Computational insights into diverse binding modes of the allosteric modulator and their regulation on dopamine D1 receptor

Allosteric drugs hold the promise of addressing many challenges in the current drug development of GPCRs. However, the molecular mechanism underlying their allosteric modulations remain largely elusive. The dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1), a member of Class A GPCRs, is critical for treating psychiatric disorders, and LY3154207 serves as its promising positive allosteric modulator (PAM). In the work, we utilized extensive Gaussian-accelerated molecular dynamics simulations (a total of 41μs) for the first time probe the diverse binding modes of the allosteric modulator and their regulation effects, based on the DRD1 and LY3154207 as representative. Our simulations identify four binding modes of LY3154207 (one boat mode, two metastable vertical modes and a novel cleft-anchored mode), in which the boat mode is the most stable while there three modes are similar in the stability. However, it is interesting to observed that the most stable boat mode inversely exhibits the weakest positive allosteric effect on influencing the orthosteric ligand binding and maintaining the activity of the transducer binding site. It should result from its induced weaker correlation between the allosteric site and the orthosteric site, and between the orthosteric site and the transducer binding site than the other three binding modes, as well as its weakened interaction between a crucial activation-related residue (S2025.46) and the orthosteric ligand (dopamine). Overall, the work offers atomic-level information to advance our understanding of the complex allosteric regulation on GPCRs, which is beneficial to the allosteric modulator design and development.

Enantioenriched Positive Allosteric Modulators Display Distinct Pharmacology at the Dopamine D1 Receptor

(1) Background: Two first-in-class racemic dopamine D₁ receptor (D₁R) positive allosteric modulator (PAM) chemotypes (1 and 2) were identified from a high-throughput screen. In particular, due to its selectivity for the D₁R and reported lack of intrinsic activity, compound 2 shows promise as a starting point toward the development of small molecule allosteric modulators to ameliorate the cognitive deficits associated with some neuropsychiatric disease states; (2) Methods: Herein, we describe the enantioenrichment of optical isomers of 2 using chiral auxiliaries derived from (R)- and (S)-3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethyldihydrofuran-2(3H)-one (d- and l-pantolactone, respectively); (3) Results: We confirm both the racemate and enantiomers of 2 are active and selective for the D₁R, but that the respective stereoisomers show a significant difference in their affinity and magnitude of positive allosteric cooperativity with dopamine; (4) Conclusions: These data warrant further investigation of asymmetric syntheses of optically pure analogues of 2 for the development of D₁R PAMs with superior allosteric properties.

Crystal structure of dopamine D1 receptor in complex with G protein and a non-catechol agonist

Dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) is an important drug target implicated in many psychiatric and neurological disorders. Selective agonism of D1R are sought to be the therapeutic strategy for these disorders. Most selective D1R agonists share a dopamine-like catechol moiety in their molecular structure, and their therapeutic potential is therefore limited by poor pharmacological properties in vivo. Recently, a class of non-catechol D1R selective agonists with a distinct scaffold and pharmacological properties were reported. Here, we report the crystal structure of D1R in complex with stimulatory G protein (Gs) and a non-catechol agonist Compound 1 at 3.8 Å resolution. The structure reveals the ligand bound to D1R in an extended conformation, spanning from the orthosteric site to extracellular loop 2 (ECL2). Structural analysis reveals that the unique features of D1R ligand binding pocket explains the remarkable selectivity of this scaffold for D1R over other aminergic receptors, and sheds light on the mechanism for D1R activation by the non-catechol agonist.

Structural insights into the human D1 and D2 dopamine receptor signaling complexes

The D1- and D2-dopamine receptors (D1R and D2R), which signal through Gs and Gi, respectively, represent the principal stimulatory and inhibitory dopamine receptors in the central nervous system. D1R and D2R also represent the main therapeutic targets for Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and many other neuropsychiatric disorders, and insight into their signaling is essential for understanding both therapeutic and side effects of dopaminergic drugs. Here, we report four cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of D1R-Gs and D2R-Gi signaling complexes with selective and non-selective dopamine agonists, including two currently used anti-Parkinson's disease drugs, apomorphine and bromocriptine. These structures, together with mutagenesis studies, reveal the conserved binding mode of dopamine agonists, the unique pocket topology underlying ligand selectivity, the conformational changes in receptor activation, and potential structural determinants for G protein-coupling selectivity. These results provide both a molecular understanding of dopamine signaling and multiple structural templates for drug design targeting the dopaminergic system.

Ligand recognition and allosteric regulation of DRD1-Gs signaling complexes

Dopamine receptors, including D1- and D2-like receptors, are important therapeutic targets in a variety of neurological syndromes, as well as cardiovascular and kidney diseases. Here, we present five cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the dopamine D1 receptor (DRD1) coupled to Gs heterotrimer in complex with three catechol-based agonists, a non-catechol agonist, and a positive allosteric modulator for endogenous dopamine. These structures revealed that a polar interaction network is essential for catecholamine-like agonist recognition, whereas specific motifs in the extended binding pocket were responsible for discriminating D1- from D2-like receptors. Moreover, allosteric binding at a distinct inner surface pocket improved the activity of DRD1 by stabilizing endogenous dopamine interaction at the orthosteric site. DRD1-Gs interface revealed key features that serve as determinants for G protein coupling. Together, our study provides a structural understanding of the ligand recognition, allosteric regulation, and G protein coupling mechanisms of DRD1.

Ursolic acid ameliorates stress and reactive oxygen species in C. elegans knockout mutants by the dopamine Dop1 and Dop3 receptors

BACKGROUND

Depression and stress-related disorders are leading causes of death worldwide. Standard treatments elevating serotonin or noradrenaline levels are not sufficiently effective and cause adverse side effects. A connection between dopamine pathways and stress-related disorders has been suggested. Compounds derived from herbal medicine could be a promising alternative. We examined the neuroprotective effects of ursolic acid (UA) by focusing on dopamine signalling.

METHODS

Trolox equivalent capacity assay was used to determine the antioxidant activities of UA in vitro. C. elegans N2 wildtype and dopamine receptor-knockout mutants (dop1-deficient RB665 and dop3-deficient LX703 strains) were used as in vivo models. H2DCFDA and acute juglone assays were applied to determine the antioxidant activity in dependency of dopamine pathways in vivo. Stress was assessed by heat and acute osmotic stress assays. The influence of UA on overall survival was analyzed by a life span assay. The dop1 and dop3 mRNA expression was determined by real time RT-PCR. We also examined the binding affinity of UA towards C. elegans Dop1 and Dop3 receptors as well as human dopamine receptors D1 and D3 by molecular docking.

RESULTS

Antioxidant activity assays showed that UA exerts strong antioxidant activity. UA increased resistance towards oxidative, osmotic and heat stress. Additionally, UA increased life span of nematodes. Moreover, dop1 and dop3 gene expression was significantly enhanced upon UA treatment. Docking analysis revealed stronger binding affinity of UA to C. elegans and human dopamine receptors than the natural ligand, dopamine. Binding to Dop1 was stronger than to Dop3.

CONCLUSION

UA reduced stress-dependent ROS generation and acted through Dop1 and to a lesser extent through Dop3 to reduce stress and prolong life span in C. elegans. These results indicate that UA could be a promising lead compound for the development of new antidepressant medications.

Phosphorylation barcode-dependent signal bias of the dopamine D1 receptor

Agonist-activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) must correctly select from hundreds of potential downstream signaling cascades and effectors. To accomplish this, GPCRs first bind to an intermediary signaling protein, such as G protein or arrestin. These intermediaries initiate signaling cascades that promote the activity of different effectors, including several protein kinases. The relative roles of G proteins versus arrestins in initiating and directing signaling is hotly debated, and it remains unclear how the correct final signaling pathway is chosen given the ready availability of protein partners. Here, we begin to deconvolute the process of signal bias from the dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) by exploring factors that promote the activation of ERK1/2 or Src, the kinases that lead to cell growth and proliferation. We found that ERK1/2 activation involves both arrestin and Gαs, while Src activation depends solely on arrestin. Interestingly, we found that the phosphorylation pattern influences both arrestin and Gαs coupling, suggesting an additional way the cells regulate G protein signaling. The phosphorylation sites in the D1R intracellular loop 3 are particularly important for directing the binding of G protein versus arrestin and for selecting between the activation of ERK1/2 and Src. Collectively, these studies correlate functional outcomes with a physical basis for signaling bias and provide fundamental information on how GPCR signaling is directed.

[Heterodimeric D1-D2 dopamine receptors: a review]

This review summarizes modern data on the structure and functions ofheteromersformed by D1 and D2 dopamine receptors focusing on their role in the mechanisms of drug dependence. This article discusses potential functional significance of heterodimeric D1-D2 dopamine receptorsdue to their localization in the brain as well as unique pharmacological propertiesversus constituent monomers. It is shown that heteromerization results in dramatic changes in activated signaling pathways compare to the corresponding monomers. These studies update our current knowledge of ligand-receptor interactions and provide better understanding of dopamine receptors pharmacology. Furthermore elucidation of significance of heterodimeric D1-D2 dopamine receptors as drug targets is important for the development of new effective drug addiction treatment.

The dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromer exerts a tonic inhibitory effect on the expression of amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization

A role for the dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromer in the regulation of reward and addiction-related processes has been previously implicated. In the present study, we examined the effects of D1-D2 heteromer stimulation by the agonist SKF 83959 and its disruption by a selective TAT-D1 peptide on amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization, a behavioral model widely used to study the neuroadaptations associated with psychostimulant addiction. D1-D2 heteromer activation by SKF 83959 did not alter the acute locomotor effects of amphetamine but significantly inhibited amphetamine-induced locomotor responding across the 5day treatment regimen. In addition, a single injection of SKF 83959 was sufficient to abolish the expression of locomotor sensitization induced by a priming injection of amphetamine after a 72-hour withdrawal. Conversely, inhibition of D1-D2 heteromer activity by the TAT-D1 peptide enhanced subchronic amphetamine-induced locomotion and the expression of amphetamine locomotor sensitization. Treatment solely with the TAT-D1 disrupting peptide during the initial 5day treatment phase was sufficient to induce a sensitized locomotor phenotype in response to the priming injection of amphetamine. Together these findings demonstrate that the dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromer exerts a tonic inhibitory control on neurobiological processes involved in sensitization to amphetamine, indicating that the dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromer may be a novel molecular substrate in addiction processes involving psychostimulants.

Investigation of D₁ receptor-agonist interactions and D₁/D₂ agonist selectivity using a combination of pharmacophore and receptor homology modeling

The aim of this study was to use a combined structure and pharmacophore modeling approach to extract information regarding dopamine D₁ receptor agonism and D₁/D₂ agonist selectivity. A 3D structure model of the D₁ receptor in its agonist-bound state was constructed with a full D₁ agonist present in the binding site. Two different binding modes were identified using (+)-doxanthrine or SKF89626 in the modeling procedure. The 3D model was further compared with a selective D₁ agonist pharmacophore model. The pharmacophore feature arrangement was found to be in good agreement with the binding site composition of the receptor model, but the excluded volumes did not fully reflect the shape of the agonist binding pocket. A new receptor-based pharmacophore model was developed with forbidden volumes centered on atom positions of amino acids in the binding site. The new pharmacophore model showed a similar ability to discriminate as the previous model. A comparison of the 3D structures and pharmacophore models of D₁ and D₂ receptors revealed differences in shape and ligand-interacting features that determine selectivity of D₁ and D₂ receptor agonists. A hydrogen bond pharmacophoric feature (Ser-TM5) was shown to contribute most to the selectivity. Non-conserved residues in the binding pocket that strongly contribute to D₁/D₂ receptor agonist selectivity were also identified; those were Ser/Cys³·³⁶, Tyr/Phe⁵·³⁸, Ser/Tyr⁵·⁴¹, and Asn/His⁶·⁵⁵ in the transmembrane (TM) helix region, together with Ser/Ile and Leu/Asn in the second extracellular loop (EC2). This work provides useful information for the design of new selective D₁ and D₂ agonists. The combined receptor structure and pharmacophore modeling approach is considered to be general, and could therefore be applied to other ligand-protein interactions for which experimental information is limited.

C-terminal di-leucine motif of dopamine D₁ receptor plays an important role in its plasma membrane trafficking

The dopamine D₁ receptor (D₁R), a G protein-coupled receptor, plays a critical role in regulating blood pressure through its actions on renal hemodynamics and epithelial ion transport, which are highly linked to its intracellular trafficking. In this study, we generated a series of C-terminal mutants of D₁R that were tagged with or without enhanced yellow fluorescent protein, and analyzed the consequences of these mutants on the plasma membrane trafficking of D₁R and cyclic AMP response to D₁R stimulation. D₁R with mutations within the endocytic recycling signal (amino acid residues 360–382) continued to be functional, albeit decreased relative to wild-type D₁R. Mutation of the palmitoylation site (347C>S) of D₁R did not impair its trafficking to the plasma membrane, but abolished its ability to increase cyclic AMP accumulation. In contrast, replacement of di-leucines (344–345L>A) by alanines resulted in the retention of D₁R in the early endosome, decreased its glycosylation, and prevented its targeting to the plasma membrane. Our studies suggest that di-L motif at the C-terminus of D₁R is critical for the glycosylation and cell surface targeting of D₁R.

Direct involvement of sigma-1 receptors in the dopamine D1 receptor-mediated effects of cocaine

It is well known that cocaine blocks the dopamine transporter. This mechanism should lead to a general increase in dopaminergic neurotransmission, and yet dopamine D(1) receptors (D(1)Rs) play a more significant role in the behavioral effects of cocaine than the other dopamine receptor subtypes. Cocaine also binds to σ-1 receptors, the physiological role of which is largely unknown. In the present study, D(1)R and σ(1)R were found to heteromerize in transfected cells, where cocaine robustly potentiated D(1)R-mediated adenylyl cyclase activation, induced MAPK activation per se and counteracted MAPK activation induced by D(1)R stimulation in a dopamine transporter-independent and σ(1)R-dependent manner. Some of these effects were also demonstrated in murine striatal slices and were absent in σ(1)R KO mice, providing evidence for the existence of σ(1)R-D(1)R heteromers in the brain. Therefore, these results provide a molecular explanation for which D(1)R plays a more significant role in the behavioral effects of cocaine, through σ(1)R-D(1)R heteromerization, and provide a unique perspective toward understanding the molecular basis of cocaine addiction.

Synthesis and in vitro pharmacological evaluation of a new series of 5-HT1A 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor ligands containing a norbornene nucleus

A series of 4-substituted piperazine derivatives bearing a norbornene nucleus have been prepared and their affinity for serotonin 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors has been evaluated. Compounds showing the highest affinity have been selected and evaluated on dopaminergic (D1 and D2) and adrenergic (alpha1 and alpha2) receptors. The combination of structural elements (heterocyclic nucleus, oxyalkyl chain and 4-substituted piperazine) known to be critical in order to have affinity on serotonin receptors and the proper selection of substituents led to compounds with higher receptor specificity and affinity. In binding studies, several molecules showed affinity in nanomolar range towards 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors and moderate to no affinity for other relevant receptors (D1, D2, alpha1 and alpha2). Compound 2q 4-[2-[4-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethoxy]-4-aza-tricyclo[5.2.1.02,6]dec-8-ene-3,5-dione (Ki = 1.13 nM), was the most active and selective derivative for the 5-HT2C receptor with respect to other serotonin, dopaminergic and adrenergic receptors. Moreover, compound 3p showed mixed 5-HT2A/5-HT2C activity with affinity values in nanomolar range.

Mechanism of action of clozapine in the context of dopamine D1-D2 receptor hetero-dimerization--a working hypothesis

The tight correlation between the clinical potency and the D2R blocking action of antipsychotic medications suggests that dopamine hyperactivity plays a significant role in psychosis. Clozapine, one of the most effective antipsychotic drugs, has been shown to display moderate affinity for various neurotransmitter receptors, including the dopamine D1 and D2 receptors; however, the exact mechanism of action of clozapine has not yet been fully elucidated. Here, we describe our working hypothesis pointing to the role of dopamine D1-D2 receptor hetero-dimerization as a mechanism of action of clozapine. It has been widely assumed that D1 and D2 receptors are segregated to separate neuronal populations; however, other data suggest that D1 and D2 receptors are co-expressed by a moderate to substantial proportion of striatal neurons, as well as in the medial prefrontal cortex. Our recent studies indicate that concomitant stimulation of both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors induces an increase in their hetero-dimerization. In order to confirm the working hypothesis that clozapine influences D1-D2 receptor oligomerization, we employed fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) technology, using fluorescently tagged dopamine receptors and fluorescence lifetime microscopy of intact living cells. The effect of clozapine on D1R-D2R hetero-oligomerization was strongly dependent on the drug concentration; the lower concentration, which resulted in binding to the high affinity sites, decreased the transfer efficiency, while the higher concentration of clozapine enhanced transfer efficiency. Further investigation confirmed the idea that high affinity binding sites exist when the receptor is coupled with G protein, and also that clozapine attenuates the hetero-oligomerization of a high affinity pool of dopamine D1-D2 receptors. The results discussed in the present study, showing the effect of clozapine on D1-D2 receptor hetero-oligomerization, together with the data pointing to the importance of receptors forming hetero-oligomers as a novel level for pharmacological intervention help to increase the understanding of the molecular mechanism of action of antipsychotic drugs.

Desensitization of the dopamine D1 and D2 receptor hetero-oligomer mediated calcium signal by agonist occupancy of either receptor

When dopamine D1 and D2 receptors were coactivated in D1-D2 receptor hetero-oligomeric complexes, a novel phospholipase C-mediated calcium signal was generated. In this report, desensitization of this Gq/11-mediated calcium signal was demonstrated by pretreatment with dopamine or with the D1-selective agonist (+/-)-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide (SKF-81297) or the D2-selective agonist quinpirole. Desensitization of the calcium signal mediated by D1-D2 receptor hetero-oligomers was initiated by agonist occupancy of either receptor subtype even though the signal was generated only by occupancy of both receptors. The efficacy, potency, and rate of calcium signal desensitization by agonist occupancy of the D1 receptor (t1/2, approximately 1 min) was far greater than by the D2 receptor (t1/2, approximately 10 min). Desensitization of the calcium signal was not mediated by depletion of calcium stores or internalization of the hetero-oligomer and was not decreased by inhibiting second messenger-activated kinases. The involvement of G protein-coupled receptor kinases 2 or 3, but not 5 or 6, in the desensitization of the calcium signal was shown, occurring through a phosphorylation independent mechanism. Inhibition of Gi protein function associated with D2 receptors increased D1 receptor-mediated desensitization of the calcium signal, suggesting that cross-talk between the signals mediated by the activation of different G proteins controlled the efficacy of calcium signal desensitization. Together, these results demonstrate the desensitization of a signal mediated only by hetero-oligomerization of two G protein-coupled receptors that was initiated by agonist occupancy of either receptor within the hetero-oligomer, albeit with differences in desensitization profiles observed.

Dopamine D1 receptor agonist and D2 receptor antagonist effects of the natural product (-)-stepholidine: molecular modeling and dynamics simulations

(-)-Stepholidine (SPD), an active ingredient of the Chinese herb Stephania, is the first compound found to have dual function as a dopamine receptor D1 agonist and D2 antagonist. Insights into dynamical behaviors of D1 and D2 receptors and their interaction modes with SPD are crucial in understanding the structural and functional characteristics of dopamine receptors. In this study a computational approach, integrating protein structure prediction, automated molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations were employed to investigate the dual action mechanism of SPD on the D1 and D2 receptors, with the eventual aim to develop new drugs for treating diseases affecting the central nervous system such as schizophrenia. The dynamics simulations revealed the surface features of the electrostatic potentials and the conformational "open-closed" process of the binding entrances of two dopamine receptors. Potential binding conformations of D1 and D2 receptors were obtained, and the D1-SPD and D2-SPD complexes were generated, which are in good agreement with most of experimental data. The D1-SPD structure shows that the K-167_EL-2-E-302_EL-3 (EL-2: extracellular loop 2; EL-3: extracellular loop 3) salt bridge plays an important role for both the conformational change of the extracellular domain and the binding of SPD. Based on our modeling and simulations, we proposed a mechanism of the dual action of SPD and a subsequent signal transduction model. Further mutagenesis and biophysical experiments are needed to test and improve our proposed dual action mechanism of SPD and signal transduction model.

D1 and D2 dopamine receptor expression is regulated by direct interaction with the chaperone protein calnexin

As for all proteins, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) undergo synthesis and maturation within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The mechanisms involved in the biogenesis and trafficking of GPCRs from the ER to the cell surface are poorly understood, but they may involve interactions with other proteins. We have now identified the ER chaperone protein calnexin as an interacting protein for both D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors. These protein-protein interactions were confirmed using Western blot analysis and co-immunoprecipitation experiments. To determine the influence of calnexin on receptor expression, we conducted assays in HEK293T cells using a variety of calnexin-modifying conditions. Inhibition of glycosylation either through receptor mutations or treatments with glycosylation inhibitors partially blocks the interactions with calnexin with a resulting decrease in cell surface receptor expression. Confocal fluorescence microscopy reveals the accumulation of D(1)-green fluorescent protein and D(2)-yellow fluorescent protein receptors within internal stores following treatment with calnexin inhibitors. Overexpression of calnexin also results in a marked decrease in both D(1) and D(2) receptor expression. This is likely because of an increase in ER retention because confocal microscopy revealed intracellular clustering of dopamine receptors that were co-localized with an ER marker protein. Additionally, we show that calnexin interacts with the receptors via two distinct mechanisms, glycan-dependent and glycan-independent, which may underlie the multiple effects (ER retention and surface trafficking) of calnexin on receptor expression. Our data suggest that optimal receptor-calnexin interactions critically regulate D(1) and D(2) receptor trafficking and expression at the cell surface, a mechanism likely to be of importance for many GPCRs.

D1-D2 dopamine receptor heterooligomers with unique pharmacology are coupled to rapid activation of Gq/11 in the striatum

We demonstrate a heteromeric D1-D2 dopamine receptor signaling complex in brain that is coupled to Gq/11 and requires agonist binding to both receptors for G protein activation and intracellular calcium release. The D1 agonist SKF83959 was identified as a specific agonist for the heteromer that activated Gq/11 by functioning as a full agonist for the D1 receptor and a high-affinity partial agonist for a pertussis toxin-resistant D2 receptor within the complex. We provide evidence that the D1-D2 signaling complex can be more readily detected in mice that are 8 months in age compared with animals that are 3 months old, suggesting that calcium signaling through the D1-D2 dopamine receptor complex is relevant for function in the postadolescent brain. Activation of Gq/11 through the heteromer increases levels of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIalpha in the nucleus accumbens, unlike activation of Gs/olf-coupled D1 receptors, indicating a mechanism by which D1-D2 dopamine receptor complexes may contribute to synaptic plasticity.

Fluorescence Studies Reveal Heterodimerization of Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptors in the Plasma Membrane

Evidence for hetero-oligomerization has recently been provided for various G protein-coupled receptors. In this paper, we have studied the possibility that dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors physically interact with each other. Human dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors were fluorescently tagged with derivatives of green fluorescence protein and transiently coexpressed in the membrane of human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Using qualitative fluorescence spectroscopy, as well as quantitative Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis, performed in a single cell by confocal microscopy and fluorescence lifetime microscopy, we show that dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors can form hetero-oligomers in the plasma membrane. The degree of receptor protein-protein interaction is significantly enhanced by concomitant addition of D(1) and D(2) receptor subtype-specific agonists. Our investigations extend biochemical and electrophysiological studies and give insights into the regulation and synergistic mode of operation of dopamine receptors.

Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology

The concept of intrinsic efficacy has been enshrined in pharmacology for half of a century, yet recent data have revealed that many ligands can differentially activate signaling pathways mediated via a single G protein-coupled receptor in a manner that challenges the traditional definition of intrinsic efficacy. Some terms for this phenomenon include functional selectivity, agonist-directed trafficking, and biased agonism. At the extreme, functionally selective ligands may be both agonists and antagonists at different functions mediated by the same receptor. Data illustrating this phenomenon are presented from serotonin, opioid, dopamine, vasopressin, and adrenergic receptor systems. A variety of mechanisms may influence this apparently ubiquitous phenomenon. It may be initiated by differences in ligand-induced intermediate conformational states, as shown for the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Subsequent mechanisms that may play a role include diversity of G proteins, scaffolding and signaling partners, and receptor oligomers. Clearly, expanded research is needed to elucidate the proximal (e.g., how functionally selective ligands cause conformational changes that initiate differential signaling), intermediate (mechanisms that translate conformation changes into differential signaling), and distal mechanisms (differential effects on target tissue or organism). Besides the heuristically interesting nature of functional selectivity, there is a clear impact on drug discovery, because this mechanism raises the possibility of selecting or designing novel ligands that differentially activate only a subset of functions of a single receptor, thereby optimizing therapeutic action. It also may be timely to revise classic concepts in quantitative pharmacology and relevant pharmacological conventions to incorporate these new concepts.

Hyperdopaminergia and altered locomotor activity in GABAB1-deficient mice

GABAB1-/- mice, which are devoid of functional GABAB receptors, consistently exhibit marked hyperlocomotion when exposed to a novel environment. Telemetry recordings now revealed that, in a familiar environment, GABAB1-/- mice display an altered pattern of circadian activity but no hyperlocomotion. This indicates that hyperlocomotion is only triggered when GABAB1-/- mice are aroused by novelty. In microdialysis experiments, GABAB1-/- mice exhibited a 2-fold increased extracellular level of dopamine in the striatum. Following D-amphetamine administration, GABAB1-/- mice released less dopamine than wild-type mice, indicative of a reduced cytoplasmic dopamine pool. The hyperdopaminergic state of GABAB1-/- mice is accompanied by molecular changes, including reduced levels of tyrosine hydroxylase mRNA, D1 receptor binding-sites and Ser40 phosphorylation of tyrosine hydroxylase. Tyrosine hydroxylase activity, tissue dopamine content and dopamine metabolism do not appear to be measurably altered. Pharmacological and electrophysiological experiments support that the hyperdopaminergic state of GABAB1-/- mice is not severe enough to inactivate dopamine D2 receptors and to disrupt D2-mediated feedback inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase activity. The data support that loss of GABAB activity results in a sustained moderate hyperdopaminergic state, which is phenotypically revealed by contextual hyperlocomotor activity. Importantly, the presence of an inhibitory GABA tone on the dopaminergic system mediated by GABAB receptors provides an opportunity for therapeutic intervention.

Agonist-induced cell surface trafficking of an intracellularly sequestered D1 dopamine receptor homo-oligomer

The role of oligomerization in D1 dopamine receptor trafficking to the cell surface was examined using conformationally distinct variants of this receptor. Substitution of the highly conserved aspartic acid (Asp103) in transmembrane domain 3 resulted in a constitutively active receptor, D103A, that did not bind agonists or antagonists but trafficked to the cell surface as oligomers. Coexpression of D103A with the wild-type D1 receptor in human embryonic kidney 293t cells resulted in inhibition of cell surface expression of the D1 receptor because of receptor oligomerization, causing intracellular retention of both proteins. Rescue of the intracellularly retained oligomer could be achieved only by membrane-permeable full and partial agonists, which resulted in cell surface expression of the D1 receptor, whereas cell-permeable antagonists and cell impermeable agonists had no effect. Cell surface fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of cells coexpressing D103A and D1 revealed no signal before agonist treatment but a robust signal after agonist treatment, indicating that the intact D1/D103A oligomer reached the cell surface only after agonist treatment but not under basal conditions. This suggests that rescue of the retained D1/D103A oligomer to the cell surface was a result of an agonist-induced change in the conformation of D1, permitting cell surface trafficking of the D1/D103A receptor oligomeric complex from the endoplasmic reticulum.

Dopamine Receptor Oligomerization Visualized in Living Cells

G protein-coupled receptors occur as dimers within arrays of oligomers. We visualized ensembles of dopamine receptor oligomers in living cells and evaluated the contributions of receptor conformation to the dynamics of oligomer association and dissociation, using a strategy of trafficking a receptor to another cellular compartment. We incorporated a nuclear localization sequence into the D1 dopamine receptor, which translocated from the cell surface to the nucleus. Receptor inverse agonists blocked this translocation, retaining the modified receptor, D1-nuclear localization signal (NLS), at the cell surface. D1 co-translocated with D1-NLS to the nucleus, indicating formation of homooligomers. (+)-Butaclamol retained both receptors at the cell surface, and removal of the drug allowed translocation of both receptors to the nucleus. Agonist-nonbinding D1(S198A/S199A)-NLS, containing two substituted serine residues in transmembrane 5 also oligomerized with D1, and both were retained on the cell surface by (+)-butaclamol. Drug removal disrupted these oligomerized receptors so that D1 remained at the cell surface while D1(S198A/S199A)-NLS trafficked to the nucleus. Thus, receptor conformational differences permitted oligomer disruption and showed that ligand-binding pocket occupancy by the inverse agonist induced a conformational change. We demonstrated robust heterooligomerization between the D2 dopamine receptor and the D1 receptor. The heterooligomers could not be disrupted by inverse agonists targeting either one of the receptor constituents. However, D2 did not heterooligomerize with the structurally modified D1(S198A/S199A), indicating an impaired interface for their interaction. Thus, we describe a novel method showing that a homogeneous receptor conformation maintains the structural integrity of oligomers, whereas conformational heterogeneity disrupts it.

Physicochemical modulation of agonist-induced [35s]GTPgammaS binding: implications for coexistence of multiple functional conformations of dopamine D1-like receptors

Dopamine agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding to membrane G proteins was studied in select brain regions under experimental conditions that permit the activation of receptor coupling to the G proteins Gi, Gs, or Gq. Agents studied were agonists known to be effective at various dopamine receptor/effector systems and included quinelorane (D2-like/Gi), SKF38393 (D1-like/Gq, D1-like/Gs), SKF85174 (D1-like/Gs), and SKF83959 (D1-like/Gq). Dopamine and SKF38393 significantly stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding to normal striatal membranes by 161% and 67% above controls. Deoxycholate, which enhances agonist-induced phospholipase C (PLC) stimulation, markedly enhanced the agonistic effects of dopamine and SKF38393 to 530% and 637% above controls, respectively. The enhancing effects of deoxycholate were reversed if it was washed off the membranes before agonist addition. The thiol-reducing agent, dithiothreitol, completely abolished the effects of SKF38393 and SKF83959, whereas SKF85174 effects were augmented. Agonist responses were concentration-related, and highest efficacies were obtained in the hippocampus, thus paralleling both the brain regional distribution and agonist efficacies previously observed in phosphoinositide hydrolysis assays. These findings suggest that D1-like receptor conformations that mediate agonist stimulation of Gs/adenylylcyclase may be structurally different from those that mediate Gq/PLC activation. Although the exact mechanism of deoxycholate's effect awaits elucidation, the results are consistent with the emerging concept of functional selectivity whereby deoxycholate could create a membrane environment that facilitates the transformation of the receptor from a conformation that activates Gs/adenylylcyclase to one that favors Gq/PLC signaling.

Structural Determinants of Pharmacological Specificity Between D1and D2Dopamine Receptors

To test the hypothesis that pharmacological differentiation between D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors results from interactions of selective ligands with nonconserved residues lining the binding pocket, we mutated amino acid residues in the D(2) receptor to the corresponding aligned residues in the D(1) receptor and vice versa and expressed the receptors in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Determinations of the affinity of the 14 mutant D(2) receptors and 11 mutant D(1) receptors for D(1)- and D(2)-selective antagonists, and rhodopsin-based homology models of the two receptors, identified two residues whose direct interactions with certain ligands probably contribute to ligand selectivity. The D(1) receptor mutant W99(3.28)F showed dramatically increased affinity for several D(2)-selective antagonists, particularly spiperone (225-fold), whereas the D(2) receptor mutant Y417(7.43)W had greatly decreased affinity for benzamide ligands such as raclopride (200-fold) and sulpiride (125-fold). The binding of the D(1)-selective ligand R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH23390) was unaffected, indicating that SCH23390 makes little contact with these ancillary pocket residues. Mutation of A/V(5.39) caused modest but consistent and reciprocal changes in affinity of the receptors for D(1) and D(2)-selective ligands, perhaps reflecting altered packing of the interface of helices 5 and 6. We also obtained some evidence that residues in the second extracellular loop contribute to ligand binding. We conclude that additional determinants of D(1)/D(2) receptor-selective binding are located either in that loop or in the transmembrane helices but, like residue 5.39, indirectly influence the interactions of selective ligands with conserved residues by altering the shape of the primary and ancillary binding pockets.

Application of Validated QSAR Models of D1 Dopaminergic Antagonists for Database Mining

Rigorously validated quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models have been developed for 48 antagonists of the dopamine D1 receptor and applied to mining chemical datasets to discover novel potential antagonists. Several QSAR methods have been employed, including comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), simulated annealing-partial least squares (SA-PLS), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and support vector machines (SVM). With the exception of CoMFA, these approaches employed 2D topological descriptors generated with the MolConnZ software package (EduSoft, LLC. MolconnZ, version 4.05; http://www.eslc.vabiotech.com/ [4.05], 2003). The original dataset was split into training and test sets to allow for external validation of each training set model. The resulting models were characterized by cross-validated R2 (q2) for the training set and predictive R2 values for the test set of (q2/R2) 0.51/0.47 for CoMFA, 0.7/0.76 for kNN, R2 for the training and test sets of 0.74/0.71 for SVM, and training set fitness and test set R2 values of 0.68/0.63 for SA-PLS. Validated QSAR models with R2 > 0.7, (i.e., kNN and SVM) were used to mine three publicly available chemical databases: the National Cancer Institute (NCI) database of ca. 250,000 compounds, the Maybridge Database of ca. 56,000 compounds, and the ChemDiv Database of ca. 450,000 compounds. These searches resulted in only 54 consensus hits (i.e., predicted active by all models); five of them were previously characterized as dopamine D1 ligands, but were not present in the original dataset. A small fraction of the purported D1 ligands did not contain a catechol ring found in all known dopamine full agonist ligands, suggesting that they may be novel structural antagonist leads. This study illustrates that the combined application of predictive QSAR modeling and database mining may provide an important avenue for rational computer-aided drug discovery.

D1 and D2 Dopamine Receptors Form Heterooligomers and Cointernalize after Selective Activation of Either Receptor

We provided evidence for the formation of a novel phospholipase C-mediated calcium signal arising from coactivation of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. In the present study, robust fluorescence resonance energy transfer showed that these receptors exist in close proximity indicative of D1-D2 receptor heterooligomerization. The close proximity of these receptors within the heterooligomer allowed for cross-phosphorylation of the D2 receptor by selective activation of the D1 receptor. D1-D2 receptor heterooligomers were internalized when the receptors were coactivated by dopamine or either receptor was singly activated by the D1-selective agonist (+/-)-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide (SKF 81297) or the D2-selective agonist quinpirole. The D2 receptor expressed alone did not internalize after activation by quinpirole except when coexpressed with the D1 receptor. D1-D2 receptor heterooligomerization resulted in an altered level of steady-state cell surface expression compared with D1 and D2 homooligomers, with increased D2 and decreased D1 receptor cell surface density. Together, these results demonstrated that D1 and D2 receptors formed heterooligomeric units with unique cell surface localization, internalization, and transactivation properties that are distinct from that of D1 and D2 receptor homooligomers.

Dopamine D1 receptor interaction with arrestin3 in neostriatal neurons

Dopamine D1 receptor interactions with arrestins have been characterized using heterologously expressed D1 receptor and arrestins. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction of the endogenous D1 receptor with endogenous arrestin2 and 3 in neostriatal neurons. Endogenous arrestin2 and 3 in striatal homogenates bound to the C-terminus of the D1 receptor in a glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pulldown assay, with arrestin3 binding more strongly. The D1 C-terminus and, to a lesser extent, the third cytoplasmic loop also bound purified arrestin2 and 3. In neostriatal neurons, 2, 5, and 20 min agonist treatment increased the colocalization of the D1 receptor and arrestin3 immunoreactivity without altering the colocalization of the D1 receptor and arrestin2. Further, agonist treatment for 5 and 20 min caused translocation of arrestin3, but not arrestin2, to the membrane. The binding of arrestin3, but not arrestin2, to the D1 receptor was increased as assessed by coimmunoprecipitation after agonist treatment for 5 and 20 min. Agonist treatment of neurons induced D1 receptor internalization (35-45%) that was maximal within 2-5 min, a time-course similar to that of the increase in colocalization of the D1 receptor with arrestin3. These data indicate that the D1 receptor preferentially interacts with arrestin3 in neostriatal neurons.

Delineation of the conserved functional properties of D1A, D1B and D1C dopamine receptor subtypes in vertebrates

The three main subtypes of dopamine D(1) receptor (D(1A), D(1B) and D(1C)) subtypes found in most vertebrate groups were generated by two major steps of gene duplications, early in evolution. To identify the functional characteristics contributing to conservation of these paralogous D(1) receptors in vertebrates, the pharmacological and functional properties of fish (Anguilla anguilla), amphibian (Xenopus laevis) and human receptors were systematically analysed in transfected cells. The ligand-binding parameters appeared essentially similar for orthologous receptors, but differed significantly among the subtypes. The D(1A) receptors from the three species displayed low intrinsic activity and a fast rate of agonist-induced desensitization. All the orthologous D(1B) receptors exhibited a similar desensitization time-course, but with smaller amplitude of decrease than D(1A) receptors, in agreement with their higher basal activity. In contrast, D(1C) receptors, which do not exist in mammals, have low intrinsic activity and exhibit only weak, but rapid, agonist-induced desensitization, without any changes upon longer treatment with agonist. Thus, each of the three D(1) receptor subtypes are characterized by activation and desensitization properties, in a sequence-specific manner, which has been probably acquired early after gene duplications, and constrained their conservation during vertebrate evolution. These properties have been instrumental to adapt dopamine system to the physiology of the numerous neuronal networks and functions they control in the large and complex brains of vertebrates.

Role of the fourth intracellular loop of D1-like dopaminergic receptors in conferring subtype-specific signaling properties

We investigate whether the fourth intracellular loop (IL4) of D1 and D5 dopaminergic receptors (D1R, D5R) confers D1-like subtype-specific signaling properties. Using chimeric receptors (D1R-IL4B and D5R-IL4A), we show that swapping of IL4 leads to a switch in dopamine affinity and constitutive activity of D1R and D5R. Dopamine potency was reduced for both chimeras in comparison with wild-type receptors. Moreover, dopamine-mediated maximal activation was drastically increased in cells expressing D1R-IL4B when compared with those harboring D5R-IL4A or wild-type receptors. In conclusion, IL4 plays a pivotal role in imparting subtype-specific ligand binding and activation properties to highly homologous seven-transmembrane receptors.

Regulation of dopamine D-receptor activation in vivo by protein phosphatase 2B (calcineurin)

Mice lacking dopamine D2 receptors exhibit a significantly decreased agonist-promoted forebrain neocortical D1 receptor activation that occurs without changes in D1 receptor expression levels. This raises the possibility that, in brains of D2 mutants, a substantial portion of D1 receptors are uncoupled from their G protein, a phenomenon known as receptor desensitization. To test this, we examined D1-agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding (in the presence and absence of protein phosphatase inhibitors) and cAMP production (in the presence and absence of pertussis toxin) in forebrain neocortical tissues of wild-type mice and D2-receptor mutants. These studies revealed a decreased agonist-stimulated G-protein activation in D2 mutants. Moreover, whereas protein phosphatase 1/2A (PP1/2A) and 2B (PP2B) inhibitors decrease [35S]GTPgammaS binding in a concentration-dependent manner in wild type, they have either no (PP2B) or only partial (PP1/2A) effects in D2 mutants. Furthermore, for D2 mutants, immunoprecipitation experiments revealed increased basal and D1-agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of D1-receptor proteins at serine residues. Finally, D1 immunoprecipitates of both wild type and D2 mutants also contain protein kinase A (PKA) and PP2B immunoreactivities. In D2 mutants, however, the catalytic activity of the immunoprecipitated PP2B is abolished. These data indicate that neocortical D1 receptors are physically linked to PKA and PP2B and that the increased phosphorylation of D1 receptors in brains of D2 mutants is due to defective dephosphorylation of the receptor rather than increased kinase-mediated phosphorylation.

Oligomeric assembly of dopamine D1 and glutamate NMDA receptors: molecular mechanisms and functional implications

In the striatum, dopamine D1R (D1 receptor) activation potentiates NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) transmission and is required for NMDA-mediated long-term potentiation at corticostriatal synapses. By using a combination of co-immunoprecipitation, pull-out with glutathione S-transferase-fusion proteins and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, we have reported that the D1R forms a heteromeric complex with the NMDAR (NMDA receptor) and that this mechanism is crucial to recruit the D1R to the postsynaptic density. By using confocal and radioligand-binding assay, we also demonstrated that the interaction with NMDAR abolishes agonist-mediated D1R sequestration, indicating that oligomerization with NMDAR could represent a novel regulatory mechanism modulating D1R cellular trafficking and desensitization.

Direct interactions between NMDA and D1 receptors: a tale of tails

Considerable evidence has accumulated describing a complex interaction between the dopaminergic and glutamatergic pathways. Efforts to describe the mechanisms underlying this complex interaction have implicated a functional interaction between dopamine and glutamate receptors. Classically, the interaction between D1 and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors has been proposed to involve the activation of second-messenger signalling cascades after receptor stimulation. However, in recent years, another paradigm has emerged which involves the direct interaction between D1 and NMDA receptors. The physical association between D1 and NMDA receptors is unique in that two different regions of the D1 C-terminus are able to couple specifically and physically with two different NMDA subunits. The selective modulation of multiple NMDA receptor-mediated functions by direct interactions with D1 receptors may form a new avenue to identify specific targets for therapeutics to modulate NMDA receptor-governed synaptic plasticity, neuronal development and disease states.

Identification of a novel endocytic recycling signal in the D1 dopamine receptor

A critical event determining the functional consequences of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) endocytosis is the molecular sorting of internalized receptors between divergent recycling and degradative membrane pathways. The D1 dopamine receptor recycles rapidly and efficiently to the plasma membrane after agonist-induced endocytosis and is remarkably resistant to proteolytic down-regulation. Whereas the mechanism mediating agonist-induced endocytosis of D1 receptors has been investigated in some detail, little is known about how receptors are sorted after endocytosis. We have identified a sequence present in the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the human D1 dopamine receptor that is specifically required for the efficient recycling of endocytosed receptors back to the plasma membrane. This sequence is distinct from previously identified membrane trafficking signals and is located in a proximal portion of the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain, in contrast to previously identified GPCR recycling signals present at the distal tip. Nevertheless, fusion of this sequence to the carboxyl terminus of a chimeric mutant delta opioid neuropeptide receptor is sufficient to re-route internalized receptors from lysosomal to recycling membrane pathways, defining this sequence as a bona fide endocytic recycling signal that can function in both proximal and distal locations. These results identify a novel sorting signal controlling the endocytic trafficking itinerary of a physiologically important dopamine receptor, provide the first example of such a sorting signal functioning in a proximal portion of the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain, and suggest the existence of a diverse array of sorting signals in the GPCR superfamily that mediate subtype-specific regulation of receptors via endocytic membrane trafficking.

Biochemical Identification of the Dopamine D<SUB>2</SUB> Receptor Domains Interacting With the Adenosine A<SUB>2A</SUB> Receptor

Functional interactions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors have been demonstrated both at the D2 agonist-binding and second messenger levels. The present studies use a [3H]dopamine-binding assay as a sensitive measure of A2A receptor-mediated modulation of D2 receptors. Co-incubation with an A2A receptor agonist increased the Kd value of high-affinity [3H]dopamine-binding sites of the D2 receptor without changing their Bmax values in a cotransfected cell line. This interaction was shown to be subtype specific, as the A2A receptor agonist did not modulate the affinity of the D1 receptor for [3H]dopamine. The domains of the D2 receptor important for the A2A/D2 receptor interaction were studied with chimeric dopamine D2/D1 receptors. The results showed that the A2A receptor agonist still strongly reduced the affinity of a D2/D1 chimera with the sixth transmembrane (TM) domain and third extracellular loop from the D1 receptor. However, the A2A receptor agonist was not able to modulate a D2/D1 chimeric receptor containing the fifth and sixth TM domains and the third intracellular and extracellular loops from the D1 receptor, indicating that the fifth TM domain and/or the third intracellular loop may be involved in the interaction between A2A and D2 receptors.

The role of phosphorylation in D1 dopamine receptor desensitization: evidence for a novel mechanism of arrestin association

Homologous desensitization of D(1) dopamine receptors is thought to occur through their phosphorylation leading to arrestin association which interdicts G protein coupling. In order to identify the relevant domains of receptor phosphorylation, and to determine how this leads to arrestin association, we created a series of mutated D(1) receptor constructs. In one mutant, all of the serine/threonine residues within the 3rd cytoplasmic domain were altered (3rdTOT). A second construct was created in which only three of these serines (serines 256, 258, and 259) were mutated (3rd234). We also created four truncation mutants of the carboxyl terminus (T347, T369, T394, and T404). All of these constructs were comparable with the wild-type receptor with respect to expression and adenylyl cyclase activation. In contrast, both of the 3rd loop mutants exhibited attenuated agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation that was correlated with an impaired desensitization response. Sequential truncation of the carboxyl terminus of the receptor resulted in a sequential loss of agonist-induced phosphorylation. No phosphorylation was observed with the most severely truncated T347 mutant. Surprisingly, all of the truncated receptors exhibited normal desensitization. The ability of the receptor constructs to promote arrestin association was evaluated using arrestin-green fluorescent protein translocation assays and confocal fluorescence microscopy. The 3rd234 mutant receptor was impaired in its ability to induce arrrestin translocation, whereas the T347 mutant was comparable with wild type. Our data suggest a model in which arrestin directly associates with the activated 3rd cytoplasmic domain in an agonist-dependent fashion; however, under basal conditions, this is sterically prevented by the carboxyl terminus of the receptor. Receptor activation promotes the sequential phosphorylation of residues, first within the carboxyl terminus and then the 3rd cytoplasmic loop, thereby dissociating these domains and allowing arrestin to bind to the activated 3rd loop. Thus, the role of receptor phosphorylation is to allow access of arrestin to its receptor binding domain rather than to create an arrestin binding site per se.

Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection

One of the most important characteristics of Quantitative Structure Activity Relashionships (QSAR) models is their predictive power. The latter can be defined as the ability of a model to predict accurately the target property (e.g., biological activity) of compounds that were not used for model development. We suggest that this goal can be achieved by rational division of an experimental SAR dataset into the training and test set, which are used for model development and validation, respectively. Given that all compounds are represented by points in multidimensional descriptor space, we argue that training and test sets must satisfy the following criteria: (i) Representative points of the test set must be close to those of the training set; (ii) Representative points of the training set must be close to representative points of the test set; (iii) Training set must be diverse. For quantitative description of these criteria, we use molecular dataset diversity indices introduced recently (Golbraikh, A., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 40 (2000) 414-425). For rational division of a dataset into the training and test sets, we use three closely related sphere-exclusion algorithms. Using several experimental datasets, we demonstrate that QSAR models built and validated with our approach have statistically better predictive power than models generated with either random or activity ranking based selection of the training and test sets. We suggest that rational approaches to the selection of training and test sets based on diversity principles should be used routinely in all QSAR modeling research.

Promiscuous coupling at receptor-Galpha fusion proteins. The receptor of one covalent complex interacts with the alpha-subunit of another

Fusion proteins between heptahelical receptors (GPCR) and G protein alpha-subunits show enhanced signaling efficiency in transfected cells. This is believed to be the result of molecular proximity, because the interaction between linked modules of one protein chain, if not constrained by structure, should be strongly favored compared with the same in which partners react as free species. To test this assumption we made a series of fusion proteins (type 1 and 4 opioid receptors with G(o) and beta(2) adrenergic and dopamine 1 receptors with G(sL)) and some mutated analogs carrying different tags and defective GPCR or Galpha subunits. Using cotransfection experiments with readout protocols able to distinguish activation at fused and non-fused alpha-subunits, we found that both the GPCR and the Galpha limb of one fusion protein can freely interact with non-fused proteins and the tethered partners of a neighboring fusion complex. Moreover, a bulky polyanionic inhibitor can suppress with identical potency receptor-Galpha interaction, either when occurring between latched domains of a fused system or separate elements of distinct molecules, indicating that the binding surfaces are equally accessible in both cases. These data demonstrate that there is no entropy drive from the linked condition of fusion proteins and suggest that their signaling may result from the GPCR of one complex interacting with the alpha-subunit of another. Moreover, the enhanced coupling efficiency commonly observed for fusion proteins is not due to the receptor tether, but to the transmembrane helix that anchors Galpha to the membrane.

Membrane biochips

Membrane-bound proteins represent the single most important class of drug targets. This article discusses the issues surrounding fabrication of membrane-protein microarrays by conventional robotic pin printing techniques. Ligand binding selectivity and specificity to G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) microarrays are presented. The potential applications of these arrays for drug screening are discussed.

Homologous regulation of the heptahelical D1A receptor responsiveness: specific cytoplasmic tail regions mediate dopamine-induced phosphorylation, desensitization and endocytosis

In the present study, we investigate the role of specific cytoplasmic tail (CT) regions of the D1A receptor in mediating dopamine (DA)-induced phosphorylation, desensitization and endocytosis. Results obtained in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells expressing the wild-type (WT) or truncation forms (Delta425, Delta379 and Delta351) of the D1A receptor show that sequences located downstream of Gly379 regulate DA-mediated phosphorylation-dependent desensitization of D1A receptors. However, the longer truncation mutant Delta351 failed to undergo detectable DA-induced phosphorylation while exhibiting DA-induced desensitization features similar to the shorter truncation mutant Delta379. These data potentially suggest a novel role for a receptor phosphorylation-independent process in the DA-promoted D1A subtype desensitization. Our immunofluorescence data also suggest that sequences located between Cys351 and Gly379 play an important role in DA-mediated receptor endocytosis. Additionally, time-course studies were done in intact cells expressing WT or truncation receptors to measure the observed rate constant for adenylyl cyclase (AC) activation or k(obs), a parameter linked to the receptor-G protein coupling status. In agreement with the desensitization data, Delta425- and Delta379-expressing cells exhibit an increase of kobs in comparison with WT-expressing cells. Nevertheless, Delta351-expressing cells, which harbor similar desensitization features of Delta379-expressing cells, display no change in k(obs) when compared with WT-expressing cells. Our results suggest that a defective DA-induced endocytosis may hamper Delta351 resensitization and concomitant increase in k(obs). Thus, our study showing that specific D1A receptor CT sequences regulate DA-induced phosphorylation, desensitization, and endocytosis highlights the underlying molecular complexity of signaling at dopaminergic synapses.

Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection

One of the most important characteristics of Quantitative Structure Activity Relashionships (QSAR) models is their predictive power. The latter can be defined as the ability of a model to predict accurately the target property (e.g., biological activity) of compounds that were not used for model development. We suggest that this goal can be achieved by rational division of an experimental SAR dataset into the training and test set, which are used for model development and validation, respectively. Given that all compounds are represented by points in multidimensional descriptor space, we argue that training and test sets must satisfy the following criteria: (i) Representative points of the test set must be close to those of the training set; (ii) Representative points of the training set must be close to representative points of the test set; (iii) Training set must be diverse. For quantitative description of these criteria, we use molecular dataset diversity indices introduced recently (Golbraikh, A., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 40 (2000) 414-425). For rational division of a dataset into the training and test sets, we use three closely related sphere-exclusion algorithms. Using several experimental datasets, we demonstrate that QSAR models built and validated with our approach have statistically better predictive power than models generated with either random or activity ranking based selection of the training and test sets. We suggest that rational approaches to the selection of training and test sets based on diversity principles should be used routinely in all QSAR modeling research.

Regulation of dopamine D(1) receptor trafficking by protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation

The aim of this study was to use pharmacological inhibition of protein kinase A and mutation of potential protein kinase A phosphorylation sites to determine the role of protein kinase A-catalyzed phosphorylation of the dopamine D(1) receptor in agonist-stimulated desensitization and internalization of the receptor. To facilitate purification and imaging of the D(1) receptor, we attached a polyhistidine tag to the amino terminus and enhanced green fluorescent protein to the carboxyl terminus of the receptor (D(1)-EGFP). D(1)-EGFP was similar to the untagged D(1) receptor in terms of affinity for agonist and antagonist ligands, coupling to G proteins, and stimulation of cyclic AMP accumulation. D(1)-EGFP and two mutants in which either Thr268 or Ser380 was replaced with Ala were stably expressed in NS20Y neuroblastoma cells. Pretreatment with the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89 (N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide) or substitution of Ala for Thr268 reduced agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of the receptor and resulted in diminished trafficking of the receptor to the perinuclear region of the cell. Substitution of Ala for Thr268 had no effect, however, on agonist-induced receptor sequestration or desensitization of cyclic AMP accumulation. Substitution of Ala for Ser380 had no effect on D(1) receptor phosphorylation, sequestration, desensitization, or trafficking to the perinuclear region. We conclude that protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation of the D(1) receptor on Thr268 regulates a late step in the sorting of the receptor to the perinuclear region of the cell, but that phosphorylation of Thr268 is not required for receptor sequestration or maximal desensitization of cyclic AMP accumulation.

Distinct residues in the carboxyl tail mediate agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the human dopamine D1 receptor

We have shown in a previous study that desensitization and internalization of the human dopamine D(1) receptor following short-term agonist exposure are mediated by temporally and biochemically distinct mechanisms. In the present study, we have used site-directed mutagenesis to remove potential phosphorylation sites in the third intracellular loop and carboxyl tail of the dopamine D(1) receptor to study these processes. Mutant D(1) receptors were stably transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells, and kinetic parameters were measured. Mutations of Ser/Thr residues to alanine in the carboxyl tail demonstrated that the single substitution of Thr-360 abolished agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the receptor. Isolated mutation of the adjacent glutamic acid Glu-359 also abolished agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the receptor. These data suggest that Thr-360 in conjunction with Glu-359 may comprise a motif necessary for GRK2-mediated phosphorylation and desensitization. Agonist-induced internalization was not affected with mutation of either the Thr-360 or the Glu-359 residues. However, receptors with Ser/Thr residues mutated in the distal carboxyl tail (Thr-446, Thr-439, and Ser-431) failed to internalize in response to agonist activation, but were able to desensitize normally. These results indicate that agonist-induced desensitization and internalization are regulated by separate and distinct serine and threonine residues within the carboxyl tail of the human dopamine D(1) receptor.

Plasticity of afferent fibers to striatal neurons bearing D1 dopamine receptors in Parkinson's disease

The loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra provokes a plasticity of corticostriatal synapses in Parkinson's disease (PD). The corticostriatal pathway nevertheless makes synapses with neurons bearing D1 dopamine receptors (D1R) and/or D2 dopamine receptors. At the ultrastructural level, we analyzed the morphological characteristics of synapses formed by afferent fibers making asymmetric contacts with the dendritic spines of neurons identified by D1R immunoreactivity, in the striatum of control subjects and PD patients. A quantitative analysis of the morphological characteristics of the synapses and of the number of perforated synapses (considered to be very active) was performed. In PD, a 50% increase in the number of perforated synapses making contact with D1R dendritic spines was observed, whereas no change in the number of perforated synapses on non-D1R spines was observed. The change in the number of perforated synapses on D1R dendrites was associated with a slight but nonsignificant increase in the surface area of the corticostriatal afferent fibers and the surface of the mitochondria in these fibers (+29.0% and +34.6%, respectively). This suggests a hyperactivity of corticostriatal fibers in contact with D1R-bearing neurons of the direct pathway in the basal ganglia circuitry. Since stimulation of the direct pathway is thought to alleviate the clinical symptoms of PD, this suggests that the differences observed may be involved in compensatory mechanisms.

Distinct function of the cytoplasmic tail in human D1-like receptor ligand binding and coupling

To delineate the role of the cytoplasmic tail in the distinct binding and coupling properties of human dopamine D1-like receptors, chimeric receptors were generated in which the entire tail region of wild-type human D1A (or D1) and D1B (or D5) receptors was exchanged. The hD1A-D1BT, but not hD1B-D1AT, receptor expression was dramatically reduced compared with wild-type receptor expression. Swapping the cytoplasmic tail resulted in a full switch of dopamine binding affinity and constitutive activity, while dopamine potency decreased and agonist-mediated maximal activation of adenylyl cyclase increased for both chimeras. Hence, the cytoplasmic tail plays a crucial role in D1-like receptor expression, agonist binding affinity and constitutive activation but regulates in a distinct fashion the formation of D1A and D1B receptor active states upon dopamine binding.

Direct protein-protein coupling enables cross-talk between dopamine D5 and gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors

GABA(A) (gamma-aminobutyric-acid A) and dopamine D1 and D5 receptors represent two structurally and functionally divergent families of neurotransmitter receptors. The former comprises a class of multi-subunit ligand-gated channels mediating fast interneuronal synaptic transmission, whereas the latter belongs to the seven-transmembrane-domain single-polypeptide receptor superfamily that exerts its biological effects, including the modulation of GABA(A) receptor function, through the activation of second-messenger signalling cascades by G proteins. Here we show that GABA(A)-ligand-gated channels complex selectively with D5 receptors through the direct binding of the D5 carboxy-terminal domain with the second intracellular loop of the GABA(A) gamma2(short) receptor subunit. This physical association enables mutually inhibitory functional interactions between these receptor systems. The data highlight a previously unknown signal transduction mechanism whereby subtype-selective G-protein-coupled receptors dynamically regulate synaptic strength independently of classically defined second-messenger systems, and provide a heuristic framework in which to view these receptor systems in the maintenance of psychomotor disease states.

Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of dopamine D(1) antagonists using comparative molecular field analysis, genetic algorithms-partial least-squares, and K nearest neighbor methods

Several quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods were applied to 29 chemically diverse D(1) dopamine antagonists. In addition to conventional 3D comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), cross-validated R(2) guided region selection (q(2)-GRS) CoMFA (see ref 1) was employed, as were two novel variable selection QSAR methods recently developed in one of our laboratories. These latter methods included genetic algorithm-partial least squares (GA-PLS) and K nearest neighbor (KNN) procedures (see refs 2-4), which utilize 2D topological descriptors of chemical structures. Each QSAR approach resulted in a highly predictive model, with cross-validated R(2) (q(2)) values of 0.57 for CoMFA, 0.54 for q(2)-GRS, 0.73 for GA-PLS, and 0.79 for KNN. The success of all of the QSAR methods indicates the presence of an intrinsic structure-activity relationship in this group of compounds and affords more robust design and prediction of biological activities of novel D(1) ligands.

Functional analysis of the human D5 dopamine receptor missense and nonsense variants: differences in dopamine binding affinities

The functional analysis of expressed human gene variants is important in the study of genetic susceptibility to diseases, pharmacogenetic traits and for the investigation of the human genetic diversity at the molecular level. We have performed the analysis of sequence polymorphisms in the human D5 dopamine receptor gene (DRD5) predicting missense and nonsense amino acid changes in the receptor protein. The amino acid substitutions in the human D5 dopamine receptor are: Leu88 to Phe in the putative second transmembrane domain, Ala269 to Val in the third intracellular and Pro330 to Gln in the third extracellular loops, Asn351 to Asp in the seventh transmembrane and Ser453 to Cys in the C-terminal domains and Cys335 to Stop in the third extracellular loop. The two amino acid substitutions in the transmembrane domains had an effect on agonist binding to the human D5 dopamine receptor. Asn351 to Asp resulted in an approximately 10-fold decrease in dopamine and threefold decrease in R(+)-SKF-38393 binding affinities. Leu88 to Phe resulted in a small increase in dopamine binding affinity. Antagonist binding affinities were mostly unaffected by the amino acid substitutions with the exception of Leu88 to Phe, which showed small reductions in binding affinities of SCH-23390 and risperidone. The existence of functionally different variants of the human dopamine receptors might have phenotypic consequences given their importance in central nervous system physiology and pharmacology.

Dopamine D1B receptor chimeras reveal modulation of partial agonist activity by carboxyl-terminal tail sequences

NNC 01-0012, a second-generation benzazepine compound, pharmacologically differentiates multiple vertebrate D1 receptor subtypes (D1A, D1B, D1C, and D1D) and displays high selectivity and affinity for dopamine D1C receptors. Functionally, whereas NNC 01-0012 acts as a full or poor antagonist at D1C and D1A receptor-mediated cyclic AMP production, respectively, it exhibits partial agonist activity at the D1B receptor. To define some of the structural motifs that regulate the pharmacological and functional differentiation of vertebrate dopamine D1 receptors by NNC 01-0012, a series of receptor chimeras were constructed in which the divergent carboxyl-terminal (CT) receptor tails were replaced with the corresponding sequences of D1A, D1B, or D1C receptors. Substitution of the vertebrate D1B carboxyl-terminal-tail at position Tyr345 with carboxyl-terminal-tail sequences of the D1A receptor abolished the partial agonist activity of NNC 01-0012 without affecting dopamine-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation. At vertebrate D1B/D1CcT-tail receptor mutants, however, the intrinsic activity of the partial agonist NNC 01-0012 (10 microM) was markedly enhanced (approximately 60% relative to 10 microM dopamine) with no concomitant alteration in the molecule's ligand binding affinity or constitutive activity of the chimeric receptor. Similar results were obtained with other benzazepines such as SKF-38393 and SCH-23390, which act as partial agonists at vertebrate D1B receptors. Substitution of D1A and D1C receptor carboxyl-terminal tails with sequences encoded by the D1B receptor carboxyl-terminal tail did not, however, produce receptors with functional characteristics significantly different from wild type. Taken together, these data clearly suggest that in addition to well-characterized domains and amino acid residues in the third cytoplasmic loop, partial agonist activity at the D1B receptor is modulated by sequence-specific motifs within the carboxyl-terminal tail, a region that may underlie the possible structural basis for functionally divergent roles of multiple dopamine D1-like receptors.