The Impact of Low-dose Gliclazide on the Incretin Effect and Indices of Beta-cell Function

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Studies in permanent neonatal diabetes suggest that sulphonylureas lower blood glucose without causing hypoglycemia, in part by augmenting the incretin effect. This mechanism has not previously been attributed to sulphonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We therefore aimed to evaluate the impact of low-dose gliclazide on beta-cell function and incretin action in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Paired oral glucose tolerance tests and isoglycemic infusions were performed to evaluate the difference in the classical incretin effect in the presence and absence of low-dose gliclazide in 16 subjects with T2DM (hemoglobin A1c < 64 mmol/mol, 8.0%) treated with diet or metformin monotherapy. Beta-cell function modeling was undertaken to describe the relationship between insulin secretion and glucose concentration.

RESULTS

A single dose of 20 mg gliclazide reduced mean glucose during the oral glucose tolerance test from 12.01 ± 0.56 to 10.82 ± 0.5mmol/l [P = 0.0006; mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)]. The classical incretin effect was augmented by 20 mg gliclazide, from 35.5% (lower quartile 27.3, upper quartile 61.2) to 54.99% (34.8, 72.8; P = 0.049). Gliclazide increased beta-cell glucose sensitivity by 46% [control 22.61 ± 3.94, gliclazide 33.11 ± 7.83 (P = 0.01)] as well as late-phase incretin potentiation [control 0.92 ± 0.05, gliclazide 1.285 ± 0.14 (P = 0.038)].

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Low-dose gliclazide reduces plasma glucose in response to oral glucose load, with concomitant augmentation of the classical incretin effect. Beta-cell modeling shows that low plasma concentrations of gliclazide potentiate late-phase insulin secretion and increase glucose sensitivity by 50%. Further studies are merited to explore whether low-dose gliclazide, by enhancing incretin action, could effectively lower blood glucose without risk of hypoglycemia.

Investigating the beneficial effect of aliskiren in attenuating neuropathic pain in diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats

Objectives

Worldwide, diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a major complication of diabetes mellitus. The direct renin inhibitor aliskiren is recognized as a treatment for cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients, but little is known about its potential benefits in cases of diabetic neuropathy. Accordingly, we investigated the effects of aliskiren (ALIS) and gliclazide (GLZ) and their combination therapy on peripheral neuropathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

Methods

In total, 112 adult Sprague-Dawley rats were used for this study. Diabetes was induced using streptozotocin (STZ), whereas the control group was treated with an equal volume of citrate buffer. The diabetic rats were divided randomly into six groups according to the proposed treatment regime: diabetic control (DC), gliclazide (GLZ), aliskiren (ALIS), ramipril (RAM), (GLZ + ALIS) and (GLZ + RAM). Behavioural responses to thermal (hot-plate) and mechanical (tail-pinch) pain were evaluated. After eight weeks of daily treatments, the animals were fasted and sacrificed. The blood samples were collected, with the serum separated and subjected to various biochemical and enzyme analyses so as to assess the effect of the treatments on diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Results

After 8 weeks, aliskiren alone and in combination with gliclazide therapy had a significant effect (P < .001) in reducing blood glucose levels and showed increased hot-plate and tail-flick latencies compared with the diabetic control group. The threshold of mechanical hyperalgesia was also significantly elevated (P < .001).

Conclusions/Interpretations

These data suggest that either aliskerin alone or in combination with gliclazide can protect against the development and progression of diabetic neuropathy.

Response of 1,5-anhydroglucitol level to intensive glucose- and blood-pressure lowering interventions, and its associations with clinical outcomes in the ADVANCE trial

AIMS

To evaluate 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) according to clinical outcomes and assess the effects of glucose- and blood pressure-lowering interventions on change in 1,5-AG levels in people with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We measured 1,5-AG in 6826 stored samples at baseline and in a random subsample of 684 participants at the 1-year follow-up visit in the ADVANCE trial. We examined baseline 1,5-AG [< 39.7, 39.7-66.2, ≥ 66.2 μmol/L (<6, 6-10, ≥10 μg/mL)] and microvascular and macrovascular events and mortality using Cox regression models during 5 years of follow-up. Using an intention-to-treat approach, we examined 1-year change in 1,5-AG (mean and percent) in response to the glucose- and blood pressure-lowering interventions in the subsample.

RESULTS

Low 1,5-AG level [<39.7 μmol/L vs ≥ 66.2 μmol/L (<6 μg/mL vs ≥10 μg/mL)] was associated with microvascular events (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.60) after adjustment for risk factors and baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); however, the associations for macrovascular events and mortality were not independent of HbA1c. The glucose-lowering intervention was associated with a significant 1-year increase in 1,5-AG (vs standard control) of 6.69 μmol/L (SE 2.52) [1.01 μg/mL (SE 0.38)], corresponding to an 8.26% (SE 0.10%) increase from baseline. We also observed an increase in 1,5-AG of similar magnitude in response to the blood pressure intervention independent of the glucose-lowering effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that 1,5-AG is a marker of risk in adults with type 2 diabetes, but only for microvascular events independently of HbA1c. We found that 1,5-AG was improved (increased) in response to an intensive glucose-lowering intervention, although the independent effect of the blood pressure-lowering intervention on 1,5-AG suggests potential non-glycaemic influences.

Incident Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Patients Treated with a Sulfonylurea: A Nationwide, Nested, Case-Control Study

Several studies have shown that the use of sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we investigated the effects of individual sulfonylureas on HCC development using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort in South Korea. Among 47,738 subjects aged 40 years or older who had newly diagnosed with diabetes, 241 incident HCC cases and 1205 matched controls were identified. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) as estimates of the relative risk of HCC were calculated using logistic regression analysis. Compared to patients never treated with a sulfonylurea, those treated with a sulfonylurea had a 1.7-fold increased risk of HCC development. Of the different types of sulfonylureas, the exclusive use of glimepiride was associated with a significantly elevated risk of HCC (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.02-3.47) compared to those who were never treated with sulfonylureas. No significant associations were observed between exclusive gliclazide use and incident HCC (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 0.75-5.52). In conclusion, the association between the use of sulfonylureas and risk of HCC was different according to the type of sulfonylurea, in patients with new-onset T2DM. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these results and translate them into clinical practice.

Antidiabetic effect of mangiferin in combination with oral hypoglycemic agents metformin and gliclazide

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus poses serious threat to the global population due to the alarming diabetic complications it leads to. The current therapeutic options available can be improved for better efficiency and maximum benefits. Combination therapy has been commonly used to improve the efficacy and to minimize the side effects of drugs in current clinical use.

PURPOSE

The present study aims to assess the interaction between a natural molecule mangiferin with the commercially available oral hypoglycemic drugs metformin and gliclazide in diabetic rats.

METHODS

In this study, the in vitro cytotoxicity and glucose uptake studies were performed in HepG2 cells. Based on experimental data, the combination index of the hypoglycemic drugs like metformin and gliclazide in combination with different doses of mangiferin was determined using COMPUSYN software. Further, in vivo studies were performed in HFD + STZ induced diabetic male Sprague Dawley rats. Serum parameters, enzyme markers, hepatic oxidative stress markers, gene and protein expression studies and histopathological analyses were performed in rat liver to identify the mode of action of the combination drug administration.

RESULTS

The in vitro studies on HepG2 cells suggest a positive interaction of mangiferin with both metformin and gliclazide at specific concentrations as evidenced by glucose uptake. The hepatic enzymes, oxidative stress markers, carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes, gene (AMPK, Akt, ACC β and Glut-2) and protein (PPARα, PPARγ) expression confirmed the results of the in vitro studies. Both the combinations of mangiferin with metformin and mangiferin with gliclazide exhibited potent antidiabetic effect. The combination of mangiferin with metformin was insulin dependent (Akt pathway) whereas the combination of mangiferin and gliclazide was insulin independent (AMPK pathway).

CONCLUSION

The overall results suggest that combination of mangiferin with both metformin and gliclazide alleviates diabetic conditions potentially at specific doses and modulates the adverse effect of high dose of commonly used OHD's. This combination therapy can be translated for its clinical use as a diabetes management strategy.

A randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of sulphonylurea gliclazide MR (modified release) and the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin on glycemic variability and control measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in Brazilian women with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate whether there is a difference between the effects of vildagliptin and gliclazide MR (modified release) on glycemic variability (GV) in women with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) as evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

METHODS

An open-label, randomized study was conducted in T2DM women on steady-dose metformin monotherapy which were treated with 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily or 60-120 mg of gliclazide MR once daily. CGM and GV indices calculation were performed at baseline and after 24 weeks.

RESULTS

In total, 42 patients (age: 61.9 ± 5.9 years, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c): 7.3 ± 0.56) were selected and 37 completed the 24-week protocol. Vildagliptin and gliclazide MR reduced GV, as measured by the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE, p = 0.007 and 0.034, respectively). The difference between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Vildagliptin also significantly decreased the standard deviation of the mean glucose (SD) and the mean of the daily differences (MODD) (p = 0.007 and 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Vildagliptin and gliclazide MR similarly reduced the MAGE in women with T2DM after 24 weeks of treatment. Further studies are required to attest differences between vildagliptin and gliclazide MR regarding glycemic variability.

Haemoglobin glycation index and risk for diabetes-related complications in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Previous studies have suggested that the haemoglobin glycation index (HGI) can be used as a predictor of diabetes-related complications in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. We investigated whether HGI was a predictor of adverse outcomes of intensive glucose lowering and of diabetes-related complications in general, using data from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial.

METHODS

We studied participants in the ADVANCE trial with data available for baseline HbA_1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (n = 11,083). HGI is the difference between observed HbA_1c and HbA_1c predicted from a simple linear regression of HbA_1c on FPG. Using Cox regression, we investigated the association between HGI, both categorised and continuous, and adverse outcomes, considering treatment allocation (intensive or standard glucose control) and compared prediction of HGI and HbA_1c.

RESULTS

Intensive glucose control lowered mortality risk in individuals with high HGI only (HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.61, 0.91]; p = 0.003), while there was no difference in the effect of intensive treatment on mortality in those with high HbA_1c. Irrespective of treatment allocation, every SD increase in HGI was associated with a significant risk increase of 14-17% for macrovascular and microvascular disease and mortality. However, when adjusted for identical covariates, HbA_1c was a stronger predictor of these outcomes than HGI.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

HGI predicts risk for complications in ADVANCE participants, irrespective of treatment allocation, but no better than HbA_1c. Individuals with high HGI have a lower risk for mortality when on intensive treatment. Given the discordant results and uncertain relevance beyond HbA_1c, clinical use of HGI in type 2 diabetes cannot currently be recommended.

A Randomized Trial of Insulin Glargine plus Oral Hypoglycemic Agents versus Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion to Treat Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

AIMS

Basal insulin plus oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) has not been investigated for early intensive antihyperglycemic treatment in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. This study is aimed at comparing the short-term (over a period of 12 days) effects of basal insulin glargine plus OHAs and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on glycemic control and beta-cell function in this setting.

METHODS

An open-label parallel-group study. Newly diagnosed hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥11.1 mmol/L or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥9% (75 mmol/mol) were randomized to CSII or insulin glargine in combination with metformin and gliclazide. The primary outcome measure was the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and secondary endpoints included time to reach glycemic control target (FPG < 7 mmol/L and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose < 10 mmol/L), markers of β-cell function, and hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

Subjects in the CSII (n = 35) and basal insulin plus OHA (n = 33) groups had a similar significant reduction from baseline to end of treatment in glycated albumin (-6.44 ± 3.23% and- 6.42 ± 3.56%, P = 0.970). Groups A and B have comparable time to glycemic control (3.6 ± 1.2 days and 4.0 ± 1.4 days), MAGE (3.40 ± 1.40 mmol/L vs. 3.16 ± 1.38 mmol/L; p = 0.484), and 24-hour mean blood glucose (7.49 ± 0.96 mmol/L vs. 7.02 ± 1.03 mmol/L). Changes in the C-peptide reactivity index, the secretory unit of islet in transplantation index, and insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2 indicated a greater β-cell function improvement with basal insulin plus OHAs versus CSII.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term insulin glargine plus OHAs may be an alternative to CSII for initial intensive therapy in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

Epidemiologic Surveillance of Glycemic Response to a Scored, Breakable, Extended Release, Fixed Dose Combination of Gliclazide and Metformin in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

The combination of metformin and a sulphonylurea has been recommended for treatment of type 2 diabetes. A, scored, breakable, extended release, once daily fixed dose combination (FDC) of gliclazide and metformin is available in India.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the initial blood glucose lowering efficacy, glycemic control and patient acceptability of the fixed dose combination of original gliclazide 60mg and metformin 500mg in an extended release, scored and breakable formulation (in a range of 1, 1½, and 2 tablets) among Indian patients in day to day practice.

METHODS

In a multi-center epidemiologic surveillance protocol of 60 days, patients with type 2 diabetes were prospectively prescribed 1 to 2 tablet of gliclazide 60mg + metformin 500mg during the course of study. The possibility of breaking the tablet in two equal halves enabled administration of 1½ tablets wherever required. Primary data on fasting plasma glucose response and adverse events was extracted for analysis from the case records of patients kept with the investigators. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving glycemic control, defined as fasting plasma glucose of 90-130 mg/dl at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Of the 759 patients treated with an extended release FDC of gliclazide 60mg + metformin 500mg, the number (%, 95% CI) which achieved glycemic control was 474/759 (62.5%, 59.0% to 65.8%). The proportion controlled with 1 tablet was, 252/759 (33.2%, 29.9% to 36.6%); with 1½ tablets, 149/298, (50.0%, 44.3% to 55.6%); and with 2 tablets, 73/94, (77.5%, 68.2% to 85.0%). Mean (95% CI) FPG mg/dl decreased from baseline by 48.7 (45.0 to 51.4) with 1 tablet; by 71.3 (66.0 to 76.6) with 1½ tablets; and by 86.3 (75.7 to 96.9) with 2 tablets. Frequency of hypo-glycaemia was 0.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended release FDC of gliclazide 60mg + metformin 500mg, a scored, breakable, once daily, formulation was effective in controlling blood glucose in a large proportion of type 2 diabetes with a low risk of hypoglycaemia.

Metformin Increases Cortisol Regeneration by 11βHSD1 in Obese Men With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

CONTEXT

The mechanism of action of metformin remains unclear. Given the regulation of the cortisol-regenerating enzyme 11βhydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 (11βHSD1) by insulin and the limited efficacy of selective 11βHSD1 inhibitors to lower blood glucose when co-prescribed with metformin, we hypothesized that metformin reduces 11βHSD1 activity.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether metformin regulates 11βHSD1 activity in vivo in obese men with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

SETTING

A hospital clinical research facility.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight obese nondiabetic (OND) men and eight obese men with type 2 diabetes (ODM).

INTERVENTION

Participants received 28 days of metformin (1 g twice daily), placebo, or (in the ODM group) gliclazide (80 mg twice daily) in random order. A deuterated cortisol infusion at the end of each phase measured cortisol regeneration by 11βHSD1. Oral cortisone was given to measure hepatic 11βHSD1 activity in the ODM group. The effect of metformin on 11βHSD1 was also assessed in human hepatocytes and Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome adipocytes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The effect of metformin on whole-body and hepatic 11βHSD1 activity.

RESULTS

Whole-body 11βHSD1 activity was approximately 25% higher in the ODM group than the OND group. Metformin increased whole-body cortisol regeneration by 11βHSD1 in both groups compared with placebo and gliclazide and tended to increase hepatic 11βHSD1 activity. In vitro, metformin did not increase 11βHSD1 activity in hepatocytes or adipocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin increases whole-body cortisol generation by 11βHSD1 probably through an indirect mechanism, potentially offsetting other metabolic benefits of metformin. Co-prescription with metformin should provide a greater target for selective 11βHSD1 inhibitors.

Effect of incretin therapies compared to pioglitazone and gliclazide in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in diabetic patients not controlled on metformin alone: An observational, pilot study

AIM

To compare the effect of different hypoglycemic drugs on laboratory and ultrasonographic markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with type 2 diabetes not controlled on metformin alone.

METHODS

Prospective study of diabetic patients treated with metformin in combination with gliclazide, pioglitazone, sitagliptin, exenatide, or liraglutide. NAFLD was assessed by abdominal ultrasound and NAFLD fibrosis score was calculated at baseline and 6 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients completed 6 months of follow-up: 15 received gliclazide, 13 pioglitazone, 15 sitagliptin, 7 exenatide, and 8 liraglutide. NAFLD affected 57.8% of patients at baseline, and its ultrasonographic course varied depending on changes in weight (P=.009) and waist circumference (P=.012). The proportions of patients who experienced ultrasonographic improvement in the different treatment groups were: 33.3% with gliclazide, 37.5% with pioglitazone, 45.5% with sitagliptin, 80% with exenatide, and 33% with liraglutide (P=.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative ultrasonographic NAFLD improvement in diabetic patients treated with metformin in combination with other hypoglycemic drugs is associated to change over time in weight and waist circumference. Long-term clinical trials are needed to assess whether incretin therapies result in better liver outcomes than other hypoglycemic therapies.

Implementing an optimized glucose-lowering strategy with a novel once daily modified release gliclazide formulation

AIM

The 6-months titration profile of a new scored gliclazide modified release (MR) formulation (MR 60 mg) was explored in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This international study enrolled 7170 individuals, age ≥ 35 years with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% (59 mmol/mol) and not on insulin. Participants were started on 30-120 mg gliclazide MR 60 mg once daily as a first line (FIRST), add-on (ADD) or switch from a previous oral antihyperglycemic treatment strategy (SWITCH). Uptitration was capped at 120 mg.

RESULTS

Women comprised 58.5% of the cohort. Mean baseline age was 58.9 years, body mass index 30.1 kg/m(2) and diabetes duration 5.1 years. Mean baseline HbA1c for the FIRST (n=2023), ADD (n=3136) and SWITCH (n=1834) groups was 8.9% (74 mmol/mol), 8.8% (73 mmol/mol) and 8.8% (73 mmol/mol), respectively. Probability of reaching optimal dose at months 1, 2, 3 and 6 was 15%, 39%, 59% and 92%, respectively. Mean HbA1c changes from baseline to month 6 were FIRST: -1.98%, ADD: -1.74% and SWITCH: -1.61% (all p<0.01). Overall, 65.3% achieved HbA1c ≤ 7.0% (53 mmol/mol); average duration for achieving glucose control was 80.1 days. Mean weight loss ranged from -1.45 to -1.27 kg. Severe hypoglycemia was experienced by 0.06% of participants. Most (95.5%) indicated a greater likelihood of adherence with the gliclazide MR 60 mg regime relative to their previous therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, real world study, progressive uptitration with gliclazide MR 60 mg once daily appears to be efficacious and safe in individuals with suboptimal glycemic control at various stages of the diabetes continuum.

Effects of metformin plus gliclazide versus metformin plus glimepiride on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

High blood glucose level, lipid profile disturbances and plasma homocysteine (Hcy) are important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare effects of glimepiride/metformin combination versus gliclazide/metformin combination on cardiovascular risk factors in type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. One hundred and eighty T2DM patients were randomly allocated for treatment with placebo (control), metformin (500 mg twice daily), glimepiride (3mg once daily), gliclazide (80 mg once daily), metformin plus glimepiride or metformin plus gliclazide for 3 months. We evaluated plasma levels of glucose (PG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), Hcy, vitamin B12, folic acid and lipid profile before treatment and 3 months post treatment. Compared to metformin treated patients, glimepiride plus metformin induced significant reductions in: fasting plasma glucose, postprandial PG level, HbA1C % and Hcy level. Conversely, plasma folic acid and vitamin B12 were significantly increased. The levels of total cholesterol and triglyceride were significantly decreased; low-density lipoprotein was markedly decreased, whereas high-density lipoprotein was significantly increased and hence risk ratio was significantly decreased. Similar results but with lower values were obtained using combination of metformin plus gliclazide on glycemic control only. Combination of glimepiride with metformin was superior to gliclazide plus metformin in alleviating the cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Metformin in combination with various insulin secretagogues in type 2 diabetes and associated risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality--a retrospective nationwide study

AIMS

Metformin is the first-line treatment for most patients with type 2 diabetes but many patients need additional treatment with insulin secretagogues (IS) to achieve glycemic control. We aimed to compare mortality and cardiovascular risk among users of metformin in combination with pharmacologically different ISs.

METHODS

Using nationwide administrative Danish registries, we followed all individuals without prior stroke or myocardial infarction who initiated metformin and an IS from 1997 through 2009. Rate ratios (RR) of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death were compared between user groups using time-dependent multivariable Poisson regression models. The most common combination, glimepiride+metformin, was used as reference.

RESULTS

A total of 56,827 patients were included, 56% male, the mean age was 61 ± 12.5 years, and median duration of prior monotherapy was 2.2 (inter quartile range 0.5-4.5) years. Crude incidence rates of mortality for combinations of ISs with metformin were; 15.4 (repaglinide), 28.1 (glipizide), 23.7 (glibenclamide), 21.1 (gliclazide), 20.7 (glimepiride), 27.7 (tolbutamide) deaths per 1000 person years. In adjusted analysis, the associated mortality risk was similar for users of gliclazide+metformin (RR=1.01 [0.88-1.15]), repaglinide+metformin (RR=0.81 [0.62-1.05]), glibenclamide+metformin (RR=0.98 [0.87-1.10]), and tolbutamide+metformin (RR=1.04 [0.85-1.28]). Users of glipizide+metformin was associated with increased all-cause mortality (RR=1.16 [1.02-1.32], p=0.02), cardiovascular death (RR=1.21 [1.01-1.46], p=0.04), and the combined endpoint (RR=1.20 [1.06-1.36, p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

Most ISs in combination with metformin were associated with similar mortality and cardiovascular risk. Whether glipizide is associated with increased risk compared with other ISs when used in combinations with metformin warrants further study.

Follow-up of blood-pressure lowering and glucose control in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

In the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) factorial trial, the combination of perindopril and indapamide reduced mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes, but intensive glucose control, targeting a glycated hemoglobin level of less than 6.5%, did not. We now report results of the 6-year post-trial follow-up.

METHODS

We invited surviving participants, who had previously been assigned to perindopril-indapamide or placebo and to intensive or standard glucose control (with the glucose-control comparison extending for an additional 6 months), to participate in a post-trial follow-up evaluation. The primary end points were death from any cause and major macrovascular events.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were similar among the 11,140 patients who originally underwent randomization and the 8494 patients who participated in the post-trial follow-up for a median of 5.9 years (blood-pressure-lowering comparison) or 5.4 years (glucose-control comparison). Between-group differences in blood pressure and glycated hemoglobin levels during the trial were no longer evident by the first post-trial visit. The reductions in the risk of death from any cause and of death from cardiovascular causes that had been observed in the group receiving active blood-pressure-lowering treatment during the trial were attenuated but significant at the end of the post-trial follow-up; the hazard ratios were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 0.99; P=0.03) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.99; P=0.04), respectively. No differences were observed during follow-up in the risk of death from any cause or major macrovascular events between the intensive-glucose-control group and the standard-glucose-control group; the hazard ratios were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.08) and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.08), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits with respect to mortality that had been observed among patients originally assigned to blood-pressure-lowering therapy were attenuated but still evident at the end of follow-up. There was no evidence that intensive glucose control during the trial led to long-term benefits with respect to mortality or macrovascular events. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; ADVANCE-ON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00949286.).

Novel artificial cell microencapsulation of a complex gliclazide-deoxycholic bile acid formulation: a characterization study

Gliclazide (G) is an antidiabetic drug commonly used in type 2 diabetes. It has extrapancreatic hypoglycemic effects, which makes it a good candidate in type 1 diabetes (T1D). In previous studies, we have shown that a gliclazide-bile acid mixture exerted a hypoglycemic effect in a rat model of T1D. We have also shown that a gliclazide-deoxycholic acid (G-DCA) mixture resulted in better G permeation in vivo, but did not produce a hypoglycemic effect. In this study, we aimed to develop a novel microencapsulated formulation of G-DCA with uniform structure, which has the potential to enhance G pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in our rat model of T1D. We also aimed to examine the effect that DCA will have when formulated with our new G microcapsules, in terms of morphology, structure, and excipients' compatibility. Microencapsulation was carried out using the Büchi-based microencapsulating system developed in our laboratory. Using sodium alginate (SA) polymer, both formulations were prepared: G-SA (control) at a ratio of 1:30, and G-DCA-SA (test) at a ratio of 1:3:30. Complete characterization of microcapsules was carried out. The new G-DCA-SA formulation was further optimized by the addition of DCA, exhibiting pseudoplastic-thixotropic rheological characteristics. The size of microcapsules remained similar after DCA addition, and these microcapsules showed no chemical interactions between the excipients. This was supported further by the spectral and microscopy studies, suggesting microcapsule stability. The new microencapsulated formulation has good structural properties and may be useful for the oral delivery of G in T1D.

Risk of acute coronary events associated with glyburide compared with gliclazide use in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study

AIM

Sulfonylureas might increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events; however, emerging evidence suggests there may be important differences amongst these drugs. Some, like glyburide, inhibit KATP channels in the heart and pancreas, while others, like gliclazide, are more likely to selectively inhibit KATP channels in the pancreas. We hypothesized that the risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events would be higher in patients using glyburide compared with gliclazide.

METHODS

This nested case-control study used administrative health data from Alberta, Canada. New users of glyburide or gliclazide aged ≥66 years between 1998 and 2010 were included. Cases were individuals with an ACS-related hospitalization or death. Up to four controls were matched based on birth year, sex, cohort-entry year and follow-up time. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR), controlling for baseline drug use and co-morbidities.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 7441 gliclazide and 13 884 glyburide users; 51.4% men, mean (s.d.) age 75.5 (6.6) years and mean (s.d.) duration of follow-up 5.5 (4.0) years. A total of 4239 patients had an ACS-related hospitalization or death and were matched to 16 723 controls. Compared with gliclazide use, glyburide use was associated with a higher risk (adjusted OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.23) of ACS-related hospitalization or death over 5.5 years (number needed to harm: 50).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, glyburide use was associated with a 14% higher risk of ACS events compared with gliclazide use. Although the difference is small and probably to have implications at the population level rather than the individual patient or clinician, any causal inferences regarding sulfonylurea use and adverse cardiovascular risk should be tested in a large-scale randomized controlled trial.

Evaluation approach can significantly influence oral glucose-lowering drugs total mortality risks in retrospective cohorts of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

BACKGROUND

Retrospective evaluations of mortality risks in cohorts of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), receiving oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLDs) gave conclusions about association between certain OGLDs and mortality that do not exactly agree with each other. Different approaches were used: recording the outcomes depending on the first prescription, later changes were ignored or receiving one of OGLDs according to data of last documented visit before the end of observation period; without change of OGLD during the whole observation; treatment intervals - period from onset of treatment to onset of the next drug treatment, or until outcome. Impact of each study approach was not evaluated yet. We conducted such comparative analysis using the database of Ukrainian Diabetes Register.

METHODS

All-cause mortality in retrospective cohorts of 36 449 type 2 diabetes patients treated with glibenclamide, gliclazide or metformin monotherapy all of which were included at least in one of evaluation models: "first prescription" - 2 862 /257, "last prescription" - 34 818 / 4 224; "unchanged" - 8 786/680 and "treatment intervals" - 13 546/3 142 T2D patients / death cases respectively, were evaluated using Cox regression with gender, age, and diabetes duration adjusting. We compared the mortality risk (Hazard ratios -HRs) associated with Gliclazide or Metformin versus Glibenclamide monotherapy.

RESULTS

Gliclazide or metformin-treated patients demonstrated lesser mortality risk than glibenclamide-treated ones in all four evaluation models, but age and duration stratification can influence this phenomenon in case of "first prescription model". In case of "without change OGLD" model the increase of mortality risk in glibenclamide-treated group is the most evident when comparing to gliclazide-treated, rather than to metformin-treated one. When comparing gliclazide vs metformin mortality risk for this model, gliclazide-treated patients demonstrated lesser mortality risk than metformin-treated ones: gender, age and diabetes duration adjusting HR = 0.51 (0.35-0.72), p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

Different approaches used for mortality analysis in observation studies of T2D patients can present discrepant results.

Effect of two hydrophobic polymers on the release of gliclazide from their matrix tablets

Gliclazide is an oral hypoglycemic agent, indicated in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and in patients with diabetic retinopathy. It has good tolerability and is a short acting sulfonyl urea that requires large dose to maintain the blood glucose level. So development of a sustained release formulation of gliclazide (GLZ) is required for better patient compliance. This study was conducted to assess the effects of different drug polymer ratios on the release profile of gliclazide from the matrix. Oral matrix tablets of gliclazide were prepared by hot melt method, using pure and blended mixture of glyceryl monostearate (GMS) and stearic acid (SA) in different ratios. In vitro release pattern was studied for 8 h in phosphate buffer media (pH 7.4). Different kinetic models including zero order, first order, Higuchi and Peppas were applied to evaluate drug release behavior. Drug excipient compatibility was evaluated by scanning with DSC and FTIR. Higuchi model was found the most appropriate model for describing the release profile of GLZ and non-Fickian release was found predominant mechanism of drug release. The release of drug from the matrix was greatly controlled by GMS while SA appeared to facilitate the release of drug from matrix tablets. FTIR results showed no chemical interaction between drug and the polymers, and DSC results indicated amorphous state of GLZ and polymers without significant complex formation. The results indicate that matrix tablets of gliclazide using glyceryl monostearate and stearic acid showed marked sustained release properties.

Adverse cardiovascular events during treatment with glyburide (glibenclamide) or gliclazide in a high-risk population

AIMS

Sulphonylureas promote insulin release by inhibiting pancreatic potassium channels. Older sulphonylureas such as glyburide (glibenclamide), but not newer ones such as gliclazide, antagonize similar channels in myocardium, interfering with the protective effects of ischaemic preconditioning. Whether this imparts a higher risk of adverse cardiac events is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients aged 66 years and older who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction or who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between 1 April 2007 and 31 March 2010 while receiving either glyburide or gliclazide. We used a high-dimensional propensity score matching process to ensure similarity of glyburide- and gliclazide-treated patients. The primary outcome was a composite of death or hospitalization for myocardial infarction or heart failure.

RESULTS

During the 2-year study period, we matched 1690 patients treated with glyburide to 984 patients treated with gliclazide at the time of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention. We found no difference in the risk of the composite outcome among patients receiving glyburide (adjusted hazard ratio 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.18). We found similar results in secondary analyses of each outcome individually, and in two supplementary analyses (haemorrhage and pneumonia) in which we anticipated no difference between the two patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention, treatment with glyburide is not associated with an increased risk of future adverse cardiovascular events relative to gliclazide, suggesting that the effect of glyburide on ischaemic preconditioning is of little clinical relevance.

Glycaemic control and cost analysis when changing from gliclazide co-administered with metformin to pre-combined glibenclamide-metformin tablets in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients who were on gliclazide co-administered with metformin were changed to pre-combined glibenclamide-metformin tablets in the Endocrine Clinic, Penang Hospital. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the differences in glycaemic control and treatment cost following the change. Eighty patients (60% females) with a mean age of 55 years old were studied. Mean glycosylated haemoglobin (HbAlc) reduction was -0.92% (p<0.01) and -0.83% (p<0.01) after three and six months respectively. Patients with baseline HbA1c > or =8% had greater reduction in mean HbA1c (-1.36%) after six months. The treatment cost per month was reduced by 45% at 3 months (p<0.01)) and 44% at 6 months (p<0.01). The change to pre-combined glibenclamide-metformin tablets resulted in significant improvement in glycaemia and reduction in treatment cost

Effect of binary and ternary solid dispersions on the in vitro dissolution and in-situ rabbit intestinal absorption of gliclazide

Solid dispersion technique is widely used to improve the dissolution rate of drugs. Most investigators relied on the in-vitro characterization and considered the enhanced dissolution as an indication of improved bioavailability. The current study investigated the effects of binary and ternary solid dispersions of gliclazide with polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000) and/or pluronic F68 (PL F68) on the dissolution of gliclazide. The study also investigated the intestinal absorption in presence of solid dispersion components. The latter employed the in-situ rabbit intestinal perfusion technique. Preparation of binary solid dispersion with PEG 6000 or PL F68 significantly enhanced the dissolution rate compared to pure drug. The ternary solid dispersion of gliclazide with both polymers resulted in rapid drug dissolution with most drug being released in the first five minutes. The intestinal perfusion indicated the possibility of complete drug absorption from the small intestine. This, together with slow dissolution of pure drug suggested that the absorption of gliclazide is dissolution rate limited. The presence of PEG 6000 did not alter the intestinal absorption but PL F68 showed a trend of enhanced intestinal absorption of the drug. Ternary solid dispersion can thus provide rapid absorption due to rapid dissolution and potential increase in intestinal permeability.

Formulation and evaluation of Ficus glomerata mucilage sustained release matrix tablets of gliclazide

The main aim of present investigation was to develop sustained release matrix tablets of Gliclazide using fruit mucilage from the plant Ficus glomerata. Varying ratios of drug and polymer viz. 1:0.25, 1:0.5, 1:0.75, 1:1.0 and 1:1.25 were selected for the study. The flow properties of powdered mucilage and physical properties of matrix tablets were performed. The swelling behavior and release rate characteristics were studied. The in vitro drug release data was analyzed by zero order, first order, Higuchi plot, Peppas plot and Hixon-Crowell Models. It was observed that as the proportion of mucilage increased the release of drug from the matrix tablets was retarded. Stability studies were conducted at 40±2ºC and RH 75±5% for 3 months indicates that Gliclazide was stable in the matrix tablets. The Differential Scanning Calorimetric (DSC) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) study revealed that there was no negative chemical interaction between drug and the mucilage used. From the dissolution study, it was concluded that dried Ficus glomerata mucilage can be used as an excipient for making sustained release matrix tablets.

Comparison of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin and the sulphonylurea gliclazide in combination with metformin, in Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during Ramadan: results of the VECTOR study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of hypoglycaemic events (HEs) in a real-world setting in Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during Ramadan.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a ≤16-week prospective, non-interventional, two-cohort study. Data were collected 1-6 weeks before and ≤6 weeks after fasting. Patients were enrolled who had been receiving vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily) or sulphonylurea (SU) as add-on to metformin at least 4 weeks prior to fasting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy endpoint was incidence of HEs during the Ramadan fast. Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and body weight, as well as adherence to treatment, were also assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were enrolled (vildagliptin, n = 30; SU, n = 41; no treatment, n = 1), of whom 23 (76.7%) and 36 (87.8%), respectively, completed the study. With vildagliptin, there were no HEs or severe HEs, compared with 34 HEs (15 patients, 41.7%) and one severe (grade 2) HE with SU. The mean between-group difference in the proportion who experienced at least one HE was -41.7% (95%CI -57.8%, -25.6%), p = 0.0002. Vildagliptin lowered mean HbA(1c) from 7.6% (SD 0.9%) at baseline to 7.2% (SD 0.7%) post-Ramadan, whereas SU had no effect (7.2% [SD 0.6%] vs 7.3% [SD 0.7%]; mean between-group difference -0.5% [95% CI -0.9%, -0.1%], p = 0.0262). The mean number of missed doses was markedly lower with vildagliptin (0.2 [SD 0.8] vs 7.6 [SD 14.9]; mean between-group difference -7.4 [95% CI -13.7, -1.20] doses; p = 0.0204). Body weight remained unchanged in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Vildagliptin caused no hypoglycaemia, was well adhered to and improved HbA(1c), making it a suitable treatment option for managing fasting. Study limitations are the sample size and the lack of diet and exercise data. When extrapolated to the global Muslim population with a similar clinical background, these findings could have considerable public health and clinical implications.

Effects of metformin plus gliclazide compared with metformin alone on circulating endothelial progenitor cell in type 2 diabetic patients

Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play an important role in the development and progression of diabetic vascular complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of gliclazide plus metformin (GLIMET) compared with metformin alone (MET) on number and function of circulating EPCs in T2DM patients. Patients with newly diagnosed T2DM were randomly divided into two groups, receiving the following treatments for 16 weeks: MET group (assuming metformin 500-2500 mg/day, n=24) and GLIMET group [assuming gliclazide (modified release, 30-60 mg/day)+metformin (250-1000 mg/day), n=23]. Circulating EPCs were quantified by flow cytometry, and the ability to uptake LDL and stain for lectin were used as another method of characterizing EPCs ex vivo. The functions of circulating EPCs were evaluated by colony-forming units (CFU) and migration. The status of oxidative stress was analyzed by serum-free malonaldehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics and number and function of circulating EPCs between two groups at baseline. Glycemic responses were similar after treatments. Compared with MET group, GLIMET group was associated with an increase in circulating EPCs number, DiLDL-lectin-positive EPCs, and migration. The mean improvements in MDA and SOD of GLIMET group were more strongly upregulated than those of MET group. This study demonstrated that both metformin mono-treatment and metformin plus gliclazide combination treatment provided with improvements in number and function of circulating EPCs. Compared with metformin mono-treatment, early use of combination therapy with gliclazide plus metformin made more effective improvements in circulating EPCs.

Maintenance of glycaemic control with the evening administration of a long acting sulphonylurea in male type 2 diabetic patients undertaking the Ramadan fast

BACKGROUND

In Ramadan, misuse of hypoglycaemic agents, alterations in diet and hypoglycaemia are frequent. This study assessed whether switching to an evening administration of a long acting sulphonylurea during the 29-day, dawn to dusk fast, can maintain glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Male type 2 diabetic patients from Bangladesh, Pakistan and India, under glycaemic control with gliclazide modified release (MR) 60 mg monotherapy, switched to evening administration of the same dose during Ramadan, and reverted to the morning schedule thereafter. The primary outcome was the difference in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) before and after Ramadan.

RESULTS

In 136 patients, mean (95% CI) FPG decreased by 0.01 mmol/l (0-0.2, p = 0.3) with evening medication by the end of the fast, and increased by 0.2 mmol/l (0.1-0.3, p = 0.01) after reverting to morning medication 20 days later. There were 5 (3.7%) hypoglycaemic episodes before, 3 (2.2%) during and 2 (1.5%) after Ramadan.

CONCLUSION

Male type 2 diabetic patients undertaking the Ramadan fast can safely maintain glycaemic control with evening administration of gliclazide MR 60 mg during the fast, and reverting to a morning schedule thereafter.

A comparison of efficacy and safety of vildagliptin and gliclazide in combination with metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone: a 52-week, randomized study

AIM

To demonstrate non-inferiority of vildagliptin compared with gliclazide, as an add-on therapy, in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin in a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study.

METHODS

Patients receiving a stable dose of metformin (> or = 1500 mg) were randomized (1 : 1) to receive vildagliptin (50 mg twice daily; n = 513) or gliclazide (up to 320 mg/day; n = 494).

RESULTS

Non-inferiority of vildagliptin was demonstrated (95% confidence interval -0.11%, 0.20%) with a mean change (se) from baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) (approximately 8.5% in both groups) to a 52-week endpoint of -0.81% (0.06) with vildagliptin and -0.85% (0.06) with gliclazide. Although a similar proportion of patients reached HbA(1c) < 7.0%, the total number of hypoglycaemic events was lower in the vildagliptin group (6 vs. 11 events). Vildagliptin was non-inferior (margin 0.6 mmol/l) to gliclazide in reducing fasting plasma glucose (1.31 vs. 1.52 mmol/l, P = 0.257). The overall incidence of any adverse events was similar in both groups (approximately 61%), but the number of serious adverse events was higher in the gliclazide group (8.7 vs. 6.7%). The number of patients who discontinued as a result of an unsatisfactory effect was higher in the vildagliptin group (n = 22 vs. 13, respectively) compared with gliclazide, but vildagliptin did not induce weight gain.

CONCLUSION

In patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin, addition of vildagliptin provided similar HbA(1c)-lowering efficacy compared with gliclazide after 52 weeks of treatment. Although both treatments were well tolerated, vildagliptin-treated patients had fewer hypoglycaemic events and did not gain weight.

In-vitro and in-vivo correlation for two gliclazide extended-release tablets

The aim of this study was to perform an in-vitro-in-vivo correlation (IVIVC) for two 60-mg gliclazide extended-release formulations (Fast and Slow release) given once a day and to compare their plasma concentrations over time. In-vitro release rate data were obtained for each formulation using the USP apparatus II, paddle stirrer at 50 and 100 rev min−1 in 0.1 M HCl and pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. The similarity factor (f2) was used to analyse the dissolution data. Eighteen healthy subjects participated in the study, conducted according to a completely randomized, two-way crossover design. The formulations were compared using area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC0-∞′, time to reach peak plasma concentration, Tmax', and peak plasma concentration Cmax', while correlation was determined between in-vitro release and in-vivo absorption. A linear correlation model was developed using percent absorbed data versus percent dissolved data from the two formulations. Predicted gliclazide concentrations were obtained by use of a curve fitting equation. Prediction errors were estimated for Cmax and area under the curve AUC0-∞ to determine the validity of the correlation. 0.1 M HCl at 50 rev min−1 was found to be the most discriminating dissolution method. Linear regression analysis of the mean percentage of dose absorbed versus the mean percentage of in-vitro release resulted in a significant correlation (r2 &gt; 0.98) for the two formulations. An average percent prediction error for Cmax was 4.15% for Fast release and 3.99% for Slow release formulation whereas for AUC0-∞ it was 6.36% and 4.66% for Fast release and Slow release formulation, respectively.

[Dynamics of structural-functional parameters of cardiovascular system during use of complex therapy of women with type 2 diabetes mellitus]

Aim of the work was to study dynamics of parameters of cardiovascular system in women during use of various sugar lowering drugs in complex multifactorial therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). We included in this 12 months study 182 women older than 55 years with type 2 DM, abdominal obesity and artrerial hypertension (AH). All women received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins. As sugar lowering drugs we used metformin (n = 46), metformin with glyclazide (n = 47), monotherapy with insulin (n = 45). Long-term use of metformin in complex multifactorial therapy of women with decompensated type 2 diabetes DM, AH and abdominal obesity provides improvement of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, lowering of arterial pressure, diminishment of albuminuria, diastolic dysfunction, and stiffness of left ventricular myocardium. The use of combination of metformin with glyclazide MB provides advantages in lowering of insulin resistance, contol glycemia, and lessening of hypertrophy of left ventricular myocardium.

[Capabilities of hypoglycemic therapy in women with decompensated type 2 diabetes mellitus]

AIM

to comparatively evaluated the efficiency of various sugar-lowering therapy (SLT) options in patients with decompensated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-two women who were over 55 years of age with a more than 3-5-year history of T2DM and more than one-year decompensation, abdominal obesity (AO), arterial hypertension, and concomitant treatment-matched were randomized into 4 groups: (1) metformin (n=46); (2) a combination of metformin and gliclaside MB (n=47); (3) metformin and insulin (n=44); and (4) insulin (n=45). A follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

As compared with the patients receiving insulin monotherapy, the patients taking metformin alone or in combination showed a more effective recovery of carbohydrate and lipid metabolic disturbances, diminished insulin resistance (IR), lowered blood pressure and albuminuria, reduced diastolic dysfunction, and a smaller cardiovascular risk. When metformin was used in combination with gliclaside (Group 2) for 12 months, there was the maximum IR reduction, an increase in insulin sensitivity, and better results in reaching the goal values of carbohydrate metabolism; there was left ventricular myocardial reverse remodeling. In all the groups, quality of life (SF-36v2) improved, reduced depression (CES-D) reduced; the greatest improvement of the mental component of health-related quality (SF-36v2) and the greatest satisfaction with treatment results (DTSO) were noted when metformin was given in combination with gliclaside MB.

CONCLUSION

In patients having a more than 3-5-year history of T2DM in the presence of AO and IR, with a history of DM decompensation, the use of metformin in combination with gliclaside MB is more preferable, by effectively correcting IR, recovering the physiological profile of insulin secretion, and adequately controlling glycemia.

Normal insulin response to short-term intense exercise is abolished in Type 2 diabetic patients treated with gliclazide

BACKGROUND

Physical activity is an essential component of diabetes management; however, exercise is associated with the risk for metabolic decompensation. The aim of the study was to analyze insulin response to the short-term intense exercise in middle-aged Type 2 diabetic patients treated with gliclazide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen Type 2 diabetic patients (47.9+/-1.6 years, mean+/-S.E.M.), treated with gliclazide, and 14 healthy controls (45.1+/-1.0 years) were submitted to standard graduated submaximal (90% HR(max)) exercise treadmill testing at 2 h after standardized breakfast. Serum glucose, insulin, proinsulin, C peptide, growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, and cortisol concentrations; and plasma lactate, glucagon, epinephrine, and norepinephrine concentrations were measured during the periexercise period up to the 60th min of the recovery period.

RESULTS

Significant hemodynamic (heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure), metabolic (lactate concentration), and hormonal (epinephrine and norepinephrine levels) responses to the exercise were similar in patients and healthy subjects. Glucose, insulin, and proinsulin levels were higher in the diabetic group at the preexercise and at all the next analyzed time points. The insulin concentration increased during the postprandial period in both groups and decreased subsequently during the exercise only in the control group, without concurrent C peptide decline. The C peptide-to-insulin ratio increased during the exercise and decreased immediately postexercise only in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial decrease of the insulin serum concentration during short-term intense exercise in normal middle-aged men is primarily related to the increased clearance of the hormone. Normal insulin response to the exercise was abolished in Type 2 diabetic patients treated with gliclazide.

Vildagliptin therapy and hypoglycaemia in Muslim type 2 diabetes patients during Ramadan

AIMS

To compare hypoglycaemic events, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and changes in bodyweight in metformin-treated Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes receiving adjunctive treatment with vildagliptin or gliclazide during Ramadan fasting.

METHODS

Data were collected from Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes attending primary care practices in North West London, whose HbA(1c) was > 8.5% despite treatment with metformin 2 g daily before Ramadan and who received gliclazide 160 mg twice daily (n = 26) or vildagliptin 50 mg twice daily (n = 26) in addition to metformin. Hypoglycaemic events, HbA(1c) and weight were recorded 2 weeks before and 10 days after the Ramadan fast. All patients received education about how to identify and manage hypoglycaemia during Ramadan.

RESULTS

During Ramadan, at least one hypoglycaemic event (defined as blood glucose < 3.5 mmol/l with or without symptoms) was recorded in two patients receiving vildagliptin (7.7%) and 16 patients receiving gliclazide [61.5%; difference between groups -53.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -74.9 to -26.3, p < 0.001]. Vildagliptin was associated with a reduction in the mean number of hypoglycaemic events during Ramadan compared with before Ramadan, whereas gliclazide was associated with an increase (least squares mean difference between groups -0.66, 95% CI -1.20 to -0.13, p = 0.0168). Both gliclazide and vildagliptin were associated with similar reductions in HbA(1c) and a small, but insignificant, increase in weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate treatment adjustments can lead to improved diabetes management during Ramadan, with avoidance of significant weight gain and improved glucose control without hypoglycaemia. The addition of vildagliptin to metformin therapy during Ramadan in Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with a reduction in the incidence of hypoglycaemia.

Preparation and In Vitro/In Vivo Evaluation of Gliclazide Loaded Eudragit Nanoparticles as a Sustained Release Carriers

The aim of this study was to formulate and optimize gliclazide-loaded Eudragit nanoparticles (Eudragit L100 and Eudragit RS) as a sustained release carrier with enhanced efficacy. Eudragit L 100 nanoparticles (ELNP) were prepared by controlled precipitation method whereas Eudragit RSPO nanoparticles (ERSNP) were prepared by solvent evaporation method. The influence of various formulation factors (stirring speed, drug:polymer ratio, homogenization, and addition of surfactants) on particle size, drug loading, and encapsulation efficiency were investigated. The developed Eudragit nanoparticles (L100 and RS) showed high drug loading and encapsulation efficiencies with nanosize. Mean particle size altered by changing the drug:polymer ratio and stirring speed. Addition of surfactants showed a promise to increase drug loading, encapsulation efficiency, and decreased particle size of ELNP as well as ERSNP. Dissolution study revealed sustained release of gliclazide from Eudragit L100 as well as Eudragit RSPO NP. SEM study revealed spherical morphology of the developed Eudragit (L100 and RS) NP. FT-IR and DSC studies showed no interaction of gliclazide with polymers. Stability studies revealed that the gliclazide-loaded nanoparticles were stable at the end of 6 months. Developed Eudragit NPs revealed a decreased t(min) (ELNP), and enhanced bioavailability and sustained activity (ELNP and ERSNP) and hence superior activity as compared to plain gliclazide in streptozotocin induced diabetic rat model and glucose-loaded diabetic rat model. The developed Eudragit (L100 and RSPO) NP could reduce dose frequency, decrease side effects, and improve patient compliance.

Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular outcomes remain uncertain.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide (modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy), assessed both jointly and separately.

RESULTS

After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%). Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy (P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06; P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon, was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.)

Hypoglycemic effects of a sesquiterpene glycoside isolated from leaves of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.)

Sesquiterpene glycoside, nerolidol-3-O-alpha-l-rhamnopyranosyl(1-->4)-alpha-l-rhamnopyranosyl(1-->2)-[alpha-l-rhamnopyranosyl(1-->6)]-beta-d-glucopyranoside was isolated from dried leaves of loquat [Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl., Rosaceae]. Hypoglycemic effects of this natural product were assessed in normal and alloxan-diabetic mice model. Animals received orally administration of the sesquiterpene glycoside in dose of 25 and 75 mg/kg. The anti-hyperglycemic effect was compared with gliclazide's. The dose of 25 and 75 mg/kg both exerted a significant (p<0.05) hypoglycemic effect in alloxan-diabetic mice throughout the test and a slight effect in normal mice.

In vivo and in vitro evaluation of a solid dispersion system of gliclazide:PEG 6000

OBJECTIVE

Gliclazide is a potent antidiabetic agent because of its capability to decrease blood glucose level via stimulating endogenous insulin secretion from beta-pancreas cells. Gliclazide is insoluble in water and has low dissolution rate. In this study, polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 was used as a matrix to disperse gliclazide in the solid state, and the pharmacokinetic profile of this solid dispersion was studied in rats.

DESIGN

The solid dispersion of Gliclazide:PEG 6000 (1:4) was prepared by solvent evaporation method.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Samples characterization included differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), infrared spectroscopy (IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and solubility and dissolution test. In vivo study was carried out in healthy rats, randomly. After a single dose of oral administration, blood samples were collected pre-dose (15 min before) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h post-dose. Plasma concentration of gliclazide was determined by high pressure liquid chromatography method using C-18 column, with mobile phase KH2PO4 (pH 4.6)-acetonitril (40:60 v/v) and UV detection at 229 nm.

RESULTS

Results showed that there were no differences in DSC, IR spectroscopy, XRD, and dissolution test between the solid dispersion and physical mixture. In vivo data showed that the Tmax of gliclazide in solid dispersion and physical mixture was significantly decreased, while the Cmax, AUC(0-12), and AUC(0-infinity) were significantly increased compared to gliclazide alone. These results indicate that the rapid Tmax was due to rapid absorption of gliclazid across the GI tract membrane. Increased Cmax, AUC(0-12), and AUC(0-infinity) indicate a better absorption of gliclazide in solid dispersion and physical mixture than of gliclazide alone.

CONCLUSION

Increased in gliclazide dissolution in the presence of PEG 6000 was followed by improved in vivo data.

The mushroom Agaricus Blazei Murill in combination with metformin and gliclazide improves insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Complementary and alternative medicine use in adults with type 2 diabetes is popular. Although most of the herbs and supplements appear to be safe, there is still insufficient evidence that demonstrates their definitive beneficial effects. This study was done to determine whether the supplement of Agaricus blazei Murill extract improves insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a clinical randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Of a population of 536 registered diabetes patients with 72 subjects (1) aged between 20 and 75 years, (2) being Chinese, (3) having type 2 diabetes for more than 1 year, and (4) having been taking gliclazide and metformin for more than 6 months were enrolled in this study. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to either receiving supplement of Agaricus blazei Murill (ABM) extract or placebo (cellulose) 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks. Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was used as the major outcome measurement.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, subjects who received supplement of ABM extract (n = 29) showed significantly lower HOMA-IR index (3.6[standard deviation, 2.5] versus 6.6[standard deviation, 7.4], p = 0.04) than the control group (n = 31). The plasma adiponectin concentration increased 20.0(standard deviation, 40.7)% in the ABM group after 12 weeks of treatment, but decreased 12.0(20.0)% among those taking the placebo (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Supplement of ABM extract improves insulin resistance among subjects with type 2 diabetes. The increase in adiponectin concentration after taking AMB extract for 12 weeks might be the mechanism that brings the beneficial effect. Studies with longer periods of follow-up should be conducted in the future.

Controlling of systemic absorption of gliclazide through incorporation into alginate beads

This work investigates preparation of biodegradable beads with alginate polymer by ionotropic gelation method to take the advantages of the swelling and mucoadhesive properties of alginate beads for improving the oral delivery of the antidiabetic agent gliclazide. It demonstrates that the ionic gelation of alginate molecules offers a flexible and easily controllable process for manipulating the characteristics of the beads which are important in controlling the release rate and consequently the absorption of gliclazide from the gastrointestinal tract. Variations in polymer concentration, stirring speed, internal phase volume and the type of surfactant in the external phase were examined systemically for their effects on the particle size, incorporation efficiency and flow properties of the beads. The swelling behavior was strongly dependent on the polymer concentration in the formulations and the pH of the medium. The in vitro release experiments revealed that the swelling is the main parameter controlling the release rate of gliclazide from the beads. In vivo studies on diabetic rabbits showed that the hypoglycemic effect induced by the gliclazide loaded alginate beads was significantly greater and more prolonged than that induced by the marketed conventional gliclazide tablet (Gliclazide). The results clearly demonstrated the ability of the system to maintain tight blood glucose level and improved the patient compliance by enhancing, controlling and prolonging the systemic absorption of gliclazide.

ADVANCE: breaking new ground in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: preterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation) is a large-scale trial designed to investigate the benefits of blood pressure lowering and intensive glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes, and to address a number of unresolved issues: whether blood pressure-lowering therapy and intensive glucose control therapy will reduce the risk of major vascular disease regardless of initial blood pressure or glucose concentration; whether more intensive glucose control targeting a haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 6.5% or less will confer greater protection against microvascular disease; and whether the benefits of the two interventions are additive.

DESIGN AND METHODS

ADVANCE is a 2 x 2 factorial randomized clinical trial evaluating the risks and benefits of the low-dose fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide versus placebo to lower blood pressure and of an intensive gliclazide-MR-based glucose control regimen, targeting an HbA1c of 6.5% or less versus standard guidelines based therapy for glucose control. There are two primary outcomes: a composite macrovascular endpoint and a composite microvascular endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 12 878 participants from 215 centres in 20 countries entered a 6-week run-in phase between June 2001 and January 2003, and 11 140 patients were randomly assigned by March 2003. The average (SD) systolic and diastolic blood pressure fell from 145 (22)/81 (11) to 137 (20)/78 (10) mmHg during the 6-week run-in phase, during which participants received one tablet of open-labelled perindopril 2 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg. Of the 12 878 patients who entered the run-in, only 3.6% withdrew because of suspected intolerance to perindopril/indapamide. The study is half way through follow-up and both the study medications (perindopril 2 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg and gliclazide-MR) continue to be well tolerated. Completion is expected in 2007.

CONCLUSION

Safe and effective blood pressure lowering with the fixed low-dose combination of perindopril and indapamide was confirmed during the run-in phase in 11 140 patients with type 2 diabetes, who were subsequently randomly assigned. Post-randomization study treatments have been well tolerated, and the completion of follow-up is scheduled in 2007.

Clinical observation on effect of Kaixin Capsule in treating 40 patients with diabetic myocardial ischemia

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effect of Kaixin Capsule (KXC) on myocardial ischemia and plasma endothelin (ET) level in patients with diabetic heart disease (DHD).

METHODS

The 72 subjects for observation were randomly selected from inpatients whose diagnosis fit to the standard of DHD. The 32 patients allocated in the control group were treated with conventional Western medicine, and the 40 patients in the treated group were treated with conventional Western medicine in combination with KXC, with the therapeutic course for both groups as 60 days.

RESULTS

On ECG, the total effective rate and markedly effective rate in the treated group was 85.0% and 37.5% respectively, higher than those in the control group's 68.7% and 28.1% respectively, and showing significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The level of ET in patients in both groups was significantly higher than normal range, after treatment, but reduced to different extent, and the comparison between them also showed that the difference was significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

KXC might, by way of inhibiting and blocking the release of ET, lower its level in plasma so as to improve the myocardial ischemic condition of patients with DHD.

Metrics for external model evaluation with an application to the population pharmacokinetics of gliclazide

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to define and illustrate metrics for the external evaluation of a population model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this paper, several types of metrics are defined: based on observations (standardized prediction error with or without simulation and normalized prediction distribution error); based on hyperparameters (with or without simulation); based on the likelihood of the model. All the metrics described above are applied to evaluate a model built from two phase II studies of gliclazide. A real phase I dataset and two datasets simulated with the real dataset design are used as external validation datasets to show and compare how metrics are able to detect and explain potential adequacies or inadequacies of the model.

RESULTS

Normalized prediction errors calculated without any approximation, and metrics based on hyperparameters or on objective function have good theoretical properties to be used for external model evaluation and showed satisfactory behaviour in the simulation study.

CONCLUSIONS

For external model evaluation, prediction distribution errors are recommended when the aim is to use the model to simulate data. Metrics through hyperparameters should be preferred when the aim is to compare two populations and metrics based on the objective function are useful during the model building process.

Double-blind, randomized, multicentre study of the efficacy and safety of gliclazide-modified release in the treatment of Chinese type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gliclazide-modified release (gliclazide MR) is a new formulation of the sulfonylurea gliclazide designed for once-daily administration. The hydrophilic matrix of hypromellose-based polymer in the new formulation induces a progressive drug release, which parallels the 24-h glycaemic profile in type 2 diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of gliclazide MR (once-daily administration) versus gliclazide (twice-daily administration) in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three type 2 diabetic Chinese patients who had been on diet control alone or on treatment with metformin or on low dose of sulfonylurea were randomized to either gliclazide MR taken once daily or gliclazide taken twice daily. Dosage of metformin was maintained throughout the study, and the sulfonylurea was stopped. The dose of gliclazide MR was increased at 1-month intervals from 30 mg to 120 mg, while that of gliclazide from 80 mg to 320 mg until metabolic control was achieved [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < or = 7.7 mmol/l] or the maximum dose reached. Efficacy was mainly evaluated by levels of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and FPG.

RESULTS

The mean baseline characteristics of the full analysis set 1 (FAS1) (HbA1c, n = 58) and the FAS2 (FPG, n = 61) were comparable in both groups. The levels of HbA1c decreased similarly in both groups over the treatment period: -1.6 +/- 1.6% (p < 0.001) on gliclazide MR (n = 31) and -1.6 +/- 1.4% (p < 0.001) on gliclazide (n = 27). Decrease in HbA1c was observed irrespective of pre-existing therapy for diabetes: -2.3 +/- 1.5% for patients on diet alone; -0.6 +/- 1.3% for patients switched from sulfonylurea to study drug and -1.4 +/- 0.8% for patients on metformin in combination with study drug. FPG decreased significantly from 177.5 +/- 63.5 to 136.7 +/- 42.2 (p < 0.001, n = 32) on gliclazide MR and not significant from 188.2 +/- 62.6 to 163.7 +/- 67.9 (p = 0.059, n = 29) on gliclazide. Both treatments were very well tolerated with no major hypoglycaemic episodes requiring external assistance; only three patients experienced mild hypoglycaemic episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily gliclazide MR showed a better trend in improving blood glucose control in comparison with gliclazide in type 2 diabetic Chinese patients irrespective of the pre-existing anti-diabetic treatment. The safety profiles of gliclazide MR and gliclazide were similar with a small number of patients having reported hypoglycaemic episodes. Once-daily dosing with gliclazide MR should improve patient compliance, an important factor in long-term glycaemic control.

Effects of Isopropyl Palmitate on the Skin Permeation of Drugs

The model penetrants oxaprozin, nimesulide, gliclazide, and ribavirin, because of their different lipophilicities, were selected to assess the enhancing activity of pre-treatment solutions consisting of isopropyl palmitate (IP) in ethanol (5%, 10%, 15%and 20%, w/w, respectively) across excised rat skin using Franz diffusion cells and HPLC detection. All pre-treatment solutions produced a significant increase in the flux and permeation of all four penetrants (p<0.001) and a relationship between penetrant lipophilicity and enhancement effect was observed. The general order of IP effectiveness at concentration was 20%>15%>10%>5% (w/w). The lag-time of drugs did not significantly change except for ribavirin.

Single and multiple dose bioequivalence evaluation of two brands of gliclazide modified release tablets in healthy Chinese male volunteers

Randomized, two-way, crossover, single- and multiple-dose studies were conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers to evaluate the bioequivalence of two brands of gliclazide (CAS 21187-98-4, 1-(3-azabicylco(3, 3, 0)oct-3-yl)-3-p-tolysulfonylurea) 30 mg tablets, viz. Gliclazide modified release (MR) tablets as test (T) and a commercial gliclazide standard preparation as reference (R) product. Each volunteer received T and R tablets separated by 7 days of a drug-free washout period. The plasma concentrations of gliclazide, determined by a validated LC-ESI-MS method, were employed to assess the pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum and minimum observed plasma concentration (Cmax and Cmin), time to Cmax (tmax), average plasma concentration at steady state (Cav), area under plasma concentration curve (AUC(0-72), AUC(0-infinity) and AUC(ss), and degree of fluctuation for plasma concentration (DF %). As to these parameters, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no significant difference and 90 % confidence intervals (CI) fell entirely into the acceptable range of bioequivalence. Based on these statistical inferences, the two formulations are considered bioequivalent in the extent and rate of absorption from both single- and multiple-dose studies.

The DIACOM study (effect of DosIng frequency of oral Antidiabetic agents on the COMpliance and biochemical control of type 2 diabetes)

AIM

Sulphonylureas are widely used in the management of type 2 diabetes. The effectiveness of treatment with oral antidiabetic drugs depends largely on patient compliance. The objective of the DIACOM (effect of DosIng frequency of oral Antidiabetic agents on the COMpliance and biochemical control of type 2 diabetes) study was to compare the compliance of patients treated with once-daily (od) or twice-daily (bid) sulphonylureas.

METHODS

One hundred and five patients, previously treated with glibenclamide, were randomized to receive gliclazide in modified-release formulation (MR) once daily or glibenclamide twice daily for 16 weeks, using an electronic monitoring system (MEMS).

RESULTS

A significant difference in compliance was observed between the two groups. The overall compliance was 93.5+/-14.0% in the once-daily gliclazide MR group and 87.2+/-21.1% in the twice-daily glibenclamide group (p<0.05), and the correct number of doses was taken on 86.3+/-15.4 and 66.9+/-29.0% of treatment days respectively (p<0.0001). The percentage of missed doses was 9.3+/-12.5% in the once-daily group and 17.5+/-18.0% in the twice-daily group (p<0.01). The percentage of doses taken in the correct time window and correct inter-dose interval was higher in the once-daily group, as was therapeutic coverage. Patients in the gliclazide MR group also achieved significantly better glycaemic control [fasting plasma glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c))] than those treated with glibenclamide (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that patient compliance with once-daily gliclazide MR is significantly better than with twice-daily glibenclamide. Consistently better efficacy was observed for short-term (fasting glucose) and long-term glycaemic control (HbA(1c)) in the once-daily group. These results demonstrate the possible therapeutic advantages of once-daily agents over twice-daily agents in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

[A multicenter clinic study of slow-release-gliclazide in type 2 diabetes mellitus]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 30 mg slow-release-gliclazide (Diamicron MR) on type 2 diabetes patients with the level of blood glucose poorly controlled formerly.

METHODS

154 type 2 diabetes patients with the level of blood glucose poorly controlled formerly were enrolled and treated with Diamicron MR for 16 weeks. The efficacy of slow-release-gliclazide was evaluated through HbA1c, FPG and 2 h PBG after 16 weeks of treatment period. The safety was evaluated through the adverse events including hypoglycemic episodes and the change of vital signs and clinic laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

After 16 weeks of treatment period, the HbA1c, FPG and 2 h PBG were decreased by 1.89%, 2.31 mmol/L and 3.94 mmol/L respectively, cutting down 21.6%, 24.5% and 27.8% relatively in comparison with pre-treatment. Glucose metabolism could be significantly improved by taking once-daily Diamicron MR.

CONCLUSION

Slow-release-gliclazide offers the significant treatment safely, which is important to optimize type 2 diabetes mellitus management.

Changes in liver tests during 1-year treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes with pioglitazone, metformin or gliclazide

AIMS

Patients with Type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of liver damage. Therefore, it is of particular importance to investigate the hepatic effects of drugs used to treat such patients.

METHODS

Liver testing results performed in four 1-year, randomized, double-blind studies comparing effects of pioglitazone, metformin or a sulphonylurea, gliclazide, in the treatment of over 3700 patients with Type 2 diabetes have been analysed.

RESULTS

Pioglitazone caused reductions in mean levels of hepatic enzymes of between 3 and 18%, whilst gliclazide caused small increases of between 3 and 13%. Metformin treatment showed either small mean increases or decreases. More patients receiving pioglitazone had liver tests within the normal range at the end of treatment (> or = 87%) compared with patients receiving metformin (> or= 80%) or gliclazide (> or = 75%). Slightly fewer patients with pioglitazone than with comparators showed a large increase (> 3 upper limit of normal) in alanine aminotransferase levels at any time during treatment (pioglitazone 0.9%, metformin 1.9%, gliclazide 1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

During pioglitazone treatment there is a reduction in liver enzyme levels. Although the mechanism of this effect is not clear, the results demonstrate potential beneficial effects on the liver during treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes with pioglitazone.