Real-world treatment patterns and diagnosis of charcot foot in franco-belgian diabetic foot expert centers (The EPiChar Study)

AIM

To evaluate the real-life diagnosis and therapeutic means of Charcot Neuroosteoarthropathy (CN) in French-Belgian diabetic foot expert centers.

METHODS

We collected clinical characteristics, results of exams and therapeutic pathways of consecutive adult patients with diabetic osteoarthropathy seen in consultation or hospitalization from January 1 to December 31, 2019 in 31 diabetic foot expert centers. The primary outcome was to describe the diagnostic and management methods for CN according to patient clinical characteristics, the clinical-radiological characteristics of acute and chronic CN and discharge means.

RESULTS

467 patients were included: 364 with chronic CN and 103 in the acute phase. 101 patients had bilateral chronic CN. Most patients were male (73.4%), treated with insulin (73.3%), and with multicomplicated diabetes. In the acute phase, edema and increased foot temperature were present in 75% and 58.3% of cases, respectively. Diagnosis confirmation was usually by MRI and the mode of discharge was variable. In the chronic phase, orthopedic shoes were prescribed in 81.5% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic practices in 31 diabetic foot centers. Our results highlight that the use of MRI and the modalities of offloading, an essential treatment in the acute phase, need to be better standardized. Centers were highly encouraging about creating a patient registry.

Genome-based typing reveals rare events of patient contamination with Pseudomonas aeruginosa from other patients and sink traps in a medical intensive care unit

AIM

We used genome-based typing data with the aim of identifying the routes of acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by patients hospitalized in a medical intensive care unit (MICU) over a long period in a non-epidemic context.

METHODS

This monocentric prospective study took place over 10 months in 2019 in a 15-bed MICU that applies standard precautions of hygiene. Lockable sink traps installed at all water points of use were bleach disinfected twice a week. We sampled all sink traps weekly to collect 404 P. aeruginosa environmental isolates and collected all P. aeruginosa isolates (N = 115) colonizing or infecting patients (N = 65). All isolates had their phenotypic resistance profile determined and their genome sequenced, from which we identified resistance determinants and assessed the population structure of the collection at the nucleotide level to identify events of P. aeruginosa transmission.

FINDINGS

All sink traps were positive for P. aeruginosa, each sink trap being colonized for several months by one or more clones. The combination of genomic and spatiotemporal data identified one potential event of P. aeruginosa transmission from a sink trap to a patient (1/65, 1.5%) and six events of patient cross-transmission, leading to the contamination of five patients (5/65, 7.7%). All transmitted isolates were fully susceptible to β-lactams and aminoglycosides.

CONCLUSIONS

Genome-based typing revealed the contamination of patients by P. aeruginosa originating from sink traps to be infrequent (1.5%) in an MICU with sink trap-bleaching measures, and that only 7.7% of the patients acquired P. aeruginosa originating from another patient.

Trends in the relation between hyperglycemia correction and active Charcot neuroarthropathy: results from the EPICHAR study

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology of Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) remains unclear. There are a number of hypotheses but these are not exclusive. In its clinical presentation, this complication intersects with the semiology of diabetic-induced neuropathy, such as peripheral hypervascularization and the appearance of arteriovenous shunt. The EPICHAR study is as yet an unpublished cohort of people living with diabetes complicated by CN (in active or chronic phase). Based on the findings of the EPICHAR study, this study aimed to investigate whether a reduction in the rate of hyperglycemia accompanies the onset of an active phase of CN.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were assessed 3 months (M3) and 6 months (M6) before the diagnosis of active CN (M0).

RESULTS

103 patients living with diabetes and presenting active CN were included between January and December 2019 from the 31 centers participating in this study (30 in France and 1 in Belgium). The mean age of the participants was 60.2±12.2 years; the vast majority were men (71.8%) living with type 2 diabetes (75.5%). Mean HbA1c levels significantly declined between M6 (median 7.70; Q1, Q3: 7.00, 8.55) and M3 (median 7.65; Q1, Q3: 6.90, 8.50) (p=0.012), as well as between M6 and M0 (median 7.40; Q1, Q3: 6.50, 8.50) (p=0.014). No significant difference was found between M3 and M0 (p=0.072).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant reduction in HbA1c levels seems to accompany the onset of the active phase of CN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCM03744039.

Impact of diabetes on COVID-19 prognosis beyond comorbidity burden: the CORONADO initiative

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Diabetes has been recognised as a pejorative prognostic factor in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since diabetes is typically a disease of advanced age, it remains unclear whether diabetes remains a COVID-19 risk factor beyond advanced age and associated comorbidities. We designed a cohort study that considered age and comorbidities to address this question.

METHODS

The Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and Diabetes Outcomes (CORONADO) initiative is a French, multicentric, cohort study of individuals with (exposed) and without diabetes (non-exposed) admitted to hospital with COVID-19, with a 1:1 matching on sex, age (±5 years), centre and admission date (10 March 2020 to 10 April 2020). Comorbidity burden was assessed by calculating the updated Charlson comorbidity index (uCCi). A predefined composite primary endpoint combining death and/or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), as well as these two components separately, was assessed within 7 and 28 days following hospital admission. We performed multivariable analyses to compare clinical outcomes between patients with and without diabetes.

RESULTS

A total of 2210 pairs of participants (diabetes/no-diabetes) were matched on age (mean±SD 69.4±13.2/69.5±13.2 years) and sex (36.3% women). The uCCi was higher in individuals with diabetes. In unadjusted analysis, the primary composite endpoint occurred more frequently in the diabetes group by day 7 (29.0% vs 21.6% in the no-diabetes group; HR 1.43 [95% CI 1.19, 1.72], p<0.001). After multiple adjustments for age, BMI, uCCi, clinical (time between onset of COVID-19 symptoms and dyspnoea) and biological variables (eGFR, aspartate aminotransferase, white cell count, platelet count, C-reactive protein) on admission to hospital, diabetes remained associated with a higher risk of primary composite endpoint within 7 days (adjusted HR 1.42 [95% CI 1.17, 1.72], p<0.001) and 28 days (adjusted HR 1.30 [95% CI 1.09, 1.55], p=0.003), compared with individuals without diabetes. Using the same adjustment model, diabetes was associated with the risk of IMV, but not with risk of death, within 28 days of admission to hospital.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our results demonstrate that diabetes status was associated with a deleterious COVID-19 prognosis irrespective of age and comorbidity status.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04324736.

Diabetes Increases Severe COVID-19 Outcomes Primarily in Younger Adults

CONTEXT

Diabetes is reported as a risk factor for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but whether this risk is similar in all categories of age remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes in hospitalized patients with and without diabetes according to age categories.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 6314 consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between February and 30 June 2020 in the Paris metropolitan area, France; follow-up was recorded until 30 September 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The main outcome was a composite outcome of mortality and orotracheal intubation in subjects with diabetes compared with subjects without diabetes, after adjustment for confounding variables and according to age categories.

RESULTS

Diabetes was recorded in 39% of subjects. Main outcome was higher in patients with diabetes, independently of confounding variables (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13 [1.03-1.24]) and increased with age in individuals without diabetes, from 23% for those <50 to 35% for those >80 years but reached a plateau after 70 years in those with diabetes. In direct comparison between patients with and without diabetes, diabetes-associated risk was inversely proportional to age, highest in <50 years and similar after 70 years. Similarly, mortality was higher in patients with diabetes (26%) than in those without diabetes (22%, P < 0.001), but adjusted HR for diabetes was significant only in patients younger than age 50 years (HR 1.81 [1.14-2.87]).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes should be considered as an independent risk factor for the severity of COVID-19 in young adults more so than in older adults, especially for individuals younger than 70 years.

Sex disparities in COVID-19 outcomes of inpatients with diabetes: insights from the CORONADO study

OBJECTIVE

Male sex is one of the determinants of severe coronavirus diseas-e-2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to characterize sex differences in severe outcomes in adults with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19.

METHODS

We performed a sex-stratified analysis of clinical and biological features and outcomes (i.e. invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and home discharge at day 7 (D7) or day 28 (D28)) in 2380 patients with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19 and included in the nationwide CORONADO observational study (NCT04324736).

RESULTS

The study population was predominantly male (63.5%). After multiple adjustments, female sex was negatively associated with the primary outcome (IMV and/or death, OR: 0.66 (0.49-0.88)), death (OR: 0.49 (0.30-0.79)) and ICU admission (OR: 0.57 (0.43-0.77)) at D7 but only with ICU admission (OR: 0.58 (0.43-0.77)) at D28. Older age and a history of microvascular complications were predictors of death at D28 in both sexes, while chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was predictive of death in women only. At admission, C-reactive protein (CRP), aspartate amino transferase (AST) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), according to the CKD-EPI formula predicted death in both sexes. Lymphocytopenia was an independent predictor of death in women only, while thrombocytopenia and elevated plasma glucose concentration were predictors of death in men only.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with diabetes admitted for COVID-19, female sex was associated with lower incidence of early severe outcomes, but did not influence the overall in-hospital mortality, suggesting that diabetes mitigates the female protection from COVID-19 severity. Sex-associated biological determinants may be useful to optimize COVID-19 prevention and management in women and men.

[Insulin sensitivity and ethnic groups]

Epidemiological surveys show a large variation of type 2 diabetes (DT2) prevalence from one country to another, suggesting ethnic discrepancies in insulin sensitivity. Many data seem to confirm this hypothesis. We will show them while concentrating on data provided by surveys performed in French-speaking countries. The mechanisms of the ethnic differences in insulin sensitivity are unclear and further insights are needed. More than genetic factors, environmental factors appear to be involved in the occurence of insulin resistance and DT2. The epidemic nature of obesity and subsequent DT2 in the world urges health authorities in each country to raise campaigns to promote changes in life style and nutritional habits before the announced pandemy of DT2 becomes reality.