Selective antagonism of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors does not block the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine

Differential effects of 7-OH-DPAT on the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine and cocaine

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether concurrent treatments with a low dose of the dopamine D(3)-preferring receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT would attenuate the development of behavioral sensitization to the indirect dopamine receptor agonist, cocaine, or the direct dopamine receptor agonist, apomorphine. In two experiments, male Wistar rats (250-350 g) were given seven daily injections of 7-OH-DPAT (0.05 mg/kg sc) or vehicle in combination with either cocaine (15 mg/kg ip), apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg sc), or vehicle. After the injections, the rats were tested for activity in photocell arenas for 40 min, and three measures of motor behavior (distance traveled, rearing, and stereotypy) were recorded at 10-min intervals. A total of 24 h after the last preexposure session, all rats were given a challenge injection of either cocaine (10.0 mg/kg ip, Experiment 1) or apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg sc, Experiment 2) and tested for activity. Major findings were as follows: (a) 7-OH-DPAT treatments alone suppressed all measures of locomotor activity and did not affect subsequent behavioral sensitivity to either cocaine or apomorphine; (b) cocaine treatments acutely increased all measures of activity, and repeated treatments produced behavioral sensitization to the horizontal locomotor-activating effects of cocaine; (c) apomorphine treatments alone increased horizontal activity and stereotypy but completely abolished rearing behavior; (d) like cocaine, repeated treatments with apomorphine induced behavioral sensitization; (e) concurrent treatments of 7-OH-DPAT with cocaine acutely attenuated cocaine-induced increases in motor behavior but enhanced the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine; and (f) concurrent 7-OH-DPAT treatments did not significantly affect either the acute or chronic effects of apomorphine. It is evident from these results that concurrent treatment with 7-OH-DPAT does not block the development of behavioral sensitization to either cocaine or apomorphine. Moreover, the differential acute and chronic effects of 7-OH-DPAT on cocaine- and apomorphine-induced hyperactivity appear to be mediated by dopamine autoreceptor stimulation.

Probing the role of the dopamine D1 receptor in psychostimulant addiction

Pharmacological studies have shown that blockade of the dopamine D1 receptor attenuates locomotor behaviors and prevents sensitization to psychostimulants. However, due to possible cross-reactivities of the D1 receptor antagonists, the exact role of the D1 receptor in response to psychostimulants is still not definitive. To address this issue, we used D1 receptor mutant mice and tested locomotor responses of the mutant mice and wild-type control mice after cocaine and amphetamine treatments. We found that the D1 receptor mutant mice exhibit significantly reduced locomotor responses to repeated cocaine administration compared to wild-type mice. Moreover, D1 receptor mutant mice were less sensitive than the wild-type mice to acute amphetamine administration over a dose range, although they exhibited apparently similar behavioral responses to those of the wild-type mice after repeated amphetamine administration at the 5 mg/kg dose. These studies suggest that the D1 receptor plays an essential role in mediating cocaine-induced locomotor responses in mice. In addition, the D1 receptor also participates in behavioral responses induced by amphetamine administration. Further molecular studies are in progress to address the intracellular signaling mechanisms in response to D1 receptor activation by psychostimulants.

Context determines the type of sensitized behaviour: a brief review and a hypothesis on the role of environment in behavioural sensitization

Behavioural sensitization to psychostimulants may develop context-dependency in certain circumstances. Animals given a stimulant repeatedly in a test cage but not in other environments may show enhanced drug-induced behaviour in the test cage. Conditioning mechanisms have been claimed to be responsible for these phenomena. However, several recent findings are not properly accounted for by conditioning. In addition, growing evidence supports the hypothesis that behavioural sensitization reflects neural changes induced by repeated exposure to psychostimulants (the pharmacological hypothesis). However, the pharmacological hypothesis itself fails to account for environmental influences. In this paper, we propose a hypothesis on the role of environment that is complementary to the pharmacological hypothesis. According to our hypothesis, environment does not have a causal role in the development of sensitization, but it modifies the mode of expression of the sensitized behaviour. Sensitization primarily reflects a neuroadaptive change induced by repeated exposure of the neural system to psychostimulants. However, psychostimulants are known to induce different behaviours in different environments. Therefore, repeated administration of a psychostimulant in different environments would result in augmentation of different behaviours. Our hypothesis potentially accommodates various previous observations. We briefly review the literature and present our hypothesis.

Behavioral responses to cocaine and amphetamine administration in mice lacking the dopamine D1 receptor

Cocaine and amphetamine can induce both short-term and long-term behavioral changes in rodents. The major target for these psychostimulants is thought to be the brain dopamine system. To determine whether the dopamine D1 receptor plays a crucial role in the behavioral effects of psychostimulants, we tested both the locomotor and stereotyped behaviors in D1 receptor mutant and wild-type control mice after cocaine and amphetamine treatments. We found that the overall locomotor responses of D1 receptor mutant mice to repeated cocaine administration were significantly reduced compared to those of the wild-type mice and the responses of the D1 receptor mutant mice to cocaine injections were never significantly higher than their responses to saline injections. D1 receptor mutant mice were less sensitive than the wild-type mice to acute amphetamine stimulation over a dose range even though they exhibited apparently similar behavioral responses as those of the wild-type mice after repeated amphetamine administration at the 5 mg/kg dose. Immunostaining experiments indicated that there was no detectable neurotoxicity in the nucleus accumbens in both D1 receptor mutant and wild-type mice after repeated amphetamine administration. The data suggest that the D1 receptor plays an essential role in mediating cocaine-induced behavioral changes in mice. Moreover, the D1 receptor also participates in behavioral responses induced by amphetamine administration.

Both glutamate receptor antagonists and prefrontal cortex lesions prevent induction of cocaine sensitization and associated neuroadaptations

Behavioral sensitization to psychomotor stimulants is accompanied by a number of alterations in the mesoaccumbens dopamine (DA) system, including DA autoreceptor subsensitivity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and DA D1 receptor supersensitivity in the nucleus accumbens (NAc). We investigated the role of excitatory amino acid (EAA) transmission in the induction of cocaine sensitization and these accompanying DA receptor alterations. To do so, we used three glutamate receptor antagonists, the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg), the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist CGS 19755 (10.0 mg/kg), and the AMPA receptor antagonist NBQX (12.5 mg/kg). Rats received daily double injections of either one of these antagonists or saline with either cocaine (15.0 mg/kg) or saline for 5 days. Cocaine sensitization was defined as an increase in horizontal locomotor activity in response to cocaine challenge (7.5 mg/kg) on the third day of withdrawal. All three antagonists prevented the induction of cocaine sensitization. Extracellular single cell recordings revealed that these antagonists also prevented the induction of DA autoreceptor subsensitivity in the VTA and DA D1 receptor supersensitivity in the NAc. To determine whether the relevant glutamate receptors were under regulation by medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) EAA efferents, we next lesioned the mPFC bilaterally with ibotenic acid at least 7 days before repeated cocaine treatment began. These lesions also prevented the induction of cocaine sensitization and the associated neuroadaptations. Our findings indicate that glutamate transmission from mPFC to the mesoaccumbens DA system is critical for the induction of cocaine sensitization and its cellular correlates.

Sensitization of stereotyped behavior to amphetamine is context and response dependent

The present study was designed to determine whether the environmental context in which amphetamine is administered plays a role in the development of sensitization to the stereotyped behavioral effects of amphetamine in mice. In male CF-1 mice, the dose-response curve for stereotyped behavior elicited by amphetamine was shifted 1.9-fold to the left 48 h after pretreatment with 14 mg/kg amphetamine. Behavioral sensitization only developed in mice that were pretreated in the same or a similar environment as that of the test environment. In addition, when mice were placed in an environment that attenuated the acute expression of stereotyped behavior elicited by the pretreatment dose of amphetamine, sensitization never developed. A further experiment showed that 96% of the mice that expressed stereotypy after the ED50 pretreatment dose of 10 mg/kg amphetamine showed a stereotyped behavioral response to the lesser dose of 7 mg/kg 48 h later, indicating sensitization. In contrast, mice that did not express stereotypy after the ED50 dose of amphetamine failed to show a significant stereotyped behavioral response to amphetamine challenge compared to vehicle-pretreated controls. Therefore, the results indicate that preexposure to a single high dose of amphetamine produces context- and response-dependent sensitization to amphetamine-induced stereotyped behavior.

Repeated injection of GBR 12909, but not cocaine or WIN 35,065-2, into the ventral tegmental area induces behavioral sensitization

A role for the mesolimbic dopamine system in the development of behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants, such as cocaine and amphetamine, is well established. Previous reports have suggested that the ventral tegmental area (VTA) is involved in the initiation of, while the nucleus accumbens is in involved in the expression of behavioral sensitization. This hypothesis is supported in part, by studies which demonstrated that behavioral sensitization could be induced by repeated intra-VTA, but not intra-accumbal, administration of amphetamine. The present studies were designed to determine whether repeated intra-VTA cocaine would similarly induce behavioral sensitization. Rats receiving four daily injections of cocaine (1.5, 5 or 15 nmol/side) into the VTA did not show a sensitized behavioral response when challenged with cocaine (15 mg/kg, ip) 1 week later. In contrast to this, repeated injection of the specific dopamine reuptake inhibitor, GBR 12909 (15 nmol/side) produced behavioral sensitization to a challenge injection of cocaine. Repeated injections of the cocaine analog WIN 35,065-2 did not induce behavioral sensitization to cocaine, suggesting that the local anesthetic properties of cocaine were not responsible for the inability of intra-VTA cocaine to induce sensitization. In summary, the data suggest that sensitization to cocaine may involve mechanisms different from amphetamine.

Cocaine conditioning and cocaine sensitization: what is the relationship?

With repeated cocaine use, cocaine conditioned behavior develops to associated stimuli, and in addition, sensitization can occur to the unconditioned stimulant effects of cocaine. To investigate the relationship between the conditioned and unconditioned behavioral effects of repeated cocaine use, two groups of rats (n = 7) were given five daily paired cocaine treatments (10 mg/kg i.p.) immediately before a 20-min placement in an open-field environment. Other groups received either saline before testing or cocaine unpaired which was administered 30 min after testing in the homecage. When tested in the open-field with saline for conditioned effects, the two cocaine paired groups selectively exhibited substantial and equivalent cocaine conditioned responses. One of these groups was subjected to an extinction procedure which was effective in eliminating the cocaine conditioned responses. Subsequently, all the rats which had received cocaine in the first phase of the experiment, paired and unpaired, along with a subset of saline animals were given a cocaine (10 mg/kg i.p.) challenge test. The paired cocaine animals exhibited an earlier onset of the cocaine induced behavioral response (sensitization) as compared with the saline and the unpaired cocaine animals. Critically, the sensitization effects were unaffected by extinction, and in addition, the conditioned response did not contribute to the sensitization effect. It is suggested that the cocaine drug response occludes the cocaine conditioned response. Subsequent to this sensitization test, the animals were retested for conditioning. In this test, the paired cocaine animals which had not been subjected to the extinction procedure still exhibited a conditioned cocaine response, whereas, the paired cocaine group subjected to extinction was indistinguishable from saline controls. Although the present results show that Pavlovian conditioned responses to exteroceptive contextual cues do not directly contribute to cocaine induced behavioral sensitization effects, the sensitization effects were context-specific, and therefore, were tied to associative processes. It is suggested that context specificity is mediated by a compound stimulus complex comprised of exteroceptive stimuli and interoceptive cocaine drug cues. Furthermore, these exteroceptive and interoceptive cues associated with cocaine effectively expedite the onset of cocaine effects, and thereby, facilitate the addictive potency of cocaine.

Alterations in behavior and opioid gene expression induced by the novel tropane analog WF-31

The effects of the acute administration of the serotonin-selective tropane analog, [2beta-propanoyl-3beta-(4-isopropylphenyl)-tropane, WF-31, on spontaneous locomotor activity were measured and compared to those of the highly selective serotonin uptake inhibitor, fluoxetine and cocaine, a non-selective re-uptake inhibitor of dopamine and serotonin. WF-31 (1, 10 and 30 mg/kg)-elicited increases in locomotor behaviors when compared to vehicle-treated rats. This increased activity was blocked by pre-treatment with the dopaminergic antagonist, flupenthixol, suggesting that these effects may be mediated by dopaminergic mechanisms. Cocaine, but not fluoxetine, also elicited increases in behaviors. In addition, the effects of these three compounds on opioid peptide gene expression were also assessed using in situ hybridization histochemistry in the same animals. The acute administration of both WF-31 and cocaine increased the expression of preprodynorphin mRNA in the dorsal striatum whereas fluoxetine had no effect. Expression of striatal preproenkephalin mRNA was augmented by all three compounds. Within the nucleus accumbens, PPD mRNA levels were affected only by treatment with WF-31, an effect that was blocked by pre-treatment with flupenthixol. In contrast, the acute administration of both WF-31 and fluoxetine, but not cocaine, increased the expression of preproenkephalin mRNA. These increases, however, were not reversed by pre-treatment with flupenthixol. Despite its profile in vitro as a relatively selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, some of the in vivo actions of WF-31 appear to be mediated by dopaminergic mechanisms. These data further suggest that the mechanisms underlying expression of the opioid peptides in the nucleus accumbens may vary from those in the dorsal striatum.

Neonatal and preweanling rats are able to express short-term behavioral sensitization to cocaine

The present study assessed the ability of suckling rats to express short-term behavioral sensitization to cocaine prior to weaning. Rat pups, aged either 3, 5, 10, 12, 17 or 19 days at the beginning of the experiment, were placed in a chamber after daily injection with cocaine (7.5 or 15 mg/kg. i.p.) for either 2 or 4 consecutive days, and were tested for behavioral responsiveness to cocaine in the same chamber 24 h later (at either 7, 14 or 21 days of age). Such a short post-treatment interval was adopted, along with a consistent pairing of the testing context with the drug effect and a sensitive technique of behavioral measurement (video recording), in order to maximize the possibility of detecting any cocaine sensitization. Locomotion was sensitized at all ages, after both regimens in 14-day-old pups, but solely after 2 injections in 21- and 4 injections in 7-day-old pups. Sensitization was also expressed via behaviors specific to each age. Four cocaine injections augmented cocaine-induced uncoordinated movements of head, paws and body (horizontal activity) in 7-day-old pups, and mouth movements in 14-day-old pups. In 21-day-old pups, sensitization was dose- and regimen-dependently expressed via adult-like stereotyped head movements. In neonatal 7-day-old pups, cocaine sensitization was also visible as reductions in immobility (both injection regimens). Contrary to previous studies, these results indicate that, given the use of an appropriate methodology, short-term sensitization to the motoric effects of cocaine can be expressed by suckling rats prior to weaning, even after relatively short regimens of daily injections.

Locomotor activity and dopamine synthesis following 1 and 15 days of withdrawal from repeated apomorphine treatments

In two experiments, the effects of repeated apomorphine treatments on locomotor activity and terminal field dopamine synthesis was assessed after either a 1- or 15-day withdrawal period. In the first experiment, rats (n = 11/group) were treated with apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg, s.e.) or vehicle and tested for locomotor activity daily for 10 days. Fifteen days after the last repeated treatment, all rats received 1.0 mg/kg apomorphine and were tested for locomotor activity. Locomotor sensitization developed over the 10 day period and was still evident after the 15-day withdrawal period. In the second experiment rats (n = 11/group) were treated with apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) or vehicle and tested for locomotor activity daily for 10 days. Dopamine synthesis was assessed following 1 or 15 days of withdrawal by measuring dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) accumulation (after DOPA decarboxylase inhibition with NSD-1015) in striatum and nucleus accumbens-olfactory tuberele. As in the first experiment, rats treated with repeated apomorphine showed locomotor sensitization over the 10 days, relative to controls. Dopamine synthesis was reliably enhanced in the striatum, but not nucleus accumbens-olfactory tuberele, following both 1- and 15-day withdrawal periods. These results indicate that enhanced basal dopamine synthesis following repeated apomorphine treatments, similar to locomotor sensitization, is a persistent phenomenon.

Evidence for dissociable mechanisms of amphetamine- and stress-induced behavioral sensitization: effects of MK-801 and haloperidol pretreatment

The present study examined the ability of pretreatment with MK-801 or haloperidol to block the induction of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine challenge by repeated immobilization stress in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Fifteen minutes before each of ten 30-min restraint sessions, rats were administered saline, MK-801 (0.01, 0.10 or 0.25 mg/kg i.p.) or haloperidol (0.10 or 0.25 mg/kg i.p.). Control rats received the same injection regimen without restraint. An additional experiment examined the ability of MK-801 to block the induction of sensitization by repeated d-amphetamine. In this experiment, rats were administered saline or MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg i.p.) 15 min before each of ten amphetamine injections (1.0 mg/kg i.p., administered under the same regimen as immobilization stress). Four days after the final immobilization or amphetamine injection, rats were tested for locomotor response to novelty, saline and d-amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg i.p.). Exposure to repeated immobilization stress significantly enhanced the locomotor response to amphetamine challenge but not to saline challenge whether rats were pretreated with saline, MK-801 or haloperidol. Secondary analysis of dose effects in each pretreatment group revealed that at 0.25 mg/kg, repeated MK-801 in itself induced sensitization to the response to amphetamine in control rats and potentiated stress-induced sensitization in restrained rats. In contrast, the sensitization induced by repeated amphetamine was attenuated by MK-801 pretreatment. Neither dose of haloperidol affected the locomotor response to saline or amphetamine in control or stressed rats. These results indicate that the effects of MK-801 on the induction of sensitization are complex and suggest that amphetamine- and stress-induced behavioral sensitization may arise through different mechanisms.

Changes in behavioral sensitivity to SKF-38393 and quinpirole following withdrawal from continuous cocaine administration in rats

The effects of withdrawal from continuous administration of cocaine on spontaneous locomotor activity and behavioral sensitivity to SKF-38393 and quinpirole were examined in rats. Subdermal minipumps that delivered either saline or 20 mg/kg/day cocaine hydrochloride were implanted for 14 days. Spontaneous locomotor activity, SKF-38393-induced (10 mg/kg, SC) grooming and tongue protrusions, and quinpirole-induced locomotor activity and stereotypy (0.32 and 1.0 mg/kg, SC) were examined either 4-5 h or 7 days after removal of the minipumps. Animals withdrawn from cocaine for 4 h exhibited a decrease in spontaneous locomotor activity relative to saline-pretreated controls, whereas animals withdrawn for 7 days did not differ from controls. Animals withdrawn from cocaine for 4 h did not differ from controls in their sensitivity to SKF-38393, whereas animals withdrawn from cocaine for 7 days exhibited an increase in SKF-38393-induced tongue protrusions relative to controls. In contrast, animals withdrawn from cocaine for 4 h exhibited a decrease in quinpirole-induced locomotion, whereas animals withdrawn for 7 days did not differ from controls. There were no differences in sensitivity to quinpirole-induced stereotypy relative to controls at either withdrawal period. These findings suggest that an increased sensitivity of D1-like receptors emerges within 7 days during the course of withdrawal from continuous cocaine administration, whereas a change in sensitivity of D2-like receptors may occur early during withdrawal but normalizes within 7 days.

Cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization: effects of haloperidol and SCH 23390 treatments

The objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine could be prevented by high doses of the dopamine receptor antagonists haloperidol and SCH 23390. In two experiments, male Wistar rats were injected daily for 4 days with either cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle in combination with haloperidol (1.0 mg/kg, IP), SCH 23390 (0.5 mg/kg, SC), or vehicle. After the daily injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas. At 24 h after the last preexposure test session, all rats were given a challenge injection of cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) and tested for activity. Cocaine treatments produced a greater relative increase in locomotor activity with repeated exposure compared to vehicle treatments (i.e., sensitization). Moreover, the acute activating effects of cocaine over days were blocked by both haloperidol and SCH 23390. The coadministration of haloperidol, but not SCH 23390, blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine. That is, after the cocaine challenge injection, rats pretreated with SCH 23390 and cocaine did not differ from rats preexposed only to cocaine, whereas rats pretreated with haloperidol and cocaine did not differ from rats pretreated only with vehicle. Pretreatment with haloperidol or SCH 23390 without cocaine enhanced the locomotor-activating effects of the subsequent cocaine challenge injection. These findings suggest that cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization may develop as a result of repeated dopamine D1- or D2-type receptor stimulation, and that brief dopamine antagonist treatments enhance subsequent behavioral sensitivity to cocaine.

The effects of D1 or D2 dopamine receptor blockade on zif/268 and preprodynorphin gene expression in rat forebrain following a short-term cocaine binge

Selective D1 or D2 dopamine receptor antagonists were used to investigate the transynaptic regulation of mRNAs coding for the opioid peptide, preprodynorphin, and the nuclear transcription factor, zif/268 after an acute cocaine binge. Rats were injected intraperitoneally with the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, or the D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride, 30 min prior to 3 hourly injections of saline or 20 mg/kg cocaine and killed 1 h after the final injection. Behavioral ratings indicated that SCH 23390 blocked, whereas sulpiride augmented, cocaine-induced stereotypical behaviors. Striatal sections were hybridized with oligonucleotides coding for zif/268 and preprodynorphin. Quantitative image analysis of autoradiograms revealed that (1) SCH 23390 completely suppressed basal and cocaine binge-induced zif/268 mRNA in the striatal and cerebral cortical areas examined; (2) sulpiride enhanced basal levels of zif/268 mRNA in the medial caudate and dorsomedial shell of the nucleus accumbens; (3) sulpiride partially blocked cocaine binge-induced levels of zif/268 mRNA in the dorsal striatum but had no effect in sensory cortex; (4) SCH 23390, but not sulpiride, significantly reduced the constitutive expression of preprodynorphin mRNA; and (5) SCH 23390 and sulpiride blocked cocaine binge-induced expression of preprodynorphin mRNA in the dorsal striatum.

Modification of cocaine sensitization by dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists in terms of ambulation in mice

The progressive enhancement in the ambulation increase caused by the repeated five-time dosings of cocaine (10 mg/kg SC) at 3- to 4-day intervals was dose dependently reduced by simultaneous administration with the selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists, SCH 23390; R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (0.01, 0.03, and 0.1 mg/kg SC) and YM-09151-2 (nemonapride); cis-N-(1-benzyl-2-methylpyrrolidin-3-yl)-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4- methylaminobenzamide (0.01, 0.03, and 0.1 mg/kg SC), respectively. However, the mice given cocaine with SCH 23390 (0.03 mg/kg) or YM-09151-2 (0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg) demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than the mice given cocaine alone to challenge cocaine. Both 2-h and 24-h posttreatments with SCH 23390 (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) after each cocaine administration, at which the acute stimulant effect of cocaine had disappeared, significantly and dose dependently enhanced the cocaine sensitization. In contrast, 2-h, but not 24-h, posttreatment with YM-09151-2 (0.01-0.1 mg/kg), slightly retarded the induction of cocaine sensitization. The present results suggest that the blockade of dopamine D1 receptors is responsible for a significant enhancement in the cocaine sensitization, independent of the timings of its administration, whereas the blockade of dopamine D2 receptors elicits time-dependent alterations in the cocaine sensitization, a strong enhancement in the simultaneous administration schedule, but a slight retardation in the early posttreatment schedule.

The delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole prevents sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine

A conditioned place preference paradigm was used to determine whether: (i) prior exposure to cocaine results in an enhancement of its rewarding effects, and (ii) the delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole can prevent the development of this response. Rats received daily injections of saline or cocaine (10.0 mg/kg i.p.) for 5 days in the colony room. Additional animals received naltrindole (0.03-0.3 mg/kg s.c.), lithium chloride (20 mg/kg s.c.) or vehicle prior to i.p. injections. Conditioning sessions (2 drug; 2 vehicle) commenced 3 days later. Cocaine (1.0-10.0 mg/kg) was ineffective as a conditioning stimulus in saline pre-exposed rats. In cocaine pre-exposed animals, however, doses of 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg cocaine resulted in significant drug-induced place preferences. Significant cocaine-induced place preferences were also observed in animals which had received lithium chloride with the cocaine treatment regimen. In animals which had received naltrindole together with the chronic cocaine treatment regimen, cocaine failed to produce a conditioned response. These data demonstrate that the repeated administration of cocaine results in an enhancement of its rewarding effects (e.g. sensitization) and that this phenomenon is prevented by a delta-opioid receptor antagonist. Furthermore, the finding that naltrindole does not modify the acute rewarding effects of cocaine suggests a specific role of delta-opioid receptors in the sensitization process.

Effects of dopaminergic and glutamatergic receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expression of cocaine conditioning place preference

A balanced conditioning place preference (CPP) paradigm was used to study the role of dopamine D1 and D2 and glutamatergic NMDA and AMPA/kainate receptors on the acquisition and expression of cocaine place conditioning. The D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.1-0.2 mg/kg i.p.), administered before cocaine during the training phase, significantly blocked the establishment of place conditioning (acquisition) but had no effect when administered before testing for place preference in the absence of cocaine (expression). Similar results were obtained with the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.1-0.5 mg/kg i.p.). The D2 receptor antagonist (-)-sulpiride (50-100 mg/kg i.p.) had no effect on either acquisition or expression of cocaine CPP. The AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist DNQX, administered intracerebroventricularly (0.2-3 micrograms/10 microliters), blocked cocaine CPP when given before testing but not when given before cocaine during the training trials. The results suggest that dopaminergic D1 (but not D2) and glutamatergic NMDA receptors are involved in the primary rewarding properties of cocaine (as assessed by the establishment of CPP) whereas the AMPA/kainate receptors are important only for the behaviour elicited by the stimuli previously associated with the drug action (CPP expression). The implications for the treatment of cocaine craving and relapse are discussed.