1
|
Allen BJ, Hill DJ, Burke AM, Clark M, Marchant R, Stringer LC, Williams DR, Lyon C. Projected future climatic forcing on the global distribution of vegetation types. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2024; 379:20230011. [PMID: 38583474 PMCID: PMC10999268 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Most emissions scenarios suggest temperature and precipitation regimes will change dramatically across the globe over the next 500 years. These changes will have large impacts on the biosphere, with species forced to migrate to follow their preferred environmental conditions, therefore moving and fragmenting ecosystems. However, most projections of the impacts of climate change only reach 2100, limiting our understanding of the temporal scope of climate impacts, and potentially impeding suitable adaptive action. To address this data gap, we model future climate change every 20 years from 2000 to 2500 CE, under different CO2 emissions scenarios, using a general circulation model. We then apply a biome model to these modelled climate futures, to investigate shifts in climatic forcing on vegetation worldwide, the feasibility of the migration required to enact these modelled vegetation changes, and potential overlap with human land use based on modern-day anthromes. Under a business-as-usual scenario, up to 40% of terrestrial area is expected to be suited to a different biome by 2500. Cold-adapted biomes, particularly boreal forest and dry tundra, are predicted to experience the greatest losses of suitable area. Without mitigation, these changes could have severe consequences both for global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ecological novelty and planetary stewardship: biodiversity dynamics in a transforming biosphere'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany J. Allen
- Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel 4056, Switzerland
- Computational Evolution Group, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland
| | - Daniel J. Hill
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Ariane M. Burke
- Département d'Anthropologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Michael Clark
- Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK
- Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3BD, UK
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK
| | - Robert Marchant
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5NG, UK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5NG, UK
- Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - David R. Williams
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Christopher Lyon
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5NG, UK
- Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huynh LTM, Su J, Wang Q, Stringer LC, Switzer AD, Gasparatos A. Meta-analysis indicates better climate adaptation and mitigation performance of hybrid engineering-natural coastal defence measures. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2870. [PMID: 38594246 PMCID: PMC11004181 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46970-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Traditional approaches to coastal defence often struggle to reduce the risks of accelerated climate change. Incorporating nature-based components into coastal defences may enhance adaptation to climate change with added benefits, but we need to compare their performance against conventional hard measures. We conduct a meta-analysis that compares the performances of hard, hybrid, soft and natural measures for coastal defence across different functions of risk reduction, climate change mitigation, and cost-effectiveness. Hybrid and soft measures offer higher risk reduction and climate change mitigation benefits than unvegetated natural systems, while performing on par with natural measures. Soft and hybrid measures are more cost-effective than hard measures, while hybrid measures provide the highest hazard reduction among all measures. All coastal defence measures have a positive economic return over a 20-year period. Mindful of risk context, our results provide strong an evidence-base for integrating and upscaling nature-based components into coastal defences in lower risk areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lam Thi Mai Huynh
- Graduate Program in Sustainability Science - Global Leadership Initiative (GPSS-GLI), The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa City, Japan.
| | - Jie Su
- Institute for Future Initiatives (IFI), The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Quanli Wang
- Institute for Future Initiatives (IFI), The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK
| | - Adam D Switzer
- Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
- Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexandros Gasparatos
- Institute for Future Initiatives (IFI), The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
- Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS), United Nations University, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adranyi E, Stringer LC, Altink H. Joined-up governance for more complementary interactions between expanding artisanal small-scale gold mining and agriculture: Insights from Ghana. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298392. [PMID: 38573980 PMCID: PMC10994392 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Rising gold prices have led artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) operations to proliferate in sub-Saharan Africa, extending into agricultural areas. Little is known about the interactions between agriculture and mining in these new frontiers. This study aimed to investigate the impacts of ASGM on natural and physical livelihood capitals, ASGM's interactions with agriculture at household, community and institutional levels and the drivers underpinning those interactions, and the policy implications for the co-existence of sustainable agriculture and ASGM. Alongside literature review, field-work took place in Atiwa West District and Koforidua, Ghana using environmental field surveys, questionnaires, focus group discussions and interviews. Questionnaire and field survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, with thematic analysis of interviews and focus group data. Findings revealed that most miners were unregulated, mined irresponsibly and degraded land, waterways, and farm roads. Over one-third of farmers (38%) suffered land degradation, and 79% of affected farmers' lands were not reclaimed. Farmers diversified into ASGM, and mining proceeds boosted farming. Young farmers (18-40 years) shifted into ASGM full-time because it is more lucrative. Yet, ASGM is not replacing agriculture: cocoa farming remains a vital economic activity. Informal ASGM generates short-term income at household level for some but imposes long-term costs at community level, linked to cumulative loss of agricultural land and degradation of forest areas and water bodies, creating tensions, and increasing vulnerability. Financial hardships faced by farmers, landowners' desire to benefit directly from gold and lack of law enforcement drive informal ASGM. There are no institutional linkages between the agricultural and mining sectors. More joined up governance across agriculture and mining is needed and between formal and informal (traditional) institutions. ASGM should be incorporated into broader rural development policy reforms that support farmers, incentivise miners to operate legally and responsibly and ensure effective stakeholder engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enoch Adranyi
- Department of Politics, and Department of Environment and Geography, Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre (IGDC), University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Henrice Altink
- Department of History, Interdisciplinary Global Development Centre (IGDC), University of York, York, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Akhtar-Schuster M, Stringer LC, Barger N. Fast-tracking action on the Sustainable Development Goals by enhancing national institutional arrangements. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298855. [PMID: 38507393 PMCID: PMC10954137 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Six years remain to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite some progress, institutional effectiveness for SDG achievement has not been delivered at a national level. Identification and establishment of an institutional framework to operationalise the 2030 Agenda within national plans, giving science-based coordination of SDG implementation a central role, is urgently required to accelerate progress. This paper tackles this challenge. Drawing on literature analysis, it asks: 1) What are the deficiencies in institutional national arrangements that hinder SDG implementation? 2) How can existing institutional deficiencies in SDG implementation be addressed? and 3) How can institutional changes support fast-tracking of SDG implementation processes at national level? Findings show that country-specific horizontal institutional arrangements are usually advanced. However, national visions to improve mainstreaming across decision-making at different levels to enable whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches to SDG implementation are commonly under-developed. Deficiencies are due to poor systematic engagement of scientific and technical expertise in operational day-to-day communication, as well as in the design, validation, implementation, monitoring and reporting of domestic SDG-related multi-stakeholder actions. Vertical institutional arrangements are complex, and risk resource-consuming, uncoordinated implementation. Our analyses suggest countries may benefit from establishing a national, centralised independent scientific and technical coordinating body for SDG implementation at national level, within existing science-based institutional arrangements. Such a body would not be led by governmental processes but would provide technical support to government agencies. We argue that scientific and technical skills in data and information management and quality control are central to coordinated and evidence-informed support, and could help to accelerate national SDG implementation. Such a supporting body would also enable a more joined-up approach between stakeholders working in the areas of science and technology, government and practice, improving orchestrated science-based actions and their auditing across sectors and stakeholder communities at national and sub-national levels. It would further guide actions to reduce trade-offs within national sustainable development aspirations, and would facilitate consideration of diverse values in advancing towards a durable and just transformative future. Such efforts are vital given the rapidly closing window of time for SDG achievement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Nichole Barger
- The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America
- The University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ren Z, Li C, Fu B, Wang S, Stringer LC. Effects of aridification on soil total carbon pools in China's drylands. Glob Chang Biol 2024; 30:e17091. [PMID: 38273482 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Drylands are important carbon pools and are highly vulnerable to climate change, particularly in the context of increasing aridity. However, there has been limited research on the effects of aridification on soil total carbon including soil organic carbon and soil inorganic carbon, which hinders comprehensive understanding and projection of soil carbon dynamics in drylands. To determine the response of soil total carbon to aridification, and to understand how aridification drives soil total carbon variation along the aridity gradient through different ecosystem attributes, we measured soil organic carbon, inorganic carbon and total carbon across a ~4000 km aridity gradient in the drylands of northern China. Distribution patterns of organic carbon, inorganic carbon, and total carbon at different sites along the aridity gradient were analyzed. Results showed that soil organic carbon and inorganic carbon had a complementary relationship, that is, an increase in soil inorganic carbon positively compensated for the decrease in organic carbon in semiarid to hyperarid regions. Soil total carbon exhibited a nonlinear change with increasing aridity, and the effect of aridity on total carbon shifted from negative to positive at an aridity level of 0.71. In less arid regions, aridification leads to a decrease in total carbon, mainly through a decrease in organic carbon, whereas in more arid regions, aridification promotes an increase in inorganic carbon and thus an increase in total carbon. Our study highlights the importance of soil inorganic carbon to total carbon and the different effects of aridity on soil carbon pools in drylands. Soil total carbon needs to be considered when developing measures to conserve the terrestrial carbon sink.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuobing Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Changjia Li
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Bojie Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK
- York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kong ZH, Stringer LC, Paavola J. Knowledge exchange in the implementation of National Environmental Programmes (NEPs) in China: A complex picture. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288641. [PMID: 37440578 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Knowledge is an intrinsic element of environmental management. Understanding what kinds of knowledge are needed and how to communicate them effectively is crucial for building environmental management capacity. Despite extensive research, knowledge and its exchange are commonly considered from the viewpoint of its creators and disseminators, rather than that of its recipients. This can lead to mismatches between supply of and demand for knowledge, and futile knowledge exchange that undermines the effectiveness of interventions. Research is needed that looks carefully at the contexts and consequences of such scenarios. Addressing this gap, we examine the implementation of National Environmental Programs (NEPs) in north-western China, drawing from interviews and questionnaires with scientists, grassroots implementers, and farmers and herders, to identify what and how knowledge has been exchanged and what their perspectives are about knowledge exchange with other actors. We ascertain the positive impacts of knowledge exchange during NEP implementation, as well as the consequences when it is lacking, by analysing the interfaces and interactions between actors, seeking explanation for successes and failures. We conclude that with changing socio-ecological systems, knowledge and its exchange also need to change accordingly, extending beyond the environmental domain to integrate local socioeconomic concerns. Such efforts are necessary to improve environmental management outcomes and advance sustainable development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng-Hong Kong
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
- York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
| | - Jouni Paavola
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou W, Li C, Wang S, Ren Z, Stringer LC. Effects of grazing and enclosure management on soil physical and chemical properties vary with aridity in China's drylands. Sci Total Environ 2023; 877:162946. [PMID: 36948320 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Dryland soils are nutrient-poor and prone to degradation due to aridity, grazing and enclosure. It is essential to examine the effects of grazing and enclosure on aridity-induced soil degradation in dryland ecosystems to optimize land management practices in response to climate change. However, quantitative evaluation on this topic is scarce due to a lack of long-term field monitoring data. This study evaluated the combined effects of aridity and grazing/enclosure using long-term data (2005-2015) from three research stations on soil physical and chemical properties in typical steppes and desert steppes across the semi-arid and hyper-arid areas of China's drylands. Results showed that soil organic matter (OM) content was higher for enclosures (20.50 g/kg) than for grazing (19.06 g/kg). In the semi-arid steppe, enclosures aged 30-33 years had the highest soil total nitrogen (TN) content (1.21 g/kg). Longer enclosures aged 34-36 years showed decreased soil TN content (0.88 g/kg). In the desert steppe, enclosures aged 5-8 years exhibited the highest soil OM (2.44 g/kg) and TN (0.21 g/kg) contents. Grazing enhanced the decrease of OM content (from 4.57 to 2.39 g/kg) with increasing aridity (1 - aridity index) from 0.35 to 1. These findings indicate that enclosures can improve soil fertility, but prolonged enclosures may have negative effects. Grazing had a synergistic effect on the decrease of OM with aridity. Results can be used in response to climate changes to formulate sustainable land management strategies, such as reducing the enclosure period in wetter and restored areas, and diminishing the grazing intensity in areas with higher aridity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxin Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Changjia Li
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
| | - Shuai Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuobing Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK; York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhou W, Li C, Wang S, Ren Z, Stringer LC. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil properties and vegetation attributes in the arid and semi-arid regions of China. J Environ Manage 2023; 343:118186. [PMID: 37224686 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Driven by the goal of reversing desertification and recovering degraded lands, a wide range of vegetation restoration practices (such as planting and fencing) have been implemented in China's drylands. It is essential to examine the effects of vegetation restoration and environmental factors on soil nutrients to optimize restoration approaches. However, quantitative evaluation on this topic is insufficient due to a lack of long-term field monitoring data. This study evaluated the effects of sandy steppe restoration and sand dune fixation in the semi-arid desert, and natural and artificial vegetation restoration in the arid desert. It considered soil and plant characteristics using long-term (2005-2015) data from the Naiman Research Station located in the semi-arid region and Shapotou Research Station in the arid region of China's drylands. Results showed the sandy steppe had higher soil nutrient contents, vegetation biomass and rate of accumulating soil organic matter (OM) than the fixed dunes and moving dunes. Soil nutrient contents and vegetation biomass of the natural vegetation of Artemisia ordosica were higher than those of the artificial restoration of Artemisia ordosica since 1956. Artificial restoration had a higher rate of accumulating soil OM, total nitrogen (TN) and grass litter biomass than natural restoration. Soil water indirectly affected soil OM by affecting vegetation. Grass diversity was the main influencing factor on soil OM variance in the semi-arid Naiman desert while shrub diversity was the main factor in the arid Shapotou desert. These findings indicate that sand fixation in the semi-arid desert and vegetation restoration in the arid desert bring benefits for soil nutrient accumulation and vegetation improvement, and that natural restoration is preferable to artificial restoration. Results can be used to formulate sustainable vegetation restoration strategies, such as encouraging natural restoration, considering local resource constraints, and giving priority to restoring shrubs in arid areas with limited water.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxin Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Changjia Li
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
| | - Shuai Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuobing Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK; York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Simpson NP, Simpson KJ, Ferreira AT, Constable A, Glavovic B, Eriksen SEH, Ley D, Solecki W, Rodríguez RS, Stringer LC. Climate-resilient development planning for cities: progress from Cape Town. NPJ Urban Sustain 2023; 3:10. [PMID: 36874410 PMCID: PMC9972314 DOI: 10.1038/s42949-023-00089-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Priorities and programmes in the City of Cape Town's Integrated Development Plan (2022-2027) demonstrate progress towards operationalising local level planning for climate-resilient development. These developments provide lessons of process and focus on transformative outcomes for cities seeking equitable and just development while implementing climate change adaptation and mitigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas P. Simpson
- African Climate and Development Initiative, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Kayleen Jeanne Simpson
- Future Planning and Resilience, Strategic Policy Branch, City of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Albert T. Ferreira
- Future Planning and Resilience, Strategic Policy Branch, City of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Andrew Constable
- Australian Antarctic Division, Commonwealth Department of Agriculture, Water and Environment, Channel Highway, Kingston, ACT Australia
| | - Bruce Glavovic
- School of People, Environment and Planning, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | | | - Debora Ley
- Energy and Natural Resources, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - William Solecki
- Department of Geography, Hunter College-City University of New York, New York, NY USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aigbe GO, Stringer LC, Cotton M. Gas Flaring in Nigeria: A Multi-level Governance and Policy Coherence Analysis. Anthr. Sci. 2023. [PMCID: PMC9927060 DOI: 10.1007/s44177-023-00045-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
The unnecessary flaring of natural gas impacts public and environmental health, contributes to climate change and wastes fuel resources. Though reducing flaring is an emergent global environmental governance priority, progress has been slow. We assess gas flaring policy in the critical case of Nigeria through multi-level governance (MLG) structure. Our analysis assesses policy coherence (leading to progress in reaching shared goals) and divergence (creating tension and undermining progress) amongst sectors and institutional structures across the supranational, federal, state and local government scales. A combined dataset of documents, stakeholder interviews and expert surveys is analysed using Qualitative Document Analysis (QDA) and content analysis. We identify the principal actors involved, examine the extent of gas flaring awareness and policy coherence across multiple sectors/policy domains, and assess progress towards Nigeria’s national intended contribution and national policy on climate change mitigation. We find that policy coherence around gas flaring, including efforts towards climate change mitigation, has been slowed by political partisanship, poor governance, lack of regulatory compliance, and policy conflict between environmental protection and economic development priorities. Nigeria urgently requires inclusive involvement of stakeholder voices across multiple sectors and scales of local/regional government, the strengthening of federal institutions, a revaluation of economic aspirations through revenue diversification, and leadership that can temper the power of International Oil Companies (IOCs) to exploit the complexity of the MLG structure. These actions would help the government in improving environmental justice outcomes for flaring-affected communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Godwin O. Aigbe
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York, YO10 5NG UK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York, YO10 5NG UK
| | - Matthew Cotton
- School of Social Sciences Humanities and Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wells HBM, Porensky LM, Veblen KE, Riginos C, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Namoni M, Ekadeli J, Young TP. At high stocking rates, cattle do not functionally replace wild herbivores in shaping understory community composition. Ecol Appl 2022; 32:e2520. [PMID: 34918420 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Over a quarter of the world's land surface is grazed by cattle and other livestock, which are replacing wild herbivores, potentially impairing ecosystem structure, and functions. Previous research suggests that cattle at moderate stocking rates can functionally replace wild herbivores in shaping understory communities. However, it is uncertain whether this is also true under high stocking rates and the effects of wild herbivore on plant communities are moderate, enhanced, or simply additive to the effects of cattle at high stocking rates. To evaluate the influence of cattle stocking rates on the ability of cattle to functionally replace wild herbivores and test for interactive effects between cattle and wild herbivores in shaping understory vegetation, we assessed herbaceous vegetation in a long-term exclosure experiment in a semi-arid savanna in central Kenya that selectively excludes wild mesoherbivores (50-1000 kg) and megaherbivores (elephant and giraffe). We tested the effects of cattle stocking rate (zero/moderate/high) on herbaceous vegetation (diversity, composition, leafiness). We also tested how those effects depend on the presence of wild mesoherbivores and megaherbivores. We found that herbaceous community composition (primary ordination axis) was better explained by the presence/absence of herbivore types than by total herbivory, suggesting that herbivore identity is a more important determinant of community composition than total herbivory at high cattle stocking rates. The combination of wild mesoherbivores and cattle stocked at high rates led to increased bare ground and annual grass cover, reduced perennial grass cover and understory leafiness, and enhanced understory diversity. These shifts were weaker or absent when cattle were stocked at high stocking rates in the absence of wild mesoherbivores. Megaherbivores tempered the effects of cattle stocked at high rates on herbaceous community composition but amplified the effects of high cattle stocking rate on bare ground and understory diversity. Our results show that cattle at high stocking rates do not functionally replace wild herbivores in shaping savanna herbaceous communities contrary to previous findings at moderate stocking rates. In mixed-use rangelands, interactions between cattle stocking rate and wild herbivore presence can lead to non-additive vegetation responses with important implications for both wildlife conservation and livestock production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry B M Wells
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Lolldaiga Hills Research Programme, Nanyuki, Kenya
- Space for Giants, Nanyuki, Kenya
| | - Lauren M Porensky
- Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya
- USDA-ARS Rangeland Resources Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Kari E Veblen
- Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya
- Department of Wildland Resources and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA
| | - Corinna Riginos
- Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya
- The Nature Conservancy, Lander, Wyoming, USA
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK
| | - Andrew J Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Truman P Young
- Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya
- Department of Plant Sciences and Ecology Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Warren‐Thomas E, Agus F, Akbar PG, Crowson M, Hamer KC, Hariyadi B, Hodgson JA, Kartika WD, Lopes M, Lucey JM, Mustaqim D, Pettorelli N, Saad A, Sari W, Sukma G, Stringer LC, Ward C, Hill JK. No evidence for trade‐offs between bird diversity, yield and water table depth on oil palm smallholdings: Implications for tropical peatland landscape restoration. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Warren‐Thomas
- Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, Department of Biology University of York York UK
- School of Natural Sciences Bangor University Bangor UK
- Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg Austria
| | - Fahmuddin Agus
- Indonesian Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development Bogor Indonesia
| | | | - Merry Crowson
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London London UK
| | - Keith C. Hamer
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences University of Leeds Leeds UK
| | - Bambang Hariyadi
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | - Jenny A. Hodgson
- Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
| | - Winda D. Kartika
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | - Mailys Lopes
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London London UK
| | | | - Dedy Mustaqim
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | | | - Asmadi Saad
- Faculty of Agriculture Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | - Widia Sari
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | - Gita Sukma
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, Department of Biology University of York York UK
- Department of Environment and Geography University of York York UK
- School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UK
| | - Caroline Ward
- Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, Department of Biology University of York York UK
- School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UK
| | - Jane K. Hill
- Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, Department of Biology University of York York UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Priyadarshini P, Bundela AK, Gasparatos A, Stringer LC, Dhyani S, Dasgupta R, Reddy CS, Baral H, Muradian R, Karki M, Abhilash PC, Peñuelas J. Advancing Global Biodiversity Governance: Recommendations for Strengthening the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Anthr Sci 2022. [PMCID: PMC8931452 DOI: 10.1007/s44177-022-00013-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Reversing ecosystem degradation and halting global biodiversity loss due to climate change and other anthropogenic drivers are essential for socioeconomic development and human wellbeing, as well as for advancing global sustainability. The latest initiative in this direction is the ‘Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework’, which establishes a blueprint for global coordinated action towards development of national and regional strategies targeting conservation and sustainable utilization of biodiversity. By supporting the notion of ‘ecological civilization’, it emphasises the need for transformative strategies to conserve, monitor and sustainably manage ecosystems by 2030. Arguably the articulation of fit-for-purpose goals and targets is a key precondition for achieving this vision by enhancing cooperation and influencing the development of implementation strategies and regulatory instruments at national and local levels. The present Policy Analysis critically reviews the key features of the draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework and suggests recommendations to further strengthen it. Graphical Abstract ![]()
Biodiversity conservation is imperative for planetary resilience and human health and wellbeing. The Post-2020 Global Biodiversity framework aims to guide biodiversity governance towards ‘ecological civilization’. Transformative approaches targeting climate adaptation and mitigation, circularity, biodiversity renewal and nature-based solutions require better inclusion. Attainable and widely acceptable indicators for the different targets are necessary to ensure the framework’s effectiveness. The interface of climate change mitigation, adaptation and biodiversity conservation should be further strengthened in the framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Priyadarshini
- Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India
| | - Amit Kumar Bundela
- Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India
| | - Alexandros Gasparatos
- Institute for Future Initiatives (IFI), University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan
- Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS), United Nations University, Tokyo, 150-8925 Japan
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, YO10 5NG York UK
| | - Shalini Dhyani
- CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur, Maharashtra India
| | - Rajarshi Dasgupta
- Nature Resources and Ecosystem Services, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan
| | - Chintala Sudhakar Reddy
- National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Hyderabad, 500-037 India
| | - Himlal Baral
- Climate Change, Energy and Low Carbon Development, CIFOR-ICRAF, Bogor Regency, Indonesia
| | - Roldan Muradian
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Rio di Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Madhav Karki
- Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal
| | | | - Josep Peñuelas
- CSIC, Global Ecology, CREAF-CSIC-UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Catalonia Spain
- CREAF, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valles, Catalonia Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wells HBM, Crego RD, Ekadeli J, Namoni M, Kimuyu DM, Odadi WO, Porensky LM, Dougill AJ, Stringer LC, Young TP. Less Is More: Lowering Cattle Stocking Rates Enhances Wild Herbivore Habitat Use and Cattle Foraging Efficiency. Front Ecol Evol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.825689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Over a quarter of the world’s land surface is grazed by cattle and other livestock, which are replacing wild herbivores and widely regarded as drivers of global biodiversity declines. The effects of livestock presence versus absence on wild herbivores are well documented. However, the environmental context-specific effects of cattle stocking rate on biodiversity and livestock production are poorly understood, precluding nuanced rangeland management recommendations. To address this, we used a long term exclosure experiment in a semi-arid savanna ecosystem in central Kenya that selectively excludes cattle (at different stocking rates), wild mesoherbivores, and megaherbivores. We investigated the individual and interactive effects of cattle stocking rate (zero/moderate/high) and megaherbivore (>1,000 kg) accessibility on habitat use (measured as dung density) by two dominant wild mesoherbivores (50–1,000 kg; zebra Equus quagga and eland Taurotragus oryx) across the “wet” and “dry” seasons. To explore potential tradeoffs or co-benefits between cattle production and wildlife conservation, we tested for individual and interactive effects of cattle stocking rate and accessibility by wild mesoherbivores and megaherbivores (collectively, large wild herbivores) on the foraging efficiency of cattle across both seasons. Eland habitat use was reduced by cattle at moderate and high stocking rates across both dry and wet seasons and regardless of megaherbivore accessibility. We observed a positive effect of megaherbivores on zebra habitat use at moderate, but not high, stocking rates. Cattle foraging efficiency (g dry matter step–1 min–1) was lower in the high compared to moderate stocking rate treatments during the dry season, and was non-additively reduced by wild mesoherbivores and high cattle stocking rates during the wet season. These results show that high stocking rates are detrimental to wild mesoherbivore habitat use and cattle foraging efficiency, while reducing to moderate stocking rates can benefit zebra habitat use and cattle foraging efficiency. Our findings demonstrate that ecosystem management and restoration efforts across African rangelands that involve reducing cattle stocking rates may represent a win-win for wild herbivore conservation and individual performance of livestock.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lyon C, Saupe EE, Smith CJ, Hill DJ, Beckerman AP, Stringer LC, Marchant R, McKay J, Burke A, O'Higgins P, Dunhill AM, Allen BJ, Riel-Salvatore J, Aze T. Climate change research and action must look beyond 2100. Glob Chang Biol 2022; 28:349-361. [PMID: 34558764 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Anthropogenic activity is changing Earth's climate and ecosystems in ways that are potentially dangerous and disruptive to humans. Greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere continue to rise, ensuring that these changes will be felt for centuries beyond 2100, the current benchmark for projection. Estimating the effects of past, current, and potential future emissions to only 2100 is therefore short-sighted. Critical problems for food production and climate-forced human migration are projected to arise well before 2100, raising questions regarding the habitability of some regions of the Earth after the turn of the century. To highlight the need for more distant horizon scanning, we model climate change to 2500 under a suite of emission scenarios and quantify associated projections of crop viability and heat stress. Together, our projections show global climate impacts increase significantly after 2100 without rapid mitigation. As a result, we argue that projections of climate and its effects on human well-being and associated governance and policy must be framed beyond 2100.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Lyon
- Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Ste Anne de Bellevue, Quebec, Canada
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Erin E Saupe
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher J Smith
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria
| | - Daniel J Hill
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew P Beckerman
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Robert Marchant
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, UK
| | - James McKay
- School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ariane Burke
- Département d'Anthropologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Paul O'Higgins
- Department of Archaeology and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Bethany J Allen
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Tracy Aze
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Lengefeld
- Amrita School for Sustainable Development Center for Research in Analytics and Technologies for Education (CREATE), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amritapuri 690525 India
| | | | - Prema Nedungadi
- Center for Research in Analytics and Technologies for Education (CREATE), Department of Computer Science and Engineering Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amritapuri 690525 India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Favretto N, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Kruger L. Knowledge exchange enhances engagement in ecological restoration and rehabilitation initiatives. Restor Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Favretto
- School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography University of York Heslington, York YO10 5NG U.K
| | - Andrew J. Dougill
- School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
| | - Liezl Kruger
- Living Lands 5 Noordhoek Main Road, Sunnydale, Cape Town 7950 South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ihemezie EJ, Nawrath M, Strauß L, Stringer LC, Dallimer M. The influence of human values on attitudes and behaviours towards forest conservation. J Environ Manage 2021; 292:112857. [PMID: 34051474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Human attitudes and behaviours have been linked to the degradation of global biodiversity, particularly forest ecosystems. Indeed, effective conservation actions require that the attitudes and behaviours of affected individuals and communities are taken into account. While several studies have examined how human attitudes and behaviours affect conservation, it is still unclear which, and how, human value orientations influence conservation attitudes and behaviour. This is critical because attitudes and behaviours are underpinned by the complex concept of human values. Thus, effective management and conservation of environmental resources requires an in-depth knowledge and understanding of these values, and how they affect attitudinal and behavioural preferences towards the natural environment and their protection. Here we review the human value orientations influencing people's attitudes and behaviours towards forest conservation, and discuss how conservation projects can be more successful by aligning their goals and operations to people's values. To do this, we carried out a scoping review, using the sub-Saharan Africa region as a case study, and followed the PRISMA-ScR systematic review guidelines. A narrative synthesis was adopted for data analysis. We identified different value types that fall within three broad human value orientation domains influencing forest conservation attitudes and behaviours. Anthropocentric and relational value orientations emerged as most dominant, with both positive and negative influences on a number of forest conservation attitudes and behaviours, albeit with more evidence for positive influence. The positive attitudes and behaviours were linked to utilitarian motivations and cultural beliefs and include rural support for conservation, compliance to forest rules, sustainable forest use, and participation in forest management. The values linked to dependence on forest resources, low benefits from conservation, and conservation costs, tend to trigger negative conservation attitudes and behaviours. To effectively achieve forest conservation goals, environmental managers, conservationists, and decision-makers should understand the extent and directional influence of value orientations on conservation attitudes and behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eberechukwu Johnpaul Ihemezie
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
| | - Maximilian Nawrath
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Lena Strauß
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5NG, UK
| | - Martin Dallimer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Harry B. M. Wells
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
- Lolldaiga Hills Research Programme PO Box 26 Nanyuki Kenya
| | - Elijah H. Kirobi
- School of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure Studies Kenyatta University Nairobi PO Box 43844 Kenya
| | - Cadia L. Chen
- Lolldaiga Hills Research Programme PO Box 26 Nanyuki Kenya
| | | | | | | | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
- Department of Environment and Geography University of York York YO10 5NG U.K
| | - Andrew J. Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wells HBM, Kimuyu DM, Odadi WO, Dougill AJ, Stringer LC, Young TP. Wild and domestic savanna herbivores increase smaller vertebrate diversity, but less than additively. J Appl Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Harry B. M. Wells
- Sustainability Research Institute School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UK
- Lolldaiga Hills Research Programme Nanyuki Kenya
| | - Duncan M. Kimuyu
- Mpala Research Centre Nanyuki Kenya
- Department of Natural Resources Karatina University Karatina Kenya
| | - Wilfred O. Odadi
- Mpala Research Centre Nanyuki Kenya
- Department of Natural Resources Egerton University Egerton Kenya
| | - Andrew J. Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UK
- Department of Environment and Geography University of York York UK
| | - Truman P. Young
- Mpala Research Centre Nanyuki Kenya
- Department of Plant Sciences and Ecology Graduate Group University of California Davis CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ward C, Stringer LC, Warren-Thomas E, Agus F, Crowson M, Hamer K, Hariyadi B, Kartika WD, Lucey J, McClean C, Nurida NL, Petorelli N, Pratiwi E, Saad A, Andriyani R, Ariani T, Sriwahyuni H, Hill JK. Smallholder perceptions of land restoration activities: rewetting tropical peatland oil palm areas in Sumatra, Indonesia. Reg Environ Change 2020; 21:1. [PMID: 33362432 PMCID: PMC7749744 DOI: 10.1007/s10113-020-01737-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The Indonesian government committed to restoring over 2 million ha of degraded peatland by the end of 2020, mainly to reduce peat fires and greenhouse gas emissions. Although it is unlikely the government will meet this target, restoration projects are still underway. One restoration strategy involves blocking peatland drainage canals, but the consequences of this for smallholder farmers whose livelihoods are dependent on agriculture are unclear. This paper investigates perceived impacts of canal blocks on smallholder farmers and identifies factors that affect their willingness to accept canal blocks on their land. We use data from 181 household questionnaires collected in 2018 across three villages in Jambi province, Sumatra. We found that the majority of respondents would accept canal blocks on their farms, perceiving that the blocks would have no impact on yields or farm access, and would decrease fire risk. Respondents who would not accept blocks on their farms were more likely to use canals to access their farms and perceive that canal blocks would decrease yields. The majority of farmers unwilling to accept canal blocks did not change their mind when provided with an option of a block that would allow boat travel. Our results improve understanding of why some smallholders may be unwilling to engage with peatland restoration. Further research is needed to understand the impact of canal blocks on smallholders' yields. Engaging with stakeholders from the outset to understand farmers' concerns, and perceptions is key if the government is to succeed in meeting its peatland restoration target and to ensure that the costs and benefits of restoration are evenly shared between local stakeholders and other actors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10113-020-01737-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Ward
- Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Environment Department, University of York, York, UK
| | - Eleanor Warren-Thomas
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK
- School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, York, UK
| | - Fahmuddin Agus
- Indonesia Soil Research Institute, Indonesia Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development, Bogor, Indonesia
| | - Merry Crowson
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
| | - Keith Hamer
- School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Bambang Hariyadi
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
| | - Winda D. Kartika
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
| | | | - Colin McClean
- Environment Department, University of York, York, UK
| | - Neneng L. Nurida
- Indonesia Soil Research Institute, Indonesia Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development, Bogor, Indonesia
| | | | - Etty Pratiwi
- Indonesia Soil Research Institute, Indonesia Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development, Bogor, Indonesia
| | - Aasmadi Saad
- Soil Science Division, Faculty of Agriculture, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
| | - Ririn Andriyani
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
| | - Tantria Ariani
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
| | - Heni Sriwahyuni
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Jambi University, Jambi, Indonesia
| | - Jane K. Hill
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Singh RK, Singh A, Kumar S, Sheoran P, Sharma DK, Stringer LC, Quinn CH, Kumar A, Singh D. Perceived Climate Variability and Compounding Stressors: Implications for Risks to Livelihoods of Smallholder Indian Farmers. Environ Manage 2020; 66:826-844. [PMID: 32789595 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01345-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Micro-scale perspectives are seldom included in planned climate change adaptations, yet farmers' perceptions can provide useful insights into livelihood impacts from interactions between climatic and other stressors. This research aims to understand how climate variability and other stressors are impacting the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Azamgarh district, eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Data from 84 smallholder farmers were collected using mixed qualitative and quantitative approaches, including interview and participatory methods, informed by multiple stressor and sustainable livelihood frameworks. Results revealed that farmers are increasingly facing problems caused by the reduced duration and number of rainy days, and erratic rainfall. Anomalies in seasonal cycles (longer summers, shorter winters) seem to have altered the local climate. Farmers reported that repeated drought impacts, even in years of moderate rainfall, are adversely affecting the rice crop, challenging the formal definition of drought. Climate variability, identified as the foremost stressor, often acts as a risk multiplier for ecological (e.g., soil sodicity), socio-economic (e.g., rising costs of cultivation) and political (e.g., mismatching policies and poor extension systems) stressors. In addition to climate stresses, resource-poor marginal groups in particular experienced higher risks resulting from changes in resource management regimes. This study provides an important cue to revisit the formal definitions of normal rainfall and drought, accommodating farmers' perceptions that evenly distributed rainfall, and not total rainfall is a key determinant of crop yields. Though India has developed adaptive measures for climate change and variability, integration of farmers' perceptions of climate and other stressors into such policies can improve the resilience of smallholder farmers, who have hitherto depended largely on autonomous adaptation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjay K Singh
- ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India.
| | - Anshuman Singh
- ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
| | - Satyendra Kumar
- ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
| | - Parvender Sheoran
- ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
| | - D K Sharma
- ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- School of Earth and Environment, Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire H Quinn
- School of Earth and Environment, Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Arvind Kumar
- ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
| | - Dheeraj Singh
- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Pali, Rajasthan, India
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van den Elsen E, Stringer LC, De Ita C, Hessel R, Kéfi S, Schneider FD, Bautista S, Mayor AG, Baudena M, Rietkerk M, Valdecantos A, Vallejo VR, Geeson N, Brandt CJ, Fleskens L, Hemerik L, Panagos P, Valente S, Keizer JJ, Schwilch G, Jucker Riva M, Sietz D, Christoforou M, Hadjimitsis DG, Papoutsa C, Quaranta G, Salvia R, Tsanis IK, Daliakopoulos I, Claringbould H, de Ruiter PC. Advances in Understanding and Managing Catastrophic Ecosystem Shifts in Mediterranean Ecosystems. Front Ecol Evol 2020. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.561101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
24
|
Ward C, Stringer LC, Warren‐Thomas E, Agus F, Hamer K, Pettorelli N, Hariyadi B, Hodgson J, Kartika WD, Lucey J, McClean C, Nurida NL, Saad A, Hill JK. Wading through the swamp: what does tropical peatland restoration mean to national‐level stakeholders in Indonesia? Restor Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Ward
- Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds Leeds U.K
| | | | | | - Fahmuddin Agus
- Indonesia Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development Indonesia Soil Research Institute Bogor Indonesia
| | - Keith Hamer
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences University of Leeds Leeds U.K
| | | | - Bambang Hariyadi
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | - Jenny Hodgson
- Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool Liverpool U.K
| | - Winda D. Kartika
- Biology Education Program, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | | | | | - Neneng L. Nurida
- Indonesia Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development Indonesia Soil Research Institute Bogor Indonesia
| | - Asmadi Saad
- Soil Science Division, Faculty of Agriculture Jambi University Jambi Indonesia
| | - Jane K. Hill
- Department of Biology University of York York U.K
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Okpara UT, Fleskens L, Stringer LC, Hessel R, Bachmann F, Daliakopoulos I, Berglund K, Blanco Velazquez FJ, Ferro ND, Keizer J, Kohnova S, Lemann T, Quinn C, Schwilch G, Siebielec G, Skaalsveen K, Tibbett M, Zoumides C. Helping stakeholders select and apply appraisal tools to mitigate soil threats: Researchers' experiences from across Europe. J Environ Manage 2020; 257:110005. [PMID: 31989961 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Soil improvement measures need to be ecologically credible, socially acceptable and economically affordable if they are to enter widespread use. However, in real world decision contexts not all measures can sufficiently meet these criteria. As such, developing, selecting and using appropriate tools to support more systematic appraisal of soil improvement measures in different decision-making contexts represents an important challenge. Tools differ in their aims, ranging from those focused on appraising issues of cost-effectiveness, wider ecosystem services impacts and adoption barriers/opportunities, to those seeking to foster participatory engagement and social learning. Despite the growing complexity of the decision-support tool landscape, comprehensive guidance for selecting tools that are best suited to appraise soil improvement measures, as well as those well-adapted to enable participatory deployment, has generally been lacking. We address this gap using the experience and survey data from an EU-funded project (RECARE: Preventing and REmediating degradation of soils in Europe through land CARE). RECARE applied different socio-cultural, biophysical and monetary appraisal tools to assess the costs, benefits and adoption of soil improvement measures across Europe. We focused on these appraisal tools and evaluated their performance against three broad attributes that gauge their differences and suitability for widespread deployment to aid stakeholder decision making in soil management. Data were collected using an online questionnaire administered to RECARE researchers. Although some tools worked better than others across case studies, the information collated was used to provide guiding strategies for choosing appropriate tools, considering resources and data availability, characterisation of uncertainty, and the purpose for which a specific soil improvement measure is being developed or promoted. This paper provides insights to others working in practical soil improvement contexts as to why getting the tools right matters. It demonstrates how use of the right tools can add value to decision-making in ameliorating soil threats, supporting the sustainable management of the services that our soil ecosystems provide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uche T Okpara
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK.
| | - Luuk Fleskens
- Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, Netherlands.
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK.
| | - Rudi Hessel
- Soil, Water and Land Use, Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, Netherlands.
| | - Felicitas Bachmann
- Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Ioannis Daliakopoulos
- Department of Agriculture, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Heraklion, 71410, Greece; School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, 73100, Greece.
| | - Kerstin Berglund
- Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
| | | | - Nicola Dal Ferro
- Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Italy.
| | - Jacob Keizer
- Earth Surface Processes Team, Center for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
| | - Silvia Kohnova
- Department of Land and Water Resources Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
| | - Tatenda Lemann
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK.
| | - Claire Quinn
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK.
| | - Gudrun Schwilch
- Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 10, 3012, Bern, Switzerland; Federal Office for the Environment, Soil Section, 3003, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Grzegorz Siebielec
- Department of Soil Science Erosion and Land Protection, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, State Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland.
| | - Kamilla Skaalsveen
- Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Frederik A. Dahls vei 20, 1430, Aas, Norway.
| | - Mark Tibbett
- Department of Sustainable Land Management & Soil Research Centre, School of Agricultural Policy and Development, University of Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AR, UK.
| | - Christos Zoumides
- Energy, Environment and Water Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, Cyprus.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Reitzel K, Bennett WW, Berger N, Brownlie WJ, Bruun S, Christensen ML, Cordell D, van Dijk K, Egemose S, Eigner H, Glud RN, Grönfors O, Hermann L, Houot S, Hupfer M, Jacobs B, Korving L, Kjærgaard C, Liimatainen H, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Macintosh KA, Magid J, Maia F, Martin-Ortega J, McGrath J, Meulepas R, Murry M, Neset TS, Neumann G, Nielsen UG, Nielsen PH, O'Flaherty V, Qu H, Santner J, Seufert V, Spears B, Stringer LC, Stutter M, Verburg PH, Wilfert P, Williams PN, Metson GS. New Training to Meet the Global Phosphorus Challenge. Environ Sci Technol 2019; 53:8479-8481. [PMID: 31283194 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper Reitzel
- University of Southern Denmark , Department of Biology , Campusvej 55 , 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - William W Bennett
- University of Southern Denmark , Department of Biology , Campusvej 55 , 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Nils Berger
- EuroChem Agro GmbH , Reichskanzler-Müller-Str. 23 , 68165 Mannheim , Germany
| | - Will J Brownlie
- Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in Edinburgh , Penicuik , Midlothian , Scotland, U.K. EH26 0QB
| | - Sander Bruun
- University of Copenhagen , Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences , Thorvaldsensvej 40 , 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Morten L Christensen
- Aalborg University , Department of Chemistry and Bioscience , Frederiks Bajers Vej 7H , 9220 Aalborg , Denmark
| | - Dana Cordell
- University of Technology Sydney , Institute for Sustainable Futures , PO Box 123 Broadway New South Wales 2007 , Australia
| | - Kimo van Dijk
- European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform , 8 Avenue du Dirgeable , 1170 Bruxelles , Belgium
| | - Sara Egemose
- University of Southern Denmark , Department of Biology , Campusvej 55 , 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Herbert Eigner
- AGRANA Research & Innovation Center GmbH , Josef Reitherstraße 21-23 , 3430 Tulln an der Donau , Austria
| | - Ronnie N Glud
- University of Southern Denmark , Department of Biology , Campusvej 55 , 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Outi Grönfors
- Kemira Oyj , R&D and Technology EMEA, Water treatment , Luoteisrinne 2 , FI-02270 Espoo , Finland
| | - Ludwig Hermann
- Proman Management GmbH , Weingartenstrasse 92 , 2214 Auersthal , Austria
| | - Sabine Houot
- French National Institute for Agricultural Research , INRA UMR, ECOSYS, Route de la Ferme , F-78850 Thiverval-Grignon , France
| | - Michael Hupfer
- Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries , Department of Chemical Analytics and Biogeochemistry , Müggelseedamm 301 , 12587 Berlin , Germany
| | - Brent Jacobs
- University of Technology Sydney , Institute for Sustainable Futures , PO Box 123 Broadway New South Wales 2007 , Australia
| | - Leon Korving
- Wetsus , European centre of excellence for sustainable water technology , Oostergoweg 9 , 8911 MA Leeuwarden , The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Kjærgaard
- SEGES , Danish Agriculture & Food Council F.m.b.A. Nature and Environment , Agro Food Park 15 , 8200 Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Henrikki Liimatainen
- University of Oulu , Fiber and Particle Engineering , Erkki Koiso-Kanttilankatu , Oulu 90014 , Finland
| | - Mark C M Van Loosdrecht
- Delft University of Technology , Department of Biotechnology , Van der Maasweg 9 , 2629 HZ Delft , The Netherlands
| | - Katrina A Macintosh
- The Queen's University of Belfast , School of Biological Sciences and the Institute for Global Food Security , 19 Chlorine Gardens , Belfast , BT9 5DL , Northern Ireland
| | - Jakob Magid
- University of Copenhagen , Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences , Thorvaldsensvej 40 , 1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Frederico Maia
- Smallmatek, Lda , Rua dos Canhas , 3810-075 Aveiro , Portugal
| | - Julia Martin-Ortega
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment , University of Leeds , LS2 9JT Leeds , UK
| | - John McGrath
- The Queen's University of Belfast , School of Biological Sciences and the Institute for Global Food Security , 19 Chlorine Gardens , Belfast , BT9 5DL , Northern Ireland
| | - Roel Meulepas
- Wetsus , European centre of excellence for sustainable water technology , Oostergoweg 9 , 8911 MA Leeuwarden , The Netherlands
| | - Michael Murry
- NVP energy ltd , Galway Technology Center , Mervue Business Park , Mervue, Galway , Irland
| | - Tina-Simone Neset
- Linköping University , Department of Thematic Studies-Environmental Change , SE-58183 Linköping , Sweden
| | - Günter Neumann
- University of Hohenheim , Institute of Crop Science (340h) , Fruwirthstr. 20 , 70593 Stuttgart Germany
| | - Ulla G Nielsen
- Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy , University of Southern Denmark , Campusvej 55 , 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Per H Nielsen
- Aalborg University , Department of Chemistry and Bioscience , Frederiks Bajers Vej 7H , 9220 Aalborg , Denmark
| | - Vincent O'Flaherty
- National University of Ireland Galway , University Road , Galway , Ireland H91 TK33
| | - Haiyan Qu
- University of Southern Denmark , Department of Chemical engineering, Biotechnology- and Environmental Technology , Campusvej 55 , 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Jakob Santner
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna , Institute of Agronomy , Konrad-Lorenz-Straße 24 , 3430 Tulln an der Donau , Vienna , Austria
| | - Verena Seufert
- VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies , De Boelelaan 1087 , 1081 HV Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Bryan Spears
- Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in Edinburgh , Penicuik , Midlothian , Scotland, U.K. EH26 0QB
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment , University of Leeds , LS2 9JT Leeds , UK
| | - Marc Stutter
- The James Hutton Institute , Environmental and Biochemical Sciences Group , Aberdeen , AB15 8QH , Scotland, U.K
| | - Peter H Verburg
- VU University Amsterdam, Institute for Environmental Studies , De Boelelaan 1087 , 1081 HV Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Philipp Wilfert
- IPP-Kiel , Rendsburger Landstraße 196-198 , D-24113 Kiel , Germany
| | - Paul N Williams
- The Queen's University of Belfast , School of Biological Sciences and the Institute for Global Food Security , 19 Chlorine Gardens , Belfast , BT9 5DL , Northern Ireland
| | - Geneviève S Metson
- Linköping University , Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology , Fysikhuset, Rum 3D.306 SE-58183 Linköping , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- Henry B. M. Wells
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT UK
- Lolldaiga Hills Research Programme, PO Box 26 Nanyuki Kenya
| | - Andrew J. Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT UK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lopez Porras G, Stringer LC, Quinn CH. Corruption and conflicts as barriers to adaptive governance: Water governance in dryland systems in the Rio del Carmen watershed. Sci Total Environ 2019; 660:519-530. [PMID: 30640119 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Water governance in the Rio del Carmen watershed has failed to achieve sustainable water use, generating social conflicts, water overexploitation, and grassland loss. This leaves it unable to adapt and learn, to reconcile different stakeholder perspectives and to adequately respond to uncertainty. Adaptive water governance regulates water access through flexible, inclusive and innovative institutions, increasing system adaptive capacity in the face of uncertainty. This is necessary for water-scarce systems since they suffer context-specific exposure to land degradation and climate change. This research focuses on how water governance regulates water access in the Rio del Carmen watershed, Mexico, identifying key legal and institutional features that could increase adaptation and secure water resources in the long-term. 27 semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders in the watershed, in order to understand the water governance structure and its system dynamics. It was found that water mismanagement, overexploitation, and conflicts over access to water are due to the lack of application and neglect of formal rules. Results indicate that breaches of the legal framework are commonplace, permitted by corruption of both former and current government officials. Many farmers have institutionalized this corruption in order to access water; increasing social conflicts and hindering any type of planning or water management, which, in turn, continues to affect the ecological conditions of the watershed. By understanding the governance system, its structure and the interactions that weaken and bypass formal institutions to the detriment of water resources, stakeholder engagement has emerged as an entry point for enabling collaboration and acceptance of formal institutions. This process has the potential to create a formal network, as a Watershed Committee, that could be honoured in practice through the efficacy of this engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Lopez Porras
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Claire H Quinn
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ward C, Stringer LC, Holmes G. Protected area co-management and perceived livelihood impacts. J Environ Manage 2018; 228:1-12. [PMID: 30205240 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Creation of protected areas to conserve biodiversity can have both positive and negative impacts, with impacts unequally distributed within local communities. A global shift towards local community involvement in protected area governance and co-management has aimed to reduce costs of protected area establishment and their uneven distribution. Yet, there is mixed evidence to support whether such initiatives are succeeding. Here, a protected area in Madagascar is used as a case study to explore how co-management governance processes impact upon livelihood strategies and outcomes, and how these impacts are distributed within and between villages. Focus groups, interviews and questionnaires were conducted in 2015/16 with households surrounding a protected area, co-managed by local community associations and a national NGO. Data analysis was framed around the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework. The majority of respondents perceived negative livelihood outcomes, and impacts were unevenly distributed between social groups. Respondents were more likely to report negative livelihood outcomes if they were from remote villages, poorer households and reliant on provisioning ecosystem services before protected area establishment. Qualitative data showed that the main drivers of this were protected area-related rules and regulations restricting forest activities. Drivers of improved livelihood outcomes were training and materials improving agricultural yields and increased community cohesion. Although co-managed protected areas may be overall more effective in meeting biological and socio-economic goals than protected areas of other governance types, the evidence here suggests that governance processes can lead to local perceptions of inequity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Ward
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - George Holmes
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yiran GAB, Stringer LC. Adaptation to Climatic Hazards in the Savannah Ecosystem: Improving Adaptation Policy and Action. Environ Manage 2017; 60:665-678. [PMID: 28608036 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0901-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
People in Ghana's savannah ecosystem have historically experienced a range of climatic hazards that have affected their livelihoods. In view of current climate variability and change, and projected increases in extreme events, adaptation to climate risks is vital. Policies have been put in place to enhance adaptation across sub-Saharan Africa in accordance with international agreements. At the same time, local people, through experience, have learned to adapt. This paper examines current policy actions and their implementation alongside an assessment of barriers to local adaptation. In doing so it links adaptation policy and practice. Policy documents were analysed that covered key livelihood sectors, which were identified as climate sensitive. These included agriculture, water, housing and health policies, as well as the National Climate Change Policy. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were also held with key stakeholders in the Upper East Region of Ghana. Analyses were carried using thematic content analysis. Although policies and actions complement each other, their integration is weak. Financial, institutional, social, and technological barriers hinder successful local implementation of some policy actions, while lack of local involvement in policy formulation also hinders adaptation practice. Integration of local perspectives into policy needs to be strengthened in order to enhance adaptation. Coupled with this is a need to consider adaptation to climate change in development policies and to pursue efforts to reduce or remove the key barriers to implementation at the local level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald A B Yiran
- Department of Geography and Resource Development, School of Social Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wood BT, Quinn CH, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ. Investigating Climate Compatible Development Outcomes and their Implications for Distributive Justice: Evidence from Malawi. Environ Manage 2017; 60:436-453. [PMID: 28540441 PMCID: PMC5544806 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0890-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Governments and donors are investing in climate compatible development in order to reduce climate and development vulnerabilities. However, the rate at which climate compatible development is being operationalised has outpaced academic enquiry into the concept. Interventions aiming to achieve climate compatible development "wins" (for development, mitigation, adaptation) can also create negative side-effects. Moreover, benefits and negative side-effects may differ across time and space and have diverse consequences for individuals and groups. Assessments of the full range of outcomes created by climate compatible development projects and their implications for distributive justice are scarce. This article develops a framework using a systematic literature review that enables holistic climate compatible development outcome evaluation over seven parameters identified. Thereafter, we explore the outcomes of two donor-funded projects that pursue climate compatible development triple-wins in Malawi using this framework. Household surveys, semi-structured interviews and documentary material are analysed. Results reveal that uneven outcomes are experienced between stakeholder groups and change over time. Although climate compatible development triple-wins can be achieved through projects, they do not represent the full range of outcomes. Ecosystem-and community-based activities are becoming popularised as approaches for achieving climate compatible development goals. However, findings suggest that a strengthened evidence base is required to ensure that these approaches are able to meet climate compatible development goals and further distributive justice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin T Wood
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Claire H Quinn
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Andrew J Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Akhtar-Schuster M, Stringer LC, Erlewein A, Metternicht G, Minelli S, Safriel U, Sommer S. Unpacking the concept of land degradation neutrality and addressing its operation through the Rio Conventions. J Environ Manage 2017; 195:4-15. [PMID: 27666648 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Revised: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 09/14/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The world's commitment towards land degradation neutrality (LDN) became enshrined in various international agreements and decisions throughout the year 2015. The challenge now becomes one of addressing its operation, in order to achieve these new policy goals and targets by the year 2030. Advancing LDN demands attention to what the concept seeks to achieve, as well as unravelling the perspectives of the key multi-lateral environmental agreements through which progress can be made. The three Rio Conventions (the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)) all play key roles in shaping the international LDN governance and implementation context. Their different but related foci create a number of challenges and opportunities for advancing LDN. In this paper we critically analyze the literature to elucidate potential challenges and opportunities in moving LDN towards implementation, considering the mandates and objectives of all three Rio Conventions. We first unpack the concept of LDN's aspirations. We highlight the importance of the definitions and terminology used, and the relationships between those definitions, terms and the actors using them, as well as their implications in framing the range of policy actions and synergies that could benefit progress towards multiple Sustainable Development Goals. We then examine the LDN pilot project spearheaded by the UNCCD to identify key lessons for LDN implementation. Synthesizing these lessons, we present a portfolio of blended interventions that seeks to address the aspirations of the UNCCD, UNFCCC and CBD in the LDN space, identifying synergistic options for national actions to move towards LDN. Overall, our analysis provides insights in advancing LDN from its current position as a policy target, towards synergetic action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Akhtar-Schuster
- Secretariat DesertNet International, c/o Biocentre Klein Flottbek and Botanical Garden, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Alexander Erlewein
- United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Graciela Metternicht
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales Australia, NSW 2052 Sydney, Australia.
| | - Sara Minelli
- United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1, 53113 Bonn, Germany.
| | - Uriel Safriel
- The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Ecology Evolution and Behavior, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Stefan Sommer
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, Via E. Fermi, 21029 Ispra (VA), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dougill AJ, Whitfield S, Stringer LC, Vincent K, Wood BT, Chinseu EL, Steward P, Mkwambisi DD. Mainstreaming conservation agriculture in Malawi: Knowledge gaps and institutional barriers. J Environ Manage 2017; 195:25-34. [PMID: 27692890 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Revised: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 09/24/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Conservation agriculture (CA) practices of reduced soil tillage, permanent organic soil coverage and intercropping/crop rotation, are being advocated globally, based on perceived benefits for crop yields, soil carbon storage, weed suppression, reduced soil erosion and improved soil water retention. However, some have questioned their efficacy due to uncertainty around the performance and trade-offs associated with CA practices, and their compatibility with the diverse livelihood strategies and varied agro-ecological conditions across African smallholder systems. This paper assesses the role of key institutions in Malawi in shaping pathways towards more sustainable land management based on CA by outlining their impact on national policy-making and the design and implementation of agricultural development projects. It draws on interviews at national, district and project levels and a multi-stakeholder workshop that mapped the institutional landscape of decision-making for agricultural land management practices. Findings identify knowledge gaps and institutional barriers that influence land management decision-making and constrain CA uptake. We use our findings to set out an integrated roadmap of research needs and policy options aimed at supporting CA as a route to enhanced sustainable land management in Malawi. Findings offer lessons that can inform design, planning and implementation of CA projects, and identify the multi-level institutional support structures required for mainstreaming sustainable land management in sub-Saharan Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
| | - Stephen Whitfield
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
| | - Katharine Vincent
- Kulima Integrated Development Solutions (Pty) Ltd, Hilton, South Africa; School of Architecture and Planning, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, WITS 2050, South Africa.
| | - Benjamin T Wood
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
| | - Edna L Chinseu
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
| | - Peter Steward
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
| | - David D Mkwambisi
- Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bunda College Campus, Lilongwe, Malawi.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Orchard SE, Stringer LC, Manyatsi AM. Farmer Perceptions and Responses to Soil Degradation in Swaziland. Land Degrad Dev 2017; 28:46-56. [PMID: 30393450 PMCID: PMC6199004 DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Soil degradation is globally concerning due to its adverse effects on the environment and agricultural production. Much of Swaziland is at risk from degradation. This paper assesses farmer perceptions and responses to soil degradation in 2002 and 2014, focusing on two land uses that underpin rural livelihoods: arable land and rangeland areas. It uses repeat household surveys and semi-structured interviews, in two case study chiefdoms in the country's middleveld (KaBhudla and Engcayini) in the first longitudinal study of its kind. We find that observations of land degradation are perceived mainly through changes in land productivity, with chemical degradation occurring predominantly on arable land and physical degradation and erosion mainly in rangeland areas. Changes in rainfall are particularly important in determining responses. While perceptions of the causes and impacts of degradation largely concur with the scientific literature, responses were constrained by poor land availability, shorter and more unpredictable cropping seasons because of changing rains and low awareness, access to or knowledge of agricultural inputs. We suggest that sustainable arable land management can be enhanced through improved access to alternative sources of water, use of management practices that retain soil and moisture and greater access to agricultural inputs and capacity building to ensure their appropriate use. We suggest collaborative management for settlement planning that integrates soil conservation and livestock management strategies such as controlled stocking levels and rotational grazing could improve land quality in rangeland areas. Together, these approaches can help land users to better manage change. © 2016 The Authors. Land Degradation & Development published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven E. Orchard
- Sustainability Research Institute (SRI), School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsLS2 9JTUK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute (SRI), School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsLS2 9JTUK
| | - Absalom M. Manyatsi
- Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of SwazilandLuyengoM205Swaziland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Orchard SE, Stringer LC. Challenges to polycentric governance of an international development project tackling land degradation in Swaziland. Ambio 2016; 45:796-807. [PMID: 27272347 PMCID: PMC5055482 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0791-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Revised: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
To effectively address the drivers and impacts of land degradation requires polycentric governance systems that facilitate international development projects (IDPs). This paper analyses an IDP aiming to reduce land degradation in Swaziland. A longitudinal-style qualitative approach draws on repeat household surveys, semi-structured interviews and focus groups. We aim to identify the changes that have taken place since the departure of the IDP funders, and the subsequent dynamics between stakeholders. We: (1) chart the evolution of the institutional structures and processes of the IDP; and (2) assess community perceptions of IDP outcomes. Lack of meaningful participation at various stages of the PMC caused the project to lose momentum following the departure of the funders. We discuss these findings in relation to a polycentric approach, and identify how multi-stakeholder IDP can be facilitated as part of wider polycentric governance approaches to inform policies to combat land degradation within Swaziland and more widely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven E. Orchard
- Sustainability Research Institute (SRI), School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute (SRI), School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Okpara UT, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ. Lake drying and livelihood dynamics in Lake Chad: Unravelling the mechanisms, contexts and responses. Ambio 2016; 45:781-795. [PMID: 27371137 PMCID: PMC5055484 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0805-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2015] [Revised: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This article examines lake drying and livelihood dynamics in the context of multiple stressors through a case study of the "Small Lake Chad" in the Republic of Chad. Livelihoods research in regions experiencing persistent lake water fluctuations has largely focused on the well-being and security of lakeshore dwellers. Little is known about the mechanisms through which lake drying shapes livelihood drawbacks and opportunities, and whether locally evolved responses are enhancing livelihoods. Here we address these gaps using empirical, mixed-methods field research couched within the framework of livelihoods and human well-being contexts. The analysis demonstrates that limited opportunities outside agriculture, the influx of mixed ethnic migrants and the increasing spate of violence all enhance livelihood challenges. Livelihood opportunities centre on the renewal effects of seasonal flood pulses on lake waters and the learning opportunities triggered by past droughts. Although drying has spurred new adaptive behaviours predicated on seasonality, traditional predictive factors and the availability of assets, responses have remained largely reactive. The article points to where lake drying fits amongst changes in the wider socio-economic landscape in which people live, and suggests that awareness of the particularities of the mechanisms that connect lake drying to livelihoods can offer insights into the ways local people might be assisted by governments and development actors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uche T. Okpara
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - Andrew J. Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Okpara UT, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ. Using a novel climate-water conflict vulnerability index to capture double exposures in Lake Chad. Reg Environ Change 2016; 17:351-366. [PMID: 32269500 PMCID: PMC7114970 DOI: 10.1007/s10113-016-1003-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Climate variability is amongst an array of threats facing agricultural livelihoods, with its effects unevenly distributed. With resource conflict being increasingly recognised as one significant outcome of climate variability and change, understanding the underlying drivers that shape differential vulnerabilities in areas that are double-exposed to climate and conflict has great significance. Climate change vulnerability frameworks are rarely applied in water conflict research. This article presents a composite climate-water conflict vulnerability index based on a double exposure framework developed from advances in vulnerability and livelihood assessments. We apply the index to assess how the determinants of vulnerability can be useful in understanding climate variability and water conflict interactions and to establish how knowledge of the climate-conflict linked context can shape interventions to reduce vulnerability. We surveyed 240 resource users (farmers, fishermen and pastoralists) in seven villages on the south-eastern shores of Lake Chad in the Republic of Chad to collect data on a range of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity variables. Results suggest that pastoralists are more vulnerable in terms of climate-structured aggressive behaviour within a lake-based livelihoods context where all resource user groups show similar levels of exposure to climate variability. Our approach can be used to understand the human and environmental security components of vulnerability to climate change and to explore ways in which conflict-structured climate adaptation and climate-sensitive conflict management strategies can be integrated to reduce the vulnerability of populations in high-risk, conflict-prone environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uche T. Okpara
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J. Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dougill AJ, Akanyang L, Perkins JS, Eckardt FD, Stringer LC, Favretto N, Atlhopheng J, Mulale K. Land use, rangeland degradation and ecological changes in the southern Kalahari, Botswana. Afr J Ecol 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/aje.12265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Dougill
- School of Earth and Environment; University of Leeds; Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
| | - Lawrence Akanyang
- School of Earth and Environment; University of Leeds; Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
- Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Botswana; Private Bag UB 0022 Gaborone Botswana
| | - Jeremy S. Perkins
- Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Botswana; Private Bag UB 0022 Gaborone Botswana
| | - Frank D. Eckardt
- Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences; University of Cape Town; Private Bag X3 Rondebosch 7701 South Africa
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- School of Earth and Environment; University of Leeds; Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
| | - Nicola Favretto
- School of Earth and Environment; University of Leeds; Woodhouse Lane Leeds LS2 9JT U.K
- United Nations University - Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU-INWEH); 175 Longwood Road South, Suite 204 Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Julius Atlhopheng
- Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Botswana; Private Bag UB 0022 Gaborone Botswana
| | - Kutlwano Mulale
- Department of Environmental Sciences; University of Botswana; Private Bag UB 0022 Gaborone Botswana
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Reed MS, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Perkins JS, Atlhopheng JR, Mulale K, Favretto N. Reorienting land degradation towards sustainable land management: linking sustainable livelihoods with ecosystem services in rangeland systems. J Environ Manage 2015; 151:472-485. [PMID: 25617787 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2014] [Revised: 11/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/07/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
This paper identifies new ways of moving from land degradation towards sustainable land management through the development of economic mechanisms. It identifies new mechanisms to tackle land degradation based on retaining critical levels of natural capital whilst basing livelihoods on a wider range of ecosystem services. This is achieved through a case study analysis of the Kalahari rangelands in southwest Botswana. The paper first describes the socio-economic and ecological characteristics of the Kalahari rangelands and the types of land degradation taking place. It then focuses on bush encroachment as a way of exploring new economic instruments (e.g. Payments for Ecosystem Services) designed to enhance the flow of ecosystem services that support livelihoods in rangeland systems. It does this by evaluating the likely impacts of bush encroachment, one of the key forms of rangeland degradation, on a range of ecosystem services in three land tenure types (private fenced ranches, communal grazing areas and Wildlife Management Areas), before considering options for more sustainable land management in these systems. We argue that with adequate policy support, economic mechanisms could help reorient degraded rangelands towards more sustainable land management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Reed
- Knowledge ExCHANGE Research Centre of Excellence, Birmingham School of the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Millennium Point, Curzon Street, Birmingham B4 7XG, UK.
| | - L C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire LS2 9JT, UK
| | - A J Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire LS2 9JT, UK
| | - J S Perkins
- Department of Environmental Science, University of Botswana, Private Bag, 00704 Gaborone, Botswana
| | - J R Atlhopheng
- Department of Environmental Science, University of Botswana, Private Bag, 00704 Gaborone, Botswana
| | - K Mulale
- Department of Environmental Science, University of Botswana, Private Bag, 00704 Gaborone, Botswana
| | - N Favretto
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, West Yorkshire LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wang F, Mu X, Li R, Fleskens L, Stringer LC, Ritsema CJ. Co-evolution of soil and water conservation policy and human-environment linkages in the Yellow River Basin since 1949. Sci Total Environ 2015; 508:166-177. [PMID: 25478653 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2014] [Revised: 11/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/16/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Policy plays a very important role in natural resource management as it lays out a government framework for guiding long-term decisions, and evolves in light of the interactions between human and environment. This paper focuses on soil and water conservation (SWC) policy in the Yellow River Basin (YRB), China. The problems, rural poverty, severe soil erosion, great sediment loads and high flood risks, are analyzed over the period of 1949-present using the Driving force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework as a way to organize analysis of the evolution of SWC policy. Three stages are identified in which SWC policy interacts differently with institutional, financial and technology support. In Stage 1 (1949-1979), SWC policy focused on rural development in eroded areas and on reducing sediment loads. Local farmers were mainly responsible for SWC. The aim of Stage 2 (1980-1990) was the overall development of rural industry and SWC. A more integrated management perspective was implemented taking a small watershed as a geographic interactional unit. This approach greatly improved the efficiency of SWC activities. In Stage 3 (1991 till now), SWC has been treated as the main measure for natural resource conservation, environmental protection, disaster mitigation and agriculture development. Prevention of new degradation became a priority. The government began to be responsible for SWC, using administrative, legal and financial approaches and various technologies that made large-scale SWC engineering possible. Over the historical period considered, with the implementation of the various SWC policies, the rural economic and ecological system improved continuously while the sediment load and flood risk decreased dramatically. The findings assist in providing a historical perspective that could inform more rational, scientific and effective natural resource management going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Wang
- Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; Soil Physics and Land Management, Wageningen University & Research Centre (WUR), P.O. Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Xingmin Mu
- Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Rui Li
- Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Luuk Fleskens
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; Soil Physics and Land Management, Wageningen University & Research Centre (WUR), P.O. Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Coen J Ritsema
- Soil Physics and Land Management, Wageningen University & Research Centre (WUR), P.O. Box 47, 6700AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Suckall N, Stringer LC, Tompkins EL. Presenting Triple-Wins? Assessing Projects That Deliver Adaptation, Mitigation and Development Co-benefits in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa. Ambio 2015; 44:34-41. [PMID: 24705929 PMCID: PMC4293359 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0520-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2013] [Revised: 03/01/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
The concept of climate compatible development (CCD) is increasingly employed by donors and policy makers seeking 'triple-wins' for development, adaptation and mitigation. While CCD rhetoric is becoming more widespread, analyses drawing on empirical cases that present triple-wins are sorely lacking. We address this knowledge gap. Drawing on examples in rural sub-Saharan Africa, we provide the first glimpse into how projects that demonstrate triple-win potential are framed and presented within the scientific literature. We identify that development projects are still commonly evaluated in terms of adaptation or mitigation benefits. Few are framed according to their benefits across all three dimensions. Consequently, where triple-wins are occurring, they are likely to be under-reported. This has important implications, which underestimates the co-benefits that projects can deliver. A more robust academic evidence base for the delivery of triple-wins is necessary to encourage continued donor investment in activities offering the potential to deliver CCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Suckall
- />School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Earth and Environment Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - Lindsay C. Stringer
- />School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Earth and Environment Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK
| | - Emma L. Tompkins
- />Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Building 44, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Reed MS, Stringer LC, Fazey I, Evely AC, Kruijsen JHJ. Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. J Environ Manage 2014; 146:337-345. [PMID: 25194520 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2014] [Revised: 07/11/2014] [Accepted: 07/21/2014] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
This paper outlines five principles for effective practice of knowledge exchange, which when applied, have the potential to significantly enhance the impact of environmental management research, policy and practice. The paper is based on an empirical analysis of interviews with 32 researchers and stakeholders across 13 environmental management research projects, each of which included elements of knowledge co-creation and sharing in their design. The projects focused on a range of upland and catchment management issues across the UK, and included Research Council, Government and NGO funded projects. Preliminary findings were discussed with knowledge exchange professionals and academic experts to ensure the emerging principles were as broadly applicable as possible across multiple disciplines. The principles suggest that: knowledge exchange needs to be designed into research; the needs of likely research users and other stakeholders should be systematically represented in the research where possible; and long-term relationships must be built on trust and two-way dialogue between researchers and stakeholders in order to ensure effective co-generation of new knowledge. We found that the delivery of tangible benefits early on in the research process helps to ensure continued motivation and engagement of likely research users. Knowledge exchange is a flexible process that must be monitored, reflected on and continuously refined, and where possible, steps should be taken to ensure a legacy of ongoing knowledge exchange beyond initial research funding. The principles have been used to inform the design of knowledge exchange and stakeholder engagement guidelines for two international research programmes. They are able to assist researchers, decision-makers and other stakeholders working in contrasting environmental management settings to work together to co-produce new knowledge, and more effectively share and apply existing knowledge to manage environmental change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Reed
- Knowledge Exchange Research Centre of Excellence, Birmingham School of the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Millennium Point, Curzon Street, Birmingham B4 7XG, United Kingdom.
| | - L C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
| | - I Fazey
- School of the Environment, University of Dundee, Perth Road, Dundee DD1 4HN, United Kingdom
| | - A C Evely
- Project MAYA CIC, 54 Tetherdown, London N101NG, United Kingdom
| | - J H J Kruijsen
- Centre for Understanding Sustainable Practice, Robert Gordon University, Schoolhill, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Stringer LC, Fleskens L, Reed MS, de Vente J, Zengin M. Participatory evaluation of monitoring and modeling of sustainable land management technologies in areas prone to land degradation. Environ Manage 2014; 54:1022-42. [PMID: 23868445 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0126-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2012] [Accepted: 07/05/2013] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Examples of sustainable land management (SLM) exist throughout the world. In many cases, SLM has largely evolved through local traditional practices and incremental experimentation rather than being adopted on the basis of scientific evidence. This means that SLM technologies are often only adopted across small areas. The DESIRE (DESertIfication mitigation and REmediation of degraded land) project combined local traditional knowledge on SLM with empirical evaluation of SLM technologies. The purpose of this was to evaluate and select options for dissemination in 16 sites across 12 countries. It involved (i) an initial workshop to evaluate stakeholder priorities (reported elsewhere), (ii) field trials/empirical modeling, and then, (iii) further stakeholder evaluation workshops. This paper focuses on workshops in which stakeholders evaluated the performance of SLM technologies based on the scientific monitoring and modeling results from 15 study sites. It analyses workshop outcomes to evaluate how scientific results affected stakeholders' perceptions of local SLM technologies. It also assessed the potential of this participatory approach in facilitating wider acceptance and implementation of SLM. In several sites, stakeholder preferences for SLM technologies changed as a consequence of empirical measurements and modeling assessments of each technology. Two workshop examples are presented in depth to: (a) explore the scientific results that triggered stakeholders to change their views; and (b) discuss stakeholders' suggestions on how the adoption of SLM technologies could be up-scaled. The overall multi-stakeholder participatory approach taken is then evaluated. It is concluded that to facilitate broad-scale adoption of SLM technologies, de-contextualized, scientific generalisations must be given local context; scientific findings must be viewed alongside traditional beliefs and both scrutinized with equal rigor; and the knowledge of all kinds of experts must be recognised and considered in decision-making about SLM, whether it has been formally codified or not. The approach presented in this paper provided this opportunity and received positive feedback from stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C Stringer
- School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Fleskens L, Nainggolan D, Stringer LC. An exploration of scenarios to support sustainable land management using integrated environmental socio-economic models. Environ Manage 2014; 54:1005-21. [PMID: 24263675 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0202-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2013] [Accepted: 11/03/2013] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Scenario analysis constitutes a valuable deployment method for scientific models to inform environmental decision-making, particularly for evaluating land degradation mitigation options, which are rarely based on formal analysis. In this paper we demonstrate such an assessment using the PESERA-DESMICE modeling framework with various scenarios for 13 global land degradation hotspots. Starting with an initial assessment representing land degradation and productivity under current conditions, options to combat instances of land degradation are explored by determining: (1) Which technologies are most biophysically appropriate and most financially viable in which locations; we term these the "technology scenarios"; (2) how policy instruments such as subsidies influence upfront investment requirements and financial viability and how they lead to reduced levels of land degradation; we term these the "policy scenarios"; and (3) how technology adoption affects development issues such as food production and livelihoods; we term these the "global scenarios". Technology scenarios help choose the best technology for a given area in biophysical and financial terms, thereby outlining where policy support may be needed to promote adoption; policy scenarios assess whether a policy alternative leads to a greater extent of technology adoption; while global scenarios demonstrate how implementing technologies may serve wider sustainable development goals. Scenarios are applied to assess spatial variation within study sites as well as to compare across different sites. Our results show significant scope to combat land degradation and raise agricultural productivity at moderate cost. We conclude that scenario assessment can provide informative input to multi-level land management decision-making processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Fleskens
- School of Earth & Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dyer J, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Leventon J, Nshimbi M, Chama F, Kafwifwi A, Muledi JI, Kaumbu JMK, Falcao M, Muhorro S, Munyemba F, Kalaba GM, Syampungani S. Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: experiences in community engagement from southern Africa. J Environ Manage 2014; 137:137-45. [PMID: 24632402 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2013] [Revised: 10/29/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
The emphasis on participatory environmental management within international development has started to overcome critiques of traditional exclusionary environmental policy, aligning with shifts towards decentralisation and community empowerment. However, questions are raised regarding the extent to which participation in project design and implementation is meaningful and really engages communities in the process. Calls have been made for further local-level (project and community-scale) research to identify practices that can increase the likelihood of meaningful community engagement within externally initiated projects. This paper presents data from three community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) project case studies from southern Africa, which promote Joint Forest Management (JFM), tree planting for carbon and conservation agriculture. Data collection was carried out through semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, community-level meetings, focus groups and interviews. We find that an important first step for a meaningful community engagement process is to define 'community' in an open and participatory manner. Two-way communication at all stages of the community engagement process is shown to be critical, and charismatic leadership based on mutual respect and clarity of roles and responsibilities is vital to improve the likelihood of participants developing understanding of project aims and philosophy. This can lead to successful project outcomes through community ownership of the project goals and empowerment in project implementation. Specific engagement methods are found to be less important than the contextual and environmental factors associated with each project, but consideration should be given to identifying appropriate methods to ensure community representation. Our findings extend current thinking on the evaluation of participation by making explicit links between the community engagement process and project outcomes, and by identifying further criteria that can be considered in process and outcome-based evaluations. We highlight good practices for future CBNRM projects which can be used by project designers and initiators to further the likelihood of successful project outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Dyer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - L C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - A J Dougill
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - J Leventon
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - M Nshimbi
- School of Natural Resources, Copperbelt University, Box 21692, Kitwe, Zambia
| | - F Chama
- School of Natural Resources, Copperbelt University, Box 21692, Kitwe, Zambia
| | - A Kafwifwi
- School of Natural Resources, Copperbelt University, Box 21692, Kitwe, Zambia
| | - J I Muledi
- Faculty of Agronomy, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - J-M K Kaumbu
- Faculty of Agronomy, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - M Falcao
- Eduardo Mondlane University, Department of Forestry, PO Box 257, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - S Muhorro
- Eduardo Mondlane University, Department of Forestry, PO Box 257, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - F Munyemba
- Faculty of Agronomy, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - G M Kalaba
- Faculty of Agronomy, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - S Syampungani
- School of Natural Resources, Copperbelt University, Box 21692, Kitwe, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Reed MS, Kenter J, Bonn A, Broad K, Burt TP, Fazey IR, Fraser EDG, Hubacek K, Nainggolan D, Quinn CH, Stringer LC, Ravera F. Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. J Environ Manage 2013; 128:345-362. [PMID: 23774752 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2008] [Revised: 04/29/2013] [Accepted: 05/09/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
A methodological framework is proposed for participatory scenario development on the basis of evidence from the literature, and is tested and refined through the development of scenarios for the future of UK uplands. The paper uses a review of previous work to justify a framework based around the following steps: i) define context and establish whether there is a basis for stakeholder engagement in scenario development; ii) systematically identify and represent relevant stakeholders in the process; iii) define clear objectives for scenario development with stakeholders including spatial and temporal boundaries; iv) select relevant participatory methods for scenario development, during initial scenario construction, evaluation and to support decision-making based on scenarios; and v) integrate local and scientific knowledge throughout the process. The application of this framework in case study research suggests that participatory scenario development has the potential to: i) make scenarios more relevant to stakeholder needs and priorities; ii) extend the range of scenarios developed; iii) develop more detailed and precise scenarios through the integration of local and scientific knowledge; and iv) move beyond scenario development to facilitate adaptation to future change. It is argued that participatory scenario development can empower stakeholders and lead to more consistent and robust scenarios that can help people prepare more effectively for future change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Reed
- Centre for Environmental and Society Research, Birmingham School of the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Millenium Point, Curzon Street, Birmingham B4 7XG, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Glew D, Stringer LC, McQueen-Mason S. Achieving sustainable biomaterials by maximising waste recovery. Waste Manag 2013; 33:1499-1508. [PMID: 23562447 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2012] [Revised: 02/26/2013] [Accepted: 03/06/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The waste hierarchy of 'reduce, reuse, recycle, recover' can be followed to improve the sustainability of a product, yet it is not applied in any meaningful way in the biomaterials industry which focuses more on sustainable sourcing of inputs. This paper presents the results of industry interviews and a focus group with experts to understand how waste recovery of biomaterials could become more widespread. Interview findings were used to develop three scenarios: (1) do nothing; (2) develop legislation; and (3) develop certification standards. These scenarios formed the basis for discussions at an expert focus group. Experts considered that action was required, rejecting the first scenario. No preference was apparent for scenarios (2) and (3). Experts agreed that there should be collaboration on collection logistics, promotion of demand through choice editing, product 'purity' could be championed though certification and there should be significant investment and research into recovery technologies. These considerations were incorporated into the development of a model for policy makers and industry to help increase biomaterial waste recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Glew
- Centre for Novel Agricultural Products, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dougill AJ, Stringer LC, Leventon J, Riddell M, Rueff H, Spracklen DV, Butt E. Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelands. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013; 367:3178-90. [PMID: 23045714 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Climate finance investments and international policy are driving new community-based projects incorporating payments for ecosystem services (PES) to simultaneously store carbon and generate livelihood benefits. Most community-based PES (CB-PES) research focuses on forest areas. Rangelands, which store globally significant quantities of carbon and support many of the world's poor, have seen little CB-PES research attention, despite benefitting from several decades of community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects. Lessons from CBNRM suggest institutional considerations are vital in underpinning the design and implementation of successful community projects. This study uses documentary analysis to explore the institutional characteristics of three African community-based forest projects that seek to deliver carbon-storage and poverty-reduction benefits. Strong existing local institutions, clear land tenure, community control over land management decision-making and up-front, flexible payment schemes are found to be vital. Additionally, we undertake a global review of rangeland CBNRM literature and identify that alongside the lessons learned from forest projects, rangeland CB-PES project design requires specific consideration of project boundaries, benefit distribution, capacity building for community monitoring of carbon storage together with awareness-raising using decision-support tools to display the benefits of carbon-friendly land management. We highlight that institutional analyses must be undertaken alongside improved scientific studies of the carbon cycle to enable links to payment schemes, and for them to contribute to poverty alleviation in rangelands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Dougill
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Stringer LC, Dougill AJ. Channelling science into policy: enabling best practices from research on land degradation and sustainable land management in dryland Africa. J Environ Manage 2013; 114:328-335. [PMID: 23158525 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2012] [Revised: 10/06/2012] [Accepted: 10/18/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Demands are increasing for scientific research to be explicitly and demonstrably policy relevant. Research funders are requiring greater returns on their investments and scientists are expected to demonstrate clearly how their research can inform policy and regulation to deliver positive consequences for societal, economic and environmental wellbeing. Within the co-evolving context of environmental management research in dryland Africa and the policy approaches designed to mitigate land degradation, few academic analyses have deconstructed the practical 'bottom-up' actions that can help to channel scientific research into national decision-making and policy. Similarly, while international platforms developed by the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification have started to facilitate greater knowledge exchange between scientists and policymakers, analyses have failed to consider the powerful informal actions that scientists can take to allow their research to inform evidence-based international policy. Drawing on examples in the literature from research on land degradation and sustainable land management across sub-Saharan African drylands, we identify key enabling activities that help make scientific research more visible, accessible to, and compatible with, policy processes at local, national and international levels. We argue that these enablers are applicable to other environmental research areas beyond land degradation, and suggest that improved understanding of science into policy processes that look across multiple scales and levels will help researchers and policy-makers to better match information supply and demand to the mutual benefit of both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay C Stringer
- Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|