51
|
Arnold TC, Baldassano SN, Litt B, Stein JM. Simulated diagnostic performance of low-field MRI: Harnessing open-access datasets to evaluate novel devices. Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 87:67-76. [PMID: 34968700 PMCID: PMC8816889 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate a method for virtually evaluating novel imaging devices using machine learning and open-access datasets, here applied to a new, low-field strength portable 64mT MRI device. Paired 3 T and 64mT brain images were used to develop and validate a transformation converting standard clinical images to low-field quality images. Separately, 3 T images were aggregated from open-source databases spanning four neuropathologies: low-grade glioma (LGG, N = 76), high-grade glioma (HGG, N = 259), stroke (N = 28), and multiple sclerosis (MS, N = 20). The transformation method was then applied to the open-source data to generate simulated low-field images for each pathology. Convolutional neural networks (DenseNet-121) were trained to detect pathology in axial slices from either 3 T or simulated 64 mT images, and their relative performance was compared to characterize the potential diagnostic capabilities of low-field imaging. Algorithm performance was measured using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all cohorts, pathology detection was similar between 3 T and simulated 64mT images (LGG: 0.97 vs. 0.98; HGG: 0.96 vs. 0.95; stroke: 0.94 vs. 0.94; MS: 0.90 vs 0.87). Pathology detection was further characterized as a function of lesion size, intensity, and contrast. Simulated images showed decreasing sensitivity for lesions smaller than 4 cm2. While simulations cannot replace prospective trials during the evaluation of medical devices, they can provide guidance and justification for prospective studies. Simulated data derived from open-source imaging databases may facilitate testing and validation of new imaging devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Campbell Arnold
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Steven N Baldassano
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joel M Stein
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Neuroengineering and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
de Brito Robalo BM, Biessels GJ, Chen C, Dewenter A, Duering M, Hilal S, Koek HL, Kopczak A, Yin Ka Lam B, Leemans A, Mok V, Onkenhout LP, van den Brink H, de Luca A. Diffusion MRI harmonization enables joint-analysis of multicentre data of patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 32:102886. [PMID: 34911192 PMCID: PMC8609094 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acquisition-related differences in diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) hamper pooling of multicentre data to achieve large sample sizes. A promising solution is to harmonize the raw diffusion signal using rotation invariant spherical harmonic (RISH) features, but this has not been tested in elderly subjects. Here we aimed to establish if RISH harmonization effectively removes acquisition-related differences in multicentre dMRI of elderly subjects with cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), while preserving sensitivity to disease effects. METHODS Five cohorts of patients with SVD (N = 397) and elderly controls (N = 175) with 3 Tesla MRI on different systems were included. First, to establish effectiveness of harmonization, the RISH method was trained with data of 13 to 15 age and sex-matched controls from each site. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were compared in matched controls between sites using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and voxel-wise analysis, before and after harmonization. Second, to assess sensitivity to disease effects, we examined whether the contrast (effect sizes of FA, MD and peak width of skeletonized MD - PSMD) between patients and controls within each site remained unaffected by harmonization. Finally, we evaluated the association between white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden, FA, MD and PSMD using linear regression analyses both within individual cohorts as well as with pooled scans from multiple sites, before and after harmonization. RESULTS Before harmonization, significant differences in FA and MD were observed between matched controls of different sites (p < 0.05). After harmonization these site-differences were removed. Within each site, RISH harmonization did not alter the effect sizes of FA, MD and PSMD between patients and controls (relative change in Cohen's d = 4 %) nor the strength of association with WMH volume (relative change in R2 = 2.8 %). After harmonization, patient data of all sites could be aggregated in a single analysis to infer the association between WMH volume and FA (R2 = 0.62), MD (R2 = 0.64), and PSMD (R2 = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS We showed that RISH harmonization effectively removes acquisition-related differences in dMRI of elderly subjects while preserving sensitivity to SVD-related effects. This study provides proof of concept for future multicentre SVD studies with pooled datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno M de Brito Robalo
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Geert Jan Biessels
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Christopher Chen
- Memory, Aging and Cognition Center, Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Anna Dewenter
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Marco Duering
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Medical Image Analysis Center (MIAC AG) and qbig, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Saima Hilal
- Memory, Aging and Cognition Center, Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Huiberdina L Koek
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Anna Kopczak
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Bonnie Yin Ka Lam
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Gerald Choa Neuroscience Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| | - Alexander Leemans
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Vincent Mok
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Gerald Choa Neuroscience Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| | - Laurien P Onkenhout
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Hilde van den Brink
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Alberto de Luca
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Schilling KG, Tax CM, Rheault F, Hansen C, Yang Q, Yeh FC, Cai L, Anderson AW, Landman BA. Fiber tractography bundle segmentation depends on scanner effects, vendor effects, acquisition resolution, diffusion sampling scheme, diffusion sensitization, and bundle segmentation workflow. Neuroimage 2021; 242:118451. [PMID: 34358660 PMCID: PMC9933001 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
When investigating connectivity and microstructure of white matter pathways of the brain using diffusion tractography bundle segmentation, it is important to understand potential confounds and sources of variation in the process. While cross-scanner and cross-protocol effects on diffusion microstructure measures are well described (in particular fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity), it is unknown how potential sources of variation effect bundle segmentation results, which features of the bundle are most affected, where variability occurs, nor how these sources of variation depend upon the method used to reconstruct and segment bundles. In this study, we investigate six potential sources of variation, or confounds, for bundle segmentation: variation (1) across scan repeats, (2) across scanners, (3) across vendors (4) across acquisition resolution, (5) across diffusion schemes, and (6) across diffusion sensitization. We employ four different bundle segmentation workflows on two benchmark multi-subject cross-scanner and cross-protocol databases, and investigate reproducibility and biases in volume overlap, shape geometry features of fiber pathways, and microstructure features within the pathways. We find that the effects of acquisition protocol, in particular acquisition resolution, result in the lowest reproducibility of tractography and largest variation of features, followed by vendor-effects, scanner-effects, and finally diffusion scheme and b-value effects which had similar reproducibility as scan-rescan variation. However, confounds varied both across pathways and across segmentation workflows, with some bundle segmentation workflows more (or less) robust to sources of variation. Despite variability, bundle dissection is consistently able to recover the same location of pathways in the deep white matter, with variation at the gray matter/ white matter interface. Next, we show that differences due to the choice of bundle segmentation workflows are larger than any other studied confound, with low-to-moderate overlap of the same intended pathway when segmented using different methods. Finally, quantifying microstructure features within a pathway, we show that tractography adds variability over-and-above that which exists due to noise, scanner effects, and acquisition effects. Overall, these confounds need to be considered when harmonizing diffusion datasets, interpreting or combining data across sites, and when attempting to understand the successes and limitations of different methodologies in the design and development of new tractography or bundle segmentation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt G. Schilling
- Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States,Vanderbilt Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Chantal M.W. Tax
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Francois Rheault
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Colin Hansen
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Qi Yang
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Fang-Cheng Yeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, United States
| | - Leon Cai
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Adam W. Anderson
- Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States,Vanderbilt Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Bennett A. Landman
- Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States,Vanderbilt Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States,Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Di Biase MA, Cetin-Karayumak S, Lyall AE, Zalesky A, Cho KIK, Zhang F, Kubicki M, Rathi Y, Lyons MG, Bouix S, Billah T, Anticevic A, Schleifer C, Adkinson BD, Ji JL, Tamayo Z, Addington J, Bearden CE, Cornblatt BA, Keshavan MS, Mathalon DH, McGlashan TH, Perkins DO, Cadenhead KS, Tsuang MT, Woods SW, Stone WS, Shenton ME, Cannon TD, Pasternak O. White matter changes in psychosis risk relate to development and are not impacted by the transition to psychosis. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:6833-6844. [PMID: 34024906 PMCID: PMC8611104 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01128-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Subtle alterations in white matter microstructure are observed in youth at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. However, the timing of these changes and their relationships to the emergence of psychosis remain unclear. Here, we track the evolution of white matter abnormalities in a large, longitudinal cohort of CHR individuals comprising the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS-3). Multi-shell diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data were collected across multiple timepoints (1-5 over 1 year) in 286 subjects (aged 12-32 years): 25 CHR individuals who transitioned to psychosis (CHR-P; 61 scans), 205 CHR subjects with unknown transition outcome after the 1-year follow-up period (CHR-U; 596 scans), and 56 healthy controls (195 scans). Linear mixed effects models were fitted to infer the impact of age and illness-onset on variation in the fractional anisotropy of cellular tissue (FAT) and the volume fraction of extracellular free water (FW). Baseline measures of white matter microstructure did not differentiate between HC, CHR-U and CHR-P individuals. However, age trajectories differed between the three groups in line with a developmental effect: CHR-P and CHR-U groups displayed higher FAT in adolescence, and 4% lower FAT by 30 years of age compared to controls. Furthermore, older CHR-P subjects (20+ years) displayed 4% higher FW in the forceps major (p < 0.05). Prospective analysis in CHR-P did not reveal a significant impact of illness onset on regional FAT or FW, suggesting that transition to psychosis is not marked by dramatic change in white matter microstructure. Instead, clinical high risk for psychosis-regardless of transition outcome-is characterized by subtle age-related white matter changes that occur in tandem with development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Di Biase
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia.
| | - Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda E Lyall
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia
| | - Kang Ik Kevin Cho
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marek Kubicki
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yogesh Rathi
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Monica G Lyons
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sylvain Bouix
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tashrif Billah
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alan Anticevic
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Brendan D Adkinson
- Yale Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jie Lisa Ji
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zailyn Tamayo
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jean Addington
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Carrie E Bearden
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior and Department of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Barbara A Cornblatt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Psychology, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA
- The Zucker Hillside Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matcheri S Keshavan
- Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel H Mathalon
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Thomas H McGlashan
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Diana O Perkins
- Department of Psychology, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, USA
- University of North Carolina (UNC), Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kristen S Cadenhead
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ming T Tsuang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Scott W Woods
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - William S Stone
- Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martha E Shenton
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tyrone D Cannon
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Kurokawa R, Kamiya K, Koike S, Nakaya M, Uematsu A, Tanaka SC, Kamagata K, Okada N, Morita K, Kasai K, Abe O. Cross-scanner reproducibility and harmonization of a diffusion MRI structural brain network: A traveling subject study of multi-b acquisition. Neuroimage 2021; 245:118675. [PMID: 34710585 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Characterization of brain networks by diffusion MRI (dMRI) has rapidly evolved, and there are ongoing movements toward data sharing and multi-center studies. To extract meaningful information from multi-center data, methods to correct for the bias caused by scanner differences, that is, harmonization, are urgently needed. In this work, we report the cross-scanner differences in structural network analyses using data from nine traveling subjects (four males and five females, 21-49 years-old) who underwent scanning using four 3T scanners (public database available from the Brain/MINDS Beyond Human Brain MRI project (http://mriportal.umin.jp/)). The reliability and reproducibility were compared to those of data from another set of four subjects (all males, 29-42 years-old) who underwent scan-rescan (interval, 105-147 days) with the same scanner as well as scan-rescan data from the Human Connectome Project database. The results demonstrated that the reliability of the edge weights and graph theory metrics was lower for data including different scanners, compared to the scan-rescan with the same scanner. Besides, systematic differences between scanners were observed, indicating the risk of bias in comparing networks obtained from different scanners directly. We further demonstrate that it is feasible to reduce inter-scanner variabilities while preserving the inter-subject differences among healthy individuals by modeling the scanner effects at the level of network matrices, when traveling-subject data are available for calibration between scanners. The present data and results are expected to serve as a basis for developing and evaluating novel harmonization methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Kurokawa
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kouhei Kamiya
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Shinsuke Koike
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Moto Nakaya
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Akiko Uematsu
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Saori C Tanaka
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Naohiro Okada
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kentaro Morita
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kiyoto Kasai
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Osamu Abe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Elad D, Cetin‐Karayumak S, Zhang F, Cho KIK, Lyall AE, Seitz‐Holland J, Ben‐Ari R, Pearlson GD, Tamminga CA, Sweeney JA, Clementz BA, Schretlen DJ, Viher PV, Stegmayer K, Walther S, Lee J, Crow TJ, James A, Voineskos AN, Buchanan RW, Szeszko PR, Malhotra AK, Keshavan MS, Shenton ME, Rathi Y, Bouix S, Sochen N, Kubicki MR, Pasternak O. Improving the predictive potential of diffusion MRI in schizophrenia using normative models-Towards subject-level classification. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:4658-4670. [PMID: 34322947 PMCID: PMC8410550 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion MRI studies consistently report group differences in white matter between individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Nevertheless, the abnormalities found at the group-level are often not observed at the individual level. Among the different approaches aiming to study white matter abnormalities at the subject level, normative modeling analysis takes a step towards subject-level predictions by identifying affected brain locations in individual subjects based on extreme deviations from a normative range. Here, we leveraged a large harmonized diffusion MRI dataset from 512 healthy controls and 601 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, to study whether normative modeling can improve subject-level predictions from a binary classifier. To this aim, individual deviations from a normative model of standard (fractional anisotropy) and advanced (free-water) dMRI measures, were calculated by means of age and sex-adjusted z-scores relative to control data, in 18 white matter regions. Even though larger effect sizes are found when testing for group differences in z-scores than are found with raw values (p < .001), predictions based on summary z-score measures achieved low predictive power (AUC < 0.63). Instead, we find that combining information from the different white matter tracts, while using multiple imaging measures simultaneously, improves prediction performance (the best predictor achieved AUC = 0.726). Our findings suggest that extreme deviations from a normative model are not optimal features for prediction. However, including the complete distribution of deviations across multiple imaging measures improves prediction, and could aid in subject-level classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doron Elad
- Department of MathematicsTel‐Aviv UniversityTel‐AvivIsrael
| | - Suheyla Cetin‐Karayumak
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Fan Zhang
- Department of RadiologyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Kang Ik K. Cho
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Amanda E. Lyall
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Departments of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Johanna Seitz‐Holland
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of MunichMunichGermany
| | | | | | - Carol A. Tamminga
- Department of PsychiatryUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - John A. Sweeney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral NeuroscienceUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiOhioUSA
| | - Brett A. Clementz
- Departments of Psychology and NeuroscienceBio‐Imaging Research Center, University of GeorgiaAthensGeorgiaUSA
| | - David J. Schretlen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological ScienceJohns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Petra Verena Viher
- Translational Research CenterUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Katharina Stegmayer
- Translational Research CenterUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Sebastian Walther
- Translational Research CenterUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry, University of BernBernSwitzerland
| | - Jungsun Lee
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea
| | - Tim J. Crow
- Department of Psychiatry, SANE POWICWarneford Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Anthony James
- Department of Psychiatry, SANE POWICWarneford Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Aristotle N. Voineskos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
| | - Robert W. Buchanan
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Philip R. Szeszko
- Department of PsychiatryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical CenterJames J. Peters VA Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Anil K. Malhotra
- The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research and Zucker Hillside HospitalManhassetNew YorkUSA
| | - Matcheri S. Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CentreHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Martha E. Shenton
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of RadiologyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Departments of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Yogesh Rathi
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Sylvain Bouix
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Nir Sochen
- Department of MathematicsTel‐Aviv UniversityTel‐AvivIsrael
| | - Marek R. Kubicki
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of RadiologyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Departments of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of PsychiatryBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of RadiologyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Koerte IK, Bahr R, Filipcik P, Gooijers J, Leemans A, Lin AP, Tripodis Y, Shenton ME, Sochen N, Swinnen SP, Pasternak O. REPIMPACT - a prospective longitudinal multisite study on the effects of repetitive head impacts in youth soccer. Brain Imaging Behav 2021; 16:492-502. [PMID: 34505977 PMCID: PMC8825640 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00484-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Repetitive head impacts (RHI) are common in youth athletes participating in contact sports. RHI differ from concussions; they are considered hits to the head that usually do not result in acute symptoms and are therefore also referred to as “subconcussive” head impacts. RHI occur e.g., when heading the ball or during contact with another player. Evidence suggests that exposure to RHI may have cumulative effects on brain structure and function. However, little is known about brain alterations associated with RHI, or about the risk factors that may lead to clinical or behavioral sequelae. REPIMPACT is a prospective longitudinal study of competitive youth soccer players and non-contact sport controls aged 14 to 16 years. The study aims to characterize consequences of exposure to RHI with regard to behavior (i.e., cognition, and motor function), clinical sequelae (i.e., psychiatric and neurological symptoms), brain structure, function, diffusion and biochemistry, as well as blood- and saliva-derived measures of molecular processes associated with exposure to RHI (e.g., circulating microRNAs, neuroproteins and cytokines). Here we present the structure of the REPIMPACT Consortium which consists of six teams of clinicians and scientists in six countries. We further provide detailed information on the specific aims and the design of the REPIMPACT study. The manuscript also describes the progress made in the study thus far. Finally, we discuss important challenges and approaches taken to overcome these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga K Koerte
- cBRAIN, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Roald Bahr
- Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter Filipcik
- Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Jolien Gooijers
- Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Goup Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,KU Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexander Leemans
- PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander P Lin
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Clinical Spectroscopy, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yorghos Tripodis
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Center and Boston University CTE Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martha E Shenton
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nir Sochen
- Department of Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Stephan P Swinnen
- Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Goup Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,KU Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
Chamberland M, Genc S, Tax CMW, Shastin D, Koller K, Raven EP, Cunningham A, Doherty J, van den Bree MBM, Parker GD, Hamandi K, Gray WP, Jones DK. Detecting microstructural deviations in individuals with deep diffusion MRI tractometry. NATURE COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE 2021; 1:598-606. [PMID: 35865756 PMCID: PMC7613101 DOI: 10.1038/s43588-021-00126-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Most diffusion magnetic resonance imaging studies of disease rely on statistical comparisons between large groups of patients and healthy participants to infer altered tissue states in the brain; however, clinical heterogeneity can greatly challenge their discriminative power. There is currently an unmet need to move away from the current approach of group-wise comparisons to methods with the sensitivity to detect altered tissue states at the individual level. This would ultimately enable the early detection and interpretation of microstructural abnormalities in individual patients, an important step towards personalized medicine in translational imaging. To this end, Detect was developed to advance diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tractometry towards single-patient analysis. By operating on the manifold of white-matter pathways and learning normative microstructural features, our framework captures idiosyncrasies in patterns along white-matter pathways. Our approach paves the way from traditional group-based comparisons to true personalized radiology, taking microstructural imaging from the bench to the bedside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Chamberland
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sila Genc
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chantal M. W. Tax
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dmitri Shastin
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Department of Neuroscience, University Hospital of Wales (UHW), Cardiff, UK
| | - Kristin Koller
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Erika P. Raven
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adam Cunningham
- Medical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Joanne Doherty
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Medical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Marianne B. M. van den Bree
- Medical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Greg D. Parker
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Khalid Hamandi
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Department of Neuroscience, University Hospital of Wales (UHW), Cardiff, UK
- Brain Repair and Intracranial Neurotherapeutics (BRAIN) Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - William P. Gray
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Department of Neuroscience, University Hospital of Wales (UHW), Cardiff, UK
- Brain Repair and Intracranial Neurotherapeutics (BRAIN) Unit, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Derek K. Jones
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Seitz-Holland J, Cetin-Karayumak S, Wojcik JD, Lyall A, Levitt J, Shenton ME, Pasternak O, Westin CF, Baxi M, Kelly S, Mesholam-Gately R, Vangel M, Pearlson G, Tamminga CA, Sweeney JA, Clementz BA, Schretlen D, Viher PV, Stegmayer K, Walther S, Lee J, Crow T, James A, Voineskos A, Buchanan RW, Szeszko PR, Malhotra AK, Rathi Y, Keshavan M, Kubicki M. Elucidating the relationship between white matter structure, demographic, and clinical variables in schizophrenia-a multicenter harmonized diffusion tensor imaging study. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:5357-5370. [PMID: 33483689 PMCID: PMC8329919 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01018-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
White matter (WM) abnormalities are repeatedly demonstrated across the schizophrenia time-course. However, our understanding of how demographic and clinical variables interact, influence, or are dependent on WM pathologies is limited. The most well-known barriers to progress are heterogeneous findings due to small sample sizes and the confounding influence of age on WM. The present study leverages access to the harmonized diffusion magnetic-resonance-imaging data and standardized clinical data from 13 international sites (597 schizophrenia patients (SCZ)). Fractional anisotropy (FA) values for all major WM structures in patients were predicted based on FA models estimated from a healthy population (n = 492). We utilized the deviations between predicted and real FA values to answer three essential questions. (1) "Which clinical variables explain WM abnormalities?". (2) "Does the degree of WM abnormalities predict symptom severity?". (3) "Does sex influence any of those relationships?". Regression and mediator analyses revealed that a longer duration-of-illness is associated with more severe WM abnormalities in several tracts. In addition, they demonstrated that a higher antipsychotic medication dose is related to more severe corpus callosum abnormalities. A structural equation model revealed that patients with more WM abnormalities display higher symptom severity. Last, the results exhibited sex-specificity. Males showed a stronger association between duration-of-illness and WM abnormalities. Females presented a stronger association between WM abnormalities and symptom severity, with IQ impacting this relationship. Our findings provide clear evidence for the interaction of demographic, clinical, and behavioral variables with WM pathology in SCZ. Our results also point to the need for longitudinal studies, directly investigating the casualty and sex-specificity of these relationships, as well as the impact of cognitive resiliency on structure-function relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Seitz-Holland
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joanne D Wojcik
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda Lyall
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James Levitt
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton, MA, USA
| | - Martha E Shenton
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carl-Fredrik Westin
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Madhura Baxi
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Graduate Program of Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sinead Kelly
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Raquelle Mesholam-Gately
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Vangel
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Carol A Tamminga
- Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - John A Sweeney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Brett A Clementz
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - David Schretlen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Petra Verena Viher
- University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Katharina Stegmayer
- University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Walther
- University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jungsun Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tim Crow
- Department of Psychiatry, SANE POWIC, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anthony James
- Department of Psychiatry, SANE POWIC, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aristotle Voineskos
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert W Buchanan
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Philip R Szeszko
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anil K Malhotra
- The Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Yogesh Rathi
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matcheri Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marek Kubicki
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Individual deviations from normative models of brain structure in a large cross-sectional schizophrenia cohort. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:3512-3523. [PMID: 32963336 PMCID: PMC8329928 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-00882-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The heterogeneity of schizophrenia has defied efforts to derive reproducible and definitive anatomical maps of structural brain changes associated with the disorder. We aimed to map deviations from normative ranges of brain structure for individual patients and evaluate whether the loci of individual deviations recapitulated group-average brain maps of schizophrenia pathology. For each of 48 white matter tracts and 68 cortical regions, normative percentiles of variation in fractional anisotropy (FA) and cortical thickness (CT) were established using diffusion-weighted and structural MRI from healthy adults (n = 195). Individuals with schizophrenia (n = 322) were classified as either within the normative range for healthy individuals of the same age and sex (5-95% percentiles), infra-normal (<5% percentile) or supra-normal (>95% percentile). Repeating this classification for each tract and region yielded a deviation map for each individual. Compared to the healthy comparison group, the schizophrenia group showed widespread reductions in FA and CT, involving virtually all white matter tracts and cortical regions. Paradoxically, however, no more than 15-20% of patients deviated from the normative range for any single tract or region. Furthermore, 79% of patients showed infra-normal deviations for at least one locus (healthy individuals: 59 ± 2%, p < 0.001). Thus, while infra-normal deviations were common among patients, their anatomical loci were highly inconsistent between individuals. Higher polygenic risk for schizophrenia associated with a greater number of regions with infra-normal deviations in CT (r = -0.17, p = 0.006). We conclude that anatomical loci of schizophrenia-related changes are highly heterogeneous across individuals to the extent that group-consensus pathological maps are not representative of most individual patients. Normative modeling can aid in parsing schizophrenia heterogeneity and guiding personalized interventions.
Collapse
|
61
|
Kraguljac NV, McDonald WM, Widge AS, Rodriguez CI, Tohen M, Nemeroff CB. Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2021; 178:509-521. [PMID: 33397140 PMCID: PMC8222104 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20030340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Schizophrenia is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome with a heterogeneous genetic, neurobiological, and phenotypic profile. Currently, no objective biological measures-that is, biomarkers-are available to inform diagnostic or treatment decisions. Neuroimaging is well positioned for biomarker development in schizophrenia, as it may capture phenotypic variations in molecular and cellular disease targets, or in brain circuits. These mechanistically based biomarkers may represent a direct measure of the pathophysiological underpinnings of the disease process and thus could serve as true intermediate or surrogate endpoints. Effective biomarkers could validate new treatment targets or pathways, predict response, aid in selection of patients for therapy, determine treatment regimens, and provide a rationale for personalized treatments. In this review, the authors discuss a range of mechanistically plausible neuroimaging biomarker candidates, including dopamine hyperactivity, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor hypofunction, hippocampal hyperactivity, immune dysregulation, dysconnectivity, and cortical gray matter volume loss. They then focus on the putative neuroimaging biomarkers for disease risk, diagnosis, target engagement, and treatment response in schizophrenia. Finally, they highlight areas of unmet need and discuss strategies to advance biomarker development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina V. Kraguljac
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL,Corresponding Author: Nina Vanessa Kraguljac, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, SC 501, 1720 7th Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35294-0017, 205-996-7171,
| | - William M. McDonald
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Alik S. Widge
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Carolyn I. Rodriguez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA,Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Mauricio Tohen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Charles B. Nemeroff
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Zhang F, Breger A, Cho KIK, Ning L, Westin CF, O'Donnell LJ, Pasternak O. Deep learning based segmentation of brain tissue from diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2021; 233:117934. [PMID: 33737246 PMCID: PMC8139182 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Segmentation of brain tissue types from diffusion MRI (dMRI) is an important task, required for quantification of brain microstructure and for improving tractography. Current dMRI segmentation is mostly based on anatomical MRI (e.g., T1- and T2-weighted) segmentation that is registered to the dMRI space. However, such inter-modality registration is challenging due to more image distortions and lower image resolution in dMRI as compared with anatomical MRI. In this study, we present a deep learning method for diffusion MRI segmentation, which we refer to as DDSeg. Our proposed method learns tissue segmentation from high-quality imaging data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP), where registration of anatomical MRI to dMRI is more precise. The method is then able to predict a tissue segmentation directly from new dMRI data, including data collected with different acquisition protocols, without requiring anatomical data and inter-modality registration. We train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to learn a tissue segmentation model using a novel augmented target loss function designed to improve accuracy in regions of tissue boundary. To further improve accuracy, our method adds diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) parameters that characterize non-Gaussian water molecule diffusion to the conventional diffusion tensor imaging parameters. The DKI parameters are calculated from the recently proposed mean-kurtosis-curve method that corrects implausible DKI parameter values and provides additional features that discriminate between tissue types. We demonstrate high tissue segmentation accuracy on HCP data, and also when applying the HCP-trained model on dMRI data from other acquisitions with lower resolution and fewer gradient directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anna Breger
- Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Kang Ik Kevin Cho
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lipeng Ning
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carl-Fredrik Westin
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren J O'Donnell
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Buchanan CR, Muñoz Maniega S, Valdés Hernández MC, Ballerini L, Barclay G, Taylor AM, Russ TC, Tucker-Drob EM, Wardlaw JM, Deary IJ, Bastin ME, Cox SR. Comparison of structural MRI brain measures between 1.5 and 3 T: Data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:3905-3921. [PMID: 34008899 PMCID: PMC8288101 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Multi‐scanner MRI studies are reliant on understanding the apparent differences in imaging measures between different scanners. We provide a comprehensive analysis of T1‐weighted and diffusion MRI (dMRI) structural brain measures between a 1.5 T GE Signa Horizon HDx and a 3 T Siemens Magnetom Prisma using 91 community‐dwelling older participants (aged 82 years). Although we found considerable differences in absolute measurements (global tissue volumes were measured as ~6–11% higher and fractional anisotropy [FA] was 33% higher at 3 T than at 1.5 T), between‐scanner consistency was good to excellent for global volumetric and dMRI measures (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range: .612–.993) and fair to good for 68 cortical regions (FreeSurfer) and cortical surface measures (mean ICC: .504–.763). Between‐scanner consistency was fair for dMRI measures of 12 major white matter tracts (mean ICC: .475–.564), and the general factors of these tracts provided excellent consistency (ICC ≥ .769). Whole‐brain structural networks provided good to excellent consistency for global metrics (ICC ≥ .612). Although consistency was poor for individual network connections (mean ICCs: .275−.280), this was driven by a large difference in network sparsity (.599 vs. .334), and consistency was improved when comparing only the connections present in every participant (mean ICCs: .533–.647). Regression‐based k‐fold cross‐validation showed that, particularly for global volumes, between‐scanner differences could be largely eliminated (R2 range .615–.991). We conclude that low granularity measures of brain structure can be reliably matched between the scanners tested, but caution is warranted when combining high granularity information from different scanners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin R Buchanan
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Susana Muñoz Maniega
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Maria C Valdés Hernández
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lucia Ballerini
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gayle Barclay
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Adele M Taylor
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tom C Russ
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Joanna M Wardlaw
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ian J Deary
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark E Bastin
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Simon R Cox
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Sakaie K, Fedler JK, Yankey JW, Nakamura K, Debbins J, Lowe MJ, Raska P, Fox RJ. Influence of equipment changes on MRI measures of brain atrophy and brain microstructure in a placebo-controlled trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2021; 7:20552173211010843. [PMID: 34046185 PMCID: PMC8138298 DOI: 10.1177/20552173211010843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hardware changes can be an unavoidable confound in imaging trials. Understanding the impact of such changes may play an important role in the analysis of imaging data. Objective To characterize the effect of equipment changes in a longitudinal, multi-site multiple sclerosis trial. Methods Using data from a clinical trial in progressive multiple sclerosis, we explored how major changes in imaging hardware affected data. We analyzed the extent to which these changes affected imaging biomarkers and the estimated treatment effects by including such changes as a time-dependent covariate. Results Significant differences whole brain atrophy (brain parenchymal fraction, BPF) and microstructure (transverse diffusivity, TD) between scans with and without changes were found and depended on the type of hardware change. A switch from GE HDxt to Siemens Skyra led to significant shifts in BPF (p < 0.04) and TD (p < 0.0001). However, we could not detect the influence of hardware changes on overall trial outcomes- differences between placebo and treatment arms in change over time of BPF and TD (p > 0.5). Conclusions The results suggest that differences among hardware types should be considered when planning and analyzing brain atrophy and diffusivity in a longitudinal clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Sakaie
- Imaging Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Janel K Fedler
- Data Coordinating Center, NeuroNEXT, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jon W Yankey
- Data Coordinating Center, NeuroNEXT, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kunio Nakamura
- Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Josef Debbins
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mark J Lowe
- Imaging Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Paola Raska
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert J Fox
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Kamagata K, Andica C, Kato A, Saito Y, Uchida W, Hatano T, Lukies M, Ogawa T, Takeshige-Amano H, Akashi T, Hagiwara A, Fujita S, Aoki S. Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22105216. [PMID: 34069159 PMCID: PMC8155849 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been an increasing prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases with the rapid increase in aging societies worldwide. Biomarkers that can be used to detect pathological changes before the development of severe neuronal loss and consequently facilitate early intervention with disease-modifying therapeutic modalities are therefore urgently needed. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising tool that can be used to infer microstructural characteristics of the brain, such as microstructural integrity and complexity, as well as axonal density, order, and myelination, through the utilization of water molecules that are diffused within the tissue, with displacement at the micron scale. Diffusion tensor imaging is the most commonly used diffusion MRI technique to assess the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases. However, diffusion tensor imaging has several limitations, and new technologies, including neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, and free-water imaging, have been recently developed as approaches to overcome these constraints. This review provides an overview of these technologies and their potential as biomarkers for the early diagnosis and disease progression of major neurodegenerative diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (C.A.); (Y.S.); (W.U.); (T.A.); (A.H.); (S.F.); (S.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Christina Andica
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (C.A.); (Y.S.); (W.U.); (T.A.); (A.H.); (S.F.); (S.A.)
| | - Ayumi Kato
- Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8504, Japan;
| | - Yuya Saito
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (C.A.); (Y.S.); (W.U.); (T.A.); (A.H.); (S.F.); (S.A.)
| | - Wataru Uchida
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (C.A.); (Y.S.); (W.U.); (T.A.); (A.H.); (S.F.); (S.A.)
| | - Taku Hatano
- Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (T.H.); (T.O.); (H.T.-A.)
| | - Matthew Lukies
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - Takashi Ogawa
- Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (T.H.); (T.O.); (H.T.-A.)
| | - Haruka Takeshige-Amano
- Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (T.H.); (T.O.); (H.T.-A.)
| | - Toshiaki Akashi
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (C.A.); (Y.S.); (W.U.); (T.A.); (A.H.); (S.F.); (S.A.)
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (C.A.); (Y.S.); (W.U.); (T.A.); (A.H.); (S.F.); (S.A.)
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (C.A.); (Y.S.); (W.U.); (T.A.); (A.H.); (S.F.); (S.A.)
| | - Shigeki Aoki
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan; (C.A.); (Y.S.); (W.U.); (T.A.); (A.H.); (S.F.); (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Jolly AE, Bălăeţ M, Azor A, Friedland D, Sandrone S, Graham NSN, Zimmerman K, Sharp DJ. Detecting axonal injury in individual patients after traumatic brain injury. Brain 2021; 144:92-113. [PMID: 33257929 PMCID: PMC7880666 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Poor outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are common yet remain difficult to predict. Diffuse axonal injury is important for outcomes, but its assessment remains limited in the clinical setting. Currently, axonal injury is diagnosed based on clinical presentation, visible damage to the white matter or via surrogate markers of axonal injury such as microbleeds. These do not accurately quantify axonal injury leading to misdiagnosis in a proportion of patients. Diffusion tensor imaging provides a quantitative measure of axonal injury in vivo, with fractional anisotropy often used as a proxy for white matter damage. Diffusion imaging has been widely used in TBI but is not routinely applied clinically. This is in part because robust analysis methods to diagnose axonal injury at the individual level have not yet been developed. Here, we present a pipeline for diffusion imaging analysis designed to accurately assess the presence of axonal injury in large white matter tracts in individuals. Average fractional anisotropy is calculated from tracts selected on the basis of high test-retest reliability, good anatomical coverage and their association to cognitive and clinical impairments after TBI. We test our pipeline for common methodological issues such as the impact of varying control sample sizes, focal lesions and age-related changes to demonstrate high specificity, sensitivity and test-retest reliability. We assess 92 patients with moderate-severe TBI in the chronic phase (≥6 months post-injury), 25 patients in the subacute phase (10 days to 6 weeks post-injury) with 6-month follow-up and a large control cohort (n = 103). Evidence of axonal injury is identified in 52% of chronic and 28% of subacute patients. Those classified with axonal injury had significantly poorer cognitive and functional outcomes than those without, a difference not seen for focal lesions or microbleeds. Almost a third of patients with unremarkable standard MRIs had evidence of axonal injury, whilst 40% of patients with visible microbleeds had no diffusion evidence of axonal injury. More diffusion abnormality was seen with greater time since injury, across individuals at various chronic injury times and within individuals between subacute and 6-month scans. We provide evidence that this pipeline can be used to diagnose axonal injury in individual patients at subacute and chronic time points, and that diffusion MRI provides a sensitive and complementary measure when compared to susceptibility weighted imaging, which measures diffuse vascular injury. Guidelines for the implementation of this pipeline in a clinical setting are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Jolly
- Clinical, cognitive and computational neuroimaging laboratory (C3NL), Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.,UK Dementia Research Institute Care Research and Technology Centre, Imperial College London and the University of Surrey, London, W12 0NN UK
| | - Maria Bălăeţ
- Clinical, cognitive and computational neuroimaging laboratory (C3NL), Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Adriana Azor
- Clinical, cognitive and computational neuroimaging laboratory (C3NL), Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Daniel Friedland
- Clinical, cognitive and computational neuroimaging laboratory (C3NL), Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Stefano Sandrone
- Clinical, cognitive and computational neuroimaging laboratory (C3NL), Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Neil S N Graham
- Clinical, cognitive and computational neuroimaging laboratory (C3NL), Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - Karl Zimmerman
- Clinical, cognitive and computational neuroimaging laboratory (C3NL), Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK
| | - David J Sharp
- Clinical, cognitive and computational neuroimaging laboratory (C3NL), Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK.,UK Dementia Research Institute Care Research and Technology Centre, Imperial College London and the University of Surrey, London, W12 0NN UK
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Koerte IK, Esopenko C, Hinds SR, Shenton ME, Bonke EM, Bazarian JJ, Bickart KC, Bigler ED, Bouix S, Buckley TA, Choe MC, Echlin PS, Gill J, Giza CC, Hayes J, Hodges CB, Irimia A, Johnson PK, Kenney K, Levin HS, Lin AP, Lindsey HM, Lipton ML, Max JE, Mayer AR, Meier TB, Merchant-Borna K, Merkley TL, Mills BD, Newsome MR, Porfido T, Stephens JA, Tartaglia MC, Ware AL, Zafonte RD, Zeineh MM, Thompson PM, Tate DF, Dennis EL, Wilde EA, Baron D. The ENIGMA sports injury working group:- an international collaboration to further our understanding of sport-related brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 2021; 15:576-584. [PMID: 32720179 PMCID: PMC7855299 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-020-00370-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Sport-related brain injury is very common, and the potential long-term effects include a wide range of neurological and psychiatric symptoms, and potentially neurodegeneration. Around the globe, researchers are conducting neuroimaging studies on primarily homogenous samples of athletes. However, neuroimaging studies are expensive and time consuming, and thus current findings from studies of sport-related brain injury are often limited by small sample sizes. Further, current studies apply a variety of neuroimaging techniques and analysis tools which limit comparability among studies. The ENIGMA Sports Injury working group aims to provide a platform for data sharing and collaborative data analysis thereby leveraging existing data and expertise. By harmonizing data from a large number of studies from around the globe, we will work towards reproducibility of previously published findings and towards addressing important research questions with regard to diagnosis, prognosis, and efficacy of treatment for sport-related brain injury. Moreover, the ENIGMA Sports Injury working group is committed to providing recommendations for future prospective data acquisition to enhance data quality and scientific rigor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga K Koerte
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Waltherstr. 23, 80337, Munich, Germany.
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Carrie Esopenko
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA
- School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Sidney R Hinds
- Department of Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martha E Shenton
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Elena M Bonke
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Waltherstr. 23, 80337, Munich, Germany
- Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Jeffrey J Bazarian
- Departments of Emergency Medicine & Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C Bickart
- UCLA Steve Tisch BrainSPORT Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erin D Bigler
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
- Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Sylvain Bouix
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas A Buckley
- Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
- Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Meeryo C Choe
- UCLA Steve Tisch BrainSPORT Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul S Echlin
- Elliott Sports Medicine Clinic, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica Gill
- Department of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher C Giza
- UCLA Steve Tisch BrainSPORT Program, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jasmeet Hayes
- Psychology Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Chronic Brain Injury Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Cooper B Hodges
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Andrei Irimia
- Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paula K Johnson
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Kimbra Kenney
- Department of Neurology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
- National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Harvey S Levin
- H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander P Lin
- Center for Clinical Spectroscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hannah M Lindsey
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael L Lipton
- Departments of Radiology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and The Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, The Gruss Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Max
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Andrew R Mayer
- Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Timothy B Meier
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kian Merchant-Borna
- Departments of Emergency Medicine & Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Tricia L Merkley
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
- Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Brian D Mills
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mary R Newsome
- H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tara Porfido
- School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Jaclyn A Stephens
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Maria Carmela Tartaglia
- Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ashley L Ware
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ross D Zafonte
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Paul M Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Stevens Neuroimaging & Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Marina del Rey, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Departments of Neurology, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Radiology, Engineering, and Ophthalmology, USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David F Tate
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Emily L Dennis
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Elisabeth A Wilde
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Baron
- Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Wilde EA, Dennis EL, Tate DF. The ENIGMA Brain Injury working group: approach, challenges, and potential benefits. Brain Imaging Behav 2021; 15:465-474. [PMID: 33506440 PMCID: PMC8035294 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00450-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) consortium brings together researchers from around the world to try to identify the genetic underpinnings of brain structure and function, along with robust, generalizable effects of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The recently-formed ENIGMA Brain Injury working group includes 10 subgroups, based largely on injury mechanism and patient population. This introduction to the special issue summarizes the history, organization, and objectives of ENIGMA Brain Injury, and includes a discussion of strategies, challenges, opportunities and goals common across 6 of the subgroups under the umbrella of ENIGMA Brain Injury. The following articles in this special issue, including 6 articles from different subgroups, will detail the challenges and opportunities specific to each subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth A Wilde
- TBICC, Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily L Dennis
- TBICC, Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Imaging Genetics Center, Stevens Neuroimaging & Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Marina del Rey, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - David F Tate
- TBICC, Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Missouri Institute of Mental Health, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Del Re EC, Stone WS, Bouix S, Seitz J, Zeng V, Guliano A, Somes N, Zhang T, Reid B, Lyall A, Lyons M, Li H, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Keshavan M, Seidman LJ, McCarley RW, Wang J, Tang Y, Shenton ME, Niznikiewicz MA. Baseline Cortical Thickness Reductions in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Brain Regions Associated with Conversion to Psychosis Versus Non-Conversion as Assessed at One-Year Follow-Up in the Shanghai-At-Risk-for-Psychosis (SHARP) Study. Schizophr Bull 2021; 47:562-574. [PMID: 32926141 PMCID: PMC8480195 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess cortical thickness (CT) and surface area (SA) of frontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions in a large clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR) sample, and to identify cortical brain abnormalities in CHR who convert to psychosis and in the whole CHR sample, compared with the healthy controls (HC). METHODS Magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, and cognitive data were acquired at baseline in 92 HC, 130 non-converters, and 22 converters (conversion assessed at 1-year follow-up). CT and SA at baseline were calculated for frontal, temporal, and parietal subregions. Correlations between regions showing group differences and clinical scores and age were also obtained. RESULTS CT but not SA was significantly reduced in CHR compared with HC. Two patterns of findings emerged: (1) In converters, CT was significantly reduced relative to non-converters and controls in the banks of superior temporal sulcus, Heschl's gyrus, and pars triangularis and (2) CT in the inferior parietal and supramarginal gyrus, and at trend level in the pars opercularis, fusiform, and middle temporal gyri was significantly reduced in all high-risk individuals compared with HC. Additionally, reduced CT correlated significantly with older age in HC and in non-converters but not in converters. CONCLUSIONS These results show for the first time that fronto-temporo-parietal abnormalities characterized all CHR, that is, both converters and non-converters, relative to HC, while CT abnormalities in converters relative to CHR-NC and HC were found in core auditory and language processing regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta C Del Re
- Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, VA Boston
Healthcare System, Brockton Division, and Harvard Medical School,
Boston, MA
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA
| | - William S Stone
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sylvain Bouix
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA
| | - Johanna Seitz
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA
| | - Victor Zeng
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anthony Guliano
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nathaniel Somes
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA
| | - Tianhong Zhang
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of
Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, SHARP
Program, Shanghai China
| | - Benjamin Reid
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA
| | - Amanda Lyall
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Monica Lyons
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Huijun Li
- Florida A&M University, Department of Psychology,
Tallahassee, FL
| | | | - Matcheri Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Larry J Seidman
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert W McCarley
- Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, VA Boston
Healthcare System, Brockton Division, and Harvard Medical School,
Boston, MA
| | - Jijun Wang
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of
Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, SHARP
Program, Shanghai China
| | - Yingying Tang
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of
Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, SHARP
Program, Shanghai China
| | - Martha E Shenton
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Research and Development, VA Boston Healthcare System,
Boston, MA
| | - Margaret A Niznikiewicz
- Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, VA Boston
Healthcare System, Brockton Division, and Harvard Medical School,
Boston, MA
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA
- To whom correspondence should be addressed; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Dinsdale NK, Jenkinson M, Namburete AIL. Deep learning-based unlearning of dataset bias for MRI harmonisation and confound removal. Neuroimage 2021; 228:117689. [PMID: 33385551 PMCID: PMC7903160 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Increasingly large MRI neuroimaging datasets are becoming available, including many highly multi-site multi-scanner datasets. Combining the data from the different scanners is vital for increased statistical power; however, this leads to an increase in variance due to nonbiological factors such as the differences in acquisition protocols and hardware, which can mask signals of interest. We propose a deep learning based training scheme, inspired by domain adaptation techniques, which uses an iterative update approach to aim to create scanner-invariant features while simultaneously maintaining performance on the main task of interest, thus reducing the influence of scanner on network predictions. We demonstrate the framework for regression, classification and segmentation tasks with two different network architectures. We show that not only can the framework harmonise many-site datasets but it can also adapt to many data scenarios, including biased datasets and limited training labels. Finally, we show that the framework can be extended for the removal of other known confounds in addition to scanner. The overall framework is therefore flexible and should be applicable to a wide range of neuroimaging studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola K Dinsdale
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
| | - Mark Jenkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Australian Institute for Machine Learning (AIML), School of Computer Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ana I L Namburete
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Kelly S, Guimond S, Pasternak O, Lutz O, Lizano P, Cetin-Karayumak S, Sweeney JA, Pearlson G, Clementz BA, McDowell JE, Tamminga CA, Shenton ME, Keshavan MS. White matter microstructure across brain-based biotypes for psychosis - findings from the bipolar-schizophrenia network for intermediate phenotypes. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2021; 308:111234. [PMID: 33385763 DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The B-SNIP consortium identified three brain-based Biotypes across the psychosis spectrum, independent of clinical phenomenology. To externally validate the Biotype model, we used free-water fractional volume (FW) and free-water corrected fractional anisotropy (FAT) to compare white matter differences across Biotypes and clinical diagnoses. Diffusion tensor imaging data from 167 individuals were included: 41 healthy controls, 55 schizophrenia probands, 47 schizoaffective disorder probands, and 24 probands with psychotic bipolar disorder. Compared to healthy controls, FAt reductions were observed in the body of corpus callosum (BCC) for schizoaffective disorder (d = 0.91) and schizophrenia (d = 0.64). Grouping by Biotype, Biotype 1 showed FAt reductions in the CC and fornix, with largest effect in the BCC (d = 0.87). Biotype 2 showed significant FAt reductions in the BCC (d = 0.90). Schizoaffective disorder individuals had elevated FW in the CC, fornix and anterior corona radiata (ACR), with largest effect in the BCC (d = 0.79). Biotype 2 showed elevated FW in the CC, fornix and ACR, with largest effect in the BCC (d = 0.94). While significant diagnosis comparisons were observed, overall greater discrimination from healthy controls was observed for lower FAt in Biotype 1 and elevated FW in Biotype 2. However, between-group differences were modest, with one region (cerebral peduncle) showing a between-Biotype effect. No between-group effects were observed for diagnosis groupings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinead Kelly
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| | - Synthia Guimond
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Psychiatry, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Z 7K4, Canada
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Olivia Lutz
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Paulo Lizano
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - John A Sweeney
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
| | - Godfrey Pearlson
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States
| | - Brett A Clementz
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States
| | - Jennifer E McDowell
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States
| | - Carol A Tamminga
- Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, United States
| | - Martha E Shenton
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Matcheri S Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Turesky TK, Vanderauwera J, Gaab N. Imaging the rapidly developing brain: Current challenges for MRI studies in the first five years of life. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2021; 47:100893. [PMID: 33341534 PMCID: PMC7750693 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Rapid and widespread changes in brain anatomy and physiology in the first five years of life present substantial challenges for developmental structural, functional, and diffusion MRI studies. One persistent challenge is that methods best suited to earlier developmental stages are suboptimal for later stages, which engenders a trade-off between using different, but age-appropriate, methods for different developmental stages or identical methods across stages. Both options have potential benefits, but also biases, as pipelines for each developmental stage can be matched on methods or the age-appropriateness of methods, but not both. This review describes the data acquisition, processing, and analysis challenges that introduce these potential biases and attempts to elucidate decisions and make recommendations that would optimize developmental comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted K Turesky
- Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jolijn Vanderauwera
- Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique De Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique De Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Nadine Gaab
- Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Afzali M, Pieciak T, Newman S, Garyfallidis E, Özarslan E, Cheng H, Jones DK. The sensitivity of diffusion MRI to microstructural properties and experimental factors. J Neurosci Methods 2021; 347:108951. [PMID: 33017644 PMCID: PMC7762827 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Diffusion MRI is a non-invasive technique to study brain microstructure. Differences in the microstructural properties of tissue, including size and anisotropy, can be represented in the signal if the appropriate method of acquisition is used. However, to depict the underlying properties, special care must be taken when designing the acquisition protocol as any changes in the procedure might impact on quantitative measurements. This work reviews state-of-the-art methods for studying brain microstructure using diffusion MRI and their sensitivity to microstructural differences and various experimental factors. Microstructural properties of the tissue at a micrometer scale can be linked to the diffusion signal at a millimeter-scale using modeling. In this paper, we first give an introduction to diffusion MRI and different encoding schemes. Then, signal representation-based methods and multi-compartment models are explained briefly. The sensitivity of the diffusion MRI signal to the microstructural components and the effects of curvedness of axonal trajectories on the diffusion signal are reviewed. Factors that impact on the quality (accuracy and precision) of derived metrics are then reviewed, including the impact of random noise, and variations in the acquisition parameters (i.e., number of sampled signals, b-value and number of acquisition shells). Finally, yet importantly, typical approaches to deal with experimental factors are depicted, including unbiased measures and harmonization. We conclude the review with some future directions and recommendations on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Afzali
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
| | - Tomasz Pieciak
- AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland; LPI, ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
| | - Sharlene Newman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Program of Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
| | - Eleftherios Garyfallidis
- Program of Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Department of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA.
| | - Evren Özarslan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Hu Cheng
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Program of Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
| | - Derek K Jones
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Cetin-Karayumak S, Di Biase MA, Chunga N, Reid B, Somes N, Lyall AE, Kelly S, Solgun B, Pasternak O, Vangel M, Pearlson G, Tamminga C, Sweeney JA, Clementz B, Schretlen D, Viher PV, Stegmayer K, Walther S, Lee J, Crow T, James A, Voineskos A, Buchanan RW, Szeszko PR, Malhotra AK, Hegde R, McCarley R, Keshavan M, Shenton M, Rathi Y, Kubicki M. White matter abnormalities across the lifespan of schizophrenia: a harmonized multi-site diffusion MRI study. Mol Psychiatry 2020; 25:3208-3219. [PMID: 31511636 PMCID: PMC7147982 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-019-0509-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 05/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Several prominent theories of schizophrenia suggest that structural white matter pathologies may follow a developmental, maturational, and/or degenerative process. However, a lack of lifespan studies has precluded verification of these theories. Here, we analyze the largest sample of carefully harmonized diffusion MRI data to comprehensively characterize age-related white matter trajectories, as measured by fractional anisotropy (FA), across the course of schizophrenia. Our analysis comprises diffusion scans of 600 schizophrenia patients and 492 healthy controls at different illness stages and ages (14-65 years), which were gathered from 13 sites. We determined the pattern of age-related FA changes by cross-sectionally assessing the timing of the structural neuropathology associated with schizophrenia. Quadratic curves were used to model between-group FA differences across whole-brain white matter and fiber tracts at each age; fiber tracts were then clustered according to both the effect-sizes and pattern of lifespan white matter FA differences. In whole-brain white matter, FA was significantly lower across the lifespan (up to 7%; p < 0.0033) and reached peak maturation younger in patients (27 years) compared to controls (33 years). Additionally, three distinct patterns of neuropathology emerged when investigating white matter fiber tracts in patients: (1) developmental abnormalities in limbic fibers, (2) accelerated aging and abnormal maturation in long-range association fibers, (3) severe developmental abnormalities and accelerated aging in callosal fibers. Our findings strongly suggest that white matter in schizophrenia is affected across entire stages of the disease. Perhaps most strikingly, we show that white matter changes in schizophrenia involve dynamic interactions between neuropathological processes in a tract-specific manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA.
| | - Maria A Di Biase
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - Natalia Chunga
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, Rochester, USA
| | - Benjamin Reid
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
| | - Nathaniel Somes
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
- MGH Institute of Health Professions, MA, Charlestown, USA
| | - Amanda E Lyall
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sinead Kelly
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Vangel
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Carol Tamminga
- Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - John A Sweeney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Brett Clementz
- Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, USA
| | - David Schretlen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, USA
| | - Petra Verena Viher
- University of Bern, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Sebastian Walther
- University of Bern, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jungsun Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tim Crow
- Department of Psychiatry, SANE POWIC, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anthony James
- Department of Psychiatry, SANE POWIC, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aristotle Voineskos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Philip R Szeszko
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Anil K Malhotra
- The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research and Zucker Hillside Hospital, Manhasset, USA
| | - Rachal Hegde
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Matcheri Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martha Shenton
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Yogesh Rathi
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marek Kubicki
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Hegde RR, Kelly S, Lutz O, Guimond S, Karayumak SC, Mike L, Mesholam-Gately RI, Pasternak O, Kubicki M, Eack SM, Keshavan MS. Association of white matter microstructure and extracellular free-water with cognitive performance in the early course of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2020; 305:111159. [PMID: 32919288 DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Schizophrenia (SZ) is proposed as a disorder of dysconnectivity underlying cognitive impairments and clinical manifestations. Although previous studies have shown extracellular changes in white matter of first-episode SZ, little is known about the transition period towards chronicity and its association with cognition. Free-water (FW) imaging was applied to 79 early course SZ participants and 29 controls to detect white matter axonal and extracellular differences during this phase of illness. Diffusion-weighted images were collected from two sites, harmonized, and processed using a pipeline separately modeling water diffusion in tissue (FAt) and extracellular space (FW). Tract-Based Spatial Statistics was performed using the ENIGMA-DTI protocols. SZ showed FAt reductions in the posterior thalamic radiation (PTR) and FW elevations in the cingulum compared to controls, suggesting FAt and FW changes in the early course of SZ. In SZ, greater FAt of the fornix & stria terminalis (FXST) was positively associated with Theory of Mind performance; average whole-brain FAt, FAt of the FXST and the PTR were positively associated with greater working memory performance; average whole-brain FAt was positively associated with visual learning. Further studies are necessary to better understand the neurobiological mechanisms of SZ for developing intervention strategies to preserve brain structure and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachal R Hegde
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sinead Kelly
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olivia Lutz
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Synthia Guimond
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Suheyla Cetin Karayumak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Luke Mike
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Raquelle I Mesholam-Gately
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marek Kubicki
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shaun M Eack
- Department of Psychiatry and School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matcheri S Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Graham NSN, Zimmerman KA, Bertolini G, Magnoni S, Oddo M, Zetterberg H, Moro F, Novelli D, Heslegrave A, Chieregato A, Fainardi E, Fleming JM, Garbero E, Abed-Maillard S, Gradisek P, Bernini A, Sharp DJ. Multicentre longitudinal study of fluid and neuroimaging BIOmarkers of AXonal injury after traumatic brain injury: the BIO-AX-TBI study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e042093. [PMID: 33172948 PMCID: PMC7656955 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often results in persistent disability, due particularly to cognitive impairments. Outcomes remain difficult to predict but appear to relate to axonal injury. Several new approaches involving fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers show promise to sensitively quantify axonal injury. By assessing these longitudinally in a large cohort, we aim both to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of TBI, and provide better tools to predict clinical outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS BIOmarkers of AXonal injury after TBI is a prospective longitudinal study of fluid and neuroimaging biomarkers of axonal injury after moderate-to-severe TBI, currently being conducted across multiple European centres. We will provide a detailed characterisation of axonal injury after TBI, using fluid (such as plasma/microdialysate neurofilament light) and neuroimaging biomarkers (including diffusion tensor MRI), which will then be related to detailed clinical, cognitive and functional outcome measures. We aim to recruit at least 250 patients, including 40 with cerebral microdialysis performed, with serial assessments performed twice in the first 10 days after injury, subacutely at 10 days to 6 weeks, at 6 and 12 months after injury. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The relevant ethical approvals have been granted by the following ethics committees: in London, by the Camberwell St Giles Research Ethics Committee; in Policlinico (Milan), by the Comitato Etico Milano Area 2; in Niguarda (Milan), by the Comitato Etico Milano Area 3; in Careggi (Florence), by the Comitato Etico Regionale per la Sperimentazione Clinica della Regione Toscana, Sezione area vasta centro; in Trento, by the Trento Comitato Etico per le Sperimentazioni Cliniche, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari della Provincia autonoma di Trento; in Lausanne, by the Commission cantonale d'éthique de la recherche sur l'être humain; in Ljubljana, by the National Medical Ethics Committee at the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia. The study findings will be disseminated to patients, healthcare professionals, academics and policy-makers including through presentation at conferences and peer-reviewed publications. Data will be shared with approved researchers to provide further insights for patient benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03534154.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Samuel Nyholm Graham
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- UK DRI Centre for Care Research and Technology, London, UK
| | - Karl A Zimmerman
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- UK DRI Centre for Care Research and Technology, London, UK
| | - Guido Bertolini
- Public Health, IRCCS-'Mario Negri' Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ranica, Italy
| | - Sandra Magnoni
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Mauro Oddo
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHUV Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Federico Moro
- Public Health, IRCCS-'Mario Negri' Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ranica, Italy
| | - Deborah Novelli
- Public Health, IRCCS-'Mario Negri' Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ranica, Italy
| | | | - Arturo Chieregato
- Neurorianimazione, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Enrico Fainardi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Sciences, Careggi University Hospital, University of Firenze, Florence, Italy
| | - Joanne M Fleming
- Public Health, IRCCS-'Mario Negri' Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ranica, Italy
| | - Elena Garbero
- Public Health, IRCCS-'Mario Negri' Institute for Pharmacological Research, Ranica, Italy
| | - Samia Abed-Maillard
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHUV Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Primoz Gradisek
- Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Adriano Bernini
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, CHUV Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - David J Sharp
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- UK DRI Centre for Care Research and Technology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
St‐Jean S, Viergever MA, Leemans A. Harmonization of diffusion MRI data sets with adaptive dictionary learning. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41:4478-4499. [PMID: 32851729 PMCID: PMC7555079 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging can indirectly infer the microstructure of tissues and provide metrics subject to normal variability in a population. Potentially abnormal values may yield essential information to support analysis of controls and patients cohorts, but subtle confounds could be mistaken for purely biologically driven variations amongst subjects. In this work, we propose a new harmonization algorithm based on adaptive dictionary learning to mitigate the unwanted variability caused by different scanner hardware while preserving the natural biological variability of the data. Our harmonization algorithm does not require paired training data sets, nor spatial registration or matching spatial resolution. Overcomplete dictionaries are learned iteratively from all data sets at the same time with an adaptive regularization criterion, removing variability attributable to the scanners in the process. The obtained mapping is applied directly in the native space of each subject toward a scanner-space. The method is evaluated with a public database which consists of two different protocols acquired on three different scanners. Results show that the effect size of the four studied diffusion metrics is preserved while removing variability attributable to the scanner. Experiments with alterations using a free water compartment, which is not simulated in the training data, shows that the modifications applied to the diffusion weighted images are preserved in the diffusion metrics after harmonization, while still reducing global variability at the same time. The algorithm could help multicenter studies pooling their data by removing scanner specific confounds, and increase statistical power in the process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel St‐Jean
- Image Sciences InstituteUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Max A. Viergever
- Image Sciences InstituteUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Alexander Leemans
- Image Sciences InstituteUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Di Biase MA, Zalesky A, Cetin-Karayumak S, Rathi Y, Lv J, Boerrigter D, North H, Tooney P, Pantelis C, Pasternak O, Shannon Weickert C, Cropley VL. Large-Scale Evidence for an Association Between Peripheral Inflammation and White Matter Free Water in Schizophrenia and Healthy Individuals. Schizophr Bull 2020; 47:542-551. [PMID: 33085749 PMCID: PMC7965083 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clarifying the role of neuroinflammation in schizophrenia is subject to its detection in the living brain. Free-water (FW) imaging is an in vivo diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) technique that measures water molecules freely diffusing in the brain and is hypothesized to detect inflammatory processes. Here, we aimed to establish a link between peripheral markers of inflammation and FW in brain white matter. METHODS All data were obtained from the Australian Schizophrenia Research Bank (ASRB) across 5 Australian states and territories. We first tested for the presence of peripheral cytokine deregulation in schizophrenia, using a large sample (N = 1143) comprising the ASRB. We next determined the extent to which individual variation in 8 circulating pro-/anti-inflammatory cytokines related to FW in brain white matter, imaged in a subset (n = 308) of patients and controls. RESULTS Patients with schizophrenia showed reduced interleukin-2 (IL-2) (t = -3.56, P = .0004) and IL-12(p70) (t = -2.84, P = .005) and increased IL-6 (t = 3.56, P = .0004), IL-8 (t = 3.8, P = .0002), and TNFα (t = 4.30, P < .0001). Higher proinflammatory signaling of IL-6 (t = 3.4, P = .0007) and TNFα (t = 2.7, P = .0007) was associated with higher FW levels in white matter. The reciprocal increases in serum cytokines and FW were spatially widespread in patients encompassing most major fibers; conversely, in controls, the relationship was confined to the anterior corpus callosum and thalamic radiations. No relationships were observed with alternative dMRI measures, including the fractional anisotropy and tissue-related FA. CONCLUSIONS We report widespread deregulation of cytokines in schizophrenia and identify inflammation as a putative mechanism underlying increases in brain FW levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Di Biase
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia,Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,To whom correspondence should be addressed; Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Level 3, Alan Gilbert Bld. 161 Barry St, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia; tel: +61-3-9035-3404, fax: +61-3-9035-8842, e-mail:
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia,Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Yogesh Rathi
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jinglei Lv
- School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Danny Boerrigter
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia,School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hayley North
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia,School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Tooney
- School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Christos Pantelis
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia,Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cynthia Shannon Weickert
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia,School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Department of Neuroscience & Physiology, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
| | - Vanessa L Cropley
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia,Centre for Mental Health, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Qi X, Arfanakis K. Regionconnect: Rapidly extracting standardized brain connectivity information in voxel-wise neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage 2020; 225:117462. [PMID: 33075560 PMCID: PMC7811895 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Reporting white matter findings in voxel-wise neuroimaging studies typically lacks specificity in terms of brain connectivity. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to develop an approach for rapidly extracting standardized brain connectivity information for white matter regions with significant findings in voxel-wise neuroimaging studies. The new approach was named regionconnect and is based on precalculated average healthy adult brain connectivity information stored in standard space in a fashion that allows fast retrieval and integration. Towards this goal, the present work first generated and evaluated the white matter connectome of the IIT Human Brain Atlas v.5.0. It was demonstrated that the edges of the atlas connectome are representative of those of individual participants of the Human Connectome Project in terms of the spatial organization of streamlines and spatial patterns of track-density. Next, the new white matter connectome was used to develop multi-layer, connectivity-based labels for each white matter voxel of the atlas, consistent with the fact that each voxel may contain axons from multiple connections. The regionconnect algorithm was then developed to rapidly integrate information contained in the multi-layer labels across voxels of a white matter region and to generate a list of the most probable connections traversing that region. Usage of regionconnect does not require high angular resolution diffusion MRI or any MRI data. The regionconnect algorithm as well as the white matter tractogram and connectome, multi-layer, connectivity-based labels, and associated resources developed for the IIT Human Brain Atlas v.5.0 in this work are available at www.nitrc.org/projects/iit. An interactive, online version of regionconnect is also available at www.iit.edu/~mri.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxiao Qi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Konstantinos Arfanakis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, United States; Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Jelescu IO, Palombo M, Bagnato F, Schilling KG. Challenges for biophysical modeling of microstructure. J Neurosci Methods 2020; 344:108861. [PMID: 32692999 PMCID: PMC10163379 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The biophysical modeling efforts in diffusion MRI have grown considerably over the past 25 years. In this review, we dwell on the various challenges along the journey of bringing a biophysical model from initial design to clinical implementation, identifying both hurdles that have been already overcome and outstanding issues. First, we describe the critical initial task of selecting which features of tissue microstructure can be estimated using a model and which acquisition protocol needs to be implemented to make the estimation possible. The model performance should necessarily be tested in realistic numerical simulations and in experimental data - adapting the fitting strategy accordingly, and parameter estimates should be validated against complementary techniques, when/if available. Secondly, the model performance and validity should be explored in pathological conditions, and, if appropriate, dedicated models for pathology should be developed. We build on examples from tumors, ischemia and demyelinating diseases. We then discuss the challenges associated with clinical translation and added value. Finally, we single out four major unresolved challenges that are related to: the availability of a microstructural ground truth, the validation of model parameters which cannot be accessed with complementary techniques, the development of a generalized standard model for any brain region and pathology, and the seamless communication between different parties involved in the development and application of biophysical models of diffusion.
Collapse
|
81
|
Hagiwara A, Fujita S, Ohno Y, Aoki S. Variability and Standardization of Quantitative Imaging: Monoparametric to Multiparametric Quantification, Radiomics, and Artificial Intelligence. Invest Radiol 2020; 55:601-616. [PMID: 32209816 PMCID: PMC7413678 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiological images have been assessed qualitatively in most clinical settings by the expert eyes of radiologists and other clinicians. On the other hand, quantification of radiological images has the potential to detect early disease that may be difficult to detect with human eyes, complement or replace biopsy, and provide clear differentiation of disease stage. Further, objective assessment by quantification is a prerequisite of personalized/precision medicine. This review article aims to summarize and discuss how the variability of quantitative values derived from radiological images are induced by a number of factors and how these variabilities are mitigated and standardization of the quantitative values are achieved. We discuss the variabilities of specific biomarkers derived from magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, and focus on diffusion-weighted imaging, relaxometry, lung density evaluation, and computer-aided computed tomography volumetry. We also review the sources of variability and current efforts of standardization of the rapidly evolving techniques, which include radiomics and artificial intelligence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akifumi Hagiwara
- From the Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo
| | | | - Yoshiharu Ohno
- Department of Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shigeki Aoki
- From the Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Seitz J, Cetin-Karayumak S, Lyall A, Pasternak O, Baxi M, Vangel M, Pearlson G, Tamminga C, Sweeney J, Clementz B, Schretlen D, Viher PV, Stegmayer K, Walther S, Lee J, Crow T, James A, Voineskos A, Buchanan RW, Szeszko PR, Malhotra A, Keshavan M, Koerte IK, Shenton ME, Rathi Y, Kubicki M. Investigating Sexual Dimorphism of Human White Matter in a Harmonized, Multisite Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Cereb Cortex 2020; 31:201-212. [PMID: 32851404 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Axonal myelination and repair, critical processes for brain development, maturation, and aging, remain controlled by sexual hormones. Whether this influence is reflected in structural brain differences between sexes, and whether it can be quantified by neuroimaging, remains controversial. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is an in vivo method that can track myelination changes throughout the lifespan. We utilize a large, multisite sample of harmonized dMRI data (n = 551, age = 9-65 years, 46% females/54% males) to investigate the influence of sex on white matter (WM) structure. We model lifespan trajectories of WM using the most common dMRI measure fractional anisotropy (FA). Next, we examine the influence of both age and sex on FA variability. We estimate the overlap between male and female FA and test whether it is possible to label individual brains as male or female. Our results demonstrate regionally and spatially specific effects of sex. Sex differences are limited to limbic structures and young ages. Additionally, not only do sex differences diminish with age, but tracts within each subject become more similar to one another. Last, we show the high overlap in FA between sexes, which implies that determining sex based on WM remains open.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Seitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA
| | - Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA
| | - Amanda Lyall
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02114, USA
| | - Ofer Pasternak
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02114, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA
| | - Madhura Baxi
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA.,Graduate Program of Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Mark Vangel
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA
| | - Godfrey Pearlson
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Carol Tamminga
- Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - John Sweeney
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA
| | - Brett Clementz
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, 30601, USA
| | - David Schretlen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, 21205, USA
| | - Petra Verena Viher
- University of Bern, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
| | - Katharina Stegmayer
- University of Bern, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Walther
- University of Bern, University Hospital of Psychiatry, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
| | - Jungsun Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 690-749, Korea
| | - Tim Crow
- Department of Psychiatry, SANE POWIC, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7 JX, UK
| | - Anthony James
- Department of Psychiatry, SANE POWIC, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7 JX, UK
| | - Aristotle Voineskos
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5T1R8, Canada
| | - Robert W Buchanan
- Maryland Psychiatry Research Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21228, USA
| | - Philip R Szeszko
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, 10029, USA.,Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, 10461, USA
| | - Anil Malhotra
- The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research and Zucker Hillside Hospital, Manhasset, 11030, USA
| | - Matcheri Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA
| | - Inga K Koerte
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA.,cBRAIN, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, 80337, Germany
| | - Martha E Shenton
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02114, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA.,VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton, MA, 02301, USA
| | - Yogesh Rathi
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02114, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA
| | - Marek Kubicki
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02114, USA.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Tong Q, Gong T, He H, Wang Z, Yu W, Zhang J, Zhai L, Cui H, Meng X, Tax CWM, Zhong J. A deep learning-based method for improving reliability of multicenter diffusion kurtosis imaging with varied acquisition protocols. Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 73:31-44. [PMID: 32822818 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Multicenter magnetic resonance imaging is gaining more popularity in large-sample projects. Since both varying hardware and software across different centers cause unavoidable data heterogeneity across centers, its impact on reliability in study outcomes has also drawn much attention recently. One fundamental issue arises in how to derive model parameters reliably from image data of varying quality. This issue is even more challenging for advanced diffusion methods such as diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). Recently, deep learning-based methods have been demonstrated with their potential for robust and efficient computation of diffusion-derived measures. Inspired by these approaches, the current study specifically designed a framework based on a three-dimensional hierarchical convolutional neural network, to jointly reconstruct and harmonize DKI measures from multicenter acquisition to reformulate these to a state-of-the-art hardware using data from traveling subjects. The results from the harmonized data acquired with different protocols show that: 1) the inter-scanner variation of DKI measures within white matter was reduced by 51.5% in mean kurtosis, 65.9% in axial kurtosis, 53.7% in radial kurtosis, and 61.5% in kurtosis fractional anisotropy, respectively; 2) data reliability of each single scanner was enhanced and brought to the level of the reference scanner; and 3) the harmonization network was able to reconstruct reliable DKI values from high data variability. Overall the results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed deep learning-based method for DKI harmonization and help to simplify the protocol setup procedure for multicenter scanners with different hardware and software configurations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiqi Tong
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Research Center for Healthcare Data Science, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Ting Gong
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Hongjian He
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Zheng Wang
- Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, State Key Laboratory of Neuroscience, CAS Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
| | - Wenwen Yu
- Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, State Key Laboratory of Neuroscience, CAS Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Lihao Zhai
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongsheng Cui
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xin Meng
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chantal W M Tax
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
| | - Jianhui Zhong
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Intensity warping for multisite MRI harmonization. Neuroimage 2020; 223:117242. [PMID: 32798678 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In multisite neuroimaging studies there is often unwanted technical variation across scanners and sites. These "scanner effects" can hinder detection of biological features of interest, produce inconsistent results, and lead to spurious associations. We propose mica (multisite image harmonization by cumulative distribution function alignment), a tool to harmonize images taken on different scanners by identifying and removing within-subject scanner effects. Our goals in the present study were to (1) establish a method that removes scanner effects by leveraging multiple scans collected on the same subject, and, building on this, (2) develop a technique to quantify scanner effects in large multisite studies so these can be reduced as a preprocessing step. We illustrate scanner effects in a brain MRI study in which the same subject was measured twice on seven scanners, and assess our method's performance in a second study in which ten subjects were scanned on two machines. We found that unharmonized images were highly variable across site and scanner type, and our method effectively removed this variability by aligning intensity distributions. We further studied the ability to predict image harmonization results for a scan taken on an existing subject at a new site using cross-validation.
Collapse
|
85
|
Ning L, Bonet-Carne E, Grussu F, Sepehrband F, Kaden E, Veraart J, Blumberg SB, Khoo CS, Palombo M, Kokkinos I, Alexander DC, Coll-Font J, Scherrer B, Warfield SK, Karayumak SC, Rathi Y, Koppers S, Weninger L, Ebert J, Merhof D, Moyer D, Pietsch M, Christiaens D, Gomes Teixeira RA, Tournier JD, Schilling KG, Huo Y, Nath V, Hansen C, Blaber J, Landman BA, Zhylka A, Pluim JPW, Parker G, Rudrapatna U, Evans J, Charron C, Jones DK, Tax CMW. Cross-scanner and cross-protocol multi-shell diffusion MRI data harmonization: Algorithms and results. Neuroimage 2020; 221:117128. [PMID: 32673745 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cross-scanner and cross-protocol variability of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) data are known to be major obstacles in multi-site clinical studies since they limit the ability to aggregate dMRI data and derived measures. Computational algorithms that harmonize the data and minimize such variability are critical to reliably combine datasets acquired from different scanners and/or protocols, thus improving the statistical power and sensitivity of multi-site studies. Different computational approaches have been proposed to harmonize diffusion MRI data or remove scanner-specific differences. To date, these methods have mostly been developed for or evaluated on single b-value diffusion MRI data. In this work, we present the evaluation results of 19 algorithms that are developed to harmonize the cross-scanner and cross-protocol variability of multi-shell diffusion MRI using a benchmark database. The proposed algorithms rely on various signal representation approaches and computational tools, such as rotational invariant spherical harmonics, deep neural networks and hybrid biophysical and statistical approaches. The benchmark database consists of data acquired from the same subjects on two scanners with different maximum gradient strength (80 and 300 mT/m) and with two protocols. We evaluated the performance of these algorithms for mapping multi-shell diffusion MRI data across scanners and across protocols using several state-of-the-art imaging measures. The results show that data harmonization algorithms can reduce the cross-scanner and cross-protocol variabilities to a similar level as scan-rescan variability using the same scanner and protocol. In particular, the LinearRISH algorithm based on adaptive linear mapping of rotational invariant spherical harmonics features yields the lowest variability for our data in predicting the fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK) and the rotationally invariant spherical harmonic (RISH) features. But other algorithms, such as DIAMOND, SHResNet, DIQT, CMResNet show further improvement in harmonizing the return-to-origin probability (RTOP). The performance of different approaches provides useful guidelines on data harmonization in future multi-site studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lipeng Ning
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
| | | | | | - Farshid Sepehrband
- Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Enrico Kaden
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Can Son Khoo
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Jaume Coll-Font
- Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Benoit Scherrer
- Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Simon K Warfield
- Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Suheyla Cetin Karayumak
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Yogesh Rathi
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Moyer
- Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
| | - Maximilian Pietsch
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daan Christiaens
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT/PSI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rui Azeredo Gomes Teixeira
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques-Donald Tournier
- Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kurt G Schilling
- Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Yuankai Huo
- Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Vishwesh Nath
- Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Colin Hansen
- Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Justin Blaber
- Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Bennett A Landman
- Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Andrey Zhylka
- Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - Greg Parker
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Umesh Rudrapatna
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - John Evans
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Cyril Charron
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Derek K Jones
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chantal M W Tax
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Tong Q, He H, Gong T, Li C, Liang P, Qian T, Sun Y, Ding Q, Li K, Zhong J. Multicenter dataset of multi-shell diffusion MRI in healthy traveling adults with identical settings. Sci Data 2020; 7:157. [PMID: 32461581 PMCID: PMC7253426 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0493-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Multicenter diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has drawn great attention recently due to the expanding need for large-scale brain imaging studies, whereas the variability in MRI scanners and data acquisition tends to confound reliable individual-based analysis of diffusion measures. In addition, a growing number of multi-shell diffusion models have been shown with the potential to generate various estimates of physio-pathological information, yet their reliability and reproducibility in multicenter studies remain to be assessed. In this article, we describe a multi-shell diffusion dataset collected from three traveling subjects with identical acquisition settings in ten imaging centers. Both the scanner type and imaging protocol for anatomical and diffusion imaging were well controlled. This dataset is expected to replenish individual reproducible studies via multicenter collaboration by providing an open resource for advanced and novel microstructural and tractography modelling and quantification.
Collapse
Grants
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871428, 91632109), Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders(No. 13dz2260500), Major Scientific Project of Zhejiang Lab (No. 2018DG0ZX01), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(No. 2019QNA5026, 2019XZZX001-01-08),and Zhejiang University Education Foundation Global Partnership Fund.
- Beijing Talents Foundation (No. 2016000021223TD07), Capacity Building for Sci-Tech Innovation - Fundamental Scientific Research Funds (No. 19530050157, 19530050184), and the Beijing Brain Initiative of Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission.
- Zhejiang Province Laboratory Work Research Project (No. YB201730).
- Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project of Brain cognition and brain medicine (No. Z171100000117001), and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (No. ZYLX201609).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiqi Tong
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongjian He
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Ting Gong
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chen Li
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Peipeng Liang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China.
| | - Tianyi Qian
- MR Collaboration NE Asia, Siemens Healthcare, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Sun
- MR Collaboration NE Asia, Siemens Healthcare, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiuping Ding
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kuncheng Li
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianhui Zhong
- Center for Brain Imaging Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrumental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Pinto MS, Paolella R, Billiet T, Van Dyck P, Guns PJ, Jeurissen B, Ribbens A, den Dekker AJ, Sijbers J. Harmonization of Brain Diffusion MRI: Concepts and Methods. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:396. [PMID: 32435181 PMCID: PMC7218137 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI diffusion data suffers from significant inter- and intra-site variability, which hinders multi-site and/or longitudinal diffusion studies. This variability may arise from a range of factors, such as hardware, reconstruction algorithms and acquisition settings. To allow a reliable comparison and joint analysis of diffusion data across sites and over time, there is a clear need for robust data harmonization methods. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of diffusion data harmonization concepts and methods, and their limitations. Overall, the methods for the harmonization of multi-site diffusion images can be categorized in two main groups: diffusion parametric map harmonization (DPMH) and diffusion weighted image harmonization (DWIH). Whereas DPMH harmonizes the diffusion parametric maps (e.g., FA, MD, and MK), DWIH harmonizes the diffusion-weighted images. Defining a gold standard harmonization technique for dMRI data is still an ongoing challenge. Nevertheless, in this paper we provide two classification tools, namely a feature table and a flowchart, which aim to guide the readers in selecting an appropriate harmonization method for their study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maíra Siqueira Pinto
- Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,imec-Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Roberto Paolella
- imec-Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Icometrix, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Pieter Van Dyck
- Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Ben Jeurissen
- imec-Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | - Jan Sijbers
- imec-Vision Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Moyer D, Ver Steeg G, Tax CMW, Thompson PM. Scanner invariant representations for diffusion MRI harmonization. Magn Reson Med 2020; 84:2174-2189. [PMID: 32250475 PMCID: PMC7384065 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In the present work, we describe the correction of diffusion‐weighted MRI for site and scanner biases using a novel method based on invariant representation. Theory and Methods Pooled imaging data from multiple sources are subject to variation between the sources. Correcting for these biases has become very important as imaging studies increase in size and multi‐site cases become more common. We propose learning an intermediate representation invariant to site/protocol variables, a technique adapted from information theory‐based algorithmic fairness; by leveraging the data processing inequality, such a representation can then be used to create an image reconstruction that is uninformative of its original source, yet still faithful to underlying structures. To implement this, we use a deep learning method based on variational auto‐encoders (VAE) to construct scanner invariant encodings of the imaging data. Results To evaluate our method, we use training data from the 2018 MICCAI Computational Diffusion MRI (CDMRI) Challenge Harmonization dataset. Our proposed method shows improvements on independent test data relative to a recently published baseline method on each subtask, mapping data from three different scanning contexts to and from one separate target scanning context. Conclusions As imaging studies continue to grow, the use of pooled multi‐site imaging will similarly increase. Invariant representation presents a strong candidate for the harmonization of these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Moyer
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
| | - Greg Ver Steeg
- Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
| | - Chantal M W Tax
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Paul M Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Siless V, Hubbard NA, Jones R, Wang J, Lo N, Bauer CCC, Goncalves M, Frosch I, Norton D, Vergara G, Conroy K, De Souza FV, Rosso IM, Wickham AH, Cosby EA, Pinaire M, Hirshfeld-Becker D, Pizzagalli DA, Henin A, Hofmann SG, Auerbach RP, Ghosh S, Gabrieli J, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Yendiki A. Image acquisition and quality assurance in the Boston Adolescent Neuroimaging of Depression and Anxiety study. Neuroimage Clin 2020; 26:102242. [PMID: 32339824 PMCID: PMC7184183 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The Connectomes Related to Human Diseases (CRHD) initiative was developed with the Human Connectome Project (HCP) to provide high-resolution, open-access, multi-modal MRI data to better understand the neural correlates of human disease. Here, we present an introduction to a CRHD project, the Boston Adolescent Neuroimaging of Depression and Anxiety (BANDA) study, which is collecting multimodal neuroimaging, clinical, and neuropsychological data from 225 adolescents (ages 14-17), 150 of whom are expected to have a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety. Our transdiagnostic recruitment approach samples the full spectrum of depressed/anxious symptoms and their comorbidity, consistent with NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). We focused on an age range that is critical for brain development and for the onset of mental illness. This project sought to harmonize imaging sequences, hardware, and functional tasks with other HCP studies, although some changes were made to canonical HCP methods to accommodate our study population and questions. We present a thorough overview of our imaging sequences, hardware, and scanning protocol. We detail similarities and differences between this study and other HCP studies. We evaluate structural-, diffusion-, and functional-image-quality measures that may be influenced by clinical factors (e.g., disorder, symptomatology). Signal-to-noise and motion estimates from the first 140 adolescents suggest minimal influence of clinical factors on image quality. We anticipate enrollment of an additional 85 participants, most of whom are expected to have a diagnosis of anxiety and/or depression. Clinical and neuropsychological data from the first 140 participants are currently freely available through the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Siless
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Nicholas A Hubbard
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States; University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States
| | - Robert Jones
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jonathan Wang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Nicole Lo
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Clemens C C Bauer
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States; Northeastern University, Department of Psychology, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Isabelle Frosch
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Daniel Norton
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Isabelle M Rosso
- McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Aude Henin
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Satrajit Ghosh
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - John Gabrieli
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States; Northeastern University, Department of Psychology, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Anastasia Yendiki
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Hubbard NA, Siless V, Frosch IR, Goncalves M, Lo N, Wang J, Bauer CCC, Conroy K, Cosby E, Hay A, Jones R, Pinaire M, Vaz De Souza F, Vergara G, Ghosh S, Henin A, Hirshfeld-Becker DR, Hofmann SG, Rosso IM, Auerbach RP, Pizzagalli DA, Yendiki A, Gabrieli JDE, Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Brain function and clinical characterization in the Boston adolescent neuroimaging of depression and anxiety study. Neuroimage Clin 2020; 27:102240. [PMID: 32361633 PMCID: PMC7199015 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
We present a Human Connectome Project study tailored toward adolescent anxiety and depression. This study is one of the first studies of the Connectomes Related to Human Diseases initiative and is collecting structural, functional, and diffusion-weighted brain imaging data from up to 225 adolescents (ages 14-17 years), 150 of whom are expected to have a current diagnosis of an anxiety and/or depressive disorder. Comprehensive clinical and neuropsychological evaluations and longitudinal clinical data are also being collected. This article provides an overview of task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) protocols and preliminary findings (N = 140), as well as clinical and neuropsychological characterization of adolescents. Data collection is ongoing for an additional 85 adolescents, most of whom are expected to have a diagnosis of an anxiety and/or depressive disorder. Data from the first 140 adolescents are projected for public release through the National Institutes of Health Data Archive (NDA) with the timing of this manuscript. All other data will be made publicly-available through the NDA at regularly scheduled intervals. This article is intended to serve as an introduction to this project as well as a reference for those seeking to clinical, neurocognitive, and task fMRI data from this public resource.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Hubbard
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States; University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States
| | - V Siless
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - I R Frosch
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - M Goncalves
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - N Lo
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - J Wang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - C C C Bauer
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - K Conroy
- Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - E Cosby
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - A Hay
- Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - R Jones
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - M Pinaire
- Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - F Vaz De Souza
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - G Vergara
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - S Ghosh
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - A Henin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - D R Hirshfeld-Becker
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - S G Hofmann
- Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - I M Rosso
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - R P Auerbach
- Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - D A Pizzagalli
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States
| | - A Yendiki
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - J D E Gabrieli
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - S Whitfield-Gabrieli
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States; Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Zhong J, Wang Y, Li J, Xue X, Liu S, Wang M, Gao X, Wang Q, Yang J, Li X. Inter-site harmonization based on dual generative adversarial networks for diffusion tensor imaging: application to neonatal white matter development. Biomed Eng Online 2020; 19:4. [PMID: 31941515 PMCID: PMC6964111 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-0748-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Site-specific variations are challenges for pooling analyses in multi-center studies. This work aims to propose an inter-site harmonization method based on dual generative adversarial networks (GANs) for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) derived metrics on neonatal brains. Results DTI-derived metrics (fractional anisotropy, FA; mean diffusivity, MD) are obtained on age-matched neonates without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities: 42 neonates from site 1 and 42 neonates from site 2. Significant inter-site differences of FA can be observed. The proposed harmonization approach and three conventional methods (the global-wise scaling, the voxel-wise scaling, and the ComBat) are performed on DTI-derived metrics from two sites. During the tract-based spatial statistics, inter-site differences can be removed by the proposed dual GANs method, the voxel-wise scaling, and the ComBat. Among these methods, the proposed method holds the lowest median values in absolute errors and root mean square errors. During the pooling analysis of two sites, Pearson correlation coefficients between FA and the postmenstrual age after harmonization are larger than those before harmonization. The effect sizes (Cohen’s d between males and females) are also maintained by the harmonization procedure. Conclusions The proposed dual GANs-based harmonization method is effective to harmonize neonatal DTI-derived metrics from different sites. Results in this study further suggest that the GANs-based harmonization is a feasible pre-processing method for pooling analyses in multi-center studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhong
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.,School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China
| | - Ying Wang
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China.
| | - Jie Li
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China
| | - Xuetong Xue
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China
| | - Simin Liu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Miaomiao Wang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Xinbo Gao
- School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an, 710071, China
| | - Quan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Biomedical Spectroscopy of Xi'an, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, 710119, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
| | - Xianjun Li
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Bagher-Ebadian H, Lu M, Siddiqui F, Ghanem AI, Wen N, Wu Q, Liu C, Movsas B, Chetty IJ. Application of radiomics for the prediction of HPV status for patients with head and neck cancers. Med Phys 2020; 47:563-575. [PMID: 31853980 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform radiomic analysis of primary tumors extracted from pretreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) images for patients with oropharyngeal cancers to identify discriminant features and construct an optimal classifier for the characterization and prediction of human papilloma virus (HPV) status. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred and eighty seven patients with oropharyngeal cancers with known HPV status (confirmed by immunohistochemistry-p16 protein testing) were retrospectively studied as follows: Group A: 95 patients (19HPV- and 76HPV+) from the MICAII grand challenge. Group B: 92 patients (52HPV- and 40HPV+) from our institution. Radiomic features (172) were extracted from pretreatment diagnostic CE-CT images of the gross tumor volume (GTV). Levene and Kolmogorov-Smirnov's tests with absolute biserial correlation (>0.48) were used to identify the discriminant features between the HPV+ and HPV- groups. The discriminant features were used to train and test eight different classifiers. Area under receiver operating characteristic (AUC), positive predictive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were used to evaluate the performance of the classifiers. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied on the discriminant feature set and seven PCs were used to train and test a generalized linear model (GLM) classifier. RESULTS Among 172 radiomic features only 12 radiomic features (from 3 categories) were significantly different (P < 0.05, |BSC| > 0.48) between the HPV+ and HPV- groups. Among the eight classifiers trained and applied for prediction of HPV status, the GLM showed the highest performance for each discriminant feature and the combined 12 features: AUC/PPV/NPV = 0.878/0.834/0.811. The GLM high prediction power was AUC/PPV/NPV = 0.849/0.731/0.788 and AUC/PPV/NPV = 0.869/0.807/0.870 for unseen test datasets for groups A and B, respectively. After eliminating the correlation among discriminant features by applying PCA analysis, the performance of the GLM was improved by 3.3%, 2.2%, and 1.8% for AUC, PPV, and NPV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Results imply that GTV's for HPV+ patients exhibit higher intensities, smaller lesion size, greater sphericity/roundness, and higher spatial intensity-variation/heterogeneity. Results are suggestive that radiomic features primarily associated with the spatial arrangement and morphological appearance of the tumor on contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT datasets may be potentially used for classification of HPV status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mei Lu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Farzan Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ahmed I Ghanem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ning Wen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Qixue Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Benjamin Movsas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Indrin J Chetty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Tate DF, Wilde EA, York GE, Bigler ED. Neuroimaging in Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Concussion 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-65384-8.00003-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
94
|
Pomponio R, Erus G, Habes M, Doshi J, Srinivasan D, Mamourian E, Bashyam V, Nasrallah IM, Satterthwaite TD, Fan Y, Launer LJ, Masters CL, Maruff P, Zhuo C, Völzke H, Johnson SC, Fripp J, Koutsouleris N, Wolf DH, Gur R, Gur R, Morris J, Albert MS, Grabe HJ, Resnick SM, Bryan RN, Wolk DA, Shinohara RT, Shou H, Davatzikos C. Harmonization of large MRI datasets for the analysis of brain imaging patterns throughout the lifespan. Neuroimage 2019; 208:116450. [PMID: 31821869 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
As medical imaging enters its information era and presents rapidly increasing needs for big data analytics, robust pooling and harmonization of imaging data across diverse cohorts with varying acquisition protocols have become critical. We describe a comprehensive effort that merges and harmonizes a large-scale dataset of 10,477 structural brain MRI scans from participants without a known neurological or psychiatric disorder from 18 different studies that represent geographic diversity. We use this dataset and multi-atlas-based image processing methods to obtain a hierarchical partition of the brain from larger anatomical regions to individual cortical and deep structures and derive age trends of brain structure through the lifespan (3-96 years old). Critically, we present and validate a methodology for harmonizing this pooled dataset in the presence of nonlinear age trends. We provide a web-based visualization interface to generate and present the resulting age trends, enabling future studies of brain structure to compare their data with this reference of brain development and aging, and to examine deviations from ranges, potentially related to disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Pomponio
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Guray Erus
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohamad Habes
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jimit Doshi
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dhivya Srinivasan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mamourian
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vishnu Bashyam
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ilya M Nasrallah
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Yong Fan
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lenore J Launer
- Laboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, National Institute on Aging, USA
| | - Colin L Masters
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul Maruff
- Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chuanjun Zhuo
- Tianjin Mental Health Center, Nankai University Affiliated Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China; Department of Psychiatry, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Henry Völzke
- Institute for Community Medicine, University of Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sterling C Johnson
- Wisconsin Alzheimer's Institute, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, USA
| | - Jurgen Fripp
- CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Australian e-Health Research Centre CSIRO, Australia
| | - Nikolaos Koutsouleris
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel H Wolf
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raquel Gur
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ruben Gur
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, USA
| | - Marilyn S Albert
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Hans J Grabe
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University, Germany
| | - Susan M Resnick
- Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, USA
| | - R Nick Bryan
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, USA
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Haochang Shou
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Center for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Schick U, Lucia F, Dissaux G, Visvikis D, Badic B, Masson I, Pradier O, Bourbonne V, Hatt M. MRI-derived radiomics: methodology and clinical applications in the field of pelvic oncology. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190105. [PMID: 31538516 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Personalized medicine aims at offering optimized treatment options and improved survival for cancer patients based on individual variability. The success of precision medicine depends on robust biomarkers. Recently, the requirement for improved non-biologic biomarkers that reflect tumor biology has emerged and there has been a growing interest in the automatic extraction of quantitative features from medical images, denoted as radiomics. Radiomics as a methodological approach can be applied to any image and most studies have focused on PET, CT, ultrasound, and MRI. Here, we aim to present an overview of the radiomics workflow as well as the major challenges with special emphasis on the use of multiparametric MRI datasets. We then reviewed recent studies on radiomics in the field of pelvic oncology including prostate, cervical, and colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Schick
- Radiation Oncology department, University Hospital, Brest, France.,LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France.,Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France
| | - François Lucia
- Radiation Oncology department, University Hospital, Brest, France.,LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France
| | - Gurvan Dissaux
- Radiation Oncology department, University Hospital, Brest, France.,LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France.,Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France
| | - Dimitris Visvikis
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France
| | - Bogdan Badic
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France.,Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - Ingrid Masson
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France
| | - Olivier Pradier
- Radiation Oncology department, University Hospital, Brest, France.,LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France.,Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France
| | - Vincent Bourbonne
- Radiation Oncology department, University Hospital, Brest, France.,LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France
| | - Mathieu Hatt
- LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, ISBAM, UBO, UBL, Brest, France
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Zhao F, Wu Z, Wang L, Lin W, Xia S, Shen D, Li G. Harmonization of Infant Cortical Thickness Using Surface-to-Surface Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks. MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION : MICCAI ... INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION 2019; 11767:475-483. [PMID: 32128523 PMCID: PMC7052700 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32251-9_52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Increasing multi-site infant neuroimaging datasets are facilitating the research on understanding early brain development with larger sample size and bigger statistical power. However, a joint analysis of cortical properties (e.g., cortical thickness) is unavoidably facing the problem of non-biological variance introduced by differences in MRI scanners. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose cycle-consistent adversarial networks based on spherical cortical surface to harmonize cortical thickness maps between different scanners. We combine the spherical U-Net and CycleGAN to construct a surface-to-surface CycleGAN (S2SGAN). Specifically, we model the harmonization from scanner X to scanner Y as a surface-to-surface translation task. The first goal of harmonization is to learn a mapping G X : X → Y such that the distribution of surface thickness maps from G X (X) is indistinguishable from Y. Since this mapping is highly under-constrained, with the second goal of harmonization to preserve individual differences, we utilize the inverse mapping G Y : Y → X and the cycle consistency loss to enforce G Y (G X (X)) ≈ X (and vice versa). Furthermore, we incorporate the correlation coefficient loss to guarantee the structure consistency between the original and the generated surface thickness maps. Quantitative evaluation on both synthesized and real infant cortical data demonstrates the superior ability of our method in removing unwanted scanner effects and preserving individual differences simultaneously, compared to the state-of-the-art methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenqiang Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Zhengwang Wu
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Weili Lin
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shunren Xia
- Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dinggang Shen
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gang Li
- Department of Radiology and BRIC, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Dallmeier JD, Meysami S, Merrill DA, Raji CA. Emerging advances of in vivo detection of chronic traumatic encephalopathy and traumatic brain injury. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180925. [PMID: 31287716 PMCID: PMC6732918 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disorder that is of epidemic proportions in contact sports athletes and is linked to subconcussive and concussive repetitive head impacts (RHI). Although postmortem analysis is currently the only confirmatory method to diagnose CTE, there has been progress in early detection techniques of fluid biomarkers as well as in advanced neuroimaging techniques. Specifically, promising new methods of diffusion MRI and radionucleotide PET scans could aid in the early detection of CTE.The authors examine early detection methods focusing on various neuroimaging techniques. Advances in structural and diffusion MRI have demonstrated the ability to measure volumetric and white matter abnormalities associated with CTE. Recent studies using radionucleotides such as flortaucipir and 18F-FDDNP have shown binding patterns that are consistent with the four stages of neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) distribution postmortem. Additional research undertakings focusing on fMRI, MR spectroscopy, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and singlephoton emission CT are also discussed as are advanced MRI methods such as diffusiontensor imaging and arterial spin labeled. Neuroimaging is fast becoming a key instrument in early detection and could prove essential for CTE quantification. This review explores a global approach to in vivo early detection.Limited data of in vivo CTE biomarkers with postmortem confirmation are available. While some data exist, they are limited by selection bias. It is unlikely that a single test will be sufficient to properly diagnosis and distinguish CTE from other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease or Frontotemporal Dementia. However, with a combination of fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging, and genetic testing, early detection may become possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian D. Dallmeier
- Department of Neuroscience, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Somayeh Meysami
- Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - David A. Merrill
- Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Pacific Brain Health Center, UCLA and Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Cyrus A. Raji
- Radiology, Washington University Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Tax CM, Grussu F, Kaden E, Ning L, Rudrapatna U, John Evans C, St-Jean S, Leemans A, Koppers S, Merhof D, Ghosh A, Tanno R, Alexander DC, Zappalà S, Charron C, Kusmia S, Linden DE, Jones DK, Veraart J. Cross-scanner and cross-protocol diffusion MRI data harmonisation: A benchmark database and evaluation of algorithms. Neuroimage 2019; 195:285-299. [PMID: 30716459 PMCID: PMC6556555 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion MRI is being used increasingly in studies of the brain and other parts of the body for its ability to provide quantitative measures that are sensitive to changes in tissue microstructure. However, inter-scanner and inter-protocol differences are known to induce significant measurement variability, which in turn jeopardises the ability to obtain 'truly quantitative measures' and challenges the reliable combination of different datasets. Combining datasets from different scanners and/or acquired at different time points could dramatically increase the statistical power of clinical studies, and facilitate multi-centre research. Even though careful harmonisation of acquisition parameters can reduce variability, inter-protocol differences become almost inevitable with improvements in hardware and sequence design over time, even within a site. In this work, we present a benchmark diffusion MRI database of the same subjects acquired on three distinct scanners with different maximum gradient strength (40, 80, and 300 mT/m), and with 'standard' and 'state-of-the-art' protocols, where the latter have higher spatial and angular resolution. The dataset serves as a useful testbed for method development in cross-scanner/cross-protocol diffusion MRI harmonisation and quality enhancement. Using the database, we compare the performance of five different methods for estimating mappings between the scanners and protocols. The results show that cross-scanner harmonisation of single-shell diffusion data sets can reduce the variability between scanners, and highlight the promises and shortcomings of today's data harmonisation techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Mw Tax
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
| | - Francesco Grussu
- Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Enrico Kaden
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lipeng Ning
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Umesh Rudrapatna
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - C John Evans
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel St-Jean
- Image Sciences Institute, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander Leemans
- Image Sciences Institute, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Simon Koppers
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States; Institute of Imaging & Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Dorit Merhof
- Institute of Imaging & Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Aurobrata Ghosh
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ryutaro Tanno
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Machine Intelligence and Perception Group, Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel C Alexander
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stefano Zappalà
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Cyril Charron
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Slawomir Kusmia
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - David Ej Linden
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Derek K Jones
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jelle Veraart
- New York University, New York, NY, United States; imec-Vision Lab, Department of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Lock C, Kwok J, Kumar S, Ahmad-Annuar A, Narayanan V, Ng ASL, Tan YJ, Kandiah N, Tan EK, Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD, Keong NC. DTI Profiles for Rapid Description of Cohorts at the Clinical-Research Interface. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 5:357. [PMID: 30687707 PMCID: PMC6335243 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a syndrome comprising gait disturbance, cognitive decline and urinary incontinence that is an unique model of reversible brain injury, but it presents as a challenging spectrum of disease cohorts. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), with its ability to interrogate structural white matter patterns at a microarchitectural level, is a potentially useful tool for the confirmation and characterization of disease cohorts at the clinical-research interface. However, obstacles to its widespread use involve the need for consistent DTI analysis and interpretation tools across collaborator sites. We present the use of DTI profiles, a simplistic methodology to interpret white matter injury patterns based on the morphology of diffusivity parameters. We examined 13 patients with complex NPH, i.e., patients with NPH and overlay from multiple comorbidities, including vascular risk burden and neurodegenerative disease, undergoing extended CSF drainage, clinical assessments, and multi-modal MR imaging. Following appropriate exclusions, we compared the morphology of DTI profiles in such complex NPH patients (n = 12, comprising 4 responders and 8 non-responders) to exemplar DTI profiles from a cohort of classic NPH patients (n = 16) demonstrating responsiveness of white matter injury to ventriculo-peritoneal shunting. In the cohort of complex NPH patients, mean age was 71.3 ± 7.6 years (10 males, 2 females) with a mean MMSE score of 21.1. There were 5 age-matched healthy controls, mean age was 73.4 ± 7.2 years (1 male, 4 females) and mean MMSE score was 26.8. In the exemplar cohort of classic NPH patients, mean age was 74.7 ± 5.9 years (10 males, 6 females) and mean MMSE score was 24.1. There were 9 age-matched healthy controls, mean age was 69.4 ± 9.7 years (4 males, 5 females) and mean MMSE score was 28.6. We found that, despite the challenges of acquiring DTI metrics from differing scanners across collaborator sites and NPH patients presenting as differing cohorts along the spectrum of disease, DTI profiles for responsiveness to interventions were comparable. Distinct DTI characteristics were demonstrated for complex NPH responders vs. non-responders. The morphology of DTI profiles for complex NPH responders mimicked DTI patterns found in predominantly shunt-responsive patients undergoing intervention for classic NPH. However, DTI profiles for complex NPH non-responders was suggestive of atrophy. Our findings suggest that it is possible to use DTI profiles to provide a methodology for rapid description of differing cohorts of disease at the clinical-research interface. By describing DTI measures morphologically, it was possible to consistently compare white matter injury patterns across international collaborator datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Lock
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Janell Kwok
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sumeet Kumar
- Department of Neuroradiology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Azlina Ahmad-Annuar
- Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Vairavan Narayanan
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Adeline S L Ng
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yi Jayne Tan
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nagaendran Kandiah
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eng-King Tan
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zofia Czosnyka
- Neurosurgical Division, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marek Czosnyka
- Neurosurgical Division, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - John D Pickard
- Neurosurgical Division, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nicole C Keong
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|