The impact of pioglitazone on glycemic control and atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Pioglitazone and cardiovascular risk. A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

AIM

The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was to assess whether pioglitazone is also associated with increased cardiovascular risk, as recently reported for rosiglitazone.

METHODS

RCT of pioglitazone were retrieved from Medline (any date up to 31 August 2007; English language only). Unpublished RCT were identified through http://www.clinicaltrials.gov or http://www.fda.gov websites, and results on cardiovascular outcomes were retrieved from investigators and/or sponsors, whenever possible. RCT were included in meta-analysis if pioglitazone was compared with other treatments (placebo, active comparators or no treatment) for at least 4 weeks. Ninety-four trials, 10 of which were unpublished, were retrieved; those included in the analysis, which excluded PROspective PioglitAzone Clinical Trial In MacroVascular Events (PROACTIVE), enrolled 11 268 and 9912 patients in the pioglitazone and comparator groups respectively. Data for analysis, extracted independently by two observers, included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and incidence of non-fatal coronary events and heart failure. Proportions of outcome measures across treatment groups were compared by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Pioglitazone was associated with reduced all-cause mortality [OR 0.30 (0.14-0.63); p < 0.05], with no relevant effect on non-fatal coronary events. The observed increase in incidence of non-fatal heart failure was not statistically significant [OR 1.38 (0.90-2.12)].

CONCLUSION

The use of pioglitazone does not appear to be harmful in terms of cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths.

Thiazolidinedione therapy is not associated with increased colonic neoplasia risk in patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Thiazolidinedione ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma), are used to treat diabetes. PPARgamma is highly expressed in the colon, and exposure to thiazolidinediones has been proposed to affect the risk for colorectal neoplasia. In vitro models suggest that thiazolidinediones have antineoplastic effects, whereas in vivo studies have produced mixed results: Some indicate an increased risk for intestinal tumors. This study examined the association between PPARgamma-targeted therapies and the risk of colonic neoplasia in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted 3 retrospective case-control studies nested within the cohort of diabetic patients who were cared for within the Kaiser Permanente of Northern California system from 1994 to 2005. Case subjects were those with colonic neoplasia identified at the time of colonoscopy (study 1), sigmoidoscopy (study 2), or at follow-up lower endoscopy (study 3). Controls had no neoplasia identified at the endoscopic examination. A minimum of 1 year of therapy was used to define medication exposure.

RESULTS

Fourteen thousand eighty-six patients were included. Among patients undergoing colonoscopy, there was an inverse association between thiazolidinedione exposure and prevalence of neoplasia (adjusted odd ratio [OR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.92); however, this was not evident among patients without anemia (adjusted OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64-1.49). Significant associations between any or long-term thiazolidinedione use and colonic neoplasia were not observed among patients undergoing sigmoidoscopy or serial lower endoscopies.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that thiazolidinedione therapy is not associated with an increased risk for colonic neoplasia.

Targeting the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes: rationale for combination therapy with pioglitazone and exenatide

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this article are to review the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), present the rationale for a pathophysiologically based treatment approach for patients with T2DM and discuss the role of the therapeutic combination of pioglitazone and exenatide in the management of T2DM.

METHODS

References were identified from searches of the PubMed database that were conducted in May 2007, October 2007 and March 2008 and updates to product labeling that occurred between May 2007 and December 2007. Information was selected for inclusion on the basis of its relevance to the pathophysiology of T2DM or the clinical use of thiazolidinediones or exenatide. Discussion of other anti-diabetic treatment strategies is not included.

RESULTS

T2DM results from a combination of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction. The combination of a thiazolidinedione and an incretin mimetic offers a combination of characteristics (e.g., glycemic control, reduced insulin resistance, decreased weight, potential cardiovascular benefits, beta-cell preservation) that addresses many of the pathophysiologic underpinnings of T2DM. A recent small placebo-controlled study assessed the effects of exenatide used with a thiazolidinedione (TZD; pioglitazone or rosiglitazone) with or without metformin. Exenatide demonstrated a greater incidence of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) < 7%; greater reductions in fasting blood glucose, postprandial plasma glucose and body weight; and improved beta-cell function versus the TZD/placebo group. However, exenatide was associated with a high dropout rate, and the 16-week duration of treatment in this study precluded evaluation of the long-term effects of the exenatide/pioglitazone combination. Furthermore, exenatide/pioglitazone has not been compared with any other anti-diabetic combination in a head-to-head clinical study.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual effects on insulin sensitivity (TZD) and insulin secretion (exenatide) make the TZD/exenatide combination a rational treatment option for patients who do not attain glycemic control with a single agent. Studies undertaken to evaluate the effects on cardiovascular outcomes and the potential for prevention of T2DM with impaired glucose tolerance may reveal additional advantages of this combination approach.

Hepatic dysfunction and insulin insensitivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a critical target for insulin-sensitizing agents

The liver plays an essential role in maintaining glucose homeostasis, which includes insulin-mediated processes such as hepatic glucose output (HGO) and uptake, as well as in clearance of insulin itself. In type 2 diabetes, the onset of hyperglycaemia [itself a potent inhibitor of hepatic glucose output (HGO)], alongside hyperinsulinaemia, indicates the presence of hepatic insulin insensitivity. Increased HGO is central to the onset of hyperglycaemia and highlights the need to target hepatic insulin insensitivity as a central component of glucose-lowering therapy. The mechanisms underlying the development of hepatic insulin insensitivity are not well understood, but may be influenced by factors such as fatty acid oversupply and altered adipocytokine release from dysfunctional adipose tissue and increased liver fat content. Furthermore, although the impact of insulin insensitivity as a marker of cardiovascular disease is well known, the specific role of hepatic insulin insensitivity is less clear. The pharmacological tools available to improve insulin sensitivity include the biguanides (metformin) and thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone). Data from a number of sources indicate that thiazolidinediones, in particular, can improve multiple aspects of hepatic dysfunction, including reducing HGO, insulin insensitivity and liver fat content, as well as improving other markers of liver function and the levels of mediators with potential involvement in hepatic function, including fatty acids and adipocytokines. The current review addresses this topic from the perspective of the role of the liver in maintaining glucose homeostasis, its key involvement in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and the tools currently available to reduce hepatic insulin insensitivity.

Thiazolidinediones and the preservation of beta-cell function, cellular proliferation and apoptosis

The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) or glitazones are pharmaceutical agents that have profound effects on energy expenditure and conservation. They also exert significant anti-inflammatory effects and influence cell proliferation and cell death. The drugs are primarily used in clinical practice in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, a disorder of insulin resistance that occurs when the pancreatic beta-cells are unable to produce adequate amounts of insulin to maintain euglycaemia. Loss of pancreatic beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes is progressive and often precedes overt diabetes by 10 years or more, as was shown by the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Any therapeutic or preventive approach that would limit or reverse loss of beta-cell function in diabetes would have profound effects on the morbidity associated with this widespread disease. Evidence suggesting a potential role of TZDs in preserving beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes as well as the ability of these agents to exert anti-inflammatory and proapoptotic anticancer effects, and their ability to promote cellular proliferation in various organs is reviewed.

The effect of pioglitazone as add-on therapy to metformin or sulphonylurea compared to a fixed-dose combination of metformin and glibenclamide on diabetic dyslipidaemia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diabetic dyslipidaemia contributes to the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes. This paper examines the effectiveness of adding pioglitazone to metformin or a sulphonylurea (SU) compared with a fixed-dose combination of metformin and glibenclamide on diabetic dyslipidaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients (n=250) treated with metformin (< or =3g/day) or an SU as monotherapy at a stable dose for > or =3 months were randomised to receive either pioglitazone (15-30 mg/day) in addition to their metformin or SU, or a fixed-dose combination tablet containing metformin (400mg) and glibenclamide (2.5 mg) [up to 3 tablets daily] for 6 months. Addition of pioglitazone tended to increase plasma high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) [0.04 mmol/L; P=0.051] at 6 months and significantly reduced plasma triglycerides (-0.25 mmol/L; P=0.013) compared with baseline. Patients treated with metformin/glibenclamide for 6 months had reduced HDL-C (-0.09 mmol/L; P<0.01) and no change in plasma triglyceride levels (0.03 mmol/L; P=0.733). Both treatment regimes resulted in a similar level of glycaemic control.

CONCLUSION

The beneficial effects of pioglitazone on diabetic dyslipidaemia may help combat the increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality observed in patients with Type 2 diabetes while providing stable glycaemic control.

Pioglitazone improves metabolic markers in patients with type 2 diabetes independently from physical activities: results from the IRIS III study

AIM

Pioglitazone is an established peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist for the treatment of insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This analysis of the observational IRIS III study was performed to evaluate the effects of pioglitazone treatment in relation to the degree of physical exercise activities in a large patient population under daily life conditions.

METHODS

A total of 1298 patients out of 2092 enrolled into the IRIS III study who had provided information about their exercise level could be included in the final analysis (622 female, 676 male; age: 63.1 +/- 10.4 years, diabetes duration: 6.6 +/- 5.0 years, mean +/- SD). All patients were glitazone naïve prior to study entry. They received pioglitazone in addition to their previous oral antidiabetic treatment. The patients were stratified according to their physical activity level (never, sometimes, and regularly). Data were evaluated at baseline and after 20 +/- 2 weeks of treatment. Observation parameters were fasting blood glucose, lipids, and blood pressure. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was determined in a central laboratory, and insulin sensitivity was assessed by the IRIS II score.

RESULTS

Glycemic control, blood pressure, and the lipid profile improved independently from the degree of physical activity (e.g., no exercise vs frequent exercise: DeltaHbA1c: -0.89 +/- 1.2% vs -0.72 +/- 1.1%, not significant). A positive impact of exercise on insulin resistance could be observed at baseline, which, however, was further decreased by pioglitazone treatment [IRIS II score (baseline/end point): no exercise vs frequent exercise: 74.0 +/- 15.9/62.5 +/- 20.2 vs 66.7 +/- 19.0/58.0 +/- 21.8, p < 0.001/not significant].

CONCLUSIONS

These observational results, obtained from a nonselected patient population under daily routine conditions, confirm that the benefits of pioglitazone treatment on glycemic control, lipid metabolism, and blood pressure are independent from physical activity. Exercise has a positive influence on insulin sensitivity, but pioglitazone shows additional favorable effects and is, therefore, recommended for use independently from the activity level of the patients.

New-onset diabetes mellitus in the kidney recipient: diagnosis and management strategies

Advancing care has markedly improved survival after kidney transplantation, leaving patients susceptible to the effects of chronic transplant-associated morbidities. New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is common in kidney recipients, threatening health and longevity by predisposing to microvascular and cardiovascular disease and by reducing graft survival. A strong rationale therefore exists for the aggressive treatment of NODM in kidney recipients to limit these complications. Screening for diabetes should be systematic and should span the pre- and posttransplantation periods. Once NODM is diagnosed in the kidney transplant patient, a comprehensive plan of therapy should be used to achieve treatment targets. As in the general population, treatment includes lifestyle modification and drug therapy as needed, but transplant-specific factors add complexity to the care of kidney recipients. Among these, minimizing immunosuppression-related toxicity without compromising graft outcomes is of paramount importance. Preexisting allograft functional impairment and the potential for significant interactions with immunosuppressive agents mandate that the expanding armamentarium of hypoglycemic agents be used with care. A team-oriented treatment approach that capitalizes on the collective expertise of transplant physicians, diabetologists, nurse-educators, and dieticians will optimize both glycemic control and the overall health of hyperglycemic kidney recipients.

Preserving insulin secretion in Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex disease characterized by insulin resistance and a progressive decline in β-cell function and mass. Current evidence suggests that β-cell dysfunction is present early in the course of the disease and that this dysfunction, rather than insulin resistance, is primarily responsible for the progression of T2DM. β-cell dysfunction can be accelerated by glucose toxicity, lipotoxicity, oxidative stress, chronic increases in inflammatory mediators and, potentially, the use of sulfonylureas. This review suggests that future efforts to limit the impact of T2DM must focus on strategies to preserve β-cell function. Several interventions have shown promise in this regard, including lifestyle modifications, thiazolidinediones, potassium channel openers, incretin mimetics, cytokine antagonists, bariatric surgery and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, although therapeutic insulin remains the most robust and physiological approach.

Effects of pretreatment with low-dose metformin on metabolic parameters and weight gain by pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether or not "low dose" metformin could prevent weight gain induced by pioglitazone.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes received 500-750 mg metformin a day for 12 weeks as an observation period before the start of the intervention. After an observation period, inadequately controlled patients (hemoglobin A1c >or=7.5%, n=34) received additional treatment with 15 mg pioglitazone (+P, M+P group). The other patients (n= 35) continued metformin monotherapy (Met group). In addition, another group consisting of 28 patients treated with 15 mg pioglitazone alone (Pio group) was observed. Body mass index (BMI), as well as several clinical parameters of glycemic control and lipid metabolism, was compared before and after 24 weeks of intervention.

RESULTS

BMI increased significantly in the Pio group [24.0+/-3.8 vs. 24.8+/-4.3 kg/m(2), (mean +/- SD), p<0.001], but not in the M+P group (25.1+/-3.5 vs. 25.3+/-3.4 kg/m(2), NS) and Met group (24.0+/-3.3 vs. 24.0+/-3.5 kg/m(2), NS). In addition to improvement in glycemic control, a significant reduction in the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), defined as log [TG x0.0112/HDL-C x0.02586], was observed in the Pio group (0.06+/-0.23 vs. -0.04+/-0.27, p<0.05) and M+P group (0.08+/-0.24 vs. -0.001+/-0.252, p<0.01), but not in the Met group.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates potential benefits of the addition of pioglitazone to "low dose" metformin in terms of improvement of glucose and lipid metabolism without weight gain.

Pioglitazone and sulfonylureas: effectively treating type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is characterised by a gradual decline in glycaemic control and progression from oral glucose-lowering monotherapy to combination therapy and exogenous insulin therapy. Functional decline of the insulin-secreting beta-cells is largely responsible for the deterioration in glycaemic control. Preservation of beta-cell functionality, in addition to maintaining glycaemic control and reducing insulin resistance, is now regarded as a key target for long-term management strategies. Early, aggressive intervention with combination therapy is emerging as a valid approach to optimise long-term outcomes and combining agents with differing modes of action and secondary effect profiles should prove valuable. Sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones exert their glucose-lowering effect through differing mechanisms of action - the sulfonylureas by stimulating insulin secretion, whereas the thiazolidinediones are insulin sensitisers. Both agents offer excellent improvements in glycaemic control when given as monotherapy or in combination. The thiazolidinediones protect beta-cell structural and functional integrity and functionality and complement the sulfonylureas by inducing and maintaining improvements in insulin resistance, the abnormal lipid profile associated with type 2 diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, there is a strong rationale to support the addition of thiazolidinediones to sulfonylureas as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes. This combination may be particularly effective in the early stages of the disease when beta-cell function is at its highest, allowing maximal benefit to be obtained from the insulin secretion-promoting abilities of the sulfonylureas and the beta-cell-protective effects of the thiazolidinediones.

The importance of beta-cell management in type 2 diabetes

Despite intervention with effective oral glucose-lowering agents, most patients with type 2 diabetes will experience a gradual loss of glycaemic control. Irrespective of underlying levels of insulin resistance, the progressive failure and loss of beta-cells are ultimately responsible for the onset of frank type 2 diabetes. The mechanisms responsible for loss of beta-cell function are likely to be multifactorial, but may involve toxicity because of elevated glucose and/or lipid levels, increased secretory demand because of insulin resistance, amyloid deposition and altered levels of cytokines. Preservation of beta-cell function is now gaining recognition as a critical target in the management of type 2 diabetes. For patients with frank type 2 diabetes, preservation of beta-cell function has the potential to reduce or stabilise the progression of type 2 diabetes and to decrease the need for additional oral glucose-lowering agents and/or insulin therapy. There is a growing body of animal/preclinical evidence for improved and preserved beta-cell function with current glucose-lowering agents, such as the thiazolidinediones, metformin and the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, exenatide. Clinical studies incorporating indirect measures of beta-cell function also support a protective effect with some agents. A number of novel therapies that are currently under investigation may also offer beta-cell structural and functional protection, including dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors and cannabinoid receptor type 1 blockers. Emerging evidence from interventional trials suggests that both intensive lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy can delay or possibly prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals. For patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, early and aggressive intervention strategies that combine maximal glucose-lowering efficacy alongside potential beta-cell preserving properties may provide an opportunity to delay or prevent progression of the disease.

Effect of pioglitazone and its combination with statins in coronary artery disease patients with hyperinsulinemia

The objective of the study was to demonstrate the effect of pioglitazone and pioglitazone in combination with statin on East Indian patients with hyperinsulinemia and hyperlipidemia. It was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study with a parallel-group design comprising 83 patients. Patients of either sex with cardiac complications, including hyperlipidemia and (or) diabetes mellitus with or without hyperinsulinemia, were enrolled. Patients over 70 years of age, with renal or hepatic failure, or with severe diabetes mellitus (total glucose >400 mg/dL) were excluded from the study. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned to 4 groups that received placebo, pioglitazone, atorvastatin, or both. Blood samples were collected before and after treatment for analysis of serum glucose, insulin, lipid profile, apolipoprotein (apo) A1, apo B, and fibrinogen. Data were compared with that of patients with normal insulin or hyperinsulinemia. The patients with hyperinsulinemia receiving only pioglitazone showed a significant decrease in insulin levels compared with those with normal insulin levels. These patients also showed a significant increase in HDL levels. However, no significant change was observed in patients treated with both atorvastatin and pioglitazone. Pioglitazone was also found to increase significantly the apo A1 levels in patients with hyperinsulinemia, but there was no significant increase in patients given both atorvastatin and pioglitazone. Our data suggests that pioglitazone should be given preferably to the patients with hyperinsulinemia and statin should not be coadministered.

Pioglitazone stimulates apolipoprotein A-I production without affecting HDL removal in HepG2 cells: involvement of PPAR-alpha

OBJECTIVE

Pioglitazone, an antihyperglycemic drug, increases plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes. The mechanisms by which pioglitazone regulate HDL levels are not clear. This study examined the effect of pioglitazone on hepatocyte apolipoprotein AI (apoA-I) and apoA-II production and HDL-protein/cholesterol ester uptake.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In human hepatoblastoma (HepG2) cells, pioglitazone, dose-dependently (0.5 to 10 micromol/L), increased the de novo synthesis (up to 45%), secretion (up to 44%), and mRNA expression (up to 59%) of apoA-I. Pioglitazone also increased apoA-II de novo synthesis (up to 73%) and mRNA expression (up to 129%). Pioglitazone did not affect the uptake of HDL3-protein or HDL3-cholesterol ester in HepG2 cells. The pioglitazone-induced apoA-I lipoprotein particles increased cholesterol efflux from THP-1 macrophages. The pioglitazone-induced apoA-I secretion or mRNA expression by the HepG2 cells was abrogated with the suppression of PPAR-alpha by small interfering RNA or a specific inhibitor of PPAR-alpha, MK886.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate that pioglitazone increases HDL by stimulating the de novo hepatic synthesis of apoA-I without affecting hepatic HDL-protein or HDL-cholesterol removal. We suggest that pioglitazone-mediated hepatic activation of PPAR-alpha may be one of the mechanisms of action of pioglitazone to raise hepatic apoA-I and HDL.

The pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus and the future of therapy

Diabetes mellitus is a complex disease with several metabolic abnormalities leading to varied, interconnected endothelial and vascular dysfunction and resulting in accelerated atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of mortality in patients with diabetes. Apart from traditional therapy for control of hyperglycemia and other associated comorbidities, various newer therapies are being investigated to fight atherosclerosis at a molecular level. In this review, the authors briefly describe the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus and the future of therapy.

Comparative study on the efficacy of pioglitazone in Caucasian and Maori-Polynesian patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes

AIM

Although the pharmodynamic properties of the thiazolidinedione (TZD) insulin-sensitizing agents in the treatment of type 2 diabetes are well established, there are no studies comparing the pharmacoefficacy of these drugs in different ethnic groups. The aim of this pilot, prospective study was to examine the hypothesis that the efficacy of TZDs may vary depending on ethnicity. This aim was achieved by comparing the effects of 6-months treatment with pioglitazone (45 mg/day) on glucose control and metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in Caucasian and Maori-Polynesian patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients (40 Caucasian and 57 Maori-Polynesian) with type 2 diabetes were selected for the study from our clinical databases if they were on the maximum tolerated dose of oral agents and had a haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) > 8.0% for at least 2 months. All the patients received pioglitazone (45 mg/day) for 6 months in addition to their regular diabetes therapy. Clinical data and blood samples were collected at monthly intervals and the following indices measured: weight, blood pressure, oedema score, HbA(1c), plasma glucose, alanine amino transferase and adiponectin levels and plasma lipid profile, including low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol particle size and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP). The data of the 81 patients who finished the study were analysed using analysis of variance, chi-square analysis and multiple regression methods.

RESULTS

The absolute change from baseline in mean HbA(1c) (Caucasian -1.4% vs. Maori-Polynesian -1.3%) and fasting glucose levels (Caucasian -2.1 mmol/l vs. Maori-Polynesian -2.8 mmol/l) was similar in the two groups. Pioglitazone caused an improvement in lipid profile in both ethnic groups, with a reduction in mean values of atherogenic fractions (triglyceride: Caucasian -0.5 mmol/l, p < 0.001 vs. Maori-Polynesian -0.3 mmol/l, p = 0.05; very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol: Caucasian -0.11 mmol/l, p = 0.001 vs. Maori-Polynesian -0.04 mmol/l, p = 0.85; VLDL-triglyceride: Caucasian -0.36 mmol/l, p < 0.001 vs. Maori-Polynesian -0.22 mmol/l, p = 0.14; apolipoprotein B: Caucasian -0.09 mmol/l, p = 0.03 vs. Maori-Polynesian -0.08 mmol/l, p = 0.18). These changes were associated with an increase in LDL-cholesterol particle size (Caucasian +0.23 nm, p = 0.05 vs. Maori-Polynesian +0.26 nm, p = 0.04) and a decrease in AIP (Caucasian -0.14, p < 0.001 vs. Maori-Polynesian -0.08, p = 0.04). While the changes in the lipid indices tended to be greater in the Caucasian group, the difference in lipid response between the two ethnic groups was not statistically significant. Multiple regression analyses showed that the baseline value of the individual lipid fractions was the main determinant of the changes in lipid levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrated that pioglitazone has similar beneficial effects on glucose control and plasma lipid profile in Caucasian and Maori-Polynesian patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Our data showed that while the improvement in lipid profile was more pronounced in Caucasian patients than in Maori-Polynesian patients, this difference was not statistically significant.

Pioglitazone plus glimepiride: a promising alternative in metabolic control

Current approaches to pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes focus on two key aspects of hyperglycaemia - insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance. Combining drugs that target both these defects via different mechanisms of action improves long-term glycaemic control and offers a number of additional benefits. A fixed-dose combination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in a single tablet is now available in the US (Duetact(TM)). Both pioglitazone and glimepiride are glucose-lowering agents with distinct mechanisms of action. Pioglitazone is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist that improves whole-body insulin sensitivity and augments hepatic glucose uptake. On the other hand, glimepiride acts by releasing insulin from pancreatic beta-cells and improves both first and second phases of insulin secretion. These two therapies have been shown to act synergistically to treat type 2 diabetes - glimepiride therapy achieves rapid reductions in glycated haemaglobin (HbA(1c)), whereas pioglitazone sustains glycaemic control in the longer term. Furthermore, pioglitazone and glimepiride affect a number of pleiotropic markers. In particular, pioglitazone has beneficial effects on the atherogenic diabetic dyslipidaemia that are greater than those seen with rosiglitazone and other oral glucose-lowering agents. This advantage is also seen when comparing pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in combination with glimepiride. In addition, pioglitazone also improves a number of atherosclerotic risk markers that appear to translate into clinical benefits on macrovascular outcomes. Glimepiride may also improve several atherosclerotic risk markers and lipoproteins. This review discusses the potential benefits of combining pioglitazone plus glimepiride on patient compliance, targeting the dual effects of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction and affecting a number of metabolic and cardiovascular parameters.

Fixed-dose combination of pioglitazone and glimepiride in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by impaired insulin sensitivity and disturbances in β-cell function. While glimepiride stimulates β-cell secretion and leads to a reduction of blood glucose levels, pioglitazone activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and improves insulin resistance. Combining these two modes of action has been shown to improve glucose and lipid metabolism, and to improve the overall cardiovascular risk in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The combination of glimepiride and pioglitazone is generally well tolerated and a fixed combination may lead to an improved compliance in patients. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the clinical data that has been published on this combination, appearing to represent a convenient way to obtain therapeutic targets in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Beta-cell preservation with thiazolidinediones

Progressive beta-cell dysfunction and beta-cell failure are fundamental pathogenic features of type 2 diabetes. Ultimately, the development and continued progression of diabetes is a consequence of the failure of the beta-cell to overcome insulin resistance. Strategies that aim to prevent diabetes must, therefore, ultimately aim to stabilize the progressive decline of the beta-cell. Clinical study evidence from several sources now suggests that thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have profound effects on the beta-cell, such as improving insulin secretory capacity, preserving beta-cell mass and islet structure and protecting beta-cells from oxidative stress, as well as improving measures of beta-cell function, such as insulinogenic index and homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-%B). Furthermore, intervention studies suggest that TZDs have the potential to delay, stabilize and possibly even prevent the onset on diabetes in high-risk individuals, and these effects appear to accompany improvements in beta-cell function. Here, we review the evidence, from in vitro studies to large intervention trials, for the effects of TZDs on beta-cell function and the consequences for glucose-lowering therapy.

Thiazolidinediones and the risk of edema: a meta-analysis

The use of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been associated with an increased risk of peripheral edema. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the overall risk for developing edema secondary to TZD. A systematic literature search was conducted using five electronic databases. All prospective, randomized, either placebo-controlled or comparative studies reporting the incidence of edema with TZD therapy were included. Odds ratios were generated by pooling estimates across the studies. The analysis included 26 studies consisting of 15,332 patients with T2DM. The pooled odds ratio for TZD induced edema was 2.26 (95% CI: 2.02-2.53). The results yielded a higher risk for developing edema with rosiglitazone (3.75 [2.70-5.20]) compared to pioglitazone (2.42 [1.90-3.08]). Concordant results persisted with calculations of the adjusted indirect estimate. This meta-analysis demonstrates at least a two-fold increase in the risk for developing edema with a TZD agent. The risk appears to be greater with rosiglitazone than with pioglitazone. Further studies are needed to explore this difference.

Response to pioglitazone treatment is associated with the lipoprotein lipase S447X variant in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus

To investigate the influence of the S447X variant in lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene on the response rate to therapy with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone. A total of 113 diabetic patients were treated with pioglitazone 30 mg for 10 weeks. Response to the pioglitazone treatment was defined by either a >10% relative reduction in fasting blood glucose (FBG) or a more than 1% decrease in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values after 10 weeks of pioglitazone treatment. The genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. Using the criteria >10% relative reduction in FBG after 10 weeks of pioglitaone treatment, responder frequency to pioglitazone treatment in S447S genotype group is significantly higher than S447X genotype group. Meanwhile, the S447X genotype conferred a statistically significant 0.538-fold reduction in response rate to pioglitazone treatment relative to the S447S genotype. Moreover, pioglitazone treatment has significantly beneficial effects on serum lipid profile and blood pressure in S447S genotype carriers. The S447X variant in LPL gene may be a cause for therapy modification by pioglitazone.

beta-cell failure in diabetes and preservation by clinical treatment

There is a progressive deterioration in beta-cell function and mass in type 2 diabetics. It was found that islet function was about 50% of normal at the time of diagnosis, and a reduction in beta-cell mass of about 60% was shown at necropsy. The reduction of beta-cell mass is attributable to accelerated apoptosis. The major factors for progressive loss of beta-cell function and mass are glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity, proinflammatory cytokines, leptin, and islet cell amyloid. Impaired beta-cell function and possibly beta-cell mass appear to be reversible, particularly at early stages of the disease where the limiting threshold for reversibility of decreased beta-cell mass has probably not been passed. Among the interventions to preserve or "rejuvenate" beta-cells, short-term intensive insulin therapy of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes will improve beta-cell function, usually leading to a temporary remission time. Another intervention is the induction of beta-cell "rest" by selective activation of ATP-sensitive K+ (K(ATP)) channels, using drugs such as diazoxide. A third type of intervention is the use of antiapoptotic drugs, such as the thiazolidinediones (TZDs), and incretin mimetics and enhancers, which have demonstrated significant clinical evidence of effects on human beta-cell function. The TZDs improve insulin secretory capacity, decrease beta-cell apoptosis, and reduce islet cell amyloid with maintenance of neogenesis. The TZDs have indirect effects on beta-cells by being insulin sensitizers. The direct effects are via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activation in pancreatic islets, with TZDs consistently improving basal beta-cell function. These beneficial effects are sustained in some individuals with time. There are several trials on prevention of diabetes with TZDs. Incretin hormones, which are released from the gastrointestinal tract in response to nutrient ingestion to enhance glucose-dependent insulin secretion from the pancreas, aid the overall maintenance of glucose homeostasis through slowing of gastric emptying, inhibition of glucagon secretion, and control of body weight. From the two major incretins, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), only the first one or its mimetics or enhancers can be used for treatment because the diabetic beta-cell is resistant to GIP action. Because of the rapid inactivation of GLP-1 by dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-IV, several incretin analogs were developed: GLP-1 receptor agonists (incretin mimetics) exenatide (synthetic exendin-4) and liraglutide, by conjugation of GLP-1 to circulating albumin. The acute effect of GLP-1 and GLP-1 receptor agonists on beta-cells is stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin release, followed by enhancement of insulin biosynthesis and stimulation of insulin gene transcription. The chronic action is stimulating beta-cell proliferation, induction of islet neogenesis, and inhibition of beta-cell apoptosis, thus promoting expansion of beta-cell mass, as observed in rodent diabetes and in cultured beta-cells. Exenatide and liraglutide enhanced postprandial beta-cell function. The inhibition of the activity of the DPP-IV enzyme enhances endogenous GLP-1 action in vivo, mediated not only by GLP-1 but also by other mediators. In preclinical studies, oral active DPP-IV inhibitors (sitagliptin and vildagliptin) also promoted beta-cell proliferation, neogenesis, and inhibition of apoptosis in rodents. Meal tolerance tests showed improvement in postprandial beta-cell function. Obviously, it is difficult to estimate the protective effects of incretin mimetics and enhancers on beta-cells in humans, and there is no clinical evidence that these drugs really have protective effects on beta-cells.

Traitement médicamenteux du diabète de type 2 (première partie)

Drug treatment of 2 diabetes is intended to normalize glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA(1c)<6.5%) and thereby prevent the development of micro- and macrovascular complications. Oral antidiabetic agents target the metabolic abnormalities that cause diabetes. The two principal families of oral antidiabetic agents - insulin sensitizers and insulin secretagogues - can be taken together. Thiazolidinediones or glitazones (insulin sensitizers) improve peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin. Metformin (an insulin sensitizer) reduces hepatic glucose production. Sulfonylureas and meglitinides (insulin secretagogues) stimulate insulin secretion and can cause hypoglycemia. GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1) analogs and DPP-IV (dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV) inhibitors are new drug classes currently under development.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists for management and prevention of vascular disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus

Inflammation is known to have a pathogenic role in atherosclerosis and the genesis of acute coronary syndromes. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma, which is expressed in many constituent cells of atheromatous plaques, inhibits the activation of several proinflammatory genes responsible for atheromatous plaque development and maturation. Agonists of this receptor, such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, are currently available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and several lines of evidence have shown that these drugs have antiatherogenic effects. Insulin resistance is associated with inflammation and has a key role in atherogenesis. The antiatherogenic and insulin sensitizing effects of the thiazolidinediones in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may be associated with this action. However, in recent years there has been growing evidence that the antiatherogenic effects of PPAR-gamma agonists are not confined to patients with diabetes mellitus. PPAR-gamma agonists have been shown to downregulate the expression of endothelial activation markers, reduce circulating platelet activity, improve flow-mediated dilatation and attenuate atheromatous plaque progression in patients without diabetes mellitus. These effects of PPAR-gamma agonists appear to result from both insulin sensitization and a direct modulation of transcriptional activity in the vessel wall. This review summarizes the current understanding of the role of PPAR-gamma agonists in atherogenesis and discusses their potential role in the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in nondiabetic patients.

Dual PPARα/γ Agonist Tesaglitazar Reduces Atherosclerosis in Insulin-Resistant and Hypercholesterolemic ApoE*3Leiden Mice

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether the dual PPARalpha/gamma agonist tesaglitazar has anti-atherogenic effects in ApoE*3Leiden mice with reduced insulin sensitivity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ApoE*3Leiden transgenic mice were fed a high-fat (HF) insulin-resistance-inducing diet. One group received a high-cholesterol (HC) supplement (1% wt/wt; HC group). A second group received the same HC supplement along with tesaglitazar (T) 0.5 micromol/kg diet (T group). A third (control) group received a low-cholesterol (LC) supplement (0.1% wt/wt; LC group). Tesaglitazar decreased plasma cholesterol by 20% compared with the HC group; cholesterol levels were similar in the T and LC groups. Compared with the HC group, tesaglitazar caused a 92% reduction in atherosclerosis, whereas a 56% reduction was seen in the cholesterol-matched LC group. Furthermore, tesaglitazar treatment significantly reduced lesion number beyond that expected from cholesterol lowering and induced a shift to less severe lesions. Concomitantly, tesaglitazar reduced macrophage-rich and collagen areas. In addition, tesaglitazar reduced inflammatory markers, including plasma SAA levels, the number of adhering monocytes, and nuclear factor kappaB-activity in the vessel wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Tesaglitazar has anti-atherosclerotic effects in the mouse model that go beyond plasma cholesterol lowering, possibly caused by a combination of altered lipoprotein profiles and anti-inflammatory vascular effects.

Is the metabolic syndrome a real clinical entity and should it receive drug treatment?

Metabolic syndrome represents a cluster of risk factors commonly associated with obesity and diabetes that in turn are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The worldwide prevalence of metabolic syndrome, obesity, and diabetes is on the rise, leading to serious public health concerns surrounding the downstream consequences in the form of premature cardiovascular disease. In this review, we examine the debate surrounding the characterization and diagnosis of metabolic syndrome and discuss potential treatment options.

Factors associated with the effect-size of thiazolidinedione (TZD) therapy on HbA(1c): a meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors affecting the size of the HbA(1c) response to thiazolidinedione (TZD) therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomized TZD controlled trials which were identified using PubMed, EBSCO and Sci-lit databases and were published in English. Sociodemographic and clinical data were extracted from each trial. HbA(1c) effect size was defined as either a placebo-subtracted change in HbA(1c) or a change in HbA(1c) from baseline. Weighted multivariable regression was used to examine factors associated with changes in HbA(1c). Bootstrapped smearing estimates were computed to obtain reliable estimates of HbA(1c) effect size.

RESULTS

Forty-two trials yielded 60 trial arms which represented 8322 patients treated with thiazolidinediones. Weighted placebo-subtracted change in HbA(1c) was -0.99% +/- 0.02% with an average baseline HbA(1c) of 9.1% +/- 1.0%. Weighted bootstrapped smearing estimate of the placebo-subtracted change in HbA(1c) was -1.02% +/- 0.004%. After controlling for other variables, the baseline HbA(1c) level had a significant negative association with placebo-subtracted HbA(1c) change (p = 0.004) and also with change in HbA(1c) from baseline (p = 0.002). Longer trial duration was associated with greater placebo-subtracted HbA(1c) change (p = 0.01) but not with the change in HbA(1c) from baseline. The multivariable models explained 72% of the variation in placebo-subtracted HbA(1c) change. It was not possible to estimate effects of the run-in period and obesity on TZD effect size.

CONCLUSION

Baseline HbA(1c) and trial duration significantly impacted the effect size of TZD therapy on HbA(1c). Age, gender, duration of diabetes and prior use of anti-diabetic therapy were not associated with the TZD effect size.

Pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetes has long been recognised as a strong, independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, a problem which accounts for approximately 70% of all mortality in people with diabetes. Prospective studies show that compared to their non-diabetic counterparts, the relative risk of cardiovascular mortality for men with diabetes is two to three and for women with diabetes is three to four. The two biggest trials in type 2 diabetes, the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and the University Group Diabetes Program (UGDP) study did not reveal a reduction of cardiovascular endpoints through improved metabolic control. Theoretical benefits of the newer peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma) activators like pioglitazone on endothelial function and cardiovascular risk factors might result in fewer macrovascular disease events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from computerised searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. The last search was conducted in August 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials in adult people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and had a trial duration of at least 24 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Pooling of studies by means of random-effects meta-analysis could be performed for adverse events only.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two trials which randomised approximately 6200 people to pioglitazone treatment were identified. Longest duration of therapy was 34.5 months. Published studies of at least 24 weeks pioglitazone treatment in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus did not provide convincing evidence that patient-oriented outcomes like mortality, morbidity, adverse effects, costs and health-related quality of life are positively influenced by this compound. Metabolic control measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as a surrogate endpoint did not demonstrate clinically relevant differences to other oral antidiabetic drugs. Occurrence of oedema was significantly raised. The results of the single trial with relevant clinical endpoints (Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial In Macrovascular Events--PROactive study) have to be regarded as hypothesis-generating and need confirmation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Until new evidence becomes available, the benefit-risk ratio of pioglitazone remains unclear. Different therapeutic indications for pioglitazone of the two big U.S. and European drug agencies should be clarified to reduce uncertainties amongst patients and physicians.

Thiazolidinediones, insulin resistance and obesity: Finding a balance

The clinical efficacy of currently available thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in improving glycaemic control and ameliorating several risk factors for cardiovascular disease (linked to their insulin-sensitising actions as well as direct vascular effects) is well established. Treatment-associated weight gain, however, which has been identified as a class effect of the TZDs, is seen in a number of patients. The magnitude of weight gain correlates in part with improved metabolic control, i.e. better responders are more prone to increases in body weight. The cardiovascular risk associated with obesity appears to be depot specific; while peripheral obesity is associated with a low risk of cardiovascular complications, central obesity confers a greater degree of risk. Evidence is reviewed that increases in body weight associated with TZD treatment are associated with neutral effects (or even, decreases) in visceral fat, the adipose depot that is associated with central obesity.

Investigational PPAR-gamma agonists for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes

The tremendous increase in the global prevalence of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its conglomeration of metabolic disorders has dramatically intensified the search for innovative therapies to fight this emerging epidemic. Over the last decade, the family of nuclear receptors, especially the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), has emerged as one of the most important drug targets aimed at combating the metabolic syndrome. Consequently, compounds that activate the PPARs have served as potential therapeutics for the treatment of T2D and the metabolic anomalies associated with this disorder. This review focuses on the currently marketed compounds and also describes the discovery and development of the next generation of PPAR ligands that are under investigation for the potential treatment of T2D and the metabolic syndrome.

Can thiazolidinediones delay disease progression in type 2 diabetes?

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes results from increasing insulin resistance coupled with progressive loss of beta-cell function. Further deterioration of beta-cell function is associated with progression of diabetes and the potential development of microvascular and macrovascular complications.

SCOPE

This review examines current knowledge of beta-cell function and uses this information to assess how the results of ongoing trials could increase our understanding of disease progression and potential interventions. Data were derived from a Medline search using the search terms 'beta-cell dysfunction', 'IGT', 'thiazolidinediones', 'metformin', and 'sulfonylurea'.

RESULTS

The mechanisms that underlie beta-cell dysfunction are complex and most likely involve the interplay of a range of factors that reduce both beta-cell mass and secretory function. These include detrimental effects associated with hyperglycemia itself, elevated free fatty acids, and inflammatory responses linked to adipocyte-derived cytokines, with apoptosis a key underlying mechanism. Early intervention with treatments that address these defects, and preserve beta-cell function while improving insulin sensitivity, may delay disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes and also prevent the development of diabetes in 'at-risk' individuals. Two of the studies examining the effects of interventions on development and progression of diabetes that are due to report shortly are ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial), comparing a thiazolidinedione, metformin and a sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes not previously treated with oral hypoglycemic agents, and DREAM (Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication), assessing the effects of a thiazolidinedione and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and/or impaired fasting glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we do not have a full understanding of the mechanisms driving progression of type 2 diabetes, there is growing evidence that we may be able to modulate them and thereby improve patient outcomes.

Pioglitazone: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Pioglitazone is an antihyperglycaemic agent that, in the presence of insulin resistance, increases hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and increasing peripheral and splanchnic glucose uptake. Pioglitazone is generally well tolerated, weight gain and oedema are the most common emergent adverse events, and there are no known drug interactions between pioglitazone and other drugs. In clinical trials in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone as monotherapy, or in combination with metformin, repaglinide, insulin or a sulphonylurea, induced both long- and short-term improvements in glycaemic control and serum lipid profiles. Pioglitazone was also effective in reducing some measures of cardiovascular risk and arteriosclerosis. Pioglitazone thus offers an effective treatment option for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Pioglitazone: an antidiabetic drug with the potency to reduce cardiovascular mortality

Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug known to decrease peripheral, hepatic and vascular insulin resistance by the stimulation of PPARgamma. In clinical trials, pioglitazone as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin has demonstrated to effectively improve blood glucose levels, long-term glucose control and the lipid profile. The vascular effects of pioglitazone include improvement of endothelial function and microcirculation, reduction of blood pressure and inflammatory surrogate markers of atherosclerosis, and a reduction of a composite measure of macrovascular events (death, stroke and myocardial infarctions). The drug is well tolerated and has an acceptable side effect profile. Because of its additional microvascular and macrovascular effects, pioglitazone is an attractive and effective treatment option for the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease

The metabolic syndrome, which is very common in the general population, is defined by the clustering of several classic cardiovascular risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, high triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL). Central obesity and insulin resistance, which are the two underlying disorders of the syndrome, are further risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Moreover, a panel of novel (non-traditional) risk factors are ancillary features of the metabolic syndrome. They include biomarkers of chronic mild inflammation (e.g. C-reactive protein, CRP), increased oxidant stress (e.g. oxidized low density lipoprotein, LDL), thrombophilia (e.g. plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, PAI-1) and endothelial dysfunction (e.g. E-selectin). Therefore, subjects with the metabolic syndrome are potentially at high risk of developing atherosclerosis and clinical cardiovascular events.In recent years several longitudinal studies have confirmed that subjects with the metabolic syndrome present with atherosclerosis and suffer from myocardial infarction and stroke at rates higher than subjects without the syndrome. The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is particularly high in women with the syndrome and in subjects with pre-existing diabetes, CVD and/or high CRP. However, an increased risk is already present in subjects with a cluster of multiple mild abnormalities. The risk related to the metabolic syndrome is definitely higher when subjects affected are compared to subjects free of any metabolic abnormality.

Pioglitazone and reductions in post-challenge glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM

Pioglitazone (PIO) has been shown to decrease insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes, resulting in lowered blood glucose concentrations, lowered plasma insulin levels and lowered haemoglobin A1C (A1C) values. Postprandial glucose control has been recently recognized as an important target for reducing overall glycemic burden in patients with type 2 diabetes. Some authors assert that reductions in postprandial glucose levels may lead to a decrease in cardiovascular risk, one of the major complications associated with diabetes.

METHODS

Data were analysed from a 26-week PIO monotherapy study of 88 patients who underwent a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (75 g dose) at baseline and last measurement. Change from baseline in area under the curve (AUC) values and hourly glucose concentrations were calculated and analysed at both time points for four medication groups: placebo group and PIO 15, 30 and 45 mg groups. Changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and A1C also were reported.

RESULTS

Glucose AUC was significantly (p < 0.05) different from baseline at 15, 30 and 45 mg doses of PIO. In addition, when compared to placebo, PIO (15, 30 and 45 mg) significantly decreased post-challenge blood glucose AUC (p < 0.05). The mean hourly blood glucose levels at last measurement for PIO 15, 30 and 45 mg all were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than placebo at all four time points. In addition, PIO significantly (p < 0.05) reduced FPG and A1C from baseline to last measurement in a dose-related fashion.

CONCLUSIONS

PIO significantly reduced post-challenge glucose levels following an oral glucose challenge, leading to improvements in overall glycemic control. Postprandial glucose lowering is one of several metabolic effects of PIO in addition to decreasing insulin resistance and improving some lipids components. Whether these combined metabolic effects can lead to cardiovascular risk reductions may be confirmed by the pending results of cardiovascular outcomes studies with PIO.

Short-term pioglitazone treatment improves vascular function irrespective of metabolic changes in patients with type 2 diabetes

To determine whether pioglitazone influences endothelial function directly, we examined in a randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial the effects of 4 weeks of pioglitazone treatment in 20 male type 2 diabetic patients. We conclude that short-term pioglitazone treatment ameliorates endothelial dysfunction in conduit arteries irrespective of significant beneficial changes in plasma levels of insulin, FFA, adiponectin, or CRP in type 2 patients with diabetes. Pioglitazone, a PPARgamma agonist, not only improves insulin resistance and glycemic control but may also have additional beneficial vascular effects in patients with type 2 diabetes. Low-grade inflammation, free fatty acids, and adiponectin may play a role in modulation of vascular function. We studied the effect of 4 weeks of pioglitazone treatment on endothelial function, metabolic changes, and C-reactive protein in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was performed in which pioglitazone 30 mg once daily was administered to 20 patients with type 2 diabetes on oral antihyperglycemic agents for 4 weeks. Shear stress-induced flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery was used as outcome parameter for vascular function. Brachial artery endothelial function was significantly increased by pioglitazone treatment compared with placebo (FMD 5.4 +/- 0.5% versus 3.1 +/- 0.5%, P = 0.001). Endothelium-independent vasodilation was not different between the 2 study periods. Pioglitazone treatment reduced insulin, FFA, and C-reactive protein concentrations compared with placebo (18.3 +/- 2.4 versus 14.8 +/- 2.1 mU/L, P = 0.03; 641 +/- 46 versus 542 +/- 33 mumol/L, P = 0.04; and 3.5 +/- 0.6 mg/L versus 2.6 +/- 0.5 mg/L, P = 0.01; respectively). A significant increase in plasma adiponectin concentration (3.95 +/- 0.57 microg/mL versus 7.59 +/- 0.95 microg/mL, P = 0.002) was also observed. No correlations were found between these metabolic changes and the improvement of conduit artery endothelial function. Short-term pioglitazone treatment ameliorates endothelial dysfunction in conduit arteries irrespective of changes in insulin, FFA, adiponectin, or CRP in type 2 patients with diabetes.

Transcriptional suppression of human microsomal triglyceride transfer protein by hypolipidemic insulin sensitizers

Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) catalyzes the assembly and secretion of liver triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. The human MTP (hMTP) promoter activity is reported here to be suppressed by HNF-4alpha ligand antagonists (e.g., Medica analogs) or by PPARgamma ligand agonists (e.g., thiazolidinediones), thus accounting for their hypolipidemic activity in humans. Suppression of liver hMTP by Medica analogs or by thiazolidinediones was mediated by the TAAA sequence that serves as non-canonical TATA box of the hMTP core promoter. MTP suppression was evident in the specific context of the wild type hMTP core promoter, but not in the context of the mutated rodent-conforming hMTP core promoter governed by a canonical TATA box conjoined with its proximal (-50/-38)DR-1 element. hMTP suppression by Medica analogs or thiazolidinediones mediated by hMTP TAAA was independent of HNF-4alpha or PPARgamma. hMTP suppression by Medica analogs, but not by thiazolidinediones, was further complemented by inhibition of HNF-4alpha transcriptional activity transduced by the distal (-83/-70)DR-1 element of hMTP promoter. hMTP promoter activity was unaffected by PPARalpha activation. Furthermore, in contrast to hMTP, the promoter activity of the rodent-conforming hMTP was robustly activated by Wy-14,643-activated PPARalpha or by thiazolidinedione-activated PPARgamma. Transcriptional activation by PPARalpha or PPARgamma of the rodent-conforming, but not the wild type hMTP gene promoter, resulted from the species-specific context of the respective proximal DR-1 elements. Hence, suppression of hMTP transcription by hypolipidemic insulin sensitizers requires the specific context of hMTP core promoter. In light of the species-specific context of MTP core promoters, the rodent MTP promoter may not substitute for the human promoter when searching for hypolipidemic MTP suppressors.

Therapeutic roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) play key roles in the regulation of energy homeostasis and inflammation, and agonists of PPARalpha and -gamma are currently used therapeutically. Fibrates, first used in the 1970s for their lipid-modifying properties, were later shown to activate PPARalpha. These agents lower plasma triglycerides and VLDL particles and increase HDL cholesterol, effects that are associated with cardiovascular benefit. Thiazolidinediones, acting via PPARgamma, influence free fatty acid flux and thus reduce insulin resistance and blood glucose levels. PPARgamma agonists are therefore used to treat type 2 diabetes. PPARalpha and -gamma agonists also affect inflammation, vascular function, and vascular remodeling. As knowledge of the pleiotropic effects of these agents advances, further potential indications are being revealed, including roles in the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the metabolic syndrome. Dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists (currently in development) look set to combine the properties of thiazolidinediones and fibrates, and they hold considerable promise for improving the management of type 2 diabetes and providing an effective therapeutic option for treating the multifactorial components of CVD and the metabolic syndrome. The functions of a third PPAR isoform, PPARdelta, and its potential as a therapeutic target are currently under investigation.

Beta-cell preservation: a potential role for thiazolidinediones to improve clinical care in Type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is caused by progressively increasing insulin resistance coupled with deteriorating beta-cell function, and there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that both of these defects precede hyperglycaemia by many years. Several studies have demonstrated the importance of maintaining beta-cell function in patients with Type 2 diabetes. This review explores parameters used to indicate beta-cell dysfunction, in Type 2 diabetes and in individuals with a predisposition to the disease. A genetic element undoubtedly underlies beta-cell dysfunction; however, a number of modifiable components are also associated with beta-cell deterioration, such as chronic hyperglycaemia and elevated free fatty acids. There is also evidence for a link between pro-inflammatory cytokines and impairment of insulin-signalling pathways in the beta-cell, and the potential role of islet amyloid deposition in beta-cell deterioration continues to be a subject for debate. The thiazolidinediones are a class of agents that have demonstrated clinical improvements in indices of beta-cell dysfunction and have the potential to improve beta-cell function. Data are accumulating to show that this therapeutic group offers a number of advantages over traditionally employed oral agents, and these data demonstrate the growing importance of thiazolidinediones in Type 2 diabetes management.

Pioglitazone increases the fractional catabolic and production rates of high-density lipoproteins apo AI in the New Zealand White Rabbit

Pioglitazone is an agonist of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) that raises HDL-cholesterol plasma in humans. Whether pioglitazone-mediated modifications in HDL-apolipoprotein AI (apo AI) turnover in vivo contribute to this effect has not been completely elucidated. Therefore, we performed kinetic studies of HDL-apo AI radiolabeled with 125I in male New Zealand White rabbits after 6 weeks of 0.6 (n = 8), 1.75 (n = 8), and 2.6 mg/kg/day (n = 7) pioglitazone and vehicle (n = 12) treatment. Fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of HDL-apo AI was significantly higher in 1.75 and 2.6 mg/kg pioglitazone-treated animals, as compared with control rabbits (0.057+/-0.014 and 0.049+/-0.01 versus 0.025+/-0.005 pools/h, respectively); these changes were associated to a similar increase in apo AI production rates (PR) (1.24+/-0.62 and 1.14+/-0.40 versus 0.53+/-0.17 mg/kg/h, p < 0.01). Consequently, apo AI plasma levels in pioglitazone-treated animals were similar to those of controls. The apo AI-FRC and -PR correlated with the relative proportion of the HDL3c subclass, as determined by polyacrylamide gradient electrophoresis. Our data demonstrate that pioglitazone markedly modifies apo AI kinetics and enhances the proportion of small HDL3c particles, despite the unchanged apo AI concentration. Whether or not the pioglitazone-induced structural changes of HDL contribute to the anti-atherosclerotic effects of the drug remains to be determined.

Pathogenesis and management of diabetic dyslipidemia

Patients with diabetes mellitus have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, and cerebrovascular disease, which are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in this population. Several epidemiological studies have shown an association between diabetic dyslipidemia, which is characterized by hypertriglyceridemia, low levels of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, postprandial lipemia and small, dense low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) particles, and the occurrence of cardiovascular disease. Other studies have established the beneficial effects of lipid lowering on the reduction of major coronary events in diabetic patients. The recent National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines emphasize diabetes as a coronary heart disease risk equivalent. The NCEP ATP III states that elevated LDL-C is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease, and the primary goal of risk-reduction therapy is the reduction of LDL-C levels to 100 mg/dL. This article defines and describes diabetic dyslipidemia and its etiology and pathogenesis, as well as reviewing guidelines and recommendations for treatment of this disorder. Treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia includes 1) lifestyle modifications: physical activity and a diet low in saturated fats and cholesterol and high in complex carbohydrates and fiber; and 2) pharmacological treatment with (i) oral antihyperglycemic agents: metformin and thiazolidinediones; (ii) weight reduction drugs: orlistat and sibutramine and; (iii) lipid-lowering drugs: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, fibric acid derivatives, nicotinic acid, and bile acid sequestrants.

A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia

OBJECTIVE

Published reports suggest that pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, these previous studies were either retrospective chart reviews or clinical trials not rigorously controlled for concomitant glucose- and lipid-lowering therapies. This study examines the lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We enrolled subjects with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (treated with diet alone or oral monotherapy) and dyslipidemia (not treated with any lipid-lowering agents). After a 4-week placebo washout period, subjects randomly assigned to the pioglitazone arm (n = 400) were treated with 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks followed by 45 mg once daily for an additional 12 weeks, whereas subjects randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (n = 402) were treated with 4 mg once daily followed by 4 mg twice daily for the same intervals.

RESULTS

Triglyceride levels were reduced by 51.9 +/- 7.8 mg/dl with pioglitazone, but were increased by 13.1 +/- 7.8 mg/dl with rosiglitazone (P < 0.001 between treatments). Additionally, the increase in HDL cholesterol was greater (5.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.5 mg/dl; P < 0.001) and the increase in LDL cholesterol was less (12.3 +/- 1.6 vs. 21.3 +/- 1.6 mg/dl; P < 0.001) for pioglitazone compared with rosiglitazone, respectively. LDL particle concentration was reduced with pioglitazone and increased with rosiglitazone (P < 0.001). LDL particle size increased more with pioglitazone (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have significantly different effects on plasma lipids independent of glycemic control or concomitant lipid-lowering or other antihyperglycemic therapy. Pioglitazone compared with rosiglitazone is associated with significant improvements in triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL particle concentration, and LDL particle size.