51
|
Defize IL, van der Horst S, Bülbul M, Haj Mohammad N, Mook S, Meijer GJ, Brosens LAA, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Salvage Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) for T4b Esophageal Cancer After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:2730-2738. [PMID: 33341917 PMCID: PMC8043929 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09425-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with esophageal cancer that invades adjacent structures (cT4b) are precluded from surgery and usually treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). dCRT might result in sufficient downstaging to enable a radical resection, possibly improving survival. This study aimed to assess the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of a salvage robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) in patients with cT4b esophageal cancer after dCRT. Methods Between June 2012 and November 2019, patients who underwent a RAMIE with a gastric conduit reconstruction after completion of dCRT for cT4b esophageal carcinoma were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical database at the University Medical Center Utrecht. Results In total, 24 patients with a histopathologically confirmed T4b adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were included. The adjacent organs involved were the tracheobronchial tree (67%), aorta (21%) or both (13%). No conversions or major intraoperative complications were observed. A radical resection was achieved in 22 patients (92%), and a pathologic complete response was observed in 13 (54%) patients. Postoperative grade 2 or higher complications occurred in 20 patients (83%). The disease-free survival at 24 months was 68% for the patients in whom a radical resection was achieved. Conclusion In patients with cT4b esophageal cancer treated with dCRT followed by a salvage RAMIE, a radical resection rate of 92% was achieved, with acceptable complications and promising survival rates. These results demonstrate the feasibility of a curative surgical treatment for patients with initially irresectable esophageal cancer but underscore the importance of a proper preoperative patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I L Defize
- Department of Surgery, G04.228, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S van der Horst
- Department of Surgery, G04.228, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Bülbul
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - N Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Mook
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G J Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, G04.228, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, G04.228, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Wu WA, Yang YP, Liang J, Zhao J, Wang JS, Zhang J. External beam radiotherapy with or without californium-252 neutron brachytherapy for treatment of recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:20902. [PMID: 33262384 PMCID: PMC7708621 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78074-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the application of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with californium-252 (252Cf) neutron intraluminal brachytherapy (NBT) in patients with local recurrent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Sixty-two patients with local recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive CRT were retrospectively analyzed; 31 patients underwent NBT+EBRT, and 31 received EBRT alone. The response rate; 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates; and adverse event occurrence rates were compared between these two patient groups. The response rate was 83.87% (26/31) in the NBT+EBRT group and 67.74% (21/31) in the EBRT group (p < 0.001). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 80.6%, 32.3%, and 6.5%, respectively, in the EBRT group, with a median survival time of 18 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 83.8%, 41.9%, and 6.9%, respectively, in the NBT+EBRT group, with a median survival time of 19 months. The differences between the groups were not significant (p = 0.352). Regarding acute toxicity, no incidences of fistula or massive bleeding were observed during the treatment period. The incidences of severe and late complications were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.080). However, the causes of death for all patients differed between the groups. Our data indicate that 252Cf-NBT+EBRT produces favorable local control for patients with local recurrent esophageal cancer after CRT, with tolerable side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-An Wu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.,The Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Yi-Ping Yang
- The Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Jing Liang
- The Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Jin Zhao
- The Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Jian-Sheng Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
| | - Jia Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Zhang W, Zhao J, Han W, Zhang H, Wang X, Li C, Chen J, Wang X, Zhao Y, Qiao X, Zhou Z, Han C, Zhu S, Shen W, Wang L, Ge X, Sun X, Zhang K, Hu M, Li L, Hao C, Li G, Xu Y, Wang Y, Lu N, Liu M, Qian S, Xiao Z, Wang P, Pang Q. Dose escalation of 3D radiotherapy is effective for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis (3JECROG R-03). ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1140. [PMID: 33240989 PMCID: PMC7576038 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background To evaluate the impact of radiation dose escalation on overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with radical radiotherapy. Methods The clinical data of ESCC patients treated with three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy were collected from multiple institutes and retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received radiation dose ≥40 Gy were included. Radiation dose as a continuous variable was entered into the Cox regression model by using penalized spline regression to allow for a nonlinear relationship between radiation dose and OS to be identified. Patients were stratified into five groups according to EQD2. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the OS in different dose groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with OS. Results A total of 2,469 patients were included from 10 institutes across China. The median follow-up time was 58.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 56.4–60.2 months]. The median OS and PFS time were 24.3 months (95% CI: 22.5–26.2 months) and 18.0 months (95% CI: 16.4–19.6 months), respectively. The risk of death decreased sharply with a dose up to 60 to 62 Gy, before increasing slightly after the dose was elevated beyond 62 Gy. Multivariate analysis indicated that the chance of death was significantly decreased in patients who received radiotherapy doses of 60–62 Gy [P=0.028, hazard ratio (HR) 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.98)], compared with those who received radiotherapy doses of 40–60 Gy. Conclusions Our results reveal radiation dose is a significant prognostic factor of survival for ESCC patients. Higher radiation dose contributes to much more favorable survival outcomes for ESCC patients receiving radical radiotherapy by modern techniques, and 60 Gy or above might be the most optimal radiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingjing Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hualei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital/Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Xueying Qiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Zhiguo Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Chun Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Shuchai Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Wenbin Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Lan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xinchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Kaixian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Miaomiao Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Chongli Hao
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Gaofeng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China
| | - Yonggang Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China
| | - Yadi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Na Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Miaoling Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Shuai Qian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Hu L, Kong Z, Meng Q, Wang J, Zhou M, Yu J, Jiang X. The Safety and Efficacy of Apatinib Treatment in Addition to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Nonoperative Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e927221. [PMID: 33243967 PMCID: PMC7706142 DOI: 10.12659/msm.927221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal cancer is a common gastrointestinal malignancy in China. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding Apatinib to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, we compared short-term efficacy, long-term efficacy, and adverse events between patients who received Apatinib and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (Apatinib group), and those who received only concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT group). RESULTS Sixty-five patients with stage II and III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled (31 in the Apatinib group, 34 in the CCRT group). After treatment, the therapy response rate (the sum of the complete and partial remission rates) was significantly higher in the Apatinib group than in the CCRT group (P=0.045); the complete remission rate was particularly higher in the Apatinib group. Median progression-free survival in the Apatinib group (12 months) was higher than that of the CCRT group (7 months), and the 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in the Apatinib group than in the CCRT group (47.0% vs. 30.3% and 20.2% vs. 12.1%, respectively; P=0.040). The main adverse effects of Apatinib treatment were elevated blood pressure, proteinuria, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, and oral mucositis, all of which were level 1-2. Cox multivariate regression analysis indicated T stage and short-term efficacy were independent prognostic factors for overall and progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS For patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, combining Apatinib with concurrent chemoradiotherapy can improve patient survival and significantly prolong progression-free survival, with tolerable adverse reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijun Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Ze Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Qinghong Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Jianlin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Mengyun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Jingping Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xiaodong Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Luo HS, Huang SF, Xu HY, Li XY, Wu SX, Wu DH. A nomogram based on pretreatment CT radiomics features for predicting complete response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:249. [PMID: 33121507 PMCID: PMC7597023 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01692-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop and validate a nomogram model to predict complete response (CR) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients using pretreatment CT radiomic features. Methods Data of patients diagnosed as ESCC and treated with CCRT in Shantou Central Hospital during the period from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively collected. Eligible patients were included in this study and randomize divided into a training set and a validation set after successive screening. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with logistic regression to select radiomics features calculating Rad-score in the training set. The logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictive clinical factors for developing a nomogram model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was used to assess the performance of the predictive nomogram model and decision curve was used to analyze the impact of the nomogram model on clinical treatment decisions. Results A total of 226 patients were included and randomly divided into two groups, 160 patients in training set and 66 patients in validation set. After LASSO analysis, seven radiomics features were screened out to develop a radiomics signature Rad-score. The AUC of Rad-score was 0.812 (95% CI 0.742–0.869, p < 0.001) in the training set and 0.744 (95% CI 0.632–0.851, p = 0.003) in the validation set. Multivariate analysis showed that Rad-score and clinical staging were independent predictors of CR status, with p values of 0.035 and 0.023, respectively. A nomogram model incorporating Rad-socre and clinical staging was developed and validated, with an AUC of 0.844 (95% CI 0.779–0.897) in the training set and 0.807 (95% CI 0.691–0.894) in the validation set. Delong test showed that the nomogram model was significantly superior to the clinical staging, with p < 0.001 in the training set and p = 0.026 in the validation set. The decision curve showed that the nomogram model was superior to the clinical staging when the risk threshold was greater than 25%. Conclusion We developed and validated a nomogram model for predicting CR status of ESCC patients after CCRT. The nomogram model was combined radiomics signature Rad-score and clinical staging. This model provided us with an economical and simple method for evaluating the response of chemoradiotherapy for patients with ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He-San Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.,Department of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Shao-Fu Huang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hong-Yao Xu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xu-Yuan Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - Sheng-Xi Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China
| | - De-Hua Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Gao LR, Wang X, Han W, Deng W, Li C, Wang X, Zhao Y, Ni W, Chang X, Zhou Z, Deng L, Wang W, Liu W, Liang J, Zhang T, Bi N, Wang J, Zhai Y, Feng Q, Lv J, Li L, Xiao Z. A multicenter prospective phase III clinical randomized study of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: 3JECROG P-02 study protocol. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:901. [PMID: 32962674 PMCID: PMC7510301 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07387-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), no prospective study has investigated whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy (SIB-IMRT with 60 Gy) remains superior to radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) alone for unresectable esophageal cancer (EC). Furthermore, the optimal therapeutic regimen for patients who cannot tolerate concurrent chemoradiotherapy is unclear. We recently completed a phase I/II radiation dose-escalation trial using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), elective nodal irradiation, and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable EC. We now intend to conduct a prospective, phase III, randomized study of SIB-IMRT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. We aim to find a safe, practical, and effective therapeutic regimen to replace the conventional segmentation (1.8-2.0 Gy) treatment mode (radiotherapy ± chemotherapy) for unresectable EC. METHODS This two-arm, open, randomized, multicenter, phase III trial will recruit esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (stage IIA-IVB [UICC 2002]; IVB only with metastasis to the supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes). In all, 164 patients will be randomized using a 1:1 allocation ratio, and stratified by study site and disease stage, especially the extent of lymph node metastasis. Patients in the SIB arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy (95% planning target volume/planning gross tumor volume, 50.4 Gy/59.92 Gy/28 f, equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions = 60.62 Gy). Patients in the SIB + concurrent chemotherapy arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and a platinum-based drug (5-6 weeks). Four cycles of consolidated chemoradiotherapy will also be recommended. The primary objective is to compare the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival of the SIB + chemotherapy group and SIB groups. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, local recurrence-free rate, completion rate, and adverse events. Detailed radiotherapy protocol and quality-assurance procedures have been incorporated into this trial. DISCUSSION In unresectable, locally advanced EC, a safe and effective total radiotherapy dose and reasonable segmentation doses are required for the clinical application of SIB-IMRT + two-drug chemotherapy. Whether this protocol will replace the standard treatment regimen will be prospectively investigated. The effects of SIB-IMRT in patients with poor physical condition who cannot tolerate definitive chemoradiotherapy will also be investigated. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03308552 , November 1, 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin-Rui Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenyang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yirui Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jima Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Tengzhou Central People's Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining Medical University, Tengzhou, 277599, China.
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Zhao J, Lei T, Zhang T, Chen X, Dong J, Guan Y, Wang J, Wei H, Er P, Han D, Wei X, Guo Z, Du Q, Wang J, Liu N, Song Y, Yuan Z, Zhao L, Zhang W, Pang Q, Wang P. The efficacy and safety of simultaneous integrated dose reduction in clinical target volume with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1160. [PMID: 33241009 PMCID: PMC7576073 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background Compelling research to explore the effectiveness of simultaneous integrated dose reduction in clinical target volume (CTV) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIR-IMRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and treatment-related toxicity between SIR-IMRT and conventional IMRT (C-IMRT) in the treatment of ESCC. Methods From March 2010 to September 2016, the clinical data of 257 patients with ESCC who received definitive IMRT in the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Among these patients, 137 patients received C-IMRT with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions for planning target volume (PTV), while 120 patients received SIR-IMRT with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions for the planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) and a prescribed dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions for PTV. All of the patients received definitive IMRT with elective nodal irradiation. Locoregional control, survival, treatment toxicity and dose to organs at risk (OAR) were compared between the groups. Results Patients who received SIR-IMRT showed a similar locoregional failure rate compared to the C-IMRT group (27.5% versus 29.9%, P=0.668). The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71.5%, 44.3%, 44.3% vs. 77.9%, 52.1%, 32.9% in the C-IMRT and SIR-IMRT groups, respectively (P=0.825). No significant differences were observed in PFS and LRRFS between the two groups (P=0.880 and P=0.216, respectively). The dose of lung V30 and the maximum dose of spinal cord in the C-IMRT group were significantly higher than those in the SIR-IMRT group (P=0.013, P=0.047). The incidence of acute radiation esophagitis was significantly lower in the SIR-IMRT group (P=0.046), although no statistical difference was observed in the incidence of acute severe adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions SIR-IMRT offers an effective and safe option for patients with unresectable ESCC who receive definitive RT. Further prospective and larger sample size studies are warranted to confirm our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Tongda Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Tian Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jie Dong
- Department of Nutritional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yong Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Hui Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Puchun Er
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Dong Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoying Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhoubo Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Qingwu Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ningbo Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Yongchun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Lujun Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Wang X, Ge X, Wang X, Zhang W, Zhou H, Lin Y, Qie S, Hu M, Wang W, Liu K, Pang Q, Li M, Chen J, Liu M, Zhang K, Li L, Shi Y, Deng W, Li C, Ni W, Chang X, Han W, Deng L, Wang W, Liang J, Bi N, Zhang T, Liu W, Wang J, Zhai Y, Feng Q, Chen D, Zhou Z, Zhao Y, Sun X, Xiao Z. S-1-Based Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy With S-1 in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase II Trial. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1499. [PMID: 32983991 PMCID: PMC7484368 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Intensive treatments can often not be administered to elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), leading to a poorer prognosis. This multi-center phase II trial aimed to determine the toxicity profile and efficiency of S-1–based simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy (SIB-RT) followed by consolidation chemotherapy with S-1 in elderly ESCC patients and to evaluate the usefulness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Patients and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 46 elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with histopathologically proven ESCC. The patients underwent pretreatment CGA followed by SIB-RT (dose, 59.92 Gy/50.4 Gy) in 28 daily fractions administered using intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy. S-1 was orally administered (40–60 mg/m2) concurrently with radiotherapy and 4–8 weeks later, for up to four 3-week cycles at the same dose. Results: The median survival time was 22.6 months. The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 80.4 and 47.8%, respectively. The overall response rate was 78.3% (36/46). The incidence of grade 3–4 toxicities was 28% (13/46). The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were radiation esophagitis (5/46, 10.9%), nausea (4/46, 8.7%), anorexia (3/46, 6.5%), and radiation pneumonitis (3/46, 6.5%). There were no grade 5 toxicities. CGA identified that 48.8% of patients were at risk for depression and 65.5% had malnutrition. Conclusion: Concurrent S-1 treatment with SIB-RT followed by 4 cycles of S-1 monotherapy yielded satisfactory tumor response rates and manageable toxicities in selected elderly patients with ESCC. Pretreatment CGA uncovered numerous health problems and allowed the provision of appropriate supportive care. Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02979691.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Haiwen Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Shuai Qie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Miaomiao Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Ke Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Minghe Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Miaoling Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China
| | - Kaixian Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Oncology, Tengzhou Central People's Hospital, Tengzhou, China
| | - Yonggang Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weiming Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenyang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianyang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yirui Zhai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongfu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, China
| | - Xinchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Sun X, Wang L, Wang Y, Kang J, Jiang W, Men Y, Hui Z. High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1222. [PMID: 32850362 PMCID: PMC7418493 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with prespecified searching strategy. Studies which compared high radiation dose group with low-dose radiation group using modern radiotherapy techniques for esophageal cancer patients in CCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and the odds ratios (OR) for local-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and toxicities were considered as the outcomes of interest. R 3.6.2 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twelve studies involving 10,896 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the high-dose group had better OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70-0.90, P = 0.0004) and the local-regional control (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46-0.76, P < 0.0001), especially for patients who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The subgroup analyses further indicated that ≥ circa 60 Gy can significantly improve the OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.68-0.80, P < 0.0001) as well as the local-regional control (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.40-0.74, P < 0.0001) as compared with < circa 60 Gy. Another subgroup analysis comparing ≤ 50.4 Gy with > 50.4 Gy showed no substantial difference in OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93-1.03, P = 0.43). In addition, there are no significant differences between the two groups in grade 3-5 radiation pneumonitis (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.54-2.05, P = 0.89), grade 3-5 radiation esophagitis (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93-2.11, P = 0.11), treatment-related death (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.70-3.66, P = 0.27), and DM (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.92-1.59, P = 0.17). Conclusions: For esophageal carcinoma receiving CCRT with modern radiation techniques, evidence suggested that high-dose radiotherapy, especially ≥circa 60 Gy, had potentials to improve the OS and local-regional control without increase in severe toxicities when compared with low-dose radiotherapy. The result needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Department of VIP Region, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jingjing Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yu Men
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhouguang Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Wang X, Geng X, Zhu L, Li M. Clinical response to chemoradiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma is associated with survival and benefit of consolidation chemotherapy. Cancer Med 2020; 9:5881-5888. [PMID: 32627960 PMCID: PMC7433822 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Few studies have reported the impact of the clinical response of patients with Esophageal Carcinoma to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Our study examines the association between clinical response and pretreatment variables, survival, patterns of failure, and benefit of consolidation chemotherapy in subjects with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving CRT. METHODS Data from ESCC patients treated at Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 2013 and December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. By definition, we considered a poor response as progressive disease (PD) and stable disease (SD), while complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) were considered as a good response. Multivariate analyses were carried out using Cox proportional hazards models and patient survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. RESULTS After CRT, 136 (48.9%) patients responded well (good response) and 152 (51.1%) patients responded poorly (poor response). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) differed significantly between patients responded well and those responded poorly. Patients with an early-stage or the upper location of the tumor were more likely to achieve a good response. Patients showing poor responses tended to experience local failure. The 3-year OS and PFS rates of patients showing poor response were 38.9% and 25.5%, respectively, for the CRT with consolidation chemotherapy (CRT + C) group, and 22.7% and 16.7%, respectively, for the CRT group. However, patients with a good response did not benefit from the consolidation chemotherapy. Primary tumor location, T category, N category, and clinical response to chemoradiotherapy were independent factors predicting OS and PFS in ESCC. CONCLUSION Clinical response to CRT substantially improves patient survival and is associated with failure patterns in ESCC. Consolidated chemotherapy may benefit patients with a poor response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongxing Zhao
- School of MedicineShandong UniversityJinanChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyLiaocheng People’s HospitalLiaochengChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyShandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteJinanChina
| | - Yanan Zhang
- Department of Health CareLiaocheng People’s HospitalLiaochengChina
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation OncologyShandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteJinanChina
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical SciencesJinanChina
| | - Xiaotao Geng
- School of MedicineShandong UniversityJinanChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyShandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteJinanChina
| | - Liqiong Zhu
- Department of Radiation OncologyShandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteJinanChina
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical SciencesJinanChina
| | - Minghuan Li
- Department of Radiation OncologyShandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteJinanChina
- Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical SciencesJinanChina
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Abgral R, Bourhis D, Calais J, Lucia F, Leclère JC, Salaün PY, Vera P, Schick U. Correlation between fluorodeoxyglucose hotspots on preradiotherapy PET/CT and areas of cancer local relapse: Systematic review of literature. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:444-452. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
62
|
Seyedin SN, Gannon MK, Plichta KA, Abushahin L, Berg DJ, Arshava EV, Parekh KR, Keech JC, Caster JM, Welsh JW, Allen BG. Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locoregional Recurrences After Prior Chemoradiation for Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1311. [PMID: 32850412 PMCID: PMC7412633 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as salvage therapy for locally recurrent esophageal cancer. We hypothesized that SBRT would provide durable treated tumor control with minimal associated toxicity in patients with progressive disease after definitive radiation, chemotherapy, and surgical resection. Methods: This single-institution retrospective study assessed outcomes in patients who received SBRT for locoregional failure of esophageal cancer after initial curative-intent treatment. Only patients who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (≥41.4 Gy) for esophageal cancer were selected. Subsequent surgical resection was optional but institutional follow-up by an oncologist was required. The primary endpoints of this study were gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicity, scored with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. A secondary outcome, treated-tumor control, was assessed with RECIST v1.1. Results: Nine patients (11 locoregional recurrences) treated with SBRT were reviewed, with a median follow-up time of 10.5 months. Most patients initially presented with T3 (88.9%), N1 (55.6%), moderately differentiated (66.7%) adenocarcinoma (88.9%), and had received a median 50.4 Gy delivered over 28 fractions with concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. Median time to recurrence was 16.3 months. Median total dose delivered by SBRT was 27.5 Gy (delivered in five fractions). Two patients experienced acute grade 1 fatigue and vomiting. No patient experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity. One patient experienced failure in the SBRT treatment field at 5.8 months after treatment and six patients developed distant failure. The median progression-free survival time for SBRT-treated tumors was 5.0 months, and median overall survival time was 12.9 months. Conclusions: This single-institution study demonstrated the feasibility of SBRT for locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer with minimal treatment-related toxicity and high rates of treated tumor control. Prospective studies identifying ideal salvage SBRT candidates for locoregional failure as well as validating its safety are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven N. Seyedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, United States
| | | | - Kristin A. Plichta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, United States
| | - Laith Abushahin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, United States
| | - Daniel J. Berg
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, United States
| | - Evgeny V. Arshava
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, United States
| | - Kalpaj R. Parekh
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, United States
| | - John C. Keech
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, United States
| | - Joseph M. Caster
- Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA, United States
| | - James W. Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Bryan G. Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Hasatani K, Tamamura H, Yamamoto K, Aoyagi H, Miyanaga T, Kaizaki Y, Sawada T. Efficacy of Endoscopic Evaluation of Acute Radiation Esophagitis during Chemoradiotherapy with Proton Beam Therapy Boost for Esophageal Cancer. Digestion 2020; 101:366-374. [PMID: 31067539 PMCID: PMC7384344 DOI: 10.1159/000500039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM To evaluate the utility of endoscopy for assessing radiation esophagitis during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with proton beam therapy (PBT) boost for esophageal cancer. METHODS Between December 2012 and December 2016, 38 patients with esophageal cancer were treated with CRT with PBT boost. To evaluate radiation esophagitis, endoscopy was performed after administration of CRT with standard PBT boost (total dose 50-60 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]). Radiation esophagitis was evaluated and classified into 5 newly developed endoscopic grades (Fukui Acute Radiation Esophagitis [FARE] grade). The additional PBT boost was then adjusted and delivered (2-20 Gy [RBE]) to a maximum total dose of 74.4 Gy (RBE) based on the degree of radiation esophagitis, probability of residual tumor, and patient's general condition. To evaluate the utility of endoscopic examination, the incidences of adverse events graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 4.0) were determined at the time of endoscopic examination after CRT with standard PBT boost (50-60 Gy [RBE]) and at the completion of treatment (60-74.4 Gy [RBE]), as well as during the 90 days from the beginning of treatment. RESULTS There was a significant correlation between FARE grade and CTCAE esophagitis grade (ρ = 0.48; p = 0.03). Moreover, endoscopy detected severe esophagitis in an asymptomatic patient. Radiation dose escalation was achieved without severe acute adverse events. There was no significant difference between the incidence of acute toxicity at the time of the CRT with standard PBT boost (50-60 Gy [RBE]) and the higher dose at the completion of treatment (60-74.4 Gy [RBE]), which suggests this dose escalation strategy is safe. CONCLUSION Endoscopic evaluation of radiation esophagitis using FARE grades was safely performed and useful for adjusting added radiation to ensure the safety of escalations in CRT with PBT boost for esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenkei Hasatani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan,Division of Translational and Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan,Department of Cardiovascular and Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan
| | | | | | - Hiroyuki Aoyagi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Tamon Miyanaga
- Department of Surgery, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Yasuharu Kaizaki
- Department of Pathology, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sawada
- Division of Translational and Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan,Department of Cardiovascular and Internal Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan,*Takeshi Sawada, MD, PhD, Division of Translational and Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa 920-8641 (Japan), E-Mail
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Wang X, Wang P, Geng X, Zhu L, Li M. The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2020; 10:523. [PMID: 32373526 PMCID: PMC7176819 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The present study aimed to determine the prognostic value of the size of metastatic lymph node (LN) in non-surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Three hundred seventy-six ESCC patients treated with definitive (chemo-) radiotherapy from January 2013 to March 2016 were reviewed. We analyzed potential associations of metastatic nodal size with responses, patterns of failure, and survival. Log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the impact of the clinical factors on survival. Results: The 3-years over survival (OS) rates following a median follow-up of 28.2 months were 53.2, 46.2, 35.5, and 22.7% for the N0 group, the >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, the >1 to ≤2 cm group, and the >2 cm group, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rates for 2 years were 50.9, 44.2, 26.6, and 23.4% for the N0 group, the >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, the >1 to ≤2 cm group, and the >2 cm group, respectively. The objective response rates (ORR) for the 280 patients with metastatic LNs were 43.1% for the LN >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, 46.9% for the LN >1 to ≤2 cm group, and 25.5% for the LN ≥2 cm group. The LN >2 cm group had the worst ORR of the three groups with LNs. Gross tumor volume (GTV) failure was the most common failure pattern, followed by distant failure and out of GTV LN failure, with incidences of 47.9% (180 of 376), 42% (158 of 376), and 13.8% (52 of 376), respectively. Nodal size correlated statistically with GTV failure and distant failure but not with out-of-GTV nodal failure. After adjusting for age, sex, T category, Primary tumor location, and CRT, the size of metastatic LNs was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Nodal size is one of prognostic factors for non-surgical patients with ESCC and correlated statistically with GTV failure and distant failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongxing Zhao
- School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Yanan Zhang
- Department of Health Care, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China.,Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Peiliang Wang
- School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaotao Geng
- School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Liqiong Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China.,Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Minghuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Sun LC, Su Y, Ding XC, Xu DS, Li CM, Wang L, Li WL, Sun XD, Yu JM, Meng X. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel liquid fiducial marker for image-guided radiotherapy. Oncol Lett 2020; 20:569-580. [PMID: 32565982 PMCID: PMC7286123 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The true extent of a tumor is difficult to visualize, during radiotherapy, using current modalities. In the present study, the safety and feasibility of a mixture of N-butyl cyanoacrylate and lipiodol (NBCA/Lip) was evaluated in order to investigate the optimal combination for application as a fiducial marker for radiotherapy. Four combinations of NBCA/Lip injection (1:1–0.1, 1:1–0.15, 1:3–0.1 and 1:3–0.15 ml) were injected into the subcutaneous tissue of BALB/c mice. The changes in gross histopathology, body weight, skin score, marker volume, neutrophil and macrophage counts were observed to analyze the effects of the different mixing ratios and injection volumes, in order to identify the best combination. Evaluation according to the International Organization for Standardization criteria was further conducted in order to test the biocompatibility of the mixture, including an acute systematic assay with mice, cytotoxicity with L929 fibroblasts and delayed-type hypersensitivity tests with guinea pigs and an intradermal test with rabbits. The results revealed that at the seventh week, 42 markers (42/48; 87.5%) were still visible using computed tomography (CT) imaging. No serious adverse effects were observed throughout the study period; however, the combination of 1:1–0.1 ml had the lowest body weight and worst skin score. A review of the histopathological reaction to NBCA/Lip revealed a combination of acute inflammation, chronic inflammation, granulation tissue, foreign-body reaction and fibrous capsule formation. The 1:1 NBCA combination ratio resulted in the most intense tissue repair reaction and a slower degradation rate of markers. In general, the combination of 1:3–0.15 ml had a better fusion with local tissue, maintained a stable imaging nodule on CT images for 7 weeks and the final biocompatibility test demonstrated its safety. Overall, the findings of the present study demonstrated NBCA/Lip as a safe and feasible fiducial marker, when using the 1:3–0.15 ml combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang-Chao Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, Shandong 300060, P.R. China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Yi Su
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University Institution, Yantai, Shandong 264001, P.R. China
| | - Xing-Chen Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Dong-Shui Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Cheng-Ming Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Wan-Long Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Xin-Dong Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Jin-Ming Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Xue Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Chen D, Menon H, Welsh J. Using Real-World Historical Controls to Evaluate Radiation Dose Escalation in Esophageal Cancer—Reply. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:583-584. [DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dawei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Hari Menon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - James Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Modesto A, Dalmasso C, Lusque A, Vieillevigne L, Izar F, Moyal E, Carrère N, Guimbaud R, Rives M. Tolerance and efficacy of dose escalation using IMRT combined with chemotherapy for unresectable esophageal carcinoma: Long-term results of 51 patients. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:88-92. [PMID: 32156457 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal dose in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT) remains debated. We herein report on the dosimetric results, treatment-related toxicities and long-term outcomes of escalated dose up to 60Gy delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS All consecutive patients that received a definitive CRT>50Gy for an unresectable esophageal carcinoma between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated for this study. Methodology included data base search, delayed toxicity grading, statistical testing including frequency analysis and survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 51 patients were irradiated for a squamous cell carcinoma (86.3%) or an adenocarcinoma (13.7%). The median age at diagnosis was 62 years. Seven patients were simultaneously irradiated for another synchronous primary tumor. Forty-six patients (90.2%) received concurrent platin-based chemotherapy. The median prescribed doses were 60Gy (54-66) and 48Gy (44.8-56) delivered in 30 (27-35) fractions to the high and the low risks PTV respectively. The mean dose delivered to the lungs was 11.4Gy (IC 95%: 4.8-19.8), the median volumes receiving up to 20Gy (V20) and 30Gy (V30) were 13.5% (3.0-46.0) and 4.6% (0.7-19.8) respectively. The mean dose delivered to the heart was 13.9Gy (IC 95%:0.3-31.3) with a median V40 of 3.3% (0.0-25.0). One treatment-related death occurred within days after RT completion (neutropenic aplasia). After a median follow-up of 2.7 years (95% CI: 1.9-4.3), the 2-year overall survival, disease free survival and loco-regional control rates were 53.6%, 42.0% and 72.8% respectively. Delayed treatment related-toxicities ≤grade 3 occurred among 25 patients (62.5%) mostly esophageal stricture (79.2%). CONCLUSION We demonstrated in this study that dose escalation using IMRT in combination with platin-based chemotherapy as a definitive treatment for esophageal carcinoma is safe and results in higher loco-regional and control survival when compared to previously reported data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Modesto
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
| | - C Dalmasso
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - A Lusque
- Biostatistics Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse, Cedex 9, France
| | - L Vieillevigne
- Physics Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - F Izar
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - E Moyal
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - N Carrère
- Gastro-intestinal surgical Department, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Purpan, 1 place Baylac, Toulouse, France
| | - R Guimbaud
- Digestive Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse-Rangueil, 1, avenue Jean Pouilhès, Toulouse, France
| | - M Rives
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse, 1, avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Yang H, Wang K, Wang T, Li M, Li B, Li S, Yuan L. The Combination Options and Predictive Biomarkers of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Esophageal Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:300. [PMID: 32195194 PMCID: PMC7066251 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common cancers with poor survival in the world. Nowadays, a generous number of clinical trials are underway on the use of immunotherapy in EC patients, especially the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors. However, only a few patients could benefit from single-agent therapy. Others need combination therapies to enhance the response rate and survival. In this review, we focus on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and its combination options in EC patients. We also summarized the potential predictive biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ling Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Quantification of Esophageal Tumor Motion and Investigation of Different Image-Guided Correction Strategies. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:84-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
70
|
Fan XW, Wang HB, Mao JF, Li L, Wu KL. Sequential boost of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with chemotherapy for inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective phase II study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:2812-2819. [PMID: 32100452 PMCID: PMC7163105 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This prospective phase II study aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of sequential boost of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with chemotherapy for patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with histologically or cytologically proven inoperable ESCC were enrolled in this study (ChiCTR‐OIC‐17010485). A larger target volume for subclinical lesion was irradiated with 50 Gy, and then, a smaller target volume only including gross tumor was boosted to 66 Gy. The fraction dose was 2 Gy, and no elective node was irradiated. Concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy of fluorouracil (600 mg/m2, days 1‐3) plus cisplatin (25 mg/m2, days 1‐3) was administered every 4 weeks, for 4 cycles in total. The primary endpoint was 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Results Eighty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 65 years (range: 45‐75 years), and 69 patients (78.4%) were men. With the median follow‐up of 26 (range: 3‐95) months, the 2‐ and 5‐year PFS were 39.3% and 36.9%, respectively, and overall survival (OS) were 57.1% and 39.2%, respectively. Tumor stage and concurrent chemotherapy were independent OS predictors. Major acute adverse events were myelosuppression and esophagitis, most of which were grades 1‐2. Nine percent and 2.3% of patients had grade 3 acute esophagitis and late esophageal strictures, respectively. Conclusions Sequential boost to 66 Gy by IMRT with chemotherapy was safe and effective for inoperable ESCC. A randomized phase III study to compare with standard dose of 50 Gy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing-Wen Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong-Bing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing-Fang Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kai-Liang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Matsuda S, Mayanagi S, Irino T, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y. Definitive chemoradiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose for T4 esophageal cancer-will it stand for a standard treatment? J Thorac Dis 2020; 11:5682-5684. [PMID: 32030301 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Mayanagi
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Irino
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kawakubo
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Jethwa KR, Haddock MG, Tryggestad EJ, Hallemeier CL. The emerging role of proton therapy for esophagus cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:144-156. [PMID: 32175118 PMCID: PMC7052753 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.11.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plays an essential role in the treatment of esophageal cancer as either curative or neoadjuvant therapy. When delivered with conventional photon-based techniques, multiple adjacent organs at risk including the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, stomach, and bowel, receive considerable radiation dose which may contribute to acute and late adverse events (AEs). Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers a reduction in radiation exposure to these organs and potentially an improvement in the therapeutic ratio. Herein we discuss the emerging role of PBT for esophageal cancer, including rationale, treatment planning, early dosimetric and clinical comparisons of PBT with photon-based techniques, ongoing prospective trials, and potential areas of opportunity for the incorporation of PBT with the goal of improving outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R. Jethwa
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
73
|
Phase I Trial of Intensity-Modulated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy Boost with Concurrent Chemotherapy Immediately Following Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Patients Primarily with Advanced Intra-thoracic/Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:340-348. [PMID: 31655197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Local persistence and relapse of disease in the gross tumor volume (GTV) account for the majority of treatment failures after standard chemoradiation therapy. The primary objective of this phase 1 trial was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) boost to the GTV with concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin after standard-dose chemoradiation therapy, using image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients were given weekly doses of paclitaxel (45 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 1.5) for 5 weeks with concurrent radiation therapy (50 Gy), immediately followed by an HFRT boost to the GTV with the same chemotherapy regimen. The boost doses were escalated in increments of 7.2 Gy delivered in 6 twice-daily fractions of 1.2 Gy using a modified Fibonacci design. Once the MTD was established, additional patients were treated at that dose to determine the safety. RESULTS Thirty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The incidence of dose-limiting toxicity was 0 of 3, 0 of 3, 0 of 3, 1 of 6 (grade 4 esophagitis), 0 of 3, and 2 of 3 (1 case each of grade 5 esophageal fistula and grade 3 pneumotitis) at 7.2, 14.4, 21.6, 28.8, 36, and 43.2 Gy, respectively, indicating an MTD of 36 Gy. Ten patients treated with this MTD showed no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common acute grade 3 or greater toxicities were esophagitis (26%) and neutropenia (19%). Late toxicity of grade 2 esophageal stricture occurred in 4 patients. The overall response rate was 84% (95% confidence interval, 42%-93%) in the entire cohort. The 1-year local control rate was 100% among those receiving a cumulative dose of the MTD or greater. CONCLUSIONS The MTD of the HFRT boost after standard chemoradiation therapy in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy was 36 Gy, resulting in the cumulative tumor dose of 86 Gy in patients primarily with advanced intrathoracic/cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and not adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. A phase 2 study to further evaluate this regimen is underway.
Collapse
|
74
|
Zhang N, Gu M, Wang J, Wu S. Comparison of nodal irradiation dose using radiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. Oncol Lett 2020; 19:1042-1050. [PMID: 31897217 PMCID: PMC6924155 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.11178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare incidental nodal irradiation (INI) doses using volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), 5-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (5F-IMRT) and 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment plans for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer (EC). A total of 15 patients with thoracic EC were selected for participation between October 2016 and July 2017 at the Hangzhou Cancer Hospital. Regional lymph nodal stations were contoured according to 3D CT-based images of the Japan Esophageal Society Guidelines. All patients were treated with 60 Gy using VMAT, 5F-IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. Dose-volume histograms of planning target volume (PTV), lung, heart, spinal cord and incidental nodal irradiation were compared between the three plans. 5F-IMRT was superior in PTV_V95% (the volume of the PTV receiving 95% of the prescription dose, P=0.003) and the VMAT plan was best in terms of conformal index (P=0.005). V20 and V30 were reduced by 10.7-22.6% (P=0.002) and 12.8-21% (P=0.026), respectively, in normal lung tissue using the VMAT plan. 5F-IMRT demonstrated the lowest maximum dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord (P=0.037). For the INI, 3D-CRT exhibited the highest equivalent uniform dose (EUD) values for 106pre (P=0.014) and 106tb-L (P=0.03) in upper-thoracic EC. The mean EUD of all lymph nodal regions in middle-thoracic EC were >40 Gy in VMAT and 5F-IMRT plans; the VMAT plan had higher EUD values in lower-thoracic EC compared with 5F-IMRT, 3D-CRT plans for INI. VMAT were comparable to the 5F-IMRT plan with respect to dosimetric characteristics for planning and INI doses to thoracic nodal levels NO 105-112 are considerable for thoracic EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ni Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, P.R. China
| | - Min Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, P.R. China
| | - Jiahao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, P.R. China
| | - Shixiu Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Lu HI, Chen Y, Lo CM, Wang YM, Chen LC, Li SH. Outcome and prognostic analysis of salvage esophagectomy for clinical T4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definite chemoradiotherapy. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/jcrp.jcrp_19_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
76
|
Dai H, Shao YW, Tong X, Wu X, Pang J, Feng A, Yang Z. YAP1 amplification as a prognostic factor of definitive chemoradiotherapy in nonsurgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med 2019; 9:1628-1637. [PMID: 31851786 PMCID: PMC7050074 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Definitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with nonsurgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), yet patients have demonstrated great variations in their responses to dCRT and inevitably progressed following treatment. Methods To identify prognostic biomarkers, we performed targeted next‐generation sequencing of 416 cancer‐related genes on primary tumors from 47 nonsurgical ESCC patients prior to dCRT treatment. The association between genetic alterations and patients' local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed. Results TP53 (78% of patients), NOTCH1 (32%), ARID1A (13%), FAT1 (13%), and CDKN2A (13%) were commonly mutated in ESCC patients, while gene amplifications frequently occurred in MCL1 (36%), FGF19 (34%), MYC (32%), CCND1 (27%), ZNF217 (15%), CDKN2A (13%), and YAP1 (11%). Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical factors and genetic alterations indicated that sex is an independent prognostic factor, with males tending to have better LRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95%CI, 0.08‐0.77, P = .015) and progression‐free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.13‐0.93, P = .030) following dCRT. Meanwhile, YAP1 amplification (n = 7) was an adverse prognostic factor, and patients with this alteration demonstrated a tendency toward worse outcomes with shorter LRFS (HR, 4.06; 95%CI, 1.26‐13.14, P = .019) and OS (HR, 2.78; 95%CI, 0.95‐8.17, P = .062). In a subgroup analysis, while sex and M‐stage were controlled, a much stronger negative effect of YAP1 amplification vs wild‐type in LRFS was observed (log‐rank P = .0067). Conclusion The results suggested that YAP1 amplification is a potentially useful biomarker for predicting treatment outcomes and identifying patients with a high risk of relapse who should be closely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honghai Dai
- Tumor Research and Therapy Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yang W Shao
- Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, Nanjing, China.,School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoling Tong
- Translational Medicine Research Institute, Geneseeq Technology Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xue Wu
- Translational Medicine Research Institute, Geneseeq Technology Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Alei Feng
- Tumor Research and Therapy Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhe Yang
- Tumor Research and Therapy Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Fountoulakis A, Souglakos J, Vini L, Douridas GN, Koumarianou A, Kountourakis P, Agalianos C, Alexandrou A, Dervenis C, Gourtsoyianni S, Gouvas N, Kalogeridi MA, Levidou G, Liakakos T, Sgouros J, Sgouros SN, Triantopoulou C, Xynos E. Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of oesophageal cancer. Updates Surg 2019; 71:599-624. [DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00696-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
78
|
Xu X, Wang Z, Jiang S, Shang Y, Wu Y. Evaluating the optimal re-irradiation dose for locally recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:191. [PMID: 31684983 PMCID: PMC6827256 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1402-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Re-irradiation (re-RT) has the active effect of relieving clinical symptoms and prolonging the survival of patients with recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal re-RT dose is still uncertain. Here, we analyzed the prognostic factors associated with survival and explored the optimal re-RT dose for patients with recurrent ESCC following definitive radiotherapy. Patients and methods The data of 47 patients with recurrent ESCC who were retreated between 2010 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received a radiation dose > 50 Gy during the primary treatment. The median time to recurrence after primary radiotherapy was 26 months (range 6–120 months). All patients had in-field recurrence in the esophagus. Recurrence within the local site was observed in 37 patients (78.7%), and recurrence in both the local site and regional nodes were observed in 10 patients (21.3%). All patients received 3D conformal re-RT with a median dose of 58 Gy (range 26–64 Gy). Chemotherapy was sequentially used in 27.7% of the patients. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by log-rank tests. The factors predictive of survival were identified with univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Dysphagia relief after re-RT was achieved in 20 of the 35 symptomatic patients (57.1%). The median survival time (MST) of all patients was 17 months, and the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 72.3, 25.5, 17.0 and 2.1%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of 0–1 (P = 0.014), recurrence at the local site (P = 0.048), time to recurrence ≥24 months (P = 0.006) and re-RT dose ≥50 Gy (P < 0.001) were associated with favorable OS. In the multivariate analysis, only re-RT dose was an independent factor for OS (P = 0.007). Severe complications were observed in 7 patients, two of whom received a re-RT dose > 60 Gy. Conclusion Our results demonstrated that patients with recurrent ESCC following definitive radiotherapy had unfavorable OS. Re-RT could be considered a feasible and effective treatment modality. A re-RT dose > 50 Gy could improve the survival outcomes, and a dose > 60 Gy should be administered with caution due to the risk of severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiujuan Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lianyungang No 2 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, 222023, China
| | - Zhongming Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lianyungang No 2 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, 222023, China.
| | - Shunian Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lianyungang No 2 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, 222023, China
| | - Yuping Shang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lianyungang No 2 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, 222023, China
| | - Yan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lianyungang No 2 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, 222023, China
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Anderegg MCJ, Ruurda JP, Gisbertz SS, Blom RLGM, Sosef MN, Wijnhoven BPL, Hulshof MCCM, Bergman JJGHM, van Laarhoven HWM, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Feasibility of extended chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:626-631. [PMID: 31706717 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of cT4b esophageal carcinoma usually consists of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). However, outcome after dCRT in these patients is poor. Whether surgery should have a place in the treatment of cT4b esophageal cancer is still subject to debate. Goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of esophagectomy after extended chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT4b esophageal cancer. METHODS Patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma, as determined by endoscopic ultrasound and (PET-)CT, were eligible for this phase-2 study. Patients were treated with weekly carboplatin + paclitaxel with 50.4 Gy radiotherapy in 28 fractions for 5.5 weeks followed by an explorative thoracotomy and esophagectomy if deemed feasible. RESULTS From July 2011 through March 2013, 16 patients were enrolled. Five patients did not undergo surgery because of detection of distant metastases during/after CRT (n = 3), unwillingness to undergo surgery (n = 1) or death before start of CRT (n = 1). Of the 13 patients who completed CRT, 3 patients experienced major hematologic toxicity (grade 3). A radical (R0) resection was achieved in 9 of 11 patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients. A reoperation was performed in 2 patients and 2 patients died in hospital after surgery. Three patients developed recurrent disease (1 locoregional and 2 systemic) after a mean interval of 17 months. Median overall survival of all included patients was 14.3 months. CONCLUSIONS In certain patients with cT4b esophageal carcinoma a radical resection can be accomplished after chemoradiotherapy. However, this treatment is associated with considerable complications and should therefore be reserved for physically fit patients. NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTER NUMBER NTR3060.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rachel L G M Blom
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Meindert N Sosef
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Boustani J, Rivin Del Campo E, Blanc J, Peiffert D, Benezery K, Pereira R, Rio E, Le Prisé E, Créhange G, Huguet F. Quality Assurance of Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy in a Randomized Trial for Locally Advanced Oesophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:329-337. [PMID: 31299242 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The ongoing phase 2/3 PRODIGE 26/CONCORDE trial compares chemoradiation therapy with and without dose escalation in patients with locally advanced or unresectable esophageal cancer. The results of a benchmark case procedure are reported here to evaluate the protocol compliance of participating centers as part of quality assurance for radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Volume delineation, target coverage, and dose constraints to the organs at risk (OARs) were assessed on treatment plans of a common benchmark case performed by each participating center. The centers were classified in 3 categories: per protocol, minor acceptable deviation (MiD), or major unacceptable deviation (MaD). A plan was rejected if ≥4 MiDs or 1 MaD were found. RESULTS Thirty-5 centers submitted 43 plans. Among them, 14 (32.6%) were per protocol, 19 (44.2%) presented at least 1 MiD, 2 (4.6%) presented at least 1 MaD, and 8 (18.6%) presented both MiD and MaD. Overall, 11 (25.6%) plans were rejected. Only 1 plan was rejected because gross tumor volume was not correctly delineated. The OAR delineation was respected in all cases. Dose constraints to the OARs were respected in the majority of cases except for the heart, where one-third of the plans presented a deviation. As for the target volume, 3 plans (5.8%) had a major underdosage and 1 plan (1.9%) had a major overdosage. Overall, 58% of all treatments were planned with intensity modulated radiation therapy, whereas 42% were planned with 3-dimensional chemoradiation therapy. Significantly more plans in the intensity modulated radiation therapy group were accepted compared with the 3-dimensional chemoradiation therapy group (P = .03). CONCLUSION The high frequency of protocol deviations underlines the importance of a quality assurance program in clinical trials. Further work should assess the impact of quality assurance for radiation therapy on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihane Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Unicancer-Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France.
| | - Eleonor Rivin Del Campo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne University Medical Faculty, Paris, France
| | - Julie Blanc
- Department of Biostatistics, Unicancer-Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France
| | - Didier Peiffert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| | - Karine Benezery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Renata Pereira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Guillaume Le Conquérant, Le Havre, France
| | - Emmanuel Rio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Florence Huguet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Sorbonne University Medical Faculty, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Li J, Zhao Z, Du G, Dai T, Zhen X, Cai H, Liao D, Xiang M, Wen Y, Geng L, Yang X, Feng G, Zhang Y, Bai J, Liu L, Du X. Safety and efficacy of pulsed low-dose rate radiotherapy for local recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radiotherapy: Study protocol for a prospective multi-center phase II trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16176. [PMID: 31261551 PMCID: PMC6620741 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Re-irradiation after radiotherapy is a common treatment for locally recurrent esophageal cancer. However, the side effects of re-irradiation are serious. The most serious adverse reactions of re-irradiation include esophageal perforation and hemorrhage caused by esophageal perforation. Studies have shown that pulsed low-dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR) induces a hypersensitivity effect on tumor tissue and a hyper-repair effect on normal tissue, which can simultaneously reduce damage on the normal tissue and increase the therapeutic effect on the tumor. The objective of this study is to explore whether PLDR can reduce rate of esophageal perforation and improve efficacy in patients with recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after radiotherapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a prospective, multi-center, open, single-arm clinical trial designed to enroll 27 patients with locally recurrent ESCC after radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Re-irradiation will be performed using intensity modulated radiation therapy in 50 Gy/25 fractions. The strategy of PLDR includes dividing 2 Gy into 10 fractions, and administering each irradiating dose of 20 cGy at an interval of 3 minutes before the next low-dose irradiation. The actual dose rate of administration each time will be 16.67 cGy /minute. The primary endpoint in this study is the rate of esophageal perforation. The secondary endpoints are the objective remission rate, the palliative effect on quality of life and pain, and the time of disease progression. The observation time is 2 years after the end of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trial number: ChiCTR1900020609.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Li
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| | - Zhenhua Zhao
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| | - Guobo Du
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nan Chong
| | - Tangzhi Dai
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| | - Xuhai Zhen
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| | - Hongwei Cai
- Department of Oncology, Lang Zhong People‘s Hospital, Lang Zhong
| | - Dongbiao Liao
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| | - Miao Xiang
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| | - Yixue Wen
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nan Chong
| | - Lidan Geng
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nan Chong
| | - Xiyue Yang
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nan Chong
| | - Gang Feng
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| | - Jie Bai
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan
| | - Xiaobo Du
- Department of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Li C, Wang X, Wang X, Han C, Wang P, Pang Q, Chen J, Sun X, Wang L, Zhang W, Lin Y, Ge X, Zhou Z, Ni W, Chang X, Liang J, Deng L, Wang W, Zhao Y, Xiao Z. A multicenter phase III study comparing Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1 versus SIB alone in elderly patients with esophageal and esophagogastric cancer - the 3JECROG P-01 study protocol. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:397. [PMID: 31036088 PMCID: PMC6489222 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5544-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of definitive radiotherapy for elderly patients with esophageal and esophagogastric-junction cancer is pronounced. However, little is known in terms of the best way to combine radiotherapy with other treatment options. This study aims to compare the efficiency of SIB radiotherapy alone with SIB radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1 for elderly patients. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is also incorporated in the procedure of treatment. METHODS/DESIGN The study is a two arm, open, randomized multicenter Phase III trial with patients over 70 years old with stage IIA-IVB (UICC 2002, IVB only with metastasis to supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes) squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. A total of 300 patients will be randomized using a 1:1 allocation ratio stratified by disease stage and study site. Patients allocated to the SIB arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy (95%PTV/PGTV 50.4Gy/59.92Gy/28f) while those randomized to SIB + S-1 arm will receive definitive SIB radiotherapy concurrent and consolidated with S-1. The primary endpoint of the trial is 1-year overall survival. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival (local-regional and distant), disease failure pattern, toxicity profile as well as quality of life. Besides, detailed radiotherapy protocol and quality assurance procedure have been incorporated into this trial. DISCUSSION The proportion of elderly patients in esophageal cancer is now growing, but there is a lack of evidence in term of treatment standard for this group of patients, which is what we aim to obtain through this prospective phase III study. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT02979691 . Registered November 22, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiaomin Wang
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Chun Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Qingsong Pang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Junqiang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital/Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Xinchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Lan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Wencheng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Yu Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital/Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Xiaolin Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen Center, Shenzhen, 518000, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yidian Zhao
- Department 4th of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, 455000, China.
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Li C, Ni W, Wang X, Zhou Z, Deng W, Chang X, Chen D, Feng Q, Liang J, Wang X, Deng L, Wang W, Bi N, Zhang T, Xiao Z. A phase I/II radiation dose escalation trial using simultaneous integrated boost technique with elective nodal irradiation and concurrent chemotherapy for unresectable esophageal Cancer. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:48. [PMID: 30876442 PMCID: PMC6420772 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1249-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To investigate the safety and tolerability of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique concurrent with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and dual-drug chemotherapy for patients with unresectable esophageal cancer. Methods In phase I, the prophylactic PTV received a stable dose of 50.40Gy/1.80Gy/28f while the boost area was planned with 3 consecutive dose levels: the first dose level was 60.76Gy/2.17Gy/28f, and then escalated approximately every 2 Gy. ENI was incorporated in Clinical Target Volume (CTV), and paclitaxel and nedaplatin were given concurrently for at least 5 weeks. In phase II, enrolled patients were treated with Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) obtained in phase I and the compliance rate, survival results and toxicities were evaluated. Results From December 2014 to April 2017, 53 patients were enrolled. In phase I, 2 out of 6 patients developed Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) at dose level 1. Due to excessive treatment-related toxicities, the escalation process was suspended and de-escalated to 59.92Gy /2.14Gy /28 f. Three patients were treated at this dose level, all of whom completed at least 5 weeks of chemotherapy and none of whom reached a DLT, determining the newly added dose level to be the MTD. In phase II, 44 patients were treated with MTD, 31 of them (70.0%) completed at least 5 weeks of chemotherapy. The most common Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in phase II included leukopenia (21%) and esophagitis (15%). With a median follow-up time of 16.9 months, 1-y OS, DFS and local failure-free survival were 76.9, 63.6 and 78.8% respectively. Conclusion The SIB technique was feasible and safe at the MTD (95% PGTV/PTV 59.92/50.40Gy/28f) concurrent with ENI and dual-drug chemotherapy for patients with unresectable esophageal cancer. Trial registration clinicaltrials.govNCT02429622. Retrospectively registered on April 24, 2015. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1249-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenjie Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zongmei Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiao Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Dongfu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qinfu Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiaozhen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zefen Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Blais E, Vendrely V, Sargos P, Créhange G, Huguet F, Maingon P, Simon JM, Bourdais R, Ozsahin M, Bourhis J, Clément-Colmou K, Belghith B, Proudhom Briois MA, Gilliot O, Dujols JP, Peyras A, Dupin C, Riet FG, Canova CH, Huertas A, Troussier I. [Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: A critical review of the literature]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:62-72. [PMID: 30639379 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Locally advanced oesophageal cancer treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach with the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for preoperative and definitive strategy. Preoperative chemoradiation improves the locoregional control and overall survival after surgery for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Definitive chemoradiation can also be proposed for non-resectable tumours or medically inoperable patients. Besides, definitive chemoradiation is considered as an alternative option to surgery for locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas. Chemotherapy regimen associated to radiotherapy consists of a combination of platinum derived drugs (cisplatinum or oxaliplatin) and 5-fluorouracil or a weekly scheme combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel according to CROSS protocol in a neoadjuvant strategy. Radiation doses vary from 41.4Gy to 45Gy for a preoperative strategy or 50 to 50.4Gy for a definitive treatment. The high risk of lymphatic spread due to anatomical features could justify the use of an elective nodal irradiation when the estimated risk of microscopic involvement is higher than 15% to 20%. An appropriate delineation of the gross tumour volume requires an exhaustive and up-to-date evaluation of the disease. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy represents a promising approach to spare organs-at-risk. This critical review of the literature underlines the roles of radiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal cancers and describes doses, volumes of treatment, technical aspects and dose constraints to organs-at-risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Blais
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - V Vendrely
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU de Bordeaux-Haut Lévêque, avenue du Haut-Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - P Sargos
- Service de radiothérapie, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - G Créhange
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Professeur-Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - P Maingon
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - J-M Simon
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - R Bourdais
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - M Ozsahin
- Service de radio-oncologie, CHUV, rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Suisse
| | - J Bourhis
- Service de radio-oncologie, CHUV, rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Suisse
| | - K Clément-Colmou
- Service de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO) centre René-Gauducheau, boulevard Professeur-Jacques-Monod, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - B Belghith
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - M-A Proudhom Briois
- Service de radiothérapie, groupe de radiothérapie et d'oncologie des Pyrénées, 49, rue Aristide-Briand, 64000 Pau, France
| | - O Gilliot
- Service de radiothérapie, groupe de radiothérapie et d'oncologie des Pyrénées, 49, rue Aristide-Briand, 64000 Pau, France
| | - J-P Dujols
- Service de radiothérapie, groupe de radiothérapie et d'oncologie des Pyrénées, 49, rue Aristide-Briand, 64000 Pau, France
| | - A Peyras
- Service de radiothérapie, groupe de radiothérapie et d'oncologie des Pyrénées, 49, rue Aristide-Briand, 64000 Pau, France
| | - C Dupin
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU de Bordeaux-Haut Lévêque, avenue du Haut-Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - F-G Riet
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - C-H Canova
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - A Huertas
- Service de radiothérapie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - I Troussier
- Service de radio-oncologie, hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Genève, Suisse
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Hu L, Sun F, Sun Z, Ni X, Wang J, Wang J, Zhou M, Feng Y, Kong Z, Hua Q, Yu J. Apatinib enhances the radiosensitivity of the esophageal cancer cell line KYSE-150 by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle redistribution. Oncol Lett 2018; 17:1609-1616. [PMID: 30675220 PMCID: PMC6341789 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
To determine the radiosensitizing effect of apatinib on esophageal cancer cells, and to preliminarily investigate the underlying mechanism, KYSE-150 cells were treated with apatinib, x-ray or apatinib combined with x-ray, and compared with a blank control. It was observed that apatinib significantly inhibited vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion and the proliferation of KYSE-150 cells in a dose-dependent manner. As the concentration of apatinib increased, the radiobiological parameters inactivation dose (D0), quasi domain does (Dq) and survival fraction (SF2) of KYSE-150 cells decreased, while the sensitization enhancement ratio SERD0 increased. The rate of apoptosis in cells treated with apatinib and x-ray was markedly higher compared with those of the blank control, x-ray and apatinib alone groups (P<0.05). The proportion of cells in the G2/M phase was significantly increased in the apatinib, x-ray and combination groups compared with the blank control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control and x-ray groups, combination treatment did not significantly alter the expression level of polyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), although it significantly increased the expression of cleaved-PARP (P<0.05). Moreover, the expression of cell serine/threonine-protein kinase-2 (CHK2) was downregulated (P<0.05), whilst expression of the phosphorylated form, pCHK2, was significantly increased (P<0.05) in the combination group when compared with the control and x-ray groups. In conclusion, the present study suggested that apatinib increases the radiosensitivity of KYSE-150 esophageal cancer cells by inhibiting VEGF secretion and cell proliferation, and promoting apoptosis and cell cycle redistribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijun Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Fei Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Zhiqiang Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Xinchu Ni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Jianlin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Mengyun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Yue Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Ze Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Qiu Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| | - Jingping Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Zhou Y, Su Y, Zhu H, Wang X, Li X, Dai C, Xu C, Zheng T, Mao C, Chen D. Interleukin-23 receptor signaling mediates cancer dormancy and radioresistance in human esophageal squamous carcinoma cells via the Wnt/Notch pathway. J Mol Med (Berl) 2018; 97:177-188. [PMID: 30483821 PMCID: PMC6348073 DOI: 10.1007/s00109-018-1724-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Abstract In the tumor microenvironment, inflammatory cells and molecules influence almost every process; among them, interleukin-23 (IL-23) is a pro-inflammatory molecule that exhibits pro- or anti-tumor properties, but both activities remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the effect of extracellular IL-23 in IL-23 receptor-positive (IL-23R+) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and explored the mechanisms underlying this effect. We analyzed ESCC tumor tissues by immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining and found that IL-23, which was highly expressed, co-localized with Oct-4A in IL-23R+ ESCC cells. In addition, IL-23 treatment significantly increased the accumulation of CD133+ cells and activated the Wnt and Notch signaling pathways in CD133−IL-23R+ ESCC cell lines. Consistently, CD133−IL-23R+ cells pretreated with IL-23 showed stronger anti-apoptosis activity when exposed to radiation and higher survival than untreated groups. Moreover, the inhibition of Wnt/Notch signaling by a small-molecule inhibitor or siRNA abolished the effect of IL-23-induced dormancy and consequent radioresistance. Taken together, these results suggested that IL-23 facilitates radioresistance in ESCC by activating Wnt/Notch-mediated G0/1 phase arrest, and attenuating these detrimental changes by blocking the formation of dormancy may prove to be an effective pretreatment for radiotherapy. Key messages IL-23/IL-23R is correlated with the acquisition of stem-like potential in ESCC. CD133−IL-23R+ ESCCs acquired dormancy via IL-23. Radioresistance depends on IL-23-mediated Wnt/Notch pathway activation in vitro and vivo.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00109-018-1724-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuepeng Zhou
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiefang Road 438, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Yuting Su
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiefang Road 438, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Haitao Zhu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Xuefeng Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Xiaoqin Li
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiefang Road 438, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Chunhua Dai
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiefang Road 438, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Chengcheng Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Tingting Zheng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Chaoming Mao
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiefang Road 438, Zhenjiang, 212001, China.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China.
| | - Deyu Chen
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiefang Road 438, Zhenjiang, 212001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
The role of definitive chemoradiation in patients with non-metastatic oesophageal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 36-37:53-59. [PMID: 30551857 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) is a curative treatment option for patients with oesophageal cancer. It is effective in both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. However, locoregional control is less after dCRT compared to preoperative CRT (pCRT) followed by surgery. Also, overall survival is lower compared to pCRT followed by surgery, which can only partly be explained by a negative selection of patients. The optimal dose of radiotherapy remains to be determined, but dose escalation above 50.4Gy might be beneficial. Cisplatinum/5-FU is the most applied concurrent chemotherapy, but carboplatin/paclitaxel seems equally effective with less toxicity. The addition of 5-FU to a taxane and platinum seems promising. Accelerated fractionation and addition of cetuximab did not improve results. dCRT is a successful treatment for regional lymph node recurrences, but less so for recurrences at the anastomotic site. Re-irradiation after prior curative radiotherapy yields poor results. dCRT can be safely used in carefully selected elderly.
Collapse
|
88
|
Sun Y, Zhang XL, Mao QF, Liu YH, Kong L, Li MH. Elective nodal irradiation or involved-field irradiation in definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell cancer: a retrospective analysis in clinical N0 patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 25:e423-e429. [PMID: 30464693 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective We compared failure patterns and survival after elective nodal irradiation (eni) or involved-field irradiation (ifi) in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (escc), clinical stage T2-4N0M0, to determine whether ifi is feasible for such patients. Methods Between 2005 and 2015, 126 patients with clinical stage T2-4N0M0 thoracic escc who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute and who had complete data, were analyzed retrospectively. Of those patients, 49 received ifi, and 77 received eni. In the ifi group, the radiation field included the primary tumour, with a 3-cm to 4-cm margin in the craniocaudal direction, and the elective irradiation was delivered to the adjacent regional lymphatics according to the location of the primary tumour. Patterns of failure were classified using the first site of failure, which included primary tumour failure, regional lymph node failure, and distant metastasis. Results Median progression-free survival was 20 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 7.87 months to 39.2 months] in the ifi group and 30 months (95% ci: 17.4 months to 44.6 months) in the eni group (p = 0.580). Median overall survival (os) was 36 months (95% ci: 21.9 months to 50.1 months) in the ifi group and 38 months (95% ci: 26.1 months to 49.9 months) in the eni group (p = 0.761). The estimated 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year os rates were, respectively, 87.8%, 49.4%, and 32.3% for the ifi patients and 92.2%, 52.0%, and 28.9% for the eni patients. Disease persistence and primary lesion recurrence after complete remission (cr) were the most frequent causes of treatment failure in the patients overall (83 of 124, 66.9%). Of the 66 patients achieving a clinical cr, 25 experienced recurrence of the primary lesion, 12 experienced distant relapse, 10 experienced regional nodal failure, and 2 experienced an isolated recurrence. No significant differences in the pattern of failure or in the incidences of grade 3 or greater treatment-related myelosuppression or esophagitis were found between the ifi and eni groups. Conclusions In patients with thoracic escc clinical stage T2-4N0M0 receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy, failure patterns and os were similar with either eni or ifi. Large prospective randomized studies are needed to further investigate and verify those results in this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Sun
- The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, P.R.C
| | - X L Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, P.R.C
| | - Q F Mao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, P.R.C
| | - Y H Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, P.R.C
| | - L Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, P.R.C
| | - M H Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, P.R.C
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Gross tumour delineation on computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oesophageal cancer: A nationwide study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 14:33-39. [PMID: 30519647 PMCID: PMC6260422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Interobserver variability in delineation of the oesophageal GTV can be considerable. Delineation variation is mainly located at the cranial and caudal border. PET significantly influences the delineated GTV in oesophageal cancer. The impact of PET to CT on observer variation of the GTV is limited. Accurate GTV delineation is essential for results of radiation boost-strategies.
Background and purpose Accurate delineation of the primary tumour is vital to the success of radiotherapy and even more important for successful boost strategies, aiming for improved local control in oesophageal cancer patients. Therefore, the aim was to assess delineation variability of the gross tumour volume (GTV) between CT and combined PET-CT in oesophageal cancer patients in a multi-institutional study. Materials and methods Twenty observers from 14 institutes delineated the primary tumour of 6 cases on CT and PET-CT fusion. The delineated volumes, generalized conformity index (CIgen) and standard deviation (SD) in position of the most cranial/caudal slice over the observers were evaluated. For the central delineated region, perpendicular distance between median surface GTV and each individual GTV was evaluated as in-slice SD. Results After addition of PET, mean GTVs were significantly smaller in 3 cases and larger in 1 case. No difference in CIgen was observed (average 0.67 on CT, 0.69 on PET-CT). On CT cranial-caudal delineation variation ranged between 0.2 and 1.5 cm SD versus 0.2 and 1.3 cm SD on PET-CT. After addition of PET, the cranial and caudal variation was significantly reduced in 1 and 2 cases, respectively. The in-slice SD was on average 0.16 cm in both phases. Conclusion In some cases considerable GTV delineation variability was observed at the cranial-caudal border. PET significantly influenced the delineated volume in four out of six cases, however its impact on observer variation was limited.
Collapse
|
90
|
Nachbar M, Mönnich D, Kalwa P, Zips D, Thorwarth D, Gani C. Comparison of treatment plans for a high-field MRI-linac and a conventional linac for esophageal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:327-334. [PMID: 30361744 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1386-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare radiotherapy treatments plans in esophageal cancer calculated for a high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-linac with plans for a conventional linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas were re-planned retrospectively using the research version of Monaco (V 5.19.03, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with a nine-field step-and-shoot technique and two-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created for the Elekta MRI-linac and a conventional linac, respectively. The prescribed dose was 60 Gy to the primary tumor (PTV60) and 50 Gy to elective volumes (PTV50). Plans were optimized for optimal coverage of the 60 Gy volume and compared using dose-volume histogram parameters. RESULTS All calculated treatment plans met predefined criteria for target volume coverage and organs at risk dose both for MRI-linac and conventional linac. Plans for the MRI-linac had a lower number of segments and monitor units. No significant differences between both plans were seen in terms of V20Gy of the lungs and V40Gy of the heart with slightly higher mean doses to the heart (14.0 Gy vs. 12.5 Gy) and lungs (12.8 Gy vs. 12.2 Gy). CONCLUSION Applying conventional target volume and margin concepts as well as dose-fractionation prescription reveals clinically acceptable dose distributions using hybrid MRI-linac in its current configuration compared to standard IMRT/VMAT. This represents an important prerequisite for future studies to investigate the clinical benefit of MRI-guided radiotherapy exploiting the conceptional advantages such as reduced margins, plan adaptation and biological individualization and hypofractionation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paul Kalwa
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Vendrely V, Launay V, Najah H, Smith D, Collet D, Gronnier C. Prognostic factors in esophageal cancer treated with curative intent. Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:991-996. [PMID: 30166221 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The overall prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer has improved in recent decades due to surgical and medical progress, but overall survival remains poor. Better patient selection and tailored treatment are needed. Different prognostic factors linked with the patient, tumoral characteristics and treatment with curative intent have been identified and are the purpose of this review. Tumor detection at an earlier stage, the advent of new molecules and therapeutic combinations, and the centralization of management in high-volume centers should help to improve the prognosis of esophageal cancer. Improved imaging techniques and a better prediction strategy should guide future treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Vendrely
- Bordeaux University of Medicine, Bordeaux, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Pessac, France; INSERM UMR1035 University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Vincent Launay
- Esophageal and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Visceral Surgery Department, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Haythem Najah
- Esophageal and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Visceral Surgery Department, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Denis Smith
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Denis Collet
- Bordeaux University of Medicine, Bordeaux, France; Esophageal and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Visceral Surgery Department, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- Bordeaux University of Medicine, Bordeaux, France; Esophageal and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Visceral Surgery Department, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France; INSERM, UMR1053 Bordeaux Research in Translational Oncology, BaRITOn, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Hong L, Huang YX, Zhuang QY, Zhang XQ, Tang LR, Du KX, Lin XY, Zheng BH, Cai SL, Wu JX, Li JL. Survival benefit of re-irradiation in esophageal Cancer patients with Locoregional recurrence: a propensity score-matched analysis. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:171. [PMID: 30201005 PMCID: PMC6131819 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1122-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the treatment failure pattern and factors influencing locoregional recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and examine patient survival with re-irradiation (re-RT) after primary radiotherapy. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 87 ESCC patients treated initially with radiotherapy. Failure patterns were classified into regional lymph node recurrence only (LN) and primary failure with/without regional lymph node recurrence (PF). Patients received either re-RT or other treatments (non-re-RT group). Baseline covariates were balanced by a propensity score model. Overall survival (OS) and toxicities were assessed as outcomes. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 87 months. Thirty-nine patients received re-RT. Failure pattern and re-RT were independent prognostic factors for OS (P = 0.040 and 0.015) by Cox multivariate analysis. Re-RT with concomitant chemotherapy showed no survival benefit over re-RT alone (P = 0.70). No differences in characteristics were found between the groups by Chi-square tests after propensity score matching. The Cox model showed that failure pattern and re-RT were prognostic factors with hazard ratios (HR) of 0.319 (P = 0.025) and 0.375 (P = 0.002), respectively, in the matched cohort. Significant differences in OS were observed according to failure pattern (P = 0.004) and re-RT (P < 0.001). In the re-RT and non-re-RT groups, 9.09% and 3.03% of patients experienced tracheoesophageal fistulas, and 15.15% and 3.03% of patients developed pericardial/pleural effusion, respectively (P > 0.05). The incidence of radiation pneumonitis was higher in the re-RT group (24.24% vs. 6.06%, P = 0.039), but no cases of pneumonia-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS Re-RT improved long-term survival in patients with locoregional recurrent ESCC. Despite a high incidence of radiation pneumonitis, toxicities were tolerable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Yun-Xia Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Qing-Yang Zhuang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Xue-Qing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Li-Rui Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Kai-Xin Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Xiamen, China
| | - Xiao-Yi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Xiamen, China
| | - Bu-Hong Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Shao-Li Cai
- Biomedical Research Center of South China, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jun-Xin Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China
| | - Jin-Luan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, 350014, China.
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Definitive radiotherapy dose escalation with chemotherapy for treating non-metastatic oesophageal cancer. Sci Rep 2018; 8:12877. [PMID: 30150679 PMCID: PMC6110762 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31302-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The locoregional failure rate remains high after concurrent chemoradiotherapy with standard-dose radiotherapy (RT, 50–50.4 Gy) for oesophageal cancer (EC). This retrospective study evaluated whether RT dose escalation was effective among 115 consecutive patients with non-metastatic EC (July 2003 to November 2016). Forty-four patients received an RT dose of <66 Gy and 71 patients received ≥66 Gy, with most patients receiving concurrent cisplatin plus fluorouracil. The median follow-up was 12 months for all patients (52 months for 18 surviving patients). The ≥66 Gy group had significantly higher 3-year rates of overall survival (17.9% vs. 32.1%, p = 0.026) and local progression-free survival (46.1% vs. 72.1%, p = 0.005), but not disease progression-free survival (11.4% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.059) and distant metastasis-free survival (49% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.852). The ≥66 Gy group also had significantly better 5-year overall survival compared with 41.4–65.9 Gy. The only significant difference in treatment-related toxicities involved acute dermatitis (7% vs. 28%, p = 0.009). Inferior overall survival was associated with poor performance status, clinical N2–3 stage and not receiving maintenance chemotherapy. In conclusion, patients with inoperable EC experienced better survival outcomes and acceptable toxicities if they received higher dose RT (≥66 Gy) rather than lower dose RT (<66 Gy).
Collapse
|
94
|
Effeney R, Shaw T, Burmeister BH, Burmeister E, Harvey J, Mai GT, Thomas J, Barbour AP, Smithers BM, Pryor DI. Patterns of Failure Following Dose-escalated Chemoradiotherapy for Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Staged Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oesophagus. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:642-649. [PMID: 30017206 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To analyse outcomes and patterns of failure following dose-escalated definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for staging and treatment planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive CRT to a dose of ≥56 Gy was conducted. Patient and tumour characteristics, treatment received and first sites of relapse were analysed. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2014, 72 patients were treated with CRT to a median dose of 60 Gy (range 56-66 Gy). The median age was 63 years; most (61%) were stage III/IVa. The median follow-up was 57 months. Three year in-field control, relapse-free survival and overall survival was 64% (95% confidence interval 50-75%), 38% (95% confidence interval 27-50%) and 42% (95% confidence interval 30-53%), respectively. Of the 41 failures prior to death or at last follow-up date, isolated locoregional relapse occurred in 16 patients (22%) with isolated in-field recurrence in 11 patients (15%). Distant failure as first site of relapse was present in 25 patients (35%). No in-field failures occurred in the 11 patients with cT1-2, N0-1 tumours. The median survival for cT4 tumours was 8 months, with five of eight patients developing local progression within the first 6 months. CONCLUSIONS Dose-escalated radiotherapy was associated with promising rates of in-field local control, with the exception of cT4 tumours. Distant failure remains a significant competing risk. Our data supports the need for current trials re-examining the role of dose escalation in the modern era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Effeney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - T Shaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - B H Burmeister
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - E Burmeister
- Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - J Harvey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - G T Mai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - J Thomas
- Upper Gastro-intestinal and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - A P Barbour
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Upper Gastro-intestinal and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Surgical Oncology Group, Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - B M Smithers
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Upper Gastro-intestinal and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D I Pryor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
The Role of PET-Based Radiomic Features in Predicting Local Control of Esophageal Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. Sci Rep 2018; 8:9902. [PMID: 29967326 PMCID: PMC6028651 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28243-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the predictive performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)-based radiomic features for local control of esophageal cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). For each of the 30 patients enrolled, 440 radiomic features were extracted from both pre-CRT and mid-CRT PET images. The top 25 features with the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for identifying local control status were selected as discriminative features. Four machine-learning methods, random forest (RF), support vector machine, logistic regression, and extreme learning machine, were used to build predictive models with clinical features, radiomic features or a combination of both. An RF model incorporating both clinical and radiomic features achieved the best predictive performance, with an accuracy of 93.3%, a specificity of 95.7%, and a sensitivity of 85.7%. Based on risk scores of local failure predicted by this model, the 2-year local control rate and PFS rate were 100.0% (95% CI 100.0–100.0%) and 52.2% (31.8–72.6%) in the low-risk group and 14.3% (0.0–40.2%) and 0.0% (0.0–40.2%) in the high-risk group, respectively. This model may have the potential to stratify patients with different risks of local failure after CRT for esophageal cancer, which may facilitate the delivery of personalized treatment.
Collapse
|
96
|
Elimova E, Wang X, Qiao W, Sudo K, Wadhwa R, Shiozaki H, Shimodaira Y, Planjery V, Charalampakis N, Lee JH, Weston BR, Bhutani MS, Komaki R, Rice DC, Swisher SG, Blum MA, Rogers JE, Skinner HD, Maru DM, Hofstetter WL, Ajani JA. Actionable Locoregional Relapses after Therapy of Localized Esophageal Cancer: Insights from a Large Cohort. Oncology 2018; 94:345-353. [PMID: 29705797 DOI: 10.1159/000486720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of surveillance after therapy of localized esophageal cancer (LEC) is to identify actionable relapses amenable to salvage; however, the current surveillance algorithms are not optimized. We report on a large cohort of LEC patients with actionable locoregional relapses (LRRs). METHODS Between 2000 and 2013, 127 (denominator = 752) patients with actionable LRR were identified. Histologic/cytologic confirmation was the gold standard. All surveillance tools (imaging, endoscopy, fine needle aspiration) were assessed. RESULTS Most patients were men (89%), had adenocarcinoma (79%), and had no new symptoms (72%) when diagnosed with LRR. In trimodality patients, endoscopic confirmation of positron emission tomography-computed tomography-suspected LRR occurred in only 44%, and 56% required additional tools (e.g., fine needle aspiration). Alternatively, in bimodality patients, endoscopy confirmed LRRs in 81%. Trimodality patients had a higher risk of subsequent LRR/distant metastases after the first LRR than the bimodality patients (p = 0.03). In all patients, 78% of the subsequent relapses were distant. For patients who were salvaged, survival was significantly prolonged (50.6 vs. 25.1 months, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Patients live longer after successful salvage of the LRR than if salvage is not possible. After LRR, patients have a high risk of subsequent distant metastasis and whether the second relapse is local or distant, survival is uniformly poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Elimova
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wei Qiao
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kazuki Sudo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roopma Wadhwa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hironori Shiozaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yusuke Shimodaira
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Venkatram Planjery
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nikolaos Charalampakis
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Brian R Weston
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mariela A Blum
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jane E Rogers
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Heath D Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dipen M Maru
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Fan B, Fan P, Kong L, Sun X, Zhao S, Sun X, Fu Z, Zheng J, Ma L, Wang S, Hu M, Yu J. 18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to predict local failure in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2018; 8:34498-34506. [PMID: 28404900 PMCID: PMC5470985 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients are at risk for local failure (LF) following treatment. Predicting tumor regions at high risk for local failure before radiotherapy may increase treatment efficacy by permitting an escalated radiation dose specifically to those regions critical for tumor control. Forty-one patients with non-resectable locally advanced ESCC underwent 18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) imaging before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). After CCRT, a second (failure) FDG PET/CT was performed in cases of relapse. Failure FDG PET/CT scans were fused to pre-treatment scans to identify tumor regions at high risk for LF. Within a median follow-up time of 26 months, 20 patients (48.8%) had LF. In 19 patients, the failure occurred within a pre-treatment high FDG uptake region; the failure occurred outside these regions in only one patient. Pre-treatment metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was independently associated with LF (P<0.001, HR 1.128, 95% CI: 1.061–1.198). LF was more likely in patients with MTVs ≥27 cm3. In initial PET/CT images, when 50% maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was used as the threshold, delineated subvolumes overlapped LF regions. These results confirm that LF occurs most commonly within pre-treatment high FDG uptake regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingjie Fan
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Pingping Fan
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Li Kong
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Xindong Sun
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Shuqiang Zhao
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaorong Sun
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Zheng Fu
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Jinsong Zheng
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Li Ma
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Shijiang Wang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Man Hu
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Jinming Yu
- Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Departments of Radiation Oncology and Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Deng W, Lin SH. Advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:79. [PMID: 29666802 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a common type of malignancy worldwide and usually requires multidisciplinary care. Radiotherapy plays an important part in management of the disease. During the past few years, researchers have made much progress about radiotherapy for esophageal cancer, which was revealed in every aspect of clinical practice. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to show less toxicities and non-inferior prognosis. What's more, definitive chemoradiotherapy could be an option for non-surgical candidates and good responders to chemoradiotherapy. Advances in radiation techniques result in higher conformity, homogeneity, more normal tissue sparing and less treatment time. Promising prognoses and less toxicities were also seen in advanced techniques. As radiation dose higher than 50 Gy obtains better local control and survival, simultaneously integrated boost is designed to increase primary tumor dosage and keep prophylactic dose to subclinical areas. Elective nodal irradiation brings about better local control but do not show advantages in survival compared with involved field irradiation (IFI). As a trend, more tolerable chemoradiotherapy regimen would be taken into account in dealing with elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Chen Y, Zhu HP, Wang T, Sun CJ, Ge XL, Min LF, Zhang XW, Jia QQ, Yu J, Yang JQ, Allgayer H, Abba ML, Zhang XZ, Sun XC. What is the optimal radiation dose for non-operable esophageal cancer? Dissecting the evidence in a meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8:89095-89107. [PMID: 29179502 PMCID: PMC5687672 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 06/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard radiation dose 50.4 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy for localized inoperable esophageal cancer as supported by INT-0123 trail is now being challenged since a radiation dose above 50 Gy has been successfully administered with an observable dose-response relationship and insignificant untoward effects. Therefore, to ascertain the treatment benefits of different radiation doses, we performed a meta-analysis with 18 relative publications. According to our findings, a dose between 50 and 70 Gy appears optimal and patients who received ≥ 60 Gy radiation had a significantly better prognosis (pooled HR = 0.78, P = 0.004) as compared with < 60 Gy, especially in Asian countries (pooled HR = 0.75, P = 0.003). However, contradictory results of treatment benefit for ≥ 60 Gy were observed in two studies from Western countries, and the pooled treatment benefit of ≥ 60 Gy radiation was inconclusive (pooled HR = 0.86, P = 0.64). There was a marginal benefit in locoregional control in those treated with high dose (> 50.4/51 Gy) radiation when compared with those treated with low dose (≤ 50.4/51 Gy) radiation (pooled OR = 0.71, P = 0.06). Patients that received ≥ 60 Gy radiation had better locoregional control (OR = 0.29, P = 0.001), and for distant metastasis control, neither the > 50.4 Gy nor the ≥ 60 Gy treated group had any treatment benefit as compared to the groups that received ≤ 50.4 Gy and < 60 Gy group respectively. Taken together, a dose range of 50 to 70 Gy radiation with CCRT is recommended for non-operable EC patients. A dose of ≥ 60 Gy appears to be better in improving overall survival and locoregional control, especially in Asian countries, while the benefit of ≥ 60 Gy radiation in Western countries still remains controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hui-Ping Zhu
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhangjiagang First People's Hospital, Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chang-Jiang Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiao-Lin Ge
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ling-Feng Min
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xian-Wen Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qing-Qing Jia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jie Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jian-Qi Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Heike Allgayer
- Department of Experimental Surgery-Cancer Metastasis, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany and Centre for Biomedicine and Medical Technology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed L. Abba
- Department of Experimental Surgery-Cancer Metastasis, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany and Centre for Biomedicine and Medical Technology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xi-Zhi Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xin-Chen Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Zhao L, Zhou Y, Mu Y, Chai G, Xiao F, Tan L, Lin SH, Shi M. Patterns of failure and clinical outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:21852-21860. [PMID: 28423530 PMCID: PMC5400628 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Because of the scarcity of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC), data for this disease entity is limited. We aim to evaluate the outcomes, prognostic factors and failure patterns of CEC treated by contemporary radiotherapy (RT). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 86 CEC patients consecutively treated between 2007 and 2015 by definitive RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. RT was mainly delivered with Intensity Modulated Irradiation Therapy (IMRT) or Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Statistical analyses were performed on survival, prognostic factors and failure patterns. Results The median follow-up time was 19.4 months. The 3-year overall survival (OS), local regional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastatic free survival (DMFS), and progression free survival (PFS) were 53.6%, 57.9%, 81.5% and 41.5%, respectively. Independent predictors for poorer OS were N stage, hoarseness and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node (RLN) involvement, and predictors for LRFFS were N stage and EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction) to gross tumor volume (GTV), with ≥ 66Gy achieving local control of 94.7%. Patients receiving elective nodal irradiation (ENI) had better nodal regional control than those receiving involved field irradiation (IFI). 31 (36%) patients had treatment failure and 15 (17.4%), 8 (9.3%) and 14 (16.2%) patients had local, regional, and distant failure, respectively. 86.7% (13/15) local failures were within GTV, and supraclavicular region (62.5%, 5/8) was the most common regional failure site. No severe toxicities were observed. Conclusions Our results seem to indicate that good locoregional control might be achieved for CEC with adequate radiation dose and treatment planning approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Yongchun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Yunfeng Mu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Guangjin Chai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Feng Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Lina Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Mei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032 China
| |
Collapse
|