1
|
Hoth KF, Ten Eyck P, Harland KK, Krishnadasan A, Rodriguez RM, Montoy JCC, Wendt LH, Mower W, Wallace K, Santibañez S, Talan DA, Mohr NM. Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298807. [PMID: 38626053 PMCID: PMC11020772 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic placed health care personnel (HCP) at risk for stress, anxiety, burnout, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To address this, hospitals developed programs to mitigate risk. The objectives of the current study were to measure the availability and use of these programs in a cohort of academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States early in the pandemic and identify factors associated with program use. METHODS Cross-sectional survey of ED HCP in 21 academic EDs in 15 states between June and September 2020. Site investigators provided data on the availability of 28 programs grouped into 9 categories. Individual support programs included: financial, workload mitigation, individual COVID-19 testing, emotional (e.g., mental health hotline), and instrumental (e.g., childcare) Clinical work support programs included: COVID-19 team communication (e.g., debriefing critical incident), patient-family communication facilitation, patient services (e.g., social work, ethics consultation), and system-level exposure reduction. Participants provided corresponding data on whether they used the programs. We used generalized linear mixed models clustered on site to measure the association between demographic and facility characteristics and program use. RESULTS We received 1,541 survey responses (96% response rate) from emergency physicians or advanced practice providers, nurses, and nonclinical staff. Program availability in each of the 9 categories was high (>95% of hospitals). Program use was variable, with clinical work support programs used more frequently (28-50% of eligible HCP across categories) than individual employee support programs (6-13% of eligible HCP across categories). Fifty-seven percent of respondents reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had affected their stress and anxiety, and 12% were at elevated risk for PTSD. Program use did not significantly differ for HCP who reported symptoms of anxiety and/or stress compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS Early in the pandemic, support programs were widely available to ED HCP, but program use was low. Future work will focus on identifying barriers and facilitators to use and specific programs most likely to be effective during periods of highest occupational stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin F. Hoth
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | - Patrick Ten Eyck
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | - Karisa K. Harland
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | - Anusha Krishnadasan
- Olive View-UCLA Education and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Robert M. Rodriguez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Juan Carlos C. Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Linder H. Wendt
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | - William Mower
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Kelli Wallace
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | - Scott Santibañez
- Division of Infectious Disease Readiness and Innovation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - David A. Talan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Nicholas M. Mohr
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang RC, Carlos C Montoy J, Rodriguez RM, Menegazzi JJ, Lacocque J, Dillon DG. Trends in Presumed Drug Overdose Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests in San Francisco, 2015-2023. Resuscitation 2024:110159. [PMID: 38458415 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Estimates of the prevalence of drug-related out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary, ranging from 1.8 - 10.0% of medical OHCA. However, studies conducted prior to the recent wave of fentanyl deaths likely underestimate the current prevalence of drug-related OHCA. We evaluated recent trends in drug-related OHCA, hypothesizing that the proportion of presumed drug-related OHCA treated by emergency medical services (EMS) has increased since 2015. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of OHCA patients treated by EMS providers in San Francisco, California between 2015 - 2023. Participants included OHCA cases in which resuscitation was attempted by EMS. The study exposure was the year of arrest. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of drug-related OHCA, defined as the EMS impression of OHCA caused by a presumed or known overdose of medication(s) or drug(s). RESULTS From 2015 to 2023, 5044 OHCA resuscitations attended by EMS (average 561 per year) met inclusion criteria. The median age was 65 (IQR 50-79); 3508 (69.6%) were male. The EMS impression of arrest etiology was drug-related in 446/5044 (8.8%) of OHCA. The prevalence of presumed drug-related OHCA increased significantly each year from 1% in 2015 to 17.6% in 2023 (p-value for trend = 0.0001). After adjustment, presumed drug-related OHCA increased by 30% each year from 2015-2023. CONCLUSION Drug-related OHCA is an increasingly common etiology of OHCA. In 2023, one in six OHCA was presumed to be drug related. Among participants less than 60 years old, one in three OHCA was presumed to be drug related.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
| | | | - Robert M Rodriguez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - James J Menegazzi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
| | - Jeremy Lacocque
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - David G Dillon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huebinger R, Ketterer AR, Hill MJ, Mann NC, Wang RC, Montoy JCC, Osborn L, Ugalde IT. National community disparities in prehospital penetrating trauma adjusted for income, 2020-2021. Am J Emerg Med 2024; 77:183-186. [PMID: 38163413 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While Black individuals experienced disproportionately increased firearm violence and deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic, less is known about community level disparities. We sought to evaluate national community race and ethnicity differences in 2020 and 2021 rates of penetrating trauma. METHODS We linked the 2018-2021 National Emergency Medical Services Information System databases to ZIP Code demographics. We stratified encounters into majority race/ethnicity communities (>50% White, Black, or Hispanic/Latino). We used logistic regression to compare penetrating trauma for each community in 2020 and 2021 to a combined 2018-2019 historical baseline. Majority Black and majority Hispanic/Latino communities were compared to majority White communities for each year. Analyses were adjusted for household income. RESULTS We included 87,504,097 encounters (259,449 penetrating traumas). All communities had increased odds of trauma in 2020 when compared to 2018-2019, but this increase was largest for Black communities (aOR 1.4, [1.3-1.4]; White communities - aOR 1.2, [1.2-1.3]; Hispanic/Latino communities - aOR 1.1. [1.1-1.2]). There was a similar trend of increased penetrating trauma in 2021 for Black (aOR 1.2, [1.2-1.3]); White (aOR 1.2, [1.1-1.2]); Hispanic/Latino (aOR 1.1, [1.1-1.1]). Comparing penetrating trauma in each year to White communities, Black communities had higher odds of trauma in all years (2018/2019 - aOR 3.0, [3.0-3.1]; 2020 - aOR 3.3, [3.3-3.4]; 2021 - aOR 3.3, [3.2-3.2]). Hispanic/Latino also had more trauma each year but to a lesser degree (2018/2019 - aOR 2.0, [2.0-2.0]; 2020 - aOR 1.8, [1.8-1.9]; 2021 - aOR 1.9, [1.8-1.9]). CONCLUSION Black communities were most impacted by increased penetrating trauma rates in 2020 and 2021 even after adjusting for income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Huebinger
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
| | - Andrew R Ketterer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Mandy J Hill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - N Clay Mann
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
| | - Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
| | - Lesley Osborn
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
| | - Irma T Ugalde
- Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Menegazzi JJ, Bosson N, Gausche-Hill M, Montoy JCC, Dillon DJG, Donofrio-Ödmann JJ, Salcido DD. Letter to the Editor: Vasopressors and Rearrest. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2023; 28:459-460. [PMID: 37797213 DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2023.2264925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- James J Menegazzi
- University of Pittsburgh - Emergency Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nichole Bosson
- University of Pittsburgh - Emergency Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - David J G Dillon
- University of Pittsburgh - Emergency Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - David D Salcido
- University of Pittsburgh - Emergency Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dillon DG, Wang RC, Shetty P, Douchee J, Rodriguez RM, Montoy JCC. Efficacy of emergency department calcium administration in cardiac arrest: A 9-year retrospective evaluation. Resuscitation 2023; 191:109933. [PMID: 37562663 PMCID: PMC10529187 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of empiric calcium for patients with undifferentiated cardiac arrest has come under increased scrutiny, including a randomized controlled trial that was stopped early due to a trend towards harm with calcium administration. However, small sample sizes and non-significant findings have hindered precise effect estimates. In this analysis we evaluate the association of calcium administration with survival in a large retrospective cohort of patients with cardiac arrest treated in the emergency department (ED). METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of medical records from two academic hospitals (one quaternary care center, one county trauma center) in San Francisco between 2011 and 2019. Inclusion criteria were patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years old who received treatment for cardiac arrest during their ED course. Our primary exposure was the administration of calcium while in the ED and the main outcome was survival to hospital admission. The association between calcium and survival to admission was estimated using a multivariable log-binomial regression, and also with two propensity score models. RESULTS We examined 781 patients with cardiac arrest treated in San Francisco EDs between 2011 and 2019 and found that calcium administration was associated with decreased survival to hospital admission (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.66-0.82). These findings remained significant after adjustment for patient age, sex, whether the cardiac arrest was witnessed, and including an interaction term for shockable cardiac rhythms (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.50-0.72) and non-shockable cardiac rhythms (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76-0.99). Risk ratios for the association between calcium and survival to hospital admission were also similar between two propensity score-based models: nearest neighbor propensity matching model (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68-0.89) and inverse propensity weighted regression adjustment model (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.67-0.84). CONCLUSIONS Calcium administration as part of ED-directed treatment for cardiac arrest was associated with lower survival to hospital admission. Given the lack of statistically significant outcomes from smaller, more methodologically robust evaluations on this topic, we believe these findings have an important role to serve in confirming previous results and allowing for more precise effect estimates. Our data adds to the growing body evidence against the empiric use of calcium in cardiac arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Dillon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
| | - Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pranav Shetty
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Jeremiah Douchee
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert M Rodriguez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Montoy JCC, Ford J, Yu H, Gottlieb M, Morse D, Santangelo M, O’Laughlin KN, Schaeffer K, Logan P, Rising K, Hill MJ, Wisk LE, Salah W, Idris AH, Huebinger RM, Spatz ES, Rodriguez RM, Klabbers RE, Gatling K, Wang RC, Elmore JG, McDonald SA, Stephens KA, Weinstein RA, Venkatesh AK, Saydah S. Prevalence of Symptoms ≤12 Months After Acute Illness, by COVID-19 Testing Status Among Adults - United States, December 2020-March 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 72:859-865. [PMID: 37561663 PMCID: PMC10415002 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7232a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
To further the understanding of post-COVID conditions, and provide a more nuanced description of symptom progression, resolution, emergence, and reemergence after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-like illness, analysts examined data from the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE), a prospective multicenter cohort study. This report includes analysis of data on self-reported symptoms collected from 1,296 adults with COVID-like illness who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using a Food and Drug Administration-approved polymerase chain reaction or antigen test at the time of enrollment and reported symptoms at 3-month intervals for 12 months. Prevalence of any symptom decreased substantially between baseline and the 3-month follow-up, from 98.4% to 48.2% for persons who received a positive SARS-CoV-2 test results (COVID test-positive participants) and from 88.2% to 36.6% for persons who received negative SARS-CoV-2 test results (COVID test-negative participants). Persistent symptoms decreased through 12 months; no difference between the groups was observed at 12 months (prevalence among COVID test-positive and COVID test-negative participants = 18.3% and 16.1%, respectively; p>0.05). Both groups reported symptoms that emerged or reemerged at 6, 9, and 12 months. Thus, these symptoms are not unique to COVID-19 or to post-COVID conditions. Awareness that symptoms might persist for up to 12 months, and that many symptoms might emerge or reemerge in the year after COVID-like illness, can assist health care providers in understanding the clinical signs and symptoms associated with post-COVID-like conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE) Group
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; Center for Connected Care, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Clinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gottlieb M, Spatz ES, Yu H, Wisk LE, Elmore JG, Gentile NL, Hill M, Huebinger RM, Idris AH, Kean ER, Koo K, Li SX, McDonald S, Montoy JCC, Nichol G, O’Laughlin KN, Plumb ID, Rising KL, Santangelo M, Saydah S, Wang RC, Venkatesh A, Stephens KA, Weinstein RA. Long COVID Clinical Phenotypes up to 6 Months After Infection Identified by Latent Class Analysis of Self-Reported Symptoms. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad277. [PMID: 37426952 PMCID: PMC10327879 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The prevalence, incidence, and interrelationships of persistent symptoms after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection vary. There are limited data on specific phenotypes of persistent symptoms. Using latent class analysis (LCA) modeling, we sought to identify whether specific phenotypes of COVID-19 were present 3 months and 6 months post-infection. Methods This was a multicenter study of symptomatic adults tested for SARS-CoV-2 with prospectively collected data on general symptoms and fatigue-related symptoms up to 6 months postdiagnosis. Using LCA, we identified symptomatically homogenous groups among COVID-positive and COVID-negative participants at each time period for both general and fatigue-related symptoms. Results Among 5963 baseline participants (4504 COVID-positive and 1459 COVID-negative), 4056 had 3-month and 2856 had 6-month data at the time of analysis. We identified 4 distinct phenotypes of post-COVID conditions (PCCs) at 3 and 6 months for both general and fatigue-related symptoms; minimal-symptom groups represented 70% of participants at 3 and 6 months. When compared with the COVID-negative cohort, COVID-positive participants had higher occurrence of loss of taste/smell and cognition problems. There was substantial class-switching over time; those in 1 symptom class at 3 months were equally likely to remain or enter a new phenotype at 6 months. Conclusions We identified distinct classes of PCC phenotypes for general and fatigue-related symptoms. Most participants had minimal or no symptoms at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Significant proportions of participants changed symptom groups over time, suggesting that symptoms present during the acute illness may differ from prolonged symptoms and that PCCs may have a more dynamic nature than previously recognized. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04610515.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Erica S Spatz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health,New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine,New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Huihui Yu
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine,New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lauren E Wisk
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joann G Elmore
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicole L Gentile
- Post-COVID Rehabilitation and Recovery Clinic, Department of Family Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mandy Hill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Ahamed H Idris
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Efrat R Kean
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shu-Xia Li
- Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine,New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Samuel McDonald
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Clinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Graham Nichol
- Departments of Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kelli N O’Laughlin
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ian D Plumb
- National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kristin L Rising
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Connected Care, Sidney Kimmel Medical School, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michelle Santangelo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sharon Saydah
- National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Arjun Venkatesh
- Yale Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine,New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kari A Stephens
- Departments of Family Medicine, Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert A Weinstein
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- The CORE Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang RC, Gottlieb M, Montoy JCC, Rodriguez RM, Yu H, Spatz ES, Chandler CW, Elmore JG, Hannikainen PA, Chang AM, Hill M, Huebinger RM, Idris AH, Koo K, Li SX, McDonald S, Nichol G, O’Laughlin KN, Plumb ID, Santangelo M, Saydah S, Stephens KA, Venkatesh AK, Weinstein RA. Association Between SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Frequency of Acute Symptoms: Analysis of a Multi-institutional Prospective Cohort Study-December 20, 2020-June 20, 2022. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad275. [PMID: 37426947 PMCID: PMC10327880 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While prior work examining severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern focused on hospitalization and death, less is known about differences in clinical presentation. We compared the prevalence of acute symptoms across pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron. Methods We conducted an analysis of the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE), a cohort study enrolling symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive participants. We determined the association between the pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron time periods and the prevalence of 21 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute symptoms. Results We enrolled 4113 participants from December 2020 to June 2022. Pre-Delta vs Delta vs Omicron participants had increasing sore throat (40.9%, 54.6%, 70.6%; P < .001), cough (50.9%, 63.3%, 66.7%; P < .001), and runny noses (48.9%, 71.3%, 72.9%; P < .001). We observed reductions during Omicron in chest pain (31.1%, 24.2%, 20.9%; P < .001), shortness of breath (42.7%, 29.5%, 27.5%; P < .001), loss of taste (47.1%, 61.8%, 19.2%; P < .001), and loss of smell (47.5%, 55.6%, 20.0%; P < .001). After adjustment, those infected during Omicron had significantly higher odds of sore throat vs pre-Delta (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; 95% CI, 2.26-3.35) and Delta (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.69-2.28). Conclusions Participants infected during Omicron were more likely to report symptoms of common respiratory viruses, such as sore throat, and less likely to report loss of smell and taste. Trial registration NCT04610515.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert M Rodriguez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Huihui Yu
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Erica S Spatz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Christopher W Chandler
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joann G Elmore
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Paavali A Hannikainen
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anna Marie Chang
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mandy Hill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ryan M Huebinger
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ahamed H Idris
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Katherine Koo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shu-Xia Li
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Samuel McDonald
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Graham Nichol
- Departments of Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kelli N O’Laughlin
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ian D Plumb
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michelle Santangelo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sharon Saydah
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kari A Stephens
- Departments of Family Medicine and Biomedical Informatics & Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Arjun K Venkatesh
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Robert A Weinstein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gottlieb M, Wang RC, Yu H, Spatz ES, Montoy JCC, Rodriguez RM, Chang AM, Elmore JG, Hannikainen PA, Hill M, Huebinger RM, Idris AH, Lin Z, Koo K, McDonald S, O’Laughlin KN, Plumb ID, Santangelo M, Saydah S, Willis M, Wisk LE, Venkatesh A, Stephens KA, Weinstein RA. Severe Fatigue and Persistent Symptoms at 3 Months Following Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infections During the Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron Time Periods: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:1930-1941. [PMID: 36705268 PMCID: PMC10249989 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most research on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants focuses on initial symptomatology with limited longer-term data. We characterized prevalences of prolonged symptoms 3 months post-SARS-CoV-2 infection across 3 variant time-periods (pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron). METHODS This multicenter prospective cohort study of adults with acute illness tested for SARS-CoV-2 compared fatigue severity, fatigue symptoms, organ system-based symptoms, and ≥3 symptoms across variants among participants with a positive ("COVID-positive") or negative SARS-CoV-2 test ("COVID-negative") at 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 testing. Variant periods were defined by dates with ≥50% dominant strain. We performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to estimate independent effects of variants adjusting for sociodemographics, baseline health, and vaccine status. RESULTS The study included 2402 COVID-positive and 821 COVID-negative participants. Among COVID-positives, 463 (19.3%) were pre-Delta, 1198 (49.9%) Delta, and 741 (30.8%) Omicron. The pre-Delta COVID-positive cohort exhibited more prolonged severe fatigue (16.7% vs 11.5% vs 12.3%; P = .017) and presence of ≥3 prolonged symptoms (28.4% vs 21.7% vs 16.0%; P < .001) compared with the Delta and Omicron cohorts. No differences were seen in the COVID-negatives across time-periods. In multivariable models adjusted for vaccination, severe fatigue and odds of having ≥3 symptoms were no longer significant across variants. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection were more common among participants infected during pre-Delta than with Delta and Omicron; however, these differences were no longer significant after adjusting for vaccination status, suggesting a beneficial effect of vaccination on risk of long-term symptoms. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04610515.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Huihui Yu
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Erica S Spatz
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert M Rodriguez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California – San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Anna Marie Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joann G Elmore
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California – Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Paavali A Hannikainen
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mandy Hill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ryan M Huebinger
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ahamed H Idris
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Katherine Koo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Samuel McDonald
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Clinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kelli N O’Laughlin
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ian D Plumb
- National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michelle Santangelo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sharon Saydah
- National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael Willis
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lauren E Wisk
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California – Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Arjun Venkatesh
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kari A Stephens
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robert A Weinstein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Murphy CE, Coralic Z, Wang RC, Montoy JCC, Ramirez B, Raven MC. Extended-Release Naltrexone and Case Management for Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med 2023; 81:440-449. [PMID: 36328851 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of initiating treatment for alcohol use disorder with extended-release naltrexone and case management services in the emergency department (ED) and measure the intervention's impact on daily alcohol consumption and quality of life. METHODS This is a 12-week prospective open-label single-arm study of a multimodal treatment for alcohol use disorder consisting of monthly extended-release naltrexone injections and case management services initiated at an urban academic ED. Participants were actively drinking adult patients in ED with known or suspected alcohol use disorder and an AUDIT-C score more than 4. The main feasibility outcomes included the rates of participant enrollment, retention in the study, and continuing treatment after study completion. Efficacy outcomes were the change in daily alcohol consumption (drinks per day; 14 g ethanol per drink), measured by a 14-day timeline followback, and the change in quality of life measured with a single-item Kemp quality of life scale. RESULTS One hundred seventy-nine patients were approached, and 32 were enrolled (18%). Of the 32 enrolled patients, 25 (78%) completed all visits, and 22 (69%) continued naltrexone after the trial. The mean baseline daily alcohol consumption was 7.6 drinks per day (interquartile range, 4.5, 13.4), and the mean quality of life was 3.6 (SD 1.7) on a 7-point scale. The median daily alcohol consumption change was -7.5 drinks per day (Hodges-Lehmann 95% confidence interval -8.6, -5.9). The mean quality of life change was 1.2 points (95% confidence interval 0.5, 1.9; P<.01). CONCLUSION We found that initiation of treatment of alcohol use disorder with extended-release naltrexone and case management is feasible in an ED setting and observed significant reductions in drinking with improved quality of life in the short term. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E Murphy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Zlatan Coralic
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Bianca Ramirez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Maria C Raven
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wisk LE, Gottlieb MA, Spatz ES, Yu H, Wang RC, Slovis BH, Saydah S, Plumb ID, O’Laughlin KN, Montoy JCC, McDonald SA, Lin Z, Lin JMS, Koo K, Idris AH, Huebinger RM, Hill MJ, Gentile NL, Chang AM, Anderson J, Hota B, Venkatesh AK, Weinstein RA, Elmore JG, Nichol G. Association of Initial SARS-CoV-2 Test Positivity With Patient-Reported Well-being 3 Months After a Symptomatic Illness. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2244486. [PMID: 36454572 PMCID: PMC9716377 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Long-term sequelae after symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection may impact well-being, yet existing data primarily focus on discrete symptoms and/or health care use. OBJECTIVE To compare patient-reported outcomes of physical, mental, and social well-being among adults with symptomatic illness who received a positive vs negative test result for SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study was a planned interim analysis of an ongoing multicenter prospective longitudinal registry study (the Innovative Support for Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry [INSPIRE]). Participants were enrolled from December 11, 2020, to September 10, 2021, and comprised adults (aged ≥18 years) with acute symptoms suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of receipt of a SARS-CoV-2 test approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The analysis included the first 1000 participants who completed baseline and 3-month follow-up surveys consisting of questions from the 29-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29; 7 subscales, including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social participation, sleep disturbance, and pain interference) and the PROMIS Short Form-Cognitive Function 8a scale, for which population-normed T scores were reported. EXPOSURES SARS-CoV-2 status (positive or negative test result) at enrollment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mean PROMIS scores for participants with positive COVID-19 tests vs negative COVID-19 tests were compared descriptively and using multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS Among 1000 participants, 722 (72.2%) received a positive COVID-19 result and 278 (27.8%) received a negative result; 406 of 998 participants (40.7%) were aged 18 to 34 years, 644 of 972 (66.3%) were female, 833 of 984 (84.7%) were non-Hispanic, and 685 of 974 (70.3%) were White. A total of 282 of 712 participants (39.6%) in the COVID-19-positive group and 147 of 275 participants (53.5%) in the COVID-19-negative group reported persistently poor physical, mental, or social well-being at 3-month follow-up. After adjustment, improvements in well-being were statistically and clinically greater for participants in the COVID-19-positive group vs the COVID-19-negative group only for social participation (β = 3.32; 95% CI, 1.84-4.80; P < .001); changes in other well-being domains were not clinically different between groups. Improvements in well-being in the COVID-19-positive group were concentrated among participants aged 18 to 34 years (eg, social participation: β = 3.90; 95% CI, 1.75-6.05; P < .001) and those who presented for COVID-19 testing in an ambulatory setting (eg, social participation: β = 4.16; 95% CI, 2.12-6.20; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, participants in both the COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative groups reported persistently poor physical, mental, or social well-being at 3-month follow-up. Although some individuals had clinically meaningful improvements over time, many reported moderate to severe impairments in well-being 3 months later. These results highlight the importance of including a control group of participants with negative COVID-19 results for comparison when examining the sequelae of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E. Wisk
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles
| | - Michael A. Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Erica S. Spatz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Huihui Yu
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ralph C. Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Benjamin H. Slovis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sharon Saydah
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ian D. Plumb
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kelli N. O’Laughlin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Juan Carlos C. Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Samuel A. McDonald
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Clinical Informatics Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Zhenqiu Lin
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jin-Mann S. Lin
- National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katherine Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ahamed H. Idris
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Ryan M. Huebinger
- Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Mandy J. Hill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Nicole L. Gentile
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Anna Marie Chang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jill Anderson
- Department of Medicine, Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Arjun K. Venkatesh
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Robert A. Weinstein
- Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joann G. Elmore
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles
| | - Graham Nichol
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Department of Medicine, Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mohr NM, Krishnadasan A, Harland KK, Ten Eyck P, Mower WR, Schrading WA, Montoy JCC, McDonald LC, Kutty PK, Hesse E, Santibanez S, Weissman DN, Slev P, Talan DA. Emergency department personnel patient care-related COVID-19 risk. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0271597. [PMID: 35867681 PMCID: PMC9307202 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Emergency department (ED) health care personnel (HCP) are at risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this study was to determine the attributable risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from providing ED care, describe personal protective equipment use, and identify modifiable ED risk factors. We hypothesized that providing ED patient care increases the probability of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of 1,673 ED physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), nurses, and nonclinical staff at 20 U.S. centers over 20 weeks (May to December 2020; before vaccine availability) to detect a four-percentage point increased SARS-CoV-2 incidence among HCP related to direct patient care. Participants provided monthly nasal and serology specimens and weekly exposure and procedure information. We used multivariable regression and recursive partitioning to identify risk factors. RESULTS Over 29,825 person-weeks, 75 participants (4.5%) acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection (31 were asymptomatic). Physicians/APPs (aOR 1.07; 95% CI 0.56-2.03) did not have higher risk of becoming infected compared to nonclinical staff, but nurses had a marginally increased risk (aOR 1.91; 95% CI 0.99-3.68). Over 99% of participants used CDC-recommended personal protective equipment (PPE), but PPE lapses occurred in 22.1% of person-weeks and 32.1% of SARS-CoV-2-infected patient intubations. The following factors were associated with infection: household SARS-CoV-2 exposure; hospital and community SARS-CoV-2 burden; community exposure; and mask non-use in public. SARS-CoV-2 intubation was not associated with infection (attributable risk fraction 13.8%; 95% CI -2.0-38.2%), and nor were PPE lapses. CONCLUSIONS Among unvaccinated U.S. ED HCP during the height of the pandemic, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar in nonclinical staff and HCP engaged in direct patient care. Many identified risk factors were related to community exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas M. Mohr
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Anusha Krishnadasan
- Olive View-UCLA Education and Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Karisa K. Harland
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America
| | - Patrick Ten Eyck
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America
| | - William R. Mower
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Walter A. Schrading
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama and Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America
| | - Juan Carlos C. Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - L. Clifford McDonald
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Preeta K. Kutty
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Elisabeth Hesse
- Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Scott Santibanez
- Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - David N. Weissman
- Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States of America
| | - Patricia Slev
- ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - David A. Talan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America
- Olive View-UCLA Education and Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ronald Reagan-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Montoy JCC, Shen YC, Hsia RY. Trends in Inequities in the Treatment of and Outcomes for Women and Minorities with Myocardial Infarction. Ann Emerg Med 2022; 80:108-117. [PMID: 35750557 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To test whether the differences across sex and race in the treatment of and outcomes for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have changed over a recent decade. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with a diagnosis of STEMI or NSTEMI in California from 2005 to 2015 using the Office of State Health Planning and Development dataset. Using multivariable linear regression with county-fixed effects, we measured the baseline and change over time in the proportions of patients with STEMI or NSTEMI who underwent appropriately-timed coronary angiography (day of admission and within 3 days of admission, respectively) and survived at 1 year according to sex and race (Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White) and adjusting for comorbidities, payor, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS We analyzed 159,068 STEMI and 294,068 NSTEMI presentations. In 2005, 50.0% of 12,329 men and 35.7% of 6,939 women with STEMI and 45.0% of 14,379 men and 33.1% of 10,674 women with NSTEMI underwent timely angiography. In 2015, 76.7% of 6,257 men and 66.8% of 2,808 women with STEMI underwent timely angiography and 56.3% of 13,889 men and 45.9% of 9,334 women with NSTEMI underwent timely angiography. In 2005, 1-year survival was 82.3% for men and 69.6% for women after STEMI; in 2013, 1-year survival was 88.1% for men and 79.1% for women. In the multivariable model, the baseline difference was 1.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2 to 1.9), and survival increased for women compared with men by 0.3 percentage points per year (95% CI 0.2 to 0.5). In 2005, 46.0% (5,878) of 12,789 White patients and 31.2% (330) of 1,057 Black patients with STEMI underwent timely angiography; in 2015 75.2% of 3,928 White patients and 69.2% of 522 Black patients underwent timely angiography for STEMI. In the multivariable model, this difference was 6.4 percentage points at baseline (95% CI 4.5 to 8.3), and the probability of undergoing timely angiography for Black patients increased by 0.3 percentage points per year (95% CI -0.1 to 0.6). CONCLUSION Despite overall improvements in the treatment of and outcomes for STEMI and NSTEMI, disparities persist in the treatment of and outcomes for both the conditions, particularly for women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yu-Chu Shen
- Graduate School of Business and Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA
| | - Renee Y Hsia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dillon DG, Porto GD, Eswaran V, Shay C, Montoy JCC. Identification and Treatment of Opioid-Associated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Emergency Medical Service Protocols. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2214351. [PMID: 35622369 PMCID: PMC9142866 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This cross-sectional study reviews emergency medical services (EMS) treatment protocols for adults presenting with cardiac arrest or overdose to evaluate whether current protocols include the consideration of opioid overdose for patients with possible out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G. Dillon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Gustavo D. Porto
- Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut
| | - Vidya Eswaran
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Courtney Shay
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Montoy JCC, Shen YC, Krumholz HM, Hsia RY. Association of STEMI regionalization of care with de facto NSTEMI regionalization. Am Heart J 2021; 242:1-5. [PMID: 34274313 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The regionalization of care for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may unintentionally concentrate patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) into percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capable hospitals. This could lead to benefits such as increased access to PCI-capable hospitals, but could cause harms such as crowding in some hospitals with decreased patient volume and revenue in others. We set out to assess whether STEMI regionalization programs concentrated patients with NSTEMI at STEMI-receiving hospitals.
Collapse
|
16
|
Yusuf HM, Geier C, Staidle A, Montoy JCC. Efficacy of topical capsaicin for the treatment of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: A retrospective cohort study. Am J Emerg Med 2021; 43:142-148. [PMID: 33561623 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) is a clinical disorder characterized by abdominal pain and intractable vomiting among patients with chronic marijuana use. We sought to assess the efficacy of capsaicin to determine whether it could reduce ED length of stay in patients with CHS. METHODS his retrospective observational study was conducted among patients with CHS. Patients were classified based on whether they received capsaicin, which was pseudorandomized and dependent on the pharmacist available. Outcomes included time to discharge, number of medications given, bounceback rate, and admission rate. Statistical analyses included t-tests, survival analyses, and cox regressions. RESULTS 55 patients (35 capsaicin, 20 no capsaicin) met inclusion criteria. There was no difference in time to discharge between the experimental and control groups (4.46 h vs 3.52 h, p = 0.10), rounds of medications given (2.60 vs 3.54, p = 0.09), bounceback rate within 24 h (0.11 vs 0.10, p = 0.43), or admission rate to the hospital (0.19 vs 0.05, p = 0.07). A survival analysis and cox regression showed no difference in time to discharge. A subgroup analysis between patients who received capsaicin within their first two rounds of treatment had statistically significantly shorter length of stays than patients who received capsaicin afterwards, (4.83 h vs 7.09 h, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Topical capsaicin was not associated with shorter length of stays than no capsaicin. When given earlier during an ED visit, it is associated with a shorter length of stay than when given later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamzah M Yusuf
- University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
| | - Curtis Geier
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
| | - Alex Staidle
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rodriguez RM, Montoy JCC, Hoth KF, Talan DA, Harland KK, Eyck PT, Mower W, Krishnadasan A, Santibanez S, Mohr N. Symptoms of Anxiety, Burnout, and PTSD and the Mitigation Effect of Serologic Testing in Emergency Department Personnel During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ann Emerg Med 2021; 78:35-43.e2. [PMID: 33846014 PMCID: PMC7862892 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Study Objective Among a comprehensive range of frontline emergency department health care personnel, we assessed symptoms of anxiety and burnout, specific coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) work-related stressors, and risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We also determined whether COVID-19 serologic testing of HCP decreased their self-reported anxiety. Methods In a prospective cohort study from May 13, 2020, to July 8, 2020, we used electronic surveys to capture participant self-reported symptoms before and after serologic testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibodies. Participants were physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and nonclinical ED personnel at 20 geographically diverse United States EDs. We evaluated these domains: 1) the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on overall stress and anxiety; 2) COVID-19-related work stressors; 3) burnout; and 4) PTSD risk (measured using the Primary Care-PTSD Screen for DSM-5, a 5-item screening instrument in which a score of ≥3 signifies high risk for PTSD). We also assessed perceptions of whether results of COVID-19 antibody testing decreased participants’ self-reported anxiety. Results Of 1,606 participants, 100% and 88% responded to the baseline and follow-up surveys, respectively. At baseline, approximately half (46%) reported symptoms of emotional exhaustion and burnout from their work, and 308 (19.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.3% to 21.1%) respondents screened positive for increased PTSD risk. Female respondents were more likely than males to screen positive (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.78). Common concerns included exposing their family and the health of coworkers diagnosed with COVID-19. After receiving antibody test results, 54% (95% CI 51.8 to 56.7) somewhat agreed, agreed, or strongly agreed that knowledge of their immune status had decreased their anxiety. A positive serology result indicating prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a higher likelihood of reporting decreased anxiety (2.83, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.83). Conclusion Symptoms of anxiety and burnout were prevalent across the spectrum of ED staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. One-fifth of ED personnel appeared to be at risk for PTSD. Increased provision of serologic testing may help to mitigate anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Rodriguez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA.
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Karin F Hoth
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
| | - David A Talan
- Olive View-UCLA Education and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles Ronald Reagan Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Karisa K Harland
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
| | - Patrick Ten Eyck
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
| | - William Mower
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles Ronald Reagan Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Scott Santibanez
- Division of Preparedness and Emerging Infections, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Nicholas Mohr
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Montoy JCC, Shen YC, Brindis RG, Krumholz HM, Hsia RY. Impact of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Regionalization Programs on the Treatment and Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e016932. [PMID: 33470136 PMCID: PMC7955417 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.120.016932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Many communities have implemented systems of regionalized care to improve access to timely care for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. However, patients who are ultimately diagnosed with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMIs) may also be affected, and the impact of regionalization programs on NSTEMI treatment and outcomes is unknown. We set out to determine the effects of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization schemes on treatment and outcomes of patients diagnosed with NSTEMIs. Methods and Results The cohort included all patients receiving care in emergency departments diagnosed with an NSTEMI at all nonfederal hospitals in California from January 1, 2005 to September 30, 2015. Data were analyzed using a difference-in-differences approach. The main outcomes were 1-year mortality and angiography within 3 days of the index admission. A total of 293 589 patients with NSTEMIs received care in regionalized and nonregionalized communities. Over the study period, rates of early angiography increased by 0.5 and mortality decreased by 0.9 percentage points per year among the overall population (95% CI, 0.4-0.6 and -1.0 to -0.8, respectively). Regionalization was not associated with early angiography (-0.5%; 95% CI, -1.1 to 0.1) or death (0.2%; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.8). Conclusions ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization programs were not statistically associated with changes in guideline-recommended early angiography or changes in risk of death for patients with NSTEMI. Increases in the proportion of patients with NSTEMI who underwent guideline-directed angiography and decreases in risk of mortality were accounted for by secular trends unrelated to regionalization policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yu-Chu Shen
- Graduate School of Defense Management, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey CA.,National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge MA
| | - Ralph G Brindis
- Department of Medicine University of California, San Francisco CA.,Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies University of California, San Francisco CA
| | - Harlan M Krumholz
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Internal Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.,Department of Health Policy and Management Yale School of Public Health New Haven CT.,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation Yale-New Haven Hospital New Haven CT
| | - Renee Y Hsia
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of California, San Francisco CA.,Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies University of California, San Francisco CA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rodriguez RM, Tseng ZH, Montoy JCC, Repplinger D, Moffatt E, Addo N, Wang RC. NAloxone CARdiac Arrest Decision Instruments (NACARDI) for targeted antidotal therapy in occult opioid overdose precipitated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2021; 159:69-76. [PMID: 33359417 DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have recently demonstrated that a significant proportion of fatal out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) are precipitated by occult overdose, which could benefit from antidote therapy administered adjunctively with other cardiac resuscitation measures. We sought to develop simple decision instruments that EMS providers and other first responders can use to rapidly identify occult opioid overdose-associated OHCAs. METHODS We examined data from February 2011 through December 2017 in the Postmortem Systematic Investigation of Sudden Cardiac Death study, in which San Francisco (California) County EMS-attended OHCA deaths received autopsy and expert panel adjudication of cause of death. Using classification tree analyses, we derived highly sensitive and specific decision instruments that predicted our primary outcome of occult opioid OD-associated OHCA. We then calculated screening performance characteristics of these instruments. RESULTS Of 767 OHCA deaths, 80 (10.4%) were associated with occult opioid overdose. Of the eight models with 100% sensitivity for opioid overdose-associated cardiac arrest, the highest specificity model (23.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 20.3-26.7%) was age < 60 years OR race = black or non-Latinx white OR arrest in public place. The highest specificity instrument (96.3%, 95% CI 94.6-97.5%) consisting of age < 60 years AND race = black or non-Latinx white AND unwitnessed arrest AND female sex had 25% (95% CI 16-35.9%) sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS We have derived simple decision instruments that can identify patients whose OHCA precipitant was occult opioid overdose. These instruments may be used to guide selective administration of the antidote naloxone in OHCA resuscitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Rodriguez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
| | - Zian H Tseng
- Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Daniel Repplinger
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Ellen Moffatt
- Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, City and County of San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Newton Addo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | - Ralph C Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rodriguez RM, Montoy JCC, Repplinger D, Dave S, Moffatt E, Tseng ZH. Occult Overdose Masquerading as Sudden Cardiac Death: From the POstmortem Systematic InvesTigation of Sudden Cardiac Death Study. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173:941-944. [PMID: 32777183 DOI: 10.7326/m20-0977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Rodriguez
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (R.M.R., J.C.M., D.R., S.D., Z.H.T.)
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (R.M.R., J.C.M., D.R., S.D., Z.H.T.)
| | - Daniel Repplinger
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (R.M.R., J.C.M., D.R., S.D., Z.H.T.)
| | - Shiktij Dave
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (R.M.R., J.C.M., D.R., S.D., Z.H.T.)
| | - Ellen Moffatt
- Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco, California (E.M.)
| | - Zian H Tseng
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (R.M.R., J.C.M., D.R., S.D., Z.H.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rodriguez RM, Chan V, Wong AHK, Montoy JCC. A Review of Journal Impact Metrics and Characteristics to Assist Emergency Medicine Investigators with Manuscript Submission Decisions. West J Emerg Med 2020; 21:877-882. [PMID: 32726259 PMCID: PMC7390583 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction A crucial, yet subjective and non-evidence-based, decision for researchers is where to submit their original research manuscripts. The approach of submitting to journals in descending order of impact factor (IF) is a common but imperfect strategy. The validity of the IF as a measure of journal quality and significance is suspect, and a number of other journal impact scores have emerged, such that no one scale is universally accepted. Furthermore, practical considerations, such as likelihood of manuscript acceptance rates and times for decisions, may influence how authors prioritize journals. In this report, we sought to 1) review emergency medicine (EM) journal impact metrics, and 2) provide a comprehensive list of pertinent journal characteristics that may influence researchers’ choice of submission. Methods We systematically reviewed five impact metrics (IF, H Index, CiteScore, Source-Normalized Impact per Paper, and SCImago Journal Rank) and other relevant characteristics of 20 EM journals. Results We found good to excellent agreement in ordinal rankings of four of the journal impact metrics, as measured by the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The median acceptance rate for original research manuscripts in the EM category was 25% (interquartile range [IQR] 18, 31%), and the median initial decision time was 33 days (IQR 18, 56 days). Fourteen EM journals (70%) accepted brief reports, and 15 (75%) accepted case reports/images. Conclusion We recommend replication, expansion, and formalization of this repository of information for EM investigators in a continuously updated, open-access forum sponsored by an independent organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Rodriguez
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Virginia Chan
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Angela H K Wong
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Montoy JCC, Coralic Z, Herring AA, Clattenburg EJ, Raven MC. Association of Default Electronic Medical Record Settings With Health Care Professional Patterns of Opioid Prescribing in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Quality Improvement Study. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180:487-493. [PMID: 31961377 PMCID: PMC6990860 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Prescription opioids play a significant role in the ongoing opioid crisis. Guidelines and physician education have had mixed success in curbing opioid prescriptions, highlighting the need for other tools that can change prescriber behavior, including nudges based in behavioral economics. OBJECTIVE To determine whether and to what extent changes in the default settings in the electronic medical record (EMR) are associated with opioid prescriptions for patients discharged from emergency departments (EDs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This quality improvement study randomly altered, during a series of five 4-week blocks, the prepopulated dispense quantities of discharge prescriptions for commonly prescribed opioids at 2 large, urban EDs. These changes were made without announcement, and prescribers were not informed of the study itself. Participants included all health care professionals (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) working clinically in either of the 2 EDs. Data were collected from November 28, 2016, through July 9, 2017, and analyzed from July 16, 2017, through May 14, 2018. INTERVENTIONS Default quantities for opioids were changed from status quo quantities of 12 and 20 tablets to null, 5, 10, and 15 tablets according to a block randomization scheme. Regardless of the default quantity, each health care professional decided for whom to prescribe opioids and could modify the quantity prescribed without restriction. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the number of tablets of opioid-containing medications prescribed under each default setting. RESULTS A total of 104 health care professionals wrote 4320 prescriptions for opioids during the study period. Using linear regression, an increase of 0.19 tablets prescribed (95% CI, 0.15-0.22) was found for each tablet increase in default quantity. When evaluating each of the 15 pairwise comparisons of default quantities (eg, 5 vs 15 tablets), a lower default was associated with a lower number of pills prescribed in more than half (8 of the 15) of the pairwise comparisons; there was a higher quantity in 1 and no difference in 6 comparisons. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that default settings in the EMR may influence the quantity of opioids prescribed by health care professionals. This low-cost, easily implementable, EMR-based intervention could have far-reaching implications for opioid prescribing and could be used as a tool to help combat the opioid epidemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04155229.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zlatan Coralic
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Andrew A Herring
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Oakland, California
| | - Eben J Clattenburg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital-Alameda Health System, Oakland, California.,Tuba City Regional Health Care Corporation, Tuba City, Arizona
| | - Maria C Raven
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Many HIV positive individuals are still undiagnosed, which has led health systems to try many approaches to expand HIV testing. In a randomized controlled trial, we found that behavioral economics interventions (opt-out testing and financial incentives) each improved HIV testing rates and these approaches are being implemented by several hospital systems. However, it is unclear if these strategies are cost-effective. We quantified the cost-effectiveness of different behavioral approaches to HIV screening-opt-out testing, financial incentives, and their combination-in terms of cost per new HIV diagnosis and infections averted. We estimated the incremental number of new HIV diagnoses and program costs using a mathematical screening model, and infections averted using and HIV transmission model. We used a 1-year time horizon and a hospital perspective. Switching from opt-into opt-out results in 39 additional diagnoses (56% increase) after 1-year at a cost of $3807 per new diagnosis. Switching from no incentive to a $1, $5, or $10 incentive adds 14, 13, and 28 new diagnoses (20, 19, and 41% increases) at a cost of $11,050, $17,984, and $15,298 per new diagnosis, respectively. Layering on financial incentives to opt-out testing enhances program effectiveness, though at a greater marginal cost per diagnosis. We found a similar pattern for infections averted. This is one of the first cost-effectiveness analyses of behavioral economics interventions in public health. Changing the choice architecture from opt-into opt-out and giving financial incentives for testing are both cost-effective in terms of detecting HIV and reducing transmission. For hospitals interested in increasing HIV screening rates, changing the choice architecture is an efficient strategy and more efficient than incentives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Wagner
- RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA, 90401, USA.
| | - Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emmanuel F Drabo
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William H Dow
- School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Montoy JCC, Tamayo-Sarver J, Miller GA, Baer AE, Peabody CR. Predicting Emergency Department "Bouncebacks": A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. West J Emerg Med 2019; 20:865-874. [PMID: 31738713 PMCID: PMC6860392 DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2019.8.43221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The short-term return visit rate among patients discharged from emergency departments (ED) is a quality metric and target for interventions. The ability to accurately identify which patients are more likely to revisit the ED could allow EDs and health systems to develop more focused interventions, but efforts to reduce revisits have not yet found success. Whether patients with a high number of ED visits are at increased risk of a return visit remains underexplored. METHODS This was a population-based, retrospective, cohort study using administrative data from a large physician partnership. We included patients discharged from EDs from 80 hospitals in seven states from July 2014 - June 2016. We performed multivariable logistic regression of short-term return visits on patient, visit, hospital, and community characteristics. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had a return visit within 14 days of an index ED visit. RESULTS Among 6,699,717 index visits, the overall risk of 14-day revisit was 12.6%. Frequent visitors accounted for 18.7% of all visits and 40.2% of all 14-day revisits. Frequent visitor status was associated with the highest odds of a revisit (odds ratio [OR] 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.041 - 3.073). Other predictors of revisits were cellulitis (OR 2.131; 95% CI, 2.106 - 2.156), alcohol-related disorders (OR 1.579; 95%CI, 1.548 - 1.610), congestive heart failure (OR 1.175; 95% CI, 1.126 - 1.226), and public insurance (Medicaid OR 1.514; 95% CI, 1.501 - 1.528; Medicare OR 1.601; 95% CI, 1.583 - 1.620). CONCLUSION Previous ED use - even a single previous visit - was a stronger predictor of a return visit than any other patient, hospital, or community characteristic. Clinicians should consider previous ED use when considering treatment decisions and risk of return visit, as should stakeholders targeting patients at risk of a return visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos C Montoy
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Amy E Baer
- Vituity Healthcare, Emeryville, California
| | - Christopher R Peabody
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the effect of default test offers--opt-in, opt-out, and active choice--on the likelihood of acceptance of an HIV test among patients receiving care in an emergency department? METHODS This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the emergency department of an urban teaching hospital and regional trauma center. Patients aged 13-64 years were randomized to opt-in, opt-out, and active choice HIV test offers. The primary outcome was HIV test acceptance percentage. The Denver Risk Score was used to categorize patients as being at low, intermediate, or high risk of HIV infection. STUDY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS 38.0% (611/1607) of patients in the opt-in testing group accepted an HIV test, compared with 51.3% (815/1628) in the active choice arm (difference 13.3%, 95% confidence interval 9.8% to 16.7%) and 65.9% (1031/1565) in the opt-out arm (difference 27.9%, 24.4% to 31.3%). Compared with active choice testing, opt-out testing led to a 14.6 (11.1 to 18.1) percentage point increase in test acceptance. Patients identified as being at intermediate and high risk were more likely to accept testing than were those at low risk in all arms (difference 6.4% (3.4% to 9.3%) for intermediate and 8.3% (3.3% to 13.4%) for high risk). The opt-out effect was significantly smaller among those reporting high risk behaviors, but the active choice effect did not significantly vary by level of reported risk behavior. Patients consented to inclusion in the study after being offered an HIV test, and inclusion varied slightly by treatment assignment. The study took place at a single county hospital in a city that is somewhat unique with respect to HIV testing; although the test acceptance percentages themselves might vary, a different pattern for opt-in versus active choice versus opt-out test schemes would not be expected. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Active choice is a distinct test regimen, with test acceptance patterns that may best approximate patients' true preferences. Opt-out regimens can substantially increase HIV testing, and opt-in schemes may reduce testing, compared with active choice testing. FUNDING, COMPETING INTERESTS, DATA SHARING This study was supported by grant NIA 1RC4AG039078 from the National Institute on Aging. The full dataset is available from the corresponding author. Consent for data sharing was not obtained, but the data are anonymized and risk of identification is low.Trial registration Clinical trials NCT01377857.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos C Montoy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, 505 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - William H Dow
- School of Public Health, University of California, 239 University Hall #7360, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, USA
| | - Beth C Kaplan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, 1001 Potrero Ave, San Francisco CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|