Evaluation of novel candidate filtration markers from a global metabolomic discovery for glomerular filtration rate estimation

Creatinine and cystatin-C are recommended for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) but accuracy is suboptimal. Here, using untargeted metabolomics data, we sought to identify candidate filtration markers for a new targeted assay using a novel approach based on their maximal joint association with measured GFR (mGFR) and with flexibility to consider their biological properties. We analyzed metabolites measured in seven diverse studies encompasing 2,851 participants on the Metabolon H4 platform that had Pearson correlations with log mGFR and used a stepwise approach to develop models to < -0.5 estimate mGFR with and without inclusion of creatinine that enabled selection of candidate markers. In total, 456 identified metabolites were present in all studies, and 36 had correlations with mGFR < -0.5. A total of 2,225 models were developed that included these metabolites; all with lower root mean square errors and smaller coefficients for demographic variables compared to estimates using untargeted creatinine. Seventeen metabolites were chosen, including 12 new candidate filtration markers. The selected metabolites had strong associations with mGFR and little dependence on demographic factors. Candidate metabolites were identified with maximal joint association with mGFR and minimal dependence on demographic variables across many varied clinical settings. These metabolites are excreted in urine and represent diverse metabolic pathways and tubular handling. Thus, our data can be used to select metabolites for a multi-analyte eGFR determination assay using mass spectrometry that potentially offers better accuracy and is less prone to non-GFR determinants than the current eGFR biomarkers.

Urine Albumin Measurements in Clinical Diagnostics

BACKGROUND

Measurement of urine albumin is critical for diagnosis, risk classification, and monitoring of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Guidelines recommend clinical decision cutoffs for the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) of 30 and 300 mg/g (3 and 30 mg/mmol). However, differences among manufacturers' routine urine albumin measurement procedures have been found to exceed 40%, suggesting CKD diagnosis and risk classification may vary depending upon the specific measurement procedure implemented in the laboratory.

CONTENT

This review discusses urine albumin pathophysiology and clinical practice guideline recommendations for CKD. The review also provides recommendations for urine specimen collection and storage, and results reporting for the ACR. Recent advances in measurement techniques and development of reference systems intended to facilitate standardization of urine albumin measurements are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Urine albumin is an important measurement procedure used for diagnosis, risk classification, and management of CKD. Urine albumin results should be reported as the ACR using quantitative measurement procedures. Random urine collections used for albuminuria screening should be followed by confirmation with first morning void collections to reduce variation and increase diagnostic accuracy for urine albumin measurement. Most measurement procedures utilize immunoturbidimetric or immunonephelometric techniques. However, results vary significantly among measurement procedures, potentially resulting in differences in classification or risk assessment for CKD. The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) and other laboratories are developing reference systems, including liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry candidate reference measurement procedures and reference materials, to enable standardization of routine measurement procedures.

Quantification of Mycophenolic Acid in Plasma by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sodium mycophenolate are commonly prescribed immunosuppressive drugs for patients who have undergone solid organ transplant. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of these drugs is performed by assessing mycophenolic acid (MPA) in plasma. Due to the large inter-individual variability and narrow therapeutic range, the precise determination of systemic MPA concentration carries great clinical significance. We present a rapid, sensitive, specific, and robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantitation of MPA in plasma. A Waters Xevo TQ-S Micro mass spectrometer coupled to a Water's Acquity liquid chromatography system was used in positive electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. MPA quantitation was achieved using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Mycophenolic acid carboxybutoxy ether (MPAC) was employed as an internal standard. The method is linear from 0.25 to 40.00 mg/L, has intra-assay (N = 24) imprecision of 2.7% at 1.57 mg/L and 3.9% at 4.61 mg/L and inter-assay (N = 20 days) imprecision of 4.0% at 1.62 mg/L and 5.6% at 4.68 mg/L.

Association of urine and plasma ADMA with atherosclerotic risk in DKD cardiovascular disease risk in diabetic kidney disease: findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, especially among those with diabetes. Altered metabolism of solutes that accumulate in CKD [asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO)] may reflect pathways linking CKD with ASCVD.

METHODS

This case-cohort study included Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort participants with baseline diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and without prior history for each outcome. The primary outcome was incident ASCVD (time to first myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral artery disease event) and secondary outcome was incident heart failure. The subcohort comprised randomly selected participants meeting entry criteria. Plasma and urine ADMA, SDMA and TMAO concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Associations of uremic solute plasma concentrations and urinary fractional excretions with outcomes were evaluated by weighted multivariable Cox regression models, adjusted for confounding covariables.

RESULTS

Higher plasma ADMA concentrations (per standard deviation) were associated with ASCVD risk [hazard ratio (HR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.68]. Lower fractional excretion of ADMA (per standard deviation) was associated with ASCVD risk (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.89). The lowest quartile of ADMA fractional excretion was associated with greater ASCVD risk (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.08-4.69) compared with the highest quartile. Plasma SDMA and TMAO concentration and fractional excretion were not associated with ASCVD. Neither plasma nor fractional excretion of ADMA, SDMA and TMAO were associated with incident heart failure.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that decreased kidney excretion of ADMA leads to increased plasma concentrations and ASCVD risk.

Discrepancies between Cystatin C-Based and Creatinine-Based eGFR

BACKGROUND

Recent guidance suggests clinicians increase use of cystatin C for the estimation of GFR. Discrepant levels of creatinine- versus cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFRcr versus eGFRcys) can occur and might signify inaccurate estimation of GFR using creatinine alone. This study sought to enhance the knowledge of the risk factors and clinical implications of having a large eGFR discrepancy.

METHODS

Participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, a prospective cohort study of US adults, were followed over 25 years. eGFR discrepancy was measured at five clinical visits and defined as eGFRcys either 30% lower or higher than eGFRcr, the current clinical standard of care. The associations between eGFR discrepancies and kidney-related laboratory parameters were assessed using linear and logistic regression and long-term adverse outcomes, including kidney failure, AKI, heart failure, and death, using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 13,197 individuals (mean age 57 [SD 6] years, 56% women, 25% Black race), 7% had eGFRcys 30% lower than eGFRcr at visit 2 (1990-1992), and this proportion increased over time to 23% by visit 6 (2016-2017). By contrast, the percent with eGFRcys 30% higher than eGFRcr was relatively stable (3%-1%). Independent risk factors for having eGFRcys 30% lower than eGFRcr included older age, female sex, non-Black race, higher eGFRcr, higher body mass index, weight loss, and current smoking. Those with eGFRcys 30% lower than eGFRcr had more anemia and higher uric acid, fibroblast growth factor 23, and phosphate levels as well as higher risk of subsequent mortality, kidney failure, AKI, and heart failure compared with those with similar eGFRcr and eGFRcys values.

CONCLUSIONS

Having eGFRcys lower than eGFRcr was associated with worse kidney-related laboratory derangements and a higher risk of adverse health outcomes.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2023_09_08_CJN0000000000000217.mp3.

Prediabetes, intervening diabetes and subsequent risk of dementia: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the association of prediabetes with dementia is explained by the intervening onset of diabetes.

METHODS

Among participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study we defined baseline prediabetes as HbA1c 39-46 mmol/mol (5.7-6.4%) and subsequent incident diabetes as a self-reported physician diagnosis or use of diabetes medication. Incident dementia was ascertained via active surveillance and adjudicated. We quantified the association of prediabetes with dementia risk before and after accounting for the subsequent development of diabetes among ARIC participants without diabetes at baseline (1990-1992; participants aged 46-70 years). We also evaluated whether age at diabetes diagnosis modified the risk of dementia.

RESULTS

Among 11,656 participants without diabetes at baseline, 2330 (20.0%) had prediabetes. Before accounting for incident diabetes, prediabetes was significantly associated with the risk of dementia (HR 1.12 [95% CI 1.01, 1.24]). After accounting for incident diabetes, the association was attenuated and non-significant (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.94, 1.16]). Earlier age of onset of diabetes had the strongest association with dementia: HR 2.92 (95% CI 2.06, 4.14) for onset before 60 years; HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.47, 2.04) for onset at 60-69 years; and HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.08, 1.40) for onset at 70-79 years.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Prediabetes is associated with dementia risk but this risk is explained by the subsequent development of diabetes. Earlier age of onset of diabetes substantially increases dementia risk. Preventing or delaying progression of prediabetes to diabetes will reduce dementia burden.

Assessment of circulating insulin using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry during insulin glargine treatment in type 2 diabetes: Implications for estimating insulin sensitivity and β-cell function

AIM

To determine the potential impact of the cross-reactivity of insulin glargine U-100 and its metabolites on insulin sensitivity and β-cell measures in people with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), we measured concentrations of endogenous insulin, glargine and its two metabolites (M1 and M2) in fasting and oral glucose tolerance test-stimulated plasma from 19 participants and fasting specimens from another 97 participants 12 months after randomization to receive the insulin glargine. The last dose of glargine was administered before 10:00 PM the night before testing. Insulin was also measured on these specimens using an immunoassay. We used fasting specimens to calculate insulin sensitivity (Homeostatic Model Assessment 2 [HOMA2]-S%; QUICKI index; PREDIM index) and β-cell function (HOMA2-B%). Using specimens following glucose ingestion, we calculated insulin sensitivity (Matsuda ISI[comp] index) and β-cell response (insulinogenic index [IGI], and total incremental insulin response [iAUC] insulin/glucose).

RESULTS

In plasma, glargine was metabolized to form the M1 and M2 metabolites that were quantifiable by LC-MS; however, the analogue and its metabolites cross-reacted by less than 100% in the insulin immunoassay. This incomplete cross-reactivity resulted in a systematic bias of fasting-based measures. By contrast, because M1 and M2 did not change following glucose ingestion, a bias was not observed for IGI and iAUC insulin/glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite glargine metabolites being detected in the insulin immunoassay, dynamic insulin responses can be used to assess β-cell responsiveness. However, given the cross-reactivity of the glargine metabolites in the insulin immunoassay, fasting-based measures of insulin sensitivity and β-cell function are biased.

Association of Uremic Solutes With Cardiovascular Death in Diabetic Kidney Disease

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of mortality among people with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). The pathophysiology is inadequately explained by traditional CVD risk factors. The uremic solutes trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) and asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA, SDMA) have been linked to CVD in kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT), but data are limited in populations with diabetes and less severe kidney disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS

Random subcohort of 555 REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study participants with diabetes and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at study entry.

EXPOSURE

ADMA, SDMA, and TMAO assayed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in plasma and urine.

OUTCOME

Cardiovascular mortality (primary outcome); all-cause mortality and incident KFRT (secondary outcomes).

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Plasma concentrations and ratios of urine to plasma concentrations of ADMA, SDMA, and TMAO were tested for association with outcomes. Adjusted Cox regression models were fitted and hazard ratios of outcomes calculated per standard deviation and per doubling, and as interquartile comparisons.

RESULTS

The mean baseline eGFR was 44 mL/min/1.73 m2. Cardiovascular death, overall mortality, and KFRT occurred in 120, 285, and 89 participants, respectively, during a mean 6.2 years of follow-up. Higher plasma ADMA and SDMA (HRs of 1.20 and 1.28 per 1-SD greater concentration), and lower ratios of urine to plasma concentrations of ADMA, SDMA, and TMAO (HRs per halving of 1.53, 1.69, and 1.38) were associated with cardiovascular mortality. Higher plasma concentrations of ADMA, SDMA, and TMAO (HRs of 1.31, 1.42, and 1.13 per 1-SD greater concentration) and lower urine to plasma ratios of ADMA, SDMA, and TMAO (HRs per halving of 1.34, 1.37, and 1.26) were associated with all-cause mortality. Higher plasma ADMA and SDMA were associated with incident KFRT by categorical comparisons (HRs of 2.75 and 2.96, comparing quartile 4 to quartile 1), but not in continuous analyses.

LIMITATIONS

Single cohort, restricted to patients with diabetes and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, potential residual confounding by GFR, no dietary information.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher plasma concentrations and lower ratios of urine to plasma concentrations of uremic solutes were independently associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in DKD. Associations of ratios of urine to plasma concentrations with mortality suggest a connection between renal uremic solute clearance and CVD pathogenesis.

Markers of Kidney Tubular Secretion and Risk of Adverse Events in SPRINT Participants with CKD

BACKGROUND

Kidney tubular secretion is an essential mechanism for clearing many common antihypertensive drugs and other metabolites and toxins. It is unknown whether novel measures of tubular secretion are associated with adverse events (AEs) during hypertension treatment.

METHODS

Among 2089 SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) participants with baseline eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, we created a summary secretion score by averaging across the standardized spot urine-to-plasma ratios of ten novel endogenous tubular secretion measures, with lower urine-to-plasma ratios reflecting worse tubular secretion. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between the secretion score and risk of a composite of prespecified serious AEs (hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, AKI, electrolyte abnormalities, and injurious falls). The follow-up protocol for SPRINT routinely assessed two laboratory monitoring AEs (hyperkalemia and hypokalemia).

RESULTS

Overall, 30% of participants experienced at least one AE during a median follow-up of 3.0 years. In multivariable models adjusted for eGFR and albuminuria, lower (worse) secretion scores at baseline were associated with greater risk of the composite AE outcome (hazard ratio per 1-SD lower secretion score, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.27). In analyses of the individual AEs, lower secretion score was associated with significantly greater risk of AKI, serious electrolyte abnormalities, and ambulatory hyperkalemia. Associations were similar across randomized treatment assignment groups.

CONCLUSION

Among SPRINT participants with CKD, worse tubular secretion was associated with greater risk of AEs, independent of eGFR and albuminuria.

Self-reported Race, Serum Creatinine, Cystatin C, and GFR in Children and Young Adults With Pediatric Kidney Diseases: A Report From the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Recent reassessment of the use of race in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in adults has instigated questions about the role of race in eGFR expressions for children. Little research has examined the associations of self-reported race with measured GFR (mGFR) adjusting for serum creatinine or cystatin C in children and young adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study examined these associations and evaluated the performance of the previously published "U25" (under the age of 25 years) eGFR equations in a large cohort of children and young adults with CKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Participants in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) study including 190 Black and 675 non-Black participants contributing 473 and 1,897 annual person-visits, respectively.

EXPOSURE

Self- or parental-reported race (Black, non-Black). Adjustment for serum creatinine or cystatin C, body size, and socioeconomic status.

OUTCOME

mGFR based on iohexol clearance.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Linear regression with generalized estimating equations, stratified by age (<6, 6-12, 12-18, and ≥18 years) incorporating serum creatinine or serum cystatin C. Contrasting performance in different self-reported racial groups of the U25 eGFR equations.

RESULTS

Self-reported Black race was significantly associated with 12.8% higher mGFR among children in regression models including serum creatinine. Self-reported Black race was significantly associated with 3.5% lower mGFR after adjustment for cystatin C overall but was not significant for those over 12 years. The results were similar after adjustment for body size and socioeconomic factors. The average of creatinine- and cystatin C-based U25 equations was unbiased by self-reported race groups.

LIMITATIONS

Small number of children < 6 years; lean body mass was estimated.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in the creatinine-mGFR relationship by self-reported race were observed in children and young adults with CKD and were consistent with findings in adults. Smaller and opposite differences were observed for the cystatin C-mGFR relationship, especially in the younger age group. We recommend inclusion of children for future investigations of biomarkers to estimate GFR. Importantly, for GFR estimation among those under 25 years of age, the average of the new U25 creatinine and cystatin C equations without race coefficients yields unbiased estimates of mGFR.

New Creatinine- and Cystatin C-Based Equations to Estimate GFR without Race

BACKGROUND

Current equations for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) that use serum creatinine or cystatin C incorporate age, sex, and race to estimate measured GFR. However, race in eGFR equations is a social and not a biologic construct.

METHODS

We developed new eGFR equations without race using data from two development data sets: 10 studies (8254 participants, 31.5% Black) for serum creatinine and 13 studies (5352 participants, 39.7% Black) for both serum creatinine and cystatin C. In a validation data set of 12 studies (4050 participants, 14.3% Black), we compared the accuracy of new eGFR equations to measured GFR. We projected the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and GFR stages in a sample of U.S. adults, using current and new equations.

RESULTS

In the validation data set, the current creatinine equation that uses age, sex, and race overestimated measured GFR in Blacks (median, 3.7 ml per minute per 1.73 m² of body-surface area; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 5.4) and to a lesser degree in non-Blacks (median, 0.5 ml per minute per 1.73 m²; 95% CI, 0.0 to 0.9). When the adjustment for Black race was omitted from the current eGFR equation, measured GFR in Blacks was underestimated (median, 7.1 ml per minute per 1.73 m²; 95% CI, 5.9 to 8.8). A new equation using age and sex and omitting race underestimated measured GFR in Blacks (median, 3.6 ml per minute per 1.73 m²; 95% CI, 1.8 to 5.5) and overestimated measured GFR in non-Blacks (median, 3.9 ml per minute per 1.73 m²; 95% CI, 3.4 to 4.4). For all equations, 85% or more of the eGFRs for Blacks and non-Blacks were within 30% of measured GFR. New creatinine-cystatin C equations without race were more accurate than new creatinine equations, with smaller differences between race groups. As compared with the current creatinine equation, the new creatinine equations, but not the new creatinine-cystatin C equations, increased population estimates of CKD prevalence among Blacks and yielded similar or lower prevalence among non-Blacks.

CONCLUSIONS

New eGFR equations that incorporate creatinine and cystatin C but omit race are more accurate and led to smaller differences between Black participants and non-Black participants than new equations without race with either creatinine or cystatin C alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.).

A Low-Sodium DASH Dietary Pattern Affects Serum Markers of Inflammation and Mineral Metabolism in Adults with Elevated Blood Pressure

BACKGROUND

The blood pressure-lowering effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern and reduced sodium intake are well established. The effects on other biomarkers related to vascular health are of interest and might assist in explaining the effects of the DASH diet and sodium reduction.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that a low-sodium DASH diet improves (lowers) biomarkers of inflammation [C-reactive protein (CRP) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR)] and mineral metabolism [phosphorus and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23)].

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of the DASH-Sodium trial using frozen serum samples. This controlled feeding study randomly assigned 412 adults (≥22 y) with elevated blood pressure (120-159/80-95 mmHg) to consume either a DASH diet or control diet. Within each arm, participants received 3 sodium levels [low (1150 mg), intermediate (2300 mg), high (3450 mg)] in random sequence, each for 30 d. To maximize contrast, samples collected at the end of the low-sodium DASH (n = 198) and high-sodium control (n = 194) diets were compared. Between-diet differences in serum CRP, suPAR, phosphorus, and FGF23 concentrations were assessed using linear regression adjusted for age, sex, race, income, education, smoking status, and BMI.

RESULTS

CRP concentrations did not differ between groups (P = 0.83), but suPAR was higher after the low-sodium DASH diet than the high-sodium control [geometric mean 2470 pg/mL (95% CI: 2380, 2560 pg/mL), compared with 2290 pg/mL (95% CI: 2210, 2380 pg/mL); P = 0.006]. Phosphorus was higher after the low-sodium DASH diet [geometric mean 3.50 mg/dL (95% CI: 3.43, 3.57 mg/dL)] compared with the high-sodium control diet [geometric mean 3.39 mg/dL (95% CI: 3.33, 3.46 mg/dL); P = 0.04]. FGF23 was also higher after the low-sodium DASH diet [geometric mean 35.3 pg/mL (95% CI: 33.3, 37.3 pg/mL) compared with 28.2 pg/mL (95% CI: 26.6, 29.8 pg/mL); P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, biomarkers of inflammation and mineral metabolism were increased or unchanged by a low-sodium DASH diet compared with a high-sodium control diet in adults with elevated blood pressure.

Abstract MP01: Effect Of The DASH-Sodium Diet On Serum Biomarkers Of Inflammation And Mineral Metabolism

Background: The blood pressure-lowering effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern and reduced sodium intake are well-established. The effects on other biomarkers related to vascular health are of interest and may assist in explaining cardiovascular benefits of the DASH diet.

Objective: We hypothesized that a low-sodium DASH diet improves biomarkers of inflammation [i.e. reduces C-reactive protein (CRP) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR)] and mineral metabolism [phosphorus and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23)].

Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the DASH-Sodium trial using stored frozen serum samples. This controlled feeding study randomized 412 adults to consume either a DASH diet or control diet representative of a typical American diet. Within each arm, participants received three sodium levels (low, intermediate, high) in random sequence, each for 30 days. To maximize contrast, samples collected at the end of the low-sodium DASH (n=198) and high-sodium control (n=194) diets were compared. Between-diet differences in biomarker concentrations were assessed by t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for normally distributed and skewed variables, respectively.

Results: CRP concentrations did not differ between groups ( P =0.19), but suPAR was higher after the low-sodium DASH diet than the high-sodium control (median, IQR: 2473, 2127-2887 pg/mL vs. 2281, 1929-2679 pg/mL; P =0.003). FGF23 was also higher after the DASH diet (35.9, 26.9-44.8 pg/mL vs. 30.2, 23.5-37.5 pg/mL; P< 0.001). Serum phosphorus was higher after the DASH diet (mean±SEM: 3.5±0.04 mg/dL) versus the control (3.4±0.04 mg/dL; P =0.02).

Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, biomarkers of inflammation and mineral metabolism were increased or unchanged by a low-sodium DASH diet compared to a high-sodium control diet. Potential reasons (e.g. short duration of the trial, sodium-specific effects, bioavailable phosphorus-rich dairy intake) require further investigation.

Recalibration of cystatin C using standardized material in Siemens nephelometers

BACKGROUND

Cystatin C is a key GFR biomarker. Recently, Siemens recalibrated the assay based on certified reference material ERM-DA471/IFCC. The NIH-funded longitudinal chronic kidney disease in children (CKiD) study has > 3000 cystatin C measurements based on a pre-IFCC calibrator provided by Siemens. Since cystatin C values for CKiD are now standardized to IFCC certified reference material, it is important to relate the IFCC-calibrated results to the previous values so that there are no discontinuous results.

METHODS

We diluted cystatin C ERM-DA471/IFCC (5.48 mg/L) into buffer and compared results with predicted ones. We then updated the cystatin C application on our BN II nephelometer to provide results based on pre-IFCC and IFCC calibrations of CKiD specimens simultaneously. We assayed 51 previously analyzed sera and 62 fresh additional specimens.

RESULTS

The predicted concentrations from the IFCC standard were consistently 17% higher than the measured values using the pre-IFCC calibration (y = 1.1686x). Similarly, the re-run and fresh sample concentrations were 17% higher via the IFCC calibration than by the pre-IFCC calibration (y = 1.168x). There was very high reliability in the measurements using the previous calibration for re-run specimens (0.99) and for 33 pristine specimens using IFCC calibration (0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm the recalibration proposed by Siemens. To convert pre-IFCC results to IFCC-calibrated concentrations, the value is multiplied by 1.17. Conversely, one divides IFCC-calibrated results by 1.17 to estimate GFR via previously published pre-IFCC CKiD eGFR equations. For older adolescents, cystatin C has already been standardized and can be directly applied to the CKD-EPI equations.

An investigation of enzymatic creatinine interference in a patient receiving dopamine and dobutamine

BACKGROUND

A laboratory investigation was initiated after a renal failure patient had a 2.18 mg/dL decrease in serum creatinine, which was not explained through medical intervention. The investigation revealed specimens providing questionably low results had been collected from a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line.

METHODS

Patient specimens and serum pools were analyzed by the Siemens Vista enzymatic creatinine measurement procedure. A simulation of the patient's infusion protocol examined potential PICC line carryover and specimen collection technique.

RESULTS

A simultaneously collected specimen set, arterial line and PICC line, yielded a difference of 1.86 mg/dL. Infusion and collection simulation studies suggested the most likely scenario was the infusion pump was not shut off while the specimen collection occurred and contaminated the specimen.

CONCLUSION

Providers should be aware of erroneously low creatinine results when administering catecholamine drugs and collecting specimens through the same catheter. The mechanism of specimen contamination is consistent with a siphoning effect from one lumen to the other during collection with the infusion pumps still running.

A Novel Method for Rapid Bedside Measurement of GFR

Background Direct quantitative measurement of GFR (mGFR) remains a specialized task primarily performed in research settings. Multiple formulas for estimating GFR have been developed that use the readily available endogenous biomarkers creatinine and/or cystatin C. However, eGFR formulas have limitations, and an accurate mGFR is necessary in some clinical situations and for certain patient populations. We conducted a prospective, open-label study to evaluate a novel rapid technique for determining plasma volume and mGFR.Methods We developed a new exogenous biomarker, visible fluorescent injectate (VFI), consisting of a large 150-kD rhodamine derivative and small 5-kD fluorescein carboxymethylated dextrans. After a single intravenous injection of VFI, plasma volume and mGFR can be determined on the basis of the plasma pharmacokinetics of the rhodamine derivative and fluorescein carboxymethylated dextrans, respectively. In this study involving 32 adults with normal kidney function (n=16), CKD stage 3 (n=8), or CKD stage 4 (n=8), we compared VFI-based mGFR values with values obtained by measuring iohexol plasma disappearance. VFI-based mGFR required three 0.5-ml blood draws over 3 hours; iohexol-based mGFR required five samples taken over 6 hours. Eight healthy participants received repeat VFI injections at 24 hours.Results VFI-based mGFR values showed close linear correlation with the iohexol-based mGFR values in all participants. Injections were well tolerated, including when given on consecutive days. No serious adverse events were reported. VFI-based mGFR was highly reproducible.Conclusions The VFI-based approach allows for the rapid determination of mGFR at the bedside while maintaining patient safety and measurement accuracy and reproducibility.

Challenges in Measuring Glomerular Filtration Rate: A Clinical Laboratory Perspective

The assessment of kidney function is a cornerstone in the clinical management and health of the patient. Although the kidneys perform many physiologic functions and are essential for maintaining homeostasis, kidney function is typically evaluated, quantitated, and understood using the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Although GFR can be directly measured using a variety of externally administered glomerular filtration markers, in general practice, the GFR is usually estimated (eGFR) using endogenous markers that are cleared primarily by kidney filtration. Common situations exist where the GFR needs to be measured (mGFR) in order to proceed with care. This manuscript will review laboratory challenges in the assessment of GFR. Key points to consider when implementing a mGFR testing protocol are the following: marker selection, clearance methodology (urinary vs solely plasma measurements of filtration marker), sample collection, number of samples to collect, staff required, and analytical measurement technology for the filtration marker selected. We suggest those wanting to implement mGFR testing examine site-specific institutional resources along with patient population and proceed with the approaches best suited for their clinical needs and laboratory resources available.

Moving Toward Standardization of Urine Albumin Measurements

Measurement of urine albumin is important for detecting and monitoring kidney disease. At the present time, measurement of urine albumin is not standardized due to the lack of a reference system, which includes both a reference measurement procedure and certified reference materials. Developing a reference system will provide a means for clinical laboratory measurement procedures to become standardized and will enable successful use of uniform clinical decision points. Currently, urine albumin results vary in excess of 40% depending on which commercially available measurement procedure is utilized for measurement. Clinicians may struggle with classification of kidney disease in part due to differences in measurements from lack of agreement among laboratory methodologies employed when assessing urine albumin concentrations. This report focuses on current findings in urine albumin testing, highlights important measurement and reporting considerations, and presents strategies for developing a reference measurement procedure to enable standardization of urine albumin measurements.

Standardization of Urine Albumin Measurements: Status and Performance Goals

BACKGROUND

Urine albumin is a key laboratory test used for classification, assessment of risk, and monitoring treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease. Urine albumin measurement results are not standardized among different measurement procedures. Consequently, clinical guidelines using fixed decision values for urine albumin cannot be applied consistently.

CONTENT

Isotope dilution mass spectrometry reference measurement procedures and certified reference materials are being developed to enable standardization of immunoassay measurement procedures for urine albumin. A previous report determined calibration bias was the major error source for differences in results among different measurement procedures for urine albumin. Performance goals for between-day precision, ≤6% CV above 15 mg/L, and for specimen-specific effects, ≤6% CV, were established on the basis of the performance capability of current measurement procedures. The biological variation model was used to estimate a total allowable error of ≤24%-30% and from that the goal for bias of ≤7%-13%.

SUMMARY

A reference system of higher-order certified reference materials and reference measurement procedures is being developed to enable standardization of urine albumin measurement results. Goals have been established for total allowable error, specimen-specific effects, imprecision, and bias to facilitate efforts to standardize urine albumin measurement results.

Urine Creatinine Concentrations in Drug Monitoring Participants and Hospitalized Patients

Urine drug testing is commonly performed in both clinical and forensic arenas for screening, monitoring and compliance purposes. We sought to determine if urine creatinine concentrations in monitoring program participants were significantly different from hospital in-patients and out-patients undergoing urine drug testing. We retrospectively reviewed urine creatinine submitted in June through December 2015 for all specimens undergoing urine drug testing. The 20,479 creatinine results were categorized as hospitalized patients (H) and monitoring/compliance groups for pain management (P), legal (L) or recovery (R). Median creatinine concentrations (interquartile range, mg/dL) were significantly different (P < 0.001) between groups: H 126 (122-136); P 138 (137-143); L 147 (144-154); R 95 (92-97). In the two groups subject to on-demand sampling time pressures, median creatinine concentrations were significantly lower in the R vs. L group (P<0.001). In conclusion, recovery (R) participants have more dilute specimens, reflected by significantly lower creatinine concentration and may indicate participants' attempts to tamper with their drug test results through dilution means.

Discordance Between Iothalamate and Iohexol Urinary Clearances

BACKGROUND

Iothalamate and iohexol are contrast agents that have supplanted inulin for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in clinical practice. Previous studies have noted possible differences in renal handling of these 2 agents, but clarity about the differences has been lacking.

STUDY DESIGN

Study of diagnostic test accuracy.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

150 participants with a wide range of GFRs were studied in an outpatient clinical laboratory facility.

INDEX TESTS

Simultaneous urinary clearances of iothalamate, iohexol, and creatinine.

REFERENCE TEST

None.

OUTCOME

Relative differences between the urinary clearances. Iohexol and iothalamate in plasma and urine were assayed concurrently by a novel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay.

RESULTS

Mean iohexol, iothalamate, and creatinine clearances were 52±28 (SD), 60±34, and 74±40 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. The proportional bias of iohexol to iothalamate urinary clearance was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.88) and was proportional across the GFR range. The mean proportional bias of iohexol clearance compared with creatinine clearance is 1.27 (95% CI, 1.20-1.34), whereas that of iothalamate clearance compared with creatinine clearance is 1.09 (95% CI, 1.03-1.15).

LIMITATIONS

Lack of reference standard.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals a significant and consistent difference between urinary clearances of iothalamate and iohexol. Comparison of studies reporting renal clearance measurements using iohexol versus iothalamate must account for this observed bias.

Iothalamate quantification by tandem mass spectrometry to measure glomerular filtration rate

BACKGROUND

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be determined by measuring renal clearance of the radiocontrast agent iothalamate. Current analytic methods for quantifying iothalamate concentrations in plasma and urine using liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis have limitations such as long analysis times and susceptibility to interferences. We developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to overcome these limitations.

METHODS

Urine and plasma samples were deproteinized using acetonitrile and centrifugation. The supernatant was diluted in water and analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a water:methanol gradient. We monitored 4 multiple reaction monitoring transitions: m/z 614.8-487.0, 614.8-456.0, 614.8-361.1, and 614.8-177.1. We compared the results to those obtained via our standard capillary electrophoresis (CE-UV) on samples from 53 patients undergoing clinical GFR testing.

RESULTS

Mean recovery was 90%-110% in both urine and plasma matrices. Imprecision was <or=15% for the m/z 614.8-487.0 and 614.8-456.0 transitions over a 10-day period at 1 mg/L. Method comparison for 159 patient samples (53 clearances) provided the following Passing-Bablok regressions: plasma iothalamate LC-MS/MS (y) vs CE-UV (x), y = 0.99x + 0.36; urine iothalamate LC-MS/MS vs CE-UV, y = 1.01x + 0.31; corrected GFR LC-MS/MS vs CE-UV, y = 1.00x + 0.00. Interfering substances prevented accurate iothalamate quantification by CE-UV in 2 patients, whereas these samples could be analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

CONCLUSIONS

Iothalamate can be quantified by LC-MS/MS for GFR measurement. This method circumvents potential problems with interfering substances that occasionally confound accurate GFR determinations.

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of urinary fluticasone propionate-17beta-carboxylic acid for monitoring compliance with inhaled-fluticasone propionate therapy

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids including fluticasone propionate (FP) are the most effective treatment for persistent-asthma. Noncompliance ranging from 20% to 80% of treated patients is associated with substantial health care costs, morbidity and fatalities. A noninvasive test to assess FP treatment compliance is needed. The major metabolite of FP is FP-17beta-carboxylic acid (FP17betaCA) and is excreted in urine. This study demonstrates the development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay to measure FP17betaCA in urine and evaluation of FP17betaCA urinary elimination.

EXPERIMENTAL

Fluorometholone was used as the internal standard. After acetonitrile precipitation, samples were extracted with dichloromethane, washed and dried. Reconstituted extract (60 microL) was subjected to reversed-phase chromatography and positive-ion mode LC-MS/MS analysis. Assay precision, linearity, recovery and sample stability were determined. Elimination evaluation included measurement of FP17betaCA in urine collected daily from human subjects before (day 1), during treatment (days 2-5; dose FP-110 microg 2 puffs/day), and following cessation of FP therapy (days 6-14; n=4).

RESULTS

Linear range of the FP17betaCA assay was 10.3-9510pg/mL. Limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 10.3 pg/mL and recovery ranged from 85.8% to 111.9%. Inter-assay CVs were 7.4-12.0% for FP17betaCA concentrations of 11.1-5117 pg/mL. Urine FP17betaCA was absent in subjects prior to FP therapy, detectable (180-1991 ng FP17betaCA/g creatinine) throughout the dosing period and reached below the LOQ at 6 days after therapy cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of FP17betaCA by LC-MS/MS has acceptable analytical performance for clinical use. These data support the clinical utility of measuring FP17betaCA in urine to monitor patient compliance with FP therapy.

Comparison of urinary albumin quantification by immunoturbidimetry, competitive immunoassay, and protein-cleavage liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND

Increased urinary albumin excretion is a well-documented diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for renal disease. Urinary albumin is typically measured in clinical settings by immunoassay methods. However, neither a reference method nor a urine albumin calibration reference material is currently available.

METHODS

We quantified urinary albumin in patient samples by using 3 commercially available reagent systems: DiaSorin SPQ and Beckman Coulter LX 20 (immunoturbidimetric), and Siemens Immulite (competitive immunoassay). Results were compared to values obtained by protein-cleavage liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS

In general, results from the 3 immunoassays agreed with results from LC-MS/MS. However, the SPQ results showed a negative bias across all ranges of albuminuria [(0-200 mg/L, y = 0.91x - 3.74 (CI 0.86-0.96); > 200 mg/L, y = 0.88x - 40.30 (CI 0.76-1.00)], whereas the LX 20 showed minimal bias in the 0-200 mg/L range [y = 0.97x - 88 (CI 0.92-1.02)] and the Immulite assay showed positive bias in the 0-200 mg/L range [y = 1.15x - 4.38 (CI 1.09-1.20)].

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed a reasonable quantification of urinary albumin by representative polyclonal and monoclonal immunoassays compared to an LC-MS/MS assay. In addition, the results do not suggest the presence of nonimmunoreactive albumin in urine. However, differences in analytic performance between assays support the need for a reference calibration material and reference method to standardize clinical laboratory measurements of urinary albumin.

Quantification of urinary albumin by using protein cleavage and LC-MS/MS

BACKGROUND

Urinary albumin excretion is a sensitive diagnostic and prognostic marker for renal disease. Therefore, measurement of urinary albumin must be accurate and precise. We have developed a method to quantify intact urinary albumin with a low limit of quantification (LOQ).

METHODS

We constructed an external calibration curve using purified human serum albumin (HSA) added to a charcoal-stripped urine matrix. We then added an internal standard, (15)N-labeled recombinant HSA ((15)NrHSA), to the calibrators, controls, and patient urine samples. The samples were reduced, alkylated, and digested with trypsin. The concentration of albumin in each sample was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and linear regression analysis, in which the relative abundance area ratio of the tryptic peptides (42)LVNEVTEFAK(51) and (526)QTALVELVK(534) from albumin and (15)NrHSA were referenced to the calibration curve.

RESULTS

The lower limit of quantification was 3.13 mg/L, and the linear dynamic range was 3.13-200 mg/L. Replicate digests from low, medium, and high controls (n = 5) gave intraassay imprecision CVs of 2.8%-11.0% for the peptide (42)LVNEVTEFAK(51), and 1.9%-12.3% for the (526)QTALVELVK(534) peptide. Interassay imprecision of the controls for a period of 10 consecutive days (n = 10) yielded CVs of 1.5%-14.8% for the (42)LVNEVTEFAK(51) peptide, and 6.4%-14.1% for the (526)QTALVELVK(534) peptide. For the (42)LVNEVTEFAK(51) peptide, a method comparison between LC-MS/MS and an immunoturbidometric method for 138 patient samples gave an R(2) value of 0.97 and a regression line of y = 0.99x + 23.16.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary albumin can be quantified by a protein cleavage LC-MS/MS method using a (15)NrHSA internal standard. This method provides improved analytical performance in the clinically relevant range compared to a commercially available immunoturbidometric assay.

Comparison between immunoturbidimetry, size-exclusion chromatography, and LC-MS to quantify urinary albumin

BACKGROUND

The accurate and precise measurement of urinary albumin is critical, since even minor increases are diagnostically sensitive indicators of renal disease, cardiovascular events, and risk for death. To gain insights into potential measurement biases, we systematically compared urine albumin measurements performed by LC-MS, a clinically available immunoturbidimetric assay, and size-exclusion HPLC.

METHODS

We obtained unused clinical urine samples from 150 patients who were stratified by degrees of albuminuria (<20 mg/L, 20-250 mg/L, >250 mg/L) as determined by the immunoturbidimetric assay used in our clinical laboratory (Roche Hitachi 912). Urine albumin was then remeasured via LC-MS and HPLC (Accumin) assays.

RESULTS

The immunoturbidimetric assay, calibrated using manufacturer-supplied serum-derived calibrators (Diasorin), underestimated albumin compared with LC-MS. After calibration with purified HSA, this immunoturbidimetric assay correlated well with LC-MS. HPLC overestimated albumin compared with both LC-MS and immunoturbidimetry. The current LC-MS and HPLC assays both performed poorly at concentrations <20 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts are needed to establish gold-standard traceable calibrators for clinical assays. LC-MS is a specific method to quantify albumin in native urine when concentrations exceed 20 mg/L, and therefore could be employed for standardization among assays.