1
|
Hall P, Howell S, Venkitaraman R, Thomson A, Raja F, King J, Michie C, Khan S, Brunt A, Gahir D, McAdam K, Cooner J, Kane N. P084 Socioeconomic Outcomes With Ribociclib in Patients With HR+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) in UK Real-world Settings. Breast 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(23)00201-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
|
2
|
Margham J, McAdam K, Cunningham A, Porter A, Fiebelkorn S, Mariner D, Digard H, Proctor C. The Chemical Complexity of e-Cigarette Aerosols Compared With the Smoke From a Tobacco Burning Cigarette. Front Chem 2021; 9:743060. [PMID: 34660535 PMCID: PMC8514950 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.743060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: As e-cigarette popularity has increased, there is growing evidence to suggest that while they are highly likely to be considerably less harmful than cigarettes, their use is not free of risk to the user. There is therefore an ongoing need to characterise the chemical composition of e-cigarette aerosols, as a starting point in characterising risks associated with their use. This study examined the chemical complexity of aerosols generated by an e-cigarette containing one unflavored and three flavored e-liquids. A combination of targeted and untargeted chemical analysis approaches was used to examine the number of compounds comprising the aerosol. Contributions of e-liquid flavors to aerosol complexity were investigated, and the sources of other aerosol constituents sought. Emissions of 98 aerosol toxicants were quantified and compared to those in smoke from a reference tobacco cigarette generated under two different smoking regimes. Results: Combined untargeted and targeted aerosol analyses identified between 94 and 139 compounds in the flavored aerosols, compared with an estimated 72-79 in the unflavored aerosol. This is significantly less complex (by 1-2 orders of magnitude) than the reported composition of cigarette smoke. Combining both types of analysis identified 5-12 compounds over and above those found by untargeted analysis alone. Gravimetrically, 89-99% of the e-cigarette aerosol composition was composed of glycerol, propylene glycol, water and nicotine, and around 3% comprised other, more minor, constituents. Comparable data for the Ky3R4F reference tobacco cigarette pointed to 58-76% of cigarette smoke "tar" being composed of minor constituents. Levels of the targeted toxicants in the e-cigarette aerosols were significantly lower than those in cigarette smoke, with 68.5->99% reductions under ISO 3308 puffing conditions and 88.4->99% reductions under ISO 20778 (intense) conditions; reductions against the WHO TobReg 9 priority list were around 99%. Conclusion: These analyses showed that the e-cigarette aerosols contain fewer compounds and at significantly lower concentrations than cigarette smoke. The chemical diversity of an e-cigarette aerosol is strongly impacted by the choice of e-liquid ingredients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Margham
- Group Research and Development, British American Tobacco, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - K. McAdam
- McAdam Scientific Ltd., Eastleigh, United Kingdom
| | - A. Cunningham
- Group Research and Development, British American Tobacco, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - A. Porter
- Independent Researcher, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - S. Fiebelkorn
- Group Research and Development, British American Tobacco, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - D. Mariner
- Mariner Science Ltd., Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - H. Digard
- Group Research and Development, British American Tobacco, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - C. Proctor
- DoctorProctorScience Ltd., Ascot, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Favara DM, McAdam K, Cooke A, Bordessa-Kelly A, Budriunaite I, Bossingham S, Houghton S, Doffinger R, Ainsworth N, Corrie PG. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Antibody Seroprevalence among UK Healthcare Professionals Working with Cancer Patients during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:667-675. [PMID: 33941453 PMCID: PMC8064872 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Aims The proportion of UK oncology healthcare professionals (HCPs) infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave is unknown. The primary aim of this study was to determine the SARS-CoV-2 infection and seroprevalence rates among HCPs. Materials and methods Patient-facing oncology HCPs working at three large UK hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave underwent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antibody testing [Luminex and point-of-care (POC) tests] on two occasions 28 days apart (June–July 2020). Results In total, 434 HCPs were recruited: nurses (58.3%), doctors (21.2%), radiographers (10.4%), administrators (10.1%); 26.3% reported prior symptoms suggestive of SARS-CoV-2. All participants were PCR negative during the study, but 18.4% were Luminex seropositive on day 1, of whom 42.5% were POC seropositive. Nurses had the highest seropositive prevalence trend (21.3%, P = 0.2). Thirty-eight per cent of seropositive HCPs reported previous SARS-CoV-2 symptoms: 1.9 times higher odds than seronegative HCPs (P = 0.01). Of 400 participants retested on day 28, 13.3% were Luminex seropositive (92.5% previously, 7.5% newly). Thirty-two per cent of initially seropositive HCPs were seronegative on day 28. Conclusion In this large cohort of PCR-negative patient-facing oncology HCPs, almost one in five were SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive at the start of the pandemic's first wave. Our findings that one in three seropositive HCPs retested 28 days later became seronegative support regular SARS-CoV-2 PCR and antibody testing until widespread immunity is achieved by effective vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Favara
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Lynn, UK; Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - K McAdam
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Peterborough City Hospital, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, UK
| | - A Cooke
- Cambridge Clinical Laboratories, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Bordessa-Kelly
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - I Budriunaite
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Bossingham
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Houghton
- Department of Immunology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - R Doffinger
- Department of Immunology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - N Ainsworth
- Department of Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, Kings Lynn, UK
| | - P G Corrie
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Earl HM, Hiller L, Dunn J, Macpherson I, Rea D, Hughes-Davies L, McAdam K, Hall P, Mansi J, Wheatley D, Abraham JE, Caldas C, Gasson S, O'Riordan E, Wilcox M, Miles D, Cameron DA, Wardley A. Optimising the Duration of Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Early Breast Cancer in the UK. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:15-19. [PMID: 32723485 PMCID: PMC7382576 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H M Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK.
| | - L Hiller
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - I Macpherson
- University of Glasgow, Institute of Cancer Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - D Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Hughes-Davies
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - K McAdam
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Oncology, Peterborough City Hospital, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, UK
| | - P Hall
- Edinburgh University Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J Mansi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College Medical School, London, UK
| | - D Wheatley
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - J E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - C Caldas
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK; Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - S Gasson
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - E O'Riordan
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK
| | - M Wilcox
- Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK
| | - D Miles
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - D A Cameron
- Edinburgh University Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Wardley
- The NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility at The Christie, Manchester, UK; University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Borkar N, Provenzano E, Garreffa E, Benson J, Forouhi P, Hugh-Davies L, Wilson C, McAdam K, Russell S, Agrawal A. Does Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy response in the primary breast tumour correlate with axillary response in proven node positive ER positive HER2 negative disease? Eur J Cancer 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(20)30696-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
6
|
Jones R, Casbard A, Carucci M, Smith J, Ingarfield K, Gee J, Hudson Z, Alchami F, Hayward L, Hickish T, Hwang D, McAdam K, Spensley S, Waters S, Wheatley D, Beresford M. LBA20 Vandetanib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant after relapse or progression on an aromatase inhibitor in metastatic ER positive breast cancer (FURVA): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
7
|
Corrie PG, Qian W, Basu B, Valle JW, Falk S, Lwuji C, Wasan H, Palmer D, Scott-Brown M, Wadsley J, Arif S, Bridgewater J, Propper D, Gillmore R, Gopinathan A, Skells R, Bundi P, Brais R, Dalchau K, Bax L, Chhabra A, Machin A, Dayim A, McAdam K, Cummins S, Wall L, Ellis R, Anthoney A, Evans J, Ma YT, Isherwood C, Neesse A, Tuveson D, Jodrell DI. Scheduling nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:1760-1768. [PMID: 32350413 PMCID: PMC7283477 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0846-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nabP+gemcitabine) offers modest survival gains for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Sequential scheduling of nabP+gemcitabine in a PDAC mouse model improved efficacy; this hypothesis was tested in a clinical trial. METHODS Patients with previously untreated metastatic PDAC were randomised to receive nabP+gemcitabine administered either concomitantly on the same day, or sequentially, with gemcitabine administered 24 h after nabP. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety, quality of life (QoL) and predictive biomarkers. RESULTS In total, 71 patients received sequential (SEQ) and 75 concomitant (CON) treatment. Six-month PFS was 46% with SEQ and 32% with CON scheduling. Median PFS (5.6 versus 4.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.47-0.95, p = 0.022) and ORR (52% versus 31%, p = 0.023) favoured the SEQ arm; median OS was 10.2 versus 8.2 months (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65-1.33, p = 0.70). CTCAE Grade ≥3 neutropaenia incidence doubled with SEQ therapy but was not detrimental to QoL. Strongly positive tumour epithelial cytidine deaminase (CDA) expression favoured benefit from SEQ therapy (PFS HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.70). CONCLUSIONS SEQ delivery of nabP+gemcitabine improved PFS and ORR, with manageable toxicity, but did not significantly improve OS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN71070888; ClinialTrials.gov (NCT03529175).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P G Corrie
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK.
| | - W Qian
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - B Basu
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - J W Valle
- University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Falk
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - C Lwuji
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - H Wasan
- Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - D Palmer
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - M Scott-Brown
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | | | - S Arif
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | | | - A Gopinathan
- Cancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - R Skells
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - P Bundi
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - R Brais
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - K Dalchau
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - L Bax
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - A Chhabra
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - A Machin
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - A Dayim
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
| | - K McAdam
- Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK
| | - S Cummins
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - L Wall
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - R Ellis
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals, Truro, UK
| | - A Anthoney
- St. James's University Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | - J Evans
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Y T Ma
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Isherwood
- Cancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Neesse
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Cancer Clinic, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - D Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA
| | - D I Jodrell
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Addenbrooke's Hospital), Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abraham JE, Vallier AL, Qian W, Machin A, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Weiss M, Harvey C, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roberts A, Provenzano E, Pinilla K, Roylance R, Copson E, Armstrong A, McMurtry E, Tischkowitz M, Earl HM. Abstract OT3-01-02: PARTNERING / PARTNER : Phase II sub-study to establish if the addition of combinations of new agents (olaparib, cell cycle and immune checkpoint inhibitors) can improve the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and / or germline BRCA mutated (gBRCAm) patients with evidence of residual disease after PARTNER therapy. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-ot3-01-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
In patients with TNBC, following standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, residual disease (RD) is correlated with poor prognosis and 50% relapse within 5 years [1]. PARTNER is a neoadjuvant clinical trial which randomises TNBC and gBRCAm patients to carboplatin and paclitaxel +/- olaparib followed by anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Patients with RD after neoadjuvant treatment in this trial also face poorer survival outcomes, due to the paucity of treatment options. PARTNERING, develops a new strategy using novel agent combinations as an alternative pathway for patients with RD within the PARTNER trial.
Methods: PARTNERING is a phase II open label, sub-study with a two-stage Simon design with biomarker guided treatment cohorts open only to patients in the PARTNER trial. A maximum of 15 patients will be included in each cohort. Patients with RD > 10% tumour cellularity (TC) on biopsy after neoadjuvant therapy will be eligible. Patients who have no tumour cells or < 10% TC, and those with progressive disease will be excluded. Allocation of patients into the cohorts will be based on tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) expression either on diagnostic or post treatment biopsy. Patients with tumours with TILs score ≤20% are considered “non-immunogenic” They will be stratified according to HRD status and allocated to receive a cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor + olaparib. Patients with a TILs score >20% are considered “immunogenic” and will be allocated to receive an immune checkpoint inhibitor with olaparib or a cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor.
Primary outcome measure is pCR / MRD rate at surgery after the administration of 2 cycles / 8 weeks of a combination of new agents. The rate of conversion to pCR/MRD will be correlated with TC, TILs, BRCA and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, Ki67% and previous olaparib treatment.
Progress: The PARTNERING pathway in the PARTNER trial will be open late 2018.
Citation Format: Abraham JE, Vallier A-L, Qian W, Machin A, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Weiss M, Harvey C, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roberts A, Provenzano E, Pinilla K, Roylance R, Copson E, Armstrong A, McMurtry E, Tischkowitz M, Earl HM. PARTNERING / PARTNER : Phase II sub-study to establish if the addition of combinations of new agents (olaparib, cell cycle and immune checkpoint inhibitors) can improve the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and / or germline BRCA mutated (gBRCAm) patients with evidence of residual disease after PARTNER therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JE Abraham
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A-L Vallier
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - W Qian
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Machin
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Grybowicz
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - S Thomas
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Weiss
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - C Harvey
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - K McAdam
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Hughes-Davies
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Roberts
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - E Provenzano
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - K Pinilla
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - R Roylance
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - E Copson
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Armstrong
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - E McMurtry
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Tischkowitz
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - HM Earl
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abraham J, Vallier AL, Qian W, Machin A, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Weiss M, Harvey C, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roberts A, Roylance R, Copson E, Pinilla K, Armstrong A, Provenzano E, Tischkowitz M, McMurty E, Earl H. Abstract OT3-03-03: PARTNER: Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-ot3-03-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: No specific targeted therapies are available for Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC), an aggressive and diverse subgroup. The basal TNBC sub-group share some phenotypic and molecular similarities with germline BRCA (gBRCA) tumours. In gBRCA patients, and potentially other homologous recombination deficiencies, these already compromised pathways may allow drugs called PARP inhibitors (Olaparib) to work more effectively. Aims: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for basal TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR)).
Methods: Trial design: 3-stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin +/- olaparib, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen. Stage 1 and 2: Randomisation (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or one of two research arms with the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD for 12 days. Stage 3: Patients are randomised (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2. End-points: Stage 1: Safety; Stage 2: Schedule selection using pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib using a “pick-the-winner” design. Stage 3: pCR rate. Enrichment design is applied with an overall significance level 0.05(α) and 80% power. A total of 527 patients will be included to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to platinum based chemotherapy.
Trial Progress: PARTNER has been recruiting in UK since 27th May 2016. IDSMC recommended to continue the trial without change after reviewing the Stage 1 safety data. The recruitment of stage 2 was completed in April 2018 and results to be reviewed by the IDSMC in early 2019. The trial is open and enrolling patients to national and international sites.
Citation Format: Abraham J, Vallier A-L, Qian W, Machin A, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Weiss M, Harvey C, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roberts A, Roylance R, Copson E, Pinilla K, Armstrong A, Provenzano E, Tischkowitz M, McMurty E, Earl H. PARTNER: Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-03-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Abraham
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A-L Vallier
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - W Qian
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Machin
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Grybowicz
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - S Thomas
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Weiss
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - C Harvey
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - K McAdam
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - L Hughes-Davies
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Roberts
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - R Roylance
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - E Copson
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - K Pinilla
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Armstrong
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - E Provenzano
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Tischkowitz
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - E McMurty
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - H Earl
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Astra Zenecca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom; NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McAdam K, Davis P, Ashmore L, Eaton D, Jakaj B, Eldridge A, Liu C. Influence of machine-based puffing parameters on aerosol and smoke emissions from next generation nicotine inhalation products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2019; 101:156-165. [DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 11/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
11
|
McAdam K, Vas C, Kimpton H, Faizi A, Liu C, Porter A, Synnerdahl T, Karlsson P, Rodu B. Ethyl carbamate in Swedish and American smokeless tobacco products and some factors affecting its concentration. Chem Cent J 2018; 12:86. [PMID: 30043180 PMCID: PMC6057859 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-018-0454-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We are interested in comparing the levels of harmful or potentially harmful constituents in Swedish and American smokeless tobacco products (STPs). We report here the concentrations of the IARC Group 2 A (probable human) carcinogen ethyl carbamate (EC) in seventy commercial STPs from the US and Sweden, representing 80-90% of the market share of the major STP categories in these countries. We also examine the effects of various additives, processing and storage conditions on EC concentrations in experimental snus samples. RESULTS EC was determined from aqueous extracts of the STPs using ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/MS/MS). EC was undetectable (< 20 ng/g wet weight basis WWB) in 60% of the commercial STPs, including all the chewing tobacco (CT), dry snuff (DS), hard pellet (HP), soft pellet (SP), and plug products. Measurable levels of EC were found in 11/16 (69%) of the moist snuff (MS) samples (average 154 ng/g in those samples containing EC) and 19/32 (59%) of the Swedish snus samples (average 35 ng/g). For the experimental snus samples, EC was only observed in ethanol treated samples. EC concentrations increased significantly with ethanol concentrations (0-4%) and with storage time (up to 24 weeks) and temperature (8 °C vs 20 °C). EC concentrations were lower at lower pHs but were unaffected by adding nitrogenous precursors identified from food studies (citrulline and urea), increasing water content or by pasteurisation. Added EC was stable in the STP matrix, but evaporative losses were significant when samples were stored for several weeks in open containers at 8 °C. CONCLUSIONS EC was found in measurable amounts only in some moist STPs i.e. pasteurised Swedish snus and unpasteurised US MS; it is not a ubiquitous contaminant of STPs. The presence of ethanol contributed significantly to the presence of EC in experimental snus samples, more significantly at higher pH levels. Sample age also was a key determinant of EC content. In contrast, pasteurisation and fermentation do not appear to directly influence EC levels. Using published consumption rates and mouth level exposures, on average STP consumers are exposed to lower EC levels from STP use than from food consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. McAdam
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - C. Vas
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - H. Kimpton
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - A. Faizi
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - C. Liu
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - A. Porter
- 3810 St. Antoine W, Montreal, QC H4C 1B4 Canada
| | - T. Synnerdahl
- Eurofins Food & Feed Testing Sweden AB, Sjöhagsgatan 3, 531 40 Lidköping, Sweden
| | - P. Karlsson
- Eurofins Food & Feed Testing Sweden AB, Sjöhagsgatan 3, 531 40 Lidköping, Sweden
| | - B. Rodu
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Room 208, 505 South Hancock Street, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Earl HM, Hiller L, Dunn JA, Blenkinsop C, Grybowicz L, Vallier AL, Gounaris I, Abraham JE, Hughes-Davies L, McAdam K, Chan S, Ahmad R, Hickish T, Rea D, Caldas C, Bartlett JMS, Cameron DA, Provenzano E, Thomas J, Hayward RL. Disease-free and overall survival at 3.5 years for neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, for women with HER2 negative early breast cancer: ARTemis Trial. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1817-1824. [PMID: 28459938 PMCID: PMC5834079 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The ARTemis trial previously reported that addition of neoadjuvant bevacizumab (Bev) to docetaxel (D) followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (D-FEC) in HER2 negative breast cancer improved the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. We present disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with central pathology review. Patients and methods Patients were randomized to 3 cycles of D followed by 3 cycles of FEC (D-FEC), ±4 cycles of Bev (Bev + D-FEC). DFS and OS were analyzed by treatment and by central pathology reviewed pCR and Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) class. Results A total of 800 patients were randomized [median follow-up 3.5 years (IQR 3.2–4.4)]. DFS and OS were similar across treatment arms [DFS hazard ratio (HR)=1.18 (95% CI 0.89–1.57), P = 0.25; OS HR = 1.26 (95% CI 0.90–1.76), P = 0.19). Both local pathology report review and central histopathology review confirmed a significant improvement in DFS and OS for patients who achieved a pCR [DFS HR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.23–0.63), P < 0.001; OS HR = 0.43 (95% CI 0.24–0.75), P = 0.003]. However, significant heterogeneity was observed (P = 0.02); larger improvements in DFS were obtained with a pCR achieved with D-FEC than a pCR achieved with Bev + D-FEC. As RCB class increased, significantly worse DFS and OS was observed (P for trend <0.0001), which effect was most marked in the ER negative group. Conclusions The addition of short course neoadjuvant Bev to standard chemotherapy did not demonstrate a DFS or OS benefit. Achieving a pCR with D-FEC is associated with improved DFS and OS but not when pCR is achieved with Bev + D-FEC. At the present time therefore, Bev is not recommended in early breast cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01093235.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H M Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.,NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge.,Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
| | - L Hiller
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry
| | - J A Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry
| | - C Blenkinsop
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry
| | - L Grybowicz
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit - Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
| | - A-L Vallier
- Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit - Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
| | - I Gounaris
- Department of Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust, King's Lynn.,Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - J E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.,NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge.,Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
| | - L Hughes-Davies
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.,Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
| | - K McAdam
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge.,Department of Oncology, Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough
| | - S Chan
- Department of Oncology, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham
| | - R Ahmad
- Department of Oncology, West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth
| | - T Hickish
- Department of Oncology, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust/Bournemouth University, Poole
| | - D Rea
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - C Caldas
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.,NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge.,Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge.,Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - J M S Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, MaRS Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, IGMM, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| | - D A Cameron
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, IGMM, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| | - E Provenzano
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge.,Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge
| | - J Thomas
- Department of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - R L Hayward
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, IGMM, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abraham J, Vallier AL, Qian W, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Machin A, Harvey C, Chiu E, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roylance R, Copson E, Armstrong A, Provenzano E, Tischkowitz M, McMurtry E, Earl H. Abstract OT3-04-03: PARTNER randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-ot3-04-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: No specific targeted therapies are available for Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC), an aggressive and diverse subgroup. The basal TNBC subgroup show some phenotypic and molecular similarities with germline BRCA (gBRCA). In gBRCA patients, and potentially other homologous recombination deficiencies, these already compromised pathways may allow drugs called PARP inhibitors (olaparib) to work more effectively.
Aims: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy for basal TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy (pathological complete response (pCR)).
Trial design: 3 stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin +/olaparib, followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen.
Stage 1 and 2: Patients are randomised (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 4 cycles) or one of two research arms with the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD for 12 days.
Stage 3: Patients are randomised (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2.
Methods:
Stage 1 Safety: both research arms combined.
Stage 2 Schedule selection criteria: pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib protocol treatment. It is a “pickthewinner” design with 53 patients in each research arm. This allows a 90% power, 5% onesided significance level to test null hypothesis of pCR ≤35% versus an alternative hypothesis of pCR ≥55% in each of the research arms.
Stage 3 Efficacy:anticipated pCR ˜55-60% for all trial patients and ˜60-65% for gBRCA patients. The trial is powered to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to chemotherapy (enriched design). TNBC patient recruitment will be capped, to ensure required gBRCA patients are enrolled. Enrichment design is applied with overall significance level 0.05(α) = 0.025(αall)+ 0.025(αgBRCA) and 80% power.
Target accrual: 527 [gBRCA 220] Current accrual: 56 Sites activated: 15 [expected number of sites 30-50].
Citation Format: Abraham J, Vallier A-L, Qian W, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Machin A, Harvey C, Chiu E, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roylance R, Copson E, Armstrong A, Provenzano E, Tischkowitz M, McMurtry E, Earl H. PARTNER randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-04-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Abraham
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - A-L Vallier
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - W Qian
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - L Grybowicz
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - S Thomas
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - A Machin
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - C Harvey
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - E Chiu
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - K McAdam
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - L Hughes-Davies
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - R Roylance
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - E Copson
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - A Armstrong
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - E Provenzano
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - M Tischkowitz
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - E McMurtry
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| | - H Earl
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McAdam K, Kimpton H, Porter A, Liu C, Faizi A, Mola M, McAughey J, Rodu B. Comprehensive survey of radionuclides in contemporary smokeless tobacco products. Chem Cent J 2017; 11:131. [PMID: 29256072 PMCID: PMC5735045 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-017-0359-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
There is considerable interest in the chemical composition of smokeless tobacco products (STPs), owing to health concerns associated with their use. Previous studies have documented levels of 210Po, 210Pb and uranium in STP samples. Here, the levels of 13 α-particle and 15 β-radiation emitting radionuclides have been measured in a broad and representative range of contemporary STPs commercially available in the United States and Sweden. For each radionuclide, the level of radioactivity and calculated mass per gram of STP are reported. The results indicate that, among 34 Swedish snus and 44 US STPs, a more complex radionuclide content exists than previously reported for these products. Of the 28 radionuclides examined, 13 were detected and quantified in one or more STPs. The most frequently identified radionuclides in these STPs were 40K, 14C, 210Po and 226Ra. Over half the STPs also contained 228Th, and an additional 8 radionuclides were identified in a small number of STPs. The presence of 14C, 3H and 230Th are reported in tobacco for the first time. The activity of β-emitters was much greater than those of α-emitters, and the β-emitter 40K was present in the STPs with both the greatest radioactivity and mass concentrations. Since the three radionuclides included in the FDA's HPHC list were either not detected (235U), identified in only three of 78 samples (238U), and/or had activity levels over fifty times lower than that of 40K (210Po, 238U), there may be a rationale for reconsidering the radionuclides currently included in the FDA HPHC list, particularly with respect to 40K. Using a model of the physical and biological compartments which must be considered to estimate the exposure of STP users to radionuclides, we conclude that exposure from α-emitters may be minimal to STP users, but 40K in particular may expose the oral cavities of STP users to β-radiation. Although a more comprehensive picture of the radioisotope content of STPs has emerged from this study, epidemiological evidence suggests that the levels of radionuclides measured in this study appear unlikely to present significant risks to STP users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. McAdam
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - H. Kimpton
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - A. Porter
- 3810 St. Antoine W, Montreal, QC H4C 1B4 Canada
| | - C. Liu
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - A. Faizi
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - M. Mola
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - J. McAughey
- Group Research & Development, British American Tobacco, Regents Park Road, Southampton, SO15 8TL UK
| | - B. Rodu
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, 505 South Hancock Street, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abraham JE, Vallier AL, Qian W, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Mahmud S, Harvey C, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roylance R, Copson E, Brown J, Provenzano E, Tischkowitz M, Earl HM. Abstract OT2-01-15: PARTNER - Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-ot2-01-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) are a biologically diverse and aggressive sub-group. Early effective treatment can lead to cure. Current standard treatment is systemic chemotherapy either pre-/post-definitive surgery. No specific targeted therapies are available for TNBC. There are phenotypic and molecular similarities between germline BRCA (gBRCA) breast cancer and TNBC. In TNBC 10%-20% harbour gBRCA mutations. In gBRCA patients, and potentially other homologous recombination deficiencies, these already compromised pathways allow drugs called PARP inhibitors (olaparib) to work particularly effectively.
Aims: To establish if the addition of olaparib to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy for TNBC and/or gBRCA breast cancer is safe and improves efficacy.
Trial design: 3-stage open label randomised phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant olaparib +/- platinum containing chemotherapy followed by clinicians' choice of anthracycline regimen. Stage 1 and 2, patients are randomised (1:1:1) to either control (3 weekly carboplatin AUC5/weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 chemotherapy - 4 cycles) or one of two research arms which uses the same chemotherapy regimen but with two different schedules of olaparib 150mg BD). Stage 3: patients are randomised (1:1) to either control arm or to the research arm selected in stage 2.
Primary outcome measures:
Stage 1: safety of the addition of olaparib to chemotherapy. Prophylactic G-CSF is mandatory.
Stage 2: pathological complete response (pCR) in each of the two research arms. At the end of stage 2, one of the research arms will be dropped.
Stage 3: pCR at surgery after neoadjuvant treatment. pCR - defined as no residual invasive carcinoma within the breast (ductal carcinoma in situ permitted) AND no evidence of metastatic disease within the lymph nodes.
Eligibility:
•Aged 16 to 70.
•Written informed consent.
•Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer.
•Clinical stage T1-4 N0-2 (tumour or metastatic node diameter>10mm)
•Confirmed ER-negative and HER2-negative or gBRCA mutation positive, irrespective of hormone status.
•Performance Status 0-1
Statistical Methods: Stage 1, Safety: both research arms combined. Stage 2, Schedule selection criteria: pCR rate and completion rate of olaparib protocol treatment. It is a “pick-the winner” design with 53 patients in each research arm. This allows a 90% power, 5% one-sided significance level to test null hypothesis of pCR ≤35% versus an alternative hypothesis of pCR ≥55% in each of the research arms.
Stage 3, Efficacy: anticipated pCR ∼45-55% for all trial patients and ∼50-60% for gBRCA patients. The trial is powered to detect an absolute improvement of 15% (all patients) and 20% (gBRCA patients) by adding olaparib to chemotherapy (enriched design). TNBC patient recruitment will be capped, to ensure the required number of gBRCA patients are enrolled. Enrichment design is applied with the overall significance level 0.05(α)=0.025(αall)+ 0.025(αgBRCA) and 80% power.
Present accrual: 1 [Trial opened: 23rd May 2016]
Target accrual: 527 (TNBC 307; gBRCA 220)
Contact information: Dr. Jean Abraham; Email: ja344@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Citation Format: Abraham JE, Vallier A-L, Qian W, Grybowicz L, Thomas S, Mahmud S, Harvey C, McAdam K, Hughes-Davies L, Roylance R, Copson E, Brown J, Provenzano E, Tischkowitz M, Earl HM. PARTNER - Randomised, phase II/III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of olaparib to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative and/or germline BRCA mutated breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-01-15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JE Abraham
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - A-L Vallier
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - W Qian
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - L Grybowicz
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Thomas
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Mahmud
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Harvey
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - K McAdam
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - L Hughes-Davies
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - R Roylance
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Copson
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Brown
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Provenzano
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Tischkowitz
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - HM Earl
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom; University College London, London, United Kingdom; University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Eldridge A, Betson TR, Gama MV, McAdam K. Variation in tobacco and mainstream smoke toxicant yields from selected commercial cigarette products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2015; 71:409-27. [PMID: 25620723 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2014] [Revised: 01/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
There is a drive toward the mandated lowering and reporting of selected toxicants in tobacco smoke. Several studies have quantified the mainstream cigarette emissions of toxicants, providing benchmark levels. Few, however, have examined how measured toxicant levels within a single product vary over time due to natural variation in the tobacco, manufacturing and measurement. In a single centre analysis, key toxicants were measured in the tobacco blend and smoke of 3R4F reference cigarette and three commercial products, each sampled monthly for 10 months. For most analytes, monthly variation was low (coefficient of variation <15%); but higher (⩾ 20%) for some compounds present at low (ppb) levels. Reporting toxicant emissions as a ratio to nicotine increased the monthly variation of the 9 analytes proposed for mandated lowering, by 1-2 percentage points. Variation in toxicant levels was generally 1.5-1.7-fold higher in commercial cigarettes compared with 3R4F over the 10-month period, but increased up to 3.5-fold for analytes measured at ppb level. The potential error (2CV) associated with single-point-in-time sampling averaged ∼ 20%. Together, these data demonstrate that measurement of emissions from commercial cigarettes is associated with considerable variation for low-level toxicants. This variation would increase if the analyses were conducted in more than one laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Eldridge
- British American Tobacco, Group Research and Development, Southampton, UK.
| | - T R Betson
- British American Tobacco, Group Research and Development, Southampton, UK
| | - M Vinicius Gama
- Souza Cruz S.A/British American Tobacco, PC-Americas, Cachoeirinha, Brazil
| | - K McAdam
- British American Tobacco, Group Research and Development, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hertz-Schünemann R, Ehlert S, Streibel T, Liu C, McAdam K, Baker RR, Zimmermann R. High-resolution time and spatial imaging of tobacco and its pyrolysis products during a cigarette puff by microprobe sampling photoionisation mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015; 407:2293-9. [PMID: 25627787 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8447-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Revised: 12/21/2014] [Accepted: 12/22/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
The time- and space-resolved chemical signatures of gases and vapours formed in solid-state combustion processes are difficult to examine using recent analytical techniques. A machine-smoked cigarette represents a very reproducible model system for dynamic solid-state combustion. By using a special sampling system (microprobe unit) that extracts the formed gases from inside of the burning cigarette, which is coupled to a photoionisation mass spectrometer, it was possible to study the evolution of organic gases during a 2-s cigarette puff. The concentrations of various pyrolysis and combustion products such as 1,3-butadiene, toluene, acetaldehyde and phenol were monitored on-line at different sampling points within cigarettes. A near-microscopic-scale spatial resolution and a 200-ms time resolution were achieved. Finally, the recorded information was combined to generate time-resolved concentration maps, showing the formation and destruction zones of the investigated compounds in the burning cigarette. The combustion zone at the tip of cigarette, where e.g. 1,3-butadiene is predominately formed, was clearly separable from the pyrolysis zones. Depending on the stability of the precursor (e.g. lignin or cellulose), the position of pyrolytic formation varies. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that soft photoionisation mass spectrometry in conjunction with a microprobe sampling device can be used for time- and space-resolved analysis of combustion and pyrolysis reactions. In addition to studies on the model cigarette, further model systems may be studied with this approach. This may include further studies on the combustion of biomass or coal chunks, on heterogeneously catalysed reactions or on spray, dust and gas combustion processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hertz-Schünemann
- Joint Mass Spectrometry Centre, University of Rostock and Helmholtz Zentrum München, 18059, Rostock, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Awada A, Spector N, El-Hariry I, Rodriguez AA, Erban JK, Cortes J, Gomez H, Kong A, Hickish T, Fein L, Vahdat L, MacPherson I, Canon JL, Mansoor S, Giovanne A, McAdam K, Vukovic VM, Yalcin I, Bradley R, Proia D, Mano MS, Perez EA, Cameron DA. Abstract P2-16-23: The ENCHANT-1 trial (NCT01677455): An open label multicenter phase 2 proof of concept study evaluating first line ganetespib monotherapy in women with metastatic HER2 positive or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p2-16-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone protein required for the stabilization and activation of many proteins, referred to as Hsp90 ‘clients’, such as HER2, HIF1-a, EGFR, ER, PI3K, AKT, P53 and VEGFR. The drug candidate, ganetespib is a novel triazolone inhibitor of Hsp90, with over 700 patients treated to date. Ganetespib has shown activity in preclinical models of HER2+, ER+/PR+ and TNBC. Early clinical trials documented ganetespib single agent activity in heavily pretreated HER2+ and TNBC patients. Ganetespib has been well tolerated in clinical trials with a favorable safety profile. This efficacy-screening study is designed to provide further evidence of ganetespib activity and identify potentially predictive biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer (BC).
Methods: The ENCHANT-1 Trial is an international, first-line 2-cohort Phase 2 study in BC patients: Cohort A, HER2 amplified (n = 35), and Cohort B, TNBC (n = 35). Patients who present with previously untreated metastatic disease are eligible for treatment with ganetespib at 150 mg/m2 twice weekly on 3 out of 4 wks, for a total of up to 12 wks. Primary endpoint: ORR assessed using RECIST1.1 criteria. Key secondary endpoints include metabolic response as assessed by PET/CT at wk 3 utilizing modified EORTC criteria. Disease progression (PD) at wk 3 by PET imaging indicates discontinuation of study therapy, and is performed to quickly offer patients with metabolic PD a standard of care treatment.
The study is designed as Simon 2-stage requiring at least one OR in 15 patients for the respective cohort to expand to 35 patients. A Steering Committee is established to oversee the overall study and review the interim results.
Results: The study was initiated in 23 centers globally. At the time of submission, a total of 17 patients had been enrolled; TNBC (n = 15) and HER2 (n = 2). Here we report the interim analysis in the TNBC cohort. The median age was 54 years (range 30 -77) with ECOG PS 0 (n = 7/15). Most patients (n = 9) presented with de novo metastatic disease. 5 patients were not evaluable for PET assessment (3 had not yet reached wk 3 and 2 withdrawn before wk 3 for clinical progression), and 9 patients were not evaluable for objective response at wk 6 (3 withdrawn before or at wk 3 for clinical progression and 6 had not yet reached wk 6 evaluation). In the 10 patients with evaluable PET imaging, 9 patients achieved metabolic (m) response (2 mPR, 4 mSD with dominant tumor shrinkage and 3 SD) and one patient with mPD. In the 6 patients evaluable for OR at wk 6, one patient achieved PR, 2 SD and 3 PD. Treatment with ganetespib was well tolerated; the most common AEs were mild or moderate diarrhea (8/15, 53%), fatigue (5/15, 33%), decreased appetite (4/15, 27%), insomnia (4/15, 27%), and nausea (4/15, 27%).
Conclusion: Ganetespib single agent was generally well tolerated and showed anti-tumor activity TNBC patients as early as 3 weeks following treatment. PET seems to be a good tool to screen antitumor activity of new agents in early settings rather that in heavily pretreated patients. The TNBC cohort has met the protocol criteria for proceeding to stage 2.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Awada
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - N Spector
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - I El-Hariry
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - AA Rodriguez
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - JK Erban
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - J Cortes
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - H Gomez
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Kong
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - T Hickish
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - L Fein
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - L Vahdat
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - I MacPherson
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - J-L Canon
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - S Mansoor
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - A Giovanne
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - K McAdam
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - VM Vukovic
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - I Yalcin
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - R Bradley
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - D Proia
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - MS Mano
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - EA Perez
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - DA Cameron
- Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc, Lexington; The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston; Tufts Medical Center, Boston; Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona; Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru; Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom; Centro Oncológico de Rosario, Rosario Santa Fe, Argentina; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; The Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Georgia Cancer Specialists, Atlanta; Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú, Lima, Peru; Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville; Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Combes R, Scott K, Dillon D, Meredith C, McAdam K, Proctor C. The effect of a novel tobacco process on the in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of cigarette smoke particulate matter. Toxicol In Vitro 2012; 26:1022-9. [PMID: 22542757 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2011] [Revised: 03/13/2012] [Accepted: 04/10/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Some of the toxic effects of smoking have been attributed to the combustion of nitrogenous protein in tobacco. The effects of a treatment which reduces tobacco's protein nitrogen level, on the in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of cigarette smoke particulate matter (PM), were measured. PMs were tested in the Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) test; the Salmonella mutagenicity assay (SAL); the mouse lymphoma mammalian cell mutation assay (MLA) and the in vitro micronucleus test (IVMNT). PMs from all of the cigarettes were cytotoxic and genotoxic. PM obtained from smoking treated tobacco, showed a small, consistent and statistically significant reduced mutagenicity (revertants/μg) in TA98 with post-mitochondrial supernatant (S9). No consistent quantitative or qualitative differences were detected in the other tests. The data are discussed in relation to published information on smoke chemistry obtained from cigarettes made of tobacco treated using this technique. The observations confirm that the method did not give rise to any new qualitative or quantitative cytotoxic or genotoxic effects, and may have reduced PM's bacterial mutagenicity in TA98 with S9. Further toxicity testing is warranted, to investigate the effects of the tobacco treatment in more detail and add to the data already obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Combes
- British American Tobacco, Group Research and Development, Regents Park Road, Southampton SO15 8TL, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Corrie PG, Bulusu R, Wilson CB, Armstrong G, Bond S, Hardy R, Lao-Sirieix S, Parashar D, Ahmad A, Daniel F, Hill M, Wilson G, Blesing C, Moody AM, McAdam K, Osborne M. A randomised study evaluating the use of pyridoxine to avoid capecitabine dose modifications. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:585-7. [PMID: 22814578 PMCID: PMC3419962 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pyridoxine is frequently used to treat capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome (HFS), although the evidence of benefit is lacking. We performed a randomised placebo-controlled trial to determine whether pyridoxine could avoid the need for capecitabine dose modifications and improve outcomes. METHODS A total of 106 patients planned for palliative single-agent capecitabine (53 in each arm, 65%/35% colorectal/breast cancer) were randomised to receive either concomitant pyridoxine (50 mg po) or matching placebo three times daily. RESULTS Compared with placebo, pyridoxine use was associated with an increased rate of avoiding capecitabine dose modifications (37% vs 23%, relative risk 0.59, 95% CI 0.29, 1.20, P=0.15) and fewer grade 3/4 HFS-related adverse events (9% vs 17%, odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.15-1.6, P=0.26). Use of pyridoxine did not improve response rate or progression-free survival. CONCLUSION Pyridoxine may reduce the need for capecitabine dose modifications and the incidence of severe HFS, but does not impact on antitumour effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P G Corrie
- Oncology Division, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Neema S, Atuyambe LM, Otolok-Tanga E, Twijukye C, Kambugu A, Thayer L, McAdam K. Using a clinic based creativity initiative to reduce HIV related stigma at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2012; 12:231-9. [PMID: 23056033 DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v12i2.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stigma has been associated with chronic health conditions such as HIV/AIDS, leprosy, tuberculosis, Mental illness and Epilepsy. Different forms of stigma have been identified: enacted stigma, perceived stigma, and self stigma. Stigma is increasingly regarded as a key driver of the HIV/AIDS epidemic and has a major impact on public health interventions. OBJECTIVES The initiative was to provide activities in the clinic while patients waited to be seen by healthcare professionals. It was envisaged this would contribute to reduction of clinic based stigma felt by clients. METHODS This was a repeated cross-sectional survey (October-November 2005 and March-April 2007) that was conducted at the Infectious Diseases Institute clinic (IDC) at Mulago, the national referral hospital in Uganda. We utilized quantitative (survey) and qualitative (key informants, focus group discussions) methods to collect the data. Data were collected on stigma before the creativity initiative intervention was implemented, and a second phase survey was conducted to assess effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS Clients who attended the IDC before the creativity intervention were about twice as likely to fear catching an infection as those who came after the intervention. The proportion that had fears to be seen by a friend or relative at the clinic decreased. Thus during the implementation of the Creativity intervention, HIV related stigma was reduced in this clinic setting. CONCLUSIONS The creativity intervention helped to build self esteem and improved communication among those attending the clinic; there was observed ambiance at the clinic and clients became empowered, with creative, communication and networking skills. Improved knowledge and communication are key in addressing self stigma among HIV positive individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Neema
- Makerere University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Kampala, Uganda.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Windsor P, Potter J, McAdam K, McCowan C. Evaluation of a Fatigue Initiative: Information on Exercise for Patients Receiving Cancer Treatment. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009; 21:473-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2007] [Revised: 01/02/2009] [Accepted: 01/22/2009] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
23
|
Earl HM, Vallier A, Hiller L, Fenwick N, Iddawela M, Hughes-Davies L, Provenzano E, McAdam K, Hickish T, Caldas C. Neo-tAnGo: A neoadjuvant randomized phase III trial of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel ± gemcitabine in the treatment of women with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC): First report of the primary endpoint, pathological complete response (pCR). J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
522 Background: Neo-tAnGo used a 2-by-2 factorial design, addressing: (i) gemcitabine (G) in a sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) regimen of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and paclitaxel (T); and (ii) the sequencing of these treatment components (EC then T ± G versus T ± G then EC). Methods: Patients (Pts) with early breast cancer (T2 tumours or above) were randomised to EC then T, T then EC, EC then TG or TG then EC. All components were given x 4 cycles. (E= 90 mg/m2 day (d)1 every (q) 21d; C = 600 mg/m2 d1 q21d; T = 175 mg/m2 d1 q14d; G = 2,000 mg/m2 d1 q14d.) The primary endpoint was pCR, defined as absence of invasive disease in the breast and axillary lymph nodes. 800 pts were required to detect 10% differences in the primary endpoint pCR rates, at the 5% (2-sided) significance level with 85% power. Stratification was by age, inflammatory/locally advanced disease, tumour size, clinical involvement of axillary nodes and oestrogen receptor (ER) status. Results: Between January 2005 and September 2007, 831 pts were randomised by 88 consultants from 57 UK centres. Characteristics were balanced across groups: 63% <50 years old, 25% had inflammatory and/or locally advanced disease, 79% of tumours <50 mm, 50% node positive and 34% ER negative. Two-reader review of 813 (98%) eligible pts'. pathology reports, blinded to treatment arm, were carried out. pCR rates were 17% (95% CI 14–21) for EC&T pts and 17% (95% CI 14–21) for EC&TG pts (p = 0.98). However the sequence T±G then EC, showed pCR of 20% (95% CI 16–24) compared with 15% (95% CI 11–18) for EC then T±G pts (p = 0.03). Adjustment by stratification did not alter results. Conclusions: The Neo-tAnGo results confirm those of the adjuvant tAnGo trial in terms of gemcitabine effect (ASCO 2008). The sequence of T±G-first has demonstrated a significant advantage in pCR compared with the more conventional anthracycline-first sequencing. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. M. Earl
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - A. Vallier
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - L. Hiller
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - N. Fenwick
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - M. Iddawela
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - L. Hughes-Davies
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - E. Provenzano
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - K. McAdam
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - T. Hickish
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| | - C. Caldas
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Clinical Trials Unit, Coventry, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peterborough Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Royal Bournemouth Hospital,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Colebunders R, Bukenya T, Pakker N, Smith O, Boeynaems V, Waldron J, Muganga AM, Twijukye C, McAdam K, Katabira E. Assessment of the patient flow at the infectious diseases institute out-patient clinic, Kampala, Uganda. AIDS Care 2007; 19:149-51. [PMID: 17364392 DOI: 10.1080/09540120600762078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
In order to cope with the increasing patient load, a study was performed to identify bottlenecks in patient flow at the Infectious Diseases out-patient clinic in Kampala, Uganda on 10 January 2005. On a standardised questionnaire we recorded for all patients: the time they presented at reception, waiting times for different services and in- and out times for nursing, counselling and doctor visits. 250 patients visited the clinic the study day: 36 (20 per cent) were asymptomatic; 133 (75 per cent) symptomatic but not critically ill and 8 (4.5 per cent) severely ill; 63 (37.5 per cent) were on antiretroviral treatment. The median time spend at the clinic was 157 minutes (range 22-426). The median time from reception to the triage/vital-signs measuring unit was 34 minutes (range 3-92), from triage nurse to doctor 51 minutes (range 1-205), from doctor to pharmacy 24 minutes (range 5-292). The median waiting time at the pharmacy was 30 minutes (range 10-175). Based on these results, organisational changes were proposed. A similar methodology could be used to evaluate and compare health service delivery systems for persons with HIV infection in Africa in order to identify the most efficient models of care.
Collapse
|
25
|
Verrill MW, Lee J, Cameron DA, Agrawal R, Coleman RE, McAdam K, Wardley A, Bowman A, Ferrigan L, Yellowlees A. Anglo-Celtic IV: First results of a UK National Cancer Research Network randomized phase III pharmacogenetic trial of weekly compared to 3 weekly paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.lba1005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
LBA1005 Background: Phase II studies of weekly paclitaxel (P) confirm this to be a well tolerated regimen in ABC with potentially superior efficacy to standard q3w schedules. This was tested in the phase III CALGB 9840 trial, which used a “patient resource conserving” design, combining randomised patients with imported control data from a previous CALGB study of predominantly 2nd line treatment. This and the higher total dose of P in the weekly arm, left many unsure if there really was superior activity for the weekly schedule. Methods: The primary efficacy objective was to detect a 2 month improvement (6 to 8 months, HR = 1.33) in time to progression (TTP) by the giving the same total dose of P weekly (wP) vs. 3 weekly (3wP). 560 randomised patients were required to give 90% power to detect this difference at the 0.05 significance level. A single analysis was planned six months after study closure. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, toxicity and quality of life. The primary translational endpoint is a pharmacogenetic (PG) study of the effect of MDR and CYP single nucleotide polymorphisms. Between Sept. 2002 and July 2006, 569 patients were randomized to receive either wP 90 mg/m2 for 12 weeks or 3wP 175 mg/m2 for 6 cycles. Patients were stratified for measurable disease, prior treatment for ABC and Trastuzumab use. Results: The investigator reported response rates were 27% (3wP) and 42% (wP), p=0.002. Median TTP was 22.0 weeks for 3wP (95% CI 19.7–24.6) and 23.9 weeks for wP (95% CI 20.7–26.7), HR=0.92, p=0.06. Both schedules were well tolerated. PG samples from 325 patients are being matched to the unblinded efficacy data. Conclusions: This phase III trial shows that, for a matched total dose, wP produces a higher response rate than 3wP. This confirms the result from CALGB 9840. The mismatch in treatment duration in this trial may explain why TTP with wP was superior in CALGB 9840 while in the current study we have failed to detect superiority despite a higher response rate. Combining the trial results supports the hypothesis that total dose and schedule of P are important. Our results support the widespread adoption of wP as the standard schedule. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. W. Verrill
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - J. Lee
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - D. A. Cameron
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - R. Agrawal
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - R. E. Coleman
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - K. McAdam
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - A. Wardley
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - A. Bowman
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - L. Ferrigan
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| | - A. Yellowlees
- NICR, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom; Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough, United Kingdom; Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; ISD Cancer Clinical Trials Team, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Quantics, Melrose, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hill P, Jeffries D, Brookes R, Fox A, Jackson-Sillah D, Lugos M, Donkor S, de Jong B, Corrah T, Adegbola R, McAdam K. P1625 Using ELISPOT to expose false positive skin test conversion in tuberculosis contacts. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s0924-8579(07)71464-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
27
|
Gazzard B, Lutwama F, Mayanja H, Shihab H, Serwanga J, Wanyama J, McAdam K, John L, Spacek L, Eller M, Kamya M, Kelleher P, Quinn T. WITHDRAWN: Rapid decline in CD38 T cell activation in HIV infected Ugandans taking antiretroviral therapy – towards that of healthy european controls. J Infect 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.11.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Greenaway C, Lienhardt C, Adegbola R, Brusasca P, McAdam K, Menzies D. Humoral response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in patients with tuberculosis in the Gambia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9:1112-9. [PMID: 16229222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of four common mycobacterial antigens with three RD-1 region antigens in the serological diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in the Gambia. DESIGN Serum from 300 Gambians (100 with active PTB, 100 of their household contacts, and 100 community controls) was tested using an ELISA method to detect antibodies to seven mycobacterial antigens (three encoded in the RD-1 region [ESAT-6, CFP-10 and Rv3871] and four common [38 kDa, GLU-S, 19 kDa and 14 kDa]). Individuals with active TB were recruited from one of the National Leprosy and TB Control Program clinics in the western region of the Gambia, and neighborhood controls were an age-matched individual living within five houses of the case. RESULTS The sensitivity of the RD-1 antigens ranged from 34% to 67%, while specificity ranged from 51% to 71%. The sensitivity of the common antigens ranged from 24% to 75% and specificity from 26% to 75%. CONCLUSION In countries with high rates of TB, such as the Gambia, the clinical utility of serological testing to diagnose active TB remains limited, even with newer antigens encoded in the RD-1 region of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Greenaway
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lienhardt C, Fielding K, Sillah JS, Bah B, Gustafson P, Warndorff D, Palayew M, Lisse I, Donkor S, Diallo S, Manneh K, Adegbola R, Aaby P, Bah-Sow O, Bennett S, McAdam K. Investigation of the risk factors for tuberculosis: a case-control study in three countries in West Africa. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34:914-23. [PMID: 15914505 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyi100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Host-related and environment-related factors have been shown to play a role in the development of tuberculosis (TB), but few studies were carried out to identify their respective roles in resource-poor countries. METHODS A multicentre case-control study was conducted in Guinée, Guinea Bissau, and The Gambia, from January 1999 to March 2001. Cases were newly detected smear positive TB patients. Two controls were recruited for each case, one within the household of the case, and one in the community. RESULTS Regarding host-related factors, univariate analysis by conditional logistic regression of 687 matched pairs of cases and household controls showed that TB was associated with male sex, family history of TB, absence of a BCG scar, smoking, alcohol, anaemia, HIV infection, and history and treatment of worm infection. In a multivariable model based on 601 matched pairs, male sex, family history of TB, smoking, and HIV infection were independent risk factors of TB. The investigation of environmental factors based on the comparison of 816 cases/community control pairs showed that the risk of TB was associated with single marital status, family history of TB, adult crowding, and renting the house. In a final model assessing the combined effect of host and environmental factors, TB was associated with male sex, HIV infection, smoking (with a dose-effect relationship), history of asthma, family history of TB, marital status, adult crowding, and renting the house. CONCLUSION TB is a multifactorial disorder, in which environment interacts with host-related factors. This study provided useful information for the assessment of host and environmental factors of TB for the improvement of TB control activities in developing countries.
Collapse
|
30
|
Braun MS, Adab F, Bradley C, McAdam K, Thomas G, Wadd NJ, Rea D, Philips R, Twelves C, Bozzino J, MacMillan C, Saunders MP, Counsell R, Anderson H, McDonald A, Stewart J, Robinson A, Davies S, Richards FJ, Seymour MT. Modified de Gramont with oxaliplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 89:1155-8. [PMID: 14520437 PMCID: PMC2394314 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2003] [Revised: 05/23/2003] [Accepted: 06/29/2003] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We previously reported high activity for oxaliplatin and a modified de Gramont regimen (OxMdG) in a single centre study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We now report results with a further 56 patients treated at 14 centres. Low rates of grade 3 and 4 toxicity were seen, with no toxic deaths. Objective response rates were CR/PR=53%; NC=34.7%; PD=12.2%. Median time to progression was 8.3 months and overall survival was 14.5 months. This regimen is more convenient than those based around the conventional de Gramont regimen but is highly active and well tolerated; it forms part of a current UK MRC phase 3 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Braun
- Cancer Research UK Centre in Leeds, Cookridge Hospital, Leeds LS16 6QB, UK
| | - F Adab
- Staffordshire Oncology Centre, Royal Infirmary, Princes Road, Hartshill, Stoke on Trent ST4 7LN, UK
| | - C Bradley
- Department of Oncology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - K McAdam
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Peterborough District Hospital, Thorpe Road, Peterborough, PE3 6DA, UK
| | - G Thomas
- Department of Oncology, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, London Road, Derby DE1 2QY, UK
| | - N J Wadd
- Department of Oncology, South Cleveland Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
| | - D Rea
- CRC Institute for Cancer Studies, Vincent Drive, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - R Philips
- Department of Oncology, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK
| | - C Twelves
- Beatson Oncology Centre, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK
| | - J Bozzino
- Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment, Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK
| | - C MacMillan
- Northamptonshire Centre for Oncology, Northampton General Hospital, Biling Road, Northampton NN1 5BD, UK
| | - M P Saunders
- Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - R Counsell
- Gloucestershire Oncology Centre, Cheltenham Royal Infirmary, Sandford Road, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, UK
| | - H Anderson
- Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - A McDonald
- Beatson Oncology Centre, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT, UK
| | - J Stewart
- Northamptonshire Centre for Oncology, Northampton General Hospital, Biling Road, Northampton NN1 5BD, UK
| | - A Robinson
- Department of Oncology, Southend Hospital, Westcliffe-on-Sea, Essex SS0 0RY, UK
| | - S Davies
- Cancer Research UK Centre in Leeds, Cookridge Hospital, Leeds LS16 6QB, UK
| | - F J Richards
- Cancer Research UK Centre in Leeds, Cookridge Hospital, Leeds LS16 6QB, UK
| | - M T Seymour
- Cancer Research UK Centre in Leeds, Cookridge Hospital, Leeds LS16 6QB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bennett S, Lienhardt C, Bah-Sow O, Gustafson P, Manneh K, Del Prete G, Gomes V, Newport M, McAdam K, Hill A. Investigation of environmental and host-related risk factors for tuberculosis in Africa. II. Investigation of host genetic factors. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155:1074-9. [PMID: 12034587 DOI: 10.1093/aje/155.11.1074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In an accompanying paper (Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002;155:1066-73), the authors describe the design of a large multicenter study being carried out in three West African countries for investigation of the roles of environmental and host-related factors in the development of tuberculosis. In this paper, the authors review some evidence that host genetic factors play a role in susceptibility to tuberculosis. They describe the three components of the study that are designed to investigate the effect of host genetic factors on the development of tuberculosis: case-control and family-based association studies of candidate genes and analysis of affected relative pairs to screen the human genome for areas of linkage to the disease. The authors also address a number of methodological issues that arise, such as the effects of consanguinity, half-siblings, and nonpaternity. Lastly, they review opportunities to assess gene-environment interaction in the framework of the study, in light of current methodological knowledge. Consideration of these issues may be useful in the design of other studies of genetic susceptibility to infectious diseases, particularly those to be carried out in developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bennett
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lienhardt C, Bennett S, Del Prete G, Bah-Sow O, Newport M, Gustafson P, Manneh K, Gomes V, Hill A, McAdam K. Investigation of environmental and host-related risk factors for tuberculosis in Africa. I. Methodological aspects of a combined design. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155:1066-73. [PMID: 12034586 DOI: 10.1093/aje/155.11.1066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Host-related and environmental factors for tuberculosis have usually been investigated separately using different study designs. Joint investigation of the genetic, immunologic, and environmental factors at play in susceptibility to tuberculosis represents an innovative goal for obtaining a better understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease. In this paper, the authors describe methods being used to investigate these points in a West African study combining several designs. Patients with newly diagnosed smear-positive cases of tuberculosis are recruited. The effect of host-related factors is assessed by comparing each case with a healthy control from the case's household. The role of environmental factors is estimated by comparing cases with randomly selected community controls. The frequencies of candidate gene variants are compared between cases and community controls, and results are validated through family-based association studies. Members of the households of cases and community controls are being followed prospectively to determine the incidence of "secondary" tuberculosis and to evaluate the influence of geographic and genetic proximity to the index case. This type of design raises important methodological issues that may be useful to consider in studies investigating the natural history of infectious diseases and in attempts to disentangle the effects of environmental and genetic factors in response to infection.
Collapse
|
33
|
Shaw M, van der Sande M, West B, Paine K, Ceesay S, Bailey R, Walraven G, Morison L, McAdam K. Prevalence of herpes simplex type 2 and syphilis serology among young adults in a rural Gambian community. Sex Transm Infect 2001; 77:358-65. [PMID: 11588283 PMCID: PMC1744381 DOI: 10.1136/sti.77.5.358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate prevalence and risk factors for herpes simplex 2 (HSV2) positivity, syphilis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection among rural people aged 15-34 in the Gambia. METHODS Questionnaires and serum samples were collected from 1076 men and women aged 15-34 during a cross sectional prevalence survey in a rural area of the Gambia. Sera were screened for antibodies to herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV2), and for syphilis using Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA) and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests. Urine was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for C trachomatis infection. RESULTS 28% of women and 5% of men were HSV2 ELISA positive; 10% of women and 2% of men were TPHA positive; and 7% of women and 1% of men were both RPR and TPHA positive. Out of 1030 urine sample tested only six were positive for C trachomatis. 7% of those who reported never having sex were positive for one or other of these tests. Prevalences of all STIs increased with age and were higher in women than men. Women were much less likely than men to seek treatment for STI symptoms at a health centre. Married people were at increased risk of an STI compared with single people. Jola and Fula women had a higher prevalence of HSV2 than women from other ethnic groups, and Fulas also had a higher prevalence of RPR/TPHA positivity. The limited number of sexual behaviour questions were not significantly associated with STIs after adjustment for age, marital status, and ethnic group. CONCLUSIONS The prevalences of the ulcerative infections HSV2 and syphilis in this population are a cause for concern. In a setting where HIV1 prevalence remains low this indicates an urgent need for STI control and behaviour change programmes to prevent an HIV epidemic. Concerns about the validity of reported sexual behaviour data high light the necessity of biological markers in the evaluation of behaviour change programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Shaw
- Medical Research Council, Banjul, the Gambia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Libretto SE, Barrett-Lee PJ, Branson K, Gorst DW, Kaczmarski R, McAdam K, Stevenson P, Thomas R. Improvement in quality of life for cancer patients treated with epoetin alfa. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2001; 10:183-91. [PMID: 11829381 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2001.00264.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Anaemia is a common complication of cancer and cancer therapies, and fatigue is one of the most common symptoms of anaemia, disrupting functional performance and reducing overall quality of life. The positive effects of treating renal patients with recombinant human erythropoietin are well documented. This case report series details the specific effects of fatigue on individual patients with cancer and their way of life, and describes their significant improvement in lifestyle following the reversal of anaemia using recombinant human erythropoietin, epoetin alfa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S E Libretto
- Janssen-Cilag Ltd, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the quality and costs of sexually transmitted disease (STD) case management in urban pharmacies in The Gambia, and explore pharmacy workers' (PWs) willingness to improve the STD care they provide. PWs from 24 registered pharmacies were interviewed in order to collect information on their knowledge and practices regarding management of STDs. The same pharmacies were visited by a male 'simulated client' (SC) to ascertain how urethral discharge syndrome (UDS) cases were managed in practice. Fifteen (63%) pharmacies were equipped for treatment of UDS, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and genital ulcer syndrome (GUS), according to national guidelines. Appropriate syndromic management for UDS was mentioned by 11% of PWs but actually given to 4.4% of the SC visits. None of the PID or GUS cases would be treated correctly. Forty-two per cent of PWs advised on partner notification, 38% on safe sex and 29% on treatment compliance in the SC visits. The reported costs for treatment of UDS, PID and GUS ranged from $2.5-$15.0. The cost of treatment actually purchased by the SC averaged $3.5 (range $1.5-$9.6) for UDS. Excluding the pharmacy sector from interventions will limit the impact of STD control measures. Regular training in syndromic management and rational drug use, with a concise manual for reference are recommended. Strategies to lower the cost of drugs should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Leiva
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Blagden S, Corrie P, McAdam K, Pam I, Moody M. Study to compare tolerability of standard versus modified mayo regimen 5-fluorouracil. Eur J Cancer 2001. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)81618-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- G Thwaites
- Department of Microbiology, St Thomas's Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
von Seidlein L, Milligan P, Pinder M, Bojang K, Anyalebechi C, Gosling R, Coleman R, Ude JI, Sadiq A, Duraisingh M, Warhurst D, Alloueche A, Targett G, McAdam K, Greenwood B, Walraven G, Olliaro P, Doherty T. Efficacy of artesunate plus pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine for uncomplicated malaria in Gambian children: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355:352-7. [PMID: 10665554 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)10237-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resistance to cheap effective antimalarial drugs, especially to pyrimethaminesulphadoxine (Fansidar), is likely to have a striking impact on childhood mortality in sub-Sharan Africa. The use of artesunate (artesunic acid) [corrected] in combination with pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine may delay or prevent resistance. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this combined treatment. METHODS We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in The Gambia. 600 children with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, aged 6 months to 10 years, at five health centres were randomly assigned pyrimethaminesulphadoxine (25 mg/500 mg) with placebo; pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine plus one dose of artesunate (4mg/kg bodyweight); or pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine plus one dose 4 mg/kg bodyweight artesunate daily for 3 days. Children were visited at home each day after the start of treatment until parasitaemia had cleared. FINDINGS The combined treatment was well tolerated. No adverse reactions attributable to treatment were recorded. By day 1, only 178 (47%) of 381 children treated with artesunate were still parasitaemic, compared with 157 (81%) of 195 children in the pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine alone group (relative risk 1.7 [95% CI 1.5-2.0], p<0.001). Treatment-failure rates at day 14 were 3.1% in the pyrimethamine sulphadoxine alone group, and 3.7% in the one-dose artesunate group (risk difference -0.6% [-4.2 to 3.0]) and 1.6% in the three-dose group (1.5 [1.5-4.5], p=0.048). Symptoms resolved faster in children who received artesunate, but there was no additional benefit for three doses of artesunate over one dose. Children given artesunate were less likely to be gametocytaemic after treatment. INTERPRETATION The combined treatment was safe, well tolerated, and effective. The addition of artesunate to malaria treatment regimens in Africa results in lower gametocyte rates and may lower transmission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L von Seidlein
- Farafenni Field Station, Medical Research Council Laboratories, The Gambia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
von Seidlein L, Bojang K, Jones P, Jaffar S, Pinder M, Obaro S, Doherty T, Haywood M, Snounou G, Gemperli B, Gathmann I, Royce C, McAdam K, Greenwood B. A randomized controlled trial of artemether/benflumetol, a new antimalarial and pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in African children. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 58:638-44. [PMID: 9598454 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.58.638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
We report here the results of a randomized double blind trial comparing coartemether (CGP56697), a combination of artemether and benflumetol, with pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine (P/S). Two hundred eighty-seven children 1-5 years of age with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were enrolled at two centers in The Gambia between July 1996 and December 1996. Following treatment, children were visited at home every 24 hr until a blood film free of asexual parasites was obtained. Genotyping of parasites was used to distinguish recrudescence from new infections. Three days after the start of treatment, 133 (100%) of the CGP56697-treated children compared with 128 (93.4%) of children treated with P/S had cleared their parasites (P = 0.003). The day 15 cure rate was 93.3% for CGP56697 and 97.7% for P/S (P = 0.13). Within the third and fourth week after initiation of therapy, 20 children treated with CGP56697 and one of the P/S-treated children returned with second malaria episodes (P < 0.0001). Genotyping suggested that the majority (19 of 23 [82.6%]) of these second episodes were due to new infections, supporting the World Health Organization recommendation that longer follow-up is not relevant for the assessment of drug efficacy. At the two-week follow-up, 28.9% of the P/S treated children but none of the CGP56697-treated children carried gametocytes (P < 0.0001). This study showed that CGP56697 is safe in African children with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria, clears parasites more rapidly than P/S, and results in fewer gametocyte carriers. More frequent new infections within the third and fourth week following treatment with CGP56697 than treatment with P/S are likely to be due to the short prophylactic effect of CGP56697.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L von Seidlein
- Medical Research Council Laboratories, Fajara, Banjul, The Gambia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Aaby P, Babiker A, Darbyshire J, Nunn A, Barreto S, Alonso P, Badaro R, Barros F, Victoria C, Binka F, Biryahwaho B, Byabamazima C, Sempala S, Tugume B, Kalebu P, Kengeya-Kayondo J, Whitworth J, Paxton L, Convit J, Corrah T, McAdam K, Datta M, Dowlati Y, Fine P, Tanner M. Ethics of HIV trials. Lancet 1997; 350:1546. [PMID: 9388413 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)26047-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
41
|
Falcone DJ, McCaffrey TA, Mathew J, McAdam K, Borth W. THP-1 macrophage membrane-bound plasmin activity is up-regulated by transforming growth factor-beta 1 via increased expression of urokinase and the urokinase receptor. J Cell Physiol 1995; 164:334-43. [PMID: 7622580 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.1041640214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Receptors for urokinase (uPA) and plasminogen provide a mechanism to direct the cellular activation of plasminogen. The regulation of these receptors is important for several macrophage functions. In these studies, the effect of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) on uPA, uPA receptor, and plasminogen receptor expression by human THP-1 macrophage was examined. TGF-beta 1 induction of uPA expression by THP-1 cells was differentiation dependent. Suspension and adherent cultures expressed similar constitutive levels of uPA. Exposure of adherent cells to TGF-beta 1 led to a dose- and time-dependent increase in uPA activity which was paralleled by an increase in uPA antigen and uPA mRNA. In contrast, uPA expression by suspension cultures was unresponsive to TGF-beta 1. The differential response exhibited by suspension and adherent THP-1 cells may reflect differences in their expression of TGF-beta 1 receptors, since when assayed by crosslinking techniques, suspension cells primarily expressed a 65 kDa receptor; whereas, the adherent cells expressed 65 and 100 kDa receptors. TGF-beta 1-induced alterations in uPA receptor expression by adherent THP-1 cells were examined by quantitating membrane-bound uPA activity. Membrane-bound uPA activity increased three-fold when cells were incubated with TGF-beta 1. The increase in membrane-uPA activity expressed by TGF-beta 1-treated cells was not due to increased uPA receptor occupancy since incubation of either control or TGF-beta 1 primed cells with exogenous uPA did not lead to an increase in membrane-bound uPA activity. Furthermore, immunoreactive uPA receptor was increased in TGF-beta 1-treated cells. Following incubation with plasminogen, membrane-bound plasmin activity increased three-fold in TGF-beta 1-treated cells. However, no change in immunoreactive membrane-bound plasmin(ogen) was observed. In addition, binding of 125I-Lys-plasminogen to THP-1 cells was not affected by TGF-beta 1 treatment. We conclude that TGF-beta 1 stimulates membrane-bound plasmin activity, without affecting plasminogen receptor expression, through the up-regulation of uPA and the uPA receptor expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Falcone
- Department of Pathology, Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Godfrey-Faussett P, Baggaley R, Mwinga A, Hosp M, Porter J, Luo N, Kelly M, Msiska R, McAdam K. Recruitment to a trial of tuberculosis preventive therapy from a voluntary HIV testing centre in Lusaka: relevance to implementation. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1995; 89:354-8. [PMID: 7570860 DOI: 10.1016/0035-9203(95)90005-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
To determine the number of clients attending for voluntary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing who are able to enter a trial of preventive therapy for tuberculosis, and the factors that determine who receives therapy, we studied 475 consecutive people attending for an HIV test at Lusaka's first voluntary HIV testing centre and the preventive therapy study clinic at the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by counsellors and collated with recruitment data from the trial. Two hundred and twenty-five people were seropositive, of whom 201 returned to collect their results; 77 (38%) of these (16% of the total number screened) entered the trial. Reasons for not entering the trial included exclusion by trial protocol (30), including 18 who had active tuberculosis; psychological adjustment to a positive result (27); death (6); worries about confidentiality (3); the experimental nature of the trial (12); attitudes of staff in the hospital (5); and cost of transport (7). Targeting preventive therapy at those who are already choosing to be tested for HIV seems appropriate and may be cost-effective. Although visiting a hospital may deter some people, the prevalence of active tuberculosis among this group emphasized the importance of arranging adequate screening facilities.
Collapse
|
43
|
Falcone DJ, Borth W, McCaffrey TA, Mathew J, McAdam K. Regulation of macrophage receptor-bound plasmin by autoproteolysis. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:32660-6. [PMID: 7528219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The activation of plasminogen by macrophage is regulated by their expression of receptors for urokinase and plasmin(ogen). In these studies we have examined plasmin(ogen) binding to adherent human THP-1 macrophage. Plasmin bound to the THP-1 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner (Kd 15.8 +/- 6.2 nM; Bmax 1.4 +/- 0.3 x 10(6)/cell). The lysine analog epsilon-aminocaproic acid competitively inhibited plasmin binding. The fraction of membrane-bound plasmin, however, became increasingly resistant to displacement with epsilon-aminocaproic acid. Over a 24-h period, membrane-bound plasmin activity fell 80% despite the presence of catalytically active plasmin in the incubation media. The loss of receptor-bound plasmin activity was not due to proteolytic alterations of its receptor since 125I-Lys-plasminogen bound to THP-1 cells pretreated with plasmin with similar affinity as to untreated cells. Following a 24-h incubation of 125I-Lys-plasminogen or 125I-plasmin with THP-1 cells, several degradative fragments were apparent in their conditioned media. The smaller degradative fragments (28 and 36 kDa) lacked cell binding activity and were demonstrated to be active by casein-zymography. A 48-kDa fragment bound to cells in a lysine-dependent manner but was not active. In contrast, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride-inactivated 125I-plasmin retained its binding activity over 24 h, and degradative fragments were not present in the conditioned media. The binding of 125I-Lys-plasmin(ogen) to THP-1 cells was also examined in the presence of excess alpha 2 plasmin inhibitor. Despite the absence of fluid-phase plasmin activity, membrane-bound 125I-Lys-plasmin(ogen) decreased over 24 h. At 24 h a radiolabeled 48-kDa fragment was observed in the conditioned media and together with 125I-Lys-plasmin(ogen) was bound to cells. Unlike 125I-Lys-plasmin, the 48-kDa fragment did not form a complex with alpha 2 plasmin inhibitor. Thus, autoproteolysis of receptor-bound plasmin results in fragments with truncated physiologic properties that possess either cell binding or catalytic activities. We propose that autoproteolysis is a mechanism for regulating membrane-bound plasmin activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Falcone
- Department of Pathology, Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
|
46
|
Nunn P, Gathua S, Kibuga D, Binge R, Brindle R, Odhiambo J, McAdam K. The impact of HIV on resource utilization by patients with tuberculosis in a tertiary referral hospital, Nairobi, Kenya. Tuber Lung Dis 1993; 74:273-9. [PMID: 8219180 DOI: 10.1016/0962-8479(93)90054-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
By using routinely collected data and results from research studies at the Infectious Diseases Hospital (IDH), Nairobi, we have begun to determine the scale of the increase in resource utilisation and treatment costs for tuberculosis control services caused by the HIV epidemic. New cases of tuberculosis registered annually at the IDH rose 61%, from 447 in 1985 to 720 in 1990. HIV seroprevalence among patients with tuberculosis rose from 7.5% in 1986 to 42% in 1990. The inpatient mortality rate rose from 8.4% in 1985 to 16.8% in 1989, but fell to 13.5% in 1990. HIV-positive patients were admitted to hospital on 2 or more occasions more often than HIV-negative patients (Relative risk (RR) = 2.46, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.1-5.7), but average duration of admission was similar for the 2 groups. Significantly more HIV-positive patients were prescribed antibiotics, antifungal agents, antidiarrhoeal agents, analgesics and corticosteroids than HIV-negative patients. Microbiological investigations, apart from those for tuberculosis, were performed more commonly among HIV-positive patients (RR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.0-4.2). Using this data, the average cost of ideal drug therapy, including antituberculosis drugs and treatment for intercurrent infections and other complications, was estimated using 1992 prices (ECHO, Coulsdon Surrey, UK). The costs were US$16.62 and US$32.94 for HIV-negative patients using 'standard' therapy (2STH/10TH) and short course therapy (2SHRZ/6TH) respectively, and US$41.18 for HIV-positive patients using a short-course regimen without thiacetazone (2EHRZ/6EH). The HIV epidemic is causing both an increase in the numbers of patients requiring treatment and an increase in the average cost of treatment per patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Nunn
- Infectious Diseases Hospital, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nunn P, Brindle R, Carpenter L, Odhiambo J, Wasunna K, Newnham R, Githui W, Gathua S, Omwega M, McAdam K. Cohort study of human immunodeficiency virus infection in patients with tuberculosis in Nairobi, Kenya. Analysis of early (6-month) mortality. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992; 146:849-54. [PMID: 1416409 DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.4.849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Retrospective studies suggest that the mortality rate from HIV-1-associated tuberculosis is greater than that from tuberculosis alone, but it is not clear if this is due to failure of antituberculosis treatment or to the complications of HIV-1 infection. We have carried out a prospective cohort study of patients with tuberculosis in Nairobi, Kenya, to compare mortality rates, risk factors, and causes of death in HIV-1 positive and HIV-1 negative patients. One hundred seven HIV-1 positive and 174 HIV-1 negative patients with tuberculosis attending two tuberculosis treatment centers in Nairobi were enrolled and followed monthly. Mortality was significantly higher in HIV-1 positive than in HIV-1 negative patients within 6 months of the start of antituberculosis treatment after adjustment for age, sex, and education (rate ratio = 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7 to 8.1; p less than 0.001). Most of the excess mortality occurred after the first month of treatment and was due to nontuberculous infections. Predictors for mortality differed greatly between HIV-1 positive and HIV-1 negative patients. Mortality was greater in HIV-1 positive patients treated with a "standard" regimen for tuberculosis than in HIV-1 positive patients receiving a "short-course" regimen (p = 0.08 when adjusted for all independent risk factors). Tuberculosis control programs in developing countries need to implement "short-course" regimens and train health workers to recognize and treat nontuberculous infections to maintain their effectiveness in the face of the HIV epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Nunn
- Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
In 1988, the Los Angeles County University of Southern California Medical Center (LAC USC) surveyed 1,102 RNs (75% of its total RN population) to determine factors critical to nursing retention. The Nursing Retention Survey required participants to rank 46 retention factors related to compensation benefits, work environment, amount and type of work, work relationships, availability of support services, management practices, and opportunities for professional growth. This article reports survey responses for the ten most significant and ten least significant retention factors. Survey findings, which guided LAC USC in designing nursing retention strategies, show that RNs who stated that they would leave their jobs were consistently less satisfied with all the top-ranking important elements than those who would stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Chan
- University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles 90033
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Yamada Y, Kimball K, Okusawa S, Vachino G, Margolis N, Sohn JW, Li JJ, Wakabayashi G, McAdam K, Burke JF. Cytokines, acute phase proteins, and tissue injury. C-reactive protein opsonizes dead cells for debridement and stimulates cytokine production. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990; 587:351-61. [PMID: 2193581 DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb00176.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Y Yamada
- School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
McAdam K. A colour atlas of AIDS in the tropics. Sex Transm Infect 1989. [DOI: 10.1136/sti.65.6.403-a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|