1
|
Zwahlen DR, Schröder C, Holer L, Bernhard J, Hölscher T, Arnold W, Polat B, Hildebrandt G, Müller AC, Martin Putora P, Papachristofilou A, Schär C, Hayoz S, Sumila M, Zaugg K, Guckenberger M, Ost P, Giovanni Bosetti D, Reuter C, Gomez S, Khanfir K, Beck M, Thalmann GN, Aebersold DM, Ghadjar P. Erectile function preservation after salvage radiation therapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy: Five-year results of the SAKK 09/10 randomized phase 3 trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100786. [PMID: 38706726 PMCID: PMC11067361 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate effects of dose intensified salvage radiotherapy (sRT) on erectile function in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PC) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods Eligible patients had evidence of biochemical failure after RP and a PSA at randomization of ≤ 2 ng/ml. Erectile dysfunction (ED) was investigated as secondary endpoint within the multicentre randomized trial (February 2011 to April 2014) in patients receiving either 64 Gy or 70 Gy sRT. ED and quality of life (QoL) were assessed using CTCAE v4.0 and the EORTC QoL questionnaires C30 and PR25 at baseline and up to 5 years after sRT. Results 344 patients were evaluable. After RP 197 (57.3 %) patients had G0-2 ED while G3 ED was recorded in 147 (42.7 %) patients. Subsequently, sexual activity and functioning was impaired. 5 years after sRT, 101 (29.4 %) patients noted G0-2 ED. During follow-up, 44.2 % of patients with baseline G3 ED showed any improvement and 61.4 % of patients with baseline G0-2 ED showed worsening. Shorter time interval between RP and start of sRT (p = 0.007) and older age at randomization (p = 0.005) were significant predictors to more baseline ED and low sexual activity in the long-term. Age (p = 0.010) and RT technique (p = 0.031) had a significant impact on occurrence of long-term ED grade 3 and worse sexual functioning. During follow-up, no differences were found in erectile function, sexual activity, and sexual functioning between the 64 Gy and 70 Gy arm. Conclusion ED after RP is a known long-term side effect with significant impact on patients' QoL. ED was further affected by sRT, but dose intensification of sRT showed no significant impact on erectile function recovery or prevalence of de novo ED after sRT. Age, tumor stage, prostatectomy and RT-techniques, nerve-sparing and observation time were associated with long-term erectile function outcome.ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01272050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa Holer
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Competence Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Bernhard
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Corinne Schär
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Competence Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Competence Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Piet Ost
- Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | - Marcus Beck
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - George N. Thalmann
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and Bern University, Bern, Switzerland
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ost P, Siva S, Brabrand S, Dirix P, Liefhooghe N, Otte FX, Gomez-Iturriaga A, Everaerts W, Shelan M, Conde-Moreno A, López Campos F, Papachristofilou A, Guckenberger M, Scorsetti M, Zapatero A, Villafranca Iturre AE, Eito C, Couñago F, Muto P, Van De Voorde L, Mach N, Bultijnck R, Fonteyne V, Moon D, Thon K, Mercier C, Achard V, Stellamans K, Goetghebeur E, Reynders D, Zilli T. PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:462-468. [PMID: 37821242 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment recommendations for patients with limited nodal recurrences are lacking, and different locoregional treatment approaches are currently being used. OBJECTIVE The aim of this trial is to compare metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) with or without elective nodal pelvic radiotherapy (ENRT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of OligoRecurrent nodal prostate cancer Metastases (STORM) is an international, phase 2, open-label, randomized, superiority trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569241). Patients diagnosed with positron emission tomography-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (five or fewer nodes) following radical local treatment for prostate cancer were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between arm A (MDT and 6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) and arm B (ENRT [25 × 1.8 Gy] with MDT and 6 mo of ADT). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We report the secondary endpoint acute toxicity, defined as worst grade ≥2 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity within 3 mo of treatment. The chi-square test was used to compare toxicity between treatment arms. We also compare the quality of life (QoL) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30 and PR25 questionnaires. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Between June 2018 and April 2021, 196 patients were assigned randomly to MDT or ENRT. Ninety-seven of 99 patients allocated to MDT and 93 of 97 allocated to ENRT received per-protocol treatment. Worst acute GI toxicity proportions were as follows: grade ≥2 events in three (3%) in the MDT group versus four (4%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.11). Worst acute GU toxicity proportions were as follows: grade ≥2 events in eight (8%) in the MDT group versus 12 (13%) in the ENRT group (p = 0.95). We observed no significant difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients with a clinically significant QoL reduction from baseline for any subdomain score area. CONCLUSIONS No clinically meaningful differences were observed in worst grade ≥2 acute GI or GU toxicity or in QoL subdomains between MDT and ENRT. PATIENT SUMMARY We found no evidence of differential acute bowel or urinary side effects using metastasis-directed therapy and elective nodal radiotherapy for the treatment of patients with a pelvic lymph node recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Iridium Netwerk, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Shankar Siva
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; ICON Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Piet Dirix
- Iridium Netwerk, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Wouter Everaerts
- LICR, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Clara Eito
- Instituto Oncólogico Clinica Universitaria IMQ, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- University Hospital Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Muto
- Napoli Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Nicolas Mach
- Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Renée Bultijnck
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Daniel Moon
- Royal Melbourne Clinical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kristian Thon
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; ICON Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Vérane Achard
- Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Els Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dries Reynders
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Christ SM, Alongi F, Ricardi U, Scorsetti M, Livi L, Balermpas P, Lievens Y, Braam P, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Stellamans K, Ratosa I, Widder J, Peulen H, Dirix P, Bral S, Ramella S, Hemmatazad H, Khanfir K, Geets X, Jeene P, Zilli T, Fournier B, Ivaldi GB, Clementel E, Fortpied C, Oppong FB, Ost P, Guckenberger M. Cancer-specific dose and fractionation schedules in stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease: An interim analysis of the EORTC-ESTRO E 2-RADIatE OligoCare study. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110235. [PMID: 38508239 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION Optimal dose and fractionation in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic cancer patients remain unknown. In this interim analysis of OligoCare, we analyzed factors associated with SBRT dose and fractionation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Analysis was based on the first 1,099 registered patients. SBRT doses were converted to biological effective doses (BED) using α/β of 10 Gy for all primaries, and cancer-specific α/β of 10 Gy for non-small cell lung and colorectal cancer (NSCLC, CRC), 2.5 Gy for breast cancer (BC), or 1.5 Gy for prostate cancer (PC). RESULTS Of the interim analysis population of 1,099 patients, 999 (99.5 %) fulfilled inclusion criteria and received metastasis-directed SBRT for NSCLC (n = 195; 19.5 %), BC (n = 163; 16.3 %), CRC (n = 184; 18.4 %), or PC (n = 457; 47.5 %). Two thirds of patients were treated for single metastasis. Median number of fractions was 5 (IQR, 3-5) and median dose per fraction was 9.7 (IQR, 7.7-12.4) Gy. The most frequently treated sites were non-vertebral bone (22.8 %), lung (21.0 %), and distant lymph node metastases (19.0 %). On multivariate analysis, the dose varied significantly for primary cancer type (BC: 237.3 Gy BED, PC 300.6 Gy BED, and CRC 84.3 Gy BED), and metastatic sites, with higher doses for lung and liver lesions. CONCLUSION This real-world analysis suggests that SBRT doses are adjusted to the primary cancers and oligometastasis location. Future analysis will address safety and efficacy of this site- and disease-adapted SBRT fractionation approach (NCT03818503).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian M Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Filippo Alongi
- IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Negrar-Verona, Italy & University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Radiation Oncology, Florence, Italy
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pètra Braam
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia & Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Heike Peulen
- Catharina Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Piet Dirix
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Samuel Bral
- Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Radiation Oncology, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Sara Ramella
- Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico-Oncology Center, Radiation Oncology, Roma, Italy
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kaouthar Khanfir
- Hopital de Sion, Hopital du Valais, Radiation Oncology, Sion, and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Xavier Geets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, MIRO-IREC Lab UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paul Jeene
- Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG), Radiation Oncology, Geneva, Switzerland; Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Radiation Oncology, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Fournier
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Enrico Clementel
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Felix Boakye Oppong
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Corrao G, Andratschke N, Balagamwala EH, Bedke J, Blanck O, Capitanio U, Correa RJM, De Meerleer G, Franzese C, Gaeta A, Gandini S, Garibaldi C, Gerszten PC, Gillessen S, Grubb WR, Guckenberger M, Hannan R, Jhaveri PM, Josipovic M, Kerkmeijer LGW, Lehrer EJ, Lindskog M, Louie AV, Nguyen QN, Ost P, Palma DA, Procopio G, Rossi M, Staehler M, Tree AC, Tsang YM, Van As N, Zaorsky NG, Zilli T, Pasquier D, Siva S. Delphi consensus on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma-a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology study endorsed by the European Association of Urology. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e193-e204. [PMID: 38697165 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00023-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
The purpose of this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) project, endorsed by the European Association of Urology, is to explore expert opinion on the management of patients with oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma by means of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on extracranial metastases, with the aim of developing consensus recommendations for patient selection, treatment doses, and concurrent systemic therapy. A questionnaire on SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma was prepared by a core group and reviewed by a panel of ten prominent experts in the field. The Delphi consensus methodology was applied, sending three rounds of questionnaires to clinicians identified as key opinion leaders in the field. At the end of the third round, participants were able to find consensus on eight of the 37 questions. Specifically, panellists agreed to apply no restrictions regarding age (25 [100%) of 25) and primary renal cell carcinoma histology (23 [92%] of 25) for SABR candidates, on the upper threshold of three lesions to offer ablative treatment in patients with oligoprogression, and on the concomitant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor. SABR was indicated as the treatment modality of choice for renal cell carcinoma bone oligometatasis (20 [80%] of 25) and for adrenal oligometastases 22 (88%). No consensus or major agreement was reached regarding the appropriate schedule, but the majority of the poll (54%-58%) retained the every-other-day schedule as the optimal choice for all the investigated sites. The current ESTRO Delphi consensus might provide useful direction for the application of SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma and highlight the key areas of ongoing debate, perhaps directing future research efforts to close knowledge gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ehsan H Balagamwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology and Transplantation surgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Aurora Gaeta
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Garibaldi
- Unit of Radiation Research, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter C Gerszten
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - William R Grubb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Pavan M Jhaveri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Magnus Lindskog
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Section of Genitourinary Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium and Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - David A Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Dipartimento Di Oncologia Medica, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maddalena Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Staehler
- Interdisciplinary Centre on Renal Tumours, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Urology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Yat Man Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Van As
- Department of Urology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre O Lambret, Lille, France; University of Lille, Centrale Lille, CNRS, UMR 9189-CRIStAL, Lille, France
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ost P, Siva S, Zilli T. OLIGOPELVIS and the "All You Can Eat" Strategy for Oligorecurrent Nodal Prostate Cancer: Are We Already Full? Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02307-8. [PMID: 38679526 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deek MP, Sutera P, Jing Y, Gao R, Rothman E, Day H, Chang D, Dirix P, Armstrong AJ, Campbell B, Campos FL, Berenguer M, Ramotar M, Conde-Moreno A, Berlin A, Bosetti DG, Corcoran N, Koontz B, Mercier C, Siva S, Pryor D, Ost P, Huynh MA, Kroeze S, Stish B, Kiess A, Trock B, Tran PT, Gillessen S, Sweeney C. Multi-institutional Analysis of Metastasis-directed Therapy with or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Oligometastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00086-5. [PMID: 38570239 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is increasingly being used in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). However, it is currently unclear how to optimally integrate MDT with the standard of care of systemic hormonal therapy. OBJECTIVE To report long-term outcomes of MDT alone versus MDT and a defined course of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in omCSPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Here, a multicenter, international retrospective cohort of omCSPC as defined by conventional imaging was reported. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), distant progression-free survival (dPFS), and combined biochemical or distant progression-free survival (cPFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 263 patients were included, 105 with MDT + ADT and 158 with MDT alone. The majority of patients had metachronous disease (90.5%). Five-year bPFS, dPFS, and cPFS were, respectively, 24%, 41%, and 19% in patients treated with MDT + ADT and 11% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.64), 29% (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.78), and 9% (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.67) in patients treated with MDT alone. On a multivariable analysis adjusting for pretreatment variables, the use of ADT was associated with improved bPFS (HR 0.43, p < 0.001), dPFS (HR 0.45, p = 0.002), and cPFS (HR 0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this large multi-institutional report, the addition of concurrent ADT to MDT appears to improve time to prostate-specific antigen progression and distant recurrence, noting that about 10% patients had durable control with MDT alone. Ongoing phase 3 studies will help further define treatment options for omCSPC. PATIENT SUMMARY Here, we report a large retrospective review evaluating the outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy with or without a limited course of androgen deprivation for patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. This international multi-institutional review demonstrates that the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) improves progression-free survival. While a proportion of patients appear to have long-term disease control with MDT alone, further work in biomarker discovery is required to better identify which patients would be appropriate for de-escalated therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Philip Sutera
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yuezhou Jing
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute of Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Emily Rothman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heather Day
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Australian Prostate Cancer Research Center, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, GasthuisZusters Antwerp (GZA) 'Sisters of the Hospital', Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bethany Campbell
- Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Miguel Berenguer
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Matthew Ramotar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antonio Conde-Moreno
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Davide Giovanni Bosetti
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Niall Corcoran
- Urology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Carole Mercier
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, GasthuisZusters Antwerp (GZA) 'Sisters of the Hospital', Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Pryor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Australian Prostate Cancer Research Center, Queensland, Australia
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mai Anh Huynh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephanie Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bradley Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ana Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bruce Trock
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute of Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fonteyne V, Berghen C, Van Praet C, Vanderstraeten B, Verbeke S, Villeirs G, Colman R, Vanneste B, Ost P, De Meerleer G, Lumen N. Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 3-year toxicity results of a multicentre randomized phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Radiother Oncol 2024; 193:110089. [PMID: 38278333 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is a standard treatment for prostate cancer patients. We compared 2 moderate HFRT regimens, with a biologically equivalent dose of 80 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, with a modest simultaneous integrated boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized phase 3 trial with acute toxicity as the primary endpoint, comparing: 56 Gy in 4 weeks (16x3.5 Gy, 4 days/week, Arm A) with 67 Gy in 5 weeks (25x2.68 Gy, 5 days/week, Arm B). The H0 hypothesis is that both regimens are equivalent in terms of acute grade ≥ 2 gastro-intestinal toxicity, defined as a difference in acute grade ≥ 2 gastro-intestinal toxicity of ≤ 10 %. Here we report on acute and late toxicity. RESULTS We included 170 patients in Arm A and 172 patients in Arm B. The median follow-up time for all patients was 42 months. Acute grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity was reported by 24 % of patients in both groups. Acute grade 2 and 3 urinary toxicity was observed in 52 % and 9 % of patients in Arm A and 53 % and 7 % in Arm B. Late grade 2 and grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 19 % and 4 % of patients in Arm A compared with 15 % and 4 % in Arm B. Late grade 2 and grade ≥ 3 urinary toxicity was observed in 37 % and 10 % of patients in Arm A and 36 % and 6 % in Arm B. CONCLUSION This analysis confirms that both HFRT regimens are safe and equivalent in terms of acute grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - C Berghen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, Louvain, Belgium
| | - C Van Praet
- Department of Urology, ERN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - B Vanderstraeten
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - G Villeirs
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - R Colman
- Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - B Vanneste
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - P Ost
- Department Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - G De Meerleer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, Louvain, Belgium
| | - N Lumen
- Department of Urology, ERN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mercier C, Billiet C, Ost P, Joye I, Meijnders P, Vermeulen P, Dirix L, Verellen D, Dirix P. Long-Term Results of a Phase 1 Dose Escalation Trial of Ablative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1490-1496. [PMID: 38151189 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used for oligometastatic disease as well as palliation, but treatment protocols for nonspine bone and nodal metastases are lacking, with a wide variety of schedules applied. METHODS AND MATERIALS A prospective dose-escalation trial was initiated, involving 90 patients, among whom 52 (58%) had primary prostate tumors, 13 had breast tumors (14%), and 25 (28%) had other primary tumor types. All visible lymph node or nonspine bone oligometastases were treated in 3 consecutive cohorts: 5 × 7.0 Gy, 3 × 10.0 Gy, or 1 × 20.0 Gy. RESULTS Initial results revealed no dose-limiting toxicity after a median follow-up of 17.2 months. This update provides information on long-term toxicity, local failure (LF), and progression-free survival (PFS). After a median follow-up of 50 months, no new safety signals were observed. Grade 2 toxicity was 13%, 7% and 10% in the respective cohorts (P = .9), without grade 3 to 5 toxicities. LF rates were 9%, 3%, and 6% (P = .5) for the respective treatment groups, with an overall cumulative risk of LF of 7% (95% CI, 2-12) at 4 years. Median PFS was 16.5 months (95% CI, 9.8-21.5), and 4-year PFS was 21% (95% CI, 14-32). Median overall survival across groups was not reached (95% CI, 52.8 - not reached), 4-year OS was 68% (95% CI, 59-78). A subset of patients (23%) remained long-term disease-free, 37% had oligoprogressive disease at first recurrence and 40% developed polymetastatic relapse. CONCLUSIONS The safe and effective use of dose-escalated single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy for bone and lymph node metastases is supported by this trial, especially considering patient-convenience and cost-effectiveness. Caution is needed when generalizing these outcomes beyond breast and prostate cancer, given their underrepresentation in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Mercier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Charlotte Billiet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ines Joye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul Meijnders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Vermeulen
- Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Luc Dirix
- Department of Medical Oncology, GZA Hospitals, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium; Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bultijnck R, Van Hemelrijck M, Fonteyne V, Livi L, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Hemmatazad H, Mayinger M, Peulen H, Verbeke L, Ramella S, Castro P, Tsoutsou P, Stellamans K, Shaukat A, Orazem M, Jeene P, Braam P, Verkooijen H, Simek IM, Alongi F, Clementel E, Fortpied C, Machingura A, Boakye Oppong F, Guckenberger M, Ost P. Health-related quality of life in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer following metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy: Real-world data from the E 2-RADIatE OligoCare cohort. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100715. [PMID: 38274388 PMCID: PMC10808936 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) using real-world data from the OligoCare cohort. Materials and methods OligoCare is a pragmatic, observational cohort designed to assess the impact of metastases-directed SBRT on patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD). We report an interim analyses of the secondary endpoint HRQoL, assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, within six months of metastases-directed SBRT for oligometastatic disease in men with PCa among the first 1600 registered patients. HRQoL data collection was optional within the OligoCare cohort. To compare HRQoL between baseline and first follow-up assessment, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used. A multiple linear regression model was used to explore the HRQoL associations with predefined factors. Results Out of the 1600 registered patients, 658 were treated for oligometastatic PCa, of which 233 had baseline QoL data and 132 patients had both baseline and follow-up HRQoL data. At baseline, most patients had a WHO performance status of 0 or 1 (87 %), were de-novo oligometastatic (79 %), had one metastasis (90 %), and had a good overall global health status (mean 80.81, SD16.11, IQR 75-92). 51 % received hormonal therapy as concomitant systemic treatment. Patients with comorbidities as assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity index had a worse global health status at baseline (-4.88, 95 % CI:-9.35, -0.42). No clinically meaningful significant difference in global health status was observed at first assessment following SBRT (median 3.0 months) compared with baseline (mean difference 2.27, 95 % CI:-1.54, 6.08). Upon evaluating the proportions, meaningful clinically important differences (a 10-point or more difference) was observed in, 17 % and 11 % of the patients reporting deterioration and improvement of global health status, respectively. Conclusion Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy had no negative impact on global HRQoL within the first six months after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Bultijnck
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences M Serio, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Dept. of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Heike Peulen
- Catharina Ziekenhuis, Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Luc Verbeke
- Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Radiation Oncology, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Sara Ramella
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Pablo Castro
- Health Research Institute Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
| | - Pelagia Tsoutsou
- Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève - HUG - site de Cluse-Roseraie, Genève, Switzerland
| | | | - Adnan Shaukat
- NHS Grampian - Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Miha Orazem
- Institute of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Paul Jeene
- Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Pètra Braam
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Inga-Malin Simek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Filippo Alongi
- IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital & University of Brescia, Radiation Oncology, Verona, Italy
| | - Enrico Clementel
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Abigirl Machingura
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Felix Boakye Oppong
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zilli T, Ost P. Reply to Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Barletta, and Alberto Briganti's Letter to the Editor re: Piet Ost, Shankar Siva, Sugmund Brabrand, et al. PEACE V-Salvage Treatment of Oligorecurrent Nodal Prostate Cancer Metastases (STORM): Acute Toxicity of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.007. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00045-2. [PMID: 38418267 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Iridium Netwerk, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bindels BJJ, Mercier C, Gal R, Verlaan JJ, Verhoeff JJC, Dirix P, Ost P, Kasperts N, van der Linden YM, Verkooijen HM, van der Velden JM. Stereotactic Body and Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2355409. [PMID: 38345820 PMCID: PMC10862159 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are commonly used treatment options for relieving metastatic bone pain. The effectiveness of SBRT compared with cEBRT in pain relief has been a subject of debate, and conflicting results have been reported. Objective To compare the effectiveness associated with SBRT vs cEBRT for relieving metastatic bone pain. Data Sources A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on June 5, 2023. Additionally, results were added from a new randomized clinical trial (RCT) and additional unpublished data from an already published RCT. Study Selection Comparative studies reporting pain response after SBRT vs cEBRT in patients with painful bone metastases. Data Extraction and Synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies. Data were extracted for the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall and complete pain response at 1, 3, and 6 months after radiotherapy, according to the study's definition. Relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for each study. A random-effects model using a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was applied for meta-analysis. Results There were 18 studies with 1685 patients included in the systematic review and 8 RCTs with 1090 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 7 RCTs, overall pain response was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints in clinical trials (ICPRE). The complete pain response was reported in 6 RCTs, all defined according to the ICPRE. The ITT meta-analyses showed that the overall pain response rates did not differ between cEBRT and SBRT at 1 (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99-1.30), 3 (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.47), or 6 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.96-1.54) months. However, SBRT was associated with a higher complete pain response at 1 (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01), 3 (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.78), and 6 (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-4.91) months after radiotherapy. The PP meta-analyses showed comparable results. Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with painful bone metastases experienced similar overall pain response after SBRT compared with cEBRT. More patients had complete pain alleviation after SBRT, suggesting that selected subgroups will benefit from SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas J. J. Bindels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carole Mercier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Gal
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J. C. Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Integrated Personalised and Precision Oncology Network, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerpen, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicolien Kasperts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvette M. van der Linden
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Centre of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miszczyk M, Rajwa P, Yanagisawa T, Nowicka Z, Shim SR, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, von Deimling M, Pradere B, Rivas JG, Gandaglia G, van den Bergh RCN, Goldner G, Supiot S, Zilli T, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL, Briganti A, Ost P, Ploussard G, Shariat SF. The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Eur Urol 2024; 85:125-138. [PMID: 37945451 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well-designed prospective studies. OBJECTIVE To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33-52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94-98%), 55% (95% CI: 44-65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95-98%), respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade 2 and ≥3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2-7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain. PATIENT SUMMARY Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Zuzanna Nowicka
- Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gregor Goldner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephane Supiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICO René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI-EOC), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sanmamed N, Gómez-Rivas J, Buchser D, Montijano M, Gómez-Aparicio MA, Duque-Santana V, Torres L, Zilli T, Ost P, Maldonado A, López-Campos F, Couñago F. Docetaxel Provides Oncological Benefits in the Era of New-Generation Androgen Receptor Inhibitors - or Is Three a Crowd? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:56-66. [PMID: 37599133 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, several systemic therapies have been introduced for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with docetaxel (Doc) and/or new-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI). Trials evaluating ADT + ARSI have consistently demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit for doublet therapy over ADT alone. Similarly, the STOPCaP meta-analysis showed an OS benefit in favor of ADT + Doc versus ADT alone. ARSI, Doc, and ADT have different antitumor mechanisms, thus potentiating the effect of combination therapy. Two randomized trials showed that the addition of ARSI to ADT + Doc improves OS, especially for synchronous high-volume disease. However, the real question about triplet therapy remains unanswered: whether combining Doc with ARSI improves outcomes compared to ADT + ARSI. As there are no head-to-head comparisons, this narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding triplet therapy versus doublet therapy including ADT+ ARSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelia Sanmamed
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Gómez-Rivas
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitario Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Buchser
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Miguel Montijano
- Radiation Oncology Department, Genesis Care Hospital San Francisco de Asís and Hospital la Milagrosa, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Lisselott Torres
- Radiation Oncology Department, Genesis Care Hospital San Francisco de Asís and Hospital la Milagrosa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology Department, Southern Institute of Swiss Oncology, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Spain
| | - Antonio Maldonado
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Department, University Hospital Quironsalud Madrid/University Hospital La Luz. Grupo Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Felipe Couñago
- Radiation Oncology Department, Genesis Care Hospital San Francisco de Asís and Hospital la Milagrosa, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peters C, Vandewiele J, Lievens Y, van Eijkeren M, Fonteyne V, Boterberg T, Deseyne P, Veldeman L, De Neve W, Monten C, Braems S, Duprez F, Vandecasteele K, Ost P. Incidence and radiotherapy treatment patterns of complicated bone metastases. J Bone Oncol 2024; 44:100519. [PMID: 38179260 PMCID: PMC10765249 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the encouraging results of the SCORAD trial, single fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) remains underused for patients with complicated bone metastases with rates as low as 18-39%. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and treatment patterns of these metastases in patients being referred to a tertiary centre for palliative radiotherapy. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective review of all bone metastases treated at our centre from January 2013 until December 2017. Lesions were classified as uncomplicated or complicated. Complicated was defined as associated with (impending) fracture, existing spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Our protocol suggests using SFRT for all patients with complicated bone metastases, except for those with symptomatic neuraxial compression and a life expectancy of ≥28 weeks. Results Overall, 37 % of all bone metastases were classified as complicated. Most often as a result of an (impending) fracture (56 %) or spinal cord compression (44 %). In 93 % of cases, complicated lesions were located in the spine, most commonly originating from prostate, breast and lung cancer (60 %). Median survival of patients with complicated bone metastases was 4 months. The use of SFRT for complicated bone metastases increased from 51 % to 85 % over the study period, reaching 100 % for patients with the poorest prognosis. Conclusions Approximately 37 % of bone metastases are classified as complicated with the majority related to (impending) fracture. Patients with complicated bone metastases have a median survival of 4 months and were mostly treated with SFRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cedric Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Julie Vandewiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marc van Eijkeren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter Deseyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Chris Monten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sabine Braems
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fréderic Duprez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tombal BF, Gomez-Veiga F, Gomez-Ferrer A, López-Campos F, Ost P, Roumeguere TA, Herrera-Imbroda B, D'Hondt LA, Quivrin M, Gontero P, Villà S, Khaled H, Fournier B, Musoro J, Krzystyniak J, Pretzenbacher Y, Loriot Y. A Phase 2 Randomized Open-label Study of Oral Darolutamide Monotherapy Versus Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men with Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer (EORTC-GUCG 1532). Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00034-8. [PMID: 38272747 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Darolutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor that increases overall survival in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa). This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of darolutamide as monotherapy without ADT in patients with eugonadal testosterone levels. METHODS This was a 24-wk, open-label, randomized study of patients with hormone-sensitive, histologically confirmed PCa requiring gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH); an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0/1; and life expectancy >1 yr. All patients received darolutamide 600 mg bid or a commercially available GnRH analog. The primary endpoint is a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, defined as a ≥80% decline at week 24 relative to baseline in the darolutamide study arm. The GnRH arm is used as an internal control. The secondary endpoints included changes in T levels, safety/tolerability, and quality of life. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Among 61 men enrolled, the median (range) age was 72 yr (53-86 yr); 42.6% of them had metastases. In the darolutamide arm, the evaluable population with available PSA values at baseline and week 24 consisted of 23 patients. Twenty-three (100%) evaluable darolutamide patients achieved a PSA decline of >80% at week 24 (primary endpoint), with a median (range) decrease of -99.1% (-91.9%, -100%). Serum T levels increased by a median (range) of 44.3 (5.7-144.0) at week 24, compared with baseline. In the darolutamide arm, 48.4% of men reported drug-related adverse events (AEs; mostly grade 1 or 2). The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs included gynecomastia (35.5%), fatigue (12.9%), hot flush (12.9%), and hypertension (12.9%). Health-related quality of life measures are descriptive, and GnRH arm results will be presented as an internal reference. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Darolutamide monotherapy was associated with a significant PSA response in nearly all men with hormone-naïve PCa. Testosterone-level changes and most common AEs (gynecomastia, fatigue, hypertension, and hot flush) were consistent with potent androgen receptor inhibition. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we report the first use of darolutamide, a novel antiandrogen, as monotherapy without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The study shows that darolutamide induce a profound suppression of prostate-specific antigen in all patients, with a safety profile different from that of ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand F Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | - Piet Ost
- Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thierry Andre Roumeguere
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles Erasme Hospital, ULB, Anderlecht, Belgium
| | | | | | - Magali Quivrin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Anticancer Center, Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Clinica Urologica, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Salvador Villà
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Badalona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yohann Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Warner EW, Van der Eecken K, Murtha AJ, Kwan EM, Herberts C, Sipola J, Ng SWS, Chen XE, Fonseca NM, Ritch E, Schönlau E, Bernales CQ, Donnellan G, Munzur AD, Parekh K, Beja K, Wong A, Verbeke S, Lumen N, Van Dorpe J, De Laere B, Annala M, Vandekerkhove G, Ost P, Wyatt AW. Multiregion sampling of de novo metastatic prostate cancer reveals complex polyclonality and augments clinical genotyping. Nat Cancer 2024; 5:114-130. [PMID: 38177459 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00692-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
De novo metastatic prostate cancer is highly aggressive, but the paucity of routinely collected tissue has hindered genomic stratification and precision oncology. Here, we leveraged a rare study of surgical intervention in 43 de novo metastatic prostate cancers to assess somatic genotypes across 607 synchronous primary and metastatic tissue regions plus circulating tumor DNA. Intra-prostate heterogeneity was pervasive and impacted clinically relevant genes, resulting in discordant genotypes between select primary restricted regions and synchronous metastases. Additional complexity was driven by polyclonal metastatic seeding from phylogenetically related primary populations. When simulating clinical practice relying on a single tissue region, genomic heterogeneity plus variable tumor fraction across samples caused inaccurate genotyping of dominant disease; however, pooling extracted DNA from multiple biopsy cores before sequencing can rescue misassigned somatic genotypes. Our results define the relationship between synchronous treatment-sensitive primary and metastatic lesions in men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer and provide a framework for implementing genomics-guided patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan W Warner
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kim Van der Eecken
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Andrew J Murtha
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cameron Herberts
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joonatan Sipola
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sarah W S Ng
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Xinyi E Chen
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicolette M Fonseca
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elie Ritch
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elena Schönlau
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cecily Q Bernales
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gráinne Donnellan
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Aslı D Munzur
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Karan Parekh
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Beja
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amanda Wong
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sofie Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bram De Laere
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matti Annala
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Prostate Cancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tays Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland
| | - Gillian Vandekerkhove
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hoang T, Sutera P, Nguyen T, Chang J, Jagtap S, Song Y, Shetty AC, Chowdhury DD, Chan A, Carrieri FA, Hathout L, Ennis R, Jabbour SK, Parikh R, Molitoris J, Song DY, DeWeese T, Marchionni L, Ren L, Sawant A, Simone N, Lafargue A, Van Der Eecken K, Bunz F, Ost P, Tran PT, Deek MP. TP53 structure-function relationships in metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer and the impact of APR-246 treatment. Prostate 2024; 84:87-99. [PMID: 37812042 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite well-informed work in several malignancies, the phenotypic effects of TP53 mutations in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) progression and metastasis are not clear. We characterized the structure-function and clinical impact of TP53 mutations in mCSPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed an international retrospective review of men with mCSPC who underwent next-generation sequencing and were stratified according to TP53 mutational status and metastatic burden. Clinical outcomes included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression. We also utilized isogenic cancer cell lines to assess the effect of TP53 mutations and APR-246 treatment on migration, invasion, colony formation in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo. Preclinical experimental observations were compared using t-tests and ANOVA. RESULTS Dominant-negative (DN) TP53 mutations were enriched in patients with synchronous (vs. metachronous) (20.7% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01) and polymetastatic (vs. oligometastatic) (14.4% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.01) disease. On multivariable analysis, DN mutations were associated with worse rPFS (hazards ratio [HR] = 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-2.98) and overall survival [OS] (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.14-3.68) compared to TP53 wild type (WT). In vitro, 22Rv1 TP53 R175H cells possessed stronger migration, invasion, colony formation ability, and cellular movement pathway enrichment in RNA sequencing analysis compared to 22Rv1 TP53 WT cells. Treatment with APR-246 reversed the effects of TP53 mutations in vitro and inhibited 22Rv1 TP53 R175H tumor growth in vivo in a dosage-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS DN TP53 mutations correlated with worse prognosis in prostate cancer patients and higher metastatic potential, which could be counteracted by APR-246 treatment suggesting a potential future therapeutic avenue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tung Hoang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Philip Sutera
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Triet Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jinhee Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Shreya Jagtap
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yang Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amol C Shetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dipanwita D Chowdhury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Aaron Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Francesca A Carrieri
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lara Hathout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ronald Ennis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Rahul Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jason Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Theodore DeWeese
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Lei Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amit Sawant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicole Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Audrey Lafargue
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kim Van Der Eecken
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fred Bunz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Urology, James Buchanan Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Danckaert W, Spaas M, Sundahl N, De Bruycker A, Fonteyne V, De Paepe E, De Wagter C, Vanhaecke L, Ost P. Microbiome and metabolome dynamics during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2023; 189:109950. [PMID: 37827280 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy are susceptible to acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity due to substantial overlap of the intestines with the radiation volume. Due to their intimate relationship with GI toxicity, faecal microbiome and metabolome dynamics during radiotherapy were investigated. MATERIAL & METHODS This prospective study included 50 prostate cancer patients treated with prostate (bed) only radiotherapy (PBRT) (n = 28) or whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT) (n = 22) (NCT04638049). Longitudinal sampling was performed prior to radiotherapy, after 10 fractions, near the end of radiotherapy and at follow-up. Patient symptoms were dichotomized into a single toxicity score. Microbiome and metabolome fingerprints were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography hybrid high-resolution mass spectrometry, respectively. RESULTS The individual α-diversity did not significantly change over time. Microbiota composition (β-diversity) changed significantly over treatment (PERMANOVA p-value = 0.03), but there was no significant difference in stability when comparing PBRT versus WPRT. Levels of various metabolites were significantly altered during radiotherapy. Baseline α-diversity was not associated with any toxicity outcome. Based on the metabolic fingerprint, no natural clustering according to toxicity profile could be achieved. CONCLUSIONS Radiation dose and treatment volume demonstrated limited effects on microbiome and metabolome fingerprints. In addition, no distinctive signature for toxicity status could be established. There is an ongoing need for toxicity risk stratification tools for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, but the current evidence implies that the translation of metabolic and microbial biomarkers into routine clinical practice remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willeke Danckaert
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Mathieu Spaas
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nora Sundahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Aurélie De Bruycker
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ellen De Paepe
- Laboratory of Integrative Metabolomics (LIMET), Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Carlos De Wagter
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lynn Vanhaecke
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium; Laboratory of Integrative Metabolomics (LIMET), Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, BT7 1NN Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang A, Shen J, Rodriguez AA, Saunders EJ, Chen F, Janivara R, Darst BF, Sheng X, Xu Y, Chou AJ, Benlloch S, Dadaev T, Brook MN, Plym A, Sahimi A, Hoffman TJ, Takahashi A, Matsuda K, Momozawa Y, Fujita M, Laisk T, Figuerêdo J, Muir K, Ito S, Liu X, Uchio Y, Kubo M, Kamatani Y, Lophatananon A, Wan P, Andrews C, Lori A, Choudhury PP, Schleutker J, Tammela TL, Sipeky C, Auvinen A, Giles GG, Southey MC, MacInnis RJ, Cybulski C, Wokolorczyk D, Lubinski J, Rentsch CT, Cho K, Mcmahon BH, Neal DE, Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Martin RM, Nordestgaard BG, Nielsen SF, Weischer M, Bojesen SE, Røder A, Stroomberg HV, Batra J, Chambers S, Horvath L, Clements JA, Tilly W, Risbridger GP, Gronberg H, Aly M, Szulkin R, Eklund M, Nordstrom T, Pashayan N, Dunning AM, Ghoussaini M, Travis RC, Key TJ, Riboli E, Park JY, Sellers TA, Lin HY, Albanes D, Weinstein S, Cook MB, Mucci LA, Giovannucci E, Lindstrom S, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Penney KL, Turman C, Tangen CM, Goodman PJ, Thompson IM, Hamilton RJ, Fleshner NE, Finelli A, Parent MÉ, Stanford JL, Ostrander EA, Koutros S, Beane Freeman LE, Stampfer M, Wolk A, Håkansson N, Andriole GL, Hoover RN, Machiela MJ, Sørensen KD, Borre M, Blot WJ, Zheng W, Yeboah ED, Mensah JE, Lu YJ, Zhang HW, Feng N, Mao X, Wu Y, Zhao SC, Sun Z, Thibodeau SN, McDonnell SK, Schaid DJ, West CM, Barnett G, Maier C, Schnoeller T, Luedeke M, Kibel AS, Drake BF, Cussenot O, Cancel-Tassin G, Menegaux F, Truong T, Koudou YA, John EM, Grindedal EM, Maehle L, Khaw KT, Ingles SA, Stern MC, Vega A, Gómez-Caamaño A, Fachal L, Rosenstein BS, Kerns SL, Ostrer H, Teixeira MR, Paulo P, Brandão A, Watya S, Lubwama A, Bensen JT, Butler EN, Mohler JL, Taylor JA, Kogevinas M, Dierssen-Sotos T, Castaño-Vinyals G, Cannon-Albright L, Teerlink CC, Huff CD, Pilie P, Yu Y, Bohlender RJ, Gu J, Strom SS, Multigner L, Blanchet P, Brureau L, Kaneva R, Slavov C, Mitev V, Leach RJ, Brenner H, Chen X, Holleczek B, Schöttker B, Klein EA, Hsing AW, Kittles RA, Murphy AB, Logothetis CJ, Kim J, Neuhausen SL, Steele L, Ding YC, Isaacs WB, Nemesure B, Hennis AJ, Carpten J, Pandha H, Michael A, Ruyck KD, Meerleer GD, Ost P, Xu J, Razack A, Lim J, Teo SH, Newcomb LF, Lin DW, Fowke JH, Neslund-Dudas CM, Rybicki BA, Gamulin M, Lessel D, Kulis T, Usmani N, Abraham A, Singhal S, Parliament M, Claessens F, Joniau S, den Broeck TV, Gago-Dominguez M, Castelao JE, Martinez ME, Larkin S, Townsend PA, Aukim-Hastie C, Bush WS, Aldrich MC, Crawford DC, Srivastava S, Cullen J, Petrovics G, Casey G, Wang Y, Tettey Y, Lachance J, Tang W, Biritwum RB, Adjei AA, Tay E, Truelove A, Niwa S, Yamoah K, Govindasami K, Chokkalingam AP, Keaton JM, Hellwege JN, Clark PE, Jalloh M, Gueye SM, Niang L, Ogunbiyi O, Shittu O, Amodu O, Adebiyi AO, Aisuodionoe-Shadrach OI, Ajibola HO, Jamda MA, Oluwole OP, Nwegbu M, Adusei B, Mante S, Darkwa-Abrahams A, Diop H, Gundell SM, Roobol MJ, Jenster G, van Schaik RH, Hu JJ, Sanderson M, Kachuri L, Varma R, McKean-Cowdin R, Torres M, Preuss MH, Loos RJ, Zawistowski M, Zöllner S, Lu Z, Van Den Eeden SK, Easton DF, Ambs S, Edwards TL, Mägi R, Rebbeck TR, Fritsche L, Chanock SJ, Berndt SI, Wiklund F, Nakagawa H, Witte JS, Gaziano JM, Justice AC, Mancuso N, Terao C, Eeles RA, Kote-Jarai Z, Madduri RK, Conti DV, Haiman CA. Characterizing prostate cancer risk through multi-ancestry genome-wide discovery of 187 novel risk variants. Nat Genet 2023; 55:2065-2074. [PMID: 37945903 PMCID: PMC10841479 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-023-01534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
The transferability and clinical value of genetic risk scores (GRSs) across populations remain limited due to an imbalance in genetic studies across ancestrally diverse populations. Here we conducted a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of 156,319 prostate cancer cases and 788,443 controls of European, African, Asian and Hispanic men, reflecting a 57% increase in the number of non-European cases over previous prostate cancer genome-wide association studies. We identified 187 novel risk variants for prostate cancer, increasing the total number of risk variants to 451. An externally replicated multi-ancestry GRS was associated with risk that ranged from 1.8 (per standard deviation) in African ancestry men to 2.2 in European ancestry men. The GRS was associated with a greater risk of aggressive versus non-aggressive disease in men of African ancestry (P = 0.03). Our study presents novel prostate cancer susceptibility loci and a GRS with effective risk stratification across ancestry groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anqi Wang
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jiayi Shen
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Fei Chen
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rohini Janivara
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Burcu F. Darst
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Xin Sheng
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yili Xu
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alisha J. Chou
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sara Benlloch
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology,University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Anna Plym
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Urology Division, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ali Sahimi
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Thomas J. Hoffman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Atushi Takahashi
- Laboratory for Statistical Analysis, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Genomic Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Suita, Japan
| | - Koichi Matsuda
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Laboratory of Clinical Genome Sequencing,Graduate school of Frontier Sciences,The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihide Momozawa
- Laboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center of Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masashi Fujita
- Laboratory for Cancer Genomics, RIKEN Center of Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Triin Laisk
- Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Jéssica Figuerêdo
- Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shuji Ito
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Xiaoxi Liu
- Laboratory for Statistical and Translational Genetics, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan
| | - The Biobank Japan Project
- Corresponding Author: Christopher A. Haiman, Harlyne J. Norris Cancer Research Tower, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1450 Biggy Street, Rm 1504, Los Angeles, CA 90033 or
| | - Yuji Uchio
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shimane University, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Michiaki Kubo
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yoichiro Kamatani
- Laboratory for Statistical and Translational Genetics, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - Peggy Wan
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Caroline Andrews
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Division of Population Sciences,Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adriana Lori
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, USA
| | | | - Johanna Schleutker
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Medical Genetics, Genomics, Laboratory Division, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Csilla Sipeky
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Unit of Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health,The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert J. MacInnis
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health,The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Dominika Wokolorczyk
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Christopher T. Rentsch
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kelly Cho
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - David E. Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK
- University of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Freddie C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Faculty of Medical Science, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard M. Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Borge G. Nordestgaard
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sune F. Nielsen
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maren Weischer
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Røder
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hein V. Stroomberg
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jyotsna Batra
- Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Qld, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Lisa Horvath
- Chris O’Brien Lifehouse (COBLH), Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Sydney, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Judith A. Clements
- Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Qld, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Wayne Tilly
- Dame Roma Mitchell Cancer Research Laboratories, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Gail P. Risbridger
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Translational Research Program, Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Henrik Gronberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Markus Aly
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Robert Szulkin
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- SDS Life Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Nordstrom
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nora Pashayan
- University College London, Department of Applied Health Research, London, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Maya Ghoussaini
- Open Targets, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Saffron Walden, Hinxton, UK
| | - Ruth C. Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim J. Key
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jong Y. Park
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Thomas A. Sellers
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hui-Yi Lin
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Demetrius Albanes
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie Weinstein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael B. Cook
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH,, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lorelei A. Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara Lindstrom
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David J. Hunter
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kathryn L. Penney
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Constance Turman
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine M. Tangen
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Phyllis J. Goodman
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ian M. Thompson
- CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Hospital – Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Robert J. Hamilton
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Dept. of Surgery (Urology), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Neil E. Fleshner
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Antonio Finelli
- Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marie-Élise Parent
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Armand-Frappier Santé Biotechnologie, Laval, QC, Canada
| | - Janet L. Stanford
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elaine A. Ostrander
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stella Koutros
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Laura E. Beane Freeman
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Meir Stampfer
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gerald L. Andriole
- Brady Urological Institute in National Capital Region, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert N. Hoover
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mitchell J. Machiela
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Michael Borre
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William J. Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - James E. Mensah
- University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | - Yong-Jie Lu
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Ninghan Feng
- Wuxi Second Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangzhu Province, China
| | - Xueying Mao
- Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, London, UK
| | - Yudong Wu
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, The Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shan-Chao Zhao
- Department of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zan Sun
- The People’s Hospital of Liaoning Proviouce, The People’s Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China, Shenyang, China
| | - Stephen N. Thibodeau
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Daniel J. Schaid
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Catharine M.L. West
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gill Barnett
- University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Oncology Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Olivier Cussenot
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- CeRePP, Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Menegaux
- Exposome and Heredity, CESP (UMR 1018), Paris-Saclay Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Exposome and Heredity, CESP (UMR 1018), Paris-Saclay Medical School, Paris-Saclay University, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Yves Akoli Koudou
- Cancer & Environment Group, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif Cédex, France
| | - Esther M. John
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute,Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Lovise Maehle
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kay-Tee Khaw
- Clinical Gerontology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sue A. Ingles
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mariana C Stern
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Spain
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Laura Fachal
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Spain
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
- Fundación Pública Galega Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Barry S. Rosenstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah L. Kerns
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harry Ostrer
- Professor of Pathology and Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Manuel R. Teixeira
- Department of Laboratory Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) / RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Paula Paulo
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) / RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andreia Brandão
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) / RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) / Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Jeannette T. Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ebonee N. Butler
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - James L. Mohler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jack A. Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Manolis Kogevinas
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- University of Cantabria-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Gemma Castaño-Vinyals
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lisa Cannon-Albright
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Craig C. Teerlink
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Chad D. Huff
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Pilie
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ryan J. Bohlender
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jian Gu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sara S. Strom
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luc Multigner
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Rennes, France
| | - Pascal Blanchet
- CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Laurent Brureau
- CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Radka Kaneva
- Molecular Medicine Center, Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Chavdar Slavov
- Department of Urology and Alexandrovska University Hospital, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Vanio Mitev
- Molecular Medicine Center, Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Robin J. Leach
- Department of Cell Systems and Anatomy and Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xuechen Chen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Ben Schöttker
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ann W. Hsing
- Department of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Adam B. Murphy
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christopher J. Logothetis
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeri Kim
- The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L. Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Linda Steele
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yuan Chun Ding
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - William B. Isaacs
- James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital and Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Barbara Nemesure
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Anselm J.M. Hennis
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Chronic Disease Research Centre and Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados
| | - John Carpten
- Department of Translational Genomics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Kim De Ruyck
- Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Ghent University Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care and Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Azad Razack
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jasmine Lim
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia (CRM), Outpatient Centre, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Lisa F. Newcomb
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel W. Lin
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay H. Fowke
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Epidemiology,The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Benjamin A. Rybicki
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Marija Gamulin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Urogenital Unit, Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Davor Lessel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tomislav Kulis
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Nawaid Usmani
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Aswin Abraham
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sandeep Singhal
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew Parliament
- Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frank Claessens
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Van den Broeck
- Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Genomic Medicine Group, Galician Foundation of Genomic Medicine, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Servicio Galego de Saúde, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jose Esteban Castelao
- Genetic Oncology Unit, CHUVI Hospital, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Galicia Sur (IISGS), Vigo (Pontevedra), Spain
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Samantha Larkin
- Scientific Education Support, Thames Ditton, Surrey, Formerly Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul A. Townsend
- School of Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK
| | | | - William S. Bush
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Melinda C. Aldrich
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Dana C. Crawford
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shiv Srivastava
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jennifer Cullen
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Surgery, Center for Prostate Disease Research,Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gyorgy Petrovics
- Department of Surgery, Center for Prostate Disease Research,Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Graham Casey
- Department of Public Health Science, Center for Public Health Genomics,University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, USA
| | - Yao Tettey
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
- Department of Pathology, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Joseph Lachance
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Wei Tang
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Andrew A. Adjei
- Department of Pathology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
| | - Evelyn Tay
- Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
| | | | | | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Jacob M. Keaton
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jacklyn N. Hellwege
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Peter E. Clark
- Atrium Health/Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Olufemi Ogunbiyi
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Olayiwola Shittu
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and Univerity College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Olukemi Amodu
- Institute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Akindele O. Adebiyi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oseremen I. Aisuodionoe-Shadrach
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Hafees O. Ajibola
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Mustapha A. Jamda
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Olabode P. Oluwole
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | - Maxwell Nwegbu
- College of Health Sciences, University of Abuja, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Cancer Science Center, Abuja, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | - Halimatou Diop
- Laboratoires Bacteriologie et Virologie, Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Susan M. Gundell
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Monique J. Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Guido Jenster
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ron H.N. van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennifer J. Hu
- The University of Miami School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Maureen Sanderson
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Linda Kachuri
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Rohit Varma
- Southern California Eye Institute, CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Roberta McKean-Cowdin
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mina Torres
- Southern California Eye Institute, CHA Hollywood Presbyterian Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael H. Preuss
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruth J.F. Loos
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine,Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Zawistowski
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sebastian Zöllner
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Zeyun Lu
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine,University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Douglas F. Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology,, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefan Ambs
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Todd L. Edwards
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Reedik Mägi
- Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Timothy R. Rebbeck
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lars Fritsche
- Department of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Stephen J. Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sonja I. Berndt
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Fredrik Wiklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hidewaki Nakagawa
- Laboratory for Cancer Genomics, RIKEN Center of Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - John S. Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
- Departments of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - J. Michael Gaziano
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Nick Mancuso
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Chikashi Terao
- Laboratory for Statistical and Translational Genetics, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan
- Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
- The Department of Applied Genetics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - David V. Conti
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher A. Haiman
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sutera P, Song Y, Van der Eecken K, Shetty AC, English K, Hodges T, Chang J, Fonteyne V, Rana Z, Ren L, Mendes AA, Lumen N, Delrue L, Verbeke S, De Man K, Song DY, Pienta K, Feng FY, Joniau S, Lotan T, Lane B, Kiess A, Rowe S, Pomper M, DeWeese T, Deek M, Sweeney C, Ost P, Tran PT. Clinical and Genomic Differences Between Advanced Molecular Imaging-detected and Conventional Imaging-detected Metachronous Oligometastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2023; 84:531-535. [PMID: 37173210 PMCID: PMC10636237 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
In metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), disease volume plays an integral role in guiding treatment recommendations, including selection of docetaxel therapy, metastasis-directed therapy, and radiation to the prostate. Although there are multiple definitions of disease volume, they have commonly been studied in the context of metastases detected via conventional imaging (CIM). One such numeric definition of disease volume, termed oligometastasis, is heavily dependent on the sensitivity of the imaging modality. We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective review of men with metachronous oligometastatic CSPC (omCSPC), detected via either advanced molecular imaging alone (AMIM) or CIM. Patients were compared with respect to clinical and genomic features using the Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's χ2 test, and Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analyses with a log-rank test. A total of 295 patients were included for analysis. Patients with CIM-omCSPC had significantly higher Gleason grade group (p = 0.032), higher prostate-specific antigen at omCSPC diagnosis (8.0 vs 1.7 ng/ml; p < 0.001), more frequent pathogenic TP53 mutations (28% vs 17%; p = 0.030), and worse 10-yr OS (85% vs 100%; p < 0.001). This is the first report of clinical and biological differences between AMIM-detected and CIM-detected omCSPC. Our findings are particularly important for ongoing and planned clinical trials in omCSPC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Metastatic prostate cancer with just a few metastases only detected via newer scanning methods (called molecular imaging) is associated with fewer high-risk DNA mutations and better survival in comparison to metastatic cancer detected via conventional scan methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Sutera
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yang Song
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kim Van der Eecken
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Amol C Shetty
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Keara English
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Theresa Hodges
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jinhee Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Zaker Rana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Adrianna A Mendes
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Louke Delrue
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sofie Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kathia De Man
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kenneth Pienta
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Departments of Medicine, Urology and Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tamara Lotan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Barton Lane
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ana Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Steven Rowe
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Martin Pomper
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Theodore DeWeese
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lorton O, Achard V, Koutsouvelis N, Jaccard M, Vanhoutte F, Dipasquale G, Ost P, Zilli T. Elective Nodal Irradiation for Oligorecurrent Nodal Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Variability in the PEACE V-STORM Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101290. [PMID: 38047214 PMCID: PMC10692293 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Consistency in delineation of pelvic lymph node regions for prostate cancer elective nodal radiation therapy is still challenging despite current guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability in elective lymph node delineation in the PEACE V - STORM randomized phase 2 trial for oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer. Methods and Materials Twenty-three centers were asked to delineate the elective pelvic nodal clinical target volume (CTV) of a postoperative oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer benchmark case using a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 2009 template (upper limit at the L4/L5 interspace). Overall, intersection and overflow volumes, Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and count maps merged with computed tomography images were analyzed. Results The mean volume including the 23 nodal CTVs was 430.4 ± 64.1 cm3, larger than the modified RTOG 2009 CTV reference volume (386.1 cm3). The intersection common volume between the modified reference RTOG 2009 and the 23 nodal CTVs was estimated at 83.9%, whereas the overflow volume was 23.4%, mainly located at the level of the presacral and the upper limit of the L4/L5 interspace. The mean Dice coefficient was 0.79 ± 0.02, whereas the mean Hausdorff distance was 27 ± 4.4 mm. Conclusions In salvage radiation therapy treatment of oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer, variations in elective lymph node volume delineation were mainly observed in the presacral and common iliac areas. Routine implementation and diffusion of available contouring guidelines together with a constant evaluation and evidence-based updating are expected to further decrease the existing variability in pelvic node contouring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orane Lorton
- Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Maud Jaccard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederik Vanhoutte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Giovanna Dipasquale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Le Guevelou J, Magne N, Counago F, Magsanoc JM, Vermeille M, De Crevoisier R, Benziane-Ouaritini N, Ost P, Niazi T, Supiot S, Sargos P. Stereotactic body radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: current status and future directions. World J Urol 2023; 41:3333-3344. [PMID: 37725131 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04605-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Around 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this review is to describe both toxicity and oncological outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered to the prostate bed (PB). METHOD In april 2023, we performed a systematic review of studies published in MEDLINE or ClinicalTrials.gov according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews, using the keywords "stereotactic radiotherapy" AND "postoperative" AND "prostate cancer". RESULTS A total of 14 studies assessing either adjuvant or salvage SBRT to the whole PB or macroscopic local recurrence (MLR) within the PB, and SBRT on radiorecurrent MLR within the PB were included. Doses delivered to either whole PB or MLR between 30 to 40 Gy are associated with a low rate of late grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity, ranging from 2.2 to 15.1%. Doses above 40 Gy are associated with increased rate of late GU toxicity, raising up to 38%. Oncological outcomes should be interpreted with caution, due to both short follow-up, heterogeneous populations and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use. CONCLUSION PB or MLR SBRT delivered at doses up to 40 Gy appears safe with relatively low late severe GU toxicity rates. Caution is needed with dose-escalated RT schedules above 40 Gy. Further prospective trials are eagerly awaited in this disease setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicolas Magne
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Felipe Counago
- Radiation Oncology Department, GenesisCare Madrid Clinical Director, San Francisco de Asis and La Milagrosa Hospitals, National Chair of Research and Clinical Trials, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Matthieu Vermeille
- Radiation Oncology Department, Genolier Swiss Radio-Oncology Network, Genolier, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Piet Ost
- Radiation Oncology Department, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hoang T, Sutera P, Nguyen T, Chang JH, Jagtap S, Song Y, Shetty A, Chowdhury DD, Chan A, Carrieri FAA, Song D, DeWeese TL, Lafargue A, Van der Eecken K, Bunz F, Ost P, Tran PT, Deek MP. The Impact of TP53 Mutations and Use of the TP53-Mutation-Reactivating Agent APR-246 on Metastatic Castrate-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e443. [PMID: 37785435 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) TP53 mutations appear to be enriched over the spectrum of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and are associated with worse survival outcomes. We chose to further explore the impact of dominant negative (DN) TP53 mutations on mCSPC progression and pro-metastatic behaviors in addition to studying the ability of APR-246, a small molecule targeting TP53 mutants, to blunt pro-metastatic behaviors. MATERIALS/METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 531 mCSPC patients who underwent next-generation sequencing. Patients were stratified by metastasis timing (synchronous if metastasis present at diagnosis or metachronous if arising after definitive treatment of localized disease) and the number of metastatic lesions (oligometastatic ≤5 or polymetastatic >5 lesions). Tumors were classified based on TP53 mutation status (missense, truncating, or wild-type [WT]) and dominant negativity, which was defined as the production of a mutant protein that reduces the residual WT protein's transcriptional activity according to the World Health Organization TP53 database. Clinical outcomes were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS), evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression. To verify the impact of TP53 mutation on metastasis, we created isogenic 22Rv1 prostate cancer cell lines that carried either TP53 WT or TP53 R175H and tested this mutation for migration, invasion, and anchorage-independent growth. APR-246 (25-80 µM) was tested for anti-metastatic properties in vitro and anti-tumor growth in 22Rv1 xenografted nude mice. RESULTS In our cohort, 155 (29.2%) had a TP53 mutation, which mostly occurred in the DNA-binding domain (85.16%). DN TP53 mutations were associated with more aggressive disease states: DN TP53 mutations were enriched in patients with synchronous (vs. metachronous: 20.7% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01) and polymetastatic disease (vs. oligometastatic: 14.4% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, DN TP53 mutations were correlated with shorter rPFS (HR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.31-2.98, p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.14-3.68, p = 0.02) compared to those with TP53 WT. In vitro, 22Rv1 cells with DN TP53 R175H mutation had increased abilities to migrate, invade, and form colonies compared to TP53 WT. APR-246 treatment of TP53 R175H mutants blunted the pro-metastatic effects of the cell line in vitro (p < 0.01 for all assays by unpaired t-test). Interestingly, APR-246 also inhibited xenograft tumor growth of 22Rv1 TP53 R175H mutants (p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA). CONCLUSION DN TP53 mutations were associated with poorer survival outcomes for mCSPC patients. DN TP53 mutations also promoted prostate cancer pro-metastatic behaviors in vitro, which was effectively counteracted by APR-246, making it a promising treatment option that should be explored further in early-phase clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Hoang
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - P Sutera
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - T Nguyen
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - J H Chang
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - S Jagtap
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Y Song
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Shetty
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - A Chan
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - D Song
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, MD
| | - T L DeWeese
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Lafargue
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - F Bunz
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - P Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - P T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - M P Deek
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bamias A, Stenzl A, Brown SL, Albiges L, Babjuk M, Birtle A, Briganti A, Burger M, Choudhury A, Colecchia M, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Gallucci M, Rivas JG, Huddart R, Junker K, Kroeze S, Loriot Y, Merseburger A, Montironi R, Necchi A, Oing C, Oldenburg J, Ost P, Pinkawa M, Ribal MJ, Rouprêt M, Thoeny H, Zilli T, Hoskin P. Definition and Diagnosis of Oligometastatic Bladder Cancer: A Delphi Consensus Study Endorsed by the European Association of Urology, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and European Society of Medical Oncology Genitourinary Faculty. Eur Urol 2023; 84:381-389. [PMID: 37217391 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to other cancers, the concept of oligometastatic disease (OMD) has not been investigated in bladder cancer (BC). OBJECTIVE To develop an acceptable definition, classification, and staging recommendations for oligometastatic BC (OMBC) spanning the issues of patient selection and the roles of systemic therapy and ablative local therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A European consensus group of 29 experts, led by the European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and including members from all other relevant European societies, was established. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS A modified Delphi method was used. A systematic review was used to build consensus questions. Consensus statements were extracted from two consecutive surveys. The statements were formulated during two consensus meetings. Agreement levels were measured to determine if consensus was achieved (≥75% agreement). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The first survey included 14 questions and the second survey had 12. Owing to a considerable lack of evidence, which was the major limitation, definition was limited in the context of de novo OMBC, which was further classified as synchronous OMD, oligorecurrence, and oligoprogression. A maximum of three metastatic sites, all resectable or amenable to stereotactic therapy, was proposed as the definition of OMBC. Pelvic lymph nodes represented the only "organ" not included in the definition of OMBC. For staging, no consensus on the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was reached. A favourable response to systemic treatment was proposed as the criterion for selection of patients for metastasis-directed therapy. CONCLUSIONS A consensus statement on the definition and staging of OMBC has been formulated. This statement will help to standardise inclusion criteria in future trials, potentiate research on aspects of OMBC for which consensus was not achieved, and hopefully will lead to the development of guidelines on optimal management of OMBC. PATIENT SUMMARY As an intermediate state between localised cancer and disease with extensive metastasis, oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) might benefit from a combination of systemic treatment and local therapy. We report the first consensus statements on OMBC drawn up by an international expert group. These statements can provide a basis for standardisation of future research, which will lead to high-quality evidence in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotelis Bamias
- National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Chaidari, Greece.
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Marko Babjuk
- 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Praha, Czechia
| | - Alison Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology. Hospital Clinico San Carlos. Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Kerstin Junker
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Abteilung für Klinisch-Experimentelle Forschung, Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Oing
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Harriet Thoeny
- Department of Radiology, HFR Fribourg-Hôpital Cantonal, University of Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Clinica di Radio-Oncologia, Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sutera P, Shetty A, Hakansson A, Van der Eecken K, Song Y, Liu Y, Fonteyne V, Verbeke S, Song D, Ross AE, Feng FY, Gillessen S, Attard G, James N, Lotan TL, Davicioni E, Sweeney C, Tran PT, Deek MP, Ost P. Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Metastatic Disease Timing within Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e261-e262. [PMID: 37785002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is commonly partitioned into high- and low-volume subgroups which have demonstrated differential biology, prognosis, and response to therapy. Timing of metastasis has similarly demonstrated differences in clinical outcomes, however less is known about any potential underlying biologic differences between these disease states. Herein we aim to compare transcriptomic differences between synchronous and metachronous mCSPC and identify any differential responses to therapy. MATERIALS/METHODS We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective review of men with mCSPC who completed RNA expression profiling evaluation of their primary tumor. Patients were stratified according to disease timing (synchronous vs metachronous). The primary endpoint was to identify differences in transcriptomic profiles between disease time. Median genomic scores between groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary analyses included determining clinical and transcriptomic variables associated with overall survival (OS) from time of metastasis. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier Method and Multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 252 patients were included with a median follow-up of 39.6 months. Patients with synchronous disease experienced worse 5-yr OS (39% vs 79%, p<0.01) and demonstrated lower median Androgen Receptor Activity (AR-A) (11.78 vs 12.64, p<0.01) and Hallmark Androgen Response (HAR) (3.15 vs 3.32; p<0.01). Multivariable cox-regression identified only high-volume disease (HR = 4.97, 95% CI 2.71-9.10; p<0.01) and HAR score (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.88; p = 0.02 significantly associated with OS. Finally, patients with synchronous (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.72; <0.01) but not metachronous (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.50-3.92; p = 0.56) disease were found to have better OS with Androgen Receptor (AR) + non-AR combination therapy as compared to monotherapy (p value for interaction = 0.05). CONCLUSION We have demonstrated a potential biologic difference between metastatic timing of mCSPC. Specifically, for patients with low volume disease, those with metachronous low volume disease have a more hormone dependent transcriptional profile and exhibit a better prognosis than synchronous low volume disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sutera
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Shetty
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - K Van der Eecken
- Department of Pathology and Human Structure and Repair, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Y Song
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Y Liu
- Decipher/Veractye, San Francisco, CA
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - F Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - S Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - G Attard
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - N James
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - T L Lotan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - C Sweeney
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - P T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - M P Deek
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - P Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
De Kerf G, Claessens M, Raouassi F, Mercier C, Stas D, Ost P, Dirix P, Verellen D. A geometry and dose-volume based performance monitoring of artificial intelligence models in radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 28:100494. [PMID: 37809056 PMCID: PMC10550805 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementations lack ground-truth when applied on real-world data. This study investigated how combined geometrical and dose-volume metrics can be used as performance monitoring tools to detect clinically relevant candidates for model retraining. Materials and Methods Fifty patients were analyzed for both AI-segmentation and planning. For AI-segmentation, geometrical (Standard Surface Dice 3 mm and Local Surface Dice 3 mm) and dose-volume based parameters were calculated for two organs (bladder and anorectum) to compare AI output against the clinically corrected structure. A Local Surface Dice was introduced to detect geometrical changes in the vicinity of the target volumes, while an Absolute Dose Difference (ADD) evaluation increased focus on dose-volume related changes. AI-planning performance was evaluated using clinical goal analysis in combination with volume and target overlap metrics. Results The Local Surface Dice reported equal or lower values compared to the Standard Surface Dice (anorectum: (0.93 ± 0.11) vs (0.98 ± 0.04); bladder: (0.97 ± 0.06) vs (0.98 ± 0.04)). The ADD metric showed a difference of (0.9 ± 0.8)Gy for the anorectum D 1 cm 3 . The bladder D 5cm 3 reported a difference of (0.7 ± 1.5)Gy. Mandatory clinical goals were fulfilled in 90 % of the DLP plans. Conclusions Combining dose-volume and geometrical metrics allowed detection of clinically relevant changes, applied to both auto-segmentation and auto-planning output and the Local Surface Dice was more sensitive to local changes compared to the Standard Surface Dice. This monitoring is able to evaluate AI behavior in clinical practice and allows candidate selection for active learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert De Kerf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Michaël Claessens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Fadoua Raouassi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Carole Mercier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Daan Stas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sutera P, Deek MP, Jing Y, Pryor DI, Huynh MA, Koontz BF, Mercier C, Ost P, Kiess AP, Conde-Moreno AJ, Stish BJ, Bosetti DG, Siva S, Berlin A, Kroeze S, Corcoran N, Trock B, Gillessen S, Tran PT, Sweeney C. Multi-Institutional Analysis of Metastasis Directed Therapy with or without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Oligometastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e442-e443. [PMID: 37785433 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Several prospective trials in oligometastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) have shown metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) can delay time to progression and initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to observation. However, the optimal integration of ADT with MDT remains unclear. Here we report a multi-national, multi-institutional retrospective cohort of omCSPC treated with MDT to characterize the long-term outcomes of patients treated with MDT alone or in combination with ADT. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with a controlled primary site and omCSPC (defined as ≤ 5 lesions on conventional imaging) treated with MDT with or without concurrent ADT and with at least 36 months follow-up were retrospectively screened across 13 institutions. The primary endpoints included biochemical progression free survival (bPFS) and radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and stratified by treatment group (MDT alone vs MDT + ADT). Multivariable Cox regression was performed adjusted for variables found to be prognostic on univariate analysis. RESULTS Among 414 patients screened, a total of 263 patients treated between 2003 and 2018 met inclusion criteria and included. Of these, 105 received MDT alone and 158 received MDT+ADT, with median follow-up of 49.5 and 54.5 months, respectively. The majority were metachronous (90%) and had bone lesions (60%). Median ADT duration was 21.3 months (IQR 12.0- 31.9). Patients who received ADT vs. no ADT had poorer prognostic features including 23% vs. 1% synchronous (p<0.001), and 55% vs 40% Gleason 8-10 (p = 0.012). ADT use was associated with a better 5-year bPFS 24% vs 11% (p<0.0001) and rPFS 41% vs 29% (p<0.001). On multivariable Cox regression adjusting for post-MDT PSA nadir and salvage therapy, ADT use maintained significance for both bPFS (HR 0.51 (0.36, 0.71), p<0.001) and rPFS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Long-term outcomes with MDT alone suggest a small proportion of patients experience sustained disease control. The addition of ADT appears to improve rPFS, however prospective studies are needed in order to allow for personalization of care in patients with omCSPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sutera
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - M P Deek
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Y Jing
- Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - D I Pryor
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - M A Huynh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - C Mercier
- Gasthuis Sisters, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - P Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A P Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - B J Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D G Bosetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - S Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - A Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Kroeze
- University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Corcoran
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - B Trock
- Brady Urological Institute at Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD
| | - S Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - P T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Sweeney
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pizurica M, Larmuseau M, Van der Eecken K, de Schaetzen van Brienen L, Carrillo-Perez F, Isphording S, Lumen N, Van Dorpe J, Ost P, Verbeke S, Gevaert O, Marchal K. Whole Slide Imaging-Based Prediction of TP53 Mutations Identifies an Aggressive Disease Phenotype in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res 2023; 83:2970-2984. [PMID: 37352385 PMCID: PMC10538366 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-3113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
In prostate cancer, there is an urgent need for objective prognostic biomarkers that identify the metastatic potential of a tumor at an early stage. While recent analyses indicated TP53 mutations as candidate biomarkers, molecular profiling in a clinical setting is complicated by tumor heterogeneity. Deep learning models that predict the spatial presence of TP53 mutations in whole slide images (WSI) offer the potential to mitigate this issue. To assess the potential of WSIs as proxies for spatially resolved profiling and as biomarkers for aggressive disease, we developed TiDo, a deep learning model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in predicting TP53 mutations from WSIs of primary prostate tumors. In an independent multifocal cohort, the model showed successful generalization at both the patient and lesion level. Analysis of model predictions revealed that false positive (FP) predictions could at least partially be explained by TP53 deletions, suggesting that some FP carry an alteration that leads to the same histological phenotype as TP53 mutations. Comparative expression and histologic cell type analyses identified a TP53-like cellular phenotype triggered by expression of pathways affecting stromal composition. Together, these findings indicate that WSI-based models might not be able to perfectly predict the spatial presence of individual TP53 mutations but they have the potential to elucidate the prognosis of a tumor by depicting a downstream phenotype associated with aggressive disease biomarkers. SIGNIFICANCE Deep learning models predicting TP53 mutations from whole slide images of prostate cancer capture histologic phenotypes associated with stromal composition, lymph node metastasis, and biochemical recurrence, indicating their potential as in silico prognostic biomarkers. See related commentary by Bordeleau, p. 2809.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Pizurica
- Internet Technology and Data Science Lab (IDLab/IMEC), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Plant biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Maarten Larmuseau
- Internet Technology and Data Science Lab (IDLab/IMEC), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Plant biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | | | - Louise de Schaetzen van Brienen
- Internet Technology and Data Science Lab (IDLab/IMEC), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Plant biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Francisco Carrillo-Perez
- Department of Architecture and Computer Technology (ATC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Simon Isphording
- Internet Technology and Data Science Lab (IDLab/IMEC), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Plant biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sofie Verbeke
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Olivier Gevaert
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kathleen Marchal
- Internet Technology and Data Science Lab (IDLab/IMEC), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Plant biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Spaas M, Sundahl N, Kruse V, Rottey S, De Maeseneer D, Duprez F, Lievens Y, Surmont V, Brochez L, Reynders D, Danckaert W, Goetghebeur E, Van den Begin R, Van Gestel D, Renard V, Dirix P, Ost P. Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The CHEERS Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1205-1213. [PMID: 37410476 PMCID: PMC10326732 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 have improved the outcome for many cancer types, the majority of patients fails to respond to ICI monotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of ICIs. Objective To assess the addition of radiotherapy to ICIs compared with ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted in 5 Belgian hospitals and enrolled participants between March 2018 and October 2020. Patients 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. A total of 99 patients were randomly assigned to either the control arm (n = 52) or the experimental arm (n = 47). Of those, 3 patients (1 in the control arm vs 2 in the experimental arm) withdrew consent and thus were not included in the analysis. Data analyses were performed between April 2022 and March 2023. Interventions Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive anti-PD-1/PD-1 ligand 1 ICIs alone as per standard of care (control arm) or combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy 3 × 8 gray to a maximum of 3 lesions prior to the second or third ICI cycle, depending on the frequency of administration (experimental arm). Randomization was stratified according to tumor histologic findings and disease burden (3 and fewer or more than 3 cancer lesions). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as per immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Key secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, local control rate, and toxic effects. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, while safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. Results Among 96 patients included in the analysis (mean age, 66 years; 76 [79%] female), 72 (75%) had more than 3 tumor lesions and 65 (68%) had received at least 1 previous line of systemic treatment at time of inclusion. Seven patients allocated to the experimental arm did not complete the study-prescribed radiotherapy course due to early disease progression (n = 5) or intercurrent illness (n = 2). With a median (range) follow-up of 12.5 (0.7-46.2) months, median PFS was 2.8 months in the control arm compared with 4.4 months in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.58-1.53; P = .82). Between the control and experimental arms, no improvement in median OS was observed (11.0 vs 14.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48-1.41; P = .47), and objective response rate was not statistically significantly different (22% vs 27%; P = .56), despite a local control rate of 75% in irradiated patients. Acute treatment-related toxic effects of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 79% and 18% of patients in the control arm vs 78% and 18% in the experimental arm, respectively. No grade 5 adverse events occurred. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that while safe, adding subablative stereotactic radiotherapy of a limited number of metastatic lesions to ICI monotherapy failed to show improvement in PFS or OS. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03511391.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Spaas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nora Sundahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Vibeke Kruse
- Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Sylvie Rottey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Daan De Maeseneer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Fréderic Duprez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Veerle Surmont
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lieve Brochez
- Department of Dermatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dries Reynders
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics and Stat-Gent CRESCENDO Consortium, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Willeke Danckaert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Els Goetghebeur
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics and Stat-Gent CRESCENDO Consortium, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Robbe Van den Begin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Renard
- Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vanwelkenhuyzen J, Van Bos E, Van Bruwaene S, Lesage K, Maes A, Üstmert S, Lavent F, Beels L, Grönberg H, Ost P, Lindberg J, De Laere B. AR and PI3K Genomic Profiling of Cell-free DNA Can Identify Poor Responders to Lutetium-177-PSMA Among Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 53:63-66. [PMID: 37292496 PMCID: PMC10244905 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligands (177Lu-PSMA) are new therapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We evaluated the prognostic value of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) profiling in patients with mCRPC starting treatment with 177Lu-PSMA I&T. Between January 2020 and October 2022, patients with late-stage mCRPC (n = 57) were enrolled in a single-centre observational cohort study. Genomic alterations in the AR gene, PI3K signalling pathway, TP53, and TMPRSS2-ERG were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) on Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Median PFS of 3.84 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-5.4) was observed, and 21/56 (37.5%) evaluable patients experienced a prostate-specific antigen response of ≥50% during treatment. Among 46 patients who provided a blood sample for profiling before 177Lu-PSMA treatment. ctDNA was detected in 39 (84.8%); higher ctDNA was correlated with shorter PFS. Genomic structural rearrangements in the AR gene (hazard ratio [HR] 9.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-39.5; p = 0.001) and alterations in the PI3K signalling pathway (HR 3.58, 95% CI 1.41-9.08; p = 0.007) were independently associated with poor 177Lu-PSMA prognosis on multivariable Cox regression. Prospective evaluation of these associations in biomarker-driven trials is warranted. Patient summary We examined cell-free DNA in blood samples from patients with advanced metastatic prostate cancer who started treatment with lutetium-177-PSMA, a new radioligand therapy. We found that patients with genetic alterations in the androgen receptor gene or PI3K pathway genes did not experience a lasting benefit from lutetium-177-PSMA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Vanwelkenhuyzen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Centre for Medical Biotechnology (CMB) VIB, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
| | - Eva Van Bos
- Department of Urology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | | | - Karl Lesage
- Department of Urology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Alex Maes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Sezgin Üstmert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Filip Lavent
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Laurence Beels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiotherapy, GZA Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bram De Laere
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sutera PA, Shetty AC, Hakansson A, Van der Eecken K, Song Y, Liu Y, Chang J, Fonteyne V, Mendes AA, Lumen N, Delrue L, Verbeke S, De Man K, Rana Z, Hodges T, Hamid A, Roberts N, Song DY, Pienta K, Ross AE, Feng F, Joniau S, Spratt D, Gillessen S, Attard G, James ND, Lotan T, Davicioni E, Sweeney C, Tran PT, Deek MP, Ost P. Transcriptomic and clinical heterogeneity of metastatic disease timing within metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:605-614. [PMID: 37164128 PMCID: PMC10330666 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.04.515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is commonly classified into high- and low-volume subgroups which have demonstrated differential biology, prognosis, and response to therapy. Timing of metastasis has similarly demonstrated differences in clinical outcomes; however, less is known about any underlying biologic differences between these disease states. Herein, we aim to compare transcriptomic differences between synchronous and metachronous mCSPC and identify any differential responses to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective review of men with mCSPC who completed RNA expression profiling evaluation of their primary tumor. Patients were stratified according to disease timing (synchronous versus metachronous). The primary endpoint was to identify differences in transcriptomic profiles between disease timing. The median transcriptomic scores between groups were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Secondary analyses included determining clinical and transcriptomic variables associated with overall survival (OS) from the time of metastasis. Survival analysis was carried out with the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 252 patients were included with a median follow-up of 39.6 months. Patients with synchronous disease experienced worse 5-year OS (39% versus 79%; P < 0.01) and demonstrated lower median androgen receptor (AR) activity (11.78 versus 12.64; P < 0.01) and hallmark androgen response (HAR; 3.15 versus 3.32; P < 0.01). Multivariable Cox regression identified only high-volume disease [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.71-9.10; P < 0.01] and HAR score (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.88; P = 0.02) significantly associated with OS. Finally, patients with synchronous (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.72; P < 0.01) but not metachronous (HR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.50-3.92; P = 0.56) disease were found to have better OS with AR and non-AR combination therapy as compared with monotherapy (P value for interaction = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated a potential biologic difference between metastatic timing of mCSPC. Specifically, for patients with low-volume disease, those with metachronous low-volume disease have a more hormone-dependent transcriptional profile and exhibit a better prognosis than synchronous low-volume disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Sutera
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - A C Shetty
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - K Van der Eecken
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Y Song
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - J Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A A Mendes
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - N Lumen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - L Delrue
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - S Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K De Man
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Z Rana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - T Hodges
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - A Hamid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - N Roberts
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, USA
| | - D Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - K Pienta
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - A E Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - F Feng
- Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, USA; Department of Urology, UCSF, San Francisco, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF, San Francisco, USA
| | - S Joniau
- Department of Urology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, USA
| | - S Gillessen
- Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - G Attard
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N D James
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - T Lotan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - C Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - P T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - M P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
| | - P Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Saesen R, Van Hemelrijck M, Bogaerts J, Booth CM, Cornelissen JJ, Dekker A, Eisenhauer EA, Freitas A, Gronchi A, Hernán MA, Hulstaert F, Ost P, Szturz P, Verkooijen HM, Weller M, Wilson R, Lacombe D, van der Graaf WT. Defining the role of real-world data in cancer clinical research: The position of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Eur J Cancer 2023; 186:52-61. [PMID: 37030077 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of the precision medicine paradigm in oncology has led to increasing interest in the integration of real-world data (RWD) into cancer clinical research. As sources of real-world evidence (RWE), such data could potentially help address the uncertainties that surround the adoption of novel anticancer therapies into the clinic following their investigation in clinical trials. At present, RWE-generating studies which investigate antitumour interventions seem to primarily focus on collecting and analysing observational RWD, typically forgoing the use of randomisation despite its methodological benefits. This is appropriate in situations where randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are not feasible and non-randomised RWD analyses can offer valuable insights. Nevertheless, depending on how they are designed, RCTs have the potential to produce strong and actionable RWE themselves. The choice of which methodology to employ for RWD studies should be guided by the nature of the research question they are intended to answer. Here, we attempt to define some of the questions that do not necessarily require the conduct of RCTs. Moreover, we outline the strategy of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to contribute to the generation of robust and high-quality RWE by prioritising the execution of pragmatic trials and studies set up according to the trials-within-cohorts approach. If treatment allocation cannot be left up to random chance due to practical or ethical concerns, the EORTC will consider undertaking observational RWD research based on the target trial principle. New EORTC-sponsored RCTs may also feature concurrent prospective cohorts composed of off-trial patients.
Collapse
|
33
|
Bultijnck R, Rammant E, Raes A, Vandecasteele N, Decaestecker K, Fonteyne V, Lumen N, Ost P, Deforche B. Experiences of Men With Prostate Cancer Participating in a Clinical Pathway With a Supervised Group-based Exercise Program to Combat Androgen Deprivation-Induced Side Effects: A Qualitative Focus Group Study. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39:151404. [PMID: 36925317 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A clinical pathway in daily practice improved implementation of evidence-based strategies for the management of androgen deprivation-induced side effects in men with prostate cancer. This study aimed to explore patients' expectations and reasons to start with the clinical pathway; explore patients' experiences and attitudes toward the pathway; and identify key pathway ingredients and examine patients' attitudes about a possible transition toward the home environment after a hospital-based pathway participation. DATA SOURCES Focus group interviews were conducted through purposeful sampling, consisting of former and current participants of the clinical pathway at Ghent University Hospital. Data was audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, coded in NVivo12, and thematically and inductively analyzed through constant comparisons. CONCLUSION Men with prostate cancer have positive experiences toward the use of a holistic multidisciplinary approach (ie, clinical pathway) to combat androgen deprivation therapy-induced side effects in practice. Patients identified several key ingredients of the pathway, such as peer support, physiotherapist involvement, and availability of a multidisciplinary team. Patients were, however, reluctant to continue the exercise component at home because of negative attitudes toward a public gym, practical issues, absence of known facilitators, and other priorities. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Referral by a health care provider remains an important motivator for pathway participation. Peer support, physiotherapist involvement, and availability of a multidisciplinary team are crucial components of the clinical pathway and should be taken into account when developing and implementing similar pathways to increase program uptake in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Bultijnck
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Elke Rammant
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | - Karel Decaestecker
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Benedicte Deforche
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Danckaert W, Ost P, De Wagter C. Accuracy and reliability of a commercial treatment planning system in nontarget regions in modern prostate radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023:e14003. [PMID: 37170654 PMCID: PMC10402685 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The currently available treatment planning systems (TPSs) are neither designed nor intended for accurate dose calculations in nontarget regions. The aim of this work is to quantify the accuracy and reliability of nontarget doses calculated by a commercially available TPS. METHODS Nontarget doses calculated by the collapsed cone (CC) (v5.2) algorithm implemented in the RayStation (v6) TPS were compared to measured values. Different scenarios were investigated, from simple static fields to intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans. Deviations and confidence limits (CLs) were calculated between results of calculations and measurements-applying both local (δ) and global (Δ) normalization-for various points of interest (POIs). Results were based on a single-institution experience for one clinical test case (prostate) and evaluated against internationally accepted criteria. RESULTS Overall, the TPS underestimated the nontarget dose by an average of -17.7% ± 25.3% for IMRT. Quantitatively similar results were obtained for VMAT (-17.6% ± 21.2%). POIs receiving < 5% of the prescription dose were significantly underestimated by the TPS (p-value < 0.05 for both IMRT and VMAT). Dose calculation accuracy was also determined by the contribution of secondary radiation, with measured doses for out-of-field POIs being significantly different from calculated values (p-value < 0.01 for both IMRT and VMAT). Although the CLδ in nontarget regions failed the proposed tolerance criteria (40%) for both IMRT (68.8%) and VMAT (52.6%), the CLΔ was within the tolerance limit (4%) for both treatment techniques (1.9% for IMRT and 1.3% for VMAT). No action levels (7%) were exceeded. CONCLUSIONS Based on the currently available benchmarks our TPS is considered acceptable for clinical use, although the dose in some POIs was poorly predicted by the CC algorithm. Some areas were pointed out where TPSs and linear accelerator control systems can be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willeke Danckaert
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Carlos De Wagter
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gillessen S, Bossi A, Davis ID, de Bono J, Fizazi K, James ND, Mottet N, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney CJ, Tombal B, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Daugaard G, De Santis M, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ekeke ON, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Higano C, Hofman MS, Horvath LG, Hussain M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Kramer G, Leibowitz R, Logothetis C, Mahal B, Maluf F, Mateo J, Matheson D, Mehra N, Merseburger A, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Pezaro CJ, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin MA, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sartor O, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna I, Soule H, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Türkeri L, Turco F, Uemura H, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, van Oort I, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Zilli T, Omlin A. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer-metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:178-215. [PMID: 37003085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation together with novel treatment options have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. However, we still lack high-level evidence in many areas relevant to making management decisions in daily clinical practise. The 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) addressed some questions in these areas to supplement guidelines that mostly are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE To present the voting results of the APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The experts voted on controversial questions where high-level evidence is mostly lacking: locally advanced prostate cancer; biochemical recurrence after local treatment; metastatic hormone-sensitive, non-metastatic, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; oligometastatic prostate cancer; and managing side effects of hormonal therapy. A panel of 105 international prostate cancer experts voted on the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The panel voted on 198 pre-defined questions, which were developed by 117 voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. A total of 116 questions on metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer are discussed in this manuscript. In 2022, the voting was done by a web-based survey because of COVID-19 restrictions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting reflects the expert opinion of these panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results are reported in the supplementary material. We report here on topics in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS These voting results in four specific areas from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting and can help research funders and policy makers identify information gaps and consider what areas to explore further. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions always have to be individualised based on patient characteristics, including the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), co-morbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps where there is non-consensus and that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with healthcare providers worldwide. At each APCCC, an expert panel votes on pre-defined questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment for which there are gaps in knowledge. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients and their relatives as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision-making. This report focuses on the advanced setting, covering metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and both non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. TWITTER SUMMARY Report of the results of APCCC 2022 for the following topics: mHSPC, nmCRPC, mCRPC, and oligometastatic prostate cancer. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE At APCCC 2022, clinically important questions in the management of advanced prostate cancer management were identified and discussed, and experts voted on pre-defined consensus questions. The report of the results for metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer is summarised here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Neal Shore
- Medical Director, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA; CMO, Urology/Surgical Oncology, GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | | - Ana M Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, Université Paris-Saclay, Oncostat, Inserm U-1018, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Simon Chowdhury
- Guys and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ross Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dan George
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Division of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raja Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Christopher Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Brandon Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, Walsall Campus, Walsall, UK
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Chief, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Carmel J Pezaro
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong; The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, KFSHRC Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark A Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital, Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Cancer Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - Inge van Oort
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, G4-830, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sutera P, Deek MP, Van der Eecken K, Shetty AC, Chang JH, Hodges T, Song Y, Verbeke S, Van Dorpe J, Fonteyne V, De Laere B, Mishra M, Rana Z, Molitoris J, Ferris M, Ross A, Schaeffer E, Roberts N, Song DY, DeWeese T, Pienta KJ, Antonarakis ES, Ost P, Tran PT. WNT Pathway Mutations in Metachronous Oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1095-1101. [PMID: 36708787 PMCID: PMC10443895 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE WNT signaling is a cellular pathway that has been implicated in the development and progression of prostate cancer. Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) represents a unique state of disease in which metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival. Herein, we investigate the clinical implications of genomic alterations in the WNT signaling cascade in men with omCSPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of 277 men with metachronous omCSPC who underwent targeted DNA sequencing of their primary/metastatic tumor. Patients were classified by presence or absence of pathogenic WNT pathway mutations (in the genes APC, RNF43, and CTNNB1). Pearson χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine differences in clinical factors between genomic strata. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival, stratified according to WNT pathway mutation status. RESULTS A pathogenic WNT pathway mutation was detected in 11.2% of patients. Patients with WNT pathway mutations were more likely to have visceral metastases (22.6% vs 2.8%; P < .01) and less likely to have regional lymph node metastases (29.0% vs 50.4%; P = .02). At time of oligometastasis, these patients were treated with MDT alone (33.9%), MDT + limited course of systemic therapy (20.6%), systemic therapy alone (22.4%), or observation (defined as no treatment for ≥6 months after metastatic diagnosis). Multivariable cox regression demonstrated WNT pathway mutations associated with significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-12.00). CONCLUSIONS Somatic WNT pathway alterations are present in approximately 11% of patients with omCSPC and are associated with an increased likelihood of visceral metastases. Although these patients have a worse natural history, they may benefit from MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Sutera
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew P Deek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Kim Van der Eecken
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Amol C Shetty
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jin Hee Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theresa Hodges
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yang Song
- Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sofie Verbeke
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bram De Laere
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Zaker Rana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jason Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew Ferris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ashley Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nicholas Roberts
- Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; James Buchanan Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theodore DeWeese
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; James Buchanan Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; James Buchanan Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emmanuel S Antonarakis
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Muhammad Ali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kroeze SGC, Pavic M, Stellamans K, Lievens Y, Becherini C, Scorsetti M, Alongi F, Ricardi U, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Westhoff P, But-Hadzic J, Widder J, Geets X, Bral S, Lambrecht M, Billiet C, Sirak I, Ramella S, Giovanni Battista I, Benavente S, Zapatero A, Romero F, Zilli T, Khanfir K, Hemmatazad H, de Bari B, Klass DN, Adnan S, Peulen H, Salinas Ramos J, Strijbos M, Popat S, Ost P, Guckenberger M. Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e121-e132. [PMID: 36858728 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00752-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with metastatic cancer, especially when characterised by a low tumour burden (ie, oligometastatic disease), receiving targeted therapy or immunotherapy has become a frequently practised and guideline-supported treatment strategy. Despite the increasing use in routine clinical practice, there is little information on the safety of combining SBRT with modern targeted therapy or immunotherapy and a paucity of high-level evidence to guide clinical management. A systematic literature review was performed to identify the toxicity profiles of combined metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These results served as the basis for an international Delphi consensus process among 28 interdisciplinary experts who are members of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OligoCare consortium. Consensus was sought about risk mitigation strategies of metastases-directed SBRT combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy; a potential need for and length of interruption to targeted therapy or immunotherapy around SBRT delivery; and potential adaptations of radiation dose and fractionation. Results of this systematic review and consensus process compile the best available evidence for safe combination of metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or oligometastatic cancer and aim to guide today's clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karin Stellamans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge Campus Kennedylaan, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Paulien Westhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jasna But-Hadzic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Xavier Geets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, MIRO-IREC Lab, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Samuel Bral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Leuvens Kanker Instituut, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Igor Sirak
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Sara Ramella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sergi Benavente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabiola Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kaouthar Khanfir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Valais, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Berardino de Bari
- Service Radio-Oncologie Neuchåtel Hôpital Network, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Desiree N Klass
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Shaukat Adnan
- Department of Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, UK
| | - Heike Peulen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Juan Salinas Ramos
- Radiation Oncology Department, Santa Lucia General University Hospital, Cartagena, Spain
| | - Michiel Strijbos
- Department of Oncology, GasthuisZusters Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gillessen S, Bossi A, Davis ID, de Bono J, Fizazi K, James ND, Mottet N, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney C, Tombal B, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio AM, Armstrong AJ, Attard G, Beer TM, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Briganti A, Bristow RG, Bulbul M, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Clarke CS, Clarke N, Daugaard G, De Santis M, Duran I, Eeles R, Efstathiou E, Efstathiou J, Ngozi Ekeke O, Evans CP, Fanti S, Feng FY, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, Frydenberg M, George D, Gleave M, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Higano C, Hofman MS, Horvath LG, Hussain M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kanesvaran R, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Khauli RB, Klotz L, Kramer G, Leibowitz R, Logothetis CJ, Mahal BA, Maluf F, Mateo J, Matheson D, Mehra N, Merseburger A, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Pezaro C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Rubin MA, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Pablo Sade J, Sartor OA, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna I, Soule H, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Steuber T, Suzuki H, Sydes MR, Taplin ME, Tilki D, Türkeri L, Turco F, Uemura H, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, van Oort I, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Zilli T, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022. Eur Urol 2023; 83:267-293. [PMID: 36494221 PMCID: PMC7614721 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. OBJECTIVE To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers prioritise areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient and cancer characteristics (disease extent and location, treatment history, comorbidities, and patient preferences) and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, therapeutic guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with health care providers and patients worldwide. At each APCCC, a panel of physician experts vote in response to multiple-choice questions about their clinical opinions and approaches to managing advanced prostate cancer. This report presents voting results for the subset of questions pertaining to intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical relapse after definitive treatment, advanced (next-generation) imaging, and management of side effects caused by hormonal therapies. The results provide a practical guide to help clinicians and patients discuss treatment options as part of shared multidisciplinary decision-making. The findings may be especially useful when there is little or no high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Genitourinary Oncology, Prostate Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University and Eastern Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Johann de Bono
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA; Urology/Surgical Oncology, GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mathew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ana M Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Tomasz M Beer
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Département de Radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rob G Bristow
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Christie NHS Trust and CRUK Manchester Institute and Cancer Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Ros Eeles
- The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Jason Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke
- Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Valerie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Prostate Cancer Research Program, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel George
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Gleave
- Urological Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Celestia Higano
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maha Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere Cancer Center, Tampere, Finland; Research, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Department of Urology and the Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute (NKBCI), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raya Leibowitz
- Oncology Institute, Shamir Medical Center, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Christopher J Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; University of Athens Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Prostate Cancer Translational Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO) and Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, Walsall Campus, Walsall, UK
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Carmel Pezaro
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong; The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, KFSHRC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark A Rubin
- Bern Center for Precision Medicine and Department for Biomedical Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology, GU Malignancies Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Iwona Skoneczna
- Rafal Masztak Grochowski Hospital, Maria Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Howard Soule
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Matthew R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Levent Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Ankara University Cancer Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- University College London, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - Inge van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tombal BF, Gomez-Veiga F, Gomez-Ferrer A, López-Campos F, Ost P, Roumeguere TA, Herrera-Imbroda B, D'Hondt LA, Quivrin M, Gontero P, Villà S, Khaled HM, Fournier B, Krzystyniak J, Pretzenbacher Y, Erkol H, Loriot Y. A phase 2 randomized open-label study of oral darolutamide monotherapy vs. androgen deprivation therapy in men with hormone-naive prostate cancer (EORTC-GUCG 1532). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
160 Background: Darolutamide is androgen-receptor (AR) inhibitor with low blood–brain barrier penetration and limited potential for clinically relevant drug–drug interactions. Darolutamide has been shown to increase overall survival in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (PC) and, in combination with docetaxel, in men with non-metastatic castration resistant PC. This phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of DARO as a monotherapy without ADT in patients with non-castrate testosterone (T) levels (≥230 ng/dL). Methods: This was a 24-wk, open-label, randomized study of patients with hormone-naïve, histologically confirmed prostate cancer (all stages, with a max of 4 metastatic lesions) requiring hormonal treatment, an ECOG PS score of 0, and a life expectancy >1 y. All patients received DARO 600 mg bid or commercially available LHRH analogue. The primary endpoint is PSA response defined as a ≥ 80% decline at week 24 relative to baseline, in the DARO study arm. The ADT arm is used as an internal control. Secondary endpoints included changes in T levels, safety/tolerability, and quality of life. Results: Among 61 men enrolled, the median (range) age was 72 y (53-86y); 49.2% had metastases; 14.8% and 62.3% had undergone prostatectomy or radiotherapy before study entry. The median (range) of PSA at baseline was 8.9 ng/mL (2.2-333.8). In the DARO arm, the evaluable population with available PSA values at baseline and week 24 consisted of 21 patients. The PSA response rate (>80% PSA decline at wk 24) was 100%, with a median (range) decrease of -99.6% (-94.3, -100) at wk 24 in the DARO arm. Serum T levels increased by a median (range) of 43.4% (5.7-144.0) at wk 24, compared with baseline. In the DARO arm, 45.2% of men reported drug-related AEs (mostly Grade 1 or 2). Most frequent treatment-emergent AEs included gynaecomastia (19.4%), fatigue (12.9%), and hot flush (12.9%). 3.1% of men experienced SAEs, none of which were drug related. HR-QoL measures and ADT arm results will be presented as internal reference. Conclusions: DARO monotherapy (600 mg bid) was associated with significant PSA response in nearly all men with hormone-naïve prostate cancer. Testosterone level changes and most common AEs (gynecomastica, fatigue and hot flush) were consistent with potent AR inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT02972060 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand F. Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Piet Ost
- Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Magali Quivrin
- CHU de Dijon - Centre Georges-Francois-Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Dipartimento di Discipline Medico Chirurgiche, Clinica Urologica, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Salvador Villà
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sutera P, Van der Eecken K, Shetty A, Song Y, Hodges T, Verbeke S, Van Dorpe J, Fonteyne V, De Laere B, Mishra MV, Rana ZH, Molitoris JK, Ferris MJ, Roberts NJ, Song DY, DeWeese TL, Pienta KJ, Deek M, Ost P, Tran PT. Genomic determinants of patterns of failure in metachronous oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
238 Background: Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) represents an early state along the progression of metastatic disease in which patients experience improved outcomes compared to those with higher disease burden. Despite the generally more indolent nature, much heterogeneity still exists with some patients experiencing a more aggressive clinical course unexplained by clinical features alone. Here we correlate tumor genomics with modes of progression (MOP) and patterns of failure (POF) following treatment for omCSPC. Methods: We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of men treated for metachronous omCSPC, who underwent tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) with at least 1 year of follow-up. Descriptive POF and MOP were reported with respect to presence of genomic alterations in pathways of interest. Genomic pathways of interest included TP53, SPOP, WNT ( APC, CTNNB1, RNF43), DNA double strand break repair, cell cycle genes ( Rb1, CCND1–3, CDKN1B, and CDKN2A), and PI3K/AKT/mTOR. MOP were defined as oligoprogression (1-3 lesions), polyprogression (≥4 lesions), or long-term control (LTC, no radiographic progression at last follow-up). POF included location of lesions at first failure. Overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Genomic associations with patterns/modes of failure were compared with chi-square test. Results: 221 patients were included for analysis with the majority having either 1 (47.5%) or 2 (27.3%) metastatic lesions at oligometastasis. 5-yr OS was associated with MOP 92% vs 89% vs 69% (p<0.01) for LTC, oligo- and polyprogression respectively. TP53 mutations were associated with significantly lower rates of LTC (24.4% vs 46%, p<0.01) and cell cycle mutations associated with high rates of polyprogression (36.7% vs 15.7%, p<0.01). With respect to POF, bone failure was significantly more common within tumors harboring mutations in TP53 (41.2% vs 23.1%, p=0.01) and less common with SPOP mutations (4.2% vs 27.8%, p=0.02). Finally, visceral failures were more common in tumors harboring either WNT pathway (20% vs 5.1%, p<0.01) or SPOP (17.4% vs 5.2%, p=0.04) mutations. Notably, SPOP and WNT pathway mutations cluster together (p<0.01). Conclusions: Tumor genomics provides novel insight into patterns of failure and modes of progression following treatment for metachronous omCSPC. Patients with TP53 and cell cycle mutations have a higher likelihood of progression and TP53, SPOP, and WNT pathway mutations may have a role in metastatic organotropism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yang Song
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Y. Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Piet Ost
- Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Huynh MA, Tang C, Siva S, Berlin A, Hannan R, Warner A, Koontz B, De Meeleer G, Palma D, Ost P, Tran PT. Review of Prospective Trials Assessing the Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastasis-directed Treatment in Oligometastatic Genitourinary Cancers. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:28-38. [PMID: 36283936 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Emerging evidence supports the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as metastatic-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic genitourinary cancers; however, the prospective data to guide its application as an alternative standard of care remain limited. OBJECTIVE To review prospective trials that assess the role of SBRT for patients with genitourinary cancers within a modern framework of oligometastatic disease (OMD) and to highlight clinical scenarios where SBRT may offer a benefit to patients with metastatic cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a critical review of PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov in April 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, combined with expert input to identify prospective studies investigating the role of SBRT for oligometastatic prostate, renal, or bladder cancer. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most commonly studied application of SBRT has been for metachronous oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Further prospective study is needed to define the role of SBRT in delaying time to next therapy or inducing synergy with other systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS SBRT has been associated with high rates of local control and minimal risk of toxicity with multiple trials assessing an MDT-alone approach for oligorecurrent HSPC. From a tumor-agnostic perspective, the clinical benefit of SBRT for OMD has been associated with the ability to extend overall survival. As methods of cancer detection and treatment evolve, expansion of studies that prospectively evaluate SBRT MDT, stratifying by tumor histology and oligometastatic state, is needed to inform optimal patient selection and treatment strategy. PATIENT SUMMARY We review outcomes from prospective trials assessing the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic genitourinary cancers, which have predominantly investigated SBRT for oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Much work remains to define how SBRT alone compares with other standard of care treatments for prostate cancer or the role of SBRT in tumor control or delaying time to next therapy in oligometastatic renal and bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Anh Huynh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Building, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Gert De Meeleer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Palma
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Le Guevelou J, Sargos P, Siva S, Ploussard G, Ost P, Gillessen S, Zilli T. The Emerging Role of Extracranial Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:114-124. [PMID: 36151031 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the advent of new systemic agents, still few patients experience a long-term durable response. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is nowadays commonly used as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), but limited data exist on how best to implement this strategy as part of a multimodal approach. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the potential role of extracranial SABR in mRCC and to identify future therapeutic developments of SABR in different disease settings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was conducted in May 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement on the PubMed database. Thirty-four studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS SABR has been used with four main goals: (1) eradication of the whole metastatic burden in synchronous and metachronous oligometastatic patients, resulting in a long-term local control (LC) rate of >90% and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranging between 8 and 15 mo; (2) eradication of oligoprogressive lesions, enabling an extension of the duration of the systemic therapy by approximately 9 mo; (3) improvement of the response to systemic therapy in polymetastatic patients, resulting in an overall response rate ranging from 17% to 56%; and (4) cytoreduction in polymetastatic mRCC patients, with LC rates ranging between 71% and 100%, and preservation of the renal function, but unclear PFS and overall survival impact. Overall, the combination of SABR and systemic agents has been associated with overall good tolerance, with grade ≥3 toxicity ranging from 0% to 13%. CONCLUSIONS Current data highlight the role of SABR as an emerging MDT treatment option in both oligometastatic and oligoprogressive extracranial mRCC, able to ensure long-term disease control and delay the use of next-line systemic therapies. The use of SABR for cytoreduction in the de novo metastatic disease and as an immunological booster in the polymetastatic setting remains investigational and warrants further investigations. PATIENT SUMMARY Radiotherapy delivered with ablative doses (>6 Gy per fraction) is a promising treatment strategy for patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Excellent outcome results have been observed in patients with a limited number of metastases, improving metastasis-free survival by several months. For patients with a few metastases progressing under systemic therapy, radiotherapy allows an extension of the duration of the ongoing therapy by several months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Le Guevelou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Piet Ost
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Fonteyne V, Danckaert W, Ost P, Berghen C, Vandecasteele K, Vanneste B, Rans K, Liefhooghe N, Wallaert S, Paelinck L. Dosimetric and Hematologic Implications of Prostate-Only Versus Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy: Results of the Multicentric Phase 3 PROPER Study. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338231154088. [PMID: 37016933 PMCID: PMC10084583 DOI: 10.1177/15330338231154088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The aim is to evaluate the incidental dose to the lymphatic regions in prostate-only radiotherapy (PORT) and to compare hematological outcome between PORT and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) in node-positive prostate cancer (pN1 PCa), in the era of modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: We performed a prospective phase 3 trial in which a total of 64 pN1 PCa patients were randomized between PORT (ARM A) and WPRT (ARM B) delivered with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The lymph node (LN) regions were delineated separately and differences between groups were calculated using Welch t-tests. Hematological toxicity was scored according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03. To evaluate differences in the evolution of red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), and platelet count over time between PORT and WPRT, 3 linear mixed models with a random intercept for the patient was fit with model terms randomization group, study time point, and the interaction between both categorical predictors. Results: Except for dose to the obturator region, the incidental dose to the surrounding LN areas was low in ARM A. None of the patients developed severe hematological toxicity. The change in RBC from time point pre-external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to month 3 and for WBC from time point pre-EBRT to months 3 and 12 was significantly different with ARM B showing a larger decrease. Conclusion: The incidental dose to the lymphatic areas becomes neglectable when PORT is delivered with VMAT. Hematological toxicity is very low after WPRT with VMAT and when bone marrow constraints are used for planning, although WPRT causes a decrease in RBC and WBC count over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 60200Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Willeke Danckaert
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 60200Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human structure and Repair, 26656Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Charlien Berghen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 60200Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ben Vanneste
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 60200Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kato Rans
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Nick Liefhooghe
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 60211AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Steven Wallaert
- Department of Medicine and Health Science, 26656Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Leen Paelinck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, 60200Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:23-47. [PMID: 36473945 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bukavina L, Luckenbaugh AN, Hofman MS, Hope T, Kamran SC, Murphy DG, Yamoah K, Ost P. Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2022; 83:521-533. [PMID: 36404204 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising molecular target for prostate cancer (PCa) that has allowed the development of a novel diagnostic approach to PCA in the primary and recurrent settings. OBJECTIVE To summarize available data and recommendations regarding the use of PSMA in newly diagnosed and recurrent PCa via a narrative review. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Scopus. The search strategy included meta-analyses, reviews, and original studies on staging and restaging with 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Studies comparing PSMA-targeted imaging and conventional imaging suggest superior performance of PSMA-targeted imaging in primary and recurrent PCa, albeit with several clinically relevant limitations. Pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT allowed more accurate PCa staging in compared to routine practice for high-risk cases, and identified a number of otherwise unknown metastatic lesions. In biochemically recurrent PCa, PSMA PET can reveal sites of recurrence with greater sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging, potentially detecting a major proportion of occult disease. This review will help providers in applying the most up-to-date and relevant literature to (1) determine which patients truly have oligometastatic disease and (2) ascertain who is most likely to experience a meaningful response to local consolidation in the biochemical recurrence setting. CONCLUSIONS Data on PSMA diagnostic studies in primary and recurrent PCa highlight the accuracy and clinical application of PSMA PET. While this review and the evidence to date might lead to a perception of superiority in metastasis directed therapy, fundamental lack of phase III clinical trials with clinically meaningful outcomes are yet to be determined. PATIENT SUMMARY PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) scans have shown great promise for initial evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) and in detection of PCa recurrence. The benefits are more apparent for initial staging of PCa. There are more limited clinical trial results for PCa recurrence on how best to use this new technique to guide cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
47
|
Zilli T, Achard V, Dal Pra A, Schmidt-Hegemann N, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Lancia A, Ingrosso G, Alongi F, Aluwini S, Arcangeli S, Blanchard P, Conde Moreno A, Couñago F, Créhange G, Dirix P, Gomez Iturriaga A, Guckenberger M, Pasquier D, Sargos P, Scorsetti M, Supiot S, Tree AC, Zapatero A, Le Guevelou J, Ost P, Belka C. Recommendations for radiation therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: An ESTRO-ACROP Delphi consensus. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:199-207. [PMID: 36228761 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Oligometastatic prostate cancer is a new and emerging treatment field with only few prospective randomized studies published so far. Despite the lack of strong level I evidence, metastasis-directed therapies (MDT) are widely used in clinical practice, mainly based on retrospective and small phase 2 studies and with a large difference across centers. Pending results of ongoing prospective randomized trials, there is a clear need for more consistent treatment indications and radiotherapy practices. MATERIAL AND METHODS A European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Guidelines Committee consisting of radiation oncologists' experts in prostate cancer was asked to answer a dedicated questionnaire, including 41 questions on the main controversial issues with regard to oligometastatic prostate cancer. RESULTS The panel achieved consensus on patient selection and routine use of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging as preferred staging and restaging imaging. MDT strategies are recommended in the de novo oligometastatic, oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease setting for nodal, bone and visceral metastases. Radiation therapy doses, volumes and techniques were discussed and commented. CONCLUSION These recommendations have the purpose of providing standardization and consensus to optimize the radiotherapy treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer until mature results of randomized trials are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France; Inserm U1018 Oncostat, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Antonio Conde Moreno
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Castellón, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital La Luz, Madrid, Spain; Medicine Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alfonso Gomez Iturriaga
- Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Basque Country University (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Research Institute, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jennifer Le Guevelou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA ziekenhuizen, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Barry A, Helou J, Bezjak A, Wong R, Dawson L, Ringash J, Fazelzad R, Liu Z, Olson R, Palma D, Ost P, Siva S, Phillips R, Adhikari N. Health Related Quality of Life Outcomes Following Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Oligo-Metastatic Disease: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
49
|
De Laere B, Crippa A, Discacciati A, Larsson B, Oldenburg J, Mortezavi A, Ost P, Eklund M, Lindberg J, Grönberg H. Clinical Trial Protocol for ProBio: An Outcome-adaptive and Randomised Multiarm Biomarker-driven Study in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1617-1621. [PMID: 35317973 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
ProBio is an outcome-adaptive, multiarm, multiple-assignment randomised, biomarker-driven platform trial in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Here we describe the amended clinical protocol, focusing on expansion of the trial to include patients with de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram De Laere
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Alessio Crippa
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrea Discacciati
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Berit Larsson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Ahus, Norway
| | - Ashkan Mortezavi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, GZA Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Martin Eklund
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lindberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Grönberg
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Capio S:t Görans Sjukhus, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sutera P, Van der Eecken K, Deek M, Verbeke S, Van Dorpe J, Fonteyne V, DeLaere B, Mishra M, Rana Z, Molitoris J, Ferris M, Ross A, Schaeffer E, Roberts N, Song D, DeWeese T, Pienta K, Antonarakis E, Ost P, Tran P. Role of WNT Pathway Mutations within Oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|