Current approaches in the grading and management of cytokine release syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Prophylactic corticosteroid use in patients receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel for large B-cell lymphoma

ZUMA‐1 (NCT02348216) examined the safety and efficacy of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi‐cel), an autologous CD19‐directed chimaeric antigen receptor (CAR)‐T cell therapy, in refractory large B‐cell lymphoma. To reduce treatment‐related toxicity, several exploratory safety management cohorts were added to ZUMA‐1. Specifically, cohort 6 investigated management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events (NEs) with prophylactic corticosteroids and earlier corticosteroid and tocilizumab intervention. CRS and NE incidence and severity were primary end‐points. Following leukapheresis, patients could receive optional bridging therapy per investigator discretion. All patients received conditioning chemotherapy (days −5 through −3), 2 × 10⁶ CAR‐T cells/kg (day 0) and once‐daily oral dexamethasone [10 mg, day 0 (before axi‐cel) through day 2]. Forty patients received axi‐cel. CRS occurred in 80% of patients (all grade ≤2). Any grade and grade 3 or higher NEs occurred in 58% and 13% of patients respectively. Sixty‐eight per cent of patients did not experience CRS or NEs within 72 h of axi‐cel. With a median follow‐up of 8·9 months, objective and complete response rates were 95% and 80% respectively. Overall, prophylactic corticosteroids and earlier corticosteroid and/or tocilizumab intervention resulted in no grade 3 or higher CRS, a low rate of grade 3 or higher NEs and high response rates in this study population.

Impact of Tocilizumab on Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19-Associated Cytokine Release Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Tocilizumab is an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist hypothesized to blunt the uncontrolled immune response, cytokine release syndrome, in severe COVID-19 and prevent attributable morbidity and mortality. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes in COVID-19-associated cytokine release syndrome.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective cohort study assessing sixty-nine adult patients receiving tocilizumab for suspected COVID-19 cytokine release syndrome. The primary outcome was change in WHO clinical status scale on day seven post-dose analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Secondary outcomes assessed impact of timing of administration on clinical outcome. Safety analyses included development of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and sepsis within 7 days post-dose. Statistical analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

No aggregate clinical change was found between day 0 and day 7. Eleven patients improved, twenty-seven worsened, and thirty-one showed no change. Clinical outcomes were weakly correlated with time from symptom onset (r_s = 0.21; p = 0.08) or hospital admission (r_s = -0.08; p = 0.49) to dose. In-hospital mortality was 63%. Sepsis was diagnosed in 21 patients, five of which were post-dose. Transaminitis, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in seven, one, and six patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab did not appear to influence clinical outcomes in our study population, irrespective of timing of administration. Adverse events were not considered drug-related.

Short-Interval Sequential CAR-T Cell Infusion May Enhance Prior CAR-T Cell Expansion to Augment Anti-Lymphoma Response in B-NHL

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy emerges as a new treatment for refractory or relapsed (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL); however, the overall response rate (ORR) of which in the B-NHL patients is much lower compared to the patients with r/r B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We previously confirmed that sequential infusions of CD20 and CD22 CAR-T cells significantly improved the prognosis of the B-NHL patients, while some advanced patients still progressed to death during these CAR-T cell treatments. In this study, we showed that timely sequential administration of the second CAR-T cells could enhance expansion of prior CAR-T cells with stronger tumor-killing capacity in vitro and in vivo. We further conducted compassionate treatments on two advanced B-NHL patients with short-interval sequential infusions of CD19/22/20 CAR-T cells. Disease progression was observed in both patients after primary CAR-T cell infusion but robust re-expansion of prior CAR-T cells and anti-tumor effects was induced by infusion of a secondary CAR-T cells. These results indicate sequential infusions of CAR-T cells with a short interval may improve therapeutic efficacy in the B-NHL patients by promoting expansion of prior CAR-T cells.

A first-in-human study of KMRC011, a potential treatment for acute radiation syndrome, to explore tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics

KMRC011 is a novel Toll-like receptor 5 agonist under development as a treatment for acute radiation syndrome (ARS). The aim of this first-in-human study was to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a single intramuscular dose of KMRC011 in healthy subjects. A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single dose-escalation study was conducted with the starting dose of 5 μg. Eight (4 only for 5 μg cohort) subjects per cohort were randomly assigned to KMRC011 or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed throughout the study. Serum concentrations of KMRC011, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured up to 48 h postdose. Based on safety review, the dose of KMRC011 escalated up to 20 μg, and consequently, a total of 4 dose levels (5, 10, 15, and 20 μg) were explored. The most common adverse event was injection site reaction, showing no dose-related trend. Three DLTs (2 cases of hepatic enzyme increased and 1 of pyrexia) were observed; 1 in the 15 μg cohort and 2 in the 20 μg cohort. A developed method could not detect any KMRC011 in serum. KMRC011 15 μg and 20 μg showed significant increases of G-CSF, IL-6, and absolute neutrophil counts, compared with the placebo. A single intramuscular administration of KMRC011 ranging from 5 to 15 μg was tolerated in healthy subjects. Doses of KMRC011 equal to or greater than 15 μg exerted TLR5 agonist-like activities by increasing serum G-CSF and IL-6. It suggests that KMRC011 has the potential for a treatment for ARS.

An overview of some potential immunotherapeutic options against COVID-19

After the advent of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) in the late 2019, the resulting severe and pernicious syndrome (COVID-19) immediately was deployed all around the world. To date, despite relentless efforts to control the disease by drug repurposing, there is no approved specific therapy for COVID-19. Given the role of innate and acquired immune components in the control and elimination of viral infections and inflammatory mutilations during SARS-CoV2 pathogenesis, immunotherapeutic strategies appear to be beneficent. Passive immunotherapies such as convalescent plasma, which has received much attention especially in severe cases, as well as suppressing inflammatory cytokines, interferon administration, inhibition of kinases and complement cascade, virus neutralization with key engineered products, cell-based therapies, immunomodulators and anti-inflammatory drugs are among the key immunotherapeutic approaches to deal with COVID-19, which is discussed in this review. Also, details of leading COVID-19 vaccine candidates as the most potent immunotherapy have been provided. However, despite salient improvements, there is still a lack of completely assured vaccines for universal application. Therefore, adopting proper immunotherapies according to the cytokine pattern and involved immune responses, alongside engineered biologics specially ACE2-Fc to curb SARS-CoV2 infection until achieving a tailored vaccine is probably the best strategy to better manage this pandemic. Therefore, gaining knowledge about the mechanism of action, potential targets, as well as the effectiveness of immune-based approaches to confront COVID-19 in the form of a well-ordered review study is highly momentous.

What the Cardiologist Needs to Know About Cancer Immunotherapies and Complications

OPINION STATEMENT

Immunotherapies have transformed the current landscape for cancer treatment and demonstrated unparalleled improvements in survival rates. Now, a third of cancer patients are eligible for treatment with the most widely used class of immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). As more patients are treated with these novel agents, it is critical for both oncologists and subspecialists to establish a better understanding of the adverse events which can occur. The incidence of myocarditis associated with ICI therapy has been reported to be between 0.27 and 1.14%, 5 times that of myocarditis from other cancer therapies, and, of those patients, 20-50% develop a fulminant form. However, because of unclear risk factors, a broad clinical spectrum, and lack of specific noninvasive studies for diagnosis, the care of patients with ICI-associated cardiotoxicity can be challenging. Here, we have provided a brief overview of the current immunotherapy agents with a focus on the emerging evidence regarding diagnosis and management of cardiac adverse events.

Post COVID-19 opportunistic candida retinitis: A case report

A 42-year-old male patient presented with profound impairment of vision in both eyes, just as he was recovering from COVID-19. A known diabetic and hypertensive, he suffered from COVID-19 pneumonia further complicated by ARDS, septicaemia and acute kidney injury. His vision on presentation was finger counting close to face bilaterally with multiple, yellowish lesions at the posterior pole. Based on the clinical findings and previous blood culture report, it was diagnosed as candida retinitis and treated with oral and intravitreal anti-fungals. The lesions were regressing at follow-up. This is a post COVID-19 presumed candida retinitis case report.

Neurological complications of cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has emerged as a powerful therapeutic approach in many areas of clinical oncology and hematology. The approval of ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the immune cell receptor CTLA-4, has marked the beginning of the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In the meantime, numerous antibodies targeting the PD-1 pathway have expanded the class of clinically approved immune checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, novel antibodies directed against other immune checkpoints are currently in clinical evaluation. More recently, bispecific antibodies, which link T cells directly to tumor cells as well as adoptive T cell transfer with immune cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor, have been approved in certain indications. Neurological complications associated with the use of these novel immunotherapeutic concepts have been recognized more and more frequently. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may cause various neurological deficits mainly by alterations of the peripheral nervous system's integrity. These include radiculopathies, neuropathies, myopathies as well as myasthenic syndromes. Side effects involving the central nervous system are less frequent but may result in severe clinical symptoms and syndromes. The administration of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell is subject to rigorous patient selection and their use is frequently associated with neurological complications including encephalopathy and seizures, which require immediate action and appropriate therapeutic measures. Close clinical monitoring for neurological symptoms is key for early recognition of immunotherapy-related side effects. Comprehensive diagnostic work-up and adequate therapeutic measures are essential to avoid further clinical deterioration and residual neurological deficits.

Cardiotoxicity Associated with Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapy: Recognition, Risk Factors, and Management

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) are improving outcomes in pediatric and adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias and subtypes of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. As this treatment is being increasingly utilized, a better understanding of the unique toxicities associated with this therapy is warranted. While there is growing knowledge on the diagnosis and treatment of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), relatively little is known about the associated cardiac events that occur with CRS that may result in prolonged length of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit for pressor support, or cardiac death. This review focuses on the various manifestations of cardiotoxicity, potential risk factors, real world and clinical trial data on prevalence of reported cardiotoxicity events, and treatment recommendations.

Research advances in chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell therapy (Review)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T-cells are T-cells that have been genetically engineered to express CAR molecules to target specific surface antigens on tumor cells. CAR T-cell therapy, a novel cancer immunotherapy, has been attracting increasing attention, since it exhibited notable efficacy in the treatment of hematological tumors in clinical trials. However, for this type of therapy, challenges must be overcome in the treatment of solid tumors. Furthermore, certain side effects associated with CAR T-cell therapy, including cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-related neurotoxicity syndrome, tumor lysis syndrome and on-target off-tumor toxicity, must be taken into consideration. The present study provides a systematic review of the principle, clinical application, current challenges, possible solutions and future perspectives for CAR T-cell therapy.

Biomarkers for Predicting Cytokine Release Syndrome following CD19-Targeted CAR T Cell Therapy

Chimeric Ag receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has shown astonishing potency in treating a variety of hematological malignancies in recent years. Along with this lifesaving potential comes the life-threatening toxicities of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. This work seeks to consolidate biomarker candidates with the potential to predict the severity of CRS and neurotoxicity in patients receiving CD19-targeted CAR T cell therapy. In this systematic review, 33 clinical trials were evaluated for biomarkers that can predict the severity of posttreatment CRS and neurotoxicity. CRS and neurotoxicity occurred in 73.4 and 37% of the reviewed patients, respectively. Identified biomarker candidates included tumor burden, platelet count, C-reactive protein, ferritin, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, and TGF-β. Combinatorial algorithms based on cytokine levels and clinical parameters show excellent promise in predicting CAR-T-cell-therapy-associated toxicities, with improved accuracy over the component biomarkers.

Addressing the Challenges of Aggressive Lymphomas

Katherine L. Byar, MSN, ANP-BC, BMTCN®, and Matthew Lunning, DO, FACP, covered how to tackle challenges in the treatment of aggressive lymphomas by understanding how to apply emerging data, reviewing optimal therapies and treatment recommendations, and discovering how to manage associated adverse events in this disease state at JADPRO Live 2019.

COVID-19 in patients with cancer: Risks and precautions

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a member of the coronavirus family, which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The phenotype of the disease varies from asymptomatic, to a mild phenotype, through to the severe form of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which often leads to death, especially in those with underlying diseases. It has been reported that those who suffer from cancer (especially lung cancer and hematological malignancies) are at higher risk of serious complications and death from COVID-19. Some cancer treatments such as CAR T cell therapy can produce a cytokine storm, which is also a hallmark of severe COVID-19. Therefore, patients receiving CAR T cells are at higher risk if they become infected with COVID-19, and could be treated with anti-cytokine approaches.

Myeloid cell and cytokine interactions with chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy: implication for future therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy is a revolutionary tool in the treatment of cancer. CAR-T cells exhibit their effector functions through the recognition of their specific antigens on tumor cells and recruitment of other immune cells. However, this therapy is limited by the development of severe toxicities and modest antitumor activity in solid tumors. The host and tumor microenvironment interactions with CAR-T cells play an important role in orchestrating CAR-T-cell functions. Specifically, myeloid lineage cells and their cytokines critically influence the behavior of CAR-T cells. Here, we review the specific effects of myeloid cell interactions with CAR-T cells, their impact on CAR-T-cell response and toxicities, and potential efforts to modulate myeloid cell effects to enhance CAR-T-cell therapy efficacy and reduce toxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Independent studies and correlative science from clinical trials indicate that inhibitory myeloid cells and cytokines contribute to the development of CAR-T-cell-associated toxicities and impairment of their effector functions.

SUMMARY

These findings illuminate a novel way to reduce CAR-T-cell-associated toxicities and enhance their efficacy through the modulation of myeloid lineage cells and inhibitory cytokines.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune effector cell-related adverse events

Immune effector cell (IEC) therapies offer durable and sustained remissions in significant numbers of patients with hematological cancers. While these unique immunotherapies have improved outcomes for pediatric and adult patients in a number of disease states, as 'living drugs,' their toxicity profiles, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), differ markedly from conventional cancer therapeutics. At the time of article preparation, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, and brexucabtagene autoleucel, all of which are IEC therapies based on genetically modified T cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), and additional products are expected to reach marketing authorization soon and to enter clinical development in due course. As IEC therapies, especially CAR T cell therapies, enter more widespread clinical use, there is a need for clear, cohesive recommendations on toxicity management, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of common toxicities in the context of IEC treatment, including baseline laboratory parameters for monitoring, timing to onset, and pharmacological interventions, ultimately forming evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Formation of the Pre-Metastatic Niche

Simple Summary

The formation of the pre-metastatic niche, a favorable microenvironment in an organ distant from a primary tumor, is critical for tumor metastasis. We review the role of a key player, a class of proteins named pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted from both tumor cells and other cells in tissues, in helping to build the pre-metastatic niche. Various drugs have been developed to target pro-inflammatory cytokines, and their effects on tumor metastases are under investigation. Future clinical studies should focus on combining those drugs and applying them during cancer surgery, a critical moment for the establishment of the pre-metastatic niche.

Abstract

In the presence of a primary tumor, the pre-metastatic niche is established in secondary organs as a favorable microenvironment for subsequent tumor metastases. This process is orchestrated by bone marrow-derived cells, primary tumor-derived factors, and extracellular matrix. In this review, we summarize the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), and Chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1) in the formation of the pre-metastatic niche according to the most recent studies. Pro-inflammatory cytokines released from tumor cells or stromal cells act in both autocrine and paracrine manners to induce phenotype changes in tumor cells, recruit bone marrow-derived cells, and form an inflammatory milieu, all of which prime a secondary organ’s microenvironment for metastatic cell colonization. Considering the active involvement of pro-inflammatory cytokines in niche formation, clinical strategies targeting them offer ways to inhibit the establishment of the pre-metastatic niche and therefore attenuate metastatic progression. We review clinical trials targeting different inflammatory cytokines in patients with metastatic cancers. Due to the pleiotropy and redundancy of pro-inflammatory cytokines, combined therapies should be designed in the future.

CART Cell Toxicities: New Insight into Mechanisms and Management

T cells genetically engineered with chimeric antigen receptors (CART) have become a potent class of cancer immunotherapeutics. Numerous clinical trials of CART cells have revealed remarkable remission rates in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. Despite recent clinical success, CART cell therapy has also led to significant morbidity and occasional mortality from associated toxicities. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) present barriers to the extensive use of CART cell therapy in the clinic. CRS can lead to fever, hypoxia, hypotension, coagulopathies, and multiorgan failure, and ICANS can result in cognitive dysfunction, seizures, and cerebral edema. The mechanisms of CRS and ICANS are becoming clearer, but many aspects remain unknown. Disease type and burden, peak serum CART cell levels, CART cell dose, CAR structure, elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, and activated myeloid and endothelial cells all contribute to CART cell toxicity. Current guidelines for the management of toxicities associated with CART cell therapy vary between clinics, but are typically comprised of supportive care and treatment with corticosteroids or tocilizumab, depending on the severity of the symptoms. Acquiring a deeper understanding of CART cell toxicities and developing new management and prevention strategies are ongoing. In this review, we present findings in the mechanisms and management of CART cell toxicities.

Cardiotoxicity of Contemporary Anticancer Immunotherapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Contemporary anticancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, has changed the landscape of treatment for patients with a variety of malignancies who historically had a poor prognosis. However, both immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T cell therapy are associated with serious cardiovascular adverse effects. As immunotherapy evolves to include high-risk patients with preexisting cardiovascular risk factors and disease, the risk and relevance of its associated cardiotoxicity will be even higher.

RECENT FINDINGS

ICI can cause myocarditis, which usually occurs early after initiation, can be fulminant, and prompt treatment with high-dose corticosteroids is crucial. CAR T cell therapy frequently leads to cytokine release syndrome, which is associated with cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia development and may also result in circulatory collapse. Supportive treatment, as well as tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, is the cornerstone of treatment. Recent findings suggest that preexisting cardiovascular risk factors and disease may increase the risk of such cardiotoxicity, and prompt recognition, as well as treatment, may favorably alter the outcomes.

SUMMARY

ICI and CAR T cell therapy have improved cancer-related outcomes; however, they both are associated with potentially therapy-limiting cardiotoxicity. Cardio-oncologists are required to play an important role in patient selection, pretherapy cardiovascular optimization, and prompt recognition and treatment of cardiotoxicity.

General Approach to the Clinical Care of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with COVID-19 Infection: Management for Transplant Recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Insufficient knowledge about COVID-19 and the potential risks of COVID-19 are limiting organ transplantation in wait-listed candidates and deferring essential health care in solid organ transplant recipients. In this review, we expand the understanding and present an overview of the optimized management of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Transplant recipients are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19. The unique characteristics of transplant recipients can make it more difficult to identify COVID-19. Based on the COVID-19 data to date and our experience, we present testing, management, and prevention methods for COVID-19. Comprehensive diagnostic tests should be performed to determine disease severity, phase of illness, and identify other comorbidities in transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19. Outpatients should receive education for preventative measures and optimal health care delivery minimizing potential infectious exposures. Multidisciplinary interventions should be provided to hospitalized transplant recipients for COVID-19 because of the complexity of caring for transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Transplant recipients should strictly adhere to infection prevention measures. Understanding of the transplant specific pathophysiology and development of effective treatment strategies for COVID-19 should be prioritized.

The incidence of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy in the patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoma

Our objective was to summarize the side effect of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma. Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data. A total of 35 hematologic malignancy studies with CD19 CAR-T cell were included (1412 participants). Severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS) proportion was experienced by 18.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.128-0.259; P = 0.000) of 982 patients with the National Cancer Institute/Lee/common terminology criteria for adverse events grading system. The pooled neurotoxicity proportion was 21.7% (95% CI, 0.167-0.287; P = 0.000) of 747 patients with the same grading system. For all of the 25 clinical trials with the same grading system, subgroup analysis was performed. Based on the different disease type, a pooled prevalence of 35.7% was observed with event rate (ER) of 0.358 (95% CI, 0.289-0.434; P = 0.000) for ALL in 12 clinical trials. For lymphoma, a pooled prevalence of 13% was observed with ER of 0.073 (95% CI, 0.028-0.179; P = 0.000) in eight clinical trials. It was demonstrated that the patients who were older than 18 years of age have the lower sCRS incidence of 16.1% (95% CI, 0.110-0.250; P = 0.000) compared with 28.6% of the remaining population who were younger than 18 years of age (95% CI, 0.117-0.462: P = 0.023) in our analysis. Based on the different co-stimulatory domain, the sCRS of 16.5% was observed with ER of 0.175 (95% CI, 0.090-0.312; P = 0.000) for 4-1BB. The sCRS of 22.2% was observed with ER of 0.193 (95% CI, 0.107-0.322; P = 0.000) for CD28. For both the CD28 and 4-1BB, the sCRS of 17.3% was observed with ER of 0.170 (95% CI, 0.067-0.369; P = 0.003). Sub-analysis sCRS of the impact with cell dose and specific disease indication were also demonstrated. Limitations include heterogeneity of study populations, as well as high risk of bias of included studies. These results are helpful for physicians, patients and the other stakeholders to understand the adverse events and to further promote the improvement of CAR-T cell therapy in the future.

Toxicities Associated with Immunotherapy and Approach to Cardiotoxicity with Novel Cancer Therapies

In recent years, major advances in oncology especially the advent of targeted agents and immunotherapies (immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs] and chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cell therapy) have led to improved quality of life and survival rates in patients with cancer. This article focuses on the clinical features, and grading and management of toxicities associated with ICIs and CAR T-cell therapy. In addition, because cardiotoxicity is one of the most harmful effects of anticancer therapeutics, we describe the risk factors and mechanisms of cardiovascular injury associated with newer agents, screening technologies for at-risk patients, and preventive and treatment strategies.

Side-effect management of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells directed against the B-cell marker CD19 are currently changing the landscape for treatment of patients with refractory and/or relapsed B-cell malignancies. Due to the nature of CAR T cells as living drugs, they display a unique toxicity profile. As CAR T-cell therapy is extending towards other diseases and being more broadly employed in hematology and oncology, optimal management strategies of side-effects associated with CAR T-cell therapy are of high relevance. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytopenias constitute challenges in the treatment of patients with CAR T cells. This review summarizes the current understanding of CAR T-cell toxicity and its management.

The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia

Acute leukemia is a constellation of rapidly progressing diseases that affect a wide range of patients regardless of age or gender. Traditional treatment options for patients with acute leukemia include chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation. The advent of cancer immunotherapy has had a significant impact on acute leukemia treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies have efficacy and have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline composed of consensus recommendations on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia.

Pharmacology of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells

Cell-based immunotherapies using T cells that are engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T cells) are an effective treatment option for several B cell malignancies. Compared with most drugs, CAR-T cell products are highly complex, as each cell product is composed of a heterogeneous mixture of millions of cells. The biodistribution and kinetics of CAR-T cells, following administration, are unique given the ability of T cells to actively migrate as well as replicate within the patient. CAR-T cell therapies also have multiple mechanisms of action that contribute to both their antitumor activity and their toxicity. This review provides an overview of the unique pharmacology of CAR-T cells, with a focus on CD19-targeting and B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting CAR-T cells.

Emerging immunotherapies in multiple myeloma

Despite considerable advances in treatment approaches in the past two decades, multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease. Treatments for myeloma continue to evolve with many emerging immunotherapies. The first immunotherapy used to treat hematologic cancers, including multiple myeloma, was an allogeneic stem cell transplant. In the mid-2000s, immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide, lenalidomide, and subsequently pomalidomide were proven to be effective in multiple myeloma and substantially improved survival. The next wave of immunotherapies for multiple myeloma included the monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and elotuzumab, which were approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015. Subsequently, a variety of immunotherapies have been developed for multiple myeloma, including chimeric antigen receptor T cells, bispecific antibodies, antibody drug conjugates, and checkpoint inhibitors. Many of these emerging treatments target the B cell maturation antigen, which is expressed on plasma cells, although several other novel receptors are also being studied. This review summarizes the evidence of these various immunotherapies, their mechanism of action, and data from clinical trials regarding the treatments' safety and efficacy.

Implications of Oxidative Stress and Potential Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in COVID-19: Therapeutic Effects of Vitamin D

Due to its high degree of contagiousness and like almost no other virus, SARS-CoV-2 has put the health of the world population on alert. COVID-19 can provoke an acute inflammatory process and uncontrolled oxidative stress, which predisposes one to respiratory syndrome, and in the worst case, death. Recent evidence suggests the mechanistic role of mitochondria and vitamin D in the development of COVID-19. Indeed, mitochondrial dynamics contribute to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, and its uncoupling involves pathological situations. SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with altered mitochondrial dynamics with consequent oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory state, cytokine production, and cell death. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency seems to be associated with increased COVID-19 risk. In contrast, vitamin D can normalize mitochondrial dynamics, which would improve oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory state, and cytokine production. Furthermore, vitamin D reduces renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system activation and, consequently, decreases ROS generation and improves the prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thus, the purpose of this review is to deepen the knowledge about the role of mitochondria and vitamin D directly involved in the regulation of oxidative stress and the inflammatory state in SARS-CoV-2 infection. As future prospects, evidence suggests enhancing the vitamin D levels of the world population, especially of those individuals with additional risk factors that predispose to the lethal consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Obesity and COVID-19: A Perspective from the European Association for the Study of Obesity on Immunological Perturbations, Therapeutic Challenges, and Opportunities in Obesity

Accumulating evidence suggests that obesity is a major risk factor for the initiation, progression, and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO), as a scientific and medical society dedicated to the promotion of health and well-being, is greatly concerned about the concomitant obesity and COVID-19 pandemics and their impact on health and society at large. In this perspective, we will address the inherent immunological perturbations and alterations in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with obesity and COVID-19, and discuss how these impairments may underlie the increased susceptibility and more detrimental outcomes of COVID-19 in people with obesity. Clearly, this has important implications for preventive measures, vaccination, and future therapeutic strategies to combat COVID-19. Furthermore, we will highlight important knowledge gaps and provide suggestions for future research and recommendations for policy actions. Since many new reports on COVID-19 rapidly appear, the present perspective should be seen as a focus for discussion to drive forward further understanding, research initiatives, and clinical management of COVID-19.

Higher levels of IL-6 early after tocilizumab distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors in COVID-19 pneumonia: A possible indication for deeper targeting of IL-6

Introduction

The most serious COVID‐19 deriving from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causes a cytokine release storm and it is associated with worse outcomes. In COVID‐19 patients, interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) levels are significantly elevated. Blocking IL‐6 preliminarily resulted in the improvement of this hyperinflammatory state. It is unknown which patients could require higher doses of tocilizumab to get out of the cytokine storm.

Materials and Methods

Twenty‐four patients affected by COVID‐19 pneumonia were included. All the patients underwent tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously and were tested for serum IL‐6 24 to 48 hours before and 12 to 48 hours after tocilizumab infusion. Comparisons between survivors and nonsurvivors were performed.

Results

Eighteen patients were discharged, while six patients died, with no clinical or laboratory differences between the two groups at baseline. IL‐6 was not different at baseline (P = .41), while 24 to 48 hours post‐tocilizumab IL‐6 serum levels were significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (2398.5 [430.5‐9372] vs 290.5 [58.5‐1305.5] pg/mL, P = .022). Serum IL‐6 post‐tocilizumab showed a good predictive ability to discriminate survivors from nonsurvivors (area under the curve, 0.815; 95% confidence interval, 0.63‐0.99, P = .02).

Conclusion

Repeated measurement of the serum level of IL‐6 early after tocilizumab may distinguish nonsurvivors from survivors and support the choice of deeper targeting IL‐6 in COVID‐19 pneumonia.

IL‐6 could be a useful biomarker for severity of COVID‐19.

The highest burden of inflammation may be revealed by IL‐6 levels after tocilizumab.

IL‐6 levels before and after tocilizumab may indicate how to improve IL‐6 targeting therapy in COVID‐19.

Cardiac dysfunction in cancer patients: beyond direct cardiomyocyte damage of anticancer drugs: novel cardio-oncology insights from the joint 2019 meeting of the ESC Working Groups of Myocardial Function and Cellular Biology of the Heart

In western countries, cardiovascular (CV) disease and cancer are the leading causes of death in the ageing population. Recent epidemiological data suggest that cancer is more frequent in patients with prevalent or incident CV disease, in particular, heart failure (HF). Indeed, there is a tight link in terms of shared risk factors and mechanisms between HF and cancer. HF induced by anticancer therapies has been extensively studied, primarily focusing on the toxic effects that anti-tumour treatments exert on cardiomyocytes. In this Cardio-Oncology update, members of the ESC Working Groups of Myocardial Function and Cellular Biology of the Heart discuss novel evidence interconnecting cardiac dysfunction and cancer via pathways in which cardiomyocytes may be involved but are not central. In particular, the multiple roles of cardiac stromal cells (endothelial cells and fibroblasts) and inflammatory cells are highlighted. Also, the gut microbiota is depicted as a new player at the crossroads between HF and cancer. Finally, the role of non-coding RNAs in Cardio-Oncology is also addressed. All these insights are expected to fuel additional research efforts in the field of Cardio-Oncology.

The immunology of COVID-19: is immune modulation an option for treatment?

In December, 2019, an outbreak of COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, China and quickly spread globally. As of May 7, 2020, there were 3 672 238 confirmed infections and 254 045 deaths attributed to COVID-19. Evidence has shown that there are asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 who can transmit the disease to others. The virus incubation time shows a wide range (0-24 days) and the virus displays a high infectivity. It is therefore urgent to develop an effective therapy to treat patients with COVID-19 and to control the spread of the causative agent, severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Repurposing of approved drugs is widely adopted to fight newly emerged diseases such as COVID-19, as these drugs have known pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. As pathological examination has confirmed the involvement of immune hyperactivation and acute respiratory distress syndrome in fatal cases of COVID-19, several disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS), such as hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab, have been proposed as potential therapies for the treatment of COVID-19. In this Review, we discuss the immunological aspects of COVID-19 and the potential implication of DMARDs in treating this disease.

Next-generation CAR T cells to overcome current drawbacks

As a rapidly emerging treatment in the oncology field, adoptive transfer of autologous, genetically modified chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has shown striking efficacy and is curative in certain relapsed/refractory patients with hematologic malignancy. This treatment modality of using a "living drug" offers many tantalizing and novel therapeutic strategies for cancer patients whose remaining treatment options may have otherwise been limited. Despite the early success of CAR T cells in hematologic malignancies, many barriers remain for widespread adoption. General barriers include cellular manufacturing limitations, baseline quality of the T cells, adverse events post-infusion such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity, and host rejection of non-human CARs. Additionally, each hematologic disease presents unique mechanisms of relapse which have to be addressed in future clinical trials if we are to augment the efficacy of CAR T treatment. In this review, we will describe current barriers to hindering efficacy of CAR T-cell treatment for hematologic malignancies in a disease-specific manner and review recent innovations aimed at enhancing the potency and applicability of CAR T cells, with the overall goal of building a framework to begin incorporating this form of therapy into the standard medical management of blood cancers.

Exploring pharmacological approaches for managing cytokine storm associated with pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19 patients

Sars-CoV-2 complications include pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which require intensive care unit admission. These conditions have rapidly overwhelmed healthcare systems, with detrimental effects on the quality of care and increased mortality. Social isolation strategies have been implemented worldwide with the aim of reducing hospital pressure. Among therapeutic strategies, the use of immunomodulating drugs, to improve prognosis, seems promising. Particularly, since pneumonia and ARDS are associated with a cytokine storm, drugs belonging to therapeutic classes as anti-IL-6, anti-TNF, and JAK inhibitors are currently studied. In this article, we discuss the potential advantages of the most promising pharmacological approaches.

COVID-19 Clinical Trials: A Primer for the Cardiovascular and Cardio-Oncology Communities

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a proliferation of clinical trials designed to slow the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Many therapeutic agents that are being used to treat patients with COVID-19 are repurposed treatments for influenza, Ebola, or for malaria that were developed decades ago and are unlikely to be familiar to the cardiovascular and cardio-oncology communities. Here, we provide a foundation for cardiovascular and cardio-oncology physicians on the front line providing care to patients with COVID-19, so that they may better understand the emerging cardiovascular epidemiology and the biological rationale for the clinical trials that are ongoing for the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

Off-label use of tocilizumab for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Milan, Italy

BACKGROUND

Tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, targets IL-6 receptors blocking downstream pro-inflammatory effects of IL-6. In preliminary reports it was suggested to be beneficial in patients with severe COVID-19.

METHODS

In this open-label prospective study we describe clinical characteristics and outcome of 51 patients hospitalized with confirmed and severe COVID-19 pneumonia treated with tocilizumab intravenously. All patients had elevated IL-6 plasma level (>40 pg/mL) and oxygen saturation <93% in ambient air. Clinical outcomes, oxygen support, laboratory data and adverse events were collected over a follow-up of 30 days.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (88%) were on high-flow oxygen supplementation, six of whom with invasive ventilation. From baseline to day 7 after tocilizumab we observed a dramatic drop of body temperature and CRP value with a significant increase in lymphocyte count (p<0.001). Over a median follow-up time of 34 days from tocilizumab, 34 patients (67%) showed an improvement in their clinical severity class; 31 were discharged; 17 (33%) showed a worsening of their clinical status, of these 14 died (27%). The mortality rate was significantly associated with mechanical ventilation at baseline (83.3% vs 20% of patients on non-invasive oxygen support; p=0.0001). The most frequent side effects were an increase of hepatic enzymes (29%), thrombocytopenia (14%), and serious bacterial and fungal infections (27%).

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab exerts a rapidly beneficial effect on fever and inflammatory markers, although no significant impact on the clinical outcome can be inferred by our results. Critically ill patients seem to have a high risk of serious infections with this drug.

Therapeutic opportunities to manage COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 infection: Present and future

A severe form of respiratory disease - COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, has evolved into a pandemic resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. The unabated spread of the disease is due to lack of vaccine and effective therapeutic agents against this novel virus. Hence, the situation demands an immediate need to explore all the plausible therapeutic and prophylactic strategies that can be made available to stem the spread of the disease. Towards this effort, the current review outlines the key aspects of the pathobiology associated with the morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients, which includes a viral response phase and an exaggerated host response phase. The review also summarizes therapeutic agents that are currently being explored along with those with potential for consideration. The broad groups of therapeutic agents discussed include those that: (i) block viral entry to host cells, (ii) block viral replication and survival in host cells, and (iii) dampen exaggerated host immune response. The various kinds of pharmaceutical prophylactic options that may be followed to prevent COVID-19 have also been discussed.

COVID-19 Clinical Trials: A Primer for the Cardiovascular and Cardio-Oncology Communities

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a proliferation of clinical trials designed to slow the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Many therapeutic agents that are being used to treat patients with COVID-19 are repurposed treatments for influenza, Ebola, or for malaria that were developed decades ago and are unlikely to be familiar to the cardiovascular and cardio-oncology communities. Here, the authors provide a foundation for cardiovascular and cardio-oncology physicians on the front line providing care to patients with COVID-19, so that they may better understand the emerging cardiovascular epidemiology and the biological rationale for the clinical trials that are ongoing for the treatment of patients with COVID-19.

State of the art in CAR T cell therapy for CD19+ B cell malignancies

Cellular therapy for hematologic malignancies is a rapidly evolving field, with new iterations of novel constructs being developed at a rapid pace. Since the initial reports of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T cell)success in CD19+ B cell malignancies, multiple clinical trials of CAR T cell therapy directed to CD19 have led to the approval of this therapy by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency for specific indications. Despite strikingly similar efficacy, investigators at multiple centers participating in these studies have observed the nuances of each CAR T cell product, including variability in manufacturing, availability, and toxicity profiles. Here we review state-of-the-art clinical data on CD19-directed CAR T cell therapies in B cell hematologic malignancies, advances made in understanding and modeling associated toxicities, and several exciting advances and creative solutions for overcoming challenges with this therapeutic modality.

CAR T cell therapy: newer approaches to counter resistance and cost

The genetically engineered Chimeric Antigen Receptor bearing T-cell (CAR T cell) therapy has been emerged as the new paradigm of cancer immunotherapy. However, recent studies have reported an increase in the number of relapsed haematological malignancies. This review provides newer insights into how the efficacy of CAR T cells might be increased by the application of new genome editing technologies, monitoring the complexity of tumor types and T cells sub-types. Next, tumor mutation burden along with tumormicroenvironment and epigenetic mechanisms of CAR T cell as well as tumor cell may play a vital role to tackle the cancer resistance mechanisms. These studies highlight the need to consider traditional cancer therapy in conjunction with CAR T cell therapy for relapsed or cases unresponsive to treatment. Of note, this therapy is highly expensive and requires multi-skill for successful implementation, which results in reduction of its accessibility/affordability to the patients. Here, we also propose a model for cost minimization of CAR T cell therapy by a collaboration of academia, hospitals and industry.

CAR-T treatment for hematological malignancies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy has sparked a wave of optimism in hematological malignancies, reflected by the successful results of early clinical trials involving patients with pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, B-cell lymphomas and multiple myeloma. CAR-T-cell therapy is considered to be a novel immunotherapy treatment that has the potential for curing certain hematological cancers. However, as use of CAR-T-cell therapy has grown, new challenges have surfaced. These challenges include the process of manufacturing the CAR-T cells, the mechanisms of resistance that underlie disease relapse, adverse effects and cost. This review describes the published results of clinical trials and expected developments to overcome CAR-T resistance.

National Institute for the Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani", IRCCS. Recommendations for COVID-19 clinical management

On January 9 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the identification, by Chinese Health authorities, of a novel coronavirus, further classified as SARS-CoV-2 responsible of a disease (COVID-19) ranging from asymptomatic cases to severe respiratory involvement. On March 9 2020, WHO declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Italy is the second most affected country by COVID-19 infection after China. The "L. Spallanzani" National Institute for the Infectious Diseases, IRCCS, Rome, Italy, has been the first Italian hospital to admit and manage patients affected by COVID-19. Hereby, we show our recommendations for the management of COVID-19 patients, based on very limited clinical evidences; they should be considered as expert opinions, which may be modified according to newly produced literature data.

Extracorporeal cytokine removal in severe CAR-T cell associated cytokine release syndrome

PURPOSE

Life-threatening complications of CD-19 Chimeric antigen receptor - T (CAR-T) cells such as the cytokine release syndrome (CRS)) have been reported. Treatment is limited to IL-6 blockade and steroids although global removal of elevated soluble inflammatory factors might be more effective.

METHODS

Clinical course of a CRS patient treated with extracorporeal cytokine adsorption (Cytosorb®). A panel of 48 cytokines, chemokines and endothelial markers has been analyzed longitudinally. Ex vivo stimulation of endothelial cells to visualize (immunocytochemistry) and quantify (ECIS, TER) endothelial barrier effects.

RESULTS

Following CAR-T cell application a 65 years old male developed grade 4 CRS with refractory shock (3 vasopressors) and severe capillary leakage (+37 L/24 h resuscitation). Treatment included IL-6 blockade, methylprednisolone and additionally Cytosorb hemoperfusion. While multiple soluble inflammatory factors were elevated and most of them decreased by more than 50% following Cytosorb, markers of endothelial injury increased steadily (e.g. Angpt-2/Angpt-1) leading to profound endothelial activation and leakage in ex vivo assays.

CONCLUSION

This is the first reported use of cytokine adsorption for CRS showing efficacy in absorption of various cytokines but not endothelial growth factors. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate additional Cytosorb treatment in CRS is currently recruiting at our institution (NCT04048434).

Advances and Challenges of CAR T Cells in Clinical Trials

As a specifically programmable, living immunotherapeutic drug, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells are providing an alternative treatment option for a broad variety of diseases including so far refractory cancer. By recognizing a tumor-associated antigen, the CAR triggers an anti-tumor response of engineered patient's T cells achieving lasting remissions in the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma. During the last years, significant progress was made in optimizing the CAR design, in manufacturing CAR-engineered T cells, and in the clinical management of patients showing promise to establish adoptive CAR T cell therapy as an effective treatment option in the forefront.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Cancer and Heart: JACC Council Perspectives

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has significantly advanced the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies and is increasingly investigated as a therapeutic option of other malignancies. The main adverse effect of CAR T-cell therapy is potentially life-threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Clinical cardiovascular (CV) manifestations of CRS include tachycardia, hypotension, troponin elevation, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary edema, and cardiogenic shock. Although insults related to CRS toxicity might be transient and reversible in most instances in patients with adequate CV reserve, they can be particularly challenging in higher-risk, often elderly patients with pre-existing CV disease. As the use of CAR T-cell therapy expands to include a wider patient population, careful patient selection, pre-treatment cardiac evaluation, and CV risk stratification should be considered within the CAR T-cell treatment protocol. Early diagnosis and management of CV complications in patients with CRS require awareness and multidisciplinary collaboration.

Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Treatment and Management Updates

OBJECTIVE

To present an overview of novel therapies for the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia and to discuss nursing implications for these new therapies.

DATA SOURCES

Published manuscripts, Web sites, and pharmaceutical package inserts.

CONCLUSION

Several promising therapies have emerged in the treatment of relapsed/refractory and minimal residual disease acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

With the changing paradigm for hematologic malignancies, nurses must remain current in their knowledge regarding novel therapies, including their administration, toxicity profile, and management of adverse events. This article addresses the clinical benefits of novel agents and nursing implications for those agents.

The Role of Advanced Practitioners in Optimizing Clinical Management and Support of Patients With Cytokine Release Syndrome From CAR T-Cell Therapy

CAR T-cell therapy is rapidly emerging as a promising treatment for many hematologic malignancies. However, CAR T cells can be associated with unique toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which can be severe or fatal if not recognized promptly and treated appropriately. Therefore, it is essential that advanced practitioners caring for patients who have received CAR T-cell therapy to be knowledgeable regarding the signs and symptoms of CRS and understand how to grade and manage toxicities. Understanding the risk factors that may be associated with the development of toxicities as well as the incidence, severity, and timing of CRS with different CAR T-cell products will allow for earlier recognition and treatment, and therefore improvement of outcomes in patients receiving this novel therapy.

Management Principles Associated With Cytokine Release Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To discuss current recommendations and resources for nurses to ensure they advocate for patients with cytokine release syndrome (CRS).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using key terms: cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, CAR T, adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy is a growing and rapidly changing field of research. Prompt recognition and management of the side effects of CAR T-cell therapy is pivotal to the safe outcomes of patients. As patients are treated with these novel therapies, additional recommendations and standards for treating CRS and neurotoxicity will occur.

IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nursing plays a pivotal role in the CAR T patients' treatment course because they are the first line of defense in the care of these patients. Providers and patients both rely on nursing knowledge and training to recognize symptoms of CRS and neurotoxicity. With the early recognition of the signs and symptoms of CRS and neurotoxicity, nursing will help improve the outcomes of the patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy.