1
|
Marin MV, Ratti MF, Peres NA, Goss EM. New Genotypes of Phytophthora nicotianae Found on Strawberry in Florida. Phytopathology 2024; 114:743-751. [PMID: 37942874 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-05-23-0175-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora cactorum is the most common causal agent of Phytophthora crown rot and leather rot of strawberry, but P. nicotianae is also responsible for the disease in Florida. Studies of P. nicotianae populations have suggested that different groups of genotypes are associated with different hosts; however, it is not yet clear how many lineages exist globally and how they are related to different production systems. The aim of this study was to determine the genetic relationships of P. nicotianae isolates from Florida strawberry with genotypes reported from other hosts, quantify the genetic variation on strawberry, and test for an association with nursery source. A total of 49 isolates of P. nicotianae were collected from strawberry plants originating from multiple nursery sources during six seasons of commercial fruit production in Florida. Microsatellite genotyping identified 28 multilocus genotypes on strawberry that were distinct among 208 isolates originating from various hosts and locations. Based on STRUCTURE analysis, two genetic groups were identified: one consisting of isolates from strawberry, and the other comprising samples from different hosts. Multilocus genotypes were shared among nursery sources, and populations defined by nursery were not differentiated. Both mating types were found among the isolates from North Carolina- and California-origin plants and in most strawberry seasons; however, a predominance of A1 was observed, and regular sexual reproduction was not supported by the data. This study reveals a unique genetic population of P. nicotianae associated with strawberry and emphasizes the vital role of nursery monitoring in mitigating disease spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus V Marin
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, FL 33598, U.S.A
| | - Maria F Ratti
- Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, Guayaquil, Guayas, República del Ecuador
| | - Natalia A Peres
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, FL 33598, U.S.A
| | - Erica M Goss
- Department of Plant Pathology and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang R, Zhou R, Meng Y, Zheng J, Lu W, Yang Y, Yang J, Wu Y, Shan W. Specific Detection of Phytophthora parasitica by Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assays Based on a Unique Multicopy Genomic Sequence. Plant Dis 2024; 108:987-995. [PMID: 37884481 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-04-23-0722-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora parasitica is a highly destructive oomycete plant pathogen that is capable of infecting a wide range of hosts including many agricultural cash crops, fruit trees, and ornamental garden plants. One of the most important diseases caused by P. parasitica worldwide is black shank of tobacco. Rapid, sensitive, and specific pathogen detection is crucial for early rapid diagnosis, which can facilitate effective disease management. In this study, we used a genomics approach to identify repeated sequences in the genome of P. parasitica by genome sequence alignment and identified a 203-bp P. parasitica-specific sequence, PpM34, that is present in 31 to 60 copies in the genome. The P. parasitica genome specificity of PpM34 was supported by PCR amplification of 24 genetically diverse strains of P. parasitica, 32 strains representing 12 other Phytophthora species, one Pythium species, six fungal species, and three bacterial species, all of which are plant pathogens. Our PCR and real-time PCR assays showed that the PpM34 sequence was highly sensitive in specifically detecting P. parasitica. Finally, we developed a PpM34-based high-efficiency recombinase polymerase amplification assay, which allowed us to specifically detect as little as 1 pg of P. parasitica total DNA from both pure cultures and infected Nicotiana benthamiana at 39°C using a fluorometric thermal cycler. The sensitivity, specificity, convenience, and rapidity of this assay represent a major improvement for early diagnosis of P. parasitica infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongsheng Wang
- Liaoning Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Ran Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yuling Meng
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jie Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wenqin Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yang Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jiapeng Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yuanhua Wu
- Liaoning Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
| | - Weixing Shan
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Riley N, Förster H, Adaskaveg JE. Diversity and Clonality in Populations of Phytophthora citrophthora and P. syringae Causing Brown Rot of Citrus in California. Phytopathology 2024; 114:792-801. [PMID: 38085984 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-09-23-0309-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Phytophthora citrophthora and P. syringae are currently the primary causal organisms of brown rot of citrus fruits in California. To possibly find an explanation for the prevalence of the previously minor species P. syringae, we determined the population structures of both pathogens in California using next-generation sequencing and population genomics analyses. Whole-genome sequencing and aligning with newly assembled reference genomes identified 972,266 variants in 132 isolates of P. citrophthora and 422,208 variants in 154 isolates (including 24 from noncitrus tree crops) of P. syringae originating from three major growing regions. The resulting data sets were visualized using principal component analysis, discriminant analysis of principal components, unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean dendrograms, fastStructure, and minimum spanning networks, and we obtained the index of association, diversity summary statistics, and genetic distance statistics values GST, G''ST, and Jost's D. Subpopulations of both species were mostly defined by their geographic origin indicating restricted dispersal of inoculum. Except for five isolates, the population structure of P. citrophthora (that is heterothallic and unlikely to reproduce sexually) was clonal to semi-clonal, with very little genetic diversity within and among subgroups. In contrast, the population structure of P. syringae was also clonal to semi-clonal, but isolates were placed into four main clusters of much higher diversity. Clonality in both species can be explained by a high level of asexual reproduction. The higher diversity in the homothallic P. syringae is likely due to commonly occurring sexual reproduction. One distinct cluster of P. syringae consisted solely of isolates from noncitrus hosts; therefore, the origin of P. syringae in citrus could not be resolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Riley
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
| | - Helga Förster
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
| | - James E Adaskaveg
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tong X, Wu J, Mei L, Wang Y. Detecting Phytophthora cinnamomi associated with dieback disease on Carya cathayensis using loop-mediated isothermal amplification. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0257785. [PMID: 34784360 PMCID: PMC8594852 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Chinese hickory (Carya cathayensis Sarg.) is an economically and ecologically important nut plant in China. Dieback and basal stem necrosis have been observed in the plants since 2016, and its recent spread has significantly affected plant growth and nut production. Therefore, a survey was conducted to evaluate the disease incidence at five sites in Linan County, China. The highest incidence was recorded at the Tuankou site at up to 11.39% in 2019. The oomycete, Phytophthora cinnamomi, was isolated from symptomatic plant tissue and plantation soil using baiting and selective media-based detection methods and identified. Artificial infection with the representative P. cinnamomi ST402 isolate produced vertically elongated discolorations in the outer xylem and necrotic symptoms in C. cathayensis seedlings in a greenhouse trial. Molecular detections based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) specific to P. cinnamomi ST402 were conducted. Result indicated that LAMP detection showed a high coherence level with the baiting assays for P. cinnamomi detection in the field. This study provides the evidence of existence of high-pathogenic P. cinnamomi in the C. cathayensis plantation soil in China and the insights into a convenient tool developed for conducting field monitoring of this aggressive pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqing Tong
- Department of Forest Protection, College of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiayi Wu
- Department of Forest Protection, College of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Li Mei
- State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yongjun Wang
- Department of Forest Protection, College of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang W, Chen L, Fengler K, Bolar J, Llaca V, Wang X, Clark CB, Fleury TJ, Myrvold J, Oneal D, van Dyk MM, Hudson A, Munkvold J, Baumgarten A, Thompson J, Cai G, Crasta O, Aggarwal R, Ma J. A giant NLR gene confers broad-spectrum resistance to Phytophthora sojae in soybean. Nat Commun 2021; 12:6263. [PMID: 34741017 PMCID: PMC8571336 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26554-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora root and stem rot caused by P. sojae is a destructive soybean soil-borne disease found worldwide. Discovery of genes conferring broad-spectrum resistance to the pathogen is a need to prevent the outbreak of the disease. Here, we show that soybean Rps11 is a 27.7-kb nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR or NLR) gene conferring broad-spectrum resistance to the pathogen. Rps11 is located in a genomic region harboring a cluster of large NLR genes of a single origin in soybean, and is derived from rounds of unequal recombination. Such events result in promoter fusion and LRR expansion that may contribute to the broad resistance spectrum. The NLR gene cluster exhibits drastic structural diversification among phylogenetically representative varieties, including gene copy number variation ranging from five to 23 copies, and absence of allelic copies of Rps11 in any of the non-Rps11-donor varieties examined, exemplifying innovative evolution of NLR genes and NLR gene clusters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weidong Wang
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Liyang Chen
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Kevin Fengler
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Joy Bolar
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Victor Llaca
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Xutong Wang
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Chancelor B Clark
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Tomara J Fleury
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, USDA, ARS, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Jon Myrvold
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - David Oneal
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | | | - Ashley Hudson
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Jesse Munkvold
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Andy Baumgarten
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Jeff Thompson
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
| | - Guohong Cai
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
- Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, USDA, ARS, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Oswald Crasta
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA
- R&D, Equinom, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 46268, USA
| | - Rajat Aggarwal
- Research and Development, Corteva Agriscience™, Johnston, IA, 50131, USA.
| | - Jianxin Ma
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sahoo DK, Das A, Huang X, Cianzio S, Bhattacharyya MK. Tightly linked Rps12 and Rps13 genes provide broad-spectrum Phytophthora resistance in soybean. Sci Rep 2021; 11:16907. [PMID: 34413429 PMCID: PMC8377050 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96425-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The Phytophtora root and stem rot is a serious disease in soybean. It is caused by the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora sojae. Growing Phytophthora resistant cultivars is the major method of controlling this disease. Resistance is race- or gene-specific; a single gene confers immunity against only a subset of the P. sojae isolates. Unfortunately, rapid evolution of new Phytophthora sojae virulent pathotypes limits the effectiveness of an Rps ("resistance to Phytophthora sojae") gene to 8-15 years. The current study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of Rps12 against a set of P. sojae isolates using recombinant inbred lines (RILs) that contain recombination break points in the Rps12 region. Our study revealed a unique Rps gene linked to the Rps12 locus. We named this novel gene as Rps13 that confers resistance against P. sojae isolate V13, which is virulent to recombinants that contains Rps12 but lack Rps13. The genetic distance between the two Rps genes is 4 cM. Our study revealed that two tightly linked functional Rps genes with distinct race-specificity provide broad-spectrum resistance in soybean. We report here the molecular markers for incorporating the broad-spectrum Phytophthora resistance conferred by the two Rps genes in commercial soybean cultivars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipak K Sahoo
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA
| | - Anindya Das
- Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA
| | - Xiaoqiu Huang
- Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA
| | - Silvia Cianzio
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
O’Hanlon R, Destefanis M, Milenković I, Tomšovský M, Janoušek J, Bellgard SE, Weir BS, Kudláček T, Horta Jung M, Jung T. Two new Nothophytophthora species from streams in Ireland and Northern Ireland: Nothophytophthora irlandica and N. lirii sp. nov. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250527. [PMID: 34038450 PMCID: PMC8153472 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Slow growing oomycete isolates with morphological resemblance to Phytophthora were obtained from forest streams during routine monitoring for the EU quarantine forest pathogen Phytophthora ramorum in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequence analysis indicated that they belonged to two previously unknown species of Nothophytophthora, a recently erected sister genus of Phytophthora. Morphological and temperature-growth studies were carried out to characterise both new species. In addition, Bayesian and Maximum-Likelihood analyses of nuclear 5-loci and mitochondrial 3-loci datasets were performed to resolve the phylogenetic positions of the two new species. Both species were sterile, formed chlamydospores and partially caducous nonpapillate sporangia, and showed slower growth than any of the six known Nothophytophthora species. In all phylogenetic analyses both species formed distinct, strongly supported clades, closely related to N. chlamydospora and N. valdiviana from Chile. Based on their unique combination of morphological and physiological characters and their distinct phylogenetic positions the two new species are described as Nothophytophthora irlandica sp. nov. and N. lirii sp. nov. Their potential lifestyle and geographic origin are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard O’Hanlon
- Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Dublin, Ireland
- Queens University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Ivan Milenković
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Phytophthora Research Centre, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Tomšovský
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Phytophthora Research Centre, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Josef Janoušek
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Phytophthora Research Centre, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Stanley E. Bellgard
- Massey University, School of Fundamental Sciences, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | | | - Tomáš Kudláček
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Phytophthora Research Centre, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marilia Horta Jung
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Phytophthora Research Centre, Brno, Czech Republic
- Phytophthora Research and Consultancy, Nußdorf, Germany
| | - Thomas Jung
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Phytophthora Research Centre, Brno, Czech Republic
- Phytophthora Research and Consultancy, Nußdorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meng H, Sun M, Jiang Z, Liu Y, Sun Y, Liu D, Jiang C, Ren M, Yuan G, Yu W, Feng Q, Yang A, Cheng L, Wang Y. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals resistant and susceptible genes in tobacco cultivars in response to infection by Phytophthora nicotianae. Sci Rep 2021; 11:809. [PMID: 33436928 PMCID: PMC7804271 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80280-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora nicotianae is highly pathogenic to Solanaceous crops and is a major problem in tobacco production. The tobacco cultivar Beihart1000-1 (BH) is resistant, whereas the Xiaohuangjin 1025 (XHJ) cultivar is susceptible to infection. Here, BH and XHJ were used as models to identify resistant and susceptible genes using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Roots were sampled at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 60 h post infection. In total, 23,753 and 25,187 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in BH and XHJ, respectively. By mapping upregulated DEGs to the KEGG database, changes of the rich factor of "plant pathogen interaction pathway" were corresponded to the infection process. Of all the DEGs in this pathway, 38 were specifically regulated in BH. These genes included 11 disease-resistance proteins, 3 pathogenesis-related proteins, 4 RLP/RLKs, 2 CNGCs, 7 calcium-dependent protein kinases, 4 calcium-binding proteins, 1 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, 1 protein EDS1L, 2 WRKY transcription factors, 1 mannosyltransferase, and 1 calmodulin-like protein. By combining the analysis of reported susceptible (S) gene homologs and DEGs in XHJ, 9 S gene homologs were identified, which included 1 calmodulin-binding transcription activator, 1 cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel, 1 protein trichome birefringence-like protein, 1 plant UBX domain-containing protein, 1 ADP-ribosylation factor GTPase-activating protein, 2 callose synthases, and 2 cellulose synthase A catalytic subunits. qRT-PCR was used to validate the RNA-seq data. The comprehensive transcriptome dataset described here, including candidate resistant and susceptible genes, will provide a valuable resource for breeding tobacco plants resistant to P. nicotianae infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He Meng
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Mingming Sun
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Zipeng Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Yutong Liu
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Ying Sun
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Dan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Caihong Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Min Ren
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Guangdi Yuan
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Wenlong Yu
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
- College of Agronomy, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, 266109, China
| | - Quanfu Feng
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| | - Aiguo Yang
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China.
| | - Lirui Cheng
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China.
| | - Yuanying Wang
- Key Laboratory of Tobacco Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, 266100, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bose T, Wingfield MJ, Roux J, Vivas M, Burgess TI. Phytophthora Species Associated with Roots of Native and Non-native Trees in Natural and Managed Forests. Microb Ecol 2021; 81:122-133. [PMID: 32740757 DOI: 10.1007/s00248-020-01563-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Roots act as a biological filter that exclusively allows only a portion of the soil-associated microbial diversity to infect the plant. This microbial diversity includes organisms both beneficial and detrimental to plants. Phytophthora species are among the most important groups of detrimental microbes that cause various soil-borne plant diseases. We used a metabarcoding approach with Phytophthora-specific primers to compare the diversity and richness of Phytophthora species associated with roots of native and non-native trees, using different types of soil inocula collected from native and managed forests. Specifically, we analysed (1) roots of two non-native tree species (Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mearnsii) and native trees, (2) roots of two non-native tree species from an in vivo plant baiting trial, (3) roots collected from the field versus those from the baiting trial, and (4) roots and soil samples collected from the field. The origin of the soil and the interaction between root and soil significantly influenced Phytophthora species richness. Moreover, species richness and community composition were significantly different between the field root samples and field soil samples with a higher number of Phytophthora species in the soil than in the roots. The results also revealed a substantial and previously undetected diversity of Phytophthora species from South Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanay Bose
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
| | - Michael J Wingfield
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Jolanda Roux
- Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Sappi Forests Pty. Ltd., Research Planning and Nurseries (RPN), Shaw Research Centre, Howick, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Maria Vivas
- Institute for Dehesa Research (INDEHESA), Ingeniería Forestal y del Medio Natural, Universidad de Extremadura, Plasencia, Spain
| | - Treena I Burgess
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
- Phytophthora Science and Management, Centre for Climate Impacted Terrestrial Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Winkworth RC, Nelson BCW, Bellgard SE, Probst CM, McLenachan PA, Lockhart PJ. A LAMP at the end of the tunnel: A rapid, field deployable assay for the kauri dieback pathogen, Phytophthora agathidicida. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0224007. [PMID: 31978166 PMCID: PMC6980612 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The root rot causing oomycete, Phytophthora agathidicida, threatens the long-term survival of the iconic New Zealand kauri. Currently, testing for this pathogen involves an extended soil bioassay that takes 14–20 days and requires specialised staff, consumables, and infrastructure. Here we describe a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the detection of P. agathidicida that targets a portion of the mitochondrial apocytochrome b coding sequence. This assay has high specificity and sensitivity; it did not cross react with a range of other Phytophthora isolates and detected as little as 1 fg of total P. agathidicida DNA or 116 copies of the target locus. Assay performance was further investigated by testing plant tissue baits from flooded soil samples using both the extended soil bioassay and LAMP testing of DNA extracted from baits. In these comparisons, P. agathidicida was detected more frequently using the LAMP test. In addition to greater sensitivity, by removing the need for culturing, the hybrid baiting plus LAMP approach is more cost effective than the extended soil bioassay and, importantly, does not require a centralised laboratory facility with specialised staff, consumables, and equipment. Such testing will allow us to address outstanding questions about P. agathidicida. For example, the hybrid approach could enable monitoring of the pathogen beyond areas with visible disease symptoms, allow direct evaluation of rates and patterns of spread, and allow the effectiveness of disease control to be evaluated. The hybrid LAMP bioassay also has the potential to empower local communities to evaluate the pathogen status of local kauri stands, providing information for disease management and conservation initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard C. Winkworth
- Bio-Protection Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
- School of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
- * E-mail:
| | - Briana C. W. Nelson
- School of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Peter J. Lockhart
- Bio-Protection Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
- School of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hu J, Shrestha S, Zhou Y, Mudge J, Liu X, Lamour K. Dynamic Extreme Aneuploidy (DEA) in the vegetable pathogen Phytophthora capsici and the potential for rapid asexual evolution. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227250. [PMID: 31910244 PMCID: PMC6946123 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Oomycete plant pathogens are difficult to control and routine genetic research is challenging. A major problem is instability of isolates. Here we characterize >600 field and single zoospore isolates of Phytophthora capsici for inheritance of mating type, sensitivity to mefenoxam, chromosome copy number and heterozygous allele frequencies. The A2 mating type was highly unstable with 26% of 241 A2 isolates remaining A2. The A1 mating type was stable. Isolates intermediately resistant to mefenoxam produced fully resistant single-spore progeny. Sensitive isolates remained fully sensitive. Genome re-sequencing of single zoospore isolates revealed extreme aneuploidy; a phenomenon dubbed Dynamic Extreme Aneuploidy (DEA). DEA is characterized by the asexual inheritance of diverse intra-genomic combinations of chromosomal ploidy ranging from 2N to 3N and heterozygous allele frequencies that do not strictly correspond to ploidy. Isolates sectoring on agar media showed dramatically altered heterozygous allele frequencies. DEA can explain the rapid increase of advantageous alleles (e.g. drug resistance), mating type switches and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Although the mechanisms driving DEA are unknown, it can play an important role in adaptation and evolution and seriously hinders all aspects of P. capsici research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Hu
- College of Agro-grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sandesh Shrestha
- Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America
| | - Yuxin Zhou
- College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Joann Mudge
- National Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Xili Liu
- College of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Kurt Lamour
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhong C, Li Y, Sun S, Duan C, Zhu Z. Genetic Mapping and Molecular Characterization of a Broad-spectrum Phytophthora sojae Resistance Gene in Chinese Soybean. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:E1809. [PMID: 31013701 PMCID: PMC6515170 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20081809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 04/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) causes serious annual soybean yield losses worldwide. The most effective method to prevent PRR involves growing cultivars that possess genes conferring resistance to Phytophthora sojae (Rps). In this study, QTL-sequencing combined with genetic mapping was used to identify RpsX in soybean cultivar Xiu94-11 resistance to all P. sojae isolates tested, exhibiting broad-spectrum PRR resistance. Subsequent analysis revealed RpsX was located in the 242-kb genomic region spanning the RpsQ locus. However, a phylogenetic investigation indicated Xiu94-11 carrying RpsX is distantly related to the cultivars containing RpsQ, implying RpsX and RpsQ have different origins. An examination of candidate genes revealed RpsX and RpsQ share common nonsynonymous SNP and a 144-bp insertion in the Glyma.03g027200 sequence encoding a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) region. Glyma.03g027200 was considered to be the likely candidate gene of RpsQ and RpsX. Sequence analyses confirmed that the 144-bp insertion caused by an unequal exchange resulted in two additional LRR-encoding fragments in the candidate gene. A marker developed based on the 144-bp insertion was used to analyze the genetic population and germplasm, and proved to be useful for identifying the RpsX and RpsQ alleles. This study implies that the number of LRR units in the LRR domain may be important for PRR resistance in soybean.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Zhong
- National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
| | - Yinping Li
- National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
- Institute of Pomology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xingcheng 125100, China.
| | - Suli Sun
- National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
| | - Canxing Duan
- National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
| | - Zhendong Zhu
- National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Amalraj A, Taylor J, Bithell S, Li Y, Moore K, Hobson K, Sutton T. Mapping resistance to Phytophthora root rot identifies independent loci from cultivated (Cicer arietinum L.) and wild (Cicer echinospermum P.H. Davis) chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 2019; 132:1017-1033. [PMID: 30535647 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-018-3256-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Major QTL for Phytophthora root rot resistance have been identified in three mapping populations with independent sources of resistance contributed by C. echinospermum and C. arietinum. Phytophthora root rot (PRR) caused by the oomycete Phytophthora medicaginis is a major soil-borne disease of chickpea in Australia. With no economic in-crop control of PRR, a genetic approach to improve resistance is the most practical management option. Moderate field resistance has been incorporated in the cultivated C. arietinum variety, Yorker, and a higher level of resistance has been identified in a derivative of wild chickpea (C. echinospermum, interspecific breeding line 04067-81-2-1-1). These genotypes and two other released varieties were used to develop one intra-specific and two interspecific F6-derived recombinant inbred line mapping populations for genetic analysis of resistance. The Yorker × Genesis114 (YG), Rupali × 04067-81-2-1-1 (RB) and Yorker × 04067-81-2-1-1 (YB) populations were genotyped using genotyping-by-sequencing and phenotyped for PRR under three field environments with a mixture of 10 P. medicaginis isolates. Whole-genome QTL analysis identified major QTL QRBprrsi01, QYBprrsi01, QRBprrsi03 and QYBprrsi02 for PRR resistance on chromosomes 3 and 6, in RB and YB populations, respectively, with the resistance source derived from the wild Cicer species. QTL QYGprrsi02 and QYGprrsi03 were also identified on chromosomes 5 and 6 in YG population from C. arietinum. Aligning QTL regions to the corresponding chickpea reference genome suggested that the resistance source from C. arietinum and C. echinospermum may be different. The findings from this study provide tools for marker-assisted selection in chickpea breeding and information to assist the development of populations suitable for fine-mapping of resistance loci to determine the molecular basis for PRR resistance in chickpea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amritha Amalraj
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia
| | - Julian Taylor
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia
| | - Sean Bithell
- NSW Department of Primary Industries, 4 Marsden Park Rd, Tamworth, NSW, 2340, Australia
| | - Yongle Li
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia
| | - Kevin Moore
- NSW Department of Primary Industries, 4 Marsden Park Rd, Tamworth, NSW, 2340, Australia
| | - Kristy Hobson
- NSW Department of Primary Industries, 4 Marsden Park Rd, Tamworth, NSW, 2340, Australia
| | - Tim Sutton
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia.
- South Australian Research and Development Institute, GPO Box 397, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tremblay ÉD, Duceppe MO, Bérubé JA, Kimoto T, Lemieux C, Bilodeau GJ. Screening for Exotic Forest Pathogens to Increase Survey Capacity Using Metagenomics. Phytopathology 2018; 108:1509-1521. [PMID: 29923801 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-02-18-0028-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities have a major impact on the global environment. Canada's natural resources are threatened by the spread of fungal pathogens, which is facilitated by agricultural practices and international trade. Fungi are introduced to new environments and sometimes become established, in which case they can cause disease outbreaks resulting in extensive forest decline. Here, we describe how a nationwide sample collection strategy coupled to next-generation sequencing (NGS) (i.e., metagenomics) can achieve fast and comprehensive screening for exotic invasive species. This methodology can help provide guidance to phytopathology stakeholders such as regulatory agencies. Several regulated invasive species were monitored by processing field samples collected over 3 years (2013 to 2015) near high-risk areas across Canada. Fifteen sequencing runs were required on the Ion Torrent platform to process 398 samples that yielded 45 million reads. High-throughput screening of fungal and oomycete operational taxonomic units using customized fungi-specific ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 barcoded primers was performed. Likewise, Phytophthora-specific barcoded primers were used to amplify the adenosine triphosphate synthase subunit 9-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase subunit 9 spacer. Several Phytophthora spp. were detected by NGS and confirmed by species-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays. The target species Heterobasidion annosum sensu stricto could be detected only through metagenomics. We demonstrated that screening target species using a variety of sampling techniques and NGS-the results of which were validated by qPCR-has the potential to increase survey capacity and detection sensitivity, reduce hands-on time and costs, and assist regulatory agencies to identify ports of entry. Considering that early detection and prevention are the keys in mitigating invasive species damage, our method represents a substantial asset in plant pathology management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Émilie D Tremblay
- First, second, and sixth authors: Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K2H 8P9, Canada; third author: Natural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Du P.E.P.S. Street, P.O. Box 10380 Québec, Québec, G1V 4C7, Canada; fourth author: CFIA, 4321 Still Creek Dr, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6S7, Canada; and fifth author: Institut de biologie intégrative et des systèmes, 1030 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Marc-Olivier Duceppe
- First, second, and sixth authors: Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K2H 8P9, Canada; third author: Natural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Du P.E.P.S. Street, P.O. Box 10380 Québec, Québec, G1V 4C7, Canada; fourth author: CFIA, 4321 Still Creek Dr, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6S7, Canada; and fifth author: Institut de biologie intégrative et des systèmes, 1030 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Jean A Bérubé
- First, second, and sixth authors: Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K2H 8P9, Canada; third author: Natural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Du P.E.P.S. Street, P.O. Box 10380 Québec, Québec, G1V 4C7, Canada; fourth author: CFIA, 4321 Still Creek Dr, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6S7, Canada; and fifth author: Institut de biologie intégrative et des systèmes, 1030 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Troy Kimoto
- First, second, and sixth authors: Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K2H 8P9, Canada; third author: Natural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Du P.E.P.S. Street, P.O. Box 10380 Québec, Québec, G1V 4C7, Canada; fourth author: CFIA, 4321 Still Creek Dr, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6S7, Canada; and fifth author: Institut de biologie intégrative et des systèmes, 1030 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Claude Lemieux
- First, second, and sixth authors: Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K2H 8P9, Canada; third author: Natural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Du P.E.P.S. Street, P.O. Box 10380 Québec, Québec, G1V 4C7, Canada; fourth author: CFIA, 4321 Still Creek Dr, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6S7, Canada; and fifth author: Institut de biologie intégrative et des systèmes, 1030 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Guillaume J Bilodeau
- First, second, and sixth authors: Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), 3851 Fallowfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K2H 8P9, Canada; third author: Natural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Du P.E.P.S. Street, P.O. Box 10380 Québec, Québec, G1V 4C7, Canada; fourth author: CFIA, 4321 Still Creek Dr, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5C 6S7, Canada; and fifth author: Institut de biologie intégrative et des systèmes, 1030 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ma D, Jiang J, He L, Cui K, Mu W, Liu F. Detection and Characterization of QoI-Resistant Phytophthora capsici Causing Pepper Phytophthora Blight in China. Plant Dis 2018; 102:1725-1732. [PMID: 30125205 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-01-18-0197-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora capsici is a highly destructive plant pathogen that has spread worldwide. To date, the quinone outside inhibitor (QoI) azoxystrobin has been the choice of farmers for managing this oomycete. In this study, the sensitivity of 90 P. capsici isolates collected from Yunnan, Fujian, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, and Guangdong in southern China to azoxystrobin was assessed based on mycelial growth, sporangia formation, and zoospore discharge. Furthermore, the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene from azoxystrobin-sensitive and -resistant P. capsici isolates was compared to investigate the mechanism of QoI resistance. The high values for effective concentration to inhibit 50% of mycelial growth and large variation factor obtained provide strong support for the existence of azoxystrobin-resistant subpopulations in wild populations. The resistance frequency of P. capsici to azoxystrobin was greater than 40%. Sensitive P. capsici isolates were strongly suppressed on V8 medium plates containing azoxystrobin supplemented with salicylhydroxamic acid at 50 µg ml-1, whereas resistant isolates grew well under these conditions. Multiple alignment analysis revealed a missense mutation in the cytb gene that alters codon 137 (GGA to AGA), causing an amino acid substitution of glycine to arginine (G137R). The fitness of the azoxystrobin-sensitive isolate is similar to that of the G137R mutant. Additionally, the P. capsici isolates used in this study exhibited decreased sensitivity to two other QoI fungicides (pyraclostrobin and famoxadone). Necessary measures should be taken to control this trend of resistance to QoI that has developed in P. capsici in southern China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dicheng Ma
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology of Vegetable Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, China
| | - Jiangong Jiang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology of Vegetable Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, China
| | - Leiming He
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology of Vegetable Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, China
| | - Kaidi Cui
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology of Vegetable Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, China
| | - Wei Mu
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology of Vegetable Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology of Vegetable Diseases and Insect Pests, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, Shandong 271018, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nawaz K, Shahid AA, Bengyella L, Subhani MN, Ali M, Anwar W, Iftikhar S, Ali SW. Evidence of genetically diverse virulent mating types of Phytophthora capsici from Capsicum annum L. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2018; 34:130. [PMID: 30101403 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-018-2511-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Chili pepper (Capsicum annum L.) is an important economic crop that is severely destroyed by the filamentous oomycete Phytophthora capsici. Little is known about this pathogen in key chili pepper farms in Punjab province, Pakistan. We investigated the genetic diversity of P. capsici strains using standard taxonomic and molecular tools, and characterized their colony growth patterns as well as their disease severity on chili pepper plants under the greenhouse conditions. Phylogenetic analysis based on ribosomal DNA (rDNA), β-tubulin and translation elongation factor 1α loci revealed divergent evolution in the population structure of P. capsici isolates. The mean oospore diameter of mating type A1 isolates was greater than that of mating type A2 isolates. We provide first evidence of an uneven distribution of highly virulent mating type A1 and A2 of P. capsici that are insensitive to mefenoxam, pyrimorph, dimethomorph, and azoxystrobin fungicides, and represent a risk factor that could ease outpacing the current P. capsici management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran Nawaz
- Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
| | - Ahmad Ali Shahid
- Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
- Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Louis Bengyella
- Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center (TFREC), College of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resource Sciences (CAHNRS), Washington State University, Wenatchee, USA.
- Department of Biological Control, Advanced Biotech Cooperative, Bali-Nyonga, Cameroon.
| | | | - Muhammad Ali
- Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Waheed Anwar
- Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Sehrish Iftikhar
- Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Shinawar Waseem Ali
- Institute of Agricultural Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tabima JF, Coffey MD, Zazada IA, Grünwald NJ. Populations of Phytophthora rubi Show Little Differentiation and High Rates of Migration Among States in the Western United States. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2018; 31:614-622. [PMID: 29451433 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-10-17-0258-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Population genetics is a powerful tool to understand patterns and evolutionary processes that are involved in plant-pathogen emergence and adaptation to agricultural ecosystems. We are interested in studying the population dynamics of Phytophthora rubi, the causal agent of Phytophthora root rot in raspberry. P. rubi is found in the western United States, where most of the fresh and processed raspberries are produced. We used genotyping-by-sequencing to characterize genetic diversity in populations of P. rubi sampled in the United States and other countries. Our results confirm that P. rubi is a monophyletic species with complete lineage sorting from its sister taxon P. fragariae. Overall, populations of P. rubi show low genetic diversity across the western United States. Demographic analyses suggest that populations of P. rubi from the western United States are the source of pathogen migration to Europe. We found no evidence for population differentiation at a global or regional (western United States) level. Finally, our results provide evidence of migration from California and Oregon into Washington. This report provides new insights into the evolution and structure of global and western United States populations of the raspberry pathogen P. rubi, indicating that human activity might be involved in moving the pathogen among regions and fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier F Tabima
- 1 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A
| | - Michael D Coffey
- 2 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, UC Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, U.S.A.; and
| | - Inga A Zazada
- 3 Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR 97330, U.S.A
| | - Niklaus J Grünwald
- 3 Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR 97330, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
de Assis Costa OY, Tupinambá DD, Bergmann JC, Barreto CC, Quirino BF. Fungal diversity in oil palm leaves showing symptoms of Fatal Yellowing disease. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0191884. [PMID: 29370299 PMCID: PMC5785003 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) is an excellent source of vegetable oil for biodiesel production; however, there are still some limitations for its cultivation in Brazil such as Fatal Yellowing (FY) disease. FY has been studied for many years, but its causal agent has never been determined. In Colombia and nearby countries, it was reported that the causal agent of Fatal Yellowing (Pudrición del Cogollo) is the oomycete Phytophthora palmivora, however, several authors claim that Fatal Yellowing and Pudrición del Cogollo (PC) are different diseases. The major aims of this work were to test, using molecular biology tools, Brazilian oil palm trees for the co-occurrence of the oomycete Phytophthora and FY symptoms, and to characterize the fungal diversity in FY diseased and healthy leaves by next generation sequencing. Investigation with specific primers for the genus Phytophthora showed amplification in only one of the samples. Analysis of the fungal ITS region demonstrated that, at the genus level, different groups predominated in all symptomatic samples, while Pyrenochaetopsis and unclassified fungi predominated in all asymptomatic samples. Our results show that fungal communities were not the same between samples at the same stage of the disease or among all the symptomatic samples. This is the first study that describes the evolution of the microbial community in the course of plant disease and also the first work to use high throughput next generation sequencing to evaluate the fungal community associated with leaves of oil palm trees with and without symptoms of FY.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jessica Carvalho Bergmann
- Embrapa-Agroenergy, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
- Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology Program, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
| | - Cristine Chaves Barreto
- Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology Program, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
| | - Betania Ferraz Quirino
- Embrapa-Agroenergy, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
- Genomic Sciences and Biotechnology Program, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Engelbrecht J, Duong TA, Berg NVD. New microsatellite markers for population studies of Phytophthora cinnamomi, an important global pathogen. Sci Rep 2017; 7:17631. [PMID: 29247246 PMCID: PMC5732169 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17799-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora cinnamomi is the causal agent of root rot, canker and dieback of thousands of plant species around the globe. This oomycete not only causes severe economic losses but also threatens natural ecosystems. In South Africa, P. cinnamomi affects eucalyptus, avocado, macadamia and indigenous fynbos. Despite being one of the most important plant pathogens with a global distribution, little information is available regarding origin, invasion history and population biology. This is partly due to the limited number of molecular markers available for studying P. cinnamomi. Using available genome sequences for three isolates of P. cinnamomi, sixteen polymorphic microsatellite markers were developed as a set of multiplexable markers for both PCR and Gene Scan assays. The application of these markers on P. cinnamomi populations from avocado production areas in South Africa revealed that they were all polymorphic in these populations. The markers developed in this study represent a valuable resource for studying the population biology and movement of P. cinnamomi and will aid in the understanding of the origin and invasion history of this important species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Engelbrecht
- Department of Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.
| | - T A Duong
- Department of Genetics, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
| | - N V D Berg
- Department of Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Henricot B, Pérez-Sierra A, Armstrong AC, Sharp PM, Green S. Morphological and Genetic Analyses of the Invasive Forest Pathogen Phytophthora austrocedri Reveal that Two Clonal Lineages Colonized Britain and Argentina from a Common Ancestral Population. Phytopathology 2017; 107:1532-1540. [PMID: 28742458 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-03-17-0126-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora austrocedri is causing widespread mortality of Austrocedrus chilensis in Argentina and Juniperus communis in Britain. The pathogen has also been isolated from J. horizontalis in Germany. Isolates from Britain, Argentina, and Germany are homothallic, with no clear differences in the dimensions of sporangia, oogonia, or oospores. Argentinian and German isolates grew faster than British isolates across a range of media and had a higher temperature tolerance, although most isolates, regardless of origin, grew best at 15°C and all isolates were killed at 25°C. Argentinian and British isolates caused lesions when inoculated onto both A. chilensis and J. communis; however, the Argentinian isolate caused longer lesions on A. chilensis than on J. communis and vice versa for the British isolate. Genetic analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial loci showed that all British isolates are identical. Argentinian isolates and the German isolate are also identical but differ from the British isolates. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms are shared between the British and Argentinian isolates. We concluded that British isolates and Argentinian isolates conform to two distinct clonal lineages of P. austrocedri founded from the same as-yet-unidentified source population. These lineages should be recognized and treated as separate risks by international plant health legislation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Béatrice Henricot
- First, third, and fifth authors: Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, United Kingdom; second author: Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, United Kingdom; and fourth author: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom
| | - Ana Pérez-Sierra
- First, third, and fifth authors: Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, United Kingdom; second author: Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, United Kingdom; and fourth author: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom
| | - April C Armstrong
- First, third, and fifth authors: Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, United Kingdom; second author: Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, United Kingdom; and fourth author: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom
| | - Paul M Sharp
- First, third, and fifth authors: Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, United Kingdom; second author: Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, United Kingdom; and fourth author: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Green
- First, third, and fifth authors: Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, United Kingdom; second author: Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, United Kingdom; and fourth author: Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pánek M, Tomšovský M. In vitro growth response of Phytophthora cactorum, P. nicotianae and P. × pelgrandis to antibiotics and fungicides. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2017; 62:269-277. [PMID: 28127667 DOI: 10.1007/s12223-017-0493-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The reactions of isolates of Phytophthora cactorum, P. nicotianae and P. × pelgrandis to metalaxyl, mancozeb, dimethomorph, streptomycin and chloramphenicol were tested to obtain information about the variability of resistance in these pathogens. Distinct genetic groups showed significant differences in resistance to all tested substances except streptomycin. In response to streptomycin, the growth inhibition rates of distinct groups did not differ significantly. The most remarkable differences were detected in the reactions to chloramphenicol and metalaxyl. Discriminant analysis evaluating the effect of all substances confirmed the differences among the groups, which are in agreement with the differences revealed by earlier DNA analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pánek
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507/73, 161 06, Praha 6, Czech Republic.
| | - M Tomšovský
- Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Beaulieu J, Ford B, Balci Y. Genotypic Diversity of Phytophthora cinnamomi and P. plurivora in Maryland's Nurseries and Mid-Atlantic Forests. Phytopathology 2017; 107:769-776. [PMID: 28168927 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-05-16-0215-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Genetic diversity of two Phytophthora spp.-P. cinnamomi (102 isolates), commonly encountered in Maryland nurseries and forests in the Mid-Atlantic United States, and P. plurivora (186 isolates), a species common in nurseries-was characterized using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Expected heterozygosity and other indices suggested a lower level of diversity among P. cinnamomi than P. plurivora isolates. Hierarchical clustering showed P. cinnamomi isolates separated into four clusters, and two of the largest clusters were closely related, containing 80% of the isolates. In contrast, P. plurivora isolates separated into six clusters, one of which included approximately 40% of the isolates. P. plurivora isolates recovered from the environment (e.g., soil and water) were genotypically more diverse than those found causing lesions. For both species, isolate origin (forest versus nursery or among nurseries) was a significant factor of heterozygosity. Clonal groups existed within P. cinnamomi and P. plurivora and included isolates from both forest and nurseries, suggesting that a pathway from nurseries to forests or vice versa exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Beaulieu
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Blaine Ford
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park
| | - Yilmaz Balci
- Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kunadiya M, White D, Dunstan WA, Hardy GESJ, Andjic V, Burgess TI. Pathways to false-positive diagnoses using molecular genetic detection methods; Phytophthora cinnamomi a case study. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2017; 364:fnx009. [PMID: 28087616 DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnx009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora cinnamomi is one of the world's most invasive plant pathogens affecting ornamental plants, horticultural crops and natural ecosystems. Accurate diagnosis is very important to determine the presence or absence of this pathogen in diseased and asymptomatic plants. In previous studies, P. cinnamomi species-specific primers were designed and tested using various polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques including conventional PCR, nested PCR and quantitative real-time PCR. In all cases, the primers were stated to be highly specific and sensitive to P. cinnamomi. However, few of these studies tested their primers against closely related Phytophthora species (Phytophthora clade 7). In this study, we tested these purported P. cinnamomi-specific primer sets against 11 other species from clade 7 and determined their specificity; of the eight tested primer sets only three were specific to P. cinnamomi. This study demonstrated the importance of testing primers against closely related species within the same clade, and not just other species within the same genus. The findings of this study are relevant to all species-specific microbial diagnosis.
Collapse
|
24
|
Haudenshield JS, Song JY, Hartman GL. A novel, multiplexed, probe-based quantitative PCR assay for the soybean root- and stem-rot pathogen, Phytophthora sojae, utilizes its transposable element. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176567. [PMID: 28441441 PMCID: PMC5404879 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora root rot of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is caused by the oomycete Phytophthora sojae (Kaufm. & Gerd.). P. sojae has a narrow host range, consisting primarily of soybean, and it is a serious pathogen worldwide. It exists in root and stem tissues as mycelium, wherein it can form oospores which subsequently germinate to release motile, infectious zoospores. Molecular assays detecting DNA of P. sojae are useful in disease diagnostics, and for determining the presence of the organism in host tissues, soils, and runoff or ponded water from potentially infested fields. Such assays as published have utilized ITS sequences from the nuclear ribosomal RNA genes in conventional PCR or dye-binding quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) but are not amenable to multiplexing, and some of these assays did not utilize control strategies for type I or type II errors. In this study, we describe primers and a bifunctional probe with specificity to a gypsy-like retroelement in the P. sojae genome to create a fluorogenic 5'-exonuclease linear hydrolysis assay, with a multiplexed internal control reaction detecting an exogenous target to validate negative calls, and with uracil-deglycosylase-mediated protection against carryover contamination. The assay specifically detected 13 different P. sojae isolates, and excluded 17 other Phytophthora species along with 20 non-Phytophthora fungal and oomycete species pathogenic on soybean. A diagnostic limit of detection of 34 fg total P. sojae DNA was observed in serial dilutions, equivalent to 0.3 genome, and a practical detection sensitivity of four zoospores per sample was achieved, despite losses during DNA extraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S. Haudenshield
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, and Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Jeong Y. Song
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Glen L. Hartman
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, and Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yang B, Wang Q, Jing M, Guo B, Wu J, Wang H, Wang Y, Lin L, Wang Y, Ye W, Dong S, Wang Y. Distinct regions of the Phytophthora essential effector Avh238 determine its function in cell death activation and plant immunity suppression. New Phytol 2017; 214:361-375. [PMID: 28134441 DOI: 10.1111/nph.14430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/09/2016] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora pathogens secrete effectors to manipulate host innate immunity, thus facilitating infection. Among the RXLR effectors highly induced during Phytophthora sojae infection, Avh238 not only contributes to pathogen virulence but also triggers plant cell death. However, the detailed molecular basis of Avh238 functions remains largely unknown. We mapped the regions responsible for Avh238 functions in pathogen virulence and plant cell death induction using a strategy that combines investigation of natural variation and large-scale mutagenesis assays. The correlation between cellular localization and Avh238 functions was also evaluated. We found that the 79th residue (histidine or leucine) of Avh238 determined its cell death-inducing activity, and that the 53 amino acids in its C-terminal region are responsible for promoting Phytophthora infection. Transient expression of Avh238 in Nicotiana benthamiana revealed that nuclear localization is essential for triggering cell death, while Avh238-mediated suppression of INF1-triggered cell death requires cytoplasmic localization. Our results demonstrate that a representative example of an essential Phytophthora RXLR effector can evolve to escape recognition by the host by mutating one nucleotide site, and can also retain plant immunosuppressive activity to enhance pathogen virulence in planta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Yang
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Qunqing Wang
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
- Department of Plant Pathology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, China
| | - Maofeng Jing
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Baodian Guo
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Jiawei Wu
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Haonan Wang
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Long Lin
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Wenwu Ye
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Suomeng Dong
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| | - Yuanchao Wang
- Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests (Ministry of Education), Nanjing, 210095, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alejandro Rojas J, Jacobs JL, Napieralski S, Karaj B, Bradley CA, Chase T, Esker PD, Giesler LJ, Jardine DJ, Malvick DK, Markell SG, Nelson BD, Robertson AE, Rupe JC, Smith DL, Sweets LE, Tenuta AU, Wise KA, Chilvers MI. Oomycete Species Associated with Soybean Seedlings in North America-Part I: Identification and Pathogenicity Characterization. Phytopathology 2017; 107:280-292. [PMID: 27801078 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-16-0177-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Oomycete pathogens are commonly associated with soybean root rot and have been estimated to reduce soybean yields in the United States by 1.5 million tons on an annual basis. Limited information exists regarding the frequency and diversity of oomycete species across the major soybean-producing regions in North America. A survey was conducted across 11 major soybean-producing states in the United States and the province of Ontario, Canada. In 2011, 2,378 oomycete cultures were isolated from soybean seedling roots on a semiselective medium (CMA-PARPB) and were identified by sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region of rDNA. Sequence results distinguished a total of 51 Pythium spp., three Phytophthora spp., three Phytopythium spp., and one Aphanomyces sp. in 2011, with Pythium sylvaticum (16%) and P. oopapillum (13%) being the most prevalent. In 2012, the survey was repeated, but, due to drought conditions across the sampling area, fewer total isolates (n = 1,038) were collected. Additionally, in 2012, a second semiselective medium (V8-RPBH) was included, which increased the Phytophthora spp. isolated from 0.7 to 7% of the total isolates. In 2012, 54 Pythium spp., seven Phytophthora spp., six Phytopythium spp., and one Pythiogeton sp. were recovered, with P. sylvaticum (14%) and P. heterothallicum (12%) being recovered most frequently. Pathogenicity and virulence were evaluated with representative isolates of each of the 84 species on soybean cv. Sloan. A seed-rot assay identified 13 and 11 pathogenic species, respectively, at 13 and 20°C. A seedling-root assay conducted at 20°C identified 43 species as pathogenic, having a significantly detrimental effect on the seedling roots as compared with the noninoculated control. A total of 15 species were pathogenic in both the seed and seedling assays. This study provides a comprehensive characterization of oomycete species present in soybean seedling roots in the major production areas in the United States and Ontario, Canada and provides a basis for disease management and breeding programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alejandro Rojas
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Janette L Jacobs
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Stephanie Napieralski
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Behirda Karaj
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Carl A Bradley
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Thomas Chase
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Paul D Esker
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Loren J Giesler
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Doug J Jardine
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Dean K Malvick
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Samuel G Markell
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Berlin D Nelson
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Alison E Robertson
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - John C Rupe
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Damon L Smith
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Laura E Sweets
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Albert U Tenuta
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Kiersten A Wise
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Martin I Chilvers
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University; fifth author: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteeenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rojas JA, Jacobs JL, Napieralski S, Karaj B, Bradley CA, Chase T, Esker PD, Giesler LJ, Jardine DJ, Malvick DK, Markell SG, Nelson BD, Robertson AE, Rupe JC, Smith DL, Sweets LE, Tenuta AU, Wise KA, Chilvers MI. Oomycete Species Associated with Soybean Seedlings in North America-Part II: Diversity and Ecology in Relation to Environmental and Edaphic Factors. Phytopathology 2017; 107:293-304. [PMID: 27841963 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-16-0176-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is produced across a vast swath of North America, with the greatest concentration in the Midwest. Root rot diseases and damping-off are a major concern for production, and the primary causal agents include oomycetes and fungi. In this study, we focused on examination of oomycete species distribution in this soybean production system and how environmental and soil (edaphic) factors correlate with oomycete community composition at early plant growth stages. Using a culture-based approach, 3,418 oomycete isolates were collected from 11 major soybean-producing states and most were identified to genus and species using the internal transcribed spacer region of the ribosomal DNA. Pythium was the predominant genus isolated and investigated in this study. An ecology approach was taken to understand the diversity and distribution of oomycete species across geographical locations of soybean production. Metadata associated with field sample locations were collected using geographical information systems. Operational taxonomic units (OTU) were used in this study to investigate diversity by location, with OTU being defined as isolate sequences with 97% identity to one another. The mean number of OTU ranged from 2.5 to 14 per field at the state level. Most OTU in this study, classified as Pythium clades, were present in each field in every state; however, major differences were observed in the relative abundance of each clade, which resulted in clustering of states in close proximity. Because there was similar community composition (presence or absence) but differences in OTU abundance by state, the ordination analysis did not show strong patterns of aggregation. Incorporation of 37 environmental and edaphic factors using vector-fitting and Mantel tests identified 15 factors that correlate with the community composition in this survey. Further investigation using redundancy analysis identified latitude, longitude, precipitation, and temperature as factors that contribute to the variability observed in community composition. Soil parameters such as clay content and electrical conductivity also affected distribution of oomycete species. The present study suggests that oomycete species composition across geographical locations of soybean production is affected by a combination of environmental and edaphic conditions. This knowledge provides the basis to understand the ecology and distribution of oomycete species, especially those able to cause diseases in soybean, providing cues to develop management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alejandro Rojas
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Janette L Jacobs
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Stephanie Napieralski
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Behirda Karaj
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Carl A Bradley
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Thomas Chase
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Paul D Esker
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Loren J Giesler
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Doug J Jardine
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Dean K Malvick
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Samuel G Markell
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Berlin D Nelson
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Alison E Robertson
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - John C Rupe
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Damon L Smith
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Laura E Sweets
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Albert U Tenuta
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Kiersten A Wise
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| | - Martin I Chilvers
- First, second, third, fourth, and nineteenth authors: Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, and first and nineteenth authors: Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; fifth author; Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; sixth author: Department of Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007; seventh and fifteenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; tenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; eleventh and twelfth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701; sixteenth author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; seventeenth author: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada; and eighteenth author: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Puglisi I, De Patrizio A, Schena L, Jung T, Evoli M, Pane A, Van Hoa N, Van Tri M, Wright S, Ramstedt M, Olsson C, Faedda R, Magnano di San Lio G, Cacciola SO. Two previously unknown Phytophthora species associated with brown rot of Pomelo (Citrus grandis) fruits in Vietnam. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0172085. [PMID: 28208159 PMCID: PMC5313238 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Two distinct Phytophthora taxa were found to be associated with brown rot of pomelo (Citrus grandis), a new disease of this ancestral Citrus species, in the Vinh Long province, Mekong River Delta area, southern Vietnam. On the basis of morphological characters and using the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of the rDNA and the cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) as barcode genes, one of the two taxa was provisionally named as Phytophthora sp. prodigiosa, being closely related to but distinct from P. insolita, a species in Phytophthora Clade 9, while the other one, was closely related to but distinct from the Clade 2 species P. meadii and was informally designated as Phytophthora sp. mekongensis. Isolates of P. sp. prodigiosa and P. sp. mekongensis were also obtained from necrotic fibrous roots of Volkamer lemon (C. volkameriana) rootstocks grafted with 'King' mandarin (Citrus nobilis) and from trees of pomelo, respectively, in other provinces of the Mekong River Delta, indicating a widespread occurrence of both Phytophthora species in this citrus-growing area. Koch's postulates were fulfilled via pathogenicity tests on fruits of various Citrus species, including pomelo, grapefruit (Citrus x paradisi), sweet orange (Citrus x sinensis) and bergamot (Citrus x bergamia) as well as on the rootstock of 2-year-old trees of pomelo and sweet orange on 'Carrizo' citrange (C. sinensis 'Washington Navel' x Poncirus trifoliata). This is the first report of a Phytophthora species from Clade 2 other than P. citricola and P. citrophthora as causal agent of fruit brown rot of Citrus worldwide and the first report of P. insolita complex in Vietnam. Results indicate that likely Vietnam is still an unexplored reservoir of Phytophthora diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Puglisi
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
- Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Feo di Vito, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | | | - Leonardo Schena
- Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Feo di Vito, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Thomas Jung
- Phytophthora Research Center Mendel University, Zemedelska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- Phytophthora Research and Consultancy, Am Rain 9, Nußdorf, Germany
| | - Maria Evoli
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Antonella Pane
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Nguyen Van Hoa
- Southern Horticultural Research Institute, My Tho, Tien Giang, Vietnam
| | - Mai Van Tri
- Southern Horticultural Research Institute, My Tho, Tien Giang, Vietnam
| | - Sandra Wright
- Department of Electronics, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Mauritz Ramstedt
- Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish Agricultural University (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Christer Olsson
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roberto Faedda
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Gaetano Magnano di San Lio
- Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Feo di Vito, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Santa Olga Cacciola
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sahoo DK, Abeysekara NS, Cianzio SR, Robertson AE, Bhattacharyya MK. A Novel Phytophthora sojae Resistance Rps12 Gene Mapped to a Genomic Region That Contains Several Rps Genes. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0169950. [PMID: 28081566 PMCID: PMC5233422 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 12/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora sojae Kaufmann and Gerdemann, which causes Phytophthora root rot, is a widespread pathogen that limits soybean production worldwide. Development of Phytophthora resistant cultivars carrying Phytophthora resistance Rps genes is a cost-effective approach in controlling this disease. For this mapping study of a novel Rps gene, 290 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) (F7 families) were developed by crossing the P. sojae resistant cultivar PI399036 with the P. sojae susceptible AR2 line, and were phenotyped for responses to a mixture of three P. sojae isolates that overcome most of the known Rps genes. Of these 290 RILs, 130 were homozygous resistant, 12 heterzygous and segregating for Phytophthora resistance, and 148 were recessive homozygous and susceptible. From this population, 59 RILs homozygous for Phytophthora sojae resistance and 61 susceptible to a mixture of P. sojae isolates R17 and Val12-11 or P7074 that overcome resistance encoded by known Rps genes mapped to Chromosome 18 were selected for mapping novel Rps gene. A single gene accounted for the 1:1 segregation of resistance and susceptibility among the RILs. The gene encoding the Phytophthora resistance mapped to a 5.8 cM interval between the SSR markers BARCSOYSSR_18_1840 and Sat_064 located in the lower arm of Chromosome 18. The gene is mapped 2.2 cM proximal to the NBSRps4/6-like sequence that was reported to co-segregate with the Phytophthora resistance genes Rps4 and Rps6. The gene is mapped to a highly recombinogenic, gene-rich genomic region carrying several nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat (NBS-LRR)-like genes. We named this novel gene as Rps12, which is expected to be an invaluable resource in breeding soybeans for Phytophthora resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipak K. Sahoo
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America
| | - Nilwala S. Abeysekara
- Department Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America
| | - Silvia R. Cianzio
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America
| | - Alison E. Robertson
- Department Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Biasi A, Martin FN, Cacciola SO, di San Lio GM, Grünwald NJ, Schena L. Genetic Analysis of Phytophthora nicotianae Populations from Different Hosts Using Microsatellite Markers. Phytopathology 2016; 106:1006-14. [PMID: 27111805 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-11-15-0299-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
In all, 231 isolates of Phytophthora nicotianae representing 14 populations from different host genera, including agricultural crops (Citrus, Nicotiana, and Lycopersicon), potted ornamental species in nurseries (Lavandula, Convolvulus, Myrtus, Correa, and Ruta), and other plant genera were characterized using simple-sequence repeat markers. In total, 99 multilocus genotypes (MLG) were identified, revealing a strong association between genetic grouping and host of recovery, with most MLG being associated with a single host genus. Significant differences in the structure of populations were revealed but clonality prevailed in all populations. Isolates from Citrus were found to be genetically related regardless of their geographic origin and were characterized by high genetic uniformity and high inbreeding coefficients. Higher variability was observed for other populations and a significant geographical structuring was determined for isolates from Nicotiana. Detected differences were related to the propagation and cultivation systems of different crops. Isolates obtained from Citrus spp. are more likely to be distributed worldwide with infected plant material whereas Nicotiana and Lycopersicon spp. are propagated by seed, which would not contribute to the spread of the pathogen and result in a greater chance for geographic isolation of lineages. With regard to ornamental species in nurseries, the high genetic variation is likely the result of the admixture of diverse pathogen genotypes through the trade of infected plant material from various geographic origins, the presence of several hosts in the same nursery, and genetic recombination through sexual reproduction of this heterothallic species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Biasi
- First, fourth, and sixth authors: Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; second author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905; third author: Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi, Via S. Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy; and fifth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR
| | - Frank N Martin
- First, fourth, and sixth authors: Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; second author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905; third author: Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi, Via S. Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy; and fifth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR
| | - Santa O Cacciola
- First, fourth, and sixth authors: Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; second author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905; third author: Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi, Via S. Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy; and fifth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR
| | - Gaetano Magnano di San Lio
- First, fourth, and sixth authors: Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; second author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905; third author: Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi, Via S. Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy; and fifth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR
| | - Niklaus J Grünwald
- First, fourth, and sixth authors: Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; second author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905; third author: Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi, Via S. Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy; and fifth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR
| | - Leonardo Schena
- First, fourth, and sixth authors: Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; second author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), 1636 East Alisal Street, Salinas, CA 93905; third author: Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi, Via S. Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy; and fifth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Blaya J, Marhuenda FC, Pascual JA, Ros M. Microbiota Characterization of Compost Using Omics Approaches Opens New Perspectives for Phytophthora Root Rot Control. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0158048. [PMID: 27490955 PMCID: PMC4973912 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora root rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae is an economically important disease in pepper crops. The use of suppressive composts is a low environmental impact method for its control. Although attempts have been made to reveal the relationship between microbiota and compost suppressiveness, little is known about the microorganisms associated with disease suppression. Here, an Ion Torrent platform was used to assess the microbial composition of composts made of different agro-industrial waste and with different levels of suppressiveness against P. nicotianae. Both bacterial and fungal populations responded differently depending on the chemical heterogeneity of materials used during the composting process. High proportions (67–75%) of vineyard pruning waste were used in the most suppressive composts, COM-A and COM-B. This material may have promoted the presence of higher relative abundance of Ascomycota as well as higher microbial activity, which have proved to be essential for controlling the disease. Although no unique fungi or bacteria have been detected in neither suppressive nor conducive composts, relatively high abundance of Fusarium and Zopfiella were found in compost COM-B and COM-A, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that studies compost metabolome. Surprisingly, composts and peat clustered together in principal component analysis of the metabolic data according to their levels of suppressiveness achieved. This study demonstrated the need for combining the information provided by different techniques, including metagenomics and metametabolomics, to better understand the ability of compost to control plant diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefa Blaya
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Murcia, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | - Frutos C. Marhuenda
- Department of Agrochemistry and Biochemistry. University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Jose A. Pascual
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Murcia, Spain
| | - Margarita Ros
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Stamler RA, Sanogo S, Goldberg NP, Randall JJ. Phytophthora Species in Rivers and Streams of the Southwestern United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016; 82:4696-4704. [PMID: 27235435 PMCID: PMC4984303 DOI: 10.1128/aem.01162-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2016] [Accepted: 05/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Phytophthora species were isolated from rivers and streams in the southwestern United States by leaf baiting and identified by sequence analysis of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA (rDNA). The major waterways examined included the Rio Grande River, Gila River, Colorado River, and San Juan River. The most prevalent species identified in rivers and streams were Phytophthora lacustris and P. riparia, both members of Phytophthora ITS clade 6. P. gonapodyides, P. cinnamomi, and an uncharacterized Phytophthora species in clade 9 were also recovered. In addition, six isolates recovered from the Rio Grande River were shown to be hybrids of P. lacustris × P. riparia Pathogenicity assays using P. riparia and P. lacustris failed to produce any disease symptoms on commonly grown crops in the southwestern United States. Inoculation of Capsicum annuum with P. riparia was shown to inhibit disease symptom development when subsequently challenged with P. capsici, a pathogenic Phytophthora species. IMPORTANCE Many Phytophthora species are significant plant pathogens causing disease on a large variety of crops worldwide. Closer examinations of streams, rivers, and forest soils have also identified numerous Phytophthora species that do not appear to be phytopathogens and likely act as early saprophytes in aquatic and saturated environments. To date, the Phytophthora species composition in rivers and streams of the southwestern United States has not been evaluated. This article details a study to determine the identity and prevalence of Phytophthora species in rivers and streams located in New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Utah, and Texas. Isolated species were evaluated for pathogenicity on crop plants and for their potential to act as biological control agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rio A Stamler
- Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
| | - Soumalia Sanogo
- Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
| | - Natalie P Goldberg
- Department of Extension Plant Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
| | - Jennifer J Randall
- Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Blaya J, Lloret E, Santísima-Trinidad AB, Ros M, Pascual JA. Molecular methods (digital PCR and real-time PCR) for the quantification of low copy DNA of Phytophthora nicotianae in environmental samples. Pest Manag Sci 2016; 72:747-53. [PMID: 26012497 DOI: 10.1002/ps.4048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Revised: 05/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2015] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is the technique most often used to quantify pathogen presence. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a new technique with the potential to have a substantial impact on plant pathology research owing to its reproducibility, sensitivity and low susceptibility to inhibitors. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of using dPCR and qPCR to quantify Phytophthora nicotianae in several background matrices, including host tissues (stems and roots) and soil samples. RESULTS In spite of the low dynamic range of dPCR (3 logs compared with 7 logs for qPCR), this technique proved to have very high precision applicable at very low copy numbers. The dPCR was able to detect accurately the pathogen in all type of samples in a broad concentration range. Moreover, dPCR seems to be less susceptible to inhibitors than qPCR in plant samples. Linear regression analysis showed a high correlation between the results obtained with the two techniques in soil, stem and root samples, with R(2) = 0.873, 0.999 and 0.995 respectively. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that dPCR is a promising alternative for quantifying soil-borne pathogens in environmental samples, even in early stages of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefa Blaya
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
| | - Eva Lloret
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ana B Santísima-Trinidad
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
| | - Margarita Ros
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jose A Pascual
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Torres GA, Sarria GA, Martinez G, Varon F, Drenth A, Guest DI. Bud Rot Caused by Phytophthora palmivora: A Destructive Emerging Disease of Oil Palm. Phytopathology 2016; 106:320-329. [PMID: 26714102 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-09-15-0243-rvw] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Oomycetes from the genus Phytophthora are among the most important plant pathogens in agriculture. Epidemics caused by P. infestans precipitated the great Irish famine and had a major impact on society and human history. In the tropics, P. palmivora is a pathogen of many plant species including cacao (Theobroma cacao), citrus (Citrus sp.), durian (Durio zibethines), jackfruit (Artrocarpus heterophyllus), rubber (Hevea brasiliensis), and several palm species including coconut (Cocos nucifera), and the African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) as determined recently. The first localized epidemics of bud rot in oil palm in Colombia were reported in 1964. However, recent epidemics of bud rot have destroyed more than 70,000 ha of oil palm in the Western and Central oil palm growing regions of Colombia. The agricultural, social, and economic implications of these outbreaks have been significant in Colombia. Identification of the pathogen after 100 years of investigating the disease in the world enabled further understanding of infection, expression of a range of symptoms, and epidemiology of the disease. This review examines the identification of P. palmivora as the cause of bud rot in Colombia, its epidemiology, and discusses the importance of P. palmivora as a major threat to oil palm plantings globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Torres
- First, second, third, and fourth authors: Pests and Diseases Program, Colombian Oil Palm Research Centre, Cenipalma Bogota, Colombia; fifth author: Centre for Plant Science, The University of Queensland, Australia; and sixth author: Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - G A Sarria
- First, second, third, and fourth authors: Pests and Diseases Program, Colombian Oil Palm Research Centre, Cenipalma Bogota, Colombia; fifth author: Centre for Plant Science, The University of Queensland, Australia; and sixth author: Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - G Martinez
- First, second, third, and fourth authors: Pests and Diseases Program, Colombian Oil Palm Research Centre, Cenipalma Bogota, Colombia; fifth author: Centre for Plant Science, The University of Queensland, Australia; and sixth author: Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - F Varon
- First, second, third, and fourth authors: Pests and Diseases Program, Colombian Oil Palm Research Centre, Cenipalma Bogota, Colombia; fifth author: Centre for Plant Science, The University of Queensland, Australia; and sixth author: Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - A Drenth
- First, second, third, and fourth authors: Pests and Diseases Program, Colombian Oil Palm Research Centre, Cenipalma Bogota, Colombia; fifth author: Centre for Plant Science, The University of Queensland, Australia; and sixth author: Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - D I Guest
- First, second, third, and fourth authors: Pests and Diseases Program, Colombian Oil Palm Research Centre, Cenipalma Bogota, Colombia; fifth author: Centre for Plant Science, The University of Queensland, Australia; and sixth author: Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Blaya J, Lacasa C, Lacasa A, Martínez V, Santísima-Trinidad AB, Pascual JA, Ros M. Characterization of Phytophthora nicotianae isolates in southeast Spain and their detection and quantification through a real-time TaqMan PCR. J Sci Food Agric 2015; 95:1243-1251. [PMID: 25043929 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Revised: 06/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/04/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The soil-borne pathogens Phytophthora nicotianae and P. capsici are the causal agents of root and stem rot of many plant species. Although P. capsici was considered the causal agent in one of the main pepper production areas of Spain to date, evidence of the presence of P. nicotianae was found. We aimed to survey the presence of P. nicotianae and study the variability in its populations in this area in order to improve the management of Tristeza disease. RESULTS A new specific primer and a TaqMan probe were designed based on the internal transcribed spacer regions of ribosomal DNA to detect and quantify P. nicotianae. Both morphological and molecular analysis showed its presence and confirmed it to be the causal agent of the Phytophthora disease symptoms in the studied area. The genetic characterization among P. nicotianae populations showed a low variability of genetic diversity among the isolates. Only isolates of the A2 mating type were detected. CONCLUSIONS Not only is a specific and early detection of P. nicotianae essential but also the study of genetic variability among isolates for the appropriate management of the disease, above all, in producing areas with favorable conditions for the advance of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefa Blaya
- Department of Soil and Water Conservation and Organic Wastes Management, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura (CEBAS-CSIC), 30100, Espinardo, Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sharma M, Ghosh R, Tarafdar A, Telangre R. An efficient method for zoospore production, infection and real-time quantification of Phytophthora cajani causing Phytophthora blight disease in pigeonpea under elevated atmospheric CO₂. BMC Plant Biol 2015; 15:90. [PMID: 25888001 PMCID: PMC4377013 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-015-0470-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2014] [Accepted: 03/06/2015] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phytophthora blight caused by Phytophthora cajani is an emerging disease of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) affecting the crop irrespective of cropping system, cultivar grown and soil types. Current detection and identification methods for Phytophthora species rely primarily on cultural and morphological characteristics, the assessment of which is time-consuming and not always suitable. Sensitive and reliable methods for isolation, identification, zoospore production and estimating infection severity are therefore desirable in case of Phytophthora blight of pigeonpea. RESULTS In this study, protocols for isolation and identification of Phytophthora blight of pigeonpea were standardized. Also the method for zoospore production and in planta infection of P. cajani was developed. Quantification of fungal colonization by P. cajani using real-time PCR was further standardized. Phytophthora species infecting pigeonpea was identified based on mycological characters such as growth pattern, mycelium structure and sporangial morphology of the isolates and confirmed through molecular characterization (sequence deposited in GenBank). For Phytophthora disease development, zoospore suspension of 1 × 10(5) zoospores per ml was found optimum. Phytophthora specific real-time PCR assay was developed using specific primers based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 and 2. Use of real-time PCR allowed the quantitative estimation of fungal biomass in plant tissues. Detection sensitivities were within the range of 0.001 pg fungal DNA. A study to see the effect of elevated CO₂ on Phytophthora blight incidence was also conducted which indicated no significant difference in disease incidence, but incubation period delayed under elevated CO₂ as compared to ambient level. CONCLUSION The zoospore infection method for Phytophthora blight of pigeonpea will facilitate the small and large scale inoculation experiments and thus devise a platform for rapid and reliable screening against Phytophthora blight disease of pigeonpea. qPCR allowed a reliable detection and quantification of P. cajani in samples with low pathogen densities. This can be useful in early warning systems prior to potential devastating outbreak of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamta Sharma
- Legumes Pathology, International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, 502324, Telangana, India.
| | - Raju Ghosh
- Legumes Pathology, International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, 502324, Telangana, India.
| | - Avijit Tarafdar
- Legumes Pathology, International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, 502324, Telangana, India.
| | - Rameshwar Telangre
- Legumes Pathology, International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, 502324, Telangana, India.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Català S, Pérez-Sierra A, Abad-Campos P. The use of genus-specific amplicon pyrosequencing to assess phytophthora species diversity using eDNA from soil and water in Northern Spain. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0119311. [PMID: 25775250 PMCID: PMC4361056 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora is one of the most important and aggressive plant pathogenic genera in agriculture and forestry. Early detection and identification of its pathways of infection and spread are of high importance to minimize the threat they pose to natural ecosystems. eDNA was extracted from soil and water from forests and plantations in the north of Spain. Phytophthora-specific primers were adapted for use in high-throughput Sequencing (HTS). Primers were tested in a control reaction containing eight Phytophthora species and applied to water and soil eDNA samples from northern Spain. Different score coverage threshold values were tested for optimal Phytophthora species separation in a custom-curated database and in the control reaction. Clustering at 99% was the optimal criteria to separate most of the Phytophthora species. Multiple Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) corresponding to 36 distinct Phytophthora species were amplified in the environmental samples. Pyrosequencing of amplicons from soil samples revealed low Phytophthora diversity (13 species) in comparison with the 35 species detected in water samples. Thirteen of the MOTUs detected in rivers and streams showed no close match to sequences in international sequence databases, revealing that eDNA pyrosequencing is a useful strategy to assess Phytophthora species diversity in natural ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Català
- Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Pérez-Sierra
- Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, Spain
- Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Paloma Abad-Campos
- Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Miles TD, Martin FN, Coffey MD. Development of Rapid Isothermal Amplification Assays for Detection of Phytophthora spp. in Plant Tissue. Phytopathology 2015; 105:265-78. [PMID: 25208239 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-05-14-0134-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Several isothermal amplification techniques recently have been developed that are tolerant of inhibitors present in many plant extracts, which can reduce the need for obtaining purified DNA for running diagnostic assays. One such commercially available technique that has similarities with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for designing primers and a labeled probe is recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA). This technology was used to develop two simple and rapid approaches for detection of Phytophthora spp.: one genus-specific assay multiplexed with a plant internal control and the other species-specific assays for Phytophthora ramorum and P. kernoviae. All assays were tested for sensitivity (ranging from 3 ng to 1 fg of DNA) and specificity using DNA extracted from more than 136 Phytophthora taxa, 21 Pythium spp., 1 Phytopythium sp., and a wide range of plant species. The lower limit of linear detection using purified DNA was 200 to 300 fg of DNA in all pathogen RPA assays. Six different extraction buffers were tested for use during plant tissue maceration and the assays were validated in the field by collecting 222 symptomatic plant samples from over 50 different hosts. Only 56 samples were culture positive for Phytophthora spp. whereas 91 were positive using the Phytophthora genus-specific RPA test and a TaqMan real-time PCR assay. A technique for the generation of sequencing templates from positive RPA amplifications to confirm species identification was also developed. These RPA assays have added benefits over traditional technologies because they are rapid (results can be obtained in as little as 15 min), do not require DNA extraction or extensive training to complete, use less expensive portable equipment than PCR-based assays, and are significantly more specific than current immunologically based methods. This should provide a rapid, field-deployable capability for pathogen detection that will facilitate point-of-sample collection processing, thereby reducing the time necessary for accurate diagnostics and making management decisions.
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Sudden oak death, the tree disease caused by Phytophthora ramorum, has significant environmental and economic impacts on natural forests on the U.S. west coast, plantations in the United Kingdom, and in the worldwide nursery trade. Stream baiting is vital for monitoring and early detection of the pathogen in high-risk areas and is performed routinely; however, little is known about the nature of water-borne P. ramorum populations. Two drainages in an infested California forest were monitored intensively using stream-baiting for 2 years between 2009 and 2011. Pathogen presence was determined both by isolation and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from symptomatic bait leaves. Isolates were analyzed using simple sequence repeats to study population dynamics and genetic structure through time. Isolation was successful primarily only during spring conditions, while PCR extended the period of pathogen detection to most of the year. Water populations were extremely diverse, and changed between seasons and years. A few abundant genotypes dominated the water during conditions considered optimal for aerial populations, and matched those dominant in aerial populations. Temporal patterns of genotypic diversification and evenness were identical among aerial, soil, and water populations, indicating that all three substrates are part of the same epidemiological cycle, strongly influenced by rainfall and sporulation on leaves. However, there was structuring between substrates, likely arising due to reduced selection pressure in the water. Additionally, water populations showed wholesale mixing of genotypes without the evident spatial autocorrelation present in leaf and soil populations.
Collapse
|
40
|
Parke JL, Knaus BJ, Fieland VJ, Lewis C, Grünwald NJ. Phytophthora community structure analyses in Oregon nurseries inform systems approaches to disease management. Phytopathology 2014; 104:1052-1062. [PMID: 24702667 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-14-0014-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Nursery plants are important vectors for plant pathogens. Understanding what pathogens occur in nurseries in different production stages can be useful to the development of integrated systems approaches. Four horticultural nurseries in Oregon were sampled every 2 months for 4 years to determine the identity and community structure of Phytophthora spp. associated with different sources and stages in the nursery production cycle. Plants, potting media, used containers, water, greenhouse soil, and container yard substrates were systematically sampled from propagation to the field. From 674 Phytophthora isolates recovered, 28 different species or taxa were identified. The most commonly isolated species from plants were Phytophthora plurivora (33%), P. cinnamomi (26%), P. syringae (19%), and P. citrophthora (11%). From soil and gravel substrates, P. plurivora accounted for 25% of the isolates, with P. taxon Pgchlamydo, P. cryptogea, and P. cinnamomi accounting for 18, 17, and 15%, respectively. Five species (P. plurivora, P. syringae, P. taxon Pgchlamydo, P. gonapodyides, and P. cryptogea) were found in all nurseries. The greatest diversity of taxa occurred in irrigation water reservoirs (20 taxa), with the majority of isolates belonging to internal transcribed spacer clade 6, typically including aquatic opportunists. Nurseries differed in composition of Phytophthora communities across years, seasons, and source within the nursery. These findings suggest likely contamination hazards and target critical control points for management of Phytophthora disease using a systems approach.
Collapse
|
41
|
Dunn AR, Bruening SR, Grünwald NJ, Smart CD. Evolution of an Experimental Population of Phytophthora capsici in the Field. Phytopathology 2014; 104:1107-1117. [PMID: 24702666 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-12-13-0346-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Populations of the vegetable pathogen Phytophthora capsici are often highly diverse, with limited gene flow between fields. To investigate the structure of a newly established, experimental population, an uninfested research field was inoculated with two single-zoospore isolates of P. capsici in September 2008. From 2009 through 2012, ≈50 isolates of P. capsici were collected from the field each year and genotyped using five microsatellite loci. The same two isolates were also crossed in the lab. High levels of diversity were detected in the research field, with 26 to 37 unique multilocus genotypes detected each year. Through 2012, genotypic diversity did not decline and no evidence of genetic drift was observed. However, during the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons, four new alleles not present in either parental isolate were observed in the field. Selfing (but not apomixis) was observed at low frequency among in vitro progeny. In addition, evidence for loss of heterozygosity was observed in half of the in vitro progeny. These results suggest that recombination, mutation, and loss of heterozygosity can affect the genetic structure observed in P. capsici populations.
Collapse
|
42
|
Bilodeau GJ, Martin FN, Coffey MD, Blomquist CL. Development of a multiplex assay for genus- and species-specific detection of Phytophthora based on differences in mitochondrial gene order. Phytopathology 2014; 104:733-748. [PMID: 24915428 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-09-13-0263-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
A molecular diagnostic assay for Phytophthora spp. that is specific, sensitive, has both genus- and species-specific detection capabilities multiplexed, and can be used to systematically develop markers for detection of a wide range of species would facilitate research and regulatory efforts. To address this need, a marker system was developed based on the high copy sequences of the mitochondrial DNA utilizing gene orders that were highly conserved in the genus Phytophthora but different in the related genus Pythium and plants to reduce the importance of highly controlled annealing temperatures for specificity. An amplification primer pair designed from conserved regions of the atp9 and nad9 genes produced an amplicon of ≈340 bp specific for the Phytophthora spp. tested. The TaqMan probe for the genus-specific Phytophthora test was designed from a conserved portion of the atp9 gene whereas variable intergenic spacer sequences were used for designing the species-specific TaqMan probes. Specific probes were developed for 13 species and the P. citricola species complex. In silico analysis suggests that species-specific probes could be developed for at least 70 additional described and provisional species; the use of locked nucleic acids in TaqMan probes should expand this list. A second locus spanning three tRNAs (trnM-trnP-trnM) was also evaluated for genus-specific detection capabilities. At 206 bp, it was not as useful for systematic development of a broad range of species-specific probes as the larger 340-bp amplicon. All markers were validated against a test panel that included 87 Phytophthora spp., 14 provisional Phytophthora spp., 29 Pythium spp., 1 Phytopythium sp., and 39 plant species. Species-specific probes were validated further against a range of geographically diverse isolates to ensure uniformity of detection at an intraspecific level, as well as with other species having high levels of sequence similarity to ensure specificity. Both diagnostic assays were also validated against 130 environmental samples from a range of hosts. The only limitation observed was that primers for the 340 bp atp9-nad9 locus did not amplify Phytophthora bisheria or P. frigida. The identification of species present in a sample can be determined without the need for culturing by sequencing the genus-specific amplicon and comparing that with a reference sequence database of known Phytophthora spp.
Collapse
|
43
|
Lin F, Zhao M, Baumann DD, Ping J, Sun L, Liu Y, Zhang B, Tang Z, Hughes E, Doerge RW, Hughes TJ, Ma J. Molecular response to the pathogen Phytophthora sojae among ten soybean near isogenic lines revealed by comparative transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 2014; 15:18. [PMID: 24410936 PMCID: PMC3893405 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2013] [Accepted: 01/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phytophthora root and stem rot (PRR) of soybean, caused by Phytophthora sojae, is controlled by Rps genes. However, little is known regarding the Rps-induced molecular responses to P. sojae and how they actually overlap. We thus sequenced, analyzed, and compared the transcriptomes of 10 near isogenic lines (NILs), each with a unique Rps gene/allele, and the susceptible parent Williams, pre- and post-inoculation with the pathogen. RESULTS A total of 4,330 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in Williams versus 2,014 to 5,499 DEGs in individual NILs upon inoculation with the pathogen. Comparisons of the DEGs between the NILs and Williams identified incompatible interaction genes (IIGs) and compatible interaction genes (CIGs). Hierarchical cluster and heatmap analyses consistently grouped the NILs into three clusters: Cluster I (Rps1-a), Cluster II (Rps1-b, 1-c and 1-k) and Cluster III (Rps3-a, 3-b, 3-c, 4, 5, and 6), suggesting an overlap in Rps-induced defense signaling among certain NILs. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed associations between members of the WRKY family and incompatible reactions and between a number of phytohormone signaling pathways and incompatible/compatible interactions. These associations appear to be distinguished according to the NIL clusters. CONCLUSIONS This study characterized genes and multiple branches of putative regulatory networks associated with resistance to P. sojae in ten soybean NILs, and depicted functional "fingerprints" of individual Rps-mediated resistance responses through comparative transcriptomic analysis. Of particular interest are dramatic variations of detected DEGs, putatively involved in ethylene (ET)-, jasmonic acid (JA)-, (reactive oxygen species) ROS-, and (MAP-kinase) MAPK- signaling, among these soybean NILs, implicating their important roles of these signaling in differentiating molecular defense responses. We hypothesize that different timing and robustness in defense signaling to the same pathogen may be largely responsible for such variations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Lin
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Meixia Zhao
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Douglas D Baumann
- Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin – La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA
| | - Jieqing Ping
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Lianjun Sun
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Yunfeng Liu
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Biao Zhang
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Zongxiang Tang
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Elisa Hughes
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Rebecca W Doerge
- Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Teresa J Hughes
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
- USDA-ARS Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Jianxin Ma
- Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
The detection of live quarantine pathogenic fungi plays an important role in guaranteeing regional biological safety. DNA barcoding, an emerging species identification technology, holds promise for the reliable, quick, and accurate detection of quarantine fungi. International standards for phytosanitary guidelines are urgently needed. The varieties of quarantine fungi listed for seven countries/regions, the currently applied detection methods, and the status of DNA barcoding for detecting quarantine fungi are summarized in this study. Two approaches have been proposed to apply DNA barcoding to fungal quarantine procedures: (i) to verify the reliability of known internal transcribed spacer (ITS)/cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) data for use as barcodes, and (ii) to determine other barcodes for species that cannot be identified by ITS/COI. As a unique, standardizable, and universal species identification tool, DNA barcoding offers great potential for integrating detection methods used in various countries/regions and establishing international detection standards based on accepted DNA barcodes. Through international collaboration, interstate disputes can be eased and many problems related to routine quarantine detection methods can be solved for global trade.
Collapse
|
45
|
Eyre CA, Kozanitas M, Garbelotto M. Population dynamics of aerial and terrestrial populations of Phytophthora ramorum in a California forest under different climatic conditions. Phytopathology 2013; 103:1141-1152. [PMID: 23745672 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-11-12-0290-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Limited information is available on how soil and leaf populations of the sudden oak death pathogen, Phytophthora ramorum, may differ in their response to changing weather conditions, and their corresponding role in initiating the next disease cycle after unfavorable weather conditions. We sampled and cultured from 425 trees in six sites, three times at the end of a 3-year-long drought and twice during a wet year that followed. Soil was also sampled twice with similar frequency and design used for sampling leaves. Ten microsatellites were used for genetic analyses on cultures from successful isolations. Results demonstrated that incidence of leaf infection tripled at the onset of the first wet period in 3 years in spring 2010, while that of soil populations remained unchanged. Migration of genotypes among sites was low and spatially limited under dry periods but intensity and range of migration of genotypes significantly increased for leaf populations during wet periods. Only leaf genotypes persisted significantly between years, and genotypes present in different substrates distributed differently in soil and leaves. We conclude that epidemics start rapidly at the onset of favorable climatic conditions through highly transmissible leaf genotypes, and that soil populations are transient and may be less epidemiologically relevant than previously thought.
Collapse
|
46
|
Lewis Ivey ML, Miller SA. Assessing the efficacy of pre-harvest, chlorine-based sanitizers against human pathogen indicator microorganisms and Phytophthora capsici in non-recycled surface irrigation water. Water Res 2013; 47:4639-4651. [PMID: 23770479 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2013] [Revised: 04/04/2013] [Accepted: 04/18/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Many factors must be considered in order to develop and implement treatment systems to improve the microbial quality of surface water and prevent the accidental introduction of plant and human pathogens into vegetable crops. The efficacy of chlorine gas (Cl2(g)) and chlorine dioxide (ClO2) injection systems in combination with rapid sand filtration (RSF) was evaluated in killing fecal indicator microorganisms in irrigation water in a vegetable-intensive production area. The efficacy of ClO2 and Cl2(g) was variable throughout the distribution systems and coliform bacteria never dropped below levels required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for recreational waters. Sampling date and sampling point had a significant effect on the abundance of coliforms in Cl2(g)- and ClO2-treated water. Sampling date and sampling point also had a significant effect on the abundance of generic Escherichia coli in Cl2(g) treated water but only sampling point was significant in ClO2 treated water. Although the waterborne plant pathogen Phytophthora capsici was detected in five different sources of surface irrigation water using baiting and P. capsici-specific PCR, in vitro studies indicated that ClO2 at concentrations similar to those used to treat irrigation water did not reduce mycelial growth or direct germination of P. capsici sporangia and reduced zoospore populations by less than 50%. This study concludes that injection of ClO2 and Cl2(g) into surface water prior to rapid sand filtration is inadequate in reducing fecal indicator microorganism populations and ClO2 ineffectively kills infectious propagules of P. capsici. Additional research is needed to design a system that effectively targets and significantly reduces both plant and human pathogens that are present in surface irrigation water. A model for a multiple barrier approach to treating surface water for irrigation is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Lewis Ivey
- Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hu J, Pang Z, Bi Y, Shao J, Diao Y, Guo J, Liu Y, Lv H, Lamour K, Liu X. Genetically diverse long-lived clonal lineages of Phytophthora capsici from pepper in Gansu, China. Phytopathology 2013; 103:920-926. [PMID: 23550971 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-13-0016-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora capsici causes significant loss to pepper production in China, and our objective was to investigate the population structure in Gansu province. Between 2007 and 2011, 279 isolates were collected from pepper at 24 locations. Isolates (or subsets) were assessed for simple sequence repeat (SSR) genotype, metalaxyl resistance, mating type, and physiological race using cultivars from the World Vegetable Center (AVRDC) and New Mexico recombinant inbred lines (NMRILs). The A1 and A2 mating types were recovered from nine locations and metalaxyl-resistant isolates from three locations. A total of 104 isolates tested on the AVRDC panel resolved five physiological races. None of 42 isolates tested on the NMRIL panel caused visible infection. SSR genotyping of 127 isolates revealed 59 unique genotypes, with 42 present as singletons and 17 having 2 to 13 isolates. Isolates with identical genotypes were recovered from multiple sites across multiple years and, in many cases, had different race types or metalaxyl sensitivities. Isolates clustered into three groups with each group having almost exclusively the A1 or A2 mating type. Overall it appears long-lived genetically diverse clonal lineages are dispersed across Gansu, outcrossing is rare, and functionally important variation exists within a clonal framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Hu
- Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zhang YL, Jia QL, Li DW, Wang JE, Yin YX, Gong ZH. Characteristic of the pepper CaRGA2 gene in defense responses against Phytophthora capsici Leonian. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:8985-9004. [PMID: 23698759 PMCID: PMC3676768 DOI: 10.3390/ijms14058985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2013] [Revised: 04/15/2013] [Accepted: 04/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The most significant threat to pepper production worldwide is the Phytophthora blight, which is caused by the oomycete pathogen, Phytophthora capsici Leonian. In an effort to help control this disease, we isolated and characterized a P. capsici resistance gene, CaRGA2, from a high resistant pepper (C. annuum CM334) and analyzed its function by the method of real-time PCR and virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). The CaRGA2 has a full-length cDNA of 3,018 bp with 2,874 bp open reading frame (ORF) and encodes a 957-aa protein. The protein has a predicted molecular weight of 108.6 kDa, and the isoelectric point is 8.106. Quantitative real-time PCR indicated that CaRGA2 expression was rapidly induced by P. capsici. The gene expression pattern was different between the resistant and susceptible cultivars. CaRGA2 was quickly expressed in the resistant cultivar, CM334, and reached to a peak at 24 h after inoculation with P. capsici, five-fold higher than that of susceptible cultivar. Our results suggest that CaRGA2 has a distinct pattern of expression and plays a critical role in P. capsici stress tolerance. When the CaRGA2 gene was silenced via VIGS, the resistance level was clearly suppressed, an observation that was supported by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and detached leave inoculation. VIGS analysis revealed their importance in the surveillance to P. capsici in pepper. Our results support the idea that the CaRGA2 gene may show their response in resistance against P. capsici. These analyses will aid in an effort towards breeding for broad and durable resistance in economically important pepper cultivars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Li Zhang
- College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; E-Mails: (Y.-L.Z.); (Q.-L.J.); (D.-W.L.); (J.-E.W.); (Y.-X.Y.)
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qing-Li Jia
- College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; E-Mails: (Y.-L.Z.); (Q.-L.J.); (D.-W.L.); (J.-E.W.); (Y.-X.Y.)
| | - Da-Wei Li
- College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; E-Mails: (Y.-L.Z.); (Q.-L.J.); (D.-W.L.); (J.-E.W.); (Y.-X.Y.)
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jun-E Wang
- College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; E-Mails: (Y.-L.Z.); (Q.-L.J.); (D.-W.L.); (J.-E.W.); (Y.-X.Y.)
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yan-Xu Yin
- College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; E-Mails: (Y.-L.Z.); (Q.-L.J.); (D.-W.L.); (J.-E.W.); (Y.-X.Y.)
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhen-Hui Gong
- College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; E-Mails: (Y.-L.Z.); (Q.-L.J.); (D.-W.L.); (J.-E.W.); (Y.-X.Y.)
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Li M, Inada M, Watanabe H, Suga H, Kageyama K. Simultaneous detection and quantification of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. cactorum, and distribution analyses in strawberry greenhouses by duplex real-time PCR. Microbes Environ 2013; 28:195-203. [PMID: 23614901 PMCID: PMC4070668 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.me12177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2012] [Accepted: 12/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora nicotianae and P. cactorum cause Phytophthora rot of strawberry. A duplex real-time PCR technique for simultaneous detection and quantification of the two pathogens was developed. Species-specific primers for P. nicotianae and P. cactorum were designed based on the internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS) of rDNA and the ras-related protein gene Ypt1, respectively. TaqMan probes were labeled with FAM for P. nicotianae and HEX for P. cactorum. Specificities were demonstrated using 52 isolates, including various soil-borne pathogens. Sensitivities for P. nicotianae and P. cactorum DNAs were 10 fg and 1 pg, respectively. The technique was applied to naturally infested soil and root samples; the two pathogens were detected and the target DNA concentrations were quantified. Significant correlations of DNA quantities in roots and the surrounding soils were found. The minimum soil DNA concentration predicting the development of disease symptoms was estimated as 20 pg (g soil)(-1). In three strawberry greenhouses examined, the target DNA concentrations ranged from 1 to 1,655 pg (g soil)(-1) for P. nicotianae and from 13 to 233 pg (g soil)(-1) for P. cactorum. The method proved fast and reliable, and provides a useful tool to monitor P. nicotianae and P. cactorum in plants or soils.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingzhu Li
- River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu 501–1193, Japan
| | - Minoru Inada
- Saga Prefectural Agricultural Research Center, Saga 840–2205, Japan
| | - Hideki Watanabe
- Gifu Prefectural Agricultural Technology Center, Gifu 501–1152, Japan
| | - Haruhisa Suga
- Life Science Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu 501–1193, Japan
| | - Koji Kageyama
- River Basin Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu 501–1193, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Aguayo J, Adams GC, Halkett F, Catal M, Husson C, Nagy ZÁ, Hansen EM, Marçais B, Frey P. Strong genetic differentiation between North American and European populations of Phytophthora alni subsp. uniformis. Phytopathology 2013; 103:190-199. [PMID: 23095465 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-05-12-0116-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Alder decline caused by Phytophthora alni has been one of the most important diseases of natural ecosystems in Europe during the last 20 years. The emergence of P. alni subsp. alni -the pathogen responsible for the epidemic-is linked to an interspecific hybridization event between two parental species: P. alni subsp. multiformis and P. alni subsp. uniformis. One of the parental species, P. alni subsp. uniformis, has been isolated in several European countries and, recently, in North America. The objective of this work was to assess the level of genetic diversity, the population genetic structure, and the putative reproduction mode and mating system of P. alni subsp. uniformis. Five new polymorphic microsatellite markers were used to contrast both geographical populations. The study comprised 71 isolates of P. alni subsp. uniformis collected from eight European countries and 10 locations in North America. Our results revealed strong differences between continental populations (Fst = 0.88; Rst = 0.74), with no evidence for gene flow. European isolates showed extremely low genetic diversity compared with the North American collection. Selfing appears to be the predominant mating system in both continental collections. The results suggest that the European P. alni subsp. uniformis population is most likely alien and derives from the introduction of a few individuals, whereas the North American population probably is an indigenous population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Aguayo
- INRA, UMR1136, INRA, Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres- Micro- organismes, IFR110 EFABA, Centre INRA de Nancy, 54280 Champenoux, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|