1
|
Grivas P, Garralda E, Meric-Bernstam F, Mellinghoff IK, Goyal L, Harding JJ, Dees EC, Bahleda R, Azad NS, Karippot A, Kurzrock R, Tabernero J, Kononen J, Ng MCH, Mehta R, Uboha NV, Bigot F, Boni V, Bowyer SE, Breder V, Cervantes A, Chan N, Cleary JM, Dhawan M, Eefsen RL, Ewing J, Graham DM, Guren TK, Won Kim J, Koynov K, Oh DY, Redman R, Yen CJ, Spetzler D, Roubaudi-Fraschini MC, Nicolas-Metral V, Ait-Sarkouh R, Zanna C, Ennaji A, Pokorska-Bocci A, Flaherty KT. Evaluating Debio 1347 in Patients with FGFR Fusion-Positive Advanced Solid Tumors from the FUZE Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Basket Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2024:745460. [PMID: 38771739 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This multicenter phase II basket trial investigated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of Debio 1347, an investigational, oral, highly selective, ATP-competitive, small molecule inhibitor of FGFR1-3, in patients with solid tumors harboring a functional FGFR1-3 fusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible adults had a previously treated locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic biliary tract (cohort 1), urothelial (cohort 2) or other histologic cancer type (cohort 3). Debio 1347 was administered at 80 mg once daily, continuously, in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS Between March 22, 2019 and January 8, 2020, 63 patients were enrolled and treated, 30 in cohort 1, four in cohort 2, and 29 in cohort 3. An unplanned preliminary statistical review showed that the efficacy of Debio 1347 was lower than predicted and the trial was terminated. Three of 58 evaluable patients had partial responses, representing an ORR of 5%, with a further 26 (45%) having stable disease (≥6 weeks duration). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22 (35%) of 63 patients, with the most common being hyperphosphatemia (13%) and stomatitis (5%). Two patients (3%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Debio 1347 had manageable toxicity; however, the efficacy in patients with tumors harboring FGFR fusions did not support further clinical evaluation in this setting. Our transcriptomic-based analysis characterized in detail the incidence and nature of FGFR fusions across solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | | | - Ingo K Mellinghoff
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - James J Harding
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - E Claire Dees
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | | | - Nilofer S Azad
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Asha Karippot
- Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Tulsa, United States
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Villejuif, France
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), UVic-UCC, IOB-Quirón, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Valeriy Breder
- National Medical Research Center of Oncology n.a. N.Blokhin, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Nancy Chan
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | | | - Mallika Dhawan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA - California, United States
| | - Rikke L Eefsen
- Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Capital region, Denmark
| | - James Ewing
- Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers, United States
| | | | | | - Jin Won Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seongnam, Korea (South), Republic of
| | | | - Do-Youn Oh
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (South), Republic of
| | | | - Chia-Jui Yen
- National Cheng Kung University Hospital, college of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - David Spetzler
- Caris Life Sciences (United States), Tempe, Az, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Keith T Flaherty
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Necchi A, Roumiguié M, Kamat AM, Shore ND, Boormans JL, Esen AA, Lebret T, Kandori S, Bajorin DF, Krieger LEM, Niglio SA, Uchio EM, Seo HK, de Wit R, Singer EA, Grivas P, Nishiyama H, Li H, Baranwal P, Van den Sigtenhorst-Fijlstra M, Kapadia E, Kulkarni GS. Pembrolizumab monotherapy for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer without carcinoma in situ and unresponsive to BCG (KEYNOTE-057): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2024:S1470-2045(24)00178-5. [PMID: 38740030 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00178-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The KEYNOTE-057 trial evaluated activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who were ineligible for or declined radical cystectomy. In cohort A (patients with carcinoma in situ, with or without papillary tumours) of the KEYNOTE-057 study, pembrolizumab monotherapy led to a complete response rate of 41% at 3 months, and 46% of responders maintained a response lasting at least 12 months. Here, we evaluate pembrolizumab monotherapy in cohort B of patients with papillary tumours without carcinoma in situ. METHODS KEYNOTE-057 is a single-arm, phase 2 study in 54 sites (hospitals and cancer centres) in 14 countries. Cohort B eligible patients were aged 18 years and older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had BCG-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with papillary tumours (high-grade Ta or any-grade T1) without carcinoma in situ. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour within 12 weeks of first pembrolizumab dose was required. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of 35 cycles. Primary endpoint was 12-month disease-free survival of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer or progressive disease as assessed by cystoscopy, cytology, and central pathology and radiology review. Activity was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had a baseline evaluation. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02625961, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between April 12, 2016, and June 17, 2021, 132 patients (104 [79%] men and 28 [21%] women) who had received a median of ten (IQR 9-15) previous BCG instillations were enrolled into cohort B of the study. Patients received a median of 10 cycles (IQR 6-27) of pembrolizumab. At data cutoff date, Oct 20, 2022, median follow-up was 45·4 months (IQR 36·4-59·3) and five (4%) of 132 patients remained on treatment. The 12-month disease-free survival was 43·5% (95% CI 34·9-51·9). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97 (73%) of 132 patients; 19 (14%) had a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event; the most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were colitis (in three [2%] patients) and diarrhoea (in two [2%]). 17 (13%) of 132 patients experienced serious treatment-related adverse events, of which colitis (three patients [2%]) was most common. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed antitumour activity and manageable toxicity in patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk Ta or T1 bladder cancer without carcinoma in situ and could potentially be a suitable treatment option for patients who decline or are ineligible for radical cystectomy. Findings will need to be confirmed in a randomised controlled trial. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole CHU, Toulouse, France
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Thierry Lebret
- Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - Shuya Kandori
- Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Dean F Bajorin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Scot A Niglio
- Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Ronald de Wit
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eric A Singer
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Girish S Kulkarni
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leary JB, Enright T, Bakaloudi DR, Basnet A, Bratslavsky G, Jacob J, Spiess PE, Li R, Necchi A, Kamat AM, Pavlick DC, Danziger N, Huang RSP, Lin DI, Cheng L, Ross J, Talukder R, Grivas P. Frequency and Nature of Genomic Alterations in ERBB2-Altered Urothelial Bladder Cancer. Target Oncol 2024; 19:447-458. [PMID: 38570422 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01056-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) overexpression is an oncogenic driver in many solid tumors, including urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). In addition, activating mutations in the ERBB2 gene have been shown to play an oncogenic role similar to ERBB2 amplification. OBJECTIVE To describe and compare the frequency and nature of genomic alterations (GA) of ERBB2-altered (mutations, amplification) and ERBB2 wild-type UBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using a hybrid capture-based comprehensive profiling assay, 9518 UBC cases were grouped by ERBB2 alteration and evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations (GA), tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), and genomic mutational signature. PD-L1 expression was measured by immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3). Categorical statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS A total of 602 (6.3%) UBC cases featured ERBB2 extracellular domain short variant (SV) GA (ECDmut+), 253 (2.7%) cases featured ERBB2 kinase domain SV GA (KDmut+), 866 (9.1%) cases had ERBB2 amplification (amp+), and 7797 (81.9%) cases were ERBB2 wild-type (wt). European genetic ancestry of ECDmut+ was higher than ERBB2wt. Numerous significant associations were observed when comparing GA by group. Notably among these, CDKN2A/MTAP loss were more frequent in ERBB2wt versus ECDmut+ and amp+. ERBB3 GA were more frequent in ECDmut+ and KDmut+ than ERBB2wt. TERT GA were more frequent in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ versus ERBB2wt. TOP2A amplification was significantly more common in ECDmut+ and amp+ versus ERBB2wt, and TP53 SV GA were significantly higher in ERBB2 amp+ versus ERBB2wt. Mean TMB levels were significantly higher in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ than in ERBB2wt. Apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptides (APOBEC) signature was more frequent in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ versus ERBB2wt. No significant differences were observed in PD-L1 status between groups, while gLOH-high status was more common in amp+ versus ERBB2wt. MSI-high status was more frequent in KDmut+ versus ERBB2wt, and in ERBB2wt than in amp+. CONCLUSIONS We noted important differences in co-occurring GA in ERBB2-altered (ECDmut+, KDmut+, amp+) versus ERBB2wt UBC, as well as higher mean TMB and higher APOBEC mutational signature in the ERBB2-altered groups. Our results can help refine future clinical trial designs and elucidate possible response and resistance mechanisms for ERBB2-altered UBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob B Leary
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Thomas Enright
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Alina Basnet
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Joseph Jacob
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Legoretta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Lifespan Academic Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Loriot Y, Kalebasty AR, Fléchon A, Jain RK, Gupta S, Bupathi M, Beuzeboc P, Palmbos P, Balar AV, Kyriakopoulos CE, Pouessel D, Sternberg CN, Tonelli J, Sierecki M, Zhou H, Grivas P, Barthélémy P, Bangs R, Tagawa ST. A plain language summary of the TROPHY-U-01 study: sacituzumab govitecan use in people with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. Future Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38682560 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-1030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT? Sacituzumab govitecan (brand name: TRODELVY®) is a new treatment being studied for people with a type of bladder cancer, called urothelial cancer, that has progressed to a locally advanced or metastatic stage. Locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer are usually treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Metastatic urothelial cancer is also treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. There are few treatment options for people whose cancer gets worse after receiving these treatments. Sacituzumab govitecan is a suitable treatment option for most people with urothelial cancer because it aims to deliver an anti-cancer drug directly to the cancer in an attempt to limit the potential harmful side effects on healthy cells. This is a summary of a clinical study called TROPHY-U-01, focusing on the first group of participants, referred to as Cohort 1. All participants in Cohort 1 received sacituzumab govitecan. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS? All participants received previous treatments for their metastatic urothelial cancer, including a platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor. The tumor in 31 of 113 participants became significantly smaller or could not be seen on scans after sacituzumab govitecan treatment; an effect that lasted for a median of 7.2 months. Half of the participants were still alive 5.4 months after starting treatment, without their tumor getting bigger or spreading further. Half of them were still alive 10.9 months after starting treatment regardless of tumor size changes. Most participants experienced side effects. These side effects included lower levels of certain types of blood cells, sometimes with a fever, and loose or watery stools (diarrhea). Side effects led 7 of 113 participants to stop taking sacituzumab govitecan. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS? The study showed that sacituzumab govitecan had significant anti-cancer activity. Though most participants who received sacituzumab govitecan experienced side effects, these did not usually stop participants from continuing sacituzumab govitecan. Doctors can help control these side effects using treatment guidelines, but these side effects can be serious. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03547973 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (TROPHY-U-1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohann Loriot
- Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Rohit K Jain
- H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sumati Gupta
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah's Huntsman Cancer Institute, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Phillip Palmbos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Arjun V Balar
- Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Damien Pouessel
- Institut Claudius Regaud/Cancer Comprehensive Center, IUCT, Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Philippe Barthélémy
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg/Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Rick Bangs
- Patient Advocate, Pittsford, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koehne EL, Bakaloudi DR, Ghali F, Nyame Y, Schade GR, Grivas P, Yezefski TA, Hawley JE, Yu EY, Hsieh AC, Montgomery RB, Psutka SP, Gore JL, Wright JL. Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival After Radical Cystectomy in Histologic Subtype Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102100. [PMID: 38763862 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with histologic subtype bladder cancer (HSBC) suffer worse outcomes than those with conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). We sought to characterize the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in HSBC after radical cystectomy (RC) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively queried the NCDB (2006-2019) for patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer (BC) who underwent RC (N = 45,797). Patients were stratified by histologic subtype and receipt of AC. Multivariable logistic regression determined associations of demographic and clinicopathologic features with receipt of AC. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated associations between receipt of any AC and overall survival (OS). RESULTS We identified 4,469 patients with HSBC classified as squamous, adenocarcinoma, small cell, sarcomatoid, micropapillary, or plasmacytoid. Squamous comprised 31% of the HSBC cohort, followed by small cells and micropapillary. Black patients were presented with a higher prevalence of adenocarcinoma (119/322, 37.0%). Use of AC was highest in plasmacytoid and small cell (30% each) and lowest in squamous (11%). Neuroendocrine histology was independently associated with greater odds of receiving AC (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.37-1.87), while squamous cell histology was associated with lower odds (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.71). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, treatment with AC was associated with significantly longer OS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.81) and for squamous, sarcomatoid, and micropapillary cohorts after stratified by subtype. CONCLUSIONS AC was variably used among patients with HSBC and was associated with OS benefit in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Koehne
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - Dimitra R Bakaloudi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Fady Ghali
- Department of Urology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Yaw Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - George R Schade
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Todd A Yezefski
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jessica E Hawley
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew C Hsieh
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - R Bruce Montgomery
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grivas P, Pouessel D, Park CH, Barthelemy P, Bupathi M, Petrylak DP, Agarwal N, Gupta S, Fléchon A, Ramamurthy C, Davis NB, Recio-Boiles A, Sternberg CN, Bhatia A, Pichardo C, Sierecki M, Tonelli J, Zhou H, Tagawa ST, Loriot Y. Sacituzumab Govitecan in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer That Progressed After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: TROPHY-U-01 Cohort 3. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1415-1425. [PMID: 38261969 PMCID: PMC11095901 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pembrolizumab is standard therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progress after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, only approximately 21% of patients respond. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a trophoblast cell surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with US Food and Drug Administration-accelerated approval to treat patients with locally advanced or mUC who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). Here, we report the primary analysis of TROPHY-U-01 cohort 3. METHODS TROPHY-U-01 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label phase II study. Patients were CPI-naïve and had mUC progression after platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting or ≤12 months in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Patients received 10 mg/kg of SG once on days 1 and 8 and 200 mg of pembrolizumab once on day 1 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per central review. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per central review, and safety. RESULTS Cohort 3 included 41 patients (median age 67 years; 83% male; 78% visceral metastases [29% liver]). With a median follow-up of 14.8 months, the ORR was 41% (95% CI, 26.3 to 57.9; 20% complete response rate), CBR was 46% (95% CI, 30.7 to 62.6), median DOR was 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.8 to not estimable [NE]), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 10.2). The median overall survival was 12.7 months (range, 10.7-NE). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61% of patients; most common were neutropenia (37%), leukopenia (20%), and diarrhea (20%). CONCLUSION SG plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a high response rate with an overall manageable toxicity profile in patients with mUC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. No new safety signals were detected. These data support further evaluation of SG plus CPI in mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Department of Medical Oncology & Clinical Research Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-Oncopôle), Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chethan Ramamurthy
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott T. Tagawa
- Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tateo V, Cigliola A, Mercinelli C, Agarwal N, Grivas P, Kamat AM, Gibb EA, Moschini M, Brausi M, Dyrskjøt L, Loriot Y, Gupta S, Colecchia M, Spiess PE, Ross JS, Necchi A. Optimizing the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Assays in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma: Recommendations by the 2023 San Raffaele Retreat Panel. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102091. [PMID: 38735133 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The application of precision medicine in clinical practice implies a thorough evaluation of actionable genomic alterations to streamline therapeutic decision making. Comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor via next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a great opportunity but also several challenges. During the 2023 San Raffaele Retreat, we aimed to provide expert recommendations for the optimal use of NGS in urothelial carcinoma (UC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A modified Delphi method was utilized, involving a panel of 12 experts in UC from European and United States centers, including oncologists, urologists, pathologists, and translational scientists. An initial survey, conducted before the meeting, delivered 15 statements to the panel. A consensus was defined when ≥70% agreement was reached for each statement. Statements not meeting the consensus threshold were discussed during the meeting. RESULTS Nine of the 15 statements covering patient selection, cancer characteristics, and type of NGS assay, achieved a consensus during the survey. The remaining six statements addressing the optimal timing of NGS use, the ideal source of tumor biospecimen for NGS testing, and the subsequent need to evaluate the germline nature of certain genomic findings were discussed during the meeting, leading to unanimous agreement at the end of the conference. CONCLUSION This consensus-building effort addressed multiple unanswered questions regarding the use of NGS in UC. The opinion of experts was in favor of broader use of NGS. In a setting where recommendations/guidelines may be limited, these insights may aid clinicians to provide informed counselling and raise the bar of precision and personalized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Tateo
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Antonio Cigliola
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Mercinelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute (NCI-CCC), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Brausi
- Department of Urology, Cure Hesperia Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Lars Dyrskjøt
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA; SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pal SK, Grivas P, Gupta S, Dizman N, Zengin Z, Valderrama BP, Rodriguez-Vida A, Roghmann F, Sevillano Fernandez E, Matin SF, Loriot Y, Sridhar SS, Sonpavde G, Fleming MT, Lerner SP, Bellmunt J, Master V, Tripathi A, Davis K, van Veenhuyzen D, Weng R, Daneshmand S. Infigratinib Versus Placebo for Patients with High-risk Resected Urothelial Cancer Bearing an FGFR3 Genomic Alteration: Results from the PROOF302 Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02247-4. [PMID: 38580518 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sumanta K Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematologic and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nazli Dizman
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zeynep Zengin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Mark T Fleming
- Department of Medical Oncology, Virginia Oncology Associates, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Seth P Lerner
- Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Viraj Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Loriot Y, Petrylak DP, Rezazadeh Kalebasty A, Fléchon A, Jain RK, Gupta S, Bupathi M, Beuzeboc P, Palmbos P, Balar AV, Kyriakopoulos CE, Pouessel D, Sternberg CN, Tonelli J, Sierecki M, Zhou H, Grivas P, Barthélémy P, Tagawa ST. TROPHY-U-01, a phase II open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors: updated safety and efficacy outcomes. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:392-401. [PMID: 38244927 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate containing cytotoxic SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. SG received accelerated US Food and Drug Administration approval for locally advanced (LA) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor, based on cohort 1 of the TROPHY-U-01 study. Mutations in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene are associated with increased adverse events (AEs) with irinotecan-based therapies. Whether UGT1A1 status could impact SG toxicity and efficacy remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label, phase II registrational study. Cohort 1 includes patients with LA or mUC who progressed after platinum- and checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies. SG was administered at 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per central review; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Post hoc safety analyses were exploratory with descriptive statistics. Updated analyses include longer follow-up. RESULTS Cohort 1 included 113 patients. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, ORR was 28% (95% CI 20.2% to 37.6%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.4 months (95% CI 3.5-6.9 months) and 10.9 months (95% CI 8.9-13.8 months), respectively. Occurrence of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs and treatment-related discontinuation were consistent with prior reports. UGT1A1 status was wildtype (∗1|∗1) in 40%, heterozygous (∗1|∗28) in 42%, homozygous (∗28|∗28) in 12%, and missing in 6% of patients. In patients with ∗1|∗1, ∗1|∗28, and ∗28|∗28 genotypes, any grade treatment-related AEs occurred in 93%, 94%, and 100% of patients, respectively, and were managed similarly regardless of UGT1A1 status. CONCLUSIONS With longer follow-up, the ORR remains high in patients with heavily pretreated LA or mUC. Safety data were consistent with the known SG toxicity profile. AE incidence varied across UGT1A1 subgroups; however, discontinuation rates remained relatively low for all groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Loriot
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | - D P Petrylak
- Genitourinary Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven
| | | | - A Fléchon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - R K Jain
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa
| | - S Gupta
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City
| | - M Bupathi
- Medical Oncology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Littleton, USA
| | - P Beuzeboc
- Oncology and Supportive Care Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - P Palmbos
- Urologic Oncology Clinic, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - A V Balar
- Genitourinary Oncology Department, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York
| | - C E Kyriakopoulos
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
| | - D Pouessel
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Research Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-Oncopôle), Toulouse, France
| | - C N Sternberg
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York
| | - J Tonelli
- Clinical Development - Oncology, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Parsippany
| | - M Sierecki
- Clinical Development - Oncology, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Parsippany
| | - H Zhou
- Department of Biometrics, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City
| | - P Grivas
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA
| | - P Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - S T Tagawa
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Connolly RM, Wang V, Hyman DM, Grivas P, Mitchell EP, Wright JJ, Sharon E, Gray RJ, McShane LM, Rubinstein LV, Patton DR, Williams PM, Hamilton SR, Wang J, Wisinski KB, Tricoli JV, Conley BA, Harris LN, Arteaga CL, O'Dwyer PJ, Chen AP, Flaherty KT. Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in Patients with Non-Breast/Gastroesophageal HER2-Amplified Tumors: Results from the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol J. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1273-1280. [PMID: 38433347 PMCID: PMC10984755 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE NCI-MATCH assigned patients with advanced cancer and progression on prior treatment, based on genomic alterations in pretreatment tumor tissue. Arm J (EAY131-J) evaluated the combination of trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) across HER2-amplified tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had high levels of HER2 amplification [copy number (CN) ≥7] detected by central next-generation sequencing (NGS) or through NCI-designated laboratories. Patients with breast/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and those who received prior HER2-directed therapy were excluded. Enrollment of patients with colorectal cancer was capped at 4 based on emerging data. Patients received HP IV Q3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, with 25 included in the primary efficacy analysis (CN ≥7 confirmed by a central lab, median CN = 28). Median age was 66 (range, 31-80), and half of all patients had ≥3 prior therapies (range, 1-11). The confirmed ORR was 12% [3/25 partial responses (colorectal, cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial cancers), 90% confidence interval (CI) 3.4%-28.2%]. There was one additional partial response (urothelial cancer) in a patient with an unconfirmed ERBB2 copy number. Median PFS was 3.3 months (90% CI 2.0-4.1), and median OS 9.4 months (90% CI 5.0-18.9). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with prior studies. There was no association between HER2 CN and response. CONCLUSIONS HP was active in a selection of HER2-amplified tumors (non-breast/gastroesophageal) but did not meet the predefined efficacy benchmark. Additional strategies targeting HER2 and potential resistance pathways are warranted, especially in rare tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roisin M Connolly
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Cancer Research @UCC, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Ireland
| | - Victoria Wang
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David M Hyman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Edith P Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John J Wright
- Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Elad Sharon
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robert J Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M McShane
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larry V Rubinstein
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - David R Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - P Mickey Williams
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland
| | | | - Jue Wang
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kari B Wisinski
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James V Tricoli
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Barbara A Conley
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lyndsay N Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T Flaherty
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matsubara N, de Wit R, Balar AV, Siefker-Radtke AO, Zolnierek J, Csoszi T, Shin SJ, Park SH, Atduev V, Gumus M, Su YL, Karaca SB, Cutuli HJ, Sendur MAN, Shen L, O'Hara K, Okpara CE, Franco S, Moreno BH, Grivas P, Loriot Y. Pembrolizumab with or Without Lenvatinib as First-line Therapy for Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (LEAP-011): A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Eur Urol 2024; 85:229-238. [PMID: 37778952 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib has shown antitumor activity and acceptable safety in patients with platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC). OBJECTIVE To evaluate pembrolizumab plus either lenvatinib or placebo as first-line therapy for advanced UC in the phase 3 LEAP-011 study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with advanced UC who were ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy or any platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 wk plus either lenvatinib 20 mg or placebo orally once daily. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). An external data monitoring committee (DMC) regularly reviewed safety and efficacy data every 3 mo. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between June 25, 2019 and July 21, 2021, 487 patients were allocated to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n = 245) or placebo plus pembrolizumab (n = 242). The median time from randomization to the data cutoff date (July 26, 2021) was 12.8 mo (interquartile range, 6.9-19.3). The median PFS was 4.5 mo in the combination arm and 4.0 mo in the pembrolizumab arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.72-1.14]). The median OS was 11.8 mo for the combination arm and 12.9 mo for the pembrolizumab arm (HR 1.14 [95% CI 0.87-1.48]). Grade 3-5 adverse events attributed to trial treatment occurred in 123 of 241 patients (51%) treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and in 66 of 242 patients (27%) treated with placebo plus pembrolizumab. This trial was terminated earlier than initially planned based on recommendation from the DMC. CONCLUSIONS The benefit-to-risk ratio for first-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was not considered favorable versus pembrolizumab plus placebo as first-line therapy in patients with advanced UC. PATIENT SUMMARY Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was not more effective than pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Tibor Csoszi
- Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County Hospital, Szolnok, Hungary
| | - Sang Joon Shin
- Yosnei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Vagif Atduev
- Volga District Medical Center, Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | | | - Yu-Li Su
- Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Mehmet A N Sendur
- Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine and Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Posada JM, Yakirevich E, Kamat AM, Sood A, Jacob JM, Bratslavsky G, Grivas P, Spiess PE, Li R, Necchi A, Mega AE, Golijanin DJ, Pavlick D, Huang RSP, Lin D, Danziger N, Sokol ES, Sivakumar S, Ross JS, Cheng L. Characterizing the Genomic Landscape of the Micropapillary Subtype of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Harboring Activating Extracellular Mutations of ERBB2. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100424. [PMID: 38219954 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
The micropapillary subtype of urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) of the bladder is a very aggressive histological variant of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). A high frequency of MPUC contains activating mutations in the extracellular domain (ECD) of ERBB2. We sought to further characterize ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC to identify additional genomic alterations that have been associated with tumor progression and therapeutic response. In total, 5,485 cases of archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded UBC underwent comprehensive genomic profiling to identify ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC and evaluate the frequencies of genomic co-alterations. We identified 219 cases of UBC with ERBB2 ECD mutations (74% S310F and 26% S310Y), of which 63 (28.8%) were MPUC. Genomic analysis revealed that TERT, TP53, and ARID1A were the most common co-altered genes in ERBB2-mutant MPUC (82.5%, 58.7%, and 39.7%, respectively) and did not differ from ERBB2-mutant non-MPUC (86.5%, 51.9%, and 35.3%). The main differences between ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC compared with non-MPUC were KMT2D, RB1, and MTAP alterations. KMT2D and RB1 are tumor-suppressor genes. KMT2D frequency was significantly decreased in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (6.3%) in contrast to non-MPUC (27.6%; P < .001). RB1 mutations were more frequent in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (33.3%) than in non-MPUC (17.3%; P = .012). Finally, MTAP loss, an emerging biomarker for new synthetic lethality-based anticancer drugs, was less frequent in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (11.1%) than in non-MPUC (26.9%; P = .018). Characterizing the genomic landscape of MPUC may not only improve our fundamental knowledge about this aggressive morphological variant of UBC but also has the potential to identify possible prognostic and predictive biomarkers that may drive tumor progression and dictate treatment response to therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Posada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Warren Albert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Laboratory of Systems Cancer Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
| | - Evgeny Yakirevich
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Warren Albert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Akshay Sood
- Department of Urology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Andrea Necchi
- San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Anthony E Mega
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Dragan J Golijanin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Brown University, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Dean Pavlick
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Douglas Lin
- Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York; Foundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Warren Albert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beckabir W, Wobker SE, Damrauer JS, Midkiff B, De la Cruz G, Makarov V, Flick L, Woodcock MG, Grivas P, Bjurlin MA, Harrison MR, Vincent BG, Rose TL, Gupta S, Kim WY, Milowsky MI. Spatial Relationships in the Tumor Microenvironment Demonstrate Association with Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2024; 85:242-253. [PMID: 38092611 PMCID: PMC11022933 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is standard for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Pathologic response (complete: ypT0N0 and partial: OBJECTIVE Using the NanoString GeoMx platform, we performed proteomic digital spatial profiling (DSP) on transurethral resections of bladder tumors from 18 responders ( DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Pretreatment tumor samples were stained by hematoxylin and eosin and immunofluorescence (panCK and CD45) to select four regions of interest (ROIs): tumor enriched (TE), immune enriched (IE), tumor/immune interface (tumor interface = TX and immune interface = IX). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS DSP was performed with 52 protein markers from immune cell profiling, immunotherapy drug target, immune activation status, immune cell typing, and pan-tumor panels. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Protein marker expression patterns were analyzed to determine their association with pathologic response, incorporating or agnostic of their ROI designation (TE/IE/TX/IX). Overall, DSP-based marker expression showed high intratumoral heterogeneity; however, response was associated with markers including PD-L1 (ROI agnostic), Ki-67 (ROI agnostic, TE, IE, and TX), HLA-DR (TX), and HER2 (TE). An elastic net model of response with ROI-inclusive markers demonstrated better validation set performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827) than an ROI-agnostic model (AUC = 0.432). A model including DSP, tumor mutational burden, and clinical data performed no better (AUC = 0.821) than the DSP-only model. CONCLUSIONS Despite high intratumoral heterogeneity of DSP-based marker expression, we observed associations between pathologic response and specific DSP-based markers in a spatially dependent context. Further exploration of tumor region-specific biomarkers may help predict response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in MIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we used the GeoMx platform to perform proteomic digital spatial profiling on transurethral resections of bladder tumors from 18 responders and 18 nonresponders from two studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (LCCC1520 [pembrolizumab] and BLASST-1 [nivolumab]). We found that assessing protein marker expression in the context of tumor architecture improved response prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Beckabir
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sara E Wobker
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Damrauer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bentley Midkiff
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gabriela De la Cruz
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Vladmir Makarov
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Leah Flick
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mark G Woodcock
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marc A Bjurlin
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Urology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael R Harrison
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Benjamin G Vincent
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Computational Medicine Program, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tracy L Rose
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - William Y Kim
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mathew Thomas V, Grivas P, Agarwal N. Gemcitabine with cisplatin and nivolumab: Redefining standard of care for first-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma? Med 2024; 5:109-111. [PMID: 38340704 DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Nivolumab with gemcitabine/cisplatin in the CheckMate 901 trial improved overall and progression-free survival in front-line locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer. The EV-302 trial establishes enfortumab-vedotin plus pembrolizumab as the preferred standard in this setting. Personalized decisions are crucial given patient eligibility and economics. Ongoing trials and predictive biomarkers will further refine treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, UT.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sridhar SS, Powles T, Climent Durán MÁ, Park SH, Massari F, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Valderrama BP, Ullén A, Tsuchiya N, Aragon-Ching JB, Gupta S, Petrylak DP, Bellmunt J, Wang J, Laliberte RJ, di Pietro A, Costa N, Grivas P, Sternberg CN, Loriot Y. Avelumab First-line Maintenance for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Analysis from JAVELIN Bladder 100 by Duration of First-line Chemotherapy and Interval Before Maintenance. Eur Urol 2024; 85:154-163. [PMID: 37714742 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (advanced UC) without progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To report post hoc analyses of subgroups defined by the duration of first-line chemotherapy and interval before maintenance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with advanced UC without progression after four to six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and a 4-10-wk interval after chemotherapy (n = 700) were randomized to receive avelumab + BSC or BSC alone. Subgroups were defined by duration (quartile [Q]) and estimated number of cycles of chemotherapy, and interval between chemotherapy and maintenance. The median follow-up was >19 mo in both arms. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OS (primary endpoint), PFS, and safety were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for OS with avelumab + BSC versus BSC alone were as follows: by chemotherapy duration-Q3: 0.63 (0.39-1.00); by number of cycles-four cycles: 0.69 (0.48-1.00), five cycles: 0.98 (0.57-1.71), and six cycles: 0.66 (0.47-0.92); and by interval-4-<6 wk: 0.75 (0.54-1.04), 6-<8 wk: 0.67 (0.43-1.06), and 8-10 wk: 0.69 (0.47-1.02). Results were similar for PFS. Safety was similar across subgroups. All analyses were exploratory. CONCLUSIONS Post hoc analyses of OS and PFS in subgroups defined by first-line chemotherapy duration and interval before maintenance were generally consistent with the results in the overall population, with similar safety findings. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these findings. PATIENT SUMMARY Avelumab maintenance treatment helped patients with advanced urothelial cancer without disease progression after at least four cycles of prior chemotherapy, and who started maintenance treatment at least 4 wk after chemotherapy, to live longer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srikala S Sridhar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Se Hoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
| | - Norihiko Tsuchiya
- Department of Urology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | | | - Shilpa Gupta
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Hematology/Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERMU981, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Powles T, Assaf ZJ, Degaonkar V, Grivas P, Hussain M, Oudard S, Gschwend JE, Albers P, Castellano D, Nishiyama H, Daneshmand S, Sharma S, Sethi H, Aleshin A, Shi Y, Davarpanah N, Carter C, Bellmunt J, Mariathasan S. Updated Overall Survival by Circulating Tumor DNA Status from the Phase 3 IMvigor010 Trial: Adjuvant Atezolizumab Versus Observation in Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2024; 85:114-122. [PMID: 37500339 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interim results from IMvigor010 showed an overall survival (OS) benefit for adjuvant atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) versus observation in patients with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-positive muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC). OBJECTIVE To report updated OS and safety by ctDNA status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This ad hoc analysis from a global, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial (NCT02450331) included intention-to-treat (ITT) population with evaluable cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) ctDNA samples. INTERVENTION Atezolizumab (1200 mg every 3 wk) or observation for ≤1 yr. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OS, relapse rates, and safety by ctDNA status were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Among 581 of 809 ITT patients included, 214 (37%) were ctDNA positive. Atezolizumab did not improve OS versus observation in ITT patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.73-1.13]; median follow-up 46.8 mo [interquartile range, 36.1-53.6]). In the observation arm, ctDNA positivity versus negativity was associated with shorter OS (HR 6.3 [95% CI 4.3-9.3]). The ctDNA positivity identified patients with an OS benefit favoring atezolizumab versus observation (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.42-0.83]). A greater reduction in ctDNA levels with atezolizumab (C3D1) was associated with longer OS (100% clearance, 60.0 mo [95% CI 35.5-not estimable]; 50-99% reduction, 34.3 mo [95% CI 15.2-not estimable]; <50% reduction, 19.9 mo [95% CI 16.4-32.2]). The ctDNA positivity at C1D1 + C3D1 was associated with relapse with greater sensitivity than C1D1 alone (68% vs 57%). Adverse events were more frequent with atezolizumab than with observation, regardless of ctDNA status. A study limitation was its exploratory design. CONCLUSIONS Evidence suggests that ctDNA positivity in MIUC predicts a benefit with atezolizumab. An in-progress prospective study will further evaluate these findings. PATIENT SUMMARY Among patients with urothelial cancer after surgery, survival was poorer if tumor-derived DNA was detected in their bloodstream; these patients' survival was longer with atezolizumab versus observation. Bloodstream tumor-derived DNA may identify patients who benefit from atezolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London ECMC, Barts Health, London, UK.
| | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stephane Oudard
- Georges Pompidou European Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department CIBER-ONC, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Yi Shi
- Roche/Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hoffman-Censits J, Grivas P, Powles T, Hawley J, Tyroller K, Seeberger S, Guenther S, Jacob N, Mehr KT, Hahn NM. The JAVELIN Bladder Medley trial: avelumab-based combinations as first-line maintenance in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Future Oncol 2024; 20:179-190. [PMID: 37671748 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Results from JAVELIN Bladder 100 established avelumab (anti-PD-L1) first-line maintenance as the standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) that has not progressed with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We describe the design of JAVELIN Bladder Medley (NCT05327530), an ongoing phase II, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, umbrella trial. Overall, 252 patients with advanced UC who are progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy will be randomized 1:2:2:2 to receive maintenance therapy with avelumab alone (control group) or combined with sacituzumab govitecan (anti-Trop-2/topoisomerase inhibitor conjugate), M6223 (anti-TIGIT) or NKTR-255 (recombinant human IL-15). Primary end points are progression-free survival per investigator and safety/tolerability of the combination regimens. Secondary end points include overall survival, objective response and duration of response per investigator, and pharmacokinetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Hoffman-Censits
- Departments of Medical Oncology & Urology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Thomas Powles
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jessica Hawley
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karin Tyroller
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | | | | | | | | | - Noah M Hahn
- Departments of Medical Oncology & Urology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang Y, Abu-Sbeih H, Tang T, Shatila M, Faleck D, Harris J, Dougan M, Olsson-Brown A, Johnson DB, Shi C, Grivas P, Diamantopoulos L, Owen DH, Cassol C, Arnold CA, Warner DE, Alva A, Powell N, Ibraheim H, De Toni EN, Philipp AB, Philpott J, Sleiman J, Lythgoe M, Daniels E, Sandhu S, Weppler AM, Buckle A, Pinato DJ, Thomas A, Qiao W. Novel endoscopic scoring system for immune mediated colitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 674 Patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)00043-9. [PMID: 38272276 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS No endoscopic scoring system has been established for immune-mediated colitis (IMC). This study aimed to establish such a system for IMC and explore its utility in guiding future selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) use compared to clinical symptoms. METHODS This retrospective international 14-center study included 674 patients who developed IMC after immunotherapy and underwent endoscopic evaluation. Ten endoscopic features were selected by group consensus and assigned one point each to calculate an IMC endoscopic score (IMCES). IMCES cutoffs were chosen to maximize specificity for SIT use. This specificity was compared between IMCES, and clinical symptoms graded according to a standardized instrument. RESULTS A total of 309 (45.8%) patients received SIT. IMCES specificity for SIT use was 82.8% with a cutoff of 4 . The inclusion of ulceration as a mandatory criterion resulted in higher specificity (85.0% for a cutoff of 4). In comparison, the specificity of a Mayo Endoscopy Score (MES) of 3 was 74.6% while specificity of clinical symptom grading was much lower at 27.4% and 12.3% respectively. Early endoscopy was associated with timely SIT use (p<0.001, r=0.4084). CONCLUSIONS This is the largest, multi-center study to devise an endoscopic scoring system to guide IMC management. An IMCES cutoff 4 has a higher specificity for SIT use than clinical symptoms, supporting early endoscopic evaluation for IMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinghong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
| | - Hamzah Abu-Sbeih
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA, 64110
| | - Tenglong Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030; Department of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Malek Shatila
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030
| | - David Faleck
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, 10065
| | - Jessica Harris
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, 10065
| | - Michael Dougan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 02114
| | | | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA, 37235
| | - Chanjuan Shi
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA, 37235
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA, 98109
| | - Leonidas Diamantopoulos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA, 98109
| | - Dwight H Owen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 43210
| | - Clarissa Cassol
- Division of Renal Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 43210
| | - Christina A Arnold
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 43210
| | - David E Warner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 48109
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 48109
| | - Nick Powell
- Royal Marsden Hospital, and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK, SE1 9RS
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Royal Marsden Hospital, and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK, SE1 9RS
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander B Philipp
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, 44195
| | - Joseph Sleiman
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, 44195; Department of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 15213
| | - Mark Lythgoe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK, SW7 2BX
| | - Ella Daniels
- Department of Oncology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK, SW10 9NH
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
| | - Alison M Weppler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
| | - Andrew Buckle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK, SW7 2BX; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy, 28100
| | - Anusha Thomas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030
| | - Wei Qiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kovalenko I, Lynn Ng W, Geng Y, Wang Y, Msaouel P, Bhatia S, Grivas P, Benkhadra R, Alhalabi O. Adverse events of immune checkpoint therapy alone versus when combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: a pooled meta-analysis of 1735 patients. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1238517. [PMID: 38239644 PMCID: PMC10796151 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1238517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Combining immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) may result in increased treatment-related and immune-related adverse events (TRAEs and irAEs) compared to ICT alone. This metanalysis was conducted to identify prospective phase II or III clinical studies that evaluated the toxicity profile of ICT + VEGFi compared to ICT alone. Methods A systematic search was performed across all cancer types and major databases until August 10, 2022, and screening was done by two independent investigators. Inclusion criteria included phase 2 or 3 studies with at least one arm of patients treated with combination therapy and one arm treated with monotherapy. Adverse event data were pooled using a restricted maximum likelihood fixed effects model, and heterogeneity using Cochran's Q (chi-square) test. Results 7 out of 9366 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 808 and 927 patients were treated with ICT monotherapy and a combination of ICT with VEGFi, respectively. Only one study reported irAEs, so the analysis was restricted to TRAEs. The total number of TRAEs was significantly higher in the ICT + VEGFi group (RR:1.49; 95% CI 1.37 -1.62; p=1.5×10-21), and more frequent treatment withdrawals were attributed to TRAEs (RR:3.10; 95% CI 1.12-8.59; p=0.029). The highest TRAE effect size increases noted for rash (RR 6.50; 95% CI 3.76 - 11.25; p=2.1×10-11), hypertension (RR:6.07; 95% CI 3.69-10.00; p=1.3×10-12), hypothyroidism (RR:5.02; 95% CI 3.08 - 8.19; p=8.9×10-11), and diarrhea (RR:4.94; 95% CI 3.21-7.62; p=3.8×10-13). Other significantly more frequent TRAEs included nausea, anemia, anorexia, and proteinuria. Conclusion Combination therapy with ICT and VEGFi carries a higher risk of certain TRAEs, such as rash, hypertension, hypothyroidism, diarrhea, nausea, anorexia, and proteinuria, compared to ICT monotherapy. More granular details on the cause of AEs, particularly irAEs, should be provided in future trials of such regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliia Kovalenko
- Internal Medicine Department, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA, United States
| | - Wern Lynn Ng
- Internal Medicine Department, UPMC Harrisburg, Harrisburg, PA, United States
| | - Yimin Geng
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Yinghong Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Shailender Bhatia
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Raed Benkhadra
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Omar Alhalabi
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hensley PJ, Choudhury A, Khaki AR, Grivas P, Kamat AM. The 2023 European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Critical Appraisal. Eur Urol 2024; 85:32-34. [PMID: 37919189 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J Hensley
- Department of Urology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grivas P, Koshkin VS, Chu X, Cole S, Jain RK, Dreicer R, Cetnar JP, Sundi D, Gartrell BA, Galsky MD, Woo B, Li-Ning-Tapia E, Hahn NM, Carducci MA. PrECOG PrE0807: A Phase 1b Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab Without and with Lirilumab in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Ineligible for or Refusing Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00288-2. [PMID: 38155060 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) improves overall survival (OS) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, many patients are cisplatin ineligible; therefore, new treatment options are needed. Nivolumab without/with lirilumab prior to RC was investigated in cisplatin-ineligible patients in this phase 1b trial (NCT03532451) to determine its safety/feasibility. METHODS Patients with localized MIBC received two doses of nivolumab (480 mg) alone (cohort 1) or with lirilumab (240 mg; cohort 2) prior to RC. Cohorts were enrolled sequentially. The key eligibility criteria were cT2-4aN0-1M0 stage and cisplatin ineligibility/refusal. The primary endpoint was the rate of grade (G) ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The key secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who underwent RC >6 wk after the last dose, CD8+ T-cell density change between pretreatment transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and post-treatment RC, ypT0N0, KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Among 43 patients enrolled (n = 13, cohort 1; n = 30, cohort 2), 13 and 29 completed intended neoadjuvant therapy, respectively, in cohorts 1 and 2, and 41 underwent RC. The median time from the last dose to RC was 4 wk. The G3 TRAEs occurred in 0% (90% confidence interval [CI] 0-21%) of patients in cohort 1 and 7% (90% CI 1-20%) in cohort 2; all these TRAEs resolved and no G4/5 TRAEs occurred. No patient had delayed RC for >6 wk. In cohorts 1 and 2, ypT0N0 rates for patients with MIBC and RC were 17% and 21%, CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Neoadjuvant nivolumab-based immunotherapy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC. Although ypT0N0 rates were lower than expected, 2-yr survival rates seem to be comparable with those of other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials. Nivolumab is being evaluated in the CA-017-078 trial (NCT03661320). PATIENT SUMMARY For patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer unable to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, treatment with nivolumab without and with lirilumab prior to radical cystectomy was safe, feasible, and well tolerated. Nivolumab-based immunotherapy showed lower pathologic response rates than but similar survival rates to other neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Suzanne Cole
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Robert Dreicer
- University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Debasish Sundi
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Benjamin A Gartrell
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brianna Woo
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Noah M Hahn
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael A Carducci
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Msaouel P, Sweis RF, Bupathi M, Heath E, Goodman OB, Hoimes CJ, Milowsky MI, Davis N, Kalebasty AR, Picus J, Shaffer D, Mao S, Adra N, Yorio J, Gandhi S, Grivas P, Siefker-Radtke A, Yang R, Latven L, Olson P, Chin CD, Der-Torossian H, Mortazavi A, Iyer G. A Phase 2 Study of Sitravatinib in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00282-1. [PMID: 38105142 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI) has demonstrated survival benefits in urothelial carcinoma (UC); however, not all patients benefit from CPI due to resistance. Combining sitravatinib, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of TYRO3, AXL, and MERTK (TAM) receptors and VEGFR2, with CPI may improve antitumor responses. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC. METHODS The 516-003 trial (NCT03606174) is an open-label, multicohort phase 2 study evaluating sitravatinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/metastatic UC enrolled in eight cohorts depending on prior treatment with CPI, platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC), or antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). Overall, 244 patients were enrolled and treated with sitravatinib plus nivolumab (median follow-up 14.1-38.2 mo). Sitravatinib (free-base capsules 120 mg once daily [QD] or malate capsule 100 mg QD) plus nivolumab (240 mg every 2 wk/480 mg every 4 wk intravenously). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. The Predictive probability design and confidence interval methods were used. Among patients previously treated with PBC, ORR, and median PFS were 32.1% and 3.9 mo in CPI-naïve patients (n = 53), 14.9% and 3.9 mo in CPI-refractory patients (n = 67), and 5.4% and 3.7 mo in CPI- and ADC-refractory patients (n = 56), respectively. Across all cohorts, grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 51.2% patients and grade 4 in 3.3%, with one treatment-related death (cardiac failure). Immune-related adverse events occurred in 50.4% patients. TRAEs led to sitravatinib/nivolumab discontinuation in 6.1% patients. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Sitravatinib plus nivolumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile but did not result in clinically meaningful ORRs in patients with advanced/metastatic UC in the eight cohorts studied. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, the combination of two anticancer drugs, sitravatinib and nivolumab, resulted in manageable side effects but no meaningful responses in patients with bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavlos Msaouel
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Oscar B Goodman
- Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada - Southwest, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | | | | | - Nancy Davis
- Vanderbilt - Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Joel Picus
- Washington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - David Shaffer
- New York Oncology Hematology - Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Shifeng Mao
- Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nabil Adra
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Sunil Gandhi
- Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute - North Region (SCRI), Tampa Bay, FL, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Rui Yang
- Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Latven
- Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Peter Olson
- Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Amir Mortazavi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Gopa Iyer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kamat AM, Apolo AB, Babjuk M, Bivalacqua TJ, Black PC, Buckley R, Campbell MT, Compérat E, Efstathiou JA, Grivas P, Gupta S, Kurtz NJ, Lamm D, Lerner SP, Li R, McConkey DJ, Palou Redorta J, Powles T, Psutka SP, Shore N, Steinberg GD, Sylvester R, Witjes JA, Galsky MD. Definitions, End Points, and Clinical Trial Designs for Bladder Cancer: Recommendations From the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer and the International Bladder Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:5437-5447. [PMID: 37793077 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a significant unmet need for new and efficacious therapies in urothelial cancer (UC). To provide recommendations on appropriate clinical trial designs across disease settings in UC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) and the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) convened a multidisciplinary, international consensus panel. METHODS Through open communication and scientific debate in small- and whole-group settings, surveying, and responses to clinical questionnaires, the consensus panel developed recommendations on optimal definitions of the disease state, end points, trial design, evaluations, sample size calculations, and pathology considerations for definitive studies in low- and intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high-risk NMIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and metastatic UC. The expert panel also solicited input on the recommendations through presentations and public discussion during an open session at the 2021 Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Think Tank (held virtually). RESULTS The consensus panel developed a set of stage-specific bladder cancer clinical trial design recommendations, which are summarized in the table that accompanies this text. CONCLUSION These recommendations developed by the SITC-IBCG Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial Design consensus panel will encourage uniformity among studies and facilitate drug development in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andrea B Apolo
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Marek Babjuk
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Roger Buckley
- Department of Urology, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew T Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Neil J Kurtz
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY
| | - Donald Lamm
- Patient Advocate, Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN), Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Roger Li
- Scott Department of Urology, Dan L Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - David J McConkey
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Joan Palou Redorta
- Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Thomas Powles
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Neal Shore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ghelani GH, Zerdan MB, Jacob J, Spiess PE, Li R, Necchi A, Grivas P, Kamat A, Danziger N, Lin D, Huang R, Decker B, Sokol ES, Cheng L, Pavlick D, Ross JS, Bratslavsky G, Basnet A. HPV-positive clinically advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder (aBSCC): A comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) study. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:486.e15-486.e23. [PMID: 37821306 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced bladder squamous cell carcinoma (aBSCC) is an uncommon form of urinary bladder malignancy when compared with the much higher urothelial carcinoma incidence. We studied the genomic alteration (GA) landscape in a series of aBSCC based on the association with human papilloma virus (HPV) to determine if differences in GA would be observed between the positive and negative groups. METHODS Using a hybrid capture-based FDA-approved CGP assay, a series of 171 aBSCC were sequenced to evaluate all classes of GA. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on up to 1.1 Mbp of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability (MSI) was determined on up to 114 loci. Programmed cell death ligand -1 (PD-L1) expression was determined by IHC (Dako 22C3) with negative expression when PD-L1 was 0, lower expression of positivity set at 1 to 49%, and higher expression set at ≥50% expression. RESULTS Overall, 11 (6.4%) of the aBSCC were found to harbor HPV sequences (10 HPV16 and 1 HPV 11). HPV+ status was identified slightly more often in women (NS) and in younger patients (P = 0.04); 2 female patients with aBSCC had a prior history of SCC including 1 anal SCC and 1 vaginal SCC. HPV+ aBSCC had fewer GA/tumor (P < 0.0001), more inactivating mutations in RB1 (P = 0.032), and fewer inactivating GA in CDKN2A (P < 0.0001), CDKN2B (P = 0.05), TERT promoter (P = 0.0004) and TP53 (P < 0.0001). GA in genes associated with urothelial carcinoma including FGFR2 and FGFR3 were similar in both HPV+ and HPV- aBSCC groups. MTAP loss (homozygous deletion) which has emerged as a biomarker for PRMT5 inhibitor-based clinical trials was not identified in any of the 11 HPV+ aBSCC cases, which was significantly lower than the 28% positive frequency of MTAP loss in the HPV- aBSCC group (P < 0.0001). MTOR and PIK3CA pathway GA were not significantly different in the 2 groups. Putative biomarkers associated with immunotherapy (IO) response, including MSI and TMB status, were also similar in the 2 groups. PD-L1 expression data was available for a subset of both HPV+ and HPV- cases and showed high frequencies of positive staining which was not different in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS HPV+ aBSCC tends to occur more often in younger patients. As reported in other HPV-associated squamous cell carcinomas, HPV+ aBSCC demonstrates significantly reduced frequencies of inactivating mutations in cell cycle regulatory genes with similar GA in MTOR and PIK3CA pathways. The implication of HPV in the pathogenesis of bladder cancer remains unknown but warrants further exploration and clinical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - J Jacob
- Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - P E Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - R Li
- Department of GU Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - A Necchi
- IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - P Grivas
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - A Kamat
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - D Lin
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - R Huang
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | - B Decker
- Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - L Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, and the Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | - J S Ross
- Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | | | - A Basnet
- Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ghali F, Vakar-Lopez F, Roudier MP, Garcia J, Arora S, Cheng HH, Schweizer MT, Haffner MC, Lee JK, Yu EY, Grivas P, Montgomery B, Hsieh AC, Wright JL, Lam HM. Metastatic Bladder Cancer Expression and Subcellular Localization of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 in Variant Histology: A Rapid Autopsy Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:669-678. [PMID: 37344281 PMCID: PMC10674028 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nectin-4 and Trop-2 are transmembrane targets of FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) Enfortumab-vedotin (EV) and Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), respectively, for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The expression and role of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 in mUC variant histology is poorly described. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluate membranous and cytoplasmic protein expression, and mRNA levels of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 within matched primary and metastatic mUC samples to determine heterogeneity of ADC targets in mUC variants. RESULTS Patients with mUC were consented for rapid autopsy immediately after death. Tissues from matched primary and metastatic lesions were collected. A total of 67 specimens from 20 patients were analyzed: 27 were UC, 17 plasmacytoid (PUC), 18 UC with squamous differentiation (UCSD), and 5 neuroendocrine (NE); 10 from primary and 57 from metastatic sites. All histology except NE expressed moderate-high levels of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 by both immunohistochemistry and RNAseq. Nectin-4 demonstrated prominent cytoplasmic staining in metastatic PUC and UCSD. Trop-2 demonstrated strong cytoplasmic and membrane staining in primary and metastatic tumors. Interestingly, Nectin-4 and Trop-2 expression are positively correlated at both mRNA and protein levels. CONCLUSION UC and non-NE variants express notable level of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 in both primary and metastatic lesions. Membrane staining of Nectin-4 and Trop-2 is present but cytoplasmic staining is a more common event in both mUC and mUC variant histology. These findings support evaluation of EV and SG in heavily treated variant histology BC and urge attention on the clinical relevance of cytoplasmic localization of ADC targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fady Ghali
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Martine P Roudier
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Jose Garcia
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Sonali Arora
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael T Schweizer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael C Haffner
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - John K Lee
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Bruce Montgomery
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew C Hsieh
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| | - Hung-Ming Lam
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Necchi A, Spiess PE, Costa de Padua T, Li R, Grivas P, Huang RSP, Lin DI, Danziger N, Ross JS, Jacob JM, Sager RA, Basnet A, Li G, Graf RP, Pavlick DC, Bratslavsky G. Genomic Profiles and Clinical Outcomes of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Elevated Tumor Mutational Burden. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2348002. [PMID: 38150257 PMCID: PMC10753400 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a putative biomarker of efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies of solid tumors, but not specifically for penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). Objective To characterize biomarker features and ICI therapy outcomes associated with high TMB in PSCC in the routine clinical practice setting. Design, Setting, and Participants In this cohort study, 397 PSCC cases were analyzed to identify genomic alterations in more than 300 cancer-associated genes and genomic signatures, including TMB, using a hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay. Tumor mutational burden was categorized as low (<10 mutations per megabase [mut/Mb]), high (10-19 mut/Mb), or very high (≥20 mut/Mb). Germline status of genetic alterations was predicted using a validated somatic-germline computational method. Clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic PSCC receiving first-line ICI were abstracted using the deidentified nationwide Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB) from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2022. Exposure Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using FoundationOne and FoundationOne CDx assays from Foundation Medicine Inc. Main outcomes and measures The spectrum of genetic alterations by TMB level in PSCC, the percentage of germline genetic alterations, and the outcome (overall survival with routine clinical treatment) by TMB of chemotherapy-naive patients with PSCC who received ICI treatment up front were assessed in this descriptive study. Results Among 397 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [54-73] years; 266 [67.0%] of European, 83 [20.9%] of admixed American, and 34 [8.5%] of African or other genomic ancestry), the median (IQR) age (eg, 65 [53-73] years for low TMB vs 68 [61-78] years for TMB ≥10 mut/Mb) and genomic ancestry distribution (eg, European 228 of 339 [67.3%] for low TMB vs 38 of 58 [65.5%] for TMB ≥10 mut/Mb) were similar between TMB subgroups. There were 339 PSCC cases (85.4%) with low TMB, 40 cases (10.1%) with high TMB, and 18 cases (4.5%) with very high TMB. Comparisons of TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher vs low TMB showed an enrichment of genetic alterations in PIK3CA (48.3% vs 18.3%; P < .001) and KMT2D (29.3% vs 7.7%; P < .001) and less frequent genetic alterations in CDKN2A (25.9% vs 45.7%; P = .05). Most genetic alterations did not co-occur. Human papillomavirus identification was more frequent as TMB increased: 28.3% for low TMB, 50.0% for high, and 72.2% for very high. In total, 95 of 1377 genetic alterations (6.9%) were germline. Of 10 patients identified from the CGDB receiving frontline ICIs, median (IQR) follow-up was 9.9 months. Four patients had overall survival with clinical treatment of more than 12 months, including 2 of 3 patients with TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of advanced metastatic PSCC based on TMB levels, significant differences were observed for biomarkers in nearly 15% of patients with a TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher. Germline testing and ICI-based therapy should be integrated into the management of selected PSCC cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Philippe E. Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Roger Li
- Department of GU Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | - Jeffrey S. Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | | | | | - Alina Basnet
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Gerald Li
- Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Ryon P. Graf
- Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grivas P, Grande E, Davis ID, Moon HH, Grimm MO, Gupta S, Barthélémy P, Thibault C, Guenther S, Hanson S, Sternberg CN. Avelumab first-line maintenance treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: review of evidence to guide clinical practice. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102050. [PMID: 37976999 PMCID: PMC10685024 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase III trial led to the incorporation of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance treatment into international guidelines as a standard of care for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) without progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. JAVELIN Bladder 100 showed that avelumab 1L maintenance significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival in this population compared with a 'watch-and-wait' approach. The aim of this manuscript is to review clinical studies of avelumab 1L maintenance in patients with advanced UC, including long-term efficacy and safety data from JAVELIN Bladder 100, subgroup analyses in clinically relevant subpopulations, and 'real-world' data obtained outside of clinical trials, providing a comprehensive resource to support patient management. Extended follow-up from JAVELIN Bladder 100 has shown that avelumab provides a long-term efficacy benefit, with a median OS of 23.8 months measured from start of maintenance treatment, and 29.7 months measured from start of 1L chemotherapy. Longer OS was observed across subgroups, including patients who received 1L cisplatin + gemcitabine, patients who received four or six cycles of 1L chemotherapy, and patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease as best response to 1L induction chemotherapy. No new safety signals were seen in patients who received ≥1 year of avelumab treatment, and toxicity was similar in those who had received cisplatin or carboplatin with gemcitabine. Other clinical datasets, including noninterventional studies conducted in Europe, USA, and Asia, have confirmed the efficacy of avelumab 1L maintenance. Potential subsequent treatment options after avelumab maintenance include antibody-drug conjugates (enfortumab vedotin or sacituzumab govitecan), erdafitinib in biomarker-selected patients, platinum rechallenge in suitable patients, nonplatinum chemotherapy, and clinical trial participation; however, evidence to determine optimal treatment sequences is needed. Ongoing trials of avelumab-based combination regimens as maintenance treatment have the potential to evolve the treatment landscape for patients with advanced UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, USA.
| | - E Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - I D Davis
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - H H Moon
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside Medical Center, Riverside, USA
| | - M-O Grimm
- Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - S Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, USA
| | - P Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg
| | - C Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - S Guenther
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - C N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Meeks JJ, Black PC, Galsky M, Grivas P, Hahn NM, Hussain SA, Milowsky MI, Steinberg GD, Svatek RS, Rosenberg JE. Checkpoint Inhibitors in Urothelial Carcinoma-Future Directions and Biomarker Selection. Eur Urol 2023; 84:473-483. [PMID: 37258363 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Several recent phase 2 and 3 trials have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy for urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the metastatic, localized muscle-invasive UC (MIUC), upper tract UC, and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) disease state. OBJECTIVE To assess the outcomes and toxicity of CPIs across the treatment landscape of UC and contextualize their application to current real-world treatment. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We queried PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases and conference abstracts to identify prospective trials examining CPIs in UC. The primary endpoints included overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and toxicity (when available). A secondary analysis included biomarker evaluation of response. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 21 trials, 12 phase 2 and nine phase 3 trials, in which a CPI was used for metastatic UC (seven), MIUC (nine), and NMIBC (five). For first-line (1L) metastatic UC, concurrent chemotherapy with CPIs failed to show superiority. Improved overall and progression-free survival for switch maintenance avelumab (after achieving stable disease or response with induction systemic chemotherapy) has established the current standard of care for 1L metastatic UC. A single-agent CPI is a consideration for patients unable to tolerate chemotherapy. CPIs in the perioperative setting are limited to only the adjuvant treatment with nivolumab after radical surgery for MIUC in patients at a higher risk of recurrence based on pathologic stage. Only pembrolizumab is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for carcinoma in situ unresponsive to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in patients who are not fit for or who refuse radical cystectomy. Trials investigating CPIs in combination with multiple immune regulators, antibody drug conjugates, targeted therapies, antiangiogenic agents, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are enrolling patients and may shape the future treatment of patients with UC. CONCLUSIONS CPIs have an established role across multiple states of UC, with broadened applications likely to occur in the future. Several combinations are being evaluated, while the development of predictive biomarkers and their validation may help identify patients who are most likely to respond. PATIENT SUMMARY Our findings highlight the broad activity of checkpoint inhibitors in urothelial carcinoma, noting the need for further investigation for the best application of combinations and patient selection to patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Meeks
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Jesse Brown VAMC, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Noah M Hahn
- Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Syed A Hussain
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Matthew I Milowsky
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Robert S Svatek
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio (UTHSA), San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nyame YA, Baker KK, Montgomery B, Grivas P, Redman MW, Wright JL. Racial and sex differences in tumor genomics in urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:456.e1-456.e5. [PMID: 37481462 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Differences in bladder cancer outcomes have been demonstrated by sex and race/ethnicity, with studies showing a higher burden of adverse outcomes among women and racially minoritized populations. Despite these epidemiologic differences, populations with disproportionally adverse outcomes are often underrepresented in genomic cohorts. This exclusion impacts the accuracy and generalizability of genomic studies in bladder cancer and has the potential to widen disparities by sex and/or race/ethnicity. BASIC PROCEDURES We analyzed pooled somatic mutational data from publicly available cohorts in the cBioPortal open access platform. FINDINGS A total of 796 unique patients were identified. Average age for the cohort was 67 years (range: 25-98 years), 188 (24%) were female, and the majority were White (n = 423, 85% among those who report race). Median total mutation count was 91 (IQR: 20, 202) per patient. We used multivariable logistic regression to independently evaluate the association between race/sex and mutation status in each of 122 genes of interest, identified from TCGA, adjusting for age and bladder cancer invasive status. In adjusted analyses, male sex was associated with increased risk of mutation in ARID1A, CHD6, and NCOR1 compared with female sex. White race was associated with increased risk of mutation in ARID1A, EP300, PIK3CA, and TP53 and decreased risk of mutation in HRAS compared with non-White race. CONCLUSIONS These differences highlight the importance of enriching cohorts for female and non-White patients in genomic studies and clinical trials, especially as we test the use of molecular biomarkers to personalize care for patients with bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaw A Nyame
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| | - Kelsey K Baker
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Bruce Montgomery
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Mary W Redman
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nagaraj G, Vinayak S, Khaki AR, Sun T, Kuderer NM, Aboulafia DM, Acoba JD, Awosika J, Bakouny Z, Balmaceda NB, Bao T, Bashir B, Berg S, Bilen MA, Bindal P, Blau S, Bodin BE, Borno HT, Castellano C, Choi H, Deeken J, Desai A, Edwin N, Feldman LE, Flora DB, Friese CR, Galsky MD, Gonzalez CJ, Grivas P, Gupta S, Haynam M, Heilman H, Hershman DL, Hwang C, Jani C, Jhawar SR, Joshi M, Kaklamani V, Klein EJ, Knox N, Koshkin VS, Kulkarni AA, Kwon DH, Labaki C, Lammers PE, Lathrop KI, Lewis MA, Li X, Lopes GDL, Lyman GH, Makower DF, Mansoor AH, Markham MJ, Mashru SH, McKay RR, Messing I, Mico V, Nadkarni R, Namburi S, Nguyen RH, Nonato TK, O'Connor TL, Panagiotou OA, Park K, Patel JM, Patel KG, Peppercorn J, Polimera H, Puc M, Rao YJ, Razavi P, Reid SA, Riess JW, Rivera DR, Robson M, Rose SJ, Russ AD, Schapira L, Shah PK, Shanahan MK, Shapiro LC, Smits M, Stover DG, Streckfuss M, Tachiki L, Thompson MA, Tolaney SM, Weissmann LB, Wilson G, Wotman MT, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Mishra S, French B, Warner JL, Lustberg MB, Accordino MK, Shah DP. Clinical characteristics, racial inequities, and outcomes in patients with breast cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and cancer consortium (CCC19) cohort study. eLife 2023; 12:e82618. [PMID: 37846664 PMCID: PMC10637772 DOI: 10.7554/elife.82618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations. Methods This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity. Results 1383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32-1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24-2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70-6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71-5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83-12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63-3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20-2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66-3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89-22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing, and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status. Conclusions Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC-related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Funding This study was partly supported by National Cancer Institute grant number P30 CA068485 to Tianyi Sun, Sanjay Mishra, Benjamin French, Jeremy L Warner; P30-CA046592 to Christopher R Friese; P30 CA023100 for Rana R McKay; P30-CA054174 for Pankil K Shah and Dimpy P Shah; KL2 TR002646 for Pankil Shah and the American Cancer Society and Hope Foundation for Cancer Research (MRSG-16-152-01-CCE) and P30-CA054174 for Dimpy P Shah. REDCap is developed and supported by Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant support (UL1 TR000445 from NCATS/NIH). The funding sources had no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication. Clinical trial number CCC19 registry is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04354701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shaveta Vinayak
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
- University of WashingtonSeattleUnited States
- Seattle Cancer Care AllianceSeattleUnited States
| | | | - Tianyi Sun
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUnited States
| | - Nicole M Kuderer
- University of WashingtonSeattleUnited States
- Advanced Cancer Research GroupKirklandUnited States
| | | | - Jared D Acoba
- University of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluUnited States
| | - Joy Awosika
- University of Cincinnati Cancer CenterCincinnatiUnited States
| | | | | | - Ting Bao
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUnited States
| | - Babar Bashir
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUnited States
| | | | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory UniversityAtlantaUnited States
| | - Poorva Bindal
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUnited States
| | - Sibel Blau
- Northwest Medical SpecialtiesTacomaUnited States
| | - Brianne E Bodin
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUnited States
| | - Hala T Borno
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
| | | | - Horyun Choi
- University of Hawaii Cancer CenterHonoluluUnited States
| | - John Deeken
- Inova Schar Cancer InstituteFairfaxUnited States
| | | | | | - Lawrence E Feldman
- University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences SystemChicagoUnited States
| | | | | | - Matthew D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUnited States
| | - Cyndi J Gonzalez
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan-Ann ArborAnn ArborUnited States
| | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
- University of WashingtonSeattleUnited States
- Seattle Cancer Care AllianceSeattleUnited States
| | | | - Marcy Haynam
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusUnited States
| | - Hannah Heilman
- University of Cincinnati Cancer CenterCincinnatiUnited States
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUnited States
| | - Clara Hwang
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford HospitalDetroitUnited States
| | | | - Sachin R Jhawar
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusUnited States
| | - Monika Joshi
- Penn State Health St Joseph Cancer CenterReadingUnited States
| | - Virginia Kaklamani
- Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer CenterSan AntonioUnited States
| | | | - Natalie Knox
- Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola UniversityMaywoodUnited States
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
| | - Amit A Kulkarni
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUnited States
| | - Daniel H Kwon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUnited States
| | | | | | - Kate I Lathrop
- Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer CenterSan AntonioUnited States
| | - Mark A Lewis
- Intermountain HealthcareSalt Lake CityUnited States
| | - Xuanyi Li
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUnited States
| | - Gilbert de Lima Lopes
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiUnited States
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
- University of WashingtonSeattleUnited States
- Seattle Cancer Care AllianceSeattleUnited States
| | - Della F Makower
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUnited States
| | | | - Merry-Jennifer Markham
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Health Cancer CenterGainesvilleUnited States
| | | | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUnited States
| | - Ian Messing
- Division of Radiation Oncology, George Washington UniversityWashingtonUnited States
| | - Vasil Mico
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUnited States
| | | | | | - Ryan H Nguyen
- University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences SystemChicagoUnited States
| | | | | | | | - Kyu Park
- Loma Linda University Cancer CenterLoma LindaUnited States
| | | | | | | | - Hyma Polimera
- Penn State Health St Joseph Cancer CenterReadingUnited States
| | | | - Yuan James Rao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, George Washington UniversityWashingtonUnited States
| | - Pedram Razavi
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San DiegoSan DiegoUnited States
| | - Sonya A Reid
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUnited States
| | - Jonathan W Riess
- UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, DavisDavisUnited States
| | - Donna R Rivera
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer InstituteRockvilleUnited States
| | - Mark Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUnited States
| | - Suzanne J Rose
- Carl & Dorothy Bennett Cancer Center, Stamford HospitalStamfordUnited States
| | - Atlantis D Russ
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Health Cancer CenterGainesvilleUnited States
| | | | - Pankil K Shah
- Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer CenterSan AntonioUnited States
| | | | - Lauren C Shapiro
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUnited States
| | | | - Daniel G Stover
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusUnited States
| | | | - Lisa Tachiki
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUnited States
- University of WashingtonSeattleUnited States
- Seattle Cancer Care AllianceSeattleUnited States
| | | | | | | | - Grace Wilson
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUnited States
| | - Michael T Wotman
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUnited States
| | | | - Sanjay Mishra
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleUnited States
| | | | | | - Maryam B Lustberg
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of MedicineNew HavenUnited States
| | - Melissa K Accordino
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUnited States
| | - Dimpy P Shah
- Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer CenterSan AntonioUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Peak T, Spiess PE, Li R, Grivas P, Necchi A, Pavlick D, Huang RSP, Lin D, Danziger N, Jacob JM, Bratslavsky G, Ross JS. Comparative Genomic Landscape of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Among Patients of East and South Asian Genomic Ancestry. Oncologist 2023; 28:e910-e920. [PMID: 37196060 PMCID: PMC10546831 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the low rate of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) in patients of South Asian (SAS) and East Asian (EAS) descent, they make up a significant portion of the cases worldwide. Nevertheless, these patients are largely under-represented in clinical trials. We queried whether UCB arising in patients with SAS and EAS ancestry would have unique genomic features compared to the global cohort. METHODS Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was obtained for 8728 patients with advanced UCB. DNA was extracted and comprehensive genomic profiling was performed. Ancestry was classified using a proprietary calculation algorithm. Genomic alterations (GAs) were determined using a 324-gene hybrid-capture-based method which also calculates tumor mutational burden (TMB) and determines microsatellite status (MSI). RESULTS Of the cohort, 7447 (85.3%) were EUR, 541 (6.2%) were AFR, 461 (5.3%) were of AMR, 74 (0.85%) were SAS, and 205 (2.3%) were EAS. When compared with EUR, TERT GAs were less frequent in SAS (58.1% vs. 73.6%; P = .06). When compared with non-SAS, SAS had less frequent GAs in FGFR3 (9.5% vs. 18.5%, P = .25). TERT promoter mutations were significantly less frequent in EAS compared to non-EAS (54.1% vs. 72.9%; P < .001). When compared with the non-EAS, PIK3CA alterations were significantly less common in EAS (12.7% vs. 22.1%, P = .005). The mean TMB was significantly lower in EAS vs. non-EAS (8.53 vs. 10.02; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS The results from this comprehensive genomic analysis of UCB provide important insight into the possible differences in the genomic landscape in a population level. These hypothesis-generating findings require external validation and should support the inclusion of more diverse patient populations in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Peak
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Joseph M Jacob
- Department of Urology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Urology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gulati S, Hsu CY, Shah S, Shah PK, Zon R, Alsamarai S, Awosika J, El-Bakouny Z, Bashir B, Beeghly A, Berg S, de-la-Rosa-Martinez D, Doroshow DB, Egan PC, Fein J, Flora DB, Friese CR, Fromowitz A, Griffiths EA, Hwang C, Jani C, Joshi M, Khan H, Klein EJ, Heater NK, Koshkin VS, Kwon DH, Labaki C, Latif T, McKay RR, Nagaraj G, Nakasone ES, Nonato T, Polimera HV, Puc M, Razavi P, Ruiz-Garcia E, Saliby RM, Shastri A, Singh SRK, Tagalakis V, Vilar-Compte D, Weissmann LB, Wilkins CR, Wise-Draper TM, Wotman MT, Yoon JJ, Mishra S, Grivas P, Shyr Y, Warner JL, Connors JM, Shah DP, Rosovsky RP. Systemic Anticancer Therapy and Thromboembolic Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cancer and COVID-19. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1390-1400. [PMID: 37589970 PMCID: PMC10436185 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Importance Systematic data on the association between anticancer therapies and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with COVID-19 are lacking. Objective To assess the association between anticancer therapy exposure within 3 months prior to COVID-19 and TEEs following COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients who were hospitalized and had active cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were accrued from March 2020 to December 2021 and analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022. Exposure Treatments of interest (TOIs) (endocrine therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors/tyrosine kinase inhibitors [VEGFis/TKIs], immunomodulators [IMiDs], immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs], chemotherapy) vs reference (no systemic therapy) in 3 months prior to COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes were (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and (2) arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Secondary outcome was severity of COVID-19 (rates of intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, 30-day all-cause mortality following TEEs in TOI vs reference group) at 30-day follow-up. Results Of 4988 hospitalized patients with cancer (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-78] years; 2608 [52%] male), 1869 had received 1 or more TOIs. Incidence of VTE was higher in all TOI groups: endocrine therapy, 7%; VEGFis/TKIs, 10%; IMiDs, 8%; ICIs, 12%; and chemotherapy, 10%, compared with patients not receiving systemic therapies (6%). In multivariable log-binomial regression analyses, relative risk of VTE (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69) but not ATE (aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56-1.16) was significantly higher in those exposed to all TOIs pooled together vs those with no exposure. Among individual drugs, ICIs were significantly associated with VTE (aRR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.01-2.07). Also noted were significant associations between VTE and active and progressing cancer (aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03), history of VTE (aRR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.38-4.04), and high-risk site of cancer (aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.75). Black patients had a higher risk of TEEs (aRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50) than White patients. Patients with TEEs had high intensive care unit admission (46%) and mechanical ventilation (31%) rates. Relative risk of death in patients with TEEs was higher in those exposed to TOIs vs not (aRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.91-1.38) and was significantly associated with poor performance status (aRR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.30-2.40) and active/progressing cancer (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13-2.13). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, relative risk of developing VTE was high among patients receiving TOIs and varied by the type of therapy, underlying risk factors, and demographics, such as race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the need for close monitoring and perhaps personalized thromboprophylaxis to prevent morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19-related thromboembolism in patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuchi Gulati
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Chih-Yuan Hsu
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Surbhi Shah
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix
| | - Pankil K. Shah
- Mays Cancer Center at University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson
| | - Rebecca Zon
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston
| | | | - Joy Awosika
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - Babar Bashir
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alicia Beeghly
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Deborah B. Doroshow
- Tisch Cancer Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Pamela C. Egan
- Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Joshua Fein
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Ariel Fromowitz
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Clara Hwang
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Monika Joshi
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Hina Khan
- Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Elizabeth J. Klein
- Brown University and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Vadim S. Koshkin
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California San Francisco
| | - Daniel H. Kwon
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California San Francisco
| | - Chris Labaki
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tahir Latif
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego
| | | | - Elizabeth S. Nakasone
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Taylor Nonato
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego
| | | | | | - Pedram Razavi
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego
| | | | | | - Aditi Shastri
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Vicky Tagalakis
- Division of Internal Medicine and Centre for Clinical Epidemiology of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Cy R. Wilkins
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Michael T. Wotman
- Tisch Cancer Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - James J. Yoon
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Petros Grivas
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Yu Shyr
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jeremy L. Warner
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jean M. Connors
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dimpy P. Shah
- Mays Cancer Center at University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson
| | - Rachel P. Rosovsky
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bakaloudi DR, Talukder R, Lin GI, Makrakis D, Diamantopoulos LN, Tripathi N, Agarwal N, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Brown JR, Pinato DJ, Korolewicz J, Jindal T, Koshkin VS, Murgić J, Miletić M, Frobe A, Johnson J, Zakharia Y, Drakaki A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Rey-Cárdenas M, Castellano D, Buznego LA, Duran I, Carballeira CC, Barrera RM, Marmorejo D, McKay RR, Stewart T, Gupta S, Ruplin AT, Yu EY, Khaki AR, Grivas P. Response and Outcomes of Maintenance Avelumab After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (PBC) in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (aUC): "Real World" Experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:584-593. [PMID: 37414620 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) followed by avelumab switch maintenance in nonprogressors is standard first line (1L) treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). We describe clinical features and outcomes in a "real-world' cohort treated with avelumab maintenance for aUC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients (pts) who received 1L switch maintenance avelumab after no progression on PBC for aUC. We calculated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from initiation of maintenance avelumab. We also described OS and PFS for specific subsets using Cox regression and observed response rate (ORR). RESULTS A total of 108 pts with aUC from 14 sites treated with maintenance avelumab were included. There was a median of 6 weeks1-30 from end of PBC to avelumab initiation; median follow-up time from avelumab initiation was 8.8 months (1-42.7). Median [m]PFS was 9.6 months (95%CI 7.5-12.1) and estimated 1-year OS was 72.5%. CR/PR (vs. SD) to 1L PBC (HR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.87) and ECOG PS 0 (vs. ≥1), (HR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.47) were associated with longer OS. The presence of liver metastases was associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.17-4.59). ORR with avelumab maintenance was 28.7% (complete response 17.6%, partial response 11.1%), 29.6% stable disease, 26.9% progressive disease as best response (14.8% best response unknown). CONCLUSIONS Results seem relatively consistent with findings from JAVELIN Bladder100 trial and recent "real world" studies. Prior response to platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG PS 0, and absence of liver metastases were favorable prognostic factors. Limitations include the retrospective design, lack of randomization and central scan review, and possible selection/confounding biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Dimitrios Makrakis
- Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Jason R Brown
- Division of Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Clevelant, OH
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - James Korolewicz
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Tanya Jindal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jure Murgić
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marija Miletić
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Frobe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Jeffrey Johnson
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, IMM Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucia Alonso Buznego
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Clara Castro Carballeira
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Marqués of Valdecilla, IDIVAL Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Rafael Morales Barrera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Marmorejo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Tyler Stewart
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Ali R Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ho MD, Black AJ, Zargar H, Fairey AS, Mertens LS, Dinney CP, Mir MC, Krabbe LM, Cookson MS, Jacobsen NE, Montgomery JS, Yu EY, Xylinas E, Kassouf W, Dall‘Era MA, Vasdev N, Sridhar SS, McGrath JS, Aning J, Holzbeierlein JM, Thorpe AC, Shariat SF, Wright JL, Morgan TM, Bivalacqua TJ, North S, Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Grivas P, Stephenson AJ, Shah JB, van Rhijn BW, Daneshmand S, Spiess PE, Black PC. The effect of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the renal function of patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2023; 17:301-309. [PMID: 37851909 PMCID: PMC10581722 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Cisplatin, however, can induce renal toxicity. Furthermore, RC is an independent risk factor for renal injury, with decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of up to 6 mL/min/1.73 m2 reported at one year postoperatively. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of cisplatin-based NAC and RC on the renal function of patients undergoing both. METHODS We analyzed a multicenter database of patients with MIBC, all of whom received cisplatin-based NAC prior to RC. eGFR values were collected at time points T1 (before NAC), T2 (after NAC but before RC), and T3 (one year post-RC). eGFR and proportion of patients with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage ≥3) were compared between these time points. As all patients in this dataset had received NAC, we identified a retrospective cohort of patients from one institution who had undergone RC during the same time period without NAC for context. RESULTS We identified 234 patients with available renal function data. From T1 to T3, there was a mean decline in eGFR of 17% (13 mL/min/1.73 m2) in the NAC cohort and an increase in proportion of patients with stage ≥3 CKD from 27% to 50%. The parallel cohort of patients who did not receive NAC was comprised of 236 patients. The mean baseline eGFR in this cohort was lower than in the NAC cohort (66 vs. 75 mL/min/1.73 m2). The mean eGFR decline in this non-NAC cohort from T1 to T3 was 6% (4 mL/min/1.73 m2), and the proportion of those with stage ≥3 CKD increased from 37% to 51%. CONCLUSIONS Administration of NAC prior to RC was associated with a 17% decline in eGFR and a nearly doubled incidence of stage ≥3 CKD at one year after RC. Patients who underwent RC without NAC had a higher rate of stage ≥3 CKD at baseline but appeared to have less renal function loss at one year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D. Ho
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anna J. Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Homayoun Zargar
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adrian S. Fairey
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Laura S. Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Colin P. Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Maria C. Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Michael S. Cookson
- Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| | | | - Jeffrey S. Montgomery
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc A. Dall‘Era
- Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | - John S. McGrath
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Aning
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery, Exeter Surgical Health Services Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Jeff M. Holzbeierlein
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Andrew C. Thorpe
- Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, United Kingdom
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Todd M. Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of California at Davis, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | | | - Scott North
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel A. Barocas
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Jay B. Shah
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Bas W. van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Philippe E. Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Peter C. Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sekar RR, Diamantopoulos LN, Bakaloudi DR, Khaki AR, Grivas P, Winters BR, Vakar-Lopez F, Tretiakova MS, Psutka SP, Holt SK, Gore JL, Lin DW, Schade GR, Hsieh AC, Lee JK, Yezefski T, Schweizer MT, Cheng HH, Yu EY, True LD, Montgomery RB, Wright JL. Sarcomatoid Urothelial Carcinoma Is Associated With Limited Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Poor Oncologic Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:507.e1-507.e14. [PMID: 37150667 PMCID: PMC10621753 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To examine oncologic outcomes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC) treated with radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively queried our institutional database (2003-18) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare (2004-2015) for patients with cT2-4, N0-2, M0 SUC and conventional UC (CUC) treated with RC. Clinicopathologic characteristics were described using descriptive statistics (t test, χ2-test and log-rank-test for group comparison). Overall (OS) and recurrence-free-survival (RFS) after RC were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method and associations with OS were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS We identified 38 patients with SUC and 287 patients with CUC in our database, and 190 patients with SUC in SEER-Medicare. In the institutional cohort, patients with SUC versus CUC had higher rates of pT3/4 stage (66% vs. 35%, P < 0.001), lower rates of ypT0N0 (6% vs. 35%, P = .02), and worse median OS (17.5 vs. 120 months, P < .001). Further, patients with SUC in the institutional versus SEER-Medicare cohort had similar median OS (17.5 vs. 21 months). In both cohorts, OS was comparable between patients with SUC undergoing NAC+RC vs. RC alone (17.5 vs. 18.4 months, P = .98, institutional cohort; 24 vs. 20 months, P = .56, SEER cohort). In Cox proportional hazards models for the institutional RC cohort, SUC was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.3, CI 1.4-3.8, P = .001). CONCLUSION SUC demonstrates poor pathologic response to NAC and worse OS compared with CUC, with no OS benefit associated with NAC. A unique pattern of rapid abdominopelvic cystic recurrence was identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi R Sekar
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | | | - Dimitra R Bakaloudi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Ali R Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Brian R Winters
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Bellevue, Washington
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Maria S Tretiakova
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah K Holt
- Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - John L Gore
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - George R Schade
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew C Hsieh
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - John K Lee
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Todd Yezefski
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael T Schweizer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Lawrence D True
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - R Bruce Montgomery
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Castelo-Branco L, Lee R, Brandão M, Cortellini A, Freitas A, Garassino M, Geukens T, Grivas P, Halabi S, Oliveira J, Pinato DJ, Ribeiro J, Peters S, Pentheroudakis G, Warner JL, Romano E. Learning lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for real-world evidence research in oncology-shared perspectives from international consortia. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101596. [PMID: 37418836 PMCID: PMC10277850 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- L Castelo-Branco
- Scientific and Medical Division, ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology), Lugano, Switzerland; NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - R Lee
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester; Medical Oncology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - M Brandão
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Cortellini
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmight Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, London
| | - A Freitas
- Department of Computer Science/CRUK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; IDIAP Research Institute, Martigny, Switzerland
| | - M Garassino
- Department of medicine, Hematology Oncology section, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - T Geukens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle
| | - S Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - J Oliveira
- Department of Medicine, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Porto, Portugal
| | - D J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - J Ribeiro
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Cancer Medicine, Villejuif, France
| | - S Peters
- Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- Scientific and Medical Division, ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - J L Warner
- Center for Clinical Cancer Informatics and Data Science, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, USA
| | - E Romano
- Emanuela Romano Center of Cancer Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Storm EM, Makrakis D, Lin GI, Talukder R, Bakaloudi DR, Shah EE, Liou IW, Hockenbery D, Grivas P, Khaki AR. Role of Underlying Liver Pathology in the Development of Immune-Related Hepatitis: A Case-Control Study. Target Oncol 2023; 18:601-610. [PMID: 37358780 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00980-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune-related hepatitis (irH) is a serious immune-related adverse event (IRAE) that may result in morbidity, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy interruption and, rarely, mortality. The impact of underlying liver pathology, including liver metastasis, on the incidence of irH remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVES We hypothesized that the presence of underlying liver pathology increased the risk of irH in patients with cancer treated with ICI. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective case-control study of irH in patients with cancer receiving first ICI treatment from 2016-2020. Provider documented cases of ≥ grade 2 irH were identified and control matched in a 2:1 ratio based on age, sex, time of ICI initiation, and follow-up time. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the relationship between irH and liver metastasis at ICI initiation. RESULTS Ninety-seven cases of irH were identified, 29% of which had liver metastases at time of ICI initiation. Thirty-eight percent of patients developed grade 2, 47% grade 3, and 14% grade 4 irH. When adjusted for covariates/confounders, the presence of liver metastasis was associated with increased odds of irH (aOR 2.79 95% CI 1.37-5.66, p = 0.005). The presence of liver metastases did not correlate with irH grade or rate of irH recurrence after ICI rechallenge. CONCLUSIONS Presence of liver metastases increased the odds of irH in patients with first-time ICI therapy. Limitations include the retrospective nature, moderate sample size, possible selection bias and confounding. Our findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant external validation as well as tissue and circulating biomarker exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dimitrios Makrakis
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Grivas P, Park SH, Voog E, Caserta C, Gurney H, Bellmunt J, Kalofonos H, Ullén A, Loriot Y, Sridhar SS, Yamamoto Y, Petrylak DP, Sternberg CN, Gupta S, Huang B, Costa N, Laliberte RJ, di Pietro A, Valderrama BP, Powles T. Avelumab First-line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Comprehensive Clinical Subgroup Analyses from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol 2023; 84:95-108. [PMID: 37121850 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial, avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who were progression-free following 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, leading to regulatory approval in various countries. OBJECTIVE To analyze clinically relevant subgroups from JAVELIN Bladder 100. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC without progression on 1L gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin were randomized to receive avelumab + BSC (n = 350) or BSC alone (n = 350). Median follow-up was >19 mo in both arms (data cutoff October 21, 2019). This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02603432. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OS (primary endpoint) and PFS were analyzed in protocol-specified and post hoc subgroups using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS with avelumab + BSC versus BSC alone were <1.0 across all subgroups examined, including patients treated with 1L cisplatin + gemcitabine (HR 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.93) or carboplatin + gemcitabine (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.90), patients with PD-L1+ tumors treated with carboplatin + gemcitabine (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.39-1.14), and patients whose best response to chemotherapy was a complete response (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.46-1.37), partial response (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.84), or stable disease (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.46-1.06). Observations were similar for PFS. Limitations include the smaller size and post hoc evaluation without multiplicity adjustment for some subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Analyses of OS and PFS in clinically relevant subgroups were consistent with results for the overall population, further supporting avelumab 1L maintenance as standard-of-care treatment for patients with aUC who are progression-free following 1L platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY In the JAVELIN Bladder 100 study, maintenance treatment with avelumab helped many different groups of people with advanced cancer of the urinary tract to live longer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eric Voog
- Centre Jean Bernard Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France
| | - Claudia Caserta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Howard Gurney
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Yohann Loriot
- INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Cora N Sternberg
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Liu C, Shatila M, Mathew A, Machado AP, Thomas A, Zhang HC, Thomas AS, Faleck D, Funchain P, Philpott J, Grivas P, Obeid M, Carbonnel F, Wang Y. Role of C-Reactive Protein in Predicting the Severity and Response of Immune-Mediated Diarrhea and Colitis in Patients with Cancer. J Cancer 2023; 14:1913-1919. [PMID: 37476185 PMCID: PMC10355204 DOI: 10.7150/jca.84261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) frequently develop after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a serum inflammatory biomarker used to stratify and monitor disease severity in many inflammatory conditions. However, CRP level is not specific and is widely influenced by various factors non-specific to bowel inflammation. We aimed to study the utility of CRP as a predictor of disease severity and therapy response in IMDC. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with IMDC who had CRP measured at IMDC onset and after treatment with selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT: infliximab and vedolizumab), between 01/2016 and 02/2022 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and IMDC data were collected and analyzed. Results: Our sample of 128 patients had a median age of 67 years; most were white (89.8%); and male (65.6%). Prior to development of IMDC, 15 (11.7%) were initially treated with anti-CTLA-4, 42 (32.8%) with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1, and 71 (55.5%) with a combination of both. We found higher CRP level was associated with higher CTCAE grade of clinical symptoms such as diarrhea (p=0.015), colitis (p=0.013), and endoscopic findings (p=0.016). While CRP levels decreased after IMDC treatment, there was no significant association between CRP levels with clinical remission, endoscopic remission or histologic remission. There also was no significant correlation between CRP level and recurrence of IMDC, or with fecal calprotectin levels. Conclusion: CRP level may be useful to assess initial severity of IMDC, including grade of diarrhea and colitis and degree of endoscopic inflammation. However, CRP is not a robust surrogate biomarker for assessing treatment response or disease recurrence. Despite the reduction of CRP levels observed following IMDC treatment, this finding might be nonspecific and potentially confounded by concurrent clinical factors, such as underlying malignancy, other inflammatory processes, and systemic anti-cancer therapy. Further studies of the role of CRP are warranted in patients with cancer and IMDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Liu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Malek Shatila
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antony Mathew
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antonio Pizuorno Machado
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Austin Thomas
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hao Chi Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anusha S. Thomas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Faleck
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pauline Funchain
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michel Obeid
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Department of Medicine, Service of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Franck Carbonnel
- Gastroenterology Department, Université Paris Saclay 11, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Yinghong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ghali F, Wright JL, Grivas P. The Pursuit of Intravesical and Systemic Therapies in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:321-322. [PMID: 37045706 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fady Ghali
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fa'ak F, Buni M, Falohun A, Lu H, Song J, Johnson DH, Zobniw CM, Trinh VA, Awiwi MO, Tahon NH, Elsayes KM, Ludford K, Montazari EJ, Chernis J, Dimitrova M, Sandigursky S, Sparks JA, Abu-Shawer O, Rahma O, Thanarajasingam U, Zeman AM, Talukder R, Singh N, Chung SH, Grivas P, Daher M, Abudayyeh A, Osman I, Weber J, Tayar JH, Suarez-Almazor ME, Abdel-Wahab N, Diab A. Selective immune suppression using interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors for management of immune-related adverse events. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e006814. [PMID: 37328287 PMCID: PMC10277540 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is important as they cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, more often seen with combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) as therapy for irAEs. METHODS We performed a retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients diagnosed with de novo irAEs or flare of pre-existing autoimmune disease following ICI and were treated with anti-IL-6R. Our objectives were to assess the improvement of irAEs as well as the overall tumor response rate (ORR) before and after anti-IL-6R treatment. RESULTS We identified a total of 92 patients who received therapeutic anti-IL-6R antibodies (tocilizumab or sarilumab). Median age was 61 years, 63% were men, 69% received anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies alone, and 26% patients were treated with the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (46%), genitourinary cancer (35%), and lung cancer (8%). Indications for using anti-IL-6R antibodies included inflammatory arthritis (73%), hepatitis/cholangitis (7%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%), polymyalgia rheumatica (4%), and one patient each with autoimmune scleroderma, nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis and central nervous system vasculitis. Notably, 88% of patients had received corticosteroids, and 36% received other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as first-line therapies, but without adequate improvement. After initiation of anti-IL-6R (as first-line or post-corticosteroids and DMARDs), 73% of patients showed resolution or change to ≤grade 1 of irAEs after a median of 2.0 months from initiation of anti-IL-6R therapy. Six patients (7%) stopped anti-IL-6R due to adverse events. Of 70 evaluable patients by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) V.1.1 criteria; the ORR was 66% prior versus 66% after anti-IL-6R (95% CI, 54% to 77%), with 8% higher complete response rate. Of 34 evaluable patients with melanoma, the ORR was 56% prior and increased to 68% after anti-IL-6R (p=0.04). CONCLUSION Targeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to treat several irAE types without hindering antitumor immunity. This study supports ongoing clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R antibody) in combination with ICIs (NCT04940299, NCT03999749).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Fa'ak
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maryam Buni
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Adewunmi Falohun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Huifang Lu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Juhee Song
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Van A Trinh
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Khaled M Elsayes
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kaysia Ludford
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Emma J Montazari
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Julia Chernis
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston John P and Katherine G McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maya Dimitrova
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sabina Sandigursky
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Sparks
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Osama Abu-Shawer
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Osama Rahma
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Rafee Talukder
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Namrata Singh
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sarah H Chung
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - May Daher
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ala Abudayyeh
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Iman Osman
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey Weber
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jean H Tayar
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Noha Abdel-Wahab
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Assiut University Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Adi Diab
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Singh N, Grivas P, Makris UE, Suarez-Almazor ME, O'Hare AM, Barton JL. Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Supporting Shared Decision-Making Between Patients With Cancer and Clinicians. ACR Open Rheumatol 2023. [PMID: 37166652 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle
| | - Una E Makris
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | - Ann M O'Hare
- Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- Oregon Health and Science University and Department of Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jana S, Brahma S, Arora S, Wladyka CL, Hoang P, Blinka S, Hough R, Horn JL, Liu Y, Wang LJ, Depeille P, Smith E, Montgomery RB, Lee JK, Haffner MC, Vakar-Lopez F, Grivas P, Wright JL, Lam HM, Black PC, Roose JP, Ryazanov AG, Subramaniam AR, Henikoff S, Hsieh AC. Transcriptional-translational conflict is a barrier to cellular transformation and cancer progression. Cancer Cell 2023; 41:853-870.e13. [PMID: 37084735 PMCID: PMC10208629 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
We uncover a tumor-suppressive process in urothelium called transcriptional-translational conflict caused by deregulation of the central chromatin remodeling component ARID1A. Loss of Arid1a triggers an increase in a nexus of pro-proliferation transcripts, but a simultaneous inhibition of the eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2), which results in tumor suppression. Resolution of this conflict through enhancing translation elongation speed enables the efficient and precise synthesis of a network of poised mRNAs resulting in uncontrolled proliferation, clonogenic growth, and bladder cancer progression. We observe a similar phenomenon in patients with ARID1A-low tumors, which also exhibit increased translation elongation activity through eEF2. These findings have important clinical implications because ARID1A-deficient, but not ARID1A-proficient, tumors are sensitive to pharmacologic inhibition of protein synthesis. These discoveries reveal an oncogenic stress created by transcriptional-translational conflict and provide a unified gene expression model that unveils the importance of the crosstalk between transcription and translation in promoting cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujata Jana
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Sandipan Brahma
- Basic Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Sonali Arora
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Cynthia L Wladyka
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Patrick Hoang
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Steven Blinka
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Rowan Hough
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Jessie L Horn
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Yuzhen Liu
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Li-Jie Wang
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Philippe Depeille
- Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Eric Smith
- Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | | | - John K Lee
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michael C Haffner
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA
| | - Hung-Ming Lam
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jeroen P Roose
- Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Alexey G Ryazanov
- Department of Pharmacology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | | | - Steven Henikoff
- Basic Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Andrew C Hsieh
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98915, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Powles T, Park SH, Caserta C, Valderrama BP, Gurney H, Ullén A, Loriot Y, Sridhar SS, Sternberg CN, Bellmunt J, Aragon-Ching JB, Wang J, Huang B, Laliberte RJ, di Pietro A, Grivas P. Avelumab First-Line Maintenance for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial After ≥2 Years of Follow-Up. J Clin Oncol 2023:JCO2201792. [PMID: 37071838 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Initial results from the phase III JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02603432) showed that avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who were progression-free after 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Avelumab 1L maintenance treatment is now a standard of care for aUC. Here, we report updated data with ≥ 2 years of follow-up in all patients, including OS (primary end point), PFS, safety, and additional novel analyses. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive avelumab plus BSC (n = 350) or BSC alone (n = 350). At data cutoff (June 4, 2021), median follow-up was 38.0 months and 39.6 months, respectively; 67 patients (19.5%) had received ≥2 years of avelumab treatment. OS remained longer with avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone in all patients (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.91]; 2-sided P = .0036). Investigator-assessed PFS analyses also favored avelumab. Longer-term safety was consistent with previous analyses; no new safety signals were identified with longer treatment duration. In conclusion, longer-term follow-up continues to show clinically meaningful efficacy benefits with avelumab 1L maintenance plus BSC versus BSC alone in patients with aUC. An interactive visualization of data reported in this article is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Center, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Claudia Caserta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Howard Gurney
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Gustave Roussy, INSERMU981, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Meric-Bernstam F, Ford JM, O'Dwyer PJ, Shapiro GI, McShane LM, Freidlin B, O'Cearbhaill RE, George S, Glade-Bender J, Lyman GH, Tricoli JV, Patton D, Hamilton SR, Gray RJ, Hawkins DS, Ramineni B, Flaherty KT, Grivas P, Yap TA, Berlin J, Doroshow JH, Harris LN, Moscow JA. National Cancer Institute Combination Therapy Platform Trial with Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (ComboMATCH). Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1412-1422. [PMID: 36662819 PMCID: PMC10102840 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, multiple trials, including the precision medicine trial National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH, EAY131, NCT02465060) have sought to determine if treating cancer based on specific genomic alterations is effective, irrespective of the cancer histology. Although many therapies are now approved for the treatment of cancers harboring specific genomic alterations, most patients do not respond to therapies targeting a single alteration. Further, when antitumor responses do occur, they are often not durable due to the development of drug resistance. Therefore, there is a great need to identify rational combination therapies that may be more effective. To address this need, the NCI and National Clinical Trials Network have developed NCI-ComboMATCH, the successor to NCI-MATCH. Like the original trial, NCI-ComboMATCH is a signal-seeking study. The goal of ComboMATCH is to overcome drug resistance to single-agent therapy and/or utilize novel synergies to increase efficacy by developing genomically-directed combination therapies, supported by strong preclinical in vivo evidence. Although NCI-MATCH was mainly comprised of multiple single-arm studies, NCI-ComboMATCH tests combination therapy, evaluating both combination of targeted agents as well as combinations of targeted therapy with chemotherapy. Although NCI-MATCH was histology agnostic with selected tumor exclusions, ComboMATCH has histology-specific and histology-agnostic arms. Although NCI-MATCH consisted of single-arm studies, ComboMATCH utilizes single-arm as well as randomized designs. NCI-MATCH had a separate, parallel Pediatric MATCH trial, whereas ComboMATCH will include children within the same trial. We present rationale, scientific principles, study design, and logistics supporting the ComboMATCH study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James M. Ford
- Department of Medicine – Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Geoffrey I. Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lisa M. McShane
- Biometric Research Program, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Boris Freidlin
- Biometric Research Program, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Roisin E. O'Cearbhaill
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Suzanne George
- Sarcoma and Bone Oncology Division, Medical Oncology Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Julia Glade-Bender
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Gary H. Lyman
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - James V. Tricoli
- Diagnostic Biomarkers and Technology Branch, Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - David Patton
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stanley R. Hamilton
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas S. Hawkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bhanumati Ramineni
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Regulatory Affairs Branch, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Keith T. Flaherty
- Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Timothy A. Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - James H. Doroshow
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lyndsay N. Harris
- Cancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey A. Moscow
- Investigational Drug Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zhu A, Garcia JA, Faltas B, Grivas P, Barata P, Shoag JE. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Long-term Survival of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e237444. [PMID: 37043205 PMCID: PMC10098944 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.7444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alec Zhu
- Department of Urology, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jorge Alberto Garcia
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bishoy Faltas
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medicine, Seattle
| | - Pedro Barata
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jonathan E Shoag
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grivas P, Kopyltsov E, Su PJ, Parnis FX, Park SH, Yamamoto Y, Fong PC, Tournigand C, Climent Duran MA, Bamias A, Caserta C, Chang J, Cislo P, di Pietro A, Wang J, Powles T. Patient-reported Outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100: Avelumab First-line Maintenance Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2023; 83:320-328. [PMID: 35654659 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In JAVELIN Bladder 100, avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) without disease progression with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized phase 3 trial (NCT02603432) was conducted in 700 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma that had not progressed with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin. PROs were a secondary endpoint. INTERVENTION Avelumab plus BSC (n = 350) or BSC alone (n = 350). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18 (FBlSI-18) and EuroQol five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) assessments were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effect models. Time to deterioration (TTD; prespecified definition: a ≥3-point decrease from baseline in the FBlSI-18 disease-related symptoms-physical subscale for two consecutive assessments) was evaluated via Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Completion rates for scheduled on-treatment PRO assessments were >90% (overall and average per assessment). Results from descriptive analyses and mixed-effect or repeated-measures models of FBlSI-18 and EQ-5D-5L were similar between arms. TTD was also similar, both in the prespecified analysis (hazard ratio 1.26 [95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.77]) and in the post hoc analyses including off-treatment assessments and different event definitions. Limitations included the open-label design and limited numbers of evaluable patients at later time points. CONCLUSIONS Addition of avelumab first-line maintenance to BSC in patients with aUC that had not progressed with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy prolonged OS, with a relatively minimal effect on quality of life. PATIENT SUMMARY In this trial of people with advanced urothelial carcinoma who had benefited from first-line chemotherapy (ie, had stable disease or reduced tumor size), treatment with avelumab maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone improved survival significantly, without compromising quality of life, as reported by the patients themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Evgeny Kopyltsov
- State Institution of Healthcare Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia
| | - Po-Jung Su
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, LinKuo, Taiwan
| | - Francis X Parnis
- Adelaide Cancer Centre, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Peter C Fong
- The University of Auckland and Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Est Créteil University, Créteil, France
| | | | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Claudia Caserta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Makrakis D, Bakaloudi DR, Talukder R, Lin GI, Diamantopoulos LN, Jindal T, Vather-Wu N, Zakharia Y, Tripathi N, Agarwal N, Dawsey S, Gupta S, Lu E, Drakaki A, Liu S, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Fulgenzi CM, Cortellini A, Pinato D, Barata P, Grivas P, Khaki AR, Koshkin VS. Treatment Rechallenge With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:286-294. [PMID: 36481176 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine patient and disease characteristics, toxicity, and clinical outcomes for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who are rechallenged with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this retrospective cohort, we included patients treated with ICI for aUC after having prior ICI treatment. Endpoints included the evaluation of radiographic response and disease control rates with first and second ICI courses, outcomes based on whether there was a change in ICI class (anti-PD-1 vs. anti-PD-L1), and assessment of the reasons for ICI discontinuation. RESULTS We identified 25 patients with aUC from 9 institutions who received 2 separate ICI courses. ORR with first ICI and second ICI were 39% and 13%, respectively. Most patients discontinued first ICI due to progression (n = 19) or treatment-related toxicity (n = 4). Thirteen patients received non-ICI treatment between the first and second ICI, and 12 patients changed ICI class (anti-PD-1 vs. anti-PD-L1) at rechallenge. Among 10 patients who changed ICI class, 8 (80%) had progressive disease as best response with second ICI, while among 12 patients re-treated with the same ICI class, only 3 (25%) had progressive disease as best response at the time of rechallenge. With second ICI, most patients discontinued treatment due to progression (n = 18) or patient preference (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS A proportion of patients with aUC rechallenged with ICI-based regimens may achieve disease control, supporting clinical trials in that setting, especially with ICI-based combinations. Future studies are needed to validate our results and should also focus on identifying biomarkers predictive of benefit with ICI rechallenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Makrakis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Tanya Jindal
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Scott Dawsey
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Eric Lu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Claudia-Maria Fulgenzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London; Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London; Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - David Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Pedro Barata
- Tulane Medical School, New Orleans, LA; University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Diamantopoulos LN, Makrakis D, Korentzelos D, Alevizakos M, Wright JL, Grivas P, Bountziouka V, Vadikolias K, Lambropoulou M, Tripsianis G. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for overall and disease-specific survival in patients with sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2023:S1078-1439(23)00046-7. [PMID: 36931981 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC) is a rare and aggressive variant of bladder cancer with limited data guiding prognosis. In this study, we present the first prognostic nomograms in the literature for 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), for patients with SUC derived from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results database (SEER). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with SUC were identified by using the ICD-10 topography codes C67.0-C67.9 (bladder cancer), and the morphologic code 8122 (SUC). Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (TC) and a validation cohort (VC) (7:3 ratio). Variables significantly associated with OS and DSS were identified with multivariate Cox regression and were used to build the nomograms. Harrel's C-statistic with bootstrap resampling and calibration curves were used for internal (TC) and external (VC) validation. Clinical utility of the nomograms was assessed with the decision curve analysis (DCA). Goodness of fit between the nomograms and the AJCC 8th edition staging system was compared with the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS A total of 741 patients with SUC were included (507 TC, 234 VC). No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics were identified between the 2 cohorts. Sex, SEER stage, radical cystectomy and chemotherapy were common variables for the OS and the DSS nomograms with the addition of age in the former. Optimism-corrected C-statistic for the nomograms was 0.68 and 0.67 for OS and DSS respectively. In comparison, C-statistic for AJCC was 0.59 for OS and 0.60 for DSS (P < 0.001). Calibration curves constructed for the nomograms showed appropriate consistency between predicted and actual survival. The nomograms demonstrated optimal clinical utility in the DCA, outperforming the AJCC staging system, by maintaining a higher clinical net benefits than treat all, treat none and AJCC curves, across threshold probabilities. CONCLUSION We present the first prognostic nomograms developed in patients with SUC. Our models demonstrated superior prognostic performance to the AJCC system, by utilizing a set of variables readily available in daily practice and may serve as useful tools for the individualized risk assessment of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonidas N Diamantopoulos
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
| | - Dimitrios Makrakis
- Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Michail Alevizakos
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Vasiliki Bountziouka
- Division of Medical Biostatistics, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of The Aegean, Myrina, Lemnos, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Vadikolias
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece; Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Maria Lambropoulou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Gregory Tripsianis
- Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nagaraj G, Vinayak S, Khaki AR, Sun T, Kuderer NM, Aboulafia DM, Acoba JD, Awosika J, Bakouny Z, Balmaceda NB, Bao T, Bashir B, Berg S, Bilen MA, Bindal P, Blau S, Bodin BE, Borno HT, Castellano C, Choi H, Deeken J, Desai A, Edwin N, Feldman LE, Flora DB, Friese CR, Galsky MD, Gonzalez CJ, Grivas P, Gupta S, Haynam M, Heilman H, Hershman DL, Hwang C, Jani C, Jhawar SR, Joshi M, Kaklamani V, Klein EJ, Knox N, Koshkin VS, Kulkarni AA, Kwon DH, Labaki C, Lammers PE, Lathrop KI, Lewis MA, Li X, de Lima Lopes G, Lyman GH, Makower DF, Mansoor AH, Markham MJ, Mashru SH, McKay RR, Messing I, Mico V, Nadkarni R, Namburi S, Nguyen RH, Nonato TK, O’Connor TL, Panagiotou OA, Park K, Patel JM, Patel KG, Peppercorn J, Polimera H, Puc M, Rao YJ, Razavi P, Reid SA, Riess JW, Rivera DR, Robson M, Rose SJ, Russ AD, Schapira L, Shah PK, Shanahan MK, Shapiro LC, Smits M, Stover DG, Streckfuss M, Tachiki L, Thompson MA, Tolaney SM, Weissmann LB, Wilson G, Wotman MT, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Mishra S, French B, Warner JL, Lustberg MB, Accordino MK, Shah DP. Clinical Characteristics, Racial Inequities, and Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Cohort Study. medRxiv 2023:2023.03.09.23287038. [PMID: 37205429 PMCID: PMC10187350 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.09.23287038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Background Limited information is available for patients with breast cancer (BC) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially among underrepresented racial/ethnic populations. Methods This is a COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry-based retrospective cohort study of females with active or history of BC and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection diagnosed between March 2020 and June 2021 in the US. Primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on a five-level ordinal scale, including none of the following complications, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression model identified characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity. Results 1,383 female patient records with BC and COVID-19 were included in the analysis, the median age was 61 years, and median follow-up was 90 days. Multivariable analysis revealed higher odds of COVID-19 severity for older age (aOR per decade, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.32 - 1.67]); Black patients (aOR 1.74; 95 CI 1.24-2.45), Asian Americans and Pacific Islander patients (aOR 3.40; 95 CI 1.70 - 6.79) and Other (aOR 2.97; 95 CI 1.71-5.17) racial/ethnic groups; worse ECOG performance status (ECOG PS ≥2: aOR, 7.78 [95% CI, 4.83 - 12.5]); pre-existing cardiovascular (aOR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.63 - 3.15])/pulmonary comorbidities (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.20 - 2.29]); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.66 - 3.04]); and active and progressing cancer (aOR, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.89 - 22.6]). Hispanic ethnicity, timing and type of anti-cancer therapy modalities were not significantly associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. The total all-cause mortality and hospitalization rate for the entire cohort was 9% and 37%, respectively however, it varied according to the BC disease status. Conclusions Using one of the largest registries on cancer and COVID-19, we identified patient and BC related factors associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, underrepresented racial/ethnic patients experienced worse outcomes compared to Non-Hispanic White patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shaveta Vinayak
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Tianyi Sun
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Nicole M. Kuderer
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Advanced Cancer Research Group, Kirkland, WA
| | | | | | - Joy Awosika
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | | | - Ting Bao
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Babar Bashir
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Sibel Blau
- Northwest Medical Specialties, Tacoma, WA
| | - Brianne E. Bodin
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Hala T. Borno
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Horyun Choi
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthew D. Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | - Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Marcy Haynam
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Dawn L. Hershman
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Clara Hwang
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | | | - Sachin R. Jhawar
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Virginia Kaklamani
- Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Natalie Knox
- Stritch School of Medicine at Loyola University, Maywood, IL
| | - Vadim S. Koshkin
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Amit A. Kulkarni
- Masonic Cancer Center at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Daniel H. Kwon
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Kate I. Lathrop
- Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Xuanyi Li
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Gilberto de Lima Lopes
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Gary H. Lyman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Della F. Makower
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Merry-Jennifer Markham
- University of Florida, Division of Hematology and Oncology, UF Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL
| | | | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Ian Messing
- Division of Radiation Oncology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Vasil Mico
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Ryan H. Nguyen
- University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | - Kyu Park
- Loma Linda University Cancer Center, Loma Linda, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yuan James Rao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Pedram Razavi
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Jonathan W. Riess
- UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California at Davis, CA
| | - Donna R. Rivera
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, USA
| | - Mark Robson
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Suzanne J. Rose
- Carl & Dorothy Bennett Cancer Center at Stamford Hospital, Stamford, CT
| | - Atlantis D. Russ
- University of Florida, Division of Hematology and Oncology, UF Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL
| | | | - Pankil K. Shah
- Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Lauren C. Shapiro
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Daniel G. Stover
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Lisa Tachiki
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | - Grace Wilson
- Masonic Cancer Center at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Michael T. Wotman
- Tisch Cancer Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dimpy P. Shah
- Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX
| |
Collapse
|