Auto-antibodies to contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr) in two patients with painful inflammatory neuropathy

Nodal and paranodal antibody-associated neuropathies

Within the last decade, antibodies targeting the node and paranode of myelinated peripheral nerves have been increasingly identified in patients with acquired immune-mediated neuropathies, commonly termed 'nodo-paranodopathies'. Crucially, these patients often present with additional clinical features not usually seen with the most common immune-mediated neuropathies, Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and respond poorly to conventionally used immunomodulatory therapies. Emerging evidence that these are pathologically distinct diseases has further prompted the use of more targeted treatment, such as the B cell depleting monoclonal antibody rituximab, which has been reported to significantly improve functional outcomes in this subset of patients. We provide an overview of the emerging clinical and serological phenotypes in patients with specific nodal/paranodal antibodies, the practicalities of antibody testing and current evidence supporting the use of non-standard therapies.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autoantibodies for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Objectives: To review the available evidence on sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody detection in diagnosing a specific subset of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and to calculate the frequencies of different autoantibodies to paranodal proteins. Background: Diagnosis of CIDP relies on clinical and neurophysiologic criteria and lacks useful diagnostic biomarkers. A subset of CIDP patients exhibit atypical clinical phenotypes and impaired response to conventional treatments. These patients were reported as having autoantibodies targeting paranodal protein neurofascin isoform 155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein-1 (CASPR1). Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of these autoantibodies, especially for anti-NF155 antibody. Methods: We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science. Eligible studies provided information to calculate the frequencies of anti-NF155 antibody and anti-CNTN1 antibody, the sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody, and the incidence of improvement and deterioration among anti-NF155 antibody seropositive CIDP patients. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q and I ² statistics. Results: The pooled frequency of anti-NF155 autoantibody across 14 studies was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.10] with high heterogeneity; the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody for the diagnosis of a specific subgroup of CIDP patients were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.29-0.63) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97), respectively. Conclusions: For diagnosing of a specific subset of CIDP characterized by poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), we found a moderate sensitivity and a high specificity. The anti-NF155 antibody test should be used as a confirmatory test rather than a screening test. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020203385 and CRD42020190789.

Elucidating autoimmune nodopathies and the CIDP spectrum

This scientific commentary refers to ‘Antibodies to the Caspr1/contactin-1 complex in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy’, by Pascual-Goñi et al. (doi:10.1093/brain/awab014).

Antibodies to the Caspr1/contactin-1 complex in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Previous studies have described the clinical, serological and pathological features of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and antibodies directed against the paranodal proteins neurofascin-155, contactin-1 (CNTN1), contactin-associated protein-1 (Caspr1), or nodal forms of neurofascin. Such antibodies are useful for diagnosis and potentially treatment selection. However, antibodies targeting Caspr1 only or the Caspr1/CNTN1 complex have been reported in few patients with CIDP. Moreover, it is unclear if these patients belong to the same pathophysiological subgroup. Using cell-based assays in routine clinical testing, we identified sera from patients with CIDP showing strong membrane reactivity when both CNTN1 and Caspr1 were co-transfected (but not when CNTN1 was transfected alone). Fifteen patients (10 male; aged between 40 and 75) with antibodies targeting Caspr1/CNTN1 co-transfected cells were enrolled for characterization. The prevalence of anti-Caspr1/CNTN1 antibodies was 1.9% (1/52) in the Sant Pau CIDP cohort, and 4.3% (1/23) in a German cohort of acute-onset CIDP. All patients fulfilled European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) definite diagnostic criteria for CIDP. Seven (47%) were initially diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome due to an acute-subacute onset. Six (40%) patients had cranial nerve involvement, eight (53%) reported neuropathic pain and 12 (80%) ataxia. Axonal involvement and acute denervation were frequent in electrophysiological studies. Complete response to intravenous immunoglobulin was not observed, while most (90%) responded well to rituximab. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and teased nerve fibre immunohistochemistry confirmed reactivity against the paranodal Caspr1/CNTN1 complex. Weaker reactivity against Caspr1 transfected alone was also detected in 10/15 (67%). Sera from 13 of these patients were available for testing by ELISA. All 13 samples reacted against Caspr1 by ELISA and this reactivity was enhanced when CNTN1 was added to the Caspr1 ELISA. IgG subclasses were also investigated by ELISA. IgG4 was the predominant subclass in 10 patients, while IgG3 was predominant in other three patients. In conclusion, patients with antibodies to the Caspr1/CNTN1 complex display similar serological and clinical features and constitute a single subgroup within the CIDP syndrome. These antibodies likely target Caspr1 primarily and are detected with Caspr1-only ELISA, but reactivity is optimal when CNTN1 is added to Caspr1 in cell-based assays and ELISA.

Mechanisms of Primary Membranous Nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is an autoimmune disease of the kidney glomerulus and one of the leading causes of nephrotic syndrome. The disease exhibits heterogenous outcomes with approximately 30% of cases progressing to end-stage renal disease. The clinical management of MN has steadily advanced owing to the identification of autoantibodies to the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) in 2009 and thrombospondin domain-containing 7A (THSD7A) in 2014 on the podocyte surface. Approximately 50–80% and 3–5% of primary MN (PMN) cases are associated with either anti-PLA2R or anti-THSD7A antibodies, respectively. The presence of these autoantibodies is used for MN diagnosis; antibody levels correlate with disease severity and possess significant biomarker values in monitoring disease progression and treatment response. Importantly, both autoantibodies are causative to MN. Additionally, evidence is emerging that NELL-1 is associated with 5–10% of PMN cases that are PLA2R- and THSD7A-negative, which moves us one step closer to mapping out the full spectrum of PMN antigens. Recent developments suggest exostosin 1 (EXT1), EXT2, NELL-1, and contactin 1 (CNTN1) are associated with MN. Genetic factors and other mechanisms are in place to regulate these factors and may contribute to MN pathogenesis. This review will discuss recent developments over the past 5 years.

The immune response and aging in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) consists of various autoimmune subtypes in which the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is attacked. CIDP can follow a relapsing-remitting or progressive course where the resultant demyelination caused by immune cells (e.g., T cells, macrophages) and antibodies can lead to disability in patients. Importantly, the age of CIDP patients has a role in their symptomology and specific variants have been associated with differing ages of onset. Furthermore, older patients have a decreased frequency of functional recovery after CIDP insult. This may be related to perturbations in immune cell populations that could exacerbate the disease with increasing age. In the present review, the immune profile of typical CIDP will be discussed followed by inferences into the potential role of relevant aging immune cell populations. Atypical variants will also be briefly reviewed followed by an examination of the available studies on the immunology underlying them.

Treatment response to cyclophosphamide, rituximab, and bortezomib in chronic immune-mediated sensorimotor neuropathies: a retrospective cohort study

Background:

Up to 20% of patients with chronic immune-mediated sensorimotor neuropathies (CIN) do not respond adequately to first-line therapies. However, studies on further treatment are scarce.

Methods:

We analyzed retrospectively 200 CIN patients regarding disease characteristics and response to therapy with cyclophosphamide (CYP), rituximab (RTX), and bortezomib (BTZ). Treatment response was defined as improvement or stabilization of inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment overall disability score (INCAT-ODSS).

Results:

A total of 48 of 181 patients (26.5%) received therapy with CYP, RTX, or BTZ. The most frequently and first used therapy was CYP (69%). More than 40% of patients needed a second or third treatment. Overall, 71 treatments were applied in 48 patients. The combination of up to all three treatments enhanced the response-rate to 90%. Treatment within 24 months after initial diagnosis resulted in significantly higher response rate than late treatment (79% versus 50 %, p = 0.04, χ²-test, n = 46) and in lower disability in long-term follow up (INCAT-ODSS 3.8 versus 5.8, p = 0.02, t-test, n = 48). Patients with Lewis-Sumner syndrome (n = 9) and autoantibody mediated neuropathies (n = 13) had excellent response rates after treatment with RTX (90–100%). In contrast, typical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) showed a response rate of 64% in CYP, 64% in RTX, and 75% in BTZ.

Conclusion:

Treatment with CYP, RTX, or BTZ was effective in this cohort of CIN refractory to first-line treatment. Our data increase evidence for an early use of these therapies. High efficacy of RTX in Lewis-Sumner syndrome in contrast to typical CIDP suggests a distinct pathophysiology.

New evidence for secondary axonal degeneration in demyelinating neuropathies

Development of peripheral nervous system (PNS) myelin involves a coordinated series of events between growing axons and the Schwann cell (SC) progenitors that will eventually ensheath them. Myelin sheaths have evolved out of necessity to maintain rapid impulse propagation while accounting for body space constraints. However, myelinating SCs perform additional critical functions that are required to preserve axonal integrity including mitigating energy consumption by establishing the nodal architecture, regulating axon caliber by organizing axonal cytoskeleton networks, providing trophic and potentially metabolic support, possibly supplying genetic translation materials and protecting axons from toxic insults. The intermediate steps between the loss of these functions and the initiation of axon degeneration are unknown but the importance of these processes provides insightful clues. Prevalent demyelinating diseases of the PNS include the inherited neuropathies Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, Type 1 (CMT1) and Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies (HNPP) and the inflammatory diseases Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (AIDP) and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP). Secondary axon degeneration is a common feature of demyelinating neuropathies and this process is often correlated with clinical deficits and long-lasting disability in patients. There is abundant electrophysiological and histological evidence for secondary axon degeneration in patients and rodent models of PNS demyelinating diseases. Fully understanding the involvement of secondary axon degeneration in these diseases is essential for expanding our knowledge of disease pathogenesis and prognosis, which will be essential for developing novel therapeutic strategies.

Implication of Contactins in Demyelinating Pathologies

Demyelinating pathologies comprise of a variety of conditions where either central or peripheral myelin is attacked, resulting in white matter lesions and neurodegeneration. Myelinated axons are organized into molecularly distinct domains, and this segregation is crucial for their proper function. These defined domains are differentially affected at the different stages of demyelination as well as at the lesion and perilesion sites. Among the main players in myelinated axon organization are proteins of the contactin (CNTN) group of the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) of cell adhesion molecules, namely Contactin-1 and Contactin-2 (CNTN1, CNTN2). The two contactins perform their functions through intermolecular interactions, which are crucial for myelinated axon integrity and functionality. In this review, we focus on the implication of these two molecules as well as their interactors in demyelinating pathologies in humans. At first, we describe the organization and function of myelinated axons in the central (CNS) and the peripheral (PNS) nervous system, further analyzing the role of CNTN1 and CNTN2 as well as their interactors in myelination. In the last section, studies showing the correlation of the two contactins with demyelinating pathologies are reviewed, highlighting the importance of these recognition molecules in shaping the function of the nervous system in multiple ways.

Diagnostic challenges in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) consists of a spectrum of autoimmune diseases of the peripheral nerves, causing weakness and sensory symptoms. Diagnosis often is challenging, because of the heterogeneous presentation and both mis- and underdiagnosis are common. Nerve conduction study (NCS) abnormalities suggestive of demyelination are mandatory to fulfil the diagnostic criteria. On the one hand, performance and interpretation of NCS can be difficult and none of these demyelinating findings are specific for CIDP. On the other hand, not all patients will be detected despite the relatively high sensitivity of NCS abnormalities. The electrodiagnostic criteria can be supplemented with additional diagnostic tests such as CSF examination, MRI, nerve biopsy, and somatosensory evoked potentials. However, the evidence for each of these additional diagnostic tests is limited. Studies are often small without the use of a clinically relevant control group. None of the findings are specific for CIDP, meaning that the results of the diagnostic tests should be carefully interpreted. In this update we will discuss the pitfalls in diagnosing CIDP and the value of newly introduced diagnostic tests such as nerve ultrasound and testing for autoantibodies, which are not yet part of the guidelines.

Pathophysiology of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Insights into Classification and Therapeutic Strategy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is classically defined as polyneuropathy with symmetric involvement of the proximal and distal portions of the limbs. In addition to this "typical CIDP", the currently prevailing diagnostic criteria proposed by the European Federation of Neurological Societies and Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) define "atypical CIDP" as encompassing the multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM), distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS), pure sensory, pure motor, and focal subtypes. Although macrophage-induced demyelination is considered pivotal to the pathogenesis of CIDP, recent studies have indicated the presence of distinctive mechanisms initiated by autoantibodies against paranodal junction proteins, such as neurofascin 155 and contactin 1. These findings led to the emergence of the concept of nodopathy or paranodopathy. Patients with these antibodies tend to show clinical features compatible with typical CIDP or DADS, particularly the latter. In contrast, classical macrophage-induced demyelination is commonly found in some patients in each major subtype, including the typical CIDP, DADS, MADSAM, and pure sensory subtypes. Differences in the distribution of lesions and the repair processes underlying demyelination by Schwann cells may determine the differences among subtypes. In particular, the preferential involvement of proximal and distal nerve segments has been suggested to occur in typical CIDP, whereas the involvement of the middle nerve segments is conspicuous in MADSAM. These findings suggest that humoral rather than cellular immunity predominates in the former because nerve roots and neuromuscular junctions lack blood-nerve barriers. Treatment for CIDP consists of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, steroids, and plasma exchange, either alone or in combination. However, patients with anti-neurofascin 155 and contactin 1 antibodies are refractory to IVIg. It has been suggested that rituximab, a monoclonal antibody to CD20, could have efficacy in these patients. Further studies are needed to validate the CIDP subtypes defined by the EFNS/PNS from the viewpoint of pathogenesis and establish therapeutic strategies based on the pathophysiologies specific to each subtype.

Optic, trigeminal, and facial neuropathy related to anti-neurofascin 155 antibody

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the frequency and patterns of optic, trigeminal, and facial nerve involvement by neuroimaging and electrophysiology in IgG4 anti-neurofascin 155 antibody-positive (NF155⁺ ) chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

Thirteen IgG4 NF155⁺ CIDP patients with mean onset age of 34 years (11 men) were subjected to neurological examination, blink reflex, and visual-evoked potential (VEP) testing, and axial and/or coronal T2-weighted head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Among 13 patients, facial sensory impairment, facial weakness, and apparent visual impairment were observed in three (23.1%), two (15.4%), and two (15.4%) patients, respectively. All 12 patients tested had blink reflex abnormalities: absent and/or delayed R1 in 11 (91.7%), and absent and/or delayed R2 in 10 (83.3%). R1 latencies had strong positive correlations with serum anti-NF155 antibody levels (r = 0.9, P ≤ 0.0001 on both sides) and distal and F wave latencies of the median and ulnar nerves. Absent and/or prolonged VEPs were observed in 10/13 (76.9%) patients and 17/26 (65.4%) eyes. On MRI, hypertrophy, and high signal intensity of trigeminal nerves were detected in 9/13 (69.2%) and 10/13 (76.9%) patients, respectively, whereas optic nerves were normal in all patients. The intra-orbital trigeminal nerve width on coronal sections showed a significant positive correlation with disease duration.

INTERPRETATION

Subclinical demyelination frequently occurs in the optic, trigeminal, and facial nerves in IgG4 NF155⁺ CIDP, suggesting that both central and peripheral myelin structures of the cranial nerves are involved in this condition, whereas nerve hypertrophy only develops in myelinated peripheral nerve fibers.

Update on IgG4-mediated autoimmune diseases: New insights and new family members

Antibodies of IgG4 subclass are exceptional players of the immune system, as they are considered to be immunologically inert and functionally monovalent, and as such may be part of classical tolerance mechanisms. IgG4 antibodies are found in a range of different diseases, including IgG4-related diseases, allergy, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, helminth infection and IgG4 autoimmune diseases, where they may be pathogenic or protective. IgG4 autoimmune diseases are an emerging new group of diseases that are characterized by pathogenic, antigen-specific autoantibodies of IgG4 subclass, such as MuSK myasthenia gravis, pemphigus vulgaris and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The list of IgG4 autoantigens is rapidly growing and to date contains 29 candidate antigens. Interestingly, IgG4 autoimmune diseases are restricted to four distinct organs: 1) the central and peripheral nervous system, 2) the kidney, 3) the skin and mucous membranes and 4) the vascular system and soluble antigens in the blood circulation. The pathogenicity of IgG4 can be validated using our classification system, and is usually excerted by functional blocking of protein-protein interaction.

Antiparanodal antibodies and IgG subclasses in acute autoimmune neuropathy

Objective

To determine whether IgG subclasses of antiparanodal autoantibodies are related to disease course and treatment response in acute- to subacute-onset neuropathies, we retrospectively screened 161 baseline serum/CSF samples and 66 follow-up serum/CSF samples.

Methods

We used ELISA and immunofluorescence assays to detect antiparanodal IgG and their subclasses and titers in serum/CSF of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), recurrent GBS (R-GBS), Miller-Fisher syndrome, and acute- to subacute-onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (A-CIDP). We evaluated clinical data retrospectively.

Results

We detected antiparanodal autoantibodies with a prevalence of 4.3% (7/161), more often in A-CIDP (4/23, 17.4%) compared with GBS (3/114, 2.6%). Longitudinal subclass analysis in the patients with GBS revealed IgG2/3 autoantibodies against Caspr-1 and against anti–contactin-1/Caspr-1, which disappeared at remission. At disease onset, patients with A-CIDP had IgG2/3 anti–Caspr-1 and anti–contactin-1/Caspr-1 or IgG4 anti–contactin-1 antibodies, IgG3 being associated with good response to IV immunoglobulins (IVIg). In the chronic phase of disease, IgG subclass of one patient with A-CIDP switched from IgG3 to IgG4.

Conclusion

Our data (1) confirm and extend previous observations that antiparanodal IgG2/3 but not IgG4 antibodies can occur in acute-onset neuropathies manifesting as monophasic GBS, (2) suggest association of IgG3 to a favorable response to IVIg, and (3) lend support to the hypothesis that in some patients, an IgG subclass switch from IgG3 to IgG4 may be the correlate of a secondary progressive or relapsing course following a GBS-like onset.

Ultrastructural Lesions of Nodo-Paranodopathies in Peripheral Neuropathies

Whatever the cause of myelin damage of the peripheral nervous system, the initial attack on myelin by a dysimmune process may begin either at the internodal area or in the paranodal and nodal regions. The term "nodo-paranodopathy" was first applied to some "axonal Guillain-Barré syndrome" subtypes, then extended to cases classified as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy bearing IgG4 antibodies against paranodal axoglial proteins. In these cases, paranodal dissection develops in the absence of macrophage-induced demyelination. In contrast, the mechanisms of demyelination of other dysimmune neuropathies induced by macrophages are unexplained, as no antibodies have been identified in such cases. Electron microscopy of longitudinal sections of nerve biopsies is useful to visualize and authenticate the characteristic lesions of paranodes/nodes. However, it should be borne in mind that identical ultrastructural aspects are seen in other types of polyneuropathies: Genetic, experimental, and in a few polyneuropathies for which there is no obvious etiology. Ultrastructural nerve studies confirm the initial involvement of nodes/paranodes in various types of acquired and genetic neuropathies. For some of them, the antibodies or the proteins involved by mutations are clearly identified such as Caspr-1, Contactin-1, NFasc155, and NFasc186; other unidentified proteins are likely to be involved as well.

Antibodies against the node of Ranvier: a real-life evaluation of incidence, clinical features and response to treatment based on a prospective analysis of 1500 sera

INTRODUCTION

IgG4 antibodies against neurofascin (Nfasc155 and Nfasc140/186), contactin (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein (Caspr1) are described in specific subtypes of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Our objective was to assess, in a real-life practice, the incidence, the clinical features and the response to treatment of these forms of CIDP.

METHODS

1500 sera of patients suspected of having CIDP from France, Belgium and Switzerland were prospectively tested using a flow cytometry technique. The characteristics of patients with antibodies against the node of Ranvier were compared to 100 seronegative CIDP from our department.

RESULTS

IgG4 antibodies against Nfasc155, CNTN1, and Caspr1 were, respectively, detected in 15 (prevalence 1%), 10 (0.7%) and 2 (0.2%) sera. Antibodies specific of the Nfasc140/186 were not detected. All subjects with antibodies against the node of Ranvier fulfilled diagnostic criteria for CIDP. CIDP with anti-Nfasc155 were younger, had more sensory ataxia and postural tremor than seronegative CIDP. CIDP with anti-CNTN1 had more frequent subacute onset and facial paralysis, commoner renal involvement with membranous glomerulonephritis and greater disability, than seronegative CIDP. CIDP with anti-Caspr1 had more frequent respiratory failure and cranial nerve involvement but not more neuropathic pain than seronegative CIDP. Intravenous immunoglobulins were ineffective in most seropositive patients. Rituximab produced dramatic improvement in disability and decreased antibodies titres in 13 seropositive patients (8 with anti-Nfasc155 and 5 with anti-CNTN1 antibodies).

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, anti-paranodal antibodies are clinically valuable, because they are associated with specific phenotypes and therapeutic response.

Immunoadsorption and Plasma Exchange in Seropositive and Seronegative Immune-Mediated Neuropathies

The inflammatory neuropathies are disabling conditions with diverse immunological mechanisms. In some, a pathogenic role for immunoglobulin G (IgG)-class autoantibodies is increasingly appreciated, and immunoadsorption (IA) may therefore be a useful therapeutic option. We reviewed the use of and response to IA or plasma exchange (PLEx) in a cohort of 41 patients with nodal/paranodal antibodies identified from a total of 573 individuals with suspected inflammatory neuropathies during the course of routine diagnostic testing (PNAb cohort). 20 patients had been treated with PLEx and 4 with IA. Following a global but subjective evaluation by their treating clinicians, none of these patients were judged to have had a good response to either of these treatment modalities. Sequential serology of one PNAb+ case suggests prolonged suppression of antibody levels with frequent apheresis cycles or adjuvant therapies, may be required for effective treatment. We further retrospectively evaluated the serological status of 40 patients with either Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and a control group of 20 patients with clinically-isolated syndrome/multiple sclerosis (CIS/MS), who had all been treated with IgG-depleting IA (IA cohort). 32 of these patients (8/20 with CIDP, 13/20 with GBS, 11/20 with MS) were judged responsive to apheresis despite none of the serum samples from this cohort testing positive for IgG antibodies against glycolipids or nodal/paranodal cell-adhesion molecules. Although negative on antigen specific assays, three patients' pre-treatment sera and eluates were reactive against different components of myelinating co-cultures. In summary, preliminary evidence suggests that GBS/CIDP patients without detectable IgG antibodies on routine diagnostic tests may nevertheless benefit from IA, and that an unbiased screening approach using myelinating co-cultures may assist in the detection of further autoantibodies which remain to be identified in such patients.

Distinguish CIDP with autoantibody from that without autoantibody: pathogenesis, histopathology, and clinical features

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is considered to be an immune-mediated heterogeneous disease involving cellular and humoral immunity. In recent years, autoantibodies against nodal/paranodal protein neurofascin155 (NF155), neurofascin186 (NF186), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) have been identified in a small subset of patients with CIDP, which disrupt axo-glial interactions at nodes/paranodes. Although CIDP electrodiagnosis was made in patients with anti-nodal/paranodal component autoantibodies, macrophage-induced demyelination, the characteristic of typical CIDP, was not observed. Apart from specific histopathology, the pathogenic mechanisms and clinical manifestations of CIDP with autoantibody are also distinct. We herein compared pathogenesis, histopathology, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic response in CIDP with autoantibody vs. CIDP without autoantibody. CIDP with autoantibodies should be considered as an independent disease entity, not a subtype of CIDP due to many differences. They possibly should be classified as CIDP-like chronic nodo-paranodopathy, which can better characterize these disorders, help diagnose and make the most effective therapeutic decisions.

Physiology of gangliosides and the role of antiganglioside antibodies in human diseases

Gangliosides are structurally and functionally polymorphic sialic acid containing glycosphingolipids that are widely distributed in the human body. They play important roles in protecting us against immune attacks, yet they can become targets for autoimmunity and act as receptors for microbes, like the influenza viruses, and toxins, such as the cholera toxin. The expression patterns of gangliosides vary in different tissues, during different life periods, as well as in different animals. Antibodies against gangliosides (AGA) can target immune attack e.g., against neuronal cells and neutralize their complement inhibitory activity. AGAs are important especially in acquired demyelinating immune-mediated neuropathies, like Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and its variant, the Miller-Fisher syndrome (MFS). They can emerge in response to different microbial agents and immunological insults. Thereby, they can be involved in a variety of diseases. In addition, antibodies against GM3 were found in the sera of patients vaccinated with Pandemrix®, who developed secondary narcolepsy, strongly supporting the autoimmune etiology of the disease.

Molecular organization and function of vertebrate septate-like junctions

Septate-like junctions display characteristic ladder-like ultrastructure reminiscent of the invertebrate epithelial septate junctions and are present at the paranodes of myelinated axons. The paranodal junctions where the myelin loops attach to the axon at the borders of the node of Ranvier provide both a paracellular barrier to ion diffusion and a lateral fence along the axonal membrane. The septate-like junctions constrain the proper distribution of nodal Na⁺ channels and juxtaparanodal K⁺ channels, which are required for the safe propagation of the nerve influx and rapid saltatory conduction. The paranodal cell adhesion molecules have been identified as target antigens in peripheral demyelinating autoimmune diseases and the pathogenic mechanisms described. This review aims at presenting the recent knowledge on the molecular and structural organization of septate-like junctions, their formation and stabilization during development, and how they are involved in demyelinating diseases.

Pain and the immune system: emerging concepts of IgG-mediated autoimmune pain and immunotherapies

The immune system has long been recognised important in pain regulation through inflammatory cytokine modulation of peripheral nociceptive fibres. Recently, cytokine interactions in brain and spinal cord glia as well as dorsal root ganglia satellite glia have been identified important- in pain modulation. The result of these interactions is central and peripheral sensitisation of nociceptive processing. Additionally, new insights and the term 'autoimmune pain' have emerged through discovery of specific IgGs targeting the extracellular domains of antigens at nodal and synaptic structures, causing pain directly without inflammation by enhancing neuronal excitability. Other discovered IgGs heighten pain indirectly by T-cell-mediated inflammation or destruction of targets within the nociceptive pathways. Notable identified IgGs in pain include those against the components of channels and receptors involved in inhibitory or excitatory somatosensory synapses or their pathways: nodal and paranodal proteins (LGI1, CASPR1, CASPR2); glutamate detection (AMPA-R); GABA regulation and release (GAD65, amphiphysin); glycine receptors (GLY-R); water channels (AQP4). These disorders have other neurological manifestations of central/peripheral hyperexcitabability including seizures, encephalopathy, myoclonus, tremor and spasticity, with immunotherapy responsiveness. Other pain disorders, like complex regional pain disorder, have been associated with IgGs against β2-adrenergic receptor, muscarinic-2 receptors, AChR-nicotinic ganglionic α-3 receptors and calcium channels (N and P/Q types), but less consistently with immune treatment response. Here, we outline how the immune system contributes to development and regulation of pain, review specific IgG-mediated pain disorders and summarise recent development in therapy approaches. Biological agents to treat pain (anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide and anti-nerve growth factor) are also discussed.

Antibodies to neurofascin, contactin-1, and contactin-associated protein 1 in CIDP: Clinical relevance of IgG isotype

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and isotypes of anti-nodal/paranodal antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins in a large chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) cohort, compare clinical features in seronegative vs seropositive patients, and gather evidence of their isotype-specific pathogenic role.

METHODS

Antibodies to neurofascin-155 (Nfasc155), neurofascin-140/186 (Nfasc140/186), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr1) were detected with ELISA and/or cell-based assay. Antibody pathogenicity was tested by immunohistochemistry on skin biopsy, intraneural injection, and cell aggregation assay.

RESULTS

Of 342 patients with CIDP, 19 (5.5%) had antibodies against Nfasc155 (n = 9), Nfasc140/186 and Nfasc155 (n = 1), CNTN1 (n = 3), and Caspr1 (n = 6). Antibodies were absent from healthy and disease controls, including neuropathies of different causes, and were mostly detected in patients with European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) definite CIDP (n = 18). Predominant antibody isotypes were immunoglobulin G (IgG)4 (n = 13), IgG3 (n = 2), IgG1 (n = 2), or undetectable (n = 2). IgG4 antibody-associated phenotypes included onset before 30 years, severe neuropathy, subacute onset, tremor, sensory ataxia, and poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Immunosuppressive treatments, including rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate, proved effective if started early in IVIG-resistant IgG4-seropositive cases. Five patients with an IgG1, IgG3, or undetectable isotype showed clinical features indistinguishable from seronegative patients, including good response to IVIG. IgG4 autoantibodies were associated with morphological changes at paranodes in patients' skin biopsies. We also provided preliminary evidence from a single patient about the pathogenicity of anti-Caspr1 IgG4, showing their ability to penetrate paranodal regions and disrupt the integrity of the Nfasc155/CNTN1/Caspr1 complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm previous data on the tight clinico-serological correlation between antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins and CIDP. Despite the low prevalence, testing for their presence and isotype could ultimately be part of the diagnostic workup in suspected inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide treatment.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins identify patients with CIDP (sensitivity 6%, specificity 100%).

Antibody- and macrophage-mediated segmental demyelination in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: clinical, electrophysiological, immunological and pathological correlates

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder critically lacking diagnostic biomarkers. Autoantibodies to nodal and paranodal components have recently been described in a small subset of patients. Here, the diagnostic value of immune reactivity toward the myelin compartment was investigated.

METHODS

Ninety-four French CIDP patients were retrospectively studied. The reactivity toward the peripheral nerve was investigated. Sural nerve biopsies were examined by electron microscopy and immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (22%) and three patients (3%) presented with a strong immunoglobulin G or immunoglobulin M reactivity respectively against the myelin compartment. The clinical, electrophysiological and morphological features were examined in nine of these patients for whom sural nerve biopsies were available. Seven patients were electrodiagnosed with definite CIDP, one with possible CIDP and one was unclassifiable but sural nerve biopsy argued for CIDP diagnosis. Electron microscopy of sural nerve biopsies demonstrated the presence of macrophage-mediated demyelination restricted to the internode in all nine patients. Immunolabelling for voltage-gated sodium channels, myelin and axonal markers confirmed the presence of segmental demyelination and of remyelination. The nodal and paranodal regions, however, were unaffected in these patients. Nerve conduction studies corroborated the multifocal and segmental profile, and seven patients showed increased duration of proximal (1.5-5.1 times) and/or distal (1.2-3.4 times) compound muscle action potential in at least two nerves.

CONCLUSION

Antibody- and macrophage-mediated demyelination appears responsible for conduction alterations in CIDP patients and nerve immunostaining assays may serve as a supportive diagnostic biomarker.

Unique HLA haplotype associations in IgG4 anti-neurofascin 155 antibody-positive chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

To clarify the immunogenetic background of patients with immunoglobulin G (IgG)4 anti-neurofascin 155 (NF155) antibody-positive chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), we genotyped the extended human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes in 22 Japanese patients with this disorder and compared them with those of healthy Japanese controls. All IgG4 anti-NF155 antibody-positive CIDP patients exclusively carried either HLA-DRB1*15:01-DRB5*01:01-DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02 or -(A*24:02)-B*52:01-C*12:02-DRB1*15:02-DRB5*01:02-DQA1*01:03-DQB1*06:01, resulting in significantly increased HLA-DRB1*15, -DRB1*15:01, -DQB1*06:01/06:02, -DQB1*06:02, and -DRB1*15:01-DQB1*06:02 frequencies compared with healthy Japanese controls. These findings indicate the involvement of specific HLA class II molecules in the pathomechanisms of IgG4 anti-NF155 antibody-positive CIDP.

Autoantibodies in immune-mediated inflammatory neuropathies

Inflammatory neuropathies are a rare and heterogeneous group of diseases of the nervous system characterized by the dysfunction and damage of different structures of the peripheral nerves. This group includes Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic demyelinating inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy or neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy. The aetiology of these diseases is unknown, but B cells and autoantibodies play a key role in their pathogenesis. Autoantibodies against peripheral nerve molecules such as gangliosides, proteins of the Ranvier node or myelin-associated glycoprotein have been described, allowing the identification of subgroups of patients with specific clinical phenotypes. For all these reasons, these antibodies are useful in clinical practice. This review focuses on the diagnostic and therapeutic relevance of autoantibodies in inflammatory neuropathies.

Intrathecal cytokine profile in neuropathy with anti-neurofascin 155 antibody

Objective

To characterize the CSF cytokine profile in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients with IgG4 anti‐neurofascin 155 (NF155) antibodies (NF155⁺ CIDP) or those lacking anti‐NF155 antibodies (NF155⁻ CIDP).

Methods

Twenty‐eight CSF cytokines/chemokines/growth factors were measured by multiplexed fluorescent immunoassay in 35 patients with NF155⁺ CIDP, 36 with NF155⁻ CIDP, and 28 with non‐inflammatory neurological disease (NIND).

Results

CSF CXCL8/IL‐8, IL‐13, TNF‐α, CCL11/eotaxin, CCL2/MCP‐1, and IFN‐γ were significantly higher, while IL‐1β, IL‐1ra, and G‐CSF were lower, in NF155⁺ CIDP than in NIND. Compared with NF155⁻ CIDP, CXCL8/IL‐8 and IL‐13 were significantly higher, and IL‐1β, IL‐1ra, and IL‐6 were lower, in NF155⁺ CIDP. CXCL8/IL‐8, IL‐13, CCL11/eotaxin, CXCL10/IP‐10, CCL3/MIP‐1α, CCL4/MIP‐1β, and TNF‐α levels were positively correlated with markedly elevated CSF protein, while IL‐13, CCL11/eotaxin, and IL‐17 levels were positively correlated with increased CSF cell counts. IL‐13, CXCL8/IL‐8, CCL4/MIP‐1β, CCL3/MIP‐1α, and CCL5/RANTES were decreased by combined immunotherapies in nine NF155⁺ CIDP patients examined longitudinally. By contrast, NF155⁻ CIDP had significantly increased IFN‐γ compared with NIND, and exhibited positive correlations of IFN‐γ, CXCL10/IP‐10, and CXCL8/IL‐8 with CSF protein. Canonical discriminant analysis of cytokines/chemokines revealed that NF155⁺ and NF155⁻ CIDP were separable, and that IL‐4, IL‐10, and IL‐13 were the three most significant discriminators.

Interpretation

Intrathecal upregulation of type 2 helper T (Th2) cell cytokines is characteristic of IgG4 NF155⁺ CIDP, while type 1 helper T cell cytokines are increased in CIDP regardless of the presence or absence of anti‐NF155 antibodies, suggesting that overproduction of Th2 cell cytokines is unique to NF155⁺ CIDP.

Anti-pan-neurofascin IgG3 as a marker of fulminant autoimmune neuropathy

Objective

To identify and characterize patients with autoantibodies against different neurofascin (NF) isoforms.

Methods

Screening of a large cohort of patient sera for anti-NF autoantibodies by ELISA and further characterization by cell-based assays, epitope mapping, and complement binding assays.

Results

Two different clinical phenotypes became apparent in this study: The well-known clinical picture of subacute-onset severe sensorimotor neuropathy with tremor that is known to be associated with IgG4 autoantibodies against the paranodal isoform NF-155 was found in 2 patients. The second phenotype with a dramatic course of disease with tetraplegia and almost locked-in syndrome was associated with IgG3 autoantibodies against nodal and paranodal isoforms of NF in 3 patients. The epitope against which these autoantibodies were directed in this second phenotype was the common Ig domain found in all 3 NF isoforms. In contrast, anti–NF-155 IgG4 were directed against the NF-155–specific Fn3Fn4 domain. The description of a second phenotype of anti–NF-associated neuropathy is in line with some case reports of similar patients that were published in the last year.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that anti–pan-NF-associated neuropathy differs from anti–NF-155-associated neuropathy, and epitope and subclass play a major role in the pathogenesis and severity of anti–NF-associated neuropathy and should be determined to correctly classify patients, also in respect to possible differences in therapeutic response.

Polyneuropathies

BACKGROUND

Polyneuropathies (peripheral neuropathies) are the most common type of disorder of the peripheral nervous system in adults, and specifically in the elderly, with an estimated prevalence of 5-8%, depending on age. The options for treatment depend on the cause, which should therefore be identified as precisely as possible by an appropriate diagnostic evaluation.

METHODS

This review is based on the current guidelines and on large-scale cohort studies and randomized, controlled trials published from 2000 to 2017, with an emphasis on non-hereditary types of polyneuropathy, that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed.

RESULTS

Diabetes is the most common cause of polyneuropathy in Europe and North America. Alcohol-associated polyneuropathy has a prevalence of 22-66% among persons with chronic alcoholism. Because of the increasing prevalence of malignant disease and the use of new chemotherapeutic drugs, chemotherapy-induced neuropathies (CIN) have gained in clinical importance; their prevalence is often stated to be 30-40%, with high variation depending on the drug(s) and treatment regimen used. Polyneuropathy can also arise from genetic causes or as a consequence of vitamin deficiency or overdose, exposure to toxic substances and drugs, and a variety of immunological processes. About half of all cases of polyneu - ropathy are associated with pain. Neuropathic pain can be treated symptomatically with medication. Exercise, physiotherapy, and ergotherapy can also be beneficial, depending on the patient's symptoms and functional deficits.

CONCLUSION

A timely diagnosis of the cause of polyneuropathy is a prerequisite for the initiation of appropriate specific treatment. Patients with severe neuropathy of unidentified cause should be referred to a specialized center for a thorough diagnostic evaluation.

Early auto-immune targeting of photoreceptor ribbon synapses in mouse models of multiple sclerosis

Optic neuritis is one of the first manifestations of multiple sclerosis. Its pathogenesis is incompletely understood, but considered to be initiated by an auto‐immune response directed against myelin sheaths of the optic nerve. Here, we demonstrate in two frequently used and well‐validated mouse models of optic neuritis that ribbon synapses in the myelin‐free retina are targeted by an auto‐reactive immune system even before alterations in the optic nerve have developed. The auto‐immune response is directed against two adhesion proteins (CASPR1/CNTN1) that are present both in the paranodal region of myelinated nerves as well as at retinal ribbon synapses. This occurs in parallel with altered synaptic vesicle cycling in retinal ribbon synapses and altered visual behavior before the onset of optic nerve demyelination. These findings indicate that early synaptic dysfunctions in the retina contribute to the pathology of optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis.

Conduction block in immune-mediated neuropathy: paranodopathy versus axonopathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conduction block is a pathognomonic feature of immune-mediated neuropathies. The aim of this study was to advance understanding of pathophysiology and conduction block in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN).

METHODS

A multimodal approach was used, incorporating clinical phenotyping, neurophysiology, immunohistochemistry and structural assessments.

RESULTS

Of 49 CIDP and 14 MMN patients, 25% and 79% had median nerve forearm block, respectively. Clinical scores were similar in CIDP patients with and without block. CIDP patients with median nerve block demonstrated markedly elevated thresholds and greater threshold changes in threshold electrotonus, whilst those without did not differ from healthy controls in electrotonus parameters. In contrast, MMN patients exhibited marked increases in superexcitability. Nerve size was similar in both CIDP groups at the site of axonal excitability. However, CIDP patients with block demonstrated more frequent paranodal serum binding to teased rat nerve fibres. In keeping with these findings, mathematical modelling of nerve excitability recordings in CIDP patients with block support the role of paranodal dysfunction and enhanced leakage of current between the node and internode. In contrast, changes in MMN probably resulted from a reduction in ion channel density along axons.

CONCLUSIONS

The underlying pathologies in CIDP and MMN are distinct. Conduction block in CIDP is associated with paranodal dysfunction which may be antibody-mediated in a subset of patients. In contrast, MMN is characterized by channel dysfunction downstream from the site of block.

Anti-CNTN1 IgG3 induces acute conduction block and motor deficits in a passive transfer rat model

Background

Autoantibodies against the paranodal protein contactin-1 have recently been described in patients with severe acute-onset autoimmune neuropathies and mainly belong to the IgG4 subclass that does not activate complement. IgG3 anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies are rare, but have been detected during the acute onset of disease in some cases. There is evidence that anti-contactin-1 prevents adhesive interaction, and chronic exposure to anti-contactin-1 IgG4 leads to structural changes at the nodes accompanied by neuropathic symptoms. However, the pathomechanism of acute onset of disease and the pathogenic role of IgG3 anti-contactin-1 is largely unknown.

Methods

In the present study, we aimed to model acute autoantibody exposure by intraneural injection of IgG of patients with anti-contacin-1 autoantibodies to Lewis rats. Patient IgG obtained during acute onset of disease (IgG3 predominant) and IgG from the chronic phase of disease (IgG4 predominant) were studied in comparison.

Results

Conduction blocks were measured in rats injected with the “acute” IgG more often than after injection of “chronic” IgG (83.3% versus 35%) and proved to be reversible within a week after injection. Impaired nerve conduction was accompanied by motor deficits in rats after injection of the “acute” IgG but only minor structural changes of the nodes. Paranodal complement deposition was detected after injection of the “acute IgG”. We did not detect any inflammatory infiltrates, arguing against an inflammatory cascade as cause of damage to the nerve. We also did not observe dispersion of paranodal proteins or sodium channels to the juxtaparanodes as seen in patients after chronic exposure to anti-contactin-1.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that anti-contactin-1 IgG3 induces an acute conduction block that is most probably mediated by autoantibody binding and subsequent complement deposition and may account for acute onset of disease in these patients. This supports the notion of anti-contactin-1-associated neuropathy as a paranodopathy with the nodes of Ranvier as the site of pathogenesis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-019-1462-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Anti-Neurofascin-155 IgG4 antibodies prevent paranodal complex formation in vivo

Neurofascin-155 (Nfasc155) is an essential glial cell adhesion molecule expressed in paranodal septate-like junctions of peripheral and central myelinated axons. The genetic deletion of Nfasc155 results in the loss of septate-like junctions and in conduction slowing. In humans, IgG4 antibodies against Nfasc155 are implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). These antibodies are associated with an aggressive onset, a refractoriness to intravenous immunoglobulin, and tremor of possible cerebellar origin. Here, we examined the pathogenic effects of patient-derived anti-Nfasc155 IgG4. These antibodies did not inhibit the ability of Nfasc155 to complex with its axonal partners contactin-1/CASPR1 or induce target internalization. Passive transfer experiments revealed that IgG4 antibodies target Nfasc155 on Schwann cell surface, and diminished Nfasc155 protein levels and prevented paranodal complex formation in neonatal animals. In adult animals, chronic intrathecal infusions of antibodies also induced the loss of Nfasc155 and of paranodal specialization and resulted in conduction alterations in motor nerves. These results indicate that anti-Nfasc155 IgG4 perturb conduction in absence of demyelination, validating the existence of paranodopathy. These results also shed light on the mechanisms regulating protein insertion at paranodes.

Functional Domains in Myelinated Axons

Propagation of action potentials along axons is optimized through interactions between neurons and myelinating glial cells. Myelination drives division of the axons into distinct molecular domains including nodes of Ranvier. The high density of voltage-gated sodium channels at nodes generates action potentials allowing for rapid and efficient saltatory nerve conduction. At paranodes flanking both sides of the nodes, myelinating glial cells interact with axons, forming junctions that are essential for node formation and maintenance. Recent studies indicate that the disruption of these specialized axonal domains is involved in the pathophysiology of various neurological diseases. Loss of paranodal axoglial junctions due to genetic mutations or autoimmune attack against the paranodal proteins leads to nerve conduction failure and neurological symptoms. Breakdown of nodal and paranodal proteins by calpains, the calcium-dependent cysteine proteases, may be a common mechanism involved in various nervous system diseases and injuries. This chapter reviews recent progress in neurobiology and pathophysiology of specialized axonal domains along myelinated nerve fibers.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy, and pathophysiologically classified into acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN), and acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN). The main pathophysiological mechanism is complement-mediated nerve injury caused by antibody-antigen interaction in the peripheral nerves. Antiglycolipid antibodies are most pathogenic factors in the development of GBS, but not found in 40% of patients with GBS. One of the principal target regions in GBS is the node of Ranvier where functional molecules including glycolipids are assembled. Nodal dysfunction induced by the immune response in nodal axolemma, termed "nodopathy," can electrophysiologically show reversible conduction failure, axonal degeneration, or segmental demyelination. To detect new target molecules in antiglycolipid antibody-negative GBS and to elucidate the pathophysiology in the subacute and the subsequent phases of the disorder are the next problems.

Anti-neurofascin autoantibody and demyelination

Demyelination diseases involving the central and peripheral nervous systems are etiologically heterogeneous with both cell-mediated and humoral immunities playing pathogenic roles. Recently, autoantibodies against nodal and paranodal proteins, such as neurofascin186 (NF186), neurofascin155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1), contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) and gliomedin, have been discovered in not only chronic demyelinating conditions, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, but also in acute demyelinating conditions, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome. Only a minority of these patients harbor anti-nodal/paranodal protein antibodies; however, these autoantibodies, especially IgG4 subclass autoantibodies to paranodal proteins, are associated with unique features and these conditions are collectively termed nodopathy or paranodopathy. Establishing a concept of IgG4-related nodopathy/paranodopathy contributes to diagnosis and treatment strategy because IgG4 autoantibody-related neurological diseases are often refractory to conventional immunotherapies. IgG4 does not fix complements, or internalize the target antigens, because IgG4 exists in a monovalent bispecific form in vivo. IgG4 autoantibodies can bock protein-protein interaction. Thus, the primary role of IgG4 anti-paranodal protein antibodies may be blockade of interactions between NF155 and CNTN1/CASPR1, leading to conduction failure, which is consistent with the sural nerve pathology presenting paranodal terminal loop detachment from axons with intact internodes in the absence of inflammation. However, it still remains to be elucidated how these autoantibodies belonging to the same IgG4 subclass can cause each IgG4 autoantibody-specific manifestation. Another important issue is to clarify the mechanism by which IgG4 antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins emerge. IgG4 antibodies develop on chronic antigenic stimulation and can block antibodies that alleviate allergic inflammation by interfering with the binding of allergen-specific IgE to allergens. Thus, environmental antigens cross-reacting with nodal and paranodal proteins may warrant future study.

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy With Concurrent Membranous Nephropathy: An Anti-paranode and Podocyte Protein Antibody Study and Literature Survey

Background: Several case reports have described the concurrence of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and membranous nephropathy (MN). The presence of autoantibodies against podocyte antigens phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) and thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 7A (THSD7A) in MN suggests an autoimmune mechanism. Some CIDP patients also harbor autoantibodies against paranodal proteins such as neurofascin 155 (NF155) and contactin-1 (CNTN1). We investigated the relationship between CIDP and MN by assaying autoantibodies against paranodal and podocyte antigens in a CIDP patient with MN, and by a literature survey on the clinical features of CIDP with MN.

Methods: Anti-CNTN1 and NF155 antibodies were measured by flow cytometry using HEK293 cell lines stably expressing human CNTN1 or NF155. Binding capacity of antibodies was validated by immunostaining mouse teased sciatic nerve fibers. Anti-PLA2R antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked sorbent assay and anti-THSD7A antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay. Clinical features between 14 CIDP with MN cases including two with anti-CNTN1 antibodies and 20 anti-CNTN1 antibody-positive CIDP cases were compared.

Results: A patient whose ages was in the late 70 s complained of progressive weakness and superficial and deep sensory impairment in four extremities over 6 months. Nerve conduction studies showed prominent demyelination patterns. The patient presented with nephrotic syndrome. Renal biopsy disclosed basement membrane thickening with local subepithelial projections and glomerular deposits of IgG4, compatible with MN. Autoantibody assays revealed the presence of IgG4 and IgG1 anti-CNTN1 antibodies, but an absence of anti-NF155, anti-PLA2R, and anti-THSD7A antibodies. The patient's serum stained paranodes of teased sciatic nerves. CIDP with MN and anti-CNTN1 antibody-positive CIDP commonly showed male preponderance, relatively higher age of onset, acute to subacute onset in 35–50% of cases, distal dominant sensorimotor neuropathy, proprioceptive impairment leading to sensory ataxia, and very high cerebrospinal fluid protein levels. However, 11 of 13 CIDP patients with MN had a favorable response to mono- or combined immunotherapies whereas anti-CNTN1 antibody-positive CIDP was frequently refractory to corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

Conclusion: CIDP with MN and anti-CNTN1 antibody-positive CIDP show considerable overlap but are not identical. CIDP with MN is probably heterogeneous and some cases harbor anti-CNTN1 antibodies.

Ultrastructural mechanisms of macrophage-induced demyelination in CIDP

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a form of chronic neuropathy that is presumably caused by heterogeneous immune-mediated processes. Recent advances in the search for autoantibodies against components expressed at nodal regions, such as the nodes of Ranvier and paranodes, have substantially contributed to clarifying the pathogenesis of CIDP in a subpopulation of patients. In particular, immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) antibodies to paranodal junction proteins, including neurofascin-155 and contactin-1, have attracted the attention of researchers. Paranodal dissection resulting from the attachment of IgG4 at paranodal junctions and the absence of macrophage-induced demyelination are characteristic pathologic features in patients who have these antibodies. By contrast, the mechanisms of neuropathy in cases with classical macrophage-induced demyelination remain unclear despite the long-standing recognition of this process in CIDP. In addition to complement-dependent damage provoked by autoantibodies, recent studies have shed light on antibody-dependent phagocytosis by macrophages without participation of complements. However, a direct association between specific autoantibodies and macrophage-induced demyelination has not been reported. Electron microscopic examination of longitudinal sections of sural nerve biopsy specimens suggested that macrophages recognize specific sites of myelinated fibers as the initial target of demyelination. The site that macrophages select to initiate myelin breakdown is located around the nodal regions in some patients and internode in others. Hence, it seems that the components that distinguish between the nodal regions and internode play a pivotal role in the behavior of macrophages that initiate phagocytosis of myelin. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying macrophage-induced demyelination from this perspective.

Neurofascin-155 IgM autoantibodies in patients with inflammatory neuropathies

OBJECTIVES

Recently, IgG autoantibodies against different paranodal proteins have been detected and this has led to important advances in the management of inflammatory neuropathies. In contrast, not much is known on IgM autoantibodies against paranodal proteins.

METHODS

In the present study, we screened a large cohort of patients (n=140) with inflammatory neuropathies for IgM autoantibodies against neurofascin-155, neurofascin-186 or contactin-1.

RESULTS

IgM autoantibodies against neurofascin-155 were detected by ELISA in five patients, four with inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and one with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and were confirmed by ELISA-based preabsorption experiments and Western blot. Titres ranged from 1:100 to 1:400. We did not detect IgM anti-neurofascin-186 or anti-contactin-1 antibodies in this cohort. All patients presented with distally accentuated tetraparesis and hypesthesia. Remarkably, tremor was present in three of the patients with CIDP and occurred in the patients with GBS after the acute phase of disease. Nerve conduction studies revealed prolonged distal motor latencies and F wave latencies. Nerve biopsies showed signs of secondary axonal damage in three of the patients, demyelinating features in one patient. Teased fibre preparations did not demonstrate paranodal damage.

CONCLUSION

In summary, IgM neurofascin-155 autoantibodies may be worth testing in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. Their pathogenic role needs to be determined in future experiments.

Immune-mediated neuropathies

Since the discovery of an acute monophasic paralysis, later coined Guillain-Barré syndrome, almost 100 years ago, and the discovery of chronic, steroid-responsive polyneuropathy 50 years ago, the spectrum of immune-mediated polyneuropathies has broadened, with various subtypes continuing to be identified, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). In general, these disorders are speculated to be caused by autoimmunity to proteins located at the node of Ranvier or components of myelin of peripheral nerves, although disease-associated autoantibodies have not been identified for all disorders. Owing to the numerous subtypes of the immune-mediated neuropathies, making the right diagnosis in daily clinical practice is complicated. Moreover, treating these disorders, particularly their chronic variants, such as CIDP and MMN, poses a challenge. In general, management of these disorders includes immunotherapies, such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange. Improvements in clinical criteria and the emergence of more disease-specific immunotherapies should broaden the therapeutic options for these disabling diseases.

Detection Methods for Autoantibodies in Suspected Autoimmune Encephalitis

This review provides an overview on different antibody test methods that can be applied in cases of suspected paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and anti-neuronal autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) in order to explain their diagnostic value, describe potential pitfalls and limitations, and discuss novel approaches aimed at discovering further autoantibodies. Onconeuronal antibodies are well-established biomarkers for PNS and may serve as specific tumor markers. The recommended procedure to detect onconeuronal antibodies is a combination of indirect immunohistochemistry on fixed rodent cerebellum and confirmation of the specificity by line assays. Simplification of this approach by only using line assays with recombinant proteins bears the risk to miss antibody-positive samples. Anti-neuronal surface antibodies are sensitive and specific biomarkers for AIE. Their identification requires the use of test methods that allow the recognition of conformation dependent epitopes. These commonly include cell-based assays and tissue based assays with unfixed rodent brain tissue. Tissue based assays can detect most of the currently known neuronal surface antibodies and thus enable broad screening of biological samples. A complementary testing on live neuronal cell cultures may confirm that the antibody recognizes a surface epitope. In patients with peripheral neuropathy, the screening may be expanded to teased nerve fibers to identify antibodies against the node of Ranvier. This method helps to identify a novel subgroup of peripheral autoimmune neuropathies, resulting in improved immunotherapy of these patients. Tissue based assays are useful to discover additional autoantibody targets that play a role in diverse autoimmune neurological syndromes. Antibody screening assays represent promising avenues of research to improve the diagnostic yield of current assays for antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis.

Rituximab in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy with associated diseases

We aimed to analyse the response to rituximab in a cohort of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients with associated disorders. We conducted a clinical and electrophysiological retrospective monocentric study in 28 CIDP patients. Response to rituximab was defined as (a) a five-point increase in the Medical Research Council sum score or a one-point decrease in the Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale score, compared to the score at the first rituximab infusion, or (b) the discontinuation of, or reduced need for, the last treatments before rituximab initiation. Twenty-one patients (75%) were responders to rituximab. The median time before response was 6 months (1-10 months). Only two patients needed to be treated again during a median follow-up of 2.0 years (0.75-9 years). Interestingly, the response rate was good in patients with associated autoimmune disease (5/8) and similar to the response rate observed in patients with a haematological disease (16/20) (P = 0.63). A shorter disease duration was associated with a better clinical response to rituximab (odds ratio 0.81, P = 0.025) and the response rate was better (P = 0.05) in common forms (83.3%) than in sensory forms (42.9%). No major adverse events were recorded. Rituximab is efficacious in CIDP patients with haematological or autoimmune disease. It improves clinical response and decreases dependence on first-line treatments.

Association of neurofascin IgG4 and atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most commonly observed phenotype among chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies and is clinically variable. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value and characteristics of CIDP targeting neurofascin 155 (NF155).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on March 2018, and two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias on MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant articles.

RESULTS

Ten articles for the NF155 protein test with 1,161 patients and 1,636 controls were identified. The results showed that the pooled sensitivity was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-015), and specificity was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) of the NF155 for CIDP. The meta-analysis revealed that the sensory ataxic occurrence rate (OR: 10.79, 95% CI: 5.24-22.22) and tremor occurrence rate (OR: 6.71, 95% CI: 3.37-13.39) were higher among patients positive for NF155 compared with NF155-negative CIDP patients. However, the rate of good treatment response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02-0.42) was lower in NF155-positive CIDP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

NF155 is a specific protein marker for CIDP, but its diagnostic value has been questioned due to low sensitivity. However, as an antibody against paranodal antigens, NF155 seems more valuable in defining clinical subsets of CIDP.