie University, Mie, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie University, Mie, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Angelika D, Etika R, Kusumawardani NN, Mithra S, Ugrasena IDG. Observational study on necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 78:103711. [PMID: 35542312 PMCID: PMC9074384 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic on expectant mother and their babies extends to many aspects of life. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) has been recognized as a life-threatening gastrointestinal inflammatory process in neonates that has high rates of morbidity and mortality. Objective To investigate factors associated with NEC in hospitalized neonates whose mothers were SARS-CoV-2-positive and their relationship to mortality. Method This observational study was conducted from May 2020 to March 2021. All neonates who were hospitalized, after confirming that the mother was SARS-CoV-2-positive, were included in this study. The confirmation of positive SARS-CoV-2 was determined according to the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. The neonatal SARS-CoV-2 test was performed on the first day of birth. NEC was established based on a suggestive clinical presentation and abnormal abdominal radiographs. Results Of the 125 neonates enrolled in this study, there were 5 neonates who developed NEC and only one survived. Significant associated factors with NEC included lower birth weight (p < 0.001), lower gestational age (p < 0.001), positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR results (OR = 15.333; 95% CI = 2.074–113.381, p = 0.007), asphyxia (OR = 13.143; 95% CI = 1.411–122.443, p = 0.024), and mortality (OR = 156.000; 95% CI = 13.157–1849.623; p < 0.001). Mortality was significantly associated with lower gestational age (p = 0.025), cesarean section delivery (p = 0.025), and asphyxia (p = 0.025). Conclusion Significant associated factors with NEC in neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers included positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR results, asphyxia, lower gestational age, and lower birth weight. In addition to caesarean section delivery, these factors were related to mortality in neonates in such conditions. There is an association between SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers and the incidence of NEC in their neonates. Significant associated factors with NEC in neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers included positive SARS-CoV-2, asphyxia, lower gestational age, and lower birth weight. There is a link between NEC and mortality in neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Angelika
- Doctoral Program of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Risa Etika
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga - Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | | | - Setya Mithra
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya - Dr. Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, Indonesia
| | - I Dewa Gede Ugrasena
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga - Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Premature Birth—Our Experience as COVID Center. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58050587. [PMID: 35630005 PMCID: PMC9146843 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58050587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Information about the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant women is still limited and raises challenges, even as publications are increasing rapidly. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on preterm birth pregnancies. We performed a prospective, observational study in a COVID-only hospital, which included 34 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and preterm birth compared with a control group of 48 healthy women with preterm birth. The rate of cesarean delivery was 82% in the study group versus 6% for the control group. We observed a strong correlation between premature birth and the presence of COVID-19 symptoms (cough p = 0.029, fever p = 0.001, and chills p = 0.001). The risk for premature birth is correlated to a lower value of oxygen saturation (p = 0.001) and extensive radiologic pulmonary lesions (p = 0.025). The COVID-19 pregnant women with preterm delivery were older, and experienced an exacerbation of severe respiratory symptoms, decreased saturation of oxygen, increased inflammatory markers, severe pulmonary lesions and decreased lymphocytes.
Collapse
|
44
|
Toapanta-Pinta PC, Vasco-Toapanta CS, Herrera-Tasiguano AE, Verdesoto-Jácome CA, Páez-Pástor MJ, Vasco-Morales S. COVID 19 in pregnant women and neonates: Clinical characteristics and laboratory and imaging findings. An overview of systematic reviews. REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA 2022. [DOI: 10.15446/revfacmed.v71n1.97588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infection in the perinatal period may be associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in both the mother and the neonate.
Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics and, laboratory and imaging findings in pregnant women with COVID-19 and their newborns.
Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for systematic reviews published between February 1, 2020, and May 30, 2021, describing clinical characteristics and laboratory and imaging (chest) findings in pregnant women with COVID-19 and their newborns; there were no language restrictions. Data were reanalyzed by means of Bayesian meta-analysis using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO under code CRD42020178329.
Results: Six systematic reviews were retrieved (for a total of 617 primary studies). A narrative synthesis of the proportions of signs, symptoms, and imaging and laboratory findings of both mothers and neonates was performed. The Odds ratios (OR) between pregnant women with and without COVID-19 were as follows: fetal well-being involvement: 1.9 (95%CI:1.09-3.63); stillbirth: 1.73 (95%CI:1.01-2.94); preterm birth: 1.77 (95%CI:1.25-2.61); maternal admission to the intensive care unit (ICU): 6.75 (95%CI:1-31.19). Regarding symptomatology, the following OR was obtained for myalgia between pregnant women and non-pregnant women with COVID-19: 0.67 (95% CI:0.51-0.93).
Conclusions: Cough, fever, dyspnea, and myalgia are the most common symptoms in pregnant women with COVID-19; in addition, there is a higher risk of admission to the ICU. Regarding complementary testing, the most frequent alterations are lymphopenia and the evidence of lesions in chest imaging studies. The presence of COVID-19 in pregnant women is associated with premature birth. It seems that SARS-CoV-2 infection in neonates is not serious and the risk of vertical transmission is low, since no data about congenital malformations attributable to the virus were found.
Collapse
|
45
|
Glazer KB, Vieira L, Weber E, Stone J, Stern T, Bianco A, Wagner B, Nowlin S, Dolan SM, Howell EA, Janevic T. COVID-19 pandemic-related change in racial and ethnic disparities in exclusive breastmilk feeding during the delivery hospitalization: a differences-in-differences analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:225. [PMID: 35305590 PMCID: PMC8934049 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04570-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Exclusive breastmilk feeding during the delivery hospitalization, a Joint Commission indicator of perinatal care quality, is associated with longer-term breastfeeding success. Marked racial and ethnic disparities in breastfeeding exclusivity and duration existed prior to COVID-19. The pandemic, accompanied by uncertainty regarding intrapartum and postpartum safety practices, may have influenced disparities in infant feeding practices. Our objective was to examine whether the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City was associated with a change in racial and ethnic disparities in exclusive breastmilk feeding during the delivery stay. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of electronic medical records from 14,964 births in two New York City hospitals. We conducted a difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to compare Black-white, Latina-white, and Asian-white disparities in exclusive breastmilk feeding in a pandemic cohort (April 1-July 31, 2020, n=3122 deliveries) to disparities in a pre-pandemic cohort (January 1, 2019-February 28, 2020, n=11,842). We defined exclusive breastmilk feeding as receipt of only breastmilk during delivery hospitalization, regardless of route of administration. We ascertained severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection status from reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests from nasopharyngeal swab at admission. For each DID model (e.g. Black-white disparity), we used covariate-adjusted log binomial regression models to estimate racial and ethnic risk differences, pandemic versus pre-pandemic cohort risk differences, and an interaction term representing the DID estimator. RESULTS Exclusive breastmilk feeding increased from pre-pandemic to pandemic among white (40.8% to 46.6%, p<0.001) and Asian (27.9% to 35.8%, p=0.004) women, but not Black (22.6% to 25.3%, p=0.275) or Latina (20.1% to 21.4%, p=0.515) women overall. There was an increase in the Latina-white exclusive breastmilk feeding disparity associated with the pandemic (DID estimator=6.3 fewer cases per 100 births (95% CI=-10.8, -1.9)). We found decreased breastmilk feeding specifically among SARS-CoV-2 positive Latina women (20.1% pre-pandemic vs. 9.1% pandemic p=0.013), and no change in Black-white or Asian-white disparities. CONCLUSIONS We observed a pandemic-related increase in the Latina-white disparity in exclusive breastmilk feeding, urging hospital policies and programs to increase equity in breastmilk feeding and perinatal care quality during and beyond this health emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly B Glazer
- Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
- The Raquel and Jaime Gilinski Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Luciana Vieira
- Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- The Raquel and Jaime Gilinski Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ellerie Weber
- Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Joanne Stone
- The Raquel and Jaime Gilinski Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Toni Stern
- The Raquel and Jaime Gilinski Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Angela Bianco
- The Raquel and Jaime Gilinski Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Brian Wagner
- The Raquel and Jaime Gilinski Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Sarah Nowlin
- Center for Nursing Research & Innovation, Department of Nursing, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Siobhan M Dolan
- The Raquel and Jaime Gilinski Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Howell
- Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Teresa Janevic
- Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- The Raquel and Jaime Gilinski Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hartwell M, Lin V, Gatewood A, Sajjadi NB, Garrett M, Reddy AK, Greiner B, Price J. Health disparities, COVID-19, and maternal and childbirth outcomes: a meta-epidemiological study of equity reporting in systematic reviews. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35:9622-9630. [PMID: 35282754 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2049750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women with COVID-19 are at increased risk for adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes, and birth complications. Given the health outcome disparities among pregnant women of racial and ethnic minorities and the reliance of medical practice on systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs)-as they are the apical component in the hierarchy of evidence in medical research-the primary objective of the study is to examine the inclusion of the equity reporting in SRMAs focused on pregnancy outcomes and COVID-19 using PROGRESS-Plus equity framework. PROGRESS represents equity measures of Place, Race, Occupation, Gender, Religion, Education, Social capital, and Socio-economic status. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of three databases to identify SRMAs related to maternal and pregnancy outcomes related to COVID-19. We extracted whether SRMAs reported or analyzed PROGRESS-Plus components among other study characteristics. RESULTS Nearly 85% of SRMAs did not include any equity items to account for racial or geographic disparities. Reporting of race was absent from 95% of the studies. Place was the most common PROGRESS item and maternal age was the most common PROGRESS-Plus item reported overall. CONCLUSION When research is performed and reported in a way that fails to address disparities, the downstream repercussions may include medical care in the form of new protocol-driven hospital management, pharmacologic interventions, and other treatment options that mirror this absence in reporting. The absence of adequate reporting widens gaps in health outcomes among at-risk groups, such as pregnant women of racial and ethnic minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah Hartwell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.,Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Vanessa Lin
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Ashton Gatewood
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University College of Osteopathic Medicine at the Cherokee Nation, Tahlequah, OK, USA
| | - Nicholas B Sajjadi
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Morgan Garrett
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Arjun K Reddy
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Benjamin Greiner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Jameca Price
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Community Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
As of November, 2021 there have been more than 250 million coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases worldwide and more than 5 million deaths. Obstetric patients have been a population of interest given that they may be at risk of more severe infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The purpose of this review is to assess current epidemiology and outcomes research related to COVID-19 for the obstetric population. This review covers the epidemiology of COVID-19, symptomatology, transmission, and current knowledge gaps related to outcomes for the obstetric population.
Collapse
|
48
|
Callister LC. Adverse Effects of COVID-19 on Perinatal Outcomes Globally. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2022; 47:110. [PMID: 35202016 DOI: 10.1097/nmc.0000000000000798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Clark Callister
- Lynn Clark Callister is a Professor Emerita, College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, and an Editorial Board Member of MCN . Dr. Callister can be reached via email at
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Banerjee R, Neogi SB, Grover A, G S P, Agrawal U. Effect of in utero exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes and growth and development of infants: protocol for a multicentre ambispective cohort study in India. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e055377. [PMID: 35210342 PMCID: PMC8882640 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in infants born to COVID-19 positive mothers have been reported, but there is insufficient evidence regarding subsequent growth and development of these children. Our study aims to explore the effect of in-utero exposure to SARS-CoV-2 on pregnancy outcomes and growth and development of infants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A multicentric ambispective cohort study with comparison group (1:1) will be conducted at six sites. A total of 2400 participants (exposure cohort, n=1200; comparison cohort, n=1200), ie, 400 participants from each site (200 retrospectively; 200 prospectively) will be included. Exposure cohort will be infants born to women with documented COVID-19 infection anytime during pregnancy and comparison cohort will be infants born to women who did not test positive for SARS-CoV-2 anytime during pregnancy. All infants will be followed up till 1 year of age. Anthropometric measurement, age of attainment of developmental milestones and clinical examination findings will be recorded at each follow-up. Data regarding possible cofactors affecting the outcomes will be collected from both groups and adjusted for during analysis. The two groups will be compared for prevalence of every variable considered in the study. Relative risk, attributable and population attributable risks will be calculated. All risk factors with p<0.1 on bivariate analysis will be subjected to multiple logistic regression analysis. A final multivariable model will be developed by including the statistically significant risk factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of IIHMR Delhi (IRB/2021-2022/006) and will be required to be approved at all participating study sites. The study is scheduled from September 2021 to August 2023. Data from retrospective cohort will be reported by August 2022. All participants will provide written informed consent. We plan to publish our results in a peer-reviewed journal and present findings at academic conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupsa Banerjee
- Department of Health Management, International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Sutapa B Neogi
- Director of International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashoo Grover
- Department of Health Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Preetha G S
- Department of Health Management, International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Usha Agrawal
- Director of National Institute of Pathology, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Giorgini C, Simonte R, Cammarota G, DE Robertis E. What's new on the management of obstetric patients who tested positive for Covid-19? Minerva Anestesiol 2022; 88:516-523. [PMID: 35199974 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.22.16283-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
To date, there is still partial data on the effects of COVID-19 on pregnant women. The constant collection of information results in a continuous updating of the knowledge about the best management of pregnant patients affected by COVID-19. This work aims to summarize the state of the art on prevention and management of SARSCoV-2 infection in obstetric patients. This was enabled by a comprehensive literature search for the most recent and relevant publications on the subject, including guidelines and recommendations. Management of these women by a multidisciplinary team is of crucial importance, given the extreme clinical complexity of this condition. Every health worker involved must put in place all possible procedures to protect themselves from contagion. Neuraxial anesthesia should be favored in the management of labor and caesarean section over other modalities, unless there are contraindications based on the patient's status. There is still no standardized drug treatment in pregnant women with COVID-19 due to their exclusion from studies conducted to evaluate pharmacological therapies. Nevertheless, various drugs have been used to treat this disease in pregnancy, although the data at our disposal are still few. As regards mRNA vaccines, it seems that their immunogenicity, safety and tolerability in pregnant women are comparable to those of non-pregnant women of the same age. More studies are certainly needed in infected pregnant women to establish treatment and prevention protocols for this special category of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Giorgini
- Division of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Rachele Simonte
- Division of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gianmaria Cammarota
- Division of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Edoardo DE Robertis
- Division of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy -
| |
Collapse
|