51
|
Chou VB, Stegmuller A, Vaughan K, Spiegel PB. The Humanitarian Lives Saved Tool: An evidence-based approach for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health program planning in humanitarian settings. J Glob Health 2022; 11:03102. [PMID: 35003707 PMCID: PMC8709894 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.11.03102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria B Chou
- Institute for International Programs, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Angela Stegmuller
- Institute for International Programs, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Paul B Spiegel
- Johns Hopkins Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Abbara A, Rayes D, Ekzayez A, Jabbour S, Marzouk M, Alnahhas H, Basha S, Katurji Z, Sullivan R, Fouad FM. The health of internally displaced people in Syria: are current systems fit for purpose? J Migr Health 2022; 6:100126. [PMID: 35942086 PMCID: PMC9356202 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
At 6.7 million, Syria has the largest number of internally displaced people globally. Health of IDPs in Syria is often not disaggregated from that of other populations. IDPs face intersecting vulnerabilities and social determinants which impact health. Syria's fragmented health system results in different system responses for IDPs. The evidence base on IDP health in Syria is weak and requires strengthening.
Introduction: Syria has the largest number of internally displaced people (IDPs) globally with 6.7 million forced from their homes since the uprising erupted in 2011. Most face multiple intersecting vulnerabilities with adverse health impacts. We explore the key health concerns among IDPs, how the various health systems in Syria have responded to the dynamic health needs of IDPs and what modalities have been used by humanitarian actors to address these needs. Methods: We undertook a scoping review of academic and grey literature for available evidence regarding the health of IDPs in Syria. We then organised an online workshop in November 2021 with around 30 participants who represent local, regional, and international organisations and who have relevant expertise. The discussion focused on how the health systems in Syria's various territories have responded to the health needs of IDPs, what this means to the structure and dynamics of these health systems and their intended outcomes and responsiveness. Findings: These emphasised the weak evidence base around IDP health in Syria, particularly in certain geographical areas. Workshop participants explored the applicability of the term IDP in the Syrian context given the fragmented health system and its impact on IDPs, the importance of considering co-determinants (beyond forced displacement) on the health of IDPs and taking a transectoral, community led approach to identify and respond to needs. Conclusion: This manuscript presents some of the current issues with regards to IDP health in Syria, however, there remain numerous unknowns, both for the health of IDP as well as non-IDP populations. We hope that it will be the foundation for further discussions on practical steps relating to research, analysis and interventions which can support health system responses for IDPs in Syria.
Collapse
|
53
|
van Daalen KR, Dada S, James R, Ashworth HC, Khorsand P, Lim J, Mooney C, Khankan Y, Essar MY, Kuhn I, Juillard H, Blanchet K. Impact of conditional and unconditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in humanitarian settings: a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:e007902. [PMID: 35078813 PMCID: PMC8796230 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cash transfers, payments provided by formal or informal institutions to recipients, are increasingly used in emergencies. While increasing autonomy and being supportive of local economies, cash transfers are a cost-effective method in some settings to cover basic needs and extend benefits of limited humanitarian aid budgets. Yet, the extent to which cash transfers impact health in humanitarian settings remains largely unexplored. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the effect of cash transfers on health outcomes and health service utilisation in humanitarian contexts. METHODS Studies eligible for inclusion were peer reviewed (quantitative,qualitative and mixed-methods). Nine databases (PubMed, EMBAS, Medline, CINAHL, Global Health, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO and LiLACS) were searched without language and without a lower bound time restriction through 24 February 2021. The search was updated to include articles published through 8 December 2021. Data were extracted using a piloted extraction tool and quality was assessed using The Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes, results were synthesised narratively and no meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS 30 673 records were identified. After removing duplicates, 17 715 were double screened by abstract and title, and 201 in full text. Twenty-three articles from 16 countries were included reporting on nutrition outcomes, psychosocial and mental health, general/subjective health and well-being, acute illness (eg, diarrhoea, respiratory infection), diabetes control (eg, blood glucose self-monitoring, haemoglobin A1C levels) and gender-based violence. Nineteen studies reported some positive impacts on various health outcomes and use of health services, 11 reported no statistically significant impact on outcomes assessed and 4 reported potential negative impacts on health outcomes. DISCUSSION Although there is evidence to suggest a positive relationship between cash transfers and health outcomes in humanitarian settings, high-quality empirical evidence, that is methodologically robust, investigates a range of humanitarian settings and is conducted over longer time periods is needed. This should consider factors influencing programme implementation and the differential impact of cash transfers designed to improve health versus multipurpose cash transfers. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021237275.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Robin van Daalen
- Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sara Dada
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rosemary James
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | | | | | - Jiewon Lim
- School of Medicine, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ciaran Mooney
- Northern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency, Belfast, Antrim, UK
| | - Yasmeen Khankan
- Department of Biology, Siena Heights University, Adrian, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Isla Kuhn
- Medical Library, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Helene Juillard
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Karl Blanchet
- Global Health Development, University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Geneve, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Hossain MA, Dawson A. A Systematic review of sexual and reproductive health needs, experiences, access to services, and interventions among the rohingya and the afghan refugee women of reproductive age in Asia. WHO South East Asia J Public Health 2022; 11:42-53. [PMID: 36308272 DOI: 10.4103/who-seajph.who-seajph_144_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 9.2 million refugees live in Asia, with most originating from Afghanistan and Myanmar, and half of them are women, girls, and children. Humanitarian crises disrupt the existing health-care system, limiting access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. This review explores the SRH status of Afghan and Rohingya refugee women of reproductive age in Asia and their needs and experiences in accessing these services and commodities. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used the PRISMA checklist and searched for qualitative and quantitative peer-reviewed studies from five online bibliographic databases, SCOPUS, EMBASE (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, and PROQUEST, from January 2000 to April 2021. Content analysis was undertaken following the minimum initial service package objectives. RESULTS Fifteen studies were included in this review from four countries: Bangladesh (5), Pakistan (5), Iran (4), and Malaysia (1). Approximately 50.91% of Rohingya and 54% of Afghan refugee women used contraceptives. About 56.6% of Afghan refugee mothers experienced pregnancy-related complications, one-third received antenatal care, and low birth weight was 2.6 times higher among infants born to Afghan refugee mothers than to Pakistani-born mothers. One out of five Rohingya women received delivery-related care. Approximately 72% of Rohingya and 79.8% of Afghan refugee women had experienced gender-based violence, and 56.5% of Rohingya women engaged in unwanted sexual intercourse with their husbands. CONCLUSION Social norms, stigma, cultural values, distrust of providers, inadequate staff, and prohibition by family members limit their access to SRH services and influence their needs, knowledge, and perceptions regarding SRH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Anwar Hossain
- Department of Sociology, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh; Western Sydney Sexual Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Angela Dawson
- Professor, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Akik C, Asfahani F, Elghossain T, Mesmar S, Rabkin M, El Sadr W, Fouad FM, Ghattas H. Healthcare system responses to non-communicable diseases’ needs of Syrian refugees: The cases of Jordan and Lebanon. J Migr Health 2022; 6:100136. [PMID: 36148323 PMCID: PMC9486618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Hosting governments were moderately successful in providing health services to Syrian refugees through existing national health systems. Coverage and quality of care remain suboptimal and continuity is often interrupted due to inadequate implementation of national NCD guidelines, major government policy changes and UNHCR policy changes in cost sharing, eligibility, and vulnerability criteria which made the health system difficult to navigate. The latter are related to the lack of financing for NCDs at global level. There is a need for evidence-based guidelines and effective implementation models for continued NCD care in protracted emergency settings. Innovative financing solutions and increased advocacy for funding and prioritization of NCD care for refugees need to be envisioned. Strengthening existing national health systems and striving for equity in achieving universal health coverage for both nationals of host countries and refugees is imperative.
Introduction Since the start of the Syrian conflict in 2011, Jordan and Lebanon have hosted large refugee populations, with a high pre-conflict burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). We aimed to explore NCD service provision to Syrian refugees in these two host countries and to identify lessons learned that may inform the global response to the changing health needs of refugees. Methods Between January 2017 and June 2018, we conducted 36 in-depth interviews with stakeholders from Jordan and Lebanon, as well as global stakeholders, to understand the context, the achievements, gaps and priorities in the provision and uptake of NCD prevention, testing and treatment services to Syrian refugees. Findings Both countries succeeded in embedding refugee health care within national health systems, yet coverage and quality of NCD health services offered to Syrian refugees in both contexts were affected by under-funding and consequent policy constraints. Changes in policies relating to cost sharing, eligibility and vulnerability criteria led to difficulties navigating the system and increased out-of-pocket payments for Syrians. Funding shortages were reported as a key barrier to NCD screening, diagnosis and management, including at the primary care level and referral from primary to secondary healthcare, particularly in Lebanon. These barriers were compounded by suboptimal implementation of NCD guidelines and high workloads for healthcare providers resulting from the large numbers of refugees. Conclusions Despite the extraordinary efforts made by host countries, provision and continuity of high quality NCD services at scale remains a tremendous challenge given ongoing funding shortfalls and lack of prioritization of NCD care for refugees. The development of innovative, effective and sustainable solutions is necessary to counter the threat of NCDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaza Akik
- Center for Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Farah Asfahani
- Center for Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tatiana Elghossain
- Center for Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Sandra Mesmar
- Center for Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Miriam Rabkin
- ICAP, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, United States
| | - Wafaa El Sadr
- ICAP, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, United States
| | - Fouad M. Fouad
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hala Ghattas
- Center for Research on Population and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Chirgwin H, Cairncross S, Zehra D, Sharma Waddington H. Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2021; 17:e1194. [PMID: 36951806 PMCID: PMC8988822 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Background Lack of access to and use of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) cause 1.6 million deaths every year, of which 1.2 million are due to gastrointestinal illnesses like diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections like pneumonia. Poor WASH access and use also diminish nutrition and educational attainment, and cause danger and stress for vulnerable populations, especially for women and girls. The hardest hit regions are sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 calls for the end of open defecation, and universal access to safely managed water and sanitation facilities, and basic hand hygiene, by 2030. WASH access and use also underpin progress in other areas such as SDG1 poverty targets, SDG3 health and SDG4 education targets. Meeting the SDG equity agenda to "leave none behind" will require WASH providers prioritise the hardest to reach including those living remotely and people who are disadvantaged. Objectives Decision makers need access to high-quality evidence on what works in WASH promotion in different contexts, and for different groups of people, to reach the most disadvantaged populations and thereby achieve universal targets. The WASH evidence map is envisioned as a tool for commissioners and researchers to identify existing studies to fill synthesis gaps, as well as helping to prioritise new studies where there are gaps in knowledge. It also supports policymakers and practitioners to navigate the evidence base, including presenting critically appraised findings from existing systematic reviews. Methods This evidence map presents impact evaluations and systematic reviews from the WASH sector, organised according to the types of intervention mechanisms, WASH technologies promoted, and outcomes measured. It is based on a framework of intervention mechanisms (e.g., behaviour change triggering or microloans) and outcomes along the causal pathway, specifically behavioural outcomes (e.g., handwashing and food hygiene practices), ill-health outcomes (e.g., diarrhoeal morbidity and mortality), nutrition and socioeconomic outcomes (e.g., school absenteeism and household income). The map also provides filters to examine the evidence for a particular WASH technology (e.g., latrines), place of use (e.g., home, school or health facility), location (e.g., global region, country, rural and urban) and group (e.g., people living with disability). Systematic searches for published and unpublished literature and trial registries were conducted of studies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Searches were conducted in March 2018, and searches for completed trials were done in May 2020. Coding of information for the map was done by two authors working independently. Impact evaluations were critically appraised according to methods of conduct and reporting. Systematic reviews were critically appraised using a new approach to assess theory-based, mixed-methods evidence synthesis. Results There has been an enormous growth in impact evaluations and systematic reviews of WASH interventions since the International Year of Sanitation, 2008. There are now at least 367 completed or ongoing rigorous impact evaluations in LMICs, nearly three-quarters of which have been conducted since 2008, plus 43 systematic reviews. Studies have been done in 83 LMICs, with a high concentration in Bangladesh, India, and Kenya. WASH sector programming has increasingly shifted in focus from what technology to supply (e.g., a handwashing station or child's potty), to the best way in which to do so to promote demand. Research also covers a broader set of intervention mechanisms. For example, there has been increased interest in behaviour change communication using psychosocial "triggering", such as social marketing and community-led total sanitation. These studies report primarily on behavioural outcomes. With the advent of large-scale funding, in particular by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, there has been a substantial increase in the number of studies on sanitation technologies, particularly latrines. Sustaining behaviour is fundamental for sustaining health and other quality of life improvements. However, few studies have been done of intervention mechanisms for, or measuring outcomes on sustained adoption of latrines to stop open defaecation. There has also been some increase in the number of studies looking at outcomes and interventions that disproportionately affect women and girls, who quite literally carry most of the burden of poor water and sanitation access. However, most studies do not report sex disaggregated outcomes, let alone integrate gender analysis into their framework. Other vulnerable populations are even less addressed; no studies eligible for inclusion in the map were done of interventions targeting, or reporting on outcomes for, people living with disabilities. We were only able to find a single controlled evaluation of WASH interventions in a health care facility, in spite of the importance of WASH in health facilities in global policy debates. The quality of impact evaluations has improved, such as the use of controlled designs as standard, attention to addressing reporting biases, and adequate cluster sample size. However, there remain important concerns about quality of reporting. The quality and usefulness of systematic reviews for policy is also improving, which draw clearer distinctions between intervention mechanisms and synthesise the evidence on outcomes along the causal pathway. Adopting mixed-methods approaches also provides information for programmes on barriers and enablers affecting implementation. Conclusion Ensuring everyone has access to appropriate water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities is one of the most fundamental of challenges for poverty elimination. Researchers and funders need to consider carefully where there is the need for new primary evidence, and new syntheses of that evidence. This study suggests the following priority areas:Impact evaluations incorporating understudied outcomes, such as sustainability and slippage, of WASH provision in understudied places of use, such as health care facilities, and of interventions targeting, or presenting disaggregated data for, vulnerable populations, particularly over the life-course and for people living with a disability;Improved reporting in impact evaluations, including presentation of participant flow diagrams; andSynthesis studies and updates in areas with sufficient existing and planned impact evaluations, such as for diarrhoea mortality, ARIs, WASH in schools and decentralisation. These studies will preferably be conducted as mixed-methods systematic reviews that are able to answer questions about programme targeting, implementation, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and compare alternative intervention mechanisms to achieve and sustain outcomes in particular contexts, preferably using network meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Chirgwin
- International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)London International Development CentreLondonUK
| | | | | | - Hugh Sharma Waddington
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)London International Development CentreLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Whittaker G, Wood GA, Oggero G, Kett M, Lange K. Meeting AT needs in humanitarian crises: The current state of provision. Assist Technol 2021; 33:3-16. [PMID: 34951828 DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2021.1934612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Humanitarian coordination systems increasingly recognize and aim to respond to the needs of people with disabilities within populations affected by crises, spurred on by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) which was adopted in 2006. Many agencies state their aim to meet the requirements of the CRPD using a "twin track" approach: ensuring the inclusion of people with disabilities in mainstream provision, alongside targeted support for their needs, which may include the need for Assistive Technology (AT). However, there is very little evidence of AT provision in humanitarian settings, which is a specific and urgent need for many people including the elderly and people with disabilities, and an implicit requirement of Article 11 of the CRPD and World Health Assembly resolution on improving access to assistive technology. There is also little evidence of effective mechanisms for AT provision in humanitarian settings. This is despite high and growing levels of unmet AT need in crises, and despite the legally binding requirement in the CRPD to provide AT for those who need it. AT provision faces unique challenges in humanitarian settings. This paper discusses the evidence available in the literature for the scale and quality of AT provision interventions in crises, and what is known about the challenges and facilitators of provision. We conducted a search of the academic literature and retained literature that reported on any form of AT provision following crisis, where international humanitarian response was in place, published in English between January 2010 and June 2020. We found very few examples in that academic literature of systematic and coordinated AT provision at the acute stage of crisis, and even less in the preparedness and post-acute stages. However, it is difficult to assess whether this is the result of insufficient academic attention or reflects a lack of provision. The small body of academic literature that describes AT provision in humanitarian settings paints a picture of small-scale provision, specialized to single types of impairments, and delivered by predominantly by NGOs. We also conducted a search of the gray literature, using the same inclusion criteria, in two countries: Afghanistan and South Sudan (case studies forthcoming). This gray literature provided supplementary evidence of the types of AT providers and AT provision available in those protracted crises. There are very few examples of how AT services can be scaled up (from a very low baseline) and maintained sustainably within a strengthened health system. The literature also describes more examples of provision of assistive products for mobility over assistive products for other impairments. If the paucity of literature on AT provision in humanitarian settings is a reflection of the scale of provision, this implies a deficiency in humanitarian response when it comes to providing people with AT needs with the essential products and services to which they have a right, and which will enable their access to basic, life-saving assistance. We conclude by providing recommendations for urgent actions that the AT and humanitarian community must take to fill this critical gap in the provision of essential products and services for a potentially marginalized and excluded group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Golnaz Whittaker
- Humanitarian Section, UNICEF Office of Research Innocenti, Florence, Italy
| | - Gavin Adam Wood
- Humanitarian Section, UNICEF Office of Research Innocenti, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Oggero
- Access to Assistive Technology and Medical Devices Unit, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Kett
- Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, UCL, London; and Global Disability Innovation Hub, London, UK
| | - Kirstin Lange
- Disability Section, Programme Division, UNICEF, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Odlum A, James R, Mahieu A, Blanchet K, Altare C, Singh N, Spiegel P. Use of COVID-19 evidence in humanitarian settings: the need for dynamic guidance adapted to changing humanitarian crisis contexts. Confl Health 2021; 15:83. [PMID: 34798877 PMCID: PMC8602975 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-021-00418-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For humanitarian organisations to respond effectively to complex crises, they require access to up-to-date evidence-based guidance. The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the importance of updating global guidance to context-specific and evolving needs in humanitarian settings. Our study aimed to understand the use of evidence-based guidance in humanitarian responses during COVID-19. Primary data collected during the rapidly evolving pandemic sheds new light on evidence-use processes in humanitarian response. METHODS We collected and analysed COVID-19 guidance documents, and conducted semi-structured interviews remotely with a variety of humanitarian organisations responding and adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform, a website established by three universities in March 2020, to solicit, collate and document these experiences and knowledge. RESULTS We analysed 131 guidance documents and conducted 80 interviews with humanitarian organisations, generating 61 published field experiences. Although COVID-19 guidance was quickly developed and disseminated in the initial phases of the crisis (from January to May 2020), updates or ongoing revision of the guidance has been limited. Interviews conducted between April and September 2020 showed that humanitarian organisations have responded to COVID-19 in innovative and context-specific ways, but have often had to adapt existing guidance to inform their operations in complex humanitarian settings. CONCLUSIONS Experiences from the field indicate that humanitarian organisations consulted guidance to respond and adapt to COVID-19, but whether referring to available guidance indicates evidence use depends on its accessibility, coherence, contextual relevance and trustworthiness. Feedback loops through online platforms like the COVID-19 Humanitarian platform that relay details of these evidence-use processes to global guidance setters could improve future humanitarian response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Odlum
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Boulevard du Pont-d'Arve 28, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Rosemary James
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Boulevard du Pont-d'Arve 28, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Audrey Mahieu
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Boulevard du Pont-d'Arve 28, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Karl Blanchet
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Boulevard du Pont-d'Arve 28, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Altare
- Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Neha Singh
- Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Paul Spiegel
- Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Barth CA, Donovan-Hall M, Blake C, Jahan Akhtar N, Capo-Chichi JM, O’Sullivan C. A Focus Group Study to Understand the Perspectives of Physiotherapists on Barriers and Facilitators to Advancing Rehabilitation in Low-Resource and Conflict Settings. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:12020. [PMID: 34831772 PMCID: PMC8620760 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Physiotherapy as a health profession is continuously evolving in high-income countries (HIC). The highest burden of disease globally, however, is in low-resource and conflict contexts (LR-CC), resulting in unmet rehabilitation needs. Rehabilitation service models from HIC often face challenges when applied to the fragile health systems of LR-CC. It is important to engage rehabilitation experts living and working in LR-CC to guide service development. This study aims to understand physiotherapists' views and perspectives of current rehabilitation services, of how these services can be strengthened over the next 10 years and of the role of physiotherapy within this development. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 31 physiotherapists from 18 LR-CC using English as a common language. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was guided by thematic analysis. Participants provided deep insights into the complexity of developing rehabilitation services within fragile health systems. Participants agreed that physiotherapy lacked recognition and resources to be utilised effectively. Interacting themes as crucial prerequisites for strengthening the sector included (1) significance of context, (2) professional identity, and (3) professionalisation supported by workforce development and advocacy. These results are an important evidence base for informing the development of rehabilitation programmes in LR-CC and for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Anne Barth
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin (UCD), Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland; (C.B.); (C.O.)
- Cochrane Switzerland, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maggie Donovan-Hall
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK;
| | - Catherine Blake
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin (UCD), Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland; (C.B.); (C.O.)
| | - Noor Jahan Akhtar
- Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1343, Bangladesh;
| | - Joseph Martial Capo-Chichi
- Centre de Dépistage et de Traitement de L’ulcère de Buruli d’Allada, Ministry of Health, Allada BP 03, Benin;
| | - Cliona O’Sullivan
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin (UCD), Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland; (C.B.); (C.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Cantor D, Swartz J, Roberts B, Abbara A, Ager A, Bhutta ZA, Blanchet K, Madoro Bunte D, Chukwuorji JC, Daoud N, Ekezie W, Jimenez-Damary C, Jobanputra K, Makhashvili N, Rayes D, Restrepo-Espinosa MH, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Salami B, Smith J. Understanding the health needs of internally displaced persons: A scoping review. J Migr Health 2021; 4:100071. [PMID: 34820657 PMCID: PMC8600058 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2021.100071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
We seek to strengthen understanding of the health needs of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in contexts of conflict or violence. Based upon a scoping review, our paper identified limited evidence on IDP health, but nevertheless indicates that IDPs tend to experience worse health outcomes than other conflict-affected populations across a range of health issues; and this is due to the particularly vulnerable situation of IDPs relative to these other populations, including reduced access to health services. Further research is required to better understand these needs and the interventions that can most effectively address these needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cantor
- Internal Displacement Research Programme, School of Advanced Study, University of London, UK
| | | | - Bayard Roberts
- Health Services Research and Policy Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Aula Abbara
- Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK; Syria Public Health Network
| | - Alastair Ager
- Institute for Global Health & Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, USA
| | | | - Karl Blanchet
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Nihaya Daoud
- Department of Public Health, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | - Diana Rayes
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA
| | | | - Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales
- Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Fundacion Universitaria Autónoma de las Americas, Colombia
- Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Peru
| | | | - James Smith
- Elrha; Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
D'Mello-Guyett L, Cumming O, Bonneville S, D'hondt R, Mashako M, Nakoka B, Gorski A, Verheyen D, Van den Bergh R, Welo PO, Maes P, Checchi F. Effectiveness of hygiene kit distribution to reduce cholera transmission in Kasaï-Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo, 2018: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050943. [PMID: 34649847 PMCID: PMC8522665 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Household contacts of cholera cases are at a greater risk of Vibrio cholerae infection than the general population. There is currently no agreed standard of care for household contacts, despite their high risk of infection, in cholera response strategies. In 2018, hygiene kit distribution and health promotion was recommended by Médecins Sans Frontières for admitted patients and accompanying household members on admission to a cholera treatment unit in the Democratic Republic of Congo. METHODS To investigate the effectiveness of the intervention and risk factors for cholera infection, we conducted a prospective cohort study and followed household contacts for 7 days after patient admission. Clinical surveillance among household contacts was based on self-reported symptoms of cholera and diarrhoea, and environmental surveillance through the collection and analysis of food and water samples. RESULTS From 94 eligible households, 469 household contacts were enrolled and 444 completed follow-up. Multivariate analysis suggested evidence of a dose-response relationship with increased kit use associated with decreased relative risk of suspected cholera: household contacts in the high kit-use group had a 66% lower incidence of suspected cholera (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.03, p=0.055), the mid-use group had a 53% lower incidence (aRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.29, p=1.44) and low-use group had 22% lower incidence (aRR 0.78, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.53, p=0.684), compared with household contacts without a kit. Drinking water contamination was significantly reduced among households in receipt of a kit. There was no significant effect on self-reported diarrhoea or food contamination. CONCLUSION The integration of a hygiene kit intervention to case-households may be effective in reducing cholera transmission among household contacts and environmental contamination within the household. Further work is required to evaluate whether other proactive localised distribution among patients and case-households or to households surrounding cholera cases can be used in future cholera response programmes in emergency contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D'Mello-Guyett
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Oliver Cumming
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
62
|
Christy S, Siriwardhana C, Lohmann J, Roberts B, Smith S. Quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. J Migr Health 2021; 4:100068. [PMID: 34901899 PMCID: PMC8640451 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2021.100068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate measurement of mental health disorders in conflict-affected populations is crucial for improving mental health care for these populations. Most studies to develop mental health questionnaires for conflict-affected populations are conducted in high income countries despite the vast majority of conflict-affected populations residing in Low and Middle Income Countries (LAMICs). The aim of this systematic review is to assess the quality of questionnaires for mental disorders that have been either developed or validated in conflict- affected settings in LAMICs. METHODS A systematic review of 5 databases (CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) was conducted to identify validation studies for questionnaires measuring mental health disorders in adult conflict-affected population in LAMICs. Well-established psychometric criteria evaluating reliability, validity and responsiveness of questionnaires were applied for quality appraisal. RESULTS Thirty validation studies were included in this review, which reported on data for 33 questionnaires. Twenty-four were questionnaires that had been originally developed in different settings and adapted for use with a new conflict-affected population and 9 had been newly developed for the conflict-affected population being studied. Overall, there was high variability in the quality of evidence for the questionnaires with moderate evidence for the validity and reliability of included questionnaires but no responsiveness data reported. CONCLUSION There has been increasing recognition of the particular importance of psychometrics in this field to facilitate the development of good quality mental health questionnaires suitable for use in LAMICs. However, this review highlighted the current limited quantity and quality of such questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Christy
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | | | - Julia Lohmann
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK
- Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Bayard Roberts
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Sarah Smith
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Scoping Review on the Impact of Outbreaks on Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: Proposed Frameworks for Pre-, Intra-, and Postoutbreak Situations. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:9989478. [PMID: 34541003 PMCID: PMC8443356 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9989478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Recent experiences from global outbreaks have highlighted the severe disruptions in sexual and reproductive health services that expose women and girls to preventable health risks. Yet, to date, there is no review studying the possible impact of outbreaks on sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Methodology. Studies reporting outbreaks impacting sexual and reproductive health and pregnancy outcomes were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, and ISI-WoS. Reported impacts were reviewed at systems, community, and legislative levels. Results The initial run listed 4423 studies; the 37 studies that met all inclusion criteria were mainly from Latin America and Africa. Studies on outbreaks of diseases like Zika and Ebola have documented declines in facility-based deliveries, contraceptive use, and antenatal and institutional care due to burdened healthcare system. Service usage was also impacted by a lack of trust in the healthcare system and system shocks, including workforce capacity and availability. At the community level, poverty and lack of awareness were critical contributors to poor access to SRH services. Assessing the target population's knowledge, attitude, beliefs, and behavior and using health literacy principles for communication were fundamental for designing service delivery. Online resources for SRH services were an acceptable medium of information among young adults. In outbreak situations, SRH and pregnancy outcomes were improved by implementing laboratory surveillance, free-of-cost contraceptive services, improved screening through professional training, and quality of care. In addition, mobile health clinics were reported to be effective in remote areas. Knowledge Contribution. In outbreaks, the interventions are categorized into preoutbreak, during, and postoutbreak periods. The proposed steps can help to improve and do course correction in emergencies. Though conducted before the COVID-19 crisis, the authors believe that lessons can be drawn from the paper to understand and mitigate the impact of the pandemic on sexual and reproductive health services.
Collapse
|
64
|
Warsame A, Osman AY. Verbal autopsy to assess child mortality in a humanitarian setting. THE LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2021; 9:e1189-e1190. [DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00290-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
65
|
Participation by conflict-affected and forcibly displaced communities in humanitarian healthcare responses: A systematic review. J Migr Health 2021; 1-2:100026. [PMID: 34405177 PMCID: PMC8352176 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2020.100026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The moderate quantity and quality of evidence indicate benefits from community participation. There was limited evidence on involvement of communities in framing problems or designing solutions. There was inadequate engagement with the construct of community participation and power relations. There was extremely weak evidence on participation by forcibly displaced communities.
Background Community participation in health responses in humanitarian crises is increasingly promoted by humanitarian actors to support adoption of measures that are relevant and effective to local needs. Our aim was to understand the role of community participation in humanitarian health responses for conflict-affected populations (including forcibly displaced populations) in low- and middle-income countries and the barriers and facilitators to community participation in healthcare responses. Methods Using a systematic review methodology, following the PRISMA protocol, we searched four bibliographic databases for publications reporting peer-reviewed primary research. Studies were selected if they reported how conflict-affected populations were involved in healthcare responses in low- and middle-income settings, and associated changes in healthcare responses or health outcomes. We applied descriptive thematic synthesis and assessed study quality using study design-specific appraisal tools. Results Of 18,247 records identified through the database searching, 18 studies met our inclusion criteria. Various types of community participation were observed, with participation mostly involved in implementing interventions rather than framing problems or designing solutions. Most studies on community participation focused on changes in health services (access, utilisation, quality), community acceptability and awareness, and ownership and sustainability. Key barriers and facilitators to community participation included political will at national and local level, ongoing armed conflict, financial and economic factors, socio-cultural dynamics of communities, design of humanitarian responses, health system factors, and health knowledge and beliefs. Included studies were of mixed quality and the overall strength of evidence was weak. More generally there was limited critical engagement with concepts of participation. Conclusion This review highlights the need for more research on more meaningful community participation in healthcare responses in conflict-affected communities, particularly in framing problems and creating solutions. More robust research is also required linking community participation with longer-term individual and health system outcomes, and that critically engages in constructs of community participation.
Collapse
|
66
|
Ekezie W, Myles P, Murray RL, Bains M, Timmons S, Pritchard C. Self-reported diseases and their associated risk factors among camp-dwelling conflict-affected internally displaced populations in Nigeria. J Public Health (Oxf) 2021; 43:e171-e179. [PMID: 32776153 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Conflict in Nigeria displaced millions of people, and some settled in camp-like locations within the country. Evidence on the association between living conditions and health outcomes among these populations are limited. This study investigated the risk factors associated with illnesses among camp-dwelling internally displaced persons (IDPs) in northern Nigeria. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in nine camps in 2016. Self-reported data on socio-demography, resource utilization and disease outcomes were collected. Association between health conditions and various factors, including sanitation and healthcare access, was investigated. Results Data from 2253 IDPs showed 81.1% (CI = 79.5-82.7) experienced one or more health conditions; however, over 20% did not access healthcare services. Most common diseases were malaria, fever, typhoid and diarrhoea. Multivariable logistic regression presented as adjusted odds ratios(aOR) and 95% confidence intervals(CIs) showed factors significantly associated with increased likelihood of illnesses included being female (aOR = 1.53;CI = 1.19-1.96), overcrowding (aOR = 1.07;CI = 1.00-1.36), long-term conditions (aOR = 2.72;CI = 1.88-3.94), outdoor defecation (aOR = 2.37;CI = 1.14-4.94) and presence of disease-causing vectors (aOR = 3.71;CI = 1.60-8.60). Conclusion Most diseases in the camps were communicable. Modifiable risk factors such as overcrowding and poor toilet facilities were associated with increased poor health outcomes. This evidence highlights areas of high priority when planning humanitarian public health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winifred Ekezie
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Puja Myles
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Rachael L Murray
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Manpreet Bains
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Stephen Timmons
- Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK
| | - Catherine Pritchard
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Mucherera B, Spiegel S. Forced displacement: critical lessons in the protracted aftermath of a flood disaster. GEOJOURNAL 2021; 87:3855-3875. [PMID: 34305267 PMCID: PMC8282267 DOI: 10.1007/s10708-021-10471-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Forced displacement and resettlement is a pervasive challenge being contemplated across the social sciences. Scholarly literature, however, often fails to engage complexities of power in understanding socio-environmental interactions in resettlement processes. Addressing Zimbabwe's Tokwe-Mukosi flood disaster resettlement, we explore hegemonic uses of state power during the pre- and post-flood induced resettlement processes. We examine how state power exercised through local government, financial, and security institutions impacts community vulnerabilities during forced resettlement processes, while furthering capitalist agendas, drawing insights from analysing narratives between 2010 and 2021. Concerns abound that multiple ministries, the police, and the army undermined displaced people's resilience, including through inadequate compensation, with state institutions neglecting displaced communities during encampment by inadequately meeting physical security, health, educational, and livestock production needs. We explore how forcibly resettling encamped households to a disputed location is not only an ongoing perceived injustice regionally but also a continuing reference point in resettlement discussions countrywide, reflecting concerns that land use and economic reconfigurations in resettlement can undermine subsistence livelihoods while privileging certain values and interests over others. Policy lessons highlight the need for reviewing disaster management legislation, developing compensation guidelines and reviewing encampment practices. Analytically, lessons point to how state power may be studied in relation to perspectives on the destruction of flood survivors' connections to place, people and livelihoods, underscoring the critical need for theorising the relationships between power dynamics and diverse experiences around displacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blessing Mucherera
- School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Drummond St, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP UK
| | - Samuel Spiegel
- Centre of African Studies School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building, 15a George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9LD UK
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Gallandat K, Jeandron A, Ross I, Mufitini Saidi J, Bashige Rumedeka B, Lumami Kapepula V, Cousens S, Allen E, MacDougall A, Cumming O. The impact of improved water supply on cholera and diarrhoeal diseases in Uvira, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation. Trials 2021; 22:408. [PMID: 34154636 PMCID: PMC8215491 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05249-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diarrhoeal disease remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Cholera alone is estimated to cause 95,000 deaths per year, most of which occur in endemic settings with inadequate water access. Whilst a global strategy to eliminate cholera by 2030 calls for investment in improved drinking water services, there is limited rigorous evidence for the impact of improved water supply on endemic cholera transmission in low-income urban settings. Our protocol is designed to deliver a pragmatic health impact evaluation of a large-scale water supply intervention in Uvira (Democratic Republic of the Congo), a cholera transmission hotspot. METHODS/DESIGN A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SW-CRT) was designed to evaluate the impact of a large-scale drinking water supply intervention on cholera incidence among the 280,000 inhabitants of Uvira. The city was divided into 16 clusters, where new community and household taps will be installed following a randomised sequence over a transition period of up to 8 weeks in each cluster. The primary trial outcomes are the monthly incidence of "confirmed" cholera cases (patients testing positive by rapid detection kit) and of "suspected" cholera cases (patients admitted to the cholera treatment centre). Concurrent process and economic evaluations will provide further information on the context, costs, and efficiency of the intervention. DISCUSSION In this protocol, we describe a pragmatic approach to conducting rigorous research to assess the impacts of a complex water supply intervention on severe diarrhoeal disease and cholera in an unstable, low-resource setting representative of cholera-affected areas. In particular, we discuss a series of pre-identified risks and linked mitigation strategies as well as the value of combining different data collection methods and preparation of multiple analysis scenarios to account for possible deviations from the protocol. The study described here has the potential to provide robust evidence to support more effective cholera control in challenging, high-burden settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02928341 , 10th October 2016) and has received ethics approval from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (8913, 10603) and from the Ethics Committee from the School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (ESP/CE/088/2015).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Gallandat
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Aurélie Jeandron
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ian Ross
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jaime Mufitini Saidi
- Ministère de la Santé Publique, Division Provinciale de la Santé Publique, District Sanitaire d'Uvira, Uvira, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Baron Bashige Rumedeka
- Ministère de la Santé Publique, Division Provinciale de la Santé Publique, District Sanitaire d'Uvira, Uvira, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Vercus Lumami Kapepula
- Department of Hydrology, Centre de Recherche en Hydrobiologie, Uvira, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Simon Cousens
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Allen
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Amy MacDougall
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Oliver Cumming
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Als D, Meteke S, Stefopulos M, Gaffey MF, Kamali M, Munyuzangabo M, Shah S, Jain RP, Radhakrishnan A, Siddiqui FJ, Ataullahjan A, Bhutta ZA. Delivering water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 5:bmjgh-2019-002064. [PMID: 32641288 PMCID: PMC7348465 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Access to safe water and sanitation facilities and the adoption of effective hygiene practices are fundamental to reducing maternal and child morbidity and mortality globally. In armed conflict settings, inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure poses major health risks for women and children. This review aimed to synthesise the existing information on WASH interventions being delivered to women and children in conflict settings in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and to identify the personnel, sites and platforms being used to deliver such interventions. Methods We conducted a systematic search for publications indexed in four databases, and grey literature was searched through the websites of humanitarian agencies and organisations. Eligible publications reported WASH interventions delivered to conflict-affected women or children. We extracted and synthesised information on intervention delivery characteristics, as well as barriers and facilitators. Results We identified 58 eligible publications reporting on the delivery of WASH interventions, mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa. Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)/United Nations (UN) agency staff were reported to be involved in delivering interventions in 62% of publications, with the most commonly reported delivery site being community spaces (50%). Only one publication reported quantitative data on intervention effectiveness among women or children. Discussion This review revealed gaps in the current evidence on WASH intervention delivery in conflict settings. Little information is available on the delivery of water treatment or environmental hygiene interventions, or about the sites and personnel used to deliver WASH interventions. Limited quantitative data on WASH intervention coverage or effectiveness with respect to women or children are important gaps, as multiple factors can affect how WASH services are accessed differently by women and men, and the hygiene needs of adolescent girls and boys differ; these factors must be taken into account when delivering interventions in conflict settings. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019125221
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daina Als
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Meteke
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marianne Stefopulos
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle F Gaffey
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mahdis Kamali
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mariella Munyuzangabo
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shailja Shah
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reena P Jain
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amruta Radhakrishnan
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fahad J Siddiqui
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore
| | - Anushka Ataullahjan
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Alami H, Lehoux P, Fleet R, Fortin JP, Liu J, Attieh R, Cadeddu SBM, Abdoulaye Samri M, Savoldelli M, Ag Ahmed MA. How Can Health Systems Better Prepare for the Next Pandemic? Lessons Learned From the Management of COVID-19 in Quebec (Canada). Front Public Health 2021; 9:671833. [PMID: 34222176 PMCID: PMC8249772 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.671833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic challenged societies around our globalized world. To contain the spread of the virus, unprecedented and drastic measures and policies were put in place by governments to manage an exceptional health care situation while maintaining other essential services. The responses of many governments showed a lack of preparedness to face this systemic and global health crisis. Drawing on field observations and available data on the first wave of the pandemic (mid-March to mid-May 2020) in Quebec (Canada), this article reviewed and discussed the successes and failures that characterized the management of COVID-19 in this province. Using the framework of Palagyi et al. on system preparedness toward emerging infectious diseases, we described and analyzed in a chronologically and narratively way: (1) how surveillance was structured; (2) how workforce issues were managed; (3) what infrastructures and medical supplies were made available; (4) what communication mechanisms were put in place; (5) what form of governance emerged; and (6) whether trust was established and maintained throughout the crisis. Our findings and observations stress that resilience and ability to adequately respond to a systemic and global crisis depend upon preexisting system-level characteristics and capacities at both the provincial and federal governance levels. By providing recommendations for policy and practice from a learning health system perspective, this paper contributes to the groundwork required for interdisciplinary research and genuine policy discussions to help health systems better prepare for future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassane Alami
- Center for Public Health Research of the University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pascale Lehoux
- Center for Public Health Research of the University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Richard Fleet
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Chair in Emergency Medicine Université Laval-CHAU Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Lévis, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Paul Fortin
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Joanne Liu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Randa Attieh
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stéphanie Bernadette Mafalda Cadeddu
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Law, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed
- Research Chair on Chronic Diseases in Primary Care, Sherbrooke University, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada
- The Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Mistry AS, Kohrt BA, Beecroft B, Anand N, Nuwayhid I. Introduction to collection: confronting the challenges of health research in humanitarian crises. Confl Health 2021; 15:38. [PMID: 33990200 PMCID: PMC8120248 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-021-00371-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Humanitarian crises, such as armed conflict, forced displacement, natural disasters, and major disease outbreaks, take a staggering toll on human health, especially in low-resource settings. Yet there is a dearth of robust evidence to inform the governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and other humanitarian organizations on how to best respond to them. The Fogarty International Center of the U.S. National Institutes of Health commissioned a collection of Research in Practice articles that highlights the experiences of scientists conducting research in the context of humanitarian crises. Unlike traditional research papers, the case analyses in this collection go beyond what research was completed and focus on why the research was important and how it was conducted in these extremely challenging settings. Discussion The papers selected for this collection span 27 countries, cover a broad range of humanitarian crises, and discuss a wide variety of disease and health risk factors. Of the 23 papers in the collection, 17 include an author from the affected country and five papers were authored by humanitarian NGOs. Throughout the collection, 43% of the authors were from low- and middle-income countries. Across the collection, some general themes emerged that are broadly applicable. Importantly, there is a clear need for more, high-quality research to address evidence gaps. Community engagement, already a key element to global health research, was highlighted as especially important for research involving populations dealing with severe trauma and disruption. Partnership with humanitarian actors, including local governments, local and international NGOs, and UN agencies, was found to be a critical strategy as well. Conclusion A variety of audiences will find this collection useful. Global health educators can utilize papers to facilitate discussion around public health practice and equitable partnerships, among other topics. Humanitarian response organizations may use the collection to consider how research may inform and improve their work. Global health researchers, funders, and other stakeholders may use the collection to stimulate dialogue around key scientific research questions and better appreciate the importance of conducting research in humanitarian crises in the context of achieving broader global health goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit S Mistry
- Fogarty International Center, U.S. National Institutes of Health, 16A Center Drive, MSC 6710, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| | - Brandon A Kohrt
- Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Blythe Beecroft
- Fogarty International Center, U.S. National Institutes of Health, 16A Center Drive, MSC 6710, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Nalini Anand
- Fogarty International Center, U.S. National Institutes of Health, 16A Center Drive, MSC 6710, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Iman Nuwayhid
- Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Ansbro É, Homan T, Qasem J, Bil K, Rasoul Tarawneh M, Roberts B, Perel P, Jobanputra K. MSF experiences of providing multidisciplinary primary level NCD care for Syrian refugees and the host population in Jordan: an implementation study guided by the RE-AIM framework. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:381. [PMID: 33896418 PMCID: PMC8074194 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06333-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to the rising global NCD burden, humanitarian actors have rapidly scaled-up NCD services in crisis-affected low-and-middle income countries. Using the RE-AIM implementation framework, we evaluated a multidisciplinary, primary level model of NCD care for Syrian refugees and vulnerable Jordanians delivered by MSF in Irbid, Jordan. We examined the programme's Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption and acceptance, Implementation and Maintenance over time. METHODS This mixed methods retrospective evaluation, undertaken in 2017, comprised secondary analysis of pre-existing cross-sectional household survey data; analysis of routine cohort data from 2014 to 2017; descriptive costing analysis of total annual, per-patient and per-consultation costs for 2015-2017 from the provider-perspective; a clinical audit; a medication adherence survey; and qualitative research involving thematic analysis of individual interviews and focus group discussions. RESULTS The programme enrolled 23% of Syrian adult refugees with NCDs in Irbid governorate. The cohort mean age was 54.7 years; 71% had multi-morbidity and 9.9% self-reported a disability. The programme was acceptable to patients, staff and stakeholders. Blood pressure and glycaemic control improved as the programme matured and by 6.6 mmHg and 1.12 mmol/l respectively within 6 months of patient enrolment. Per patient per year cost increased 23% from INT$ 1424 (2015) to 1751 (2016), and by 9% to 1904 (2017). Cost per consultation increased from INT$ 209 to 253 (2015-2017). Staff reported that clinical guidelines were usable and patients' self-reported medication adherence was high. Individual, programmatic and organisational challenges to programme implementation and maintenance included the impact of war and the refugee experience on Syrian refugees' ability to engage; inadequate low-cost referral options; and challenges for MSF to rapidly adapt to operating in a highly regulated and complex health system. Essential programme adaptations included refinement of health education, development of mental health and psychosocial services and addition of essential referral pathways, home visit, physiotherapy and social worker services. CONCLUSION RE-AIM proved a valuable tool in evaluating a complex intervention in a protracted humanitarian crisis setting. This multidisciplinary programme was largely acceptable, achieving good clinical outcomes, but for a limited number of patients and at relatively high cost. We propose that model simplification, adapted procurement practices and use of technology could improve cost effectiveness without reducing acceptability, and may facilitate replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Éimhín Ansbro
- Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | | | | | - Karla Bil
- Médecins sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bayard Roberts
- Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pablo Perel
- Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
73
|
Falb K, Annan J. Pre-positioning an evaluation of cash assistance programming in an acute emergency: strategies and lessons learned from a study in Raqqa Governorate, Syria. Confl Health 2021; 15:12. [PMID: 33648531 PMCID: PMC7923510 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-021-00340-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Conducting ethical and rigorous research to measure the effectiveness of humanitarian programs is urgently needed given the global level of displacement and conflict, yet traditional approaches to evaluation research may be too slow and disruptive for acute humanitarian settings. The current case study utilizes an experience of implementing a mixed methods evaluation conducted between March–August 2018 in northern Raqqa Governorate, Syria. The key research objectives were to examine the influence of an unconditional, three-month cash transfer program on household basic needs and women’s wellbeing, including experiences of violence. This setting was selected for the research as it shared many aspects of an acute emergency within a protracted conflict given its recent opening of access to humanitarian aid programming following the withdrawal of ISIS as well as influxes of internally displaced persons fleeing airstrikes and fighting in Raqqa City in late 2017. Discussion The current case study was scientifically important as the use of cash assistance in emergencies has increased exponentially in recent years. Yet, little is still known about how cash assistance designed to help households meet their basic needs may also influence women’s overall wellbeing in the home. Challenges of conducting the research included selecting an emergency site appropriate for research, implementing an evaluation that would not delay or disrupt critical cash assistance programming, and measurement of sensitive violence against women outcomes. Four strategies were identified to meet the challenges of conducting an evaluation in such a setting, which included: (1) developing clear decision-making criteria for assessing feasibility; (2) frontloading processes to reduce time lag in launching research; (3) integrating the research approach within programming; and (4) closely collaborating with practitioners throughout the study, especially for research on sensitive topics like violence against women. Conclusions Advance consideration of these factors through a pre-positioning process will allow for timely, ethical, and rigorous research to be implemented in the immediate aftermath of a crisis. Such studies should be prioritized to ensure the highest effectiveness and efficiency of humanitarian aid for populations grappling with acute emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Falb
- Airbel Impact Lab, International Rescue Committee, 1730 M St NW, Suite 505, Washington DC, 20036, USA.
| | - Jeannie Annan
- Airbel Impact Lab, International Rescue Committee, 122 E 42nd St, New York City, NY, 10168, USA
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Gaffey MF, Waldman RJ, Blanchet K, Amsalu R, Capobianco E, Ho LS, Khara T, Martinez Garcia D, Aboubaker S, Ashorn P, Spiegel PB, Black RE, Bhutta ZA. Delivering health and nutrition interventions for women and children in different conflict contexts: a framework for decision making on what, when, and how. Lancet 2021; 397:543-554. [PMID: 33503457 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00133-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Existing global guidance for addressing women's and children's health and nutrition in humanitarian crises is not sufficiently contextualised for conflict settings specifically, reflecting the still-limited evidence that is available from such settings. As a preliminary step towards filling this guidance gap, we propose a conflict-specific framework that aims to guide decision makers focused on the health and nutrition of women and children affected by conflict to prioritise interventions that would address the major causes of mortality and morbidity among women and children in their particular settings and that could also be feasibly delivered in those settings. Assessing local needs, identifying relevant interventions from among those already recommended for humanitarian settings or universally, and assessing the contextual feasibility of delivery for each candidate intervention are key steps in the framework. We illustratively apply the proposed decision making framework to show what a framework-guided selection of priority interventions might look like in three hypothetical conflict contexts that differ in terms of levels of insecurity and patterns of population displacement. In doing so, we aim to catalyse further iteration and eventual field-testing of such a decision making framework by local, national, and international organisations and agencies involved in the humanitarian health response for women and children affected by conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle F Gaffey
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ronald J Waldman
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA; Doctors of the World USA, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karl Blanchet
- The Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, The Graduate Institute, Geneva, Switzerland; Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ribka Amsalu
- Save the Children, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Emanuele Capobianco
- International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lara S Ho
- International Rescue Committee, Washington, DC, USA; Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Daniel Martinez Garcia
- Women and Child Health Unit, Medical Department, Médecins Sans Frontières, Operational Centre Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Per Ashorn
- Center for Child Health Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Paul B Spiegel
- Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert E Black
- Institute for International Programs, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Centre of Excellence in Women and Child Health and Institute for Global Health and Development, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Jordan K, Lewis TP, Roberts B. Quality in crisis: a systematic review of the quality of health systems in humanitarian settings. Confl Health 2021; 15:7. [PMID: 33531065 PMCID: PMC7851932 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-021-00342-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing concern that the quality of health systems in humanitarian crises and the care they provide has received little attention. To help better understand current practice and research on health system quality, this paper aimed to examine the evidence on the quality of health systems in humanitarian settings. Methods This systematic review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The context of interest was populations affected by humanitarian crisis in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). We included studies where the intervention of interest, health services for populations affected by crisis, was provided by the formal health system. Our outcome of interest was the quality of the health system. We included primary research studies, from a combination of information sources, published in English between January 2000 and January 2019 using quantitative and qualitative methods. We used the High Quality Health Systems Framework to analyze the included studies by quality domain and sub-domain. Results We identified 2285 articles through our search, of which 163 were eligible for full-text review, and 55 articles were eligible for inclusion in our systematic review. Poor diagnosis, inadequate patient referrals, and inappropriate treatment of illness were commonly cited barriers to quality care. There was a strong focus placed on the foundations of a health system with emphasis on the workforce and tools, but a limited focus on the health impacts of health systems. The review also suggests some barriers to high quality health systems that are specific to humanitarian settings such as language barriers for refugees in their host country, discontinued care for migrant populations with chronic conditions, and fears around provider safety. Conclusion The review highlights a large gap in the measurement of quality both at the point of care and at the health system level. There is a need for further work particularly on health system measurement strategies, accountability mechanisms, and patient-centered approaches in humanitarian settings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13031-021-00342-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keely Jordan
- Department of Health Policy, New York University School of Global Public Health, 665 Broadway, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
| | - Todd P Lewis
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Munyuzangabo M, Gaffey MF, Khalifa DS, Als D, Ataullahjan A, Kamali M, Jain RP, Meteke S, Radhakrishnan A, Shah S, Siddiqui FJ, Bhutta ZA. Delivering maternal and neonatal health interventions in conflict settings: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 5:e003750. [PMID: 33608264 PMCID: PMC7903125 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While much progress was made throughout the Millennium Development Goals era in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, both remain unacceptably high, especially in areas affected by humanitarian crises. While valuable guidance on interventions to improve maternal and neonatal health in both non-crisis and crisis settings exists, guidance on how best to deliver these interventions in crisis settings, and especially in conflict settings, is still limited. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the available literature on the delivery on maternal and neonatal health interventions in conflict settings. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases using terms related to conflict, women and children, and maternal and neonatal health. We searched websites of 10 humanitarian organisations for relevant grey literature. Publications reporting on conflict-affected populations in low-income and middle-income countries and describing a maternal or neonatal health intervention delivered during or within 5 years after the end of a conflict were included. Information on population, intervention, and delivery characteristics were extracted and narratively synthesised. Quantitative data on intervention coverage and effectiveness were tabulated but no meta-analysis was undertaken. RESULTS 115 publications met our eligibility criteria. Intervention delivery was most frequently reported in the sub-Saharan Africa region, and most publications focused on displaced populations based in camps. Reported maternal interventions targeted antenatal, obstetric and postnatal care; neonatal interventions focused mostly on essential newborn care. Most interventions were delivered in hospitals and clinics, by doctors and nurses, and were mostly delivered through non-governmental organisations or the existing healthcare system. Delivery barriers included insecurity, lack of resources and lack of skilled health staff. Multi-stakeholder collaboration, the introduction of new technology or systems innovations, and staff training were delivery facilitators. Reporting of intervention coverage or effectiveness data was limited. DISCUSSION The relevant existing literature focuses mostly on maternal health especially around the antenatal period. There is still limited literature on postnatal care in conflict settings and even less on newborn care. In crisis settings, as much as in non-crisis settings, there is a need to focus on the first day of birth for both maternal and neonatal health. There is also a need to do more research on how best to involve community members in the delivery of maternal and neonatal health interventions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019125221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariella Munyuzangabo
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle F Gaffey
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dina S Khalifa
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daina Als
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anushka Ataullahjan
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mahdis Kamali
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reena P Jain
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Meteke
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amruta Radhakrishnan
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shailja Shah
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fahad J Siddiqui
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Afifi RA, Abdulrahim S, Betancourt T, Btedinni D, Berent J, Dellos L, Farrar J, Nakkash R, Osman R, Saravanan M, Story WT, Zombo M, Parker E. Implementing Community-Based Participatory Research with Communities Affected by Humanitarian Crises: The Potential to Recalibrate Equity and Power in Vulnerable Contexts. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2020; 66:381-391. [PMID: 32797639 DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Worldwide, over 70.8 million people are forcibly displaced from their homes as a result of persecution, conflict, violence, or human rights violation. In humanitarian crises, protection and the provision of basic needs are often prioritized. Research may be seen as opportunistic. However, without documenting and researching humanitarian responses, knowledge is not shared and does not accumulate, limiting the application of evidence-based interventions where they are most needed. Research in humanitarian crises is complex, both ethically and methodologically. Community-engaged research, and specifically community-based participatory research (CBPR), can address some of the challenges of research in these settings. Using case studies of research we have conducted with communities affected by humanitarian crises, we highlight challenges and opportunities of the application of the ten core principles of CBPR in humanitarian settings. Despite some challenges and barriers, CBPR is a highly effective approach to use when engaging these populations in research. We argue that the application of CBPR in these settings has the potential to recalibrate the scales of equity and power among vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rima A Afifi
- Community and Behavioral Health Department, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sawsan Abdulrahim
- Health Promotion and Community Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Theresa Betancourt
- Research Program on Children and Adversity, Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Dima Btedinni
- Health Promotion and Community Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jenna Berent
- Research Program on Children and Adversity, Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Laura Dellos
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jordan Farrar
- Research Program on Children and Adversity, Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Rima Nakkash
- Health Promotion and Community Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rilwan Osman
- Maine Immigrant and Refugee Services, Lewiston, ME, USA
| | - Monisa Saravanan
- Community and Behavioral Health Department, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - William T Story
- Community and Behavioral Health Department, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Edith Parker
- Community and Behavioral Health Department, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Makhani LA, Moran V, Sadique Z, Singh NS, Revill P, Roberts B. Examining the use of economic evaluations in health-related humanitarian programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan 2020; 35:210-218. [PMID: 31697373 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The costly nature of health sector responses to humanitarian crises and resource constraints means that there is a need to identify methods for priority setting and long-term planning. One method is economic evaluation. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the use of economic evaluations in health-related humanitarian programmes in low- and middle-income countries. This review used peer-reviewed literature published between January 1980 and June 2018 extracted from four main electronic bibliographic databases. The eligibility criteria were full economic evaluations (which compare the costs and outcomes of at least two interventions and provide information on efficiency) of health-related services in humanitarian crises in low- and middle-countries. The quality of eligible studies is appraised using the modified 36-question Drummond checklist. From a total of 8127 total studies, 11 full economic evaluations were identified. All economic evaluations were cost-effectiveness analyses. Three of the 11 studies used a provider perspective, 2 studies used a healthcare system perspective, 3 studies used a societal perspective and 3 studies did not specify the perspective used. The lower quality studies failed to provide 7information on the unit of costs and did not justify the time horizon of costs and discount rates, or conduct a sensitivity analysis. There was limited geographic range of the studies, with 9 of the 11 studies conducted in Africa. Recommendations include greater use of economic evaluation methods and data to enhance the microeconomic understanding of health interventions in humanitarian settings to support greater efficiency and transparency and to strengthen capacity by recruiting economists and providing training in economic methods to humanitarian agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lizna A Makhani
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Valerie Moran
- Luxembourg Institute of Health, 1 A-B Rue Thomas Edison, 1445 Strassen, Luxembourg.,Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, 11 Porte des Sciences, 4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Zia Sadique
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Neha S Singh
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Alcuin 'A' Block, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Aboubaker S, Evers ES, Kobeissi L, Francis L, Najjemba R, Miller NP, Wall S, Martinez D, Vargas J, Ashorn P. The availability of global guidance for the promotion of women's, newborns', children's and adolescents' health and nutrition in conflicts. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002060. [PMID: 33223502 PMCID: PMC7684670 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant global gains in sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and nutrition (SRMNCAH&N) will be difficult unless conflict settings are adequately addressed. We aimed to determine the amount, scope and quality of publically available guidance documents, to characterise the process by which agencies develop their guidance and to identify gaps in guidance on SRMNCAH&N promotion in conflicts. METHODS We identified guidance documents published between 2008 and 2018 through English-language Internet sites of humanitarian response organisations, reviewed them for their scope and assessed their quality with the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation II) tool. Additionally, we interviewed 22 key informants on guidance development, dissemination processes, perceived guidance gaps and applicability. FINDINGS We identified 105 conflict-relevant guidance documents from 75 organisations. Of these, nine were specific to conflicts, others were applicable also to other humanitarian settings. Fifteen documents were technical normative guidelines, others were operational guides (67), descriptive documents (21) or advice on legal, human rights or ethics questions (2). Nutrition was the most addressed health topic, followed by communicable diseases and violence. The documents rated high quality in their 'scope and purpose' and 'clarity of presentation' and low for 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence'. Key informants reported end user need as the primary driver for guideline development and WHO technical guidelines as their main evidence base. Insufficient local contextualisation, lack of inter-agency coordination and lack of systematic implementation were considered problems in guideline development. Several guidance gaps were noted, including abortion care, newborn care, early child development, mental health, adolescent health beyond sexual and reproductive health and non-communicable diseases. INTERPRETATION Organisations are motivated and actively producing guidance for SRMNCAH&N promotion in humanitarian settings, but few documents address conflicts specifically and there are important guidance gaps. Improved inter-organisation collaboration for guidance on SRMNCAH&N promotion in conflicts and other humanitarian settings is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Egmond Samir Evers
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Loulou Kobeissi
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lauren Francis
- Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Steve Wall
- Saving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Per Ashorn
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Tol WA, Ager A, Bizouerne C, Bryant R, El Chammay R, Colebunders R, García-Moreno C, Hamdani SU, James LE, Jansen SCJ, Leku MR, Likindikoki S, Panter-Brick C, Pluess M, Robinson C, Ruttenberg L, Savage K, Welton-Mitchell C, Hall BJ, Harper Shehadeh M, Harmer A, van Ommeren M. Improving mental health and psychosocial wellbeing in humanitarian settings: reflections on research funded through R2HC. Confl Health 2020; 14:71. [PMID: 33292413 PMCID: PMC7602334 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Major knowledge gaps remain concerning the most effective ways to address mental health and psychosocial needs of populations affected by humanitarian crises. The Research for Health in Humanitarian Crisis (R2HC) program aims to strengthen humanitarian health practice and policy through research. As a significant portion of R2HC's research has focused on mental health and psychosocial support interventions, the program has been interested in strengthening a community of practice in this field. Following a meeting between grantees, we set out to provide an overview of the R2HC portfolio, and draw lessons learned. In this paper, we discuss the mental health and psychosocial support-focused research projects funded by R2HC; review the implications of initial findings from this research portfolio; and highlight four remaining knowledge gaps in this field. Between 2014 and 2019, R2HC funded 18 academic-practitioner partnerships focused on mental health and psychosocial support, comprising 38% of the overall portfolio (18 of 48 projects) at a value of approximately 7.2 million GBP. All projects have focused on evaluating the impact of interventions. In line with consensus-based recommendations to consider a wide range of mental health and psychosocial needs in humanitarian settings, research projects have evaluated diverse interventions. Findings so far have both challenged and confirmed widely-held assumptions about the effectiveness of mental health and psychosocial interventions in humanitarian settings. They point to the importance of building effective, sustained, and diverse partnerships between scholars, humanitarian practitioners, and funders, to ensure long-term program improvements and appropriate evidence-informed decision making. Further research needs to fill knowledge gaps regarding how to: scale-up interventions that have been found to be effective (e.g., questions related to integration across sectors, adaptation of interventions across different contexts, and optimal care systems); address neglected mental health conditions and populations (e.g., elderly, people with disabilities, sexual minorities, people with severe, pre-existing mental disorders); build on available local resources and supports (e.g., how to build on traditional, religious healing and community-wide social support practices); and ensure equity, quality, fidelity, and sustainability for interventions in real-world contexts (e.g., answering questions about how interventions from controlled studies can be transferred to more representative humanitarian contexts).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wietse A Tol
- Section of Global Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, bg 9, DK-1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Peter C. Alderman Program for Global Mental Health, HealthRight International, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Alastair Ager
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cecile Bizouerne
- Mental Health, Child Care Practices, Gender and Protection, Action Contre La Faim, Paris, France
| | - Richard Bryant
- School of Psychology & Traumatic Stress Clinic, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rabih El Chammay
- National Mental Health Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
- Department of Psychiatry, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Claudia García-Moreno
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Leah E James
- Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CA, USA
| | - Stefan C J Jansen
- Center for Mental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | | | - Samuel Likindikoki
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Catherine Panter-Brick
- Jackson Institute of Global Affairs, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael Pluess
- Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Courtland Robinson
- Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, London, UK
| | - Leontien Ruttenberg
- International Medical Relief Services (IMRES), Prior association: Arq International, Europe, Netherlands
| | - Kevin Savage
- Evidence Building, World Vision International, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Courtney Welton-Mitchell
- Institute of Behavioral Science and Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Boulder, Denver, USA
| | - Brian J Hall
- Global and Community Mental Health Research Group, New York University (Shanghai), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | - Mark van Ommeren
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Gaffey MF, Ataullahjan A, Das JK, Mirzazada S, Tounkara M, Dalmar AA, Bhutta ZA. Researching the delivery of health and nutrition interventions for women and children in the context of armed conflict: lessons on research challenges and strategies from BRANCH Consortium case studies of Somalia, Mali, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Confl Health 2020; 14:69. [PMID: 33088339 PMCID: PMC7574460 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00315-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The BRANCH Consortium recently conducted 10 mixed-methods case studies to investigate the provision of health and nutrition interventions for women and children in conflict-affected countries, aiming to better understand the dominant influences on humanitarian health actors’ programmatic decision-making and how such actors surmount intervention delivery barriers. In this paper, the research challenges encountered and the mitigating strategies employed by the case study investigators in four of the BRANCH case study contexts are discussed: Somalia, Mali, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Discussion Many of the encountered research challenges were anticipated, with investigators adopting mitigation strategies in advance or early on, but others were unexpected, with implications for how studies were ultimately conducted and how well the original study aims were met. Insecurity was a fundamental challenge in all study contexts, with restricted geographical access and concerns for personal safety affecting sampling and data collection plans, and requiring reliance on digital communications, remote study management, and off-site team meetings wherever possible. The need to navigate complex local sociopolitical contexts required maximum reliance on local partners’ knowledge, expertise and networks, and this was facilitated by early engagement with a wide range of local study stakeholders. Severe lack of reliable quantitative data on intervention coverage affected the extent to which information from different sources could be triangulated or integrated to inform an understanding of the influences on humanitarian actors’ decision-making. Conclusion Strong local partners are essential to the success of any project, contributing not only technical and methodological capacity but also the insight needed to truly understand and interpret local dynamics for the wider study team and to navigate those dynamics to ensure study rigour and relevance. Maintaining realistic expectations of data that are typically available in conflict settings is also essential, while pushing for more resources and further methodological innovation to improve data collection in such settings. Finally, successful health research in the complex, dynamic and unpredictable contexts of conflict settings requires flexibility and adaptability of researchers, as well as sponsors and donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle F Gaffey
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4 Canada
| | - Anushka Ataullahjan
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4 Canada
| | - Jai K Das
- Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Moctar Tounkara
- University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako, Mali
| | | | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4 Canada.,Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Tirado V, Chu J, Hanson C, Ekström AM, Kågesten A. Barriers and facilitators for the sexual and reproductive health and rights of young people in refugee contexts globally: A scoping review. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236316. [PMID: 32687519 PMCID: PMC7371179 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need to address sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in humanitarian settings is more urgent than ever, especially among young refugees. We conducted a scoping review to identify and synthesise the literature on perceived barriers and facilitators to SRHR among young refugees and interventions created to address their needs. METHODS We searched three databases (PubMed, Global Health and POPLINE) for peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English between January 2008 and June 2018 that reported on SRHR barriers, facilitators and interventions for young refugees aged 10 to 24 years. We extracted data using standardised templates and assessed the quality of studies according to study design. Data were charted using qualitative content analysis and organised in line with a socio-ecological framework (individual, social and community, institutional and health system, and structural). FINDINGS We screened 1,169 records and included 30 publications (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) across 22 countries; 15 were peer-reviewed articles and 15 were from the grey literature. Twenty-two publications reported on young people in refugee camps or alternatives to camps (e.g. sustainable settlements), and eight referred to young refugees who had been resettled to a third country. We identified 19 sub-categories for barriers and 14 for facilitators at the individual, social and community, institutional and health system, and structural levels. No publications discussed the SRHR challenges faced by young homosexual, bisexual, transgender or queer refugees, or those living with HIV. Nine publications described interventions, which tended to focus on the provision of SRHR services and information, and the training of peers, parents, religious leaders and/or service providers. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight that while young refugees experience similar barriers to SRHR as other young people, many of these barriers are exacerbated by the refugee context. The limited number of publications and evidence on interventions underlines the immediate need to invest in and evaluate SRHR interventions in refugee contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronika Tirado
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Josephine Chu
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Claudia Hanson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Mia Ekström
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Kågesten
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Ekezie W, Timmons S, Myles P, Siebert P, Bains M, Pritchard C. An audit of healthcare provision in internally displaced population camps in Nigeria. J Public Health (Oxf) 2020; 41:583-592. [PMID: 30137460 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Armed conflict in Nigeria resulted in more than 2 million internally displaced persons (IDPs). IDPs live in poor conditions lacking basic resources with variable provision across different locations. This audit aimed to determine the health-related resources available to IDPs in camp-like settings in Nigeria and whether these met international standards. METHODS Using a cross-sectional study approach, information was collected in nine camps across seven states from camp managers, and direct observation in September-October 2016. The Sphere minimum standards in humanitarian crises were used as the audit standards. FINDINGS The 5 of 15 assessed standards were met to some extent, including the availability of water and shelter. Sanitation and vaccination were unmet in five camps, with severe overcrowding in five camps, and inadequate waste disposal in all camps. Health programme implementation was uneven, and especially poor in self-settled and dispersed settlements. CONCLUSION Inequality in distribution of humanitarian support was observed across different settings, which could lead to a higher likelihood of water, food and air-related diseases and thereby, a poorer quality of life for IDPs. Ensuring standardized health assessments could promote a more even distribution of resources across IDP locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winifred Ekezie
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Stephen Timmons
- Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Puja Myles
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Penelope Siebert
- Ringgold Standard Institution, School of Health and Social Care, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Manpreet Bains
- School of Medicine Ringgold Standard Institution, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Catherine Pritchard
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
The Importance of Developing Rigorous Social Science Methods for Community Engagement and Behavior Change During Outbreak Response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2020; 15:685-690. [PMID: 32641188 DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Despite growing international attention, the anthropological and socio-behavioral elements of epidemics continue to be understudied and under resourced and lag behind the traditional outbreak response infrastructure. As seen in the current 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the importance of socio-behavioral elements in understanding transmission and facilitating control of many outbreak-prone pathogens, this is problematic. Beyond the recent strengthening of global outbreak response capacities and global health security measures, a greater focus on the socio-behavioral components of outbreak response is required. We add to the current discussion by briefly highlighting the importance of socio-behavior in the Ebola virus disease (EVD) response, and describe vital areas of future development, including methods for community engagement and validated frameworks for behavioral modeling and change in outbreak settings.
Collapse
|
85
|
Parry AE, Kirk MD, Durrheim DN, Olowokure B, Housen T. Study protocol: building an evidence base for epidemiology emergency response, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037326. [PMID: 32601115 PMCID: PMC7328751 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Determinants and drivers for emergencies, such as political instability, weak health systems, climate change and forcibly displaced populations, are increasing the severity, complexity and frequency of public health emergencies. As emergencies become more complex, it is increasingly important that the required skillset of the emergency response workforce is clearly defined. To enable essential epidemiological activities to be implemented and managed during an emergency, a workforce is required with the right mix of skills, knowledge, experience and local context awareness. This study aims to provide local and international responders with an opportunity to actively contribute to the development of new thinking around emergency response roles and required competencies. In this study, we will develop recommendations using a broad range of evidence to address identified lessons and challenges so that future major emergency responses are culturally and contextually appropriate, and less reliant on long-term international deployments. METHOD AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a mixed-methods study using an exploratory sequential study design. The integration of four data sources, including key informant interviews, a scoping literature review, survey and semistructured interviews will allow the research questions to be examined in a flexible, semistructured way, from a range of perspectives. The study is unequally weighted, with a qualitative emphasis. We will analyse all activities as individual components, and then together in an integrated analysis. Thematic analysis will be conducted in NVivo V.11 and quantitative analysis will be conducted in Stata V.15. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION All activities have been approved by the Science and Medical Delegated Ethics Review Committee at the Australian National University (protocol numbers 2018-521, 2018-641, 2019-068). Findings will be disseminated through international and local deployment partners, peer-reviewed publication, presentation at international conferences and through social media such as Twitter and Facebook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Elizabeth Parry
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Martyn D Kirk
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - David N Durrheim
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Babatunde Olowokure
- Health Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Tambri Housen
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Ataullahjan A, Gaffey MF, Sami S, Singh NS, Tappis H, Black RE, Blanchet K, Boerma T, Langer A, Spiegel PB, Waldman RJ, Wise PH, Bhutta ZA. Investigating the delivery of health and nutrition interventions for women and children in conflict settings: a collection of case studies from the BRANCH Consortium. Confl Health 2020; 14:29. [PMID: 32514294 PMCID: PMC7254714 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00276-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, the number of people affected by conflict is the highest in history, and continues to steadily increase. There is currently a pressing need to better understand how to deliver critical health interventions to women and children affected by conflict. The compendium of articles presented in this Conflict and Health Collection brings together a range of case studies recently undertaken by the BRANCH Consortium (Bridging Research & Action in Conflict Settings for the Health of Women and Children). These case studies describe how humanitarian actors navigate and negotiate the multiple obstacles and forces that challenge the delivery of health and nutrition interventions for women, children and adolescents in conflict-affected settings, and to ultimately provide some insight into how service delivery can be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle F. Gaffey
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Samira Sami
- Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Neha S. Singh
- Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Hannah Tappis
- Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Robert E. Black
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Karl Blanchet
- Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Ana Langer
- Women and Health Initiative, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| | - Paul B. Spiegel
- Center for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Ronald J. Waldman
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
| | - Paul H. Wise
- The Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA
| | - Zulfiqar A. Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Bruno W, Haar RJ. A systematic literature review of the ethics of conducting research in the humanitarian setting. Confl Health 2020; 14:27. [PMID: 32489418 PMCID: PMC7245798 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00282-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Research around humanitarian crises, aid delivery, and the impact of these crises on health and well-being has expanded dramatically. Ethical issues around these topics have recently received more attention. We conducted a systematic literature review to synthesize the lessons learned regarding the ethics of research in humanitarian crises. Methods We conducted a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify articles regarding the ethics of research in humanitarian contexts between January 1, 1997 and September 1, 2019. We analyzed the articles to extract key themes and develop an agenda for future research. Results We identified 52 articles that matched our inclusion criteria. We categorized the article data into five categories of analysis: 32 were expert statements, 18 were case studies, 11 contained original research, eight were literature reviews and three were book chapters. All included articles were published in English. Using a step-wise qualitative analysis, we identified 10 major themes that encompassed these concepts and points. These major themes were: ethics review process (21 articles, [40.38%]); community engagement (15 articles [28.85%]); the dual imperative, or necessity that research be both academically sound and policy driven, clinical trials in the humanitarian setting (13 articles for each, [25.0%)]; informed consent (10 articles [19.23%]); cultural considerations (6 articles, [11.54%]); risks to researchers (5 articles, [9.62%]); child participation (4 articles [7.69%]); and finally mental health, and data ownership (2 articles for each [3.85%]). Conclusions Interest in the ethics of studying humanitarian crises has been dramatically increasing in recent years. While key concepts within all research settings such as beneficence, justice and respect for persons are crucially relevant, there are considerations unique to the humanitarian context. The particular vulnerabilities of conflict-affected populations, the contextual challenges of working in humanitarian settings, and the need for ensuring strong community engagement at all levels make this area of research particularly challenging. Humanitarian crises are prevalent throughout the globe, and studying them with the utmost ethical forethought is critical to maintaining sound research principles and ethical standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Bruno
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Rohini J Haar
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Research Fellow, Human Rights Center, School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Leresche E, Truppa C, Martin C, Marnicio A, Rossi R, Zmeter C, Harb H, Hamadeh RS, Leaning J. Conducting operational research in humanitarian settings: is there a shared path for humanitarians, national public health authorities and academics? Confl Health 2020; 14:25. [PMID: 32435274 PMCID: PMC7222467 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-020-00280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In humanitarian contexts, it is a difficult and multi-faceted task to enlist academics, humanitarian actors and health authorities in a collaborative research effort. The lack of research in such settings has been widely described in the past decade, but few have analysed the challenges in building strong and balanced research partnerships. The major issues include considering operational priorities, ethical imperatives and power differentials. This paper analyses in two steps a collaborative empirical endeavour to assess health service utilization by Syrian refugee and Lebanese women undertaken by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) and the Harvard François-Xavier Bagnoud (FXB) Center. First, based on challenges documented in the literature, we shed light on how we negotiated appropriate research questions, methodologies, bias analyses, resource availability, population specificities, security, logistics, funding, ethical issues and organizational cultures throughout the partnership. Second, we describe how the negotiations required each partner to go outside their comfort zones. For the academics, the drivers to engage included the intellectual value of the collaboration, the readiness of the operational partners to conduct an empirical investigation and the possibility that such work might lead to a better understanding in public health terms of how the response met population needs. For actors responding to the humanitarian crisis (the ICRC and the MOPH), participating in a technical collaboration permitted methodological issues to be worked through in the context of deliberations within the wider epistemic community. We find that when they collaborate, academics, humanitarian actors and health authorities deploy their respective complementarities to build a more comprehensive approach. Barriers such as the lack of uptake of research results or weak links to the existing literature were overcome by giving space to define research questions and develop a longer-term collaboration involving individual and institutional learning. There is the need ahead of time to create balanced decision-making mechanisms, allow for relative financial autonomy, and define organizational responsibilities. Ultimately, mutual respect, trust and the recognition of each other's expertise formed the basis of an initiative that served to better understand populations affected by conflict and meet their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Leresche
- International Committee of the Red Cross Delegation, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Claudia Truppa
- International Committee of the Red Cross Delegation, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Christophe Martin
- International Committee of the Red Cross Delegation, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Rodolfo Rossi
- International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Carla Zmeter
- International Committee of the Red Cross Delegation, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hilda Harb
- Lebanese Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Jennifer Leaning
- Harvard François Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Desrosiers A, Betancourt T, Kergoat Y, Servilli C, Say L, Kobeissi L. A systematic review of sexual and reproductive health interventions for young people in humanitarian and lower-and-middle-income country settings. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:666. [PMID: 32398129 PMCID: PMC7216726 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08818-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Accessibility of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in many lower-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) and humanitarian settings remains limited, particularly for young people. Young people facing humanitarian crises are also at higher risk for mental health problems, which can further exacerbate poor SRH outcomes. This review aimed to explore, describe and evaluate SRH interventions for young people in LMIC and humanitarian settings to better understand both SRH and psychosocial components of interventions that demonstrate effectiveness for improving SRH outcomes. Methods We conducted a systematic review of studies examining interventions to improve SRH in young people in LMIC and humanitarian settings following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) standards for systematic reviews. Peer-reviewed journals and grey literature from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2018 were included. Two authors performed title, abstract and full-text screening independently. Data was extracted and analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach and the practice-wise clinical coding system. Results The search yielded 813 results, of which 55 met inclusion criteria for full-text screening and thematic analysis. Primary SRH outcomes of effective interventions included: contraception and condom use skills, HIV/STI prevention/education, SRH knowledge/education, gender-based violence education and sexual self-efficacy. Common psychosocial intervention components included: assertiveness training, communication skills, and problem-solving. Conclusions Findings suggest that several evidence-based SRH interventions may be effective for young people in humanitarian and LMIC settings. Studies that use double blind designs, include fidelity monitoring, and focus on implementation and sustainability are needed to further contribute to this evidence-base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alethea Desrosiers
- Boston College School of Social Work, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA
| | - Theresa Betancourt
- Boston College School of Social Work, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA
| | - Yasmine Kergoat
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Servilli
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland
| | - Lale Say
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland
| | - Loulou Kobeissi
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Harriss L, Parrack C, Jordan Z. Building safety in humanitarian programmes that support post-disaster shelter self-recovery: an evidence review. DISASTERS 2020; 44:307-335. [PMID: 31343759 PMCID: PMC7154719 DOI: 10.1111/disa.12397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The humanitarian sector is increasingly aware of the role that good quality evidence plays in the underpinning of effective and accountable practice. This review addresses the need for reliable evidence by evaluating current knowledge about the intersection of two key outcome targets of post-disaster shelter response: supporting shelter self-recovery and building back safer. Evidence about post-disaster shelter programmes that aim to improve hazard resistance while supporting shelter self-recovery has been systematically analysed and evaluated. Technical support, especially training in safer construction techniques, was found to be a central programme feature, but the impact of this and other programme attributes on building safety was largely not ascertainable. Programme reports and studies lack sufficient detail, especially on the hazard resistance of repaired houses. Accounts of shelter programmes need to include more reliable reporting of key activities and assessment of outcomes, in order to contribute to the growing evidence base in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Harriss
- Visiting Researcher, Centre for Development and Emergency Practice, School of ArchitectureOxford Brookes UniversityUnited Kingdom
| | - Charles Parrack
- Senior Lecturer, Centre for Development and Emergency Practice, School of ArchitectureOxford Brookes UniversityUnited Kingdom
| | - Zoe Jordan
- Research Assistant, Centre for Development and Emergency Practice, School of ArchitectureOxford Brookes UniversityUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Kamali M, Munyuzangabo M, Siddiqui FJ, Gaffey MF, Meteke S, Als D, Jain RP, Radhakrishnan A, Shah S, Ataullahjan A, Bhutta ZA. Delivering mental health and psychosocial support interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002014. [PMID: 32201624 PMCID: PMC7073823 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Over 240 million children live in countries affected by conflict or fragility, and such settings are known to be linked to increased psychological distress and risk of mental disorders. While guidelines are in place, high-quality evidence to inform mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions in conflict settings is lacking. This systematic review aimed to synthesise existing information on the delivery, coverage and effectiveness of MHPSS for conflict-affected women and children in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods We searched Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Psychological Information Database (PsycINFO)databases for indexed literature published from January 1990 to March 2018. Grey literature was searched on the websites of 10 major humanitarian organisations. Eligible publications reported on an MHPSS intervention delivered to conflict-affected women or children in LMICs. We extracted and synthesised information on intervention delivery characteristics, including delivery site and personnel involved, as well as delivery barriers and facilitators, and we tabulated reported intervention coverage and effectiveness data. Results The search yielded 37 854 unique records, of which 157 were included in the review. Most publications were situated in Sub-Saharan Africa (n=65) and Middle East and North Africa (n=36), and many reported on observational research studies (n=57) or were non-research reports (n=53). Almost half described MHPSS interventions targeted at children and adolescents (n=68). Psychosocial support was the most frequently reported intervention delivered, followed by training interventions and screening for referral or treatment. Only 19 publications reported on MHPSS intervention coverage or effectiveness. Discussion Despite the growing literature, more efforts are needed to further establish and better document MHPSS intervention research and practice in conflict settings. Multisectoral collaboration and better use of existing social support networks are encouraged to increase reach and sustainability of MHPSS interventions. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019125221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdis Kamali
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mariella Munyuzangabo
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fahad J Siddiqui
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michelle F Gaffey
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Meteke
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daina Als
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reena P Jain
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amruta Radhakrishnan
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shailja Shah
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anushka Ataullahjan
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
The Integration of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support and Disaster Risk Reduction: A mapping and Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17061900. [PMID: 32183382 PMCID: PMC7142938 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17061900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The field of disaster and emergency management has shifted in focus towards the goal of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). However, the degree to which the Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) field has followed this trend is relatively unknown. Therefore, the objectives of this review were to identify relevant projects, materials, and publications relating to MHPSS and DRR integration and define current domains of action in this integration. A review was conducted using a two-pronged approach for data collection. This approach included 1) a mapping exercise eliciting relevant documentation and project descriptions from MHPSS actors, and 2) a database and internet literature search. The mapping exercise was conducted between January and November 2019, while the literature search was completed in March 2019. The majority of identified materials concerned actions of capacity and systems building; preparedness; policy development, consensus building, and awareness raising; school- and child-focused DRR; inclusive DRR; and resilience promotion. Results also suggested that relatively little consensus exists in terms of formal definitions of and frameworks or guidance for integrating MHPSS and DRR. Moreover, domains of action varied in terms of current implementation practices and empirical evidence. Materials and projects are reviewed and discussed in terms of implications for advancing the integration of DRR and MHPSS and expanding MHPSS approaches to include building better before emergencies.
Collapse
|
93
|
Kurdi S, Figueroa JL, Ibrahim H. Nutritional training in a humanitarian context: Evidence from a cluster randomized trial. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION 2020; 16:e12973. [PMID: 32147962 PMCID: PMC7296818 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2019] [Revised: 12/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Behavioural change communication interventions have been shown to be effective at improving infant and young child nutrition knowledge and practices. However, evidence in humanitarian response contexts is scarce. Using data on secondary outcomes of breastfeeding, water treatment, and knowledge from a cluster randomized control trial of the Yemen Cash for Nutrition programme's impact on child nutritional status, this paper shows that the programme significantly improved knowledge and practices for poor women with young children in the pilot districts. The intervention consisted of cash transfers and monthly group nutrition education sessions led by locally recruited community health volunteers. Data are based on self‐reports by participants. Estimating impacts among all 1,945 women in 190 clusters randomly assigned to treatment versus control and controlling for baseline levels and community characteristic and adjusting for noncompliance with randomization, the programme increased the probability of breastfeeding initiation within the first hour after delivery by 15.6% points (p < .05; control = 74.4% and treatment = 83.6%), the probability of exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months by 14.4% points (control = 13.5% and treatment = 25.3%), the probability of households treating water consumed by adults by 16.7% points (p < .01; control = 13.9% and treatment = 23.4%), and treating water consumed by children under two by 10.3% points (p < .10; control = 31.2% and treatment = 37.9%). Impacts on knowledge and breastfeeding are similar for both literate and illiterate women, and water treatment impacts are significantly larger for literate women. This study was registered at 3ie (RIDIE‐STUDY‐ID‐5b4eff881b29a) and funded by the Nordic Trust Fund and Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research programme on Policies, Institutions, and Markets.
Collapse
|
94
|
Khalid AF, Lavis JN, El-Jardali F, Vanstone M. Supporting the use of research evidence in decision-making in crisis zones in low- and middle-income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:21. [PMID: 32070370 PMCID: PMC7027202 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-0530-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision-makers in crisis zones are faced with the challenge of having to make health-related decisions under limited time and resource constraints and in light of the many factors that can influence their decisions, of which research evidence is just one. To address a key gap in the research literature about how best to support the use of research evidence in such situations, we conducted a critical interpretive synthesis approach to develop a conceptual framework that outlines the strategies that leverage the facilitators and address the barriers to evidence use in crisis zones. METHODS We systematically reviewed both empirical and non-empirical literature and used an interpretive analytic approach to synthesise the results and develop the conceptual framework. We used a 'compass' question to create a detailed search strategy and conducted electronic searches in CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SSCI and Web of Science. A second reviewer was assigned to a representative sample of articles. We purposively sampled additional papers to fill in conceptual gaps. RESULTS We identified 21 eligible papers to be analysed and purposively sampled an additional 6 to fill conceptual gaps. The synthesis resulted in a conceptual framework that focuses on evidence use in crisis zones examined through the lens of four systems - political, health, international humanitarian aid and health research. Within each of the four systems, the framework identifies the most actionable strategies that leverage the facilitators and address the barriers to evidence use. CONCLUSIONS This study presents a new conceptual framework that outlines strategies that leverage the facilitators and address the barriers to evidence use in crisis zones within different systems. This study expands on the literature pertaining to evidence-informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Firas Khalid
- Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - John N Lavis
- Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Fadi El-Jardali
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Management & Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- enter for Systematic Review in Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK), American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Meredith Vanstone
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Ekezie W, Adaji EE, Murray RL. Essential healthcare services provided to conflict-affected internally displaced populations in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Health Promot Perspect 2020; 10:24-37. [PMID: 32104654 PMCID: PMC7036202 DOI: 10.15171/hpp.2020.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Conflict and violent crises have resulted in over 40 million of internally displaced persons (IDPs). Most affected regions lack access to basic health resources and generally rely on humanitarian support. The objective of this review was to appraise primary health service interventions among conflict-induced internally displaced populations in low and middle income countries between 2000 and 2019. Methods: A systematic review of literature in the following databases: Embase, MEDLINE, PsyArticles, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, LILAC and CAB Articles, was performed to identify interventions implemented in conflict IDP settings. Results: Initial searches yielded 4578 papers and 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. Descriptivesynthesis analysis was used, and the final selections were assessed using a customized CriticalAppraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Included papers were from Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and the Middle East regions. Most studies were on prevention interventions, especially water treatment and maternal health. Treatment interventions mostly focused on onmalaria and mental health. Only one food and nutrition study with outcome data was identified, indicating limitations in IDP health-related intervention publications. Reported interventions were conducted between one week to five years, and the study qualities were moderate. The most effective interventions were integrated programmes and common challenges were weakstudy methodology and data reporting. Conclusion: Regardless of the intervention types and durations, the services offered were beneficial to the IDPs. More intervention evidence are, however required as shown in gaps around food and nutrition, health education and disease surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winifred Ekezie
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Rachael L Murray
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Akseer N, Wright J, Tasic H, Everett K, Scudder E, Amsalu R, Boerma T, Bendavid E, Kamali M, Barros AJD, da Silva ICM, Bhutta ZA. Women, children and adolescents in conflict countries: an assessment of inequalities in intervention coverage and survival. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e002214. [PMID: 32133179 PMCID: PMC7042600 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Conflict adversely impacts health and health systems, yet its effect on health inequalities, particularly for women and children, has not been systematically studied. We examined wealth, education and urban/rural residence inequalities for child mortality and essential reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health interventions between conflict and non-conflict low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods We carried out a time-series multicountry ecological study using data for 137 LMICs between 1990 and 2017, as defined by the 2019 World Bank classification. The data set covers approximately 3.8 million surveyed mothers (15-49 years) and 1.1 million children under 5 years including newborns (<1 month), young children (1-59 months) and school-aged children and adolescents (5-14 years). Outcomes include annual maternal and child mortality rates and coverage (%) of family planning services, 1+antenatal care visit, skilled attendant at birth (SBA), exclusive breast feeding (0-5 months), early initiation of breast feeding (within 1 hour), neonatal protection against tetanus, newborn postnatal care within 2 days, 3 doses of diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccine, measles vaccination, and careseeking for pneumonia and diarrhoea. Results Conflict countries had consistently higher maternal and child mortality rates than non-conflict countries since 1990 and these gaps persist despite rates continually declining for both groups. Access to essential reproductive and maternal health services for poorer, less educated and rural-based families was several folds worse in conflict versus non-conflict countries. Conclusions Inequalities in coverage of reproductive/maternal health and child vaccine interventions are significantly worse in conflict-affected countries. Efforts to protect maternal and child health interventions in conflict settings should target the most disadvantaged families including the poorest, least educated and those living in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Akseer
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Wright
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hana Tasic
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karl Everett
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elaine Scudder
- Save the Children USA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Ribka Amsalu
- Save the Children USA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Ties Boerma
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Eran Bendavid
- Centers for Health Policy, Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mahdis Kamali
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aluisio J D Barros
- International Centre for Equity in Health, Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| | | | - Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Edmond K, Yousufi K, Naziri M, Higgins-Steele A, Qadir AQ, Sadat SM, Bellows AL, Smith E. Mobile outreach health services for mothers and children in conflict-affected and remote areas: a population-based study from Afghanistan. Arch Dis Child 2020; 105:18-25. [PMID: 31270097 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-316802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether sustained, scheduled mobile health team (MHT) services increase antenatal care (ANC), postnatal care (PNC) and childhood immunisation in conflict-affected and remote regions of Afghanistan. DESIGN Cross-sectional, population-based study from 2013 to 2017. Proportions were compared using multivariable linear regression adjusted for clustering and socio-demographic variables. SETTING 54 intervention and 56 control districts in eight Afghanistan provinces. PARTICIPANTS 338 796 pregnant women and 1 693 872 children aged under 5 years. INTERVENTIONS 'Intervention districts' that received MHT services for 3 years compared with 'control districts' in the same province without any MHT services over the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES District-level and clinic-level ANC, PNC, childhood immunisation (pentavalent 3, measles 1), integrated management of childhood immunisation services. RESULTS Proportion of pregnant women receiving at least one ANC visit was higher in intervention districts (83.6%, 161 750/193 482) than control districts (61.3%, 89 077/145 314) (adjusted mean difference (AMD) 14.8%;95% CI: 1.6% to 28.0%). Proportion of children under 1 year receiving their first dose of measles vaccine was higher in intervention (73.8%, 142 738/193 412) than control districts (57.3%, 83 253/145 293) (AMD 12.8;95% CI: 2.1% to 23.5%). There was no association with PNC (AMD 2.8%;95% CI: -5.1% to 10.7%). MHTs did not increase clinic-level service provision for ANC (AMD 41.32;95% CI: -52.46 to 135.11) or any other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Sustained, scheduled MHT services to conflict-affected and remote regions were associated with improved coverage of important maternal and child health interventions. Outreach is an essential service and not just an 'optional extra' for the most deprived mothers and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Edmond
- United Nations Childrens Fund, Kabul, Afghanistan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Emily Smith
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Durrance-Bagale A, Salman OM, Omar M, Alhaffar M, Ferdaus M, Newaz S, Krishnan S, Howard N. Lessons from humanitarian clusters to strengthen health system responses to mass displacement in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review. J Migr Health 2020; 1-2:100028. [PMID: 33458716 PMCID: PMC7790453 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2020.100028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Potential scope for health-system learning from cluster responses to mass displacement. Non-health clusters can contribute to health improvements during mass displacement. Cluster approaches are often siloed with insufficient cross-cluster learning. Equitable power dynamics between displaced people, humanitarian actors, and governments are still needed.
The humanitarian cluster approach was established in 2005 but clarity on how lessons from humanitarian clusters can inform and strengthen health system responses to mass displacement in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) is lacking. We conducted a scoping review to examine the extent and nature of existing research and identify relevant lessons. We used Arksey and O'Malley's scoping framework with Levac's 2010 revisions and Khalil's 2016 refinements, focussing on identifying lessons from discrete humanitarian clusters that could strengthen health system responses to mass population displacement. We summarised thematically by cluster. Of 186 sources included, 56% were peer-reviewed research articles. Most related to health (37%), protection (18%), or nutrition (13%) clusters. Key lessons for health system responses included the necessity of empowering women; ensuring communities are engaged in decision-making processes (e.g. planning and construction of camps and housing) to strengthen trust and bonds between and within communities; and involving potential end-users in technological innovations development (e.g. geographical information systems) to ensure relevance and applicability. Our review provided evidence that non-health clusters can contribute to improving health outcomes using focussed interventions for implementation by government or humanitarian partners to inform LMIC health system responses to mass displacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Durrance-Bagale
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom
| | - Omar Mukhtar Salman
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom
| | - Maryam Omar
- Bart's Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1BB, United Kingdom
| | - Mervat Alhaffar
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad Ferdaus
- BRAC University, UB04 - 66 Bir Uttam AK Khandakar Road, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
| | - Sanjida Newaz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, 750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg MB R3E 0W2, Canada
| | - Sneha Krishnan
- Environment, Technology and Community Health (ETCH) Consultancy Services, Mumbai, India
| | - Natasha Howard
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.,National University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, 12 Science Drive 2, 117549, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Khalid AF, Lavis JN, El-Jardali F, Vanstone M. Stakeholders' experiences with the evidence aid website to support 'real-time' use of research evidence to inform decision-making in crisis zones: a user testing study. Health Res Policy Syst 2019; 17:106. [PMID: 31888658 PMCID: PMC6936118 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0498-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Humanitarian action in crisis zones is fraught with many challenges, including lack of timely and accessible research evidence to inform decision-making about humanitarian interventions. Evidence websites have the potential to address this challenge. Evidence Aid is the only evidence website designed for crisis zones that focuses on providing research evidence in the form of systematic reviews. The objective of this study is to explore stakeholders’ views of Evidence Aid, contributing further to our understanding of the use of research evidence in decision-making in crisis zones. Methods We designed a qualitative user-testing study to collect interview data from stakeholders about their impressions of Evidence Aid. Eligible stakeholders included those with and without previous experience of Evidence Aid. All participants were either currently working or have worked within the last year in a crisis zone. Participants were asked to perform the same user experience-related tasks and answer questions about this experience and their knowledge needs. Data were analysed using a deductive framework analysis approach drawing on Morville’s seven facets of the user experience — findability, usability, usefulness, desirability, accessibility, credibility and value. Results A total of 31 interviews were completed with senior decision-makers (n = 8), advisors (n = 7), field managers (n = 7), analysts/researchers (n = 5) and healthcare providers (n = 4). Participant self-reported knowledge needs varied depending on their role. Overall, participants did not identify any ‘major’ problems (highest order) and identified only two ‘big’ problems (second highest order) with using the Evidence Aid website, namely the lack of a search engine on the home page and that some full-text articles linked to/from the site require a payment. Participants identified seven specific suggestions about how to improve Evidence Aid, many of which can also be applied to other evidence websites. Conclusions Stakeholders in crisis zones found Evidence Aid to be useful, accessible and credible. However, they experienced some problems with the lack of a search engine on the home page and the requirement for payment for some full-text articles linked to/from the site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Firas Khalid
- Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - John N Lavis
- Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Fadi El-Jardali
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Management & Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.,Center for Systematic Review in Health Policy and Systems Research (SPARK), American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.,Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Meredith Vanstone
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
El Achi N, Papamichail A, Rizk A, Lindsay H, Menassa M, Abdul-Khalek RA, Ekzayez A, Dewachi O, Patel P. A conceptual framework for capacity strengthening of health research in conflict: the case of the Middle East and North Africa region. Global Health 2019; 15:81. [PMID: 31779660 PMCID: PMC6883714 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-019-0525-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In conflict settings, research capacities have often been de-prioritized as resources are diverted to emergency needs, such as addressing elevated morbidity, mortality and health system challenges directly and/or indirectly associated to war. This has had an adverse long-term impact in such protracted conflicts such as those found in the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA), where research knowledge and skills have often been compromised. In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework for health research capacity strengthening that adapts existing models and frameworks in low- and middle-income countries and uses our knowledge of the MENA context to contextualise them for conflict settings. METHODS The framework was synthesized using "best fit" framework synthesis methodology. Relevant literature, available in English and Arabic, was collected through PubMed, Google Scholar and Google using the keywords: capacity building; capacity strengthening; health research; framework and conflict. Grey literature was also assessed. RESULTS The framework is composed of eight principal themes: "structural levels", "the influence of the external environment", "funding, community needs and policy environment", "assessing existing capacity and needs", "infrastructure and communication", "training, leadership and partnership", "adaptability and sustainability", and "monitoring and evaluation"; with each theme being supported by examples from the MENA region. Our proposed framework takes into consideration safety, infrastructure, communication and adaptability as key factors that affect research capacity strengthening in conflict. As it is the case more generally, funding, permissible political environments and sustainability are major determinants of success for capacity strengthening for health research programmes, though these are significantly more challenging in conflict settings. Nonetheless, health research capacity strengthening should remain a priority. CONCLUSION The model presented is the first framework that focuses on strengthening health research capacity in conflict with a focus on the MENA region. It should be viewed as a non-prescriptive reference tool for health researchers and practitioners, from various disciplines, involved in research capacity strengthening to evaluate, use, adapt and improve. It can be further extended to include representative indicators and can be later evaluated by assessing its efficacy for interventions in conflict settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nassim El Achi
- Conflict Medicine Program, Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Andreas Papamichail
- School of Politics & International Relations, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS UK
| | - Anthony Rizk
- Conflict Medicine Program, Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Helen Lindsay
- Conflict Medicine Program, Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Marilyne Menassa
- Conflict Medicine Program, Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Rima A. Abdul-Khalek
- Conflict Medicine Program, Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | | | - Omar Dewachi
- Conflict Medicine Program, Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Preeti Patel
- Department of War Studies, King’s College London, London, WC2R 2LS UK
| |
Collapse
|